Al Qaeda Bellies Up To Israel’s Northern (Golan) Border…War Drums Heating Up…How Did This Happen? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Tragically – and it is indeed one of monumental proportions – there is never a dearth of disasters, or ones in the making, to report on. But if not for the blind as a bat leftist media – in the U.S., the west in general, as well as Israel – most would understand what is unfolding, and this does not even include the encircling Iranian menace!

Once again, even though Islamic terrorists will never cease their jihadi conquests, the fact of the matter is that the upcoming explosion leads straight back to Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s White House door. 

For if not for his dastardly designs, empowering the Brotherhood Mafia all over the Mid East/African regions (in Washington too…but let’s not digress), Al Qaeda (offshoots of the Brotherhood) would not be ready to pounce alongside Israel’s northern border, one which was quiet for 4 decades, ever since the Yom Kippur War! Talk about fanning the flames…

As previously indicated, Al Qaeda has captured a main tributary, smack on Israel’s, Jordan’s and Syria’s borders, but it didn’t have to be this way! A smart high school student could have figured out what would happen, once weapons/guns were run from Libya to Syria, namely, jihadi forces would grab them. More to the point, the Pyromaniac-in-Chief “led the way from behind” to this unfolding nightmare, although the Pentagon is hurriedly assigning “tasks” to Israel, Jordan and Turkey, to counter the upcoming conflagration.  Washington’s organs, at the Commander-in-Chief’s behest, are playing both arsonist & firefighter.

 A recent recap should clear through some of the smoke:…which leads us smack here –

‘West embargoes arms to Syrian rebels over their resale to al Qaeda’

DEBKAfile Special Report March 30, 2013

Israeli military field hospital springs up on Golan
Israeli military field hospital springs up on Golan

The Western arms pipeline to the Syrian rebels fighting Bashar Assad is starting to run dry since the discovery that some of the weapons are being resold and used by al Qaeda in its conquest of southern Syrian and takeover of positions on the Jordanian and Israel borders. French President Francois Hollande for this reason reversed his government’s policy. “We will not do it [send the Syrian rebel arms] as long as we cannot be certain that there is complete control of the situation by the opposition,” he said Friday, March 29.

That day too, Ankara announced that Turkish authorities had impounded 5,000 shotguns, rifles, starting pistols, gunstocks and 10,000 cartridges in the village of Akcakale before they were sent across into Syria.

DEBKAfile’s military sources: These steps are effectively putting in place a Western embargo on arms supplies to the Syrian rebels and not only the Assad regime. Saudi Arabia and Qatar remain their only sources of weapons.

This follows information reaching Washington, Paris, Ankara and Jerusalem in recent weeks that parts of the weapons consignments destined for the Syrian rebels, especially the Free Syrian Army, are being resold to Jabhat al-Nusra, the Islamist militia which this week proclaimed itself al Qaeda of Syria amid a major offensive for the occupation of southern Syria.

The aggressive Al Qaeda push has in fact swept beyond the important plans finalized last week for a US-led campaign to combat the Syrian chemical weapons threat.
Two weeks ago, high-resolution maps were spread out in Jerusalem, Ankara and Amman, marking out  zones inside Syria for their armies’ operations under the joint command centers the US set up last year in the three countries for combating chemical warfare.

Those plans and centers switched over last week to operational mode.
Friday, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmed Davutoglu made an unconvincing attempt to separate the Turkish-Israeli reconciliation from the Syrian issue. However, the fact remains that it was Barack Obama, during his trip to the region on March 20-22, who brought Turkey together with Israel and Jordan for the first joint operation in history on the soil of an Arab nation under US command.

This week, the region finds itself caught up by a menace more immediate even than a chemical war:

Scarcely noticed by the world and Israeli media (busy celebrating the Passover festival), Jabhat al Nusra is about to overrun southern Syria.

Using Western- and Arab-supplied arms smuggled in for the Syrian rebels from Turkey and Lebanon, the jihadists are taking up positions on the Israeli and Jordanian borders while also assuming control over the Yarmouk River and its tributaries.
Water in the Middle East has caused the outbreak of more than one armed conflict. And indeed 50 years ago, Israel and Israel fought a war, including aerial dogfights, to dominate that same Yarmouk River. The dispute was finally resolved when the United States stepped in and brokered an agreement for the distribution of its waters among Syria, Israel and Jordan.

Alarm over Nusra Front territorial gains has accordingly taken precedence over the chemical threat in the deliberations of the joint US-Israeli, US-Jordanian and US-Turkish command centers.

Al Qaeda’s Syrian wing has even been able to obtain from Iraqi jihadists its own stock of primitive chemicals – but weapons nonetheless.

The West hesitated too long before cutting off the supply of arms to the Syria rebels; it is already too late to prevent al Qaeda occupying international border regions and seizing control of an important regional water source. Dislodging them would call for a military offensive proper – which seems to be the rationale for the large military field hospital Israeli set up this week on its Golan border with Syria.

History will record, as well as indict, the parts played by those in charge of protecting western interests, and their manifest failures to do so will be on full display.

Barack HUSSEIN Obama will go down as the one who set the region ablaze. On the other hand, PM Netanyahu (not unlike Israel’s massive failure of leadership prior to the 1973 Yom Kippur War, as Golda Meir failed to see what was taking place right on Israel’s borders, thereby, scores of Jews died under her watch) will be excoriated for allowing Jerusalem to be led around by the nose, not only by its so called BFF, but by an irredeemable hostile POTUS. 

In any case, no leader should ever be beholden to another. PM Netanyahu (as well as many Israeli leaders), much to our national shame, is.

UPDATE: DEBKAfile Exclusive Report April 2, 2013 – 

‘Israel’s Def Min inspects Golan position. Al Qaeda nears Syrian chemical depot’…..”The minister and the generals spent time on the Golan border with Syria on final checks to make sure that the IDF units were well prepared for possible action to prevent Al Qaeda procuring chemical weapons of mass destruction.”

Forensic Profiling Unmasks The Leader Of The Free World…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The advent of forensics (, as a bonafide area of scientific study, has led to amazing results. While most are familiar with this discipline through an explosion of television shows, CSI & Forensic Files at the forefront, there is much more to this area of study than most are aware. In fact, knowing a thing or two about forensic accounting ( has led to many interesting developments and associations. Let’s leave it at that.

And while anything to do with delving into financial papers is enough to make ones eyes glaze over, the same cannot be said for forensic law enforcement. They utilize scientific tools to place all manner of criminals under the microscope, and hopefully behind bars. Said work is hardly devoid of high drama.

In this regard, its “sister” specialty, forensic profiling is less well known, yet more of an enigma. Well, this is because it is the purview of professionals who study the deep recesses of the mind,  a cerebral mystery, under the best of circumstances. While the FBI is the largest receptacle of said mental probing, there exists a smattering of private endeavors who bring, otherwise elusive, suspects to heel. One such address is The Forensic Panel (, headed by Dr. Michael Welner, featured herein –

In this regard, cogitate over the above, as you read the following, from a most reputable, highly successful criminal profiler.


‘I am not a dictator. I’m the president’

Published: 5 days ago



A forensic profiler whose previous cases have included the Natalie Holloway disappearance and the O.J. Simpson double murder says Barack Obama unconsciously made a stunning confession in his effort to blame the sequester idea he suggested on Republicans.

“Obama replied to (rare) press challenges about his contribution to the problem, ‘Give me an example of what I might do.’ Then he proceeded to unconsciously answer his own question with further denials, declaring, ‘I am not a dictator. I’m the president,’” Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., told WND in an assessment.

“Understand his powerful ‘dictator’ image spontaneously comes from his mind. Immediately following it with ‘president’ he unconsciously confesses, ‘I am the dictator president,’” Hodges said.

“For good measure he adds further unconscious proof in yet another vivid denial. I ‘can’t force Republicans to do the right thing’ – confessing again that in dictatorial fashion he was forcing the Republicans’ hands by not negotiating and failing to do the right thing.”

Hodges, who wrote “The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury,” previously deciphered the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note in the Boulder, Colo., murder case.

See all the details in Hodges’ book “The Obama Confession.”

He uses a unique psycholinguistic technique he calls “ThoughtPrint Decoding” to “read between the lines” of people’s statements – called “the cutting-edge of forensic science” by expert investigators.

He’s not new to the field, already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails, letters and police interviews to spot secret confessions. He decoded O.J.’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson had committed a double murder. He deciphered the JonBenet ransom note from Boulder, Colo., to identify the child’s killer. He decrypted letters from BTK to predict that he was about to kill again – the only profiler to do so. He studied statements by Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe to tie them to the slaying of Holloway. He showed how Casey Anthony secretly confessed to killing her daughter in 200 letters written to a jail mate. He even decoded Bill Clinton’s comments about Monica Lewinsky.

“Once more Obama has brilliantly and unknowingly profiled himself regarding his deceptive behavior – this time surrounding the sequester conflict with Republicans,” Hodges explained. “The profile is based on the discovery of an unconscious super intelligence – a major step beyond Malcolm Gladwell’s description of the ‘new adaptive unconscious’ in his best-seller ‘Blink.’ He demonstrated how our deeper mind quick-reads various situations in the blink of an eye.”

Hodges said that at Obama’s March 1 press conference, the president’s super intelligence quick-reads his deep motives about sequester and then announces those motives to the public.

“‘Let’s be clear: None of this is necessary,’ Obama said. ‘It’s happening because of a choice that Republicans in Congress have made. We shouldn’t be making a series of dumb, arbitrary cuts to things.’ We have another blatant albeit unconscious projection and confession. He knows his choice – a non-negotiable demand for more taxes after just receiving a $150 billion ‘tax raise’ in January – was foolish,” Hodges explained. “He further revealed his arbitrary behavior when he refused the choice offered to him to spread out the miniscule 2 percent budget cutacross the board to lessen the impact. Like a dictator he wanted power over the Republicans in his ploy to cast them as the evil ones.”

He also addressed Obama’s reference to two sci-fi movies.

“He suggested the idea, ‘I should somehow do a ‘Jedi mind-meld’ with these folks [Republicans] and convince them to do what’s right.’ He used a mixed image from two sci-fi shows,” Hodges explained. “First he alluded to a Jedi ‘mind trick’ used on weak-minded foes (‘Star Wars’ films) implying his continued mind games to trick subservient foolish Americans.

“His spontaneous ‘Star Wars’ image also references his war on the Republicans – efforts to discredit them so that he can affect the next election and control both houses of Congress in his dictatorial behavior. (He also suggests his war on the military – to weaken it.)

“Finally he implies in the ‘mind-meld’ technique he’s opening his unconscious mind up and we can read it if we know how – just as Commander Spock in ‘Star Trek’ would let others read his mind to provide them with special insightful messages,” he said.

He suggested Obama has been exaggerating the impact of sequester to “unconsciously paint a true picture of his overall destructive plan,” he said.

“His super intelligence looks into the future and sees the result of his plans long-term,” Hodges said.

“Middle-class families will ‘have their lives disrupted in significant ways.’ He predicts that Americans one day will know the economy didn’t have to suffer if bad decisions (his) had been averted. We ask which does greater damage: a 2 percent budget cut or his obvious long-term plan of crippling rising debt and increased taxes?”

Hodges also suggested Obama is revealing a coming “apocalypse” by saying, “There’s not going to be an apocalypse.”

“When he wonders (regarding Republicans) if he could do something else ‘to make these guys not paint horns on my head’ we indeed should be frightened beyond belief. He suggests America is in for a devil of a time to put it mildly – that deep down he harbors evil intentions,” Hodges said.

As WND reported, Hodges previously concluded Obama unconsciously confessed to stealing the 2012 election.

On Hodges’ website, Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston, Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique is “becoming the cutting edge of forensic science.”

“Dr. Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his ‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact, becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal investigators,” wrote Egger.

Much has been written, mostly by the alternative media, about Obama and his plans for America, as well as for the world. Never mind the ink spilled at these pages, including the time, energy and resources expended. But it was not an exercise in futility (at this blog), nor hyperbole, to essentially posit the question: Who is Obama, and what is he up to? Wish the question didn’t have to be asked.

And tied into his non-conventional lifestyle, a lifestyle which most Americans, at best, are uncomfortable with, lurks a man with an abiding hatred for America, and all that it represents – Which leads us back to his red/green roots, and his basic “transforming” plans for the nation he is sworn to lead – “green” bonafides are duly exhibited within –

Most significantly, under his purview, the Demsters are fiddling with the Constitution – To wit, at the helm of the left’s march towards totalitarian, dictatorial rule sits Barack HUSSEIN Obama – NO mystery at this end.

NOT to be lost in the discussion, any reasonable person, let alone one skilled in forensics, would find “The One’s” following statement, more than a little curious: ” In the prologue to the second of his autobiographies, “The Audacity of Hope,” Barack Obama said: “I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”

Due to the above preponderance of evidence, is it then far fetched to question: A leader of the free world, who views “serving as a bank screen” as a normative value system, really has more things to hide than his preference for “this or that”? Could it be, he came into power with designs so antithetical to American constructs (and against the majority public’s will, even though he managed to get elected) that only an exceptionally skilled forensic profiler can fully interpret the signs and signals?



A Confluence of Evil: Conspiracies of Silence…From Arafat To Benghazigate…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Consorting with the devil is never the purview of one political party. It is an equally opportunity scourge. It just depends on the moral character of those at the helm, and how far said leadership will go to “play ball”. Whether one is willing to admit that their party is tainted – or not – is beside the point. Evil, by design or default, will catch up with those who placate it. It always does.

Such is the case with those who are covering up Benghazigate, as amply demonstrated at this blog address. Though Obama and gang have yet to be held to account, the effects of their handiwork cannot help but ensnare them – even if it takes years – regardless how hard they try to flee. The same Islamic devils they are unleashing overseas are running loose in the U.S., though many garb themselves in western attire. Nevertheless, unless America’s leftist crew is willing to relocate in deeply burrowed bunkers, the pernicious forces will be felt, regardless how insulated leftist revolutionaries believe they are.  Islamic monsters are insatiable.

IF one needs proofs, regarding the regime’s culpability, peek within –

And for heavens sake, CIA Panetta let loose his own bomblets, as he departed office –

But those who still pretend that “seeing no evil, hearing no evil”, aka “deaf, dumb and blind”, is the preferable path, such folks must also be held to account, at least in the court of public opinion.  As indicated, evil pursues, despite ones blinders.

CONSIDER: in the same manner in which Benghazigate is being hushed – – the murderers, of another U.S. Ambassador, 40 years ago, have yet to pay the price. In fact, their “people” are the world’s pets.  


Washington covered up evidence to protect Palestinian terrorist leader

Published: 2 days ago

author-image by ART MOORE 


When a U.S. ambassador was murdered six months ago in Libya, the White House found itself in the center of political controversy over who was to blame.

Clearly, as Barack Obama sought re-election, a successful attack by forces tied to al-Qaida threatened foreign-policy bona fides that hinged on having the terrorist network “on the run.”

The White House had the evidence from the beginning, as official communications show, that the murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans had nothing to do with a protest over a movie by a right-wing bigot.

Similarly, when U.S. Ambassador Cleo Noel Jr., U.S. Charges d’affaires George Curtis Moore and Belgian Guy Eid were murdered March 2, 1973, after being taken hostage, U.S. officials immediately knew who was to blame.

And like the Benghazi affair Sept. 11, 2012, politics got in the way of justice.

If congressional Republicans have become exasperated in their attempts to get to the bottom of the Benghazi attack six months later, think about how former National Security Agency analyst James J. Welsh must feel after 40 years of stonewalling.

As WND reported in 2003, Welsh has irrefutable evidence that Arafat himself planned, directed and ordered the murders of the diplomats at the Saudi Embassy in Khartoum, Sudan, by the Black September Organization.

Black September carried out the infamous operation that killed 11 Israeli athletes at the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich.

After it became clear President Nixon would not give in to the demands of the Palestinian terrorists, the men were lined up against a wall in the basement of the embassy and gunned down.

U.S. Ambassador Cleo Noel Jr.

Welsh at the time was monitoring radio communications between Palestinian leaders in Beirut and the Sudanese capital. Audio tapes made in Cyprus and U.S. embassies in Beirut and Khartoum left no doubt that it was Arafat’s voice directing the operation from Feb. 28, 1973, – the day before the men were kidnapped – to their execution two days later.

Welsh believes the purpose of the initial cover-up was to prevent embarrassment to the State Department and the Richard Nixon White House. After Nixon was gone, the matter was kept quiet to protect the future viability of the NSA’s signals intercepts.

But ultimately, Welsh asserts, the cover-up persisted to protect Arafat’s role as a “peacemaker” and leader of the Palestinian cause.

If transcripts of the tapes had been released, it would have destroyed Arafat, Welsh believes.

“There is no way he could have been rehabilitated in the public’s eye,” Welsh told WND in a 2003 interview. “It would have been the murder of two diplomats. You just can’t push that away.”

Black September

Some details actually trickled into the mainstream press just one month after the Khartoum attack.

“Western intelligence sources” leaked to a Washington Post reporter the contents of a cable from Khartoum to the State Department with explicit details of communications between the hostage-takers and Beirut command during the crisis.

Member of the Black September organization carrying out the attack on Israeli athletes at the Olympics in Munich in 1972

David Ottaway wrote April 5, 1973, that “Arafat, leader of Fatah, was in the Black September radio command center in Beirut when the message to execute three Western diplomats being held in Khartoum was sent out.”

The Post reporter said “Arafat’s voice was reportedly monitored and recorded.”

Welsh told WND he “never saw such panic and anger at NSA as when Ottaway broke the story.”

“It was only after it was realized how potentially explosive the tapes were that the history began to be rewritten,” he said.

At the time of the event, Welsh said his strong objections to an obvious cover-up of the Arafat evidence got him into “serious trouble,” resulting in a negative military evaluation.

He finished his Navy service in 1974 and “just left it all,” but in the summer of 2000, the events of early 1973 came rushing back.

Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak were guests of President Bill Clinton, who was engaged in a furious, last-ditch effort to forge a peace agreement before his term ended.

“They were cavorting over at Camp David – that famous shot of them playing around [and gesturing], Who’s going to open the door,” Welsh said. “I’m just looking at the TV and saying, this is ridiculous.”

Not going to go there

After the Camp David talks, Welsh tried to take his case to Congress and nearly everyone associated with the event he could find.

On March 27, 2001, he sent a letter to all members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, detailing his charges. He sent another to Rep. Henry Hyde, R-Ill., a few days later after reading of the congressman’s call to re-examine U.S. policy toward the Arafat-led Palestinian Authority.

Arafat was the iconic face of the Palestinian people when he died in 2004

In his letters, Welsh alleged that an earlier congressional investigation headed by former Sen. Jeremiah Denton, R-Ala., in 1986 was subverted with false and misleading information. He offered to assist further investigations but received no response and came to realize the futility of his efforts.

Welsh at one time was in touch with the office of Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., who was chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Near the time of the 2000 presidential election, Welsh received a call from Kyl’s office, informing him the senator “has decided that this is not an issue that he wished to bring up at this time.”

In a statement to Congress on Oct. 25, 2000, Welsh charged that all existing copies of warning cables sent belatedly to the U.S. Embassy in Khartoum were ordered at a high-level by either the State Department or White House to be collected and destroyed.

Two independent investigations of the National Archives in 2001 and 2002 back up those charges.

Likewise, Russ Braley, a Middle East correspondent with the New York Daily News who was in Jordan at the time of the event, concluded after spending several days in the National Archives that records on the murders had been purged.

Braley found materials that referred to certain numbered documents, but those documents had been removed.

Welsh noted, however, that Braley began digging deeper and came up with a top-secret cable from Secretary of State Rogers to various American embassies in Europe and Middle East.

The dispatch instructed diplomats to orally brief the governments of the countries in which they served that the United States had evidence Arafat was responsible.

Protecting Moses

In 2006, a classified State Department document finally was released, titled “The Seizure of the Saudi Arabian Embassy in Khartoum,” that confirmed the Nixon administration knew the true story.

Honored by Time in 1994, Arafat became a Nobel Peace Prize winner that year

The report concluded the Khartoum operation “was planned and carried out with the full knowledge and personal approval of Yasser Arafat, Chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), and head of Fatah.”

American Spectator contributor Andrew B. Wilson recently interviewed Welsh, now 66 years old and running a grocery store in the coastal resort town of Manzanita, Ore.

Welsh “still seethes with indignation” over what happened inside the Nixon administration 40 years ago, Wilson writes in a story Friday.

Despite the certain knowledge of Arafat’s guilt, Arafat grew in global stature and, as Wilson writes, was “lionized by most of the world media as an Arab ‘Moses’ struggling to lead his people to the promised land.”

Israel has its fair share of reprobates and skeletons, so much so, when they are finally rattled an avalanche will ensue. But in the main, said machinations have been internally directed, hardly affecting allied nations. 

However, when the world’s super power colludes with evil, there is barely an ally which is not harmed. In tandem, those who serve under Washington’s leadership are often treated as little more than gum under their shoes. Disposable garbage. This is unforgivable and treacherous. Payback is long overdue.

History repeats.

Obama & Crew March In Lock-Step With UN Thugs, Chiefly To Disarm Americans…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Popular truisms are not for nothing. One can often extrapolate much from their intended usage, as well as learn from their bastardization. As such, there really is “more than one way to skin a cat”, even when things appear exceedingly bleak. But one must first recognize the dangers, otherwise how can one skin this or that. Precisely.

Yet, without piecing together all the (seemingly) disparate threads, one is hard pressed to know where the end point is. And this is no small matter. In fact, without said recognition the slippery deed will be done, bereft of a chance to massively push back, against those who seek nothing less than total submission – yours!

Par for the course, radical revolutionaries avail themselves of a potpourri of converging – to the non discerning eye, they can be seen as diverging – epicenters, as they bore from within. Rules For Radicals – …is their “holy” grail. Their bible. It is more than worthwhile to print out the above rules, as they serve as a blue print. They explain the heretofore inexplicable, making sense out of what is transpiring before our (horrified) eyes. In fact, this American-Israeli has a copy of the actual book and studies it, as necessary. Yes, reading is fundamental!

In furtherance of the above, and as a tie in to the commentary at hand, learn “Adina Kutnicki’s”  lessons/rules herein, free of charge to boot. Less than a baker’s dozen (the number within the left’s rule book), but no less trenchant.

Rule Number One: Leftist dogma is the same world over, and don’t ever forget it –

Rule Number Two:  Western media is mostly in the service of radical leftist forces, and operates to the detriment of patriots. They are particularly fired up against Americans & Israelis, the locus of leftist rage –

Rule Number Three: Leftist academia has a death grip on the nation’s young, capable of upending western civilization –

Rule Number Four: The company one keeps is emblematic of ones worldview/intentions –

Rule Number Five: Ones “roots” are, more than less, embedded, even if one states otherwise –

And while the above rules are not foolproof, they are indeed worthy of all due deliberation, as they have proven their merits, time and again. So, is the following at all surprising, even though many will “see no (Obama) evil, hear no evil”, even as Americans become buried with evidence?

‘Disarming American citizens, Obama style’

Canada Free Press, Doug Hagmann, March 19, 2013

Presently flying under the radar of the American people is the much misunderstood,  deliberately mischaracterized and under-reported United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty. Considering the persistent multi-level attacks against U.S. gun owners and American’s rights under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the “Final U.N. Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty” that convened yesterday and is scheduled to last through March 28, 2013 should be front page news all across America. But it’s not, and for good reason.

But first, let it be made clear thatBarack Hussein Obama is on record as being against the private ownership of firearms by American citizens. This might surprise anyone who listens to the hysterically-pitched assertions by such Obama lapdogs as Chris Mathews and Lawrence O’Donnell, for example, who contend that Obama has posed no threat to private gun ownership as President. Such assertions are only convincing to those who have not done any research into this matter.Most people, including conservative Americans thought the United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) was a dead issue, or at least not a threat to U.S. gun owners based on a number of assumptions relating to international treaties and U.S. Constitutional law. Like everything else with the Obama regime, however, things are never what they appear, nor are they as simple as we are led to believe.

Obama vs. the Second Amendment

In 2003, Obama voted in support of legislation that would have banned privately owned hunting shotguns, target rifles and black powder rifles in Illinois. While running for political office in 2004, Obama called for national legislation to prevent anyone but law enforcers from carrying concealed firearms. As reported in the February 20, 2004 edition of The Chicago Tribune, Obama was quoted as 
“back[ing] federal legislation that would ban citizens from carrying weapons, except for law enforcement.”Barack Hussein Obama has a long and well documented history on gun control, going back as far as his law school days. There, he was mentored by Laurence Tribe, a staunch opponent to gun rights of American citizens. In 1994, Obama was a member of the Joyce Foundation, a Chicago based charitable organization that in part, is a proponent of various anti-gun groups and related agendas.

In the April 2, 2008 edition of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Obama was quoted stating “I am not in favor of concealed weapons… I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations.” As an Illinois State Senator, Obama voted twice against SB 2165, more commonly known as the “Castle Doctrine,” which would permit household occupants to defend themselves through the use of firearms.

Perhaps most nefarious and telling of all is what Obama whispered to Sarah Brady during a meeting on 30 March 2011 concerning gun control:  “I just want you to knowthat we are working on it. We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”

By far and despite the intent of Obama-supported organizations such as Fact Check and Media Matters, it is clear that he is the most anti-Second Amendment (putative) President ever to hold office.

U.S. arms control via the UN

Perhaps most disconcerting about the present actions of the United Nations is the cavalier attitude held by most, including many conservatives, that the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty would be completely impotent against the U.S. Constitution and American’s rights under the Second Amendment. After all, it is argued that to be effective, such a treaty would require Senate ratification and at present, such ratification would have a “zero possibility” of passage. Such thinking is consistent with a normal political atmosphere and an administration that has a genuine respect for the U.S. Constitution. Considering what we’ve seen over the last decade, does the recent track record of our elected leaders alleviate your concerns?

Consider that within 24 hours of his re-election, Obama pushed for a new round of international negotiations to revive the very U.N. treaty he visibly backed off of in the months leading to the 2012 elections. Isn’t this act alone enough to trip some alarm bells, even among the most skeptic?

It should also be noted that on February 26, 2013, the American Bar Association’s Center for Human Rights issued a white paper on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty,  concluding that “the proposed ATT is consistent with the Second Amendment.” A review of this four-page document reveals certain questionable assumptions on which that conclusion is based.

This is a warning to all Americans that the Obama support of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty can lead to some “UN-intended” consequences to American’s right to own and bear arms. Americans looking at this issue are failing to look at the larger picture, which is the ultimate subjugation of the United States to a global governance. This can most effectively be accomplished through the disarmament of its citizens, especially in the face of violent outbreaks as the U.S. and the world economic systems begin to unravel.

The machinations of the Obama regime within the inner workings of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty must not be underestimated. We must look at the bigger picture and the end-game objectives of the globalists pulling the puppet strings. All is not what it appears. …and raising the clarion call is surely more than necessary, if freedom and liberty mean anything at all. Some more “proof in the pudding” –

But it is not as if this blog hasn’t fleshed out the Radical-in-Chief’s gun control designs, both involving the UN and in other converging ways. Specifically, back in July 2012, at this blog’s inception, an antenna was raised about the UN’s march toward disarming American’s, and with the Commander-in-Chief’s blessings- How dare he/they? 

Ever since then, the topic has been hotter than hot, as related within all the attendant links –  

Nevertheless, some may be heartened by the recent “shoot down” given to Sen Feinstein, the left coast harpie, as she incessantly guns for total control with her radical revolutionary surrogates –

No matter. This is certainly not the juncture to become complacent. In fact, doubling down is the way forward. And who said we can’t learn from our enemies (yes, they are) –…using their tactics against them, as we aim for Conservative, Constitutional victory!

CHEMICAL ALERT: Syrian “Rebels” More Dangerous Than Assad’s Thugs…Al Qaeda/Salafists In The Forefront…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The idiom,“separating the forest from the trees”, is often bandied about, but mostly devoid of context. Hence, its targeted import becomes entirely lost, or muddled at best. Not only that, but when it comes to the Middle East, said confusion is as explosive as countless pyromaniacs running loose, in the largest forest of all!

In this regard, it is absolutely the case, the Pyromaniac-in-Chief set the region FURTHER ablaze, giving the advantage to Al Qaeda related jihadis. You know, those same hardened terrorists who fight under the banner of the late, non-lamented Osama Bin Laden! In fact, to up the odds of his Brotherhood picks ( “cousins” of Al Qaeda ) he has unleashed those very same forces – who primed their techniques fighting Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan – to run rampant all over the region. They are currently ensconced in the Egyptian Sinai (Israel’s southern border) and abutting Israel’s northern Golan border. Pincer-like. More than a bastard.

“Leading from behind”, he has no intention of dealing with the Iranian menace through hyper-American muscle tactics. Thereby, demonstrating to its Hitlerite regime what their fate will be, if they don’t cease & desist their genocidal weapons program. Instead, for 4 + years, he opts for jaw-jaw, hardly likely to scare any of the basket cases in the world, let alone the cagey mullahs.

In other words, the west’s imperative, to break the “Iranian axis of evil”,  thus weakening Assad’s/Hezbollah’s back, never entered the fray. As such, he not only left Iran stronger, but gave the upper hand to those fighting Assad, every bit as much killing machines as Assad. However, now Israel’s border is hotter than ever, as the “rebels” have ZERO reservations about utilizing chemical warfare, unlike Assad, knowing full well that said move would bring the IDF down on his head! 

But now, Jerusalem (and other capitals) is dealing with non-state actors, thereby, making the region more than a tinderbox. Alas, a six year old could have planned a better campaign. And that’s the point. Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s intent is to weaken American interests, with Israel at the forefront! Forget about his recent “visit”. Radical politics took center stage, even as the regional upheaval demanded his full attention. Yes, he can walk and chew gum at the same time. More than a pyromaniac. My head hurts.

In the main, the leader of the free world has ensured that chemical weapons would be introduced, something which Assad’s terror forces knew was off limits, regardless of regional tensions. However, now that the “rebels” have introduced chemical warfare, all bets are off, as reported, at this blog, almost most 4 months ago –

Most rational folks realize by now – including the Commander-in-Chief and his surrogates – Islamists are bloodthirsty, whatever their stripes –…even if the POTUS feigns otherwise, no, he didn’t pick his Brotherhood (with remnants of Al Qaeda) jihadis over the rest. And this matters, mainly because he really stood still when he shouldn’t have, back in 2009, when Iranian freedom fighters were attempting to break the back of their Hitlerite regime.

Therefore, no one should be surprised, that under his watch chemical weapons have been unleashed, and the fingerprints lead straight back to his “rebels”.

‘Alarming Footage: Syrian Rebels Used Chemical Weapons’

by  on MARCH 25, 2013 

By Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat

In December of last year we revealed that the rebels had in their hands potent chemical weapons and were testing them on rabbits, and we predicted that they will use them on innocents.

Well now it is happening.

And now, new evidence translated from Arabic sources reveals the likelihood that it was the Muslim rebels (FSA) and not the Assad regime that carried out a chemical attack on the town of Khan al-Assal, west of Aleppo.

We have captured clips that were never translated (until now) showing rebels revealing heavy arsenals including weapons of mass destruction that contain chemical agents.

Russia says that it was the FSA that carried out the massacre while the White House says that there is no evidence that the rebels are responsible.

In the Arab circles, the blaming goes back and forth. The Syrian government blames the FSA and vise versa.

So who do we believe?

Even if we examine the sources in Arabic we find that the reporting on this story is usually done by masters of confusion. For example, how can an FSA reporter film an exploded chemical rocket at a close distance and remain alive?

But if we examine the videos during all the clashes between the FSA and the Syrian military we find much evidence from footage never seen in the West (until now) showing that weapons cache of scuds, tanks, Sam-7 rockets and even weapons of mass destruction (chemical as well as biological) are falling into the hands of FSA rebels.

In one video that we found, the Syrian rebels, after taking an airbase, show the substantial amount of scud missiles now in their hands:

And just when you think that these rebels are too primitive to figure out how to fire these missiles, here is a video of them actually launching one:

The chemical attack in Khan al-Assal is said to have been done by Assad, but as people are swayed to believing the jihadist rebels, we have first hand testimony from just one of the multitude of victims of this tragedy:

Also, there are some important facts that we have to take into perspective.

The assault happened in the town of Khan al-Assal, a predominately Shiite town. The Syrian revolution is a Sunni movement, and one of its main goals is to remove the Shiite Assad regime. The town has also been a common victimof attacks by Al-Qaeda, a Sunni organization. This is thus an indication that the attack was conducted by Sunnis, and not the government which is Shiite.

Moreover, neither the rebels nor the government denies that amongst the victims were military personal. In fact, it is said that out of the 26 dead 16 were Syrian soldiers.

Why would a Shiite government orchestrate a terrorist attack on its own soldiers especially in a Shiite town?

Assad is very loyal to his own sect–the Alawites–which is a part of Shia Islam, and they in turn are loyal to him. This allegiance is so strong that, according to Middle East expert Walid Phares, if Assad ever escaped from the rebels and hid in the northwestern part of Syria, where most of the Alawites live, and his enemies came to attack there, he would use chemical weapons “to defend his own community.”

Khan al-Assal, the place of the attack, is in the northwestern part of Syria, to where Assad would flee, and the region that he would be willing to defend.

Furthermore, a medic at the local civilian hospital said that he personally saw soldiers attending to the wounded at the scene of the attack.

Another factor that deserves attention is that the device used for the attack was not advanced; both American and independent weapons analysts confirm this. If the Assad regime had done last week’s incursion, then it would have utilized something of a more sophisticated arsenal.

Also, if the government was behind this, the attack would have killed more than just 26 people, since Syria is said to own the largest chemical arsenal in the region.

It is reported that the syrian military believes that the assault was done by launching into the town a home-made rocket containing CL17, a type of chlorine that can be found at your local swimming pool.

Though this was a small attack, chlorine can be used to implement very significant destruction on human populations. According to Benjamin Brodsky, writing for the Monterey Institute of International Studies:

The worst industrial accident in history is illustrative: 40 metric tons of methyl isocyanate was released from a Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, on December 3, 1984. The resulting plume killed at least 3,000 people downwind and injured more than 100,000. A sufficiently large release of elemental chlorine may be capable of exacting a comparable toll, particularly if it were to be discharged in a highly populated civilian area.

Another point is that if Assad was indeed the attacker in this scenario, then the media would be making full scale reports affirming that he is the perpetuator. The White House would be confirming it, the U.N. would be confirming it–but they are not.

It makes no sense that Assad would all of a sudden order such a strike in the first place, since he is worried about the repercussion of negative international responses. Walid Phares has made this point:

He is going to try not to use it [the chemical weapons] as much as as he can because he knows the international reaction is going to be very tough.

But, all of these facts have not stopped John Mccain and Lindsay Graham from calling for U.S. intervention and the granting of weapons to the jihadists. In a recent joint statement, the two Republican senators wrote:

We are extremely disturbed by reports that chemical weapons have been used today in Syria. President Obama has said that the use of weapons of mass destruction by Bashar Assad is a ‘red line’ for him that ‘will have consequences.’ If today’s reports are substantiated, the President’s red line has been crossed, and we would urge him to take immediate action to impose the consequences he has promised. That should include the provision of arms to vetted Syrian opposition groups, targeted strikes against Assad’s aircraft and SCUD missile batteries on the ground, and the establishment of safe zones inside Syria to protect civilians and opposition groups. If today’s reports are substantiated, the tragic irony will be that these are the exact same actions that could have prevented the use of weapons of mass destruction in Syria.

The facts do not stop Republican Mike Rogers from affirming that it is a “high probability” that Assad used chemical weapons, as can be found in a recent interview:

America is in, to a degree, intervening in the Syrian situation.

One diplomatic source has stated

Scores of U.S. military advisers in Jordan are training the rebels in

It has also been said that that training and weapons has been financed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar, and that the goal of the U.S. and NATO is to make the rebels into a formidable fighting force “capable of countering the Syrian Army.”

Our primary concern should be that one day our own nation will work with NATO to militarily strike the Assad regime and allow the revolutionaries to prevail. Such an act will not only enable Islamic fundamentalism to further expand, but empower Turkey to commence its much aspired empire–that is–a revived Ottoman empire.

BOTTOM LINE: Now that the above has been set in motion, and Al Qaeda has captured the main highway bordering Israel, Jordan and Syria, and a major tributary too –…part of his mission to Israel (aside from  “Alinskyite” indoctrination of Israel’s university students and his ONLY major speech in Israel – was to tamp down the fires. According to DEBKAfile Intelligence: “During his visit to Israel, US President Barack Obama struck a deal with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu for military action against Syrian chemical weapons. The new issue will flesh out that core decision with exclusive revelations on NATO’s role in setting up the expedition, its participants, targets and ramifications, including likely responses by Moscow and Tehran”.

More than deserving of his Satan-like status!

UPDATE: herein lies the crux of the above thesis (Obama’s incendiary handiwork)… and reading it, after today’s commentary posting, is more than noteworthy –

Muslim Rep Keith Ellison & His DEEP Connections To The Nation of Islam…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

“Keithy” (feel like he is an old friend, having featured him several times at this blog, thus, the term of “endearment” – is feeling quite spunky these days, even to the point of shouting down Sean Hannity, not exactly a timid opponent. Oh my…the guy has cajones, as is said in some Brooklyn, NY ‘hoods. See for yourselves –

‘Sean Hannity Battles Disrespectful Keith Ellison In Epic Heated Interview’-

Now, it is not as if Muslims aren’t used to lording their supremacy, but this is kind of over the top, even by Washington standards. So, what gives? Well, the Muslim Rep, for all intents and purposes, is a “made man”. In other words, the POTUS has his back. High fives all around. Fist bumps galore.

Why? BOTH are Dems, heart with the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, and the Nation of Islam. They have more than a few converging interests. As the readers are well aware, Barack HUSSEIN Obama is inextricably tied to the Brotherhood –, and he “worshiped” at the knees of Rev Wright in Trinity “Church”. It is little more than a Black Liberation Nationalist Movement, cloaked as a house of “worship”, deeply aligned with the Nation of Islam. 

Specifically, back in the day, the House’s Muslim Rep, was also a spokesman for Louis Farrakhan, you know THAT Louie, the anti-semitic, anti-white, Black separatist and champion of revolutionary terror tactics to upend America. Now, that’s a whole lot of hate –…a most vile creature.


Evidence indicates he acted as ‘representative’ for Nation of Islam

author-image by AARON KLEIN  –


Fresh from an interview dustup with the Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity, the first Muslim elected to Congress still is unable to explain evidence that his association with the anti-Semitic, anti-white Nation of Islam was much closer than he has claimed.

Newspaper reports from the 1990s indicate Ellison was known as a supporter and activist for Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam, even speaking on behalf of the controversial group as a “representative.”

The information and timeline provided by the newspaper reports are at odds with Ellison’s public explanation of his association with the group.

During his first campaign for Congress, in 2006, Ellison wrote a letter to the Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota & the Dakotas claiming he had never been a Nation of Islam member.

Immediately after he was sworn in to Congress in 2006, he posed for photographs with then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi with their hands on a copy of the Quran.

Ellison’s congressional office in Washington did not reply to a WND request for comment.

Tuesday night, Ellison was invited to talk with Hannity about the looming budget sequester, as WND reported. Responding to Hannity’s montage of President Obama’s statements about the upcoming automatic budget cuts, Ellison opened by declaring, “Quite frankly, you are the worst excuse for a journalist I’ve ever seen.” The interview went downhill from there. (See video of the interview at the end of this article).

In the letter to the Jewish group, Ellison further claimed that his association with the Nation of Islam was limited to an 18-month period in which he was helping to organize the Minnesota contingent at the 1995 Million Man March.


Ellison’s claims are contradicted by the newspaper finds, which place him as a Nation of Islam “representative” in 1997 and supporter in 1998.

In 1997, he delivered a statement for the Nation of Islam, apparently serving as the group’s spokesman while being described as a Nation of Islam “representative.”

The Minneapolis Star Tribune reported the episode Feb. 3, 1997. The case involved Joanne Jackson, the executive director of the Minneapolis Initiative Against Racism, or MIAR, who found herself in hot water for controversial comments about Jews.

Jackson was a Nation of Islam supporter who had been quoted as stating, “Jews are among the most racist white people I know.”

The Star Tribune reported “the appearance of Twin Cities representatives of Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam at the MIAR’s board meeting on Monday.” Among the “representatives” was Ellison, according to the report.

The article said Ellison read comments on behalf of the Nation of Islam.

The Tribune noted Ellison used his religious name of Muhammad in reading the statement to the board in defense of Jackson.

“[We] stand by Ms. Jackson,” Ellison said. “We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to her, and by her right to express her view without sanction. Here is why we support Ms. Jackson: She is correct about Minister Farrakhan. He is not a racist. He is also not an anti-Semite.”

Ellison also said Farrakhan’s representatives in the Twin Cities have a “sincere desire to talk over the tensions between the black and Jewish communities with reason and truth.”

The report said the statement “also criticized the board, questioning ‘whether MIAR has the requisite understanding, knowledge or resolve to be an initiative against racism.’”

“It appears that MIAR’s first initiative against racism should be directed at itself, or at least the 11 board members who voted to dismiss Joanne Jackson,’” the Tribune said.

WND also found an April 5, 1998, article in the Star Tribune describing Ellison as a well-known Nation of Islam supporter.

“Ellison, a newcomer to DFL politics, is well-known in the black community as the former head of the Legal Rights Center and a supporter of Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam,” the article said.

Ellison’s affinity for the Nation of Islam traces back at least to his days as a law student in 1989 and 1990.

Keith Ellison-Muhammad

The reported in 2006 that Ellison had used the names Keith X Ellison and Keith Ellison-Muhammad during his student days, writing columns in a student newspaper that defended Farrakhan against accusations of anti-Semitism.

In another student column, Ellison called for a separate nation for blacks.

Minnesota Public Radio reported in 2006, during Ellison’s first run for Congress, that he was also a member of the Black Law Student Association and was criticized for sponsoring anti-Semitic speakers at the University of Minnesota.

Dan Weiss, a University of Minnesota Law School classmate of Ellison’s, told MPR at the time, “My recollections of Keith are of that person who was very much in support of the Nation of Islam and their messages they tried to convey to the larger community.”

Ellison later promoted Farrakhan’s Million Man March, appearing on stage for the speech of Nation of Islam activist and spokesman Khalid Abdul Muhammad.

In an April 2011 interview with Sean Hannity, Ellison was asked if he thought the Nation of Islam should be “investigated” by the government.

“I’m more of a constitutionalist, Sean,” Ellison said. “You and I must agree that we wouldn’t just investigate a group because we don’t agree with them. We gotta have more than that. You’d agree with that, right? Wouldn’t you agree with that?”

The foxes are not only burrowed, deep within the American house, but they are also shouting in patriot’s faces. Don’t know about anyone else, but it is beyond offensive, galling and menacing. WAY beyond.

“Red/Leftists” Merge Forces With “Green/Islamists”, In A Frontal Assault Against Free Speech…NY Rabbi Used As Bait…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The term, “getting caught with one’s pants down”, usually refers to wayward spouses or cheating boyfriends, but one can aptly apply its underpinning to Islamic jihadists. In a similar fashion, Islamists  preach “inter-faith” dialogue to the wider public, but perform a volte face when speaking to their like-minded followers – Islamists & leftist sympathizers. Taquiyya reigns supreme, thus, becoming their modus operandi, as they plan their stealth attack –

And well meaning westerners have yet to learn this crucial lesson, including many over achieving, cerebral-endowed Jewish brethren, as dissembling Islamists run circles around them, continually keeping them on the defensive. They trip over themselves, issuing mea culpas…mea culpas. Sheesh. But don’t think it isn’t terribly painful to admit the above, realizing that Jewish brains (other groups don’t fare well either) often turn to mush, when anything smacks of third world criticism. Yet, their full-on mental breakdown jumps into the stratosphere, as soon as any truth telling about Islam gains momentum. A collective psychiatric couch is warranted. Calling Dr. Kenneth Levin –

This is precisely why Islamists/leftists target Jews – Rabbis too – and it perversely makes perfect sense, as demonstrated within – They know their audience well.

Not only that, but they have cowed/submitted many to their ways, merely by screaming “Islamophobia” , never mind its made up out of whole cloth “meaning” – But Jews (others as well), who possess spines, don’t have to take it lying down…not at all – Besides, ADL honcho, Abe Foxman, wouldn’t know how to offer a Jewish response, if it smacked him upside the head. Ignore his “missives”.
Yet, leave it to Tom Trento, a patriotic warrior, to expose their methods, and this is hardly his virgin voyage – As revealed, a treasure trove of emails…computer “nerds” certainly come in handy, most especially in times like these!

Mr. Habeeb Ahmed, President-Elect,
Islamic Center of Long Island
Human Rights Commission
Nassau County
From:Richard Tibbets
To: Bob Nuxoll ; Dolores Tibbets;; Elaine Peters ; Faroque Khan ; Habeeb Ahmed ; Hank Arond ;; Mark Lukens ; Marty Melkonian ; Paul Auerbach
Cc: Claire Deroche ; Tom Goodhue; Jay Keller
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:07 PM
Subject: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
Dear TIA-LI Board Members,
Claire Deroche of UUCSR advised me Pamela Geller, founder of the organization, Stop Islamization of America (SIOA) will speak in Great Neck next month.
Her talk, “Imposition of Sharia in America” will be:
DATE/TIME:  Sunday Morning, April 14, at 10:00am
LOCATION:  Great Neck Synagogue.
PRESENTED BY:  Great Neck Synagogue Men’s Club.
You can check it out at her website: geler-to-address-great-neck-synagogue.html
I also checked out the Synagogue’s website at www.gns.organd found the following by clicking on the Calendar event listed for April_14th:************************************
Men’s Club Presents: Pamela Geller @ GNS
When:  Sun, April 14, 10am – 11am
Description:  The Great Neck Synagogue Men’s Club Presents Pamela Geller
Sunday, April 14, 2013, 10:00 am
“Imposition of Sharia in America”
Pamela Geller is the founder, editor and publisher of Atlas and President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI) and Stop Islamizationof America (SIOA). She is
the author of The Post‐American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America, (foreword by Ambassador John Bolton), (Simon& Schuster). Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance (WND Books). She is also a regular columnist for World Net Daily, the American Thinker, and other publications. The Queens Village Republican Club, the oldest Republican club in America, honored Pamela Geller as the “American Patriot of the
Year” in February 2013. That same month, the Creative Zionist Coalition gave her the Queen Esther Award
Richard Tibbets, Secretary The Interfaith Alliance – Long Island Chapter
From:Habeebudddin Ahmed []
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 1:41 PM
To: Richard Tibbets; Bob Nuxoll; Dolores Tibbets;; Elaine Peters; Faroque Khan; Hank Arond;; Mark Lukens; Marty Melkonian; Paul Auerbach
Cc: Claire Deroche; Tom Goodhue; Jay Keller; beth lilach
Subject: Re: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
Dear Friends,
We need to stop her from coming to Great Neck………do we do a petition  on the stationary of council of churches, The Interfaith Alliance and The Holocaust Center?? Her views are well known…she is the personification of an Islamophobe!!!
Brothers and Sisters what do you think??
Habeeb.Habeeb U. Ahmed
First Vice President
Islamic Center of Long Island
835 Brush Hollow Rd
Westbury, NY 11590Commissioner
Human Rights Commission
Nassau County
516 581 5893
The group I was speaking with last night who gave me this information suggested contacting other rabbis in the area who would then contact the Great Neck Synagogue. They also talked about contacting the chief rabbi of the big synagogue in Manhattan and asking him to contact Great Neck Synagogue.Warm regards,
Claire Deroche
Social Justice Coordinator
48 Shelter Rock Road
Manhasset, NY 11030
516-627-6560, ext. 177, phone
516-627-6596, fax
“Nurture Your Spirit. Help Heal Our World”
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s).  Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If
you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
From: robert nuxoll
To: Claire DeRoche ; Habeeb Ahmed ; Richard Tibbets ; Dolores Tibbets ; “” ; Elaine Peters ; Faroque Khan ; Hank Arond ; Dr. Isma H Chaudhry ; Mark Lukens ; Marty Melkonian; Paul Auerbach ; Betty Nuxoll ; Daniel Nuxoll ; Vince Chimenti ; Christine Douglas
Cc: Tom Goodhue ; Jay Keller; beth lilach
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:18 PM
Subject: RE: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
Dear friends,
I have telephoned the Great Neck Synagogue (516-487-6100) and found no one who knew anything about this other than that it was scheduled by their Men’s Club.  I left a message and asked that someone return my call.  I specifically said, “This is the equivalent of a church in the 1930s inviting a representative of the Nazi Party to speak.  Pam Geller has been labeled by both
the Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center as a leader of a hate group.”  I mentioned that I am a representative of The Interfaith Alliance of Long Island and a
member of The Unitarian Universalist Congregation of Shelter Rock.
I suggest that, regardless of whatever else we do, each of us calls the Synagogue to protest their inviting a noted hate-monger to a house of worship.
Bob Nuxoll
—– Original Message —–
From: Habeebudddin Ahmed
Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:10 pm
Subject: Re: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
To: robert nuxoll , Claire DeRoche , Richard Tibbets , Dolores Tibbets , “” , Elaine Peters , Faroque Khan , Hank Arond , “Dr. Isma H Chaudhry” , Mark Lukens , Marty Melkonian , Paul Auerbach , Betty Nuxoll , Daniel Nuxoll , Vince Chimenti , Christine Douglas
Cc: Tom Goodhue , Jay Keller , beth lilachHello All,
I think Bob has a wonderful suggestion for now. Let’s start calling the Great Neck Synagogue at 516 487 6100 and tell them that it is not befitting a religious organization to invite a bigot and a known Islamophobe. Request that you would like to speak with the Rabbi and if he is not available then leave a message for him. Please do this tomorrow and pass on this message to your friends and family.
Habeeb U. Ahmed
First Vice President
Islamic Center of Long Island
835 Brush Hollow Rd
Westbury, NY 11590Commissioner
Human Rights Commission
Nassau County516 581 5893
From: “
To: Habeebudddin Ahmed
Cc: robert nuxoll ; Claire DeRoche ; Richard Tibbets ; Dolores Tibbets ; “” ; Elaine Peters ; Faroque Khan ; Hank Arond ; Dr. Isma H Chaudhry ; Mark Lukens ; Marty Melkonian ; Paul Auerbach ; Betty Nuxoll ; Daniel Nuxoll ; Vince Chimenti ; Christine Douglas ; Jay Keller ; beth lilach
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:59 PM
Subject: Re: Pam Geller to speak in Great Neck
I called yesterday, introduced myself, and said that before I started organizing protests, I wanted to confirm if what I had heard was true, since it was hard to believe that a synagogue would host somebody who’d been condemned as a bigot and hate-monger by the Anti-Defamation League.
A somewhat perplexed secretary put me through to one of the rabbis yesterday, who said he knew nothing about her coming but apparently the men’s club invited her. I told him that I hoped they would reconsider, since this was highly offensive to me and doubtless to many other folks, the equivalent of a church inviting a Nazi who claimed Jews were trying to take over America or a mosque inviting an anti-Semite who claimed that Jews were trying to impose kosher laws on the nation. I also allowed as how the men’s club could have done this without his knowledge, telling him how when I worked at Riverside Church, the Men’s Club regularly invited right wing fanatics to speak to their “class” on Sunday mornings.
I think that calling is better at this stage than public protests, both because the synagogue’s leaders may truly be surprised and embarrassed by what the men’s group has done and because we should avoid giving Geller free publicity: I think she gets off on being so offensive that it draws attention to herself.
Tom Goodhue
Thanks Tom for making the call. I called today and they did not put me thru to the Rabbi. They just took message and hung up. Tom is right at this point lets all make calls and speak to the Rabbi. Let’s tell our friends and family to do the same. Send this to all your email lists. We all can send email to the Rabbi.Phone number of Great Neck Synagogue: 516 487 6100
Main Rabbi: Rabbi Dale Polakoff
Rabbi’s email: rabbi@gns.orgThanks
Habeeb U. Ahmed
First Vice President
Islamic Center of Long Island
835 Brush Hollow Rd
Westbury, NY 11590Commissioner
Human Rights Commission
Nassau County516 581 5893

IF your brains are still intact, please refer to Prof Paul Eildelberg’s  ( trenchant analysis. It sheds light on the “Crisis of Our Times”, illuminating the current form of “conflict resolution”, and all its bloody blow back –

Tragically, most western profs are incapable of seeing Islam for what it is; a construct of immutable, political, cult-like imperatives; dressed up as the “religion of peace”, even as its adherents wage murderous jihad across the globe, with doses of “stealth” attacks in between. 

The “Crisis of Our Times” demands something from all of us: Stand up and be counted!