In the thick of a multiplicity of scandals rocking the Beltway, it is easy enough to miss the forest from the trees. In this regard, while Obama Inc. feigns outrage over the damage wrought to national security – via Snowden, NSA’s whistle blower – exhorting that now terrorists will run amok, paradoxically, the fact of the matter is that these same leaders gutted the ability to actually track said domestic terrorists! Say what? Has this blogger lost some brain matter…oops…maybe off her rocker too…yet, how can this be? Well, let’s just get back to basics, and then we will be able to blow apart their bold-faced lies.
Basically, an omerta has reigned supreme throughout all political, legal and media discourse, in relation to Islam and its nexus to terror. In effect, the most pervasive DOMESTIC threat to America – via a burgeoning Muslim American community, notwithstanding its foreign counterparts – is verboten within America’s security apparatus. Oxymoronic. Orwellian. To wit, not only is actual spying on these domestic terrorists forbidden, but relaying much needed cultural background and intelligence intel on said threats is off their radar. Got that?
Gohmert: “I want to go back to Boston. You said things like how — the FBI did an excellent job, a thorough job, don’t know what else we could have done and according to the rugs, there’s a great deal more that could have been done and when we find out about this sensitive operations review committee, and as this article points out, if it’s true, it says that we don’t know who the chairman and members are, sensitive operations review uh committee, who the staff — that’s kept secret. The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15th attacks. If the Russians tell you that someone has been radicalized and you go check and see the mosques that they went to, then you get the articles of incorporation, as I have, for the group that created the Boston mosque where these Tsarnaevs attended and you find the name al-Amoudi, which you remember, because this man who was so helpful to the Clinton Administration with so many big things, he gets arrested at Dulles Airport by the FBI, and he’s now doing over 20 years for supporting terrorism. This is the guy that started the mosque where your Tsarnaevs were attending, and you didn’t even bother to check about the mosque. And then when you had the picture, why didn’t anyone go to the mosque and say who are these guys? Why was that not done, since such a thorough job was done?” Mueller: “Your facts are not all-together…” Gohmert: “I point out specifically — point out specifically, sir, if you are going to call me a liar, you need to point out specifically where any facts are wrong. Mueller: “We went to the mosque.” Gohmert: “Prior to Boston?” Mueller: “Prior to Boston. We were talking to Imams several months beforehand as part of our outreach efforts.”
“Outreach efforts?” Really? “So in other words, we went to that mosque, we went to that mosque as part of our outreach. We are reaching out to them, saying hey, how can we be partners,” Glenn responded. “That’s insane.”
Gohmert: “Were you aware those mosques were started by Abdurahman Alamoudi?” Mueller: “I answered the question, sir.” Gohmert: “You didn’t answer the question, were you award they were started by al-Amoudi?”
“He wasn’t everybody aware of it. These are the people collecting all the information on you to keep you safe. They are purging all of the information on who the radical Islamists are. They are purging it. Why? Because our government is on the wrong side. They have deemed that you are the enemy and radical Islam is fine, as long as it’s Muslim brotherhood. It is a very, very dangerous thing we are involved in now and they are taking away your keys to the locks, they are putting around your children’s necks and wrists and arms and brain,” Glenn added. Rep. Louis Gohmert joined Glenn later in the program to discuss the exchange he had with the FBI Director who claimed the congressman had his facts wrong.
As repeatedly stated at this site: Muslim Americans are “off limits”… and the audacious lies, that spying on ALL Americans is security based, are hereby exposed for the balderdash that they are.
‘Obama’s Snooping Excludes Mosques, Missed Boston Bombers’
Homeland Insecurity: The White House assures that tracking our every phone call and keystroke is to stop terrorists, and yet it won’t snoop in mosques, where the terrorists are.
That’s right, the government’s sweeping surveillance of our most private communications excludes the jihad factories where homegrown terrorists are radicalized.
Since October 2011, mosques have been off-limits to FBI agents. No more surveillance or undercover string operations without high-level approval from a special oversight body at the Justice Department dubbed the Sensitive Operations Review Committee.
Who makes up this body, and how do they decide requests? Nobody knows; the names of the chairman, members and staff are kept secret.
We do know the panel was set up under pressure from Islamist groups who complained about FBI stings at mosques. Just months before the panel’s formation, the Council on American-Islamic Relations teamed up with the ACLU to sue the FBI for allegedly violating the civil rights of Muslims in Los Angeles by hiring an undercover agent to infiltrate and monitor mosques there.
Before mosques were excluded from the otherwise wide domestic spy net the administration has cast, the FBI launched dozens of successful sting operations against homegrown jihadists — inside mosques — and disrupted dozens of plots against the homeland.
If only they were allowed to continue, perhaps the many victims of the Boston Marathon bombings would not have lost their lives and limbs. The FBI never canvassed Boston mosques until four days after the April 15 attacks, and it did not check out the radical Boston mosque where the Muslim bombers worshipped.
The bureau didn’t even contact mosque leaders for help in identifying their images after those images were captured on closed-circuit TV cameras and cellphones.
One of the Muslim bombers made extremist outbursts during worship, yet because the mosque wasn’t monitored, red flags didn’t go off inside the FBI about his increasing radicalization before the attacks.
This is particularly disturbing in light of recent independent surveys of American mosques, which reveal some 80% of them preach violent jihad or distribute violent literature to worshippers.
What other five-alarm jihadists are counterterrorism officials missing right now, thanks to restrictions on monitoring the one area they should be monitoring
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/061213-659753-all-intrusive-obama-terror-dragnet-excludes-mosques.htm#ixzz2WDG4cP82….http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/fbi-director-should-hand-in-his-badge-now/. Unfathomably, it took several days AFTER Boston’s jihadists blew up the marathon for the FBI to even canvass Boston’s mosques, these same mosques where the bombers received much of their “inspiration” – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/27/bombers-cambridge-ma-mosque-a-mirror-image-of-us-mosquestied-into-mit-local-us-linking-back-to-brotherhood-mafias-msamsu-student-unions-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.
How dare they be so negligent and recklessly callous with American lives! Yet this site apprised readers of said dangers back in August 2012, a full 8 months before Boston blew up – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/15/the-muslim-student-association-msa-islamic-student-arm-of-muslim-brotherhoodmuslim-mafia-huma-abedin-board-member-too-what-does-this-meancommentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. So does this blogger know things that the FBI doesn’t? Hardly. Again, back to the omerta.
Thus, by blinding intelligence agents to the underlying causes of Islamic jihad (emanating from Sharia Law & attendant doctrinal/political constructs), Obama Inc is consequentially tying their hands. Hence, they are incapable of penetrating America’s most determined enemy – Islamic jihadists. But never mind, the powers that be keep trotting out the “need” to keep Americans safe, even if it means that everyone BUT the enemy is under surveillance!
In the main, is placing ones fate in Obama Inc. (or any other leadership coming down the pike, knowing full well the capabilities of domestic intrusions at their fingertips) prudent, considering the mischief which can be wrought through unfettered spying? Hope not.