Adina Kutnicki

A Zionist & Conservative Blog

Adina Kutnicki


Let’s be clear from the get go: agreed, Islam has been around for centuries and it is nauseatingly deemed one of the three “great” religions, regardless of its barbarity. Get over it. In any event, it is time to cease pandering to its “hallowed” status and to commence telling the truth, otherwise the west will be destroyed. Simple as that.

In reality, it has never stopped its war-like thrust. On the other hand, its catapult has never been more obvious. Ensured. Additionally, don’t become (mentally) entrapped into believing that to “wage war” against Islam is akin to any form of bias against individual Muslims. It is not.

Assuredly, the west’s struggle is against a totalitarian political ideology. Hence, it must be re-focused against a politically fascist and religious cloaked doctrine which has, from time immemorial, targeted western infidels, many of whom are also apostates from Islam. Essentially, “pure” Islam dictates who lives and who dies. Period.

In fact, Winston Churchill presciently noted the following observations and his predictive words are as true today as they were when he uttered them.They are absolutely historically accurate. Beyond dispute.

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! 
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia
in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many
countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods
of commerce and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the 
Prophet rule or live.  A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and 
refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity.  The fact that in Mohammedan 
law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as
a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the
faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.  

Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion 
paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.  No stronger retrograde
force exists in the world.  Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant 
and proselytizing faith.  It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising 
fearless warriors at every step, and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the 
strong arms of science, the science against which it (Islam) has vainly struggled, 
the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”  

And if its immutable relationship with blood is not enough of a precipitate, predictive and proximate danger, what else qualifies? 

With the above firmly implanted in mind, how can westerners disregard the inherent dangers from Islam, even as their leaders babble otherwise?

Only One Way To Prevent Shariah From Destroying America and other non Islamic Countries 

By: Dave Gaubatz

27 May 2014

I am not going to spend hours and hours to answer this question.  America, Israel, Canada, and other non-Islamic countries can be spared their destruction from the evils of the Islamic ideology by only one method. 

I am not a war monger, do not desire any form of violence, or want to see innocent children harmed by a war in their country.  I am providing my professional analysis of a very serious problem.  The problem is the Islamic ideology.  It is an ideology that lives, breeds, and grows faster than any know terminal form of cancer.

If we do not want America to be destroyed it is going to take Americans saying no to Islam.  Not just with bumper stickers.  Americans are going to have to demand the Islamic ideology and Shariah law to be labeled as an Islamic terrorist group.

Al Qaeda, Hamas, Boko Haram, and the dozens of other Islamic terrorist groups are just splinters from the Islamic ideology itself.  There is no good with such violent groups as the KKK, Al Sharpton’s organization, or the Islamic ideology.

Think back the last decade, how many days have gone by in which Islam and their murderers have not been in the world news.  In the name of Islam, their fighters have murdered thousands upon thousands of innocent men, women, and children.

Americans must stand up and fight the ‘Holy War’ Islamic leaders have always expressed their desire for.  The days of shaking hands and allowing Islam to spread in America are gone.  There are approximately 2300 mosques in America. Their numbers are growing and existing mosques are expanding in size.

How do Americans fight?  Again this is my analysis, not my desire.  During the civil war Americans (due to politics) had to fight other Americans.  Politicians left Americans with no choice.  In 2014 after six long years of Socialist Obama, politics are again pitting Americans against people living in America.  The people within Islam are not Americans, regardless of what a court or politician dictates.  One can only be an American if he/she vows to put the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land.  An American vows to give his/her life for America against enemies from the inside and out.

The Islamic ideology and it’s followers living in America do not support the U.S. Constitution over Shariah law.  If a Muslim tells you he/she does, they are lying to you.  The only solution to save America is for America to be a land for Americans only or those who would give their life to support the U.S. Constitution.  If a person does not meet this requirement then he/she should be considered an enemy of America.

Boko Haram, the group that kidnapped 300 innocent Christian children in Nigeria are practicing Islam as Mohammed and Shariah law dictate.  They are not radical. They are ‘Pure Muslims’ who desire to live in a land as Mohammed wanted.  They are just carrying out his commands.

“A Radical Muslim’ is a ‘Practicing Muslim’, a ‘Moderate Muslim’ is a ‘non Practicing Muslim’ or otherwise known as an Apostate of Islam…The penalty for Apostasy under Sharia law is Death”   

 “Destroy the Islamic ideology worldwide and we will have peace worldwide” .

“Islam is an economic, military, and political ideology, that uses religions as a method to obtain their ultimate goal: Islamic Ummah (Nation)Worldwide and under Sharia law” 

 “CAIR has a larger and more dependable ‘Confidential Informant’ Network’ than our entire FBI Department.  CAIR has devoted non Muslim people within local, state, and federal government.  They have police officers in high positions, medical personnel, military personnel, and most importantly they have Pastors, Ministers, and Rabbi’s.

“We are not at war with Al Qaeda, Hamas, The Taliban, or other Islamic terrorist groups.  We are at war with Islam itself and the groups that emerge from the violent ideology of Islam are our secondary enemies”. 

 Defying Statistics - 6

Paradoxically, and in a very Orwellian sense, Churchill’s Britain is Allah-bent on becoming a Shariah compliant financial hub, as are other Euro capitals. London is leading the charge. Rolling out the green carpet, so to speak!

London is vying to be the capital of Islamic finance outside of the Muslim world, says the city’s Deputy Mayor Sir Edward Lister.

A task force on building the UK’s Islamic finance industry has been at work since early 2013 and London will host the World Islamic Economic Forum in October.

“The task force has just started and its aim is to make it easier for banks in London to have Islamic products, which is still quite a new concept to any of them,” Lister told a press conference, reported Reuters.

“Only now people are beginning to understand what the products actually mean and how they comply … What you will see is a lot of companies introducing those products.”

Globally, the Islamic finance industry is forecast to be worth $2.6tn (€1.9bn, £1.6bn) by 2017. It has grown by around 30% each year since the millennium and consultancy firm Oliver Wyman predicts that there will need to be at least 150 Islamic finance institutions by 2020 to meet the ever-growing demand.

There are more than 20 UK banks offering Sharia-compliant products, such as HSBC and RBS. There are also three Sharia-only institutions, including the Islamic Bank of Britain (IBB).

By increasing the number of Sharia-compliant financial services in London it will be easier to facilitate investment in the UK from Islamic investors.

Not only that, but America is doing everything to usher in Shariah law and all its destructive permutations. Yet, with absolute certainty, Islam without Shariah law is like a bird without its wings. It would simply die. Crash and burn.
Ominously, consider what has transpired under Obama Inc. and you decide where America is headed:
On the legal front there are plans afoot to silence all criticism of Islam, so much so that the First Amendment is in its cross hairs. Moreover, Shariah financing has gained a sandal-hold into America, and Bloomberg Finance is leading the charge.
Now it is not as if (most) westerners begrudge capitalist entities from chasing after future business, but it is decidedly the case that Shariah law financing, in absolute terms, adds to Islamic jihad coffers all over the world.

Reports by Islamic banking scholars, the IMF, or the Congressional Research Service do not mention that Islamic banking was first concocted by Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna in the 1920s. The stated goal was to penetrate the Western finance system, corrupting it from within in hopes of creating a parallel system to re-establish a global Islamic empire governed by Islamic law (shariah). Islamic rules of commerce (fiqh al-muamalat) forbid interest (riba) and investing in a prohibited (hara’am) enterprise. They also mandate tithes on wealth (zakat). However, the Koran fails to precisely define these concepts. Imams and ayatollahs differ, for example, on whether riba prohibits all interest or only usurious interest.

The first successful Islamic banking experiment was the Mit Ghamr Savings Bank in Egypt in 1963. But five years later, the Egyptian government, which subsidized the bank, shut it down after Muslim-Brotherhood-led demonstrations swamped the country.

In 1963, Malaysia also introduced a limited form of Islamic banking, with establishment of Tabung Haji (Pilgrim’s Fund) that served only as a savings institution, to help Muslims save towards their pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj).

Ten yerrs later, growing oil fortunes in the Middle East, lead the Organization of the Islamic Conference’s (OIC) to establish the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) “in accordance with the principles of the shariah,” as prescribed by the MB-and to launch the fast-growing petrodollar-based Islamic financing market. The IDB, more a development than a commercial bank, was established largely “to promote Islamic banking worldwide.”  Consequently, the IDB founded the Bahrain-registered and -based Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). Other regulatory organizations followed.

Finally, the most crucial element that helped persuade reluctant Muslims to use Islamic banks, the invention of “Islamic banking windows,” is never noted in reports documenting the development of  Islamic banking. This happened in 1993, when Anwar Ibrahim, then Malaysia’s finance minister, helped to introduce the newly invented “Islamic Banking windows” into conventional banks. This measure, which familiarized clientele with and built confidence in the unknown Islamic banking system, proved central to the development of the global Islamic finance industry.

So the questions become: since Islam is underpinned by Shariah law, and Shariah law finance funds global terror, what precisely must be done to save the west? Cut off its oxygen…the head of the snake!


Islamophobia - 4

This site has never hidden its association, its nexus, with counter terror expert Dave Gaubatz. And this is only because permission has been granted to bring it to the forefront, otherwise, rest assured, it would not have seen the light of day.

So it becomes that much more egregious when his patriotic findings (via his counter terror work) are given the finger. How dare FB & Co. spit in the eye of a patriot extraordinaire. Such mistreatment is taken very personally within these pages. Not only that, FB’s intent, their muzzling, is akin to squashing freedom of speech and in line with Shariah Blasphemy Laws, all done under the “watchful” gaze of those who have the temerity to claim: Facebook to Joe Newby of Examiner: We review every piece of content that is reported to us or flagged in the system and each one is held to the exact same standard. Really? Come again? 

What’s really going on? Yet before we even get to their latest act of censorship, revealing the actual string pullers, one must hark back to where FB’s achilles heel lies; its affinity for all things Islamic! Consider (just some of) the evidence:

Is Facebook okay with death threats from Islamists? That’s the question administrators of “Islam Exposed” asked earlier this week. After administrators received a number of threatening messages, Facebook pulled the page, citing “harassment,” but restored the page on Tuesday, telling it “was removed in error…..”

Would Facebook take action against those issuing the threats? The social media site did not say, but the group did not wait and filed complaints with the FBI.

“A single bullet will strike ur (sic) head one day [admin] from a jihadist. Insha-Allah,” one threat read. Another Facebook user with a Muslim name threatened to cut off administrators’ heads if they continued to post articles in a rant too profane to quote here. Yet another person threatened to blackmail one of the administrators.

“I am giving u (sic) warning,” said another person. “Stop this page.”

According to the group, one administrator received several threatening phone calls, with some including a Muslim prayer in Arabic. He reported it to the police, they said, but nothing was done. Just this week, they added, he received two threatening calls.

Adina Kutnicki, an investigative journalist based in Israel, said she has been harassed on Facebook by an individual she identified as Iranian Mohamed Erdem.

“Back off you satanist scum of the earth! You want war, war with me!” he told Kutnicki on Facebook. The threats she received from Erdem was so alarming, she added, that “heavy duty counter terror contacts decided to ‘check things out…..'”

Fast forward to a week later…that was then…this is now:

On Wednesday, Dave Gaubatz, a former Air Force investigator and author of “Muslim Mafia,” told that he “infiltrated” a Muslim conference held in Detroit earlier this month. While at the conference, he reportedly spoke to a representative of a group known as Muslim Advocates, who said the organization is working “closely” with social media sites like Facebook and Twitter to close down accounts of users critical of Islam.

“They are asking these groups to close the accounts of anyone who is critical of Islam,” he said. “This is considered serious hate speech and should not be allowed on the Internet.”

According to Gaubatz, the representative also said that “anyone critical of Islam and sharia law are haters.” Ditto for those who oppose either the construction or expansion of a mosque in the United States.

“We are experts with deep experience in the courtroom and powerful connections in Congress and the White House,” Gaubatz recalled being told by the Muslim Advocates representative…..

He reportedly met and spoke with executives from the Islamic Society of North America and the North American Islamic Trust.

“I was informed that NAIT owned several hundred million dollars of property in America, and has the funding from 400 plus Islamic Centers in America,” he added…..

We contacted both Facebook and Muslim Advocates to verify Gaubatz’ claim and received no reply as of this writing.

Update: A few hours after this article was published, Facebook falsely flagged the link as “unsafe” in what appears to be a bid to keep it from being circulated. We have reached out to Facebook, but have not received a response.

WITHOUT missing a beat, no sooner did Examiner’s latest examination, its revelations, get posted up to some of FB’s personal and group pages, a message was sent – a warning of sorts….best to toe the line…or else – to the very same administrators who are continually beating back the censors re Islam Exposed Online. Round and round they chase us, but they won’t wear us down. This is a promise. Readers should know this by now, perhaps they can feel a measure of comfort in this site’s (and its companion, Islam Exposed Online) steadfastness. Fortitude. Hope they do.

  • Adina Kutnicki Try this –
    Unable to post comment.

Bear in mind, after our link to Examiner’s latest expose’ was repeatedly banned, similar messages were received by other “friends”, they too were “unable to post comment”! In other words, FB’s censorship is way bigger than what this American-Israeli journalist is reporting. Experiencing. Other journalists, anti-Shariah Law activists and counter terror experts (a preponderance are associated with this site, but some are not) are cataloging the same anti-freedom agenda treatment. Know this: FB’s silencing, its omerta, extends to ALL Americans/westerners, except to those who hue to Islamic and radical leftist ideologies.

NOT to be lost in the discussion, let’s peer into the composition of the aforementioned Muslim Advocates. Are they akin to the boy scouts, girl scouts or some such pro-American organization? Oh dear….its President and Executive Director, Farhana Khera, having “made her bones” as a fox in the Congressional hen house, also rubs shoulders with some terror-tied clerics, some of whom have links to Al-Qaeda operatives! Six…three…degrees of separation found within the above pdf link….but never mind, “she be” (her group, plus others) in charge of running interference between FB and Islamic “concerns”.

Groundbreaking Report Exposes Anti-Muslim Hate Online

Fatima Khan

Muslim Advocates “Click Here to End Hate” Report Empowers Social Media Users

(Oakland, CA — May 6, 2014) In a groundbreaking report, “Click Here to End HateAnti-Muslim Bigotry Online & How to Take Action,” Muslim Advocates exposes the breadth of anti-Muslim bigotry online, explains the law and corporate policies that regulate content on the Internet, and empowers individuals with the tools necessary to effectively respond to hate online.

“Online bigotry towards American Muslims continues to be a serious issue, particularly in the last few years where we’ve seen hate groups, anti-Muslim proponents, and public officials use various social media platforms to spread hate,” said Madihha Ahussain, Muslim Advocates staff attorney and lead author of the report.  “Their voices are amplified on the Internet and help create a space for the American public to echo these sentiments of hate and engage in acts of violence against an entire group or community.  People often think that there is nothing they can do to respond, but the reality is that their voices can be a powerful antidote to hate speech.”

Many use the Internet to organize online and rapidly gather supporters for their agendas.  For example, Pamela Gellar, a well-known anti-Muslim proponent and blogger had about 19 thousand followers on Facebook in June 2013.  Today, less than a year later, she has over 78 thousand.  Click Here to End Hate not only gives examples of offensive online content, but also sheds light on the legal considerations surrounding hate speech and what social media companies are doing about it.   The report also serves as a guide for individuals who want to push back with reporting mechanisms built into social media platforms and by engaging in counter speech.

Muslim Advocates has a dedicated program to counter anti-Muslim hate, and works with a broad coalition of faith, civic, and civil rights organizations to challenge bigotry against religious minorities.  Through this work, Muslim Advocates monitors hate crimes targeting American Muslims, bigotry by public officials, anti-Sharia legislation bills that have been proposed or passed in various states, and opposition to mosque construction projects affecting communities throughout the country.

The report is available online at

Muslim Advocates is a national legal advocacy and educational organization working on the front lines of civil rights to guarantee freedom and justice for Americans of all faiths. Through high-impact lawsuits, policy advocacy, and community education, Muslim Advocates serves as a resource to empower communities and ensures that the American Muslim community is heard by the courts and leaders at the highest level of government.  Visit Muslim Advocates at and follow @muslimadvocates.

DESPITE all their blah, blah nonsense about “advocacy” and “civil rights”, their associations, their alliances” (contained within the above linked pdf) attest otherwise. So in light of the above – and so much more – the following questions beg to be asked and answered: wherefore art thou FB, are your corp offices housed in the sands of Arabia, instead of  Menlo Park, CA? and to whom are you beholden? These are more than fair queries, at least from a western perspective.

In this regard, is it any wonder that FB finds it “offensive” to adhere to America’s Constitutional basis, that is, because they are hardly in sync with its underpinnings. Concomitantly, though long suspected, we now know for sure – ALL credit afforded to the valiant efforts of Dave Gaubatz  – that those FB (Obama Inc. in toto) is taking its cues from are part and parcel of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. For added listening (dis)pleasure, this too tells the tale –

Rick Ferran aka Tank and patriots with a special guest free lance writer Joe Newby speaking about Facebook’s new attacks and censorship bias towards any news regarding Islam or Muslims. Resent article by Joe Newby and Islam Exposed Facebook Page


YES, a clear nexus exists between FB and Islamic front groups! As Gaubatz noted, “anyone critical of Islam and sharia law are haters.” Ditto for those who oppose either the construction or expansion of a mosque in the United States.

“We are experts with deep experience in the courtroom and powerful connections in Congress and the White House,” Gaubatz recalled being told by the Muslim Advocates representative.”

Alas, in your mind’s eye, can you see this blogger’s disgust and outrage, positing, once again: double really? double come again? whom do they think they are kidding, thereby, taking for fools? Not this site’s readership, that’s for damn sure.

So if FB mistakenly believes that this issue, a cornerstone of liberty, is going to magically disappear – now you see it, now you don’t – well, their censors are hallucinating. Associates of this blogger at Islam Exposed online (am its Israel Administrator) are determined to bring a positive result to our readers:

The Case of Virtual Sharia on Social Media Platforms and the Missing Links: Now You See Them, and Now You Don’t!

“As a U.S. State Department-trained Arabic linguist and a retired Special Federal Agent with the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), Gaubatz has received the highest forms of U.S. intelligence clearances and top-secret briefings — including for weapons of mass destruction and espionage — for what is known as black projects. Since he retired, he has continued his work independently and has gone undercover for such projects as Mapping Sharia and has infiltrated and investigated hundreds of U.S. mosques and Islamic centers for terrorist cells, as well the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — a named “joint venturer” in the largest U.S. Federal terrorist-financing trial to date, U.S.A. v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, et. al (HLF). Gaubatz gave Joe Newby of Examiner an earful the other day in what may be construed as a clear-cut case of Facebook Sharia, pulling off its vanishing act of the year in “Now you see it, and now you don’t” — only this time, you cannot see it at all on Facebook, at least not any of Joe Newby’s latest articles about it!”

Facebook falsely flags articles mentioning Islam as ‘unsafe’

More Photos

“One article dealing with allegations made by a counter-terrorism expert was falsely blocked by Facebook on Wednesday. The other article ironically dealt with a petition on the White House “We the People” site calling for an end to censorship of speech dealing with Islam. Screen captures of both blocks can be seen in the slideshow above.

On Friday, Adina Kutnicki, an investigative journalist based in Israel, said that at least six links mentioning Islam appeared, then mysteriously disappeared but “have now miraculously reappeared.” Attempts to share the links on Facebook, however, failed as of this writing.”


hitler youth

“Conspiracy theories” cease being conspiratorial in nature – the figment of ones wild imagination – when evidence supplants the so called “conspiracy theory”. But never mind, leftist “true believers” expect the rest of us to go along (like sheep to the slaughter) with their “explanations” for this and that, even when THEIR lies are exposed in plain sight. Regardless, some of us insist on recognizing what is right before our (lying) eyes. What a conundrum – for them!

MOST inherently, when it comes to the kiddies, they are considered the ultimate “prize” of the socialist, Marxist and communist aligned. The jihadi set too. Why? Think of it this way:little foot soldiers are necessary to become big foot soldiers. Imparting their twisted ideology to a captured generation makes diabolical sense. Yes, it does. Thus, one generation after another passes the poison(s) – FORWARD MARCH…and so on and so forth. A twisted and devilish path.

That being said, where is this site’s purported evidence? Here and there:

Here and There One:

Indeed, Obamacare is front and center in capturing the kiddies, so recall this warning from Dec. 2013: Obama’s end goal rooted in national socialism; Obamacare’s hidden nexus!

Here and There Two:

Besides, does anyone really believe that Common Core has ANYTHING to do with the “3 R’s” and scholastic proficiency? Of course not. Alas, what are they up to? Well, complete surveillance of America’s kiddies…and that’s no conspiracy theory!

Here and There Three:

But who do you think is in the forefront of Common Core, as its chief (mis)educator? A domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers, the “guy who just happened to live in Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s neighborhood.” Oh yeah, THAT guy.


The Obama Youth Movement & The Seizing of American Children

There is presently a massive conspiracy designed to separate you from your children and give the government complete control over your children. To put it simply, Health and Human Services (HHS)  and their state level emissary, Child Protective Services (CPS) are engaged in a conspiracy which will culminate in (1) the Agenda 21 designed breakdown of the family; (2) the eradication of any semblance of parental authority over children; and, (3) unbridled and unfettered access to seizing children from the home in unlimited quantities for whatever nefarious purposes which might dictate the volume of child seizures.

The Plot Is International, Begins with the UN

This program emanates from a partnership between various United Nations organizations and ICF, acting on behalf of HHS, CPS and Obamacare (i.e. The Affordable Health CareAct). The evidence in this article, along with the included links, will demonstrate that when Obamacare is fully operational, our families, specifically our children will be living in a Hitler Youth Movement hellish nightmare in which the state owns and can seize your children.

After reviewing HHS, CPS and UN documents, what is being presently reported in thealternative media is merely the tip of the iceberg with regard to HHS’ intentions toward the ultimate outcome of the children in this country. After reviewing the documents, there is no doubt that Obama is representing international interests which will seek to remove as many children as possible from the homes of their parents in the spirit of the Hitler Youth Movement.

But first let me quickly review the recent revelations of the HHS/CPS/Obamacare intention to conduct what I have dubbed as “home invasion interventions.”

Obamacare Home Invasions and Interventions

According to a previously unreported Obamacare regulation, that has managed to escape “scrutiny” from the mainstream media, millions of American families will be targeted for home invasion by the forces of the Federal government in the name of preventing parental neglect resulting in disabilities in their children. And the Fourth Amendment be damned, as of January 1, 2014, Federal officials may enter your home without a warrant in order to “intervene” for the purpose of saving “high risk” children.

Obamacare’s Definition of High Risk

The exposure of the extreme and intrusive nature of Obamacare through home invasion visits is finally seeing the light of day in the alternative media. However, this exposure is grossly understated. As a starting point, I will briefly review what is making the rounds in the alternative media. According to HHS, your family is eligible for this Hitler style for “intervention” in the following situations:

1. Families where mom is not yet 21.

2. Families where someone is a tobacco user.

3. Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities.

4. Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States

5. Although this is not being widely reported, homeschoolers and their families will be targeted for “interventions” as will be families who object to having their children take vaccines.  

There is no question that all of the above categories, will warrant a home invasion followed by “remediation.”  The visits will not be conducted by HHS officials as has been reported in several publications. The home invasion visits will be conducted by CPS on behalf of HHS.

HHS has designed a detailed 110 page policy manual which focuses on the criteria constituting child neglect. This policy manual which is the guide created by HHS for CPS’ home intervention visits makes the above criteria, presently being reported in thealternative media, look tame by comparison.

HHS, CPS and the Criminalization of Parenthood 

In the 110 page HHS/CPS manual, the variables which comprise child neglect, worthy of government intervention is frightening beyond any words I can find to express their undisguised intentions. This entire document which will serve as the field manual by CPS in support of Obamacare undermines parental authority to a level that is beyond belief.

How many of you were ever grounded by your parents and not permitted to play outside with your friends? This is now illegal under the HHS/CPS policy manual. They label the treatment as neglect by isolation. There are not time frames set forth which constitutes isolation and it is left to the field representative. This obviously erodes parental discipline.

If your child is judged to be underachieving in school, this is referred to as educational neglect and is worthy of governmental intervention. Further, if your child is absent for five days in any one month from school, the same allegation would be made against the parent.

If your child has ADD or ADHD, you could be accused of neglect because the document details how this can be somehow caused by poor nutrition, although the variables associated with the cause are not specified.

The document goes out of its way to specify that poverty and neglect are not inextricably linked. Then the document goes out of its way to link poverty with child neglect. Read between the lines America. As we already are aware, many poor children who go missing from scandals such as Jerry Sandusky’s Second Mile Foundation, the infamous FranklinScandal and last year’s CPS scandal with the 78 missing wards of the state in Oklahoma, frequently end up being put into child sex trafficking rings operated and funded by such notables as DynCorps and HSBC bank.

Of course, no Obama inspired program would be complete without an attack upon theSecond Amendment. Obamacare is no exception as one of the criteria for child neglect  are parents who are also gun owners.

The presence of alcohol in the home is a trigger for an allegation of neglect and subsequent “intervention.” Of course, alcoholic parents can present a clear and present danger to a child’s well-being. However, in the policy manual the conditions for concern over alcohol do not detail the amount and percentage of the family resources involved necessary to obtain alcohol. In other words, one can of beer in the home can be considered to constitute child neglect by the Obamacare CPS fieldworker.

If your child has engages in any type of illicit or criminal behavior, your family is at risk. Raise your hands if you ever smoked pot before the age of 18, or drank as a teen, or engaged in any kind of sexual activity before the age of 18, ever stayed out past curfew, or ever shoplifted? IF your children ever engages in these and a multitude of other transgressions, you are in danger of losing your children. This also means that if your child is ever involved in a fight in school or is assigned detention, the school will be required to report the behavior to the HHS/CPS and you can expect to have a “home invasion intervention” session with your friendly Obamacare CPS fieldworker.

If you are ever late picking up your child from daycare or from school aftercare, you will now be reported to CPS.

If you have ever been depressed or have been treated for any mental disorder (e.g. PTSD,anxiety, etc.), you are at risk for losing your children.

Even illegal immigrant families are not immune from this insanity. Children are judged by the field worker to not be fully acculturated, do not properly speak the language, exhibits signs of being homesick and is judged to have not formed an unspecified number of friends and formed a cohesive social network, allegations of neglect can be made.

I would invite the reader to spend some time reviewing the document which will be serving as the policy manual for the forced home inspections. Please note that when the reader gets beyond the flowery language and professed concern for children, that the language is written so broadly that virtually any human condition, any family circumstance or child’s behavior can be interpreted as child neglect. There is literally no end to the tyranny that awaits the art of parenting in the present day.

The important thing to note is the use of language by this manual. Parents who are deemed by an Obamacare CPS field worker, operating under the HHS flag, to be neglectful towards their children are considered to have created “disabilities” within their children. As the reader will soon discover, the use of the term “disabilities” is key to understanding how far this administration is willing to go to seize children for some nefarious purpose.

Sadly, this is still only the beginning. There is far more to be concerned about beginning with who is ultimately responsible for these outrages.

Meet the Creators of the State Sponsored Child Kidnapping Rings

The primary author for this insane manual for HHS/CPS and their designed home invasion interventions is Diane DePanfilis, Ph.D., M.S.W.  She is the Associate Dean for. Research and an Associate Professor of Social Work at the University of Maryland.  More importantly she is a co-editor of the Handbook on Child Protection Practice. In other words, DePanfills has been a major player in the unconstitutional practices we see in CPS in all 50 states. As if this is not concerning enough, all of the other contributing authors have their professional origins and affiliations with the same organization.

Lindsay Ritter Taylor, from Caliber, an  ICF  International Company

Matthew Shuman, M.S.W,  A consultant with Caliber, an ICF International Company

Jean  Strohl,  A consultant with Caliber, an ICF International Company,

Jeannie Newman, M.S.W,  M.I.B.S.,  A consultant with Caliber, an ICF International Company

It was at this point, I smelled a rat. We have the primary author being a CPS author designed to teach their field operatives on the methods of how to abuse parents and undermine parental authority. And all of the contributing authors come from the exact same corporation, ICF. At this point, it is prudent to ask the question, who is ICF?

ICF Is the Biggest Player That You Have Never Heard Of

ICF International partners with government and commercial clients to deliver consulting services and technology solutions in climate change, energy, environment, transportation, social programs, defense, andhomeland security markets. In my mind, this established ICF as a major player in the introduction and implementation of the globalist agenda by designing matching Federal programs. And as it turned out they are a major player in Obamacare through their subsidiary acquisition, Caliber Associates.

Caliber is an “established leader in providing research, consulting, and innovation in human services and human resource issues.” ICF acquired Caliber in 2005 in order “to serve HHS, the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Department of Defense, and the U.S. Department of Education.”  Caliber Associates and their four contributing authors to the HHS/CPS field manual, which will be used to enforce child welfare regulations, was the undeniable link to Obamacare through this field manual. But as I discovered, the rabbit hole went even deeper.

After I found the co-authors of the HHS/CPS policy manual which will guide these forced home inspections, I smelled the distinct odor of the United Nations and Agenda 21 and sure enough, this was exactly what I found.

The United Nations and Obamacare

At times, I feel that I have the globalist playbook and I am able to often anticipate their next move. Please allow me to briefly illustrate how the globalists have operated in another area, education, and then draw the parallel to how the UN is deeply involved in Obamacare.

The Common Core Curriculum, which is sweeping the nation’s education system, was the product of “Education for All.” Education for All comes from the United Nations education arm, the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).Common Core went from UNESCO to the National Governors Association who in turn farmed out the development of the details to various NGO’s which in turn sent the standards to each state for implementation. This is the standard model that the globalists follow when implementing a controversial program and Obamacare follows a similar pattern as did Common Core.

There is no doubt that the provisions of allegedly protecting children in Obamacare, originated with the United Nations

Why do they want our kids?

In the United Nations document entitled, Human Rights, Persons with Disabilities, ICF and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Training toolkit), implementation for programs designed to help people, children in particular, with disabilities, came from the World Health Organization (WHO) [Page  36], UNESCO [Page 37], the International Labour Organization (ILO) [Page 36] and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)[Page 38]. As one can see from the title, ICF and the UN have partnered to protect people/children with disabilities.


Please remember that earlier in the article, I made the point that the HHS/CPS field manual referred to neglected children as children who have disabilities. It is quite apparent that any of the conditions listed in the HHS/CPS manual will produce children who have disabilities. Under this guise, I can draw no other conclusion than Obamacare is state sponsored child slavery.

Under Obamacare, virtually every aspect of parenting is criminalized. Any child can be considered to have a disability for which the state is the only legitimate treatment source. When Obama was first running for President in 2008, he promised to build a civilian security force that “was just as strong, just as well-funded as our military.” And when one combines this conspiracy with Obama’s Executive Order 13603 which calls for a mandatory civilian conscription to complement a coming military draft, it is clear that this lunatic is planning to enslave a large segment of the population and he will obtain many of his conscripts from Obamacare. And many of you who are familiar with Agenda 21 and their expressed views toward parental rights and the rights of children, do not need me to make connect the dots, you already have done so.

My advice to all parents, don’t answer the door when you see the lady ringing your doorbell.

I cannot see any way out of this dilemma other than to resist through the use of force. The Obamacare goons will NOT gain entry into my home while I am still breathing. I predict that HHS/CPS will soon be armed because they will, and should, meet massive resistance from the citizens.

America, we must resist this heinous tyranny with every means at our disposal. 

Will you protect your children?


BOTTOM LINE: if one truly believes that children are the property of the government, then just dismiss all the above as nothing to see here…moving right along. Mind you, their “collectivist” notion is not some anomaly within radical left circles. In fact, it is a “mainstream” outlook.

On the other hand, if it’s your biggest nightmare to hand over your children’s welfare to Fed entities – international ones too – then there is NO time to lose. Like it or not, plans are in motion – and have been in place for decades, only to be ratcheted up under the Radical-in-Chief – and they will succeed, if massive push back isn’t exerted.

At the same time, no rational person is suggesting that some parents/homes aren’t indeed unfit and dangerous to their children’s welfare. We get that. But that generally involves CLEAR cut cases of child abuse, as well an urgency to remove children from homes where a parent(s) is an addict, be they an alcoholic, drug abuser or a combination of both. Nevertheless, this is not what Obama’s goons (domestic and international) are after. They want TOTAL control and that is that.

SIGNIFICANTLY, most of their radical mischief is happening under the radar, aggregated within various “agencies” and “committees”. However, some of us have been tracking their footprints and they are HUGE. GARGANTUAN. The time to act is NOW!


Barack Obama 5 SC

Obama’s “brain”, his architect, Valerie Jarrett, infamously intoned: “there’s a lot of ways to skin a cat” and “she be” right. 

But while the aforementioned exhortation related to Obama Inc’s end run around illegal immigration, the same principle applies to all their illegal, anti-American activities. Let there be no doubt: their actions are illegal, at least within the confines of America’s Constitutional legal framework.

That being said, their “legal koshering” of illegal aliens is a subset of plans for total control – via gun control! In a very tangible sense, once legal guns are confiscated the citizens become vulnerable to whatever the leaders dictate – legal or otherwise. It is this stripping which is at the core of gun control fanatics, at least in relation to those who are imbued with power. Fascists. What utter, monstrous gall. A total putsch against “We the People”, even those of us who are ex pats.

It is the duty of every American, those who wish to live free – or die – to defy any attempts to exert gun control. Gun control is manifested through various back doors, essentially by hook or by crook.

Back Door One:

Significantly, there are several stealthy entry points, but two stand out among the rest. Therefore, let us designate them: “domestic entry” and “international entry”. To wit, let’s first deal with the internal ones.

Enter: Obamacare. How many understand the hidden march towards gun control through Obama’s nightmarish “overhaul” of America’s health system? It had been, up until now, a well functioning health system, at least compared to the rest. Very few have a clue.

Back Door Two:

Adding to the domestic nightmare, whenever criminals or insane persons use guns to kill, rest assured gun control becomes the main target. It is presumably the case – or so the twisted logic goes – when gun control becomes the “law of the land”, criminals will magically give up their black market guns and crazy folks won’t gain access to weapons either. Outrageously mendacious. In reality, the ones left defenseless will remain the formerly legal gun owners! The really dangerous – not so much.

Regardless, rabid leftists are never rational, instead exhorting to murder those who adhere to the 2nd Amendment, unless they give up their legal guns! Insanity.

Back Door Three:

As if the unglued left is not enough of a danger, those who are gunning for ultimate control over the kiddies would leave them totally defenseless and without armed guards at their schools, if they had their way. Thus, gun store owners have been in their sights for a while, but the ultimate form of totalitarian control is now wending through their bank accounts! Simply put, Obama Inc. is TOTALLY out of control. They have gone over the marked line and must be pulled back, otherwise everyone who refuses to toe the line is in for a rude awakening – banking-wise.

STUNNING: This Obama Scheme Is Shutting Down Legal Gun Stores!

WASHINGTON — Congressman Steve Stockman (R-TX 36) demanded the Obama administration suspend the Justice Department’s “Operation Choke Point,” in which government agents are pressuring banks to close the accounts of legal and law-abiding businesses engaged in commerce contrary to the political views of Barack Obama.

“(T)he Justice Department has launched Operation Choke Point, a credit card fraud probe focusing on banks and payment processors. The threat of enforcement has prompted some banks to cut ties with online gun retailers, even if those companies have valid licenses and good credit histories,” The Washington Times reported Monday morning.

“Under Obama’s ‘Operation Choke Point,’ banks are complaining that government agents are threatening them because they service legal businesses engaged in legal commerce. Often, the customer is a gun retailer or other businesses that poses no risk, but differs with Obama’s political agenda,” said Stockman.

Thousands of gun retailers have had their bank accounts forcibly closed, despite engaging in no illegal activity whatsoever.

“This is just the latest example of the Obama administration exploiting executive power to target political opponents. It would appear the only purpose of Operation Choke Point is to choke the life out of businesspeople with political views that may differ from the President,” said Stockman.

“Unable to pass gun control in Congress, Obama is seeking to stamp out gun ownership through the kind of threats and harassment you’d expect from Third World dictators or Mafia bosses,” said Stockman.

“Targeting the bank account of gun retailers engaged in peaceful and legal commerce is a blatant violation of civil liberties. Under Obama, the United States are becoming a banana republic. The Obama administration must suspend Operation Choke Point and instead focus its resources on criminal enterprises,” said Stockman.


Segueing over to the “international entry” point for disarming Americans, what can be more dangerous than a group of kleptocrats, which passes themselves off as world body reps, as they aim to shred the 2nd Amendment, the last vestige before the lights go out for the west? To be fair, let’s not blame these thugocats entirely, in so far as U.S. globalists are deeply in sync with their world rule!

When it comes to radical revolutionaries, and the implementation of their designs, the ends ALWAYS justifies the means. In fact, it’s a hallmark of their radical thinking, their trademark. And which entity qualifies more than the reprobate world body, the U.N? None.

Bulls eye. Machiavellian.




Radical leftists (and their Islamic counterparts) are forever beating the “fairness” drum, even though the reds and greens (Islamists) have their own definition of what constitutes being “fair”. This site gets it.

So as a Zionist and Conservative blogger it would only be fair – turnabout IS fair play – if some related water bills are reimbursed by either side. How they split the bill is neither here nor there. Meaning, it is due to their incestuous relations that a yucky feeling often overcomes this American-Israeli, requiring more showers than usual. Simple cause and effect.

Now that we got that settled, what have they done – again – to bring up the high cost of this blogger’s water bills in Israel? Well, it appears as if Muslim-Americans are freely bandying about their vision for America, ala Shariah Law, and they have many red and green proponents within Obama Inc. As a matter of record – and hardly an anomaly – an Imam from one of the largest mosques on the east coast recently exhorted the following, sans batting an eye. What balls.

“We, as Americans, have to put limits and borders [on] freedom of speech,” Qatanani, leader of the Islamic Center of Passaic County (ICPC), told TheBlaze. He explained that while Americans may ”have the freedom“ to speak their mind, ultimately, they “have no right to [talk about Muslim] holy issues” as it will incite “hatred or war among people.”

Qatanani said he thinks agitators who slander Islam, or, more specifically, the Prophet Muhammad, incite violence and hence, pose a national security risk that threatens the safety of Americans at home and abroad. Thus, America should disregard its First Amendment as it is typically applied and instead act in accordance with sharia law for the ultimate “good” of society.

The overwhelming presence of  the mobbed up Brotherhood Mafia within Obama Inc., their influence, accounts for their brazen pronouncements. It is as if they have a green light to dictate: the evisceration of the cornerstone of America’s Constitution, free speech, is a done deal !

And lest anyone disbelieves their closeness, think again:


BHO & the Muslim Brotherhood - 7

As is said, a picture is worth a thousand words.

AGAIN, it is mandatory to step into their cesspool even further…oh no, extra showers are on tap! And yes, although this American-Israeli is hardly a prude, playing footsie with Obama Inc. involves many hinky dealings, sexually speaking. Clearly, picking a major jihadist leader/drug trafficker to consort with as the “new face” of Syria, plus combining the admins sordid relationship with a female “spokeswoman” who is sexually promiscuous, well, it raises some concerns. Eyebrows too. Lo and behold, Hill admires this female jihadist’s (aka “pro-democracy activist”) bodacious “loveliness”! Wonder why.

Obama Embraces and Works With Major Muslim Jihadist Leader & International Drug Trafficker

That woman was also seen with Hilary Clinton (see photo below) – identified by Reuters at the time as a “young Syrian pro-democracy activist” – has since been hired by the man with whom the Obama administration has chosen to work with as the President of the Syrian Opposition Coalition, Ahmed Jarba.

Medea Daghestani meets with Hillary Clinton in Istanbul on April 1, 2012.

How she met Hillary Clinton most likely was arranged since Daghestani was prominent in staging riots and gives fiery speeches against the Syrian regime:

And the type of Jihadi operatives that the U.S. Administration is supporting involves some major terrorist leaders cooperating sexually with Daghestani. Some months after meeting with Clinton, Medea Daghestani was caught engaging in Skype sex with one of the top commanders within the Syrian opposition, Abdulrazaq Tlass. According to reports, Tlass and Daghestani performed for each other without knowing that hackers for the Assad regime were able to hijack Tlass’s computer and record the episode.

In this screenshot, Daghestani can be seen with Tlass in the lower right-hand corner:

Daghestani with Tlass during Skype sex (name spelled "Medya Daghistaney")

So one would think that her career would be over? Think again. Daghestani is flung into the arms of the very man whom the Obama works with to take over Syria. Earlier this year, Dagestani was hired as a Public Relations specialist by Syrian Opposition Coalition President Ahmad Jarba.

Daghestani: Hired by Jarba earlier this year.

Despite Jabra’s checkered reputation, Obama still meets with Jarba and was recently given additional credibility when Obama met with him at the White House during a scheduled meeting Jarba had with National Security Adviser Susan Rice:

Jarba (L) with Obama (R). Susan Rice is seen seated next to Obama.

As if all this is bad enough, just obtained from Middle Eastern sources Jabra’s history in major drug trafficking operations.

And just who is this Jabra really working for? According to reports, Jarba is close to Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who was a key figure in Jarba’s new position. Bandar instructed his agents and mercenaries in Syria to appoint Jarba (as a Saudi puppet) despite multiple convictions for drug trafficking between Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and the Gulf States, especially in Saudi Arabia.

Jabra is useful to both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia since he is well connected. Jarba reportedly utilized contacts he developed in the Syrian Embassy to secure his release every time he was arrested.

And it gets even worse, a couple of weeks ago, the DEA while entering the U.S. in Washington Airport searched his body cavities since they knew of his drug dealings and he was let go after someone important made a phone call.

Jarba’s Allegiances
Ahmad Jarba’s predecessor as the face of the Syrian opposition was at one time Ahmed Muaz Al-Khatib Alhassani (Al-Khatib), a Sufi Muslim with loyalties to the Muslim Brotherhood, as reported. Jarba being of Saudi origin belonging to the Shamra Saudi clan makes him an ideal operative to ensure the Wahhabist plans for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which has its foothold and extensions into Syria to ensure its Islamist future.

Al-Khatib’s removal remains a mystery. Analysts do not agree whether it was Qatar, Saudi Arabia or the C.I.A which foresaw his removal. But in an Arabic news report, Al-Khatib said that Jarba was:

“…bribed by the highest bidder as is commonly known. Qatar and Saudi Arabia purchases through bribes whom they want.”

On his facebook page, Al-Khatib said that 40 members even walked out on Jarba after noticing the corruption.

Ahmad Jarba embraces Saudi flag to show his allegiance; Al-Khatib on right.

On his twitter page, Jarba draws a line of distinction between the faction that he represents and the other side, tweeting that he encourages Al-Nusra Front terrorist group (translation below image):

Translation: I am not a member of Al-Nusra Front, but I encourage Al-Nusra Front. What makes the Nusra Front different is that it conquers, it burns and its destructive.

How Obama supports a man who is for Al-Nusra Front that “conquers” “burns” and is “destructive” remains a mystery. Al-Nusra is an Al-Qaeda front and a designated terrorist organization by the U.S.

But there appears to be a shift in strategy when it comes to Obama administration policy in Syria. While the “Friends of Syria” coalition is still in place, the elevation of Jarba means Saudi Arabian interests are being given more consideration after relations between Obama and the Saudis had been greatly strained.

Obama’s Friendship with “Friends of Syria” is Obama’s Farewell to Israel
Obama’s plans seem to coinside with the plans of the Syrian revolution, especially when it comes to Israel by appeasing both the Saudi Wahhabists and Muslim Brotherhood factions in Syria. Weapons shipments by a coalition of western nations Barack Obama boasted about forming and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly promoted and helped launch. Based on research done by, not only should the true intentions of the recipients of these weapons have been known by Obama and Clinton but they obviously were.

Benghazi attacks made arming Syrian rebels more difficult for Barack and Hillary.

Threats made by one of Syria’s opposition leaders who has been receiving U.S.-made anti-tank missiles to fight the Assad regime indicate the jihadists he leads would like to make good on Barack Obama’s call for Israel to return to its pre-1967 borders, which would include returning the Golan Heights to Syria. The group that provided these weapons is known as “Friends of Syria” or “Friends of the Syrian People”.

Clearly, sending anti-tank missles – as Friends of Syria has been doing – to jihadists who threaten Israel does not serve Israel’s interests. It would seem, however, to serve the interests of Barack Obama, who called for a return to the 1967 borders just months prior to the formation of Friends of Syria:

One day later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rebuked Obama publicly, from inside the White House:

Based on the claims in an interview with a rebel Division leader named Ahmad Al-Sa’oud, the high powered weaponry should be considered a threat to Israel’s sovereignty. Al-Sa’oud told the interviewer, “We are for the return of all Syrian land occupied by Israel”. Just two days prior to that interview being published, the U.S. State Department issued a press release reiterating U.S. support for Friends of Syria.

During a presidential debate prior to Obama’s reelection (after the Benghazi attacks), the President had the following to say about Friends of Syria:

We are playing the leadership role. We organized the Friends of Syria. We are mobilizinghumanitarian support, and support for the opposition. And we are making sure that those we help are those who will be friends of ours in the long term and friends of our allies in the region over the long term.

Who are these friends and allies of the Obama administration?

Ahmad Al-Sa'oud: Syrian rebel leader with U.S. anti-Tank missiles wants Golan Heights back.

Several months earlier, while in Tunisia, it was then Secretary of State Clinton who held a news conference at the group’s first meeting (the second meeting is when Clinton met with Daghestani), where she expressed the Obama administration’s commitment to the Friends of Syria. It was made clear that the administration would be assisting the group in its efforts to remove Bashar al-Assad from power. Said Clinton:

I think today the Friends of the Syrian People sent a strong and unified message that the Assad regime’s escalating violence is an affront to the international community, a threat to regional security, and a grave violation of universal human rights… we resolve today to ratchet up the pressure on the regime and increase its isolation. Now you know that until now, the Assad regime has ignored every warning, squandered every opportunity, and broken every agreement.

Turkey was represented at the Tunisia meeting by Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, who said:

“We should concentrate our efforts on empowering the Syrian opposition, which will be the backbone of a new democratic regime.”

One month prior to the Benghazi attacks, Clinton traveled to Turkey, where she met with Davutoglu and Syrian refugees. According to National Public Radio, the purpose of the meeting was two-fold. 1.) To prepare for a chemical weapons attack by Bashar al-Assad’s regime and 2.) To plan for Syria’s collapse.

Hillary and Davutoglu in Turkey one month prior to Benghazi attacks.

According to the details of a report relayed by, the U.S. operation in Benghazi was about covertly shipping weapons out of the CIA Annex to Syrian rebels via Turkey. These claims were bolstered by an admission from Speaker of the U.S. House John Boehner and reports filed by Catherine Herridge of Fox News, who reported that a Libyan ship docked in Turkey days before the Benghazi attacks was allegedlytransporting weapons. A consequence of the attack was the cessation of that covert operation, which had allegedly been run by CIA Director David Petraeus.


Petraeus meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davotoglu in 2011.

A couple of months after the Benghazi attacks, Mouaz Moustafa, the executive director for the Syrian Emergency Task Force (SETF) attended a Friends of Syria meeting in Paris according to his group’s website. The website underwent quite an overhaul when its political director Elizabeth O’Bagy found controversy after the chemical attack that occurred in Syria last year, as reported by After leaving SETF, Senator John McCain curiously hired O’Bagy as a Legislative Assistant.

Mouaz Moustafa and U.S. Senator John McCain in Syria.

Less than one year after the Benghazi attacks, the U.S. Congress approved a deal that would ship arms to Syrian rebels. At the time, O’Bagy said of the deal:

“…I wonder how much of this is simply an announcement of what they’ve already been doing on the ground,” referring to pre-existing administration efforts to encourage Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey to ship weapons into the country with assistance from the U.S.”

That comports with the explosive findings of veteran journalist Seymour Hersh that describe what the Benghazi Annex was being used for prior to the attacks, according to a ‘highly classified annex’ to a Senate Committee Report that explained the details of a deal between Obama and Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. It was about the weapons trafficking operation:

By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar… The operation was run by David Petraeus.

Congress agreed to officially ship arms to Syrian rebels after being lobbied hard by the SETF and the Syrian Support Group (SSG).

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Mike Rogers expressed concern over where the weapons would eventually end up but signed off on the deal anyway.

A man named Mazen Asbahi sits on the Board of SSG. He was ironically jettisoned from the Obama campaign in 2008 as Muslim outreach adviser because of his time serving on a Board with radical Islamic cleric Jamal Said, who has close connections to Hamas. At the time, CAIR-Chicago’s Executive Director Ahmed Rehabdefended both Asbahi and Said (CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood front group):

Despite these connections, Asbahi has been an effective lobbyist for Syrian jihadists who seek to take back the Golan Heights from Israel.

As this lobbying was going on, Friends of Syria held a meeting in Turkey. Those present included Al-Khatib, the Obama administration’s handpicked choice at the time to be the face of a post-Assad government in Syria, as reported by It was after this meeting that Al-Khatib announced his resignation for the second time. Reports indicate that he did so out of frustration over the inability of the Friends of Syria to ship weapons to the rebels.

The decision by the Obama administration to negotiate with Al-Khatib as a Syrian leader is disturbingly revealing. The administration attempted to give the extremely anti-Semitic Al-Khatib a political facelift when, in reality, he’s a member of the Muslim Brotherhood who has referred to all Jews as “the enemies of Allah”. This view obviously comports with that of rebel division leader Ahmad Al-Sa’oud, who represents Syrian jihadists who recently began receiving shipments of advanced U.S. weaponry.

Just because al-Khatib resigned from that post doesn’t mean he’s out of the picture. Just this month, he was part of a delegation that visited Egypt recently to negotiate political solutions in Syria.

During a trip to Cairo that took place before the lobbying efforts of SETF and SSG had paid off, Al-Khatib was photographed with SETF’s Mouaz Moustafa and former chairman of the Dar al-Hijrah mosque Bassam Estwani, who serves on the Board of the SETF, and is connected to terrorism as reported [here,here, here, and here]:

This site wagers a challenge: if anyone can DISPROVE the inextricable relationships between Obama Inc. and the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, which have been consistently, repeatedly described at these pages, well, this individual is welcome to watch this blogger eat a plate of crow and dirt in their presence. And if they can’t afford the airfare to the Jewish homeland, well, we can do this over skype, or some such web-based forum. Will even issue a requisite mea culpa.

The bet is on…

SETF Executive Director Mouaz Moustafa (far left), al-Khatib (second from left) and Estwani (far right) in Cairo.


china buying us banks

ASIDE from all the geo-political reverberations – seismic-worthy – spanning from the bloody Islamic slaughters of Christians throughout the Mid East and Africa to Russia’s increasing “footprints” from the Ukraine to Iran, the fact of the matter is that China has been equally busy. Not only that, but the leadership of the free world is lending the Communist People’s Republic of China more than a helping hand. More like a lock, stock and barrel approach to scoop up America! This has been going on for years, but exponentially more so under the “(mis)management” of the Radical-in-Chief. Hmm.

Indeed, while only the comatose are unaware of China’s stranglehold on American debt, few are aware of its extent. Its global ramifications. Its blow back, straight onto the very lives of ordinary Americans. What’s going on?

Well, back in Jan. 2013, a dog’s age in geo-political manipulations,this site reported on the machinations afoot to sell off America to China:The Radical-in-Chief’s Sell Off – Literally – To Communist China…Bargain Basement Prices! Oh boy…

Now, follow the trail to a follow up commentary, one written in July 2013: PHASE TWO To ‘Deconstructing The U.S. Economy’: Gold Plunges 66%, Two Days Later JP Morgan’s MAIN Gold Warehouse Catches Fire. Coincidence? What’s Going On? Happenstance? The aforementioned report was then, and here we are now, 10 months later…and J P Morgan looms again!

The Chinese Are In the Process of Occupying Amerika

Dave Hodges

May 2014

The Common Sense Show

In order to keep its head about water for just one more day, the Federal Reserve has now permitted Chinese-controlled banks to take stakes in US banks. This is a nefarious invasion of the U.S. economy. Subsequently, we have witnessed a major shift in the percentage of the U.S.debt owned by Chinese vs. the Federal Reserve. This is the beginning of the end for the dollar, the U.S. economy, your standard of living, your assets, your freedoms and for many of you, your very lives.

China Owns the Federal Reserve and Here’s How It Happened

At the end of January 2009, the month President Barack Obama was first inaugurated, Communist China owned $744.2 billion in U.S. government debt and the Fed owned $475.129 billion. In May of 2012, the Federal Reserve has approved applications by three big Chinese government-controlled banks to set up branches and take stakes in US banks after deciding they were adequately regulated in their home market.

The Chinese ownership of U.S. debt, compared to the Federal Reserve, appears to be unchanged in 2014. However, the Chinese are slowly but surely acquiring the Federal Reserve and thus, are acquiring a greater amount of U.S. government debt. Therefore, much of the debtowned by the Federal Reserve, is now owned by the Chinese and their new partners consisting of two large Spanish banks, a German bank and the Chinese. The complete Chinese takeover of our economy is silent but undeniably insidious. It would be appropriate to think of this development as the United States government doing a debt consolidation of all its treasury bonds because it can no longer pay or service the debt and the Chinese and their partners are acquiring the assets of America for pennies on the dollar. It will soon be announced that China is in the process of purchasing major Western banks (e.g. Bank of America, Wells Fargo) and physical assets. These banks make up the majority owners of the Federal Reserve. By purchasing these banks as distressed properties, the Chinese, will in effect, have purchased the Federal Reserve because these banks own the Federal Reserve. surabachiFor the naysayers that will write to me and say there is no way that this will ever take place, I will respond by telling you that you are a day late and a “distressed dollar” short with your anxiety over the future of the American economy.

Late last year, China purchased the JP Morgan building in Manhattan for $725 million. This was a symbolic move like planting the U.S. flag on top of Iwo Jima’s Mount Surabachi during the famous WW II battle. This signified that the Chinese have laid claim to all assets in the United States. One might  reason that the Chinese have in fact purchased all of JP Morgan. When this happens in earnest, it will come in the midst of a dollar devaluation and we are only months away from this happening.

The Death of Our Asset Holdings

The Chinese yuan, also known as the renmimbi, is China’s national currency. The yuan has an important role in keeping China’s economy competitive. China keeps the yuan pegged to a basket of currencies, most notably the U.S. dollar. The yuan is worth a little more than fifteen cents.

This is all about to change. China has the ability to sell its Treasury holdings, putting the value of the U.S. dollar into free fall. However, it’s not in China’s best interests to do so. By threatening to sell U.S. Treasuries, China would quickly devalue its own holdings. Even so, it’s been unwise for the U.S. to allow itself to become so indebted to any other country. However, the Chinese now have partners who are willing to purchase U.S. treasuries and shoulder the burden of owning most of the U.S. debt which will result in the total collapse of the US economy. These large investors are busy purchasing the Federal Reserve through the back door. For example, the Spanish Bank, Banco, is purchasing Citigroup in Spain according to the Wall Street Journal. The buyoff of the major investors in the Federal Reserve is well underway. China, and their BRICS country allies, and a consortium of international interests (e.g. the previously identified Spanish and German banks), will through the I.M.F., manage the U.S. debt through exchange rate increases and trade tariffs.

Dr. Jim Garrow announced on my show that a devaluation is near as the dollar will soon be valued on a 6 to 1 ratio in favor of the Chinese renmimbi. Let’s talk about the ramifications of this event. If you own a mortgage on your home for $150,000, you now owe the Chinese interests controlling your bank, who holds your mortgage note, $900,000 dollars. If you owe the bank $20,000 for your automobile, following the 2014 dollar devaluation, you now owe $120,000.  Your grocery bill for your family just went up by a factor of six. What about your retirement and social security? What retirement and social security? Long before most of you will be able to collect, your retirement will collateralized against the debt. The same is true for your 401K and your saving account holdings. It would be wise to spend your money now on elements of survival that you will need.

There is also an important aspect that nobody is talking about. When the Chinese come to claim your home, your car and your retirement, what legal recourse will you have? The answer is you will have no due process rights because your economic situation will be adjudicated in accordance with Chinese law. Under Chinese law, you will truly have the right to remain silent. When one considers the net effect of this Chinese takeover of the Federal Reserve, it is not far-fetched to postulate that Americans will actually be starving to death.

It is completely understandable that Americans will be fleeing the country. However, the Chinese will no doubt put controls in place that may allow you to leave, but your assets will stay inside the country.

The Bigger Picture

Elements, not the entire government, have sold our country out. Reid, Feinstein, Clinton, Pelosi and of course, Obama, have committed treason against the United States by participating in this planned demise. Yes, the planned demise is in full view.

The Bundy Affair is the most significant event in present day America. It exposes the fact that the Chinese will soon control our new solar based energy delivery systems through the Solar Energy Zones. These Solar Energy Zones lie on top of an estimated $228 trillion dollars of underground mineral assets. They also lie adjacent to major military installations and international corridor of interstate highways which will all soon be controlled by the Chinese.

Please note that all the rising economies of the world are tying their currencies to gold as Dr. Garrow astutely pointed out on my show. The United States is not one of these countries. He is correct as the China and India have been trading in gold, as opposed to the dollar, for several years. The present set of events represents the fulfillment of our demise which has been planned by the global elite for quite some time. If there is a silver lining, America will soon shed much of its sheep’s wool and America will fight. Hence, the real reason behind Obama’s push for gun confiscation and the fact that John Kerry signed the UN gun ban treaty last year. Now that you know that the Chinese own the very clothes on your back, it is time to take a look at how the Chinese will soon be exerting complete dictatorial control over the United States.

To date, we have largely been conquered by stealth. Soon, the specter of Chinese and Russian troops along with their DHS allies will be opposing Americans in the streets. This will be the topic of Part Three.

MOST intrinsically, the question becomes: why would U.S. leadership be on board with sinking America into such unsustainable debt – a sinkhole – knowing full well that a Chinese wolf – with others in tow – will come knocking down its financial door(s)? The answers are complex, but also quite simplistic in intent. This is not a contradiction in terms. Machiavellian too: ECONOMIC FIRESTORM:THE PLANNED DESTRUCTION OF THE U.S. ECONOMY; ITS KNOCK-ON FALLOUT!

WITH the above in mind, does it now make better sense as to why Chinese and Russian troops (others too) are firmly implanted on U.S. ground?    

Pre-designed collapse, or not? You decide.                                                                                                 




Packet given to kids at conference from “Boston GLASS” homosexual activist group includes oral sex instructions . . . and much more.

NONE of this site’s regular readership would ever imagine that a Russian poohbah would require protection herein. Well, color yourselves shocked. Floored too. Don’t keel over.

In fact, this blog is centered around exposing the red/green alliance, so much so that countless are beyond fuming at said truth telling. Regardless, there are always extenuating circumstances and this is one of those times.

Now, before we get to the heart of the matter, one has to internalize that America is in the vise-grip of revolutionary forces. They are equally as dangerous as those attributed to Putin’s Russia, as well as similarly imbued red regimes. Not only that, but a recent commentary revealed the symbiotic relationship between the two:OBAMA & PUTIN:RED TWINS SEPARATED AT BIRTH.POTUS PURPOSEFULLY TAXES A DIVE!

Nevertheless, while they are politically and ideologically aligned, there exists particular fissures, those which touch upon the definition of what constitutes a traditional family and all that it entails.

Most are also aware where the Degenerate-in-Chief aligns, and his alliances are clear as a bell:

Alliance One:

In the history of the United States of America, a nation built upon Judeo-Christian moorings, which POTUS is responsible for altering the underpinnings of the traditional family, one which has sustained the nation for its entirety:The Gay-in-Chief “Exposed” Himself Once Again: Excited About Knocking Down DOMA,. Made Time To Call Gay Couple. Why?


Not your father’s US Justice Department.Attorney General Eric Holder presents special award to transgender activist Diana Flynn, a man wearing women’s clothes, during the DOJ’s LGBT Pride Month program. At right is Chai Feldblum, radical lesbian activist and Commissioner of the EEOC.

Yes, we know that others will babble about “progress” and all that blah, blah hogwash . However, we also understand that radical revolutionaries must eviscerate traditional moorings to bring down America and rebuild from its ashes. We get that. And, Barack HUSSEIN Obama has been brought to power to usher in America’s demise. 

Alliance Two:

In this regard, what worse nightmare is there for traditional Americans than a “down low” POTUS, one whose proclivities are too yucky even to say aloud:The Continued Adventures of The “Down Low” POTUS & His (Previous) “Body Double”, Reggie Love!

Alliance Three:

And who doesn’t recall Rev Wright and his infamous “Church”:The “Down Low” POTUS And Rev Wright’s Guiding Hand: Trinity Church’s Many Secrets Stripped Naked!

Alliance Four:

Moreover, the spillage from the Degenerate-in-Chief’s activities hardly stays within the confines of his private life. That is hard enough to swallow. However, it is the kiddies who suffer, and this site is not referring to “his girls”:DEFILING The Kiddies Via “Koshering” Pedophilia: The Left’s Next Phase For Bringing Down America Midst Sexual Gratification/Perversion!

DUE to all of the above (and more), how many want any input, whatsoever, from the militant, radicalized Gay Lobby, regardless of their insertion into Russian affairs?


‘This is payback for Russian restrictions on abortion, pro-family initiatives’

Video included

A Russian lawmaker known for her outspoken support for traditional marriage and the unborn is among the officials listed in new U.S. sanctions against individuals for their alleged contribution to Russia’s unlawful grab of Ukrainian territory.

Weeks ago, President Obama announced sanctions aimed at several individuals for their alleged roles in facilitating Russia’s actions. But Yelena Mizulina’s seems out of place on the list. Mizulina is chairwoman of the Russian Duma’s Committee on Family, Women and Children’s Affairs.

She was also the lead sponsor of legislation banning Americans from adopting Russian orphans, fearing the children could suffer harm if adopted by homosexual partners.

In the documents outlining the sanctions, the allegations against Mizulina simply cite “her status as a state duma deputy.”

“Yelena Mizulina, as far as I know, has nothing to do with the controversy over the Crimea. She did sponsor a bill to make it easier for residents of the Crimea to have Russian citizenship. That was
before the Crimea was incorporated into Russia. Other than that, (she had) absolutely nothing to do with the Crimea,” said Don Feder, communications director for the World Congress of Families, which promotes traditional values around the globe.

“This is payback. This is payback for Russian restrictions on abortion. It’s payback for the child protection law. It’s payback for all the pro-family initiatives that the Russian people have undertaken in the last few years,” he said.

Feder said this story is another alarming example of who is calling the shots for the Obama administration.

“This administration is clearly controlled by the gay lobby. Whatever organized homosexuals want, the administration gives them. It was about a year or year-and-a-half ago that Obama announced that promoting gay rights abroad would be a major U.S. foreign policy initiative. You have to shake your head in wonder,” he said. “In fact, U.S. ambassadors have been ordered to march in gay pride parades all over the world, wherever they’re held.”

Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with Don Feder:

It’s a major shift in emphasis for Obama, who only embraced gay marriage publicly two years ago. Feder said it was a pragmatic move by the administration and not the result of any deep soul-searching.

“I think a lot of it has to do with funding. Remember that when Obama ran for president in 2008, he said while he was sympathetic to gay rights, he believed that marriage was between a man and a woman. Then at the beginning of 2012, at the beginning of his re-election campaign, suddenly he decided that he was in favor of gay marriage. What changed?” asked Feder.

“Obviously nothing, it was expediency. He was told by certain gay donors if he didn’t begin supporting gay marriage, they would withhold their donations. On that basis, Obama decided to have this very convenient change of heart. I think that supporting homosexual marriage … has always been Obama’s position. I think he adopted the one man-one woman (position) in 2008 as a matter of expediency. So part of it is Obama’s natural philosophical inclination on social issues and part of it is expediency,” he said.

According to Feder, the impact of the sanctions will be minimal. He said they will restrict Mizulina’s travel but will not impact her legislative work at all. In addition, he said any intended message sent through these sanctions will fall on deaf ears with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“I think Putin feels the sanctions are a joke. It gives [Obama] an opportunity to say to the people who are pressuring him to do more, ‘Look, I have this list of people that I’ve applied sanctions to,’” Feder said.

“It’s sort of like his famous red line. He’ll say, ‘I’ve drawn a red line and if Syria crosses the red line there are going to be serious consequences.’ So Syria crosses the red line and the serious
consequences are Obama drawing another red line. I don’t think Putin takes any of it seriously. In fact, I don’t think he takes our president seriously,” he said.

But what about Mizulina’s impact on Americans’ efforts to adopt Russian orphans? Many Americans on all sides of the gay marriage and gay adoption debates were frustrated by Russia putting a halt to them, even for traditionally married couples. Feder wholeheartedly endorses Mizulina’s actions.

“I think her position is absolutely right. The Russians are very traditional people. They have a strong religious orientation. They haven’t gotten caught up in the whole politically correct thing that has captured so many people in this country, that homosexuality is essentially the same as heterosexuality, that it’s genetically determined and what’s called discrimination against gays is the same as discrimination against a racial minority,” Feder said.

“The Russian people don’t feel that way. They don’t want to see Russian children placed with homosexuals,” he said. “Frankly, I don’t blame them.”

EVERYONE who can see the forest from the trees understands why America’s traditional underpinnings are purposefully falling down, one root at a time. And it is beyond Orwellian that the so-called leadership of the free world is busy targeting those in Putin’s Russia, who seek to protect that which used to be America’s priority – family and children. Can you believe it?

Not only that, but a creeping totalitarian, fascist network of underlings are marching full force, ever since the Gay-in-Chief took office. Their militancy started decades ago, but their stridency has reached fevered pitch: meet the new fascists – and their victims!

Thus, if readers look around, wondering, who exactly is controlling Obama’s America, rest assured the answer is: the most radical, anti-American forces bar none, even compared to Putin’s Russia!! 

Perverts of the highest degree are running rampant in Obama’s America! Indeed, they are indubitably cut from the very same sick ilk; cultural Marxists within the (very real) movement to normalize pedophilia!



 The infamous “spontaneous” cause of combustion – the video made them do it!

This site has repeatedly written about several key intersecting themes – all of which are now coming full circle – with tie-ins re Benghazigate and other geo-political matters. And if it was up to the Renegade-in-Chief, rest assured, all the skeletons would stay buried; from those who willingly participated in certain crimes, to others who (literally) got caught in the crossfire.

However, in order to go from there to here, it is imperative to back-track, far enough to elicit relevant and pertinent factoids. Let’s call it our patriotic “background check investigation”.

Background Check One:

Aside from one’s visceral, creepy-feeling reaction – due to the CIA Chief’s perpetual satan-like stare – John O. Brennan requires special scrutiny, but not because he resembles the devil! Pinkie swears. 

So, to lend some underlying context, let’s segue to the patch quilt connection between Obama’s mysterious, non-transparent past and his CIA pick

More than likely, the “fixer” landed the top spot at the CIA via a quid pro quo. Rest assured, Brennan’s CEO post at the very same defense contractor which “caught” one of its employees breaching the  POTUS’s bonafides was no accident.

A supposed Republican, the only diff between Brennan and the POTUS is his affinity for drone strikes. Most significantly, they are in sync with the same Islamic patrons. Regardless, Brennan understands the value of “insurance policies”, so having the upper hand always helps in this and that, particularly when the POTUS is squeamish about certain “elimination” tactics and panders to a rabid left base. Hence, the need to breach. In reality, they only differ re tactics, but agree on who needs to come out on top – the Brotherhood Mafia. This is where Benghazigate intersects with the “video defense”.

Background Check Two:

As is usually the case, at least in criminal organizations – and Obama Inc. qualifies as such – what you think you know is little more than smoke and mirrors. In other words, while the crime boss operates in the shadows, many get whacked in the process. So too it is with the skulking hulk, Washington’s hit man, John O. Brennan, himself a Muslim convert! And while we will never know the exact scope of his/their criminal dealings, the fact of the matter is that they operate completely outside the “advice and consent” of Congress!

If that isn’t shocking enough, Brennan, as an almost de facto President of the United States, was secretly meeting with heads of state!According to top secret cables recently released by Wikileaks, Brennan in 2009 met with none other than the King of Saudi Arabia and then-President of Yemen Ali Abdullah SalehAnd these are just the heads of state that we know of!

Why was Brennan, then a low-level advisor to Barack Hussein Obama, secretly meeting with heads of state? Under what authority was (and probably still is) John Brennan waging secret wars in North Africa and the Middle East? Was this the real reason for the attack on the Benghazi consulate, as Benghazi: The Definitive Report makes clear? Does the intel that came out yesterday that Ambassador Christopher Stevens was murdered via lethal injection after a failed kidnapping attempt make sense in light of Brennan’s illegal involvement in Libya and attack of Ansar al-Sharia?

According to an “exclusive” by the Washington Times yesterday:

According to a March 14 posting on an al Qaeda-linked website, Dhual-Bajadinstated that Stevens was given a lethal injection that was overlooked during the autopsy. The “plan was based on abduction and exchange of high-level prisoners,” the terrorist wrote on the prominent jihadist Web forum Ansar al-Mujahideen Network. “However, the operation took another turn, for a reason God only knows, when one of the members of the jihadist cell improvised and followed Plan B.”


Background Check Three:

Do readers recall the “mysterious” death of Lieutenant Charles Harris Jr.? Oh dear. The poor shnook got caught up in more than he bargained for, and now he lies six feet under. Fingerprints galore.

Most intrinsically, Obama Inc’s bloody fingerprints – with the CIA as the main “fixers”… State, FBI, DHS were surely their back up teams – in Benghazigate could not have happened without shadowy insiders operating behind the scenes. It is this critical element which led to the “video made them do it” “defense” and the entire criminal cover up!  

Investigative Findings: Benghazi Video Linked To CIA?

18 May 2014: Based on my extensive 18-month investigation, it is my professional conclusion that the Internet video known as Innocence of Muslims, the video allegedly responsible for Middle East violence and more importantly, the September 11, 2012 attack in Benghazi that resulted in the death of four Americans can be directly tied to a covert intelligence operation and operational assets of the U.S. Department of Justice. Additionally, the individuals and entities responsible for the Internet promotion of the video of that name can be traced not just to an intelligence operation contemporaneous to the attacks, but to previous events of historical significance and current relevance.

Investigation found that the video cited as the cause for the attack in Benghazi and riots in the Middle East underwent at least four name changes, including Desert Warrior, The innocence of bn Laden, The Real Life of Muhammad, and finally, Innocence of Muslims. Investigation also found evidence that the primary individual behind the film worked as an operational asst for the FBI in exchange for leniency due to his criminal past. Indications of a possible association by one or more of the individuals responsible for the film to U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA, are also suggested.

This investigator also found evidence that suggests that the Internet promotion of the video is linked to at least one entity with ties to government subcontractors. That is, an analysis of electronic footprints of the video trailer under the title Innocence of Muslims, which existed in virtual obscurity for a significant period from its production until September 11, 2012, has been traced to a now defunct Internet YouTube news channel that appears connected to the company formerly known as Stanley, Inc., a subcontractor to various agencies of the U.S. Federal Government that provided products and services to the U.S. military, the U.S. State Department and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, among others. Stanley, Inc. was acquired by the CGI Group in 2010.

It is relevant to note that Stanley, Inc., based in Arlington, Virginia, was awarded a $164 million contract to print new U.S. passports in 2006. It is even more important to point out that two employees of Stanley, Inc., along with a third individual employed by another defense contractor identified as The Analysis Corporation, were identified as the perpetrators who breached the records of the U.S. passport office on three occasions in 2008 and “improperly accessed” the passport records of Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain. The breaches occurred on January 9, February 21 and March 14, 2008.

Investigation verified that the CEO of the Analysis Corporation at the time of the passport office break-in was John O. Brennan, who served as a close advisor to Obama in 2008 on matters of intelligence and foreign policy. Brennan also contributed to Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign and had a 25-year career in the CIA. John O. Brennan is now the head of the CIA under Obama.

It is here that we must recall that at the time of the passport office break-in, Barack Hussein Obama was on the campaign trail as the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee. The news of the breach was made public within a week of the last intrusion, and a week later, on March 21, 2008, Obama was asked for his reaction by ABC News Jake Tapper while campaigning. Obviously, Obama now officially knows that the public has been informed about the level of the breach, and that Obama’s personal and confidential biographical information, in addition to his international travels was apparently “accessed.”

It is important to note that that the files accessed included Obama’s personal passport and not limited to his diplomatic passport.

On April 8, 2008, Obama continued to comment on the fact that the confidentiality of his passport records were apparently compromised. It was on this occasion when Obama admitted, for the first time in any public venue as a presidential candidate, that he traveled to Pakistan in 1981. It is reasonable to wonder whether Obama would have disclosed his Pakistan trip at this time had it not been for the uncertainty that the information was already “in play.”

Even ABC News appeared surprised at this sudden and unexpected revelation, considering all of the talk about Pakistan and U.S. foreign policy during the previous several months. Research shows that Obama did not disclose this trip at any time during any policy discussions or debates prior to the passport office breach.

It is also important to point out that during the investigation of the breach of the passport office records, the Washington Times reported that “officials do not know whether information was improperly copied, altered or removed from the database during the intrusions” [Emphasis added]. As time progressed, however, so did the leaks. It was reported that at least one employee within the U.S. State Department shared passport information with a man identified as Lieutenant Charles Harris Jr.

My investigation suggests that Harris was the intended recipient of stolen credit card information from the State Department employee, but received more than what he bargained for. When he realized the scope of the crime and the explosive nature of the information he possessed, he turned to investigators for protection. He also began to talk with investigators and ultimately, made a deal with federal prosecutors.

Before he could make good on his deal, Lieutenant Quarles Harris Jr. was found shot to death in his car on April 17, 2008, just over a month after the last breach. He was found in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in the northeast section of Washington. He had been shot in the head.

The murder of Harris remains unsolved, and the official narrative of that murder is that Harris was either a victim of random violence, or his murder was a result of a “street deal gone bad.”

Clearly, investigation into the video and those individuals and entities behind the video known as Innocence of Muslims has found tentacles that reach far beyond the Benghazi attacks. There seems to be a connection, born out of electronic footprints, to our own intelligence agencies in the creation and promotion of this video as outlined above.


Following the announcement to establish a Congressional Select Committee on Benghazi and in response to recently released documents to Judicial Watch, numerous government officials and media pundits have “doubled down” on the narrative that an anti-Muslim movie ultimately titled Innocence of Muslims was the proximate cause for the attacks in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012 that killed four Americans, including a U.S. Ambassador. To stipulate that the video played a primary role in the attack and murder in Benghazi, therefore, is to require it to be properly characterized as critical evidence in a criminal act of international terror. Accordingly, the video, and anyone involved in its funding, production and dissemination must be subjected to extensive investigation as it must be classified as evidence in a multiple homicide stemming from an attack on U.S. property located on foreign soil. To date, no meaningful investigation has been conducted.

Since the Benghazi attacks, officials at the highest levels of our government, supported and even in some instances, facilitated by many in the media and political pundits, have identified the film as the primary and sole motive behind the attack and the murders. As referenced above, evidence of such facilitation was further confirmed in a series of 41 documents secured by Judicial Watch pertaining to Benghazi on April 18, 2014.

Among those documents include a recently declassified e-mail originating from then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials “attempting to orchestrate a campaign to ‘reinforce’ President Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being ‘rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.”[1][emphasis by this author]

It is relevant to point out that Ben Rhodes, now Obama’s deputy national security advisor, is the brother of CBS News president David Rhodes. As the e-mail ‘thread’ details, Ben Rhodes was instrumental in changing the talking points used by administration spokesmen immediately following the attack in Benghazi. It would appear that a prima facie case now exists that places the origins of emphasis and blame on an Internet video originated at the White House level, pursuant to the instructions or with the imprimatur of Obama or one of his stand-ins. The message was merely conveyed by Rhodes, who would likely lack operational authority to make such a decision, according to multiple sources interviewed for this investigation.

In criminal cases and in modern popular culture that includes television, movies and detective novels, motive is one of three aspects of a broader summation of a crime that is used to establish, in part, the determination of guilt of a suspect or suspects. We often hear of “motive, means and opportunity” as a “three-legged stool” on which the guilt or innocence of suspects might rest. With respect to Benghazi, the motive for the attacks has been persistently identified as the creation and distribution of the film Innocence of Muslims.

For the specific benefit of anyone who maintains the belief that the film was the motive behind the attack and murders, the following represents the findings from my research and investigation. For the benefit of anyone who believes otherwise, the following should serve as confirmation that the film was a convenient, albeit planned cover story that had its origins deep within the mechanics of covert intelligence operations.

Summary of Findings


Based on extensive investigation and research in my capacity as an investigator and investigative journalist, it is my professional opinion that blaming the Internet video for the attack at Benghazi is plagued by at least three major irreconcilable inconsistencies that appear to lack any credible explanations in the context of motive:

1. The suppositious relationship between the alleged creator of the video, including others reportedly involved in its funding, creation, distribution and promotion, to U.S. federal intelligence agencies and related government subcontractors. The intelligence agencies include the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);

2. The extemporaneous timing and method of the film’s distribution;

3. The post-event use of the film by government officials and their spokespersons as a ready-made, readily accessible asset of otherwise limited prominence to divert attention away from the actual nature of the attack in its immediate aftermath.

Several investigations have already been performed by various oversight committees, including the often cited Accountability Review Board (ARB), yet none of the issues listed above have been addressed or investigated in any meaningful depth or fashion.

Supplemental note regarding video-spurred violence: Deceptive characterization of attack site

It is important to note that while the primary issue of focus has been that of inadequate security at diplomatic facilities (i.e. embassies and consulates) particularly in the Middle East, the attack occurred at an unmarked, nondescript location that effectively served as a CIA operations center and logistics facility for the covert transfer of arms and personnel throughout North Africa.

There were no American flags flying outside of the compound, and nothing iconic was overtly displayed that would readily identify this location as official U.S. property conducting normal embassy or consulate business. Therefore, to suggest that this site would be a logical target for a demonstration by Muslims upset over an insulting video is disingenuous at best, and represents an intentional deception that could only be purveyed by individuals who fully understood the precise reason for the existence of this compound.

The initial descriptions of the attack occurring at an embassy, then a consulate, and finally a “mission” were deliberately misleading. The compound was none of those, and this fact was known from the beginning. The false descriptions were used to (1) hide the true nature and use of the CIA compound in Benghazi, and (2) to reinforce the government’s position that the video caused sufficient and spontaneous violence beyond what could be reasonably anticipated or controlled.

While the issue of security failures and lapses might indeed have merit in the broader context of U.S. diplomatic facilities in the Middle East, to apply those talking points to this compound is an intentional redirection and sleight of hand deception designed to focus attention away from the real issues.

The Filmmaker…..

The Facilitator…..

The video chronology….

Online/Digital forensic investigation….

False fallout….continue connecting the dots here

Besides, the CIA’s underbelly has been demonstrably gutted, not by someone from the outside, but by a DEEP cover insider. Folks, when “the agency” veers off the American path, it is lethal to each and every U.S. citizen, regardless of their service to the country. This is a fact.

In the main, readers are free to believe that the orchestrated treacheries, from the hellish bowels of Obama Inc., are merely coinquidinks. That the interlocking trails leading straight back to the White House…to the FBI…CIA…the “contractor”…aka the “shredder” (CGI to Accenture)…are simply happenstance. Whatever floats your boat.


 ‘The Black Flag of Jihad’

WHILE a resurgent Russian bear, in tandem with an imposing China, threatens the west (particularly America), the fact of the matter is that the right leader – no pun intended – can counter them. Reagan was one such example, as well as others. However, that was then and this is now. Americans are literally being squeezed, sandwiched, between the reds and the greens! Nevertheless, do not think, even for a nanosecond, that Barack HUSSEIN Obama is upset with their ultimate goals; the knock down of America as a super power. He is in bed with them.

Consequentially, in light of the fast changing geo-political landscape, it is of utmost urgency to come to grips with the greater menace – Islam. Despite all the realities at hand, too many westerners lull themselves into a false sense of “reality”, hoping to buy off adherents to Islam with extended hands of friendship, as if this peace-seeking wish is worth a damn.

Realistically, those who are devoted to Islam are unable to accept said outstretched hand, simply because they are mandated not to. Embracing Islam IS to submit to the will of Allahعرض…

The Quran Says that Non-Muslims Should Not be Taken as Friends

Given that Allah hates non-Muslims to the extent that he would prevent them from knowing the truth, cause them to err and then condemn them to eternal torture for their unbelief and misdeeds, it would make little sense if he intended Muslims to treat unbelievers by the same standards that they treat each other here on earth.

The Quran says that no true Muslim would ever love anyone who resists Islam, even if it is a family member:

Thou wilt not find any people who believe in Allah and the Last Day, loving those who resist Allah and His Messenger, even though they were their fathers or their sons, or their brothers, or their kindred. (58:22)

There are at least nine places in the Quran where believers are warned not to befriend non-Muslims:

O ye who believe! Take not for friends unbelievers rather than believers: Do ye wish to offer Allah an open proof against yourselves? (4:144

In fact, anyone who does take a non-Muslim as a friend could be accused of being an unbeliever as well:

O ye who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for friends. They are friends one to another. He among you who taketh them for friends is (one) of them. Lo! Allah guideth not wrongdoing folk. (5:51)

Note that Christians, according to the Quran, are included in the ranks of “unbelievers”:

They indeed have disbelieved who say: Lo! Allah is the Messiah, son of Mary (5:17)

Muhammad said that unbelievers have it out for Muslims.  They may appear harmless or friendly, but, in reality, they harbor corruption and evil intentions:

O ye who believe! Take not into your intimacy those outside your ranks: They will not fail to corrupt you. They only desire your ruin: Rank hatred has already appeared from their mouths: What their hearts conceal is far worse (3:118)

For the Unbelievers are unto you open enemies (4:101)

As for them, they are but plotting a scheme (86:15)

Those outside of Islam are really helpers of evil against Allah:

The Misbeliever is a helper (of Evil), against his own Lord! (25:55)

The Quran says that “hostility and hate” will exist between Muslims and infidels “for ever” until the latter “believe in Allah alone.” (60:4)

Instead of befriending non-Muslims, the Quran encourages hostility.  Muslims are ordered to fight unbelievers:

O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty.(9:123)

The Quran tells Muslims that they will spend eternity laughing at unbelievers (83:34) and mocking their suffering as they are tortured in Hell:

And the dwellers of the garden will call out to the inmates of the fire: Surely we have found what our Lord promised us to be true; have you too found what your Lord promised to be true? They will say: Yes. Then a crier will cry out among them that the curse of Allah is on the unjust. (7:44) – Muhammad got an early start on this by personally mocking his dead enemies following the Battle of Badr (Ibn Ishaq 454)

One does not befriend those over whose suffering they will later rejoice, nor does it make any sense that Muslims would befriend those whom the Quran labels “enemies of Allah” by virtue of their unbelief. 

Let this incontrovertible fact sink in: those who follow Islam, Shariah Law, internalize the above mandate (and the rest of the Koran/hadiths) as an immutable dictate. Thus, does anyone truly think that steeped believers will disabuse Allah’s will? Asked and answered.

Nevertheless, before we delve any further, no one should dare opine: such talk is hateful against Muslims….blah…blah…yada yada too. As a matter of fact, the aforementioned truth-telling is not only mandatory for the west, but for all Muslims who are slaughtered under the boot of Islam, for whatever “infraction” they are deemed “guilty” of. So, don’t even go there…

Islamophobia - 4


And, if more is needed to prove the futility of said conciliatory hallucinations, well, perhaps this will disabuse said thinking – or not – 

“A single bullet will strike ur (sic) head one day [admin] from a jihadist. Insha-Allah,” one threat read. Another Facebook user with a Muslim name threatened to cut off administrators’ heads if they continued to post articles in a rant too profane to quote here. Yet another person threatened to blackmail one of the administrators.

“I am giving u (sic) warning,” said another person. “Stop this page.”

According to the group, one administrator received several threatening phone calls, with some including a Muslim prayer in Arabic. He reported it to the police, they said, but nothing was done. Just this week, they added, he received two threatening calls.

Adina Kutnicki, an investigative journalist based in Israel, said she has been harassed on Facebook by an individual she identified as Iranian Mohamed Erdem.

“Back off you satanist scum of the earth! You want war, war with me!” he told Kutnicki on Facebook. The threats she received from Erdem was so alarming, she added, that “heavy duty counter terror contacts decided to ‘check things out.'”

The face of another administrator was photo-shopped into a Nazi uniform and added to a Facebook post intended to incite harassment. Another picture depicted Kutnicki superimposed on a nuclear mushroom cloud with a warning that Israel would be destroyed and wiped off the map.

Folks, this is serious sh-t…listen up….      

“A Radical Muslim’ is a ‘Practicing Muslim’, a ‘Moderate Muslim’ is a ‘non Practicing Muslim’ or otherwise known as an Apostate of Islam…The penalty for Apostasy under Sharia law is Death”   
Dave Gaubatz

“Destroy the Islamic ideology worldwide and we will have peace worldwide” Dave Gaubatz

“Islam is an economic, military, and political ideology, that uses religions as a method to obtain their ultimate goal: Islamic Ummah (Nation)Worldwide and under Sharia law” 

“CAIR has a larger and more dependable ‘Confidential Informant’ Network’ than our entire FBI Department.  CAIR has devoted non Muslim people within local, state, and federal government.  They have police officers in high positions, medical personnel, military personnel, and most importantly they have Pastors, Ministers, and Rabbi’s. 

“We are not at war with Al Qaeda, Hamas, The Taliban, or other Islamic terrorist groups.  We are at war with Islam itself and the groups that emerge from the violent ideology of Islam are our secondary enemies”.

Islam Can’t Be Reformed

By: Dave Gaubatz

19 May 2014

Today I received about 25 emails asking me if Islam can be reformed.  Specifically they wanted to know if a Muslim could follow Islam and not Shariah law.  They said a well known counter-terrorism expert who was recently on the radio said a Muslim could set aside Shariah law and still be a good Muslim.  I laughed and laughed when I heard this.  The people who say this are the ‘Medical Quacks’ of the 1800’s.  They will give their audience anything for a few pennies.

This was my basic answer to the separation of Shariah from Islam:

“There is no Islam without Shariah law. One can’t separate the two. There is no Christianity without the Ten Commandments, and the same goes for Islam. The alleged counter-terrorism experts who say a person can be a follower of Islam, yet does not practice Shariah, should be tuned out. They are hurting the educational awareness of understanding ‘Pure Islam’. Islam was founded on the sayings and actions of Prophet (Pseudo) Mohammed. He is the example for all Muslims to follow. If a Muslim denies the sayings and actions of Mohammed, he/she has committed both ‘Blasphemy and Apostasy’. Dave Gaubatz, Author ‘Muslim Mafia’” 

Islamic leaders put out material distributed from Pakistan, India, and Saudi Arabia detailing the specifics of how a ‘Pure Muslim’ should lead their lives in accordance with Shariah law. A Muslim can’t pick and choose which aspects of Shariah they want to adhere to and which ones they prefer not. A Muslim is either Shariah compliant or they are not. In other words, they either practice Shariah law or they are non practicing Muslims. If a Muslim does not adhere at least in his or her heart to all aspects of Shariah law, they are considered Apostates by their leaders. This is a death sentence for them regardless of what country they reside in. Islam and Shariah law have no boundaries. Boundaries are man-made specifically by Jews and Christians, and in the hearts of Muslims they are meaningless. 

The following three requirements are directly from Islamic leaders/Imams from whom my research team and I have received advice over the last three years. The intelligence I collect is always first-hand intelligence.


1.  Islam is not a religion. Islam is a political, economic, and military ideology. Religion within Islam is used as a tactic to achieve the ultimate goal of Islam which is an Islamic Ummah (nation) worldwide and under Sharia law.


2.  Shariah law is an all or nothing. A Muslim can’t pick and choose which parts of Sharia they desire to adhere to. 90% of Shariah law may be peaceful, but it is the 10% that innocent people must ‘fear’. This part pertains to the intolerance of other religions, the hatred of Jews, Christians, and even Muslims who do not adhere to Shariah law, and physical Jihad. All Muslims are not required to physically fight their enemies, but ‘All’ Muslims must assist in equipping and financing their brothers and sisters who are engaged in physical Jihad. For a Muslim to choose not to do so equate to him/her being an Apostate of Islam; again this is a death sentence for the accused.


3.  The innocent people of all races, religions, and cultures are at war with Islam. This is the hardest and most difficult concept for people to understand. The Muslims who committed murder on 11 Sept. 2001 were doing so in the name of Islam. The 4000 plus men and women who have been murdered in Iraq and Afghanistan were killed in the name of Islam. Maj. Hassan from Ft. Hood who killed several people did so in the name of Islam. The same materials being studied by Hamas, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and the Taliban are the exact materials being distributed across America and provided to innocent young Muslim children to study in order to be ‘Pure Muslim’.

During the last year I have met with thousands of Patriots around the world.  I have had one main goal.  I want people to realize there is no peace in Islam.  Islam and Shariah law are very dangerous and one need only look around the world each day to confirm this.  When an alleged counter-terrorism expert tells you there is a peaceful side to Islam and Shariah law can be discarded by a Muslim they are doing this for one of four possible reasons:

1.  They are incompetent 
2.  They are playing the Political Correctness Game
3.  They are playing the Middle of The Road Game so as not to distance themselves from the actors and actresses of the media, politicians, and from Conservative ‘Reformers’
4.  They do not want to upset the many millions of people who will donate to them if they do not go to far off the liberal course in explaining Islam
In closing:  We will be defeated by the Islamic ideology and it’s followers if we do not define Islam for what it is.  Islam has been dangerous for over 1400 years and it can’t be changed.
I explain Islam using first hand evidence.  Since I started my crusade to expose Islam I have always done so in a purely journalistic manner.  I report facts: It is no concern to me if I offend the actors and actresses of the media, I do not care if I offend law enforcement who side with Islamic terrorists more than they do innocent Americans, I do not care if I offend politicians from the left or right, I do not care if I offend non profit 501 organizations from the left or right, I especially don’t care if I offend America’s number one Muslim Brotherhood Supporter Barack Hussein Obama. 
I lose many donations because of my straight forward reporting.  I only conduct first-hand research because I want Americans and others to know ‘Pure Islam’. When I can I use my own meager funds.  There are a few that donate for me to conduct research in their areas.  For those who would rather donate to alleged counter-terrorism experts who are hurting our country more than helping, this does not offend me.  Anyone who spouts off lies about the alleged peaceful side of Islam is hurting not only America, but the innocent people worldwide.  They are hurting the future of our children.  There is no excuse for this.
My message:  Condemn the Islamic ideology and it’s leaders/supporters as haters of the free world. 

ASIDE from all the truths laid out by Dave Gaubatz, as long as Islam can maintain its religious-based cloak of armor, well, nothing short of the full eradication of the west – and by then it will be too late! – will convince multi-culti ideologues.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s plan for America was found in an internal Brotherhood document and presented into evidence during the Holy Land Foundation terror financing trials in 2007 and 2008.

“The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and by the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Let’s face reality – however uncomfortable and harsh it is – instead of burying ourselves in the process: does anyone really believe, if Islamic adherents had their druthers, they wouldn’t implant their boot of Shariah Law all over the west’s throat? If the answer is still negative, there is nothing else to talk about. Alas, good luck with said fantasies, but don’t forget to turn the (western) lights off on your way out!




Facebook Yanks, Restores Anti-Islam Page After Admins Receive Death Threats…Adina Kutnicki

MANY of the readers are aware of this site’s association with Islam Exposed Online. I am its Israel Administrator.

In this regard, the following article is more than germane. It speaks for itself.

Facebook yanks, restores anti-Islam page after admins receive death threats

Is Facebook okay with death threats from Islamists? That’s the question administrators of “Islam Exposed” asked earlier this week. After administrators received a number of threatening messages, Facebook pulled the page, citing “harassment,” but restored the page on Tuesday, telling it “was removed in error.”

Administrators were extremely grateful to see the page restored, but questions regarding the threats remained. Would Facebook take action against those issuing the threats? The social media site did not say, but the group did not wait and filed complaints with the FBI.

“A single bullet will strike ur (sic) head one day [admin] from a jihadist. Insha-Allah,” one threat read. Another Facebook user with a Muslim name threatened to cut off administrators’ heads if they continued to post articles in a rant too profane to quote here. Yet another person threatened to blackmail one of the administrators.

“I am giving u (sic) warning,” said another person. “Stop this page.”

According to the group, one administrator received several threatening phone calls, with some including a Muslim prayer in Arabic. He reported it to the police, they said, but nothing was done. Just this week, they added, he received two threatening calls.

Adina Kutnicki, an investigative journalist based in Israel, said she has been harassed on Facebook by an individual she identified as Iranian Mohamed Erdem.

“Back off you satanist scum of the earth! You want war, war with me!” he told Kutnicki on Facebook. The threats she received from Erdem was so alarming, she added, that “heavy duty counter terror contacts decided to ‘check things out.'”

The face of another administrator was photo-shopped into a Nazi uniform and added to a Facebook post intended to incite harassment. Another picture depicted Kutnicki superimposed on a nuclear mushroom cloud with a warning that Israel would be destroyed and wiped off the map.

All of these incidents have been reported to Facebook, they said, but the social media giant has so far done nothing. Instead of punishing those actually making the threats, Facebook responded by retaliating against the victims. Unfortunately, this is not all that uncommon.

Last August, for example, we reported that a conservative female said she was targeted with explicit threats of death and rape from users with Muslim-sounding names, but Facebook dismissed them. According to that user, Facebook responded with a private email saying they could not confirm the threats violated their community standards. One threat reported to Facebook was quite specific: “We will kill you.”

At the time, Facebook told The Blaze it not only supports freedom of speech but enforces its standards uniformly across the board.

“We review every piece of content that is reported to us or flagged in the system and each one is held to the same exact standard – as is every person who uses our service and we will enforce our Statement of Rights and Responsibilities equally,” a Facebook spokesperson said.

But the administrators we spoke to — along with many hundreds of others who have reached out to Examiner over the last two years — dispute that. For Kutnicki and others, the issue is Facebook’s willingness to turn a blind eye to those who attack Jews and Israel while hammering anyone who even mentions Islam in a post.





US soldiers, along with Afghan Local Police (ALP), climb a hillock to access the Surech check post during a patrol in Kush Kunar District in the province of Nangarhar©AFP

It is not for nothing that countless scandals are erupting under the reign of Barack HUSSEIN Obama. Despite the growing list of treachery, many millions of American citizens become especially enraged, when its fighting forces are defamed and mistreated – by those sworn to have their backs! Such is the unending tragedy, under the boot of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, regardless of his blatherings, that, he too “appreciates” the sacrifices of American soldiers. Bullshit.

Obama Inc’s list, re their backstabbing of patriots, is endless. Yet, there is a common theme, a dark undertone: disdain for America’s soldiers, the symbol of U.S. hyper-power.

Along this trajectory, it is a fact that the army’s “down-sizing”, really its castration, is taking place under the regime’s hatchet. Not only that, as radical leftists are wont to opine, “downsizing” (in actuality, deconstruction) has everything to do with empty coffers. P L E A S E. For if this is even remotely true, how could it be that money ALWAYS magically appears, to fund green schemes and every other radical left pet project? Moreover, where is the money coming from to fund this and that overseas Islamic “outreach” and the “gifting” of heavy weaponry

Back to the dying vets…and Obama Inc.’s absolute hand in their demise….

Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh on Monday blasted the Veterans Administration as a “death panel being done on purpose” as the investigation into secret waiting lists and backlogs causing unnecessary deaths expanded to 19 states.

“These people are special. These are soldiers. They’re special. They got wounded in action … defending this country on missions assigned by their commander-in-chief and other commanding officers,” Limbaugh said.

“Now we learn of these deaths by attrition, secret waiting lists, and this is the real bad thing of it. People on these lists assume that they’re being moved ahead of the line. That’s the purpose of the secret list, that they’re going to really be taken care of. Because the backlog is so jammed, the line for treatment at the VA is so long that they’ve come up with this secret list business, and the people on that list think that they’re essentially being moved to the top of the class, or the head of the line, in front of the line. And they’re just being ignored,” he said.

He said it appears the death toll, combining various reports, has passed 100 victims.

“It’s simply unconscionable. So you have to ask, the natural assumption is that nobody wants these people to die, even if you add the death panel component, nobody wants these people to die, yet they are. At the very least what we’re dealing with here is a total inability to deal with this. And at worst it’s the death panel being done on purpose.”

He said he knows some people won’t recognize the death panel aspect, “even though the evidence is pretty clear.”

But if the above isn’t clear enough, well, this site pointed out their dangerous proclivities, predisposed towards active duty soldiers, as well as vets. The following was a foreshadowing:

Foreshadowing One:

What kind of monstrous regime places a bulls eye on the backs of vets and patriots?

Foreshadowing Two:

Moreover, when U.S. warrior of warriors, its SEALS, are stomped upon like yesterday’s garbage, what else does one expect their treatment of “regular” vets will be?

Foreshadowing Three:

Adding insult to grave injury, officers alike are placed in mortal danger! On the other hand, Muslim soldiers/officers are handled with kid gloves. Can you believe it? You better.

Foreshadowing Four:

As detailed, whatever the case, Obama Inc. plans to take down vets and patriots, even usurping the IRS to do its dirty work!

In this regard, why not get rid of as many vets as possible, scandal be damned?

Veterans scandal risks engulfing Obama

Amid contrived outrage over Benghazi and the improving fortunes of its healthcare reform, the Obama administration could be facing a genuine scandal about its treatment of military veterans that has the potential to attract broad political condemnation of its competence.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is facing mounting evidence that some of the hospitals it runs have been keeping two sets of books to make it look as if they were reducing waiting times to see a doctor.

 More damning, the department is investigating the claims of a whistleblower doctor in Arizona that dozens of patients at one hospital died while they were languishing on a hidden waiting list without ever being given an appointment.

Richard Griffin, the department’s acting inspector general, admitted on Thursday that its review could lead to criminal charges. In the first political casualty of the scandal, Robert Petzel, the department’s undersecretary for heath, resigned on Friday.

If the evidence of mismanagement continues to accumulate, the Obama administration will find itself not in another partisan knife-fight, but under fire from both parties in a Congress where the uniformed military is venerated.

The veterans’ healthcare scandal is, in part, one of the unintended consequences of the wars in Afghanistan in Iraq, which have created “our 9/11 generation who have served with honour in more than a decade of war,” as President Barack Obama described them on Thursday.

More than 970,000 veterans from those wars have filed disability claims, taking the total enrolled in the VA system to 8.57m by the end of 2012.

At the same time, the healthcare system is dealing with the fact that many of the 6m veterans from the Vietnam era are now reaching the age when they start to require a lot of medical services. In 2010, the administration expanded coverage to exposure from Agent Orange, the chemical used during the war in Vietnam, prompting another surge of claimants.

The result has been a constant struggle to meet new demands, despite big spending increases. The budget for the VA has risen from $73.1bn in 2006 to $153.8bn this year. However, the number of outpatient visits at its facilities has increased from 46.5m in 2002 to 83.6m in 2012. “I am amazed this is still happening, given the big increase in resources that the department has received,” said Phillip Carter, a former army officer who researches veterans’ issues at the Center for a New American Security in Washington.

I am amazed this is still happening, given the big increase in resources that the department has received– Phillip Carter, Center for a New American Security

The VA, which runs 152 hospitals and 817 outpatient clinics, has long suffered from delays and a dysfunctional bureaucracy. In 2010, it introduced a new appointments system which promised a 14-day wait for an appointment with a primary care doctor or a specialist.

While there have been reports for several years that the new waiting line system was being abused, the subject really began to gather steam three weeks ago when CNN interviewed Sam Foote, who had recently retired as a doctor after working for 24 years for VA hospitals in Phoenix, Arizona.

He said that as many as 40 patients had died after being placed on a hidden waiting list that could last for up to a year, while officials at the hospital shredded documents and faked evidence to make it seem as if waiting times were under control.

Three officials in Phoenix have been put on leave, although Mr Griffin said there was no evidence yet that patients had died because of delayed appointments.

Since then, whistleblowers have alleged similar practices at least seven other VA hospitals around the country and claimed that officials at the hospitals were sometimes paid bonuses for reducing declared waiting times.

The political impact of the scandal has been somewhat muted so far, in part because of the respect still enjoyed by the veterans affairs secretary, retired four-star general Eric Shinseki who was himself wounded twice in Vietnam. Appearing before a Senate hearing on Thursday, Mr Shinseki received pointed questioning, but in a tone more respectful than almost any other cabinet member would have encountered. “I am mad as hell,” he told the committee.

However, if Congress concludes that efforts to manipulate waiting lists have become systemic – or if the allegations that patients died while waiting for phantom appointments are proved – Mr Shinseki will face huge pressure from both parties to resign.

Richard Blumenthal, a Democratic senator for Connecticut, said there was “solid evidence of wrongdoing within the VA system”, while his colleague from Washington Patty Murray told Mr Shinseki: “The standard practice at the VA seems to be to hide the truth.”

In a sign of how serious the White House believes the political fallout could become, the president’s deputy chief of staff Rob Nabors has been dispatched to the VA to help manage the fallout.

And when the fish stinks from the head up, is it at all shocking that VA heads, instead of placing their increased resources towards patient care, shell out multi-millions for fancy digs? Again, a display of utter contempt for the men and women who served the nation, not unlike the disdain exemplified by the so-called Commander-in-Chief and his out of control Pentagon!

Concomitantly, while the silencing of Christian and Jewish beliefs has become the “norm” at the Pentagon (sanctioned by Obama Inc.), lookee here, as we witness Muslim-American soldiers, butts in the air, praying at the same Pentagon!! If you dare, click pic on to see enlargement.

Facebook Picture
It gets worse. How many patriots know the back-end story to the deaths of Seal Team Six, not only its “mysterious” underpinnings, but the accompanying outrage? Well, guess who was picked to “eulogize” these lost souls, while Christian and Jewish prayer was disallowed at the military memorial:Unreal:Pentagon invited Muslim cleric to funeral for fallen Navy SEALS who invoked Islamic prayer damning infidels to hell!
The top brass spat on their graves and that’s that. Bastards….reprobates…and every other anti-American descriptor imaginable fits them to a tee!


BEFORE we delve into the heart of the matter, please recall who the Governor of New Hampshire is. In fact, the Mrs. in charge of the citizens of New Hampshire is married to the principal of Phillips Exeter Academy, a prep school featured within these pages. A real power couple. How nice for them.

Full Disclosure: a few close acquaintances/business associates graduated from the halls of Philips Exeter Academy (the subject below) back in the early 1980′s, and just a few years before its Islamic infestation. These individuals are at the top of their chosen professions, therefore, the influence many of its graduates yield is considerable, even if not in the Presidential arena.

‘Academy That Produced Three Presidents Now Terrorist Breeding Ground’

To quote an excellent article by Chris Anu of the New Hampshire Herald:

…On Thomas Hassan’s watch, numerous Islamic scholars and activists with ties to radical Islamic groups have been invited to address student assemblies and other student forums. Among them, Hadia Mubarak, former president of the Muslim Student Association, spoke at a PEA assembly on Oct, 1, 2007. Founded by the Muslim Brotherhood, the MSA was labeled “a virtual terror factory” by terrorism expert Patrick Poole. Its former members include such notable jihadists as Anwar al-Awlaki, Ramy Zamzam, Omar Hammami, Abdurahman Alamoudi, Aafia Siddiqui and Ramzi Yousef.

With the above in mind, it is hardly surprising that strong-arm tactics are being used against anyone who refuses to toe the radical left’s dictates or the increasingly emboldened thrusts by Islamists. Readers must internalize that one does not negate the other, in fact, they feed off of each other! Dracula-like. Hence, the constant reference to the red/green alliance.

Into this arena, along came a concerned father from the small state of New Hampshire (he happens to be a lawyer, having worked in the NYC Prosecutor’s office, not exactly a milieu which renders one squeamish, nor aghast at heavy-handed actions) who became duly alarmed by a particular book assigned to his 14 year old daughter. Not unlike any responsible parent, he placed a call into the principal’s office. No one responded to his concerns. After several failed attempts, he attended a school board meeting to address the issue. Well and good – or so you would think. 

Now, the fact that the book was written by a bestselling author is neither here nor there. But what does matter is the absolute graphic and sexual nature of this work of fiction, which in the “infinite wisdom” of leftist driven school officials is supposed to teach requisite lessons. It is “a fictional account of a school shooting in New Hampshire that lasted for 19 minutes (hence the title) that contains explicit and graphic sexual material, along with arguably controversial messages about homicide and yes, gun violence”.

What’s the point? Well, even though authors are free to sell their stories – PG rated or XXX – responsible parents are allowed (actually obligated) to object to material they consider gratuitously sexual and violent in nature. The questions become: what are the educators in America, the poohbahs, thinking? and what is their driving force?

In the main, there is a concerted push to “desensitize” students to graphic sexual content and lifestyles. At the same time, they are bent on indoctrinating them into a gun control mindset, and their methods are targeted in approach.

Adding to the incendiary mix is the vise-grip surrounding all those who refuse to cow to their radical, revolutionary, anti-freedom agenda. Consider: how much easier is it to deconstruct America, especially when every sexual lifestyle is seen as “equal”(hence the push for graphic materials etc) and citizens are terrified to express opposing views, fearing they too will be arrested for resisting said putsch?

When protecting your children becomes a crime against the state in New Hampshire – The critical back-story now told

Northeast Intelligence Network


baer21By Douglas J.  Hagmann

Thursday, May 7, 2014: “I was arrested.”

It took a minute for me to wrap my mind around those words, uttered by a one of the most decent men I know. He is an attorney by profession, having worked in the prosecutor’s office within the Five Boroughs of New York City. He’s dealt with some of the most unsavory people and unspeakable crimes of our nation in that capacity. More importantly, however, he is a proud and protective family man. He’s a loving husband and a proud father of two children, including Marina Baer, a ninth grader in the Gilford, New Hampshire School District.

My mind raced as I fired questions at him with mind numbing rapidity. “Where, What for? What happened?” I prodded. He answered each question calmly and methodically, combining his replies with an extremely important “back-story” that will probably not be reported anywhere by the mainstream media.

Mr. Baer explained that he was arrested at a meeting of the Gilford School Board meeting on Monday, 5, 2014 and charged with a misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct. As audio and video evidence of the events clearly illustrates, however, there was nothing remotely disorderly about Mr. Baer’s conduct at the meeting. It was the first time he was arrested in his life.

No, there was something far deeper at work here, something that you will not see, hear or read about in the “drive-by” reports done by the mainstream media. It is this lead-up to the school board meeting that puts the events of May 5th in a much clearer, and much more unsettling perspective. It should serve as a warning to all parents that there is an agenda much greater than what we are seeing. In the words of Mr. Baer, “something is very wrong.” Indeed it is, and the report that follows should send a chill down the spine of every parent, of every American, for this is coming to your city, town, or municipality if it does not already exist.

The critical back-story

Last Thursday, Mr. Baer sent me an e-mail about a book his daughter was assigned to read by her teacher with the full and complete approval of the Gilford School Board. He wrote that he was stunned, despite his experience working in one of the toughest cities in the country, by what was assigned to his 14 year-old daughter for her ninth grade Honor’s English class, and attached a scanned copy of one page from the book for my perusal. Having over a quarter century of investigative experience myself, I’m no prude in reading graphic text. Regardless, I would never have knowingly permitted my child to read what he sent, even if it was part of a school assignment sanctioned by the school board.

Upon closer scrutiny of the book, Nineteen Minutes by author Jodi Picoult, Mr. Baer saw that it was a fictional account of a school shooting in New Hampshire that lasted for 19 minutes (hence the title) that contains explicit and graphic sexual material, along with arguably controversial messages about homicide and yes, gun violence. Despite its inclusion on the New York Times best seller list, any ordinary parent of reasonable sensibilities would certainly question why such a book was selected as required reading for a ninth-grade Honor’s English class.

After doing his own homework, Mr. Baer followed a logical approach to learn why the book was assigned without his consent, and to be proactive, for he was not about to allow his daughter to be subjected to this subject matter, at least not in this fashion. He first contacted the high school principal, who declined to formally meet with him in order to find a suitable remedy to this issue. After being effectively deferred and deflected at every turn, Mr. Baer was left with attempting to remedy the situation by attending the school board meeting to publicly address this issue.

It was as if it was made impossible for Mr. Baer to be given any remedy to clear this matter up, except by attending the school board meeting that would convene the following Monday. It is here—at this exact point— that people must pay attention to how events were being managed behind the scenes.

According to information obtained by this author, the Gilford, New Hampshire school board was alerted in advance to Mr. Baer’s intention to raise this issue at their normal Monday meeting. In anticipation of Mr. Baer’s attendance, they did a number of things they have not done in the past.

First, they stationed a Gilford Municipal police officer inside the meeting venue “to keep order.” Then, they limited all public comments to two minutes only, and refused to answer any questions of the attendees. Ostensibly, this was done because of the multitudes of those present to speak out against the book, yet not more than a few dozen people were actually present. Also, the number who actually wished to speak remained in the single digits, including Mr. Baer. Accordingly, any sensible person would question the rationale behind such an arbitrary policy instituted for this particular meeting.

No dissent permitted

The critical back-story, then, indicates that the school board not just anticipated Mr. Baer’s attendance, but took very precise steps to make certain that his objections would be muted and otherwise dealt with in a manner that has been inconsistent with previous public meetings. It would appear that dissent about the book as an assignment in an ninth grade honors class was not merely expected, but the response to such dissent was decided in advance.

The meeting

When attendees were called to speak, Sue Allen, the board chairwoman, could be heard asking at least twice if anyone cared to speak before Mr. Baer was recognized. When he was permitted (or confined) to his two minutes, he first noted that there was an unusual “default setting” to the parental authorization that would permit the children to be exposed to this material. Normally, a parent must “opt-in” to allow the book to be read by their child, must like parental authorization is given for a field trip. In this case, however, it was only if the parent had an objection to the book that they would need to “opt-out.”

Secondly, Mr. Baer asked the principal present to read page 313 of the book to give those in attendance the reasons for which he was voicing his objections. After all, not everyone there was aware of the contents of the book. The principal refused as did every other board member, calling it “inappropriate.” Mr. Baer attempted to compel the board members to answer legitimate questions about the class assignment and methods, but they refused, asserting they would only allow the attendees two minutes worth of comments to be put on record. As the video shows, it was an exasperating exercise in futility for Mr. Baer to seek redress in this venue to which he was directed.

Mr. Baer ultimately exceeded his two minutes by 18 seconds, an obviously egregious offense to the royalty of the Gilford School District. After sternly warning Mr. Baer that his time was up and they would have no part in addressing his concerns, he dutifully sat down.

At this point, a man positioned behind Mr. Baer spoke up and glowingly described how the book actually prompted a frank family discussion about the subject matter of the book, taking a tone that seemed to paint Mr. Baer as an advocate of censorship and book banning, which is far from the truth or Mr. Baer’s intent. In response to this false accusation and mischaracterization, Mr. Baer verbally dissented. He calmly defended himself against these public accusations, attempting to set the public record straight.

It was as a result of this egregious offense, one that caused Mr. Baer to add another 30 seconds or so onto his unauthorized 18 seconds beyond the allotted 2 minutes that caused the school board to react – and react with prejudice.

The arrest

Remember that out-of-place municipal police officer standing guard for the first time in recent memory at the Gilford School Board meeting? Based on what appeared to be the hand signal of a member of the school board, the officer responded by walking to a stunned Mr. Baer, who was now seated, reaching to escort him from the meeting. Mr. Baer asked if he was being asked to leave, if he was being arrested, and was further stunned by the rapidity of the response for such a minor infraction of exceeding his allotted time by less than a minute in total, including his unscheduled verbal defense against his character.

According to Mr. Baer and as seen in the video, the arresting officer appeared a bit nervous while escorting this dissenting parent from the room and placing him in handcuffs behind his back. Mr. Baer has a bad neck injury, which he made known to the officer, that restricted the movement of his left arm. This, as is seen, was apparently construed as resisting arrest by the otherwise docile Mr. Baer.

Apparently the officer had his orders, for it is here that the officer could have used his discretion and let Mr. Baer go, as long as he did not re-enter the meeting or otherwise cause problems for the school board.

Unless or until enough Americans rise up to the tyrannical methods used to quell dissent against child abuse at the hands of school authorities, Mr. Baer will be arraigned on June 17th, 2014 for charges of disorderly conduct. I spoke with Mr. Baer, who stated that he feels strongly about not just the book, but how he stood up to the school board to protect his daughter.

As an investigative journalist who thoroughly researched this set-up and a friend of Mr. Baer, I urge everyone to see through the fog of disinformation and to make your own voices of dissent heard on his behalf by demanding that the charges against him be dropped without prejudice.

I am absolutely certain that Billy Baer, attorney, father and American patriot, would do the same for all of us.

Make your voices heard: Gilford NH High School

Principal: Mr. Peter Sawyer (email –
Assistant Principal: Mr. Anthony Sperazzo (email –

Video (Part one-Mr. Baer’s statement and subsequent arrest):

Video (Part two – daughter speaking on behalf of her father following his arrest):

Gilford School Board:

Listen to Billy Baer discuss the events on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report on Tuesday, May 6, 2014 –CLICK HERE


In a VERY real sense, a police state is forming all over America, from the smallest of states to the largest. Not to switch topics midstream, but isn’t it curious that a military apparatus appeared – seemingly out of nowhere – to cow Bundy and his supporters, not unlike in a fascist police state?

In other words, isn’t there an underlining strategy at work, a common denominator, meant to intimidate/threaten parents whose only “crime” is protecting their children, as well as those who assert their property rights and more?


Do you think a second Holocaust against Jews is coming?

EVERY now and again there exists a few who emit clarion calls, whose messages resonate to a degree that others can’t. Such is the case with the following young woman, Chloe Valdary. Fraught with passion, knowledge and an impending sense of urgency, to listen to her speak [] is akin to hearing a wailing siren. Goosebumps. With complete clarity, she warns of today’s resurgent anti-semitism, almost Casandra-like. She evokes the clearest comparison of today’s rising tide of global anti-semitism, to the precursor of Hitler in 1933. Bravo!

Mind you, for all her courageous efforts, the usual attack dogs (rabid leftist Jew-boys in tow) joined in for a gang bang, and Legal Insurrection came to her defense. Thank heavens. Can you believe the brazen chutzpah of the left and their Islamist cohorts? View this. You decide.

We have featured Tulane University student Chloé Simone Valdary before.

We highlighted a great video Valdary produced for a pro-Israel event to be held at Tulane.

For that effort, Valdary was attacked by the usual suspects like Max Blumenthal, as being an Israel Lobby paid stooge. As Lori Lowenthal Marcus reports, the event Valdaray promoted took place with great success in late March, attended by over 400 pro-Israel students.

But there has been a more sinister angle to the attacks on Valdary, as we highlighted in out post about The ugly, repugnant attack on a pro-Israel black American student, including a series of nasty racialized tweets by Richard Silverstein, like this one:

Is race behind the attacks on Valdary? Yes, says an op-ed column in The NY Post by Anthony Hardy Williams, the Democratic whip in the Pennsylvania state Senate, whose father worked with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and broke the color barrier at Penn State, The racism of the Israel-bashers:


The Boycott, Divest and Sanction movement against Israel is often seen as progressive — so it’s astounding to see its supporters turn to racism.

The latest target: Chloé Simone Valdary, an African-American undergraduate at the University of New Orleans and founder of the Allies of Israel Association.

Valdary recently wrote an article criticizing the Jewish Museum’s decision to invite Judith Butler, a University of California, Berkeley professor and outspoken BDS supporter to speak — an invitation Butler at first accepted, then declined.

BDS supporters’ response to Valdary was vile. Activist Zaid Jilani tweeted, “Non-jew [Chloé Valdary] smears famous Jewish academic as ally of Hitler,” then mocked her outspoken stand against anti-Semitism. (Jilani, by the way, was ousted from a liberal think tank last year for use of what his boss called “terrible anti-Semitic language.”)

Then there was Max Blumenthal, a former writer for the pro-Hezbollah Al Akhbar newspaper. (The Nation found Blumenthal’s recent book notable for its “equation of Israel with Nazis.”) He tweeted that Valdary is “beyond sickening” and “irrationally hateful” — and a “non-Jew” who represents “the future of Zionism.” ….

I’ve seen this too many times before: a supposed “progressive” stepping on the backs of African-Americans, then walking away as if the pain he’s inflicted is different from that caused by any other racist. Why should such hate speech go unchallenged, just because it’s cloaked as criticism of Israel?

As a civil-rights activist and leader in the African-American community, I’m exceptionally disturbed to discover that the response to this attack on Valdary has been subdued, almost nonexistent.

There is a reason the BDS movement goes after non-white supporters of Israel with a particular vengeance, including not just blacks but also Native Americans.

As we witnessed at Vassar recently, trying to racialize the dispute on campuses is a key strategy of the BDS movement.

BDS feeds off racial division, hoping that in a race war non-whites on campus will side with BDS. And if it needs to create those divisions, it will.

Don’t let BDS win. Stand with Chloé Simone Valdary.

OMINOUSLY, there are no shortage of indicators, as to the raging tide of anti-semitism, even though Islamists continually exhort: “Islamophobia” places Muslims in grave danger in the west! Agreed, they slaughter one another all over Islamic lands, but this is an internecine, tribal-related struggle, it has NOTHING to do with the west. On the other hand, they shamefacedly opine: Jews are barely targeted! They lie as easily as they breathe, taqiyya gives them Shariah cover. Hmm.

Indicator One:

International forums are hardly sympathetic to the explosive tide of Jew-hatred, even as they opine otherwise, designating this and that (useless) “committee” and “remembrance” sops to “combat” anti-semitism. Moreover, Sec Kerry is demonstrably pro Muslim. No arguments to the contrary will change this dangerous calculus. Nevertheless, certain indicators have forced relevant poohbahs to concede to ground-based facts. To wit, despite their usual lip service, this was admitted to:

The International Religious Freedom Report, revealed on Monday (May 2013) by US State Secretary John Kerry, states that there has been a “continued global increase in anti-Semitism.” It adds: “Holocaust denial and glorification remained troubling themes, and opposition to Israeli policy at times was used to promote or justify blatant anti-Semitism.”

According to the report, the greatest concern stems from the anti-Semitic statements by government officials, religious leaders and the media, especially in Venezuela, Egypt and Iran. The report noted that the phenomenon is spreading in France and Hungary despite state efforts to fight it.

 Indicator Two:

The rise of global anti-semitism is such that it is hard to ignore, even at the most unlikely places, public broadcasting. Its perches (in the U.S. too) are not known to sympathize with Jewish issues: Canada’s CBC placed it front and center.

Indicator Three:

One can go on and on to document the menace, but various gauges should serve as prima facie evidence. Consequentially, this one is duly notable: Jews flee France as anti-semitism rises!

Most tellingly, how ingrained is anti-semitism throughout Europe, so much so that Maccabi Tel Aviv’s Euro basketball win sparked insane amounts of anti-semitic torrents – twitter-like!

And yet, thankfully, this is not 1933, the Jewish people have returned “home” and are in possession of a very powerful, yet tiny sliver of land. However, this American-Israeli prefers to see things as they are, not to live in fantasy land.

Concomitantly, what does it help to have the most advanced weaponry, a full nuclear arsenal – yes, we all know that Israel is a nuclear state – a highly competent, hi-tech equipped standing army, if the leadership are more terrified of international “disapproval” than anything else? Meaning, leftism and its delusions have taken a concerted toll, therefore, for over 2 terms in office, Israel’s PM has allowed the fate of the nation to fall in line with Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s dictates!  

Significantly, to those who prefer to bury their head(s) in the sand, what other proofs are they looking for, in order to spur them into action? Tragically, rather than accept that they too have to take a stand and rise up, they deny reality. For shame. Never mind the usual insidious suspects; individuals (groups/entities) who are complicit in inciting to another Holocaust!

So, at the very least, this courageous young woman (and a paltry few others like her) deserves all of our gratitude for being such a clear messenger. Intrinsically, her efforts are much more valiant and harder to accomplish, as she essentially swims against the rising tide of haters in her midst. Kudos!

Dear readers, imagine how hard it is for any young person, a Black female no less, to go against the grain, with so many hostile voices attempting to drown out, to silence, said truth telling! Therefore, this American-Israeli sends Chloe many thumbs up. Virtual hugs too. This site’s readership should consider doing the same.



In 2007, the U.S. government labeled ISNA a U.S. Muslim Brotherhood entity and an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorism-financing trial involving the Holy Land Foundation funneling money to Hamas. The label was upheld in 2009 because of “ample” evidence linking ISNA to Hamas. Last year, ISNA’s Canadian affiliate lost its status as a charity because of its accounting discrepancies and links to Pakistani terrorists.


{linked here –}

This blogger has much experience with seeing from there to here – re Islamic jihad – and the genesis started before 9/11/01. However, it got ratcheted up soon afterwards. The journey is duly described within.

But it is also understood that many are deceived by the Orwellian, indoctrinating mantra, Islam is a “religion of peace”, propagated by Muslim apologists through their Muslim Brotherhood Mafia perches. They are duly backed up by their leftist henchmen. The proofs are manifest, as well as deeply sourced. It couldn’t be any clearer.

As such, it is always instructive to hear “straight from the horse’s mouth”. Nevertheless, it becomes a herculean effort to convince the deaf, dumb and blind – this readership excluded! But never mind, get a load of this, as one example out of infinitesimal: This is directly from Muslim Advocates: “We are experts with deep experience in the courtroom and powerful connections in Congress and the White House”…and this is not smack-talk. “It be” deadly accurate. See the report below for evidence. It comes from the premier counter intelligence expert, bar none – Dave Gaubatz.


BHO & the Muslim Brotherhood - 7

Dave G. Infiltrates ISNA & NAIT Conference in Detroit 9 – 11 May 2014
14 May 2014
I use the word infiltrate because the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) likes to use this word when a non Muslim attends a MB conference.  Actually I spent four days with MB leaders from all across the country.  There were representatives from every known MB group and some that were recently developed.  The usual MB acronyms were there, but the most vocal were ISNA (Islamic Society of North America), NAIT (North American Islamic Trust), MSA (Muslim Student Association), and Muslim Advocates.
A fantastic group of American Patriots invited me to their city to obtain first-hand evidence pertaining to Islamic groups and mosques allegedly supporting the agenda of Islamic based terrorism.  This report will be general in nature until I analyze all of the intelligence I was able to obtain.
I stayed at the same hotel as the conference attendees.  The Double Tree (Hilton) on the Southfield Freeway, Dearborn, MI.  This Masjid Forum was specifically for Imams, Board members, and senior personnel for the dozen and a half MB acronym supporters.
The first MB supporters I encountered was at the Mosque Advocates ( booth.  The MB supporter manning the booth talked with me several minutes.  He was passing out material to ‘end hate’ on the internet.  I asked him to describe some examples of hate.  He said anyone critical of Islam and Sharia Law are haters.  He used the example of ACT For America.  He went on to say anyone who opposes the building of a mosque or mosque expansion in America is a hater.  Little did he know he was talking with someone who was very critical of the Islamic ideology and Sharia law.
The conference should have been titled, “The U.S. Constitution and the 1st Amendment are for MB terrorists and not for American Patriots.  The Muslim Advocates group advised they were working closely with internet social media sites such as Twitter and Facebook.  They are asking these groups to close the accounts of anyone who is critical of Islam.  This is considered serious hate speech and should not be allowed on the internet.  I was provided materials of their strategies and goals.
This is directly from Muslim Advocates: “We are experts with deep experience in the courtroom and powerful connections in Congress and the White House”.  I agree with them on this statement.  Their supporters go all the way up to the highest level of the White House.  This should be of no surprise to anyone.
I met ISNA and NAIT Executives.  The main emphasis of the conference was for Muslims to continue building and expanding in America.  ISNA promised to help with their projects and NAIT encouraged Muslim leaders to allow NAIT to hold the mosque and other property titles, so they can be better protected.  I was informed that NAIT owned several hundred million dollars of property in America, and has the funding from 400 plus Islamic Centers in America.
While in Detroit/Dearborn, I went to some suggested mosques and Islamic bookstores in Detroit to conduct research.  When I was driving around Detroit and Dearborn I thought I was back in Saudi Arabia. Islamic related: Mosques, Islamic businesses, Islamic stores, etc…  It only took a few minutes to realize the Detroit area is under invasion from the MB.  The area of Detroit has been reduced to destruction.  By far it is one of the most dangerous and ugliest cities in our country.
While at the conference I was able to obtain a taped lecture by none other than America’s number one MB terrorist leader (CAIR/Nihad Awad).  Nihad Awad had a lecture being distributed titled “How American Muslims Can Affect  Change in Politics and Media”.
Per the norm I obtained material from Detroit mosques, the conference, and Islamic bookstores, both Sunni and Shia.  The material advocates treason, sedition, and abusing innocent Muslim women and girls.  One such piece of evidence advocates marrying off Muslim girls at any age, and consummating the marriage of these girls at the age of nine.
There were books on establishing Sharia throughout the world and using physical Jihad to achieve these goals.  I found the law enforcement from the Dearborn area supported the violent Islamic ideology and Sharia law more so than they support innocent American Patriots living in this area.
For decades there has been many people like Steve Emerson, ACT leaders, and I who have provided direct evidence about the Islamic ideology, and recently there have been actors and actresses from Fox News who are now using the data we collected for decades at great financial losses and threats to us.  
The Boko Haram  Islamic terrorist group in Nigeria are helping to raise the awareness of the violence within Islam.  Boko Haram essentially means “Western Education is Unlawful”.  Just last night I was listening to Sean Hannity attempt to explain Shariah law to his followers.  It was very clear from the start that Hannity has maybe a 3rd grade level education on Islamic matters.  He has good intent, but hurts America more than he helps.
Hannity made a comment such as Boko Haram has a distorted vision of the true Islam.  He was suggesting there is an Islamic ideology formed by Mohammed that is peaceful.  Then he went on to say Sharia law is dangerous and evil.  I am sorry but only a politician can have things both ways.  There is no separation of Islam and Shariah law.  You can’t have one without the other.  If one considers Shariah law dangerous, then you must acknowledge Islam as a whole is dangerous.
The brutality of Boko Haram is not radical Islam.  Their actions are being administered exactly as Islam dictates.  Murder, hatred, violence, sexual abuse of young girls, forced conversions to Islam, and slavery are all true aspects of Islam.
Until world leaders stop making excuses for Islam and blaming it on so called radicals, ‘Pure Islam’ and it’s dangers will spread throughout the world.  America will soon see the type brutality  being committed by Boko Haram in the name of Islam, being carried out at American schools and neighborhoods.  Only you can stop Islamic based terrorism.  Do not count on our political leaders, media, or senior law enforcement to counter Islamic terrorism. {blogger link –}
In closing, a point to ponder:  If American Patriots are indeed haters because they do not want more mosques and their expansions in America, what are the billions of Muslims to be called who would kill in the name of Islam anyone who began building churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia?   
This site has fully documented their plans to take over America. But if one stands head and shoulders above the rest, again, in their own words:


obama muslim photo: obama l_d4420725f0829989ef29ac108cf95930.jpg

IT can’t be stressed enough: please internalize how intertwined and inextricably linked Barack HUSSEIN Obama is with his Kenyan family. Their ideological roots. If necessary, their nexus will be written about ad infinitum, until it becomes clear to Americans and westerners alike. A neon sign. Whatever it takes.

Significantly, most cannot wrap their minds around the “exotic” sounding jihadi names – of enumerable Islamic terror groups swathing the globe – therefore, they throw up their hands in despair and disgust. Resigned. Agreed, the laundry list is endless. Stupefying. And some names – more than others – take on their own infamy, not unlike the Brotherhood’s spawn, al-Qaeda!

Regardless, there is no other option but to charge forward. In this regard, similarly, Boko Haram has become a “superstar” killing machine in its own right. Atta boychiks…and don’t think that the Islamist-in-Chief isn’t high-fiving them too. Truth be told, that’s their “pet” name, their authentic name is:Jama’atu Ahlis Sunna Lidda’awati wal-Jihad, which in Arabic means “People of the Sunnah (the practice and examples of the Prophet Muhammad’s life) for Preaching and Jihad Group”Now, don’t you feel much better knowing that these same killers, kidnappers and garden variety “soldiers for Allah” have their own adopted moniker? But if you have been on vacation, or took a break from all the bad news, well, maybe you haven’t heard about the “goings on” inside Boko Haram!

Nigerian kidnappers willing to trade more than 300 school girls for terrorists

Abubaker Shekau, leader of the terror organization Boko Haram, may swap his prisoners for comrades, according to a Nigerian mediator who says it’s a good sign that the extremist have threatened to marry off the hostages rather than kill them.

Readers, think about it: what if this Boko Haram monster (not unlike his worldwide Islamic counterparts) showed up at your door, demanding to take your daughter to parts unknown – or else??

VERY seriously, these dudes are bad asses…unlike the (often) unfairly maligned bikers, whose looks are simply non-conventional: jihadists kidnap, sell, slaughter Christian girls (and boys)…Obama stone silent, other than wifey’s photo op signage! 

Michelle Obama posted an Instagram photo of herself holding a #BringBackOurGirls sign with the caption, 'Our prayers are with the missing Nigerian girls and their families.'

YET, how do we go from there to here, charging Barack HUSSEIN Obama with their very same agenda? More pointedly, how can’t we? Actually, almost every major player within Obama’s clan – the ones he IS reportedly closest with – share the same goals: eradicating Christianity. Judaism too. First things first.

In reality, the POTUS’s familial terror linkage has already been documented at this site, while reporting on a well known Obama commodity. Subject: Malik Obama! But he is far from an anomaly within Obama’s jihadi clan! No kidding. This is a fact. The embedded links are more than supportive of said charge. Read…you shall see… 

Fact One:

Malik Obama, the POTUS’s VERY closely linked half ‘bro, works directly with Boko Haram’s Sudanese patron, Omar al-Bashir. Both terrorists enjoy the support of Barack HUSSEIN Obama! Their linkage has been explored – more than once – at this site. As revealed, the noose is tightening! 

Fact Two:

How many ways, how many times, does it need to be spelled out: Malik Obama’s Sudanese tentacles ensnare the POTUS too!

Fact Three:

Consequentially, if not for the Islamist-in-Chief’s familial linkage, his tie-ins to the Brotherhood Mafia would not be as rock solid. And it this Mafia which underpins all the rest – Boko Haram included!

Fact Four:

Thus, one would think, the “peaceful” narrative spun by Obama re Islam – as well as all their apologists – should come unraveled, with the kidnapping of Christian schoolgirls. Not exactly.

Fact Five:

Last, but certainly not least, look who went to bat for terror-laden Boko Haram in 2013?

Therefore, why is anyone shocked to learn: that while the Mid East is burning, so too is Christianity across Africa and the Mid East, all “credit” given to…re-introducing…


Few pay attention to the common agendas shared by Boko Haram (the terrorist group that has kidnapped over 200 Nigerian schoolgirls) and the non-profit organizations ran by the Obama family. The primary goals of both is to eradicate western education in Africa; the evidence is overwhelming.

To the Hausa Muslims in northern Nigeria, the word “Boko” is a code word for “Western Education” and “Haram” means “forbidden”, which translates to “Western education is forbidden”. Prior to his death, Boko Haram founder Mohammed Yusuf gave a Lecture in the state of Yobe in which he answered a question about why Boko (Western education) was prohibited by saying:

“It’s the study in schools established by missionaries and this includes: the curriculum prescribed since kindergarten through high school and colleges, to national Service.”

This is precisely the Obama family’s agenda in Kenya. As has revealed, President Obama’s cousin Musa Ismail Obama may demonstrate this better than any other Obama family member. Al-Arab Newspaper interviewed Musa about his efforts in spreading the same brand of Islam that Boko Haram seeks to spread. The headline of the article reads, Scholars in Kenya Call Their Brethren to Spread Islam and Teach Arabic (translated). It further states:

Muslims [in Kenya] suffer from the monumental Christianization aided by Zionist expansionism that infiltrates the nation.

Musa was photographed for the article on the sidelines of the inauguration ceremony of World University Ruff in Nairobi, a school that teaches Islamic fundamentalism and rejects western education.

Musa Ismail Obama (L) at inauguration ceremony of Muslim school in Nairobi. also revealed that it was Musa, who during an interview with Al-Jazeera in Qatar exposed the foundation bearing the name of Barack’s grandmother – the Mama Sarah Obama Foundation (MSOF). In the interview, Musa confessed that the MSOF accepts western donations under faulty premises (helping orphaned children with AIDS) and then uses those funds for scholarships to send Kenyan students to extremist Wahhabist schools in Saudi Arabia. In a shocking admission, Musa explained how there were so many students that the Saudi schools couldn’t accommodate all of them and that Musa himself had to manage the overflow by sending them into Qatar.

Musa Ismail Obama (far left) seated next to Uncle Sayyid in Saudi Arabia.

Musa also stated during his Al-Jazeera interview that he aided refugees in the Dadaab refugee camp in northern Kenya. As has reported, Dadaab has become infested with al-Shabaab terrorists from Somalia.

President Obama’s uncle Sayyid is also a key figure in the spread of Islam. It was Musa who identified Sayyid as Barack’s preferred conduit of communication to and from his Kenyan family. It was Sayyid who wascaptured on video stating that his whole family is Muslim. Of course, has also done extensive research on the role of Barack’s brother Malik Obama, who works as an Executive Secretary of the Islamic Da’Wa Organization (IDO) under the control of Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir. Like Boko Haram, the agenda of the IDO is to spread wahhabist Islam and reject western education.

This is why Boko Haram kidnapped schoolgirls.

Of all the Obamas, it is Malik who may have the closest link to terrorism in his capacity as an arm of al-Bashir.

Malik Obama and Omar al-Bashir: at same 2010 Islamic Da'wa Organization Conference in Khartoum, Sudan.

In an explosive declaration made by a Franco Majok, a Christian activist during an interview with Fox News, Boko Haram’s origins can be found in the Sudan, which has been led by al-Bashir since long before Boko Haram was founded.

As reported extensively by, al-Bashir is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for crimes against humanity and leads a country that is on the U.S. State Department list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Al-Bashir is also Malik Obama’s boss.

According to Majok, who works on the ground in Nigeria:

“The [founders] of Boko Haram trained in Khartoum [Sudan] with Usama bin Laden and then they were sent to Nigeria.”

If Boko Haram’s founders trained with bin Laden, it would have been between 1992-1996. One of al-Bashir’s henchmen at that time was a man named Abubaker Ahmed Al Shingieti, who has since gained positions of prominence in the U.S., as reported by Al Shingieti was a Political Affairs Director and a Secretary General for al-Bashir’s External Communications Council. Today, Al Shingieti resides in the U.S. and sits on the Board of Trustees at the Hartford Seminary and serves as a Regional Director for the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT), a Muslim Brotherhood front.

Shingieti (L) with Feisal Abdul Rauf (R) at CFR event in 2013.

In a 1994 interview, Al Shingieti discussed Sudan’s ‘ghost houses’ or “people’s camps” that were used to train Muslims to become Mujahideen to “fight infidels”. This squares with the claims of Majok.

In his interview, Majok explained that a big reason for Nigerian Muslims ending up in Sudan has to do with the hajj or pilgrimage to Mecca. Sudan serves as a gateway for these fundamentalist pilgrims. After leaving Mecca, many of these Muslims didn’t have the means to get all the way back to Nigeria and remained in Sudan, where they were trained before being sent back to Nigeria as part of Boko Haram. This reality today validates putting Sudan on the terror list in 1993 after it was learned that one-third of the suspects in the first World Trade Center attack were Sudanese citizens, as reported.

Boko Haram founder Yusuf after his death.

Reports indicate that Boko Haram founder Mohammed Yusuf, was receiving funds from al-Bashir’s Sudan as far back as the 1990′s. Yusuf died in Nigerian custody in 2009 after an intense battle. He was replaced by his deputy, Abubakar Muhammad Shekau, who was injured in the battle and reportedly fled to Sudan only to resurface as Boko Haram’s leader in Nigeria. It is Shekau who has taken credit for the recent schoolgirl kidnappings.

Abubaker Muhammad Shekau

Shekau’s Islamic vision includes a resurrection of what’s known as the Borno Empire, which includes Sudan as well as Nigeria.

If the Obama administration is serious about rescuing the kidnapped girls, perhaps it should commission Malik – who has essentially served as his brother’s unofficial ambassador, as revealed by – to negotiate with al-Bashir and Boko Haram for their release.

The African Union (AU), to which Nigeria belongs, refuses to acknowledge the ICC indictment of al-Bashir and declared that it will not help to arrest him. To illustrate how Muslim Brotherhood-friendly the AU is, Egypt was suspended from the continental body for removing Mohammed Mursi from power last year.

Perhaps more confounding than Nigeria’s AU membership is al-Bashir’s entry into the country last year for the AU Summit. Al-Bashir was then allowed to quickly leave the country when protesters gathered to call for his arrest by Nigerian authorities. Reports suggest that al-Bashir abruptly left to escape arrest but it strains credulity that Nigeria’s government didn’t know he was there.

It is known that al-Bashir’s Sudan harbored bin Laden in the 1990′s and that al-Bashir does indeed fund warlords to do his bidding. One such example is Joseph Kony, whom the Obama administration has been targeting since the infamous Kony 2012 campaign. Yet, the very same Obama administration that targets Kony wants to ease relations with al-Bashir and remove Sudan from the State Sponsor of Terrorism list.

Kony: Terrorist agent of al-Bashir.

The geopolitical situation in Nigeria is also very similar to that of Sudan. South Sudan is a new country and is largely Christian. To its north sits Al-Bashir’s Muslim Sudan. For years, al-Bashir has funded Kony’s heinous efforts to terrorize Christians in the south and in neighboring Uganda. As in Sudan, Boko Haram operates in northern Nigeria and seeks to Islamize the entire country. Again, this fits the Omar al-Bashir model.

Yet, as with its campaign against Kony, the Obama administration ignores the Sudanese / al-Bashir root to the Boko Haram problem. A familial conflict of interest would certainly play a factor.

When these realities in Nigeria are put in the proper context, the more culpable entity behind the Nigerian schoolgirls being kidnapped by Boko Haram very well could be Sudan and al-Bashir. The Obama administration, however – as is the case with Kony – does not mention Sudan. In fact, Obama tends to find more culpability with the Nigerian government for the atrocities committed by Boko Haram.

Last year, while in Lagos, Nigeria as reported by, Barack Obama fielded a question about terrorism in Nigeria during a town hall. Obama began his response by referring to the ‘so called’ war on terror while flashing a subtle middle finger. He then proceeded to say:

“It is my strong belief that terrorism is more likely to emerge and take root where countries are not delivering for their people and where their sources of conflict and underlying frustrations that have not been adequately dealt with.”

Of course, this line of thinking actually helps terrorists by creating the perception that Muslim fundamentalists commit acts of terror because they’re disadvantaged and lashing out because they’re impoverished and disillusioned. It’s a premise akin to giving a fire more oxygen and has been used in Europe for years. In the 2005 Muslim riots in France, dozens of cars being set ablaze and it was all blamed on impoverished Muslim youths.

At about the 9:00 mark, Obama blames the terrorist problem in neighboring Mali on the government there for not “reaching out” enough. He then says that “responsiveness and governance and democracy” become “defense mechanisms against terrorism” before saying he doesn’t seek a “military solution to these problems”. As Boko Haram and other terrorists were committing horrendous atrocities, Obama advocated for more government programs instead of actually killing terrorists.

A newer Boko Haram splinter group known as Jama’atu Ansarul Muslimina fi Biladis Sudan (Ansaru), which broke from Boko Haram over different ideological interpretations of sharia, actively recruits members from Sudan.

Here is the entire interview with Franco Majok mentioned at the beginning of this article:

The Obama’s are invested in spreading wahhabist ideology through education and eliminating western education. In fact, if first lady Michelle Obama were truly interested in rescuing the victims of such tactics, she’d do well to start by calling her in-laws and telling them to stop Boko Haraming all across Kenya instead of using instragram to promote a twitter hashtag.

Equally significant, those who surround Obama Inc. are indeed Muslim Brotherhood “stealth” jihadists. There is no room for argument, and their support of Boko Haram is a done deal!

Understand this: the leader of the free world doesn’t have to send in any American boots, in order to eradicate the cancerous Boko Haram. They are VERY easily identifiable. Drones would work just fine.

Alas, to America’s shame, many of its citizens (some who are not even citizens…felons too…but why quibble) elected a leader with “personal complications”, and it is these “stumbling blocks” which demonstrate why Barack HUSSEIN Obama does not see eye to eye – with millions of other Americans – re the entire Islamic scourge.

In the main, he is interested in spreading the roots of his faith, a central component to his overall Mid East (and beyond) “strategic” wildfires. Further complicating matters, to venture into Boko-controlled territory would endanger many of his own kinfolk and their clans! Not gonna happen on his watch.

That’s the G-d’s honest truth. 

%d bloggers like this: