ISIS IS Rising, Gen. Dempsey Assesses Otherwise. What’s Going On? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

IT would have been inconceivable, even less than a decade ago, for the top General of the U.S. military to utter the mother of all lies:

According to General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, losing Ramadi to ISIS “is not symbolic in any way.” Why? Because “It’s not been declared, you know, part of the caliphate on one hand or central to the future of Iraq,” he reasoned. What will it take for the Gen. to understand that any territory taken over by ISIS becomes part of caliphate?

BLAH blah doesn’t even come close to describing such dangerous gibberish. He has lost his mind, aside from being clearly co-opted by an Islamist-in-Chief! Indeed, the guideposts were all leading in this Orwellian direction, now that patriotic Generals (and top officers) have been purged from the Pentagon. The reasons for the putsch become clearer every day.

MIND you, this is the same spineless, limp-wristed Dempsey who opined, “ISIS will win”! Alas, which is it: are they rising or not? Schmuck, make up your mind!

NOT only that, but with Obama Inc.’s Generals literally falling over themselves to bow down and prostrate before ISIS (and attendant Islamic terror offshoots), is it any wonder that ISIS IS rising….going from strength to strength?

ALAS, another tool and toadying fool, as retired Marine General John Allen caves to Islam and Barack HUSSEIN Obama! Besides, whatever happened to “men with chests”, those who are able to stand up to America’s enemies, whether they sit in the White House or lay waste to innocents all over the world?

Retired Marine General John Allen

UNDER this set of facts, let there be no doubt: Commanders, be they from the military or the high level political realm, must exert authority and ooze take charge personas. If not, who is going to follow, respect AND fear them? Yes, a pussy cat leader won’t last long, that’s for sure. But this descriptor is a far cry from a dictator-like personality. We all know to whom this reference is alluding….

THAT off the table, the Pentagon’s highest ranks have been gutted of national patriots, despite their pinned medals and puffed up chests. The remaining have agreed to toe to his Islamic diktats and that is that. Plain as day.

According to Allen, to defeat ISIS:

The solution is to “celebrate” Islam and show our “profound respect” for it.

“As we seek to expose ISIS’ true nature,” Allen told the gathering on Monday, “we must also tell a positive story, one that highlights our respect – our profound respect for Islam’s proud traditions, its rich history, and celebration of scholarship and family and community.” “We must work with clerics and scholars and teachers and parents to tell the story of how we celebrate Islam, even as we show that ISIS perverts it.”

Allen said that ISIS propaganda serves both to attract recruits and “perverts the innocent.”

“It is only when we contest ISIS  presence online and deny the legitimacy of its message – the message that it sends to vulnerable young people – and as we expose ISIS for the un-Islamic, criminal cult of violence that it really is, it is only then that ISIS will be truly defeated.”

U.S. European Command Commander, NATO Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Philip M. Breedlove

Similarly infected, the schmuck from U.S. European Command Commander, NATO Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Philip M. Breedlove had this to say….

 

“The best way to beat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria’s success at recruiting Westerners is for moderate Muslims to step up and counter the message,” the commander of NATO forces in Europe said Monday.

U.S. Air Force Gen. Philip Breedlove said the extremist group’s ability to recruit foreign fighters to come to Syria and Iraq is a “real problem” for the alliance. And it is compounded by concerns about “lone wolf” terror attacks by fighters returning from the Middle East and others inspired by the group’s ideology.

“It’s hard to address recruiting until we address those hearts and minds,” Breedlove told reporters at the Pentagon. “We need to hear the voices of moderate Muslims in the mosques.”

NOW, let’s get down to specifics, proving just how devastatingly off target Dempsey is. Absurdly, he asserted, “losing Ramadi (or another piece of territory) to ISIS is not symbolic in any way.” Why? Because “It’s not been declared, you know, part of the caliphate on one hand or central to the future of Iraq,” so sayeth the top General poohbah!

AGAIN, he has been co-opted. Regardless, the consequences of his statement are unimaginably frightening and portends disaster for America and the west. Dempsey’s entire chain of command – following his lead – is not being taught, thus, operating, under a doctrine which includes a deep understanding of Islamic warfare. Know thy enemy. Plain and simple.

Meanwhile, ISIS began issuing “smart” identity cards – On April 11, 2015, ISIS-affiliated Twitter accounts posted tweets stating that ISIS has begun to issue “smart” identity cards in the areas under its control, containing chips to prevent forgeries.

ISIS also continues to recruit American sympathizers and fighters. A unknown number of those fighters receive “terrorism training on weapons, combat and tactics,” in ISIS camps in Syria and are sent back to carry out attacks in the U.S. On April 17, in Columbus, Ohio, “Abdirahman Sheik Mohamud, a U.S. citizen originally from Somalia, was charged with supporting terrorism, supporting a terrorist group and making a false statement involving international terrorism.”  Mohamud traveled to Syria because he wanted to “join you in the high ranks as a Mujahid.” After training in “shooting weapons, breaking into houses, explosives, and hand-to-hand combat.. A cleric then instructed him to return to the U.S. to carry out an act of terrorism..[to] “kill three or four American soldiers execution style,” or attack a prison.

Other supporters of ISIS arrested in the U.S. since the beginning of April include:

  • Keonna Thomas, 30, AKA Fatayat Al Khilafah and Young Lioness, who was arrested on April 4, 2015, in Philadelphia. She was charged with attempting to send aid to ISIS and planning to join the ranks of the organization. According to the security authorities, an ISIS operative asked her to take part in a suicide bombing attack and she expressed her consent. She used the Internet to search for ways of getting to Turkey, obtained a visa and purchased a plane ticket online (Reuters, April 4, 2015).
  • Joshua Ray Van Haften, 34, was arrested at the airport in Chicago on charges of attempting to help ISIS. Van Heften was detained in Turkey since October 2014 and was sent back to the United States. According to the FBI, he wanted to go to Syria via Turkey to join the ranks of ISIS. He left the United States in August 2014. His contact on the Syrian border abandoned him because he couldn’t pay him. He returned to Turkey, where he was arrested (The Investigative Project on Terrorism, April 9, 2015).
  • John T. Booker Jr., a 20-year-old US citizen, was arrested in the US. He told an undercover FBI agent that he and two partners had planned to carry out a suicide bombing attack by means of a truck bomb against US soldiers at Fort Riley. He also made a video in which he pledged allegiance to ISIS (AFP, April 10, 2015).

More examples on ISIS propaganda efforts in past two weeks were published by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Information Center:

Publication of another issue of the ISIS organ

  • On April 1, 2015, ISIS published the eighth issue of Dabiq, its online English-language organ intended for supporters of the organization in the West. The organ includes a series of articles describing the expansion of ISIS’s activities in Africa, including an article about Boko Haram’s pledge of allegiance to ISIS. It also includes an article encouraging foreign fighters to go to Libya and an interview with a Tunisian operative. In an article by abducted British journalist John Cantlie, he warns of additional terrorist attacks that will be carried out in the future against Western countries. The issue also includes criticism of the Al-Nusra Front, claiming that the organization is adopting an ideology with Syrian nationalistic characteristics and is collaborating with the Syrian rebel groups.

New news format on the ISIS radio station

  • ISIS has issued a new format of news summaries on its radio network Al-Bayan, in Arabic, Russian and English. The first news broadcast included updates on Iraq, Syria and Libya, including the death of an ISIS commander in the Al-Yarmouk refugee camp, a suicide bombing attack in Iraq, and ISIS’s military activity in Libya (Daily Telegraph, April 7, 2015).

Left: Logo of ISIS’s radio network Al-Bayan. Right: Issue 8 of the organ Dabiq, which came out in April 2015.
Left: Logo of ISIS’s radio network Al-Bayan. Right: Issue 8 of the organ Dabiq, publised in April 2015.

Encouraging young people to sacrifice their lives for ISIS as suicide bombers

  • On April 11, 2015, ISIS’s media arm in Al-Raqqah published a video showing an ISIS operative lecturing to young boys in uniform about the “Crusaders” who operate against the Sunnis (i.e., the Christians, the US-led coalition). The speaker notes that the Islamic State has provinces in many parts of Africa and Asia, and with the help of Allah it will soon have them in Europe as well: “Allah willing, we will return Andalusia [i.e., modern-day Spain][to the fold of Islam].”
  • The speaker tells the boys that any of them who becomes a suicide bomber against the “Crusaders” will have the privilege of being faithful to the path of Allah and will even see Allah in heaven. He called on the boys to pledge allegiance to death.Following his statements, the boys stand up and shout “we pledge allegiance to death!”(ISIS’s media arm in the Al-Raqqah province, as it appeared on YouTube, April 11, 2015).

ISIS preacher encouraging young people to sacrifice themselves on behalf of ISIS as suicide bombers (ISIS’s media arm in the Al-Raqqah province, YouTube, April 11, 2015)

ISIS preacher encouraging young people to sacrifice themselves on behalf of ISIS as suicide bombers (ISIS’s media arm in the Al-Raqqah province, YouTube, April 11, 2015)

LET’s cut to the core, since the jive-talking General (and his underlings) refuses to do so: under HUSSEIN Obama the objective is NOT to beat ISIS or any other Islamic terror forces.

AS reported in Feb. 2015: The Obama administration was given multiple chances to endorse a long-time ally’s airstrikes on America’s biggest enemy at the moment, the so-called Islamic State. Over and over again, Obama’s aides declined to back Egypt’s military operation against ISIS. It’s another sign of the growing strain between the United States and Egypt, once one of its closest friends in the Middle East.

This shouldn’t be a complete surprise; Cairo, after all, didn’t tell Washington about its strikes on the ISIS hotbed of Derna, Libya. Still, Wednesday’s disconnect was jarring. White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest passed on a reporter’s question about an endorsement of Egypt’s growing campaign against ISIS. So did State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki.

“We are neither condemning nor condoning” the Egyptian strikes, is all one U.S. official would tell The Daily Beast.

In other words, these once-close nations are now fighting separate campaigns against their mutual foe. And that could prove to be very good news for ISIS. The rift between U.S. and the region’s most populous country portends of another division that ISIS could exploit, this time for its expansion into northern Africa and the broader Middle East.

MOST significantly, HUSSEIN Obama totally supports Brotherhood backed Erdogan, a CHIEF ally of ISIS! 

LESS than 3 degrees of separation…and proof positive as to why his top Generals utterly refuse to admit that ISIS IS rising.

YES, it is incumbent upon patriots to do the heavy lifting. Precisely, this was why the following analysis was written: ISIS, Islam And Obama: Understanding The Threat To The Free World!

BUT cementing the case against HUSSEIN Obama – re the catastrophes he (purposefully) unleashed in Mid East – requires fine-tuning: 

(the evidence gets going around the 21:47 point)

SO, grab a drink (not the inebriating kind), a sweet or two and put your feet up. But hold on tight. Be prepared for a rocky ride from Tom Trento, a close contact.

BY the way, this investigative journalist (and Brotherhood expert) attests to the veracity of his entire analysis and findings. A slam dunk.

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

 

Americans, BAN Shariah Law Before It Is Too Late! Bombard Your Reps & Take A Stand…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

obamacair

 

This is the true face of Shariah law, as exposed, expressed, at UC Davis’s BDS intifada! Here too… }

BEFORE we proceed, let’s clear up the following whining and opining from Islamists and leftists: since Jews are allowed to arbitrate certain cases via a Rabbinical Bet Din, surely Muslims should have the same right, if they want to utilize their religious court option ala Shariah law, agreed? A fair question, but only if one is ignorant of the major underlying distinctions between the two, or if the questioner is malevolent in intent. That’s a mouthful, but no less true.

IN the main, the Bet Din … בית דין … handles commercial, communal and matrimonial conflicts, but its renderings can never violate the nation’s laws. Not only that, but the purpose of said adjudication is solely for Jewish litigants. On the other hand, Shariah law, while utilized by Muslims, is designed to (eventually) supplant the (western) laws of the land, to impose its basis upon all citizens, like it or not!              

IF you really want to understand what’s what, one must listen to well known hooked up Islamic leaders, as discomfiting as it is. They pull no punches, yet, are Americans, westerners at large, paying attention?

On the Ben Shapiro Show Thursday, Imam Anjem Choudary said the President Obama is “inventing” his own version of Islam to forward his foreign policy agenda and that the “radical” form Choudary espouses simply aligns with the principles of the Koran and Sharia Law.

Shapiro led into the segment by quoting from Choudary’s USA Today Jan. 8 opinion piece titled People Know the Consequences,” which blamed the French government for allowing publications to “provoke Muslims” and argued that Muslims do not in fact believe in the freedom of expression:

Contrary to popular misconception, Islam does not mean peace but rather means submission to the commands of Allah alone. Therefore, Muslims do not believe in the concept of freedom of expression, as their speech and actions are determined by divine revelation and not based on people’s desires.

Shapiro then asked Choudary to discuss the Muslim view on the freedom of expression, specifically with regard to the Charlie Hebdo massacre. Choudary explained that Muslim scripture made clear that those who insult the Prophet, like journalists at Charlie Hebdo, must be punished: “Those who would insult the Prophet, kill them.” Sharia Law he said, clearly requires any who would insult those Muslims deem “prophets,” including Moses and Jesus, be tried in court and punished. This a system, he added, that Muslims are willing to “fight for and even die for.”

When Shapiro asked him if he believed that Western governments should ban the blasphemy of Mohammed, Choudary said he wanted Sharia Law in its entirety to be imposed on Western governments because it was a “better” system. However, if that were not possible, laws should be put in place against “provoking Muslims.” As he stressed in his article, Choudary said that killings like those Wednesday are “the consequence of insulting the Prophet.”

Pointing to the incompatibility of the Western and Sharia systems, Shapiro asked Choudary why the West should allow people like him to live in their boundaries. Choudary said he was born in England so he had the right to live there, and that “people always change” and “change is good,” so he believed that it was time for the West to change.

Choudary: The difference between divine law and man-made law—in other words liberal democracy and [inaudible] moralities and liberties—is that divine law can’t be changed. We can’t change the Koran, we can’t change the sayings of the Prophet, which include insulting the Prophet and the consequences. But you can change your laws…

If the West’s laws are not change, he warned, we’ll have a “blood bath.”

Choudary argued that what we’re witnessing is a “clash of two civilizations,” with al-Baghdadi leading on one side and Barack Obama leading on the other, leading Shapiro to ask about Obama’s portrayal of Islam:

Shapiro: President Obama has repeatedly attempted to what he has characterized as “defend” Islam, saying that ISIS is not Islamic. He has said that “the future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam” […] But the way he characterizes Islam is not the way you characterize Islam […] How many people do you represent versus how many people does President Obama represent when it comes to Islam? Are you in fact representative of a “tiny minority” within Islam or are you representative of something larger?

President Obama, Choudary said, is “lying” about Islam, along with other Western leaders. The Koran itself shows that “Barack Obama is a liar” about the religion’s true nature:

Choudary: Islam for them is whatever they think Islam is in terms of their own interests. Islam is in accordance to the Koran, of the sayings and actions of the Prophet. That’s it. […] I say to you, look at the Koran, look at the sayings of the Prophet, and check for yourself. Is Barack Obama a liar or am I lying? I think that you will find that he’s a liar. He’s only inventing Islam according to what his own foreign policy is.

Shapiro asked Choudary if he took offense to being called a “radical” by the Western media, to which he responded that in Scripture “every prophet of Islam was demonized,” adding that he simply teaches Sharia Law as it truly is.

YUP, you gotta give Choudary props for telling the truth! Always on (Islamic) message. In fact, he has been front and center within counter terrorism analyses for some time. 

IN this regard, those who are truly aghast at their bloodletting must understand that it makes no diff to them if they decapitate, burn alive, etc. in the Mid East, in any city USA or another western locale. The point being, when they reach a certain critical mass (via the activation of sleeper cells, be they ISIS, Hezbollah, or other Sunni branches all over America) it will ensure their deadly swathe.

YET if more evidence is required re the barbarism within Shariah law, this week’s burning of the Jordanian pilot is a prime example. It is explained by an acclaimed scholar of Islam, Dr. Mordechai Kedar:

Islamic State publicized a horrifying twenty minutevideo this week, the high point of which was the execution of a Jordanian pilot, Maaz al-Kassasbeh, by burning him alive. The film attempts to justify the punishment by describing Jordan’s part in the war against ISIS, using photos of ISIS dead, including women, children, men and mainly those burned to death.

The rest of the film has the pilot describing the involvement of the air forces of Jordan, United Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Morocco and United States and notes that American planes take off from Turkish bases.

The film is edited professionally and includes impressive sound and visual effects that attest to the talents and abilities of its editors. Many minutes are spent showing a silent visit the Jordanian pilot makes to the ruins of a large building, which seems to be the staff headquarters of ISIS that was hit by the coalition’s airplanes, possibly even the plane flown by the Jordanian himself.


Anyone who attacks Islamic State will be condemned to Hell on earth – and if he is unsure about how Hell looks and about what happens to the wicked there, he now has a movie that answers both questions.
The entire film is meant to justify the scene that is shown near its end: the burning alive of the Jordanian pilot. The event is carefully staged: the pilot is put in an iron cage so that he has no chance of escaping the fire, and the orange clothes which he wears throughout the film are soaked in gasoline. Even the sand under the cage is full of gasoline and a rivulet of gasoline-soaked sand reaches the spot where a soldier stands carrying a stick to which a gasoline-soaked rag is attached. Another soldier lights the rag, it sets the rivulet on fire, the flames advance towards the cage and set the gasoline under the pilot’s feet ablaze and after the pilot dies in excruciating agony, a bulldozer arrives and covers the cage with rocks.

What the film presents is nothing new to anyone who is familiar with Islamic sources, those that tell about how Ali ibn Abi Talib, the cousin of Muhammed who  married his daughter Fatma and became the fourth Caliph, burned two heretics to death. There is a dispute among Islamic religious figures about whether that is allowed, opponents claiming that only God is licensed to condemn heretics to the flames – that is, to burn in Hell. Islamic State – which sees itself as the force that will reestablish the original Islamic State – uses Ali’s precedent on the burning of enemies, and allows punishment by fire on earth.

This point is extremely important to those in charge of the ISIS propaganda machine: the message the film conveys is that anyone who attacks Islamic State will be condemned to a living Hell – and if he is unsure about how Hell looks and about what happens to the wicked there, he now has a movie that answers both questions. Just for comparison’s sake: several months ago, the web was full of ISIS fighters talking about Yazidi girls that they were going to have their way with, and that, too, was a clear message: that is, instead of waiting for 72 virgins, whoever joins ISIS gets to enjoy Paradise on earth.

Another reason for burning the pilot to death is the Islamic legal principle of mutuality – the punishment must fit the crime. In the case of the Jordanian pilot the video takes pains to show ISIS victims, including children, burned in coalition attacks. Ths presentation of burned victims is meant to justify the method by which the pilot is executed, based on the mutuality principle.

 

RESULTANT, listen up…to two of my close contacts, Tom Trento and Dave Gaubatz:

FIRE JIHAD

 

Britain First's photo.
ONTO…
QUESTION: What are some of the most common techniques that Muslims use to become accepted members of U.S. society?

David Gaubatz 

The vast majority of people who identify with Islam in America do not adhere to Sharia law 100 percent as Islam dictates. They are essentially Apostates of Islam. There are thousands, if not millions, of Muslims who assimilate into the American culture by going to our colleges, obtaining legitimate employment, and swearing by the U.S. Constitution just to avoid scrutiny by the U.S. intelligence organizations. They are known as “Sleeper Cells.” When the timing is right, they will openly support physical Jihad operations against America and Israel. Our Mapping Sharia study shows that 75 plus percent of the mosques and Islamic centers in America have materials calling for hate and violence against non-Muslims and their respective governments.

AND not to get off topic, but is it any wonder that the Islamist-in-Chief is pushing for Shariah law, refusing to identify Islam with terror, regardless of the carnage? Well, stop wondering: he condemned violence committed by ISIS and other Islamic militant groups and called for a “push” against those who “try to distort our religion.”

AIN’T that special…once again via “my Muslim Faith”, he outed himself!

SO what’s to be done? Well, take a page out of the following (Mississippi) lawmaker’s playbook, even though a preponderance are deaf, dumb and blind:

AMERICANS (westerners) must fully internalize that the Islamic barbarism rampaging across the world is sanctioned under Shariah law. Forget about all the lies that ISIS (and every other Islamic-based hydra) is against Islam’s laws! The decapitations, and everything in between, are “Pure Islam”. Simple as that. Horrific.

AS a visual (mind’s eye) foretaste, just imagine what will happen to the “face” of America, if Shariah law becomes the law of the land, whether actually enshrined on the books or via practical application, as FULLY implemented already in Dearborn, Michigan! Did you realize that?

MIND you, this “lovely” young jihadi feels secure enough, an untouchable, to display her support for Hamas/Islamic jihad by screaming Allahu Akbar, as well as outfitting herself in Allah’s warrior garb at UC Davis!

PATRIOTS, please listen up: this jihadi-in-training is not dabbling in face paint, as a youthful rebellious streak or sorority hi-jinx. Not at all. She is portraying her true colors – PLEDGING ALLEGIANCE to Islamic jihad – and is just one aspiring Islamist among countless, all across America. She is DEADLY serious.

FOREWARNED…forearmed!

BANNING Mosques…Muslims In Congress Too: An American (Western) Imperative. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 

FIRST and foremost, let us all agree on the most intrinsic basis for survival: the underpinnings of democracy are not meant to be suicide pacts ! Period. Don’t ever forget this western pact. Imperative. Alas, even if too many multicultural fantasists interpret freedom of religion – a core western component – as a “legitimate” veil to hide behind, rolling over and giving in is NEVER an option. Not on this watch….

IMAGINE, if you will, millions of Jews and Christians slaughtering everyone who offends their religious sensitivities. In fact, there would be so many dead bodies that cemeteries, the size of football fields, would have to be built – world over – to house the corpses! 

IT is precisely for this reason why two twin myths have to be shattered. Obliterated. Post haste. That is, if America (the west will not survive without America as a bulwark, similarly, sans Israel standing strong against Islamic jihad…twin pillars) is to survive the upcoming onslaught of perpetually aggrieved Muslims, westerners need to get with the program. Besides, when are they NOT “offended”?

MYTH ONE:

SO, let’s cut to the heart of the matter and bust open the most DANGEROUS myth, “Islam is a religion of peace”. It is beyond mendacious. It is perhaps the biggest lie on the world stage, and that is saying something. Thus, repeat ad nausea: 

The viewpoint of ISIS echos throughout the Islamic world. Mawlana Abul Ala Mawdudi, founder of Pakistan’s Islamic Fundamentalist Movement, which boasts hundreds of thousands of members, spoke openly and honestly about the religion of Islam.

Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to destroy any government made by man. Islam doesn’t look for a nation to be in better condition than another nation. Islam doesn’t care about the land or who own the land. The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power in this world that tries to get in the way of that goal, Islam will fight and destroy.”

 

                                MOHAMMAD  HI-JACKED ISLAM!
 

 

ON the other hand, its basis is “religious” in nature, but it was conceived to be used as a bludgeon, against all those who refuse to fall in line with a totalitarian political doctrine, albeit cloaked within a religious basis. Sounds Orwellian? Well, regardless, it is the truth.

PAY strict heed to Ayann Hirsi, a Somali (former) Muslim. Yes, there are scores of irrefutable proofs to back up the following:

“It makes no sense to differentiate between Islam and Islamism. One, sympathetically, probably tries to say that Islam is a normal religion, but the point is that Islam by its nature is a political movement, and that the religious dimension is cosmetic.”

NO ifs, ands or buts about this “diagnosis”.

MYTH TWO:

MYTH one leads straight into myth two…..1 + 1… (a + b) equation-like.  

THUS, it has been established (above, within this site, and elsewhere) that Islam’s basis is totalitarian, to be utilized as a political tool of war, with an end point to submit all to Allah. In factual reality, the actual meaning of Islam = submitin accordance with Quran Sunnah Educational Programs. Hmmm…

Q: Please, illustrate to me the meaning of Islam.

A: Islam means total submission to Allah (Exalted be He) through belief in His Oneness, and showing subservient and servile obedience to Him. This is the meaning of Islam.

IN this regard, multiculti brayers continuously opine: why shouldn’t Muslims be free to build mosques within the west – just like other religions – if said nations are to uphold the mantle of democracy? A fair question, but only if one didn’t know what’s what.  

INTRINSICALLY, their war plans are STRATEGIZED within their mosques (besides, this site’s counter jihad contacts have documented evidence of said charges, so, don’t even try to argue otherwise) and PREACHED inside their “religious” confines! The proofs are manifest and grave. Book-worthy.

BUT just as foretastes, the following should suffice:

 FORETASTE ONE:

MOSQUES in America are a dagger to its heart; a metastasizing cancer !

 FORETASTE TWO:

AS mentioned below – in reference to the largest terrorism trial in U.S. history – Dar al-Hijrah, in Falls Church, Virginia (out of scores of others throughout the U.S.) openly calls for armed jihad within America !

Sheik Shaker Elsayed, the imam of the Dar al-Hijrah Mosque in Falls Church, Va., advocated armed jihad before an Ethiopian Muslim group gathered at T.C. Williams High School in Alexandria, Va. last week.

“Muslim men when it is a price to pay, they are first in line,” Elsayed said in comments seen on a YouTube video found by the Creeping Sharia blog. “They are the first in the prayer line. They are the first in the zakat (charity) line. They are the first in the hajj line. They are the first in the clean-up line. They are the first in the community-service line. They are the first in jihad line. They are the first in the da’wa line.”

“But they are last if anything is being distributed, unless it is arms for jihad,” Elsayed said. “We are the first to rush and run to defend our community and defend ourselves. The enemies of Allah are lining up; the question for us is, ‘Are we lining, or are we afraid because, because they may call us terrorists.'”

Being called “terrorists” should not matter to Muslims because Muslims are being called terrorists anyway, Elsayed said.

“You are a terrorist because you are a Muslim,” Elsayed said. “Well give them a run for their money. Make it worth it. Make this title worth it, and be good a Muslim.”

Elsayed then told Muslims to accept peace when they receive peace, but to fight back when their families, communities, nations and dignity come under attack.

He has been Dar al-Hijrah’s imam since 2005. Law enforcement officials have described the mosque as being “associated with Islamic extremists” and “operating as a front for Hamas operatives in U.S….His name also appears in a 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document detailing the group’s plan to wage a non-violent civilization jihad to destroy “Western civilization from within.”

AT the very least, if anything, wouldn’t it make sense for Americans to immediately follow what a Mayor from Italy has done, a town leader who finally realizes that mosques are (beyond) a dagger to the hearts of non-Muslim citizens!

EXTRAPOLATING further, before it is too late, those already built will need to be demolished, brick by brick, not unlike forward command centers when waging war against ones enemies!  

CONCOMITANTLY, doesn’t it flow (from all of the above) that followers of Islam, Muslims, within Congress (and other western representative bodies) evince a clear and present danger? If not, why not?

André Carson, the U. S. Representative for Indiana’s 7th Congressional District announced at the “Islamic Circle of North America” convention in 2012 that American schools should follow the model of Islamic madrassas – Islamic schools with religious teachings founded on the Quran.

Carson told “America will never tap into educational innovation and ingenuity without looking at the model that we have in our madrassas, in our schools, where innovation is encouraged, where the foundation is the Quran.”

My guess is that if a Christian Congressman made the same statement indicating Bible-study class, you’d be hearing about it in a more fanatical fashion from the mainstream press. But I digress… Do you believe the comments by Carson raises any red flags? No? Well then how about this:

At the same conference, Carson also made a dire warning to U.S. undercover law enforcement: “Allah will not allow you to stop us.” 

André Carson will soon sit in on meetings where some of America’s most precious secrets are examined because Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi is set to appoint him to the House Intelligence Committee…..keep reading….

“HOLY” jihad….

COUNTLESS tools – aside from frontal bloody jihad, the most obvious – are utilized to bring down America, their prime target. In the Brotherhood Mafia’s own words: “their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands….”

AND it matters not a whit which Muslim Brotherhood front group is the main engine to this and that act of jihad. The CENTRAL fact remains that “the mosques are their barracks, the domes are their helmets, the minarets are their bayonets, and the faithful are their soldiers”!

BOTH in words and deeds, be it frontal or stealth, the Muslim Brotherhood are plotting jihad. Moreover, as mentioned, at the largest terrorism trial in U.S. history, evidence was tied to front group after front group, and to mosque after mosque. Not only that, Dar Al-Hijrah stands out as a forerunner – “Federal investigators found Akram’s memo in the home of Ismael Elbarasse, a founder of the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, during a 2004 search. Elbarasse was a member of the Palestine Committee, which the Muslim Brotherhood had created to support Hamas in the United States.”

In July 2007, seven key leaders of an Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) went on trial for charges that they had: (a) provided “material support and resources” to a foreign terrorist organization (namely Hamas); (b) engaged in money laundering; and (c) breached the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which prohibits transactions that threaten American national security. Along with the seven named defendants, the U.S. government released a list of approximately 300 “unindicted co-conspirators” and “joint venturers.” During the course of the HLF trial, many incriminating documents were entered into evidence. Perhaps the most significant of these was An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America,” by the Muslim Brotherhood operative Mohamed Akram. Federal investigators found Akram’s memo in the home of Ismael Elbarasse, a founder of the Dar Al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, during a 2004 search. Elbarasse was a member of the Palestine Committee, which the Muslim Brotherhood had created to support Hamas in the United States.

Written sometime in 1987 but not formally published until May 22, 1991, Akram’s 18-page document listed the Brotherhood’s 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” that shared the common goal of dismantling American institutions and turning the U.S. into a Muslim nation. These “friends” were identified by Akram and the Brotherhood as groups that could help convince Muslims “that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.”

An archived page of the MAS website from 2003 – smack dab in the middle of Elsayed’s tenure there – states the following:

The call and the spirit of the movement reached the shores of North America with arrival of the Muslim student and immigrants in the late 50’s and early 60’s. These early pioneers and Islamic Movement followers established in 1963. Muslim Student Association (MSA) of U.S and Canada as the rallying point in their endeavor to serve Islam and Muslims in the North America scene. Other services and outreach organization soon followed, such as North America Islamic Trust (NAIT), Islamic MedicalAssociation (IMA), Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA) and Muslim Youth of North America (MYNA), to name a few.

 

REALISTICALLY, Americans (westerners) must understand this ominous fact: the multiple pronged attacks in Paris were precursors/forerunners for the “ready, set, go….blow” attacks within the U.S. The hidden jihadi cells, all over America, are likely to piggyback onto a few more “successful” strikes within Europe. However, as mentioned, Europe is their “testing ground”. Pointedly, the following, from Debkafile Intelligence, should serve as more than “background noise”: Europe rounds up 25 jihadi suspects.

HOW much clearer does it need to be to tie U.S. mosques (similarly, all over the west) into “barracks preparing for war”? And knowing this, isn’t it a matter of national survival, an imperative, to call for their elimination? Or, on the other hand, has democracy become a western suicide pact?

IF not, listen up to this site’s valued contact, Tom Trento, via his latest counter jihad show – 

NATIONAL SECURITY TIGER TEAM PRESENTS THE ‘SECURE FREEDOM STRATEGY’ FOR VICTORY OVER THE GLOBAL JIHAD MOVEMENT !

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

 

Obama Inc.’s FULL-ON Shield Towards Muslim Brotherhood: CAIR Not A Terror Org!Surrogates Go To Bat…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

BACK in the day, before Eric Holder (who never met an Islamist/leftist who was guilty of anything, let alone terrorism /subversion/treason/murder and mayhemtook the reins, the DOJ, to a large degree, was an address for American justice.

IN effect, an unindicted co-conspirator to the largest terrorism trial in U.S. history (Holy Land Foundation Trial) would hardly be in a position to ask any Fed agency, let alone the Executive Branch, for “assistance”. But that was then (in 2007/2008) and this is now. 

INTRINSICALLY, the criminal proofs against CAIR are crystal clear, even for those who are (ideologically rendered) blind as bats. However, pathological hatred for America – fueled by leftist/Islamist fixations – is impregnable. Fortress-like.

CAIR is indeed an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounceHamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements. Its California chapter distributed posters telling Muslims not to talk to the FBI.

Although it has received millions of dollars in donations from foreign Islamic entities, it has not registered as a foreign agent as required by the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), despite spreading Islamic supremacist propaganda within the United States.

And although it presents itself as a civil rights group, CAIR actually has numerous links to hateful and violent Islamic supremacist and jihad groups.

CAIR founders Omar Ahmad and Niwad Awad (who still serves as CAIR’s executive director) were present at a Hamas planning meeting in Philadelphia in 1993 where they and other Hamas operatives conspired to raise funds for Hamas and to promote jihad in the Middle East. CAIR has steadfastly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups.

Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror:

  • Ghassan Elashi , founder of CAIR’s Texas chapter, in 2009 received a 65-year prison sentence for funneling over $12 million from the Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation to the jihad terrorist group Hamas, which is responsible for murdering hundreds of Israeli civilians
  • Mousa Abu Marzook, a former CAIR official, was in 1995 designated by the U.S. government in 1995 as a “terrorist and Hamas leader.” He now is a Hamas leader in Syria.
  • Randall Royer, CAIR’s former civil rights coordinator, in 2004 began serving a 20-year prison sentence for aiding al-Qaida and the Taliban against American troops in Afghanistan and recruiting for Lashkar e-Taiba, the jihadist group responsible for the 2008 Mumbai jihad massacres.
  • Bassem Khafagi, CAIR’s former community relations director, was arrested for involvement with the Islamic Assembly of North America, which was linked to al-Qaida. After pleading guilty to visa and bank fraud charges, Khafagi was deported.
  • Rabih Haddad, a former CAIR fundraiser, was deported for his work with the Global Relief Foundation (which he co-founded), a terror-financing organization.

In 1998 Omar Ahmad, CAIR’s co-founder and longtime Board Chairman, said: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”

After he received unwelcome publicity as a result of this statement, Ahmad denied saying it, several years after the fact. However, the original reporter, Lisa Gardiner of the Fremont Argus, stands by her story.

CAIR’s spokesman Ibrahim Hooper once said: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.”

STILL, even with the above in mind, a few visual aids/proofs require additional edification:

Edification One:

THUS, before one views the two upcoming videos, please recognize that its host, Tom Trento, is not a so-called talking head. As such, blow him off at your own (western) peril. The evidence he brings to bear is second to none, and it will frighten you out of your mind. But that’s okay. Besides, it is better to have some mental discomfit now, before it is too late to (help) turn the tide. In any case, it doesn’t hurt that he has this site’s back, in a manner of speaking.

BUT before you click on, a brief synopsis is a must read:

In 2008 the Federal Bureau of Investigation warned America that the self-proclaimed “Muslim civil-rights” group, CAIR, was really part of the Palestinian terrorist organization the HAMAS. In fact, as we have proven, CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations actually functions as the “Special Operations Division” (SOD) of the political department of the HAMAS. Part of the CAIR “SOD” functions is to attack with media propaganda any person or organization who analyzes or criticizes CAIR. For several years now, CAIR has been able to maintain their non-terrorist Islamic “hue,” that is, until they have become a subject of our ground-breaking series, “Enemies of the State.” Stay tuned to this unique series as we send our research investigators deeply into the federal files on CAIR and present factual conclusions that will disrupt, disable and destroy the operations of CAIR/HAMAS USA.

 

TO wit, now that you are scared witless – so sorry for that – is it any wonder why CAIR, aka Muslim Brotherhood Mafia leaders, is inextricably linked to jihad terror-related crimes??

MORE specifically, this investigative journalist is completely up to speed on the intersecting terror hydras accrued under the Brotherhood’s umbrella. CAIR is front and center.

NOT only that, but being less than six degrees separated from a counter-terror expert who has been (and still is) within the belly of the MB beast – having provided much of the critical evidence to indict top Brotherhood terror leaders at the Holy Land Foundation trial – well, let’s just say they were none too pleased with the captured evidence revealed within Muslim Mafia. Poor dears, they still hold a grudge! Hmm…makes you want to shed a tear for their angst…just kidding…

Buy This Explosive Book Today!

The four Congressmen then wrote Attorney General Eric Holder on October 21, 2009, saying that in light of the book’s claims of CAIR attempting to influence national security policy within Congress, they were very concerned about CAIR’s relationships with terrorist groups, and requesting that the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) provide each Congressman a summary of DOJ’s evidence and findings that led DOJ to name CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism trial…

 

Left: Cartoon posted to Facebook depicting David Gaubatz being beheaded - Right: Gaubatz on duty in Iraq.

{Left: Cartoon posted to Facebook depicting David Gaubatz being beheaded – Right: David Gaubatz on duty in Iraq}

WITH the above info in tow, listen very carefully to the Mafia-like money laundering frauds utilized by the Muslim Brotherhood, with CAIR as “Exhibit Number One”. Yet, please bear in mind, it is not an accident (nor incidental) that the same two counter-terror hunters are housed within these pages.

READERS, grab a snack, put up your feet, get comfy and pay heed to what we (who operate separately, but also in tandem) term – “follow the (jihadist) money”

{a sampling of the monies laundered/exchanged – out of scores – between HLF and CAIR, some of which individually ranged from 100,000 on up, and collectively totaled into the many millions}

BACK to Obama’s “FULL ON” shield…but now that readers are more in the (terror) loop, just listen to his mouthpiece spin, dodge and weave. Good grief.

INCONTROVERTIBLY, the leader of the (heretofore) free world assiduously lends cover for the most dangerous Islamist Mafia, bar none – the Muslim Brotherhood.

AND since it has been demonstrably proven, six ways to Sundays, that CAIR is the Brotherhood’s American propaganda arm – akin to the machine run by Joseph Goebbels during the Nazi regime – it is only due to an Islamist-in-Chief at the helm that they remain under Washington’s protective shield and also “at large” throughout the U.S.

INDICTMENT SEALED….against Obama Inc.!

CAIR’s Mask Ripped Off:U.S. “Islamophobe” TARGET BANK For Assassination! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Hassan Shibly, Nihad Awad, Zair Shakir, Kifah Mustafa and Siraj Wahhaj (clock-wise from left). All are radical Islamists who have been associated with CAIR.

Hassan Shibly, Nihad Awad, Zair Shakir, Kifah Mustafa and Siraj Wahhaj (clock-wise from left). All are radical Islamists who have been associated with CAIR.

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

MANY of us are familiar with the concept of “good cop/bad cop”, but some of us are better attuned to these matters than others. Be that as it may, in general, life-saving info is often gleaned from some very bad suspects by adopting varying stealth tactics, intel which would otherwise remain hidden. That’s just the way it is, whether the PC thought police believe this or that is too harsh, even when dealing with stone cold killers. Bleeding hearts….but never for the victims.

IN this regard, CAIR  continuously plays a similar version of “good cop”, but never mind, they were stripped bare by foxy Brooke Goldstein on FOX . The “moderate” jihadists, via their propaganda machine, spin and spin that “over zealous Muslims” – whose actions repel most Americans and westerners – are not representative of Islam.  Indeed, head chopping and throat slitting is not exactly easy to “explain” away, when they quote Islam while committing untold barbarism!  But never mind, CAIR is 100% in sync with them, even as they opine otherwise. Head spinning.

AS a matter of official record, CAIR’s “illustrious” list of who’s who in the jihadi arena is a veritable laundry list of top Brotherhood operatives. This makes perfect sense, being that the Brotherhood Mafia, specifically Hamas, sponsored their entry into America!  

MORE specifically, the following is additional “bull’s eye” proof: 

WHEN a jihadi group, CAIR, is the “go to” address for U.S. law enforcement, is it any wonder they feel free to issue hit lists? Patience, dear readers…

ACCORDING to Dave Gaubatz, a premiere counter-terrorism expert, whose access is second to none, the following is noted: 

I receive internal emails from the ADAMS Center,ADAMS CENTER ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION SITE  The Executives of the ADAMS Center are very closely aligned with CAIR National.  CAIR Executives often flip flop and join one another’s terrorist supporting organization.  The ADAMS Center and CAIR National have previously been investigated and/or raided by the FBI.  Why would the FBI recruit from Islamic terror organzations for sensitive positions, such as FBI Special Agents and FBI Analysts.  The positions require a Top Secret clearance.
The answer is there is no good reason to recruit from terrorist organizations and supporters of terrorist.  FBI Special Agent Amylynn Errera, Washington Field Office sent the email to Farooq Syed, ADAMS Center.  Farooq then forwarded the email about FBI positions to members of their internal group of supporters.  I was provided a copy by a source.
The FBI sends these job opening to Islamic terror supporters, yet I would make a multi-million dollar bet that no one from the Tea Party, ACT For America, and dozens of other conservative groups are provided an up front notice of sensitive job positions in the FBI.  There are good people within the FBI, but the majority are not properly trained in regards to Islamic terrorism issues.  Then there are some who knowingly have relationships with organizations that pose a threat to our national security.
The ADAMS Center has previously been raided for their support of terrorism (RAID ON ADAMS CENTER).  I encourage readers to contact Special Agent Amylynn Errera and ask her why Islamic terror supporters (per the FBI’s own allegations) are being recruited for TOP SECRET positions within the FBI.  Her contact information is at the bottom of the email she sent to the ADAMS Center.
U.S. government employees are paid their salaries by American taxpayers.  They are not above the law and must answer to the American people.

 

AND additional direct evidence is from another close contact of this investigative journalist, Tom Trento, who just happened to make the hit list, as verified below. Yes, he agreed to a corroborative “outing” at this site from its inception, as has Dave Gaubatz. Bless their patriotic hearts…their assistance…

 

RESULTANT,

So, the Muslim Brotherhood front group Hamas-CAIR has decided to build an “islamophobia” website and design a hit list in the same manner as the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “hate list.” The new site is Islamophobia.com.

According to the website, “Islamophobia is closed-minded prejudice against or hatred of Islam and Muslims. An Islamophobe is an individual who holds a closed-minded view of Islam and promotes prejudice against or hatred of Muslims.”

The problem with such an assertion is nicely summed up by Ned May of the International Civil Liberties Alliance (ICLA) when he said that to use the term “Islamophobia” is “a violation of logic.”

He blasted the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) in 2013 saying that the word “fails solely to inclusion of the word ‘unfounded.’ Thus, well-founded fear, mistrust or hatred of Islam does not constitute Islamophobia.”

He also went on to point out, “Millions of non-Muslims have very real reasons to fear Islam and Muslim violence, and cannot reasonably be described as ‘Islamophobes,” he said. “Furthermore, any investigation into the fear of Islam, is denounced as ‘Islamophobia.’ Thus, the definition of Islamophobia is circular, a violation of logic.”

This doesn’t stop the irrational members of CAIR, who follow the murderous founder of Islam, Mohamed. The CAIR site also claims that it envisions “a time when being Muslim carries a positive connotation and Islam has an equal place among many faiths in America’s pluralistic society.”

Sorry, but Islam does not deserve an “equal” place among many faiths. In fact, the Bible teaches the only true faith. Jesus said He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life and that no man comes to the Father but by Him. He doesn’t make room for “other” faiths. There is no king, but King Jesus!

Let’s consider the closed-mindedness of Islam. Their own book shows that they are against Christians and all infidels (non-Muslim believers. Their own history demonstrates that they believe they are superior and that they have the right to destroy all those who will not name the name of Allah and recognize the demonically possessed, thieving murderer Mohamed as a true prophet. Here’s what CAIR is really all about. Trust me, you will want to watch this.

The third President of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, had to deal with the Islamists in the Barbary Wars, understanding that these people could not be reasoned with.

We’ve seen how the Europeans have appeased the followers of Islam, but many have recently taken to the streets to rid their land of these totalitarian devils. The question now is, when are Americans going to amass in the street to put this ideology where it belongs? As Dr. Rich Swier rightly points out, this is nothing more than a “hit list for Islamic State lone wolves,” similar to the of the Southern Poverty Law Center, whose alleged “hate list” has been used to target conservative groups. The most recent target was the Family Research Council back in August of 2012, when gunman Floyd Lee Corkins II entered the FRC and planned on killing as many people as possible and smearing Chick-fil-a sandwiches in their faces because of their stance against homosexuality.

Funny, I don’t see Corkins’ name on the SPLC hate list, do you? He’s their poster boy one would think. After all, he didn’t do what he did out of love, did he? He did it out of… hate.

Here’s the list given by Hamas-CAIR at their website. Your’s truly apparently didn’t make the cut for some odd reason, but plenty of others did, and God has given them a place to speak out against the Mohammedan death cult.

Ali Sina A member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations, Sina believes, “there is NOTHING good in Islam and that it is all evil.”

Allen West A former Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives. Allen believes, “Islam does not coexist.”…

Ashraf Rameleh A member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations. When speaking about the September 11th attacks he said “they are not terrorists, they are jihad. They are for the Quran.”

Babu Suseelani a member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations. In 2012 Suseelan told an audience “If we do not kill the bacteria, the bacteria will kill us. Muslims will breed like rats and they will be a majority.”…

Brigitte Gabriel The head of Act for America. Gabriel has said, “America and the West are doomed to failure in this war unless they stand up and identify the real enemy: Islam.”……

Clare Lopez Lopez is the vice president for issues and analysis at the Center for Security Policy. She also a board member at the Clarion Project. In 2013, Lopez told an audience, “When people in other bona fide religions follow their doctrines they become better people — Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, Jews. When Muslims follow their doctrine, they become jihadists.”……

David Horowitz The founder of the David Horowitz Freedom Center. The Southern Poverty Law Center, a group that tracks hate in the United States, names Horowitz “the godfather of the modern anti-Muslim movement.”

David Yerushalmi A co-founder of the American Freedom Law Center and employee of the Center for Security Policy. Yerushalmi beleives, “Our greatest enemy today is Islam.”….

Frank Gaffney The founder and president of the Center for Security Policy. Gaffney is also connected to the Washington Times, and Clarion Project. Gaffney has advocated renewing the House Un-American Activities Committee, a discredited McCarthy-era congressional committee that President Truman once described as “the most un-American thing in the country today.”

Glenn Beck Beck hosts the Glenn Beck show on the Blaze. In February, 2011, Beck hosted anti-Muslim speaker Joel Richardson on his Fox News program and the two “tied Islam to the Antichrist in the new testament.”….

John Guandolo The founder of Understanding the Threat. Guandolo is a former FBI agent who trains law enforcement officers to believe in conspiracy theories such as his beleif that CIA Director Brennan is a secret Muslim…..

Kamal Saleem A board member of Former Muslims United. In October 2012, Right Wing Watch posted a video of Saleem and noted that in that video, “Saleem alleged that Obama’s top speech writer and Sasha and Malia’s babysitter are both Islamic fundamentalists that are wielding secret power.”……

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) A Minnesota Republican, Bachmann is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives. In June 2012, Bachmann led a group of House Republicans on a series of five letters to federal inspectors alleging that the Muslim Brotherhood was infiltrating the U.S. government. The allegations primarily centered on an aide to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and were soundly rejected by Republican leadership…….

Nonie Darwish A founder of Former Muslims United. Darwish asserts that “Islam should be fought and should be conquered and defeated and annihilated.”

Pamela Geller The caustic mouthpiece of the U.S. Islamophobia network, Geller believes, “Hitler was inspired by Islam.”She blogs at Atlas Shrugs and is a leader with the American Freedom Defense Initiative, Jihad Watch, and Stop the Islamization of Nations. Note: Geller also heads Stop Islamization of America, but this entity is identified as an AFDI project.

Rep. Peter King (R-.N.Y.) Peter King represents a district centered in New York’s, Long Island. He served as chairman of the U.S. House Homeland Security Committee from 2010-2012. King has maintained that “80%, 85% of the mosques in this country are controlled by Islamic fundamentalists,” and that average Muslims “are loyal,” but “don’t come forward, they don’t tell the police what they know”. Additionally in 2007, Representative King said, “Unfortunately, we have too many mosques in this country.”

Robert “Raphael” Shore A member of Clarion Project’s board of directors…….

Robert Spencer A prolific member of the U.S. Islamophobia network, Spencer runs the Jihad Watch web site and is also connected with the David Horowitz Freedom Center, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, and Stop Islamization of Nations. Spencer has referred to Islam’s Prophet Muhammad as a “con man. Someone who is knowing [sic] that what he is saying is false, but is fooling his followers.” In the same video he asserts, “From a historical standpoint, it is not even clear that Muhammad existed.”

Tom Trento Trento is the founder and director of The United West. He believes mosques exist to wage a “cultural jihad” against America….

Wafa Sultan Sultan is connected to both Former Muslims United and Stop Islamization of Nations. She says, “I don`t see any difference between radical Islam and regular Islam…You cannot be American and Muslim at the same time.”

Walid Shoebat The founder of the Forum for Middle East Understanding, Shoebat is the author of “The case for Islamophobia,” a book published in March 2013. Shoebat’s training and speaking events are promoted using his credentials and his “background” as a former PLO terrorist who converted to Christianity. In 2011, CNN researchers “found no evidence” to support Shoebat’s trademark claim of being a “former PLO terrorist.”

Former Lieutenant General William Boykin A board member of the Oak Initiative. Boykin asserts that “[Islam] should not be protected under the First Amendment,” that there should be “no mosques in America,” that Islam is a “totalitarian way of life,” and that there can be no interfaith dialogue or cooperation between Muslims and Christians.

While I cannot speak as to who all of these people are, one thing is for sure, this is nothing more than intimidation against them. Hamas-CAIR be warned that if any of these people are attacked physically in any way, you will be held accountable for it. I can tell you this though, since it is a hit list, I stand alongside such men as Marine veteran Nick Powers, who said if there is an attack on us, “there will be no mercy.” There, you’ve been warned!…..(see the “hit list” in its entirety…)

HEY, this investigative journalist has a personal shout out to CAIR: you deeply “wound” by leaving this blog off your list! In fact, you guys are losing your mojo, having also left off a top associate of this site – Dave Gaubatz! You know, the counter terror operative who OPENLY outed CAIR via his DEEP undercover investigations, resulting in many of the exhibits used in the Holy Land Foundation terror trial! As a matter of record, these same Islamic jihadists from CAIR issued a fatwa on his head, even going viral on FB with a head chopping!

Left: Cartoon posted to Facebook depicting David Gaubatz being beheaded - Right: Gaubatz on duty in Iraq.

Left: Cartoon posted to Facebook depicting David Gaubatz being beheaded – Right: David Gaubatz on duty in Iraq.

MuslimMafia.jpg

IN any case, will let Dave know of his exclusion….will “commiserate” together…misery likes company. Besides, what does one have to do to warrant a “distinguished” place on your list….inquiring minds demand to know…LOL…

 

 

43 Islamists On Trial For Euro-Terror Plot…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Fouad Belkacem…on trial in Belgium for recruiting ISIS terrorists etc…. 
Anjem Choundary

Anjem Choudary….spokesman for Islamist group, Islam4UK….with Omar Bakri Muhammad, he helped form an Islamist organisation, al-Muhajiroun.

DUE to all the headlines devoted to ISIS via the “mainstream” media, and the requisite pooh poohing of its relationship to Islam and attendant Brotherhood Mafia groups (the leader of the free world is in the forefront of this lie), it behooves those of us who understand the real dangers to shout from the rooftops. Nothing less will suffice.

IN this regard, not unlike many commentaries at this site, thus tying in the deleterious and earth shaking effects of the multiculti mischief makers, the following report from WND is more than noteworthy. As is said, the (Islamist) chickens have come home, to the west, to roost.

AND the fact that this investigative journalist was called upon to add her assessment to the current terror trial in Belgium, well, it was not unexpected.

43 Islamists On Trial For Euro-Terror Plot – World Net Daily

Under the banner of multiculturalism, European countries have supported Muslims through immigration provisions, allowances for Islamic law and special advocacy for mosques and schools.

In the U.K., there are entire regions dominated by Muslims that have been labeled no-go zones.

The Gatestone Institute reported there are some 650,000 Muslims in Belgium and 925,000 in the Netherlands, about 6 percent of each nation’s population. According to the report, only France’s Muslim percentage is larger, at 7 percent.

But multiculturalism has worn thin in several nations. Officials have curbed some outreach efforts and clamped down on homegrown jihad, concluding now that the country is harmed when major segments of the populations don’t assimilate.

In Belgium, for example, prosecutors in the Antwerp criminal court have asked that accused terrorist ringleader Fouad Belkacem be sentenced to 15 years in prison for allegedly recruiting at least 30 Belgian Muslims to fight with ISIS in Syria.

Belkacem, also known as Abu Imran, is the reported leader of Shariah4Belgium. Forty-two other men are also standing trial with him.

WND’s efforts to contact Belkacem’s lawyers for comment have not been successful.

Antwerp-based terrorism analyst and Arab linguist Pieter Van Ostaeyen says Belkacem is an influential cleric.

“Belkacem seems to have been an inspiration for a quite large group of people, indeed. Several men and women also converted to Islam because of his preaching. Mind, though, that he was already imprisoned before ISIS came into existence,” Van Ostaeyen said.

Partners in spreading Shariah

United West president and intelligence analyst Tom Trento points out Belkacem has worked with British Muslim cleric Anjem Choudary to promote Islam in Europe.

Choudary, who praised the perpetrators of the Sept. 11 attack and the 2005 attack on London, wants Islamic law, or Shariah, to be implemented throughout the U.K.

In an interview, Choudary acknowledged he knows Belkacem but doubted the Belgian recruited fighters for ISIS, because he’s been in jail since February.

“It’s very strange to me that Belgium is putting on this trial at all. They’ve charged 43 people but only about eight or nine of them are actually in court,” Choudary said. “It seems to be a very politically motivated trial designed to tarnish the reputation of these Muslims.”

Choudary dismissed the fear that ISIS fighters will return home to Belgium and other European countries.

“Once they go to Syria, it’s really unlikely that any of them will return. Some have already become martyrs dying on the battlefield. However, many of them are having their passports revoked and are essentially left without a country to return to,” Choudary said.

He claimed it’s “fantasy” to think such fighters would come from the U.S. then return.

But there are already reports of ISIS fighters returning home to Europe and to the U.S., said Clare Lopez, vice president for research and analysis at the U. S. Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C.

“Some intelligence community officials have expressed concern that ISIS could have a presence in the United States. We know that any number of jihadis, perhaps more than a 100 from the United States and thousands from Europe, have gone off the fight in jihad in Syria and Iraq,” Lopez said. “We know that some of them have returned.”

Authorities estimate 300 Belgians have traveled to the Middle East to fight with ISIS. Muslims from other European countries have also joined ISIS. A recent BBC News report said there are as many as 3,000 Europeans fighting with ISIS in Syria or Iraq.

Van Ostaeyen said there is general concern of rising violent jihadist activity in Europe after the June attack on the Jewish Museum in Brussels by a French Muslim.

Israel-based intelligence analyst Adina Kutnicki said the concern over ISIS is well founded. However, Kutnicki told WND in an interview that the jihadists’ point of origin should not be the focus.

“Firstly, whether they are recruited in Belgium, or any other Western nation, is not the issue. The fact that Islamic jihad has come full circle – spreading its wings from the Mideast, back into Europe, only to re-enter the Mideast – is in order to fulfill the main mandate. That’s the reestablishment of the caliphate,” Kutnicki said.

Former Air Force counter-intelligence officer and terrorism analyst Dave Gaubatz said any effort to downplay the ISIS threat to the U.S. is seriously misguided.

“ISIS and other Islamic terrorist groups, motivated by their Islamic ideology, are the world’s most dangerous threat. ISIS has money, followers, a military and a strategy for world conquest,” Gaubatz said.

Lopez emphasized ISIS fighters returning to Europe and the U.S. have two distinct advantages.

“Not only are these the most devout and practicing of all Muslims, but when they return from those battlefields they now have hardened battle skills that they learned and trained in over there. Further, they possess passports from European countries from which they may or may not need a visa to enter the U.S.,” Lopez said.

The ISIS motivation

Gaubatz said ISIS and like-minded groups are driven by one ingredient – hatred for Christians and Jews.

“Islamic-based organizations, terrorist groups and their supporters hate the Jews, Israel and Americans. When we hear them say they want to wipe out Israel, they’re serious. The U.S. has to take their threats seriously,” Gaubatz said.

Kutnicki agreed that ISIS and other jihadist groups are targeting the U.S.

“The U.S. is in grave danger because the Brotherhood Mafia (Muslim Brotherhood) is embedded in all of the relevant power centers. This goal of domination is why there are jihadi cells preparing for battle in multiple training camps. Jamaat Al-Fuqra is in the forefront on the Sunni side, and Hezbollah camps on the Shia,” Kutnicki said.
Gaubatz believes an attack on the U.S. is coming, and it may be a crushing blow.

“America will soon be attacked by ISIS, and the attacks will be through a series of simultaneous attacks across the U.S. The terrorists know we don’t have the leadership to defend against such attacks,” he said.

He said taking the ISIS threat seriously means considering what a Shariah-based government would be like.

“Look at Saudi Arabia or spend a few weeks under the Taliban. Or, spend some time with ISIS. Neither Muslims nor non-Muslims have any rights under Shariah law. You and your children’s lives can be taken away with almost no proof that you violated Shariah,” Gaubatz said.

Gaubatz believes it’s essential that the U.S. preserve its relationship with Israel.

“If Israel falls, America will fall. The Israelis are America’s only true friends in the Middle East and elsewhere, and the people have to ensure our leaders never forget this fact,” Gaubatz said.

CLEAR as a bell….case closed!

CIA’s BRENNAN, A CONVERT TO ISLAM, PUSHED TALIBAN TERROR RELEASE! WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?(EXPLOSIVE VIDEO)Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


John Brennan: Pushed for the release of five Taliban leaders since 2011.

John Brennan: Pushed for the release of five Taliban leaders since 2011.

ON matters of grave import, this site checks with its own trusted sources before reporting on explosive information, even though often drawing its own (blog) commentary conclusions. So, as a matter of record, back in February 2013, it was cited: yes, John Brennan indeed converted to Islam and there was no reason to believe otherwise.

In line with this information, the following commentaries were noted and they have now come full circle:

Circle One:

But to truly understand how the circle formed between the Islamist-in-Chief and his choice for Director of the CIA, one must also go back to the oh so “mysterious” death, one which took place during Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s first term.

Circle Two:

Not only that, but in what alternative universe is it acceptable for the Commander-in-Chief’s CIA pick to eschew the Bill of Rights? Indeed, in a fully primed anti-American one – that universe!

Circle Three:

Which brings us back to another ! “mysterious” death, that of investigative reporter Michael Hastings. How many understood Brennan’s related footprints and fingerprints?

Circle Four:

Hence, unraveling the patch quilt connection between Obama’s “mysterious”, non-transparent past and Brennan, sitting atop the CIA, comes into sharp relief.

Therefore, demanding the release of Taliban commanders, under the reign of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, appeared to be only a matter of time. An anti-American Commander-in-Chief colludes with an equally Islamist-driven CIA Director, a match made in anti-American hell!

CIA Director Accused of Converting To Islam Pushed For Release of Taliban Commanders

The outrage over the exchange of five top level Taliban commanders for Bowe Bergdahl, a deserter at best and traitor who helped the Taliban murder his fellow soldiers at worst, is palpable. The role of CIA Director John Brennan in pushing for this deal could bolster the claims made by former FBI Agent John Guandolo last year that Brennan converted to Islam while a station chief in Saudi Arabia in the 1990′s, as relayed byShoebat.com.

According to the Daily Beast, Brennan – along with another interesting figure – have been pushing for the release of these five Taliban terrorist commanders since at least 2011:

For years, CIA Director John Brennan and White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough were part of a small group of Obama administration officials who believed that five relatively high-ranking Taliban commanders could be released under certain conditions with manageable risk of harm to American interests. For years, senior defense and intelligence officials disagreed—and were poised to block a potential trade for the Taliban five and American hostage Bowe Bergdahl.

By 2014, many of the skeptics had left the Obama administration; Brennan, McDonough, and their allies assumed new roles at the very top of the Obama administration; and the White House and its allies at State were able to convince their replacements to sign off on the deal.

“All of us on the National Security team were unanimous in supporting and recommending that we take this opportunity,” National Security Advisor Susan Rice told CNN Friday. But for years, that was not the case and Brennan and McDonough were opposed to other senior officials.

The logic Brennan used when making his case was suspect as well. Moreover, two figures that have by and large been Obama loyalists even objected to the deal:

Back in 2011, the idea these five prisoners could be released safely was opposed by Leon Panetta, who served in Obama’s first term as secretary of defense and director of the CIA. James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, was also opposed. But Brennan and others argued that the Taliban five were primarily focused on fighting against other Afghans and never had a record of attacking Americans outside of their own country. They had extensive ties to al Qaeda, but were focused on their own civil war, not international jihad.

As Shoebat.com has reported, when it comes to U.S. national security, Brennan has often demonstrated a desire to defer to the umbrella group under which the Taliban essentially resides.

Also in 2011, Muslim Brotherhood agent and attorney Farhana Khera sent Brennan a letter imploring him to create a task force that would “purge” the training materials used to educate law enforcement and homeland security officials. Materials deemed offensive to Muslim Brotherhood individuals and groups (America’s enemies) would be taken out. Not only did Brennan promptly respond to Khera but he granted her much of what she wanted.

Earlier this year, Shoebat.com relayed and analyzed the findings of Seymour Hersh and discovered that Brennan’s successor – David Petraeus – was in charge of a weapons trafficking operation run out of Benghazi that was designed to ship weapons to Syrian rebels. The country of Qatar funded this operation in conjunction with Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

It’s rather obvious that the agenda of funding the rebels has remained in place. As such, Brennan is clearly interested in aiding in the effort. Earlier this week, Shoebat.com reported on the likelihood that the five Taliban commanders released to Qatar would actually become assets for that country’s interests in Syria.

Based on these new developments relative to the controversial release of Bowe Bergdahl – along with Brennan’s interest in pushing for it – the interview with Guandolo during which he made the explosive claim that Brennan converted to Islam takes on added significance. Here are the relevant portions of it:

interviewed Guandolo nearly a year after he made that shocking claim. If you listen, you will know that Guandolo is adamantly sticking by his story.

DO pay sharp attention to the embedded interview by Tom Trento, another of this site’s contacts.

IF anything, and even though it appears as if the criminal regime of Obama Inc. will make good on its plans to bring down America, the fact of the matter is that a large (patriotic) segment of the population (as well as other westerners, ex pats included) now know why so many anti-American decisions have co-opted the People’s House.

In fact, one such geo-political analyst who holds Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s (Islamic) feet to the fire, none other than Caroline Glick, is an American-Israeli whose voice is heard around the world. Deservedly so.

And if Glick’s op-ed in the Jerusalem Post doesn’t expose the Islamist-in-Chief’s mendacity, heralding the release of Talibans killers as “justifiable” policy, well, little else will suffice:

What was it about the Bergdahl trade tipped the scales? Why is this decision different from Obama’s other foreign policy decisions? For instance, why is the public outraged now when it wasn’t outraged in the aftermath of the jihadist assault on US installations in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, in which US Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were murdered? Politically, Obama emerged unscathed from failures in every area he has engaged. From Iraq to Iran to Syria to Libya to Russia and beyond, he has never experienced the sort of across the board condemnation he is now suffering. His political allies and media supporters always rallied to his side. They always explained away his failures.

So what explains the outcry? Why are people like Senator Dianne Feinstein, who have been supportive of Obama’s nuclear appeasement of Iran, up in arms over the Bergdahl swap? There are three aspects of the Bergdahl deal that distinguish it from the rest of Obama’s foreign policy blunders.

First, the Bergdahl deal was conducted in an unlawful manner and the White House readily acknowledged that it knowingly broke the law by not informing Congress 30 days in advance of the swap. This brazen lawbreaking angered Obama’s loyal allies in Congress who, like Feinstein, were insulted by his behavior.

Second, Obama initiated the story and made himself the sole owner of the swap.

Obama didn’t have to make the Bargdahl swap a story about his foreign policy. He chose to. As commentators have argued, if Obama had simply ordered the Defense Department to issue a press release announcing the swap the story probably wouldn’t have caused more than the normal amount of controversy.

And whereas Benghazi was a story about jihadists attacking, and Obama was pilloried – and defended – for his response to an act of aggression initiated by US enemies, Obama presented the Bergdahl swap as his brainchild. So it is impossible to blame anyone else for this move, or wish it away.

As the administration saw it, the public would rally around the leader over this feel-good story.

Obama obviously believed that the Bergdahl trade would help him to surmount his opponents’ criticism over the Veterans’ Administration scandal and other issues.

And this is where his failure to understand the disposition of the American people comes into play.

The third aspect of the swap that distinguishes it from his other foreign policy failures is that by organizing the ceremony at the Rose Garden, and making it a story about himself, Obama denied his supporters the tools they have used in every other instance to explain away his failures and justify his counterproductive decisions.

Obama sailed into office by presenting himself as a non-ideological pragmatist. Obama recognized that the public was tired of foreign policies based on ideology. George W. Bush lost public support for the war in Iraq, and for his foreign policy goal of bringing freedom to the Islamic world more generally, when his ideologically charged rhetoric of American exceptionalism stopped matching the situation on the ground.

A year after Bush declared an end to major combat operations in Iraq, the sight of US military contractors being lynched in Fallujah soured the public on American exceptionalism. In Obama, they hoped that they found the antidote to Bush – a man who promised to replace ideology with hard-nosed pragmatism.

In the event, Obama turned out to be even more driven by ideology than Bush was. Obama is the anti-Bush not because he matches Bush’s ideology with pragmatism. He is the anti-Bush because he matches Bush’s grand foreign policy based on American exceptionalism with his own grand foreign policy based on American moral deficiency.

He made this clear most recently at his commencement address at West Point last month where he stipulated that “American influence is always stronger when we lead by example. We can’t exempt ourselves from the rules that apply to everybody else… .”

As to American exceptionalism, Obama sneered, “What makes us exceptional is not our ability to flout international norms and the rule of law; it is our willingness to affirm them through our actions.”

But while Obama’s critics have pointed out the radicalism at the heart of his foreign policy from the outset of his presidency, his supporters were always able to explain it away.

Obama’s appeasement of the Iranians was pragmatic.

We don’t want a war there, they say.

His support for the Muslim Brotherhood is not radical. It too is pragmatic, they soothe.

And so on and so forth.

As for Benghazi, in the fog of war, the media preferred its commitment to Obama’s reelection over its responsibility to report the truth of what happened.

Obama’s success in getting away with serial foreign policy failures, and his success in hiding the radical ideological basis of his decisions has always owed to his supporters’ ability to plausibly deny both the failures and the ideological motivation for his actions.

His Rose Garden announcement made such spin all but impossible. Americans are not particularly interested in foreign policy. But there are a few things that they won’t buy.

They won’t buy that a man who comes to the White House sporting a Taliban beard and praising Allah in Arabic is a normal American father.

They won’t buy spin that describes a deserter as an exemplary soldier.

They don’t want to free five senior terrorists and mass murderers in order to buy Bergdahl’s release.

In believing that the public would side with him and Bergdahl and Bergdahl’s dad against critics of the deal, Obama showed that for all his propaganda prowess, he doesn’t understand the public.

The public didn’t oppose the war in Iraq because they thought the US is morally deficient. They opposed the war in Iraq because Bush wasn’t winning it. And the public believed that Bush’s push for the abstract goal of democracy lay at the heart of the failure on the ground.

For nearly six years, Obama and his supporters have managed to fend off allegations that his foreign policy is even more ideological – and far more radical – than Bush’s by channeling the public’s aversion to pie-in-the-sky rhetoric and obfuscating facts. But the Bergdahl announcement at the Rose Garden ended all of that.

The reason Obama is being denounced for the Bergdahl swap is because he orchestrated a radical spectacle. Try as he may to castigate critics of the deal as partisan and cynical, Obama cannot pretend away the fact that the ceremony he arranged and oversaw was an open celebration of an American defeat, by the US president and the unsympathetic parents of an accused deserter.

And worse still for Obama’s protestations of pragmatism, his decision to take sole ownership of the swap revealed his ideological myopia. Only someone blinded by a worldview in which America is morally deficient could have thought that Americans would join him and the Bergdahls in celebrating an American defeat.

And now everyone knows what makes him tick.

MOST inherently, either via impeachment or court-martial – whatever gets the job done – this much is for sure: Barack HUSSEIN Obama is the first head that has to roll. In tandem, several top players have to fall in line too, including Brennan and a gaggle of others. And even though the (mega) damage done to the nation may never be fully reversed, it doesn’t obviate the necessity for national honor to be restored. 

FOR if the POTUS absconds from prosecution (as well as his henchpeople), even though he perpetrated high crimes and misdemeanors, is America, any longer, governed by the rule of law? Furthermore, if allowed to go unpunished, what makes America any different from so many nations ruled by juntas