HUSSEIN Obama’s Illegal War In Libya:Nexus To Downed Russian Airliner & MANPAD Danger To US & Europe. Where Is The Linkage? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

MANY analyses are housed within this site regarding Obama Inc.’s decision to enter into an illegal war with Libya. Be that as it may, its rogue basis started with the administration’s failure to garner Congressional approval. This is not an insignificant, nor inconsequential, factor. Incontestably, every President – even “King” Obama – must abide by the War Powers Resolution. It is not optional. It reads in part:
Resolved by the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. This joint resolution may be cited as the “War Powers Resolution”.

PURPOSE AND POLICY

SEC. 2. (a) It is the purpose of this joint resolution to fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States and ensure that the collective judgement of both the Congress and the President will apply to the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and to the continued use of such forces in hostilities or in such situations.

(b) Under article I, section 8, of the Constitution, it is specifically provided that the Congress shall have the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution, not only its own powers but also all other powers vested by the Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.

(c) The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

CONSULTATION

SEC. 3. The President in every possible instance shall consult with Congress before introducing United States Armed Forces into hostilities or into situation where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, and after every such introduction shall consult regularly with the Congress until United States Armed Forces are no longer engaged in hostilities or have been removed from such situations.

REPORTING

SEC. 4. (a) In the absence of a declaration of war, in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced–

(1) into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances;

(2) into the territory, airspace or waters of a foreign nation, while equipped for combat, except for deployments which relate solely to supply, replacement, repair, or training of such forces; or

(3) in numbers which substantially enlarge United States Armed Forces equipped for combat already located in a foreign nation; the president shall submit within 48 hours to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate a report, in writing, setting forth–

(A) the circumstances necessitating the introduction of United States Armed Forces;

(B) the constitutional and legislative authority under which such introduction took place; and

(C) the estimated scope and duration of the hostilities or involvement.

(b) The President shall provide such other information as the Congress may request in the fulfillment of its constitutional responsibilities with respect to committing the Nation to war and to the use of United States Armed Forces abroad

(c) Whenever United States Armed Forces are introduced into hostilities or into any situation described in subsection (a) of this section, the President shall, so long as such armed forces continue to be engaged in such hostilities or situation, report to the Congress periodically on the status of such hostilities or situation as well as on the scope and duration of such hostilities or situation, but in no event shall he report to the Congress less often than once every six months….continue reading

PRAY tell, is there anything ambiguous about the above Constitutional-derived mandate, that HUSSEIN Obama felt he had the right to abrogate its basis? Not a damn thing. Mind you, poli sci and/or law majors would fail first level course work, if they “misunderstood” its essence!  

IN fact, he stated very clearly that the “War Powers Resolution” Act does not apply to his administration. Really?

President Obama is again asserting his right to act unilaterally and without congressional approval in going to war. In what has become a mantra for this Administration, Obama reportedly told members of Congress that he does not need congressional approval to unleash a comprehensive military campaign against the Islamic State. The President informed a few members at a dinner — a striking image of how low congressional authority has become in our tripartite system of government.

We have been discussing the growing concerns over President Barack Obama’s series of unilateral actions in ordering agencies not to enforce law, effectively rewriting laws, and moving hundreds of millions of dollars from appropriated purposes to areas of his choosing. One of the greatest concerns has been his unchecked authority asserted in the national security area. I previously represented members of Congress in challenging Obama’s intervention in the Libyan civil war without a declaration from Congress. In the case, President Obama insisted that he alone determines what is a war and therefore when he needs a declaration. Since the court would not recognize standing to challenge the war, it left Obama free to engage in war operations in any country of his choosing. As with his approach in Libya, Syria and other combat operations (and most recently on whether he will resume the war in Iraq), Obama is again asserting his extreme view of executive power.

As in the past, Democrats are not just silent but actually applauding the circumvention of Congress — a precedent that will likely come back to haunt them if the next president is a Republican.

I have repeatedly testified (here and here and here and here) and wrote a column on President Obama’s increasing circumvention of Congress in negating or suspending U.S. laws. However, war is a particularly egregious form of this unilateralism since the Framers worked hard to limit such powers under Article I and Article II…continue reading

 

IN this regard, it has already been established that permission was not sought, nor granted, to enter into war with Libya. Still yet, the overarching questions remain: 1) What was the main goal? 2) What were/are the knock-on effects? 3) And how do they intersect with a downed airliner(s)?

 

DARE it be suggested, how difficult would it be for some of Allah’s barbarians to stow away their newly acquired wares, only to be launched when settled within their Euro destinations as new “refugees?” Realistically, how many US flights fly in and out of said cities on a daily basis, never mind the damage accrued on European soil per se? Okay…more than food for thought

ALAS, let the following serve as “testimony”:

TESTIMONY ONE:

IN answer to questions 1 and 2 – a little over a year and a half ago – this investigative journalist asserted: “The Mysterious Disappearance Of A Malaysian Airliner: Possible Intersection With Libya’s “Missing” MANPADS. What If R2P/Obama’s Benghazigate Bears The Onus?”

YES, bear in mind that Benghazigate was a DIRECT result of the illegal war in Libya. Cause and effect.

THEN, ask yourselves: Was “Testimony One” (once explored and read) a foreshadowing to the recently downed Russian Metrojet Flight 9268 over Sinai? Asked and answered.

  TESTIMONY TWO:

SO, now we segue to the downed flight on Oct. 31, 2015 via DEBKAfile – a highly reliable and notable intelligence site – and its assessment:

The British Cobra (emergency cabinet) decision of Wednesday, Nov. 4, not to send airliners to or from Sharm El-Sheikh, where 20,000 British tourists are stranded, further strengthens the assumption that the Russian Metrojet Flight 9268 was downed over Sinai Saturday by a terrorist missile. It confirms that air traffic over Sinai and landings at Sharm are under threat from the ground – else why leave a large group of Britons under virtual siege in the Egyptian Red Sea resort? London said that the suspension of flights to Sharm was “indefinite.”
Moscow early Thursday accused London of being moved to this action out of hostility to Russia rather than security concerns.
Downing Street released a statement Wednesday saying: “As more information has come to light, we have become concerned that the plane may well have been brought down by an explosive device.” This statement was criticized by Egypt as “premature” – not a good omen for the conversation Prime Minister David Cameron is due to hold with his visitor, Egyptian president Abdel-Fatteh El-Sisi, later Thursday.

The British government has therefore stubbed toes in Moscow and Cairo without coming up with an emergency plan for evacuating its citizens from Egypt, whether overland to Cairo by bus or by sea aboard ships picking them up at the Red Sea resort and sailing through the Suez Canal.

This lack of initiative is a sign of confusion and uncertainty.
So far, the drawn-out deliberations and prevarications by officials in several countries regarding the crash of the Russian plane are meant for one purpose: to gain time for doing nothing about ISIS in Sinai. Neither the US, Russia or Britain is ready to send forces to the peninsula to confront the terrorists head-on. {note: al-Qaeda/ISIS etc gained a firm foothold in Sinai AFTER Libya was blown up!)

The Ansar al Sharia terrorist organization in Libya, which attacked the US consulate in Benghazi and murdered the American ambassador in 2012, has the very missiles capable of shooting down large airliners flying at high altitudes: Russian-made ground-to-air Buk missiles, which have a range of between three and 42 kilometers. This ultra-violent Islamist terror group has very close operational ties with ISIS-Sinai, and very possibly smuggled the missile system into Sinai from Libya.
A number of intelligence agencies are aware of this and so a flock of leading European and Persian Gulf airlines lost no time in rerouting their flights to avoid Sinai straight after the Russian air disaster.
By causing this disaster, the Islamist terrorists coolly aimed for four goals:

1.  Retaliation for Russian intervention in Syria

2.  An attempt to destabilize the regime of Egyptian President Fattah Al-Sisi

3.  To show up the inadequacies of the 63-member coalition that the US formed in its effort to fight ISIS

4. To parade before the world the Islamic State’s operational prowess, its ability to shoot down the large passenger planes of the world’s biggest powers.

For five days, intelligence and flight safety experts dismissed the claim of responsibility that ISIS issued on the evening of October 31, maintaining that it was not to be taken seriously because no proof had been provided to support the claim – as if the charred fragments of the plane spread across tens of kilometers of desert were deniable.

In the second of its three messages, ISIS repeated its claim Wednesday, Nov. 4, promising details of how it downed the plane at a later date.

While more and more Western governments are coming around to accepting that the Russian airliner’s crash was caused by an explosive device, DEBKAfile’s counterterrorism sources repeat that they cannot rule out the possibility of a missile. The argument made on Wednesday in Washington and London that terrorist organizations do not have missiles capable of downing such planes is are simply incorrect.

ISIS-Sinai’s possession of an advanced ground-air missile system does not only endanger planes in the peninsula’s airspace, but also those aircraft flying over the Suez Canal as well as parts of Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Israel. One of the Egyptian president’s main purposes in his London visit was to try and persuade Prime Minister Cameron to join an Egyptian military operation against Ansar al Sharia in Libya and so eliminate a major prop and arms supplier for ISIS-Sinai. He does not hold out much hope of success.

CONCLUSIVELY, Obama Inc. and its entire intelligence apparatus (other regimes alike) knew full well that Libya was AWASH with advanced MANPADS. In fact, the CIA’s Petraeus warned :

Speaking at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University, former CIA director General David Petraeus issued a serious warning about the international threats posed by shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles (Manpads) in the hands of al Qaeda and other terrorists.  Petraeus referred to the January 27th downing of an Egyptian military helicopter by a Russian Strela-2 missile (aka SA-7) by al Qaeda-affiliated Ansar Beit al-Maqdis in the Sinai Peninsula. “Shooting down a helicopter with an apparent shoulder-fired missile is a big deal. … Our worst nightmare [was] that a civilian airliner would be shot down by one,” he said. … “The concern over an attack on civilian aviation flows not only from the loss of passengers’ lives, but also from the likely economic consequences that would follow—a worldwide grounding of air traffic that might bring the global economy to a screeching halt.”

The threat of Manpads in the hands of al Qaeda and terrorist groups has escalated dramatically. After Moammar Gadhafi’s killing by rebels in Libya, on October 20, 2011, some 20,000 Manpads went missing. Months later only 5,000 were reportedly destroyed. Where the remaining 15,000 missiles are is unclear.

While the Obama Administration issued a statement assuring Americans that most of Libya’s weapons, including shoulder-fired Manpads, had been secured, NATO’s then-military committee chairman, Admiral Giampaolo di Paola, was not so sure. His fear that Libyan Manpads could be scattered “from Kenya to Kunduz [Afghanistan]” subsequently materialized.

Libyan, Iranian and possibly Syrian MANPADs found their way to Salafi Bedouins, Hamas and al Qaeda-affiliated terrorist groups in the Sinai, forcing restriction of Israeli military and civilian air traffic in the area. A year after Gadhafi’s fall, Israeli officials reported that an SA-7 had been fired at one of their military aircraft over the Gaza Strip (AW&ST March 12,2012)….continue reading

libyan-rebel.JPG(An anti-Gadhafi rebel holds his rocket-propelled grenade launcher as he shouts slogans after the capture of the oil town of Ras Lanouf, in eastern Libya on March 5, 2011.TRIPOLI, Libya)

 

CONCOMITANTLY, despite all the out-sized dangers associated with blowing apart Libya, HUSSEIN Obama accelerated the Mid East’s wildfires, which, incidentally, happens to be my ‘hood! To wit, shouldn’t the Islamist-in-Chief “shoulder” responsibility for the deluge of advanced shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles (that which, heretofore, had been kept under lock and key by Gadhafi’s regime) and all the ensuing deaths?? If not, why not?    

9k338-igla-s-in-syria

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Report}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

ISIS, Cartels, Open Borders & Hill’s Email-Gate: Narco-Terror Nexus & Obama Inc.’s Complicity Exposed. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

ISIS: "We are here and we are funded by your government through Swiss banks".

IF patriots want to understand how ISIS catapulted (seemingly, out of nowhere) to become the mega terror force that it is, they must be willing to revert back to Fast & Furious. Yes, the illegal gun running by the ATF, DEA and FBI from 2006-2011 should be viewed as a “test run” template for the CIA’s (with assists from various FED agencies and Mid East terror groups) Libyan operation; the largest weapons running operation into the Mid East theater, aka Benghazigate, bar none. Hill’s domain too. Not only that, Congress (yes, the erstwhile “august” body) koshered a mega weapons airlift (Oct. 2014) into the bloody Syrian war, ostensibly to supply the so-called “rebels”, those who had already been proven to align with ISIS! Hmm.

(Weapons approved by Congress, airlifted. now in ISIS’s hands…shocked??)

MOREOVER, let’s also agree that the CIA (and DHS) is akin to a criminal cartel, and it does NOT operate F/B/O America’s citizens. Indeed, their efforts are directed at guarding whatever the banksters – and their bought and paid for politicians – demand at any given time.

THAT being established, ISIS, created by Obama Inc. (and the progeny of al-Qaeda), is amok inside and outside America’s borders. Multiple high decibel alarms are ringing, yet, are Americans hearing them? 

ALARM ONE:

MOST ominously, a road map to their Mexican base – and how it came to pass – has been detailed at this site. Indeed, “ISIS is making preparations to strike U.S. southern border states” was written in Aug. 2014. 

AMERICA’s compromised borders are not the result of an operational inability to control infiltrators, whether under the guise of kiddies or not. The absence of proper controls were designed to aid and abet the overthrow of America, both through an unbearable crush of illegal aliens, further coupled with an ability to ferry Islamic terrorists for whatever havoc they have in store. Sounds bizarre, yes, but not from an Anti-American-in-Chief’s perspective.

MOVING right along…the poisonous fruits of HUSSEIN Obama’s labors are prepping to explode. As indicated, a two-prong probing is in place within America and poised inside Juarez, Mexico.

IN fact, as a main hub for narco-terror (alongside the tri-border region of Latin America), MS-13 became a front center concern at this blog. This site is anything but Johnny-Come-Lately.

ALARM TWO:

EFFECTIVELY, as related in Dec. 2014, “ISIS (and attendant jihadi tentacles) is embedded in America” and planning multiple terror attacks. Mind you, this prognostication took place a full 5 months before their opening shot in Garland, Texas. Dead on.

ALARM THREE:

AND, as predicted, only a few months onward, an ISIS hyper-alert was blared from these pages, relative to narco-terrorists and their direct nexus to jihadi smuggling!

DEMONSTRABLY, all of the above is the nexus to the seemingly disparate wildfires under the tenure of HUSSEIN Obama, and the footprints to Hillary’s (illegal) private email server housing State Dept. classified secrets. The twists and turns.

CONSEQUENTIALLY, it is due to this incendiary mix that readers should take the time to view the following clip, at least those who are concerned about America becoming the next regional wildfire.

County after county, the takeover of parts of Arizona by the drug cartels is evidenced by Pinal County Sheriff, Paul Babeu. The situation is so bad that it has drawn the attention of Presidential candidate, Ben Carson who has pledged to put the National Guard on the border in order to secure the border. Babeu bemoans the fact that the Obama administration releases convicted illegal alien felons back into American communities instead of deporting them as our laws call for.

Why would the Obama administration be complicit in these highly illegal activities? The office of the Secretary of State would be involved.

When one follows the evidence trail, Hillary Clinton is implicated in supporting terrorism and served as an accomplice in the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens at Benghazi….read the whole thing!

STILL yet, aside from all the devastating news re those who have betrayed America in unimaginable ways, there are others who will stand up and refuse to stand down. This is the case whether they are army trained or in the civilian population.

Benjamin James's photo.

SO considering the fact that 3 American heroes (2 of whom are army trained, despite being unarmed at the time of the terror attack) took down an ISIS aligned terrorist, it becomes clear that there are Americans ready to step up, when the time comes.

NOT to be overlooked, relative to America’s heroes – though currently purged from the military, others duly “missing” – HUSSEIN Obama’s abuse toward (previous) top brass warrants the following urgent questions: Since General Carter Ham and Admiral Charles M. Gaouette know the answers to what happened during Benghazigate, it behooves further inquiry: Where are Ham and Gaouette today? Why haven’t they testified in open – or closed – hearings? Were their actions akin to a military coup, knowing full well that the Commander-in-Chief had (still is) betrayed the American people? And, as loyal Americans, did they place their oaths of duty first and foremost? Apparently.

EVEN so, if one digs deep enough into the underwriters of the decades worth of terror plaguing the Mid East and its cancerous spread (knowing full well that Islams committed followers live to die for Allah, necessitating the destruction of the west on behalf of the ummah), certain factors are front and center and must be recognized for what they are. Let the chips fall where they may.

MOST significantly, looking to Congress to right said wrongs is whistling past America’s graveyard. Both sides of the aisle have already bowed, submitted, to (pagan) Allah. This is a fact.

INCONTESTABLY, both Congressional parties are inextricably linked to Booz Allen Hamilton, yes, the private equity fund owned by The Carlyle Group. Indeed, that same gov’t contractor, aka fixer, is the go to group for the CIA and its dirty deals. Yup. And when one connects the narco-terror dots, guess which ones keep popping up? Lo and behold, entities attached to the Clinton’s, the Bush’s, the House of Saud and the Bin Laden’s, yes, THAT Bin Laden – in tandem with other Mid East and global players – assist in laundering monies to fund Islamic chaos for whatever economic and political goal necessitates said funding. Moving right along, ask yourself: Where does UBS whistleblower Brad Birkenfeld’s CIA-NSA-Swiss Banks-Booz Allen Hamilton-Terrorist Finance connections enter the picture? Everywhere. Hint: at its base, there is much more than tax evasion involved. 

YES, HUSSEIN Obama’s ascendancy was timed to be the undertaker of decades worth of world chaos, particularly related to Mid East terror. And as a CIA connected “made man”, a communist/Marxist /Islamist hybrid alike, the take down of America has always been part of his tenure.

AND the fact that America is poised to become a facsimile of a narco-terror state (like Mexico and other Latin/South American nations) through unfettered open borders – facilitated by Obama Inc.’s turning a blind eye to ISIS setting up shop right across the southern border  indicates that the plan is close to fruition. 

CONCOMITANTLY, is it any wonder that ISIS feels emboldened by its plans to smash the borders of the Mid East, as well as America’s southern ones alike?

ISIS Plans To Smash Borders Of Mideast Map

ISIS in America 6

AS is said, just one strike of a match (set via the axis between ISIS/Islamic hydras and drug/criminal cartels) will indubitably alight the southern border and spread like wildfire across America. And if anyone thinks this is hysteria-talk, and not the anticipated outcome by Obama Inc., well, this site has a bridge to sell you too.

OH, and all of the above is hardly the result of a fevered imagination and conspiracy theory stone-throwing! If only.

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

 

 

Obama Inc. Created ISIS F/B/O Brotherhood’s Caliphate: DELIBERATE Knock-On Effects Of Libyan & Syrian Theaters. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 

 

IT is always gratifying to find out that straight shooting and high level security professionals have arrived at the same general conclusions as this Muslim Brotherhood expert and investigative journalist.

INTRINSICALLY, the aforementioned is in reference to the part played by Obama Inc. in “setting the stage” for the rise of ISIS, and its eventual declaration as the Islamic Caliphate. Well, said assessment may have appeared a tad “conspiratorial” in certain quarters, when first expounded at this site. No matter. No longer.

EFFECTIVELY, let’s hark back to particular dots which were previously connected, going as far back as 2013.

LET’S be clear: HUSSEIN Obama’s State Department, in tandem with the CIA, created ISIS. For the stated record, soon after Benghazigate blew up, this investigative journalist analyzed the following knock-on effects throughout several commentaries but summed up its basis in a recent report:

AS the world stares transfixed by the speed in which ISIS captured Ramadi and Palmyra, it must be internalized where the hydra-like monsters spawned from. This knowledge base will explain how they catapulted into top-tier status. Forthwith, let’s begin connecting the dots. It is only by taking the time to do so that we can properly extrapolate what HUSSEIN Obama’s game plan really is.

DOT ONE:

ALAS, it was previously asserted (Oct. 2013), while assessing the illegal war into Libya – with Benghazigate as its outgrowth – that the main objective was a weapons-running operation F/B/O Syrian Sunni jihadists and the empowerment of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. Caliphate-driven. Concomitantly, the Brotherhood is the parent of al-Qaeda and ISIS is its offshoot.

DOT TWO:

MOREOVER, as the region started to melt down after Obama Inc’s. adventure into Libya, requisite players realized that Iraq’s forces were in no position to stand up to ISIS without multiplying its force power. Therefore, what else did they expect the knock-on effects of said quasi-intervention in Iraq would be, other than a complete mowing down by ISIS? Huh and duh…continue reading

SO as repeatedly proven, ISIS is an offshoot of al-Qaeda in Iraq, andal-Qaeda is a product of the Brotherhood Mafia. Simple as that….

RESULTANT, why wouldn’t the very same “benefactors” of ISIS (al-Qaeda/MB alike) train a so-called Islamist “police commander” – plus countless others – rather than deny them elite training on U.S. soil too? Rhetorical.

A fighter with the Islamic State group in a new online video was trained in counterterrorism tactics in the U.S., the State Department confirmed.continue reading….

BUT even as hard as it is to conceive that a malignant POTUS would (and could) subvert the entire national apparatus and interest – and with an impotent and somewhat colluding Congress barely taking him on – the proofs are more than manifest. Indicting. Alas, former head of the DIA – Lieutenant General Michael Flynn – confirmed this site’s thesis, as gleaned from a RECENTLY (emphasis placed) leaked Defense Intelligence Agency document.  

An internal Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document produced recently shows that the U.S. knew that the actions of “the West, Gulf countries and Turkey” in Syria might create a terrorist group like ISIS and an Islamic caliphate.

While the powers-that-be have tried to downplay the significance of the document, the former head of the DIA – Lieutenant General Michael Flynn – just confirmed its importance.

By any measure, Flynn was a top-level American military commander. Flynn served as:

  • The Director of the U.S. Intelligence Agency
  • The Director of intelligence for Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), the main military agency responsible for targeting Al-Qaeda and other Islamic terrorists
  • The Commander of the Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance
  • The Chair of the Military Intelligence Board
  • Assistant director of national intelligence

Flynn confirmed the authenticity of the document in a new interview, and said:

[Interviewer] So the administration turned a blind eye to your analysis?

[Flynn] I don’t know that they turned a blind eye, I think it was a decision. I think it was a willful decision.

[Interviewer] A willful decision to support an insurgency that had Salafists, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood?

[Flynn] It was a willful decision to do what they’re doing.

CFmpcUQUEAEm80u.png-large

alqaeda4

Hasan: In 2012 the U.S. was helping coordinate arms transfers to those same groups [Salafists, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda in Iraq], why did you not stop that if you’re worried about the rise of quote-unquote Islamic extremists?

Flynn: I hate to say it’s not my job…but that…my job was to…was to to ensure that the accuracy of our intelligence that was being presented was as good as it could be.

Forensic evidence, video evidence, as well as recent admissions of high-level officials involved (see former Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford’s admissions here and here), have since proven the State Department and CIA’s material support of ISIS terrorists on the Syrian battlefield going back to at least 2012 and 2013 (for a clear example of “forensic evidence”: see UK-based Conflict Armament Research’s report which traced the origins of Croatian anti-tank rockets recovered from ISIS fighters back to a Saudi/CIA joint program via identifiable serial numbers).

CFjzBroW8AA42Td.jpg-large-e1432512219123

The  DIA report makes the following summary points concerning “ISI” (in 2012 “Islamic State in Iraq,”) and the soon to emerge ISIS:

  • Al-Qaeda drives the opposition in Syria
  • The West identifies with the opposition
  • The establishment of a nascent Islamic State became a reality only with the rise of the Syrian insurgency (there is no mention of U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq as a catalyst for Islamic State’s rise, which is the contention of innumerable politicians and pundits; see section 4.D. below)
  • The establishment of a “Salafist Principality” in Eastern Syria is “exactly” what the external powers  supporting the opposition want (identified as “the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey”) in order to weaken the Assad government
  • “Safe havens” are suggested in areas conquered by Islamic insurgents along the lines of the Libyan model (which translates to so-called no-fly zones as a first act of ‘humanitarian war’; see 7.B.)
  • Iraq is identified with “Shia expansion” (8.C)
  • A Sunni “Islamic State” could be devastating to “unifying Iraq” and could lead to “the renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena.” (see last non-redacted line in full PDF view.)

img_3546860969587-e1432512449736

MIND you, it is important to note that Turkey’s Erdogan, HUSSEIN Obama’s closest ally in the Mid East – highlighted within the DIA report – had been singled out as a Caliphate/Brotherhood/ISIS beneficiary at these pages as a key player, and more than once. At major interviews alike. Okay.

 

CONCLUSIVELY, it is not as if the U.S. is new to climbing into bed with Islamists. Not at all. In fact, through a grave geo-political miscalculation (let alone lack of understanding as to the ultimate goals of Islam’s warriors, as well as due to the prodding of National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, an inveterate lover of   Arabs/Muslims and the go to guy during this period) the CIA funded and trained the mujahideen, aka Al Qaeda and the Taliban, to rout the Russians from Afghanistan.

ADDITIONALLY, Brzezinski is also an influential  foreign policy adviser to HUSSEIN Obama! The “plot” thickens.

 

 

STRATEGICALLY speaking, the strategy to counter the Russians by training Islamic barbarians was beyond miscalculated. No, this is not a 20/20 hindsight observation, but that which is borne from a deep knowledge base, relative to warriors inspired by the Koran! Not only that, preceding Islamic inspired terror attacks – from the earliest part of the 20th century – displayed what Allah’s soldiers understood as their duty to protect the ummah, regardless of all else. 

HOWEVER, in the main, most – though not all – of America’s top tier were looking out for U.S. interests during the proxy war with Russia. Its blow back hardly requires edification.

NEVERTHELESS, instead of internalizing the lessons learned – as byproducts of aligning, by proxy or otherwise, with Islamic jihadists –HUSSEIN Obama and surrogates aim for an anti-American outcome. Incontrovertibly. 

AS is said, this is where the rubber meets the road. Inherently, the above (plus enumerable proofs scattered throughout this site and elsewhere) demonstrates how ISIS became the mega force it quickly morphed into, thereby, possessing the ability to declare a Caliphate in such short order.

CONSEQUENTIALLY, how much should be accrued to happenstance, bad luck or the like, when a treasure trove of high grade U.S. military hardware was left behind for ISIS (and aligned groups) to inherit? 

screenshot.2

Additional military prizes, courtesy of Obama, included numerous stacks of weapons crates that were full of the latest and greatest small arms and explosives that will undoubtedly be used against America and our allies in the future.

screenshot.1

HMM…”spoils of war” is one way to look at it. More accurately, purposefully gifted booty!! 

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

ISIS’s Nexus To State Dept: TRAINED IN COUNTER TERRORISM INSIDE U.S.! What’s Going On? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Former elite commander Col. Gulmurod Khalimov

(The U.S. State Department confirmed May 29, 2015 with CNN…how “transparent” of them…that Islamic State fighter Gulmurod Khalimov from Tajikistan was trained in the United State three times for counter terrorism instruction! )

FROM the get go, does the saying, once an Islamist, always an Islamist resonate? In other words, could America’s top leaders really be totally ignorant about what it means to be a COMMITTED “Pure Muslim?” On the flip side, the alternative is that they fully internalize what’s what, but they desire an anti-American outcome! Either way, U.S. policy is driven by fools or traitors. Pick your poison.

AS to this site’s position, well, it is not wishy washy…finger-in-the-air. It is clear-eyed and unapologetic. Thus, let’s place the onus re Obama Inc. and its State Department’s (and other agencies) treachery where it belongs – at their doorstep(s)!

NOW, before the naysayers jump into the fray, opining, U.S. agencies have to train so-called “good” Islamists to fight the “bad” Islamists, the fact remains that they should have learned their (blow back) lessons. They haven’t.

AND as a matter of historical (explosive) record, how many really understand how al-Qaeda became the mega force that resulted in 9/11/01, and the eventual parent of ISIS?  

RECALL the following facts, and then assess whether decades of American decision-makers benefited national security – or not. Not a hard calculus to discern, unless one is a mental midget or a malignant traitor. Hmm.

Front row, from left: Major Gen. Hamid Gul, director general of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI), Director of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Willian Webster; Deputy Director for Operations Clair George; an ISI colonel; and senior CIA official, Milt Bearden at a Mujahideen training camp in North-West Frontier Province of Pakistan in 1987. (source RAWA)


Ronald Reagan meets Afghan Mujahideen Commanders at the White House in 1985 (Reagan Archives)

Preface:   The director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan – Lt. General William Odom – noted:

Because the United States itself has a long record of supporting terrorists and using terrorist tactics, the slogans of today’s war on terrorism merely makes the United States look hypocritical to the rest of the world.

Odom also said:

By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In ‘78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism – in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation.

(audio here).  Background here.

This essay does not address any “inside job” theories for 9/11 or other terrorist attacks on America.  Instead, it focuses on the well-documented fact that the virtually continuous U.S. backing of Al Qaeda terrorists since the late 1970s has led to blowback which has come back to bite us numerous times.

We Created Al Qaeda to Fight the Soviets in Afghanistan

Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski admitted on CNN that the U.S. organized and supported Bin Laden and the other originators of “Al Qaeda” in the 1970s to fight the Soviets.

Brzezinski told Al Qaeda’s forefathers – the Mujahadin:

We know of their deep belief in god – that they’re confident that their struggle will succeed. That land over – there is yours – and you’ll go back to it some day, because your fight will prevail, and you’ll have your homes, your mosques, back again, because your cause is right, and god is on your side.


CIA director and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates confirmed in his memoir that the U.S. backed the Mujahadin in the 1970s.

FAST forward from the 1970’s onward to the present, but only through a clearly focused lens. In essence, one will then be able to internalize how Islamists are catapulting from strength to strength, and with no end in sight! Consider the realities at hand:

LET’S be clear: HUSSEIN Obama’s State Department, in tandem with the CIA, created ISIS. For the stated record, soon after Benghazigate blew up, this investigative journalist assessed the following knock-on effects throughout several commentaries, but summed up its basis in a recent report:

Tom Carbone's photo.

AS the world is transfixed by the speed in which ISIS captured Ramadi and Palmyra, it must be internalized where the hydra-like monsters spawned from. This knowledge base will explain how they catapulted into top-tier status. Forthwith, let’s begin connecting the dots. It is only by taking the time to do so that we can properly extrapolate what HUSSEIN Obama’s game plan really is.

DOT ONE:

AS previously asserted (Oct. 2013) while assessing the illegal war into Libya – with Benghazigate as its outgrowth – it was specifically noted that the main objective was a weapons-running operation F/B/O Syrian Sunni jihadists and the empowerment of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. Concomitantly, the Brotherhood is the parent of al-Qaeda and ISIS is its offshoot

DOT TWO:

MOREOVER, as the region started to melt down after Obama Inc’s. adventure into Libya, requisite players realized that Iraq’s forces were in no position to stand up to ISIS without multiplying its force power. Therefore, what else did they expect the knock-on effects of said quasi-intervention in Iraq would be, other than a complete mowing down by ISIS? Huh and duh…continue reading

INTRINSICALLY, as repeatedly proven, ISIS is an offshoot of al-Qaeda in Iraq, and al-Qaeda is a product of the Brotherhood Mafia. Simple as that.

The Egyptian Minister of Religious Endowments says that the Islamic State terrorist group (also known as ISIS or ISIL) was birthed from the Muslim Brotherhood movement, according to an October 13 report  in an Egyptian newspaper called the Seventh Day.

Other Egyptian leaders have made the case in recent days that the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist terrorist groups belong in the same category as the Islamic State. The Egyptian government has banned the Muslim Brotherhood and its Palestinian branch, Hamas, as terrorist groups.

According to the report, Dr. Mohamed Mokhtar Gomaa said that the Muslim Brotherhood is the progenitor of the Islamic State and similar terrorist groups. He accused the Brotherhood of disrupting education at Egyptian universities and said the group is harmful to Islam.

The Islamic State used to be Al-Qaeda’s branch in Iraq. Al-Qaeda’s leaders are known to have been influenced by the Brotherhood, but the two groups sparred over the latter’s relative restraint and involvement in elections.

The group originated as Jama’at al-Tawhid wal-Jihad in 1999, which pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda in 2004. The group participated in the Iraqi insurgency, which had followed the March 2003 invasion of Iraq. In January 2006, it joined other Sunni insurgent groups to form the Mujahideen Shura Council, which in October 2006 proclaimed the formation of the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI).

RESULTANT, why wouldn’t the very same “benefactors” of ISIS (al-Qaeda/MB alike) train a so-called Islamist “police commander” – plus countless others – rather than deny them elite training on U.S. soil too? Rhetorical.

A fighter with the Islamic State group in a new online video was trained in counterterrorism tactics in the U.S., the State Department confirmed.

Col. Gulmurod Khalimov, a former police commander from Tajikistan, is shown in black garb worn by the Islamic State group and holding a sniper rifle and a bandolier of ammunition in the terror group’s new video. He claims that he participated in training programs on U.S. soil three times, one of which was in Louisiana, CNN reported Friday.

“From 2003-2014 Colonel Khalimov participated in five counterterrorism training courses in the United States and in Tajikistan, through the Department of State’s Diplomatic Security/Anti-Terrorism Assistance program,” Pooja Jhunjhunwala, a spokeswoman for the State Department, told CNN.

Now Mr. Khalimov has joined the very kind of terrorists he was trained to fight.

The State Department said Mr. Khalimov was trained in crisis response, tactical management of special events, tactical leadership training and related issues, CNN reported.

Experts say Mr. Khalimov’s counterterrorism experience will give him a major advantage against U.S. forces.

“The real problem is he knows how to plan counterterrorism operations, so he knows how the people who protect the high value target will be thinking. He knows how the people who protect an embassy will be thinking,” Michael Breen, former Army intelligence officer and now-executive director of the Truman National Security Project, told CNN. “That puts him in a position, as we say in the military, to ‘red team’ that, to think very intelligently about how to disrupt those plans. That’s a dangerous capability.”

Mr. Khalimov says that he joined the Islamic State because what he saw in his training sessions turned him against his sponsors.

“Listen, you American pigs: I’ve been to America three times. I saw how you train soldiers to kill Muslims,” he says in Russian, CNN reported. “You taught your soldiers how to surround and attack, in order to exterminate Islam and Muslims.”

At one point in the video Mr. Khalimov looks directly into the camera and says “God willing, we will find your towns, we will come to your homes, and we will kill you,” CNN reported.

BOTTOM LINE: those who fully recognize that Islamist related decisions made by past Presidents (whatever happened to hindsight is 20/20?) are now boomeranging onto America’s security – and with a vengeance – must think outside-the-box. Said thinking leads to only one rational conclusion: HUSSEIN Obama’s ultimate knock-on effects will be cataclysmic, as intended.

SO since Obama Inc.’s State Dept. sees nothing amiss about training Islamists in U.S. counter terrorism techniques – knowing full well that the results of doing so brought 9/11/01 upon America, plus other blow back – what exactly do they expect to happen this go around?

THE answer to the above “query” leads us to the most frightening conclusion, bar none. Ponder its national (and geo-political) meaning.

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

Huma Abedin’s DEEP Brotherhood Infiltration Intersects Hill’s “Disappearing” Emails:Follow The “Arab Spring” Jihad…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

(Huma Abedin’s Mother, Saleha, a high up Muslim Sisterhood leader, stands to the right – via the computer screen – of Hillary Clinton as Hill gives her autograph to students at Dar al-Hekma college for women in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia)

AT the inception of this site (June 2012) a few “notables” were featured, and it was not for nothing. In fact, as such, Huma(la) Abedin and Hill were front and center right out of the gate. The following commentary (June 25, 2012) was written:

While attending a conference in 2007 at Columbia University (aka Bir-Zeit University) under the auspices of SPME (Scholars For Peace In The Middle East), this American-Israeli engaged in a most interesting discussion with a highly connected individual, who shall remain nameless.

NOW that Egypt has elected its first Muslim Brotherhood President the above discussion comes full circle and bears telling. The person referred to was (and still is) highly intertwined with NYC Democratic political figures (don’t be so shocked…have friends/contacts from the other side!), and often revealed tidbits which would seem shocking on the face of it, but one way or another proved to be true. There was no reason to believe that this time would be different.

IN no uncertain terms it was made known: Hillary Clinton is deeply involved with her Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin. Draw your own conclusions, as to what is meant by “deeply”. The discussion centered around the possibility of another Clinton Presidency, at the time a very real possibility. In any case, the individual was asking me if going public was in the best interests of the United States, in light of Abedin’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood ! You read this right. At first blush the thought was that there was a lack of communication between us, but then decided to ask the individual to repeat said charge. Nothing changed…

IN this regard, fast forward to 2015 via the explosive news that “Madame” Hill wiped her computer clean of “private” emails. Okay, we get that. But in order to understand the core reason why it is imperative to dig to the bottom of this grave breach of ethics (and possible criminality), first and foremost, we must expose Huma Abedin’s VERY deep Brotherhood ties. They wend to the tippy top of the Islamist spear. She is a main Brotherhood implant, as well as Hill’s joined-at-the-hip mate. That close.

IN tandem, Hill and Bill are up to their necks in Brotherhood dealings, chiefly via Billy boy’s William J. Clinton Foundation and its financial trail. As a matter of record, a previous high level employee of the Foundation, a major Brotherhood operative, has been arrested (abroad) on terror charges! Yup. 

EMBLEMATIC of said treachery, please segue to enough proofs to choke many horses.

PROOF ONE:

BESIDES, how much more evidence does Congress require to fully “investigate” Huma Abedin? Moreover, the trail leads directly to Hill and Bill too. Enter, the House of Saud!

PROOF TWO:

NOT only that, but what about their linkage to Benghazigate via Al-Qaeda? Now, that’s enough reason to create alternate email accounts, you think? Never ending.

PROOF THREE:

YET, put on your thinking caps and figure out how Hill became “acquainted” with the Brotherhood’s main spiritual adviser, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi!

PROOF FOUR:

BUT there’s more…and this time, HUSSEIN Obama’s half bro’, Malik Obama, is a key player. Deeply connected to the Brotherhood, he also ties into Huma and Hill. What are the chances….

SO it is under this umbrella of Islamist treacheries that Hill and Huma felt compelled to hide their State Dept-driven Brotherhood operations, and much more still awaits to be uncovered. Nation- shaking.

Scandal: The email plot thickens with news that Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff also used a private email account on the Clintons’ server to conduct government business.

Watchdog group Judicial Watch, which doesn’t like being lied to or jerked around any more than the House Benghazi Select Committee does, has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Department of State seeking all communications, including emails, between Secretary of State Clinton and Huma Abedin with Nagla Mahmoud, wife of ousted Egyptian president Mohammed Morsi between Jan. 21, 2009, and Jan. 21, 2013.

The lawsuit — which also seeks a thorough search of Clinton’s newly discovered private email accounts connected to a home-based server to exclusively conduct government business — comes alongside the issue of subpoenas by the Benghazi Select Committee. Both have long been curious about the scarcity of produced emails with Clinton’s name on them.

Abedin, perhaps best remembered as the wife of disgraced former congressman Anthony Wiener, is a longtime Hillary friend and confidante. She served as Clinton’s deputy chief of staff at the same time she worked as a consultant to the Clinton Foundation and a New York advisory firm tied to the Clintons, one that did business before the government….

REGARDLESS, none of their Brotherhood-tied hullabaloo is “news” on this end, other than the revelation that separate email accounts were found. For heavens sake. Be that as it may, this investigative journalist welcomes the info that other sites are, at the very least, curious about the facts at hand. As mentioned, much of its basis reverts back to this site’s inception! No matter. Better late than never. Welcome to truth-land.

IN any case, as other outlets catch up to speed, let’s not forget that Huma’s “significant” other, ex Rep. Weiner, was a focal point at this site too, and for good (Islamic doctrinal) reason.

STILL, for one to understand the most revealing aspects to her infiltration and penetration, one must fully recognize exactly how Muslims are dealt with when they marry outside the faith to infidels. Not only that, what about an intermarriage with Jews, those their Quran (Koran) deem no better than “apes and pigs?”

Sura 7:166 – But when even after this they disdainfully persisted in that from which they were forbidden, We said to them, “Become apes—despised and disgraced!” (Maududi)

Sura 2:65 – And you know well the story of those among you who broke Sabbath. We said to them: “Be apes—despised and hated by all.” 66 Thus We made their end a warning to the people of their time and succeeding generation, and an admonition for God-fearing people. (Maududi)

Sura 5:60 – Then say: “Should I inform you [People of the Book] of those, who will have even worse recompense from Allah than the transgressors? They are those whom Allah has cursed; who have been under His wrath; some of whom were turned into apes and swine; who worshipped taghut [the devil or idols]; those are the people who are in a far worse plight and who have turned farthest away from the Right Way.” (Maududi)….etc….

EVEN so, FOX recently reported the following, but let’s not put all our eggs in the Senate basket, as they tend to blow a lot of hot air.

Senate Republicans are renewing efforts to learn why Huma Abedin, a top assistant to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, was allowed to keep working at the agency under a special, part-time status while also being employed at a politically-connected consulting firm.

The new requests are being made by Iowa GOP Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, following revelations that both women used a private Internet server and email accounts for State Department correspondence.

Grassley says the earlier requests to the department have been largely ignored, so the new ones have gone to the department’s inspector general and to Secretary of State John Kerry, seeking their involvement.

HEY, Senate blowhards and schmucks: if you really want to ferret out the truth, don’t waste too much time on the minutia re her “status” at State, and said conflict of interest. Get to the meat…

YES, proofs do exist outside this site, some of which can be found below:

At what point does the compromising of the State Department by the likes of then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s closest adviser Huma Abedin (who was conveniently on some sort of questionable hiatus at the time) and Rashad Hussain contribute to the attacks?

A culture at the State Department had been created whereby a diplomatic post in Benghazi was left completely unprotected, had a Muslim Brotherhood militia providing security, and had Ansar al-Sharia for next door neighbors. Yet, no one in Congress or the media is sounding alarm bells over Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the State Department?!

Aren’t some truths self-evident enough to draw logical conclusions?

Huma Abedin, Rashad Hussain, Hillary Clinton, Hussain (L to R)

There is a reason why both Abedin and Hussain should have been disqualified from consideration for jobs with the State Department (Hussain should have been fired in 2010 when he had to admit that he lied about comments he made at a MSA event in 2004). There connections to Muslim Brotherhood groups risked compromise and conflicts of interest….

MOST significantly, when 8 billion dollars worth of State Dept. monies is unaccounted for, and when Egypt’s gov’t accuses HUSSEIN Obama and Hill of a direct nexus to the Brotherhood, well, what else is there to say?

Both President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have found themselves formally charged as accessories to terrorism. Tied to the group of “moderate” Muslims belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood, the Egyptian government is accusing Obama and Clinton of aiding and embedding the terrorists – specifically, their slaughter of innocents.

RESULTANT to all of the above, the question isn’t: why did Hill and Huma keep (heretofore) hidden email accounts to conduct “personal” and official business? Rather, the core query is: how could Congress have ignored all the signals and warnings, particularly, after ex Rep. Michelle Bachmann brought forward a full-on list of evidence which proved that Huma Abedin’s attendant Brotherhood tie-ins present a clear and present danger?

READERS, if so inclined, press your reps very hard for related answers. The truth shall set America free of the Brotherhood’s death grip!

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}

Obama’s ILLEGAL Libyan War Catapulted ISIS Into America & Europe:Maritime Piracy & Global Blow Back!Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 

WHEN global leaders purposefully ignite certain fires – domestic or foreign – they do so with the full expectation that some of the blow back will be unanticipated. On the other hand, their main goals are usually met – even if not to an exactitude – due to the massive resources at their disposal. Geo-political chess games are more of an “art”, as opposed to a science. Understood.

SO as westerners stare agape at the bloody catapult of ISIS (and their aligned surrogates), don’t bother scratching your noggins to wonder: how the hell did this happen? Instead, ask the polar opposite side of the geo-political equation: how could it not?

Islamic State has set its sights on taking over Libya as a bridgehead to eventually waging war all across southern Europe, the British Telegraph is reporting on Wednesday.

The newspaper cited letters written by ISIS supporters.

According to the report, ISIS jihadists plan to “flood Libya with militiamen from Syria and Iraq, who will then sail across the Mediterranean posing as migrants on people-trafficking vessels.”

ISIS “would then run amok in southern European cities and also try to attack maritime shipping,” the Telegraph reported.

Earlier this week, Egypt conducted air strikes on ISIS targets in Libya as retaliation for the beheading of 21 Egyptian Copts taken captive.

Libya is a mere 300 miles from the tip of southern Italy. The instability in the North African country has European officials concerned that the tumult could spill over into the Continent.

Italian security chiefs on Tuesday approved a plan to put 4,800 soldiers on the streets throughout the country to help guard against potential militant attacks, the Interior Ministry said.

A statement after a meeting of military and security officials said they would guard sensitive sites and targets until at least June.

Italian media said about 500 would be deployed in Rome, where army troops already help guard diplomatic missions and residences, the capital’s synagogue and Jewish schools. 

Terror threat: Officials are worried Islamic State could bring Somali-style piracy to the Mediterranean after threatening to hide militants among the 500,000 refugees it threatened to send to Europe - if they are attacked in Libya 

'Psychological attack': If ISIS make good on their threat of sending half a million migrants all at once to Europe, emergency services such as the Italian Coast Guards (pictured off the coast of Sicily) may not be able to cope

‘Psychological attack’: If ISIS make good on their threat of sending half a million migrants all at once to Europe, emergency services such as the Italian Coast Guards (pictured off the coast of Sicily) may not be able to cope

Mass emigration: More than 5,000 migrants - including those fleeing the Libya crisis - have arrived in Italy since the start of January alone which is a 59 per cent increase on the same time last year

Death at sea: More than 300 African migrants are believed to have died at sea this week alone, some of which are trying to escape the spread of militancy in Libya

 

IN a very tangible realm, ISIS’s plan to invade southern Europe (which will lead to an entire wave of ISIS and other aligned militia throughout Europe, flooding its borders under the cover of “fleeing migrants”) is precisely one of HUSSEIN Obama’s tactical thrusts (via “amnesty” and illegal immigrants) to undermine America and lend entry to Islamic jihadists! 

AS a matter of record, several alarms were heard to this same effect, at these pages:

ALARM ONE:

BACK in July 2013, under the DHS (mis)reign of “Mama Janet”, it was reported: DHS “lost” over 226 illegals who were deemed national security threats! Wow…a blind person could have a done a better job of guarding the homeland, but why quibble.

ALARM TWO:

IT gets worse. Additionally, five months later, guess what other method of mischief HUSSEIN Obama’s DHS got caught perpetrating? Well, they ferried illegals across the borders and they made no excuses for their illegal actions! Imagine. 

ALARM THREE:

SO, if you thought this was the end of their reign of terror – their open sesame for Islamists – think again: the Islamist-in-Chief’s henchwoman, Valerie Jarrett, coordinated the dumping!

ALARM FOUR:

REGARDING all of the above alarm bells, what’s their end goal? Simply put, Obama Inc’s Brotherhood Mafia are utilizing stealth jihad via a demographic implosion, plus other related tactics! 

(A chief MB honcho within Obama Inc.’s DHS, although now “shifted” to another posting)

IN this regard, ISIS is now on track to hold the maritime gateway to Europe hostage, similar to the Islamic Barbary pirates…aka Ottoman corsairs…from the 16th to 19th centuries. Yes, an effective Islamist weapon of yesteryear is now on tap through ISIS (and related) pirates, a lesson the Jihadi-in-Chief is on board with to maximum effect!! 

NEVER mind the (historical) fact that the U.S. Marine Corps. and the Navy were birthed due to the Barbary Wars. History be damned.

After the United States won its independence in the treaty of 1783, it had to protect its own commerce against dangers such as the Barbary pirates. As early as 1784 Congress followed the tradition of the European shipping powers and appropriated $80,000 as tribute to the Barbary states, directing its ministers in Europe, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, to begin negotiations with them. Trouble began the next year, in July 1785, when Algerians captured two American ships and the dey of Algiers held their crews of twenty-one people for a ransom of nearly $60,000.

Thomas Jefferson, United States minister to France, opposed the payment of tribute, as he later testified in words that have a particular resonance today. In his autobiography Jefferson wrote that in 1785 and 1786 he unsuccessfully “endeavored to form an association of the powers subject to habitual depredation from them. I accordingly prepared, and proposed to their ministers at Paris, for consultation with their governments, articles of a special confederation.” Jefferson argued that “The object of the convention shall be to compel the piratical States to perpetual peace.” Jefferson prepared a detailed plan for the interested states. “Portugal, Naples, the two Sicilies, Venice, Malta, Denmark and Sweden were favorably disposed to such an association,” Jefferson remembered, but there were “apprehensions” that England and France would follow their own paths, “and so it fell through.”

Paying the ransom would only lead to further demands, Jefferson argued in letters to future presidents John Adams, then America’s minister to Great Britain, and James Monroe, then a member of Congress. As Jefferson wrote to Adams in a July 11, 1786, letter, “I acknolege [sic] I very early thought it would be best to effect a peace thro’ the medium of war.” Paying tribute will merely invite more demands, and even if a coalition proves workable, the only solution is a strong navy that can reach the pirates, Jefferson argued in an August 18, 1786, letter to James Monroe: “The states must see the rod; perhaps it must be felt by some one of them. . . . Every national citizen must wish to see an effective instrument of coercion, and should fear to see it on any other element than the water. A naval force can never endanger our liberties, nor occasion bloodshed; a land force would do both.” “From what I learn from the temper of my countrymen and their tenaciousness of their money,” Jefferson added in a December 26, 1786, letter to the president of Yale College, Ezra Stiles, “it will be more easy to raise ships and men to fight these pirates into reason, than money to bribe them.”
SUFFICE to state: Obama Inc. and ISIS (a progenitor of the Muslim Brotherhood) are joined-at-the-hip! EVERY step HUSSEIN Obama takes is designed to weaken America, both domestically and foreign-wise. 

TO wit, the most incendiary region to precipitate worldwide fires is the hotter than hot Middle East.

ALAS, if you follow the Arsonist-in-Chief’s Islamist-empowering timeline, one can then gauge how ISIS is poised to gain a major foothold into Europe (other western nations too), as well as inside America.

TIMELINE ONE:

IN June 2009, only 5 months into his first term – via his speech at Cairo University – he set his sights on affirming the Muslim Brotherhood’s prominence. Front and center.

TIMELINE TWO:

FAST forward to a year and a half later (Dec. 2010), and the so-called “Arab Spring” burst onto the scene. Hmm…just like that. Poof. Magic.
TIMELINE THREE:
AND lo and behold, only 3 ! months later, in March 2011, the Jihadist-in-Chief illegally started a war in Libya to assist the Muslim Brotherhood and ISIS’s rise, all in order to set the stage for a global caliphate. 

 

WITHIN the law of averages, two of Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s best buds – inside the Mid East’s Brotherhood Mafia – are scoring 50-50. One is still a “strong horse”, while the other uses allies as stand ins. Sh-t happens. Regardless of who is up and who is down their end goal – Obama Inc. and assorted Islamic players – remains the same. Firmly implanted. No wishy-washy finger in the air fence-sitting.

RESULTANT, when Benghazigate blew up, this investigative reporter honed in on the Islamist-in-Chief’s cooperation with Egypt’s Brotherhood – in tandem with Turkey’s “behind the scenes” assists – in order to clear a path for the Blind (terror) Sheikh’s release, as well as pave the way for the Caliphate’s swathe via the most extensive weapons running in Mid East history. Never forget this. 

THUS, ISIS is laying waste to everything in its path. Indeed, the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, HUSSEIN Obama alike, couldn’t be any more delighted. Tickled to death.

CLOCK work!

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}

Obama’s Pentagon Infected With Jihadi Fervor: Spilling Secrets, Incapable Of Protecting America. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 

THE “enemy within” is hardly a new phenomenon. Not only isn’t it new, but it has deep roots in the Old Testament. As such, when Jewish self-haters lend succor to the enemy, those whose fervent desire is to destroy Israel, in actuality, their goal is to destroy Judaism. For this “distinction” they are termed Amalekites.

The descendants of Amalek described in the Bible as a cruel people who attacked the children of Israel right after they were free from slavery and left Egypt (Exodus 17:8). Hence the children of Israel were commanded to destroy the seed of Amalek (Ex 17:8-16). The Amalekites lived in the south of the land of Israel during the period of the settlement of the children of Israel in the Land of Israel to the period of the monarchy. In the Jewish folklore the Amalekites are considered to be the symbol of evil.

The Biblical relationship between the Hebrew and Amalekite tribes was that the Amalekite tribes without provocation pounced on the Hebrews when they were weak. The Amalekites became associated with ruthlessness and trickery and tyranny, even more so than Pharaoh or the Philistines, and required a ruthless response:

8 Then Amalek came and fought with Israel at Rephidim. 9 So Moses said to Joshua, “Choose for us men, and go out and fight with Amalek. Tomorrow I will stand on the top of the hill with the staff of God in my hand.” 10 So Joshua did as Moses told him, and fought with Amalek, while Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill. 11 Whenever Moses held up his hand, Israel prevailed, and whenever he lowered his hand, Amalek prevailed. 12 But Moses’ hands grew weary, so they took a stone and put it under him, and he sat on it, while Aaron and Hur held up his hands, one on one side, and the other on the other side. So his hands were steady until the going down of the sun. 13 And Joshua overwhelmed Amalek and his people with the sword.
14 Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write this as a memorial in a book and recite it in the ears of Joshua, that I will utterly blot out the memory of Amalek from under heaven.” 15 And Moses built an altar and called the name of it, The Lord is my banner, 16 saying, “A hand upon the throne of the Lord Jacob! The Lord will have war with Amalek from generation to generation.” (Exodus 17)………

UNRESERVEDLY, this investigative journalist also coins them toadying “Jew-boys”…girls too, Herzog and Livni alike. This dangerous twosome (countless in tow, fueled with illegal foreign-funded “helping hands” from Obama Inc.) are aiming to destroy Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, substituting it as a “state for all its people’s”. By grabbing the reins of the premiership, by hook or by crook, they intend to do just that. Tragically, every grouping has their own “cross(es)” to bear, and this Amalekite trait is resonant with a segment of “my people”. Can you hear the guttural sigh from this American-Israeli, others as well, who will cast a vote in the upcoming March election. 

Livni-Herzog campaign being financed by ‘Palestinian-Americans’

This should tell you all you need to know about the ideology and financing behind the effort to unseat Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. Yes, it’s being run by Barack Hussein Obama’s Presidential campaign. But it’s being paid for by ‘Palestinian-Americans.’ This came by email from Ronn Torossian.

 

A review of tax filings finds that One Voice paid $96,000 in 2011 to Howard Sumka.

Sumka was instrumental in providing “$1 million in American funding to a Hamas-run university in the Gaza Strip…” when he served as West Bank and Gaza Mission Director for US Aid.

Similarly, by reviewing the organization’s 990 tax filings, there are annual donations to The American Task Force on Palestine.

Very few Israelis would choose shared ideology with the American Task Force On Palestine, whose mission includes“An end to the Israeli occupation and the evacuation of all Israeli settlements”, and “A just solution for the Palestinian refugee problem, in accordance with international legality and the relevant UN resolutions.”

An executive board member of One Voice is Samer Hamadeh, who told Bloomberg in 2008 that “I grew up in Fresno, Calif., I went to Stanford, my parents left Palestine when they were kids and never looked back. I didn’t realize that I was Palestinian until my teens and not really what that meant until after 9/11.…”

Do prospective voters in Israel of “The Zionist Camp” identify with ideological backing from Hamadeh? One thinks that his ideology is most likely not in line with the mainstream voters that Issac Herzog and Tzipi Livni are chasing.

Well, maybe. But Sumka and Hamdeh definitely appear to be in line with Livni’s and Herzog’s ideology.

 

AND so whenever it becomes clear that leaders (with others in tandem, albeit not elected, oft-named, self-appointed “elitists”) betray the national trust, well, it is quite easy to identify them. Now, this should not be confused with an individual’s mere ideological differences, not at all. But it does have everything to do with their actions – to DIRECTLY undermine the nation’s foundations – regardless of any blathering to the contrary, yes, they too are nationalists! Liars. Reprobates.

ALONG this trajectory of understanding, let’s segue to Benghazigate, a focal point which blows back into Obama Inc’s Pentagon. 

IN this regard, after General Ham attempted to save –  via life-saving air support – those trapped in Libya’s illegal war (hidden under the umbrella of Samantha Powers’s R2P…F/B/O the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, ISIS too), voilà, the Traitor-in-Chief had him summarily removed, and then proceeded to re-shuffle the Pentagon’s top decks. Coinquidink?

What are the odds on this happening? Two flag officers, operating in the same theater (Mideast area) both relieved or reassigned within a matter of days.

Highly-respected Army Gen. Carter Ham, boss at Africa Command the past 18 months, suddenly is brought home after rumors he was outraged when his offer to send in a reaction team to save the besieged Americans at Benghazi was turned down. There are reports that the general had a rapid response team all set to go, but was ordered to “stand down.”

Sources say the general said “to hell with that” and insisted the rescue attempt be tried. Within two minutes of the order, it is said the general was apprehended and his second-in-command officially relieved him of command.

We might add here, that Obama suck-up, that wretched little gnome, Gen. Martin Dempsey, who is Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has officially denied that report, claiming that Ham was on board with the Pentagon in deciding “against sending in U.S. forces” to attempt a rescue of the Americans in the beleaguered Benghazi compound.

ANOTHER FLAG OFFICER PAYS A HEAVY PRICE

If that wasn’t indication of possible dissension at high levels, Navy Rear Admiral, former commander of the USS John Stennis Strike Group, Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette was mysteriously relieved of duty, and all the brass will say is he is “under investigation” for, get this, “inappropriate leadership judgment.”

Just another way of saying that the admiral dared differ with the Administration’s Libya policy and perhaps openly defied Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. It’ll be interesting to see if the good admiral is court-martialed and if his trial would be open to the news media.

Other than the Fox News Channel, the MSM (“mainstream media”) are so far “in the tank” for their hero Obama, his re-election so important to them, the Benghazi lies and cover-up will be downplayed and/or ignored.

The YouTube anti-Muslim video excuse and cover-story has already been exposed for a fraud, but CNN, the Washington POST and New York TIMES have yet to ask the President any embarrassing questions.

SO as the treachery against valiant commanding officers became clear, it was particular sackings which led to a FULL purging. Consequentially, Obama Inc. understood that certain officers would not betray their oaths of leadership – in essence, to serve and protect – unlike their bosses! 

ENTER, the unprecendented purging of Generals, and for more than one reason.

WHEREAS those who were purged took their oaths seriously, on the other hand, Obama and gang have other plans for the U.S. military command (never mind the violation of the Posse Comitatus Act), that which involves targeting citizens on U.S. soil. Resultant, they realized that certain military higher-ups constituted a “liability.

NOW, let’s be very clear: HUSSEIN Obama is not interested in violating the above enshrined Act to save the nation, that would be another whole order of magnitude. However, incontestably, he is seeking to protect jihadis (and their anti-American supporters from the left) who seek to destroy the nation! And for this he needs “go to” officers who will target patriots!

 

BE afraid, very afraid….as the Anti-American-in-Chief has the outrageous gall to state: Americans are inviting jihad by criticizing Islam! Beyond treacherous. Treasonous.

WHICH brings us back, once again, to MORE dire news…proof of his betrayal(s)…yet, his Pentagon mouthpieces (and other surrogates) dodge and weave via this and that spin cycle.

A U.S. military official on Thursday outlined plans to retake the key Iraq city of Mosul from Islamic State terrorists as early as April — an unusual move that immediately drew criticism from two U.S. intelligence officers.

A senior U.S. Central Command official said that the “shaping” for the battle is currently underway. The Iraqi military hopes to begin operations in the “April, May timeframe” and retake the city before Ramadan begins on June 17.

The official, who was not authorized to discuss the operation publicly and spoke with reporters on condition of anonymity, said five Iraqi Army brigades will be used in the fight, as well as several smaller brigades, adding up to a total force of up to 25,000 Iraqi troops.

Three brigades of Kurdish Peshmerga fighters will participate as well.

But two military intelligence officers told Fox News that the decision to publicly announce the plan was counterintuitive because it “telegraphs” the timing and number of units involved. The officers said it would allow Islamic State, also known as ISIS, or ISIL, to prepare for the battle by laying improvised explosive devices.

Both officers questioned whether political considerations on the part of the Obama administration factored into the decision to announce the offensive.

ISIS militants overtook Mosul last June, as the group marched across large sections of Iraq and Syria, sending Iraqi forces fleeing. At this point, officials estimate there are between 1,000 to 2,000 ISIS insurgents in the city of Mosul. Military leaders have been talking about retaking the city for some time, but they have said they won’t launch the operation until the Iraqi troops are ready.

W T F…

ALAS, U.S. soldiers would do well to finally realize that they ARE sitting ducks, and it is no accident. In fact, he ordered (as the so-called Commander-in-Chief) Marines to “disarm”, as they fled Yemen with their tail between their legs. Said grave breach of the military’s code is of piece with ISIS being able to surround ! 320 Marines at an Iraqi (training) air base, effectively getting the drop on them. Indeed.

THUS, is it any wonder that this immoral pygmy conflated anti-semitism (the incurable hatred of Jews) with anti-Muslim sentiments, all the while Muslims lay waste to innocent people all over the globe! Apparently, targeting Jews, for the “crime” of being Jews and contributing more to humanity than most others, is now on par with ill will towards countless Muslims who slaughter under the banner of Islam!

“We’ve also seen, most recently in Europe, a rise in inexcusable acts of anti-Semitism, or in some cases, anti-Muslim sentiment or anti-immigrant sentiment,” Obama told a Feb. 19 audience of U.S. and foreign officials and advocates, who met to discuss ways to minimize jihadi violence.

Peaceful criticism of Islamic culture is bad, he suggested. ”When people spew hatred toward others — because of their faith or because they’re immigrants — it feeds into terrorist narratives. … It feeds a cycle of fear and resentment and a sense of injustice upon which extremists prey,” he said.

So “we have to ensure that our diverse societies truly welcome and respect people of all faiths and backgrounds,” said Obama.

He insisted the conflict between Muslim and Western cultures is not caused by fundamentally different attitudes about freedom and religious solidarity.

TO wit, may the Jihadi-in-Chief choke on his own verbal vomit – and worse!

{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}