What Does Silicon Valley’s Big Tech Have In Common With China’s Dictators? What Do They Have In Common With Epstein, As They “Scrub” Themselves Down The “Rabbit Hole”, Too? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on August 27, 2019 by Adina Kutnicki

BIG Tech, for the most part, is centered in Silicon Valley in the southern San Fran Bay area of California, a/k/a Commiefornia. And just to lend some texture and context, there is a certain familiarity with said locale, having recently returned from a vacay in nearby Belvedere Island in Marin County, traveling all the way from Israel, too. Even more so, having co-authored (with Joe Newby from Conservative Firing Line) the only non-hagiographic book on Facebook (a main offender within) by exposing its nefarious underbelly through “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad “, well, the term familiarity is more than an understatement. Second skin.

NOW that that is established, it must be put out there: no doubt, the emergence of Big Tech has added many positive benefits to societal’s landscape – from the most benign activities to the most complex. In fact, this author has been known to appear dumb-stuck, when listening to a nearest and dearest describe some of the life-saving procedures he performs during cardio-thoracic surgery – that which couldn’t be accomplished (as safely) without a multiplicity of hi-tech innovations via computer-assisted robotics. It doesn’t get any weightier than that.

EVEN so, not unlike what is coined “Frankensteinian”, what can be used for the greater good, a/k/a the “social good”, can morph into an out of control monster in every walk of life, that is, if not reined in and monitored. Such is the case with Big Tech via its direct hand in the death of free speech, that which underpins every free society. More pointedly, it is through the (algorithmic) suppression of speech which deviates from leftist orthodoxy and its PC strictures that Big Tech reveals itself. Yes, as succinctly assessed at The Hill: Big Tech censorship of conservative users is alive and well!

WHICH brings us to the discussion at hand; a two-tier level of evil which knows no bounds. Literally. In the main, both are under the radar, but not for long. Of course, needless to say, like-minded silencers within the Demonrat Media Complex will never and never alert the public.

STILL, before we segue to the aforementioned forces of evil, it must be internalized: China’s state actors are no more suppressive than Big Tech’s overlords, they are just bolder and more open about it. For what amounts to a Herculean struggle against China’s repressive tactics and dictates, millions strong in Hong Kong are risking their lives to protest against the Chinese regime, as well as those who support the dictatorship from within their heretofore island of freethinking. Naturally, Facebook’s and Twitter’s (with other Big Tech accomplices) far-left commandants are more than pleased (ideologically and bottom-line-wise) to assist the Chinese dictatorship! Crackdown.

China’s largest state-run news agency, Xinhua News, is buying ads on Facebook and Twitter to smear protesters in Hong Kong, a new tactic being used to influence how the rest of the world perceives the pro-democracy demonstrators.

An estimated 1.7 million people in Hong Kong, roughly a quarter of its population, took to the streets on Sunday to denounce Beijing’s attempts to interfere in the semi-autonomous territory. But China has amassed soldiers across the border in Shenzhen and appears to be stepping up its propaganda efforts online through paid ads on Facebook and Twitter, as well as unpaid content on platforms like YouTube…..continue here….

BACK to the less than obvious poisons flying under the (public) radar ala the wings of Big Tech and its real affinity – the not so “social good!”

TO wit, how many are familiar with China’s “social credit” system? If not, time to catch up to speed, as its nexus to Silicon Valley is closer than a pig is to its sh*t – that close. By extrapolation, Silicon Valley’s far-left milieu is gearing up with power brokers, inside and outside the Beltway, to extract the same (obedient) coinage from Americans, that is, if they want to “earn” “social credit” points of their own to enjoy this and that.

Have you heard about China’s social credit system? It’s a technology-enabled, surveillance-based nationwide program designed to nudge citizens toward better behavior. The ultimate goal is to “allow the trustworthy to roam everywhere under heaven while making it hard for the discredited to take a single step,” according to the Chinese government.

It can also award points for charitable donations or even taking one’s own parents to the doctor.

Punishments can be harsh, including bans on leaving the country, using public transportation, checking into hotels, hiring for high-visibility jobs, or acceptance of children to private schools. It can also result in slower internet connections and social stigmatization in the form of registration on a public blacklist.

China’s social credit system has been characterized in one pithy tweet as “authoritarianism, gamified.”

Steve Randy Waldman@interfluidity

Authoritarianism, gamified. https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/2015/10/in-china-your-credit-score-is-now-affected-by-your-political-opinions-and-your-friends-political-opinions/ … ht @VitalikButerin @FrankPasquale

In China, Your Credit Score Is Now Affected By Your Political Opinions – And Your Friends’ Politi…

China just introduced a universal credit score, where everybody is measured as a number between 350 and 950. But this credit score isn’t just affected by how well you manage credit – it also reflects…

privateinternetaccess.com

40

1:44 AM – Oct 5, 2015

At present, some parts of the social credit system are in force nationwide and others are local and limited (there are 40 or so pilot projects operated by local governments and at least six run by tech giants like Alibaba and Tencent).

Beijing maintains two nationwide lists, called the blacklist and the red list—the former consisting of people who have transgressed, and the latter people who have stayed out of trouble (a “red list” is the Communist version of a white list.) These lists are publicly searchable on a government website called China Credit.

The Chinese government also shares lists with technology platforms. So, for example, if someone criticizes the government on Weibo, their kids might be ineligible for acceptance to an elite school.

Public shaming is also part of China’s social credit system. Pictures of blacklisted people in one city were shown between videos on TikTok in a trial, and the addresses of blacklisted citizens were shown on a map on WeChat.

Some Western press reports imply that the Chinese populace is suffocating in a nationwide Skinner box of oppressive behavioral modification. But some Chinese are unaware that it even exists. And many others actually like the idea. One survey found that 80% of Chinese citizens surveyed either somewhat or strongly approve of social credit system.

IT CAN HAPPEN HERE

Many Westerners are disturbed by what they read about China’s social credit system. But such systems, it turns out, are not unique to China. A parallel system is developing in the United States, in part as the result of Silicon Valley and technology-industry user policies, and in part by surveillance of social media activity by private companies.

Here are some of the elements of America’s growing social credit system……

If current trends hold, it’s possible that in the future a majority of misdemeanors and even some felonies will be punished not by Washington, D.C., but by Silicon Valley. It’s a slippery slope away from democracy and toward corporatocracy.

In other words, in the future, law enforcement may be determined less by the Constitution and legal code, and more by end-user license agreements.

BUT if that is not enough to make your freedom-loving blood boil, well, perhaps the nexus between the titans at Big Tech with a very much under the radar and nefarious activity will raise the alarm – as it relates to Epstein, who is, supposedly, six feet under and burning in hell!

NOW, ask yourselves: who better than Silicon Valley’s “Masters of the Universe” are as adept at scrubbing themselves down the rabbit hole, so to speak, of course, with their best engineering wizards reversing the dirty deed(s)??

In 1969, John Brokman wrote, “Man was nothing more than a model, a technique. It is necessary to construct a new model…“

One of the little-discussed aspects of deceased charged child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein’s life was his deep involvement with the school of thought called “transhumanism.”

It was briefly reported on by the New York Times and we have also covered it at this outlet, particularly his desire to create a sort of bizarre human farm at his Arizona ranch where he would impregnate several accomplished women to try to disseminate the world with little Epsteins.

“On multiple occasions starting in the early 2000s, Mr. Epstein told scientists and businessmen about his ambitions to use his New Mexico ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm and would give birth to his babies, according to two award-winning scientists and an adviser to large companies and wealthy individuals, all of whom Mr. Epstein told about it,” The Times reported last month, according to Infowars.

Old Thinker News noted this week that Epstein’s involvement with transhumanism “was characterized as an isolated bizarre fascination, but the community he was involved in is deadly serious about their goals.”

As the New York Times reported, Epstein gained access to the scientific community through Brockman, a little-known but very influential agent of transhumanism.

In 2000, the Wall Street Journal published an article called “At the Growing Billionaires’ Dinner, Tech Stars Move to Grown-Ups’ Table.”

The Edge Billionaire Dinner hosted all the men we now know as the major Tech Giants; Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Evan Williams, Bill Joy, Larry Page and others.

And now, according to Yahoo Finance, the group has been deleting posts on its website about Epstein in the wake of his arrest last month.

Epstein is still listed as a guest in 2000 on the website for the Edge dinner, Old Thinker News reports. Listed in 2001 is Marvin Minsky, who has been accused of having sex with a trafficking victim.

Brockman’s 1969 book, Afterwords, foreshadowed the transhumanist philosophy which was to come, envisioning man as merging with machine. ‘
He wrote:

“Man was nothing more than a model, a technique. It is necessary to construct a new model… The human delusion lies in the belief that the human being is the basis of reality and the final goal of the evolution.”

The Edge billionaire meetings have centered around the future of genetic engineering, biocomputation and re-designing humanity for a transhuman era. Physicist Freeman Dyson depicted those leading this group as having a god-like power to create entirely new species on earth in a “New Age of Wonder”. He describes them as:…continue reading the entire satanic evil here, that is, if you dare!

CONCLUSIVELY and consequentially, and as affirmed from the outset: Big Tech’s emerging technologies run the gamut – from assisting surgeons who perform life-saving surgery, to creating the availability of this and that. Resultant, its innovators and engineers have made modern life more efficient and forward-thinking. No doubt.

BUT the trade-off has been the creation of men and women at Big Tech’s tippy top who (not unlike the genocidal evil of the Nazis and their American/western successors within the Eugenics Movement – whose utter belief in mastering the human race via eugenics and controlled breeding is their entitlement and duty) are ready, willing, and able to destroy anyone who stands in their way – man, woman, and child. Ask yourselves: does anyone wonder why those on the far-left have an inviolate belief in unfettered abortion, even up until actual birth??

AS such, how else should they be deemed, other than…….

SILICON VALLEY, BIG TECH MASTERS Of THE UNIVERSE – THOU HAST BECOME EVIL!!

{re-blogged at ConservativeFiringLine}

{re-blogged at TheHomelandSecurityNetwork} click “Archives” to read, dated Aug. 28, 2019

{re-blogged at MessanoNews.com} scroll to Aug. 27, 2019 to read

{re-blogged at NewsLocker}

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED

This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}

Facebook’s Enabling Of Islamic Jihad Kicks Into High Gear: Algorithms, Proofs + More! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on May 10, 2018 by Adina Kutnicki

COINCIDENTAL or not, it is absolutely the case: ever since the publication of “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad ” (Sept. 2016), more and more dirty linen re the dangerous underbelly of Facebook is spilling into the public domain. In other words, its filthy laundry is, currently, on full display! Blowin’ in the wind….

INCREASINGLY, the twin theses of “BANNED” – Facebook’s enabling of Islamic Jihad + censorship of conservatives for the “crime” of daring to voice pro-American/pro-Israel/western support – keep coming to the fore. Resultant, a bull’s eye on the tech giant’s back is growing. But let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

NOT only that, on May 5, 2018 – a mere few weeks after Zuckerberg testified before Congress, indictingly, relative to violations of privacy, censorship, and the rampant use of Facebook by Islamic Jihadis – along comes more substantive proof in support of “BANNED.” The nail in the coffin.

Facebook has helped introduce thousands of Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isil) extremists to one another, via its ‘suggested friends’ feature, it can be revealed.

The social media giant – which is already under fire for failing to remove terrorist material from its platform – is now accused of actively connecting jihadists around the world, allowing them to develop fresh terror networks and even recruit new members to their cause.

Researchers, who analysed the Facebook activities of a thousand Isil supporters in 96 countries, discovered users with radical Islamist sympathies were routinely introduced to one another through the popular ‘suggested friends’ feature.

Using sophisticated algorithms, Facebook is designed to connect people who share common interests.

The site automatically collects a vast amount of personal information about its users, which is then used to target advertisements and also direct people towards others on the network they might wish to connect with.

But without effective checks on what information is being shared, terrorists are able to exploit the site to contact and communicate with sympathisers and supporters.

The extent to which the ‘suggested friend’ feature is helping Isil members on Facebook is highlighted in a new study, the findings of which will be published later this month in an extensive report by the Counter Extremism Project a non profit that has called on tech companies to do more to remove known extremist and terrorist material online.

Even more concerning was the response his fellow researcher, Robert Postings, got when he clicked on several non-extremist news pages about an Islamist uprising in the Philippines.

Within hours he had been inundated with friend suggestions for dozens of extremists based in that region.

Mr Postings said: “Facebook, in their desire to connect as many people as possible have inadvertently created a system which helps connect extremists and terrorists.”

Once initial introductions are made the failure of Facebook to tackle extremist content on the site means Jihadists can quickly radicalise susceptible targets.

In one example uncovered by the researchers, an Indonesian Isil supporter sent a friend request to a non-Muslim user in New York in March 2017.

During the initial exchange the American user explained that he was not religious , but had an interest in Islam.

Over the following weeks and months the Indonesian user began sending increasingly radical messages and links including pro-Isil propaganda, all of which were liked by his target.

Mr Postings said: “Over a period of six months the [US based user] went from having no clear religion to becoming a radicalised Muslim supporting Isil.”

Of the 1,000 Isil supporting profiles examined by researchers, less than half of the accounts had been suspended by Facebook six months later.

Mr Posting said: “Removing profiles that disseminate IS propaganda, calls for attacks and otherwise support the group is important…the fact that the majority of pro-IS profiles in this database have gone unremoved by Facebook is exceptionally concerning.”

Even when terrorist material was identified and the offending posts removed, the user was often allowed to remain on the site.

There have also been numerous examples of pro-Isil accounts being reinstated after the user complained to moderators about their suspension.

In one case a British terror suspect had his Facebook account reinstated nine times after complaining, despite being accused of having posted sick Isil propaganda videos.

Mr Waters said: “This project has laid bare Facebook’s inability or unwillingness to efficiently address extremist content on their site.

“The failure to effectively police its platform has allowed Facebook to become a place where extensive IS supporting networks exist, propaganda is disseminated people are radicalised and new supporters are recruited.”….continue reading….

OH my! Oh where, oh where are Facebook’s much hyped “counterterrorism squads“, you know, those whose task it is to prevent Jihadis from setting up shop at the site, let alone from connecting? Well, “BANNED” knows where – hide nor hair. In reality, CHAPTER SEVEN, “Facebook’s CounterTerror Efforts: Closing The Barn Door After The Horses Have Escaped “, reveals the poop and scoop.

THAT setting the (public good) record straight, Congress can no longer treat Facebook as merely a platform for the “social good”; a safe (internet-based) space for people to catch up with old friends, make new ones, connect with relatives near and far, and to engage in virtual exchanges of information. That ship has long sailed!

STILL yet, even though some Congressional reps placed Zuckerberg’s feet to the fire, the fact remains that too many are in Facebook’s (campaign mode) bottomless pockets. Conflict of interest, anyone? So much so, how can it be that members who questioned Zuckerberg about privacy violations, censorship of conservatives, “safe spaces” for Islamic Jihadis and related concerns are some of the internet giant’s biggest recipients! Credo quia absurdum. Smoke and mirrors….foxes in the hen house….

BESIDES, who recalls Zuckerberg’s “promise” from 2009, when he opined that Facebook will always protect user privacy? Alas, the Zuckster lied.

NOT only that, hot on the heels of the so-called grilling, what did Facebook do? Well, consider the following as (more than) a finger-in-eye….a fu-k you salute too.

Reportedly, on April 9, 2018:

A European news site has begun censoring its own reports, withholding some stories and reviews from its Facebook page because of the social media platform’s threats over its reporting on immigration.

Voice of Europe said Facebook has recently suspended its moderators. One has been suspended for 30 days another was suspended for 24 hours after posting a photograph of Poles protesting behind a banner saying “Mohammed not welcome.”

“While we’ve changed nothing in our postings, Facebook’s behaviour towards us changed. Several innocent postings were a reason for Facebook to suspend our moderators.”

Voice of Europe said it was one of the fast growing European news sites on Facebook with at least 30,000 people joining us every month.”

“On some days 5,000 people joined us, but those days are gone after Facebook decided to censor us, suspend us and threaten us.”

One recent point of contention was a review of a book by former Czech president Vaclav Klaus, who said, “The migrant influx is comparable to the barbarian invasions of Europe.”

“While the article heavily criticizes migration, it is news, like any other article on our site,” the agency said. “But not according to Facebook: The article was removed, we received a 30-day suspension and Facebook threatened to remove our page over it.”

The fact that it is a smaller website appears to have played a role in Facebook’s threats.

“That day we saw a somewhat similar article was posted by Russia Today on Facebook. … They didn’t receive a suspension over it, because that would be all over the media.”

Voice of Europe said it now has decided not to post all its articles on Facebook “because we don’t want to lose our page.”

“While Facebook blames us for posting ‘hate speech,’ we think the real reason is our site was becoming too successful with between 30,000 and 40,000 followers every month this year.”

Voice of Europe cited Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban: “Europe is not free, because freedom begins with speaking the truth. In Europe today it is forbidden to speak the truth.”

Facebook did not respond to WND’s request for comment.

Breitbart said Voice of Europe was “bludgeoned” by Facebook.

Breitbart noted that in September 2015, German Chancellor Angela Merkel was caught on an open mic asking Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to help suppress “anti-immigration” postings on the social media site. Zuckerberg replied he was already working on it…..continue reading….

BUT just when hapless users could be forgiven for thinking that Facebook would rein itself in, especially, after Congress started taking notice, well, said hopeful types have been proven wrong. Hmm….the very same algorithm that was launched in February 2018, thus, piggybacking a previous one – ensuring that conservative news stories continue to be blocked from spreading or trending – is going from strength to strength! What chutzpah. Indeed, the data is in!

KEEP in mind, Facebook, via its ubiquitous so-called “community standards”, still has no issue with pages which exhort – “Kill Trump, Hang Him, Hunt Him!” Incontrovertibly, they rise to high-level criminal charges – against the page owner(s) and Facebook!

BOTTOM LINE:

BUT for the fact that Facebook is the world’s largest social media site; its reach more powerful than any government on earth, and that it has become the world’s most dangerous censor (in league with “Alphabet, Inc.”), the argument from free market defenders that “hands off” Facebook is the way to go, that it is the capitalist march forward, would be valid.

TO wit, whereas “Ma Bell” was broken up in 1982 due to its monopolistic rule, even more so, Facebook (related tech giants, etc.) must be cut down to size.

TRUTH dare be told, Facebook (and Google) is not just a “garden variety” monopoly – it is far worse! How so? Its unchecked and uncontrolled power over the inflow and outflow of information is beyond the scope of anything in history. No exaggeration. Effectively, it has unfettered power to subvert the democratic process. Been there, done that.

INESTIMABLY, if Congress still believes that citizens are better served by competitive market forces, and that a behemoth (albeit corporate based, as opposed to government controlled) should never be allowed to control an entire industry, Facebook must be brought to heel.

FORTHWITH, antitrust laws (other measures, if necessary) have to be imposed to break up its massive and out of control power grip. In tandem, the rest of the tech lords must be cut down to size. Follow suit.

AT the end of it all, and sans a scintilla of a doubt, Facebook is subverting the democratic process.

CONCLUSIVELY, in light of all the facts cited above – least of which is Facebook’s algorithmic ability to hook up Islamic Jihadis from one end of the globe to another – the necessity for Congressional action is not in question. Resultant, the time to act is NOW!!

DEMONSTRATIVELY…..ILLUSTRATIVELY…..on and on…..and so on and so forth…

Image result for pics of facebook and jihad

{re-blogged at ConservativeFiringLine}

{re-blogged at TheHomelandSecurityNetwork} click “Archives” dated May 11, 2018 to read

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED

This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}

Facebook In Congress’s Cross-Hairs, While Zuckerberg Plays Hide & Seek – A Knock-On Effect: Propping Up “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Jihad!” Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on March 23, 2018 by Adina Kutnicki

EVER since the release of “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad ” (September 1, 2016), it has become impossible to ignore its truth-telling, irrespective of discomfiting revelations. As always, a segment prefer to remain in the dark – deaf, dumb, and blind. But never mind. To each his own.

BE that as it may, the book’s thesis has dual prongs – zeroing in on the platform’s enabling of Jihad, in concert with revealing its underbelly through the deployment of various methods of censorship. Silencing techniques.

IPSO facto, conservative voices are muted, leftist viewpoints are empowered, and Islamic Jihadis run amok. Simply put, it is a recipe for disaster, that is, for westerners who value freedom and liberty. On the other hand, Zuckerberg let it be known, as to where he stands, in relation to said liberties!

In an interview published Wednesday at Wired Magazine, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg let the cat out of the bag, telling the tech outlet that he basically wants to trade free speech and free expression for “safety” and an “informed community,” Breitbart reported.

“I think at the heart of a lot of these issues we face are tradeoffs between real values that people care about. You know, when you think about issues like fake news or hate speech, right, it’s a tradeoff between free speech and free expression and safety and having an informed community. These are all the challenging situations that I think we are working to try to navigate as best we can,” he said in response to a question about “philosophical changes” that have been going through his mind in the previous few days….

IN fact, said knock-on effects are pin-pointed and targeted in an “Open letter to Mark Zuckerberg from a frustrated, fed-up conservative.” It is a devastating, searing indictment.

NOW, before moving forward, it must be internalized: Many who are currently (emphasis placed) on board within Congress (in tandem with so-called elites) to rein in Facebook through legislation are incensed because President Trump “may have” benefited from Cambridge Analytica – the very same company, with the very same analytical techniques, which catapulted their “favorite son” to the Presidency, HUSSEIN Obama!! So, fair-minded folks may be forgiven for inquiring: Where were they during the ascendancy of the aforementioned POTUS? Hide nor hair. Asked and answered.

ALAS, as always, every dark cloud has a silver lining…blow-back, if you will.

Facebook Inc. is drawing scrutiny from the main U.S. privacy watchdog and half a dozen congressional committees over how the personal data of 50 million users was obtained by a data analytics firm that helped elect President Donald Trump.

Facebook said it would conduct staff-level briefings of six committees Tuesday and Wednesday. That includes meetings with the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, as well as the commerce and intelligence committees of both chambers.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is also probing whether Facebook violated terms of a 2011 consent decree over its handling of personal user data that was transferred to Cambridge Analytica without users’ knowledge, according to a person familiar with the matter. The FTC will be sending a letter to the company, another person said. Facebook slumped on the news, extending Monday’s decline.

The FTC is the lead U.S. agency for enforcing companies’ adherence to their own privacy policies and could fine the company into the millions of dollars if it finds Facebook violated a 2011 consent decree. New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced on Tuesday that he and Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey had sent a demand letter to Facebook as part of a joint probe stemming from the fallout. Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen announced his own probe Monday.

Amid the scrutiny, Facebook will be confronting immediate demands by Congress. In addition to the briefings, Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said he wants to hear testimony from Facebook Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg, as well as Twitter Inc. CEO Jack Dorsey. Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina, chairman of the Intelligence Committee, said any decision about calling Zuckerberg to appear before the panel is farther off.

Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine, who also serves on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Tuesday that she has “grown increasingly concerned as we’re learning more and more about the manipulation of data, the harvesting of data from Facebook, the ads that were placed to sow the seeds of discord in this country.” The panel has previously heard testimony into Russia’s use of Facebook to attempt to meddle in the 2016 election.

“I believe that Facebook, Twitter, the other social media platforms have a lot of questions to answer,” she said….continue reading….

Zuckerberg and Sandberg silent amid Facebook scandal

(Facebook bosses Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg appear to be deep in barricade mode in a vain bid to fend off, clockwise from top left, Wall Street, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, FTC’s Maureen Ohlhausen and UK leader Theresa May.NY Post composite)

MIND you, reportedly, while high-level meetings at Facebook are going down, Zuckerberg, his “Lean-In” #Me Too woman, Sheryl Sandberg, are no-shows. Delicacy aside, one pu**y deserves another! So much so, even loyalists are getting antsy, querying: Where the hell are they? And, why are they “MISSING-IN-ACTION?”

INCONTROVERTIBLY, “we frequently hear politicians speak of companies not being too big to fail. But is Facebook too big to be regulated? Is Facebook so big that it can freely operate as a government unto itself?” (pg. 23, BANNED)

INDEED, said queries have proven to be more than valid! Dare I say it, prescient?

FINALLY, blessedly, with all of the brouhaha surrounding Facebook in specific and tech giants in particular, how many know what Zuckerberg said to BBC in 2009: “We won’t sell personal information.” Liar, liar, pants on fire!

BBC Business

✔@BBCBusiness

“This is their information. They own it”
“And you won’t sell it?”
“No! Of course not.”
Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, talking to the BBC in 2009.

2:54 AM – Mar 21, 2018

DEMONSTRABLY, Zuckerberg “prefers” to hide behind his well-paid, jive-talking, hired-guns. Time will tell, whether or not he gets away with being a “no-show.” Regardless, increasingly, public opinion (at least, for those who cherish the hallmarks of a Republic via liberty, privacy, freedom of speech, and the like, thus, concomitantly, detest dictatorial thrusts) is turning against Facebook. But it remains to be seen if Congress takes real action, as promised.

“Politicians like to pound their chests and call for common-sense legislation. Yet when presented with a very real problem, they shy away. This is the point where individuals need to step up and tack action.” (pg. 138, BANNED)

{re-blogged at ConservativeFiringLine}

{re-blogged at TheHomelandSecurityNetwork} click on “Archives” dated March 24, 2018 to read

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED

This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}

Intelligence & Counter Terrorism Conference Wrap Up: Conclusions Drawn – Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on November 17, 2017 by Adina Kutnicki

Readers may, or may not, be familiar with the driving forces behind this site. And while there are many moving parts, the fact remains that the security of the U.S. and Israel are its core components.

More specifically, years of networking throughout the U.S. landscape paid huge dividends, in so far that a select group of security types within various intersecting fields seek me out, even as I learned at some of “their knees”, so to speak. Similarly, upon coming to Israel, new relationships were forged, and old ones were renewed. Let’s just leave it at that.

Be that as it may, like most professions, conferences are a part of professional development. However, when it comes to Intelligence & Counter Terrorism, well, certain aspects must remain off the radar, hence, the “closed-door” reference. Incontestably, tactical and strategic measures must stay behind closed doors. The reasons why require no explanation.

On the other hand, the overall conclusions drawn are for public consumption, after all, they are in the cross-hairs.

Still yet, before we head to today’s (having concluded a little while ago) Intelligence wrap up, a brief backgrounder is in order.

Intelligence Conference Draws Near…Oct. 4, 2017

Back in August, the 17th to be exact, I received a special invite – a shout-out, if you will – to a U.S. based “closed-door” Intelligence Conference. Several high-profile names in counter-terrorism will be in attendance. Alongside these experts, will be others who are, out of necessity, “unknown” to the general public. In the shadows.

For the most part, conferences in this arena are top-laden with academics whose concentrations are in security studies and international relations, as well as security related government officials. In tandem, an emphasis is placed on counter-terrorism and intelligence.

And while there will be two high-level (non-politicized) academics in the aforementioned intersecting fields, the crux of the conference will focus less upon theoretical matters, but more on practical applications. Facts on the ground.

In other words, the “guests of honor” will be several counter-intelligence agents, whose identities, if revealed, would not only seal their fates, but compromise countless operations. To wit, non-disclosure forms will be signed by all, with the caveat of stiff (financial) penalties, if broken. Perhaps, criminal ones alike.

As is said, this is where the “rubber meets the road.” Effectively, my participation – through a comprehensive and detailed report via confidential sources – will complement some of their findings, that which crisscrossed between the U.S. and Israel, and ricocheted into the wider Middle East.

To date, aside from the publication of my book, BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad, this conference – in both its import and scope – surpasses all. This is no small admission. Even so, upon relating to the head of the conference that traveling from Israel to the States – for a face-to-face presentation – is not viable at this time, an alternative arrangement makes my participation possible.

In this regard, it became my responsibility to access a highly “impenetrable” video-conferencing system – which has been done. Yes, “no man is an island.”

So while I prep for this major task, it must be noted: none of it would be possible without the invaluable assistance of my biggest cheerleader – you know who you are! In recognition, thanks for “securing” my participation to the max – and for so much more, גבר שלי …..

In light of the above, the following were its bullet points:

Despite years of committing vast financial resources, blood, and treasure, the U.S. and Israel are even more imperiled than prior to the so-called “fight against terror” began – post 9/11/01 – and gained the west’s attention. Don’t let the leaders convince otherwise.
That a preponderance of this dangerous state of affairs, precipitously, leads straight back to the leadership – via their failure to properly identify the real enemy, that is, Islamic Jihad, an underpinning of Islam’s basis, Shariah Law. Their absolute lack of identification, allergic-like, has caused untold death and destruction, the likes of which has yet to reach its (incalculable) peak.
Without such identification, a critical aspect to this civilizational war – unambiguously, it was identified as such – is totally off-limits. Intrinsically, the informational front is neglected to the degree that an “amorphous” enemy is creating terror, and that said terror is consigned to a “bogeyman” status. Hence, Islamic Jihadis are often called “mentally ill”, as opposed to Mohammedans. Thus, they are free to slaughter at will, sans any retribution from the citizens at large.
Furthermore, the U.S. is fighting with multicultural blindfolds, while Jihadis fight to the death. Tragically, Israel is following Washington’s lead – even though its top leaders are wholly aware of Islam’s centuries-long, uncompromising war against the west.
In turn, those really leading the U.S. “war on terror” (to a similar degree, Israel’s) are media, academic, cultural, and legal elites, even though those dying on its front-lines are courageous soldiers, with innocent civilians caught in the cross-fire.
Of course, the same can be said for the entire west, but the conference’s laser beam focus was on the twin pillars of western civilization – the U.S. and Israel.

Trust, the high-level professionals in attendance are the best of the best – bar none. Aside from placing their lives on the line on a continuous basis, they are the unsung heroes. If “unmasked”, their days would be numbered.

Significantly, from the collection of Intel to its ultimate analysis, seguing, to the necessary preventive measures, these Intelligence professionals are right on target. In fact, their ability to fluidity move and adapt to an ever-changing landscape is awe-inspiring. Heart-stopping. It is akin to watching a high-wire act without a net – and then some.

As to the Counter Terrorism professionals – the complementary side to the Intel folks – they are tasked with what is referred to as “counteraction.” Their agile responses to unfolding terror attacks and crisis performance can’t be quantified.

Moreover, the “operational” slide shows brought home the nature of the Islamic-infused beast – yes, they were identified as such. Mind you, those who fight them to the death so that citizens won’t have to, not only have a right to call them what they are, but an obligation to do so. Not only that, particular leaders and their surrogates were called out, and their extreme negligence was placed front and center. On the record.

Conclusively, the following was their considered and overarching analysis:

This war will not only last for decades, but its ultimate outcome will hardly depend upon superior firepower. Rather, the victor will be the side which has no qualms about identifying the enemy, and terrorizing it into submission!
In the interim, if an immediate volte-face is not on the national agenda, the outlook is very grim. Nation after nation will fall within the west – and with the U.S. part and parcel to the domino effect. This won’t occur in actual battle, but through a slow death-like process.
The analogy of the boiling frog was brought up and emphasized. Consider the ways in which cultural identities become unrecognizable, and this is the crossroads at which the U.S. is at.

Dear reader, dare you guess: “who’s on first?”

{re-blogged at ConservativeFiringLine}

{re-blogged at TheHomelandSecurityNetwork} click “Archives” to read, Nov. 18, 2017

{re-blogged at TeaPartyUSA.org}

{re-blogged at RightWingConservativeNewsblog.com}

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED

This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}

Sharia Compliance Takes Over Tech Giants: Alphabet Inc. & Facebook Lead The Charge. What’s The Upshot? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on September 27, 2017 by Adina Kutnicki

WITHOUT a basic understanding of Sharia (Islamic) Law, it is impossible to recognize when it is being (stealth-fully or otherwise) applied in America and the west at large. Resultant, its insidious dangers to western civilization are able to fly under the radar, and with few the wiser. And before non-Muslims realize what is taking place, constitutionally protected freedoms are no longer applicable. DOA.

AS a very simple A + B calculus, how many believe that criticism of Islam’s madman, the “prophet” Muhammad, couldn’t possibly lead to a so-called “hate crime” charge? If so (naively) inclined, think again.

EFFECTIVELY, under the guise of “Islamophobia“, “hate speech” has become the weapon used by fascist-leftists and their Islamic counterparts to squash free speech in America. No doubt, one who dares to go up against their dictates – and evinces patriotic ethos – will find themselves within a myriad of cross-hairs. Extrapolating further, the west in general – and America in particular – is in the vise-grip of a Orwellian paradox – one which turns the basic definition of a phobia upside its head! Yes, its accepted meaning is:

A persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it.

PATRIOTS, in furtherance of much needed disinfectant, take a peek at the anti-democratic police in the UK, a harbinger of things to come – as they brazenly threatened a Facebook user over “Islamophobia” ala “hate speech!” Be aware, this sampling is just Exhibit Number One – out of countless across the western world. Simply put, political leaders have gone off the rails, as they willfully apply Sharia Law’s Blasphemy dictates from atop this and that public agency.

If the blasphemer does not repent, the punishment is death. … Some modern Muslim scholars contest that Islam supports blasphemy law, stating that Muslim jurists made the offense part of Sharia. The Islamic law considers blasphemy against Muhammad a more severe offense than blasphemy against God.

NOW, with the accepted definition of “Islamophobia” at the ready, how can it even be considered a “phobia” to be afraid of Islam? Inextricably, Muhammedans, under its banner, are waging a murderous jihad – historically, derived from centuries of Islamic history! But no matter. According to Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum:

“The way the jihadists understand the term is in keeping with its usage through fourteen centuries of Islamic history…. The goal is boldly offensive, and its ultimate intent is nothing less than to achieve Muslim dominion over the entire world…. Jihad did have two variant meanings through the centuries, one more radical, one less so. The first holds that Muslims who interpret their faith differently are infidels and therefore legitimate targets of jihad…. The second meaning, associated with mystics, rejects the legal definition of jihad as armed conflict and tells Muslims to withdraw from the worldly concerns to achieve spiritual depth. Jihad in the sense of territorial expansion has always been a central aspect of Muslim life…. Today, jihad is the world’s foremost source of terrorism, inspiring a worldwide campaign of violence by self-proclaimed jihadist groups.”

MIND you, those who aren’t afraid of Islam’s dictates are more than irrational because the Koran – time and again – explicitly directs Allah’s Muslim Terrorists to execute the following, and countless of the same:

Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.”

WHAT other interpretations are there, aside from those given by jive-talking apologists – ala officialdom, the (ene)media, or Alphabet Inc. and the like? Not only that, how many times have Americans (westerners at large) heard their rallying cry, “Allahu Akbar”, while exploding all over the world! But let’s just examine jihadist Omar Mateen’s shout-out, that which took place June 2016 at Orlando’s Pulse (gay) night club.

The phone conversations and high death toll – Mateen killed 49 people – have led some survivors to believe that he did not act alone. “There’s no way” he acted alone, survivor Leydiana Puyanera told CNN. She noted that she heard Mateen yell “Allahu akbar,” the Muslim slogan widely known as a battle cry among jihadis, and had heard that there were people holding the doors of the club closed. At least one survivor, Luis Burbano, has told media that he held the door closed fearing the gunman would run out to kill those who escaped.

NOT too incidentally, the above miscalculations are so central to national security, a preponderance of evidence in support thereof can be found within this author’s book (published Sept. 2016, with co-author Joe Newby) “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad.” More specifically, take note of Chapters Two and Twelve, respectively: Militant Jihad: Its Knock-On Effects To The West, and Jihad In Orlando: Facebook Takes Center Stage.

ALL of which (and so much more) link back to the dangers at bay: Sharia Law sanctioned jihad; aided and abetted by tech giants, as they lend cover as well as lead the charge!

IN this regard, considering the fact that Social Capital CEO Chamath Palihapitiya, a former Facebook executive, bluntly states (as reported, Sept. 14, 2017) that “Facebook and Google are like ‘surveillance states’ and are inviting a government crackdown”, is it any wonder that the thesis of “BANNED” (btw, which was conceived in 2015…hmm….more than two years ahead of those jumping aboard the bandwagon), as stated on its book jacket, expounds:

POLITICIANS TALK ABOUT COMPANIES BEING TOO BIG TO FAIL, BUT IS FACEBOOK SO BIG THAT IT CAN FREELY OPERATE AS A GOVERNMENT UNTO ITSELF?

BUT for more proof of the same, let’s examine Youtube. Again, the west is subjected to the dangerous overreach of monopoly-like behemoths – those who are also in the “side business” of policing “hate speech.” Besides, who appointed them arbiters of this and that speech – approved, non-approved, or in between?? Egregiously, jihadists ply their murderous trade via Youtube 24/7 – akin to their exposure all over Alphabet Inc.! How dare they employ a double standard!

Youtube, a subsidiary of Google, has caved to pressure from designated Islamic terrorist group CAIR, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the far left ‘Jewish’ Anti Defamation League (ADL), and Pro-Publica, all of which are funded in part by George Soros .

They claim to be censoring far-right extremism, incitement to violence and Islamic terrorism, but in fact, they are censoring the people who are providing crucial information about creeping sharia and exposing the threat of Islamic jihad, both violent and institutional, rather than ignoring it, as the Left does.

Now published on Vidme.com, this is the video that got my account banned. Click screen twice to play.

https://vid.me/e/jFM6K?stats=1

Content creators and video uploaders on YouTube who follow all of the site’s rules face censorship by the platform, under new plans announced by Google. Youtube has already deleted more than half the ‘truth about Islam’ videos posted at BNI.

Reported by Breitbart, According to a post on YouTube’s official blog, videos will now be subject to the rule of the mob. If enough users flag a video as “hate speech” or “violent extremism,” YouTube may impose restrictions on the content even if it breaks none of the platform’s rules.

And it’s not only me. Apparently, YOUTUBE Suspends, Deletes Pamela Geller’s Account as well. Google is blacklisting and has admitted to working with alt-left smear groups to silence opposition and criticism of jihad and sharia.

AS to PayPal, one of the world’s largest internet payment companies, they too know no bounds. As some may be aware, the internet giant is banning conservative sites, thanks to heavy-lifting by fascist-leftist (and Islamist) groups that are aligned (and funded) with Soros.

LO and behold, even though this site chooses not to solicit funds, nor does it post items for sale (for this and that reason), its conservative ethos surely inflame many passions. Be that as it may, it was quite a surprise that the following, an out of the blue supportive “advert”, popped up at Watchdogs of Our Freedom: WOOF! Counter-revolutionary commentary for our times.

PLEASE HELP US GET BANNED BY PAYPAL! BUY THIS BOOK!

Many of you know that PayPal has begun banning conservative websites. In a textbook display of leftist irony, sites advertising the book “BANNED” by Adina Kutnicki, courageous blogger, freedom lover, and Lioness of Zion, have been among those singled out for PayPal’s opprobrium. As most of you also know, we don’t affiliate with PayPal because we give away stuff when we have it, and we don’t ask for money. But we still feel left out , so we’re boldly endorsing Adina’s book (written with co-author, Joe Newby) in a desperate attempt to get banned by PayPal in solidarity with our fellow conservative bloggers–or at least notified that if we ever want to use PayPal, we are pre-banned–is that a thing? We’d settle for that–but the main idea is to get you to buy Adina’s book! DISCLAIMER: WOOF receives no portion of any proceeds resulting from this endorsement and attests that its advocacy of Adina Kutnicki’s work is unsolicited, unpaid, and based entirely on our personal belief that she is obviously a warrior goddess.

SWEET!

DESPITE it all, there appears to be a glimmer of hope on the horizon, that is, if instituted forthwith.

Reportedly (September 19, 2017), according to the UK’s Theresa May, “Google and Facebook will face punishing fines unless they remove terrorist propaganda within a two-hour limit.” Mind you, decades of Islamist and Euro incitement against Israel, coupled with Facebook’s enabling (since 2004) in the forefront, has led to the continuous slaughter of Jews (occasionally, with others caught in the cross-fire), but it never moved the Brits to become enraged – until their citizens became jihadi cannon fire! Oh well….
Similarly, despite Capitol Hill’s lip service response to jihad in Israel, America’s “see no Islamic, hear no Islamic evil” elites couldn’t care less about dead Jews – including, Congressional Jewish reps and many in positions of communal leadership. Two-faced opportunists. Regardless, akin to their Euro counterparts, some are running scared.

On Sept. 14, ProPublica reported that it had managed to purchase ads targeted at users who’d listed interests such as “Jew hater” and “How to burn Jews.”

Facebook quickly changed its ad system to prevent similar purchases, but the episode gives further ammunition to critics who worry that the company has grown too powerful with too little oversight. Abroad, Facebook faces challenges from aggressive European antitrust regulators and governments suspicious of both its power and its treatment of user data. The idea of a crackdown is catching on in the U.S., too, amid a larger backlash against Silicon Valley. Zuckerberg has become a big, enticing target for both liberal Democrats, who see him as a media-devouring monopolist, and for nationalist Republicans, who see an opportunity to rail against the company that embodies globalization more than any other.

And it beggars belief – in a good way – that an A.I. (artificial intelligence) founder had this to say:University of Montreal professor Yoshua Bengio is one of three members of what they have self-titled the “deep learning conspiracy.” This “Canadian Mafia” of artificial intelligence visionaries is largely responsible for the tech industry’s leap into machine learning.Bengio and his colleagues consult for the companies to which he is referring: Bengio for IBM, with Geoffrey Hinton and Yann LeCun for Google and Facebook, respectively. Apple’s AI research is led by Hinton’s protege Ruslan Salakhutdinov. These are the companies that can use AI to create even better AI, embarrass China at their oldest game, police Twitter, or give your next iPhone a brain.In responding to a question from an Axios reporter as to whether the tech giants should be broken up, Bengio openly scoffed. With their power and resources only looking to increase, he wants anti-trust laws to be enforced, saying that “governments have become so meek in front of companies.”…read the whole thing….and then refer back to “BANNED”, specifically, page 139….

ONLY time will tell if relevant governmental poohbahs will perform the serious work which mandates MUCH needed regulation. But if they need any assists, this patriot refers them to “BANNED”, in particular, pages 115-155. Surely their aides will find the recommendations worth their weight in gold – all for the discounted paperback price of $ 13.87 or Kindle cost of $ 7.99! Indeed, a drop in their line-item budgets. Still yet, if they find the prices too steep, no matter. This author – in service of patriotism – will ensure they receive copies gratis. No kidding. Give a shout out…

CONCLUSIVELY, the very fact that many millions of Muhammedans (followers of Islam, not to be confused with “Muslims by birth” who are non-practicing, in effect, apostates) are mandated to impose Islam on all of mankind, well, that about spells out its inherent danger to the entire non-Muslim world! Incontestably, “jihad by the sword” has been a centuries-long method, as prescribed by “prophet” Muhammad through Allah! Surah 9 is more than enough proof, as per this site’s charge sheet.

ALONG this treacherous minefield, isn’t it patently clear that the nexus between Sharia’s mandates for death, and Facebook’s (as well as Alphabet Inc. alike) collusive and corrosive helping hands, led to the purchasing of ads targeted at users who’d listed interests such as “Jew hater” and “How to burn Jews.” Moreover, only when shamed publicly by this vile outrage did Facebook pull the ads! How can this be, as Facebook’s mouthpieces continuously harp on their so-called (stringently applied) “community standards.” Nebulous. Mendacious.

FOR the record, as a Jew, a Zionist to boot, and an American patriot, here’s a heartfelt response to the censors at Facebook and (Alphabet Inc. alike): go to hell….and a F U salute too!! Never and never will anyone silence this voice, hard as they try.

MANIFESTLY, Sharia Law must be eliminated, extinguished, primarily, within America, that is, if western civilization is to survive. And regardless of PC dictates, it is obligatory for western patriots to stand up and be counted, thus, refusing to be “stuck on stupid” when so much evidence attests to the encircling dangers.

TO wit, repeat this non-sanitized truth, and as many times as it takes: the “cult of Islam” – via Muhammedans who follow Sharia Law – is a direct danger to western civilization!!

AND that is that…a wrap too.

{re-blogged at ConservativeFiringLine}

{re-blogged at TheHomelandSecurityNetwork} to read, click on “Archives”, dated Sept. 28, 2017

{re-blogged at TeaPartyUSA.org}

{re-blogged at USSANews.com} The Tea Party’s Front Page

{re-blogged at RepublicanRise.SwillNews.com}

{re-blogged at RightWingConservativeNewsblog.com}

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED

This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}

The Poisonous Fruits of Social Media: Mohammedans GLORIFY Jew-Killing;The Slaughtering Of Infidels! What’s To be Done? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on July 26, 2017 by Adina Kutnicki

Image result for pics of islamic incitement on social media

BY definition, certain endeavors are the product of necessity. Such is the case when a void is so obvious and compelling that filling in the gap, thus, stepping up, becomes obligatory.

IN this regard, upon finding out that every book on Facebook was designed as puff piece reading – in veneration of wunderkind Zuckerberg – let’s just say that it was necessary to spring into action. Hence, writing “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” (released Sept. 2016) became a central mission and focal point; a labor of truth-telling, come what may.

IN a nutshell, with Facebook’s inception in 2004 and with Twitter’s follow-on in 2006, social media has become the go-to medium across the globe. And it is into this high-profile arena that the convergence of ever-present militant Islamic jihadis proliferate. Termite-like. In fact, social media and militant Islamic jihad are glued together like pigs to their shit. Inseparable.

NOW, as an acknowledged expert on this subject matter – alongside co-author Joe Newby – the aforementioned book is the sole source which dares to take on Facebook and its nexus to militant Islamic jihad. Not only that, forget about the lying mantras from Zuckerberg and his highly compensated hired guns, minions, yes, “Facebook wants to be “a hostile environment for terrorists.” The company’s director of policy said Facebook works “aggressively to remove terrorist content from our platform.”

BUT if it is still unclear as to the charge sheet that Facebook is a major purveyor of terrorist incitement and recipes for jihad, that’s okay. It is precisely why the heavy-lifting has been executed – with all due diligence via proofs that can be found throughout “BANNED”, satisfying a casebook with prima facie evidence. In tandem, adjunct commentaries can be accessed throughout this site. In turn, the reader will understand how (and why) the poisonous fruits of social media came to fruition.

Back in May 2014, a jaw-dropping article appeared at Examiner.com. It exposed the insidious danger, as well as the absolute double standard, inherent within Facebook. So much so, its moderators, its so-called watchdogs, punished the victims (for the umpteenth time) of DIRECT death threats from Allah’s Muslim Terrorists by removing their group page! Yet, murderous inciters were allowed to continue their threats, as if nothing happened! How can this be??

Is Facebook okay with death threats from Islamists? That’s the question administrators of “Islam Exposed” asked earlier this week. After administrators received a number of threatening messages, Facebook pulled the page, citing “harassment,” but restored the page on Tuesday, telling Examiner.com it “was removed in error.”

Administrators were extremely grateful to see the page restored, but questions regarding the threats remained. Would Facebook take action against those issuing the threats? The social media site did not say, but the group did not wait and filed complaints with the FBI.

“A single bullet will strike ur (sic) head one day [admin] from a jihadist. Insha-Allah,” one threat read. Another Facebook user with a Muslim name threatened to cut off administrators’ heads if they continued to post articles in a rant too profane to quote here. Yet another person threatened to blackmail one of the administrators.

“I am giving u (sic) warning,” said another person. “Stop this page.”

According to the group, one administrator received several threatening phone calls, with some including a Muslim prayer in Arabic. He reported it to the police, they said, but nothing was done. Just this week, they added, he received two threatening calls.

Adina Kutnicki, an investigative journalist based in Israel, said she has been harassed on Facebook by an individual she identified as Iranian Mohamed Erdem.

“Back off you satanist scum of the earth! You want war, war with me!” he told Kutnicki on Facebook. The threats she received from Erdem was so alarming, she added, that “heavy duty counter terror contacts decided to ‘check things out.’”

The face of another administrator was photo-shopped into a Nazi uniform and added to a Facebook post intended to incite harassment. Another picture depicted Kutnicki superimposed on a nuclear mushroom cloud with a warning that Israel would be destroyed and wiped off the map.

All of these incidents have been reported to Facebook, they said, but the social media giant has so far done nothing. Instead of punishing those actually making the threats, Facebook responded by retaliating against the victims. Unfortunately, this is not all that uncommon.

Last August, for example, we reported that a conservative female said she was targeted with explicit threats of death and rape from users with Muslim-sounding names, but Facebook dismissed them. According to that user, Facebook responded with a private email saying they could not confirm the threats violated their community standards. One threat reported to Facebook was quite specific: “We will kill you.”

At the time, Facebook told The Blaze it not only supports freedom of speech but enforces its standards uniformly across the board.

“We review every piece of content that is reported to us or flagged in the system and each one is held to the same exact standard – as is every person who uses our service and we will enforce our Statement of Rights and Responsibilities equally,” a Facebook spokesperson said.

But the administrators we spoke to — along with many hundreds of others who have reached out to Examiner over the last two years — dispute that. For Kutnicki and others, the issue is Facebook’s willingness to turn a blind eye to those who attack Jews and Israel while hammering anyone who even mentions Islam in a post.

Moving right along to Sept. 2015, how shocking was it to find out that Zuckerberg (as CEO of the largest social media site on the planet, the so-called arbiter of free speech) was caught colluding with Merkel (the socialist and Islamic coddling leader of Germany) by promising to stifle any criticism about the invasion of Mohammedans into Germany, Europe at large, America and the west in toto? Not very.
Additionally, in Feb. 2016, in a never-ending cycle of madness swirling around social media, a rape victim apologized ! on Facebook to her Mohammedan rapists, gang-bangers, for being raped!! Does it get any more Orwellian?
But even as Zuckerberg and his cultish minions pledged to rein in extremist content and incitement to terrorism, well, all is not as promised. How so?
In Feb. 2017, this site reported: another US vet, a convert to Islam, plotted major jihad in the heartland, and Facebook was in the mix – again! And so on and so forth….

MORE specifically, Chapter Seven of “BANNED”, “Facebook’s Counterterror Efforts: Closing The Barn Door After The Horses Have Escaped” , eviscerated their so-called claims to “aggressively remove terrorist content from our platform.” Its basis begins on page 99 – 114:

Non-tainted investigative journalists have hardly been impressed by Facebook’s implementation of a so-called “counterterrorism squad.” In a word: hogwash. This author’s counterterror and counterintelligence sources are equally unfazed. One such PR report, titled, “Facebook vs ISIS: Inside The Tech Giant’s Antiterror Strategy, is excerpted below….

RESULTANT, it should hardly be unexpected that murderous exhortations throughout Palestinian social media (with Facebook and Twitter heralding the lion’s share) and attendant Islamic forums glorified (once again!) the slaughter of a family of Jews, all for the “crime” of being Jews! The ongoing incitement to murder Jews, wherever they are, has been a staple of Facebook and Twitter since their debuts. In general, each and every infidel alike.

Palestinian social media users, along with some in the larger Arab world, praised the brutal Palestinian terrorist attack in which three members of an Israeli family were murdered on Friday night during a Sabbath meal in the town of Halamish west of Ramallah.

Palestinian journalist Yasser Zaatreh wrote, “Yesterday was one of Palestine’s biggest days, starting with a day of rage that boasted the blood of three martyrs and ended with a heroic act that hurt the invaders. This is the land that Allah blessed.”

ياسر الزعاترة

✔@YZaatreh

أمس كان يوما من أيام فلسطين العظيمة.. بدأ بالغضب والتحدي، وتعطّر بدماء 3 شهداء، وانتهى ببطولة أوجعت الغزاة. إنها الأرض التي بارك الله حولها.

9:44 AM – 22 Jul 2017

230230 Retweets

430430 likes

Palestinian poet Rebhi Altemawi used metaphorical language to describe the attack, writing, “The attack in Halamish, light and more light and more surprises.”

Palestinian journalist Mahmoud Abou Hassan quoted the Quran, writing, “Allah lifts up the hearts of the faithful.”

Abu Khalid characterized the horrific slaying thusly, “Defending al-Aqsa is not terror.”

Alubeidi wrote, “The heroes in Palestine kill the criminal Zionists and Hassan Nasrallah’s cowards kill the Syrians.”

Zakaria Mustafa wrote, “Thank Allah, the God of the world. This will happen to those who remain (of the Jews).”

The Angel of al-Aqsa made do with the words, “Long live the perpetrator of the attack.”

Zizo Yomna wrote of the assailant, “May Allah protect him from all evil.”

Another Twitter user wrote, “Allah was merciful to our martyrs. And in all regards to the Zionist Pigs, Allah will throw them into hell.”

Isam Naser wrote, “You’re a hero; you turned the equation on its head. The Zionist gangs have reinforced the area with 15,000 pigs (security personnel) and you alone have turned the equation on its head and now (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu is crying. He and his gang are now in great distress. May Allah heal a lion.”

The victims of the attack were identified as Yosef Salomon, 70, his daughter Chaya Salomon, 46, and son Elad Salomon, 36.

The perpetrator was identified as 20-year-old Omar al-Abed, from the West Bank village of Khobar, near Ramallah.

A post on Abed’s Facebook page says that he was motivated to act in response to the ongoing situation regarding the Temple Mount.

The posted stated, “I have many dreams and I believe they will come true, I love life and I love to make others happy, but what is my life when they (Israel) murder women and children and defile our al-Aqsa.”

TRUST, Facebook was rife too.

EVEN so, despite more than enough evidence to bring social media to heel, the fact remains that Congress has shielded them from responsibility and culpability.

THIS is mostly due to the out-dated twenty-year-old Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. 230, a law which didn’t envision social media, never mind its global impact! As noted, Facebook didn’t come into being until 2004, with Twitter two years later. Accordingly, Facebook can operate sans government oversight, completely unfettered. Furthermore, the Court held, under the policy of the U.S. as represented by Congress, it must provide an environment free of Federal and State regulations and restraints.

O RLY? Since when can any entity – let alone one which is akin to a government onto itself – operate like the wild west without any oversight?

Kutnicki and Newby could have wished for no greater affirmation of the urgency and gravity of the subject they focus on, than the somber caveat, issued by the left-leaning, former head of Israeli military intelligence, Maj. Gen. (res) Amos Yadlin, which the authors refer to in the course of their threat analysis.

Speaking at an international CyberTech Conference at Tel Aviv University, in January this year on what comprised the major threat facing Israel today, Yadlin warned: “The most dangerous nation in the Middle East acting against Israel is the state of Facebook”. Pointedly he added: “It has a lot more power than someone operating a military force”….

IN other words, the argument that free speech – the cornerstone of a free society – must be tolerated at all costs is itself intolerable in a civilized society. It ceases to exist, to enjoy protection, when criminal incitement to terror begins!! All rational folks understand that certain red lines must never be crossed. Yes, for instance, would yours truly be allowed to solicit the murder of Zuckerberg, et al. and expect not to be hunted down by the authorities? Of course not.

EFFECTIVELY, as recommended and detailed in “BANNED”, unless the entire Act is revamped to conform with the dangerous reality which has transpired since social media’s inception, to expect Zuckerberg and like-minded crew to police themselves is akin to placing one’s faith in foxes to guard the hen-house – and worse! Indeed, it is no different from closing the barn door after the horses have escaped – the most wild ones at that!

MOREOVER, who can possibly trust Zuckerberg to do the right thing, after he was caught on an open microphone promising to stifle negative stories of Islamic “migrants”, aka “refugees”, invading the west ala an Islamic hijrah? Atop it, he recently promised the world’s Muslims to make his site an open and welcoming place for them. Hmm.

BUT as “BANNED” illustrated, Facebook has already been doing that. In the process, the company has falsely accused many users, banning them from certain features on the flimsiest of contrived “evidence”, and has torn down pages over patently false claims and claims that are questionable at best. Many of these actions have caused financial losses, but it seems America’s legal profession has been cowed into acquiescence by the company’s sheer size.

SO, dear reader, you decide: with Facebook in the forefront and Twitter as its runner-up, are they guilty – or not – when murderous incitement runs rampant throughout their sites? And, as a knock-on effect, rivers of blood flow unimpeded due to their policies: hands off Mohammedans!!

{re-blogged at Conservative Firing Line}

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network} click on “Archives” icon to read, dated July 27, 2017

{re-blogged at RightWingConservativeNewsblog.com}

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED

This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}

Jihadis IDENTIFIED, Yet Taken Off “Watch Lists”: Western Intelligence Failures. Blindness. What’s Going On? What’s To Be Done? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on June 8, 2017 by Adina Kutnicki

WHEN one is steeped in the dirty and dangerous business of Islamic jihad, it becomes vital to recognize when smoke – and then some – is blown in this or that direction. After all, a highly developed sixth sense is more than mandatory. Call it a hyper-radar borne out of necessity. On steroids.

TOPPING it off, those of us who have written books on the subject, well, that kinda gives us a leg up. Ya think?

RESULTANT, a common denominator throughout “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” (Sept. 2016) delves into the intersection between Facebook’s censorship re anything remotely critical of Islam in particular and jihad in specific, relative to the ways in which America’s security apparatus (whether from its federal, state, or local arms) drops the ball, and even obstructs a jihadi’s capture. Of course, there are various manifest reasons for this “strange” behavior, most of which tie into politically-driven outcomes through interference into active investigations.

MORE specifically, the above referenced book explores some cases in point and outs “jihadis of interest”, as well as their enablers. It is not for nothing. Know that all due deliberation is always in play.

THEREFORE, consider the following markers as prima facie evidence to today’s thesis – that which shore up the whys and wherefores – as to how it comes to pass that the same disinterest in “follow-up” to the jihadis running amok in the US is a leading and contributory factor to the recent slaughters in Britain. Elsewhere alike. Simply put, it’s the allergic (multi-faceted) reaction of western leaders – evidenced through their failure to hold Islam’s barbarians accountable – which keeps the carnage flowing! Their coverage.

PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE:

In fact, CHAPTER TWO within BANNED is more than a backgrounder. It is evidentiary. An eye-opener. “MILITANT JIHAD: ITS KNOCK-ON EFFECTS TO THE WEST” not only details the ins and outs of Islamic jihad, but the ways in which leftist-fascist political ideology via PC correctness continuously aids and abets jihadi terrorism. No doubt.
So much so, this same chapter (page 33) discusses the “opening of jihad on US soil”, that which dates back to November 5, 1990. Nevertheless, it was covered up by officialdom for sundry political purposes, regardless of the (known) dangers at bay. Mind you, said grievously injurious and treacherous misconduct directly led to the 1993 attack on the Twin Towers and its follow-on, 9/11/01!
Moving right along, this chapter’s evidentiary trail between “Islam and Blood” (pages 40-47) can’t be any starker. No matter. US security agencies tolerate (political) arm-twisting by acceding to a “see no (Islamic) evil, hear no (Islamic) evil” “tactical” approach. How can this be?
But there’s more. Pages 48-54 directly implicate the FEDS. This is an outgrowth of their obdurate refusal to investigate overwhelming evidence re a sophisticated jihadi gold/money laundering operation housed within Massachusetts, but spread out beyond its borders. The query becomes: why would they fail to protect the American public, when they have in hand more than enough actionable intel to choke many horses?
Even worse, interspersed throughout the rest of the book is additional proof of the same. Lo and behold, in the AFTERWORD, “JIHAD IN ORLANDO: FACEBOOK TAKES CENTER STAGE,” a crescendo is reached. Well, the most direct nexus between Facebook’s enabling of Islamic jihad also uncovered recent intelligence blindness of egregious proportions! Incontestably, it would be accurate to assert: if NOT for the actual “hands off” approach to a KNOWN and “on the radar” jihadi (a mirror image to the ignoring of intelligence which led to San Bernardino’s Islamic barbarism ), so too 49 lives wouldn’t have been snuffed out – with 58 sustaining grave wounds – at the Pulse Gay Nightclub on June 12, 2016 ! Internalize: what is laid out in pages 150-153 beats a deadly and direct path from Obama Inc.’s (Islamic coddling and empowering) door, that which, then as now, still includes captured security agencies!!

WHICH brings us full circle to the most recent jihad in Britain and elsewhere in Europe. Londonistan’s devastating knock-on effects replicate the very same sickness which embed and infest from the political level and filter down into myriad security agencies. Inextricably, the jihad which is taking place – again and again – throughout America and Europe is one and the same. Immutable. Hyper-linked.

One of the three jihadists who murdered revellers in central London on Saturday had been reported to the anti-terror police on at least two occasions, it has been claimed.

A former friend of the terrorist, who was shot dead by police along with two accomplices, claimed he had been radicalised while watching YouTube videos and said he contacted the authorities after becoming concerned over his friend’s extremist views.

A neighbour also claimed she had contacted police in Barking, east London, after the suspect tried to convert her children to Islam and radicalise them. The man is not being named at the request of the police.

The former friend claimed he contacted police after comments the man made about other previous attacks. But he said the authorities had failed to act and take action despite evidence of increasingly extremist views.

The friend told the BBC’s Asian Network that the terrorist had been radicalised watching videos of the infamous American hate preacher Ahmad Musa Jibril.

He said: “We spoke about a particular attack that happened and like most radicals he had a justification for anything and everything and that day I  realised I needed to contact the authorities.”

He added: “He used to listen to a lot of Musa Jibril. I have heard some of this stuff and its very radical. I am surprised this stuff is still on YouTube and is easily accessible. I phoned the anti-terror hotline. I spoke to the gentleman. I told him about our conversation and why I think he was radicalised.”

However, he said he was not arrested and was allowed to keep his passport. “I did my bit, I know a lot of other people did their bit, but the authorities did not do their bit,” the friend said.

Erica Gasparri, an Italian mother of three who lived close to him, claimed she had reported him to Barking police two years ago, after he began “brainwashing” her children at a local park. She said she had confronted him after her two children came home and said: “Mummy I want to become a Muslim.”

She said the police had told her the information had been passed to Scotland Yard but she had heard nothing more.

Ms Gasparri said: “He was trying to radicalise the children, he would go down to the park and talk to them about Islam. He also came to the houses and gave the kids money and sweets during Ramadan.”

Anti-terror police raided the block of flats on King’s Road in Barking, where the man was believed to live with his wife and two children. The couple was said to have had an arranged marriage.

The attacker’s parents were reported to be asylum seekers from Pakistan. His father is said to also live in east London, but his mother is dead….continue reading its devastating truths….

MOST significantly for non-Muslim Americans and the nation’s security, Dearbornistan is involved. Yes, that mid-American (for all intents and purposes, Sharia Law compliant too, despite those who shriek liar, liar, and “Islamophobe” ) city houses the Islamic terror hate preacher (one of a voluminous list throughout the country) Musa Jibril, a major influencer of Londonistan’s jihadi barbarians! Say it ain’t so. In practical terms, similarly, how many Muslim-Americans is he responsible for inciting? Concomitantly, why isn’t he (and the rest of Allah’s Muslim Terrorists) in jail, or deported to one or another Islamic hell-hole?

BUT never mind. Jibril, akin to countless others, is unfettered and protected within the confines of the US. Thus, he is free to spew and incite to anti-American/western terror, both online, inside mosques, and everywhere in between. Yes, America’s leftist-fascists truly believe that said hard fought and treasured right, freedom of speech, must be extended to those who seek nothing less than the death of all infidels, as long as America is destroyed in the process! As to conservatives, oh noes, they must be silenced – at all costs!

OMINOUSLY, no one from American/western officialdom dares to stop Allah’s messengers. On the other hand, many who are sounding the alarms are being banned, effectively, silenced, be it on youtube, social media, or via official dictates.

ALAS, what’s to be done?

AS is known, this site never holds back and pulls no punches, so why should this time be any different? Precisely. In fact, each year that passes without any concrete and actionable plans from officialdom (other than pithy and toothless soundbites while they thump their chests, when this and that barbaric attack occurs), the more the ante is upped at this end. How could it not? Besides, what’s the alternative?

CONSEQUENTIALLY, one of life’s main lessons can be gleaned within this quote: “G-d helps those who help themselves.” A compelling truth. Inextricably.

TO wit, from one patriot to another, listen up….

Louisiana Rep Clay Higgens

The free world… all of Christendom… is at war with Islamic horror. Not one penny of American treasure should be granted to any nation who harbors these heathen animals. Not a single radicalized Islamic suspect should be granted any measure of quarter. Their intended entry to the American homeland should be summarily denied. Every conceivable measure should be engaged to hunt them down. Hunt them, identify them, and kill them. Kill them all. For the sake of all that is good and righteous. Kill them all.
-Captain Clay Higgins

(https://www.facebook.com/plugins/post.php?href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fcaptclayhiggins%2Fposts%2F997878010315211&width=500)

UNFAILINGLY, as night follows day, the response from Islamists and their leftist-fascist collaborators (toward this direction) is expected to be fast and furious; all for daring to point out the obvious remedies which must be directed to Allah’s Muslim Terrorists. And just so there is NO misunderstanding, this counter-jihadist is in rock solid agreement with the righteous and lifesaving prescriptive measures of Rep (Captain) Clay Higgins.

RESULTANT, and not to waste precious time and belabor the point, the answer to all who oppose the aforementioned is….

STILL yet, and not one to beat a dead horse, think about this: how much safer would the west be had officialdom, media mouthpieces, and otherwise self-appointed liberal-fascist elitists (most of whom detest Israel for the “crime” of being the Jewish people’s homeland, a thorn in the Arab/Muslim side) refused to turn a blind eye – for decades on end – to the PA/Hamas junta’s ongoing terror onslaught inflicted upon Jews in Israel? For truth dare be told, each and every jihadi method “perfected” in Israel has come back, in ten-fold measure, to explode within Europe’s cities and America’s alike.

CONCLUSIVELY, the lesson that should be learned – but probably will fall on deaf ears – is this: non-Muslims, wherever they live, cannot run away, hide from, and ignore jihadi terror, even if it appears to be the path of least resistance and is “only” targeting long-suffering, let’s be honest, despised Jews!

AT the end of it all, each and every non-Muslim is in their jihadi cross hairs – like it or not.

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network} click on “Archives” icon to read, listed under date of commentary

{re-blogged at The Conservative Firing Line}

{re-blogged at TeaPartyUSA.org}

{re-blogged at RepublicanRise.SwillNews.com}

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED

This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}

Oklahoma Rep., Marine Too, Rocks: Busted Through Civilizational Jihad Via “Muslim Capital Day.” A Template. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on March 6, 2017 by Adina Kutnicki

FULL disclosure: this Muslim Brotherhood expert has a sweet spot for patriotic men who have the stones to stand up and be counted. For the most part, they fiercely protect those they hold near and dear, as well as the core values of national import. Yes, wishy-washy, PC bull-crap doesn’t factor in, nor cloud their (moral) vision. And, more often than not (of course, there are always rotten apples), behind many such men lies a stint in the U.S. Marines. There you have it….“The Few. The Proud.”

BUT not to veer too far off (historical) course, think about this tidbit: how many know that Thomas Jefferson recognized what’s what and who’s who, as he understood the Muslim score to a historical tee? Indeed, that westerners could never, ever – in any way, shape or form – negotiate with followers of Islam. Mohammedans. Period.

RESULTANT, as noted within “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” (pg. 48): “when called upon to deal with the Barbary pirates, as Muslim kingdoms engaged in piracy and kidnapping on the high seas, Jefferson read the Qur’an to see if it was possible to negotiate with them. Hence, America’s first foreign conflict and the source of the line in the “Marine Corps Hymn”, “to the shores of Tripoli.”

INHERENTLY, have Americans forgotten their history to the degree that too many are incapable of drawing the salient parallels between militant jihad of yesteryear and that of today, that which are really one and the same? Most significantly, above all else, it will be through a non-sanitized version of the political, cultural and quasi-religious basis of Islam that western civilization will be saved. Rest assured, without the proper lessons learned, as always, it is verily impossible to fight back. It’s a bit like chasing ghosts.”

WHICH brings the discussion straight back into the path of Republican Rep. John Bennett of Oklahoma, you know, the rockin’ Marine too!

SO without further ado……

Oklahoma Rep. John Bennett asked his constituents taking part in the state’s third annual Muslim Day on Thursday — in which Muslims have the opportunity to interact with state legislators at the capitol — to fill out the questionnaire.

Adam Soltani, executive director of Council on American–Islamic Relations (CAIR) Oklahoma, said that high school students from Tulsa’s Peace Academy visited Bennett’s office to either meet with him or schedule a meeting. The students were met by a legislative assistant, Soltani said, who gave the students a questionnaire, telling them it must be filled out in writing.

Some of the questions in the document included the following:

“Sharia law says that it must rule over the kafirs, the non-Muslims. Do you agree with this?”

“The Koran, the sunna of Mohammed and Sharia Law of all schools say that the husband can beat his wife. Do you beat your wife?”

“Mohammed was a killer of pagans, Christians and Jews that did not agree with him. Do you agree with this example?

“I have heard that, according to accepted Islamic sources, Mohammed, at age of 49, married a 6-year-old girl, and that he had sex with her when he was 52 and she was only 9 years old. Is that really true?”

Bennett, a former US Marine who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, made headlines in 2014 when he made anti-Islam comments on social media, later adding that Islam is a “cancer in our nation that needs to be cut out.” He also said there is no difference between moderate and radical Islam.

“How can I be racist against Muslims or Islam when the ethnicity is actual Arab?” he said at the time, adding, “This is kind of confusing.”

Last year, Oklahoma lawmakers approved a proposal Bennett submitted to study the “current threat posted by radical Islam and the effect that Sharia Law, the Muslim Brotherhood and jihadist indoctrination have in the radicalization process in Oklahoma and America.”

BUT in order to internalize the depth of his patriotism and outside-the-box thinking, let’s first examine how Brotherhood Mafia front groups continuously pave the way for overturning America; step-by step, phase by phase. Then, and only then, can patriots recognize the depth of their infiltration and penetration, thus, exposing how Bennett (and a few other stalwart reps) outfoxed Islam’s stealth jihadists. Yes, aside from all else, they slither from capital to capital, feigning to assert their democratic “right” to influence respective leaders, as if stealth aka civilizational jihad is part of the American fabric and contract between the citizens and the government!

Written sometime in 1987 but not formally published until May 22, 1991, Akram’s 18-page document listed the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and turning the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

Akram was well aware that in the U.S., it would be extremely difficult to promote Islam by means of terror attacks. Thus the “grand jihad” that he and his Brotherhood comrades envisioned was not a violent one involving bombings and shootings, but rather a stealth (or “soft”) jihad aiming to impose Islamic law (Sharia) over every region of the earth by incremental, non-confrontational means, such as working to “expand the observant Muslim base”; to “unif[y] and direc[t] Muslims’ efforts”; and to “present Islam as a civilization alternative.” At its heart, Akram’s document details a plan to conquer and Islamize the United States – not as an ultimate objective, but merely as a stepping stone toward the larger goal of one day creating “the global Islamic state.”

In line with this objective, Akram and the Brotherhood resolved to “settle” Islam and the Islamic movement within the United States, so that the Muslim religion could be “enabled within the souls, minds and the lives of the people of the country.” Akram explained that this could be accomplished “through the establishment of firmly-rooted organizations on whose bases civilization, structure and testimony are built.” He urged Muslim leaders to make “a shift from the collision mentality to the absorption mentality,” meaning that they should abandon any tactics involving defiance or confrontation, and seek instead to implant into the larger society a host of seemingly benign Islamic groups with ostensibly unobjectionable motives; once those groups had gained a measure of public acceptance, they would be in a position to more effectively promote societal transformation by the old Communist technique of “boring from within.”

“The heart and the core” of this strategy, said Akram, was contingent upon these groups’ ability to develop “a mastery of the art of ‘coalitions.’” That is, by working synergistically they could complement, augment, and amplify one another’s efforts. Added Akram: “The big challenge that is ahead of us is how to turn these seeds or ‘scattered’ elements into comprehensive, stable, ‘settled’ organizations that are connected with our Movement and which fly in our orbit and take orders from our guidance.” The ultimate objective was not only an enlarged Muslim presence, but also implementation of the Brotherhood objectives of transforming pluralistic societies, particularly America, into Islamic states, and sweeping away Western notions of legal equality, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech.

Akram and the Brotherhood understood that in order to succeed in this endeavor, they needed to appeal to different strata of the American population in different ways; that whereas some people could be influenced by messages delivered from a religious perspective, others would be more responsive to messages delivered by educators, or bankers, or political figures, or journalists, etc. Thus, Akram’s blueprint for the advancement of the Islamic movement stressed the need to form a coalition of groups coming from the worlds of education; religious proselytization; political activism; audio and video production; print media; banking and finance; the physical sciences; the social sciences; professional and business networking; cultural affairs; the publishing and distribution of books; children and teenagers; women’s rights; vocational concerns; and jurisprudence.

By promoting the Islamic movement on such a wide variety of fronts, the Brotherhood and its allies could multiply exponentially their influence. Toward that end, the Akram/Brotherhood “Explanatory Memorandum” named the following 29 groups as the organizations they believed could collaborate effectively to destroy America from within – “if they all march according to one plan”:

By setting up these many front groups, the Muslim Brotherhood was emulating the Communist Party tactic of creating interlocking front groups during the Cold War in order to confuse its enemies and make it more difficult to combat.

IN light of the above (and so much more), how frightening is it to know that Allah’s Muslim terrorists have been wildly successful within all American spheres, and with their political muscle displayed within:

The US Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO), a coalition of leading national and local American Muslim organizations, today announced plans to host the first-of-its-kind National Muslim Advocacy Day on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on April 13, 2015.

ALAS, is it any wonder that Iraqi-American Christians, Chaldeans, are petrified in their adopted homeland – yes, they are true refugees – due to the massive inroads carved out by followers of Islam, despite the fact that Shariah Law adherents are tied to every terror attack, bar none? Not only that, the very same Chaldeans already won an initial round in 2015 in Sterling Heights, Michigan, when they protested against a mega mosque – another ! barracks within – being built in the midst of their community! But lo and behold, once again, Islamic pressure tactics – ala lawfare – turned justice upside its head.

In the end, the Iraqi Christians of Sterling Heights, Michigan, say they felt abandoned and left vulnerable by their government.

It didn’t matter that they had escaped genocide in the Middle East.

It didn’t matter they had 180 people at the City Council meeting Tuesday to voice their concerns about a large mosque being proposed in the middle of their neighborhood.

It didn’t matter, they say, that Donald Trump is their new president or that Jeff Sessions is the new attorney general.

They lost. The Muslims won.

The city on Tuesday night agreed to a settlement with a Muslim group that wants to build a mega-mosque on 15 Mile at Mound Road, in the heart of a residential area filled with Christians who escaped Muslim persecution in Iraq.

The nearly 200 people who packed city hall in protest of the mosque were limited by Mayor Michael C. Taylor to two minutes of speaking time.

“There were people crying, complaining about not being given enough time to speak,” said Nahren Anweya, spokeswoman for the approximately 50,000 Chaldean and Assyrian Christians living in the area.

“The mayor was literally acting like a dictator, wouldn’t let people finish their statements,” she told WND. “As soon as they said something about the persecution their family experienced from Muslims in Iraq, he would shut them down.”

Anweya said her own great-grandfather was crucified by Muslims in Iraq because he refused to remove the large gold cross he wore around his neck. Her family immigrated to the U.S. in 1989, when she was 6 years old.

Sensitivity training

Nahren Anweya’s family fled Iraq in 1989 after being decimated by Muslim community there.

According to the settlement deal, the city of Sterling Heights will grant the American Islamic Community Center a permit to build a 20,800-square-foot mosque and will send city employees to classes teaching them how not to discriminate against Muslims in the future.

The city planning commission had denied the mosque permit in September 2015, but nearly a year later the mosque sued the city claiming discrimination. In December 2016, the U.S. Department of Justice joined in with a similar suit claiming the city violated the Religious…..read the whole devastating betrayal….

AS the precipitating dangers creep closer and closer, the backbone of the aforementioned Oklahoma rep (and like-minded leaders), heartening as it is, is only a first step towards halting the final infiltration and penetration of Allah’s Muslim terrorists into the U.S. body politic. In tandem, post haste, President Trump MUST sign Bill S.2230 to designate the Brotherhood Mafia a terror organization, while millions of Americans MUST commit to join the struggle before it is too late. How late is it?

VERY!!

{re-blogged at Conservative Firing Line}

{re-blogged at RepublicanRise.SwillNews.com}

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

Jamie Glazov Productions Features: BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on November 2, 2016 by Adina Kutnicki

Dedicated readers of this site (with millions more becoming familiarized with its underlying basis, as it speeds across the internet like a house on fire) are aware of the recent release of my book, BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad. Joe Newby is my distinguished co-author.

In this regard, a decision was made (for what can best be described as a security related reason…let’s just leave it at that) that he would be the point person for radio and face-time interviews. A sampling can be found here and here….scroll to the 39:12 mark at the latter link, and listen to the interview at the (politically) hard-hitting Josh Bernstein Show.

Joe Newby is doing a fantastic job. So far, so good.

In this regard, his latest interview (November 1, 2016) with powerhouse Jamie Glazov (from Jamie Glazov Productions) requires little introduction. He is a well-known champion of freedom, working with patriots and counter-jihadists on the front lines. Said freedom fighters are struggling to beat back leftists and Islamists within America and the west at large. This grappling – to fend off a totalitarian choke and strangle hold on the nation – has been ongoing for decades. However, at this moment in time, it is reaching its climax. Vise-grip. Newby’s most recent interview is featured at Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch, Family Security Matters, TRUTH REVOLT and many other sites. Onward and upward. Strength to strength.

On its face, It is an ideological war (which may very well turn into an actual physical battle) between the left – via its romance with tyranny and terror – vis-à-vis patriots, who, by and large, are freedom-based liberty seekers. Glazov is one of its stalwarts.

Thus, without further ado….

Massachusetts Jihadi, William Scanlon, Knocks On This Door-Again!FEDS, What Say You?FB, Et Tu? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on June 27, 2016 by Adina Kutnicki

LIKE cockroaches are wont to do – whenever a spotlight is shined on them, even at these pages – they scurry hither and yon, only to resurface at a later date. Hmm. Such is one typical case with an out and out jihadi – a loud-mouthed and brazen Massachusetts cockroach from Worcester to boot – who hails from a state that is infested with a continuous flow of jacked-up jihadis. Fact-based.

IN any case, William Scanlon’s first unveiling at these pages can be found here. Trust, the revelations aren’t pretty. He is VERY dangerous.

BUT never mind. Apparently, he is not as smart as he fancies himself. He is surely as dumb as a big ox, at least when it comes to underestimating this investigative journalist, who happens to be considered an expert on the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia with “delicate” connections spanning the U.S. and Israel.

To further illuminate the difficult subjects we are discussing, we asked Israeli journalist Adina Kutnicki and American investigator and security specialist David Gaubatz to weigh in on the threat from ISIS and the expanding Islamist army.

Adina is an expert on the Muslim Brotherhood and her previous interview about the expansionist ideology of the organization sent shock-waves across the internet. Adina is an editor of several websites that examine the growing violence in the name of Islam, and she is the creator of a popular Israeli blog. Her insights into the conflict between Israel and the Islamic terrorists of Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority will give our readers an opportunity to find out the truth about the Middle East without the Israel bashing propaganda of the mainstream media….continue reading….

You got that, bucko?

ONTO his latest criminal admissions in this direction – re aiding and abetting Hamas, the Brotherhood Mafia’s Gazan arm, a designated terror org by U.S. authorities – via Facebook’s PM feature, regardless that he is NOT a so-called “friend” and is supposedly “blocked” from said personal page:

WED 3:03PM

Hey you Zionist Whore. I am still here .Still writing ,reporting the lies of you Jews and still supporting the State of Palestine including Hamas. I meet on a regular basis with Palestinians in Worcester, Massachusetts and we collect monies that goes to Muslim physicians in Gaza and the West Bank. You know nothing about the Muslim Brotherhood or the new Muslim Sisterhood in Gaza. No need to buy guns as I give classes in the use of a 3D printer, even in Gaza they can manufacture polymer weapons that are undetectable by the IDF. Isn’t technology great?

So I passed the last visit you sent me from the FBI. Can’t put me in prison for writing in America, not even about you Jews. Even if I am a radical. Its legal here unlike the press suppressed Zionist Apartheid of Israel.

Here is picture of the Muslim Sisterhood from my Hamas friends in Gaza

Chat Conversation End

TO recap his previous criminal offenses:

IF you decide to get involved in protecting America and supporting Israel by writing articles, conducting counter-terrorism research, or by speaking publicly about the atrocities being committed everyday by Islamic terrorists around the world, you will almost certainly receive death threats and other threats often pertaining to your family.

The threats against me are not new, but I am seeing more from Islamic terrorists and their supporters inside America. One such recent threat was by an Islamic terrorist William Scanlon, Worcester, Massachusetts. From his social media posts he is allegedly a former U.S. police officer, lived in Gaza and supported Hamas. Allegedly fighting for Hamas (U.S. designated terrorist organization) against Israel. Scanlon has sent several prominent U.S. counter-terrorism professionals threats against their lives and their families. Scanlon says he is a Muslim. Below is a partial email I received last week from Scanlon:

“Just imagine me or another Muslim fucking your wife/daughter Jack and Dave. Or imagine how life will be as we Muslims infiltrate America as we have been doing since 1776. That should get those gastric juices flowing. hehehehehehe”!

(See threat from Scanlon to Pamela Geller below)

There are five things you must do when handling a threat from an Islamic terrorist like William Scanlon:

1. Take the threats seriously.
2. Let the Islamic terrorist know you do not fear him/her and will do whatever is needed in accordance with the U.S. Constitution to protect your family and yourself. Inform the terrorist if he/she approaches your family then he is subject to ‘all hell breaking loose on his foolish person”.
3. Report the matter to law enforcement officials, but don’t expect any actions from them. This specifically includes the FBI. Americans must understand federal law enforcement officers have been indoctrinated to support Islam and Muslims first, before even thinking of supporting non-Muslims who receive death threats. Eric Holder has insured our federal authorities know that American Patriots are the real threat to America, and not Islam and it’s terrorists.
4. Insure other American and Israeli Patriots who work counter-terrorism issues are made aware of threats you have received. It is likely they have received similar ones from the Islamic terrorist such as Scanlon.
5. You must be willing to give your life to protect America, your family, and the U.S. Constitution. A tactic used by Islamic terrorists (such as CAIR leaders) is to use ‘legal lawfare’ Jihad against you. This means lawsuits. Do not be intimidated by their threats of lawsuits. Their allegations are frivolous.

In addition you must publically shame people such as Scanlon. People such as Scanlon are truly cowards. If they have a brigade of other cowards behind them, they become brave warriors. By themselves they are the scared liberal wimps of society.

Terrorists such as Scanlon are big men when it comes to threatening innocent women and children, but are cowering cowards when it comes to facing men. They should be aware that female American Patriots such as Geller can handle themselves when the need arises. Geller told Scanlon she has three words for him, “I shoot straight’.

It is important that American Patriots support our right to have firearms for our protection.

The threats by Scanlon toward myself, my family and others was reported to FBI officials this week. Do not be surprised when I tell you that the threats were ignored. The FBI said they need more specifics! A threat to sexually abuse family members and to kill you, is not enough evidence to get them out of their comfortable seats and do their job. Now, if Eric Holder wants to destroy a police officers life even when all available evidence against the officer proves he was acting in accordance with the law, he will send 40 plus FBI Agents to their hometown such as recently in Ferguson, MO.

Bottom line: There is no one who cares about your family the way you do. No one loves them more. It is your responsibility to protect them.

William Scanlon should be investigated by the FBI for his support of Hamas and his alleged support of them when he was in Gaza for 8 years. Fact: Our country is not protected from future Islamic based terrorist attacks because we have Eric Holder and Obama as the number one supporters of Islamic terrorist actions.

William Scanlon should be in prison for his threats and support to U.S. designated Islamic terrorist organizations such as Hamas. If he were to attempt carry out his planned threats against my family or myself, it is a promise he will not have to worry about prison. Dave Gaubatz

NOTE: William Scanlon (Islamic terrorist) advised he has a journalist friend (Glenn Greenwald) who supports him and his cause to kill innocent Americans and Israelis, and to commit other atrocities such as harming girls and women. Greenwald is no better than the Islamic terrorists he supports.

HEY, FEDS? What say you? Once again, are you going to “see no Islamic evil, hear no Islamic evil”, just like you did in the summer of 2014 when you “questioned” Scanlon, as he brazenly admitted this past Wed in his most recent PM?

MIND you, three major pressure points had to be duly applied, to even warrant said pithy scrutiny: this site’s reporting; a confab with the FBI by high-level counter terror investigator Dave Gaubatz, as well as with another victim who presented similar compelling evidence re Scanlon’s jihadi threats against him and his family. Indeed, he spoke with two FBI agents within spitting distance of the jihadi’s backyard in Worcester, MA, its exact location being 120 Front St, 8th Floor Worcester, MA 01608!

MOST recently, what about said “confessions” to this investigative journalist (cited above – June 22, 2016, WED. 3:03 PM – admitting that he raises monies for Hamas etc., a designated terror org. since Oct. 1997), are they not enough to throw his ass in jail? If not, why not?

AND Facebook, what say you? Why are your censors allowing the likes of Scanlon – and scores of others – to threaten non-Muslims with rape and murder, all the while one or another admits to supporting Brotherhood Mafia front groups, which happen to be branded terror orgs by U.S. law? Moreover, are these plain view actions on Facebook “justified” because they are lobbed against those who criticize Islam and its direct nexus to militant jihad?

AS a side note: “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” (with a publication date between August and September 2016) couldn’t come at a more precipitous juncture in time!

STILL yet, not to be lost in this important discussion, the following is a message, a warning, to Willie-boy Scanlon:

THIS proud and staunch Zionist (no less, an American patriot) fields contacts throughout your neck of the woods in the “Bay State” (and too many other states to count), who would love to meet you “mano-el-mano”, if you know what that means. In other words, not only do they take personal umbrage at your smack-talk against a close contact of theirs, but they are VERY offended at the blood libels you hurl against Jews – and they are not even Jewish! Let’s just say they are well-armed, well-trained, and deal with jihadis like you for sport, even though you fancy yourself a tough guy. Understood?

THEREFORE, a word to the none too wise: Scanlon, back-off – or else!!

{re-blogged at Conservative Firing Line}

LISTEN UP: Linked Radio Interview For “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad.” Connecting The Dots. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on June 18, 2016 by Adina Kutnicki

AS promised on June 16, 2016, another featured radio interview for my upcoming book (with co-author Joe Newby), “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad”, debuted on June 18.

THE round-table discussion format was hosted by USA Transnational Report, with established voices in political and security arenas.

THE show is directly linked (just click on here…make sure to listen to a very informative opening….the interview starts at the 27:00 mark) to two major radio platforms: JJ McCartney’s Nightside Radio Studios and Red State Talk Radio.

ENJOY the show.

MOST importantly, listen up and learn! Pay it forward.

RADIO INTERVIEW, ORLANDO & MORE:”BANNED:HOW FACEBOOK ENABLES MILITANT ISLAMIC JIHAD.” Tune In June 18. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on June 16, 2016 by Adina Kutnicki

IN light of the catastrophic knock-on effects from stepped-up Islamic jihad within America, Israel, and the west at large, our upcoming book release (in August or early Sept. 2016) can’t come soon enough!

IF anything, Orlando’s jihadi massacre (along with countless others) more than demonstrates how deeply intertwined Islam’s soldiers for Allah are with social media, and with FACEBOOK in the forefront. Enabled.

IN point of fact, “Orlando terrorist’s chilling Facebook posts from inside the club reveal” what the prima facie evidence of the book’s main thesis is.

Orlando shooter posted to social media during massacre

In the hours after he blasted his way into an Orlando gay nightclub, and with his victims lying dead or wounded around him, Omar Mateen took to Facebook to pledge his loyalty to ISIS and threaten more attacks on the civilized world, a key lawmaker privy to the gunman’s posts told FoxNews.com Wednesday.

Mateen, who killed 49 people and wounded 53 inside Pulse early Sunday, died when a SWAT team stormed the club. But in the roughly four hours between his initial rampage and his death, the 29-year-old radicalized Muslim broadcast his twisted message of hate on social media, according to Senate Homeland Security Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wisc.

CLICK HERE TO READ SEN. JOHNSON’S LETTER TO FACEBOOK

“I pledge my alliance to (ISIS leader) abu bakr al Baghdadi..may Allah accept me,” Mateen wrote in one post early Sunday morning. “The real muslims will never accept the filthy ways of the west” …“You kill innocent women and children by doing us airstrikes..now taste the Islamic state vengeance.”

Mateen’s social media accounts were taken down before they could be widely viewed by the public, but Johnson’s committee investigators have uncovered some or all of them. The senator has also written a letter to Facebook executives expressing concern about Mateen’s postings and asking for more information on his activities.

“It is my understanding that Omar Mateen used Facebook before and during the attack to search for and post terrorism-related content,” read Johnson’s letter. “According to information obtained by my staff, five Facebook accounts were apparently associated with Omar Mateen.”

The posts uncovered by Johnson’s committee shed light on Mateen’s actions in the hours that followed his 2 a.m. raid on the nightclub. Mateen, armed with a Sig Sauer MCX assault rifle and a handgun, shot his way past an off-duty cop and sprayed bullets throughout the club, which was packed with more than 300 revelers when he arrived. Some escaped, many died or were wounded and scores more waited out the horrific ordeal, knowing each moment could be their last.

As survivors cowered in darkened rooms, praying and texting police and relatives, Mateen accessed his Facebook account to search for media reports, using search words such as “Pulse Orlando” and “Shooting.” An FBI source told FoxNews.com he also made 16 phone calls from inside the club after the bloody spree began. Investigators are tracking down each of the recipients of those calls.

Mateen proclaimed his hatred for Westerners in one Facebook post uncovered by Johnson’s committee.

ALAS, without further ado, a head’s up….

USA Transnational Report – June 18, 2016

Join us Saturday June 18, 2016 as we interview journalist and author Joe Newby. Newby is co-author with investigative journalist Adina Kutnicki of the upcoming book “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad.” He will discuss the book and the potential implications it has regarding the role of social networks on politics.

Learn more about the book here!!!

Topics of Discussion:

How has Facebook treated articles concerning criticism of Islamic jihad?
What did Mark Zuckerberg discuss with Angela Merkel?
What legislation has been proposed to report terrorist activity on social networks?
Orlando and the Repercussions of FBI interviews with terrorist

& more . . .

Call-in #: 855-853-5227

You can listen to USA Transnational Report live on JJ McCartney’s Nightside Radio Studios and on Red State Talk Radio.

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

Orwell’s Obama Inc. Joins Up With Facebook (Social Media) To SILENCE “Hate” Speech, First Amendment Be Damned. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on June 1, 2016 by Adina Kutnicki

YESTERDAY, none too coincidentally, this investigative journalist, in tandem with her co-author, Joe Newby, handed in a completed manuscript to their publisher. As is said, timing is everything.

MORE specifically, per a recent announcement at this site, it was noted that “Banned: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” is slated for release this Fall. Its basis links the (social media) omerta descending upon America (and the west at large), in juxtaposition to the protections afforded to militant Islamic jihadists. The above segues into the purported urgency to ban “hate” speech. Liars. Reprobates.

IN fact, the opposite is the case. In a nutshell, those who require reining in – for the sake of western civilization – aren’t being banned, will never be banned, nor will they be silenced. Effectively, by hiding behind many “isms”, leftists and their Islamic overlords plan to bring free speech to a grinding halt – but not to those who are inciting to militant Islamic jihad! In reality, Blasphemy Laws are taking shape in America (and throughout the west), and few are the wiser. Readers, it is past time to catch up to speed.

IN any case, it is an open “secret” that Google, Facebook, along with other internet behemoths have revolving door access at HUSSEIN Obama’s White House. To what end?

A project examining White House visitor logs shows the Obama administration has extended an open door to Google.

Johanna Shelton, Google’s director of public policy — in effect, the company’s top lobbyist — has visited White House officials 128 times since President Barack Obama took office in 2009.

To put that in perspective, senior lobbyists for other companies in the telecommunications and cable industry — including Comcast, Facebook, Amazon, Oracle and Verizon — have visited the White House a combined 124 times in the same span. (That data goes through October 2015.)

The Google Transparency Project, the work of Campaign for Accountability, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that works to expose corporate influence on government, identified policy pushers for the 50 biggest lobbying spenders and counted how many times they appeared in the White House visitor logs.

Alphabet Inc., the parent company of Google, spent $16.6 million on lobbying in 2015. That was the twelfth most of any company, and the most by a technology firm, just above AT&T’s $16.4 million and Comcast’s $15.7 million.

Anne Weismann, executive director of the Campaign for Accountability, told Watchdog.org those logs don’t reveal the discussion of the meetings, just who attended them.

“You don’t know what the meetings are about, but the fact that someone has that level of access at the White House is revealing,” she said. “It certainly suggests a level of influence.”

AND while their lobbying efforts are mainly aimed at securing the “best deals” possible for their financial bottom lines, the fact remains that a quid pro quo is always in place. In other words, Obama Inc. is Allah-bent on silencing all criticism of Islam, and media heavy-weights are just the (cooperative) bought and paid for tickets. Yes, the imposition of Blasphemy Laws and its attendant knock-on effects.

NOW, who recalls the groundwork laid by his first AG, the illegally bent Eric Holder? If not, take a peek. Fast forward to Loretta Lynch, alas, it is more of the same, and on steroids. Not only that, immediately after Americans were slaughtered by Allah’s Muslim Terrorists in San Bernardino, what was her response, as the chief law enforcement officer of the nation?

Rather than denouncing acts of terrorism, just one day after recent tragic events in San Bernardino, Attorney General Loretta Lynch told a group assembled for the Muslim Advocates dinner that the Justice Department is prepared to take “aggressive action” against people employing anti-Muslim rhetoric that “edges towards violence.”

In effect, she’s saying she would use prosecution as a weapon to protect Muslims from others employing their First Amendment rights.

Seemingly, her greatest fear at the time was not another Paris, or San Bernardino, but “anti-Muslim rhetoric,” instead.

Speaking at Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary dinner, Lynch said since the terrorist attacks in Paris last month, she is increasingly concerned with the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric … that fear is my greatest fear.”

The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence. My message to not just the Muslim community but to the entire American community is: we cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on.

Lynch made it clear that she shares those concerns, but vowed to use the DOJ to protect Muslims from discrimination and violence. Noting the rise in violence against Muslims and mosques in the wake of the Paris attacks, Lynch added that, “When we talk about the First amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American. They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.”

As for San Bernardino, yesterday at a press conference, Lynch said it presented a “wonderful opportunity” for change.

Loretta Lynch, at a press conference yesterday, termed the San Bernardino shootings a “wonderful opportunity” to change the nature of police work: “We’re at the point where these issues have come together really like never before in law enforcement thought and in our nation’s history and it gives us a wonderful opportunity and a wonderful moment to really make significant change.”

MIND you, it was not for nothing that her anti-American remarks were made at a dinner held by the Muslim Advocates. Indeed, the aforementioned upcoming book – referenced at the onset – “Banned: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad”, will tell more of the tale. Just wait to read the bullet-proof evidence.

IN any case, the fact that Lynch made her comments at a mobbed up front group for the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, it goes without saying that it is more than coincidental that Obama Inc. is working hand-in-glove with Facebook, Google and the like to bring free speech to a screeching halt.

IN this regard, fast forward from her pro-Islam comments at the Muslim Advocates (Dec. 2015), and head to yesterday’s anti-First Amendment pronouncement.

The European Union has signed a deal with four of the world’s biggest tech firms which will see “hate speech” deleted from social media in just 24 hours.

Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft and Google have all committed to new rules designed to “ensure that online platforms do not offer opportunities for illegal online hate speech to spread virally”.

All four firms have committed to quickly analyse and remove content involving “public incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin”.

Vĕra Jourová, EU Commissioner for Justice, Consumers and Gender Equality, said, “The recent terror attacks have reminded us of the urgent need to address illegal online hate speech.

A glimpse of the future? Mark Zuckerberg at a Samsung event

“Social media is unfortunately one of the tools that terrorist groups use to radicalise young people and racists use to spread violence and hatred.

“This agreement is an important step forward to ensure that the internet remains a place of free and democratic expression, where European values and laws are respected.”

Eurocrats have insisted the laws are not about stifling freedom of expression, but making sure social media isn’t used to spread extremist messages of hate.

European Union and the Union flag sit on top of a sand castle

But not everyone is buying this explanation.

Keith Porteus Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, issued a statement condemning the hate speech laws .

He wrote: “The public incitement to violence or hatred directed against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin will create a chilling effect on freedom of expression and will be misused to muzzle it”

Right-wingers have spent years claiming tech firms have a left-wing bias which shuts out their views.

Social media lit up with anger after the “code of conduct” was unveiled.

On Twitter, one person claimed Brussels was intent on “banning speech we don’t like by calling it hate speech”.

Another tweeter said he’d “rather be living in North Korea than the EU right now”.

INDEED, since when do American companies adhere to the dictates of others, regardless of this and that dictate? Well, since HUSSEIN Obama shredded the Constitution, that’s when!

AND if there are freedom-loving Americans who remain “on the fence” as to how bad the situation is, well, look no further than to what happened to a hapless citizen who “dared” to call his Muslim neighbor a terrorist! In other words, there is no such thing as stating an “offensive” word anymore – not in “Obama’s Amerika”! Yes, the thought police are no longer satisfied with skulking in the shadows via this and that messaging. Ominously, they await to arrest you, if you “dare” to step over the PC line created by Islamists and their enablers.

AGAIN, according to anti-freedom Lynch and her gang…..

“When we talk about the First Amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American. They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted… My message not just to the Muslim community but to all Americans is ‘We cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on’” Loretta Lynch

That’s right folks, Obama’s Attorney General has promised to prosecute Americans who engage in “hate speech” against Islam.

Take the case of Jose Ortiz who was arrested last week, after he called his Muslim neighbor a “terrorist.”

The Muslim called police because Ortiz called him a terrorist… Give me a break.

Ludlow Police Sgt. David Belanger told 22News that Jose Ortiz was arrested last Tuesday. Belanger said that Ortiz’s neighbor, a man of Turkish origin, was leaving his house with his two young children, when Ortiz began calling him a “terrorist” and other names. He said that this has been an ongoing problem between Ortiz and the victim.

DEAR readers, are you sensing a pattern yet? Incontestably, how many free thinkers are going to be rounded up to satisfy what has become Orwell’s (western) universe?

{re-blogged at Conservative Firing Line}

{re-blogged at Tea Party USA}

“BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” Will Be Released Fall 2016. By Adina Kutnicki and Joe Newby (Radio Interview Included)

Posted on May 24, 2016 by Adina Kutnicki

THIS site’s vast readership (btw, many thanks for that….and to countless others who read its contents at numerous re-blogs across the internet) have become duly familiar with its main emphasis: militant Islamic jihad.

MORE specifically, on February 27, 2016, a brief commentary announced that a book contract was signed. And having worked on its basis a while before said announcement, suffice to state that I (along with my accomplished co-author) was thrilled to learn that a well-respected publishing house gave its green light. We went full steam ahead.

AND, as an aside, it was especially meaningful when this good news was received. In fact, it was the very same morning of my beloved husband’s yarzheit, Frank Kutnicki, z”l, right before my family headed to Har Menuchot – Mount of Rest – in Jerusalem to commemorate the date of his passing. It was his way of signaling, yes, you are on the right path. Go from strength to strength. It was beyond resonant.

MOREOVER, for various reasons, its exact title had been held in abeyance from the general public. This is no longer the case.

IN this regard, a decision was made to reveal it for the book’s pre-publicity tour. Its first outing can be found via an embedded radio link by scrolling down Faye Higbee’s brief article. You will come to the interview, and it starts at the 38:23 point. So listen up. Yes, others are on tap. As its launch date nears, various facets to the book’s marketing will commence via the publishing house.

REST assured, more updates will follow. In a nutshell, this topic impinges upon all who are rightly alarmed about America’s precipitous decline, Israel’s encirclement, and the west’s endangerment at large. Said fears are not for nothing, as “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” will amply reveal. Stay tuned.

In China, Your Credit Score Is Now Affected By Your Political Opinions – And Your Friends’ Politi…

IT CAN HAPPEN HERE

SHARE THIS:

Share this:

SHARE THIS:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

MESSAGE FAILED

Share this:

MESSAGE FAILED

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: