IN the same manner in which officialdom within towns, cities, states (forget about the captured FEDS) draft emergency plans and assorted contingencies for one disaster or another, so too should responsible families do the same. Community-wise alike.

ALONG said minefields, it must be emphasized that the biggest disaster facing America’s citizens does not lie in the direction of the bastardized “scientific evidence” re “climate change”, natural phenomena via earthquakes, etc., an even greater downturn in the already off-the-cliff economy, or a variant thereof. Rather, its basis is brewing from “open sesame” borders and its concomitant hijrah onslaught from “refugees” ala Shariah Law infused countries. Therein lies the absolute overwhelming danger.

ALAS, as is known, much has been written at this site about ISIS’s (associated Islamic terror hydras, be they Sunni or Shia) infiltration and penetration into the US. As a matter of record – after related commentaries are posted up – as if on cue, threatening messages are sent this way. Let’s just say that their gist involves the same theme: stop talking about Islam….Muhammad – or else!

INDEED, they are not entitled to issue death threats, or dictate what gets printed, at least on this end. 

REGARDLESS, much of the focal point has centered upon HUSSEIN Obama’s aforementioned open sesame borders, and with Mexico as the main conduit. This is not for nothing.

POINTEDLY, this is how Islamic terrorists (be they ISIL/ISIS, Hezbollah or other Brotherhood Mafia offshoots) penetrated America, and it was accomplished through DHS’s eviscerated borders alongside Mexico.

YES, this investigative journalist has proven that DHS is responsible for said infiltration and penetration, and that Mexico is key.

CONSIDER the following as one exhibit out of a lengthy list:

 EXHIBIT:

MOST ominously, a road map to their Mexican base – and how it came to pass – has been detailed at these pages. Indeed, “ISIS is making preparations to strike U.S. southern border states” was written in Aug. 2014.

AMERICA’s compromised borders are not the result of an operational inability to control infiltrators, whether under the guise of kiddies or not. The absence of proper controls were designed to aid and abet the overthrow of America, both through an unbearable crush of illegal aliens, further coupled with an ability to ferry Islamic terrorists for whatever havoc they have in store. Sounds bizarre, yes, but not from an Anti-American-in-Chief’s perspective.

MOVING right along…the poisonous fruits of HUSSEIN Obama’s labors are prepping to explode. As indicated, a two-prong probing is in place within America and poised inside Juarez, Mexico.

IN fact, as a main hub for narco-terror (alongside the tri-border region of Latin America), MS-13 became a front center concern at this blog. This site is anything but Johnny-Come-Lately….continue reading…

LO and behold, a TOP law enforcement official has finally admitted that Islamic jihadists have infiltrated through Mexico! What took them so long? Well, let’s take a stab at it: could it be that operational plans are so far along…hmm…it is impossible to pretend that what is isn’t??…continue reading….

ATOP all the out-sized dangers attributed to Obama Inc.’s dereliction of duty re national security alongside Mexico’s border, along comes an added “bonus” via the “refugee” resettlement disaster. Now, it is hardly necessary to apprise readers of the stakes, and American patriots are gearing up to react. Its basis is described at “US Patriots (Finally) In An Uproar: Islam’s Encroachment In Their Cross Hairs. Brotherhood Mafia’s Apologists Fired Up.“

IN this regard, it is particularly noteworthy that a Lebanese Minister entered the fray, in so far as Lebanon (coincidentally, not only is Lebanon a close by neighbor of this investigative journalist but a focal point of an ongoing gold/money laundering operation, one which links Massachusetts to al-Qaeda in Lebanon….six degrees of separation) is rife with Sunni and Shia jihadists. Resultant, the nation is hardly known for its concern for America’s security, or for the west at large.

BE that as it may, patriots are advised to sit up and take notice when certain warnings are blared, that which has already been confirmed by various contacts. 

Two in every 100 Syrian refugees entering Europe are ISIS supporters, according to Lebanese Education Minister Elias Bousaab.

This statement is especially alarming in light of the national security concerns regarding the migrants that have surfaced in the United States, as President Obama considers allowing refugees onto American soil.

And since the Obama Regime is pushing to allow as many as 200,000 alleged Syrian refugees into the United States, that could mean as many as 4,000 or more ISIS members slipping through our vetting process.

Bousaab went on to say that ISIS is sending trained jihadists on covert missions to plan attacks in the West, this according to the Daily Mail. The Lebanese Education Minister also stated that ISIS leaders have recruited individuals, including children, from schools and refugee camps before helping smuggle them into Europe through Greece and Turkey.

According to Minister Bousaab, the targeting of Syrian migrants by the Islamic State poses a threat that is “growing and mushrooming.”

“My gut feeling is, yes, they [ISIS] are facilitating such an operation,” Bousaab maintains. “Yes, of course, to go to Europe and other places. You may have, let’s say, two percent [of refugees] that could be radicals. It’s becoming a danger because they are recruiting kids from schools, they are recruiting everywhere. It’s a very dangerous situation and the world should wake up and do something about that. ISIS will not stop at the border with Lebanon. Before you know it Isis will be in Europe.”

In the United States these concerns are largely dismissed as unwarranted fears or – by too many on the Left – as thinly veiled Islamophobia.

Nonetheless, in speaking to proposals for allowing Syrian refugees into the U.S., House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul said recently that he can’t support allowing Syrian refugees into the United States. “I can’t support a policy that would allow a jihadist pipeline into the United States,” he told Fox News. “We’ve read their documents themselves when they talk about exploiting the refugee issue to get into the United States.”

And he’s not alone.  Both Virginia Representative Bob Goodlatte and Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley have said in a joint statement that ISIS and other terrorist organizations have already “made it abundantly clear” that they will use the refugee crisis to try to enter the U.S.

A number of politicians, both here and in Europe, have long warned that ISIS militants are entering Europe by mixing with boatloads of asylum seekers streaming across the Mediterranean from North Africa and Turkey.

This tactic is not new.

In 2011, two Kentucky residents who had been resettled as Iraqi refugees were accused of being al-Qaeda members. They were convicted of terrorism charges after their fingerprints were linked to roadside bombs in Iraq. That led to new steps to screen refugees, a process that has been criticized as slow and bureaucratic.

“Some of the 65,000 that came from Iraq actually were trying to buy stinger missiles in my hometown in Kentucky,” said U.S. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a Republican presidential candidate, in a broadcast interview. “So we do have to be wary of some of the threat that comes from mass migration.”

CLEAR as a bell.

NOW, most patriotic Americans are loathe to point to Euros as “role models”, when it comes to counter measures of resistance. However, it doesn’t obviate that a “reverse” lesson can’t be learned. Thus, the fact is that Europe is now overrun with Islam’s barbarians, and it is only AFTER they tolerated said invasion that they find themselves gripped in a MEGA nightmare. Effectively, this is precisely what patriots MUST avoid!  

RESULTANT, with Germany directly in the cross hairs the backlash is escalating. It is likely too little too late. However, there is a very small window of opportunity of push back for patriots.

SO, back to saving America and this site’s thesis, one which has been showcased time and again: emergency action plans are required to beat back Islam’s invaders!

AS reported on Jan. 13, 2016: let’s play geography. Wyoming is situated in the mountain region of the western U.S. Its land mass is the 10th largest in the nation, albeit, vastly underpopulated. Hmm. Not only that, the FEDS own massive amounts of land in the state. Double hmm.

NOW, it is not for nothing that the top conservative states are: Wyoming, Mississippi, Idaho, Utah, and Montana. Even so, said designation does not disqualify others – within left leaning states alike – from advancing the same prescriptive measures that conservatives are opting for. In fact, patriots in center leaning states will likely hop on board, if hopeful countermeasures spread like wildfire via the internet. GET BUSY. This is the case because life and death matters are at stake, leaving only a small percentage of die-hard leftists willing to sacrifice themselves on the Islamic altar. 

BUT before we head to Wyoming, let’s review (just a few templates) what has been done, so far, to keep Allah’s Muslim Terrorists at bay.

SO, at year’s end, some patriots were less inclined to sit still – waiting for the jihad to come to them – thus, Texans, as always, led the charge. Indeed….continue reading….

BUT this site warns: even self sufficient Montanans will need to step it up a notch.

Rural folks in Montana are pushing back against plans by urban elites to plant hundreds of Muslims from the Third World into Helena and Missoula. They plan a protest rally at 10 a.m. Monday in front of the county courthouse in Missoula. And if the pattern holds of similar rallies in Twin Falls, Idaho, and Fargo, North Dakota, a contingent of pro-refugee people will show up to counter protest.

Of all the 50 states, there are only two that have not received their “share” of the nearly 1 million Muslim refugees that have been infused into more than 180 U.S. cities and towns over the past 35 years, compliments of the U.S. State Department and the United Nations.

Those states are Wyoming and Montana.

Wyoming has received only five refugees from the federal resettlement program since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and is currently not participating in the program (although Gov. Matt Mead has indicated he’d like to restart the program). Montana has only received 61 refugees since 9/11 and none since 2008.

Compare that to neighboring Idaho, which has received 10,730 refugees over the same period, according to the federal refugee database. WND reported last week that Chobani’s billionaire Muslim CEO has been working with the federal government to import refugees to work in his massive yogurt plant in Twin Falls.

That has caused tensions as far out as Sand Point, in northern Idaho, where mayor Shelby Rognstad tried to lay out the welcome mat for Syrian refugees but was forced to retract his proposal after extreme blowback from the community, the Boise Weekly reported.

Another neighboring state, North Dakota, has been on the receiving end of 4,912 U.N. refugees since 9/11, according to the federal refugee database. Colorado has absorbed 18,122 refugees, Minnesota 37,838, Washington state 36,395, and Nebraska 9,161.

As WND has reported, Obama’s plan to import Syrian and other Muslim refugees has met spirited resistance in South Carolina, Idaho, Minnesota, North Dakota and Michigan. Residents in many areas of these states have let it be known they are not on board with the progressive vision of a multicultural America. They argue, with mounting evidence, that such policies in Europe have led to rampant crime, mass rapes and terrorism.

And the multicultural vision is no longer limited to gateway cities like New York, Chicago, Los Angeles or Miami.

Small cities like Boise, Idaho; Fargo, North Dakota; Wichita, Kansas – and now Helena and Missoula, Montana – are vying for a bigger slice of the refugee pie.

Here in “Big Sky Country” local politicians in Missoula, working with pro-immigrant NGOs, are inviting the federal government to begin sending Syrians, comparing them to the Hmong refugees who fled Vietnam’s communists in the late 1970s. They have not been deterred by the fact that 98 percent of Syrian refugees are Sunni Muslims, the vast majority of whom FBI Director James Comey admits are impossible to vet for ties to terrorism.

Despite Comey’s warnings, the Missoula Board of County Commissioners sent a letter on Jan. 13 to the U.S. State Department requesting Syrian refuges. “We look forward to seeing approximately 100 refugees per year resettled in Missoula,” the letter states.

“Missoula is an ideal city for resettling refugees,” the letter continues. “Our community enjoys good schools, incredible natural beauty, and a low unemployment rate, among other factors.”

Read the entire letter Missoula commissioners sent to the Obama administration.

A group of Montanans has mobilized against the plan. They are trying to educate their state and local representatives about how the refugee resettlement program actually works, including the high welfare usage of refugees, the costs of educating children who speak zero English and the risks to national security.

Wild-eyed lefties in the Wild West

Monday’s protest rally is not just aimed at Democrats. Citizen activists described the resistance put up by Republicans in the state Legislature as tepid at best.

“They’ve done little to help us and have basically given lip-service,” said Paul Nachman, a Bozeman activist who described Missoula as a town dominated by progressive politics, due largely to the influence of the University of Montana.

“It’s a wildly left-wing town, known around here as the Berkeley of Montana,” he said.

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2016/01/montana-map.jpg

Nachman says the commissioners Jan. 13 letter was astonishingly naïve.

Under the resettlement program, as governed by the Refugee Act of 1980 (authored by former Sens. Teddy Kennedy and Joe Biden), local elected leaders are not afforded any control over the number of refugees the federal government sends into their communities. The feds must “consult” with state and local leaders but are not required to abide by any suggested limits on the number of refugee arrivals. Nor is the federal government bound to restrict refugees coming from any particular country, such as Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan or any other jihadist-infested country.

The flow of refugees could begin with 10 Christians from Myanmar, for instance, but quickly evolve into hundreds of Muslims from Syria or Somalia. The Obama administration claims it has carte blanche authority over how many refugees will arrive in any given town and where they will come from.

CONSEQUENTLY, this investigative journalist is repeating: personal action plans are the best way forward, in tandem with communal participation as back ups, when necessary. 

BTW, marches (alone) won’t cut it!

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}