WOE To All “Bitter Clingers”: Yes, They’re Coming To CONFISCATE Your Guns! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Getting caught with ones pants down – skirts alike – is surely an embarrassing moment, but it can be enlightening for the onlookers, voyeurism beside the point. Such is the case with hot button issues like gun confiscation, aka gun control. 

As patriots bear witness to leftists going postal, it behooves those who cherish liberty and freedom to take their threats to heart, even when seemingly irrational – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/03/leftists-go-postal-over-gun-control-threatening-to-kill-legal-gun-owners-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/They are deadly serious.

In fact, the left has been gunning for the Second Amendment for decades, and has no intent of letting up, especially with the Radical-in-Chief shielding their backs. But it is also the case, a weakened POTUS is less likely to own the political capital required to get the job done, if patriots keep up all due pressure – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/05/15/regime-gone-wild-obama-inc-repeatedly-caught-with-their-pants-down-where-is-this-leading-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Nevertheless, stay alert to the signs, so you don’t get caught with YOUR pants down!

In the main, their quest is endless, even if abusing the kiddies is the primary way forward. For if this is not the case, then how could the following take place? – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/16/gun-control-madness-its-after-shocks-directly-related-to-students-gun-stores-too-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

Most ominously, when the biggest criminal gang in the world, the UN, is the POTUS’s “go” to address, then Americans (westerners alike) have no choice but to remain hyper-vigilant – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/28/obama-crew-march-in-lock-step-with-un-thugs-chiefly-to-disarm-americans-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Washington’s current leadership are evil incarnate, as they ignore the purview of Congress in matters requiring its assent – http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/kerry-arms-treaty/2013/06/03/id/507825?s=al&promo_code=13B4C-1…thus, hewing to UN dictates!

So while the following is not good news, it can be utilized to turn the electoral screws on all those seeking to gut the Constitutional right to bear arms. A silver “bullet” in appropriate hands.

‘Ooops… Hot mic reveals lawmakers intent to confiscate guns’

NJ3

Please comment on this article at Canada Free Press

By Douglas J. Hagmann

14 May 2013: Every American gun owner, regardless of the state in which you live, is presently or will be the target of gun confiscation. A state-by-state framework of confiscation is being erected in front of us all to strip us of our rights under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Proof of this nefarious intent of disarming citizens was serendipitously caught by a “hot” microphone at the conclusion of the May 9, 2013 meeting of the New Jersey State Legislature.

At the conclusion of the New Jersey Senate Budget & Appropriations Committee meeting last Thursday, an open microphone caught three state senators, identified by voice as Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg, Assistant Majority Leader Sandra Cunningham, Senate Majority Whip Linda Greenstein, and at least one staff member talking candidly about their intent to confiscate all guns from the people they serve. It should be noted that Senator Loretta Weinberg is the chief proponent of the anti-gun legislation being moved through the New Jersey State Senate.

For anyone doubting the bitter contempt these legislators hold for gun owners and pro-Constitutionalists, a YouTube video that captured the “open microphone moment” is available for review here.Although some of the candid conversation is a bit difficult to discern due to the ambient noise, their message is clear. “We need[ed] a bill that was going to confiscate, confiscate, confiscate,”stated one high ranking senate member. “They don’t care about the bad guys.  All they want to do is have their ‘little guns’ and do whatever they want with them,” added another in an obviously demeaning manner. Another conceded that gun owners do, in fact, want to keep guns out of the hands of criminals, but added that “they don’t have any regulations to do it.” Oh really?

During the second hour of The Hagmann & Hagmann Report that aired last night, we interviewed the highly credentialed Scott Bach, Esq., Executive Director of the Association of the New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs who explained the draconian laws being written and passed in the State of New Jersey. “Clearly, this is about nothing less than disarming the American public, and the current battleground is in New Jersey,”  stated Mr. Bach. “You might not be experiencing it in your state… yet, but you will. It’s just a matter of time.”

We must do everything we can to preserve, protect and defend our Second Amendment rights, or we will lose much more. Regardless of where you live, the fight is coming to you, if it has not yet arrived. We must be proactive, and yes, we can make our voices heard to counter the utter contempt of these lawmakers regardless of your state of residence – while we still have the chance. Let’s hold these opponents to our constitutional rights accountable for their words and actions.

The time is now, and the fight has been left to us. Make your views known and your voice heard by contacting the NJ Senate Majority Office by phone (609-847-3700) and/or fax (609-633-7254). Do it before it disappears as an option.

More information: Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs – A grassroots organization fighting to preserve our Second Amendment rights.

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/8378

Chillingly, did you know that the Radical-in-Chief has a “litmus test” for his military commanders? In fact, this topic was duly explored herein – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/06/01/u-s-chairman-of-joint-chiefs-of-staff-fires-a-decorated-commander-the-costs-of-teaching-the-truth-about-islamic-jihad-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …and Gen Dempsey was its star. Most tellingly, the wayward Commander-in-Chief doesn’t care a whit about their loyalty to America, but quite the opposite, asking: How willing are they to shoot American citizens? Think this is crazy talk? NOT so fast. 

‘OBAMA REPORTED TO BE DISMISSING MILITARY LEADERS WHO WILL NOT FIRE ON CIVILIANS IF ORDERED’

Posted 01.26.13 by Greg Campbell, TPNN Contributor

By Greg Campbell
TPNN Contributor

Noble Peace Prize nominee and humanitarian Dr. Jim Garrow is not known for outrageous accusations. Dedicated to his humanitarian work, he has not ventured into the spotlight for a moment other than to write a book about the trouble of China’s one-child policy. That has changed as he has recently divulged information he says he received from a former senior military leader in the Obama Administration.

Garrow announced,

“I have just been informed by a former senior military leader that Obama is using a new ‘litmus test’ in determining who will stay and who must go in his military leaders. Get ready to explode folks. ‘The new litmus test of leadership in the military is if they will fire on US citizens or not.’ Those who will not are being removed.”

Dr. Jim Garrow has spent the last 16 years rescuing baby girls from the harsh realities and near-certain death of China’s one-child-per-couple rule. From his efforts to raise awareness of the problem and his willingness to facilitate the adoption of these infants, it is estimated that he has saved 40,000 babies and has been considered for a Nobel Peace Prize. While he has not released who his source is, Garrow has maintained a pretty low profile and seems to not be associated with any fringe ideologies.

It is a bold accusation, but one that fits into a bigger picture. As America becomes, arguably, more and more polarized, states have discussed secession and state and county officials all across the country have publicly claimed that they will refuse to enforce executive orders that violate the Second Amendment.

Whether one agrees that America should be so polarized or not, the fact remains that this revelation comes at a time when America is deeply divided on a variety of issues ranging from gun rights to the basic question of how to solve any one of our fiscal crises. With such deep divides, the issue of secession has been discussed and people all across the country have expressed worry at a looming federal presence.

Added to the volatile mix of ideologies is the recent executive orders that were aimed at enacting gun control measures and the near-constant threat of outright bans on many firearms. Such speculation has fueled dissent and discussion amongst mainstream Americans as to how far the government ought to be allowed to go.

The Washington Free Beacon recently reported that the head of Central Command, Marine Corps Gen. James Mattis is being dismissed by President Obama and will leave his post in March. While unwilling to divulge the source, Garrow stated, “The man who told me this is one of America’s foremost military heroes.”

If what Garrow says is true, than this is sure to rouse anger and distrust from conservatives across the country who have accused the president of exceeding his authority on numerous occasions and have voiced concern over sweeping policies that are of dubious legalities. If Obama is preparing to stock his inner-circle with only those that will follow his orders beyond what should rightfully be expected from soldiers who have sworn to protect this nation, than America may see a turbulent four years.

The true irony of Obama’s presidency is that while reports such as the aforementioned have surfaced and as drone attacks continue across the globe and families mourn the loved ones lost as a result of the Justice Department’s flood of weapons to Mexican cartels, President Obama actually received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2009.

http://www.tpnn.com/obama-reported-to-be-dismissing-military-leaders-who-will-not-fire-on-civilians-if-ordered/

And those who dismiss the notion that martial law couldn’t happen in the streets of America, especially when a “crisis” presents itself, it is already a done deal – http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/05/pentagon-unilaterally-grants-itself-authority-over-civil-disturbances-2648202.html?utm_medium=verticalresponse&utm_campaign=&utm_content=beforeit39snews-verticalresponse&utm_source=direct-b4in.info&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2Fc4V2. Moreover, it was previously posited at this blog – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/23/signs-of-civil-war-could-lead-to-martial-law-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Indeed, Boston’s jihad tested the waters – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/05/11/the-opening-of-a-pandoras-box-martial-law-via-jihad-in-boston-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

So “bitter clingers”, yes, cling to your guns like a life raft. Live free or die. It’s that stark. That clear. Deadly serious.

10 thoughts on “WOE To All “Bitter Clingers”: Yes, They’re Coming To CONFISCATE Your Guns! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

  1. Adina
    You have been on fire with your posts lately. G-d bless you for your efforts.

    You are correct – the corrupt regime in the USA cannot function with armed citizens, so they must be disarmed.

    My father, a WWII veteran who fought the Nazis, always kept his shotgun at the ready. He was willing to defend his family and his property.

    I owned a .50 caliber weapon which was unfortunately lost in a boating accident last year. Many of my friends have had the same experience.

    Your posts lately remind me of a biblical quote: “Exodus 22:2-3 2 “If the thief is found breaking in, and he is struck so that he dies, there shall be no guilt for his bloodshed.

    The “thieves” are breaking in on our personal freedom and liberty. We must be prepared to defend it.

    Keep up the good work! There are many of us out here who think the way you do. May G-d preserve Israel.

    As to Obama and Holder and the IRS – you have my full name on this site. Come and get me.

  2. Weinberg? Greenstein? Adina, how about a piece that explains why our fellow Jews behave this way?

    Sent from my iPhone

  3. yes the Boston event was a false flag. the military type sweep looking for the “second” bomber was pure practice. I doubt they would have rallied like that without previous planning.

    I call it a false flag because the government refuses to be open about it or the subsequent sweep. again there is much hidden and the media is part of the operation. when the locals came out in a demonstration to praise the police for abusing all the normal freedoms and rights of American citizens I conclude was also staged.

  4. Thank you again, Adina. This is getting so scary… just everything.

    The fact that New Jersey seems to be shaping up as the first (or one of the first) to take such aggressive action against our Second Amendment Rights doesn’t surprise me. I wouldn’t be a bit surprised. I’d bet that the “conservative” governor of that state is deeply involved. Even before his lukewarm speech at the RNC (tepid?) and his touching, overly grateful gestures toward the Occupant of the Oval Office (I refuse to call that man my POTUS), Pam Geller was reporting in her excellent blog, “Atlas Shrugs” about his decision to appoint Radical Islamists to positions as judges on important courts, and how he and his wife often host Istar dinners (is that what they’re called??) with many of his closest Muslim friends at the Governor’s mansion. What a swell, multicultural guy. I only hope that citizens will have a good grasp on this information, and its implications, long before 2016. It’s becoming increasingly difficult to figure out who the “good guys” are…

    @nucleon2000, I had the exact same question for Adina quite a while ago (re: why so many Jews, in the US and in Israel, seem to behave in ways that are counter to their own best interest). She really does have a lot more on that subject. I recommend that you “use” her as your resource for such questions; she’s very generous with her time and has a wealth of information on almost any subject (and if she’s not sure, she almost certainly knows someone who has the answer).

    Adina…. before I go, I’ve been wondering about your opinion on something, so I may as well ask: We’re all aware of the many, many examples of voter fraud that went on in the 2012 election…. Information continues to trickle out. I was just wondering whether you thought that, had we had a legitimate election (if there is such a thing) that it would have actually made a difference? (i.e: different ‘folks’ living in the White House) Can the US ever again have a “fair” electtion? Would appreciate your thoughts…

    • As to Christie, he may well be a fiscal conservative, but in every other way he is a leftist at heart. Not only that, but he is knee deep with Muslim related terror entities, posing under the umbrella of CAIR etc. In a nutshell, if he is ever nominated for the POTUS, I would advise to just sit the election out, rather than vote for a Repub who is every bit as dangerous ideologically as any Demster. He is akin to Grover Norquist, a very dangerous Repub power broker, who shelters his aims under a fiscal conservative umbrella.
      Bottom line: I can foresee Christie allowing Shariah Law to creep in, and eventually consume Constitutional Law.

  5. Pingback: Russian/Foreign Troops Inside America; FEMA Detention Camps & Agenda 21: Training For MARTIAL LAW Against U.S. Citizens! Commentary BY Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  6. Pingback: MARTIAL LAW PLANS RATCHETED UP IN THE U.S.. What Does Obama Inc. Have In Store For “Non-Compliant” Citizens & Others? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  7. Pingback: FEDERALIZING STATE POLICE & COLORADANS SEEK FREEDOM FROM WASHINGTON’S GRIP: Five Counties Vote For SECESSION & Montana “Up In Arms”…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

Leave a comment