Popular truisms are not for nothing. One can often extrapolate much from their intended usage, as well as learn from their bastardization. As such, there really is “more than one way to skin a cat”, even when things appear exceedingly bleak. But one must first recognize the dangers, otherwise how can one skin this or that. Precisely.
Yet, without piecing together all the (seemingly) disparate threads, one is hard pressed to know where the end point is. And this is no small matter. In fact, without said recognition the slippery deed will be done, bereft of a chance to massively push back, against those who seek nothing less than total submission – yours!
Par for the course, radical revolutionaries avail themselves of a potpourri of converging – to the non discerning eye, they can be seen as diverging – epicenters, as they bore from within. Rules For Radicals – www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rulesfor-radicals …is their “holy” grail. Their bible. It is more than worthwhile to print out the above rules, as they serve as a blue print. They explain the heretofore inexplicable, making sense out of what is transpiring before our (horrified) eyes. In fact, this American-Israeli has a copy of the actual book and studies it, as necessary. Yes, reading is fundamental!
In furtherance of the above, and as a tie in to the commentary at hand, learn “Adina Kutnicki’s” lessons/rules herein, free of charge to boot. Less than a baker’s dozen (the number within the left’s rule book), but no less trenchant.
Rule Number One: Leftist dogma is the same world over, and don’t ever forget it – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/01/leftist-dogma-the-same-world-over-freedom-loving-people-beware-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-32-2/
Rule Number Two: Western media is mostly in the service of radical leftist forces, and operates to the detriment of patriots. They are particularly fired up against Americans & Israelis, the locus of leftist rage – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/30/u-s-leftist-media-in-the-service-of-a-radical-revolutionary-obama-administration-what-can-go-wrongcommentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.
Rule Number Three: Leftist academia has a death grip on the nation’s young, capable of upending western civilization – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/21/the-paradox-pitfalls-of-liberal-democracies-in-a-time-of-immoral-relativism-the-havoc-wrought-by-leftist-academia-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.
Rule Number Four: The company one keeps is emblematic of ones worldview/intentions – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/07/when-authentic-revolutionaries-hold-the-reins-of-american-power-centers-via-the-most-radical-regime-in-u-s-history-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.
Rule Number Five: Ones “roots” are, more than less, embedded, even if one states otherwise – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/11/the-islamist-in-chief-his-kenyan-wahhabi-relatives-obamas-inner-roots-addendum-to-the-ties-that-bind-the-islamist-in-chief-to-sunni-islam-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/
And while the above rules are not foolproof, they are indeed worthy of all due deliberation, as they have proven their merits, time and again. So, is the following at all surprising, even though many will “see no (Obama) evil, hear no evil”, even as Americans become buried with evidence?
‘Disarming American citizens, Obama style’
Canada Free Press, Doug Hagmann, March 19, 2013
Presently flying under the radar of the American people is the much misunderstood, deliberately mischaracterized and under-reported United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty. Considering the persistent multi-level attacks against U.S. gun owners and American’s rights under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the “Final U.N. Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty” that convened yesterday and is scheduled to last through March 28, 2013 should be front page news all across America. But it’s not, and for good reason.
But first, let it be made clear thatBarack Hussein Obama is on record as being against the private ownership of firearms by American citizens. This might surprise anyone who listens to the hysterically-pitched assertions by such Obama lapdogs as Chris Mathews and Lawrence O’Donnell, for example, who contend that Obama has posed no threat to private gun ownership as President. Such assertions are only convincing to those who have not done any research into this matter.Most people, including conservative Americans thought the United Nation’s Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) was a dead issue, or at least not a threat to U.S. gun owners based on a number of assumptions relating to international treaties and U.S. Constitutional law. Like everything else with the Obama regime, however, things are never what they appear, nor are they as simple as we are led to believe.
Obama vs. the Second Amendment
In 2003, Obama voted in support of legislation that would have banned privately owned hunting shotguns, target rifles and black powder rifles in Illinois. While running for political office in 2004, Obama called for national legislation to prevent anyone but law enforcers from carrying concealed firearms. As reported in the February 20, 2004 edition of The Chicago Tribune, Obama was quoted as “back[ing] federal legislation that would ban citizens from carrying weapons, except for law enforcement.”Barack Hussein Obama has a long and well documented history on gun control, going back as far as his law school days. There, he was mentored by Laurence Tribe, a staunch opponent to gun rights of American citizens. In 1994, Obama was a member of the Joyce Foundation, a Chicago based charitable organization that in part, is a proponent of various anti-gun groups and related agendas.
In the April 2, 2008 edition of The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Obama was quoted stating “I am not in favor of concealed weapons… I think that creates a potential atmosphere where more innocent people could (get shot during) altercations.” As an Illinois State Senator, Obama voted twice against SB 2165, more commonly known as the “Castle Doctrine,” which would permit household occupants to defend themselves through the use of firearms.
Perhaps most nefarious and telling of all is what Obama whispered to Sarah Brady during a meeting on 30 March 2011 concerning gun control: “I just want you to knowthat we are working on it. We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.”
By far and despite the intent of Obama-supported organizations such as Fact Check and Media Matters, it is clear that he is the most anti-Second Amendment (putative) President ever to hold office.
U.S. arms control via the UN
Perhaps most disconcerting about the present actions of the United Nations is the cavalier attitude held by most, including many conservatives, that the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty would be completely impotent against the U.S. Constitution and American’s rights under the Second Amendment. After all, it is argued that to be effective, such a treaty would require Senate ratification and at present, such ratification would have a “zero possibility” of passage. Such thinking is consistent with a normal political atmosphere and an administration that has a genuine respect for the U.S. Constitution. Considering what we’ve seen over the last decade, does the recent track record of our elected leaders alleviate your concerns?
Consider that within 24 hours of his re-election, Obama pushed for a new round of international negotiations to revive the very U.N. treaty he visibly backed off of in the months leading to the 2012 elections. Isn’t this act alone enough to trip some alarm bells, even among the most skeptic?
It should also be noted that on February 26, 2013, the American Bar Association’s Center for Human Rights issued a white paper on the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty, concluding that “the proposed ATT is consistent with the Second Amendment.” A review of this four-page document reveals certain questionable assumptions on which that conclusion is based.
This is a warning to all Americans that the Obama support of the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty can lead to some “UN-intended” consequences to American’s right to own and bear arms. Americans looking at this issue are failing to look at the larger picture, which is the ultimate subjugation of the United States to a global governance. This can most effectively be accomplished through the disarmament of its citizens, especially in the face of violent outbreaks as the U.S. and the world economic systems begin to unravel.
The machinations of the Obama regime within the inner workings of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty must not be underestimated. We must look at the bigger picture and the end-game objectives of the globalists pulling the puppet strings. All is not what it appears.
canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/53885 …and raising the clarion call is surely more than necessary, if freedom and liberty mean anything at all. Some more “proof in the pudding” – news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/032013-648751-kerry-announces-support-of-arms-trade-treaty.htm#ixzz2O7l3A6Br
But it is not as if this blog hasn’t fleshed out the Radical-in-Chief’s gun control designs, both involving the UN and in other converging ways. Specifically, back in July 2012, at this blog’s inception, an antenna was raised about the UN’s march toward disarming American’s, and with the Commander-in-Chief’s blessings- adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/09/washington-very-close-to-subsuming-the-constitutional-right-to-bear-arms-straight-into-thuggish-un-arms-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-15/. How dare he/they?
Ever since then, the topic has been hotter than hot, as related within all the attendant links – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/02/explosive-dhs-insider-reveals-congressman-louie-gohmert-too-disarming-americans-gun-control-empowers-the-redgreen-alliancesharia-law-its-beneficiary-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.
Nevertheless, some may be heartened by the recent “shoot down” given to Sen Feinstein, the left coast harpie, as she incessantly guns for total control with her radical revolutionary surrogates – pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/03/19/sen-feinsteins-assault-weapons-ban-amendment-is-doa/.
No matter. This is certainly not the juncture to become complacent. In fact, doubling down is the way forward. And who said we can’t learn from our enemies (yes, they are) – townhall.com/columnists/davidlimbaugh/2012/10/09/obama_would_double_down_in_a_second_term/page/full/…using their tactics against them, as we aim for Conservative, Constitutional victory!