A patriot’s “fatwa” should be on their heads!
WITHOUT a shadow of a doubt, U.S. mosques (and their attendant “cultural” centers) are every bit epicenters of jihad – frontal and stealth – as those found in Muslim countries. No one should be fooled otherwise. Mirror images. Most – but not all – of their violent materials are imported from Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.
AS previously explained:
First and foremost, the thrust of stealth jihad (in tandem with frontal jihad, at the most auspicious time), mainly through taqiyya and kitman, is paramount. This Koranic-based weapon is enhanced through a deep understanding of the western‘infidel’s’ mindset and their allergy to certain bugaboos, most essentially the‘racist’ canard. Petrified to ‘offend’ ‘the other’, the west is left defenseless and exposed. Hence, ‘Islamophobia’ is their (stealth) weapon of choice (enabled through the red/green alliance), as it allows for the penetration/infiltration oftaqiyya and kitman! Their jihadi death dance around westerners is bringing the west to its knees – no pun intended. (Near) submission.
And so Americans – and all freedom loving people – watch aghast, with mouths agape, as the ‘holy’ ground from 9/11/01 jihadi terror becomes defiled. YET, no one should dare feign shock…shock…for their plan, all along, was to submit the west to Islam, which literally means submission. Hoisting mosques atop America’s ruins is the BIGGEST symbol of their triumph: Insha’Allah, Allah reigns supreme!
WHO can forget all the resultant mayhem and bloodshed, whenever pics of Muhammad enters the public sphere or some such Islamic “offense”? Is it just spontaneous combustion, over and over again, or is it something inherent in Islamic teachings via Sharia law? In fact, the Pyromaniac-in-Chief blamed a related video of the “prophet” for the slaughter of Americans in Libya. Islamist lying knows no bounds. Literally.
In every country, there are those who find different religious beliefs threatening; in every culture, those who love freedom for themselves must ask how much they are willing to tolerate freedom for others.
That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world. I have made it clear that the United States government had nothing to do with this video, and I believe its message must be rejected by all who respect our common humanity.
KICKING it up a notch, what about the murder of Theo van Gogh, all for the “crime” of creating the film Submission.
“Education by murder” describes the slow and painful way people wake up to the problem of radical Islam. It took 3,000 deaths to wake up Americans, or at least to wake up the half of them who are conservative. Likewise, it took hundreds of deaths in the Bali explosion to semi-wake up Australians; it took the Madrid assault for Spaniards, and the Beslan atrocity for Russians. Twelve workers murdered in Iraq awoke the Nepalese.
The reason for this lies in the identity of the victim and the nature of the crime. He was Theo van Gogh, 47, a well-known radical libertarian, a filmmaker, television producer, talk show host, newspaper columnist, and all-around mischief-maker who enjoyed the distinction of being a relative of one of Holland’s most renowned artists, Vincent van Gogh. In recent years, Theo garnered attention by critiquing Islam (in a 2003 book Allah Knows Best and a 2004 film Submission).
He was murdered at 8:40 a.m. on November 2 in his hometown of Amsterdam while bicycling down a busy street to work. In the course of being shot repeatedly, Van Gogh beseeched his killer, “Don’t do it. Don’t do it. Have mercy. Have mercy!” Then the killer stabbed his chest with one knife and slit his throat with another, nearly decapitating van Gogh.
The presumed murderer, Mohammed Bouyeri, 26, a Dutch-born dual Moroccan-Dutch citizen, left a five-page note in both Arabic and Dutch attached to Van Gogh’s body with a knife. In it he threatened jihad against the West in general, (“I surely know that you, Oh Europe, will be destroyed”), and specifically against five prominent Dutch political figures.
Police investigators quickly realized that the assassin was an Islamist whom they knew well and had been following until just two weeks earlier; they also placed him in the “Hofstadgroep” network and charged him and six of his associates with “conspiracy with a terrorist intent.” The authorities additionally asserted that these had possible connections to the Takfir wa’l-Hijra and Al Qaeda terrorist groups.
That a non-Muslim critic of Islam was ritually murdered for artistically expressing his views was something without precedent, not just in Holland but anywhere in the West. Dutch revulsion at the deed shook the deep complacency of what is perhaps the world’s most tolerant society. The immigration minister, Rita Verdonk, one of the five persons threatened, publicly rued the country’s having long ignored the presence of radical Islam. “For too long we have said we had a multicultural society and everyone would simply find each other. We were too naïve in thinking people would exist in society together.”
YOU tell me, is the above normal in a civilized society? Is it remotely acceptable?
But back to U.S. mosques and their leaders who exhort to silence ANY criticism of Islam, as if they are ALREADY living under Shariah law! Not only that, who has their backs?
Enter, the latest in a long list of Islamic jihadis within America…who have bully pulpits to match!
An Imam in Tennessee named Yasir Qadhi is using the ban on images of James Foley’s beheading to argue for the ban of speech critical of Islam. This is exactly what the purpose behind the Innocence of Muslims video was. It was designed to gin up Muslim protests in order to pressure western governments to enact laws making criticism of Islam criminal; it’s all part of the Istanbul Process as Shoebat.com has reported.
In the case of Foley, Qadhi’s twisted logic is as follows: If the U.S. finds it appropriate to censor graphic images of Foley out of respect for his family, it should also find it appropriate to censor images critical of Islam, like the Danish Muhammad cartoons and presumably, Innocence of Muslims.
Twitter recently announced that they would delete any tweets that showed images of the execution of the American journalist James Foley, and ban the account of the user who posted such images. Facebook as well announced a strict policy in this regard. This was done to respect the memory of the deceased and honor his family’s request.
Now, I actually sympathize with this type of censoring, mainly because I don’t feel that such gruesome images should become commonplace and be seen by millions of men, women and children (and I mean ALL gruesome images, not just of this journalist).
However, what was interesting was the fact that this news wasn’t given that much national attention, nor was there any outcry regarding ‘censorship’ or ‘freedom of speech’ or ‘infringing on rights’. In fact, quite the opposite: most people who commented were supportive. People in the Western world, by and large, are sympathetic to such a ban, and appreciate the respect that Twitter and FB are showing to the families of the bereaved.
This proves my point that I made in a lecture many years ago, when the controversy over the blasphemous images of the Prophet (SAW) erupted. I claimed back then that the issue of the cartoons had nothing to do with ‘freedom of speech’, but rather with each society’s own views on what is acceptable and unacceptable to show.
Each society has a self-imposed and ever-changing red-line of taboos that it will not cross, in speech or in images. For this society, respect should be shown to the deceased’s family; for us Muslims, an infinitely more amount of respect should be shown to our religious symbols and especially to our Prophet (SAW).
INDEED, this site has demonstrated the dangers associated with tolerating unbridled mosques in America and their attendant jihadi infiltration and penetration. Not only that, but Boston’s jihad was immeasurably linked to said “religious” quarters.
IN this regard, when is enough really enough, in terms of “turning the other cheek” to the grave and impending threats?
YES, mosques in America: a dagger to its heart…a metastasizing cancer…squashing free speech under “religious” cover!
AS to the aforementioned question: “who has their backs”? Well, the leadership of the heretofore free world, that’s who, as blasted AG Holder’s DOJ invokes “blasphemy” laws in league with Barack HUSSEIN Obama!