Hundreds of thousands of regular readers have become aware of this blogger’s (in tandem with well placed investigative associates) concerted struggle against the infiltration and penetration of Muslim Brotherhood front groups into so called “pro-Israel” media forums. All is not as it seems.

The aforementioned infiltrators are fully embedded within online sites, and can also be found hidden inside mainstream print publications. Their thrust has been recapped through numerous commentaries, as well as within a featured interview.

Most recently, the following was highlighted: UPDATE: Turkish Islamist (anti-semite) ADNAN OKTAR warns those who refuse to submit to the “mahdi”. His claim to the mantle “prophesied” via the Jewish Torah! How much clearer can the danger be, yet, as indicated within the above link(s), too many “pro-Israel” forums print his vile writings, albeit via his surrogates.

So aside from Islamic penetration, a similar danger exists from Christian missionaries. At certain times they operate as “tag teams”, but oftentimes as solo actors. It just depends. But to what end do they coalesce? Well, their main objective is to “uproot” Judaism out of Israel, the eternal Jewish homeland. And it is due to this point of agreement and convergence that said main players – from both sides – are “cooperating” within Jewish social media sites and beyond. The main questions before us are: how do they operate? who is giving them despicable cover?

This blog, over a several month period, has been busy unmasking what is transpiring within the Islamic realm, so now let us turn our attention to the Christian missionary part of the “captured operation”. Rest assured, our investigative efforts have uncovered evidence which details the “merging of forces” to “de-Judasize” Israel. This is a fact. But before we head to the current online battle – a continuous struggle for our homeland – it is imperative to note several mitigating factors. 

Exhibit One: detailed below are FB exchanges within one of the largest “pro-Israel” group pages. While others are similarly infected and indicted, ISRAELI FRONTLINE  bears special scrutiny (opprobrium) due to its online prominence. Its companion page is also a non-profit –  ISRAELI FRONTLINE is non-profit. This weblog is rewarded for each click, so please visit our advertisers to see what they are offering. Interesting.                         

Moving right along…

Exhibit Two: the referenced exchanges were accumulated AFTER 4 ! attempts to keep a particular article housed within their forum, a site which posts 24/7 in varying timelines all over the world. And It was NEVER an issue of tech/computer-related glitches. Not at all. Each time it was posted – and this and that feedback ensued – the article, and its exchanges, was purposely deleted from the site. Mind you, a cadre of dedicated Zionists – attempting to highlight matters of grave concern to the Jewish nation – have become the enemy, for daring to protect the Jewish homeland. DON’T forget this aspect. It is key.

Nevertheless – and herein lies the crux – none of these Jewish patriots are allowed to question, nor print, anything which exposes the dangers from Adnan Oktar’s cult members, nor the designs of Christian missionaries!
While this issue has repeatedly been brought to the site owner’s attention, her response is always tinged with deflection. Bobbing and weaving.

In other words, she has no qualms about publicizing a site – which many thousands of its well intentioned members truly believe is pro-Israel – and stacking it with other members AND administrators who are OPENLY missionaries, some of whom are also “admirers/supporters” of Adnan Oktar’s cult members. On the other hand, authentic Zionists are being silenced when “no-no’s” are brought to the fore. 

Notably, our investigators fully recognize that a purging exists, but not against those who should be given the boot from ISRAELI FRONTLINE and other sites, but against those who dare question certain “indelicate” matters. This is an example of one message, out of many, worth highlighting: 
As far as Israeli Frontline goes. “I” [a person who this blogger decided shall remain nameless] was asked to leave there last year for exposing and fighting missionaries there..

In plain English, not the bastardized kind: a hoax is being perpetrated upon the pro-Israel community. This deception is also compromising well meaning Christians; friends who truly support Israel as a Jewish State without “pre-conditions”. Again, ISRAELI FRONTLINE is hardly the only misleading forum, despite the many important news stories posted therein. 

Exhibit Three: pay rapt attention to the opening comments at the thread below, as they are vital to understanding the entire context. Recognize the “cat and mouse” game which had to ensue – to post this highly important link – all in order to alert the forum’s high volume of readership about deeply concerning matters within IsraelToday, a missionary website.

Sach ha’kol, at the end of it all, a continual check-back at ISRAELI FRONTLINE becomes mandatory, for we understand with whom we are dealing. What a waste of time, but none of this will slow us down. Yet the “now you see it, now you don’t” poof-like game is an integral part of their strategy, and this is definitively determined from seasoned investigators.

But still, how many times do the “powers that be”, at ISRAELI FRONTLINE and other sites, believe we are going to continue to conduct this up and down chase? At the same time, other articles do not just “magically disappear” – unlike those of concern herein – DESPITE repeated promises to some well known Israeli Zionist activists to keep them at the forum. Indeed these “movers and shakers”, members in good standing at the stated group pages, are ignored with impunity. Therefore, the question becomes: who are these page owners really beholden to? What the hell is going on? Continue reading.

As noted below, Michelle Cohen, the site’s owner, gave her “blessing” to post the following all important article, yet she kept deleting its contents from her forum. Is there an ADD problem…or some involuntary tic problems which causes her to hit the delete button? Alas, this “shadowy” post, once again, is down the rabbit hole. Consider this possibility: could it be that she is not who she purports to be, and in more respects than one? Inquiring minds want, ne demand, to know!



[note: “I” below refers to a major Zionist activist…let us leave it at that, but those who need to know recognize as much]
“I” am posting this article again (fourth time!). This time with Michelle Cohen’s blessing. This article attacks the Ministry of Defense and is in support of the Messianic Jews who join the IDF. I am NOT attacking the soldiers. By posting this article, I am NOT attacking Christians and certainly not those Christians who are friends of Israel unconditionally. It is posted to warn those of us that some Christians, or Messianic Jews, feel that what we, Jews, believe in is not good enough and we should adopt their belief system in return for their love and support to Israel. To them I say, thank you but NO thank you. My tradition and my religious beliefs are non negotiable! I think it is a serious issue and we need to combat it fiercely. Israel is the ONLY Jewish state and needs to remain this way!

Pressure from anti-missionary group results in Ministry of Defense telling soldiers to avoid believers in Yeshua
Albert Vitela Jesus is the Messiah
The next thread reveals “the tussle” which was screen captured (yes, we do this as a first order of business, among many other things) during previous postings of this same article. Indeed, how many times does one have to re-post at a page which presents itself as “pro-Israel”, especially regarding grave concerns to the community? Dear heavens. Besides, the article (each time our group was forced to “play tag”) lasted at Israeli Frontline for less time than it takes this blogger to walk her fiesty Golden Retriever to do her “business”. You see how duplicitous, how insane, this is to have to deal with one’s supposed friends as if they are no better than one’s enemies? 
  • Jonathan Engel audit trail ?
  •  Someone does not like it, Jonathan Engel. Now I have sent this link to some friends. Hopefully it will still be here when they get back. if it is not, we will know that someone is personally offended by it.
    2 hours ago · Edited · 1
  •  Tamar Cummings, you are one who sent me a message asking me if I had removed it. Here it is. let us hope it is here to stay:-)
  • Tamar Cummings Reading the entire article helps, it would be easy to just read the headline/intro and miss the conclusion that nothing is what it appears to be and maybe especially so in Israel?
  • Tamar Cummings There are a number of different threads woven into this report, it may be an inkblot test to see which thread captures the reader’s focus.
  • Ray Levesque  if you have a beef with the moderators, talk to us directly. The moderators are not on trial here. You should consider that it is better to trust our judgment than to question it. We do a LOT behind their scenes to keep this group on course. As for the article, it seems fine but often the discussions get WAY out of line and it is best to delete the whole thing, which may have happened. And there is no audit trail… This is just a Facebook group eh.
  • Tamar Cummings Ray, I appreciate you keeping the site in order and understand it was not the article itself but the potential discussion that could ensue that was of concern.
  • Denise Salamone Just for the record I fight against missionaries and it is a major issue for Jews. What responses would be necessary to remove the post …… those for it or those against it. Not understanding completely. ty
    I did Ray. I talked to the Chief to Michelle Cohen. Could I do better than this? I have had dealings with you in the past, Ray Levesque and did not get too far becuase you simply decided to delete my comment. Let me see, oh yes, it was about Obama.He m…See More
  • Ray Levesque Tamar thank you. I have no clue why it was deleted, and that doesn’t bother me because I have leaned to trust the other moderators in the group. There must have been a good reason. Some members think that Israeli Frontline is their own soapbox and get …See More
  •  Your guidelines say that this is a Pro Israel site, Ray. Anyone who wishes to convert jews in israel is NOT pro Israeli! Ask me, I am Israeli. Ask Michelle Cohen,she is Israeli. She agreed with me!
  • Ray Levesque Hiya . Please continue to work with Michelle with your list of grievances. My answers are obviously insufficient.
  • Denise Salamone I agree with you , it is important that members understand why this was removed. This is a huge issue in supporting Israel.
     Thank you, Denise
  • Ray Levesque Sorry Denise, but I will not participate. I give way too many hours to this hasbara effort to then be analyzed and scrutinized by over 12,000 members. As moderators we already know what the huge issues are. But more importantly we know how to follow the IF guidelines.
  • Denise Salamone You don’t have to thank me -in fact thank you for bringing this to my attention. If there is one thing I cannot stand are messy antics.
  • Denise Salamone Ray Levesque, thanks for the response, in light of your comment you would think you would want to know why then this was removed. I am not understanding, as you know the threat they cause.
  • Denise Salamone this is not an attack – just so you know.
  • Ray Levesque Please note that there has been zero discussion about this article. If this issue is so important, why isn’t anyone discussing it? Because we are WAY off topic.
     Ray, as one who had attended several higher educations institutions and lived in several countries I have had to follow many guidelines in my life. So trust me, IF simple basic guidelines are no challenges whatsoever. Now that we have cleared that out of the way, can we get an answer why the article has been removed. Surely someone, one of your very competent admins/moderators (and I mean it seriously as I have the highest respect to people like Michelle Cohen, May Lim and Larry Moskowitz could surely provide us with an answer>
  • Tamar Cummings Jump to the conclusion of the article: “this young man joined the growing numbers of hundreds of openly Messianic Jewish soldiers proudly serving in the IDF.So why is the Ministry of Defense now publicly opposing Messianic activity in Jerusalem? According to one combat soldier, who is not Messianic, it all has to do with politics. “The government passed a law recently to recruit religious (ultra-Orthodox) Jews, but most refuse to serve,” he explained. “The army is trying to appease the Orthodox community in Jerusalem by making this absurd announcement against Messianic faith. We are all here to serve our country and the army should not be involved in telling people which path of faith to follow.””
  • Ray Levesque  please let take it up with a Moderator for whom you have some respect. I would not deign to impose my frail explanations upon you.
  •  Tamar, I agree with you. If someone chooses out of their own accord to join Messianic Judaism, no one can condemn them. They are still Jewish and should serve the army. My issue is NOT with the Christians or any non Jews, my issues are with those Christians who believe that because they come and help Israel, they are given the right to use devious methods to steal Jewish souls.
  • Thank you, Ray, no need for you to waste your time on me. After all, it was NOT you who removed it. So let us wait for the one that has removed it to tell us why? Shall we?
  • Ray Levesque Thank Tamar for posting something about the article in the comment section. THAT is the purpose of Israeli Frontline, to foster relevant, civil dialog.
  • Tamar Cummings Fascinating article! The irony of the Jewish state in the middle east being the most inclusive state around!
  • Denise Salamone And this the crux of the article -that they did go in search of messys – messy’s came to them to recruit them on the Sabbath.
  • Denise Salamone Do you support the Messianic movement Tamar Cummings?
  • Tamar Cummings The messianics are a part of the IDF, protecting all who live in Israel.
  • Denise Salamone Let me clarify do you believe in their quest to convert Jews?
  • Ray Levesque Denise, please don’t make this personal. We are not going to allow religious arguments here. Please review the guidelines.
  • Denise Salamone Ray, now I am thoroughly confused completely. I am not trying to attempt to have a religious conversation anyway. I am concerned that now it is off limits to discuss a very major threat against Jewish souls that are off limits, which is vital to the State of Israel.
  • Ray Levesque Denise, you are confronting another member about their personal beliefs. It is better to discuss the points of the article, which is NOT about Tamar Cummings. Thank you for understanding. Moderator.
  •  Denise, it is irrelevant whether Tamar is messianic or not. You can ask her that in a P.N. But what is of greater concern is that Ray Levesque, a moderator in a page that declares itself as Pro Israel does not see that as a serious issue that threatens the essence of the Jewish state, the ONLY Jewish state. makes me wonder what Ray is. But I will not ask him as it is against the group guidelines
  • Ray Levesque  if you have a personal issue with me, it does not belong in the comments section. Please share your grievances with Michelle and leave the comments for actual discussion.
  • Albert Vitela This is a horrible irrelevant article on division between Zionist
  •  Oh I have already Ray. In the past, remember? I turned to Michelle Cohen. The wisest thing I could have done. Need I say more?
  • Ray Levesque No , you need say nothing more.
  • Denise Salamone What is horrible is the messianic movement preying on Jews who are alone in this article.
  • Wiki Leek As Messianics be defined by the law of Israel and the Supreme Court of Israel as Christians they act like Fake-Jews and give the world a fraud picture of Judaism and Israel to the world which do harm to Israel. This have nothing to do with religious be…See More

    Law of Return – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


    The Law of Return (Hebrew: חוק השבות, ḥok ha-shvūt) is Israeli legislation, pass…See More
  • Denise Salamone Our History has shown quite clearly the implications fallen upon Jews from Christian Missionaries. A lesson we have learned well.
    • Ray Levesque Wiki Leek, this group reports and discusses Israeli security issues. This group does not allow proselytizing by any groups towards any others. It also is not the place to attack proselytizers. We simply don’t go there. I have banned an Orthodox Jew for…See More
    • Wiki Leek Ray do you agree that Israel is the Jewish State? The only state in the world where Jews cannot be expelled? Do you agree that trying to proselytize Jews is another way to destruct Israel or the Jews as happened the last 1700 years as Jews being forced…See More
    • Tamar Cummings “Messianics are highly regarded by military authorities, and are even sought out to serve as commanders and officers in every branch of the Israeli military, including Military Intelligence, which requires the highest security clearance.” This article has many “threads” of thought…
AGAIN, it bears repeating: Israel’s Jewish Zionist community is very appreciative of its Christian friends and supporters. This issue is in no way, shape or form, directed at said audience. But it is pointed at those who seek to link/condition any “friendship” to the Jewish homeland, as long as they “turn the other cheek” while missionaries continue to covert Jews. NO way!
Proselytizing is not only against Israeli law but in violation of the “spirit” of Zion – Ambassador Oren cautions against messianics and proselytizing:
Arutz 7, also reporting on Oren’s interview, claims that “Proselytizing in public is illegal in Israel, but the prohibition increasingly has been violated.”

But Oren actually said, “The Christian churches that are active and there are a great number of them — have an agreement with the Israeli government that they can enjoy complete religious freedom, but that they should refrain from proselytizing.”

That’s the beginning and end of it. There is no in between.
WARNING to so called “pro-Israel” forum sites: we are well aware who the missionaries are, as well as those who are connected to Islamic operatives.
So let it be known – here and now – that the true pro-Israel community, the real Zionists (secular and religious, in tandem with our pro-Israel Christian friends), are gravely concerned about what is taking place. We will not allow this situation to continue as is. We will stop their penetration into our communities (virtual or otherwise) one way or another.
In this regard, a well oiled investigative group (with a proven track record) is giving requisite notice to all those who persist in entangling pro-Israel forums with subversive elements; with persons/groups KNOWN to be working towards converting Jews in Israel through whatever insidious methods.
Listen up. Said “pro Israel” accomplices will no longer be able to deceive the public with their false bonafides, as they merge efforts with Islamic/missionary forces. It cannot be the case that those who place pro-Israel, front and center, as their mission statement, can then INCLUDE those who are at cross swords with Judaism/Israel.
Cease and desist! 


HOT on the heels of this week’s explosive commentary (encircling the web like a raging wildfire), FINAL WARNING FROM “DHS INSIDER”: PLANS “READY TO GO” TO COLLAPSE U.S. ECONOMY WHEN “CRISIS” POINT EMERGESanother highly valued counter-terror contact, Dave Gaubatz, lends his on target analysis to America’s domestic front. He renders a strategic assessment which only a former U.S. Air Force special agent, one with years of experience on the ground (inside world hot spots and domestically), can gauge as “seismic-worthy”. Ignore his warnings at your peril.

But before we learn about the latest “threat level”, we must be quipped to digest and internalize certain facts, as they percolate underneath U.S. ground. As such, it is instructive to backtrack a bit, at least for contextual impact. 

Hark back a few months ago, specifically March 2013, and the following was highlighted at this blog: Signs of Civil War Could Lead To Martial Law. Readers, this link (others too) did not go unnoticed by portals attached to DHS. Hmm. 

Catching up to speed…clear cut evidence/proof of a “good to go” dress rehearsal for an eventual imposition of martial law turns up in Boston, only 2 months after its first signs were reported on. Never mind the fact that its “necessity” was a moot point, as it did nothing to effectuate the capture of the jihadis! In essence, it was the opening shot of DHS’s pandora’s box: martial law already entered via jihad In Boston !

Stage left, enter foreign forces; already training for this and that expected “crisis”.  Russian/foreign troops are inside America, as FEMA detention camps & Agenda 21 are prepped. Yes, the training for MARTIAL LAW continues apace.

But just when you thought you may be hallucinating, and that your “lying” eyes were deceiving you, well, leave it to certain Congressional reps (with verbal diarrhea) to spill the beans. Yup, the  INCREASING THREAT Of MARTIAL LAW: Demster Rep. Shelia Jackson Lee’s loose lips and her “slip of the tongue”. Good grief.

Yet for those who believe that the head of DHS is really calling the shots…not so fast. DHS, Valerie Jarrett’s fiefdom, is where she makes plans to target U.S. (Patriotic) citizens/Christians as Obama Inc.’s first pickings. Warnings can be heard from (Retired) Army officers re MARTIAL LAW & more.

The evidence is insurmountable and leading to one overall plan: MARTIAL LAW.  What does Obama Inc. have in store for “non-compliant” citizens?

Thus, is it any wonder that states are attempting to break free of the Feds grip, as an outcome of pressure from citizens to DO something drastic?

A Civil War in America
By: Dave Gaubatz  29 Dec 2013
When I was in Iraq (2003) I was asked by our government to conduct an assessment of the ground situation in Iraq, and what is the likelihood of a civil war developing between the Sunni and Shiite people of Iraq.

I spent 6 plus months conducting an analysis of the situation.  The assessment consisted of talking with hundreds of Iraqis, both Sunni and Shiite.  This included military, former military, Iraqi police, and Iraqi government personnel.


My conclusion was that a civil war would occur once our military left the area.  It happened.  Hundreds of thousands of Sunni and Shiite have been killed during their civil war.


In America I have conducted the same type of assessment.  I have talked with hundreds of Americans from all walks of life. My conclusion is there will be a civil war within the next five years in America.


The war will be between liberals and conservatives.  There have been some people who say I desire a civil war.  I do not want any type war.  The victims in every war are the children.  The war will begin when Obama and his crew announce martial law.  No one thinks that this is possible, but one need only look at how Obama has already made a joke of our U.S. Constitution.
Within 5 years martial law will be declared and it is possible this will happen in 2016 when Obama makes up his own rules and laws and attempts to remain President.  The patriotic Americans will shout ‘we are no longer going to allow our country to be taken over by liberals, communists, Islamic leaders and their supporters’.
There will be some U.S. military leaders who will decide to no longer follow the Commander in Chief (Obama).  These Generals will be followed by thousands of our troops.  There will be many Generals who will fight for Obama and the New World Order.
There will be chaos in the streets of America.  Conservatives will not allow their First and Second Amendment rights be taken from them.  There will be a shortage of food, water, housing, and medical care.  FEMA will begin arresting tens of thousands of conservatives and place them into concentration camps.
Islamic leaders will have their Jihadi trained terrorists to begin making life ‘hell’ in America.  One will not know the difference between Afghanistan and our beautiful country.  We will see hundreds of suicide attacks by Muslims.
The conservative movement will suffer tremendously in the beginning of a war, but will bounce back and take our country back from ruins.
In actuality their will be no winners.  Our country will be devastated and it will take decades to recover.
Readers should not shake their heads and say this can’t happen in America.  We should all pray this never happens, but great society’s have been falling for centuries.  America will be no different than Rome or England.
What can we do?  We must now demand our Constitution be the law of the land, and not taken over by a Dictator regime.  We must educate our families, neighbors, friends, and co-workers to the realities our country is facing.  Do not be afraid to speak the truth about Christianity and Judaism.  We need these values in our lives more than ever.
America has a long and hard road ahead, but we can be one of the great empires that does not collapse if we take our country back now.  In the 2014 elections we must put people into power who do not sugarcoat the truth simply to appease liberals and communists.

YES, while it is more pleasant to pretend that what is isn’t, such magical thinking has no place within rational adult discourse. More to the point, how pleasant will it be when militarized law enforcement comes knocking on doors to confiscate this and that, warning citizens to “stand down”?  



This “buried” report should be considered prima facie evidence, as it details a part of the plan – approved by Israel’s ruling left – regarding Judaism’s holiest site, the Temple Mount. Bear in mind, the same Israeli malignant crew, within the commentary below, are in sync with all parts thereof.


SEVERAL levels of treachery are glaring within the following “news”, but the fact of the matter is that none of it would be germane if not for the participation of Israel’s leaders, even as it appears they are kicking and screaming to deny the truths at hand. All is not as it seems.

But before we get to the essence of the matter it is intrinsic to note that international players, for decades, have been plotting to wrest the entirety of Jerusalem – Judaism’s eternal capital – from Jewish hands. And while Arabs/Islamists have their own designs, it doesn’t obviate the fact that other global players have the same goal, yet for divergent reasons. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Never forget this.

NOW, few understand the central part played by Israel’s “elder statesman”, its 90 plus yr old President Peres, a man who never seems to fade from the limelight. Hmm. Yes, that same international “darling” (feted world over) who received the Nobel Peace Prize alongside PM Rabin and the blood soaked godfather of modern terror, “Chairman” Arafat.

But why is this a focal point herein? Well, regardless of the public blatherings from Peres (and others within Israel’s ruling clique, that Jerusalem will NEVER be divided…blah, blah) it must be internalized that his/their plans for Jerusalem mirror that of the late, non-lamented Arafat.

However, whereas Arafat expected Jerusalem to become an Islamic conquest, Peres was (still is) busy giving the Vatican the heads up; first via all Christian sites and then seguing to controlling the entire capital! In the end, international players and Arab Islamic leaders remain steadfast in their MAIN goal: “de-Judaizing” Jerusalem. Yup, you read this right. 

But before we get to the all important betrayal, the following was related during an interview at Inquisitr.com:

Wolff Bachner:On the matter of Jerusalem, I can not imagine a more terrible fate for the Jewish people, other than another Holocaust, than to see Jerusalem divided again. Not only would it cut the heart out of the Jewish spirit, but it would divide the tiny nation of Israel across the middle into two smaller, indefensible sections. Is it truly possible that Israel would actually give up half of Jerusalem to become the capital of Palestine?

Adina Kutnicki: As to Jerusalem, the heart and soul of Zion (in the same realm as Judea and Samaria), whither it goes, so too does the fate of Israel, as well as the Jewish people. It is inconceivable that Israel would survive without Jerusalem intact, and dare I suggest, there would be little reason left for its existence, sans an intact eternal capital. It is one tragedy if enemies capture it from Jewish hands, but it is a wholly different paradigm if Israel’s leaders surrender it on their own. So the question still hangs: Are Israel’s leaders capable of dividing holy Zion? One would hope and pray this is not the case, but the jury is still out. Personally, I would put nothing past some of the leadership and they bear close scrutiny. Very close.

A Historical Review:

Israel’s Jesuit President, Shimon Peres heads again to Rome to offer Pope Francis I the Cenacle (Church with the Upper Room) and an International Jerusalem.

The ground was hardly warmed in the new papal apartment for Pope Francis I in Rome, when Israeli President Shimon Peres sailed the blue skies from Israel to Italy to lend his “signatured anti-Jewish life” and influence as the President of Israel to betray again the Israeli people in Israel. This betrayal will eventually harm most, the religious pioneering and patriots of Israel who live in the settlement regions of Shomron and Judea. 

For three days, in early May (2013), Israeli President Shimon Peres was scheduled to visit Italy in order to also be hosted in a series of diplomatic meeting with the Italian president and Prime Minister of Italy. At that same time, he was being hosted and feted in a ceremony in the city of Assisi, named after the famous Catholic cleric, St. Francis of Assisi.

There Peres was awarded with the new first ever ceremonies of the Franciscans to give a “Peace Award” called the “Metal of Honor for Peace.”  There the mayor of Assisi greeted Peres and also by “hundreds of Franciscan monks” in a ceremony at the central Roman Catholic Basilica in Assisi. Then Peres was presented this inaugural award, the “Medal of Honor for Peace” as the president of Israel for his “unique contribution to dialogue and the cause of peace.” 

   Basilica Assisi

The Basilica de Papale San Francesco di Assisi 

May 13, 2013, titled, “Franciscans Honor Shimon Peres”, we learn:

 “Those who know Peres acknowledge his, honestly, psychopathic need for medals and awards, to the point of bribing the Nobel committee for a prize. Last week, Yoav Yitzhak, in the wide circulation newspaper Maariv, revealed that Peres gave Terje Larsen, the UN Middle East representative, $100,000 to secure him a Nobel Prize.

 This week, David Bedein, writing in Makor Rishon, applied the coup de grace. He interviewed a member of the Nobel Prize Committee, Kaare Kristiansen, who not just confirmed the bribe but described Larsen’s pressure on the committee in full detail.

 But accepting made-up accolades from the Franciscans is utterly insulting to anyone with a modicum of understanding of recent Jewish history. From the mid to late ’40s, the Franciscans (along with the Dominicans), in what is known as Operation Paperclip, hid in their monasteries over a hundred thousand Nazis, before smuggling them to freedom worldwide. It is estimated that just the US received 30,000, largely Franciscan “refugees.

So while in Italy, naturally Peres lavished in the praises of the Nazi saviors and then was practically smothered by a pope, not named like many believe after a talking mule, but by the very same church leader that the Franciscans honor, Francis I [St Francis of Assisi]:

Earlier than the year of 2005, a lone Israeli reporter continued to post insights into the treacherous conspiratorial schemes of the Jewish Labor Zionist national leadership seeking to the destroy the Divine Intent of the G-d of Israel. The expressed intent of the Divine One through His prophets was to reestablish the dynastic rule of His messiah on Planet Earth in what Orthodox Judaism calls the “World to Come”.   Albeit the stated goals of the Divine One through His prophets in Israel and Judah, the counter-forces of evil by HaSatan continuously seek to destroy the divine mission and goals of Religious Zionism:

  • To destroy internally the hopes and dreams of Jews over the last 2,000 year with the words, “Next Year in Jerusalem”. This laid the groundwork for a permanent homeland for the Jewish people in the Land of Israel, and a haven of safety for the Jews still living in the Diaspora would become a permanent reality.
  • To destroy externally the State of Israel by Islam, and neutralize the State of Israel from within by those Jews called the Sabbatean Jews known as JINOs (Jews in Name Only) and the Jesuit Jews like Adam Weishaupt called the Illuminati whose origins began in Bavaria. All of these stem back to the infamous false messiah in the 17th century, Shabbatai Tzevi, who announced to the Jewish people that the “day of the Jewish messiah would come” on the date of June 18, 1666 (June the 6th month; 18 or 6+6+6, and 1666 or 1000+666). What is even clearer is that ultimate saboteur is the Vatican through the agency of the Black Pope of the Society of Jesus, called the Jesuits.

The road back to Rome is a road well traveled by the current Israeli President Shimon Peres. He has routinely taken this path over the years as the Israeli investigative reporter, called the “traitorous appeasement” of Vatican’s Jewish President. 

 “In 1979, Yitzhak Rabin published his autobiography, within was a one-line offbeat quote. He said that unlike all Jewish children growing up in Poland, Shimon Peres spent his early education at a Jesuit school. It was an odd fact and I took a mental note of it without understanding its significance…Until I broke my first attention-getting story as a political journalist:

In March 1994, the newspaper Chadashot revealed a most remarkable secret of the Middle East “peace” process. A friend of Shimon Peres, the French intellectual Marek Halter claimed in an interview that in May 1993, he delivered a letter from Peres to the pope.

Within, Peres promised to internationalize Jerusalem, granting the UN political control of the Old City of Jerusalem, and the Vatican hegemony of the holy sites within. The UN would give the PLO a capital within its new territory and East Jerusalem would become a kind of free trade zone of world diplomacy. Halter’s claim was backed by the Italian newspaper La Stampa which added that Arafat was apprised of the agreement and it was included in the secret clauses of the Declaration Of Principles signed in Washington in September 1993.  

In March 1995, the Israeli radio station Arutz Sheva was leaked a cable from the Israeli Embassy in Rome to Peres’ Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem confirming the handover of Jerusalem to the Vatican. This cable was printed on the front page of the radical leftwing Israeli newspaper, Ha’aretz two days later.

A scandal erupted and numerous rabbis who had invited Peres for Passover services cancelled their invitations in protest of his treachery. Peres reacted by claiming that the cable was real but that someone had whiten out the word, “not;” the cable really said that Israel would “not” hand Jerusalem over to the holy pontiff.  

Illustrating the sorry political state of Israel’s rabbis, they accepted this cockamamie excuse and re-invited Peres to their tables. However, in the widely distributed minutes of a meeting with Clinton in 1997, Peres reiterated his diplomacy, ending with the words, “as I had previously promised the Holy See.”

Jewish Rabbi David Rosen, the Papal Knight Commander of the Pontifical Order of St. Gregory the Great 

During this era of high political and religious drama between the Vatican and the State of Israel, BibleSearchers Reflections looked at the issues more closely starting in 1993 to 2005 in the article titled, “The Vatican Wants Jerusalem”. In this article, the historical map of Rome’s model for the control of Jerusalem was mapped out from the date in 1993 when Vatican Rome and Israel agreed to normalized and establish formal diplomatic relations with each other. This was documented in the fundamental agreement between the Holy See and the State of Israel on December 30, 1993. The one problem, the “fundamental agreement” was kept secret.

It took another four years when in 1997 the State of Israel agreed to a legal status in Israel for the Vatican. This came with the Meshumad (apostate) Jewish Rabbi David Rosen, the Papal Knight Commander of the Pontifical Order of St. Gregory the Great who put the Vatican’s pathway in the future clearly on the road for the Internationalization of Jerusalem.

It was in October 20, 2005 that Israel National News reported that a seven year negotiation with Vatican Rome was finally completed and it was now time to turn over numerous buildings, parcels of land that the Roman Catholic Church claims that it used to own and control. These facts were being reported by the Vatican newspaper, El Messagero, that Israeli President Katsav was prepared to sign over to the control of the Vatican. The major site of interest was the purported site of the “Last Supper” which is recognized by the Jews as the burial site of Kings David, Solomon, Rechavam, Assa, Chezekiyahu and Amatzia.


Tomb King David
Tomb of King David in Jerusalem

According to the agreement, the upper part of David’s Tomb would traded in exchange for an ancient Jewish synagogue in Toledo, Spain that was converted into a Catholic Church after the Jews were expelled from Spain on the 9th of Av, 1492. Other sites of interest in which the Vatican wants the Israeli government to give up sovereignty over include six sites; the Church of the Annunciation in Nazareth, the Coenaculum on Mount Zion, Gethsemane on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem and the Church of the Multiplication on Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee). 

 So today, over the top of one of the largest Jewish yeshivas teaching young Jews the profound truths of the Torah will soon, if the Israeli government finally craters under the pressure from their president, Shimon Peres and the Vatican, every morning mass will be conducted overhead to the droning of ritual chants taking away one of the most peaceful and reverential areas of Old Jerusalem today. This fact alone gained the ire of a Jewish physician, Dr. Daisy Stern who wrote the following in the article titled, “Perfect Crime: The Vatican’s Plot to rob Am Yisrael of Jerusalem (The Secret Machinations of the Vatican, Part II, 2009)

 Israeli President Shimon Peres with Pope Benedict XVI reported by Leftist Israeli Haaretz News

Israel National News – “Israel’s indefatigable Shimon Peres met with Pope Benedict XVI today, and submitted an invitation to visit Israel from Acting Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. The two met for 40 minutes in the Vatican, and the Pope said he hopes to visit Israel sometime in the first half of next year. They said afterwards that they had discussed Middle East matters. “I definitely believe that a visit by the Pope can influence the peace process,” Peres told reporters. Peres is reported, in 1994, to have promised the Vatican official status in Jerusalem.

In February 2000, the Vatican and the Palestinian Authority signed an agreement calling for an internationally guaranteed special status for Jerusalem. The agreement stated that a special statute would protect “equality before the law of the three monotheistic religions [in Jerusalem], the proper identity and sacred character of the city, [and] freedom of access” to the city’s holy sites.

Israel objected, saying that freedom of religion is already protected throughout the country. It also opposed the Vatican’s treatment of the PA as an independent country.

Shortly afterwards, Pope John Paul II visited Israel, and – unlike one of his predecessors, Pope Paul VI, who visited in 1964 – agreed to come to Jerusalem. Pope John Paul II met with the Chief Rabbis in their Jerusalem offices, and visited Yad Vashem as well. Pope Paul, on the other hand, refused to visit Jerusalem, leading then-Chief Rabbi Yitzchak Nissim to boycott his visit altogether.

It was the year of 2003 in the month of September, when Richard Joel became the first non-rabbi to become the president of the Yeshiva University in New York and Israel in which according to Dr. Daisy Stern, Richard Joel was a Meshumad (apostate) Jew and a “stooge of the Council on Foreign Relations”; the nesting ground for Shabbatian Jews, Frankist Jews, NeoCon Jews, all of which have a propensity to abandon their Jewish roots and become as Rabbi Marvin Antelman called in his seminal books, “To Eliminate the Opiate, Vol I in printVol 1 on PDF and Vol 2”, JINOs or “Jews in Name Only.” 

 Yeshiva University President Richard Joel

Under the invitation of President Richard Joel, Yeshiva University invited and hosted on January 2004, the largest meeting of Cardinals ever to be assembled outside of Vatican Rome to meet exclusively with Jewish rabbis; this time in Yeshiva University in New York City. It was organized by Israel Singer with the World Jewish Congress and another “Meshumad” (apostate) the Jewish Cardinal Lustiger of Paris, France who almost gained the Curia’s nod to become the new pope taking the place of the deceased Jewish Pope John Paul II yet was instead earned by the Jewish Pope Benedict XVI (Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger) who was also a Meshumad (apostate) Jew.

The attendees at this meeting included Ten Cardinals from Rome, plus a host of Conservative and Reform rabbis plus 16 Orthodox rabbis which included current and chief rabbis from six different countries including Chief Rabbi of Israel, Israel Meir Lau.  There amidst Torah study, was an atmosphere which Dr. Stern called “highly dubious activity in this setting, where anti-Semitism around the world was being discussed.”  The rabbis in attendance were put under extreme pressure with the message; “give the Vatican back her properties or else we cannot vouch for your safety.”

On the negotiating side of the table by the Vatican were Pietro Sambi, Archbishop and Apostolic and since 1998, the Nuncio to Israel and Palestine, plus Franciscan Father David Yaeger, Giovanni LaJolo the Vatican Secretary of Relations with States, who later brought the issue of the State of Israel not relinquishing her Vatican properties to the United Nations.

Let it be clear, in addition, that the Catholic Church is and has been a strong supporter of the Oslo Peace Agreement, which, as noted earlier, goes hand in hand with the Fundamental Agreement, and is a code for the same goal, namely, return of “Church properties” to the Church, under the guise of fairness to the Arabs.

How do all of these events link themselves together? Today, Pope Francis I namesakes, the Franciscans, to whom Friar David Yaeger is a member, were one of the two major Catholic Orders that were in charge of enforcing the “Grand Inquisition.” It was their supreme order that they were to kill, maim, burn and torture Jews and Protestant Christians in the name of the Roman Christian Church!  And we now are to believe that the Franciscans still carry the mantra of the peacefulness of St. Francis of Assisi?

So what does the Hommes de Parole NGO do? They invite with kindness and graciousness their Jewish rabbis, especially the Israeli chief rabbis, to the table of consensus and try to indoctrinate them into the charade of “land for peace”. It was their purpose that these same rabbis will return to the Land of Israel and influence the secular Jews running the government to give up former Roman Catholic “Church Property” whose acquisition came with the Roman Christian Crusades.

Then we have to remember that they, the Church did not gain these acquisitions peacefully, but by the very acts of peace they are promoting today, virtually killed and destroyed every Jewish person in the Land of Israel in the 11th to the 13th century CE. So we tie together very carefully the theme that the Roman Catholic Church and the Oslo Peace Accord are indelibly intertwined. It was not created under the guise of fairness and peace for Arab Palestinians but for Vatican’s control of Jerusalem and the Middle East, but rather to hide that the Vatican wants control over the Temple Mount, so that the Vatican’s P2 Masonic Lodge with the Illuminati can erect a Temple for the Jews and a House of Prayer for all people, with the Vatican now being leading architect, instead of the G-d of Israel for peace to all the world.


Enter Obama Inc…and herein belies Sec. Kerry’s mission and his behind the scenes machinations with Israel’s resident, high profile traitors.


International mandate to control sections of Israel’s capital



U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry with Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

TEL AVIV – Secretary of State John Kerry quietly presented a U.S. plan for eastern Jerusalem that calls for an international administrative mandate to control holy sites in the area, according to informed Palestinian and Israeli diplomatic sources.

The exact composition of the international mandate is up for discussion, the sources said, but Kerry’s plan recommended a coalition that includes the Vatican, together with a group of Muslim countries such as Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

The international arrangement is being proposed as a temporary solution for about two to three years while security arrangements in Jerusalem between Israelis and Palestinians are finalized, said the sources.

Israel, the sources said, was not receptive to the particulars of Kerry’s plan, especially the concept of Turkish participation in Jerusalem. Kerry told the Israelis he would hold talks with the Kingdom of Jordan about its playing a leading role in the proposal in the place of Turkey, the sources added.

Kerry was in Jerusalem on Friday as part of an Obama administration effort to reach a deal for a Palestinian state by April, a timeline that is still on track, Kerry told reporters.

“We are working on an approach that both guarantees Israel’s security and fully respects Palestinian sovereignty,” Kerry added.

According to the Israeli and Palestinian diplomatic sources speaking to WND, Kerry’s trip this time around focused specifically on the particulars of security arrangements for the strategic Jordan Valley following a deal.

In October, WND exclusively reported Kerry was strongly urging Israel to give up the Jordan Valley in closed-door talks with the Palestinian Authority.

The current round of U.S.-brokered talks is attempting to hash out the details of a plan for the valley.

The Jordan Valley cuts through the heart of Israel. It runs from the Tiberias River in the north to the Dead Sea in the center to the city of Aqaba at the south of the country, stretching through the biblical Arabah desert.

The U.S. proposal calls for international forces to maintain security control along with unarmed Palestinian police forces, a senior Palestinian Authority negotiator told WND in October. Israel will retain security posts in some strategic areas of the Jordan Valley, according to the U.S. plan.

Previous talks incorporated an element of Jordanian authority in the Jordan Valley, but the Kingdom of Jordan is wary of participating in a future Palestinian state, the negotiator said.

The Palestinian negotiator pointed to the insurgency in Syria and changes of leadership in Egypt as reasons for Jordanian reluctance to assume any security control over Palestinian areas.

WHEREAS all of the above is absolutely an accurate historical assessment, it must be understood that countless Christians are fully behind Israel and acknowledge the central part Jerusalem plays in Jewish history. Its place in world history. Nevertheless, the traitors within Israel – chiefly led by Peres – are hell bent on making sure that Jerusalem is once again, and irrevocably, wrested from Jewish hands!

NO one should dare be fooled, believing that any of the above is a new incarnation of the “peace process”. Not at all. This plan has been in the works for decades, but rears its head whenever the accursed Oslo Peace/Death Accords are pushed to the fore – by none other than President Peres and his fellow travelers!

Memo to fellow Zionists (religious and secular), the majority population in Israel: what say you?  


Some of us have been shouting from the rooftops – actually from cyberspace but why quibble – regarding the DELIBERATE plans (implanted well before Obama came on board, but revved up under his reign…this was the reason he burst onto the scene, seemingly out of nowhere) set in motion to collapse the U.S. And all roads lead through the PURPOSEFUL decapitation of the dollar.

Now, while this site has reams of info backing up the above, it should suffice to merely cite one exhibit, it was posted during this blog’s inception: Barack Hussein Obama’s deconstruction plans: green-wise via the economy, disarming the citizens via gun control and massive FED control over the economy.

Patriots, time to connect the dots! A remedy can be found after the featured commentary. Keep reading.

DHS insider gives final warning – Northeast Intelligence Network


By Douglas J.  Hagmann

27 December 2013: Under the cover and amid the distraction of the Christmas bustle, I had my last “official” contact with a source inside the Department of Homeland Security known as “Rosebud” in my writings. My source is leaving his position, retiring along with numerous others choosing to leave this bureaucratic monstrosity. For this contact, my source took unprecedented measures to be certain that our contact was far off the radar of prying government eyes and ears. I was stunned at the lengths he employed, and even found myself somewhat annoyed by the inconvenience that his cloak-and-dagger approach caused. It was necessary, according to my source, because all department heads under FEMA and DHS are under orders to identify anyone disclosing any information for termination and potential criminal prosecution.

“DHS is like a prison environment, complete with prison snitches,” he said, referring to the search for leaks and leakers. And the warden is obsessed. Ask anyone in DHS. No one trusts anyone else and whatever sources might be left are shutting up. The threats that have been made far exceed anything I’ve ever seen. Good people are afraid for their lives and the lives of their families. We’ve all been threatened. They see the writing on the wall and are leaving. It’s not a joke and not hype.”

The following is a narrative from my source, prefaced with the instructions to “take it or leave it,” and “disregard it at your own peril.” He added that it’s now up to each American to act on the information themselves or suffer the consequences. “I’ve resigned myself to the fact that most [Americans] will never be convinced of the reality that is taking place right in front of them.”

The plan explained

“According to every internal document I’ve seen and read, and from the few people I’ve spoken with who understand what’s going on, preparations have been finalized to respond to a crisis of unprecedented magnitude within the United States. The response will include the use of lethal force against U.S. citizens under the instructions of Barack Obama.”  But why?

“‘It’s the economy, stupid,’” he began, paraphrasing a campaign slogan coined by James Carville for Bill Clinton’s 1992 campaign.  ”Just as I disclosed in our first meeting, the crisis will be rooted in an economic collapse. I told you last year, at a time when gold and silver were setting record highs, one specific indicator that time is very short. It is the final ‘smack down’ of the metals, gold and silver, that will presage the orchestrated economic collapse that is being planned by the bankers of Wall Street. Everybody needs to understand that this is a deliberate collapse of the U.S. economy with the oversight of the White House and the full knowledge of the Justice Department.  Everyone seems to be waiting for some big, history making event that will signal the start of the collapse. The fact is that the collapse has already started. It’s incremental, like a snowball rolling down a hill. It gets bigger and rolls faster. Well, this snowball is well on its way down the hill.”

“I don’t mean to sound repetitive, by I can’t stress this enough. Contrary to what you hear, we’re already in an economic collapse, except that most people haven’t a clue. The ‘big bang’ comes at the end, when people they wake up one morning and can’t log in to their bank accounts, can’t use their ATM cards, and find out that their private pension funds and other assets have been confiscated,” he stated.

“I’ve seen documentation of multiple scenarios created outside of DHS. Different plans and back-up plans. Also, please understand that I deliberately used the word ‘created,’ as this is a completely manufactured event.  In the end it won’t be presented that way, which is extremely important for everyone to understand. What is coming will be blamed on some unforeseen event out of everyone’s control, that few saw coming or thought would actually happen. Then, another event will take place concurrent with this event, or immediately after it, to confuse and compound an already explosive situation.” I asked for specifics.

“As I said, there are several scenarios and I don’t know them all. I know one calls for a cyber-attack by an external threat, which will then be compounded by something far removed from everyone’s own radar. But it’s all a ruse, or a pretext. The threat is from within,” he stated. “Before people can regain their footing, a second event will be triggered.” Again, I asked for specifics.

“I’ve seen one operational plan that refers to the federal government’s response to a significant terrorist attack on U.S. soil. Information at these levels is compartmentalized. I don’t have specifics, just plans for the response. The response will be controls and restrictions on travel, business, and every aspect of our lives, especially gun ownership and speech that incites people against the government. I guess some people would call it Martial Law, and they would not be incorrect. But understand that this will be a process deployed in stages. How quickly of a process remains to be seen.”

The mechanics explained

As I said, people continue to look for something big to happen first, followed by a militaristic response by the federal government against U.S. citizens. Based on what I’ve seen, I don’t believe it will happen this way, although there is one unthinkable exception. That exception would involve a ‘decapitation’ of our leadership, but I’ve seen nothing even remotely suggestive of that. But I’ve heard and even read articles where that is mentioned. Frankly, though, that’s always been a threat. I suppose that if the leadership is deemed useless, or becomes a liability to the larger agenda in some manner,  it could happen. The precedent exists. Let’s pray that it’s not the case now.”

“I don’t think anyone except the initiated few know the precise series of events or the exact timing, just a general overview and an equally general time period. I think we’re in that period now, as DHS has their planned responses finalized. Also, the metals are important because it’s real money, not Ponzi fiat currency. The U.S. has no inventory of gold, so the prices are manipulated down to cause a sell-off of the physical assets. China is on a buying spree of gold, and other countries want their inventory back. The very people causing the prices to drop are the ones who are also buying the metals at fire sale prices. They will emerge extremely wealthy when the prices rise after the U.S. currency becomes wallpaper. A little research will identify who these people and organizations are.”

“I’d like to add a bit of perspective that might help explain the events as I described. Do you remember former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announcing that the Pentagon was unable to account for $2.3 trillion in the defense budget? That was on September 10, 2001, the day before the attacks of 9/11. Some suggest that 9/11 was  orchestrated, in part to cover up the missing money, which is ludicrous. The result, however, was that suddenly the accounting issue took a back seat because of the attacks. The result will be the same. That’s a perfect example of the mechanics of what we are about to experience. It’s going to take years to sort out, and when it’s finally sorted out, the damage will have long been done.”

“Please note a few final things. The relationship that exists between DHS today and the executive branch is well beyond alarming. DHS and other organizations have become the private army of the Oval Office. The NSA, and I’ve got contacts there, is taking orders from the Oval Office. The IRS is under the virtual control of the Oval Office in a manner that would make Nixon cower. Even though all roads appear to lead to the Oval Office, they lead through the Oval Office. It’s not just Obama, but the men behind him, the people who put him there. The people who put him there are the ones who created him.” I asked who created him.

“First, ask yourself why there was such an all out effort to marginalize anyone talking about Obama’s eligibility in 2008. Even so-called conservatives pundits fell for the lie that such questions were nothing more than a diversion. They were following a specific drumbeat. That should tell every rational adult that he is a creation of the globalists who have no allegiance to any political party. He is the product of decades of planning, made for this very time in our history. He was selected to oversee the events I just disclosed. Who has that ability? He’s a product of our own intelligence agencies working with the globalists. He should be exhibit ‘A’ to illustrate the need to enforce the Logan Act. Need I say more?”

As often said by another of my sources, the U.S. is a captured operation. The lie is bigger than most people realize or are willing to confront. That is, until there is no other option. By then, it might be too late.

In light of the above, the following bears mentioning: through a highly valued and trusted contact, this American-Israeli has had the opportunity to interface with Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely and his INITIAL “prescriptive remedy” is detailed below. To be able to access such an American patriot is profoundly appreciated. And when given the heads up from such an individual (re any project) well, little more needs to be said.

But just because one has many stars attached to his chest hardly guarantees patriotic ethos. In fact, Obama Inc. has been purging (upwards of 200 top officers) those deemed too patriotic, but replacing them with assorted “yes” men with similar ranking who agree to be bought and paid for. There are cowards aboard every ship, ready to shove others into harm’s way while they scurry for cover. Such is the case with too many puffed up military types.

In this regard, is it outlandish to posit: America is a “soft tyranny” and on the cusp of becoming a police state !

Alas, herein lies the first “marching order” (but hardly the only one) to set the ship of state back onto its foundation’s path!


‘We need to get off our derrieres. … Hope is not a strategy’ (see videos)

The retired American military commander who earlier said in a statement released to WND that Americans need to confront Barack Obama’s tyranny now is recommending the Egyptian model through which to do that.

The Egyptian model, Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely explained on a podcast of an Internet radio show, was that 33 million people stood up to their government and told officials no.

The result was that the Egyptian Muslim Brother was removed from power and then-President Mohammed Morsi was removed from office, Vallely explained,

His call for a massive march on Washington came recently on the WBTM (We Become The Media) show.

He was asked whether America can be restored as the shining light on the hill for freedom when the electoral process, which resulted in two presidencies for Obama in 2008 and 2012, “are known to be corrupt.”

Vallely said the absence of leadership in the White House and Congress makes it difficult, and he said, “I’m not even sure our traditional process will straighten our government out in time to save us.”

And he said processes like impeachment simply won’t happen.

Then he suggested the Egyptian model, and he said millions of Americans need to “stand up” to Washington “within the next 12 months.”

He said doing nothing is not an option, because Washington won’t fix itself and “hope is not a strategy.”

“We need something … a no confidence vote,” he suggested. And perhaps legislation that could create a national recall process.

“We need to get off our derrieres, march at the state capitol, march in Washington,” he said. “Make citizens arrests.”

He said when there are those who are “conducting treason … violating the Constitution, violating our laws,” it should not be overlooked.

“When you have a president and his team who don’t care about the Constitution, they will do anything they can to win,” he said.

Vallely has been immensely popular among tea party organizations that are seeking a way to restore the rule of law to Washington.

Among other things, they cite the Obamacare law, and the 15 or more times Obama has changed the law – without consulting Congress.

In a statement earlier to WND, Vallely said a vote of no confidence could be used.

The founder of Stand Up America, an organization that provides education resources for leaders and activists based on the values of the Founding Fathers, said:

“Clearly America has lost confidence and no longer trusts those in power at a most critical time in our history,” Vallely said. “It is true that not all who ply the halls of power fit under that broad brush, but most of them are guilty of many egregious acts and we say it is time to hold a vote of no confidence. It’s time for a ‘recall.’”

Vallely believes the “credibility of our current leadership is gone.”

Now, he said, “we listen to their excuses, finger-pointing, lies and all manner of chicanery.”

He admitted there is no legal authority in a vote of no confidence, but he argued it will “take back the power of discourse.”

“What else is our nation to do now that the ‘rule-of-law’ has effectively been thrown out the window by the Obama administration? How are we to trust our government anymore, now that lying and fraud are acceptable practices?” he asked.

Vallely believes impeachment likely wouldn’t lead to conviction and doesn’t solve the problem, anyway.

“Harry Reid still controls the Senate, so like in Clinton’s day, forget about a finding of guilty,” he wrote. “Incidentally, if Obama was found guilty and removed from office, Joe Biden would step in, Valerie Jarrett still wields all the power, and likely we get more of the same.”

The Constitution can be amended without going through Congress, he pointed out, but it would take too much time, “a luxury we just do not have it we are going to save our republic.”

Sign the petition urging Congress to pursue impeachment right away!

“That brings us to the other word no one wants to utter, revolution. In our opinion, this is the least palatable option. … Others talk about the military taking over as we saw in Egypt; again, we do not support this route,” he said.

Vallely listed a sampling of Obama’s broken promises and lies, crediting Peter Wehner at Commentary Magazine:

  • His promise not to allow lobbyists to work in his administration. (They have.)
  • His commitment to slash earmarks. (He didn’t.)
  • To be the most transparent presidency in history. (He’s not.)
  • To put an end to “phony accounting.” (It started almost on Day 1 and continues.)
  • And to restore trust in government. (Trust in government is at near-historic lows.)
  • His pledge to seek public financing in the general election. (He didn’t.)
  • To treat super-PACS as a “threat to democracy.” (He embraced them.)
  • His pledge to keep unemployment from rising above 8 percent. (It remained above 8 percent for the longest stretch since the Great Depression.)
  • To create five million new energy jobs alone. (The total number of jobs created in Obama’s first term was roughly one-tenth that figure.)
  • To identify all those “shovel-ready’ jobs. (Mr. Obama later chuckled that his much-hyped “shovel-ready projects” were “not as shovel-ready as we expected.”)
  • To lift two million Americans from poverty. (A record 46 million Americans are living in poverty during the Obama era.)
  • His promise to bring down health care premiums by $2,500 for the typical family (they went up) … allow Americans to keep the health care coverage they currently have (many can’t) … refuse to fund abortion via the Affordable Care Act (it did) … to respect religious liberties (he has violated them) … and the insistent that a mandate to buy insurance, enforced by financial penalties, was not a tax (it is).
  • Obama’s pledge to stop the rise of oceans. (It hasn’t.)
  • To “remake the world” and to “heal the planet.” (Hardly.)
  • To usher in a “new beginning” based on “mutual respect” with the Arab and Islamic world and “help answer the call for a new dawn in the Middle East.” (Come again?)
  • To punish Syria if it crossed the “red line” of using chemical weapons. (The “red line” was crossed earlier this year – and nothing of consequence happened.)
  • That as president “I don’t bluff.” (See the previous sentence on Syria.)
  • And of course the much-ballyhooed Russian reset. (Tensions between Russia and the United States are increasing and examples of Russia undermining U.S. interests are multiplying.)
  • And let’s not forget Mr. Obama’s promise to bring us together. (He is the most polarizing president in the history of the Gallup polling.)
  • Or his assurance to us that he would put an end to the type of politics that “breeds division and conflict and cynicism.” (All three have increased during the Obama presidency.)
  • And his counsel to us to “resist the temptation to fall back on the same partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long.” (Remind me again whose campaign allies accused Mitt Romney of being responsible for the cancer death of a steelworker’s wife.)

“It is time to recall the reprobates and reclaim the power of the people,” Vallely said. “We need to start with the White House and all of Obama’s appointees, especially Eric Holder. … Then on to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi – the architects who shoved Obamacare down our throats. We also cannot forget John Boehner and company who openly castigate the tea-party caucus which are only doing that which they campaigned upon.”

Vallely quoted commentator Andrew C. McCarthy, who said that “absent the political will to remove the president, he will remain president no matter how many high crimes and misdemeanors he stacks up. … and absent the removal of the president, the United States will be fundamentally transformed.”

Vallely noted that while the U.S. Constitution lacks a provision for a “recall” at the federal level, “there is nothing to prevent its use as a comprehensive de facto indictment and conviction for contempt of Congress, violations of oath of office and of the Constitution itself – for all the reasons stated in such a resolution.”

He warned of growing “tyrannical centralized rule” without action.

There may be advances in the 2014 elections, but will that be a solution?

“Obama is still the president, and his Cabinet and appointees still remain in power. … Obama will just continue to subvert the Constitution he took an oath to faithfully protect. His track record shows us that no matter what the make-up of Congress is, he will twist his way around it with a pen and secure even more power reminiscent of a dictator,” Vallely said.

“When that does not work, he will manipulate the courts and law enforcement will be run by fiat, choosing winners and losers.”

Congress already is addressing charges that Obama is violating the Constitution.

WND reported when Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said Obama’s actions have reached “an unprecedented level, and we’ve got to do something about it.

“Assume that a statute said you had to provide two forms of ID to vote. Can the president require three forms? Can the president require one form? Can you suspend all requirements? If not, why not?” he said. “If you can turn off certain categories of law, do you not also have the power to turn off all categories of law?”

Gowdy cited Obama’s decisions to ignore certain immigration laws, even though Congress did not approve the changes. He also cited arbitrary changes to the Obamacare law and Obama’s “recess appointments” of judges even though the U.S. Senate was not in recess.

His proposal is for Congress to take the White House to court over the president’s actions, through a resolution proposed by Rep. Tom Rice, R-Ga., that would authorize the House to sue the Obama administration. It has 30 co-sponsors.

Rice said that because of “this disregard of our country’s checks and balances, many of you have asked me to bring legal action against the president.”

“After carefully researching the standing the House of Representatives has and what action we can take, I have introduced a resolution to stop the president’s clear overreach,” he said.

A Fox News interviewer asked Gowdy if Obama could refuse to enforce election laws.

“Why not?” asked Gowdy, “If you can turn off immigration laws, if you can turn off the mandatory minimum in our drug statutes, if you can turn off the so-called Affordable Care Act – why not election laws?”

Gowdy noted that a liberal law professor, Jonathan Turley, agrees.

WND reported Turley’s concerns earlier this month.

Turley has represented members of Congress in a lawsuit over the Libyan war, represented workers at the secret Area 51 military base and served as counsel on national security cases. He now says Obama is a danger to the U.S. Constitution.

He was addressing a House Judiciary Committee hearing Dec. 4. Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., asked him: “Professor Turley, the Constitution, the system of separated powers is not simply about stopping one branch of government from usurping another. It’s about protecting the liberty of Americans from the dangers of concentrated government power. How does the president’s unilateral modification of act[s] of Congress affect both the balance of power between the political branches and the liberty interests of the American people?”

Turley replied: “Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The danger is quite severe. The problem with what the president is doing is that he’s not simply posing a danger to the constitutional system. He’s becoming the very danger the Constitution was designed to avoid. That is the concentration of power.”

Turley explained that the “Newtonian orbit that the three branches exist in is a delicate one but it is designed to prevent this type of concentration.”

“There are two trends going on which should be of equal concern to all members of Congress,” he said. “One is that we have had the radical expansion of presidential powers under both President Bush and President Obama. We have what many once called an imperial presidency model of largely unchecked authority. And with that trend we also have the continued rise of this fourth branch. We have agencies that are quite large that issue regulations. The Supreme Court said recently that agencies could actually define their own or interpret their own jurisdiction.”

Turley was appointed in 1998 to the prestigious Shapiro Chair for Public Interest at Georgetown. He has handled a wide range of precedent-setting and headline-making cases, including the successful defense of Petty Officer Daniel King, who faced the death penalty for alleged spying for Russia.

Turley also has served as the legal expert in the review of polygamy laws in the British Columbia Supreme Court. He’s been a consultant on homeland security, and his articles appear regularly in national publications such as the New York Times and USA Today.

WND reported that it was at the same hearing that Michael Cannon, director of Health Policy Studies for the Cato Institute, said there is “one last thing to which the people can resort if the government does not respect the restraints that the Constitution places of the government.”

“Abraham Lincoln talked about our right to alter our government or our revolutionary right to overthrow it,” he said.

“That is certainly something that no one wants to contemplate. If the people come to believe that the government is no longer constrained by the laws, then they will conclude that neither are they.”

Cannon said it is “very dangerous” for the president to “wantonly ignore the laws, to try to impose obligations upon people that the legislature did not approve.”

Several members of Congress also contributed their opinions in an interview with talk-show host Sean Hannity.

See the Hannity segment: 

 Vallely explained that a “no confidence” vote now “would also tell the world that we recognize the mess this administration has wrought upon the world and we do not support his actions. Despite what supporters of Obama say about our standing in the world, the world is laughing at us. We are not pleased!”

Without that action, he writes, “Obama will just continue to subvert the Constitution he took an oath to faithfully protect.”

For those who still ! remain unconvinced, go back to sleep. Sweet dreams.


MOST western leaders tell tall tales for this and that reason (it goes without saying, the rest of the non-western aligned indubitably fare worse in the truth-meter department), thereby it is rare to find one who is actually telling the truth! Honestly.

But those of us who pay rapt attention and also “dig” on a regular basis, well, even kernels of truth can be seen for what they are. This is one of those times.

DO readers recall the many commentaries demonstrating how America stands on the precipice? Hope so. Indeed, back in Nov. 2012, the following alarm graced this site: the Radical/Islamist-in-Chief & his FORWARD march towards a green & red tyranny.

So as Obama Inc. goose steps towards tyranny, when is enough really enough before freedom/liberty is no longer an option?

Yet average folks prefer rational explanations for the above betrayals, and it is not enough to say: just because. Alas, a political DISSIDENTS LIST is confirmed via “DHS INSIDER”, detailing the TRUE intent of NSA’s spying.

Under this realm, patriotic marching orders for Americans necessitates an urgent action plan.

Hence, an ALERT is ringing forth: tyranny is nearly upon America, as Chinese troops (other foreign forces as well) are on U.S. soil training to stop dissent against Obama Inc. Said dictates are honed via Gestapo-like DHS tactics!

Now, does it make any more sense as to why the above has been front and center and harped on?

Former Top NSA Official: “We Are Now In A Police State”

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Bill Binney is the high-level NSA executive who created the agency’s mass surveillance program for digital information.  A 32-year NSA veteran widely regarded as a “legend” within the agency, Binney was the senior technical director within the agency and managed thousands of NSA employees.

Binney has been interviewed by virtually all of the mainstream media, including CBSABCCNNNew York TimesUSA TodayFox NewsPBS and many others.

Last year,Binney held his thumb and forefinger close together, and said:

We are, like, that far from a turnkey totalitarian state.

But today, Binney told Washington’s Blog that the U.S. has already become  a police state.

By way of background, the government is spying on virtually everything we do.

All of the information  gained by the NSA through spying is then shared with federal, state and local agencies, and they are using that information to prosecute petty crimes such as drugs and taxes. The agencies are instructed to intentionally “launder” the information gained through spying, i.e. to pretend that they got the information in a more legitimate way … and to hide that from defense attorneys and judges.

The NSA also ships Americans’ most confidential, sensitive information to foreign countries like Israel(and here), the UK and other countries … so they can “unmask” the information and give it back to the NSA … or use it for their own purposes.

Binney told us today:

The main use of the collection from these [NSA spying] programs [is] for law enforcement. [See below].

These slides give the policy of the DOJ/FBI/DEA etc. on how to use the NSA data. In fact, they instruct that none of the NSA data is referred to in courts – cause it has been acquired without a warrant.

So, they have to do a “Parallel Construction” and not tell the courts or prosecution or defense the original data used to arrest people. This I call: a “planned programmed perjury policy” directed by US law enforcement.

And, as the last line on one slide says, this also applies to “Foreign Counterparts.”

This is a total corruption of the justice system not only in our country but around the world. The source of the info is at the bottom of each slide. This is a totalitarian process – means we are now in a police state.

Here are the two slides which Binney pointed us to:

A slide from a presentation about a secretive information-sharing program run by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's Special Operations Division (SOD) is seen in this undated photo (Reuters / John Shiffman)

A slide from a presentation about a secretive information-sharing program run by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's Special Operations Division (SOD) is seen in this undated photo (Reuters / John Shiffman)

(Source: Reuters via RT)

We asked Binney a follow-up question:

You say “this also applies to ‘Foreign Counterparts.’”  Does that mean that foreign agencies can also “launder” the info gained from NSA spying?  Or that data gained through foreign agencies’ spying can be “laundered” and used by U.S. agencies?

Binney responded:

For countries like the five eyes (US, Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand) and probably some others it probably works both ways.  But for others that have relationships with FBI or DEA etc.,  they probably are given the data to used to arrest people but are not told the source or given copies of the data.

(See this for background on the five eyes. Past interviews of Binney by Washington’s Blog here, here, herehere, and hereFormer Top NSA Official: “We Are Now In A Police State” was originally published on Washington’s Blog)

But you know the dangers have reached critical mass when a (mostly) leftie channel starts to ponder: C-Span Question: Is The US A Police State? (Video)a sea change.

MOST intrinsically, under the guise of the “war on terror”, the “need” to spy on ALL Americans – even while excluding hotbeds of terror activity within Muslim American enclaves and institutions – through the underpinnings of the NSA’s domestic spy program becomes unmasked: NSA’s domestic spying procures all personal data, as banksters target dollar’s deconstruction; a global “order” rearranged. 

As a result, America is a police state-in-the-making through the muzzling of citizen journalists/bloggers and it is coming to the forefront. YES, the NSA is spying on American citizens, but what say you?

Consequently, America is NO longer a “tyranny-in-the-making”,THAT ship has sailed….and has led us here:

NDAA Martial Law’s Hidden Passage – The Day America Became A Police State (Video)

What more needs to be said, other than: the NSA should be within every American’s rear view mirror, especially as a N.Y. judge rules NSA phone surveillance legal !



Many around the world are still scratching their noggins trying to wrap their rational thought processes around Arab/Muslim mendacity (every time you turn around a new fable is concocted, even during the season of Christmas…alas, they NEVER take a breather), as PA leadership, once again, lay claim – and with fellow Arab/Muslim leaders in tow – that Jesus was born a “Palestinian”!  More astonishingly, how does one respond to their historical and biblical re-scripting/re-branding:


Besides, aren’t they being a tad piggish, isn’t the (historically reputed) pedophile Muhammad enough for them, even as they bow incessantly to Allah too? Que credo absurdum. 

In other words, no tall tale is too bold and outlandish to tell, as long as there are countless receptive ears willing to accept said anti-historical and anti-biblical nonsensical ravings. This is way beyond “regular” taqiyya. What’s a sane person to do, other than howl at the moon. Seriously.

But back to the target at hand; an avowed “Islamic supremacist of interest”, Adnan Oktar, aka Harun Yahya.

Many of this blog’s readership are amply familiar with a serious and ongoing investigation at this site, one which features a dangerous cult of Turkish Islamists. Intrinsically, they operate under the Mafioso-like protection of PM Erdogan and the Muslim Brotherhood. And no one should be foolish enough to opine: so what, how are the Brotherhood any different than dedicated members of other faiths? For heavens sake, even Egypt’s military rulers are calling an ace an ace, a spade a spade, officially declaring the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist group ! Not the kind of Brothers and Sisters you want to cross, if you can help it. Now, if only Obama Inc. would catch up to speed, but let’s not digress…

So for those who have yet to be “initiated” into the ways of Oktar’s cult, the following serves merely as a foretaste:

Which fundamental tools must westerners acclimate themselves to in order to differentiate between authentic seekers of peace and reconciliation, thus separating them from the likes of Islamic taqiyya-driven charlatans? Well, for the record, Adnan Oktar’s Islamic “peace” activists have been exposed herein, yet the hunt continues. So much work to be done. So little time. And while decidedly a Jewish and Israeli imperative, they are equally lethal to America and the west in toto. Wait and see.

So much so, the desecration of 9/11/01 through “stealth jihad”, ala mosques, is their signature “accomplishment”. Adnan Oktar’s Turkish-Islamic Union is part and parcel thereof, even as they find the time to penetrate into Jewish media (plus other power centers) and beyond Jewish borders. What’s their end game? Patience, dear readers.

To wit, this American-Israeli investigative journalist has a patriotic, Zionist obligation to engage in an ongoing investigation into the Muslim Brotherhood-backed Adnan Oktar’s (Sinem Tezyapar, et al.) Turkish-Islamic Union, thereby, exposing their overall penetration and tactics. The first question becomes: which Jewish entities (other religions as well) lend them cover, unwittingly or otherwise? 

The answers primarily can be found within the above linked commentaries, some of which are encapsulated within this commentary’s conclusion. But wait. There’s more building blocks to insert first, at least for those newly engaged with this topic.

Adnan Oktar is lord and master at Building Bridges, A9 TV (http://harunyahya.com/en/Building-Bridges/150414/building-bridges-program-with-wtpn), as he sits perched atop his media empire. Invariably, if one chooses to find out what’s what behind his piercing and sly persona – as his “sex kittens” demurely back him up – one must go straight to his domain.

As such, view the following (English subtitles are provided, and even some voice overs are in English too) video clips with the utmost seriousness, even if they appear at first blush surreal. Trust this grave assessment, it was conducted with the utmost due diligence.



Adding fuel to the wildfire, he equates himself with “Jesus”,  “Allah” and the “Moshiach”. What utter gall (as is said in Israel,  מה חוצפה מוחלטת) as he co-opts all 3 major religions and their belief systems. Now, if he didn’t have the power of the Brotherhood behind him, well, a psychiatric ward would be in his future plans, although he did spend some time as a resident therein. Proof of this crazy twist – to an already hair trigger situation – in a moment.



As a brief summary, Oktar has “predicted” – and from the Torah of all places, so now he claims to be a Torah scholar – that the “True Messiah” will originate from Istanbul and he is actually named as savior. Hmm.



As mentioned, he did spend time in a psychiatric ward but he hails that too as a sign of a glorious victory for Islam, thus, verifying his ascension to lead the world to “peace and salvation”. Again, many in his worldwide Brotherhood back his Turkish-Islamic Union – the end goal.



As to his obsession with Israel, aside from tic-like anti-semitic rantings (cited below), he warns Israel not to get in the way of the Brotherhood’s plans. He exhorts: “inshalla Israel must accept the Mahdi”. This site begs to differ!



And to make sure there is no misunderstanding of the Brotherhood’s intent, he further dictates to Israel: your nation will be “saved”, not through your army or atomic arsenal, but with the acceptance of the Islamic “Mahdi”. Oh, feeling so safe now.

For a double whammy, this recent quote should bring home why Oktar harps on Israel, desperate to usher it into the Islamic fold, either through syrupy words or (eventual) force:

Israel and Armenia are two key countries. Both of them are important parts of Islamic Unity, both of them are important beauties within that structure. Both Jews and Armenians will enjoy utmost freedom. We will all live in peace and beauty within the boundless Turkish Islamic Union together with the whole Islamic World. 
(A9 TV; December 12th, 2013)

Aside from headache inducing, why does any of this matter? As reiterated within various forums, most recently at a major interview (The Muslim Brotherhood’s Quest For Global Dominance – An Interview With Adina Kutnicki), the above is backed by deadly forces, yet too many prefer to play deaf, dumb and blind. Not a prudent move.

Consider the following threats from Oktar’s disciples (only a fraction are noted herein) as prima facie evidence, aside from everything else already established.

Wolff Bachner: While Adnan Oktar presents a charming public image, we understand that his representatives are not above making threats when their true agenda is exposed. Who has been threatened by Oktar or his followers and what did those threats entail? 

It seems that Oktar’s followers are not the only ones making threats and indulging in hateful rhetoric. There is also a great deal of material surfacing in which Adnan Oktar has been caught making some rather vile and strangely paranoid comments about Jews. What material have you uncovered that reveals Jew hate on the part of Adnan Oktar or gives insight into his paranoid, conspiratorial nature?

Adina Kutnicki: Let’s start with Aylin Kocaman, one of the buxom “Oktarettes”, and her CLEAR threat to Lisa Michelle; a Zionist activist, who happens to be an administrator at several well-trafficked Facebook sites. The aforementioned Aylin does more than just purr. The threatening message-rant was lobbed in a supposedly pro-Israel Facebook group. Sickening.

Word for word, Lisa Michelle was sent the following threat (now offline) from Aylin Kocaman, in a post dated 5/25/2013. But no matter, we screen captured it.

Aylin Kocaman voices her threats:

“Lisa, you are so naive my dear. You probably thought that our silence towards your insults will not be responded at all. You are wrong. We made a pretty good research about you and something about your personal life amazed us. I am sure it will amaze many people around you. Don’t worry I will share it in public soon just like you did the biggest lies about us. The difference is I will be announcing the facts about you while you are spreading lies about us. I want you to taste this. You might have underestimated us. Apparently if you did your research sufficient enough you would find out that we have great possibility and power to reach every information in the world. I think, you thought insulting Muslims would be easy. Maybe for you it is easy to insult Muslims in Afghanistan, since you think they are powerless, but we are powerful my dear. You made a grave mistake.”

Lisa Michelle responds:

“Are you threatening me, Aylin? I have nothing to hide, and I am not insulting Muslims. I’m raising awareness about the truth. Larry [an adminstrator at the Facebook site], do you see that I was just threatened?”

Pray tell, does Aylin sound like someone who yearns for “peace”? Of course not. In fact, the Islamic phrasing “I want you to taste this” is a veiled threat, bespeaking of more to come, and when least expected.

Still, not to get bogged down in too many specifics, I have also been the recipient of some not so friendly “messages”, from some who are hardly considered admirers. Oh well.

Adding to the threat level, the following venomous message was sent to a pro Israel activist, all for daring to counter the positions of Oktar and his “lovelies”. To wit, in Arabic, from the same producer at Building Bridges, then translated into English via a “helper”:

“قريب ستعلمون مدى ظلمكم وحقارت طباعكم تجاه اهل ارض فلسطين من المسلمين والنصارى يا يهود احذفو قناتي احذفو ردودي ولكن اعلموا ان اهل الارض اجتمعت على بغضكم وعرفوا انكم سفاكين لدم ارهابيين تقتلون النساء والاطفال العزل بالطائرات انتم تعلمون انكم ما انتم الا مجموعة سفله قتله مخربين اعداء للإنسانية ويلكم من الله ياويلكم من نار ستحرقكم في الآخرة”

And its translation is:

“the land of Palestine is to the Palestinians – you should be out of the land of Palestine – the land of Palestine is for Muslims and Christians – you are killing women and children – the Jews have no mercy – but in the future – we expel you from the land of Palestine, and this will happen soon”.

And this gem straight from Oktar’s lips:

At a Dubai interview in 2009, Oktar chillingly, vilely, unabashedly and unreservedly states in response to an interviewer’s question:

“You say that we will embrace the Jews. But look what Jews, Israelis are doing to Muslims. What do you say to that?”

Oktar replies:

“It is atheist Zionists who are doing this, in other words, vile fanatical killers. These have ceased to be human. They are psychopaths who have sold themselves to Satan, worship Satan and make Satan their god.”

How lovely. But there is more. Halil Arda, having tracked Adnan Oktar and his cult for years, further elucidates:

“On to this stage walked Oktar, clutching the first of his books, Judaism and Freemasons, a derivative retread of anti-Semitic clichés in the manner of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which identified Jews and the masons as the devious obstacles to the emergence of a new, powerful Turkish-Muslim nation. “The principal mission of Jews and Freemasons in Turkey,” Oktar wrote, “was to erode the spiritual, religious, and moral values of the Turkish people and make them like animals…”

And too manyJews, who are their first targets, are paradoxically giving Adnan Oktar’s cult media cover, regardless of all the proofs given, attesting to the dangers we are facing. Leftist Christians are equally on board.

Juxtapose the above against the tone deaf behavior of many associated within social and print media, as revealed at Inquisitr:

Woff Bachner: In addition to building his own media empire, Oktar has spent a great deal of energy and influence to manipulate the media in Israel and other Western nations. What is Oktar up to and how much damage has he already done to Israel’s fragile international image?

Who is helping him among the Israeli Jews and diaspora Jews and why are they helping him?

Adina Kutnicki: Perhaps you can you hear my guttural sigh from across the world, for this issue is such an explosive part of the entire subject matter. Its core. A personal, terrible sore point. Alas, this is an authentic Jewish (and western) tragedy. Tragically, too many fellow Jews, both in the diaspora and Israel, are completely enamored by sweet murmurings, even by those who seek to subdue (eventually murder) them, and this is directly related to being chronically besieged.

Specifically, within the U.S., aside for some prominent blog sites, the “go to” “kosher” media source is The Jewish Press. As a major Jewish paper for the Orthodox community for decades, it is also a font of information for Christian Zionists, as its pages are filled with reporting on Israel. Fine. Full disclosure: as a matter of record, I have several op-eds printed within their pages.

Though they are hardly the only guilty party (to gift their huge platform/megaphone, other Jewish papers – in print and online – are equally blind) it is particularly galling, as well as dangerous, that its Editors refuse to ensure that Adnan Oktar and his “kittens” become history. Even more so, especially in light of the amount of face time the J Press’s preferred Muslim “pet”, Sinem Tezyapar, has already accrued, their Editors are behaving akin to stubborn mules. Who is this creature? NOT who she claims to be. Wait and see…..

But don’t think, for a nanosecond, that I am alone, in calling to heel The Jewish Press. Even the inestimable Islamic scholar, Robert Spencer, joins in the fray. At his highly valued site, Jihad Watch, he said a mouthful through his indictment at “Jewish Press Publishes Muslim Writer’s Whitewash of Islamic Anti-semitism“.Unfathomable. Despicable. The Jewish Press.

The very fact that some leading Rabbis and public figures, both in Israel and the diaspora, have given their inexplicable “approval” for dialogue with a Muslim Brotherhood mouthpiece, is beyond troubling. It is heartburn-inducing and cringe-worthy. They are desperate for any “peace” lullabies sung their way. (un)Holy smokes.

In fact, one site worthy of specific mention and highlighting is Israeli Frontline, a well utilized Facebook page for Israel-focused postings. Sweet. Nevertheless, when the main administrator – the buck stops with her – was queried as to her tone deaf attitude towards Stealth Jihadists linking and commenting at her site, her standard mantra has been that other Israeli and Jewish sites also allow them to post. Where is she, in grade school, as she opines; others do it, so she can too! One can just imagine her stamping her feet and getting all red in the face. But, what if the owners of other pro-Israel sites collectively jump into a raging river, will she do so as well? Huh? In other words, even though the aforementioned threat appeared exclusively on her page – though now “scrubbed clean” – she still allows one of the related showgirls, Sinem Tezyapar, to advocate her “Stealth Jihad”.

Know this: the above Turkish vixen is all over the place, in print and online. Yes, she is. But few really know anything about her, other than her repeated, ad nauseam insistence on being a “Zionist-lover” and “true friend” towards the Jewish people. Have mercy. Nevertheless, some of us do our homework, whereas others don’t, and those who should execute their own professional due diligence, now require more than remedial education.

Still, Israeli Frontline remains non-chastened, yet stridently insists that Sinem Tezyapar has NO relationship with Adnan Oktar! Despite the damning proof found on Sinem’s own Facebook page, which reads more like an ode, a siren song, to her “dearest mentor,” Adnan Oktar.

And for those who are still “doubting Thomases” re the infiltration and penetration into Jewish circles, well, the following is much more than a red herring: Group Claiming to be Israel’s Sanhedrin Ready to Accept Islamic Mahdi !

Yet still, if most of the above appears to be remotely positioned from the reader’s personal radar, perhaps an additional audio from the “horse’s mouth” will hit home. Regardless, it is what it is and westerners can’t afford to feign otherwise. Oktar’s cult – and those backing him – is deadly serious. They have a worldwide swathe of dead bodies to prove their malicious intent. No matter.

Without further ado, listen up to “My Dearest Mentor” “Dear Leader” (as his Oktarette’s call him, Sinem Tezyapar is especially front and center) as he brazenly intones: America and Europe will soon recognize the system of the “Mahdi”! http://en.a9.com.tr/watch/167617/Excerpts-from-conversations/America-and-Europe-will-soon-recognize-the-system-of-the-Mahdi-%2802082013%29Chilling.

As is said, a pic is worth a thousand words, and this one comes from the cult’s FB cache – https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=576474055754507&set=a.208167722585144.48676.100001757539261&type=1&theater

In summation, the readers are astute enough to honestly assess the following: is Oktar’s cult deadly serious? and do the referenced Islamists have good reason to believe they are winning?

You decide.


A person who, with intent that any area be removed from the sovereignty of the state or placed under the sovereignty of a foreign state, commits an act calculated to bring this about, is liable to life imprisonment or the death penalty. – Section 97(b) of the current Penal Code in Israel – under “Treason.”

As to the illegality of releasing terrorists, the U.S. is in breach of the international legal aspect to the Palestinian demand for Israel to free terrorists, and to the US support for this demand. Binding UN Security Council resolution 1373 requires all states to “Deny safe haven to those who finance, plan, support, or commit terrorist acts, or provide safe havens.” In addition, Israel’s leadership are equally in violation of said international binding resolution by bowing to U.S. demands.

IN tandem with the above, there are a slew of laws within Israel’s Penal Code – primarily dealing with Jewish SOVEREIGN rights within Israel – which are violated with impunity by Israel’s leadership on a regular basis, yet propped up under political “necessity”, as if there is no other option but to chop apart the Jewish patrimony – or else. Really. This is the insidious cover under which the leadership hides behind, and opines that it just can’t be helped, as it is in the nation’s “interest” to do “this and that”. How ignorant of the laws of the land do they think its Jewish citizens are? As to the Arabs in Israel, they (mostly) support said lawlessness.

Regardless, there is no getting around this horrific fact. In effect, those who are entrusted to protect the rights/title inherent to the Jewish people’s eternal homeland, are its grossest violators. For even if the Jewish majority wanted to concede parts of Israel, they have NO mandate to do so. NONE at all. 

In this regard, let us hark back to yesteryear and take a trip down historical (legal too) memory lane, one which is fully supported within the following legal treatise authored by the (late) preeminent legal scholar, Howard Grief:The Legal Foundation And Borders Of Israel Under International Law: A Treatise on Jewish Sovereignty over the Land of Israel

“No Jew is at liberty to surrender the right of the Jewish Nation and the Land of Israel to exist.This right is reserved to the Jewish People throughout the generations. Our right to this land, in its entirety, is enduring and eternal and until the coming Redemption, we shall never yield this historic right.” -David Ben-Gurion, 20th Zionist Congress speech, Basel 1937

Believe it or not…

Israel’s Legal Right to Samaria is enshrined in International Law!

A cold, hard look at the law reveals an undeniable if inconvenient (for some) truth: Israel and the Jewish People have full sovereign rights to Judea and Samaria. A fair and objective analysis of the various post-WWI declarations, agreements, decisions and treaties regarding the Question of Palestine (not to be confused with today’s made-up “Palestine” that the “Palestinians” claim as theirs) can only lead to this conclusion.

The most significant of these decisions was the San Remo Resolution of 1920, which recognized the exclusive national Jewish rights to the Land of Israel under international law, on the strength of the historical connection of the Jewish people to the territory previously known as Palestine. The outcome of this declaration gave birth to the “Mandate for Palestine,” an historical League of Nations document that laid down the Jewish legal right to settle anywhere in western Palestine, between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. In fact, in San Remo, the nations of the world had formally obligated themselves not only to establish a Jewish state on the historic Jewish Homeland but also to facilitate its development as well (see Article 6 of the still-binding Mandate for Palestine). This plainly means that today’s Israeli settlements are in fact 100% legal and that the accusation of “occupation” is completely false. Back then, the concept of a “Palestinian People” was unheard of and “Palestine” referred only to a Levantine region and never to an Arab nation or state. Believe it or not.

From San Remo to Samaria: Following the WWI defeat of the Turkish Ottoman Empire, the League of Nations (precursor to the U.N.) decided to divide up the huge landmass of the vanquished Ottomans as follows: a mandate, or trusteeship, for France (Lebanon and Syria) and a mandate for Britain (Iraq and Palestine [comprised of what is today Israel, Gaza, Judea, Samaria and Jordan]). The legal position of the whole of Palestine was clearly defined in several international agreements*, the most important of which was the one adopted in April 1920 at the San Remo Conference, attended by the Principal Allied Powers (Council of Four). It decided to assign the Mandate for Palestine under the League of Nations to Britain. Two years later an agreed text was confirmed by the League and came into operation in September 1923. In Article 2 of that document, the League of Nations declared that

“The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and economic conditions as will secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble.”

The preamble clearly stated that

“recognition has hereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.”

It was on this basis that the British Mandate was established. The San Remo Agreement was the last legally binding international decision regarding the rights to what is today known as the West Bank, and thus, according to international law which is still binding to this day, these parts, Judea and Samaria, belong to Israel and the Jewish People, period.

The significance for Israel and the Jewish People of San Remo cannot be overestimated. None other than Chaim Weizman, the Zionist leader of that time, declared:

“The San Remo decision…is the most momentous political event in the whole history of our (Zionist) movement, and, it is perhaps, no exaggeration to say in the whole history of our people since the Exiles”

Moreover, similar evidence was brought forth in the following interview: The Inquisitr Interviews Adina Kutnicki: The Reality Of Life For An Israeli Patriot (May 2013) –

Wolff Bachner: In your own writing, you have been quite outspoken about the Israeli government’s abusive treatment of the Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria (Gaza and the West Bank). They were encouraged by Israel’s leaders to move into the territories after 1967 and build entire communities, but since 2005 they have been uprooted time and time again by the order of the Israeli government.

What is the legal status of Judea and Samaria ? Wasn’t the land promised to Israel in 1924 under the San Remo doctrine, which is considered irrevocable international law under the UN’s founding charter? Isn’t Judea and Samaria actually Jewish land and don’t Israelis have the right to settle in these areas?

Why are Israeli leaders treating their own citizens which such brutality and contempt, as we have seen over and over in the gruesome videos of Israeli soldiers and police viciously assaulting Jewish settlers and destroying their homes with tanks and bulldozers?

Adina Kutnicki: Wolff, you keep hitting them out of the ballpark. Herein lies another lightning rod question which requires much needed edification (and disinfectant) for the general public.

The legal status of Judea and Samaria is currently “disputed” territories, even after Israel recaptured its (San Remo codified) heartland from an annihilatory waged war in 1967. Besides, whatever happened to “the victor goes the spoils” ? Regardless,”occupied” territories has become the accepted lexicon and tragically Israel’s left keeps trotting out the “occupation”, as if it is a truth derived from Sinai. Adding to the crux of the matter, it is absolutely, irrefutably the legal case that San Remo bestowed Palestine to the Jewish people. San Remo bases itself on Article 22 of the League of Nations, as such, ” a sacred trust of civilization” was declared and this Mandate created a Jewish national home in Palestine (incidentally, Palestine is the pejorative name given to Judea by the Roman Emperor Hadrian, over 2,000 years ago, as a reminder of the Philistines, an ancient enemy of the Jewish people). Even more so, the following clause was significantly added: “Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.” The legal case is closed, or so it would seem. But when it comes to Jewish title to their historical, legal, biblical birthright, nothing is as it should be. Up is down and wrong is right. Is it any wonder that evil is now reconstituted as good? For a complete education on the subject I refer the readers to Howard Grief’s (an eminent international legal expert) tour de force ” The Legal Foundation and Borders of Israel Under International Law.” What a fountain of (legal) truth.

As to Israel’s leaders…where to begin? A good place to commence is through a basic understanding of Israel’s political system – an (un)holy mess. In this vein, I penned an op-ed at American Thinker (reprinted at The Jewish Press) entitled ” The Paradox of Israeli Politics: Vote Right, Get Left.” To be precise, due to this glaring paradox, whereby the majority public elects a generally right wing leadership, citizens find themselves governed from the left. The reasons are manifestly beyond the scope of this forum, but a simple google search will direct interested readers to the aforementioned article.

In any case, this dysfunction explains how PM Sharon (and others have followed suit) was able to defy the will of the majority electorate who carried him to victory. Hence, he ordered the unilateral “disengagement” from Gush Katif (aka Gaza) and the northern Shomron, as he directed Israel’s citizen soldiers to bulldoze thriving Jewish communities, all the while over 8,600 lawful, taxpaying citizens were expelled – almost as if by fiat – even defying a referendum in the process. Orwellian. If any other western leadership behaved in such a brutish, non-democratic manner towards its Jewish citizens, well, all hell would have broken loose. Not to be lost in the discussion, had PM Sharon executed the same wholesale destruction towards its Arab citizens, then let’s just say that hell on earth would be more than an apt description. And in memory of the 6th year of said expulsion, another op-ed (“The Bitter Fruits of Disengagement“, August 19, 2011) was penned. It was featured at the Jewish Press and several other media outlets.

The above political pitfalls covers the “how” part of the question, and the “why” segment falls under the general purview of appeasement syndromes, not unlike Stockholm Syndrome. But as related above, its genesis lies in the Oslo “peace” process, thus, the “Oslo Syndrome” is highly applicable.

Wolff Bachner: The Netanyahu government seems dedicated to persecuting Israeli Jews who are Nationalists and believe in a strong Israel. Zionist patriots are prosecuted for hate speech if they say a word that is critical of Palestinians or Israeli officials and Rabbis are arrested for quoting Torah. Jewish homes in Israel proper are being destroyed by the Israeli authorities while Arabs squat and build with impunity on Jewish owned land. Israeli NGO’s accept millions of dollars of foreign money from nations and organizations that are openly hostile to Israel and use the money to defame Israel in the eyes of the world and endanger the lives of Israelis.

No other nation on the planet would tolerate hostile foreign governments undermining their national sovereignty and allow their citizens to accept money from those governments to attack the policies of their own country. Has the government of Israel lost its mind and its Jewish soul?

Is it now a crime in Israel to stand up for your country in the face of endless Muslim / Arab aggression and demand the government stop compromising with people who want to commit genocide against the Jewish people?

Adina Kutnicki: The Netanyahu government is emblematic of the disparate treatment meted out towards nationalist Jews, in contrast to kid glove treatment reserved for leftists and Arabists. It is entirely befuddling to those who are convinced that Israel has a nationalist leadership. While there are nationalists within, the overall policy is far from “right wing”. The left has a stranglehold on the justice/court system (Tzipi Livni, the current AG, is an avowed leftist), and its state prosecutors are beyond the pale. They haven’t met a Jewish nationalist who is not “guilty” and in need of “re-education”. Again, much of this lies within the scope of Israel’s broken parliamentary system of governance, whereby MK’s are not held accountable, hence, the lack of responsibility to a particular constituency.

As a matter of record, on behalf of my work with HONENU Legal Defense Organization – an Israeli non-profit designated to defend Israeli soldiers and citizens, free of charge, from legal traps which ensnare “settlers” and those who support their efforts – a series of investigations ensued. A centerpiece expose’ detailed a stunning indictment of Israel’s General Security Service (GSS), and as a reference point, its equivalent arm in the U.S. is the FBI. Instead of utilizing its frontal assault against a dangerous Arab fifth column, both inside the “green line” and in Judea and Samaria, it expends huge resources to entrap “settlers’, in the expectation that they will give up their defense of the heartland and just go “home” within Israel proper. Good luck with that. “Administrative Detention Orders Against Jewish Nationalists” (October 2011) delineates said internal struggle. Aside from its posting at HONENU, it can be found at the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies/The Freeman Blog. It is not easily digestible, so I apologize in advance for any ensuing heartburn.

I will leave it up to the readers to make their own determination, as to whether the leadership has lost its mind, its Jewish soul or both. It’s not a hard calculus to discern.

But never mind, the leadership’s treachery is executed and conducted under the banner of “political maneuverings”, disguised as diplomatic imperatives, and “what we see from there, you don’t see from here”. Reprobates.

Aside from their oft repeated diplo speak and mumbo jumbo, multiple Israeli governments have egregiously vitiated Israel’s own laws, (with the “peace” process at the forefront, they also violate concrete laws when releasing terrorists, not only in contravention of Israel’s “Basic Laws”, but in the international legal arena too), making nonsense of any semblance of “rule of law”.

As a result, they continually exhibit grave (im)moral bankruptcy, and worse! So, even if they wake up one morning and collectively decide, that ceding the majority of the Jewish heartland is “mandatory” for “peace”, they are STILL not allowed to do so! Manna dropping from the sky couldn’t cover their behinds. End of story. Or so one would believe…

THEREFORE, pay rapt attention to the following column by Dr. Martin Sherman, a close associate; the most incisive strategic policy analyst – bar none – within Israel! Into the fray: Infuriating, insidious, immoral.

Then hop on over herein: Confronting Israel’s Precarious Future: An Interview With Dr. Martin Sherman: Part OneMind numbing.

In a nutshell, those who are bereft of any semblance of moral and ethical behavior think little of betraying their dead & living, therefore, JEWISH JUSTICE is always denied. Recoil, when thinking how easily legal (not to mention moral) dictates are thrown asunder! 

Tragically, aside from the insidious, immoral treachery emanating from Obama Inc., rest assured, Israel’s leaders bear just as close watching, as it is THEIR sworn obligation to protect Israel from said predators!

And if more evidence is required, it important to recognize that the release of CONVICTED Jew-killers is never sanctioned under Israeli law – for political considerations or otherwise – nor under International Law, so much so that the following would hardly come to pass without the leadership’s violations thereof: Terrorist hard core swapped for Gilead Shalit believed orchestrating current Palestinian attacks. So, as a result, any ensuing Jewish blood lands at the leadership’s door. They have become – unwittingly or not – accomplices. Years of terror releases surely tells the bloody tale. 

NO sense placing lipstick on whatever pig stinks up the truth. The results lead to the same foul and deadly ending.


Is anyone shocked to learn that the two largest and most powerful enforcement agencies in America, DHS and the AG office, operate as “legal” outlaws? In fact, so much so, that expecting them to obey the rule of law, one would still have to believe in the tooth fairy and whimsical fantasy tales. How many rational adults cling to said childhood dreams? Not too many.

In this regard, let us step back into one front of Obama Inc.’s lawlessness, and then segue into the latest revelation at hand.

And it is important to internalize that too many Americans have misplaced their faith into believing that the top law enforcement agency of the land, the AG’s fiefdom, has their backs. Nothing could be further from the truth. As a matter of record, AG Holder is running a renegade, lawless entity and his record is manifestly injudicious.

Where oh where to begin…perhaps at a most recent attempt to incite a race war, in tandem with the boss of bosses, his capo de tutti capi, Barack HUSSEIN Obama: indeed, on behalf of ‘Tray’ both continue to incite to race wars in America’s cities, courtesy of Obama Inc’s ‘shock troops’, as white teens are murdered in the crossfire. So will AG Holder investigate these crimes, given the part he plays? Don’t hold your breath.

Moving right along, we enter Holder’s DOJ and its renegade milieu, and as if on cue, bellies up to invoke Islamic “blasphemy” laws In the USA! Unfathomable, but no less true.

How impossible is it to realize that a radical, racialist, Islamist apologist DOJ imposes a mega mosque on a U.S. community, even though it was against the zoning laws to do so? Alerts are being issued, as the Radical-in-Chief tasks (il)legally-bent (AG) Holder to “criminalize” Islamic speech via thuggish UN dictates.

As a result, there is only so much patriots can tolerate, thus, a movement to IMPEACH AG Holder for crimes which surpass Articles of Impeachment is gaining steam. Yes, jail time is warranted.

In this regard, will Barack Hussein Obama’s lawless “justice” department finally ! fall?

Back to the 2nd lawless prong, the focal point of this commentary:

DHS’s (Black) employee, in charge of PROCURING weaponry, is reportedly inciting a race war! What’s going on that he is still on the job? 

Concomitantly, DHS INSIDER and its heretofore scandals are ripe to blow wide open, and NSA’s Snowden’s revelations provide an opening shot.

But let’s not forget about “FAST & FURIOUS”, an illegal weapons running scheme, accruing many dead bodies, involving AG Holder & seguing into DHS!   

The above raises increasing alarm bells re (previous DHS head)“Mama Janet’s” shopping sprees, accumulating billions in ammo & hardware alike! What’s their end goal?

Regardless, ‘Mama Janet’ resigned and landed a plum post as President of UC’s university system, yet DHS & their fixation on vets continues: a regime’s penchant for spying – “Putin-esque”.

So what are they up to now? And could it get any worse? Hang on tight…

Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.

The Washington Times

Thursday, December 19, 2013

  • **FILE** U.S. Border Patrol agent Jerry Conlin looks to the north on June 13, 2013, near where the border wall ends as is separates Tijuana, Mexico and San Diego. (Associated Press)
    A federal judge in Texas late last week accused the Obama administration of aiding drug cartels, saying that instead of enforcing immigration laws, agents knowingly helped smuggle an illegal immigrant girl into the U.S. to live with her mother, also an illegal immigrant, in Virginia.
In a 10-page order, Judge Andrew S. Hanen said the case was the fourth such case he’s seen over the last month, and in each instance Customs and Border Protection agents have helped to locate and deliver the children to their illegal immigrant parents.

The judge said in each case, the taxpayers footed the bill for flights — including flights to multiple locations in different parts of the U.S. that it took to find one of the children’s parents.

“The DHS is rewarding criminal conduct instead of enforcing the current laws. More troubling, the DHS is encouraging parents to seriously jeopardize the safety of their children,” the judge said, adding that some of the children have been made to swim the Rio Grande River or traverse remote areas as part of the smuggling.

In the case before the judge last week, a 10-year-old girl whose mother, Patricia Elizabeth Salmeron Santos, paid a smuggler to get the daughter from El Salvador across the border and to Virginia.

The agents apprehended the smuggler and the young girl, and prosecuted the smuggler, but delivered the daughter to Ms. Salmeron Santos in Virginia, even though agents were aware she was in the country illegally.

“The DHS, instead of enforcing our border security laws, actually assisted the criminal conspiracy in achieving its illegal goals,” the judge said. “It completed the mission of the conspiracy initiated by Salmeron Santos. In summary, instead of enforcing the laws of the United States, the government took direct steps to help the individuals who violated it. A private citizen would, and should, be prosecuted for this conduct.”

Judge Hanen said that Homeland Security officials regularly testify that the drug cartels control immigrant smuggling operations along the border, and he said the department’s actions in helping finish the smuggling actually end up benefitting the very cartels U.S. officials say they are trying to damage.

“The big economic losers in this scenario are the citizens of the United States who, by virtue of this DHS policy, are helping fund these evil ventures with their tax dollars,” the judge wrote.

Homeland Security officials told the court they won’t prosecute the illegal immigrant parents for their role in the smuggling, and Judge Hanen said it appeared to be a department-wide policy. Officials did say they are considering trying to deport Salmeron Santos, though it was unclear whether that had been done.

The cases highlight a growing problem along the border of what the government terms unaccompanied alien children, or UACs. Apprehensions of UACs jumped 81 percent from 2010 to 2012, suggesting more and more illegal immigrant parents are taking the risk of having their children leave home to join them in the U.S.

The young children present sympathetic cases, just as do those already in the country, known as Dreamers, after the Dream Act legislation.

President Obama last year announced a new policy to halt deportations of those young illegal immigrants, arguing they were brought to the U.S. by their parents with no say in the decision, and so should be allotted special treatment.

Immigrant-rights advocates now want the parents of the Dreamers to be spared deportation, arguing it is morally wrong to separate families.

But Judge Hanen said in the cases before him the illegal immigrants made that decision themselves, often years before. In the case of the 10-year-old, he said Ms. Salmeron Santos chose to come to the U.S. without her daughter years ago.

“She purposefully chose this course of action. Her decision to smuggle the child across the border, even if motivated by the best of motives, is not an excuse for the United States government to further a criminal conspiracy, and by doing so, encourage others to break the law and endanger additional children,” the judge wrote.

“To put this in another context, the DHS policy is as logical as taking illegal drugs or weapons that it has seized from smugglers and delivering them to the criminals who initially solicited their illegal importation/exportation. Legally, this situation is no different.”

In tandem, DHS & AG Holder (Obama Inc.’s double swords) are actively colluding with illegal aliens, with their blatant violations impinging upon law abiding citizens: a double crime; picking the public’s pocket and enriching/validating illegal aliens. Courtesy of the Thief-in-Chief

EVEN more so, the following tells another side of their lawbreaking tale: deportations under Obama plunged to just 1 percent last year ! More pointedly, America’s “law enforcers” gut the law, exhibiting the sham of immigration “reform.

ADDING to the indictments against them, what are the chances that “Mama Janet’s” DHS “lost” 226 illegals, Deemed National Security Threats Too? 

IN reality, without being able to shove major illegal immigration “reform” down America’s throat, the regime has found various circuitous, illegal routes to allow them to overrun America into a lawless nation. A regime gone wild.

Law and order…rule of law…dead and buried.


While only those in la la land believe that allies don’t spy on one another, the fact of the matter is that certain revelations reach higher levels of treachery than others.

Consider the unending case of Jonathan Pollard, as he rots in a U.S. jail for 29 plus years, all for the crime of spying for America’s BFF, Israel. Mind you, not one spy – ever in U.S. history for similar charges and much worse – has received such an unjust and harsh sentence. This is a fact and it is well delineated within SEC KERRY’S DUAL LOYALTY: his close Iranian familial connection renders a conflict of interest. ILLEGAL.

Detailed within the above commentary, Washington’s (via the Executive branch, CIA, State Dept and Pentagon) hypocrisy and anti-Israel animus is on full display and encapsulated herein:

And this brings us to Jonathan Pollard, the American Jewish naval intelligence analyst who is now serving the 29th year of his life sentence for transferring classified materials to Israel.

Snowden’s revelations and the story of the CIA’s anti-Israel front group in Washington make clear that US indignation over Israel’s fielding of an agent in Washington was equal parts self-righteousness and hypocrisy.

There was nothing extraordinary in Israel’s efforts to gain information that its American ally didn’t wish to share with it. Allies spy on each other. And they use sympathetic locals to achieve their ends. South Korean Americans have been caught spying for South Korea. Taiwanese Americans have been caught spying for Taiwan, and so on.

US prosecutors prosecuted, and US judges convicted these agents of friendly countries for their criminal activities. The average prison term meted out to such agents of friendly governments runs from four to seven years. Their average time served in prison is two to four years.

Pollard was different not because of what he did, nor even, necessarily because he transferred classified information to Israel rather than to Britain.

Pollard was unique because he was an American Jew transferring classified information to Israel. And the discriminatory treatment he has received from the US government owes entirely to the same institutional anti-Jewish bias that caused the CIA to form the first anti-Israel lobby in Washington, just three years after Israel gained independence.……

Ever since NSAgate revealed many of its skeletons, foreign friends came to realize that they were very much in the dark. And what they thought they knew, re the rules of the spy “game”, was something much more insidious. 

Snowden’s revelations paves the way towards what Obama Inc. is really afraid of. 

As to the ultimate hypocrisy, well, exposing a heretofore secret (Israeli) military site of a trusted ally to the entire world, and then spying on it to boot, oh my, that tells the treacherous tale.
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report December 23, 2013
Uncle Sam is listening

Uncle Sam is listening

Many Israelis were scandalized when documents released by Edward Snowden revealed that their best friend, America, had in 2009 targeted a former prime minister and defense minister for secret surveillance. But their political leaders were not surprised. For years, the United States has been running a complex eavesdropping and surveillance web to spy on friends and foes alike, including Israel. Satellites gather and transmit data to command centers, “informers” operate in the field and the most fertile sources of all are not human but the instruments which bug cell phones, tablets and social networks.

The US National Security Agency, NSA, exposed by its former agent the whistleblower Edward Snowden, can monitor these devices whenever it wants, just by beaming its instruments at a defined country, location, group of people or topics.
If, for instance, NSA electronically obtains a list of Israeli servicemen, their cell phone numbers and credit cards, its monitors can keep each one under constant surveillance.

The same applies to the personnel of Israel’s Air Force, Aerospace industry and other high-tech military manufacturers, such as Elbit and Rafael. Those lists may safely be assumed to be already in the agency’s hands.
To collect videos and images, American spy agencies only have to pan through such data gold mines as YouTube, Instagram, Tumblr and Pinterest, the last of which was recently crowned Content Curation. This is because Pinterest does much of the intelligence watchers’ work for them by assorting the material according to subject and field of interest and so unknowingly providing them with neat data packages.

The network catching on like wildfire of late is WhatsApp.

It is also a favorite of Israel’s elementary schoolchildren for swapping their thoughts and news.
A child may explain he or she can’t join the gang that afternoon because his or her father, an Air Force colonel or captain of a naval vessel, is just home from Crete or Sardinia. This will tell the eavesdropper that Israeli crews have been changed at those bases.

An Israeli officer driving his car only has to consult Waze for a short cut to his secret destination to reveal it to a clandestine watcher.

So who controls these armies of spies and directs their focus?

Those are murky waters which are virtually uncharted, as President Barack Obama implied obliquely in the comments he made at his end-of-year news conference Friday, Dec. 20. To still the uproar against indiscriminate spying on Americans, he promised a review and possibly reforms of the NSA, adding tellingly: “Just because we can do something doesn’t mean we necessarily should.”

Snowden’s revelations about the spies sitting on the phones of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Brazilian President Dilma Roussef have got Washington into hot water. They also revealed the negligence of their own security services.

However, Israel, to our certain knowledge, has lived with this unwanted American attention from its earliest days. In the 1980s, when the late Menahem Begin was prime minister, an odd-looking vehicle sprouting a forest of antennae stood permanently and quite visibly beneath his office window in Jerusalem.
His staff identified it quite frankly as a mobile American listening station. The measures used later were a lot more sophisticated. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Defense Minister Ehud Barak and other Israeli officials, in their turn, had their e-mails intercepted regularly.

But after 2009, Washington introduced a high-powered, multilayered system of intelligence-gathering – especially against Israel, about which neither Snowden nor the Israelis have been forthcoming. This system had a single narrow focus: to pick up the slightest murmur or clue suggesting that Israel was about to launch an attack on Iran’s nuclear sites, which it had threatened to do without prior notice to Washington.

Listening in on the laconic conversations Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu held with Ehud Barak was not enough. What the spies were told to look for was out-of-the-way conduct, such as an order placed suddenly for a large quantity of aircraft fuel, or the import of an unusual amount of emergency medical equipment.

At the high noon of this period of mistrust, US officers of the highest ranks began dropping in on Israel with increasingly frequency. Every week to ten days, some many-starred general or fast-talking Pentagon official arrived for a visit. They were told to ferret out any signs of Israel getting ready for an attack on Iran in time for Washington to step in and stop it.

These emissaries had two directives:

1. To maintain a tight grip on the prime minister, defense minister and chief of staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz and other IDF generals and keep them in sight at all times;

2. To pick up on their every nuance of speech or behavior for signals of hidden activity too subtle for monitoring devices to register.
The tempo of these visits tapered off when Washington concluded that Israel had given up on a military strike on Iran at that stage.

However, the spying did not.

DEBKAfile’s intelligence sources report that in recent months Israeli complained to the Obama administration about hotel suites which undercover agents had rented in Jerusalem at sites overlooking a secret military installation frequented by high Israeli officials for their most private consultations. The Netanyahu government asked Washington to stop this underhand surveillance. But meanwhile certain other – less friendly – Western spy agencies had caught on and took suites at the same location.
The conclusion from these incidents is that US clandestine surveillance of Israel is unlikely to stop in the foreseeable future – and not just against key figures and military personnel, but also involving economic and industrial espionage.

To combat the expanding exposure of its secrets, Israel has been introducing “sterile spaces” impenetrable to illicit penetration as well as using tricks to misdirect attention. However, the Americans and other interested parties keep on looking for holes in these barriers – and so the contest goes on.

As to NSAgate and whatever one thinks about Snowden’s actions, rest assured he shines a spotlight on the level of duplicity emanating out of the bowels of Washington.

NOT only in regard to foreign spying, but most pointedly in relation to Obama Inc’s violations of the Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, amply demonstrated through the purging: an omerta re Islam + terror within America’s power centers eviscerates NSA’s domestic spying

So there you have it. As Muslim Americans remain out of bounds…off limits…hands off…everything else is a GO.


Commentary found at – http://islamexposedonline.com/


Western audiences must internalize and FULLY understand the tactics utilized through Islamic warfare – by Sunni and Shia alike – as they seek to grab global domination. Today’s commentary, as a “green alert”, is neither scare-mongering nor pie-in-the-sky dreaming by avowed Islamists. FAR from it.

Their efforts engage many pressure points, but those which must remain our TOP priority revolve around a two-tiered jihadi prong: stealth on the one hand and frontal on the other. The underpinnings cited herein are all part and parcel of Shariah Law. Non-negotiable. Immutable. Set in Allah-stone.

The most insidious of all are those which fly “below the radar”, hence, the “stealth” appellation.  The Muslim Brotherhood developed a brilliant psychological tactic – one which is repeatedly referenced at this site.“Islamophobia” is a strategy used by Islamists and their propagandists, as western enablers act as shields for Islamic supremacists

The reason for the term’s coinage is its visceral imagery, as if to IMMEDIATELY tar those who DARE to question Islam’s underpinnings as“phobics”, demonstrating that they are the problem, not Islam.  As if they are “racists” of the highest magnitude and that is that. As if to scream there is no “there there”; that those who step out of line are doing so due to their own fevered imaginations, as such, they are the ones in need of “re-education” camps. Really. That’s their modus operandi.


The term “Islamophobia” was invented and promoted in the early 1990s by theInternational Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT’s ideology — now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them. 

This plan was an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood’s “General Strategic Goal for North America,” by which the organization aimed to wage “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.” To implement this plan, the Brotherhood enlisted the help of 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” (one of which was IIIT), whose task would be to depict themselves as civil-rights groups speaking out on behalf of a Muslim American population that was allegedly besieged by outsiders who harbored an illogical, unfounded fear of them — i.e., by a society replete with “Islamophobia.”

Although the term was coined in the early 1990s, “Islamophobia” did not become the focus of an active Brotherhood campaign until after 9/11. Since that time, Islamist lobby organizations (including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR) and Muslim civil-rights activists have regularly accused the American people, American institutions, law-enforcement authorities, and the U.S. government of harboring a deep and potentially violent prejudice against Muslims. The accusers charge that as a result of this “Islamophobia,” Muslims are disproportionately targeted by perpetrators of hate crimes and acts of discrimination.

But FBI data on hate crimes show that the foregoing accusers are wholly incorrect. The incidence of anti-Muslim abuses nationwide has actually declined since September 2001. 

And herein belies the crux of the danger, as Obama Inc., including front-line players like Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin work assiduously to impose restrictions on criticism of Islam, all the while stomping on America’s (the west’s) underpinning of free speech! YES, Hillary Clinton & her mobbed up Muslim Brotherhood terror associates: INEXORABLY tied. Politically AND business-wise. Treasonous.

Their targeted assaults incredibly bore into every powerful recess of American influence (and beyond), not even eschewing spiritual cornerstones as “no go” zones:“red/leftists” merge forces with “green/Islamists”, in a frontal attack against free speech and Rabbis (Priests too) used as baitHow dare they? Is nothing off limits? Is nothing holy, other than their jihad for Allah? In any case, for the visually inclined, this should bring the danger home – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YsdbhIbZoc.

But if the above isn’t enraging enough, understand that a HUGE and concerted effort is continually waged through a powerful Islamic entity at the UN, and Hill is front and center egging them on! Other American leaders (some in the open, some behind the scenes) are working for the same result – the castration of free speech!

Powerful Islamist Org. Ramps Up War on Free Speech in West

The primary objective of the OIC is to pressure Western countries into passing laws that would ban ‘negative stereotyping of Islam.’

December 12, 2013

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (left) participated in and supported the 'Istanbul Process.Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (left) participated in and supported the ‘Istanbul Process.”
  • The Organization of Islamic Cooperation, an influential bloc of 57 Muslim countries, has released the latest edition of its annual “Islamophobia” report.

The “Sixth OIC Observatory Report on Islamophobia: October 2012-September 2013” is a 94-page document purporting to “offer a comprehensive picture of Islamophobia, as it exists mainly in contemporary Western societies.”

The primary objective of the OIC—headquartered in Saudi Arabia and funded by dozens of Muslim countries that systematically persecute Christians and Jews—has long been to pressure Western countries into passing laws that would ban “negative stereotyping of Islam.”

In this context, the OIC’s annual Islamophobia report—an integral part of a sustained effort to prove the existence of a “culture of intolerance of Islam and Muslims” in the West—is in essence a lobbying tool to pressure Western governments to outlaw all forms of “Islamophobia,” a nebulous concept invented by the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1990s.

The OIC report comprises five main chapters and several annexes aimed at documenting “incidents of slandering and demeaning Muslims and their sacred symbols including attacks on mosques, verbal abuses and physical attacks against adherents of Islam, mainly due to their cultural traits.”

But the common thread that binds the entire document together is the OIC’s repeated insistence that the main culprit responsible for “the institutionalization of Islamophobia” in Western countries is freedom of speech, which the OIC claims has “contributed enormously to snowball Islamophobia and manipulate the mindset of ordinary Western people to develop a ‘phobia’ of Islam and Muslims.”

According to the OIC, freedom of expression is shielding “the perpetrators of Islamophobia, who seek to propagate irrational fear and intolerance of Islam, [who] have time and again aroused unwarranted tension, suspicion and unrest in societies by slandering the Islamic faith through gross distortions and misrepresentations and by encroaching on and denigrating the religious sentiments of Muslims.”

Chapter 1 of the report deals with “Islamophobia, Intolerance and Discrimination against Muslims,” and purports to reveal the “unabated rise of Islamophobia in Western countries, thereby exacerbating tensions at all levels and constituting additional obstacles to the diversity and multicultural fabrics of the societies.”

According to the OIC, freedom of speech is to blame for the “perpetuation of Islamophobia,” which:

“…has become increasingly widespread, which, in turn, has caused an increase in the actual number of hate crimes committed against Muslims. These crimes range from the usual verbal abuse and discrimination, particularly in the fields of education and employment, to other acts of violence and vandalism, including physical assaults, attacks on Islamic centers and the desecration of mosques and cemeteries.”

“In this context, acceptance of various forms of intolerance, including hate speech and the propagation of negative stereotypes against Islam and Muslims in some western countries contribute towards proliferation of intolerant societies. This process is further supported by… the exploitation of freedom of expression and perpetuation of an ideological context advocating an inescapable conflict of civilizations.”

Another factor favoring “the climate of intolerance” is:

“…the negative role played by major media outlets who not only propagate stereotypes and misperceptions about Islam, but also undermine and usually keep shadowed any meaningful instance of individuals or groups speaking out against intolerance, including advocacy of religious hatred and violence. This biased approach of the media has helped drawing an emphatically demonized, sometimes dehumanized, image of Muslims in the minds of a certain class of people which is predisposed to xenophobic feelings due to the increasingly dire economic situation, or the simply to the irrational fear of the other.”

Chapter 2 of the report deals with “Manifestations of Islamophobia in the West.” According to the OIC:

“The number of Islamophobic incidents continues to rise in the US, as a result of anti-Muslim propaganda. It is particularly alarming that anti-Muslim sentiments are taking deeper roots infiltrating further in the educational system. Notable among several other worrying trends/cases are: the initiatives taken by a leading and powerful US legislator [US Representative Peter King] to convene special Congressional Hearings on Radicalization of Islam in the US… In the same vein, the Republican Party in the recent 2013 [sic] US Presidential elections also used the anti-Islam card as a strategy.”

“With regard to Islamophobic trends in Europe, various reports and polls have revealed growing misperception vis-à-vis Islam and Muslims. Among the most common and recurring… are the ideas that Muslims are inclined to violence including revenge and retaliation; that Islam is an inherently expansionist religion, which strives for political influence, and whose followers are obsessed with proselytizing others, and more generally that Islam deprives women of their rights and encourages religious fanaticism and radicalism. According to the same polls, only a minor portion of the public tends to see Islam in a more positive light, as being a religion of peace that preaches love for neighbors, charity, openness and tolerance… Muslims who live in xenophobic environments are more exposed to daily stress and other forms of moral prejudice.”

The OIC concludes that “journalists and media organizations have a responsibility to avoid promoting rhetoric of hate by acting as a platform for its widespread dissemination.”

Chapter 3 of the OIC report highlights “Some Positive Developments” in terms of initiatives and other steps and positions taken to combat Islamophobia, including:

“…the condemnation of anti-Muslim hate speech by various quarters, including non-Muslim religious leaders; the barring from entry of certain Islamophobes to a number of countries where they intended to take part in anti-Muslim rallies or deliver inflammatory lectures; the recognition of Muslim holidays and other strict sanctions taken against acts of manifest religious intolerance. It was noted with satisfaction that a number of international organizations, including UNSECO, the OSCE and the Council of Europe, have recognized the danger posed by Islamophobia and have taken concrete steps to combat it, notably by laying down Guidelines for Educators on Countering Intolerance and Discrimination against Muslims.”

Chapter 4 of the report, “OIC Initiatives and Activities to Counter Islamophobia,” focused on the OIC’s ongoing efforts to promote the so-called Istanbul Process, an aggressive effort by Muslim countries to make it an international crime to criticize Islam. The explicit aim of the Istanbul Process is to enshrine in international law a global ban on all critical scrutiny of Islam and Islamic Sharia law.

In recent years, the OIC has been engaged in a determined diplomatic offensive to persuade Western democracies to implement United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) Resolution 16/18, which calls on all countries to combat “intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of… religion and belief.” (Analysis of the OIC’s war on free speech can be found here and here.)

Resolution 16/18, which was adopted at HRC headquarters in Geneva in March 2011 (with the support of the Obama Administration)—together with the OIC-sponsored Resolution 66/167, which was quietly approved by the 193-member UN General Assembly on December 19, 2011—is widely viewed as marking a significant step forward in OIC efforts to advance the international legal concept of defaming Islam.

Chapter 5 of the OIC report provides a set of conclusions and recommendations, which call on Western governments, international organizations and non-state actors to:

“Take all necessary measures within their power and legal/jurisdictional systems to ensure a safe environment free from Islamophobic harassment… by strictly enforcing applicable hate crime and discrimination laws;

“Create, whenever necessary, specialized bodies and initiatives in order to combat Islamophobia… based on internationally recognized human rights principles and standards;

“Combat Islamophobic hate crimes, which can be fuelled by Islamophobic hate speech in the media and on the Internet;

“Take all necessary measures to ensure that the media refrains from serving as a platform for the dissemination of hate speech… by associating extremism and terrorism to Islam and Muslims… and presents the true positive nature of Islam.

“Implement provisions of UNHRC Resolution 16/18 through the Istanbul Process mechanism as it offers a positive platform for debate, exchange of best practices and maintaining of a common and unified stance.”

The report states that “the OIC and the Member States should not be complacent in underscoring the fact that our present day world is gradually being driven towards the dangerous precipices of growing intolerance of religious and cultural diversity. This is the clear and present danger that the OIC has been consistent in warning the international community against. The sooner the phenomenon of Islamophobia is addressed, the better it is for ensuring peaceful coexistence of the present as well for the future generations to come.”

The report concludes with the transcript of a speech by OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, in which he thanks American and European political leaders for their help (here and here) in advancing his efforts to restrict free speech in the West.

“The Istanbul Process initiated with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton … must be carried forward … the Istanbul Process must also be seen as a poster child of OIC-US-EU cooperation …” Ihsanoglu said.

Most significantly, the so called “liberal” left set are in the forefront of censuring free speech, all in the name of protecting a made up out of whole cloth phobia! 

YES, even as the first Black (though a half breed) POTUS is the most powerful man in the west, they still would have us believe that conservative folks, aka“knuckledraggers”, and rational anti-Islamists are simply incapable of ferreting out this and that. Hence, strictures muzzling speech are for our own good. In fact, AG Holder already assembled said omerta: ALERT : Radical-in-Chief Obama tasks (il)legally-bent (AG) Holder to “criminalize” Islamic speech via thuggish UN dictates!

Never and never. They can all go to hell – and back.

Alas, as they hold aloft “civil rights” as the sine qua non for PC behavior, they behave like fascists and worse.

Now, few understand this subject like Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeldas they attempted to silence her hither and yon trough a tactic called “lawfare”, but they lost!

In her book, “Funding Evil”, Dr. Ehrenfeld alleged that Saudi billionaire Khalid bin Mahfouz had financed al Qaeda through his bank and charitable organization. Mahfouz denied the allegations. Dr. Ehrenfeld, a U.S. citizen based in New York, had not written or marketed her book internationally and refused to acknowledge the jurisdiction of the British court over her case. Her refusal resulted in the British Court awarding a default judgment against her.

Represented by her attorney, Daniel Kornstein,[5] Dr. Ehrenfeld pre-emptively countersued Mahfouz in New York to obtain a declaration that the judgment would not be enforced in the United States and that her book was not defamatory under United States defamation law. When the New York courts ruled that they lacked personal jurisdiction over Mahfouz, the New York State legislature took immediate action and unanimously passed the Libel Terrorism Protection Act[6] (also known as “Rachel’s Law”). Rachel’s Law was signed into law on April-29-2008. The law “offers New Yorkers greater protection against libel judgments in countries whose laws are inconsistent with the freedom of speech granted by the United States Constitution.”[7]

As of July 2010, six other states have passed analogs to Rachel’s Law: Illinois,[8] Florida,[9] California,[10] Tennessee,[11] Maryland,[12] and Utah.[13] A federal bill based on Rachel’s Law was passed unanimously out of the Judiciary Committee and has since then been approved by both Houses of Congress. President Obama signed the bill into law on 10 August 2010. The bill, S. 3518, the titled Securing and Protecting our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage Act (Speech Act),[14] includes several measures aimed at closing loopholes in First Amendment protections for free speech. The act bars enforcement of foreign libel judgments that do not meet with American constitutional standards of due process and First Amendment protections. The burden of proof is also placed on the party suing for enforcement. The party suing to prevent enforcement may also sue the libel plaintiff for a declaration that the foreign libel judgment is “repugnant” to American constitutional law, and is entitled to attorney’s fees for resultant legal proceedings. The new federal law, and the existing seven state laws that predate it, do not, however, protect American persons who exercise First Amendment freedoms but who then travel abroad and then become subject to physical application of foreign libel laws and judgments. Many countries, for example, Thailand, maintain laws that cite jurisdiction over speech exercised outside their countries and which mandate punishment for libel inside the foreign plaintiff’s country even though the speech may have occurred outside. Extraterritorial jurisdiction over First Amendment rights has not been the focus of attention in international legal jurisprudence or focus in the diplomatic community.

Dr. Ehrenfeld’s efforts at libel law reform in the United States inspired the Libel Reform Campaign[15] an NGO campaign with over 55,000 supporters. The British government has published a draft defamation bill, The Defamation Act [2013] which comes into action later this year. .[16]

BEATING back Islamic warfare, through the silencing of all dissent, is a major linchpin to beating back Shariah Law ! One and the same.

NOT on our watch…kadima…קדימה…as we continue to expose the facts at Islam Exposed Online.


Legal precepts, including their constraints and restraints, are often viewed as little more than non-discernible mumbo jumbo. Nevertheless, they are well documented within international and national systems of law and western leaders are NOT allowed to cherry pick when to abide by them, or to ignore their mandates with impunity to execute a more “valued” political outcome, come what may.

YES, one would think that legal dictates, whatever they may be, are binding upon all requisite players, unless legislated or adjudicated otherwise. Alas, this is the way a civilized system is predicated to operate. Then again, “democratic despotism” via a “soft tyranny” has become the (western) norm. Damn the law.

As to the referenced “mumbo jumbo”, there are few better equipped to extrapolate its underpinnings, other than Professor Louis Rene Beres. He is distinctly honored at this blog’s “About” tab.

My “go to” expert on all matters pertaining to international law, and a country’s right to anticipatory self defense – via preemptive strikes – is none other than Professor Louis Rene Beres of ‘Project Daniel.’ The working group’s original policy paper is found herein. He was Chair of the above strategic nuclear policy paper given to PM Ariel Sharon in 2003 – and subsequently briefed the report to President George W. Bush and to current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – in relation to Israel’s nuclear strategy in the face of Iran’s pursuit of WMD’s. He is a man of great integrity and humility.

Lou, a heartfelt thank you for being my mentor.

That being said, aside from his world class expertise in the nuclear warfare arena, he is equally an expert in the (i)legalities of Palestinian “statehood” for a sundry list of legal strictures, notwithstanding the PA’s irrefutable linkage with terror.

Tellingly, PA “statehood” & its violations of international law obligates U.S. leadership to adhere to legal constructs, as well as Israel’s “peace” obsessed too. Both reveal more of the same, indicting U.S. and Israeli counterparts (fueled by internal and external leftist players) for their parts in ignoring legal imperatives, thereby, precluding them from negotiating with those who engage in terror! Ringing any bells…as Abbas’s/Abu Mazen’s Palestinian Authority & its UNRELENTING anti-Jewish incitement more than legally binds leftist ‘peace’ fetishists, outside & inside Israel, from engaging in any “processes”, even as they thrust forward.

‘Little girls on PA TV:’

Jews are the “most evil among creations,
barbaric monkeys, wretched pigs,”
condemned to “humiliation and hardship”

by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik

Palestinian Authority TV continues to promote Islam-based hate speech and Antisemitism, voiced by little children. In this latest example, two sisters recited a poem that included the following demonization of Jews:

“You who murdered Allah’s pious prophets (i.e., Jews in Islamic tradition)
Oh, you who were brought up on spilling blood
You have been condemned to humiliation and hardship
Oh Sons of Zion, oh most evil among creations
Oh barbaric monkeys, wretched pigs.”

The poem also taught that Jerusalem is not for Jews, because Jerusalem “vomits” out the Jews who are said to be “filth” and “impure”:

“Jerusalem vomits from within it your impurity
Because Jerusalem, you impure ones, is pious, immaculate
And Jerusalem, you who are filth, is clean and pure.”

Click to view

NO serious leader can pretend that what is isn’t, even as they sit around the table pretending to be statesmen, “negotiating” this and that. The question remains: When UN thugs bestow “statehood” upon terrorists, how many violations are accrued via international law?

Once again, the floor, so to speak, is left to Professor Louis Rene Beres’s highly capable analysis.

BERES: Creeping toward Palestinian statehood

U.N. nonmember observer status was only the beginning – Washington Times

One year ago, on Nov. 29, 2012, the U.N. General Assembly voted to upgrade the Palestinian Authority (PA) to the status of a “nonmember observer state.” Although it is more or less widely thought that this organizational elevation was tantamount to a bestowal of formal legal personality, this is not the case. Jurisprudentially, at least, “Palestine” still remains outside the community of separately sovereign states.

This exclusion is evident “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Authoritative criteria of statehood making this point are already long-standing, explicit and readily available. More precisely, under pertinent international law, a state must always possess the following specific qualifications: a permanent population; a defined territory; a government; and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.

The formal existence of a state, moreover, is always independent of any recognition by other states. According to the 1934 Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (the Montevideo Convention): “Even before recognition, the state has the right to defend its integrity and independence, to provide for its conservation and prosperity, and consequently to organize itself as it sees fit .” It follows that even a Palestinian state that would fail to meet evident Montevideo expectations could simply declare otherwise, and then act persuasively “to defend its integrity and independence.” More than likely, any such “defense” would ultimately involve war or terrorism against “Occupied Palestine,” aka Israel.

Whenever the Palestinian Authority finally decides to declare statehood, thereby further enhancing its already upgraded status as a U.N. nonmember observer state, Montevideo standards and rights of statehood will be widely re-examined. Predictably, as Israel — challenging the adversarial declaration — will point correctly to relevant Oslo Agreement violations, the Palestinian Authority will counter-argue that its particular right to declare an independent state of Palestine is fundamental, or “peremptory.” It follows, the PA will subsequently add, that legal rights of statehood override any previously existing expectations of its peace accord with Israel.

In this connection, the Palestinian Authority will undoubtedly cite the plainly non treaty quality of the Oslo Agreements (per definitions of “treaty” at the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties), and certain allegedly basic and immutable human rights under international law that concern “self determination” and “national liberation.” For years, Israel has not troubled itself too intently with the juridical aspects of “Palestine.” Most Israelis, after all, were never entirely convinced that Palestinian statehood could ever become a genuinely critical issue. Now, of course, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seems to have conceded the eventual creation of Palestine, but only on the seemingly prudent condition of Palestinian “demilitarization.”

While this contingent condition may sound reassuring, it actually represents little more than a contrived and thoroughly impotent legal fiction.

No new state is ever under any obligation to remain “demilitarized,” whatever else it may have agreed to in its pre-state incarnation.

Over the years, a number of cases in U.S. federal courts have rejected the idea that the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), as “parent” of the Palestinian Authority, is in any way recognizable as the legitimate core of an independent Palestinian state. Earlier, perhaps, capable Israeli lawyers and policymakers might have been able to refer to such American case law in compelling support of an argument against Palestinian statehood, but not today. However grudgingly, after Oslo and so many years of incremental Israeli recognition of PLO-PA authority as legitimate, Israel will sometime have to accept Palestine as a co-equal “partner in peace.”

Legally, one must envy the Palestinians for the subtly nuanced dexterity with which they may have managed to outwit the Israelis. For years, legally at least, they have been very patient. Whatever other mistakes it has made in more narrowly tactical or strategic terms, the Palestinian leadership has nonetheless listened, learned, watched and persevered.

Now, even though they remain very far from satisfying the codified expectations of Montevideo, the overwhelming majority of U.N. member states are still all too willing to grant them full juridical parity with Israel.

Under the Montevideo Convention, all states are legally equal, enjoy the same rights, and have equal capacity in their exercise. The moment that the Palestinian Authority should proceed to declare a state of Palestine, the new country will become the effective juridical equal of Israel. When Israelis then begin to object strenuously to inevitable Palestinian claims for more territory — territory within “occupied Palestine” — the world will listen more than politely to the Palestinians. They will, after all, now be fully equal to Israelis under international law.

It is already too late to change all this. The concocted and perilous drift to legal symmetry between Israel and “Palestine” is the direct result of persistently concessionary policies mistakenly fashioned in Jerusalem, from Yitzak Rabin to Mr. Netanyahu. Israel can still learn some important and potentially remediating lessons from its myriad Oslo mistakes.

Above all, Jerusalem must argue vigorously against new European Union guidelines, insisting that Palestine’s borders never be based upon pre-1967 lines. In the words of an Israeli legal expert, Ambassador Alan Baker: “The legality of the presence of Israel’s communities in [Judea and Samaria] stems from the historic, indigenous and legal rights of the Jewish people to settle in the area, granted pursuant to valid and binding international legal instruments, recognized and accepted by the international community. These rights cannot be denied or placed in question.” Accordingly, Jerusalem should clearly affirm that Israeli settlement activity is recognizably consistent with international law.

For Israel to do otherwise on this contentious issue would represent a tangible and self-defeating violation of the law of nations.

At the end of the never ending “peace” process and death dance, few understand the synergistic threats involved, as does Prof Louis Rene Beres. In fact, the following analysis brings to bear the pressing and VERY GRAVE dangers of “Palestinian” statehood: Untangling synergies: Israel’s order of battle. A serious and predictable threat posed by Palestine would involve the new state’s virulent collaboration with Iran.

As the civilized world unravels due to Islamic terror one must demand that western leadership – most acutely America’s and Israel’s – seriously, urgently and diligently take the time to look back at constant error, thus, FINALLY internalizing the tangled narrative of Middle East “peace”. It is brilliantly expounded upon by Louis René Beres at  Israel’s Journal of Foreign Affairs. You think? 

Dead to rights!!

U.S. CONGRESSIONAL COMMUNISTS & The Ties That Bind: The RED Portion Of The RED/GREEN Alliance…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

It is impossible to overemphasize the multiplicity of reasons why this blog’s mission revolves around the pernicious and deadly effects of the “red/green alliance”, so much so that it is cited at the About tab within.

Sans a full understanding of the above nexus, it is akin to spitting in the wind and expecting to become well-informed in the process. It ain’t gonna happen. So, let’s backtrack to previous commentaries which connect the red” dots, but leave the “green” part  – at least for the moment – in abeyance.               

It is hardly happenstance that the Radical-in-Chief is OPENLY supported by communists and their assorted supporters domestically and abroad. Pray tell, why? Bingo.

Yet, for those who prefer visual aids, the following is a prudent point of inception: Obama’s (visual-inspired) communist roots are indeed front and center. Explicitly, the POTUS’s Hawaiian ‘roots’ (the red side to his green Wahabbi roots) are certainly irrelevant due to the exotic locale. That’s for sure.

And equally deadly are the ties that bind him to his “green” side, but this is not a reference to the environment! His inner roots, Obama’s Kenyan narrative, are more than instructive. Deadly. 

Thereby, placing one atop another accounts for more than an incendiary charge, and this lethal combination flows primarily from the Executive side. But even when one separates out the Executive branch from Congress – leaving Congress as a stand alone – well, the damage from the House of Reps is more than lethal to America’s well-being. Explosively so.


The book names names, details strategies to ‘transform’ U.S.



NEW YORK – New Zealander Trevor Loudon has just published an encyclopedic new 689-page volume, “The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress,” to accompany his 668-page 2011 book, “Barack Obama and the Enemies Within.”

In both volumes, Loudon has proved himself to be among the foremost experts in the world investigating and reporting the penetration of communists, socialists and the current group of “progressives” affiliated with Democratic Party politics who portray themselves as liberals.

In his 2011 book, Loudon presented documented evidence that Barack Obama’s rise in politics was not an accident, but a conscious, decade-long effort by the radical left to promote a candidate with African roots. Obama, he said, was packaged as an engaging and seemingly harmless Trojan Horse radical, sent to Chicago to refine his skills running for office as a Democratic Party politician.

It is impossible to read “Barack Obama and the Enemies Within” without being convinced that Obama’s education in communist ideology stretches from the extracurricular education he received from Communist Party mentor Frank Marshall Davis in Honolulu to his recruitment as a New Party candidate in Chicago, with strong ties to the Democratic Socialists of America.

Loudon continues naming names in his current volume, “The Enemies Within,” which documents how extensively communists, socialists and progressives have penetrated the U.S. Congress, running on the Democratic Party ticket.

The goal of these radicals in Congress, Loudon demonstrates, is the same goal Obama announced when running for president in 2008, to transform the United States from the constitutional republic established by its Founding Fathers into a radical socialist state. The aim is to be achieved through passing extensive social welfare legislation designed to bankrupt a government adhering to concepts of private property and private enterprise.

In an insightful essay on the Democratic Socialists of America, Loudon emphasizes the impact on U.S. radicals of the late Italian Communist Party theoretician Antonio Gramsci, whose writings from prison declared that the “working class revolution” is a dead end, arguing instead that communism can best be achieved “by infiltrating civil society – political parties, churches, labor unions, universities, the media, community groups, etc., to turn them into revolutionary vehicles.”

Similarly, Loudon documents how the Communist Party of the USA itself has adopted a stealth plan to achieve revolutionary goals by decisions made in the 1970s to infiltrate and manipulate the Democratic Party. The plan is to form alliances with the radical elements in organized labor in conjunction with radicals in the African-American community and the feminist movement to establish a progressive coalition on the left that could dominate the national political agenda for decades to come.

His essay on the Institute for Policy Studies provides extensive evidence that the IPS, operating today with the distinction of being oldest – founded in 1963 – and most influential of the far left “think tanks” in Washington, D.C., “works closely with several U.S. Marxist groups, but is particularly close to the Democratic Socialists of America.”

The congressional profiles of current members of Congress provides extensive evidence of radical leftist ties in the backgrounds of top Democratic Party legislators, including Democratic Party Sens. Barbara Boxer, Dick Durbin, Tom Harkin, Barbara Mikulski, Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey, Debbie Stabenow, Al Franken, Sherrod Brown, Ron Wyden, Jeff Merkley, Patty Murray and Tammy Baldwin.

In the House of Representatives, Loudon profiles the radical left background of Democratic Party Reps. Nancy Pelosi, Louis Gutierrez, John Conyers, Charles Rangel, Marcy Kaptur, Peter DeFazio, Sheila Jackson Lee, Jim McDermott and dozens more.

Loudon’s profiles of the radical lawmakers is extensively footnoted, complete with photos, news clips, website screen captures and quotations from published sources that leave no doubt as to the authenticity and accuracy of his allegations.

In documenting the success with which the radical left has captured the politically correct core of Democratic Party politics since the 1970s and the end of the Vietnam War, Loudon joins bestselling author Paul Kengor, who published in 2010 “Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Conservatives for a Century,” followed in 2012 by “The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor.”

What authors Loudon and Kengor show is that communism in America did not die with the fall of the Berlin Wall. It is alive and well, with ties that run deep today with Barack Obama in the White House and the radical leftist Democrats serving in the halls of Congress.

Loudon will be in Washington, D.C., at the National Press Club Aug. 20 to participate in the all day conference “The Crisis in American Journalism and the Conservative Response,” hosted by the public policy group America’s Survival Inc.

Joining Loudon, who is listed on the program to speak about his book “The Enemies Within,” will be Kengor, presenting his new book, “All the Dupes Fit to Print: Journalists Who Have Served as Tools of Communist Propaganda.”

INDEED, if not for radical revolutionaries (assorted Marxists, socialists, communists) within Obama Inc., as well as those deeply embedded inside Demster politics, there is little doubt that Obamacare would have been shoved down America’s throat, ala the art of propaganda and worse. How so? Count all the Alinskyite disciples, domestic terrorists to boot, plus George Soros – the devil incarnate – and his handiwork, and American citizens would not be losing their nation-state.

Significantly, OBAMACARE MARKETERS: ‘PERCEPTIONS MORE IMPORTANT THAN FACTS’ reveals shocking statements by the architects of health-care law’s imaging, demonstrating their plans – with malice and forethought – to dupe Americans into believing, yes, health care reform is for the general good and welfare of America’s citizens! Imagine that.

AE describes itself as a consulting firm that uses social-values surveys, cognitive linguistics and political psychology to help foundations and nonprofits develop breakthrough social change initiatives.

AE writes that since 2005, its research findings and strategic initiatives on health care, the economy and the environment have been used by multiple members of Congress.

In April 2005, current AE managing partners Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger started AE’s American branch.

Shellenberger previously worked for the anti-corporate, anti-globalization Global Exchange in San Francisco before starting a spin-off public relations firm in 1996, Communication Works.

By 2001, Shellenberger’s firm had grown and he merged it with Fenton Communications.

Fenton is the main marketing strategist for groups funded by the Soros-financed Tides Center. Fenton also crafted the public relations strategy of MoveOn.org, as well as a who’s who of far-left causes, organizations and activists, from Soros himself to Health Care for America Now to a number of anti-war groups.

In 2004, Shellenberger registered with the Department of Justice as a foreign agent.

His prime client was Venezuelan dictator Chavez. Shellenberger’s private consulting firm, Lumina Strategies LLC, got a six-month, $60,000 subcontract to help build up Chavez’s image, including by providing polling data.

IF foxes in the hen-house has any meaning, it comes full circle when understanding just how compromised the American people are due to many in Congress. For whatever fanciful reason, citizens tend to believe (and their reps are more than pleased to cement the narrative forward) that their representatives have their backs. That they are, at their core, patriots.

Dangerous nonsense. Wishful thinking. Fantasy land. Time to burst the bubble and pierce many of their veils!

Forward march…back to a Constitutional Republic!


A given investigation is only as good as its moving parts and how well they (eventually) fit together without nudging and prodding. Such is the case with one of the most pressing investigations of our times: the infiltration and global penetration of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia into America;its quest for dominanceMany are working towards ferreting out the facts at large, and a preponderance are coming to similar conclusions. Western shaking.

Specifically, charges against the Clinton’s and Hill’s “special” friend Huma are heating up, even though this site cited their nexus before most. The particulars are found within a most recent commentary: Hillary Clinton & her mobbed up Muslim Brotherhood terror associates are inexorably tied, politically and business-wise. Treasonous.

NOT only that, but Hill and Huma’s tie-ins to Benghazigate have been presented and explored at this site, and with requisite linkage to the Blind Sheikh’s contingent release from an American prison.  

Mind you, Benghazigate’s stonewall involves Egypt’s Brotherhood & its multiplicity of fingerprints; proxy jihadis; weapons running and the Blind Sheik’s release.

As a matter of record, this American-Israeli first reported on the Egyptian terror mastermind in a 2005 op-ed, the opening of jihad on U.S. soilBack then his centrality within the Muslim Brotherhood was more than appreciated in certain quarters, though many higher ups refused to listen. Just read the op-ed.

But fast forward to the present via Benghazigate’s trail of American death, and we land straight back at the Blind Sheikh’s cell. Full (jihadi) circle. How so? Alas, there are none so blind as those who refuse/fail to see!

Bill and Hillary Clinton Implicated further

by  on December 17, 2013
By Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack

The recent claims attributed to the wife of ousted Egyptian president Mohammed Mursi are shocking – very shocking. If they are true, they would be extremely damaging to the Obama administration generally but perhaps even more so, to Bill and Hillary Clinton. Naglaa Mahmoud is reported to have divulged some extremely specific details. While we wait to see the story develop, we thought we’d research secondary evidence in an attempt to discredit or bolster Mahmoud’s charges.Hillary and Mursi: Close friends since the 1980's?Hillary and Mursi: Close friends since the 1980′s?While mostly circumstantial, these claims, when examined in the context of multiple other facts, appear to add more credibility to the claims allegedly made by Mahmoud. It is for this reason that we have introduced the report below as Addendum P of our “Ironclad” Report.

Employing the Brotherhood

The employment of a prominent Muslim Brotherhood figure in Egypt, by the Clinton Foundation may help add to the veracity of shocking claims recently attributed to Naglaa Mahmoud, wife of ousted Egyptian president, Mohammed Mursi. Among other things Mahmoud reportedly said in an interview was that the Clintons “recruited” her and her husband in the 1980′s while the Egyptian couple resided in the U.S. and that the two families became close friends.

Let’s take a look at some demonstrable facts in light of these supposed claims. First, consider the potential fruits of such a relationship between the Clintons and the Mursi family.Earlier this year, it was reported that Gehad el-Haddad had been arrested by Egyptian security forces; el-Haddad also worked for the foundation of the 42nd U.S. President.Gehad El-Haddad: Al-Shater’s Chief of Staff and Clintons’ employee.Gehad el-Haddad was also the Chief of Staff to Khairat al-Shater, a top Muslim Brotherhood leader in Egypt who was the front-running Brotherhood candidate for President until Mursi took that mantle and ultimately won the presidency in 2012. El-Haddad’s father – Essam el-Haddad – was an aide to Mursi as his top foreign policy adviser according to Politisite.


We have presented overwhelming evidence that Egypt – under the control of the Muslim Brotherhood at the time – was involved in the attack in Benghazi on 9/11/12 that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Mahmoud’s claims may bolster the case even more.Ambassador Stevens: Security at SMC was “grossly” inadequate.Let’s bring forth two indisputable facts:

  1. Mohammed Mursi was passionate about wanting the release of Omar Abdel-Rahman (the Blind Sheikh). We presented this in EXHIBITS L and M of our “Ironclad” Report.
  2. The Special Mission Compound (SMC) was woefully and inexplicably insecure, just begging to be attacked. Even the Accountability Review Board (ARB) commissioned by Clinton found State Department leadership failures to be “systemic” and that security was “grossly” inadequate. This SMC came under the ultimate authority and responsibility of Hillary Clinton.

These two facts taken together instantly become more relevant in light of claims attributed to Mursi’s wife. If the Clintons and the Mursis are truly close, with Abedin having served as a Brotherhood operative inside the State Department, claims made by retired four-star Admiral James Lyons, that the attack was likely about a kidnapping operation gone wrong (to exchange Stevens for the Blind Sheikh) may take on added significance as well (EXHIBITS O and AD).

Mursi’s Wife: Provided Sisterhood resources to Hillary?

Another claim attributed to Mahmoud is that Hillary “seeks the assistance – both official and unofficial – of several members of the Muslim Sisterhood” to “help with problems in the Middle East” and that Mahmoud has “many wives of Brotherhood leaders” at her disposal to do just that. If Mursi wanted the Blind Sheikh released, it can be concluded that Mahmoud does as well; ditto Saleha Abedin and her daughter. The same can most assuredly be said for the el-Haddads and Mahmoud’s co-Sisterhood leaders.

The “grossly” inadequate security at the SMC would be like low-hanging fruit for Muslim Brotherhood terrorists to capture Stevens and demand the Blind Sheikh’s release in exchange for Stevens’ release.

When asked in a Congressional hearing about the possibility of the attack being about a kidnapping operation gone wrong, the reason given by ARB Chairman Thomas Pickering for why he dismissed the idea, didn’t comport with the facts. Pickering said he didn’t believe the attackers knew where Stevens was inside the SMC but multiple sources confirm that Stevens was specifically targeted by the attackers (see EXHIBIT AE).

Of course, when talking about the Benghazi attack, the attempt made by both Hillary and Mursi to point to the video as the cause, takes on added significance in light of Mahmoud’s purported claims. Hillary blamed the video as early as the night of the attacks (EXHIBIT F). Later, on 9/25/12, while speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), Mursi blamed the video for the attacks as well (EXHIBIT H).

Mursi: Blamed video for Benghazi while speaking at Clinton Global Initiative.

Mursi: Blamed video for Benghazi while speaking at Clinton Global Initiative.

This would mean that Hillary and Mursi were on the exact same page when it came to their expressed views for the attack on the SMC in Benghazi. Additional irony is provided by where Mursi was when he did so – CGI.

Again, the claims attributed to Mahmoud are bolstered by these facts.

Relationship with Clintons
How about the claim by Mahmoud that the Clintons ‘recruited’ her and her husband in the 1980′s? Here’s what is known. Mursi was in the U.S. from 1978 – 1985. He attended USC from ’78 – ’82 and then taught for three years at Cal State-Northridge in Los Angeles before returning to Egypt. The degree he earned from USC was in Materials Science, which appears to be a discipline of interest to Bill Clinton. In a 2008 interview Clinton gave to the AP, he said the following:

I also think colleges need to have more funding in basic funding and research and less politics, from stem cell research and human genome research to global warming research and research in materials science.

None other than Bill Clinton’s Foundation announced in November of 2007 that it would be partnering with Universities to deal with global warming from the perspective of Mursi’s area of expertise. Cal State-Northridge picked up the story at the time as well.

Via Elia Powers at Inside Higher Ed:

Its list of signatories continues to grow, and the American College and University Presidents Climate Commitment received a major boost Wednesday with the announcement of a partnership with the William J. Clinton Foundation to address global warming through building retrofits……To decrease energy consumption and work toward carbon neutrality, the commitment asks colleges to take several steps, which can include adopting green building standards and embracing energy-efficient appliances. That’s where the Clinton partnership comes in. The foundation is connecting colleges with companies that are offering to help them fund and complete building retrofits intended to decrease energy consumption and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

If Mahmoud’s claims of a relationship with the Clintons is correct, would it not have made sense for Bill to reach out to and consult with Mursi about this particular “Green Initiative”? To be sure, materials science would not be the sole aspect with regard to building retrofits but it would certainly be an aspect.

Mursi and Bill at CGI on 9/25/12: How well do these men know each other?

Mursi and Bill at CGI on 9/25/12: How well do these men know each other?

The Ph.D. Mursi earned from USC was in precisely this or a related discipline, according to the Daily Trojan. At Times Higher Education, just prior to Mursi taking office last year, David Matthews wrote:

When he submitted his PhD thesis on the “high-temperature electrical conductivity and defect structure of donor-doped [alpha]-Al2O3″ at the University of Southern California in 1982, it is doubtful that Mohamed Morsi thought he would one day become president of Egypt.

Aside from any expertise Mursi may have been able to provide to the Clinton Foundation with regard to his expertise in materials science, did a longtime relationship with the Clintons benefit Mursi’s campaign in any way? If the families were indeed close, there likely could have been some interest in seeing him win.

Consider this excerpt from an NBC News report shortly after he was elected:

Morsi has been described as the accidental candidate; in April, he replaced Khairat El-Shater, the Muslim Brotherhood’s more charismatic and effusive choice who was deemed ineligible to run.

Khairat Al-Shater was disqualified because he had been in prison too recently, convicted of crimes that included money laundering. Mursi was arrested and jailed in January of 2011, during the Arab Spring but was freed during a prison break.

After Al-Shater left the race, many believed that Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh would become the frontrunner but Mursi saw opportunity, claiming that the Muslim Brotherhood would not back Fotouh, who formally left the Brotherhood (wink, wink) in order to run for President, ostensibly because the Brotherhood announced that it would not put forth a presidential candidate. As chairman of the Freedom and Justice Party – the Brotherhood’s political arm – Mursi essentially torpedoed Fotouh’s chances by announcing that the Brotherhood would not endorse anyone for president who left the organization.

Uh, but the Brotherhood pledged not to put forth a candidate. No matter, Mursi ran anyway – and won on June 24, 2012.

Activities of Huma Abedin
It is noteworthy to keep in mind that questions about what Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin was doing during these months later became a source of controversy.In December of 2011, Abedin went on maternity leave. She returned in June of that year while simultaneously taking a job a Special Government Employee (SGE). In addition to her role their being quite ambiguous, questions about the legality of the arrangement caught the eye of Senator Charles Grassley, who sent Secretary of State John Kerry a letter demanding answers.

The letter sent in response by State Department legal counsel also included correspondence from Abedin herself. These letters raised more questions than they answered. Another interesting timeline aspect involved a letter sent by Rep. Michele Bachmann to the Inspector General at the State Department in June of 2012. In it, Bachmann expressed concerns over Abedin’s familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. It was during this same month that Abedin took her job as an SGE.

Let’s go back to transcript of the news report about Naglaa Mahmoud that appeared on Mehwar TV. While Mursi’s wife allegedly spilled a lot of beans, she went out of her way to say she would “not speak about Huma Abedin”. Remember, Mahmoud and Abedin’s mother – whom Abedin remains close to – have been very close colleagues as leaders in the Muslim Sisterhood.

In summation, the evidence already in existence, whether primary, secondary, or circumstantial only raises more questions when viewed in the context of the claims attributed to Naglaa Mahmoud.

Disgracefully, rumors abound regarding various Presidential libraries and their laundry list of nefarious contributors. But it goes without saying, the fact that terror-tied Brotherhood players are financially in bed with Clinton’s library, well, it all just comes into Brotherhood focus – the embedded infiltration and penetration of the Muslim Mafia.

Hill, Bill, Huma, Barack HUSSEIN Obama and assorted surrogates….jail should be the first remedy, but not the only one.

Where there is smoke there is always an underlying fire source. The American house is burning and many of its leaders are serving as primary incendiary agents!

U.S. ACADEMIA PLACES NAIL IN WESTERN CIVILIZATION: Deconstructing Gender To Finally Strip Judeo-Christian Teachings…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

NOBODY dare be fooled as to what is at stake, as the FINAL deconstruction of the American academy takes place. Its descent into civilization-toppling madness. Yup, this is no exaggeration.

From the get go, let’s be inordinately clear: radical, revolutionary fanatics ( wrapping themselves in “progressive” garb) are hell bent on destroying America, as such, it is the beginning and end of American exceptionalism, the epicenter of western freedoms.

Step by step, radical profs have infused America’s campuses with whatever components are necessary to bring about a revolutionary shift away from Judeo-Christian culture via divergent avenues. Consequentially, the “definition” of gender (as if it needs re-defining !) being either male and female no longer resonates. Twisted.

But no matter. This directional marker has been in their cross hairs for decades, but is now at the height of their deconstruction/transformation struggle. You got that? Their totalitarian mission cannot be completed without the destruction of the family unit, replacing it with whatever is required to meet their political end goals in its stead. As such, TRADITIONAL America gotta go.

IF this sounds familiar, it surely should, as its historical roots lie with Nazi Germany’s socialist regime; the morphing of socialism & Nazism, their hatred of Judeo-Christian ethics.

Thus, several decades ago socialists, Marxists and communists infiltrated every sphere of America’s public life, but the academy became “prime meat”.

Beginning in the 1950s, a more radical form of liberalism emerged in the academy that sowed the seeds for the sexual revolution and multiculturalism. Neo-progressivism mobilized the New Left of the 1960s, transformed American politics, and continues to dominate the cultural and political conversation today. It combines what neo-progressives call personal politics (the idea that American citizens have a right to all forms of self-expression) and cultural politics (the idea that cultural groups are entitled to special status) together as the twin pillars of a new identity politics. As a result, citizens today have more, not less, freedom from government in the realm of sexual expression, and the American electorate has been fractured into various groups.

In the past two decades, a new, more radical form of progressivism has taken over American social and political life, even finding its way into the White House. Fresh instances of this new progressivism appear every day. 

And does anyone wonder why their decades long efforts are coming to fruition under the Radical-in-Chief? Does knocking down DOMA resonate, as the Gay-in-Chief “exposed” himself once again; excited about knocking it down, and even found time to call newly “married” gay couple. Why?

Genderqueer’ rising: Colleges welcome kids who identify as neither male nor female

OAKLAND, Calif. — The weekly meetings of Mouthing Off!, a group for students at Mills College in Oakland, Calif., who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, always start the same way. Members take turns going around the room saying their names and the personal pronouns they want others to use when referring to them — she, he or something else.

It’s an exercise that might seem superfluous given that Mills, a small and leafy liberal arts school historically referred to as the Vassar of the West, only admits women as undergraduates. Yet increasingly, the “shes” and “hers” that dominate the introductions are keeping third-person company with “they,” ”ze” and other neutral alternatives meant to convey a more generous notion of gender.

SEE ALSO: Lesbian waitress may have forged anti-gay note: report

“Because I go to an all-women’s college, a lot of people are like, ‘If you don’t identify as a woman, how did you get in?’” said sophomore Skylar Crownover, 19, who is president of Mouthing Off! and prefers to be mentioned as a singular they, but also answers to he. “I just tell them the application asks you to mark your sex and I did. It didn’t ask me for my gender.”

On high school and college campuses and in certain political and social media circles, the growing visibility of a small, but semantically committed cadre of young people who, like Crownover, self-identify as “genderqueer” — neither male nor female but an androgynous hybrid or rejection of both — is challenging anew the limits of Western comprehension and the English language.

Though still in search of mainstream acceptance, students and staff members who describe themselves in terms such as agender, bigender, third gender or gender-fluid are requesting — and sometimes finding — linguistic recognition.

Inviting students to state their preferred gender pronouns, known as PGPs for short, and encouraging classmates to use unfamiliar ones such as “ze,”’sie,” ”e,” ”ou” and “ve” has become an accepted back-to-school practice for professors, dorm advisers, club sponsors, workshop leaders and health care providers at several schools.

The phenomenon gained notice in the San Francisco Bay area in early November after an 18-year-old student at a private high school in Berkeley suffered severe burns when a 16-year-old boy set fire to the student’s skirt while the two were riding a public bus. The parents of the injured student, Sascha Fleischman, said their son is biologically male but identifies as agender and favors they as a pronoun.

At the University of Vermont, students who elect to change their names and/or pronouns on class rosters now can choose from she, he and ze, as well as the option of being referred to by only their names. Hampshire College in Massachusetts advertises its inclusiveness by listing the gender pronouns of its tour guides on the school’s web site. And intake forms at the University of California, Berkeley’s student health center include spaces for male, female or other.

At Mills, the changes have included tweaking some long-standing traditions. New students are now called “first-years” instead of “freshwomen.” The student government also has edited the college’s historic chant — “Strong women! Proud women! All women! Mills women!” to “Strong, Proud, All, Mills!”

The nods to novel pronouns and nonconformity are an outgrowth of campaigns for gender-neutral bathrooms and housing that were aimed at making campuses more welcoming for transgender students moving from one side of the gender spectrum to the other. But as fewer young people choose to undergo sex reassignment surgery, such students are slowly being outnumbered by peers who refuse to be limited, said Genny Beemyn, director of the Stonewall Center at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

“Certainly we see students who are transitioning, particularly female to male, but the vast majority of students who identify under the trans umbrella identify in some way outside the binary, and that’s really causing a shift on college campuses,” said Beemyn, who studies gender identity in higher education and recently traded ze for they. “Having role models and examples allows people to say ‘Yes, what I am feeling is legitimate.’”

As neologisms like “ze” have moved beyond conversation and into students’ academic papers, some professors have expressed annoyance and uncertainty about how to respond, said Lucy Ferriss, writer-in-residence at Trinity College in Connecticut and a frequent contributor to the Chronicle of Higher Education’s language blog, Lingua Franca. .

“There is an initial discomfort. I think it’s probably hypocritical to pretend there isn’t, to say, ‘Ok, that’s what they want to do’ and leave it at that,” Ferriss said. “The people I know who teach will say ‘This is weird and it’s cumbersome and it’s not going to last because it’s not organic.’”

At the same time, Ferris thinks it’s a mistake for scholars and grammarians to dismiss the trend without considering whether English and society might be served by less-rigid ideas about gender.

“Mail carrier did not evolve organically and it’s a lot easier to say mailman. Decades ago there were poets who refused to be called poetesses,” she said. “Most language has evolved organically, but there have been times — and when it comes to issues of gender there probably have to be times — when there are people willing to push the envelope.”

Mel Goodwin, youth program director at the gay and lesbian community center in Las Vegas, said getting the hang of alternative pronouns can be tricky in conversation. Goodwin, 28, claimed they as a preferred pronoun four years ago and it took time “to unlearn what I had been taught about gender.”

Yet when people object to they as being grammatically incorrect, Goodwin counters that modern English is to blame and that scholars, writers and linguists have spent more than a century trying to come up with gender-neutral pronouns that stick. In public presentations, Goodwin also refers to a map that shows historic and contemporary cultures around the world that have recognized more than two genders.

“This is not about young people in the U.S. over the last 20 years kind of coming out of the woodwork and making up labels that aren’t real,” Goodwin said. “This is a real variation among humans, period.”

BOTTOM LINE: none of the above is about addressing the needs of some students who are indeed in much pain due to their sexual identity confusion. That being said, there are qualified medical professionals to deal with their angst, and this is definitely a painful road to travel. However, it is certainly NOT the purview of academia to behave as their mental health professionals, unless in crisis while on campus.

The fact of the matter is: to destroy America one must destroy its edifice, its Judeo-Christian foundation. Let no one opine otherwise.

To bring down the west one must first bring down America. Gender queer agenda fits to a tee. Simple, and evil, as that. 


DURING a “hot” war casualties are a given, however tragic. Oftentimes civilians accidentally get caught in the crossfire, yet when dealing with Arab/Muslim forces they eschew all “norms/rules of war”. They purposefully place their own in harms way and abuse them as “human shields” for cannon fodder. Media and political sympathy is their “tactic” of choice, as the dead bodies of their civilians pile up for effect. In fact, they target Jewish civilians for sport, not unlike ducks at a shooting range. We all know this by now.

Yes, soldiers are supposed to be the front line defense, as such the risks they take are understood and appreciated, at least they should be. However, when it comes to Israel’s leaders they have little sense of right and wrong, whether involving their citizen soldiers or civilians. JEWISH JUSTICE, if you will.

In relation to Lebanon, Israel and its northern neighbor are in a “cold state of war”, though UN resolution 1701, laid down in 2006, isn’t worth the paper it is written on. Israel’s leaders opine otherwise, but we know better. In fact, had Israel’s derelict leaders taken Lebanon’s act of war (in 2006) to its rightful conclusion, Hezbollah would NOT be in control of Lebanon, and with an arsenal tenfold more lethal than before the “cessation” of hostilities allowed them to regroup and rearm! 

As noted:

Resolution 1701 (2006) Adopted by the Security Council at its 5511th meeting, on 11 August 2006 The Security Council, Recalling all its previous resolutions on Lebanon, in particular resolutions 425 (1978), 426 (1978), 520 (1982), 1559 (2004), 1655 (2006) 1680 (2006) and 1697 (2006), as well as the statements of its President on the situation in Lebanon, in particular the statements of 18 June 2000 (S/PRST/2000/21), of 19 October 2004 (S/PRST/2004/36), of 4 May 2005 (S/PRST/2005/17), of 23 January 2006 (S/PRST/2006/3) and of 30 July 2006 (S/PRST/2006/35), Expressing its utmost concern at the continuing escalation of hostilities in Lebanon and in Israel since Hizbollah’s attack on Israel on 12 July 2006, which has already caused hundreds of deaths and injuries on both sides, extensive damage to civilian infrastructure and hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons, Emphasizing the need for an end of violence, but at the same time emphasizing the need to address urgently the causes that have given rise to the current crisis, including by the unconditional release of the abducted Israeli soldiers….

To wit, when a member of the Lebanese army ( Hezbollah actually controls the gov’t, but no matter…) murders an IDF soldier through sniper fire – and ongoing attempts to attack Israel continues unabated – all the while Navy Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen, 31 was well within Israeli territory, then all “accommodations” should be off. Plain and simple, picking off Israeli soldiers is an act of war, or so one would believe.

HOWEVER, spineless leaders ALWAYS revert true to form, leading to the path of least resistance, even as they feign braggadocio and full blown bluster…huffing and puffing to blow the (enemy’s) house down. Bull crap.

The above is not to suggest that full scale operations should ensue, but targeted operations are a must. At the very least, the political echelon has a duty, a moral obligation (to order its military) to exact JUSTICE for the blood of its fallen soldier(s). Not just for the family of the slain, but for the entire Jewish nation. Does honor bound even resonate among Israel’s leadership? Not at all.

DEBKAfile Special Report December 16, 2013
Israeli and Lebanese liaison officers met with UNIFIL Monday, Dec. 16, to clarify the circumstances in which a Lebanese soldier Sunday shot dead Navy Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen, 31, from Afula, while he was driving past the northern Israeli town of Rosh Hanikra.
At the end of the meeting, the Israel Defense Forces officers appeared ready to accept the Lebanese explanation that a member of its armed forces acted on his own initiative and “did not consult his station before carrying out the attack,” claiming it was a one-time incident. The soldier, they said, had been taken to the Defense Ministry offices in Beirut for interrogation.
DEBKAfile: The Lebanese account of the incident did not clear up the questions surrounding the attack, although Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon insisted earlier Monday that Israel would demand explanations of how it happened, whether it was a “rogue” attack and how the soldier was being disciplined. The minister wanted to hear what the Lebanese army was doing to prevent this sort of incident recurring.


Our military sources stress that Israel’s willingness to be fobbed off with lame Lebanese explanations is bound to have a negative effect on its posture of deterrence, broadcasting weakness in the face of its avowed enemies Iran, Hizballah, and Syria – especially since this was the second shooting attack from Lebanon in three days. Thursday, Dec. 12, cross-border gunfire at Israeli soldiers by another Lebanese soldier who apparently “forgot to consult” his superiors, was allowed to go without response, with the IDF spokesman speaking vaguely of “errant fire from Lebanese huntsmen” – although a fierce rainstorm was raging at the time.

Our sources report that the US, the UN and France, turned the heat on Jerusalem during the day to prevent the military encounter across the Israeli-Lebanese border from escalating into a major clash. Israel for its part was mum about the details of the event.

The IDF avoided disclosing why and who was responsible for the late Master Sgt Shlomi Cohen being ordered to turn around on his way home to Afula and take on an undisclosed mission along the Lebanese border, without being properly equipped. {Blogger’s Note: this is hardly the first time an IDF soldier died due to lack of proper equipment & backup!}

The first DEBKAfile report on the attack appeared Sunday.. The IDF confirmed Sunday night, Dec. 15 that an Israeli soldier, The soldier, Navy Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen, 31, from Afula, was killed in the Rosh Hanikra region opposite Ras Naqoura when a Lebanese soldier fired on his vehicle. The military spokesman earlier reported the Lebanese soldier had fired 6-10 rounds, after which Lebanese soldiers poured into the area. The spokesman said Israel takes a grave view of the incident and has summoned reinforcements to the border region.  “We are ready for any step and reserve the right to retaliate at the right place and time,” he said.

The Lebanese army announced that “contact was lost with a Lebanese soldier,” believed to be the sniper,without explaining whether the soldier was thought to have been captured by Israel or fled. Also claimed was that an IDF patrol had crossed into Lebanon and was fired on by Lebanese troops, after which Israel air force planes flew over southern Lebanon.

In another incident in the Sidon area further north, two Lebanese military positions or checkpoints were attacked. A Lebanese soldier and four attackers were killed. In one attack, a suicide bomber blew himself up. Both took place in the al-Awwali district of northern Sidon, at the same time as the flare-up on the Israeli border further south. Heavy Lebanese military movements were sighted after the attacks. The Jund Al-Sham and other Al Qaeda-linked organizations in the Palestinian refugee camp of Ain Hilwa outside Sidon went on a high state of preparedness.

The IDF is investigating to find out if the Lebanese soldier who attacked the Israeli patrol was connected with the Sidon assailants. DEBKAfile’s military and counterterrorism sources say that if the two events turn out to be connected, it would constitute a coordinated attack by the same terrorist group on the IDF across the Israeli border and the Lebanese army in southern Lebanon. Before midnight Sunday, the UNIFIL spokesman reported a serious incident in the Ras al-Naqoura and Serra sectors and called for restraint by Israeli and Lebanese commanders. He gave no details of the incident.

All day Monday, Washington leaned heavily on Israel’s government and military leaders to hold back from a military strike to punish the Lebanese hands behind the shooting dead of Navy Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen Sunday, Dec. 15. The Obama administration was anxious to avert a major flare-up that might jeopardize its plans for dealing with the Syrian war in cooperation with Tehran.


BOTTOM LINE: Fealty to normless democracy, in juxtaposition to normative democracy, stops Israel’s top echelon from reaching for the jugular and finally ! declaring VICTORY over Israel’s sworn enemies. The military has the skill and the firepower to end the madness, that’s not the issue. Instead, the political leadership eschews VICTORY and brings the Jewish nation/people (bowing) on its knees to Washington’s dictates. Acceding to the demands of others has taken precedence over executing JUSTICE, without which there is no moral authority to govern. 

החייל שנהרג – Below is Navy Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen, 31, murdered in cold blood. May his blood be avenged. May Israel’s leaders grow balls. May JEWISH JUSTICE prevail, proving that Jewish blood isn’t cheap! May his family be comforted by all those near and far! 
Photo: ‎החייל שנהרג‎