Certain scenarios and propositions appear so outlandish it becomes next to impossible to internalize, let alone believe, they are true.

Such is the case with today’s commentary, in so far as it has many elements attributed to “conspiracy thinking”. Agreed. Yet, those of us who keep abreast of matters farther afield than most – checking and double checking said scenarios – relying on trusted contacts to confirm certain matters, certainly realize when smoke is blown. This is NOT one of those (smoke-filled) times.

But to understand what’s unfolding behind the scenes – with many hints and variants in public view – one must backtrack, otherwise none of it makes sense. Patience, dear readers.

Enter: David Rockefeller, bankster and globalist extraordinaire, with others of great wealth similarly in sync (as a side note, being a native New Yorker, can’t count how many times shows were enjoyed at one of NYC’s most well known landmarks, Rockefeller Center…through their family’s capitalist empire they plotted America’s eventual downfall…Machiavellian) have been plotting for decades to destroy the dollar and bring America to its knees.

To catch a glimmer into Rockefeller’s evil designs, a prudent starting point can be found within the following 2 youtubes http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUvNP4C_rDo – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZZklPnVs-Y. They are just the opening shots. More specifically,

Rockefeller, who is the founder of the Trilateral Commission, a secretive internationalist think tank, wrote in his memoir, “For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

In a speech at the 1991 Bilderberg Convention, Rockefeller stated “we are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty on an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

He even praised Chinese Communist dictator Mao Zedong, who slaughtered millions of people saying, “one is impressed immediately by the sense of national harmony…. Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution it has obviously succeeded… in fostering high morale and community purpose. General social and economic progress is no less impressive….The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly form the singleness of ideology and purpose…. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in history.”

Rockefeller and his ilk claim to be defenders of capitalism but what they really are is oligarchist who believe that we are better off being rules by elite bankers who have no regard for nation states and individual liberty. Obama has proven  he is another tool of Wall Street and may only be supporting tariffs as an act or to pander to union support. Globalization is all about plundering the wealth of  American workers and consumers as well as the exploitation of third world resources and labor to benefit the ultra wealthy.

YES, decades in the making, Rockefeller’s own boastful and brazen words indict him, and the above plans are coming to fruition under the “guiding hands” of anti-American, Barack HUSSEIN Obama. And, aside from his “green/Islamist” roots, he was plucked for the Presidency – out of relative obscurity – to usher in the unfolding economic nightmare. His “red” roots assures his fealty to America’s undoing; ushering in the toppling of freedom and liberty, as the west’s epicenter. Once gone, the rest will fall into (obedient) place like dominoes. In addition, uncontrollable greed by banksters and their helpmates is at the plot’s core.  

To be sure, what was harder to accomplish decades ago, has become easy peasy – hi-tech-wise.

Weaponized banking – Cyber security, hacking & Electronic theft of all personal ID and information – Northeast Intelligence Network

Wednesday, November 20, 2013 – video embedded

20 November 2013:  Tonight will be a very important episode of The Hagmann & Hagmann Report as we welcome Steve Quayle, Michael Erevna, and “V,” The Guerrilla Economist for a round table discussion as they expose their findings on the international banking system’s criminal enterprise. We already know that the U.S. dollar is targeted for destruction, but how are events going to unfold?

Regardless of where you live or where do your banking, you are about to be financially raped in a very systematic and methodical manner. It goes far beyond the erosion of your financial wealth that is already taking place by the debasement of our currency. It is much deeper, as the central banks are involved in the collection of your personal identifying information on a global level (in the U.S., under the color of the authority of the PATRIOT Act) and the theft of such information to subjugate you to their control.

The powerhouse of knowledge brought by our guests tonight will leave you more informed and educated on the evil machinations we are about to see unfold – events that will usher in the global economic system planned and plotted so long ago.

Steve Quayle: Steve is an internationally renowned author, researcher, talk show host and regular guest on such radio programs as The Hagmann & Hagmann Report, Coast to Coast AM, and countless other syndicated stations across the world. Always in high demand, Mr. Quayle has been light years ahead of other researchers about a variety of topics, including the construction of a one world system of government that includes the economic political and religious structure that is being implemented before our eyes. Mr. Quayle has predicted with accuracy well over a decade ago, based on his own extensive research and analysis of events, what is taking place today. He is the founder and operator of his website SteveQuayle.com.

Michael Erevna:  Mr. Erevna is the founder and editor of RevelationNow.net and has worked for 20 years as a software engineer for the central banks as well as some of the largest defense contractors in the world. He is truly an insider’s insider, with knoweldge of the mechanics of the methods the central banks are employing to steal your identity and wealth.

“V,” The Guerrilla Economist™: Using the pen-name “v” and the moniker of “The Guerrilla Economist, “V” has worked as a top analyst and commercial banker for one of Great Britain’s largest financial institutions.  He predicted the first shots of our currency war, and the only source who predicted the current state of suppression of precious metals, calling exactly what the price would be contrary to every other voice in the world today. He is a contributor to Steve Quayle’s alerts and is the operator of a subscription based website RogueMoney.net.

But where does NSA’s domestic spying (foreign spying as well, but for this discussion let’s concentrate on its domestic element) arm enter into the plans of globalist banksters?

IF one fully grasps that uncovering terror connections is NOT the epicenter of domestic spying, hence, its out-sized necessity, then other motives loom into focus. How do we know this? Well, more than enough evidence obliterates Obama Inc’s claims, yes, domestic spying is terror related and nothing more. Not exactly.

In fact, there has been a purging of Islam + terror within all of America’s anti-terror/enforcement protocols ! Worse, America’s mosques, the crux of terror activity, are off limits. Thus, balderdash aside, little else matters. Jibber jabber.

At the other side of the spectrum lies NSA’s real thrust, which revolves around its little known marching orders; a two pronged scooping/surveillance mission. 

Creating a dissident’s list, in tandem with collecting all relevant personal data, gives Obama Inc. more than enough ammunition to control millions upon millions of Americans. In particular, those likely deemed “troublemakers”, specifically patriots and vets, are a globalist’s nightmare.

In effect, with such dynamite in hand, the expectation of privacy, upon which liberty and freedom are lynch pins, becomes DOA.

Most significantly, TOTAL control over the world’s citizens is their end game. Once all the pieces fall into place it will become impossible, in many lifetimes, to undo. And that’s the ultimate goal: the passing of the torch from one generation of bankster globalist family/entity to another.


WHEREAS most clear headed thinkers are hardly shocked…shocked…by the Islamist-in-Chief’s sell out to Iran’s hegemonic ambitions, the fact of the matter is that there are a few cogent explanations as to precisely what animates his treachery.

The above not only involves Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s betrayal of Israel – America’s ONLY reliable ally in the region – but western interests as a whole, most especially America’s. Simple, yet complicated, as that.

In effect, The Leader Of The Free World Aims For America’s And Israel’s Jugular – Their “Disarming”: The Benefits Accrued To Iran was written as a precursor to Obama’s traitorous behavior, with tracks laid out which defined his insidious path.

YET, now that the so called  “deal with the Islamic devil” is all but sealed – and aside from this Brotherhood expert’s banging on the same drum for over a year – few others, aside from Caroline Glick, got it right. Her analysis is more than righteous, it is a bulls eye – Jerusalem Post’s Glick: Iran Deal ‘Betrays’ US Allies:

The nuclear disarmament deal with Iran is “a heinous act of aggression by the United States against its allies in the Middle East and against its own national security,” says Caroline Glick, deputy managing editor of The Jerusalem Post.

Iran has pledged to destroy the United States, it’s developing military bases throughout Central and South America for that explicit purpose, and Obama just approved a deal that all but guarantees that Iran will acquire nuclear weapons,” Glick told “The Steve Malzberg Show” on Newsmax TV…..a blow out video is a must view!

Like anything else of major import, there is always room for add-ons, and this time is no exception. To wit, full recognition of Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s fealty to the red/green alliance must be understood for what it is; an inherent/requisite basis to his actions. 

In the main, although it appears as if Russia’s Putin runs circles around the POTUS, this is hardly the case. For if this is indeed true, it would mean that their goals are diametrically opposed and Putin trumped Obama. NOTHING could be further from the truth!

So let’s just back track a bit, merely as a starting point to the root of the matter. The Radical-in-Chief & His Communist Hawaiian Roots: More Than Just An Exotic Locale is not meant as a trip down memory lane, but one which cements the Radical-in-Chief’s red alliance. Enter: his “relationship” with Putin, as well as with other red-imbued international players, including Obama’s main consigliere, Valerie Jarrett.

As a result, If It Looks Like A Socialist/Marxist/Communist Plan It Is: Peeking/Peeling Back Into Obama’s Looking Glass – Surrogates Too – Their Bomblets Waiting To Explode – and they are indeed explosive!

Now, as much as Putin has his hands full with a dangerous Islamist presence in outlying regions, the fact of the matter is that he dispatches them efficiently with brute force. NO quarrels on this end.

However, it is absolutely the case that Putin’s Russia has been working on replanting MAJOR Russian influence back into the Mid East, a goal ever since the Soviets were supplanted by the U.S., after the Suez war of late 1956. This is a historical fact. KNOW thy history well.

Russia’s goals are primarily economic concerns, with an eye towards reaping rewards for its burgeoning arms industry – their main financial arm. Hence, Putin’s mega deals with Iran and Syria (and now with Egypt, after Obama bitch- slapped Egypt’s military rulers), the incontestable butchers in the region. Of course, with this economic foothold, it underpins Russia’s equally intrinsic aim – to knock back the U.S. to less than super power status. 

As history unfolds, with a red-infused Obama in the White House, “flexibility” comes in many arenas. Recall their “hot mic” moment: President Obama made light Tuesday of the hot microphone moment he had the day earlier with Russian President Medvedev, where he said that after the November election, he’d have more “flexibility” on the issue of missile defense. 

Accordingly, Obama’s gyrations aside, leaving Russia to “police” the Mid East – once again – suits Obama and Putin equally, despite any smoke blown by either side. 

On its face, the U.S.’s inexorable departure from the Mid East not only knocks America down to “paper tiger” status, but, most significantly, it leaves Israel boxed in between a hostile, pro-Arab Russia and a nuclear armed Iran.

And, this is why, despite Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Sunni roots – and with the Saudis (and others) up in arms about his abandonment of their interests too – the POTUS ignored Iran’s freedom fighters, back in 2009, and gave a heads up to the mullahs to continue as is. It was also the chief reason why his “red line” in Syria was nothing short of hooey and phooey, despite the fact that Assad’s regime has butchered upwards of 200,000 people. Besides, keeping promises to genocidal rulers (Shia or Sunni, as is the case with his fealty to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia) is a necessity, if the fulfillment of red/green alliances are to come to fruition. 

Always remember a central component to Obama’s outreach tour to the Muslim world in the Mid East, back in 2009. His intentions were made clear in a myriad of ways, some of which are documented herein: “I AM A MUSLIM,” OBAMA TELLS EGYPTIAN FOREIGN MINISTER GHEIT – ISLAMIC COUP ON THE WHITE HOUSE:

Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said he had a one-on-one meeting with Obama, in which President Obama told him that he was still a Muslim, the son of a Muslim father, the stepson of Muslim stepfather, that his half brothers in Kenya are Muslims, and that he was sympathetic towards the Muslim agenda.

Finally, during the week of 14-18th of January 2010, just on the eve of my winter tour to the US, Rachel picked up a Nile TV broadcast in which Egyptian Foreign Minister Abul Gheit said on the “Round Table Show” that he had had a one on one meeting with Obama who swore to him that he was a Moslem, the son of a Moslem father and step-son of Moslem step-father, that his half-brothers in Kenya were Moslems, and that he was loyal to the Moslem agenda. He asked that the Moslem world show patience. Obama promised that once he overcame some domestic American problems (Healthcare), that he would show the Moslem world what he would do with Israel. (more here)

BUT, what if there is NO there even there? How so? Well, the following, passed onto yours truly, more than gums up the works and adds to the deception in play:

The consequences of the Geneva hoax (info # 012811/13 EV) [analysis]

By Jean Tsadik © Metula News Agency

Trans. From French Llewellyn Brown

Of course, in history, kings or governments have already made oral agreements without signing the slightest document. There have already been cases of such understandings being respected. The existence of a signed treaty is not the only way for two States to come to an understanding. As far as we are concerned, we have never claimed the contrary.

It remains nonetheless true that an agreement that is duly written up in legal language, signed by plenipotentiaries and endorsed by the legislative powers of a country has substantial advantages over a contract whose contours are only vaguely defined. Thus including, of course, over a “Joint Plan of Action”, conceived in such a way that each one can present it to his population, his journalists, his supreme guide or his Congress, in the way he deems fit, while a rationally insuperable abyss separates these interpretations.

Moreover, one is obliged to make an absolutely different strategic analysis according to whether there is an agreement in all due form or a common working draft, since they do not have the same consequences: they do not offer the same guarantees and require extremely distinct safeguards.

That is why the scoop the Ména made on Sunday is fundamental. Firstly, it was important to say that there was no agreement at Geneva between Iran and the 5+1; next, that the governments are deliberately lying to the public by claiming the contrary; finally, that the media, all the media, are participating in the hoax, shirking their duty to inform, to analyze and to be curious.

Are the latter sinking into activism? Into euphoria? Into naivety? into anti-Semitism? Into an absence of any professional spirit or simply into stupidity? The details of our colleagues’ reasons do not have the slightest interest in our opinion. What is important, however, is the phenomenon: that of an entire profession, on a global scale, of people that spend their days commenting a text they have never seen, that does not exist and that they do not demand to be entitled to read.

An entire profession of people that interpret and dissect Obama’s Fact Sheet, that peremptorily repeat that at Geneva Iran engaged to do this or that, whereas in the “Joint Plan of Action”, there is not the least phrase starting by “Iran engages to…”. Neither in the form nor the content. There is no mention of a contract, a treaty, an understanding, all of that is simply invention or deception.

President Obama also risks a proceeding of impeachment, having asserted before his fellow citizens that the United States had signed an agreement that they did not sign and that Iran accepted commitments that they did not.

Other places have other rules, other traditions: in France, François Hollande can be “glad about the treaty signed” in the Swiss capital – the laws of the Fifth Republic French are very flexible when it comes to presidential distortions –, in America, it is not the case. In the USA, people do not accept that fact that a head of state can lie to those who have elected him.

Members of the Congress, Democrats and Republicans, doubtless warned by Stéphane Juffa’s article, are considering initiating impeachment proceedings. Soon, they will demand that Barack Obama present them with the “agreement signed in Geneva”. That promises to be spectacular.

In the meantime, Congressmen and Senators are preparing to draw up and enact a law defining the measures that the United States should instantly apply should the Islamic “Republic” break its undertakings. According to the calls we have received from Washington, retaliation would be fierce, and this law is most likely to pass.

Its content will obviously be based on Obama’s Fact Sheet, in the absence of any other document. On Capitol Hill – that is the good side of the fools’ agreement imposed by the president! –, they do not bother themselves, they “trust him” when they take note of all the contractual commitments supposedly agreed to by Iran.

And if the inspectors of the IAEA are hindered from inspecting, or if they discover that the Persians are not acting in accordance with the Fact Sheet, the Congress will hasten to sound the charge. Because they have the justified impression they have been duped by the White House, because they are aware of what is happening in Iran under the present dictatorship, and they do not want it to become a nuclear power, and because they support Israel.

On the international level, one can thus almost act – on the condition that one is the United States of America – on the basis of an interpretation one intends to impose on a text that has not been endorsed by the adverse party. It suffices that one arbitrarily sets the red lines and threatens one’s interlocutor with the worst sanctions if he does not undertake what is mentioned in the Joint Plan of Action.

In these conditions, why does the Ména make such a fuss about the absence of a formal treaty? Answer: because of everything such an absence implies!

Because in spite of all the pressure, the months of secret negotiations between the USA and Iran, which we have written about every week in our columns, the sanctions, the threats of Israeli interventions, the Ayatollahs have not capitulated: they have not publicly accepted to give up their project of an atomic bomb.

Because, and that is for sure – the 5+1 being believable nations – as Laurent Fabius announced yesterday, the sanctions will start to be lifted in December. What haste for Bayard-Fabius since, in such a short time, it will be impossible to observe if the Persians have or have not acted according to the terms of commitments they did not agree to!

Because the economic isolation imposed on Teheran – and which helped oblige the mullahs to discuss with the Westerners – has been irreparably broken. The Indians have already announced they are only waiting to solve a problem of transport insurance before ordering six million barrels of black gold from Khamenei. The head of the French automobile industry has already bought his ticket for Persia, where he hopes to negotiate contracts intended to give some air to his suffocating sector. He was right to hurry, because he will probably come across his Japanese, Korean and European counterparts in his hotel.

The business world is as eager to include the Iranians again, as are the latter themselves. And in the absence of clear and constraining treaty, Teheran will, in the next few days, be transformed into a new Eldorado. Moreover the figures of the increase in the Persians’ revenues resulting from the relaxing of the sanctions that are integrated in Obama’s Fact Sheet appear for what they are: ridiculous.

Besides, no mention is made of these estimations in the “Joint Plan of Action”, and it is one of the other base tricks. Even in their content, even without bothering about the lack of commitments: the facts published by Obama and Rohani do not coincide.

And on that score there is no doubt, the American previsions of 4 to 8 billion dollars of revenue for the ayatollahs will be demolished, as will those of the Israeli Minister of International Relations, Intelligence & Strategic Affairs, Yuval Steinitz, that totaled forty billion. In six months, at Metula, we would be surprised if these revenues did not attain a hundred billion, and above all, if the enthusiasm and interests they generate do not make the commitments of the 5+1 irreversible, with or without a further relaxing of sanctions, whatever the Iranians’ action regarding their nuclear program may be.

To put the Americans on the warpath, in these conditions, there would need to be a huge violation by the theocratic junta of the commitments it did not agree to. But there is nothing on the horizon that could force Obama to reconsider the other options, of which he says they remain “on the table”.

Since these hypothetical violations would not be flagrant: for example, how can one precisely qualify the dilution of the existing stock of 20% enriched uranium? How can one determine when and where it should start, and what ultimate form it should take, since nowhere is it stipulated. And if nothing is provided for, nothing can constitute a violation, that is obvious.

And this example is rather appropriate, since it constitutes the second condition imposed by the Westerners for an agreement with Teheran: 1. the ceasing of enrichment activities, 2. the lengthening of the breakout time, the time necessary for the Shi’a theocracy to build a bomb, if it decides to do so.

Then with the 185 kilos of 20% enriched uranium listed in their possession, the breakout time can be set at about 21 days. Next to nothing, in fact, and that is why the planet at least required a very precise calendar for the destruction of these reserves, starting yesterday rather than tomorrow, and stipulating all the necessary technical items. And above all, a formal, verifiable and signed one!

The agreement hoax, set up by the Obama administration with the active help of the other members of the Security Council and Germany, constitutes this time an attempt to plot [this is the first time, since its creation, that the Ména has spoken of the eventuality of a plot. Editor’s note.]. Barack Obama decided a long time ago that he would not engage in an armed conflict with the Islamic “Republic”; then, by dint of trying to negotiate, he has ended up convincing himself that Khamenei, having doubtless seen through the intentions of the American President, would not give up his nuclear project, and that he would not sign any document to this effect.

That was clear to Obama and Kerry well before the call to the meetings in Geneva, since their emissaries and their atomic experts had been regularly meeting their Persian counterparts for more than six months.

Two options remained for the resident of the White House: to resort to force in order to stop the ayatollahs from progressing on the path to their bomb, or making do with a nuclear Iran, in the short or medium term, hoping that the economic upturn and the fear of a return to sanctions would make the supreme guide and his clique back away.

That is really misjudging them, however; knowing their ability to ruse, it seems to me they will have both.

What is extraordinary, in this matter, is the relaxed manner in which Barack Obama announced to his people the signing of an agreement, and Iran’s equally fictitious commitments. And the ease with which the other powers – who also fear a confrontation that is unimaginable for them without Washington, and who were jubilant about trading with the Iranians anew – participated in the deception.

As for Binyamin Netanyahu, he is most naïve, as it so happens. His Ministry of Foreign Affairs followed in the footsteps of the US administration, and he too drew up a Fact Sheet of his own devising, taking the White House’s one at face value.

Here is a Prime Minister criticizing a non-existent treaty! He complains that Iran has not committed itself to dismantling its production tools for enriched uranium, that it is allowed to continue to enrich up to 5%, and that it has not destroyed its heavy water factory at Arak, while benefitting from a relaxing of economic sanctions. The reality is much darker: Iran is reintegrated into the world of international commerce, but has committed itself to nothing at all.

Were he better informed, better advised, he should content himself with demanding that the 5+1 publish the agreement that they claimed to have signed, that would make his task easier. And demand, alternatively, if the agreement is secret, that they say so, if it is an oral one, that they say so too.

But for that, it is much too late, most of the 5+1 leaders having already spoken of the “signing of an agreement” that is supposedly written. It remains for the Israelis to demonstrate that it is not an agreement, and that the “Joint Plan of Action” contains no commitment on the part of the Iranians.

One option remains on the table: that of an intervention by Tsahal [the IDF]. It worries the conspirators to the highest degree, as they do not want the first condemned to revolt. That explains Laurent Fabius’ comment, according to which, if the Israelis intervened militarily, whereas an agreement had been reached, no one would understand them.

Or the much tougher and even threatening remark made by the British Foreign Office Secretary, William Hague on Monday: “We would discourage anybody in the world, including Israel, from taking any steps that would undermine this agreement and we will make that very clear to all concerned”. W. Hague added that Great Britain “is on its guard”.

Not to hinder the Iranians from making an atomic bomb, but to dissuade the Israelis from putting their spanner in the works. Here, we repeat that William Hague is shamelessly lying when he speaks of an agreement, regarding which he is ideally situated to know that it does not exist.

The British Foreign Affairs Minister is only protecting the plot he is participating in. But basically he is right, as is Fabius: it will be difficult for Israel to act, as long as the conjuration obliging the latter to bend its knee remains powerful.

For Jerusalem to extricate itself, it would have to start by utilizing appropriate arguments, and for the moment, that is limited to officially demanding the treaty be published. I know, I am repeating myself, it is not my style, but here, it is important to be precise and to insist.

But essentially, for Israel to extricate itself, three conditions are necessary: 1. That it demonstrates that there is a plot, 2. That it succeeds in proving – in the juridical meaning of the term – a major violation by the Iranians of Obama’s Fact Sheet, and 3. That Saudi Arabia and other Arab states participate, and not simply half-heartedly, in a military operation with the Hebrews against the Islamic “Republic”.

In these contingent circumstances, in the case where the Jews and the Arabs of the region allied together to intervene, considering the Shi’a nuclear threat to be unbearable, and the “Joint Plan of Action” to be insufficient, no one could oppose their decision, neither Hague nor Obama, and that would delight the Congress.

And I assure you that we are infinitely closer to a coalition of this sort, which seemed improbable for decades, than I have the right to tell you. In fact, Khamenei only has one chance of escaping the joint thunderbolt of Jews and Arabs: by scrupulously respecting a contract he refused to sign and by relinquishing his nuclear project.

It is on every account a wild situation, but it is so.

NEVERTHELESS, despite the heretofore leader of the free world’s ultimate betrayal, the nation of Israel is hardly at his mercy. In fact, the only thing standing in Israel’s way is the spinelessness of many of its top leaders, as they genuflect to Obama Inc’s dictates and obediently take his administration at its (lying) word.

IN this regard, the Betrayer-in-Chief has the pulse of Israel’s leadership in the palm of his hand. He knows that they are malleable and terrified of losing America as an ally, therefore, whenever Israel’s leaders (momentarily) push back, Obama dangles “this and that” to keep them in line. Now, no one with any brain cells left believes that the following sweeteners are worth a damn, considering the POTUS’s track record, as well as the existential threat which a nuclear-armed Iran poses.

Joint Israeli-US war game when Iran deal expires

DEBKAfile November 28, 2013, 5:54 AM (GMT+02:00)

A high-ranking Israeli officer told TIME magazine Wednesday, that the US and Israel have scheduled a joint war game in six months time, when the interim nuclear agreement signed between Iran and the West on Sunday expires.
“The strategic decision is to continue to make a noise,” the  Israeli official, who asked to remain anonymous, said.
“In May there’s going to be a joint training exercise with the Americans,” he added. “It’s going to be big.”
Debkafile reported Wednesday that the administration hopes to stop the flow of rhetoric by a package of measures designed to allay Israel’s concerns over the nuclear deal and the rapprochement in progress between the US and Islamic Republic.
According to our sources, the package will include an upgrade of Israeli Air Force capabilities.

REGARDLESS, Israel’s citizen-soldiers are waiting for their appeasement-oriented leaders to buck up and to behave as statesmen should, not as slavish devotees to their “master” in Washington – I Am An Israeli Soldier, Proud To Be! – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-VzAWJ1yK4 

Future generations will (metaphorically) crucify PM Netanyahu if he fails to step out of Obama’s shadow, in time to save half of world Jewry. Time will soon tell. It’s of the essence. 


In relation to breaking free from the Fed’s choke hold, their strangle hold, previous commentaries touched upon several well qualified rumblings.

And while many are truly fed up with Washington’s dictates, it is also the case that talking is never the same barometer as doing. There are those who just jibber jabber but hardly put their cards on the table. Cowards. But this is not the case with a growing number of (“rural”) Coloradans, and other states/counties are joining the fray.

Consider the past as prologue, particularly as Obamacare’s death grip shocks many heretofore fence sitters into action-mode. Many are now realizing that the health care overhaul was never meant to result in “affordable” care, but for TOTAL control over America’s citizens, especially as up to 80 million are reportedly in jeopardy of losing their health care! Say what? NOT only that, but Obamacare is the linkage to eventual gun control. Yes, its loopholes are designed to disarm Americans. Evil.

In this regard, secession is looking better and better – the real “hope for change”. Its effects are bubbling to the surface and Northeast Intelligence Network renders some clues as to the undercurrent of secession. 

Is anyone surprised that Texans are leading the charge towards secession too ? Enter Coloradans, as they set the stage to blow out ALL Demsters who mess with their Constitutional right to bear arms.


5 counties plunge forward with plan for new state

For the first time since the Civil War, U.S. counties have voted to instruct their elected officials to pursue the possibility of forming a 51st state.

Residents of five Colorado counties voted Tuesday in favor of the resolutions.

“This is an important moment for liberty,” said Jeffrey Hare, founder of the 51st state initiative. “We have five counties in this state that have said they want to exercise their rights under the state constitution and secede.”

Colorado has a strong statement in its constitution saying the people have the right to abolish the government anytime they believe it is necessary. Article II of the Colorado constitution says:

“The people of this state have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves, as a free, sovereign and independent state; and to alter and abolish their constitution and form of government whenever they may deem it necessary to their safety and happiness, provided, such change be not repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.”

The wording is particularly significant, because Colorado became a state in 1876, 11 years after the end of the Civil War.

With the passage of the ballot measures in the five counties, Coloradans for the second time this year have drawn their authority directly from the state constitution to do something that politics was unable to accomplish.

Earlier they used Article XXI to recall from office two Democratic state senators who voted in favor of a series of gun control laws that were among the strictest in the nation. The recall was the first time the constitutional provision had ever been utilized.

Now residents are taking the first step to exercise their right to abolish their form of government. While media reports have claimed residents were voting on secession, that is not completely accurate.

Secession would need the approval of the state legislature or state electorate and then of the U.S. Congress.

Hare noted that even in the counties that voted against secession the margin of victory was not overwhelming.

“Since this movement began a few months ago we went from zero to 43 percent approval even in the counties that voted against the issue,” Hare said. “This is especially significant when you consider that unlike other ballot initiatives, there was no organized campaign in support of the measure.”

“The most we did was a few radio ads and Facebook posts. We didn’t have the time or money to have meetings advocating the issue. In spite of this, large percentages of voters said they wanted to leave the state.”

The movement has inspired residents in other states to consider similar measures. In California, residents in some northern counties are attempting to secede from the state and form a new state of Jefferson. Residents of other states have also contacted county officials asking about the possibility of starting their own secession movements.

Weld County commissioner Sean Conway said while he respects the wishes of the voters, who turned down the resolution, the issues that prompted the vote still need to be addressed.

“You have to respect the voters’ decision. Weld County commissioners will not pursue a 51st state, but we will pursue other options that I think address the problem,” Conway said from a Weld County election watch party in Fort Lupton. “The (disconnect) problem still exists. I think it’s incumbent upon us to continue this dialogue, which began in June to address the disconnect between rural and urban communities in Colorado, and come together to try and find a solution to addressing that problem.”

Conway told WND the vote raised awareness of the problem and inspired others nationwide.

“I fully understand that our movement is kind of like the young child who said the emperor has no clothes on,” Conway said. “We are setting the example and leading the way for people all across this country who are frustrated at being ignored by government officials and we’re doing what they wanted to do, but were afraid to attempt. People all across the country are now finding courage because of what we did. They’re saying if northeastern Colorado can stand up to a government that doesn’t address their concerns, then we can to.”

Hare said with Tuesday’s vote, the movement is just beginning.

“We now need to focus on educating people in the counties that voted for the issue on the need to put pressure on the legislature to allow them to have an actual vote on the issue,” Hare explained. “These counties are all right next to each other, we have established a beachhead for secession in the state and we need to build on the ground we do have.”

YES, aside from the “east and west left coasts” (alas, this American-Israeli’s home city, NYC, just elected DeBlasio, a true bloody Commissar, therefore, all “hope for change” is gone) there are many other states left over, and they are viewing the handwriting on the wall. The disarming of America. Take Montana as a “test” case….

The plaintiff in a Montana lawsuit seeking freedom from federal gun regulations has written an open letter to members of the U.S. Supreme Court, where his case soon is to be appealed, pleading with them to rein in the federal government’s arrogance and conceit.

“The natives are beyond restless. They are at the stage of collecting torches and pitchforks and preparing to head for the castle gates en masse,” writes Gary Marbut, president of Montana Shooting Sports Association and author of “Gun Laws of Montana.”

FEW can argue that the Radical-in-Chief is up to his neck in disarming America, and in more ways than one. But the fastest route to its dismantlement runs through gun control. Hence, the all out push, even if less than visible surface-wise.

For additional ammunition, a good understanding of Obama’s plans to subdue Americans is an essential read: MARTIAL LAW PLANS RATCHETED UP IN THE U.S.. What Does Obama Inc. Have In Store For “Non-Compliant” Citizens & Others? 

Chillingly, as Coloradans assert their rights, take a listen to the embedded radio show by Northeast Intelligence Network (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cfp-radio/2013/11/27/greg-evensen-and-steve-quayle-on-gun-confiscation), as intelligence insiders send out alarm bells to local police, sheriff’s departments and overall citizens, regarding the Feds plans for Martial Law. But there’s more. Guess which state is first in their cross hairs? Colorado! On the other hand, Tennessee is rapidly becoming a militarized zone, checkpoints, DNA swabs and all! 

And though the leftist controlled media by Obama Inc. has intensely squashed all hope of getting to the bottom of Fast & Furious, gun control was its genesis. Its raison d’etre.

So woe to all “bitter clingers”, Obama and goons are coming for your guns – with or without your approval! Stay alert. Pay this forward.

MARTIAL LAW PLANS RATCHETED UP IN THE U.S.. What Does Obama Inc. Have In Store For “Non-Compliant” Citizens & Others? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

There are many blessings to thank G-d for, even when the world appears to be spinning out of control. And this is something we all have to remember – this blogger included – especially when life throws us the harshest of curve balls. No easy feat. 

So Thanksgiving is one such time to also recall another blessing, by taking the time to thank those who are toiling – often at great personal and professional risks – to alert others to the many dangers lying in wait. Not to scare others, but to empower them. 

Well, in light of the above, let us discuss an ongoing concern at this site, one which would have been unthinkable to comprehend, or even contemplate, a decade ago. Believe it.

Specifically, the following exhibits demonstrate Obama Inc.’s propensity – as well as their actual preparations – towards a trigger point scenario, one which will culminate (at the most opportune crisis-like situation) into executing Martial Law.

Exhibit A – Fomented Chaos By POTUS ‘Allows’ Him To Issue Executive Orders… With Unprecedented Power Grabs (at least since 9/11/01)…Rep Kay Granger (Texas) Raises Alarm

Exhibit B – Black Hawks Swirling Over US Cities…DHS Stockpiling Inordinate Amount of Ammo..Who IS Their Target?Addendum To : RED HOT Warning From Northeast Intelligence Network

Exhibit C – CDC (Centers For Disease Control & Prevention) & FEMA…What Are They Up To? 

Exhibit D – WOE To All “Bitter Clingers”: Yes, They’re Coming To CONFISCATE Your Guns! 

Exhibit E – U.S. Law Enforcement Running Wild: Military Powers Incrementally Bestowed. Where Is This Headed?

Exhibit F – Signs of Civil War Could Lead To Martial Law

Exhibit G – The Opening Of A Pandora’s Box: Martial Law Via Jihad In Boston

Exhibit H – Russian/Foreign Troops Inside America; FEMA Detention Camps & Agenda 21: Training For MARTIAL LAW Against U.S. Citizens!

Exhibit I – The INCREASING THREAT Of MARTIAL LAW: Demster Rep. Shelia Jackson Lee’s Loose Lips, Her “Slip Of The Tongue”

Exhibit J – DHS, Valerie Jarrett’s Fiefdom, TARGETING U.S. (Patriotic) Citizens/Christians: Warnings From (Retired) Army Officers of MARTIAL LAW & More

Basically, only in a nation whereby the leadership is akin to a criminal empire, would the above exhibits NOT land them in jail. Alas, this is the case in Obama’s America: Entering The Parallel Universe of Radical Politics Gone Haywire…A Short Path To Dictatorship (Oct 2012)as such they continue (unimpeded) to “forward march”, aptly used as Obama Inc.’s main campaign slogan! How ignorant does The One think the masses are of historical slogans? VERY.

There are many underlying reasons, as to why patriotic Americans are currently  treated as the enemy, but several stand out among the rest.

The fact of the matter is that at no time in U.S. history have loyal, patriotic Americans been treated worse, than under the abusive reign of Barack HUSSEIN Obama. NOW, if the goal is to transform America from a superpower, and align it with third world countries, how better to accomplish this, than to hunt down those who are its most actively loyal citizens? For if this feat is accomplished, then there is little doubt, those less patriotically inclined will fall into line…….

Comply or die – Night of the Long Knives for Law Enforcement – Kristallnacht – Broken Glass for Americans

8:00-11:00 PM ET – Northeast Intelligence Network

Plans revealed for subjugation, arrest and even potential termination of law enforcement and citizens?

Special note: Due to emerging events combined with the schedules of those who are traveling for the U.S. Thanksgiving holiday, our normal “Tuesday’s with Stan” (Stan Deyo) time slot is being rescheduled for its normal time next Tuesday.

On Tuesday, November 2013, Dr. Greg Evensen and Steve Quayle will be sharing critical, time-sensitive newly discovered plans of battle for the subjugation, arrest and even potential termination of law enforcement and citizens who refuse to comply with the upcoming plans for gun confiscation. If you are in law enforcement or are a gun owner, you need to listen to this most important broadcast. Intercessors are asked to pray for a reprieve, for a time, to bring more of his children into His kingdom.


DO get a whiff of this local police armament…a pic is worth a thousand words!

Defense Department gives local police equipment designed for a war zone

Published November 27, 2013

  • MRAP.jpg

    March 12: Attendees look at the Lenco MRAP Bear SWAT Team vehicle at the 7th annual Border Security Expo in Phoenix, Arizona.(REUTERS)

From war zones to city streets, some military vehicles are getting a new life — and not everyone is happy about the recycling.

The Defense Department recently announced it would be giving domestic law enforcement forces hulking vehicles designed to efficiently maneuver in a war zone for use in thwarting any potential high-scale activity.

This did not sit well with those who see a troubling trend: the militarization of local police departments, including the American Civil Liberties Union, which has criticized the Defense Department for giving 18-ton, $500,000 armor-protected military fighting vehicles to local forces.

ACLU affiliates have been collecting 2012 records to determine the extent of military hardware and tactics sent to police and plan to issue a report early next year.

While it is hard to wrap ones mind around America becoming a facsimile of dictatorships world over, the fact of the matter is that America is well on its way to becoming a tyranny. However, as of yet the signs are, for the most part, muted and under the radar. Nevertheless, if not thwarted, the above will indeed come to pass.

Put another way, what else could they have in mind? Precisely.

And, Happy Thanksgiving, all the way from Israel!


Those of us being accused of hyperventilating, over the bloody “hand shake” between Sec Kerry and Iran’s FM Zarif, are not only correct in our assessments, but hardly take pleasure in being right. Too much is at stake.

And since this blogger’s valued contacts are hardly timid in nature, they are not exactly bowled over by ceremonial trappings, handshakes included. Histrionics are NOT their forte. Oh no. But as qualified experts, they certainly do NOT depend upon tea leaves to foretell what’s on the horizon. It is not part of their assessment protocol. Years of experience and expertise are more than enough to rely on, rose colored glasses never play a hand in their arsenals. 

So, hot on the heels of the leader of the free world’s final knife thrust into the west’s back, we are in mortal peril. Not today or tomorrow, but in the foreseeable future. The world will never be the same, and not in a good way!

In this regard, along comes one such expert, more than most, she knows the (terror) score. PAY strict heed to her “prognostications”As Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeldfrom the American Center For Democracy, succinctly posited: 

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s handshake with the Iranian foreign minister effectively wiped off the blood from the hands of the Iranian leadership — the U.S.’s unrepentant sworn enemy — that murdered hundreds of thousands of people directly and by its worldwide terror network. Instead of punishment, Obama through his emissary Kerry, rewarded the murderers of hundreds Americans, 150-200,000 Syrians, and thousands more elsewhere with freedom and funds to build the ultimate weapon of mass destruction.  

Moreover, Kerry’s handshake with Zarif legitimized the mullahs oppressive theocracy and put an end to the hope of regime change. It ensured Iran’s development of nuclear weapons with which it will try to attack Israel, as well as the Arab nations in the Middle East.

Now, extrapolating further, 

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report November 25, 2013
Iranian president and nuclear negotiators cheered at home

Iranian president and nuclear negotiators cheered at home

DEBKAfile’s exclusive Washington sources reveal exclusively: President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry secretly agreed to elevate Iran to the status of seventh world power, as a strong inducement for signing the interim nuclear accord in Geneva Sunday, Nov. 24, for living up to its obligations in the coming six months and for then signing a comprehensive agreement.

While Iran has always demanded respect and equal standing as a regional power, never in their wildest dreams had the ayatollahs expected to be granted big power standing, with an authoritative role recognized by the six big powers for addressing issues in a broad region spanning the Persian Gulf, the Middle East and Western Asia, including Afghanistan.

DEBKAfile’s Iranian sources report that President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Javad Zarif presented this awesome achievement Monday to their hard-line critics at home, who accused them of giving away too much in terms of Iran’s nuclear program for the sake of a deal with the West.

We come home from Geneva with recognition as a world power, they replied.

The small print of Iran’s new rating is not yet in place, but Western sources familiar with the new US-Iranian understandings say they would not be surprised to find President Rouhani sitting in future summits on the same side of the table as the six powers who faced Iran in the Geneva negotiations. Zarif would also attend future foreign ministers’ meetings as an world-class equal.
Jerusalem and Riyadh are aghast at this development. Our Jerusalem sources report that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who has kept it back from his cabinet colleagues, has been holding back-to-back confidential consultations with the heads of Israel’s security and intelligence services and the high IDF command to decide how to handle Obama’s sudden replacement of Israel with Iran as America’s No. 1 ally in the region.
Most immediately, a hostile Iran with a role in the ongoing US-sponsored negotiations with the Palestinians does not bear thinking off.

The Saudi royal house is deep in similarly anxious and angry discussions.
Some of DEBKAfile’s Western and Israeli sources in the two capitals say Israel and Saudi Arabia both find Iran’s promotion to world status more shocking and deleterious even than its pretensions to a nuclear weapon. Neither had imagined the Obama administration capable of an about face so extreme.
DEBKAfile has obtained full details of the secret US-Iranian deal as concluded between Kerry and Zarif in Geneva and endorsed by the Russian and Chinese foreign ministers. They will be revealed in the coming DEBKA Weekly Issue No. 613 out next Friday, Nov. 29.

As summarized, Obama has set the west up for a cruel downfall. COUNTDOWN TO ISRAELI STRIKE? The Predicted SELL OUT Of Israel & Western Interests By Barack HUSSEIN Obama: Valerie Jarrett, His Major Conspirator…How Did This Happen?, alongside VALERIE JARRETT: Iran’s “Deal Maker”, Her Main Mission As Obama’s Consigliere. Western Civilization’s Hit Woman, is in the foreseeable future. It bears repeating, the world will never be the same.

And when the region becomes engulfed, one way or another, due to the treachery of the leader of the HERETOFORE free world, remember the above related missives. Regional fires will, without a doubt, become global in nature.

Recall this American-Israeli’s previous commentaries, and please read them in full, in light of recent developments: 

The Leader Of The Free World Aims For America’s And Israel’s Jugular – Their “Disarming”: The Benefits Accrued To Iran

As has been charged at this site ad nauseum, the leader of the free world is both anti-American and pro Islamist. As a result, Barack HUSSEIN Obama works to weaken America and to decapitate Israel. Concomitantly, he strengthens Islamic regimes. NO doubt about it. For the record, the plans Obama Inc. has in place won’t be thwarted through partisan bickering. In fact, said squabblings lends the POTUS free cover to pursue his nation- stabbing. Besides, the Islamist-in-Chief’s deadly end point transcends – at least it should – petty politics.

That being said, this site warned against the Islamist-in-Chief’s reelection, to the point of sounding like a broken record. In the main, his efforts tobring down America are well known, and its results are playing out before American’s (and others) horrified eyes. 

Specifically, the Radical-in-Chief’s animus towards freedom is on full display through his dictatorial actions, in relation to his own citizens, as well as his treacherous dealings in the Mid East and beyond. Said dealings expose, yet again, his fealty to Islamic regimes. The deadlier the better. And, back in 2009, when Obama Inc. enjoyed a prime geo-political opening to push the mullahs back, he did no such thing. Most revealingly, Obama acted as a shield for Iran’s Islamic regime, instead of assisting its dying freedom fighters. Simply put, Barack HUSSEIN Obama revealed his hand. He had no time, nor inclination, to give them anything but the finger –  Barack HUSSEIN Obama Acted As A Shield For Islamic Regimes: Iranian Freedom Fighters Exposed His Hand ! 

What more needs to be said?

VALERIE JARRETT: Iran’s “Deal Maker”, Her Main Mission As Obama’s Consigliere. Western Civilization’s Hit Woman…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

It is seemingly impossible to quantify the amount of treachery committed by Iranian born Valerie Jarrett to western civilization, try as one may. In tandem with her boss, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, they are the most DANGEROUS duo in the western world. That’s not an easy hurdle to pass.

But if not for a highly trusted contact in mid 2012, at the inception of this site, the reportage on Val would have been minimal, if at all. A heads up from an “in the know” Washington, DC associate kept dropping hints….again and again. It is important to give credit where it is due. No one is an island.

That being said, a starting point was documented, one which included Valerie Jarrett’s crimes against America and Israel in particular and the west in general.

Exhibit A: Valerie Jarrett’s Communist Leanings & Why She Matters…Serving As Barack Hussein Obama’s Alter Ego…Cementing The Red/Green Alliance

Exhibit B: Valerie Jarrett…Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Communist/Hidden Hand…Familial & Ideological Ties That Bind

Exhibit C: Valerie Jarrett & Her Mischief Making: Capable of Upending Western Civilization…The Unofficial Buck Starts/Stops At Her Door

Exhibit D: DHS & America’s Planned Deconstruction Via Valerie Jarrett: Domestically & Foreign Policy-Wise…Addendum To: Barack Hussein Obama’s Deconstruction Plans

Exhibit E: Valerie Jarrett Reigns Supreme, Even Regarding The “Kill” – Or Not – Of Osama Bin Laden

To wit, Caroline Glick, a leading political/Mid East analyst expounds upon the above geo-political (still reverberating) explosions :

COLUMN ONE: A vastly changed Middle East


When America returns, it will likely find a changed regional landscape; nations are disintegrating, only to reintegrate in new groupings.

US President Barack Obama.

US President Barack Obama. Photo: Reuters
A week and a half ago, Syria’s Kurds announced they are setting up an autonomous region in northeastern Syria.The announcement came after the Kurds wrested control over a chain of towns from al-Qaida in the ever metastasizing Syrian civil war.The Kurds’ announcement enraged their nominal Sunni allies – including the al-Qaida forces they have been combating – in the opposition to the Assad regime. It also rendered irrelevant US efforts to reach a peace deal between the Syrian regime and the rebel forces at a peace conference in Geneva.

But more important than what the Kurds’ action means for the viability of the Obama administration’s Syria policy, it shows just how radically the strategic landscape has changed and continues to change, not just in Syria but throughout the Arab world.The revolutionary groundswell that has beset the Arab world for the past three years has brought dynamism and uncertainty to a region that has known mainly stasis and status quo for the past 500 years. For 400 years, the Middle East was ruled by the Ottoman Turks. Anticipating the breakup of the Ottoman Empire during World War I, the British and the French quickly carved up the Ottoman possessions, dividing them between themselves. What emerged from their actions were the national borders of the Arab states – and Israel – that have remained largely intact since 1922.

As Yoel Guzansky and Erez Striem from the Institute for National Security Studies wrote in a paper published this week, while the borders of Arab states remain largely unchanged, the old borders no longer reflect the reality on the ground.“As a result of the regional upheavals, tribal, sectarian, and ethnic identities have become more pronounced than ever, which may well lead to a change in the borders drawn by the colonial powers a century ago that have since been preserved by Arab autocrats.”Guzansky and Striem explained, “The iron-fisted Arab rulers were an artificial glue of sorts, holding together different, sometimes hostile sects in an attempt to form a single nation state.

Now, the de facto changes in the Middle East map could cause far-reaching geopolitical shifts affecting alliance formations and even the global energy market.”The writers specifically discussed the breakdown of national governments and the consequent growing irrelevance of national borders in Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yemen.And while it is true that the dissolution of central government authority is most acute in Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yemen, in every Arab state national authorities are under siege, stressed, or engaged in countering direct threats to their rule. Although central authorities retain control in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia and Bahrain, they all contend with unprecedented challenges.

As a consequence, today it is impossible to take for granted that the regime’s interests in any Arab state will necessarily direct the actions of the residents of that state, or that a regime now in power will remain in power tomorrow.Guzansky and Striem note that the current state of flux presents Israel with both challenges and opportunities. As they put it, “The disintegration of states represents at least a temporary deterioration in Israel’s strategic situation because it is attended by instability liable to trickle over into neighboring states….

But the changes also mean dissolution of the regular armies that posed a threat in the past and present opportunities for Israel to build relations with different minorities with the potential to seize the reins of government in the future.”Take the Kurds for example. The empowerment of the Kurds in Syria – as in Iraq – presents a strategic opportunity for Israel. Israel has cultivated and maintained an alliance with the Kurds throughout the region for the past 45 years.Although Kurdish politics are fraught with internal clashes and power struggles, on balance, the empowerment of the Kurds at the expense of the central governments in Damascus and Baghdad is a major gain for Israel.

And the Kurds are not the only group whose altered status since the onset of the revolutionary instability in the Arab world presents Israel with new opportunities. Among the disparate factions in the disintegrating Arab lands from North Africa to the Persian Gulf are dozens of groups that will be thrilled to receive Israeli assistance and, in return, be willing to cooperate with Israel on a whole range of issues.To be sure, these new allies are not likely to share Israeli values. And many may be no more than the foreign affairs equivalent of a one-night stand.

But Israel also is not obliged to commit itself to any party for the long haul. Transactional alliances are valuable because they are based on shared interests, and they last for as long as the actors perceive those interests as shared ones.Over the past week, we have seen a similar transformation occurring on a regional and indeed global level, as the full significance of the Obama administration’s withdrawal of US power from the region becomes better understood.When word got out two weeks ago about the US decision to accept and attempt to push through a deal with Iran that would strip the international sanctions regime of meaning in return for cosmetic Iranian concessions that will not significantly impact Iran’s completion of its nuclear weapons program, attempts were made by some Israeli and many American policy-makers to make light of the significance of President Barack Obama’s moves.

But on Sunday night, Channel 10 reported that far from an opportunistic bid to capitalize on a newfound moderation in Tehran, the draft agreement was the result of months-long secret negotiations between Obama’s consigliere Valerie Jarrett and Iranian negotiators.According to the report, which was denied by the White House, Jarrett, Obama’s Iranian-born consigliere, conducted secret talks with Iranian negotiators for the past several months.

The draft agreement that betrayed US allies throughout the Arab world, and shattered Israeli and French confidence in the US’s willingness to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, was presented to negotiators in Geneva as a fait accompli. Israel and Saudi Arabia, like other US regional allies were left in the dark about its contents. As we saw, it was only after the French and the British divulged the details of the deal to Israel and Saudi Arabia that the Israelis, Saudis and French formed an ad hoc alliance to scuttle the deal at the last moment.The revelation of Jarrett’s long-standing secret talks with the Iranians showed that the Obama administration’s decision to cut a deal with the mullahs was a well-thought-out, long-term policy to use appeasement of the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism as a means to enable the US to withdraw from the Middle East. The fact that the deal in question would also pave the way for Iran to become a nuclear power, and so imperil American national security, was clearly less of a concern for Obama and his team than realizing their goal of withdrawing the US from the Middle East.Just as ethnic, regional and religious factions wasted no time filling the vacuum created in the Arab world by the disintegration of central governments, so the states of the region and the larger global community wasted no time finding new allies to replace the United States.Voicing this new understanding, Foreign Minister Avigdor Liberman said Wednesday that it is time for Israel to seek out new allies.In his words, “The ties with the US are deteriorating.They have problems in North Korea, Pakistan, Iran, Syria, Egypt, China, and their own financial and immigration troubles. Thus I ask – what is our place in the international arena? Israel must seek more allies with common interests.”

In seeking to block Iran’s nuclear weapons program, Israel has no lack of allies. America’s withdrawal has caused a regional realignment in which Israel and France are replacing the US as the protectors of the Sunni Arab states of the Persian Gulf.France has ample reason to act. Iran has attacked French targets repeatedly over the past 34 years. France built Saddam Hussein’s nuclear reactor while Saddam was at war with Iran.France has 10 million Muslim citizens who attend mosques financed by Saudi Arabia.Moreover, France has strong commercial interests in the Persian Gulf. There is no doubt that France will be directly harmed if Iran becomes a nuclear power.Although Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s meeting Wednesday with Russian President Vladimir Putin did not bring about a realignment of Russian interests with the Franco- Sunni-Israeli anti-Iran consortium, the very fact that Netanyahu went to Moscow sent a clear message to the world community that in its dealings with outside powers, Israel no longer feels itself constrained by its alliance with the US.And that was really the main purpose of the visit. Netanyahu didn’t care that Putin rejected his position on Iran. Israel didn’t need Russia to block Jarrett’s deal.

Iran is no longer interested in even feigning interest in a nuclear deal. It was able to neutralize US power in the region, and cast the US’s regional allies into strategic disarray just by convincing Obama and Jarrett that a deal was in the offing. This is why Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei again threatened to annihilate Israel this week. He doesn’t think he needs to sugar coat his intentions any longer.

It is not that the US has become a nonentity in the region overnight, and despite Obama’s ill-will toward Israel, under his leadership the US has not become a wholly negative actor. The successful Israeli-US test of the David’s Sling short-range ballistic missile interceptor on Wednesday was a clear indication of the prevailing importance of Israel’s ties with the US. So, too, the delivery this week of the first of four US fast missile boats to the Egyptian navy, which will improve Egypt’s ability to secure maritime traffic in the Suez Canal, showed that the US remains a key player in the region. Congress’s unwillingness to bow to Obama’s will and weaken sanctions on Iran similarly is a positive portent for a post-Obama American return to the region.

But when America returns, it will likely find a vastly changed regional landscape. Nations are disintegrating, only to reintegrate in new groupings.

Monolithic regimes are giving way to domestic fissures and generational changes. As for America’s allies, some will welcome its return.

Others will scowl and turn away. All will have managed to survive, and even thrive in the absence of a guiding hand from Washington, and all will consequently need America less.

This changed landscape will in turn require the US to do some long, hard thinking about where its interests lie, and to develop new strategies for advancing them.

So perhaps in the fullness of time, we may all end up better off for this break in US strategic rationality.

Rest assured, if not for all of the above, the civilized world would not be facing the most frightening reality of all: the world’s most dangerous weapons in the hands of the most dangerous regime, bar none. And this is exactly what Jarrett & Obama have signed onto, in the expectation that PM Netanyahu’s hands will remain tied. Beyond traitors, reprobates and bastards. WAY beyond.

Sober thinking John Bolton coined it thusly:

The Obama administration feared an Israeli airstrike on Iran more than it feared Iran building a nuclear weapon, and that’s why it pushed for a deal to reduce sanctions against Iran, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton writes in The Weekly Standard

“Buying time for its own sake makes sense in some negotiating contexts, but the sub silentio objective here was to jerry-rig yet another argument to wield against Israel and its fateful decision whether or not to strike Iran,” Bolton writes. “Obama, fearing that strike more than an Iranian nuclear weapon, clearly needed greater international pressure on Jerusalem.”

Family Security Matters also weighed in:

The canary in the diplomatic coal mine, however, is this report, that the US had been secretly negotiating since March 2013 with Iran–(a) without telling its mortally-endangered ally, Israel until two months ago (seven months into the talks); and (b) negotiating (for one of the five meetings) with Rouhani’s predecessor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

As Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeldfrom the American Center For Democracy, succinctly posited: 

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s handshake with the Iranian foreign minister effectively wiped off the blood from the hands of the Iranian leadership — the U.S.’s unrepentant sworn enemy — that murdered hundreds of thousands of people directly and by its worldwide terror network. Instead of punishment, Obama through his emissary Kerry, rewarded the murderers of hundreds Americans, 150-200,000 Syrians, and thousands more elsewhere with freedom and funds to build the ultimate weapon of mass destruction.  

Moreover, Kerry’s handshake with Zarif legitimized the mullahs oppressive theocracy and put an end to the hope of regime change. It ensured Iran’s development of nuclear weapons with which it will try to attack Israel, as well as the Arab nations in the Middle East.

Is this handshake not reminiscent of PM Rabin’s bloody-handed clasp with “Chairman” Arafaton that infamous day of September 13, 1993? Think about it. Thousands of Jewish “sacrifices for peace”  – First of all you need to remember, that it is your own esteemed, delusionary elder-statesman, Israeli President Shimon Peres, who coined the infamous phrase ‘korbanot ha-shalom’ – sacrifices for peace – during the first intifada unleashed by his ‘peace-partner’, Yasser Arafat. As the Land of Israel was drowning in the bloody carnage of suicide bombings, road-side shootings and hidden explosives, he needed to justify the fallacy of his misguided vision and the deplorable kowtowing to the arch enemy – litter Israel’s graveyards and many more are maimed for life. Just ramp up to the highest order of magnitude, how many more will eventually die on the altar of the bloody handshake between Kerry and Zarif! More than a day in infamy…

NO doubt, Israel: The Most Imperiled/Targeted Nation In History. What Are Its Options, Now That Its Leaders Left Zion’s Fate To U.S. Dictates? 

As such, let the countdown to an Israeli strike begin….as mentioned by Israel’s Foreign Minster: 

Hinting at the possibility of military action, the foreign minister said “we will do what we must and will not hesitate for one minute – and there is no need to add another word.”

Forward march…kadima…צעדה קדימה !!

COUNTDOWN TO ISRAELI STRIKE? The Predicted SELL OUT Of Israel & Western Interests By Barack HUSSEIN Obama: Valerie Jarrett, His Major Conspirator…How Did This Happen? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

NOW, let it be known for posterity: this blog anticipated Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s betrayal, to the point in which several scathing, blistering commentaries were written in the run up to his second term, WARNING American Jews (and others): Obama’s second term plans would gravely imperil Israel (never mind the disasters from his first term) and he would go for broke, endangering American interests in toto. Bingo.

But before we get to the Islamist-in-Chief’s treachery, it is only fair to take PM Netanyahu to task, even as it appears he has been operating as a lone voice in the wilderness against Iran’s genocidal regime. Don’t dare feel sorry for him or coin him a hero! Here’s why:

Throughout PM Netanyahu’s 2 terms, it became painfully obvious that he hitched Jerusalem’s decision making to suit Obama Inc.’s dictates, so much so that the following proved itself : IRAN HEADS DOWN TO THE TRIP WIRE: Month(s) Away From Bomb-Making Ability. DECISION TIME For PM Netanyahu. Obama Already Made His. So here we find ourselves, exactly in the deadly place outlined above.

NOT only that, but it was revealed herein how PM Netanyahu’s spinelessness paved the way for the genocidal mullahs – PM Netanyahu’s SPINELESS Leadership Assists Iran’s WMD (More Than Likely) Victory.

Going from there to here is not rocket science and Jerusalem’s leadership knows as much. As such, IRAN, FOR ALL INTENTS & PURPOSES, IS A NUCLEAR POWER: Obama’s LONGSTANDING Quest To Arm Iran. The Jig Is Up! What’s Obama’s End Goal? is another “prediction”.

Thereby, those of us who keep track of such global shaking matters, surely understand that the “deal” has been in the bag, long before any public announcement was made by Obama Inc. How so? Well, Obama’s hatchet woman, his alter ego, Iranian born Valerie Jarrett has been scuttling back and forth inking a deal irrespective of this and that Geneva charade. For those who doubt Jarrett’s out-sized powers, this should pierce the veil – Valerie Jarrett & Her Mischief Making: Capable of Upending Western Civilization…The Unofficial Buck Starts/Stops At Her Door. As a matter of record, her dangerous liaisons were noted over a year ago at this site.

Indeed, Barack HUSSEIN Obama Acts As A Shield For Islamic Regimes: Iranian Freedom Fighters Exposed His Hand.

IntrinsicallyTom Trento, terror hunter from Trentovision, will discuss Obama & Jarrett’s dangerous betrayal to western civilization on tomorrow’s show (Monday, Nov. 25) at 3-4 PM eastern time. Tune in here –

WNN-1470am – http://wwnnradio.com/


http://www.iheart.com/  (search for WNN-1470, south Florida)

The Live Internet broadcast can be watched worldwide on

www.trentovision.tv or www.theunitedwest.org or www.teapartycommunity.com


Valerie Jarrett, an Iranian born, Jew-hating, doctrinaire Socialist, orchestrated this “historic mistake” which is designed to prohibit Prime Minister Netanyahu from attacking Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. As a result of Jarrett and Obama’s appeasement to Iran the world has immediately become increasingly more dangerous with the prospect of nuclear equipped Islamic jihadis…


NEVERTHELESS, despite the expected brouhaha that a breakthrough has brought Iran to heel, well, nothing could be further from the truth, regardless of Obama’s spin machine, operating at warp speed at The Washington Post & elsewhere – Iran, world powers reach historic nuclear dealBesides, history is replete with such “moments”, and most infamously, the Munich Agreement comes to mind – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfCeff19Syc#t=131

The big Iranian nuclear sale

The big Iranian nuclear sale

After all-night talks, a first-step nuclear deal was struck before dawn Sunday in Geneva between Iran and the six powers. It was announced by President Barack Obama and confirmed by Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif. Obama said key aspects of Iran’s nuclear program will be rolled back for limited sanctions relief. No new centrifuges will added to the enrichment process, work will stop at the Arak nuclear reactor and the UN will expand inspections to ensure that Iran unable to make a nuclear bomb. The overall sanctions architecture will remain in place pending a comprehensive solution to be negotiated in the next s six months, but no new sanctions will be imposed.
Israel and Saudi Arabia said before the deal was signed that they would not be bound by its provisions and reserved their military options.

The US president said he understood the concerns of Israel and the Persian Gulf nations about Iran’s intentions, and promised to closely follow Iran’s compliance and as that he as commander-in-chief of US armed forces maintain the option for military action.

Offering no information about the content of the interim accord, the Iranian foreign minister commended the Geneva process for granting the Iranian people “equal footing and mutual respect” and the deal as a first step towards removing all doubts about Iran’s nuclear program.
UK Foreign Secretary William Hague added that Iran had agreed to halt uranium enrichment above the 5 percent grade and the elimination of its stockpile of 20 percent enriched material.

As the Secretary spoke, the Saudi ambassador to London pledged every effort by his government to halt Iran’s advance toward a nuclear bomb, accusing the United States of failing to do this.
DEBKAfile’s military sources add: None of the measures revealed so far about the interim accord reached in Geneva deal with the concealed military features of Iran’s nuclear program, or the details of expanded inspections. Israel is not expected to accept any document with those omissions and will no doubt continue its preparations for exercising a military option.

See DEBKAfile’s Saturday report on the fourth day of negotiatons prior to the deal.

Both sides were pumping up an atmosphere of optimism as the foreign ministers of all six powers facing Iran made tracks for Geneva Saturday morning, Nov. 23, Day Four of the marathon negotiations for an accord on a six-month freeze on Iran’s nuclear program.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Hassan Araghchi said the six powers had agreed to respect his country’s right to enrich uranium, so removing a major hurdle in the path of an accord, whereas Foreign Minister Javad Zarif remained silent.

Sergey Lavrov was the first foreign minister to arrive Friday night, followed by Secretary of State John Kerry early Saturday. Both were said to have come to try and narrow the gaps holding up an accord. The Chinese, British, French and German foreign ministers were due in Geneva Saturday morning, after bilateral sessions between Zarif and the other six delegates failed to produce enough progress for them to adjourn to formal negotiations around the same table, least of all reach the signing stage.

This time round, the Iranian team borrowed the Western tactic of constantly maintaining that a deal is within reach. This tactic aims at weakening the resistance of the opposite side by presenting it as dragging out the nerve-wracking talkathon beyond reason. This tactic didn’t work for the Western delegations in the first round of nuclear talks on Nov. 11, which France blew up on the fourth day. The second round had reached the same touch-and-go point by Saturday morning, when none of the six delegations confirmed they had agreed to a clause respecting Iran’s right to enrich uranium as Araghchi had claimed.
This point is pivotal to both sides because it is absent from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which merely specifies that countries are allowed “to pursue peaceful nuclear energy.”

Rewording this provision to cover the right to uranium enrichment would cut the ground from under the entire treaty by throwing the door open for all its signatories to enrich uranium at will.

Tehran’s goal in making this demand is more than legitimacy for its own weapons program. It is also seeks to deprive the big powers of the prerogative to determine the rights of smaller nations.
On this point, therefore, both Iran and the six powers are digging in their heels.

The other major hurdle facing a deal is the Arak heavy water reactor Iran is building.  Tehran refuses to halt construction of this reactor arguing that like any other nation, Iran is entitled to build nuclear reactors for peaceful purposes. They shoot back at any suggestion that the Arak reactor is designed to produce plutonium as fuel for nuclear weapon, along with enriched uranium, with a charge of discrimination, and declare, “Tehran is not going to sign an agreement that permanently put Iran in an outcast category,”

The Iranians have adopted a negotiating strategy of relegating the vital technical aspects of the draft accord to a lower priority while hammering away at issues pertinent to national respect. Iran is fighting in Geneva for international respect as a legitimate and equal nuclear power on the world stage.
This strategy also has a by-product: By the time they get around to the key technical clauses, the negotiators on the other side of the table are too worn down to cope with a new set of Iranian objections.
The biggest obstacle to a deal, however, is to be found in Tehran in the person of the tough, autocratic Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. He will have the final word on whether the second round to talks in Geneva produce an accord – not the American or Russian presidents, and certainly not the foreign ministers assembling there.

Khamenei has boosted his heft by making himself unapproachable – even to Iran’s president Hassan Rouhani.  So no one can influence him or even find out where he stands until the text is ready for signing. Even then, Zarif and Araghchi may be told at the last moment to withhold their signatures over some point and return home for further consultations. The six powers will then have to decide whether it is worth taking the negotiations to a third round, as the Congress in Washington fights back by enacting tighter sanctions against Iran.

UNDOUBTEDLY, PM Netanyahu understands that his administration misdirected half of world Jewry, who believed that under his stewardship Iran would NEVER become a nuclear power. If this blogger had a nickel, a shekel, for every time he said as much, well….even as this is written: Netanyahu: Deal lets Iran gain a nuclear bomb, Israel not bound

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu slammed the interim nuclear deal signed in Geneva early Sunday as “a historic mistake that makes the world a more dangerous place.” Israel is not obligated by this agreement,” he told the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem.  Iran is committed to Israel’s destruction, he said and “I want to make clear as the prime minister of Israel, Israel will not allow Iran to develop a military nuclear capability.” For the deal, Iran made “cosmetic concessions that it can do away with in a matter of weeks,” the prime minister said.


IN any case, we are where we are. He surely intuits – smartie that PM Netanyahu is – without eliciting a strike his political career will not only be over, but he will go down in history as the Jewish leader who fell short of stopping Iran from acquiring the ultimate weapons; weapons which will allow them to keep their sworn promise to wipe Israel off the map!

Mind you, Obama Inc. (and attendant world powers) didn’t pause a beat, even as Iran’s Supreme leader exhorted right before the “deal” was inked: Iranian Leader: Israel a ‘Rabid Dog’

It is due to the above, and so much more, that a “bolt out of the blue” will likely take place. Pray it’s not too little, too late and that the following strategic assessment comes to fruition: 

A Strike on Iran: Complex, But Possible

By  November 21, 2013

BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 223

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is a risky and militarily-complicated endeavor, but within reach. Israeli ingenuity and determination could lead to a great operational and political success. The international responses are likely to be bearable.

Recent statements by Israel that it has the ability to strike and significantly damage Iran’s nuclear infrastructure reflect Israel’s growing exasperation with the weak reaction of the international community to the Iranian “charm offensive,” and a gradual realization that only military force can prevent the nuclearization of Iran.

Such an attack would require the capability to reach and destroy distant targets, while overcoming aerial defense systems. Yet the number of facilities that would need to be hit to deal a significant blow to Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is generally overestimated.

The essential ingredient for building a nuclear bomb is uranium enriched to at least 90 percent, meaning that the enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordow must be taken out. The heavy water reactor at Arak – designed to produce plutonium, another fissionable material suitable for building a nuclear bomb – is not yet active but is a necessary target, similar to the Iraqi reactor that was destroyed by Israel in 1981.

To be sure, an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure would be a risky and complicated military operation. But Israeli ingenuity and determination could lead to a great operational and political success.

Israel’s Military Capabilities

Israel’s long arm is its air force, which has the ability to strike distant targets. According to foreign reports, the Israel Air Force (IAF) has more than 400 fighter planes, more than most countries in the world. The IAF fleet includes the F-15I, one of the world’s most advanced planes, which can carry many precision-guided weapons over long distances.

The IAF also reportedly has a number of aerial refueling tankers that give its fighter jets the option to extend their flight range as far as Iran. The IAF has held a number of exercises, which received much media coverage, in which dozens of aircraft flew long distances, displaying the IAF’s ability to reach Iran.

The flight path to nuclear targets in Iran would cross over Arab countries, as in past long-distance IAF operations. But this time it is possible that these states would turn a blind eye or even cooperate with Israel, because the Sunni Arab world is very concerned about Iran attaining nuclear weapons.

Moreover, the IAF has a remarkable set of technological means that enable it to blind or paralyze air defense systems. Reported IAF operations in Syria and Sudan, which came to light only after the alleged strikes took place, may be an indication of such capabilities. Iran might have good air defense systems that could exact a price from the IAF, but it is unlikely that they could prevent the air force from conducting a successful attack.

An important issue is the ability to destroy underground targets. The US has provided Israel with bunker-buster bombs, and it is likely that the Israeli military industries are also capable of developing and producing similar weapons. An Israeli operation in Iran might also require a ground presence, mainly to ensure that targets hit from the air are indeed destroyed. The IDF special forces have trained for this task. Unfortunately, it would be difficult at this point to achieve a strategic surprise, and it is a shame that a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities was not executed several years ago. But despite Iran’s awareness of the possibility of an Israeli strike, there is still room for tactical surprises.

International Consequences

Iran’s ability to punish Israel is quite limited. Its missile arsenal can partially or perhaps largely be intercepted by Israel’s anti-ballistic missile system, featuring the Arrow 2 missile. Iran’s terrorist activities against Israeli targets abroad in recent years have not been very impressive. Iran’s allies on Israel’s borders, Hizballah and Hamas, have many thousands of missiles that can do much damage. But their full subservience to Iran remains to be seen. Even if they act as Iranian proxies, Israel has the military capability to invade the missile launching areas and limit the price they can exact from Israel’s home front. Finally, preventing a nuclear Iran is an important objective that justifies Israeli losses.

The expectations for serious international negative reactions to an Israeli military strike on Iran are also greatly exaggerated. Israel has attacked nuclear installations in the past, specifically in Iraq (1981) and Syria (2007), with few international repercussions. Many hypocritical denouncements are likely, accompanied by a private feeling of relief. Many countries, particularly in the region, are actually waiting for Israel to pull the nuclear chestnuts from the fire.


At a time when appeasing Iran seems to be in vogue, an Israeli strike could invigorate elements in the international arena who are unwilling to accept an Iran with a nuclear breakout capability. In addition, many people around the world would be reminded that muscular reactions to evil regimes are often truly necessary.

A decision by Israel to strike Iran would be a historic gamble. Nevertheless, history, necessity, and common sense point toward an attack.

For the historical record, Bolton’s analysis is spot on – Bolton: Obama Pushed Iran Deal to Prevent Israeli Airstrike…and this is the assessment from Daniel Pipes-
The Nuclear Deal With Iran is a Foreign Policy Disaster by Daniel Pipes

“For the first time in nearly a decade we have halted parts of Iran’s nuclear program” announced a jubilant Barack Obama after the news of the just-signed Geneva six-month interim agreement with Iran.

But the American goal for the accord was that the Iranians not “advance their program” of building a uranium nuclear bomb (and perhaps a plutonium bomb too); the apparent deal exactly permits such advancement, plus sanctions relief to Tehran worth about US$9 billion.

This wretched deal offers one occasion when comparison with Neville Chamberlain in Munich in 1938 is valid. An overeager Western government, blind to the evil cunning of the regime it so much wants to work with, appeases it with concessions that will come back to haunt it. Geneva and Nov. 24 will be remembered along with Munich and Sep. 29.

Barack Obama has made many foreign policy errors in the past five years, but this is the first to rank as a disaster.

Sach ha’kol, at the end of it all, a Loony Toons descriptor says it best: Obama’s Iranian “Red Line” – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttfhSJQPDlY#t=21

That’s all folks!!