The Relationship Between Muhammad, Islam, And Barack Obama: Tri-Linkage To The G-d Of Israel. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 “You will surely find the most intense of the people in animosity toward the believers to be the Jews…” — Qur’an 5:82

WHENEVER intellectual heft is required at this site, a handful are considered “worthy” to do the heavy-lifting. This is no small feat, nor an exaggerated statement. Even more so, out of this select circle, the “few and far between” are considered experts in their niche field, but fewer are qualified, as such, in multiple spheres of scholarship.

AS always, the “gift that keeps giving” is Professor Paul Eidelberg. He is not only an esteemed political scientist, but a quintessential Renaissance Man. Not for nothing.

  Muhammad, Islam, and Barak Obama

 Prof. Paul Eidelberg


Mohammad is the role-model of Muslims, hence of Barak Obama, who proudly calls himself a Muslim. How curious, since Muhammad was a warlord, whereas Obama coos like a dove. Let’s probe a little deeper.

As everyone knows, Muhammad is introduced in the Qur’an as the prophet of Allah.  Since Allah is the God of all Muslims, Obama is not an “infidel,” like Benjamin Netanyahu. As a Muslim, Obama despises infidels as “dogs” and “pigs,” as does the Qur’an. Whatever one may say of Obama, his belief that Allah is God means he is not an atheist.

In, The Science of God, physicist Gerald Schroeder writes:  The god an atheist does not believe in is usually not the God of the Bible.” This may also be said of the god of a believer like Barack Obama, whose god, most emphatically, is not the God of the Bible. Indeed, it is the profoundest error to identify Allah with the God of the Bible, i.e., the Tetragrammaton, YHVHThe Zohar puts it, “the Name YHVH belongs only to Israel.

Perhaps this fact underlies Obama’s animosity toward Israel, whose name is derived from the God of the Bible. One may therefore say Obama is an enemy of the God of Israel. Indeed, this is precisely the deeper but seldom said meaning of “anti-Semitism,” of which scholars have written ad nauseam. While they classify Jews as “Semites,” the Bible calls Jews the “Chosen People” who cannot be included under any general category without obscuring their uniqueness. Let me explain in a somewhat novel way.

It’s common knowledge that the people of the Bible are forebears of the Jews of the Talmud. It’s also well known that the Talmud is unique, sui generis. The Talmud is pretty much the subject matter of Maimonides’ monumental Mishneh Torah, a 14-volume codification of Jewish law. The scope of knowledge embodied in the Talmud extends from hygiene to cosmology. It’s of encyclopedic dimensions.

Therefore, to call Jews “Semites” trivializes them. It also obscures what anti-Semitism really signifies, but is almost never even whispered, namely, a denial of ethical and intellectual monotheism. This is the big picture obscured by countess scholars that dabble in the Lilliputian concept of “anti-Semitism.”

It may somewhat clarify the subject by saying a word about Islam’s malediction “Death to Israel.”  This curse means the “death to the Jews.” But “death to the Jews” means death to the most persistent and more profound exponents of monotheism. But this touches only the surface of Islam’s malediction.

That malediction heralds the global ascendancy of Islam and a new and endless Dark Age. Islam would extinguish the light that would illuminate and liberate mankind by an unprecedented revolution approach as if on cat’s paws: the discovery of a convergence of the laws of nature, becoming more and more a matter of common knowledge to mankind, and what is hardly known at all to mankind, the laws of morality long known in the Torah of the Jews! It is no accident that Jews, as even gentiles admit, are the preceptors of the laws of morality, as well as the paragons of scientific knowledge.

This binary knowledge of the laws of nature and the laws of morality is an obvious derivative of Hebraic monotheism. We thus stand at the brink of a new and glorious age. As I show in my latest book Rescuing America from Nihilism: A Judeo-Scientific Approach, Jewish and even some gentile astrophysicists are studying knowledge  – not mysticism – codified in the alphanumeric language of the Torah,  which will eventually reveal the aforementioned convergence of the laws of nature and the laws of morality, which will actually enlarge human creativity and concept of man’s creation in the Image of God as mankind first learned upon reading the Creation Narrative in the Book of Genesis.

This “binary” knowledge will be accelerated by the further elucidations of the Big Bang theory, as manifested in the related observations of the space satellites launched by NASA and the European Space Agency, which are yielding more and more knowledge of the origin, history, and structure of the universe. But here a caveat is in order.

Given its correlation with the Bible of Israel, the emerging cosmological knowledge poses the greatest threat not only to the moral relativists and moral relativism that dominate higher education in the democratic world, but also to the moral absolutists and moral absolutism of Islam, hell-bent on Israel’s destruction via the unknown Muslim Barack Obama, an otherwise paltry individual.

Obama would need more than a teleprompter to respond to this remark of the renowned historian and philologist Ernest Renan (1823-1892):  “To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him.”

By definition, however, the “Empty Suit” in the White House, elected by the disemboweled, the moral relativists of academia and the media, is beyond redemption. Perhaps this is why the perceptive Lee Harris warns us of The Next American Civil War, a book whose subtitle is The Populist Revolt Against the Liberal Elite.



The perennial hatred of Jews is easy to understand: They are envied for their superior intellects. As the Jesuit-educated Dr. Thomas Cahill graciously and astutely admits in his 1998 book, The Gifts of the Jews:

We Gentiles can hardly get up in the morning or cross the street without being Jewish. We dream Jewish dreams and hope Jewish hopes. Most of our best words, in fact – new, adventure, surprise, unique individual, person, vocation; time, history, future; freedom, progress, spirit; faith, hope, justice – are the gifts of the Jews.*


*Thomas Cahill, The Gift, of the Jews (New York: Anchor Books, 1998), 241. In anticipation of writing The Gifts of the Jews, Dr. Cahill studied scripture at Union Theological Seminary in New York, and spent two years as a Visiting Scholar at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, where he studied Hebrew and the Hebrew Bible. He also reads French and Italian.

In 1999, he was awarded an honorary doctorate from Alfred University in New York. Cahill has taught at Queens College, Fordham University, and Seton Hall University, served as the North American education correspondent for the Times of London, and was for many years a regular contributor to the Los Angeles Times Book Review. Prior to retiring to write full time, he was the Director of Religious Publishing at Doubleday for six years.

School’s out.

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

The Mirage & Facade Of Israeli Democracy:”Elected Despotism” Tolerates/Encourages Militant Jihad. The Whys & Wherefores. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

BEFORE assorted enemies of Israel – the homeland of the Jewish people – pounce on this site’s assertion that the country is not a (normative) democracy, it must be clarified: When compared to its jungle-like neighbors, yes, Israel is indeed a democratic entity. Not only that, its top leaders bend over backwards to ensure that unbridled multiculturalism – an anything goes mentality akin to the “wild west” – is their calling card. Concomitantly and paradoxically, an increasingly hostile and dangerous Arab/Muslim minority holds the whip over the majority Jewish public as a result of said obsession. Leftists alike. Effectively, the leaders are hell bent on proving their liberal bonafides. Resultant, they continuously trample on the rights of the majority (secular and religious) Zionist public! Credo quia absurdum.

MORE specifically, countless conflate (and confuse) Israel’s liberalism – for granting unfettered civil and human rights to the gay community and its minority citizens – with the sine qua non of Israel’s democratic veneer. Mind you, as if THAT, in itself, qualifies for its hallowed mantle. Hogwash. In fact, while many (other than those who despise Israel just for surviving, regardless of all else) prefer to believe in this fairy tale, few dare ask the most salient question: Since the majority Zionist public ushered PM Netanyahu – a supposed “right-wing” leader, having won 3 elections since 1996 via said creds – into power, how can it be that this same majority’s wishes are ignored, time and again?

MOST tellingly, it is the right-wing public which stands behind a muscular response to domestic Arab/Muslim militant jihad, still yet, PM Netanyahu holds back from said tactics! In other words, as previously noted:

To pre-empt this escalation and freeze the current wave of attacks, Israel’s military and intelligence chiefs have put forward a 7-point plan of action:

  • A general lockdown on Palestinian-populated areas of Judea, Samaria and Hebron for an indefinite period.
  • This lockdown would extend to the Palestinian districts of East Jerusalem.
  • Its borderline would run roughly along the defense barrier. Electronic tracking devices would be installed in the gaps with security personnel deployed according to need.
  • The roadblocks thrown up on the side roads leading to Palestinian villages and towns along the main highways, like Route 60 in the Gush Etzion and Hebron districts, have proved ineffective. The Palestinians find ways of circumventing them.
  • Blowing up the homes of Palestinian terrorist killers has proved disappointing as an effective deterrent to the spreading violence.
  • Military and intelligence experts are of the opinion that the desired effect of a de-escalation will only be achieved by an ultimatum: Give up terrorism or be cut off from Israel, so losing your jobs and your major sources of income.
  • Reservists will need to be mobilized on a large scale for this plan’s implementation.

{The list of terror victims could fill a book, yes, they are the “sacrifices for peace” coined by Israel’s addled “elder statesman”, Shimon Peres.}

SO, what the hell is going on in Israel? Well, instead of taking concrete PROACTIVE measures, the so-called right-wing leadership are always REACTIVE, at least when it comes to the domestic fifth column. This investigative journalist defies anyone to prove otherwise. Perversely and non-democratically, the majority public (who elected him) is relegated to listening to macho posturing and ever more bold-faced lies from “Bibi and Co.”

In a speech at the site of last Friday’s shooting attack in Tel Aviv the prime minister did seem to adopt a hint of Liberman’s often-harsh rhetoric on Arab citizens of Israel, vowing to “dramatically increase” police enforcement in Arab towns and root out “pockets of lawlessness” in the Arab population.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks to press after lighting a candle outside a pub on Dizengoff Street in central Tel Aviv, January 02, 2016, a day after two people were killed in a shooting at the bar. (Miriam Alster/Flash90)

ASSUREDLY, almost always, the security services catch the terrorists AFTER the fact. However, dead is dead, and as far as anyone can tell they have yet to be resurrected. 

Amazing Israel's photo.


CONSEQUENTLY, the mirage and facade of Israeli democracy must be explained and placed in plain view. An effective starting point can be accessed here: The Paradox of Israeli Politics: Vote Right, Get Left.

COUPLED with said primary lesson into the dysfunctional morass which passes for Israel’s political system – akin to an insane asylum – it is imperative to hear from the master of this domain, Professor Paul Eidelberg.

The Brainwashed People of Israel

Prof. Paul Eidelberg

Various passages of Alexis de Tocqueville’s unfinished work The European Revolution, where he discusses France under Napoleon and Rome under Augustus Caesar, indicate that Israel, especially under the reign of Ariel Sharon and Benjamin Netanyahu, approximates a democratically elected despotism!

Since 30 and more parties compete in Israeli national elections, and since 8 parties win seats in the Knesset, Israel has never had a majority party at the helm of state!

As a consequence, and virtually unknown to Israeli political scientists, who may simply be steeped in the political complacency, no vivid normative public opinion really exists in this country. This means that the Government of Israel has no clear and coherent national purpose conceptually and existentially related to Israel’s Jewish heritage. Hence the Government stumbles along, pursuing improvised and placid, if not docile policies toward friends and foes.

Israel’s enemies are therefore free to pursue their designs against the Jewish state with hardly any concern about Israel’s reaction, since Israel’s timid government rarely takes the initiative in foreign affairs, leaving the public in a mental fog.

In other words, the Government of Israel has given our enemies a free ride. Israel’s Prime Minister hardly needs to worry about public opinion in this country. This was shockingly evident on June 14, 2009 when Mr. Netanyahu endorsed the creation of a Muslim Arab state on the land of Israel without a whisper of protest from the brainwashed sheeple of Israel.

This passivity, nay, servility, has been the modus operandi in Israel since 1993, when the Rabin Government recognized Yasser Arafat’s PLO. And this servility has been entrenched and unshakable since 1995, when Netanyahu became PM and passively adopted the inane and insane policy of “territory for peace” with the PLO, the murderous disciples of Muhammad.

The brainwashed sheeple of Israel, lacking a government with any clear and coherent national policy rooted in the Jewish heritage, and having no political analysts to warn them of the consequences of this ideological void, have become amenable to prime ministerial dictatorship. This became transparent on June 14, 2009 when PM Netanyahu, without Knesset or public debate, endorsed the creation of a Muslim state on the holy land of the Jewish people without a whisper of public protest from this brainwashed people, including its orthodox religious Jews!

In view of his endorsement of a Muslim-Arab state in the land of Israel without any discernible public protest from the brainwashed people of Israel, there is virtually nothing Netanyahu need fear doing for the sake of his peace process, including sharing sovereignty over Jerusalem with the Palestinian Authority!


LET there be no doubt, if requisite procedural (political) prescriptive measures aren’t taken, suffice to assert that more and more dead Jewish bodies will pile up. The onus – for time immemorial – will land at the feet of Israel’s so-called democratic leaders. Indeed, this mantle will be justly deserved!!

Burying another brave son of Israel who died to protect his people and his homeland.

{Burying another brave son of Israel who died to protect his people and his homeland!}

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

PATRIOTS, TIME TO DECLARE WAR ON ISLAM/SHARIAH LAW! How Much Time Is Left For The West? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


WHILE one can always agree to disagree on religion and its interpretation (and relevance), rest assured, there should be no disagreement as to the demonic nature of the underpinnings of Islam. Indeed, the world is awash with their bloodletting, and it has not abated for centuries. Therefore, how could its basis NOT be considered demonic? So, whereas current day jihadi barbarians are acting in accordance with Islam’s relationship to blood, it is precisely why their butchering NEVER ceases, even if it appears (emphasis placed) to take “pauses” from time to time. Thus, killing in the name of pagan moon-god Allah is as relevant today as it was centuries ago.

STILL yet, for an overall encapsulation as to what’s what in America’s future, imbibe the following: “Israel On Fire, Arab Israelis (“Palestinians”) Continuously Wage Militant Jihad Against Jews. What’s To Be Done?”

EVEN so, as an American-Israeli – per the documented record – these eyes are (primarily) peeled towards the barbarism aimed at America and Israel. Along said bloody trajectory, as stated, yesterday’s militant jihad in Jerusalem is more than emblematic of the wreckage from “the demonic nature of the underpinnings of Islam.”

GUARANTEED, America (Europe alike) will suffer the same fate of DAILY (as opposed to sporadic) terror, if not stopped dead in their tracks.

Twelve people, including baby, injured in vehicular attack in Jerusalem

DEBKAfile Intelligence December 14, 2015


At least 12 people were injured when a Palestinian terrorist driving a vehicle ran down a group of people at a bus stop at the entrance to Jerusalem on Monday afternoon. One of the victims was seriously injured, while six others, including an 18-month-old baby, suffered moderate injuries and the rest sustained minor injuries. The terrorist, a resident of Beit Hanina, was shot and killed by a citizen at the bus stop on Herzl Street near the Chords Bridge. An axe was found in the terrorist’s car.

AFTER absorbing the latest (daily) militant jihad waged inside Israel by the nation’s INTERNAL fifth column, Americans must come to grips that their ownMuslim-American fifth columns are gearing up. Indeed, they are. This includes those who are ACTIVELY preparing to engage in frontal jihad, in tandem with fellow Islamists who operate “behind the scenes” as support networks. Another reference point can be found within “American Patriots, Stand Ready For Frontal Jihad In Your Streets! An Israeli Zionist’s Struggle: Lessons Learned.” 

LEARN said lessons well!

IN this regard, few and far between are as capable as Professor Paul Eidelberg (also an American-Israeli) to forewarn of the imminent dangers facing America and Israel. Similarly, by extrapolation, to the west at large. Mind you, as a pre-eminent political scientist, a scholar of Islam and the Middle East, coupled with his former background as an officer in the U.S. Air Force, well….

ALAS, presenting, Prof. Paul Eidelberg’s (most recent) alarm bell via his acute reasoning behind the American (patriotic) imperative to ARREST OBAMA FOR TREASON – FORTHWITH! It serves as an introductory basis to a well-known Spanish journalist’s incisive insights (following the Prof.’s intro) which were penned in Jan. 2008. 

Leaving aside the appalling ignorance he often displays, how should we understand the various acts of omission and commission of this still unknown President? Do they manifest a conscious or semiconscious desire to undermine the Judeo-Christian foundations of Western Civilization which he hates judging from his return a bust of Churchill to London?

Whatever Obama’s designs, there remains the awful fact that Obama is disemboweling America, and as America goes, so goes Europe.

Europe is evaporating before our eyes. Multiculturalism and the influx of a prolific Muslim population, both to Obama’s liking, have emasculated Christianity.

Meanwhile, given Obama’s policy of indiscriminate immigration, America is succumbing to national disunity and middle class discontent, This could lead to the civil war predicted by the astute Lee Harris, author of Civilization and Its Enemies.

It’s time to declare war on Islam. Start with the destruction of Iran’s command and control centers, and proceed to “quarantine” Mecca and Medina.

But first: incarcerate Obama for Treason!

If we are witnessing, as learned commentators have said, the end of Western Civilization of which Europe was the home and which is now being overrun by Muslim migrants, ponder these haunting words of the Spanish journalist Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez

“I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth –Europe died in Auschwitz.”

We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20 million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture, thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen people, truly chosen, because they produced great and wonderful people who changed the world.

The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of life: science, art international trade, and above all, as the conscience of the world. These are the people we burned.

And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance, religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and poverty due to an unwillingness to work and support their families with pride. They have turned our beautiful Spanish cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime.

Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the government, they plan the murder and destruction of their naive hosts.

And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for backwardness and superstition.

We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of Europe and their talent for hoping for a better future for their children, their determined clinging to life because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for people consumed by the desire for death for themselves and others, for our children and theirs.

What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.

*This is a translation of an article from a Spanish newspaper.

BEAR in mind that leftists, in service of Mohammedans, have attempted to smear the aforementioned Spanish journalist all over the web, but some of us know what’s what. So, the well-formed advice from these pages is: Ignore their attempts to smack him down! 

INHERENTLY, per the most salient question of all: How much time is left for the west? Well, it depends on American patriots. For if they are inclined to accept the same fate as Europeans, they will have little problem “adjusting.” And as prostrated as France, Belgium, the UK, Sweden, and the rest already are,consider the following as prima facie proof to the charge: Europe IS dead and buried. Stick a fork in it.


A German court has refused to press criminal charges against a squad of “Sharia Police,” who “patrolled” the streets of  Wuppertal in self-styled “uniforms.” The group alarmed locals last year by preaching radical Salafist Muslim morals outside of casinos and bars.

5668beebc36188eb7a8b4609The young men from Salafist movement, an ultra-conservative reform movement within Sunni Islam, caught the attention of authorities in North Rhine-Westphalia’s city as they were preaching in public places calling on people to refrain from bad habits.

The group was seen in the city’s nightlife area in September last year while trying to urge people to stop using alcohol, drugs, gambling, pornography and other activities. They also reportedly distributed leaflets with the same guidelines. Their actions cause a wide public outcry from both the local residents and the politicians who rejected the use of Sharia law in Germany.

“We will not tolerate an illegal parallel justice,” warned Justice Minister Heiko Maas at the time. “Sharia law is not tolerated on German soil,” Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere echoed the message. While Bavaria’s interior minister Joachim Herrmann described ‘Sharia police’ actions as a “direct attack by the Salafists on our rule of law.”

In early August this year, the Wuppertal Public Prosecutor had filed a case against nine Salafists, aged 24-35 for violating the ban on uniforms.

Prosecution argued that wearing ‘Sharia Police’ insignia on the safety vests was a criminal offense, and argued that uniformity of dress code of the Muslim activists equated to wearing uniforms. Wednesday court ruling however said that only symbols of organized violence or insignia of known militant groups are prohibited.

In early August this year, the Wuppertal Public Prosecutor had filed a case against nine Salafists, aged 24-35 for violating the ban on uniforms. Prosecution argued that wearing ‘Sharia Police’ insignia on the safety vests was a criminal offense, and argued that uniformity of dress code of the Muslim activists equated to wearing uniforms.

MOST significantly and ominously, this site has repeatedly warned aboutShariah Law, the underpinnings of Islam, as the weapon yielded to wield the forceps to FINALLY bury the west. In fact, the clearest alarm sounded in May 2014 within“Shariah Law Must Be Eliminated To Save America And The West: its Cancerous Scourge.” Devour it.

TO wit, the concomitant, overlapping, and overarching questions become: Since Islam is underpinned by Shariah law; and Shariah law finance funds global terror; what precisely must be done to save the west? Cut off its oxygen…the head of the snake!

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

Islamic & Leftist Jew Hatred: The Nexus. Twin Western Poisons Elucidated. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


AS the Jewish New Year – Rosh Hashana – ראש השנה – fast approaches (its corresponding Hebrew Year is 5776), it is more than efficacious for some truth-telling.

SANS a scintilla of a doubt, without internalizing the lessons learned – the linkages – between the symbiotic hatred Islamists and leftists hold towards Jews, Jewish nationalists (western patriots at large) will be grasping at straws, as they attempt to draw salient conclusions (and connections) between the rabid chaos engulfing the world. Wow, that’s a mouthful, albeit mandatory.

AND while many readers are (rightfully) not too thrilled about academic renderings, the fact remains that without the likes of Professor Paul Eidelberg, well, the dangers will remain unexplained. “Mysteries.” Thankfully, this site is blessed with the “helping hands” of some very astute critical thinkers, and there is immense gratitude for their ever-ready assistance.

BE that as it may, specifically, Americans may pooh-pooh the above: What does anti-semitism/anti-Israel campaigns have to do with multi-pronged problems plaguing the U.S., and why should they care?

A new report details the cropping up of anti-Israel advertisements across the United States over the past few years.

The report — “Misleading the Public: the Spread of Anti-Israel Ad Campaigns” — was released on Friday by the U.S.-based non-governmental international Jewish civil-rights organization the Anti-Defamation League (ADL). It highlights the use of public spaces on the part of organizations aiming to promote anti-Israel sentiment. These spaces include billboards, buses and trains…..continue here….

INHERENTLY, these same Jew-haters are seeking the demise of America as a nation-state. Yes, its fall as the super-power. It is what it is. But never mind, the following will shed much needed light, as to where the nexus lies between leftists and Muslims:

Why Muslims and Leftists Hate Jews

Prof. Paul Eidelberg

Ever hear of Zeev Breir’s book Even in the Darkest Moments (2002)?   The book is about the Chevra Hatzalah Ambulance Service, a Jewish organization that was quite active during the darkest moments of 9/11, when Islamic suicide bombers destroyed the Twin Towers. I am going to quote and paraphrase a few passages from this book to reveal why the Mullahs of Iran, indeed why Muslims in general, hate Jews. Afterwards, I will explain why Leftists hate Jews.

Chevra Hatzalah, the largest volunteer ambulance service in the United States, was founded in the late 1960s in Brooklyn, New York. Hatzalah organizations now function in IsraelArgentinaAustraliaSouth Africa, Mexico, Panama, Belgium, Switzerland, Canada, Russia, the United Kingdom, and at least five states in the US. It operates throughout New York City of 24 hours a day, seven days a week. It is run by 850 volunteer, emergency care providers.  “Hatzalah” – from the Hebrew l’hatzil, to rescue – is totally committed to the sanctity of human life, something unknown to Islam, whose adherents exulted in 9/11.

Hatzalah provides a high level of professional, pre-hospital life-saving treatment and transportation absolutely free of charge to anyone who calls, regardless of race, religion, or ethnicity.  This is why Muslims hate Jews, a hatred ignored by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and his boss, Barack Obama – both leftists, both indifferent to Iran’s malediction “Death to America.”

Hatzalah’s mantra is LIFE.  Hatzalah response time to emergency calls is 2.5 to 4 minutes.  Nothing like this anywhere.

Hatzalah also provides additional support to the patient and their families by assisting with social services, blood bank, and related services. All this is consistent with the Jewish principle that “Whoever saves even one life, it is as if he saved an entire world.”  This is beyond the mentality of Islam. No wonder Muslims hate Jews.

Hatzalah was the first ambulance to arrive at the World Trade Center following the horrific Muslim attacks of September 11, 2001.  By the time the second plane crashed into the second tower, there were 24 Hatzalah ambulances and more than 100 Hatzalah EMTs, paramedics, and doctors on the scene.  At the South end of the Twin Towers, Hatzalah was the predominant ambulance service covering the disaster.  Hatzalah rescued thousands of men women, and children, with never a thought about their racial or ethnic identity.  No wonder Muslims hate Jews.

But why should the Left hate Jews? Isn’t the Left famous for its humanitarianism and opposition to racial and ethnic discrimination?  Indeed, haven’t Jews been among the most prominent stalwarts of the Left?  Are these Jews Chomsky-like Jew-haters?  And what do the Left and Islam have in common that unites them in hatred of Jews and Israel?

I was once asked by a prominent Catholic, “Why are Jews so often Leftists?”  I replied: “Because they’re afraid to stand up as Jews.  They want to hide Jewish particularism in the obscurity of universalism or internationalism – the haven of the Left.  In other words, they want to appear as Christians without the Christian God!

Like their patron saint, Karl Marx, a Jewish-born Jew-hater, the Left deplores the nation-state system as an artificial entity that divides mankind and leads to war.  It is by means of war, however, that Islam would put an end to the nation-state because it divides Islamdom.

The Left, parading as democrats, actually consists of elitists who despise the unenlightened, tradition-oriented masses. Muslims, led by tradition-oriented autocrats, display an unconcealed arrogance toward the masses, i.e., “infidels.”

Muslims and Leftists hate the God of Israel if only because He creates what they abhor – distinct nations, free yet faithful to universal moral laws.  But what is more, the God of Israel creates unique individuals, whose freedom is God’s blessing. Jewish law forbids sacrificing the individual for the sake of the community. The Jerusalem Talmud states: “If gentiles [surrounding Israel] demand, ‘Surrender one of yourselves to us and we will kill him; otherwise we shall kill all of you,’ they must all suffer death rather than surrender a single Israelite to them.” Given this exaltation of the individual, no wonder Muslims and Leftists hate Judaism as well as Jews.

But now we can better appreciate the difference between Jews and Muslims on the one hand, as well as the difference between Jews and Leftists on the other.  Like Hatzalah, the faithful Jew is the true friend of humanity. He appreciates (and learns from) the diversity of nations without succumbing to non-judgmentalism or moral relativism. Truth-oriented and grateful for the divine gift of freedom, he refuses to impose truth on non-Jews.

While the Jew deplores the stultifying hence perverted monotheism of Islam, he deems religion as the last barrier to the stultifying materialism of the Left.

The Jew, faithful and free, must rise and rescue (l’hatzil) mankind from these twin tyrannies. This task, forsaken by America, is the task of Israel. When Israel cuts off the head of the snake in Iran, America may have a new birth of freedom!


NOT only that, let’s revert to some “poetic license”, thus, revealing the rabid underbelly of J Street, the left’s so-called Jewish address for “peace” in the Middle East between Arabs and Jews:“J Street, Which way street?”

SIGNIFICANTLY, this is HUSSEIN Obama’s “Jewish Home.”

STILL yet, if any more evidence is required attesting to the left’s collaboration (and genuflection) with Muslims/Arabs, well, look no further than to Judaism’s holiest site: The Temple Mount. Yes, you read that right. Again, where is the nexus?

RESULTANT, the following links (out of many within this site) are more than evidence-worthy: 


ARABS/MUSLIMS threaten mayhem, yet, Israel’s leaders choose appeasement and dhimmitude on The Temple Mount. Why?


WELL, let’s turn to a Jewish reporter’s notebook, as she visited The Temple Mount and sat and wept.


AND at the same time frame, a 13 year old celebrating his bar-mitzvah (many others can attest to being forcibly removed, alas, grooms before their wedding seeking spiritual blessings) was thrown off The Temple Mount (by Israeli police, in collusion with the Islamic Waqf) for uttering one of the oldest Jewish prayers out loud, Shema Yisrael, “Hear O’ Israel.” 

YES, the humiliation of Jews – through coercive efforts by Jewish leftists and their Islamic overlords – continues unabated. It further attests to the left’s dangerous “marriage” with Muslims/Arabs and anti-westerners.

EVEN more so, in relation to the hot-button issue of The (Jewish) Temple Mount, this is despite the fact that scores of Jews died during the bloody and heroic war in 1967 aka the Six-Day War. To their everlasting shame and onus, Israel’s leftist leaders handed over the de facto Israeli relinquishment of the Temple Mount to the Islamic Waqf!, after the nation’s miraculous victory. Mind you, leftist power-brokers – alongside a gaggle of so-called right wing leaders – have the temerity to still feign that Israel controls Judaism’s holiest site, even while the enemy rules it with an iron fist. Understood?

“The Temple Mount Is In Our Hands!” –

IN a nutshell, Israel is run by Jewish leftists (mis-schooled in socialism), even though it appears otherwise. Absolutely, this is Israel’s paradox, vote right, get left

BASICALLY, it is their combined ethos for totalitarian-leaning Arabs/Muslims, fueled by their hatred – yes, hatred – for traditional Judaism, which underlies their policy-making, as well as their hyper disdain for Jewish nationalism. Yes, again, the ubiquitous quest to destroy the nation-state rears its head.

CONCLUSIVELY, while the following will appear (seemingly) unrelated to all of the above, nothing could be more wrong. Effectively, the same silence which accompanies western poohbahs (leftists at large, as well as Islamic fellow travelers), relative to the non-stop slaughter of Muslim on Muslims, speaks volumes. It is comparative to their insidious efforts to permanently silence Jews and destroy Israel.

TO wit, whereas Muslims and leftists have next to nothing in common with each other, a stronger force is at play and catapults them from strength to strength. Incontestably, their powerful and visceral hatred of what the God of Israel has brought forth to mankind trumps all else.

MOST resoundingly, their loathing of individual freedom and its life-force must be extinguished, even to the extent of turning a blind eye to Christianity’s extinction from the Mid East, and the death of millions.

EXTRAPOLATING further, leftists and Islamic leaders are fully aware that without Judaism Christianity wouldn’t exist. After all, where did Jesus come from? Rhetorical.

AS Professor Paul Eidelberg wisely noted: “Muslims and Leftists hate the God of Israel if only because He creates what they abhor – distinct nations, free yet faithful to universal moral laws.  But what is more, the God of Israel creates unique individuals, whose freedom is God’s blessing.”

INDEED, totalitarians – leftists and Islamists – detest individual freedom and universal moral laws. This is key and core.

IF anything, with the Jewish New Year upon us, learn these lessons well. Never forget them!

An Open Letter to the Left

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

Christian & Jewish (Leftist) Clergy/Leaders Shield Islamic Barbarians Via “Islamophobia” & Multi-Culti Dialogue Sideshows. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki



Islamic cleric turning the Fort Worth Rodeo into an Muslim Indoctrination event

(Muslim cleric tried to turn the Fort Worth, Texas Rodeo into an Islamic Indoctrination event)

FROM this site’s inception (and it is consistently the case) certain themes are continually weaving through these pages. A primary emphasis revolves around the “locking of arms” between leftists and Islamists, aka reds and greens. It is not for nothing. Insidious. In fact, the “About” tab’s concluding paragraph reads as follows:

Hopefully, my small effort will enlighten Israelis and Americans (and the west in general) to the dangers posed by our common foes. These dangers are fueled exponentially by the morphing of the Red/Green alliance – radical leftists and Islamic jihadists. 

NOW, more than a few have expressed vitriolic outrage due to particular revelations, and this is a mild descriptor. Most always, their ire reaches a crescendo when proof after proof exposes linkage between core Islamic teachings and its underlying basis, Shariah Law. But when the left is revealed for what they truly are – back benchers for the most retrograde barbarians, bar none – well, all hell breaks loose. Don’t even ask…

AFTER all, a core mission of the left is to tar opponents as “racists” and “Islamophobes.” Thereby, when one has the “audacity” to reveal this and that Islamic truth, it becomes incumbent to shut down any discourse. Hence, par for the course, the far left Southern Poverty Law Center (having strayed off course from its heretofore venerable roots) put together a “hit list.” Good luck with that tactic.

Page 1: SPLCanti-Muslim

The Obama-tied leftist group that helped a gunman commit an act of terrorism against a conservative organization has assembled a starter kit for Islamists to attack American women who refuse to comply with Sharia law, the authoritarian doctrine that inspires Islamists and their jihadism.

It’s the summer special from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), an extremist nonprofit that lists conservative organizations that disagree with it on social issues on a catalogue of “hate groups.” A few years ago a gunman received a 25-year prison sentence for carrying out the politically-motivated shooting of the Family Research Council (FRC) headquarters after admitting that he learned about the FRC from the SPLC “hate map.” Prosecutors called it an act of terrorism and recommended a 45-year sentence.

Now the SPLC, which has conducted diversity training for the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ), is targeting female bloggers, activists and television personalities who refuse to comply with Sharia law which is rooted in the Quran. The European Court on Human rights has repeatedly ruled that Sharia is “incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy” yet politically-connected radical Muslim groups—such as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)—keep pushing to implement it in the United States and the movement has gained steam.

Among those resisting this effort publicly are the high-profile women being targeted by the SPLC. Some of them are colleagues or friends of Judicial Watch and now they must fear for their safety simply for practicing their rights under the U.S. Constitution. The new hate list is titled Women Against Islam/The Dirty Dozen and includes illustrations and detailed information on all the women, who are branded “the core of the anti-Muslim radical right.” The new SPLC hate brochure further targets them by claiming that they’re “a dozen of the most hardline anti-Muslim women activists in America.”

Political activist and commentator Pamela Geller is branded the “country’s most flamboyant and visible Muslim-basher” for, among other things “smearing and demonizing Muslims.” Blogger Ann Barnhardt is identified as one of the “most extreme Muslim-bashers in the United States” and radio talk-show host Laura Ingram made the list for saying that hundreds of millions of Muslims were delighted that 12 people were massacred by Islamic terrorists in the Paris headquarters of a satirical magazine. Former CIA agent Clare Lopez, who runs a Washington D.C. think-tank focusing on national security issues, made the list for saying that the Muslim Brotherhood has “infiltrated and suborned the U.S. government to actively assist…the mission of its grand jihad.”

Others appearing on the anti-Sharia docket include television personality and former judge and prosecutor Jeanine Pirro, former chairwoman of the Texas Republican Party Cathie Adams, talk-show host Sandy Rios of the American Family Association, syndicated columnist Diana West, attorney and columnist Debbie Schlussel, blogger Cathy Hinners, ACT! for America founder Brigitte Gabriel and conservative writer and TV personality Ann Coulter. Among her biggest offenses, according to the SPLC, is proclaiming that “not all Muslims may be terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims—at least all terrorists capable of assembling a murderous plot against America”….read the whole thing….

INDEED, in a Orwellian context they coined it an Intelligence Report! Did you ever? In other words, in perfect Alinskyite form, they turned the truth upside its head and perfectly executed “Rule 12” from Rules For Radicals.

* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)

IN this regard, leftist Christian and Jewish leaders – with the clergy in the forefront but with others in tow, chiefly, academics – are more than in the fray. In fact, they are Islam’s chief shields! How so? Let’s count the ways:


FIRSTLY, one has to internalize where much of the nexus stems from, that is, a dogmatic fealty to multi-cultural dialogue, regardless of all the monumental risks and provable costs. 

AND being that a very close association exists between this investigative journalist and one of the main experts on the phenomenon, it behooves keeping readers abreast of its dangers.

THUS, in July 2012 (2 weeks after this site’s debut), a marshaling of resources began. Enter, Professor Paul Eidelberg.

COINCIDENTALLY, it was at this time that a request from Prof Eidelberg to review (the most important policy paper written on Islam’s cultural and theological underpinnings) Islam & Blood was made. In short order it was ready for publication and distribution. Consider it your “bible” of sorts on the subject matter. 

IN tandem, he issued a scathing report, one which links leftist profs (wherever they reside) to a “marriage” with Islam. Its basis lies within conflict resolution and multicultural dialogue. Hmm. The aforementioned are both housed here

NOT only that, but the following commentary (Jan. 2015) is quite instructive:


IN the main, leftist clergy backbench for Islam’s supremacy, even if some opine otherwise. The fruits of their “multi-culti” efforts, the basis of “interfaith dialogue”, attest to its bitter outcome. Its poisons.


YET, PC infected congregants are too confused to recognize where their derelict clergy have led them. Tragically, they rely on them to pave the way, but congregants have been shamefully led astray. Indubitably.

AS a matter of record, would anyone have believed – years ago – that the most high-profile Cathedral in America would submit to Islamic “interfaith” outreach? Believe it.


IN essence, even the term itself, “interfaith dialogue”, is an Islamic smokescreen. An Allah wash. In reality, there are several Islamic mandates designed to present a benign face of Islam to Christians and Jews, but one stands out above the rest. It is termed “da’wah”. Don’t EVER forget its true meaning and intent.

Da‘wah (also transliterated daawa(h); Arabic: دعوة‎ “invitation”) means the proselytizing or preaching of Islam. Da‘wah literally means “issuing a summons”…. A Muslim who practices da‘wah, either as a religious worker or in a volunteer community effort, is called a dā‘ī(داعي, plural du‘āh/du‘āt دعاة).

NOW, don’t confuse Islamic proselytizing with that of other religions. Worlds apart. Regardless, what brought da’wah full circle was witnessing its handiwork on MIT’s college campus, surely a replica throughout America’s campuses via the Muslim Student Association, the Brotherhood’s student arm!

For this discussion it is intrinsic to note the intersection between an “occupational” interest in the Muslim Student Association, and its morphing with a mother’s growing concern. This is an understatement.….

IN light of these findings, the urgent question becomes:

Is your Preacher or Rabbi a Muslim spy?….continue reading….

ALAS, with the above firmly in place, how shocking is it to find out that a Texas Pastor (out of enumerable clergy….oy vey…) is fighting “Islamophobia” and attempting to drag along his parishioners for the (deadly) ride?

A pastor in Keller, Texas continues to push back against so-called “Islamophobia” after making national news for standing up for Muslims when Rev. Franklin Graham said they should be stopped from immigrating to the U.S. after the massacre of 5 U.S. servicemen in Chattanooga by a Muslim.

Star Telegram Pastor Bob Roberts Jr. of NorthWood Church in Keller works closely with Grand Imam Maulana Syed Muhammad Abdul Khabir Azad from the Badshahi Mosque in Lahore, Pakistan.

After gunman Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez killed five U.S. servicemen in attacks at two military installations in Chattanooga, Tenn., Graham wrote on Facebook that Muslim immigration to the U.S. should stop. Abdulazeez, 24, was born in Kuwait and raised in the U.S.

“During World War 2, we didn’t allow Japanese to immigrate to America, nor did we allow Germans,” Graham wrote. “Why are we allowing Muslims now?”  


Last month, Roberts stood with American Muslim leaders on Capitol Hill to challenge Graham’s comments.

“I was so sad when I read the Facebook posting of Franklin Graham,” Roberts said in a report by the Religion News Service. “This is not ‘evangelical’ and even less evangelistic. I don’t want American Muslims to think we fear them or that they are our enemies.”

Roberts has long worked to support people of other faiths. He defended the inclusion of a Muslim imam at this year’s Fort Worth Stock Show after the issue sparked controversy on social media.

In 2011, his church had an event to promote Muslim-Christian cooperation. The Building Bridges with Fellow Texans event drew 2,500 people. Roberts said, the interfaith effort draws criticism in the U.S. from people who don’t understand the mission or don’t see how hate speech here can put Christians in danger in Pakistan by provoking extremists.

Christian and Muslim children sing together at a special service at NorthWood Church in Keller in 2011, a gathering that was attended by 2,500 people, including more than 1,000 Muslims from across the Metroplex

“Christians in America are very concerned about what is happening to Christians in Pakistan,” Roberts said. “What they don’t understand is how they treat Muslims here — what they say to the media here — affects Christians in Pakistan and Syria and all over the world.” (blogger’s note: hey shmucky Roberts, it is the Koran/Shariah Law which inspires the slaughter of Christians, Jews and other minorities, all the while your ilk gives them cover!)

Christian leaders and Muslims met in Nepal last year, and the initial talks led to meetings in Texas and Pakistan. Those gatherings resulted in a commitment by American Christians to look out for Muslims here and by Muslims to look out for Christians and other minorities in Pakistan.


Roberts’ work with the grand imam and Channan echoes biblical teachings of the golden rule, which asks people to treat others as they would like to be treated.

“I’m a Baptist so I am passionate about religious freedom,” Roberts said. “I have to be concerned about freedom of religion for the Muslim in America. If I want freedom of religion for the Christian in Muslim countries, I need to be very concerned about that here.”


OMINOUSLY, too many fail to internalize the depths of the dangers, due to the locking of arms between the left and Islam’s barbarians. Without exaggeration, their dance with the Islamic devil is six degrees separated from the deaths of many innocents! 

TO wit, if Christian clergy fail to speak up for the wholesale slaughter of fellow Christians – no less, at the hands of those they shield, Allah’s soldiers – who else will?? From left, Father James Channan of Pakistan, Pastor Bob Roberts of NorthWood Church in Keller and Grand Imam Khateeb Molana Syed Muhammad of the Badshahi Mosque in Lahore, Pakistan

(From left, Father James Channan of Pakistan, Pastor Bob Roberts of NorthWood Church in Keller, Texas and Grand Imam Khateeb Molana Syed Muhammad of the Badshahi Mosque in Lahore, Pakistan…locking arms!)

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

ISLAM’S DISMANTLEMENT Necessary To Save Western Civilization: A Blueprint…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

A group called the Islamic State Hacking Division posted information about 100 US military members online

(A group called the Islamic State Hacking Division posted information about 100 US military members online)

In the posting, the ISIS hacking division asked its followers to kill military members 'wherever you find them'

AS is said, give them a hand and they take an arm, but with followers of Muhammad that’s just the tip. In no uncertain terms, ISLAMISTS demand a FULL dismantlement of western civilization’s undercarriage and nothing less will suffice. Total destruction. They are well on their way, as they swathe through the Mid East and Africa leaving nothing but death and destruction in their wake. In reality, the incompatibility factor with the west emanates from said all or nothing ISLAMIC imperative.

AS such, ad infinitum, this site has proven that Islam is a lethal enemy to western civilization. Hence, by extrapolation, so too are its committed followers, whether in the here and now or in the future. Yes, the following policy paper, “Islam and Blood”, documents all the factual evidence required to prove said thesis. Sans a scintilla of a doubt, it was a distinct honor and privilege to assist its author, Professor Paul Eidelberg (in 2012), with related finishing touches.

MOST significantly, the facts within “Islam and Blood” are not up for debate. As such, there is not a damn thing that any apologist for Islam can say to convince otherwise, either via their leftist mouthpieces or ISLAMISTS themselves. Let them save themselves the time and trouble….falling on deaf ears.

BUT for those who are newly aboard, here are some additional brief underpinnings to lean upon, if you choose to join our righteous struggle. If not, just get out of our way and keep your head down. Indeed, in no uncertain terms, if America and Israel fall sway to Islam, the rest of the west will topple like dominoes. Post haste.

AS noted within this investigative journalist’s most recent interview, one of the questions (within part two) rendered a foretaste:


(While children recoil in horror, men murder shouting Allah’s name and women cower in Burqas)


As we reflect on the trials and tribulations of the last six years since a little-known US Senator from Illinois was proclaimed the Second Coming at his presidential inauguration, we see a world in chaos under the leadership of Barack Hussein Obama. When we examine the global repercussions of Obama’s time in office, a frightening pattern emerges. Every corner of the planet has experienced a never-ending cycle of violent Jihad and Islamic terrorism as America’s President embraces the Muslim Brotherhood, apologizes for America’s past behavior, and throws one ally after the other under the proverbial bus.

No longer able to blame Bush, Obama’s presidency is marred by the obliteration of one Arab nation after the other at the hands of ISIS and an ever-increasing roster of like-minded Islamic terror organizations. Millions have fled their homes to struggle for survival in refugee camps or starve to death on lonely mountain tops. Parents have literally flung their own children to their doom from the heights rather than allow them to fall into the hands of the demented child molesters of ISIS, who sell girls as young as six as sex-slaves.

Happy to fill the void created by Mr. Obama’s unconscionable decision to completely withdraw the American military from Iraq and his misguided campaign of destruction in Libya, the Twelvers of Iran now control Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, and Gaza. The Ayatollahs who rule Iran with an iron fist are quite content to be the world’s leading financiers of Islamic terrorism as they make speeches calling for the total destruction of Israel and the annihilation of the Jewish people……(read the whole thing….)

MORE specifically, to extend the thought process even further, isn’t it a fact that Islam’s march into America poses a precipitous danger, as well as to the west at large? Yet, if flying heads – plus every other barbarism housed under Shariah Law’s banner – isn’t enough to spur westerners into action, then what else is there left to say? Nite…nite…alas, don’t expect to have sweet dreams!

MOST inherently, behind every Islamic danger hides a tentacled Shariah Law’s banner. This truth cannot be swept under the rug, nor double-talked. You gotta deal with reality, discomfiting as it is.

STILL, as onerous as it is, there has to be a starting point. Therefore, let’s begin by unmasking Islam, and we can proceed from there. Why is this necessary? Well, once the (mental) band-aid is ripped off, not only will it get easier to do what must be done, but it will allow westerners to realize that stepping up is a matter of national security. Concomitantly, the above unveiling (delineated at the link) has zero to do with prejudice or bias, as assorted jackals are wont to scream. Besides, you can always invest in earphones or resort to your childhood ditties: call me this, call me that…sticks and stones…so, express yourself…liberating…

ONCE this task is accomplished, the next step is to understand, then to admit, just how embedded Islam/Shariah Law is within America’s power centers. Absolutely, sans Shariah Law, Islam would cease to function. Exist. A blessing.

NEVERTHELESS, despite the uphill battle there is no other option, but to ensure that Shariah Law is gutted from America’s courts (refer to attached pdf), schoolsfinancial centers and everywhere that affects America’s security.

IN this regard, especially when Muslims refuse to abide by America’s laws, the gutting, its lessons, must commence. Shariah Law violates the Constitution, the law(s) of the land. That is that. 

YET, for a visual rendition, it is incumbent upon Americans (westerners at large) to understand the whys and the wherefores of Islam’s actual wrecking balls; the west’s cultural and heritage edifices! It is NOT for nothing. Moreover, it is not simply a manifestation of ISIS and its offshoots, they just happen to be the ones in a position to lay certain cultural/heritage foundations to waste, as exemplified by Muhammad’s jihad throughout his tenure of barbarism.

“In their self-promoting video of their wanton destruction, an ISIL spokesman says: “The prophet ordered us to get rid of statues and relics, and his companions did the same when they conquered countries after him.”

AND in answer to those who stubbornly view the above as a far off problem, well, you could not be more wrong-headed.  Misinformed. Not only is ISIS (and its Brotherhood offshoots) inside America, but the threat is exposed from a multiplicity of directions.
A decade ago ISIS was on the front page of every major newspaper. Then Obama won and declared victory over Al Qaeda and it went away. ISIS, then Al Qaeda in Iraq, didn’t actually go away, but the administration and its media allies began pretending that it had.While the current round of fighting may be taking place in Iraq and Syria,Jihadist groups have a history of using Western countries as staging platforms for taking over Middle Eastern countries, the Ayatollah Khomeini hung out in Paris, the Muslim Brotherhood is embedded in London and Washington, and asStackelbeck points out, “Some 60 percent of foreign fighters in Syria follow a Dearborn, Michigan-based Imam named Sheikh AhmadJibril on Twitter.”The Caliphate serves to rally Jihadists to its black flag and while they may burn their passports, their final endgame is here, as an ISIS spokesman recently warned, “We – with Allah’s help – want Paris, before Rome and Islamic Iberia and after we blow up the White House, Big Ben, and the Eiffel Tower.”……

NEED more?

PREVIOUSLY, this investigative journalist reported on a “kill list” and it can be found here. Besides, it has become quite personal….

IN any case, they upped the ante, if you dare imagine. They have published the complete details of their “kill list”, relative to military folks in America and their personal info is in full jihadi view.

The online document contains names and photos along with some of the addresses.

“[W]e have decided to leak 100 addresses so that our brothers residing in America can deal with you,” the group warned, The Blaze reported.

“Kill them in their own lands, behead them in their own homes, stab them to death as they walk their streets thinking that they are safe,” the “Islamic State Hacking Division” added…..

AGAIN, no one should believe that ISIS operates as a “lone wolf” ISLAMIC terror org, far from it. It operates with the full backing of its Brotherhood parent, from which its Al-Qaeda in Iraq origins sprang!

IN this regard, as promised, a BLUEPRINT:

By Professor Paul Eidelberg

“The Only Rational Goal for America and Israel: Dismantle Islam”

Since Islam has declared war against America and Israel, PM Benjamin Netanyahu and a new American President should organize for their respective countries a strategy board whose purpose is to formulate and implement an 8-pronged strategy for dismantling Islam by (1) Political, (2) Diplomatic, (3) Psychological, (4) Economic, (5) Military, (6) Electronic, (7) Clandestine, and, above all, (8) Theological means. Here is what each nation should do according to its respective capabilities:

1. Table a Resolution in the UN General Assembly demanding the expulsion of Iran from the UN. For this purpose the Resolution should cite Iran’s many violations of (a) the UN Charter; (b) the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; (c) the anti-Genocide Convention, citing Teheran’s malediction “Death to America,” its vow to “Wipe Israel of the map”; and (d) its sponsoring mosques that advocate jihad and foster hatred of America and Western Civilization.

2. Pressure various nations that receive American aid to sever diplomatic relation with Iran.

3.  Establish a counterpart to the Voice of America to publicize the vicious policies of Iran.

4.  Disseminate the writings of former Muslims critical of Islam.

5.  Disseminate information concerning Islam’s denial of man’s creation in the Image of God.

6.  Disseminate the critiques of Islam by eminent statesmen, philosophers, and theologians.

7.  Disseminate information about the crimes committed by Muslims against non-Muslims.

8.  Distribute by air drops to Iranians flyers denouncing Iran’s mistreatment of women.

9.  Intercept and disrupt by electronic means Iranian communications with its agents abroad.

10.  Do not permit Iranian government officials to enter the United States.

11.  Institute a selective blockade of Iranian ships on the high seas.

12.   Intercept Iranian supplies to its clients such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

13.   With few exceptions, do not take jihadists alive.

14.   Do not release Muslim terrorists.

15.   Prosecute Muslims and Muslim institutions in the U.S. that preach jihad.

16.   Employ clandestine operations to disrupt Iran’s military research and operations.

17.   Publicize Iran’s global ambition is to stifle freedom of conscience in general, and of Christianity and Judaism in particular.

18.   Aid Iranian freedom fighters.

19.   Establish in the United States a program of advanced education for Iranian dissidents.

20.   Establish in America community schools for teaching American Exceptionalism, focusing on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. These schools should also teach students about Islam’s bellicose doctrines and history.

THE preceding should not be regarded as exhaustive of what must be done to dismantle Islam. It is extremely important to undermine the basic ideological and institutional sources of Islam, which has rightly been called the greatest murder machine in history.

in the name of allah
NOW, as another incentive to jump aboard our western struggle (not that the above isn’t more than adequate….for heaven’s sake) this investigative journalist has intersected, interview-like, with the following rabid ISLAMIST. Resultant, he (and fellow ISLAMISTS) needs to be put in his place, whatever it takes…. 


{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

Barack HUSSEIN Obama, A Sunni Muslim: The PROOFS. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


MUCH has been written, and speculated, about the origins of Barack HUSSEIN Obama. And the fact that his bonafides have been sealed tighter than Fort Knox; that some have been terminated/eliminated who got too close; that the Usurper-in-Chief has paid upwards of 5 mil to hide his records from the public domain, and possesses a fraudulent SS # – one which belongs to a long-deceased gentleman -should raise more questions, rather than less. Suspicious? Sheesh.

BE that as it may, when this investigative journalist started digging, thus, reporting on this and that, leftists went nuts, and even some who should have known better were more than disparaging. In fact, any reference to “The One” being a “closet” Muslim, well, that sent them over the edge.

NEVER mind that his obdurate refusal to release relevant documents paved the way for much of the suspicion. And what about his counter intuitive domestic and foreign fires, having no rhyme nor reason, other than to benefit anti-Americans, especially Muslims? Not only that – aside from so much more – how should his off the cuff remark to ABC’s George Stephanopoulos ,” My Muslim Faith”, be interpreted?

AS if on (musical) cue, his spinmeisters immediately went into full overdrive….yada, yada, blah, blah…no, he didn’t mean it THAT way! Oh dear. Yes, almost like a “catch me if you can”…a cat and mouse, in your face, and up yours scenario.

REGARDLESS, there are countless proofs housed at these pages, as to his Muslim heritage (which in no way obviates his socialist, Marxist, communist roots), but the following should suffice as Exhibit Number One. Its basis allows one to understand why Muslims can plot and plot within America, yet, Obama Inc. minimizes ANY Islamic connection.

ONTO the most BULLET PROOF evidence, bar none: Barack HUSSEIN Obama is a Sunni Muslim!

Is President Obama a Sunni Muslim

13 Jan 2015
For several years I have been asked the question on the matter of President Obama being a Muslim or not.  My standard answer has always been that since Obama’s father was Muslim, so in accordance with Islam he is Muslim.  Did he leave the faith of Islam at some point?  This is the question many of us have had.  Of course if he left Islam then he would be considered an apostate. I think it is time leading counter-terrorism folks and the media start giving clear and precise answers in regards to what their professional opinion in about Obama being a Muslim.It is my analysis that Obama never left the Islamic faith and is a strong and active Sunni Muslim, but of course for political reasons he can’t openly admit he is Muslim.  Obama is living true Islam: deceit and hypocrisy.There are several key reasons I have come to the conclusion and can go on record that it is my professional opinion Obama is an active Sunni Muslim (Salafist). 
They are:
1.  During the Presidential election in 2007 and leading up to his being sworn in to office in Jan 2008, Obama/his staff visited CAIR National in Washington DC on at least two occasions.  I had two female researchers inside CAIR National when his team visited CAIR executives.  They provided statements in regards to the above.{blogger’s note: Obama had NO idea that undercover operatives were recording this and that, as revealed within Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America}

2.  It is well-known CAIR leaders are Sunni Muslim (Salfist/Wahhabe).  The mosques CAIR sponsors/supports is Dar Al Hijrah Mosque in Falls Church, Virginia.  Leaders from this mosque frequent CAIR national as well.  This mosque is a strong Salafist mosque with close ties to Saudi Arabia.  Muslims have told me they call this area the ‘Wahhabe Nation of America’.3.  Since Obama took office he has went above and beyond to support the Muslim Brotherhood and protect the reputation of Prophet Muhammed and the Islamic ideology.4.  It is no coincidence that Obama has invited Al Sharpton to the White House almost 80 times.  CAIR National selected Sharpton as their ‘Man of the Year’.  Since our book ‘Muslim Mafia’ was released in 2009, the FBI was directed to have no contact with CAIR because of their ties to Islamic based terrorism.  Sharpton is now CAIR’s direct contact into the White House with Obama and Eric Holder (U.S. Attorney).5.  Obama’s foreign and domestic policies have always been more aligned with Sharia law than the U.S. Constitution.6.  Obama has had Muslim Brotherhood meetings and supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Eqypt.  Even the UAE has admitted CAIR is a terrorist organization.

7. Obama bows to the King of Saudi Arabia.

8.  Obama did not attend the peace rally in Paris because the theme was targeted toward ‘Radical Islamic based terrorism’.  Of course Obama could not support this because he does not feel the Muslims carrying out terrorist acts are radical.  He believes they are carrying out the plans of Muhammed as Islam dictates.

9.  Obama has released numerous terrorists from GITMO.  Anyone with a basic understanding of national security knows these prisoners being released are a serious national security threat.

People will say that Obama is killing Islamic terrorist fighters in Syria, Afghanistan, and Iraq, so if he is Muslim why is he doing this?  People must understand the implementation of the Islamic caliphate will take many years.  Muslims are taught from birth to support the progression of Islam, even through deceit and giving their life.

It is my analysis Obama has used the U.S. to attack Islamic terrorists for propaganda purposes.  They are simply collateral damage for the betterment of Islam.  Anything is allowed in Islam if it strengthens Islam and leads to the formation of the caliphate worldwide.  It must be noted his attacks in Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, are very limited and do little damage.

For many years the U.S. government provided me the highest clearances and paid me a good salary to analyze national security issues. Many of my classified reports were sent via the ‘Blue Line’ which meant they were briefed to the U.S. President. I had a solid track record of being on target with my security analysis inputsI have no doubt I am correct when I go on record now as saying that President Obama is an active Sunni Muslim (Salafist).  The next two years under Obama will be used to destroy America from the inside.

AND those of us who fully understand what is at stake, willing to state the G-d’s honest truth – whether we live in America, Israel or any western nation worth a damn – surely can agree with the following too: to save the planet, the west has to kill the Muslim Third Reich!

BUT for knuckledraggers who still require edification, some intellectual heft, this site presents one of its esteemed professorial associates, Professor Paul Eidelberg.


(Arabic Grand Mufti of Jerusalem with Bosnian Muslim SS-soldiers)


The Connection Between Islam and Nazism: What is to Be Done?

 Paul Eidelberg and Will Morrisey

Winston Churchill defined Mein Kampf as “the new Koran of faith and war.”[1]  Consistent therewith, Haj Amin al-Husseini, the notorious former Mufti of Jerusalem, declared, “There is a definite similarity between the principles of Islam and the principles of Nazism.”

Although Hitler and Muhammad shared an enthusiasm for military adventurism and a hatred of Jews, still, their world views would seem to be diametrically opposed.  Let us see.

Hitler grounds his Jew-hatred in racism as well as atheism.  His Jew-hatred flows from the sewers of nineteenth-century ‘race theory.’ Its calculated blasphemy, its materialism (despite Hitler’s self-described ‘idealism’), and most obviously its idolatry of a ‘master race,’ ought to offend, and deeply offend, any serious student of the Koran.  Islam calls for the conversion of all ‘races’ to Islam, and it does much more than merely call for such conversion—it conquers for it.  Moreover, the insistent legalism of Islam sets strict limits on any would-be tyrant.  To be sure, Islam is ‘totalistic,’ as are most religions.  Islam seeks to explain and to regulate all of human life. This suggests that Islam is ‘totalitarian.’ Various scholars—Bernard Lewis and Daniel Pipes among them—deny this.[2] 

One may indeed conclude that Islam is not ‘totalitarian’ in the modern sense, since modern totalitarianism involves the all-encompassing power of the state and the exaltation of its leader.  Hence it can be said that might does not make right for the Muslim, as it does for the Nazi, the Communist, or the Fascist.  Besides, is it not obvious that for the Muslim God rules, not Hitler or Stalin?  It may well be, however, that we are here dealing with half-truths which obscure Islam’s linkage to Nazism.

What links Islam to Nazism is the ethos of jihad.  For both Islam and Nazism war is not merely a means to an end: mere conquest. War for both is a moral imperative: for the Nazi, to purge the world of racial impurity, for the Muslim, to purge the world of religious impurity.  Both have or require an enemy: for the Muslim the ‘infidel,’ for the Nazi the ‘Jew,’  Accordingly, both Islam and Nazism aim at purifying i.e. conquering the world, and there is no limit to the violence that may be used to achieve that aim.  The genocide perpetrated by Muslims against the Armenians preceded the genocide the Nazis perpetrated against the Jews.

The Nazis regarded the Jews as a virus infecting mankind, something that had to be exterminated. Although Muslims reject this racism—for a Jew could convert to Islam—Islam’s contempt for non-believers has much in common with the Nazi’s contempt for non-Aryans, Jews in particular.  As in Nazism, Islam has never respected the sanctity of human life; it has always regarded infidels, Jews or Christians, as devoid of human rights—as subhuman.  Bat Ye’or has documented fourteen centuries of dhimmitude—the degradation and dehumanization of countless Jews and Christians.[3] Dhimmitude is inherent in the ethos of jihad—the most distinctive principle of Islam.

Also inherent in the ethos of jihad, but which has no parallel in Nazism, is the will to martyrdom.  The most horrific manifestation of this jihad ethos is the homicide-suicide bomber. Islam may forbid what may be termed ‘personal’ suicide but not in the ethos of holy war.  That Arab parents can exult in their children being sacrificed as human bombs is of course mind-boggling.  This pagan-like phenomenon indicates that the sanctity of human life is not a normative Islamic doctrine.  Indeed, on page after page of the Koran¸ unbelievers are consigned to Hell—Islam’s crematoria.

If the will to martyrdom is construed in terms of sacrificing the individual for the sake of the community, then Islam converges with Nazism.  While Muslims exalt the umma, the Islamic nation, Nazis exalt the volk, the Aryan race.  Lost in both is the dignity of the individual.

In Jewish law the individual stands on a par with the community, and such is his infinite worth or dignity that he cannot rightly be sacrificed for the sake of his community.  (That Nazism regards Jews as ‘selfish’ should be understood in this light.)  The dignity of the individual has no other rational source than the Torah’s conception of man’s creation in the image of God.  Adam is an individual.  It follows, given Islam’s subordination of the individual to the collective, that Islam, like Nazism, rejects the God of the Bible!  The same God also creates diverse nations, which attests to His infinite creativity.  Both Islam and Nazism reject the existence of diverse nations.  Both would impose on mankind a stultifying uniformity.

The contrast with Judaism could hardly be more striking.  Aside from the Seven Noahide Laws of Universal Morality, Judaism insists on differentiation and individuation.  One nation should not impose order on others by erasing their salutary national differences. Diversity in unity, reflected in the twelve distinctive tribes of Israel, is a basic Torah principle.[4]

Militant nations cannot tolerate much diversity, especially where the militancy is animated by a creed or ideology as in Islam and Nazism.  In the case of Islam, its extraordinary military success and global expansion during the first hundred years of its inception was perceived by Muslims as ‘proof’ of Islam’s validity and superiority.  Might did indeed make right, in Islamic history.  In fact, according to Islamic doctrine, the mere seizure of state power gives religious authority to its leader even if he is not a devout Muslim.

The ethos of jihad has an ethics which is quite pragmatic, as one may expect from a militaristic religion. One might go so far as to say that Nazi militarism is jihad secularized—jihad without religious pretensions and obfuscations. Although literary Islam and Nazism have profound differences, these are of little significance to the victims of these militant doctrines.  The one reduces human beings to dhimmis, the other to slaves. Militarism in a religious as well as in an atheistic creed means expansionism, murder, and degradation.

In Islam, as well as in Christianity, belief in its founder is part of the creed. The Jews have suffered the consequences of rejecting both. Many if not most Christians have forgiven the Jews for their stubborn adherence to Judaism, a religion that does not proselytize and that seeks not external glory but internal perfection. The Jewish rejection of Muhammad always rankled Muslims and aroused their hatred. But with the progress of Zionism, the Balfour Declaration, and especially with the rebirth of Israel, fear began to take hold of Muslim clerics and rulers.  So long as Jews were dhimmis, Muslims did not feel threatened theologically or politically.   This is no longer the case, which is why Muslim leaders throughout the world have held conferences to confront the ‘Jewish and Zionist menace’ and have issued papers which could have been written by Nazis.

Consider, for example, a 1968 international conference of Arab theologians held at Cairo’s Al Azhar University—Islam’s most authoritative university.  The mufti of Lebanon referred to the Jews as the “dogs of humanity.”  They do not even constitute a true people or nation.  Their evilness has been transmitted throughout their history by means of their cultural inheritance.  By their behavior, the Jews have called forth the hatred and persecution of all the peoples with whom they have come into contact.  They deserve their fate.  As for the State of Israel, it is the culmination of the historical and cultural depravity of the Jews.  It must be destroyed, having been established through aggression which is its congenital and immutable nature. This must be achieved by jihad.[5]

The participants at this conference make no distinction between Judaism and Zionism. Their virulent statements against Jews and the State of Israel point to nothing less than genocide and politicide.

For decades Muslim anti-Semitism, worldwide, has outpaced those of the neo-Nazis; “what was historically a Christian phenomenon”—largely transcended—“is now primarily a Muslim phenomenon.”[6]  “The mounting scale and sheer extent of this vehemently anti-Semitic literature and commentary in the newspapers, journals, magazines, radio, television, and in the everyday life of the Middle East [is indescribable] …”[7]  Not only is Mein Kampf a fast-selling title in the region, but even in Egypt, which has a peace treaty with Israel, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion has reappeared on a forty-one part Egyptian television program and in recycled form in Arab print media.  And this is actually one of the least toxic of such excrescences.   Palestinian Authority TV had this to say about Jews and Judaism:  “Their Torah today is just a collection of writings in which those people wrote lies about God, His prophets and His teachings …To their prophets they attribute the greatest crimes: murder, prostitution, and drunkenness.  The Jews do not believe in God …” Meanwhile, in countless mosques Muslims are poisoned by recent Islamic sermons denigrating Jews:[8]

“Their tongues never cease lying, [disseminating] abomination and obscenity.… The Jews preached permissiveness and corruption, as they hid behind false slogans like freedom and equality, humanism and brotherhood. They kill Muslim youth, entice the [Muslim] woman with shameful deeds, and act to lure others through her. They defile the minds of adolescents by arousing their urges. They are envious of the Muslim woman who conceals herself and protects her honor; for this reason, they preach to her to expose herself and throw off her values. Their goal is to destroy the Muslim family, to shatter religious and social ties and foundations. They are cowards in battle. They flee from death and fear fighting. They love life.”

“Read history and you will understand that the Jews of yesterday are the evil forefathers of the even more evil Jews of today: infidels, falsifiers of words, calf worshippers, prophet murderers, deniers of prophecies. The scum of the human race, accursed by Allah, who turned them into apes and pigs. These are the Jews—an ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil, and corruption.”

“The Jews are miserly and enslaved by money.… Most of the world’s wars, particularly the great modern wars, were planned and started by the Jews so as to disseminate corruption in the land, and to achieve their goals on the ruins of the human race.”

“The Jews are defiled creatures and satanic scum…. The Jews are the cause of the misery of the human race …. The Jews are our enemies and hatred of them is in our hearts. Jihad against them is our worship.”

Der Sturmer is tame compared to the anti-Semitic cartoons of the Arab world.[9]  Such is their hatred and loathing that Arabs depicts Jews as snakes, dogs, spiders, rats, and locusts.

A chilling example of what this zoomorphism signifies may be gleaned from the Syrian celebration of the tenth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War.  In that ceremony, “Syrian militia trainees [male and female] put on a show for Syrian president Hafez Assad.  Martial music reached a crescendo as Syrian teenage girls suddenly bit into live snakes [some four or five feet long], repeatedly tearing off flesh and spitting it out as blood ran down their chins.  As Assad applauded, the girls then attached the snakes to sticks and grilled them over fire, eating them triumphantly.  Others [militiamen] then proceeded to strangle puppies and drink their blood.”[10]

Bearing also in mind that the Syrians exterminated some 18,000 Sunni residents of the city of Hama in 1982 with cyanide—to speak of Arab Nazis is not to succumb to hyperbole.

Some scholars may contend that what has here been imputed to Islam should in truth be imputed to “Islamism.” They allege that Islamism, as distinct from Islam, twists Koranic teachings to un-Koranic uses.  The candid scholar will admit that the Koran lends itself to such twists, and much more clearly so viewed from the Sharia, Islamic law.  Robert Westrich lists Koranic verses condemning a variety of vices imputed to certain Jews, including falsehood, distortion, cowardice, greed, corruption of Scripture.[11]  But the fact that the Koran condemns these vices does not preclude those influenced by the Koran from attributing such vices to the Jews—the more readily so given the Koran’s unrelenting degradation of non-believers.  This degradation was canonized by the Umariyah—the legal code of the seventh-century Caliph Umar—which established dhimmitude.  That dhimmitude was also construed as an act of charity or patronage hardly minimizes its dehumanization of Jews and Christians under Muslim rule.  Indeed, as Bat Ye’or has shown, the condition of the dhimmi was in certain respects inferior to that of a slave.[12]

Turning to the Middle East, if distinctions are to be made between Islam and Islamism, two are in order.  First and foremost, Islamism is a rejection of Arab nationalism and, in this respect, a return to classical Islam.  However, Islamists have been influenced by modernism, which makes the return to classical Islam impossible.  Second, Islamism has adopted the anti-Semitic racism of Nazism.

It is easy to see exactly where Israel stands with respect both to Arab nationalism and Islamism.  Arab nationalism was always an instrument of state-builders, just as nationalism had been in Europe.  It opposes the imperial state (except when a given nation-state decides to take on an empire), but loyally serves whatever state the state-builders envision.  What are the Islamists, but Muslims who seek to seize control of the apparatus of the modern state, which they nonetheless reject as fragmenting the umma?[13]

The existing regimes in the Islamic world are highly unlikely to change (except for the worse) by means of internal forces—‘inside-out.’ Despotism can be quite stable, making victory out of failure. Only a comprehensive geopolitical strategy can transform those regimes, ‘outside-in.’ [According to the first named author of this essay], such a transformation would require the radical transformation of the United States into an all-conquering, benevolent world power – hardly imaginable, unless another 9/11 drove America to desperation, and transformed this complacent democracy into a benevolent universal despotism, something beyond the will and wisdom of the American people, as well as beyond the secular mentality of contemporary political science.◙

DEAR readers, the above brings everything full circle. It is this site’s invaluable gift(s) to you!

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}


Palestinians throw stones during clashes with Israeli security forces in Jerusalem, Thursday, July 3, 2014. The violence erupted Wednesday after a 16-year-old Palestinian Mohammed Abu Khdeir was abducted and a charred body, believed to be the boy, was found in a Jerusalem forest. The family has blamed extremist Jews for killing him in revenge for the deaths of the three Israeli teens, whose bodies were found in a field in the West Bank on Monday after a more than two-week search. (AP Photo/Mahmoud Illean) Palestinian official: Murdered youth 'burned alive'

{reblogged here –}

{reblogged here –}

AS always, pretending what is isn’t becomes the proverbial elephant in the room…the 600 lb gorilla…monkey on the back too. And as onerous as it can be within family confines – yes, “it be” – imagine how much more so it is when embedded within a nation’s belly, especially one as endangered as Israel.

IN light of this week’s BELATED operation to deal with Hamas – strangely coined “Operation Protective Edge”…this American-Israeli prefers “Operation Pulverizer…Smackdown”…no matter…after hundreds of rockets/missiles have rained down in recent weeks, let alone over many years – little is more pressing than the oft misunderstood subject of “ceasefires”. They are the death of us.

SIGNIFICANTLY, time and again, Israel’s leaders negotiate “ceasefires/deathfires” with terror groups, be they Hamas, Fatah or Hezbollah. It makes no diff. And while said “ceasefires” aren’t worth the price of bupkes, the fact of the matter is not only are they worthless and exponentially dangerous – whetting their appetites for more of the same – they are ILLEGAL. Plain and simple.

The relentless war waged against Israel has absolutely nothing to do with land per se, and this is precisely why every insane concession, gesture and withdrawal offered by Israel’s (peace-obsessed) leaders has not elicited an expected reciprocal peace gesture, but paradoxically incites to additional jihadist behavior. And in a tangible realm it makes sense for Arabs/Muslims to become hyper-aggressive, particularly after each Israeli capitulation counter intuitively whets their insatiable appetites for more of the same. So as a result of the leadership’s desperate attempt to allay international pressure, thus abating another dangling sword, they have become wedded to peace delusions. A double whammy. Never mind the fact that murderous jihad hasn’t ceased within Israel from time immemorial. But logic escapes many of Israel’s “leading lights”, except for a handful. At the top of the list heralding Israel’s “intellectual warriors” stand Dr. Martin Sherman and Professor Paul Eidelberg.

IN certain high level legal/political circles, primarily in America and Israel, Professor Louis Rene Beres requires little introduction. But for the newly on board, introducing…

My “go to” expert on all matters pertaining to international law, and a country’s right to anticipatory self defense – via preemptive strikes – is none other than Professor Louis Rene Beres of ‘Project Daniel.’ The working group’s original policy paper is found herein. He was Chair of the above strategic nuclear policy paper given to PM Ariel Sharon in 2003 – and subsequently briefed the report to President George W. Bush and to current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – in relation to Israel’s nuclear strategy in the face of Iran’s pursuit of WMD’s. He is a man of great integrity and humility. 

Lou, a heartfelt thank you for being my mentor.

International Law Precludes Ceasefires With Terror Groups

Professor Louis Rene Beres

Any time there is an announced “cease fire” between Israel and Hamas, it wrongly and foolishly bestows upon that terror organization

(1) an expressly legitimate status under international law; and

(2) a clear and newly incontestable condition of legal symmetry between the parties.

This is never a tolerable jurisprudential arrangement for Israel.

Moreover, no proper system of law can ever permit any sort of compromise or accommodation by a government with criminal organizations, even, in the case of Israel and Hamas, one that might involve a somewhat less formal arrangement than the currently proposed cease fire.

It follows that Israel ought never to unwittingly prop up its criminal adversary in Gaza by agreeing to a cease fire or similar “armistice”; instead, it should proceed immediately to do whatever is needed operationally, while simultaneously reminding the world that the pertinent conflict is between a fully legitimate sovereign state (one that meets all criteria of the Convention  on the Rights and Duties of States, 1934) and an inherently illegal insurgent organization that meets none of these criteria, and that routinely violates all vital precepts of the law of armed conflict.

Hamas’ inherent illegality is readily deducible from the far-reaching codified and customary criminalization of terrorism under authoritative international law, and can never be challenged by even well-intentioned third parties (e.g., the United States) in the presumably overriding interests of “peace.” This is true even if Hamas were somehow mistakenly acknowledged to have “just cause” for its insurgency

Since the Hebrew Bible, there have always been clear and determinable rules of warfare. Now, moreover, especially since prominent codified changes enacted in 1949 and 1977, these rules bind all insurgent forces, not only uniformed national armies. In modern usage, they derive most plainly from the St. Petersburg Declaration (1868), which, in turn, followed upon earlier limitations expressed at the First Geneva Convention of 1864.

In any conflict, the means that can be used to injure an enemy are not unlimited. It follows that no matter how hard they may try to institute certain self-serving manipulations of language,  those who would identify the willful maiming and execution of noncombatants in the name of some abstract ideal – any ideal – are always misrepresenting international law.

Whenever Palestinian insurgents (Hamas; Fatah; Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine; Islamic Jihad, it makes no difference) claim a legal right to use “any means necessary,” they are attempting to deceive. Even if their corollary claims for “national self-determination” were in some fashion legally supportable, there would remain fully authoritative limits on permissible targets and weapons.

Under binding humanitarian international law, the ends can never justify the means.

Intentional forms of violence directed against the innocent are always repugnant, and always prohibited.

While it is true that certain insurgencies can be judged lawful, any such permissible resorts to force must nonetheless conform to the laws of war. Even if incessant Palestinian cries of “occupation” were reasonable rather than contrived, any corresponding claims of entitlement to oppose Israel “by any means necessary” would remain unsupportable.

International law has precise form and content. It cannot be invented and reinvented by terror groups or aspiring states, merely to accommodate their own presumed interests.

Earlier, on November 29, 2012, the Palestinian Authority (PA) had been upgraded by the U.N. General Assembly to the status of a “nonmember observer state,” but significantly, the PA has since declared itself nonexistent.

On January 3, 2013, Mahmoud Abbas formally “decreed” the absorption of the “former “PA into the “State of  Palestine.” While this administrative action did effectively and jurisprudentially eliminate the PA, it assuredly did not succeed in creating a new state by simple fiat. Leaving aside Abbas’ illegal refusal to follow the Palestinian Arabs’ binding obligation to negotiate full sovereignty directly with Israel, the evident criteria of “nonmember observer state” also fell far short of expectations of the only authoritative international treaty on statehood. This governing document is the Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (the “Montevideo Convention”) of 1934.

National liberation movements that fail to meet the test of just means are never protected as legitimate. Even if we were to accept the argument that Palestinian insurgent groups somehow met the criteria of “just cause,” they would not meet the additionally limiting standards of discrimination, proportionality, and military necessity. These compulsory standards have been applied to insurgent organizations by the common Article 3 of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, and also by the two authoritative protocols to these Conventions of 1977.

They are also binding upon all combatants by virtue of broader customary and conventional international law, including Article 1 of the Preamble to the Fourth Hague Convention of 1907. This rule, called the “Martens Clause,” makes all persons responsible for upholding the “laws of humanity,” and for the “dictates of public conscience.”

Every use of insurgent force by Palestinian insurgents must be judged twice, once with regard to the justness of the objective (in this case, a Palestinian state to be built upon the charred ruins of Israel), and once with regard to the justness of the violence employed.

American and European supporters of a Palestinian State continue to believe that this 23rd Arab country will somehow be part of a “two-state solution.”  Oddly, this wishful presumption is contradicted almost everywhere in the Arab/Islamic world. Cartographically, in this world, Israel has already been eliminated. On these maps, unambiguously, Israel exists only as “Occupied Palestine.”

Always, terrorist crimes mandate universal cooperation, in both apprehension and punishment. As punishers of “grave breaches” under international law, all states are expected to search out and prosecute, or extradite, individual terrorist perpetrators. In no circumstances are any states permitted to characterize terrorists as “freedom fighters.”

This expectation is explicitly and emphatically true for the United States, which already  incorporates all international law as the “supreme law of the land” at Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution (the “Supremacy Clause”), and which was intentionally formed according to the principles of Natural Law. For the Founding Fathers of the United States, of course, these principles had already been “born” at Sinai.

IN furtherance of the above legal application, Israel’s leaders, by negotiating with terrorists (and releasing them from jail!), commit treason, as evinced within Israel’s internal laws! Yes, they do.
Article Two: Treason.
Impairment of sovereignty or integrity of the State.
97. (a) If a person commits an act liable to impair the sovereignty of the state with the intention to impair that sovereignty, then he is liable to the death penalty or to life imprisonment.
(b) if a person commits an act liable to remove any area from the sovereignty of the state or place it under the sovereignty of a foreign state with the intention to bring that about, then he is liable to the death penalty or to life imprisonment.


IT is duly instructive that another of this site’s trusted contacts, the above named Professor Paul Eidelberg, joins the fray…

A Question of Treason Leading to Anarchy

Prof. Paul Eidelberg

In my June 2, 2008 report on Israel National Radio, I said, inter alia: “Knesset Member Arieh Eldad is to be congratulated for saying Prime Minister [Ehud] Olmert’s offer to yield the Golan Heights to Syria is nothing less than treason.  But the same crime may be attributed to Prime Ministers Ehud Barak and Ariel Sharon – to say nothing of many other politicians who have been complicit in yielding Jewish land to Israel’s enemies.”

A year after my report of June 2, 2008 – on June 14, 2009 to be exact – PM Benjamin Netanyahu, in a speech at Bar-Ilan University, endorsed the creation of a Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria, and did so without Knesset or public debate.

If (former) MK Arieh Eldad could say “[PM Ehud] Olmert’s offer to yield the Golan Heights to Syria is nothing less than treason,” what shall we say of PM Netanyahu’s offer to yield Judea and Samaria to the Palestinian Authority?

Is it any wonder that Israel today is verging on a state of anarchy?

CONSEQUENTIALLY, in light of continuous rocket/missile barrages – more accurately, blitzkriegs – on southern Israel, one has to stand up and shout unequivocally: today’s incessant barrages – responsible for over a million of Israel’s citizens running into bomb shelters – are the poisonous fruits of the absolutely illegal “ceasefire” from 2012!

Then, as always, PM Netanyahu “ceased” Israel’s firepower during “Operation Cast Lead” in 2008 (and in 2012 during operation עַמּוּד עָנָן, ʿAmúd ʿAnán, literally: “Pillar of Cloud”…as derived from the Bible…aka Operation Pillar of Defense…this is NOT for nothing…know your Bible well…), pulling the troops back both times, as they closed in on victory!

PERVERSELY, what kind of delusional and derelict leadership behaves as such? Will this go around be any different? Time will tell…

Smoke rises from Gaza airport



Islamic jihadists threaten to behead Dave Gaubatz…via an all too eerily facsimile of this site’s premier contact…having come out of the shadows to assist in this and that.

NOW, when friends of this blogger, let alone valued contacts, are threatened – whether via beheading or another mandated act of Islamic jihad – well, let’s just say it doesn’t sit too well. Others may react differently, preferring to curl up in a ball and pretend what is isn’t. Suit yourselves.

Mind you, he is not alone in being threatened. Most – those who are front and center – fighting against Islam’s scourge are in their cross hairs. This blogger too, as linked above. Regardless, let’s just agree to a basic, overarching premise: Islamic jihadists won’t abide constructive criticism. It’s their way…or NO way…

THAT being settled, Dave Gaubatz came onto their radar, back in 2009, when he co-authored 

Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring
to Islamize America

with Paul Sperry. Previously, he (mostly) flew under the radar and that was part and parcel of life as a high level counter terror operative.

Aside from co-authoring the magna carté of books on the Muslim underworld,Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America, Dave Gaubatz is a U.S. State Department-trained Arabic linguist and a retired Federal Agent with the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI). With over three decades of combined Air Force (AF) experience, his career has led him on missions spanning the Middle East — from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Kuwait to Iraq. As a Special Federal Agent, he has received the highest forms of U.S. security clearances for top-secret intelligence information — including for weapons of mass destruction and espionage — and has been briefed into many “black projects.”

Among his varied achievements, Gaubatz has investigated felony crimes against the U.S. Air Force and government, as well as has been assigned to counterterrorism and counterintelligence investigations. He was the very first Special Civilian Agent deployed to Nasiriyah, Iraq, in 2003 for Operation Liberation Iraq. Using his Arabic training to travel throughout, he gathered vital intelligence on espionage and weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Although he was able to uncover sites, the U.S. failed to excavate them, and the weapons were later taken by groups of insurgents.

During this stint in Iraq, Gaubatz was also assigned to rescue the family of Mohammed Odeh Al-Rehaief, the Iraqi lawyer who aided in rescuing Pfc. Jessica Lynch. He has earned numerous Federal awards for identifying WMD sites and Islamic terrorists planning attacks against the U.S. and its troops.

KNOWING what you do about Islamic barbarism, are you shocked that they (CAIR & others) have a “price” on his head? So when he warns Americans (and other westerners) of the impending dangers, you would be wise to listen up. Post haste.

AS to the barbarians inside the (American) gates, this is a done deal. Consider:

Sunni Gate One:

Enter…Jamaat ul-Fuqra via its spreading jihadi compounds, and all over America’s landscape! Interspersed within, one can find Al Qaeda/ISIS splinter groups, or some such hybrid thereof. Six of one…half a dozen of another…

Shia Gate Two:

And from Iran’s proxy arm…enter: Hezbollah and its bomb making preparations!

DESPITE the above knowledge base, who would think that in Maine, of all places, there are more Somalis being taught jihad in Lewiston, its 2nd largest city, than its number of residents in toto! W T F…Not only that, but U.S. Catholic orgs are aiding in the jihad, under the banner of multi-culti do gooder psychosis! Talk about slitting one’s own throat.

Yet, why should Americans be spared, even as Pope Francis orders the Vatican to “embrace” “Chrislam”. O M G!

Read on, and be prepared to become, at the very least, spitting mad.

Al Qaeda, ISIS, Hezbollah Operating Inside America

22 June 2014

By: Dave Gaubatz

The vast majority of American people believe Islamic terrorist groups are predominately operating in the Middle East.  In terms of physical Jihad this is correct, but in terms for preparation of future Jihad in America this is not correct. They are here and ready to fight when called.

I have conducted firsthand counter terrorism research all across our beautiful country.  Al Qaeda and other Islamic terrorist cells are operating out of mosques honored with non profit status by the IRS.

I just returned from Portland, Maine.  Nearby is the second largest city (Lewiston) in Maine.  The U.S. Census Bureau estimates there are 37,000 U.S. citizens in Lewiston.  What the Census Bureau does not say is that U.S. catholic Organizations have brought in 40,000 Somalians to the Lewiston area.  The town is scattered with mosques and Islamic stores.  The Somalians are practicing the Islamic ideology of Sunni/Salafist (Wahabee).

During my research of the mosques in Lewiston I found many Fatwas pertaining to Jihad.  This is the type of dangerous information being provided to the 40,000 Somalian community in Lewsiton and other Somalian strongholds in America.


“What can we do about the slaughter of Muslims in Palestine and around the world? 

What is our stance concerning the slaughter of Muslims in Palestine and other parts of the world that is happening right now, where houses are being destroyed, farms are being wrecked, children are being killed, the wounded are being detained in the streets, houses are being bombarded and people are being prevented by the Jews and others, from buying the food and drink that they need? What can I, as a Muslim, do?

 Praise be to Allaah.
1- You have to make du’aa’, and recite du’a’ al-qunoot in your salaah (prayer).

2- Collect charity and send it through trustworthy channels.

3- Support the weak and oppressed in all ways, including the media and the internet.

4- Get scholars, daa’iyahs, khateebs and writers to explain the oppression that is happening and the negligence on the part of the ummah, and to mobilize the ummah to defend the holy places.

5- Check on one’s own intentions with regard to fighting for the sake of Allaah, and see whether he is applying the hadeeth of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him): «Whoever dies without having fought for the sake of Allaah or having had the intention of doing so, has died following one of the branches of hypocrisy» [Saheeh Muslim].

6- Pursuing all the means of building up material and moral strength, in preparation for meeting the enemy (in battle).

7- Reminding oneself and others of the virtues of martyrdom for the sake of Allaah and studying the rulings on jihad, and not having an attachment to this world.

8- Doing as much damage as possible to the enemies who are in a state of war with us, by boycotting their products, attacking them verbally and in writing to humiliate and annoy them, and to point out their kufr and shirk, and their insults to Allaah, His Messenger and the believers, publishing as much as possible in the audio-visual and print media about this serious topic whilst also connecting that to Islamic belief and the words of Allaah and His Messenger.

We ask Allaah the Exalted and All-Powerful to support His religion and cause His word to prevail.”

Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid

There are an estimated 2 – 8 million Muslims in America.  No one knows for sure because we have millions of people crossing our borders.  Islamic terrorist groups are operating inside America.  When the time is right they will conduct physical Jihad within our schools, shopping centers, sports facilities, and they will focus on destroying the hearts of the American people….Our Children.

 Zirah Moslem jihadist t-shirt, yours for $13 (Facebook)

ISIS figurine, sold by ReziMLTN, 'The Ultimate Islamic Brand', according to its homepage. (Facebook)

Brazenly displaying their wares all over the web, cock-sure they will prevail, even inside America!

ALAS, juxtapose said t-shirt’s jihadi messaging with the one designed by Dave Gaubatz (in support of an American/Israeli anti-terror Operation), the same patriotic warrior threatened with beheading!



IN tandem, piggybacking the above, for those who are seeking “tangibles” to assist in Operation Stop Islamic Terrorism, this site promises to keep you well informed, as soon as Dave Gaubatz gives the heads up. But in the meanwhile, another valued contact, in the academic arena, has some sage wisdom, that which should be read in full. 

Professor Paul Eidelberg

“The Only Rational Goal for America and Israel: Dismantle Islam”

Since Islam has declared war against America and Israel, PM Benjamin Netanyahu and a new American President should organize for their respective countries a strategy board whose purpose is to formulate and implement an 8-pronged strategy for dismantling Islam by (1) Political, (2) Diplomatic, (3) Psychological, (4) Economic, (5) Military, (6) Electronic, (7) Clandestine, and, above all, (8) Theological means. Here is what each nation should do according to its respective capabilities:

Table a Resolution in the UN General Assembly demanding the expulsion of Iran from the UN. For this purpose the Resolution should cite Iran’s many violations of (a) the UN Charter; (b) the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; (c) the anti-Genocide Convention, citing Teheran’s malediction “Death to America,” its vow to “Wipe Israel of the map”; and (d) its sponsoring mosques that advocate jihad and foster hatred of America and Western Civilization.

  1. Pressure various nations that receive American aid to sever diplomatic relation with Iran.
  2. Establish a counterpart to the Voice of America to publicize the vicious policies of Iran.
  3. Disseminate the writings of former Muslims critical of Islam.
  4. Disseminate information concerning Islam’s denial of man’s creation in the Image of God.
  5. Disseminate the critiques of Islam by eminent statesmen, philosophers, and theologians.
  6. Disseminate information about the crimes committed by Muslims against non-Muslims.
  7. Distribute by air drops to Iranians flyers denouncing Iran’s mistreatment of women.
  8. Intercept and disrupt by electronic means Iranian communications with its agents abroad.
  9. Do not permit Iranian government officials to enter the United States.
  10. Institute a selective blockade of Iranian ships on the high seas.
  11. Intercept Iranian supplies to its clients such as Hamas and Hezbollah.
  12. With few exceptions, do not take jihadists alive.
  13. Do not release Muslim terrorists.
  14. Prosecute Muslims and Muslim institutions in the U.S. that preach jihad.
  15. Employ clandestine operations to disrupt Iran’s military research and operations.
  16. Publicize Iran’s global ambition is to stifle freedom of conscience in general, and of Christianity and Judaism in particular.
  17. Aid Iranian freedom fighters.
  18. Establish in the United States a program of advanced education for Iranian dissidents.
  19. Establish in America community schools for teaching American Exceptionalism, focusing on the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. These schools should also teach students about Islam’s bellicose doctrines and history.

The preceding should not be regarded as exhaustive of what must be done to dismantle Islam. It is extremely important to undermine the basic ideological and institutional sources of Islam, which has rightly been called the greatest murder machine in history.◙

TAKE it to heart – or not.




SANS a scintilla of a doubt, it is IMPOSSIBLE to separate Islamic doctrine from bloody jihad. Not only that, if one political commentary herein stands above all the rest, it is no doubt this one:

In brief, it is a recent policy paper by Professor Paul Eidelberg; a paper which this American-Israeli had the privilege to review and add to; duly honored and humbled to have been asked to participate in his myth shattering scholarship.

Make NO mistake, its contents are earth shaking, unbelievably thought provoking and cogently analyzed. In particular, its historical analysis and theological basis are spot on. Having read many policy papers, this praise is not offered lightly. Therefore, sit down… put your feet up… have a drink (not the inebriating kind)…. enjoy some sweets (you may need it to lighten the mood)… and start reading – .

Sharing its contents may well be your most important contribution to our common struggle. Really.

One dare not separate the authentic/true doctrinal dictates of Islam from decapitations, cannibalism, rapes, shootings, bombings and whatever method gets “the job done”. It is not as if one is dealing with Christianity or Judaism, whereby one can – if they so desire – pick and choose how religious they want to be without fear of bloody retribution.

However, in respect to Islam, savagery is meted out to all those who refuse to submit to the boot of Islam, even from within the Muslim fold. Their preferred targets are “infidels”. Muslims who stay on the sidelines and refuse to take part in their savagery are very much in their cross hairs too. 

Bloody Jihad One:

What other so-called religion inspires head chopping and more? London’s Islamic-Inspired/Sanctioned Head Chopping; Cameron’s Hideous Response, and Boston’s Jihad. Cause & Effect!

Bloody Jihad Two:

And, if decapitations are not convincing, as to the scourge from Islam, how about this: Islamic Cannibalism ROOTED In Islam’s Relationship To Blood:The Slaughter of Christians & Jews!

Bloody Jihad Three:

As is said, whatever floats your boat…and for females who are too “demure” to partake in frontal jihad, well, sexual jihad is all the rage! SEXUAL JIHAD:The Latest “Weapon” Waged To “Assist” Islamic Warriors. Where Is This Rooted?

Bloody Jihad Four:

Just how intrinsic are Islam’s underpinnings to all of the above? Explosive Religious Origins:What It Means For Western Civilization In General & Israel In Particular.

Therefore, is it any shock that Islamic jihadists are swathing across the globe and killing students/children/others hither and yon, as they scream – all under the banner of Allah – Allahu Akbar….?

Islamic militants attack Nigerian school, killing dozens of students

DAMATURU, Nigeria — Islamic militants set fire to a locked dormitory at a school in northern Nigeria, then shot and slit the throats of students who tried to escape through windows during a pre-dawn attack Tuesday. At least 58 students were killed, including many who were burned alive.

They “slaughtered them like sheep” with machetes, and gunned down those who ran away, said one teacher, Adamu Garba.

Soldiers guarding a checkpoint near the coed government school were mysteriously withdrawn hours before it was targeted by the militants, said the spokesman for the governor of northeastern Yobe state.

Female students were spared in the attack, said the spokesman, Abdullahi Bego, though girls and women have been abducted in the past by militants of the Boko Haram movement, whose name means “Western education is forbidden.”

This time, the insurgents went to the female dormitories and told the young women to go home, get married and abandon the Western education they said is anathema to Islam, Bego said. All of the dead were teenage boys or young men.

The militants, whose struggle for an Islamic state has killed thousands and made them the biggest threat to security in Africa’s top oil producer, have increasingly preyed on civilians, both Muslim and Christian. Some 300 people have died in attacks this month alone.

Local officials buried the bodies of 29 victims and another 29 were taken to Damaturu Specialist Hospital, according to the hospital records and an Associated Press reporter who went to the mortuary. Most of the victims appeared to be between 15 and 20 years old, Bego said.

Eleven wounded survivors of the attack were being treated at the hospital.

Touring the smoldering ruins Tuesday at the Federal Government College of Buni Yadi, Gov. Ibrahim Gaidam decried the federal government’s failure to protect the population.

“It is unfortunate that our children in schools are dying from lack of adequate protection from the federal government,” Gaidam told reporters.

He called on President Goodluck Jonathan to deploy more troops to the region.

Jonathan, who rarely comments on individual attacks, said in a statement that he felt “immense sadness and anguish” by the loss of life at the school, and vowed that the military would “continue to prosecute the war against terror with full vigor, diligence and determination.”

Garba said the militants locked the door of a dormitory where male students were sleeping, then set it on fire. Some students were burned alive in the attack that began around 2 a.m., he said.

The governor said it took hours for troops to arrive, giving the assailants plenty of time to set the rest of the school campus ablaze— six dormitories, the administrative building, staff quarters, classrooms, a clinic and the kitchen.

Bego, the governor’s spokesman, said the governor will be looking into why the school was left unprotected. “The community complained to the governor that yesterday the military were withdrawn and then the attack happened,” he said.

Soldiers from Damaturu, the state capital located some 45 miles (70 kilometers) away, did not arrive until noon, hours after the attackers had taken off, according to community leaders.

Military spokesman Eli Lazarus confirmed the attack, but could not give an exact death toll because soldiers were still gathering corpses. He had no immediate comment on the charge that soldiers withdrew before the attack.

Nigeria’s military has reported arresting several soldiers accused of aiding and passing information to Boko Haram extremists; a senator has also been accused of similar charges.

On Monday, Jonathan dismissed suggestions the military was losing the war to halt the 4-year-old Islamic uprising in the northeast.

Tens of thousands of Nigerians have lost family members, houses, businesses, their belongings and livelihoods to the rebellion and the fallout from a military state of emergency by soldiers accused of gross human rights violations, including setting ablaze entire villages and summary executions of suspects.

Tuesday’s attack is only the latest in a string of deadly assaults by Islamic militants.

Entire towns and villages were under the sway of Boko Haram when Jonathan declared a state of emergency in May. The military quickly forced the insurgents out of urban areas, only to have them regroup in forests and mountain caves where it has proved difficult to flush them out.

The military said recent attacks are being perpetrated by militants escaping a sustained aerial bombardment and ground assaults on their forest hideouts along the border with Cameroon, an offensive begun after Jonathan fired and replaced his entire military command last month. On Saturday, the military announced it had closed hundreds of miles of the border with Cameroon to prevent militants using it as a launch pad for attacks.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Monday condemned the “unspeakable violence and acts of terror” and said the United States was helping Nigerian authorities “to combat the threat posed by Boko Haram, while protecting civilians and ensuring respect for human rights.”

But survivors and local officials charge they get no protection.

“Everybody is living in fear,” local government chairman Maina Ularamu told the AP after Izghe village was attacked twice in a week this month — with militants killing 109 people and burning hundreds of thatched huts in neighboring Adamawa state.

“There is no protection. We cannot predict where and when they are going to attack. People can’t sleep with their eyes closed,” Ularamu said.

Aside for some pooh-pooh declarations of “outrage” muttered by Obama Inc., it is hardly comforting that these same mouthpieces BACK UP Al-Qaeda and its offshoots, all over the Mid East and beyond. 

In effect, Obama Inc. is guilty by omission and commission, despite their feigned exclamations of shock…horror…and what not! Besides, this is an admin which employs a terrorist to be an Obamacare “navigator”. Think this is smack talk? Nope. 

The fact of the matter is that Islam cannot be separated from its bloody roots, simply because jihad by the sword is DIRECTLY ordered through the Koran and by major Islamic scholars.


Question:Are Muslims permitted to force others into accepting Islam?

Summary Answer
Muslims are commanded to fight unbelievers until they are either dead, converted to Islam, or in a permanent state of subjugation under Muslim domination.  Allowing people of other faiths to live and worship independently of Islamic rule is not an option.

The Qur’an:
Qur’an (8:39) – “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.”  Translation from the Noble QuranQur’an (9:29) – “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”  Suras 9 and 5 are the last “revelations” that Muhammad handed down – hence abrogating what came before, which includes the oft-quoted verse 2:256 -“Let there be no compulsion in religion…”.Qur’an (9:5) “But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them…”  Prayer and charity are among the Five Pillars of Islam, as salat and zakat.  See below.  Islam sanctions violence as a means of coercing religion.Qur’an (9:11) – (Continued from above) “But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then are they your brethren in religion”  This confirms that Muhammad is speaking of conversion to Islam.Quran (9:56-57) – “And they swear by Allah that they are most surely of you, and they are not of you, but they are a people who are afraid (of you).  If they could find a refuge or cave or a place to enter into, they would certainly have turned thereto, running away in all haste.”  This refers to people living among Muhammad’s own people who may not be true believers, but have to pretend to be in order to survive.  They have no safe refuge to which to escape the Muslims.  If Islam were a religion of peace, then why the fear?Qur’an (2:193) – “And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion be only for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers.”  The key phrase is to fight until “religion be only for Allah.”Qur’an (3:83) – “Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and the earth has sub mitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?”  So much for the earlier verse (2:256) stating that there is “no compulsion in religion”.

From the Hadith:
Sahih Muslim (1:33) The Messenger of Allah said: “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay zakat.”  The first part of this condition is the Shahada, or profession of faith in Islam.  Violence is sanctioned until the victims embrace Muhammad’s religion.Sahih Muslim (19:4294) – “When you meet your enemies who are polytheists (which includes Christians), invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them … If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them”  Osama bin Laden echoes this order from his prophet: “Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually?  Yes. There are only three choices in Islam  … . Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.” (source: The al-Qaeda Reader p. 19-20)Bukhari (8:387) – “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.'”Bukhari (53:392) – “While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said, “Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle.”Bukhari (2:24) – “Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform a that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”Bukhari (60:80) – “The Verse:–‘You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.’ means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.”Bukhari (60:40) – “…:And fight them till there is no more affliction (i.e. no more worshiping of others along with Allah).”  ‘Affliction’ of Muslims is explicitly defined here being a condition in which others worship a different god other than Allah.  Muslims are commanded to use violence to ‘rectify’ the situation.Bukhari (59:643) – “Testify that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah, or else I will chop off your neck!”  Words of a military leader that Muhammad sent on an expedition with the mission of destroying a local religion in Yemen.Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 959 – Then the apostle sent Khalid bin Walid… to the Banu al-Harith and ordered him to invite them to Islam three days before he attacked them.  If they accepted then he was to accept it from them, and if they declined he was to fight them.  So Khalid set out and came to them, and sent out riders in all directions inviting the people to Islam, saying, “If you accept Islam you will be safe.”  So the men accepted Islam as they were invited.  The text goes on to say that Khalid taught the al-Harith about Islam after their “conversion,” proving that it was based on fear of slaughter rather than a free and intelligent decision.Ibn Kathir (Commenting on Quran 2:256, which says “let there be no compulsion in religion”) –“Therefore all people of the world should be called to Islam.  If anyone of them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the jizya, they should be fought till they are killed.”


Additional Notes:
Following his flirtation with preaching relative peace and tolerance at Mecca – a 13-year disaster that netted less than 100 followers (mostly friends and family) – Muhammad changed tactics during his last ten years.  Once he obtained the power to do so, he began forcing others into accepting his claims about himself at the point of a sword.  In many places in the Hadith, he tells his followers that he has been commanded by Allah to fight unbelievers until they profess their faith in Islam (theShahada).During these later years, Muhammad did not seem at all bothered by conversions that were made under obvious duress.  These included that of his sworn enemy of Abu Sufyan and his wife Hind.  According to Muslim historians, when Abu Sufyan went to seek peace with Muhammad, he was ordered instead to embrace Islam.  The exact words spoken to him in Muhammad’s presence were,  “Submit and testify that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the apostle of Allah before you lose your head” – (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 814).  He did.The entire city of Mecca followed suit, even though the residents and leaders detested Muhammad and had resisted his preaching from the beginning.  Most of them “converted” to Islam the day that he marched through their city with an army so dominant that little resistance was offered.  Only the most credulous of believers would think that the city’s religious epiphany just happened to coincide with the sword at their necks.Meccans who would not change their religion were forcibly expelled from the city following that last Haj (Quran 9:5).  The Christians and Jews living in Arabia at the time suffered the same fate on Muhammad’s deathbed order.  They were given the choice of either accepting Islam or being forced off their land (Sahih Muslim 19:4366).The Jews at Khaybar were not at war with Muhammad when he ordered his warriors to attack them.  Even his faithful son-in-law, Ali, whom he chose to head the mission, was somewhat perplexed as to the pretext on which they were to assault this peaceful farming community so far away from Medina:

Muhammad said: ‘Proceed on and do not look about until Allah grants you victory’, and Ali went a bit and then halted and did not look about and then said in a loud voice: ‘Allah’s Messenger, on what issue should I fight with the people?’ Thereupon he (the Prophet) said: ‘Fight with them until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger’  (Sahih Muslim 31:5917)

The Jews were caught entirely be surprise, of course.  Their wealth was stolen and their women and children taken and distributed as slaves by the prophet of Islam to his men.  Muhammad even took a woman for himself – after ordering the death of her husband.

Before he died, Muhammad sent his warriors against pagan Arab tribes, such as the al-Harith, demanding that they either convert to Islam or be wiped out (naturally, they opted for the Religion of Peace).  He cursed Christians and Jews to the very end (Bukhari 8:427).

According to al-Shafi in “The Ordinances of the Quran“, Muhammad “defeated the people until they entered Islam by hook or by crook.”  Muslims are taught to follow in the way of their prophet.  A devotee under the reign of Umar put it this way “Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute)” (Bukhari 53:386).

Likewise, Abu Bakr, Muhammad’s closest companion and immediate successor, pressed Jihad aggressively in foreign territory against people who did not want war and were of no threat.  In a letter sent to the Persians, the caliph bluntly stated, “You should convert to Islam, and then you will be safe, for if you don’t, you should know that I have come to you with an army of men that love death, as you love life.”

Down through the centuries Muslims have forced Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Zoroastrians, pagans and others to accept Islam, either by bluntly offering them death as an alternative, or by making their lives so miserable (ie. taxes, denial of rights…) that the conquered convert to Islam under the strain.

Forced conversions persist among extremists.  Recently in Egypt, a Christian girl was kidnapped and told that she would be raped if she did not convert.  In 2010, an 11-year-old Christian boy in Pakistan was kept enslaved in chains (12) by his Muslim landlord, who proudly told the world that he would liberate the lad if he embraced Islam.

Neither of these examples of attempted forced conversion was condemned by Islamic organizations, even in the West.  From the Muslim perspective, the victim in each case still technically retains the choice to convert.  In fact, some even lauded the Pakistani slave-owner for being magnanimous in offering freedom and debt relief to his subject for embracing Islam.

Since Muslims believe so sincerely that their religion is truth, they often can’t help but feel, on some level, that forced conversion is more of a favor done to the subject – a case of the end justifying the means.  As Muhammad said, “Allah marvels at those who are brought to paradise in chains” (Bukhari 52:254).

It is also important to note the critical role that jizya plays in Islamic conversion.  Paying a “tax” to Muslims is the only avenue of escape for those who don’t want to leave their religion, according to the Qur’an.  This answers the question of why Muhammad, his companions, and subsequent Muslim armies didn’t force everyone to convert to Islam.

As Muhammad realized with the Jews of Khaybar, who were allowed to keep their farming community provided they directed the profits of their labor to him, it was often more lucrative to leave local economies in place rather than killing every male who wouldn’t convert.  This became the loose rule for the Muslim armies that swept across Christian, Jewish, Persian, Hindu and Buddhist lands in the decades that followed.  The money that was collected was then used to further Islamic expansion.

As Muhammad put it: “My sustenance is under the shade of my spear, and he who disobeys my orders will be humiliated by paying Jizya” (another translation: “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.”)  The hadith has been quoted by al-Qaeda and is found in the original version of Bukhari and Ahmad (5114 or 4869, depending on the translation).

In fairness, Muslims have generally tended to follow verse 2:256 of the Quran, which states, “Let there be no compulsion in religion.” and have not felt it right to force others into embracing Islam.  However, this does not change the fact that verse 2:256 was clearly abrogated by later verses, particularly in Sura 9 – otherwise the practice of killing apostates if they do not recant their chose faith would not have become an acceptable part of Islamic law.

Another point to keep in mind is that in Islam, practice is more important than belief.  Muslims are commanded to fight unbelievers until they say they believe in Allah (or pay the Jizya), but there seems to be a tacit understanding that belief itself can’t be forced (ie. “there is no compulsion in religion”).  Nevertheless, once a subjugated individual outwardly converts to Islam under the strain of taxes and discrimination, they are not allowed to recant upon penalty of death.  Their children must also be raised Muslim.  And, if they aren’t, then it is a sign of apostasy – subject to death.

This is how Islam managed to spread so successfully within conquered populations to ratios in the high 90th percentiles over native religion.

One last point of interest is that Muhammad’s later practice of ordering people to profess their belief in him proved disastrous both for his own family and the legacy of his religion.  By the time of his death, his empire included a great many people and tribes who had accepted his rule merely to avoid war and slavery.  Many of them wanted out after he died, and several wars were immediately fought, resulting in thousands of deaths and cementing Islam’s legacy of violent intolerance.

Incredibly, even Muhammad’s sworn enemy of Abu Sufyan may have gotten the last laugh.  So ambitious was the prophet of Islam that he accepted his former foe’s outward profession of allegiance (at the point of a sword) in order to expand his empire.  Yet, it was Abu Sufyan’s own children who ultimately benefited – at the expense of Muhammad’s.

Abu Sufyan’s son, Muawiyah, inherited the empire after defeating Muhammad’s adopted son, Ali.  He also poisoned Hasan, one of the prophet’s two favorite grandsons.  Abu Sufyan’s grandson, Yazid, became the next caliph and promptly had the head of Muhammad’s other favorite grandson, Hussein, brought to him on a platter.

Such are the perils of forcing others to say that you are a prophet when they prefer to believe otherwise.

See also: MYTH: Muhammad Rejected Conversions Made Under Duress


Israel’s Leadership, Its Achilles Heel:Serial Mendacity Morphed With Besieged Mentality.A Road To Disaster…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Many of this blog’s readership are duly familiar with Professor Paul Eidelberg and the close association herein. Nonetheless, it bears repeating, for not unlike with Dr. Martin Sherman, as well as with Professor Louis Rene Beres, his assessments often serve as a self mirror, at the same time that further insights are often gleaned.

I assist several Zionist academics with their efforts, chiefly through their policy centers. I am particularly in sync with the policy prescriptions elucidated by Dr. Martin Sherman (his latest tv interview at i.24tv on the “peace process”) andProfessor Paul Eidelberg (his latest interview at Inquisitr, ‘Organized Treachery vs. Organized Hypocrisy‘). Therefore, I lend them my insights.

My “go to” expert on all matters pertaining to international law, and a country’s right to anticipatory self defense – via preemptive strikes – is none other thanProfessor Louis Rene Beres of ‘Project Daniel.’ The working group’s original policy paper is found herein. He was Chair of the above strategic nuclear policy paper given to PM Ariel Sharon in 2003 – and subsequently briefed the report to President George W. Bush and to current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – in relation to Israel’s nuclear strategy in the face of Iran’s pursuit of WMD’s. He is a man of great integrity and humility.

Lou, a heartfelt thank you for being my mentor.

But before we get to the main event, please understand that the ways in which Israel’s top leadership reacts to serial terror is more than indicative of their state of mind.

The Palestinian sniper who Tuesday, Dec. 24, shot dead an Israeli civilian employed by the IDF to repair the damaged Gazan border fence, sent  Israeli government and military chiefs into an agony of indecision over how to fight back against surging Palestinian terrorism attacks without derailing ongoing US-sponsored Middle East peace talks. Tuesday afternoon, Israeli warplanes struck a Hamas base in Gaza. This was no more than a relatively mild response. However, Hamas is evacuating its bases in case of further strikes.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu had hoped that by refraining from punishing the Palestinian attacks – spreading out from Gaza, across the West Bank, in Jerusalem and inside Israel – he could bring the talks to a successful conclusion. But he was wrong. Like his predecessors, he faild to meet the challenge which defeated them too: How to talk peace with the Palestinians under terrorist aggression.  

Netanyahu however finds himself in worse straits due his secretiveness on the extensive concessions he has offered the Palestinians in such sensitive areas as the Jordan Valley as well as the West Bank, under US Secretary of State John Kerry’s bulldozing tactics.

He almost gave the game away by a secret meeting he held with the dovish ultra-religious Torah Judaism (Aguda) Party leaders, suggesting he was planning a government reshuffle to drop pro-settlement factions from his government in favor of a lineup more amenable to concessions.

With the above firmly in mind, presenting,

Serial Mendacity: The Road to a Mental Disorder

Prof. Paul Eidelberg


Much of the historical data in this article is drawn from scattered reports of the Independent Media Review and Analysis (IMRA) and other sources. It was necessary to lightly edit this assorted material to make it more coherent and historically more familiar to diverse readers.

My paramount objective is to provide prima facie evidence that Israel is a self-­entrapped state; that its decision makers are ensnared in escapism or in denial of reality. I dare say that these decision makers are suffering from a mental disorder comparable to schizophrenia. This disorder is obscured by the co-presence of normal behavior, but which normal behavior does not preclude irrational responses to the hostile attitude and behavior of Israel’s most proximate antagonists, the Jew-hating Palestinians.

With Israel, we are dealing with Jewish politicians confronted by existential threats as well as by Arab-Islamic enemies whose traits of character cannot be readily understood and realistically addressed by people whose formal education and moral values and whose habits of life are maladapted to the language and behavior of Muslims and Arabs. This means that the Jewish state of Israel does not fit very well in the Islamic sea of the Middle East, where even Arabs and Muslims are each at their own throats. But this means that Western political analysts, including highly educated students of Islam may lead us astray as we try to understand the conflicts raging in the Middle East, especially the conflict between Israel and that nebulous entity called the “Palestinians,” an almost random conglomeration of people lacking clear-cut historical and territorial definition, as well as clearly defined ethnic and religious characteristics. As for Israel, it seems to be limping along from crisis to crisis without any clear sense of national purpose beyond the mundane but not very inspiring value of security.

Part I. Analysis of a Syndrome: Hung by Their Own Petard

Israel is trapped in a syndrome I call “serial mendacity.”  Not that mendacity is a national trait of Israelis. Rather, it’s a reaction to the mendacity which diverse scholars say is deeply engrained in Arab-Islamic culture. Even Sonia Hamady, a liberated Arab sociologist, admits that “Lying is a widespread habit among the Arabs, and they have a low idea of truth.”

Hence it’s ironic that mendacity became the modus operandi of Israel’s government when Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and his Foreign Minister Shimon Peres consummated the fraudulent Oslo or Israel-PLO Agreement of September 1993. This nefarious agreement obscures the most pertinent truths about Israel’s enemy, Islam.

First of all, Islamic supremacism makes it impossible for Muslims and Jews to coexist in genuine and abiding peace. Second, how can Muslims engage in honest negotiations with infidels, when their holiest book, the Quran, describes infidels as apes and dogs? Third, the Muslim doctrine of taqiyya makes a virtue deception and dissembling even with regard to fellow-Muslims. Successful taqiyya is a mark of individual and social superiority, which harmonizes with the theological supremacy that animates Islam and its wars against unbelievers. These characteristics of Islam undermine the primacy of reason as opposed to the primacy of force in resolving disputes with adversaries. As a consequence, it is futile and self-defeating to deal with Muslims on the basis of ‘reciprocity” or compromise, concepts foreign to Arab-Islamic culture.

As conceived by Muslim statesmen, the Oslo Agreement was nothing more than a diplomatic tactic designed to obtain territory from peace-intoxicated Jews and thus facilitate the annihilation of Israel. The demise of the Jewish state is of course sanctified by Islamic scriptures.

It follows that Israeli decision makers did not take these scriptures or Islam seriously. They disregarded Islam’s 1,400-year tradition of genocide, its denial of the nation-state system on the one hand, and its global ambitions on the other. In contrast, Israel’s democratic politicians have been conditioned by the Western concept of pluralism and adulation of parliamentarianism whereby diverse parties resolve their differences by means of mutual concessions or compromise.

Probing more deeply, the fact that Israeli politicians, unlike their Muslim counterparts, prefer to resolve differences via the primacy of reason as opposed to the primacy of force or intimidation clashes with a basic principle of Islamic theology. We need to bear in mind that Islam’s Deity represents absolute Will unbound by Reason, hence unbound by law or justice. This theology stands in striking contrary to Judaism—as illustrated by Abraham’s questioning the justice of God’s projected destruction of Sodom and Gomorra. Can anyone imagine Muhammad or Saladin or Ahmadinejad interposing between Allah and the genocides committed in his name by Muslims?

Given the overweening arrogance of Muslims underlying their murderous hatred of Infidels and supplemented by their art of deception called taqiyya, Muslim diplomats and despots have made fools of western statesmen. Prevarication is congenital in Islam, but what Western decision makers and opinion makers dare expose this seemingly “racist” portrayal of Islam?  It needs to be born in mind, however, that that the untruthfulness intrinsic to taqiyya harmonizes with Islam’s theological rejection of the primacy of reason which, in the West, is the faculty for communicating truth.

Both Israeli and American leaders have ignored Islam’s addiction to taqiyya. By so doing they have endowed Islamic mendacity with a religious veneer and have thereby conditioned Israelis and Americans to remain silent about the Oslo charade. This silence has effectively deprived American and Israeli statesmen of free will—ironically, the human faculty denied by Islamic theology! We may therefore say that the Oslo charade has made Western liberals and atheists the victims of a theology which not only rejects free will, the very quality that distinguishes the human from the subhuman, but which thereby warrants Islam’s denigration of infidels as apes and dogs!

Part II. The Unfolding of a Monumental Dilemma

Now, these ironic conclusions aside, one thing must be kept uppermost in mind: Oslo obscured the fact that the PLO is dedicated to Israel’s destruction. This truth was known to every Israeli Prime Minister, beginning with Yitzhak Rabin. It was concealed by all of his successors: Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert, and Ariel Sharon. All were ensnared in falsehood.

None of these prime ministers possessed the wit and the guts to expose the mendacious and vicious nature of the PLO—something I had personally and naively recommended to Peres in a September 1976 meeting with him arranged by former Israel Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Haim Laskov. If Prime Minister Netanyahu revealed the truth about Oslo, he would be incriminating all of his predecessors, as well as himself! Such an exposé would collapse the State of Israel, for it would then be known to the people of this country that their prime ministers were guilty of at least criminal negligence, hence that they were responsible for the thousands of Jewish casualties resulting from the Oslo Agreement. No future prime minister of Israel can avoid this dilemma!

Let us therefore review some of the evidence accumulated by IMRA which exposes the fraud perpetrated by the Government of Israel. We begin with a letter to Yitzhak Rabin from PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat dated September 9, 1993 and published by Ha’aretz Magazine:

Mr. Prime Minister,

The signing of the [Israel-PLO] Declaration of Principles marks a new era in the history of the Middle East. In firm conviction thereof, I would like to confirm the following Palestine Liberation Organization commitments: The PLO recognizes the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security. The PLO accepts United Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338. The PLO commits itself to the Middle East peace process, and to a peaceful resolution of the conflict between the two sides and declares that all outstanding issues relating to permanent status will be resolved through negotiations … The PLO renounces the use of terrorism and other acts of violence and will assume responsibility over all PLO elements and personnel in order to assure their compliance, prevent violations and discipline violators….

The PLO affirms that those articles [of the PLO Covenant] which deny Israel’s right to exist, and the provisions of the Covenant which are inconsistent with the commitments of this letter, are now inoperative and no longer valid….


Yasser Arafat
Chairman, the Palestine Liberation Organization

September 9, 1993

Prime Minister Rabin responded on the same day: “… The Government of Israel has decided to recognize the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people and to commence negotiations with the PLO within the Middle East peace process.”

Four days later [on September 13, 1993], the Declaration of Principles was signed in Washington. A month later, the Israeli government committed itself to the PLO by encouraging the activity of the Palestinian institutions of East Jerusalem. In April, an economic agreement with the PLO was signed in Paris. In May, the first PLO officials arrived in Gaza and Jericho, and two months later Yasser Arafat arrived in Gaza. In August of 1994, the protocols transferring authority to the PLO were signed at the Erez checkpoint and Cairo, and in November, donor countries decided on generous grants to the PLO. In December 1994, the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to the head of the PLO, the Prime Minister Yitzhak of Israel and Foreign Minister Peres.

In September 1995, Oslo II, also known as the Taba Agreement, called for Israeli withdrawals from various areas of the “West Bank.” In November and December of 1995, the PLO assumed control over six cities in Judea and Samaria. In January 1996, 812 terrorists were released from Israeli prisons and 10 days later, elections were held for the Palestinian Authority Council and its president. The reconciliation process reached its climax in April 1996, when Prime Minister Shimon Peres announced that the Palestinian Covenant was annulled.

However, in 2002, nine years after the 1993 exchange of mutual recognition by Yasser Arafat and Yitzhak Rabin, the Government of Israel (with the participation of the Labor Party) accepted the assessment by the Israel Defense Forces General Staff and the Shin Bet security service that the continued presence of IDF forces in Judea and Samaria is a necessary—though not always sufficient —condition for preventing terror activity. In the opinion of many of these officials, Oslo had fostered a dangerous distortion of the message of peace vis-à-vis the PLO, indeed, that the political method of resolving disputes between of the Arab residents of Samaria, Judea, and Gaza on the one hand, and Israel on the other was “blocked” or no longer tenable.

The perception of the Oslo Agreement as a means leading to peace was based on three assumptions. The first assumption was that the PLO had given up its traditional goal of eliminating the State of Israel. The second and related assumption was that the PLO had really given up violence as an instrument to achieve that traditional goal. The third assumption was that the PLO had renounced its claim of the right of return of the 1948 Arab refugees to their homes. Therefore, the logical conclusion was that a genuine and abiding peace agreement with the PLO was within reach, since the main obstacles were removed from the path to peace, while the remaining disputes, which were detailed in the Declaration of Principles, would be settled around the negotiating table.

That hope was not realized, despite the early, formative period of the Oslo Agreement in the years 1993-1996, when a “dovish” government headed by the Labor Party, with the participation of the left-wing Meretz party, was in power. The PLO terror war continued despite Oslo, and it proceeded along two axes.

The PLO’s Strategy and Tactics

The PLO’s goal was embedded in two plans, strategic and tactical. The strategic plan was included in the Palestinian Covenant, which was approved by the Palestinian National Council (PNC) in Jerusalem, in 1964. The plan is based on the negation of Jewish nationhood. The Jews have no right to statehood in Palestine since they “only belong to a religion.” But since such a state was established on Palestinian land, it must be removed through “armed struggle.”

The PNC approved of this plan in 1974. The plan was known as the “stages plan” for the liberation of Palestine. The PNC decided to achieve control over all of Palestine gradually by negotiations punctuated by “armed struggle.” The PNC had thus decided on a “peace-and-terror” strategy, a strategy of stages by which to truncate and eventually eliminate the Jewish state.

About a year before the 1993 signing of the Oslo accords, the late Faisal Husseini discussed the distinction between strategy and tactics in a speech to an Arab youth organization in Amman (Al-Ra’y, Jordan, November 12, 1992). “In the life of all nations there are two political strategies: the overall strategy and the current political strategy. We have to know that the slogan for the current stage is not ‘from the sea to the river’ … we have not conceded and will not surrender any of the existing commitments that have existed for more than 70 years … We have within our Palestinian and united Arab society the ability to deal with divided Israeli society … We must force Israeli society to cooperate … with our Arab society, and eventually to gradually dissolve the ‘Zionist entity,’”

Two years after the signing of the Oslo Agreement, Husseini repeated this cunning Palestinian stratagem on July 22, 1995, at the University of Jordan. “The political solution we are now proposing is within the context of our political strategy and not our overall strategy. Our policy with regard to the second strategy is known. If you ask any Palestinian, he will tell you that the boundaries of Palestine go from the river to the sea. There are no arguments over that. We might be mistaken about our political strategy, but we are never wrong about our permanent overall strategy.” Husseini proved that this is indeed his permanent view when he reiterated the distinction six years later. He told the Cairo Al-Arabi on June 24, 2001: “We distinguish the strategic, long-term goals from the political phased goals, which we are compelled to temporarily accept due to international pressure … The Palestinian borders according to the higher strategy [are] ‘from the river to the sea.’ Palestine in its entirety is an Arab land, the land of the Arab nation, a land no one can sell or buy, and it is impossible to remain silent while someone is robbing it, even if this requires time and even [if it means paying] a high price.”

In that interview, Husseini revealed the PLO’s strategy with regard to the Oslo Agreement. “The people of Troy … cheered and celebrated thinking that the Greek troops were routed, and while retreating, they left a harmless wooden horse as spoils of war. So they opened the gates of the city and brought in the wooden horse. We all know what happened next.”

Arafat described the tactic in a speech at a Johannesburg mosque, in May 1994 in which he compared the Oslo Agreement to the peace agreement signed between Mohammed and the Koraish tribe, at the Hudeibah springs. Mohammed signed the agreement in a moment of weakness, all the while intending to violate it and eliminate the Koraish, after he gained strength —which is what he did. “This [Oslo] agreement,” said Arafat in Johannesburg, “I am not considering it more than the agreement which had been signed between our prophet Mohammed and Koraish, and you remember the Caliph Omar refused this agreement and [considered] it a despicable truce.”

Barely an hour before the signing of the Declaration of Principles at the White House on September 13, 1993, Jordanian television broadcast a brief speech by Arafat in Arabic, which he had taped in Washington a few hours earlier. With caution that was appropriate to the timing, he mentioned the foundations of the PLO’s traditional struggle: liberating Palestine and turning it into an Arab land, the right of return of the Palestinian Diaspora to their homes, the “stages plan” of 1974 for gradual fulfillment of that right, and jihad as the means of fulfilling the plan.

There was no contradiction between what the PLO’s leaders were saying publicly in Arabic, and what was being said to Israeli representatives in closed-door discussions, and there was no concession on the right of return of the refugees to their actual homes. Deputy Defense Minister Mordechai Gur, who conducted talks with the PLO’s representatives during 1994, said (Ha’aretz, January 30, 1995), “It’s not very pleasant to hear what I hear from the Palestinians. They aren’t talking about the house in Hebron … They are talking about the university hill in Tel Aviv … Once, during one of the sessions, I called aside the head of their delegation and told him that if I were to record the discussions and play them back to the members of my party, not the opposition, 90 percent of them would say ‘stop the talks immediately.’”In early 1995, the Palestinian Information Ministry issued Booklet No. 5 in which the State of Israel is defined as “land occupied in 1948.”
Middle East Media Research Institute Booklet No. 6 declared: “Palestinian refugees and the right of return,” published in English 28 years after the 1967 war, refers to “more than four decades of occupation.” It says “the 1947 resolution guarantees the right of return of all those Palestinians who want to return home and live in peace with their neighbors.” Other sections of the booklet mirror the Palestinian covenant. “The Palestinian people didn’t accept the Balfour Declaration at anytime … The 1947 resolution on the partition of Palestine came only to complement the unjust laws and military orders enacted by the British Mandate government – the partition of Palestine was baseless and illegal … The purpose of the Zionist movement was the establishment of a state of their own at the expense of the original inhabitants of Palestine … Arab and international attempts that sought to convince the Jews to accept self-autonomy rule in Palestine, were doomed to failure …”Arafat himself declared on the Voice of Palestine, November 11, 1995, that the handover of responsibility for cities in the “West Bank” to the PLO will not end “until all of Palestine is liberated.” A clear definition of “all of Palestine” was heard from one of the “moderates” in the PLO leadership, Ahmed Qureia (Abu Ala) who declared on December 23, 1995 at the Deheisheh refugee camp near Bethlehem, “Inshallah, the return [of all the Arab refugees] is coming soon.”For Israel, the test of real change in PLO goals would be the implementation of Arafat’s letter of September 9, 1993 renouncing terrorism. When Prime Minister Peres announced on April 24, 1996 that the Palestine National Council had that day annulled what amounted to the genocidal provisions of the PLO covenant, he described this as “the most important ideological event of the past 100 years in the Middle East”; but this he said without realizing that Arafat had deceived him. The circumstances and details of the deception were only to become known two years later, in an article by the legal advisor to the Foreign Ministry in the years 1993-1996, Joel Singer (“The truth about the covenant,” Ma’ariv, June 19, 1998).When the government realized it had been deceived, it demanded a “clarification” from Arafat. It received, in English, a false version of the PNC decision which was nonetheless approved by Israel’s Government presumably because it surfaced only a few weeks before Israel’s May 1996 elections. Singer said in his article that “this was blatantly a political decision.” Elsewhere the article quotes Arafat, “I never gave an opinion to the Israeli government saying that the amendment to the Palestinian Covenant, as adopted by the PNC, met the Palestinian commitments.”The PLO’s fraud was exposed by the chairman of the PNC, Salim Za’anun ten days after the PNC met. He told Al-Nahar on May 5, 1996, that “the PNC accepted a ‘third formulation,’ different from what Israel demanded.”
Five years later, he revealed the entire truth in a manifesto issued in Cairo on February 2, 2001: “The PLO Covenant continues to exist, because the PNC was never convened to ratify the changes that were proposed in the past, particularly because no legal committee was appointed to draft the necessary change.”All of this makes clear that even in the “years of hope,” the PLO did not give up realization of all its rights, as expressed in this order: first, the right of return of the refugees to their homes; second, the right of self-determination after the return of the refugees; and third, the right to establish a state with Jerusalem as its capital on the basis of the fulfillment of the first two rights. The gap between these three conditions and the existence of the State of Israel is unbridgeable….Nissim Zvilli, a member of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee stated in Ha’aretz, July 27, 2002: “I remember myself lecturing in Paris and saying that Arafat’s double-talk had to be understood. That was our thesis, proved [later] as nonsense. Arafat meant every word, and we were naive, thinking that he is doing it to overcome the resistance to the agreement among his public.”
As far as the PLO is concerned, the Oslo agreement was not derailed and the violence involved in its implementation was dictated from the moment it was signed. Things could not be any different—and therefore they were not.People like MK Nissim Zvilli learned from the bitter Oslo years that Israel cannot reach peace by giving up homeland. The “alchemists,” who failed to bring peace-by-giving-up-land with an agreement, now promise us serenity while abandoning the land without an agreement. [This was exemplified in August 2006 in Israel’s unilateral withdrawal from Gaza.] Israel’s desperate politicians assume that what does not happen with retreat will happen with escape.Escapism is not only a recipe for continuing war. [Escapism is a mental disorder. In fact, it is one of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, which also includes delusions, apathy, depersonalization, stereotypic behaviors, flattened emotional reactions (to tragedies), impairment of volition, and lack of self-esteem (vis-à-vis others).]
To conclude, let us step back to gain some historical perspective.  In 1993, Israel’s Labor Government, seemingly oblivious of the 1,400-year Arab addiction to violence, hoped that the Oslo Agreement would result in the annulment of the PLO’s genocidal Covenant, and that it would put an end to terror and lead to peace.
The Knesset ratified the Agreement 61 to 50.In 1998, the Likud Government knew that the PLO’s genocidal Covenant remained in force. The Government knew that the operational agreement between the PLO and Hamas about the division of labor with regard to the use of terrorism and negotiations remained in place. In fact, the Government’s own sources were explicitly warned that the PLO intended to violate the Oslo Accords as well as the Wye River Memorandum, the agreement Netanyahu and the Palestinian Authority signed on October 23, 1998. The Knesset nonetheless approved the Wye agreement 75 to 19. (None of the extensive security provisions embodied in that agreement have been observed by the PA or enforced by the Netanyahu Government.)Israel’s Government is not only inept; it suffers from a profound intellectual and moral sickness quite rampant in Western Civilization, which lost its moral compass when it abandoned its roots in the Old Testament.  Mere criticism alone will get us nowhere. To go on and on subjecting the territorial policies of Israel’s Government to rational and empirically-based analysis—which Oslo critics have been doing for more than 20 years—is no more effective than trying to talk sense to a catatonic schizophrenic.◙
To wrap things up, when asked by Prof Eidelberg to critique the above analysis, this blogger offered the following and it speaks for itself:
Firstly, you are laying out a prima facie case how Israel’s leaders have adopted serious maledictions from their enemies, as they stumble from one crisis to another, and then pass off their behavior (having become serial liars themselves) as “strategies” which must be implemented, either for “peace” or for security, or a combination thereof. 

Now, it is one thing to lie to ones enemies to “get the job done” ala psy ops etc, but it is another order of magnitude to do so to ones own citizens, particularly in relation to life and death matters. Not only that, but they have adopted their own lies as truths. They are literally trapped in their own (mental and mendacious) vortex.

You have demonstrated that DIAMETRICALLY opposed value systems make it impossible to bridge the divide between Israel (the west) and the Arab/Muslim world, thus abrogating any agreements signed etc. Pretending what is isn’t has become Israel’s/west’s modus operandi. Que credo absurdum.Most tellingly, despite ALL the Arab leadership’s admissions to Arab audiences – revealing what their strategies and tactics are – none of this gives Israel’s leaders pause, even with the evidence of Arab duplicity before them. As such, they are entrapped by their serial mendacity, loathe to EXPOSE the full extent of Arab leadership’s treachery – and through their own words no less! 
In effect, if they so desired, Israel’s leaders could hold both domestic and foreign press conferences, proving, once and for all, through Arab statements, precisely why Oslo must be vitiated. Alas, such (long overdue) statesmanship would indict the entire Israeli leadership and this they will NEVER tolerate. Hence, they would rather continue along the nation’s dismemberment. 
NOT only that, but Israel’s leaders played a DIRECT part in all of Oslo’s national destruction, in so far as the leadership understood precisely what the PA junta was up to. In other words, there is NO longer any plausible deniability. Sach ha’kol, they are accomplices to the PA/PLO/Fatah’s crimes!
You clearly delineated that to continue their serial mendacity they had to pretend that “this and that” didn’t exist, so that they could be free to sign “this and that”. In other words, style over substance, but in matters of grave national import, possibly existential in nature. What kind of leaders behave/operate this way? Serially mendacious…who also happen to be mentally ill/besieged.


Indeed, a mirror image.


First of all, several levels of mendacity and its attendant dangers are manifested within today’s commentary. But before (most) readers can understand its inherent basis – and how we came from there to here – a certain foundation must be installed. Its flooring.


YES, when compared to Israel’s neighbors – whereby one Arab/Muslim regime is more barbaric than the other – Israel is a bastion of democracy. A sea change. HOWEVER, when you peer beneath the surface and peel back its veneer, you truly internalize its quasi socialist political underpinnings. As such, the (democratic) reality is a lot less rosy – that’s an understatement!

So, as the surreal “peace” train chugs apace, those who are flummoxed, as to how Israel’s PM (and not just in relation to Netanyahu’s tenure) can behave as if he is autocrat, well, the reasons are endemic in Israel’s heinous flawed political system. Kafkaesque.

Fatal Flaw One: 

WITHOUT a doubt, it is the paradox of Israeli politics, whereby you vote right but you get left. How can this be? Read excerpts from this American-Israeli’s op-ed at American Thinker:

Many supporters of Israel are continually bedeviled by a glaring contradiction within Israeli politics.  How can it be, regardless of which party wins the election, that leftist policies are invariably implemented?

As a backgrounder, from 1977 to date (excluding an eight-year period), Likud won elections based upon a platform of a “Greater Israel.”  That being the case, nevertheless, it was under Likud PM Menachem Begin whereby the entire Sinai was relinquished.  While there are too many substantive examples to enumerate, essentially proving that leftist policies continually supplant right-wing Likud electoral platforms, two stand out as “poster children” and therefore warrant special attention.

Likud’s Ariel Sharon was elected on February 6, 2001 by a landslide margin, defeating Labor’s PM Ehud Barak 62.4% to 37.6%.  Sharon’s win should have handed him a wide berth to govern from the right, regardless of outside pressures.  (It behooves mentioning that Israel’s structural deficiencies, due to proportional representation and fixed party lists — as opposed to truly democratic constituency elections — vitiates democratic electoral outcomes.  Professor Paul Eidelberg elucidates the prescriptive polices required to achieve said reforms at his policy institute, the Israel-America Renaissance Institute.)  However, policies of appeasement were in full swing during Sharon’s first year.  This was especially ironic, particularly since the well-known hawkish general — nicknamed “the bulldozer” — was nowhere to be found as his politician counterpart “fought” Arab terror.  Moreover, there were higher casualties from Arab terror attacks during Sharon’s first year in office than in previous combined years.  It wasn’t until the bodies started piling up, coupled with a hue and cry from the general public, that Operation Defensive Shield was finally belatedly launched on March 29, 2002.

Similarly, Sharon, paradoxically dubbed the “settlement builder,” executed the wholesale expulsion/destruction of the once-glorious Gush Katif “settlement” enterprise, as well as that of communities in the northern Shomron.  The expulsion/destruction took place despite a Likud-led referendum (due to massive nationalist outcry) which squashed any mandate to push forward with “disengagement.”  Even though Sharon promised to abide by the referendum, he did no such thing.

How can this be?  How can an overwhelming majority of the electorate’s voice be negated, thus allowing the left to rule, regardless of the majority’s wishes?…….

Fatal Flaw Two:

Speaking of the recently deceased PM Sharon – and no disrespect intended to the dead – the fact of the matter is that his bulldozing tactics, reflective in his ACTUAL bulldozing of scores of Jewish communities (expelling over 10,000 loyal Jews) homes, businesses, schools, synagogues, even uprooting the dead, took place despite the will of the majority public who supported him on his promise NOT to lay a hand on Jewish communities! He even defied his own referendum in the process, whereby the electorate voted, once again – לא! NO!

So, is this commentary unwarranted, or not? EX PM ARIEL SHARON’S (TARNISHED) LEGACY: A MILITARY HERO, YET TRUTH MATTERS.

Fatal Flaw Three:

IF not for Israel’s unrepresentative system, its lack of checks and balances, Israel’s “peace” obsessed leadership would be unable to commit crimes against Jewish national interests, in contravention of its own penal code!

Fatal Flaw Four:

In this regard, there is no other Israeli, as capable as Professor Paul Eidelberg, to sort this (political) mess out, but the leaders want it to remain as is. In fact, Professor Paul Eidelberg drafted a Constitution for Israel, and more than a few Knesset members have taken note of it.

Eidelberg wrote a trilogy on America’s founding fathers: The Philosophy of the American Constitution (ISBN 0819153419), On the Silence of the Declaration of Independence (ISBN 0870232169), and a Discourse on Statesmanship (ISBN 0252004280)…..

He has written several books on the Arab-Israel conflict and on Judaism. Demophrenia (ISBN 093345127X) analyses the mentality of Israel’s ruling elites. Jewish Statesmanship: Lest Israel Fall (ISBN 0761823808), which has been translated into Hebrew and Russian, discusses what he sees as the flaws inherent in Israel’s system of governance and how they may be remedied. His work, A Jewish Philosophy of History (ISBN 0595316956), investigates the world-historical events leading to the rebirth of Israel in 1948.

Policy and politics

Eidelberg has drafted a Constitution for the State of Israel, which has influenced various Knesset Members interested in constitutional reform…

Herein are more pearls of wisdom from the eminent Professor Eidelberg:

In view of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s unlawful and irrational endorsement of a Palestinian state in the Land of Israel, the public should be informed that Mr. Netanyahu has scorned the patriotism of Israel’s greatest Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, who sent this message some years ago to Ariel Sharon and Chief Justice Aharon Barak:

“No Jew is at liberty to surrender the right of the Jewish Nation and the Land of Israel to exist.  No Jewish body is sanctioned to do so.  No Jew alive today has the authority to yield any piece of land whatsoever. This right is preserved by the Jewish People throughout the generations and cannot be forfeited under any circumstance.  Even if at some given time there will be those who declare that they are relinquishing this right, they have neither the power nor the jurisdiction to negate it for future generations to come.  The Jewish Nation is neither obligated by nor responsible for any waiver such as this.  Our right to this land, in its entirety, is steadfast, inalienable and eternal.  And until the coming of the Great Redemption, we shall never yield this historic right.”

—Speech to the 21st Zionist Congress Basel 1937

It is with the above in mind that the following “news” from DEBKAfile should be viewed. So while Minister Bennett is forced to “apologize”, to step in line like party apparatchiks, PM Netanyahu continues his deception, fronting for the babblings of ‘peace’ & reciprocity’, yet Islamic adherents (including Abbas’s PA Junta) plot jihad. Is this an acceptable form of decorum and “strategic policy” from a truly democratic leadership?

DEBKAfile Special Report January 29, 2014
Partners in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks

Partners in Israeli-Palestinian peace talks

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu Wednesday, Jan. 29, demanded Naftali Bennett, the pro-settlement Jewish Home party leader and Minister of Industry and Trade apologize or be sacked, for brusquely criticizing his proposal to leave Jewish settlements in a future Palestinian state.
The minister apologized without delay, regretting that “his concern for Israel’s future and security” was taken as a personal attack on the prime minister, whose leadership in difficult circumstances he respected. But he didn’t climb down. It was his duty, the minister stressed, to voice his belief that abandoning Israel citizens to Palestinian sovereignty was a dangerous notion that must be dropped.
DEBKAfile: A cabinet crisis has been averted for now over the concessions urged on the prime minister by US Secretary of State John Kerry for the sake of a peace accord with the Palestinians. But by playing his cards too close to his vest, Netanyahu is exposing himself to more criticism and a loss of respect from within his own government.

Too often his words are countered or contradicted outright.
The Bennett episode roseout of the frustration of a member of the security cabinet which Netanyahu keeps in the dark over his solo performance.

But also today, Netanyahu was actually contradicted for insisting that the peace framework document that John Kerry is about to present to Israel and the Palestinian Authority is a US document, which represents America’s take on the points agreed and does not oblige Israel to accept its contents.

US Ambassador to Israel Dan Shapiro stepped forward to deny this. Addressing a National Security Institute conference in Tel Aviv, the ambassador said that the framework agreement mostly incorporates ideas presented by the two sides (Israel and the Palestinians), with only a few inserts of American origin.

Ambassador Shapiro must be presumed to have been authorized by Secretary Kerry to publicly challenge Prime Minister Netanyahu – and not for the first time.

Since mid-December, DEBKAfile’s sources have disclosed elements of the framework proposal which conflict with Netanyahu’s public comments.
Without going into the rights or wrongs of the dust-up between the prime minister and Bennett, it is evident to DEBKAfile’s sources that Netanyahu has most probably been prevailed upon by Kerry to make fairly far-reaching concessions to the Palestinians – particularly on the scale of Israel’s withdrawal from Judea and Samaria and Jerusalem. This information he has not shared with his ministers and as it comes out, more ructions are to be expected.
In Jerusalem, for example, Netanyahu almost certainly agreed to cede to Palestinian rule the Arab-populated suburbs of Shuafat, Beit Hanina, the Shuafat refugee camp and the large village of Issawiya. This village, which is a notorious hotbed of terror ruled by the radical Palestinian Democratic Front, has sprawled up the slopes of Mount Scopus by unopposed wildcat construction.

So the Palestinians are now also laying claim to Mt. Scopus, which has been the seat of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem without interruption since its foundation in 1918.

Even under Israeli control, heavy military and police backup is needed for entering Issawiya, which is less than 10 minutes drive from Jerusalem downtown. An outbreak of violence was quelled with difficulty by Israel border police this Wednesday. Under Palestinian control, no one doubts that this village will be one of the first sources of rocket fire on Jerusalem when even Israeli security forces are unable to subdue its hate-filled inhabitants.
Strategically, too, giving up Issawiya would mean Israel is relinquishing control of the highway connecting Jerusalem to Maaleh Adumim, throwing in the towel of a struggle waged for years to maintain territorial contiguity between these two Israeli cities.

If Netanyahu’s standing within his cabinet is waning, it is because in the view of many politicians and circles outside politics his tactics in the conduct of negotiations with Kerry and the Palestinians does not bear muster by democratic standards – and above all in Israel itself – for the handling of issues of vital concern to the nation’s security and very future.

In the case challenged by Bennett, Netanyahu appears to have yielded substantially in private to his two negotiating partners and then, when criticized, pretended the concession was not for real but a tactical stratagem for showing up Palestinian intransigence and insincerity in pursuing peace diplomacy.
It was therefore up to critics to trust him and shut up, a demand that Naftali Bennett contemptuously spurned.

Netanyahu is creating a confusing world of double and triple mirrors. The respect he claims is slipping away from him and exposed him to the less than respectful contradiction by the US ambassador.

And when he protests time and time again that his foremost concern is national security, his words are often thrown back at him – as they were Wednesday by Military Intelligence Chief Maj. Gen Aviv Kochavi, who warned shortly after the US ambassador’s comments that “170,000 rockets and missiles are threatening Israel.”
This figure was bigger before Israel’s Operation Pillar of Defense in Gaza last year, he said, and diminished in the course of the Syrian war. “But the number will rise again,” Kochavi assured his listeners.

About Iran, Kochavi said: “The Iranian nuclear project goes on and a decision by the Iranian leader will determine whether one or more nuclear bombs are built. In Washington, Director of US National Intelligence James Clapper confirmed that Iran has no technological bars for producing a nuclear bomb. It depends solely on a political decision.

The prime minister has never tried to reconcile his avowed focus on security as his paramount concern while allowing Israel’s enemies to constantly build up the number of rockets aimed at Israel, or with Iran remaining with a single dilemma, reported repeatedly by DEBKAfile in the past year, of whether to build one nuke or an arsenal, without Israel lifting a finger to forestall this threat.
It is this disparity between word and deed that is costing Netanyahu national and personal respect at a time that he needs it most.

The glaring question becomes: how can a so-called democracy behave akin to a socialist regime – castrating the majority public’s leadership and DEFYING the will of those who elected them – yet exhibit Orwellian tolerance for treasonous behavior by an internal Arab/leftist fifth column? Makes no sense…until you know what’s what!

Deceitful is the polite way to term PM Netanyahu’s (including Sharon’s actions and Rabin’s signage onto the Oslo Peace/Death Accords, as he shook Arafat’s blood-soaked hand!) ILLEGAL machinations (let alone immoral), but treacherous….perhaps, treasonous fits the bill! 

The INCREASED Rallying Cry For Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s IMPEACHMENT Grows Louder: Which Groups Are Jumping On Board? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

To be a patriot – at least in the western sense – has zero to do with ones skin color, sex or ethnicity. What it has to do with is a person’s adherence/appreciation for G-d given personal liberty and freedom.

This site has amassed a trove of evidence, detailing why Obama is ripe for impeachment. Consider: what about a regime gone wild shouldn’t lead to actionable judgment? Let us continue to count his crimes against the American people via trampling on the Constitution: IRSgate, Benghazigate and NSAgate are opening shots.

Yet, it warms the heart when Black Republicans break ranks, not only with fellow Congressional RINO’s, but with many in the Black community. Leftists in general ( Jewish brethren atop the list ), and Blacks in particular, believe that the law does not apply to Obama Inc and that is that. Fist bumps all around.


President ‘has prevented, obstructed and impeded the administration of justice’

BOB UNRUH – videos embedded


A Florida-based organization of black Republicans is calling for Barack Obama’s impeachment, releasing “Articles” that charge him with “egregious acts of despotism that constitute high crimes and misdemeanors.”

According to the Florida WatchdogWire, there are 10 articles including obstruction of the investigation into the Benghazi, Libya, murder of four Americans; the scandal of the administration’s running guns to drug ring lords in Mexico and the Internal Revenue Service’s campaign to obstruct the operations of conservative and Christian organizations.

The National Black Republican Association is an organization that is dedicated to returning “black Americans to their Republican Party roots by enlightening them about how Republicans fought for their freedom and civil rights, and are now fighting for their educational and economic advancement.”

The organization said the articles were delivered to Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Speaker John Boehner, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives.

“On July 4, 1776, the founders of our nation declared their independence from governmental tyranny and reaffirmed their faith in independence with the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. Asserting their right to break free from the tyranny of a nation that denied them the civil liberties that are our birthright, the founders declared: ‘When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such government…”

Brand new! “Impeachable Offenses” reveals the evidence of the crimes Barack Obama has committed against the United States.

The Constitution also requires that a president or vice president “Shall be removed from office” for treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The challenge to Obama lists Benghazi, his disclosure of secret grand jury material about Benghazi, the Fast and Furious gun-running scandal, his authorization of the provision of confidential income tax returns to outside interests, the IRS audits of conservatives, the electronic surveillance by the National Security Agency of innocent Americans, the Department of Justice’s wiretaps on journalists, the thwarting of the will of the people over the Defense of Marriage Act, his unconstitutional appointments of three members of the National Labor Relations Board and his intimidation of whistleblowers.

“Barack H. Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office,” the articles finish.

Just a few days earlier, a member of Congress said there likely would be votes enough in the House to impeach.

But Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas, said it would be ineffectual because the Democrats in control in the Senate never would take any action.

Buzzfeed reported Farenthold responded to a question from a constituent at an open house.

The Constitution also requires a president to be a natural-born citizen, which the Founders apparently defined as the offspring of two citizens of the nation. Obama’s father never was a U.S. citizen.

The issue got so much attention during Obama’s first term that he presented a document he claimed was his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii.

Since then, Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse investigative team have concluded the document is a fraud.

WND has reported that members of Congress are expressing interest in the dispute.

Farenthold said at the open house Saturday that it’s probably too late to address the matter.

“I think unfortunately the horse is already out of the barn on this, on the whole birth certificate issue,” said the congressman. “The original Congress, when his eligibility came up, should have looked into it, and they didn’t. I’m not sure how we fix it.”

Farenthold told the audience in Luling, Texas: “You tie into a question I get a lot: ‘If everyone’s so unhappy with what the president’s done, why don’t you impeach him?’ I’ll give you a real frank answer about that: If we were to impeach the president tomorrow, you could probably get the votes in the House of Representatives to do it. But it would go to the Senate and he wouldn’t be convicted.”

He cited the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, who was not convicted by the Senate.

That episode, he said, “redefined sex” for a lot of young people.

“What message do we sent to America if we impeach Obama and he gets away with what he’s impeached for and he is found innocent? What then do we say is OK?” Farenthold asked.

There already is a grass roots movement called Overpasses For Obama’s Impeachment, and members are staging protests on freeway overpasses, calling for impeachment.

WND also has reported Watergate investigator Bob Woodward of the Washington Post compares Obama to Richard Nixon. And there’s a national petition that calls on Congress to immediately investigate the “unconstitutional and impeachable offenses” of Obama.

The latest American group to seek formal congressional action against Obama says on its website that its goal is simple: “The removal of the corrupt and criminal president of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama.”

“His actions go unimpeded, our pleas through petitions unanswered. Our calls and letters to Congress are left ignored and unopened,” the group’s online post explains. “Our only peaceful recourse is to take to the streets and overpasses of America and DEMAND that our nation be returned to We the People, and that Barack Hussein Obama be impeached, removed from office, and held accountable for his actions while serving as president.”

The overpass protest group says America “is in its greatest time of peril in since the Founding Fathers bravely fought in the Revolutionary War.”

“Lady Liberty is calling YOU to stand up, to speak out, to take to the streets and DEMAND that the corrupt tyrant be removed from the White House, and all of those who colluded with him in his crimes against the United States be held accountable to the full extent of the law, with the maximum sentences handed down upon them.”

WND has reported previously on many calls for Obama’s impeachment, which would put him in the company of Nixon and Bill Clinton.

Sign the petition right away!

The petition states: “Therefore, we the undersigned urge Congress to immediately undertake a full and impartial investigation into the many blatantly unconstitutional actions of Barack Obama. For members of Congress, each of whom has also sworn a solemn oath to uphold the Constitution, to allow a president to routinely flout the Supreme Law of the land without being held accountable is equally repugnant to a free country and a free press.”

Tens of thousands already are on board with the effort, which is just the latest in a long string of calls for impeachment or an investigation.

Impeachment has been brought up by several WND columnists, too.

Nat Hentoff wrote that Obama, “since taking office, has continually limited the First Amendment, the most singular and powerful right that distinctly identifies Americans from residents in all other countries on Earth.”

Columnist Bert Prelutsky took it further.

“I want Obama to go through the process because he has it coming. In totalitarian states, after all, the people have no other recourse except to take to the streets and spill blood. But we have available the process of impeachment, and Obama should be forced to defend his contemptible lies and actions,” he wrote. “If for no other reason than his unbearable arrogance, the schmuck should have to pay a penalty. For instance, when a White House reporter asked him to justify spying on the Associated Press, Obama said, ‘I’ve still got 60,000-plus troops in Afghanistan and I still have a bunch of intelligence officers around the world.’ No, sir, the United States has 60,000-plus troops in Afghanistan and a bunch of intelligence officers around the world.”

A panel of top constitutional experts convened by WND blasted Obama’s actions in office. Bruce Fein, the legal scholar who is best known for having drafted articles of impeachment against former President Clinton for perjury after he lied under oath, said Obama’s orders to drone-kill a terror suspect were “tantamount to murder.”

“You can’t have democracy and the rule of law if you never get to know what the facts are and you just have to accept what the government says they are. If you don’t have a trial, that’s the definition of tyranny.”

Louis Fisher, a scholar in residence at the Constitution Project, said of Obama’s appointment of “czars”: “That is a big deal. A lot of people say, ‘Well, that’s been going on a long time.’ In our form of government, citizens vote for representatives and representatives pass laws. You have people heading departments, and they’re confirmed. There’s an understanding that we will call you up whenever we need to. … Congress passed legislation saying there’d be no funds for three czars, and they were named in the bill. Obama signed it into the law, but in the signing statement, he said that’s unconstitutional because he has the ‘prerogative’ to get the advice he needs to implement statutes. Well, c’mon Obama. You don’t have a prerogative to bring into the White House anybody you want at any salary. It’s all done by law. It goes back to 1978 where Congress passed legislation saying you have this number of people and these are their salaries and Congress can increase or decrease that at any time.”

And Herbert Titus, counsel to the law firm William J. Olson who previously taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools, said Obama’s military actions in Libya are a strong argument for impeachment.

“That’s the one that stands out. It’s unprecedented. It doesn’t even fit within any of the precedents that have been set since Korea.”

Obama should have seen such a move coming. A recent poll earlier this year said half of Americans say he should be impeached.

“It may be early in the process for members of Congress to start planning for impeachment of Barack Obama, but the American public is building a serious appetite for it,” said Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies, which did the telephone poll.

Half or nearly half of those surveyed said they believed Obama should be impeached for the multitude of scandals now consuming Washington.

On the issue of the Benghazi scandal, in which four Americans were killed after terror threats were ignored, 50.1 percent of Americans said Obama should be impeached. That included 27.6 percent of the responding Democrats.

On the IRS harassment of conservative and Christian organizations? Forty-nine percent said they agree that impeachment is appropriate, including 24.4 percent of the Democrats.

And on the fishing trip the Obama administration took into AP reporters’ telephone records in search of a security breach that may have been done by his own administration, 48.6 percent said impeachment is appropriate. That included 26.1 percent of the Democrats.

Sign the petition urging Congress to impeach Obama.

Former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan wrote that the country is in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate.

“The reputation of the Obama White House has, among conservatives, gone from sketchy to sinister, and, among liberals, from unsatisfying to dangerous<” she said. “No one likes what they’re seeing. The Justice Department assault on the Associated Press and the ugly politicization of the Internal Revenue Service have left the administration’s credibility deeply, probably irretrievably damaged. They don’t look jerky now, they look dirty. The patina of high-mindedness the president enjoyed is gone.

Noonan said Obama, “as usual, acts as if all of this is totally unconnected to him.”

“He’s shocked, it’s unacceptable, he’ll get to the bottom of it. He read about it in the papers, just like you. But he is not unconnected, he is not a bystander. This is his administration. Those are his executive agencies. He runs the IRS and the Justice Department,” she continued. “A president sets a mood, a tone. He establishes an atmosphere. If he is arrogant, arrogance spreads. If he is too partisan, too disrespecting of political adversaries, that spreads too. Presidents always undo themselves and then blame it on the third guy in the last row in the sleepy agency across town.”

It’s even being compared to Watergate, the break-in that ultimately led to the resignation of President Nixon.

That was the assessment of no less than Woodward, whose reporting on Watergate eventually snared the sitting president.

Woodward said recently: “If you read through all these emails, you see that everyone in the government is saying, ‘Oh, let’s not tell the public that terrorists were involved, people connected to al Qaeda. Let’s not tell the public that there were warnings.’ And I have to go back 40 years to Watergate when Nixon put out his edited transcripts to the conversations, and he personally went through them and said, ‘Oh, let’s not tell this, let’s not show this.’ I would not dismiss Benghazi. It’s a very serious issue.”

A Republican congressman also recently brought up the subject.

“I would say yes. I’m not willing to take it [impeachment] off to take it off the table, but that’s certainly not what we’re striving for,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told CNN.

“We want truth, we want to bring the people who perpetrated the terrorism in Benghazi to be brought to justice, and we want to have the president do what he has said he would always do. And that is be open and transparent. Thus far, the White House has not done that.”

Earlier, Chaffetz, in an interview with the Salt Lake Tribune, was asked if impeachment was within the realm of possibility.

“It’s certainly a possibility,” he told the paper. “That’s not the goal but given the continued lies perpetrated by this administration, I don’t know where it’s going to go. … I’m not taking it off the table. I’m not out there touting that but I think this gets to the highest levels of our government and integrity and honesty are paramount.”

Chaffetz has been championing the call to probe the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the Benghazi compound that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., said impeachment was possible over the “most egregious cover-up in American history.

“People may be starting to use the I-word before too long,” Inhofe told radio host Rusty Humphries, according to The Hill.

“The I-word meaning impeachment?” Humphries asked.

“Yeah,” Inhofe responded.

Additionally, radio host Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor and one-time presidential candidate, predicted Obama won’t serve out his second term because of his complicity in a cover-up over Benghazi.

Other members of Congress who have suggested impeachment for a variety of reasons in recent years include Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C.; Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.; Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas; Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas; Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fla.; and Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.

Others who have raised the subject include rock legend and gun-rights defender Ted Nugent, who said there’s “no question” Obama should be impeached.

He blasted “the criminality of this government, the unprecedented abuse of power, corruption, fraud and deceit by the Chicago gangster-scammer-ACORN-in-chief.”

“It’s so diabolical,” he said.

Even Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin called for the impeachment of Obama over his policy of permitting drone strikes on American citizens overseas who are members of terrorist organizations.

On WABC Radio’s “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” Benjamin affirmed she believes the drone warfare is an impeachable offense.

You asked for it! Sign the petition urging Congress to impeach President Barack Obama.

See Texas congressman lobby for impeachment over gun control:

See Andrew Napolitano talk about impeachment over the budget:

WND also compiled a special report on the various offenses Obama is blamed for committing and reported what experts on the Constitution believe should be happening.

See detailed results of the recent survey questions:

The administration of Democrat Barack Obama has still not satisfied congressional and media questions about just what it knew and when it knew it about the terrorist attack on U.S. diplomats in Benghazi, Libya, last September 11. That attack killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya. The Obama administration has changed its explanation of that attack several times since and has so far refused to identify those officials who made key decisions not to send help to stop the attacks, and who decided not to initially call the killings a terrorist attack. Knowing that and anything else you may be aware of about this issue, do you agree or disagree that President Obama should be impeached over his handling of this situation?

It has been learned that the Internal Revenue Service, under the administration of Democrat Barack Obama, has purposely targeted conservative and Christian groups for harassment over their tax exempt status while giving liberal nonprofit groups little or no scrutiny. Further, the IRS apparently leaked private tax information from these conservative groups to opposing liberal groups who were able to use that confidential information for political advantage. Knowing this and anything else you may be aware of about this issue, do you agree or disagree that President Obama should be impeached over his handling of this situation?

It has been learned that the U.S. Department of Justice under the administration of Democrat Barack Obama secretly obtained confidential telephone records of many reporters of the Associated Press in Washington, D.C. Attorney General Eric Holder has said his department obtained the phone records without the permission or knowledge of the Associated Press in order to find who in the federal government was leaking information about terrorist plots against America. AP officials have strongly protested this invasion of their privacy but the administration stands by its actions. Knowing this and anything else you may be aware of about this issue, do you agree or disagree that President Obama should be impeached over his handling of this situation?

Sign the petition right away!….

IF one is seeking the Constitutional backing/muster to indict the Commander-in-Chief for High Crimes and Misdemeanors, look no further than the imprimatur of Professor Paul Eidelberg. He delivers the goods. 

Most ominously, under the out of control reign of the Radical/Islamist-in-Chief, law enforcement has become the regime’s personal bludgeon…shades of Nazi Germany. As a matter of fact, under his purview local policing has become increasingly militarized, in direct violation of Posse ComitatusNeed some visual aids to said charges? Fine. ‘Big brother’ cops crush push to impeach Obama.

So, will patriots wait until Obama Inc.’s goons start roughing them up, if they dare to legally ! demonstrate against ‘dear leader’? And, isn’t America starting to resemble the totalitarian grip of Germany, while under the crushing boot of the SS?

Israel’s Elites Babble About ‘Peace’ & ‘Reciprocity’, But Islamic Adherents (including Abbas’s PA Junta) Plot Jihad…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

As always, Professor Paul Eidelberg, a true Renaissance man, asks the most penetrating/searing questions. A fellow traveler, Dr. Arieh Eldad, more than understands the psyche of Islamic adherents from both a medical/surgical perspective, as well as from having been a previous member of Israel’s Parliament. In addition, he reached the rank of Brigadier General in Israel’s Defense Forces. NOT too shabby.

So, along comes the valiant prof with the following question, one which should be obvious to anyone who claims to be civilized. YET, this is as far removed from reality as dancing pigs. Alas, the west’s poohbahs beg to differ with said basic moral construct.

Prof Paul Eidelberg queries: How is one to deal with Arabs who reject this fundamental principle of ethics, DO NOT REPAY GOOD WITH EVIL, a principle rejected by Arabs, as this article by Dr. Arieh Eldad (a former MK in Israel’s Parliament) clearly illustrates?

By Dr. Arieh Eldad:
I was instrumental in establishing the Israeli National Skin Bank, which is the largest in the world. The National Skin Bank stores skin for every day needs as well as for war time or mass casualty situations.

This skin bank is hosted at the Hadassah Ein Kerem University hospital in Jerusalem where I was the Chairman of plastic surgery. This is how I was asked to supply skin for an Arab woman from Gaza , who was hospitalized in Soroka Hospital in Beersheva, after her family burned her. Usually, such atrocities happen among Arab families when the women are suspected of having an affair.

We supplied all the needed Homografts for her treatment. She was successfully treated by my friend and colleague, Prof. Lior Rosenberg and discharged to return to Gaza. She was invited for regular follow-up visits to the outpatient clinic in Beersheva.

One day she was caught at a border crossing wearing a suicide belt. She meant to explode herself in the outpatient clinic of the hospital where they saved her life. It seems that her family promised her that if she did that, they would forgive her.

This is only one example of the war between Jews and Muslims in the Land of Israel. It is not a territorial conflict. This is a civilizational conflict, or rather a war between civilization and barbarism.


Prof Paul Eidelberg expounds further:

If Bibi understands this, he will also understand that it would be futile and disingenuous, and even misleading and   self-destructive, to speak of  “reciprocity” between Israel and her Arab enemies?

The rhetoric of “reciprocity” may please Americans, but it also disarms Jews who should be most wary about the wickedness of their enemies, who scorn the ethical principle of not repaying good with evil.

Most significantly, there is something inherently insane about hunting down Nazis, decades after the Holocaust, yet embracing Israel’s Arab Nazi ‘peace’ partner – having written his dissertation on  Holocaust denial – as he exhorts: their putative state will be Judenrein ! Still, Israel’s leaders and NO western leader – even in Washington, supposedly its ‘BFF’ – bats an eye, at least long enough to stop the ‘peace’ process in its tracks ! Why the cognitive dissonance, especially by Israel’s leaders? Emblematic of said irrational behavior/discourse, Israel’s leaders haven’t skipped a (‘peace’) beat, even as the region – due to Islamic barbarism – threatens to engulf us all!  Moreover, imagine what would happen if Israel’s top leadership similarly opined: Israel must be Arab-free too! Talk about an instantaneous, worldwide backlash. Blasted hypocrites.

Essentially, at its core, what is posited above is demonstrative of the findings within Islam & Blood; a beyond weighty policy paper authored by – you guessed it – Prof Paul Eidelberg, and with the humble assistance of this blogger.  

Tragically, Israel is the most imperiled nation in history, and no amount of appeasement and debasement by its leaders will change the calculus, despite their delusions. Besides, to call oneself a patriot demands one step up and tell the truth, regardless of the consequences – the blow back.

Good vs evil. Light vs. darkness…as western civilization finds itself in the cross hairs of Islam and in threat of being devoured by it!