The RACE BAITER-IN-CHIEF (& His Minions) Set The Stage For INCREASED Black Mob Violence, Terrorizing Whites. Race War A Real Possibility. Why?…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Fanning the flames to racial violence takes many forms. While some of its signals are overt, others are much more circumspect. Regardless, those who are prone to said violence surely understand when a bro’ has their backs. It’s an “entitlement” thing.

From the get go, the Race Baiter-In-Chief pitted Blacks against Whites. Readers may recall – or not – he stepped into (racial) doo doo when he came to the aid of his Black bud, Henry Louis Gates Jr., in July 2009, only a few months into his Presidency. Apparently, Gates had a run-in with the “po-lice”. Oh yeah.

Obama, with his chin in its usual upward tilt, unabashedly opined: the “police acted stupidly”, brazenly admitting that he didn’t even know all the facts of the case. What a chutzpah. Craven narcissist. Forensically diagnosed: The One.

Besides, can anyone imagine the POTUS calling a press conference if a White person was similarly arrested? Do pigs fly? Never mind his copy cat racially-bent surrogates, namely, Holder, Sharpton & gang. Hey, this blogger is talking to you all! 

Just as a backgrounder, a frame of reference: mind you, in June 2009, a month prior to this specific race baiting foray, Iranian freedom seekers were dying in the streets, and their leadership were BEGGING Barack HUSSEIN Obama to support them, in whatever way possible. In fact, the following commentary was written, Barack HUSSEIN Obama Acts As A Shield For Islamic Regimes: Iranian Freedom Fighters Exposed His Hand, and its resonance won it a Watcher of Weasels award

The point being, the leader of the free world’s actions were so egregious in his non-involvement in Iran, others took special note too.  So, what exactly did he, or didn’t, do? NOTHING. He couldn’t even take the time to give them a “shout out”, as many died in Tehran’s streets. Yet, he took the time (despite all his duties, as the leader of the free world) for a press conference to assist his Black (Harvard educated) leftist bro’. You see where this is going?

Lest anyone believes this is old news – reverting back to his missteps from his first term – think again. His race baiting picked up more than a notch since then. In spades.

Consider the pile up of victims, some of whom are no longer among the living:

Yes, on behalf of “Tray”, race wars were ignited in U.S. cities. On whose orders, winks and nods? As such, extracting “justice” for “Tray” meant beating Whites to a pulp !

As if the above is not indicting enough to a burgeoning race war, it’s not coincidental that the following is all the “rage”, yet, the POTUS IS STONE COLD SILENT. Where are his urgent press conferences??

June 2013 – FAMILY PICNIC TURNS TO HORROR THANKS TO BLACK MOB. Woman pistol whipped while trying to defend son

Aug. 2013 – MAN IN COMA AFTER BLACK MOB OF 50 PUMMELS HIM. She saw them strip him of his pants and go through the pockets’

Sept. 2013 – BLACK MOB MURDERS MAN IN SURPRISING PLACE’. If it is happening here, what do you think is happening in the rest of the country?’

Oct. 2013 – BLACK MOB POUNCES ON YOUNG WHITE COUPLE. ‘It keeps happening, and they keep wondering why’

Nov. 2013 – Three “Knockout” Attacks Reported In Philadelphia Area

Nov. 2013 – NEWSPAPERS DIRECTED: COVER UP BLACK VIOLENCE. City’s epidemic silenced by national ‘journalism’ society

Nov. 2013 – Surprise! Media finally wake up to Knockout Game – video included within http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/fox-launches-full-frontal-assault-on-black-mobs/

The listing of racially-inspired winks and nods can go on and on, but this blogger only has so many hours in a day to spare. Nevertheless, the trajectory of Black on White pummeling is very clear.

Now, get this, DHS Still Hasn’t Fired Black Supremacist Who Called for Mass Murder of Whites:Almost four months after he was unmasked as a militant black nationalist who called for murdering “Uncle Tom race traitors,” Ayo Kimathi is still employed. You got that??

So while the Racialist-in-Chief’s Chicago ‘hood is featured below, it is by far – as amply demonstrated above – not an isolated phenomenon. 

COPS: BLACK MOB KIDNAPS, RAPES TEEN GIRLS

Brutal assaults captured on cell-phone videos recorded by suspects

The latest case of black-mob violence in Chicago is far from the worst. We’ll get to that one in a minute.

But when a mob of black people rushed into three Chicago-area Sports Authority stores this week and rushed out dragging entire racks of winter clothing, the local CBS affiliate dubbed that “unbelievable.

CNN said the videos were “shocking.”

Not really: “That crime was only unbelievable or shocking to the reporters who spend all their time ignoring and denying black mob violence,” said one Chicago cop, who would rather keep his job than be identified as a source of stories on racial violence. “More organized, yes. Unbelievable? Hardly. Not to anyone who knows anything about the epic level of black-mob violence and black-on-white crime in this city.”

Black mobs routinely terrorize cities across the country, but the media and government are silent. Read the detailed account of rampant racial crime in “White Girl Bleed A Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore It.”

First the heist. The CBS affiliate reports:

Unbelievable surveillance video captured flash mobs dashing into store after store and running out with armloads and sometimes entire racks of sporting goods.

It has happened at three different Sports Authority stores in the Chicago area.

The video shows the mob dragging the racks out together in what can only be called a choreographed fashion: Linking them together and rolling them like a freight train through the nearby exit and out to a parking lot.

The thieves targeted clothes and knocked over one employee who tried to interfere. Other than that, no one was hurt.

This heist was comic relief compared to an episode of black-mob violence and rape involving three teenage girls in October. This week, police arrested the ninth black suspect in connection with the rape, kidnapping, drugging and assault. The Chicago Tribune picked up the story:

The girls were walking in the 700 block of North Parkside Avenue in the Austin neighborhood about 9:45 p.m. Oct. 19 when a 1999 Chevrolet van approached, according to police and prosecutors.

As the van parked outside of a liquor store, two suspects exited and started to talk to the girls. Later, the victims agreed to get into the van and left with them. The attackers had the girls sit on their laps and then gave the two 16-year-old victims alcohol and marijuana, prosecutors said.

Prosecutors said at least two of the people took turns driving while the girls were assaulted. Meanwhile, the girl who did not drink the alcohol or smoke the marijuana “fought to protect” the other girls, screaming and pounding the walls of the van, according to court records and prosecutors.

Prosecutors provided more detail about the state of the two girls who were given the alcohol and marijuana in the van. They said one of the girls was “extremely intoxicated” and could not hold her head up. One of the girls had a blood alcohol content of .237, according to prosecutors. Police found that girl unconscious and partially dressed in a suspect’s basement, lying in a pool of her own vomit, prosecutors said.

Several of the assaults were captured on cell-phone videos recorded by the suspects.

Police mugshots of some of the rape suspects.

As graphic as the Tribune’s coverage of the violence was, it was tame compared to the details in other Chicago area blogs: Crime in Chicago did not shy away from presenting a fuller picture of the violence:

Angered at her screams, Robinson held the 15-year-old down while another suspect punched her in the face until she became quiet. Still restrained, she was sexually assaulted and then kicked out of the van because she continued yelling. As she fell out, she managed to pull her 16-year-old sister out with her, even though the attackers tried yanking them back inside.

The second 16-year-old remained in the van as the sisters ran, knocked on doors and screamed for help.

The suspects drove to Durham’s home. The girl was unconscious so Johnson and Price picked her up and carried her into Durham’s home where Price then sexually assaulted her.

Three witnesses who happened to be driving in the area called police after seeing the commotion and the sisters as they escaped from the van.

The Tribune does not usually identify suspects by race. Even if the crime is part of a pattern. Even if the race of the suspects will help identify them. Even if the paper reports every day on other race-related stories about black caucuses, black churches, black colleges, black TV, black radio and on and on.

Everything except black-mob violence.

Tribune editors and columnists spend more time explaining why they do not report on racial violence in Chicago then actually reporting it. And for readers who wonder why the Trib is so heavily invested in ignoring and denying the epidemic of black-mob violence in Chicago, the Trib’s Steve Chapman has an answer: You are a racist for even asking.

“There are good reasons not to identify the attackers by race. It’s the newspaper’s sound general policy not to mention race in a story, whether about crime or anything else, unless it has some clear relevance to the topic.

“My question to readers accusing us of political correctness is: Why do you care so much about the attackers’ race? If you fear or dislike blacks, I suppose it would confirm your prejudice. But otherwise, it tells you nothing useful.”

When readers try to comment on racial violence, black-mob violence or black-on-white crime, the Tribune – like many other papers around the country – either removes the comments or does not run them at all.

“In certain circumstances, we will take down entire comment boards,” said the paper.

The Tribune disabled comments for the several stories on the West Side rapists.

Outrageously, aside for a “license” – a  high five – to steal and rampage against “Whitey”, the fact of the matter is, under Obama Inc., the Black community has been set back exponentially. How so? Their financial gains have been wrecked by an economy falling off the cliff via rampant unemployment, coupled with a gimme gimme mentality. Yes, their bro’, Obama, is responsible for their overall economic devastation. See the damage accrued from Obamacare to his “pets”, even as he claims he has their backs! Who is this creature?

What is even more outrageous is the way he abuses Blacks (his largest support base) for his own political gain and radical goals. As stated, it has been under his (mis)reign that Blacks have lost many of their hard fought gains in the economic sector, leaving many of their communities devastated.
In a nutshell, Allen West, Thomas Sowell and others (Black men of real stature) courageously posit: 
“Tell me, Black Americans, what is it you like about President Barack Obama other than the color of his skin? I ask this question because this humble observer of the asylum we all have to live in can see no reason that over 90% of black voters voted for Mr. Obama the second time. (The first time is understandable.) Everything this man has done since being in office has been done for one reason and one reason only. And that has been to promote a bigger role for government and a lessor role for the individual Americans, including black Americans.  If that sounds a bit like Marxism, that’s because that is who Barack Obama is. The only thing that I can see that our first black president has done for black Americans is to feed them a constant stream of convenient lies so that the grossly under educated black Americans can blame someone other than themselves for their lot in life”.
Exactly!
On the other hand, take Oprah Winfrey and her harping on the “color” of one’s skin, but said pigmentation seems to be important only if one’s hue is Black. What?? Well, hear the daytime diva strutt her racist stuff, and know that she always has Obama’s back –
WINFREY: I’m saying problem not solved. I’m saying that, you know, that’s the beauty of a film like “The Butler,” and it’s the beauty of a film like “12 Years a Slave,” and it’s the beauty of what we’re seeing on stage with “Scottsboro Boys” is that it allows people to see where the root of the problem started. It allows people to see, “Oh, that’s where it all started, this is how far we’ve come, and now this is how much 

farther we need to go.” Of course problem is not solved. You know, as long as people can be judged by the color of their skin, problem’s not solved. As long as there are people who still, there’s a whole generation – I say this, you know, I said this, you know, for apartheid South Africa, I said this for my own, you know, community in the south – there are still generations of people, older people, who were born and bred and marinated in it, in that prejudice and racism, and they just have to die.

So in Winfrey’s view, it’s older white people that are the problem, and once they die, racism ends.

Yet three months ago, she said of the George Zimmerman verdict, “It’s ridiculous to look at that case and not to think that race was involved.”

Zimmerman’s only 30 years old and is Hispanic.

It is patently absurd to suggest that racism is caused by old white people when racism and religious bigotry cut across all generations and ethnicities.

But folks such as Winfrey don’t want to look at it that way, for they have a different agenda:

Egregiously, it was due to “racist” America that Oprah became one of the richest women in America, which gave a Black woman all her opportunities. Hmm. It was “racist” America that elected Barack HUSSEIN Obama to the most powerful position in the world. Double hmm. Now, who are the authentic race baiters?

Do wrap your brains around what she is saying, and don’t forget it, whenever one of her many conglomerates are in view. Winfrey – a DESPICABLE racist! Is it any wonder she hearts Obama and has his back too?

 Birds of a racist, leftist feather!