HUSSEIN Obama Shields (Accessory To) Boko Haram’s Genocide:Orders U.S. Special Forces To Stand Down! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

READERS cannot help but conclude from these pages: HUSSEIN Obama is not only an enemy to America and Israel (take a peek who sat at the ‘President’s Table’ during this week’s Ramadan dinner), but to all minorities who are threatened under the boot of Islamic warfare via Shariah Law.

Islam teaches that shari’a, as God’s revealed law, perfect and eternal, is binding on individuals, society and state in all its details. By logical extension, any criticism of shari’a is heresy. Muslims who deny the validity of shari’a in any way are labeled as non-Muslims (infidels) or apostates (those who convert to another religion) by traditionalists and Islamists. As such, they face the threat of being prosecuted for apostasy, a crime that carries the death penalty in shari’a.

The mandates of shari’a are extremely harsh compared to modern Western standards. They infringe on many modern principles of human rights, religious freedom, and equality of all before the law. For example:

Hudud punishments are the severe penalities prescribed by shari’a for offenses defined as being against God himself. The punishments for these crimes are seen as divinely ordained and cannot be changed by humans. These include 100 lashes or stoning to death as punishment for adultery; 80 lashes for false accusation of adultery; amputation of limbs for theft; 40 or 80 lashes for drinking alcohol; imprisonment, amputation or death (by crucifixion in serious cases) for highway robbery; and the death penalty for apostasy from Islam. Methods of execution for apostasy can include decapitation, crucifixion, burning, strangling, drowning, impaling, and flaying. Apostates are denied a decent burial after their deaths, and the Muslims who participate in killing them are promised an eternal reward in paradise.

Discrimination on the basis of religion is fundamental to shari’a. By religious edict, Islam must be dominant; only Muslims are considered to be full citizens. Jews and Christians are defined as dhimmis (literally “protected” i.e. permitted to live). However this protection is on condition that they do not bear arms, know their lowly place in society, treat Muslims with respect, and pay a special poll tax (jizya).

Shari‘a divides the world into two opposing domains: the House of Islam (Dar al-Islam) and the House of War (Dar al-Harb). Muslims are supposed to wage jihad to change the House of War (where non-Muslims are dominant) into the House of Islam, dominated by Muslims. While some modern Muslims reject this aggressive understanding of jihad, and see it merely as a strengthening of personal faith, most agree that jihad includes defending Muslim territory and Muslims from any form of aggression; this leaves the door open to interpreting any conflict involving Muslims as a case of defensive jihad. Islamic terror groups justify their atrocities by references to the shari’a rules on jihad….read on…

THUS, it is imperative to internalize that without the Sharia’s barbaric basis, its “koshering”, Islam would cease to exist. Its bloody oxygen. Concomitantly, the chaos enveloping the world would be lessened.

IN this regard, relative to HUSSEIN Obama’s related treachery, the proofs are beyond manifest and would take more than a book to document. However, for this discussion, let us concentrate on the latest re his assistance – both active and passive – to soldiers for Allah and the rest will come full circle.

NOW, hardly a nitpicker, but isn’t it noteworthy that Barack HUSSEIN Obama (and surrogates) refuses to label the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist org, even after the UAE (and other Mid East actors) are begging him to hop on board??

SO in light of this earth shattering development – whereby certain regional  (though hardly all) players in the Mid East finally understand the grave dangers presented by the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood Mafia – there must no longer be any doubt as to what’s what.

SIMPLY put, the most dangerous man in the world is at the helm of the free world. Beyond a shadow of a doubt. Surely there are enumerable others who rate inclusion on this nefarious listing/ranking, however, none of them have the same assets at their disposal which Barack HUSSEIN Obama commands.

MORE specifically, Boko Haram has recently (March 2015) pledged its allegiance to ISIS, even though their barbarism has always been in sync with ISIS. A match made in Allah’s hellish bowels!

boko haram(Abubakar Shekau, the leader of Boko Haram, pledges allegiance to ISIS caliph Al-Baghdadi.)

IN no uncertain terms, this investigative journalist has proven that HUSSEIN Obama serves as a shield for Islamic terror hydras, Sunni and Shia alike. Specifically, on this very subject matter, a “Watchers of Weasels Award” (found under Non-Council winners, Aug. 2013) was given for said efforts via “Barack HUSSEIN Obama Acts As A Shield For Islamic Regimes: Iranian Freedom Fighters Exposed His Hand.” 

THAT being established, it was further assessed (April 2015) that while Christian heads were (still are) sawed off in Nigeria, HUSSEIN Obama backed Muhammadu Buhari, Boko Haram’s Presidential choice, a man who supports Boko Haram! Yes, he does.

AMERICANS, westerners, are you ready for some more treachery via HUSSEIN Obama, as it intersects with the aforementioned Nigerian election between President Goodluck Jonathan and former military dictator Muhammadu Buhari? If not, get a grip. Why? Well, the Islamist-in-Chief interfered in Nigeria’s election and guess which side he put America’s considerable muscle behind? And don’t let any news outlet convince you that Buhari is going to stamp out Boko Haram. That’s a damnable and Orwellian lie.

Obama Accused of Obstructing Battle against Boko Haram to Promote Axelrod’s Nigerian Muslim Client… the whole thing!


WHICH brings us to the latest crime committed by the Islamist-in-Chief ala U.S. Special Forces!

From a retired Special Forces Officer, now consulting with Rescue Christians.

In another act of brutality committed by Boko Haram The Obama Administration’s brazen disregard for human life and continued tacit support of Islamic extremists, is again highlighted by an incident revealed in an intelligence briefing given at Ft. Huachuca Arizona this morning.

This past Saturday, near the town of Damasak, Nigeria, 264 Christian men, women and children were herded into an open pit and burned alive. Seventy-eight of the victims were children. This atrocity was committed by an ISIS affiliate more commonly known as Boko Haram.

Military briefers told their listening audience (military and government intelligence personnel), that the White House had issued very specific orders that no effort was to be spared in an attempt to limit media and other humanitarian agencies from finding out just how bad the human carnage in the Middle East and Africa was becoming. A huge concern of course, is hide from the world that another genocide is happening which is either an embarrassment to Obama or Obama wishes to see the Christians massacred from so called Muslim territory. As a part of the Executive edict, was specific instructions to all military personnel, restraining them from any action or attempts to interdict these depraved killers.

Note that USAFRICOM (United States Africa Command) had received credible reports from U.S. Army Special Forces personnel operating in the area concerning the impending attack on innocents by Boko Haram. This intelligence was in the hands of AFRICOM nearly 48 hours before the actual attack took place.

If that were not sufficient cause to act; further corroborating intelligence was submitted from several indigenous resources. One of whom is rumored to be embedded with Boko Haram forces operating in the very area where this horror was committed. And yet in spite of fore knowledge well in advance of the atrocity, no action to prevent the murder of these 278 Christians was taken by American forces.

As a former Special Forces operator, several significant factors are plainly evident to me.

The first fact to catch my attention is that the briefing officer was quoted as saying that “CENTCOM gave the order” to the Special Forces personnel operating in the area. The order was given, directing US Special Operations personnel that there was to be “No Contact” with enemy combatants. This order was to be followed to the letter, regardless of what actions enemy combatants might be inflicting on the indigenous population.

If in fact CENTCOM (Central Command) did issue these orders; the question that beggars an answer, “why CENTCOM and not AFRICOM”? From a practical point of view and in light of the command structure established by the United States Military in the region; all of us know that CENTCOM is not the command authority for Africa. Rather, Africa is the responsibility of AFRICOM. So why did CENTCOM become involved?

One might draw the conclusion that CENTCOM is being tasked with a larger area of responsibility and that AFRICOM has been restricted to a lesser role on the African continent. This is not a new command factor. There was a time when CENTCOM was the command authority for several countries on the African Continent. Might we also conclude that in part this shift in command responsibility is in large part due to the poor performance record by AFRICOM in dealing with terrorist forces substantially smaller in size and capability, than those currently established in a great majority of the Middle East.

Regardless, we can conclude with absolute certainty, that in spite of what may be afoot regarding the shift in command authorities in Africa; the Obama Administration is doing all that it can to direct media and humanitarian observers focus away from the increasing reality of an impending genocide on the African continent.

The entire Obama Foreign Policy debacle would be almost laughable were it not so stark and the consequences such a catastrophic reality. Remember that Obama campaigned heavily prior to being elected for President in 2008, on the platform that he would not allow another holocaust to occur. At the time he was referring to the holocaust involving the Armenian people during the early 19th century. But of course when he made that statement, America was inebriated with the liquor of Hope!

Then in 2012, Mr. Obama again showed his true colors. Suddenly in spite of the growing evidence from the Middle East, Obama would no longer acknowledge genocide of any kind or at any time. (Past, present or future) During this time he adamantly refused to ever use the word, “genocide” and repeatedly denied that such a horror could ever again overtake mankind. Of course, shortly thereafter we began seeing graphic images as ISIS began to expand their choke-hold in the Middle East. ISIS began inflicting greater and greater acts of depravity upon the human race; particularly in the Middle East.

This past Saturday we saw clearly the consequences of Obama’s Foreign policy.

A policy that is summarized in 9 words. Embolden our enemies…Abandon our friends…Emasculate our country!

AS to HUSSEIN & wifey’s “concern”, re the unremitting Christian slaughter, well, a photo op sufficed. More than telling….

CASE closed. Indictment sealed – against the Abettor-in-Chief for accessory to genocide!

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}


This blog asserted, time and time again, that Barack HUSSEIN Obama has been working “hand-in-glove” with Iranian aspirations. Assuredly, these actions do NOT obviate his kinship, fealty and dealings with the other side of the bloody Islamic equation – the Sunni-led Brotherhood Mafia. Significantly, just as long as America is knocked down from its super power status and Islamists are elevated, it becomes a win-win for Obama Inc. NO kidding around!


Knock Down One: From the onset of the day of infamy – via the (s)election of the most anti-American POTUS in U.S. history – America’s stature and its worldwide interests have leaped from one disaster to another:The Islamist-in-Chief Lit A Fuse & His Embrace Of The Muslim Brotherhood Mafia Set Egypt (Mid East) Alight!


Knock Down Two: What better way to destroy Israel and simultaneously leave its western vanguard in existential peril – thus, dealing a mortal blow to the west – than to empower Iran’s mullahs? At the same time that he sends Kerry, his hatchet man, to threaten Israel with boycotts (even though it is against U.S. law  – to incite others – to boycott an ally…yes, this is what Obama Inc.’s rhetoric entails!), his regime seeks to empower the rise of a PA/Fatah/Hamas Sunni terror state! BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S IRANIAN TREACHERY: ISRAEL, GO TO HELL!
YES, knocking down Israel is a mortal blow to western interests in the Mid East and beyond. Make no mistake about this connection.
Knock Down Three: And when the U.S. Sec of State, America’s negotiating overseer, himself has dual loyalties, what more can go wrong? Everything. SEC KERRY’S DUAL LOYALTY: HIS CLOSE IRANIAN FAMILIAL CONNECTION & CONFLICT OF INTEREST. ILLEGAL. Mandatory due diligence is ignored! Where is the outrage?
Knock Down Four: But it is not enough to “just” tell a most trusted ally to go to hell, you have to back it up with deceit and the ultimate betrayal:OBAMA’S SELL OUT TO IRAN & ITS KEY INTERSECTION WITH THE RED/GREEN ALLIANCE: BOXING IN ISRAEL CORE!
Knock Down Five: And who better to assign, other than communist-driven, Iranian-born, mullah-connected, anti-American Valerie Jarrett, to take care of the American/western hit job? VALERIE JARRETT is Iran’s “deal maker”; her main mission, as Obama’s consigliere, is America’s downfall. Israel’s too.
Knock Down Six: Alas, to fulfill the Islamist-in-Chief’s aspirations, and that of his consigliere, they jaw-jawed Iran to the WMD finish line via Syria: A Side ‘Deal’ With Syria: Allah’s/Devil’s Bargain With America’s Foes!
Knock Down Seven: As posited in Nov. 2013, and as supportive evidence for Caroline Glick’s assessment (demonstrated within Iran’s Bomb In The Basement, cited below),  Iran, for all intents & purposes, a nuclear power: Obama’s LONGSTANDING quest to arm Iran.The jig is up!
A + B….1 + 1….
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report February 5, 2014
James Clapper, US Intelligence Director

James Clapper, US Intelligence Director

The second round of the Geneva II conference on the Syrian conflict opens Monday, Feb. 10 – this time with a seat at the table for the Iranian delegation provided by Washington, DEBKAfile reports exclusively. Washington relayed this abrupt turnabout from its ban last week on Iranian representatives to the Tehran delegates quietly attending the secret alternative conference taking place unannounced in Bern.
This event has proceeded in parallel to the public gathering in Montreux with the participation of Assad regime and opposition delegates, as well as senior US, Iranian and Russian officials. It was there that the real business was contracted behind closed doors – not in Montreux, where rigid official positions were presented for public consumption as a decoy from the Bern meeting, for which the Swiss government rather than the UN had provided the necessary technical and logistic facilities.

The Bern channel was first revealed in the last DEBKA Weekly issue, No. 621 of Jan. 31.
Permission to admit Iran to the Bern parley marked another major Obama administration concession to Tehran. For the first time, Iran delegates took their seats around an international conference table alongside the major powers with a say on political and strategic decisions for a critical Mid East conflict.

This basic shift was evinced, according to our sources, Tuesday, Feb. 4 in Washington and in Moscow.

Appearing before the House Intelligence Committee, Director of Intelligence James Clapper admitted that the agreement to dismantle the Syrian chemical weapons, reached last year in Geneva by US Secretary of State John Kerry and Russia Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, had “actually strengthened Bashar Assad’s position… by virtue of his agreement to remove the chemical weapons.”
In the space of a week, Washington has gone back on the forceful statement Kerry made at the opening of the Geneva conference on Jan. 16, when he said “as we get into this process, it will become clear there is no political solution whatsoever if Assad is not discussing a transition and if he thinks he is going to be part of that future. It is not going to happen”
The Obama administration is now forced to act on the presumption of a stronger Bashar Assad – as registered by Clapper, meaning that in order to be realistic, there is no option but to accept the Syrian ruler’s strong standing in Damascus and Tehran and the unavoidable conclusion that Iran is vitally instrumental to any resolution of the Syrian conflict.

Few people even in Israel noticed the telling comment made last week by Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas’s special emissary to Tehran, Jibril Rajoub. He said after talking to Iranian officials that Tehran must be part of the negotiating process ongoing between the Palestinians and Israel, clearly speaking under the influence of Iran’s enhanced position in the conference on Syria’s future.

In Moscow Tuesday, Lavrov, standing with Ahmad Jarba, leader of the oppsoition Syrian National Coalition, said “there was no doubt that Syrian opposition would attend” the second round of Geneva 2 next week.

This was after he had told Jarba privately, DEBKAfile’s sources report, that Iran must participate henceforth in the talks for there to be any chance of progress toward a resolution of the Syrian conflict.
None of this, or the admitted “roll-down” in the deal for eliminating Assad’s chemical arsenal, deterred Undersecretary of State Wendy Sherman, the head of the US team at the nuclear negotiations with Iran,  from explaining to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the interim nuclear agreement signed with Iran is “full of holes” because it is not a final agreement. “This is not perfect but this does freeze and roll back their program in significant ways and give us time on the clock to in fact negotiate that comprehensive agreement,” Sherman said.

The problem with this is that no one in Moscow, Tehran or Damascus has any doubt that the nuclear deals with the big powers will not turn out much differently from the agreement for destroying Syria’s chemical weapons.

SANS a scintilla of a doubt, Iran’s elevation to world power status – its newly arrived seat at “the table” – could not have happened without two main ingredients: the imprimatur of the leader of the (heretofore) free world, and its impending (or already) nuclear power status:Iran’s bomb in the basement.

INDEED, Barack HUSSEIN Obama Acts As A Shield For Islamic Regimes: Iranian Freedom Fighters Exposed His Hand!!

COUNTDOWN TO ISRAELI STRIKE? The Predicted SELL OUT Of Israel & Western Interests By Barack HUSSEIN Obama: Valerie Jarrett, His Major Conspirator…How Did This Happen? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

NOW, let it be known for posterity: this blog anticipated Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s betrayal, to the point in which several scathing, blistering commentaries were written in the run up to his second term, WARNING American Jews (and others): Obama’s second term plans would gravely imperil Israel (never mind the disasters from his first term) and he would go for broke, endangering American interests in toto. Bingo.

But before we get to the Islamist-in-Chief’s treachery, it is only fair to take PM Netanyahu to task, even as it appears he has been operating as a lone voice in the wilderness against Iran’s genocidal regime. Don’t dare feel sorry for him or coin him a hero! Here’s why:

Throughout PM Netanyahu’s 2 terms, it became painfully obvious that he hitched Jerusalem’s decision making to suit Obama Inc.’s dictates, so much so that the following proved itself : IRAN HEADS DOWN TO THE TRIP WIRE: Month(s) Away From Bomb-Making Ability. DECISION TIME For PM Netanyahu. Obama Already Made His. So here we find ourselves, exactly in the deadly place outlined above.

NOT only that, but it was revealed herein how PM Netanyahu’s spinelessness paved the way for the genocidal mullahs – PM Netanyahu’s SPINELESS Leadership Assists Iran’s WMD (More Than Likely) Victory.

Going from there to here is not rocket science and Jerusalem’s leadership knows as much. As such, IRAN, FOR ALL INTENTS & PURPOSES, IS A NUCLEAR POWER: Obama’s LONGSTANDING Quest To Arm Iran. The Jig Is Up! What’s Obama’s End Goal? is another “prediction”.

Thereby, those of us who keep track of such global shaking matters, surely understand that the “deal” has been in the bag, long before any public announcement was made by Obama Inc. How so? Well, Obama’s hatchet woman, his alter ego, Iranian born Valerie Jarrett has been scuttling back and forth inking a deal irrespective of this and that Geneva charade. For those who doubt Jarrett’s out-sized powers, this should pierce the veil – Valerie Jarrett & Her Mischief Making: Capable of Upending Western Civilization…The Unofficial Buck Starts/Stops At Her Door. As a matter of record, her dangerous liaisons were noted over a year ago at this site.

Indeed, Barack HUSSEIN Obama Acts As A Shield For Islamic Regimes: Iranian Freedom Fighters Exposed His Hand.

IntrinsicallyTom Trento, terror hunter from Trentovision, will discuss Obama & Jarrett’s dangerous betrayal to western civilization on tomorrow’s show (Monday, Nov. 25) at 3-4 PM eastern time. Tune in here –

WNN-1470am –

GET “I HEART RADIO” FOR COVERAGE WORLDWIDE  (search for WNN-1470, south Florida)

The Live Internet broadcast can be watched worldwide on or or


Valerie Jarrett, an Iranian born, Jew-hating, doctrinaire Socialist, orchestrated this “historic mistake” which is designed to prohibit Prime Minister Netanyahu from attacking Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. As a result of Jarrett and Obama’s appeasement to Iran the world has immediately become increasingly more dangerous with the prospect of nuclear equipped Islamic jihadis…


NEVERTHELESS, despite the expected brouhaha that a breakthrough has brought Iran to heel, well, nothing could be further from the truth, regardless of Obama’s spin machine, operating at warp speed at The Washington Post & elsewhere – Iran, world powers reach historic nuclear dealBesides, history is replete with such “moments”, and most infamously, the Munich Agreement comes to mind –

The big Iranian nuclear sale

The big Iranian nuclear sale

After all-night talks, a first-step nuclear deal was struck before dawn Sunday in Geneva between Iran and the six powers. It was announced by President Barack Obama and confirmed by Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif. Obama said key aspects of Iran’s nuclear program will be rolled back for limited sanctions relief. No new centrifuges will added to the enrichment process, work will stop at the Arak nuclear reactor and the UN will expand inspections to ensure that Iran unable to make a nuclear bomb. The overall sanctions architecture will remain in place pending a comprehensive solution to be negotiated in the next s six months, but no new sanctions will be imposed.
Israel and Saudi Arabia said before the deal was signed that they would not be bound by its provisions and reserved their military options.

The US president said he understood the concerns of Israel and the Persian Gulf nations about Iran’s intentions, and promised to closely follow Iran’s compliance and as that he as commander-in-chief of US armed forces maintain the option for military action.

Offering no information about the content of the interim accord, the Iranian foreign minister commended the Geneva process for granting the Iranian people “equal footing and mutual respect” and the deal as a first step towards removing all doubts about Iran’s nuclear program.
UK Foreign Secretary William Hague added that Iran had agreed to halt uranium enrichment above the 5 percent grade and the elimination of its stockpile of 20 percent enriched material.

As the Secretary spoke, the Saudi ambassador to London pledged every effort by his government to halt Iran’s advance toward a nuclear bomb, accusing the United States of failing to do this.
DEBKAfile’s military sources add: None of the measures revealed so far about the interim accord reached in Geneva deal with the concealed military features of Iran’s nuclear program, or the details of expanded inspections. Israel is not expected to accept any document with those omissions and will no doubt continue its preparations for exercising a military option.

See DEBKAfile’s Saturday report on the fourth day of negotiatons prior to the deal.

Both sides were pumping up an atmosphere of optimism as the foreign ministers of all six powers facing Iran made tracks for Geneva Saturday morning, Nov. 23, Day Four of the marathon negotiations for an accord on a six-month freeze on Iran’s nuclear program.

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Hassan Araghchi said the six powers had agreed to respect his country’s right to enrich uranium, so removing a major hurdle in the path of an accord, whereas Foreign Minister Javad Zarif remained silent.

Sergey Lavrov was the first foreign minister to arrive Friday night, followed by Secretary of State John Kerry early Saturday. Both were said to have come to try and narrow the gaps holding up an accord. The Chinese, British, French and German foreign ministers were due in Geneva Saturday morning, after bilateral sessions between Zarif and the other six delegates failed to produce enough progress for them to adjourn to formal negotiations around the same table, least of all reach the signing stage.

This time round, the Iranian team borrowed the Western tactic of constantly maintaining that a deal is within reach. This tactic aims at weakening the resistance of the opposite side by presenting it as dragging out the nerve-wracking talkathon beyond reason. This tactic didn’t work for the Western delegations in the first round of nuclear talks on Nov. 11, which France blew up on the fourth day. The second round had reached the same touch-and-go point by Saturday morning, when none of the six delegations confirmed they had agreed to a clause respecting Iran’s right to enrich uranium as Araghchi had claimed.
This point is pivotal to both sides because it is absent from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which merely specifies that countries are allowed “to pursue peaceful nuclear energy.”

Rewording this provision to cover the right to uranium enrichment would cut the ground from under the entire treaty by throwing the door open for all its signatories to enrich uranium at will.

Tehran’s goal in making this demand is more than legitimacy for its own weapons program. It is also seeks to deprive the big powers of the prerogative to determine the rights of smaller nations.
On this point, therefore, both Iran and the six powers are digging in their heels.

The other major hurdle facing a deal is the Arak heavy water reactor Iran is building.  Tehran refuses to halt construction of this reactor arguing that like any other nation, Iran is entitled to build nuclear reactors for peaceful purposes. They shoot back at any suggestion that the Arak reactor is designed to produce plutonium as fuel for nuclear weapon, along with enriched uranium, with a charge of discrimination, and declare, “Tehran is not going to sign an agreement that permanently put Iran in an outcast category,”

The Iranians have adopted a negotiating strategy of relegating the vital technical aspects of the draft accord to a lower priority while hammering away at issues pertinent to national respect. Iran is fighting in Geneva for international respect as a legitimate and equal nuclear power on the world stage.
This strategy also has a by-product: By the time they get around to the key technical clauses, the negotiators on the other side of the table are too worn down to cope with a new set of Iranian objections.
The biggest obstacle to a deal, however, is to be found in Tehran in the person of the tough, autocratic Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. He will have the final word on whether the second round to talks in Geneva produce an accord – not the American or Russian presidents, and certainly not the foreign ministers assembling there.

Khamenei has boosted his heft by making himself unapproachable – even to Iran’s president Hassan Rouhani.  So no one can influence him or even find out where he stands until the text is ready for signing. Even then, Zarif and Araghchi may be told at the last moment to withhold their signatures over some point and return home for further consultations. The six powers will then have to decide whether it is worth taking the negotiations to a third round, as the Congress in Washington fights back by enacting tighter sanctions against Iran.

UNDOUBTEDLY, PM Netanyahu understands that his administration misdirected half of world Jewry, who believed that under his stewardship Iran would NEVER become a nuclear power. If this blogger had a nickel, a shekel, for every time he said as much, well….even as this is written: Netanyahu: Deal lets Iran gain a nuclear bomb, Israel not bound

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu slammed the interim nuclear deal signed in Geneva early Sunday as “a historic mistake that makes the world a more dangerous place.” Israel is not obligated by this agreement,” he told the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem.  Iran is committed to Israel’s destruction, he said and “I want to make clear as the prime minister of Israel, Israel will not allow Iran to develop a military nuclear capability.” For the deal, Iran made “cosmetic concessions that it can do away with in a matter of weeks,” the prime minister said.


IN any case, we are where we are. He surely intuits – smartie that PM Netanyahu is – without eliciting a strike his political career will not only be over, but he will go down in history as the Jewish leader who fell short of stopping Iran from acquiring the ultimate weapons; weapons which will allow them to keep their sworn promise to wipe Israel off the map!

Mind you, Obama Inc. (and attendant world powers) didn’t pause a beat, even as Iran’s Supreme leader exhorted right before the “deal” was inked: Iranian Leader: Israel a ‘Rabid Dog’

It is due to the above, and so much more, that a “bolt out of the blue” will likely take place. Pray it’s not too little, too late and that the following strategic assessment comes to fruition: 

A Strike on Iran: Complex, But Possible

By  November 21, 2013

BESA Center Perspectives Paper No. 223

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: An Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is a risky and militarily-complicated endeavor, but within reach. Israeli ingenuity and determination could lead to a great operational and political success. The international responses are likely to be bearable.

Recent statements by Israel that it has the ability to strike and significantly damage Iran’s nuclear infrastructure reflect Israel’s growing exasperation with the weak reaction of the international community to the Iranian “charm offensive,” and a gradual realization that only military force can prevent the nuclearization of Iran.

Such an attack would require the capability to reach and destroy distant targets, while overcoming aerial defense systems. Yet the number of facilities that would need to be hit to deal a significant blow to Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is generally overestimated.

The essential ingredient for building a nuclear bomb is uranium enriched to at least 90 percent, meaning that the enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordow must be taken out. The heavy water reactor at Arak – designed to produce plutonium, another fissionable material suitable for building a nuclear bomb – is not yet active but is a necessary target, similar to the Iraqi reactor that was destroyed by Israel in 1981.

To be sure, an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure would be a risky and complicated military operation. But Israeli ingenuity and determination could lead to a great operational and political success.

Israel’s Military Capabilities

Israel’s long arm is its air force, which has the ability to strike distant targets. According to foreign reports, the Israel Air Force (IAF) has more than 400 fighter planes, more than most countries in the world. The IAF fleet includes the F-15I, one of the world’s most advanced planes, which can carry many precision-guided weapons over long distances.

The IAF also reportedly has a number of aerial refueling tankers that give its fighter jets the option to extend their flight range as far as Iran. The IAF has held a number of exercises, which received much media coverage, in which dozens of aircraft flew long distances, displaying the IAF’s ability to reach Iran.

The flight path to nuclear targets in Iran would cross over Arab countries, as in past long-distance IAF operations. But this time it is possible that these states would turn a blind eye or even cooperate with Israel, because the Sunni Arab world is very concerned about Iran attaining nuclear weapons.

Moreover, the IAF has a remarkable set of technological means that enable it to blind or paralyze air defense systems. Reported IAF operations in Syria and Sudan, which came to light only after the alleged strikes took place, may be an indication of such capabilities. Iran might have good air defense systems that could exact a price from the IAF, but it is unlikely that they could prevent the air force from conducting a successful attack.

An important issue is the ability to destroy underground targets. The US has provided Israel with bunker-buster bombs, and it is likely that the Israeli military industries are also capable of developing and producing similar weapons. An Israeli operation in Iran might also require a ground presence, mainly to ensure that targets hit from the air are indeed destroyed. The IDF special forces have trained for this task. Unfortunately, it would be difficult at this point to achieve a strategic surprise, and it is a shame that a strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities was not executed several years ago. But despite Iran’s awareness of the possibility of an Israeli strike, there is still room for tactical surprises.

International Consequences

Iran’s ability to punish Israel is quite limited. Its missile arsenal can partially or perhaps largely be intercepted by Israel’s anti-ballistic missile system, featuring the Arrow 2 missile. Iran’s terrorist activities against Israeli targets abroad in recent years have not been very impressive. Iran’s allies on Israel’s borders, Hizballah and Hamas, have many thousands of missiles that can do much damage. But their full subservience to Iran remains to be seen. Even if they act as Iranian proxies, Israel has the military capability to invade the missile launching areas and limit the price they can exact from Israel’s home front. Finally, preventing a nuclear Iran is an important objective that justifies Israeli losses.

The expectations for serious international negative reactions to an Israeli military strike on Iran are also greatly exaggerated. Israel has attacked nuclear installations in the past, specifically in Iraq (1981) and Syria (2007), with few international repercussions. Many hypocritical denouncements are likely, accompanied by a private feeling of relief. Many countries, particularly in the region, are actually waiting for Israel to pull the nuclear chestnuts from the fire.


At a time when appeasing Iran seems to be in vogue, an Israeli strike could invigorate elements in the international arena who are unwilling to accept an Iran with a nuclear breakout capability. In addition, many people around the world would be reminded that muscular reactions to evil regimes are often truly necessary.

A decision by Israel to strike Iran would be a historic gamble. Nevertheless, history, necessity, and common sense point toward an attack.

For the historical record, Bolton’s analysis is spot on – Bolton: Obama Pushed Iran Deal to Prevent Israeli Airstrike…and this is the assessment from Daniel Pipes-
The Nuclear Deal With Iran is a Foreign Policy Disaster by Daniel Pipes

“For the first time in nearly a decade we have halted parts of Iran’s nuclear program” announced a jubilant Barack Obama after the news of the just-signed Geneva six-month interim agreement with Iran.

But the American goal for the accord was that the Iranians not “advance their program” of building a uranium nuclear bomb (and perhaps a plutonium bomb too); the apparent deal exactly permits such advancement, plus sanctions relief to Tehran worth about US$9 billion.

This wretched deal offers one occasion when comparison with Neville Chamberlain in Munich in 1938 is valid. An overeager Western government, blind to the evil cunning of the regime it so much wants to work with, appeases it with concessions that will come back to haunt it. Geneva and Nov. 24 will be remembered along with Munich and Sep. 29.

Barack Obama has made many foreign policy errors in the past five years, but this is the first to rank as a disaster.

Sach ha’kol, at the end of it all, a Loony Toons descriptor says it best: Obama’s Iranian “Red Line” –

That’s all folks!!

The RACE BAITER-IN-CHIEF (& His Minions) Set The Stage For INCREASED Black Mob Violence, Terrorizing Whites. Race War A Real Possibility. Why?…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Fanning the flames to racial violence takes many forms. While some of its signals are overt, others are much more circumspect. Regardless, those who are prone to said violence surely understand when a bro’ has their backs. It’s an “entitlement” thing.

From the get go, the Race Baiter-In-Chief pitted Blacks against Whites. Readers may recall – or not – he stepped into (racial) doo doo when he came to the aid of his Black bud, Henry Louis Gates Jr., in July 2009, only a few months into his Presidency. Apparently, Gates had a run-in with the “po-lice”. Oh yeah.

Obama, with his chin in its usual upward tilt, unabashedly opined: the “police acted stupidly”, brazenly admitting that he didn’t even know all the facts of the case. What a chutzpah. Craven narcissist. Forensically diagnosed: The One.

Besides, can anyone imagine the POTUS calling a press conference if a White person was similarly arrested? Do pigs fly? Never mind his copy cat racially-bent surrogates, namely, Holder, Sharpton & gang. Hey, this blogger is talking to you all! 

Just as a backgrounder, a frame of reference: mind you, in June 2009, a month prior to this specific race baiting foray, Iranian freedom seekers were dying in the streets, and their leadership were BEGGING Barack HUSSEIN Obama to support them, in whatever way possible. In fact, the following commentary was written, Barack HUSSEIN Obama Acts As A Shield For Islamic Regimes: Iranian Freedom Fighters Exposed His Hand, and its resonance won it a Watcher of Weasels award

The point being, the leader of the free world’s actions were so egregious in his non-involvement in Iran, others took special note too.  So, what exactly did he, or didn’t, do? NOTHING. He couldn’t even take the time to give them a “shout out”, as many died in Tehran’s streets. Yet, he took the time (despite all his duties, as the leader of the free world) for a press conference to assist his Black (Harvard educated) leftist bro’. You see where this is going?

Lest anyone believes this is old news – reverting back to his missteps from his first term – think again. His race baiting picked up more than a notch since then. In spades.

Consider the pile up of victims, some of whom are no longer among the living:

Yes, on behalf of “Tray”, race wars were ignited in U.S. cities. On whose orders, winks and nods? As such, extracting “justice” for “Tray” meant beating Whites to a pulp !

As if the above is not indicting enough to a burgeoning race war, it’s not coincidental that the following is all the “rage”, yet, the POTUS IS STONE COLD SILENT. Where are his urgent press conferences??

June 2013 – FAMILY PICNIC TURNS TO HORROR THANKS TO BLACK MOB. Woman pistol whipped while trying to defend son

Aug. 2013 – MAN IN COMA AFTER BLACK MOB OF 50 PUMMELS HIM. She saw them strip him of his pants and go through the pockets’

Sept. 2013 – BLACK MOB MURDERS MAN IN SURPRISING PLACE’. If it is happening here, what do you think is happening in the rest of the country?’

Oct. 2013 – BLACK MOB POUNCES ON YOUNG WHITE COUPLE. ‘It keeps happening, and they keep wondering why’

Nov. 2013 – Three “Knockout” Attacks Reported In Philadelphia Area

Nov. 2013 – NEWSPAPERS DIRECTED: COVER UP BLACK VIOLENCE. City’s epidemic silenced by national ‘journalism’ society

Nov. 2013 – Surprise! Media finally wake up to Knockout Game – video included within

The listing of racially-inspired winks and nods can go on and on, but this blogger only has so many hours in a day to spare. Nevertheless, the trajectory of Black on White pummeling is very clear.

Now, get this, DHS Still Hasn’t Fired Black Supremacist Who Called for Mass Murder of Whites:Almost four months after he was unmasked as a militant black nationalist who called for murdering “Uncle Tom race traitors,” Ayo Kimathi is still employed. You got that??

So while the Racialist-in-Chief’s Chicago ‘hood is featured below, it is by far – as amply demonstrated above – not an isolated phenomenon. 


Brutal assaults captured on cell-phone videos recorded by suspects

The latest case of black-mob violence in Chicago is far from the worst. We’ll get to that one in a minute.

But when a mob of black people rushed into three Chicago-area Sports Authority stores this week and rushed out dragging entire racks of winter clothing, the local CBS affiliate dubbed that “unbelievable.

CNN said the videos were “shocking.”

Not really: “That crime was only unbelievable or shocking to the reporters who spend all their time ignoring and denying black mob violence,” said one Chicago cop, who would rather keep his job than be identified as a source of stories on racial violence. “More organized, yes. Unbelievable? Hardly. Not to anyone who knows anything about the epic level of black-mob violence and black-on-white crime in this city.”

Black mobs routinely terrorize cities across the country, but the media and government are silent. Read the detailed account of rampant racial crime in “White Girl Bleed A Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How the Media Ignore It.”

First the heist. The CBS affiliate reports:

Unbelievable surveillance video captured flash mobs dashing into store after store and running out with armloads and sometimes entire racks of sporting goods.

It has happened at three different Sports Authority stores in the Chicago area.

The video shows the mob dragging the racks out together in what can only be called a choreographed fashion: Linking them together and rolling them like a freight train through the nearby exit and out to a parking lot.

The thieves targeted clothes and knocked over one employee who tried to interfere. Other than that, no one was hurt.

This heist was comic relief compared to an episode of black-mob violence and rape involving three teenage girls in October. This week, police arrested the ninth black suspect in connection with the rape, kidnapping, drugging and assault. The Chicago Tribune picked up the story:

The girls were walking in the 700 block of North Parkside Avenue in the Austin neighborhood about 9:45 p.m. Oct. 19 when a 1999 Chevrolet van approached, according to police and prosecutors.

As the van parked outside of a liquor store, two suspects exited and started to talk to the girls. Later, the victims agreed to get into the van and left with them. The attackers had the girls sit on their laps and then gave the two 16-year-old victims alcohol and marijuana, prosecutors said.

Prosecutors said at least two of the people took turns driving while the girls were assaulted. Meanwhile, the girl who did not drink the alcohol or smoke the marijuana “fought to protect” the other girls, screaming and pounding the walls of the van, according to court records and prosecutors.

Prosecutors provided more detail about the state of the two girls who were given the alcohol and marijuana in the van. They said one of the girls was “extremely intoxicated” and could not hold her head up. One of the girls had a blood alcohol content of .237, according to prosecutors. Police found that girl unconscious and partially dressed in a suspect’s basement, lying in a pool of her own vomit, prosecutors said.

Several of the assaults were captured on cell-phone videos recorded by the suspects.

Police mugshots of some of the rape suspects.

As graphic as the Tribune’s coverage of the violence was, it was tame compared to the details in other Chicago area blogs: Crime in Chicago did not shy away from presenting a fuller picture of the violence:

Angered at her screams, Robinson held the 15-year-old down while another suspect punched her in the face until she became quiet. Still restrained, she was sexually assaulted and then kicked out of the van because she continued yelling. As she fell out, she managed to pull her 16-year-old sister out with her, even though the attackers tried yanking them back inside.

The second 16-year-old remained in the van as the sisters ran, knocked on doors and screamed for help.

The suspects drove to Durham’s home. The girl was unconscious so Johnson and Price picked her up and carried her into Durham’s home where Price then sexually assaulted her.

Three witnesses who happened to be driving in the area called police after seeing the commotion and the sisters as they escaped from the van.

The Tribune does not usually identify suspects by race. Even if the crime is part of a pattern. Even if the race of the suspects will help identify them. Even if the paper reports every day on other race-related stories about black caucuses, black churches, black colleges, black TV, black radio and on and on.

Everything except black-mob violence.

Tribune editors and columnists spend more time explaining why they do not report on racial violence in Chicago then actually reporting it. And for readers who wonder why the Trib is so heavily invested in ignoring and denying the epidemic of black-mob violence in Chicago, the Trib’s Steve Chapman has an answer: You are a racist for even asking.

“There are good reasons not to identify the attackers by race. It’s the newspaper’s sound general policy not to mention race in a story, whether about crime or anything else, unless it has some clear relevance to the topic.

“My question to readers accusing us of political correctness is: Why do you care so much about the attackers’ race? If you fear or dislike blacks, I suppose it would confirm your prejudice. But otherwise, it tells you nothing useful.”

When readers try to comment on racial violence, black-mob violence or black-on-white crime, the Tribune – like many other papers around the country – either removes the comments or does not run them at all.

“In certain circumstances, we will take down entire comment boards,” said the paper.

The Tribune disabled comments for the several stories on the West Side rapists.

Outrageously, aside for a “license” – a  high five – to steal and rampage against “Whitey”, the fact of the matter is, under Obama Inc., the Black community has been set back exponentially. How so? Their financial gains have been wrecked by an economy falling off the cliff via rampant unemployment, coupled with a gimme gimme mentality. Yes, their bro’, Obama, is responsible for their overall economic devastation. See the damage accrued from Obamacare to his “pets”, even as he claims he has their backs! Who is this creature?

What is even more outrageous is the way he abuses Blacks (his largest support base) for his own political gain and radical goals. As stated, it has been under his (mis)reign that Blacks have lost many of their hard fought gains in the economic sector, leaving many of their communities devastated.
In a nutshell, Allen West, Thomas Sowell and others (Black men of real stature) courageously posit: 
“Tell me, Black Americans, what is it you like about President Barack Obama other than the color of his skin? I ask this question because this humble observer of the asylum we all have to live in can see no reason that over 90% of black voters voted for Mr. Obama the second time. (The first time is understandable.) Everything this man has done since being in office has been done for one reason and one reason only. And that has been to promote a bigger role for government and a lessor role for the individual Americans, including black Americans.  If that sounds a bit like Marxism, that’s because that is who Barack Obama is. The only thing that I can see that our first black president has done for black Americans is to feed them a constant stream of convenient lies so that the grossly under educated black Americans can blame someone other than themselves for their lot in life”.
On the other hand, take Oprah Winfrey and her harping on the “color” of one’s skin, but said pigmentation seems to be important only if one’s hue is Black. What?? Well, hear the daytime diva strutt her racist stuff, and know that she always has Obama’s back –
WINFREY: I’m saying problem not solved. I’m saying that, you know, that’s the beauty of a film like “The Butler,” and it’s the beauty of a film like “12 Years a Slave,” and it’s the beauty of what we’re seeing on stage with “Scottsboro Boys” is that it allows people to see where the root of the problem started. It allows people to see, “Oh, that’s where it all started, this is how far we’ve come, and now this is how much 

farther we need to go.” Of course problem is not solved. You know, as long as people can be judged by the color of their skin, problem’s not solved. As long as there are people who still, there’s a whole generation – I say this, you know, I said this, you know, for apartheid South Africa, I said this for my own, you know, community in the south – there are still generations of people, older people, who were born and bred and marinated in it, in that prejudice and racism, and they just have to die.

So in Winfrey’s view, it’s older white people that are the problem, and once they die, racism ends.

Yet three months ago, she said of the George Zimmerman verdict, “It’s ridiculous to look at that case and not to think that race was involved.”

Zimmerman’s only 30 years old and is Hispanic.

It is patently absurd to suggest that racism is caused by old white people when racism and religious bigotry cut across all generations and ethnicities.

But folks such as Winfrey don’t want to look at it that way, for they have a different agenda:

Egregiously, it was due to “racist” America that Oprah became one of the richest women in America, which gave a Black woman all her opportunities. Hmm. It was “racist” America that elected Barack HUSSEIN Obama to the most powerful position in the world. Double hmm. Now, who are the authentic race baiters?

Do wrap your brains around what she is saying, and don’t forget it, whenever one of her many conglomerates are in view. Winfrey – a DESPICABLE racist! Is it any wonder she hearts Obama and has his back too?

 Birds of a racist, leftist feather!