Hair raising barely begins to describe any discussion which starts with civil war. But when piggybacked by Martial Law (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_law), especially in reference to America, all bets are off. After all, we are talking about a nation which fought a bloody and protracted civil war, in the hope of truly becoming the land of the free, the home of the brave, not a replica of third world basket cases!
Well, while the premise of freedom and liberty – for one and all -used to be valid, recent facts on the ground suggest otherwise. If one merely implants one piece of evidence atop another, another reality emerges, one which supports a soon to be “transformed” America, if the revolutionaries steering America have their way.
And this is why the following alarming material has to be repeatedly aired. It is meant to set off bells, and not wedding ones!
Because fiddling with the Constitution is a big deal, at least if one hues to a life of liberty and freedom – adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with-the-constitution-to-eviscerate-term-limitations-on-the-presidency-why-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.
Yet to achieve revolutionary ends, a free thinking citizenry must be “conditioned” – adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/15/u-s-leaders-forward-march-towards-tyranny-conditioning-its-citizens-in-the-process-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…and the leaders in Washington are forward marching towards this end. Yes, indeed.
But at the end of the radical process lies unspeakable measures, ones which must be put in place, even if it takes longer than anticipated to achieve their goals – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/05/cdc-centers-for-disease-control-prevention-fema-what-are-they-up-to-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.
With the above firmly in tow, isn’t it more likely – than not – that seeds are being sown for a civil war, a war which would enable the next contingency plan – Martial Law?
‘VIDEO: IS A CIVIL WAR COMING?’
VIDEO: IS A CIVIL WAR COMING? (see link)
During his New York years, he was a frequent participant in the annual Socialist Scholars Conference held in Manhattan.
Through the 1990s and 2000s, he funneled millions of dollars to socialist front groups like ACORN, via the Woods Fund and the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. His buddy, domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, helped stuff the money in the pockets of these “public welfare” groups, often taking money from wealthy donors who believed the funds were being used to further education or stamp out poverty. This was Barack Obama’s first foray into “spreading the wealth around.”
The dirty little secret about Marxists is that the moral outrage they have about the poor, about gun violence, about war, and even about the environment (so-called “global warming,” now rebranded as “climate change”) is that these are all simply tools to set up a totalitarian government. A so-called utopia where “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” is not determined by the individual, but according to an elite bureaucracy.
Except totalitarian governments don’t work very well unless you have a dependent and defenseless rabble. Obama has successfully created a welfare state, with food stamp and welfare rolls soaring. And, with Obamacare, he will put virtually the entire citizenry on the public dole.
But creating a defenseless rabble is a little more difficult in America, with the majority of Americans holding the Second Amendment as sacred.
It was easy in Russia. In October 1918, the Communist government mandated that all of its citizens register their weapons. Then it conveniently confiscated all of these “registered” weapons. (It kind of sounds like Obama’s “common sense” call for universal background checks—really a Trojan horse for a national gun registry).
But this is all a conspiracy theory, right? America could never become like Communist Russia, could it?
In 2007 and 2008 when Obama researchers such as Stanley Kurtz and Trevor Loudon unearthed Obama’s extensive radical background and warned us from the highest mountaintops to beware, most of us handed these guys tinfoil hats, figuring that if a Marxist did get into office, we had a little document called the Constitution to keep him in check and/or impeach him.
Because of a dumbed down public and two weak RINO Republicans (first McCain, then Romney), Obama was able to garner enough votes to gain the presidency twice.
We’ve had a radical Marxist sitting in the Oval Office for over four years now.
But the Constitution was still there, including the Second Amendment and the separation of powers.
And the radical connections that were unearthed in 2007 and 2008 paled in comparison to what we learned in an almost month-by-month basis in the following years.
But the Constitution was still there, including the Second Amendment and the separation of powers.
Except what if the Obama administration could disarm a large portion of the population—the so-called “progressives” who believe that guns are evil, and the dumbed down population who didn’t know any better?
And what if the only ones left who refused to give up their guns, who demanded that the Constitution be followed, and who demanded that the separation of powers doctrine be upheld (against Obama’s “I can’t wait for Congress to act!” meme)—what if the only ones left were conservatives?
And what if the Obama administration declared conservatives domestic terrorists, as they have basically done with a so-called “study,” Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States?: Those who are “reverent of individual liberty.” Those who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority.” Those who believe there is a “grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”
And what if the Obama administration could outgun their conservative enemies?
The Obama administration has amassed a staggering amount of bullets (over two billion rounds), most of it the hollow point, armor piercing variety, enough to kill every American, man, woman, and child five times.
And what if the Obama administration successfully banned “assault weapons” but was able to keep assault weapons for themselves (as they have already done) calling the use of AR-15s “personal defense weapons”?
And what if the Obama administration could nullify the Second Amendment from the portion of the public that were the most extensively trained, who were traditionally the most conservative—that is, veterans?
The Obama administration has sent out thousands of letters to veterans with the following:
A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both…
And what if the Obama administration was purchasing thousands of light armored tanks to be used against its own citizens? This, we learned over the weekend.
And what if the Obama administration ordered a fleet of “public safety” drones, able to pick up cell phone traffic, able to identify whether the target—that is, an American citizen—is armed or not with the ability to be easily outfitted with missiles?
This is something we discovered is not out of a dystopian novel but hatched by our own government, with a fleet of 30,000 drones expected by the end of Obama’s “third term.”
And what if there was a secret memo that gave the Obama administration the authority to kill any U.S. citizen at any time, anywhere, without proof, without due process, accountable to no one? Investigative journalist Michael Isikoff uncovered this last month.
So what if, unlike the Communists in Russia, the Obama administration wasn’t able to disarm its enemy—conservatives—but were able to easily outgun them, with hundreds of thousands of “personal defense weapons,” billions of rounds, tanks, and “public safety” drones?
Is a civil war coming between a totalitarian Obama administration and conservatives?
Is this some wild-eyed conspiracy theory?
Perhaps. Perhaps not.
Regardless, it stands to reason, a regime which understands the fissures it has (purposefully) created, is diligently preparing for the resultant outbursts. Thus, is Martial Law really pie-in-the-sky, conspiracy-mongering, tin-foil hat and loony tunes rabble?
‘Is Martial Law Coming?’
When the Obama administration during its “War on Women” propaganda campaign was parading Sandra Fluke—the so-called “contraception girl”—on the red carpet leading to the White House, the Leftist blog Think Progress was leading the charge to take Obama’s Public Enemy Number One Rush Limbaugh off the air because of his Sandra Fluke “whore” comments.
And of course, the third part of the unholy leftist trinity, the Center for American Progress, run by Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff John Podesta—considered the “brain” of the radical Left—was running the whole “War on Women” marionette show.
But behind the scenes of his marionette show, Podesta had bigger fish to fry.
Just off the heels of the debt ceiling crisis—part of the so-called sequestration debacle the Obama administration has been wringing their hands about lately—John Podesta was jumping for joy in the one hundred page position paper Rebalancing Our National Security. Written following the Obama-manufactured debt ceiling crisis, the paper touted the Budget Control Act of 2011’s gutting of the military to the tune of almost five hundred billion dollars over the next ten years, not the measly $86 billion sequestration cuts Obama has been wringing his hands about.
You can almost hear Podesta giggling in the background as he discusses how the military was being gutted:
The debate in Washington over security spending this year is being driven mostly by the Budget Control Act of 2011, the debt reduction deal that averted a government shutdown last summer. The law mandates about $1 trillion in cuts to federal government discretionary spending over 10 years beginning in fiscal year 2012, including $487 billion in Pentagon cuts…
…The “sequester” came in to play after Congress failed to reach an agreement on how to legislate the deficit reduction at the end of last year…The members of our Task Force agree with the near-universal consensus that sequestration is more about political maneuvering than sound budgeting practice. But we argue that the amount of cuts to the Pentagon budget mandated by both parts of the debt deal is readily achievable with no sacrifice to our security—if the cuts are done in a thoughtful manner over the next decade. We also agree that some of those savings in the U.S. defense budget should be redeployed to other parts of the federal government, specifically to those non-military programs that help our nation defend the homeland and prevent global crises from escalating into military confrontations…
Where should the gutted defense budget be “redeployed” to per Podesta? Not the $500 billion as proposed, but his call for one trillion dollars in cuts? Being a globalist, as expected, redistribution of wealth to the global community, with the United Nations no doubt holding the purse strings:
Our Task Force plan outlines an alternative trajectory for spending on offense and prevention that would achieve the benchmark of $1 trillion in military cuts over 10 years. This framework provides $123 billion for international affairs over 10 years. It would increase spending on diplomacy during this period by 28 percent more than the president’s request, and increase spending on development and humanitarian assistance by 40 percent.
It is clear then, looking at the one trillion dollars in cuts over the next ten years, that these so-called “draconian” $86 billion sequestration cuts are simply a sham.
There are four things that are apparent from the Obama administration’s antics and its partner in crime, Center for American Progress:
1. During the debt ceiling crisis, Obama knew the “super committee” would fail and the sequestration deal would go forward.
2. Obama knew the $86 billion sequestration cuts were just a drop in the bucket to the real cuts that were mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011.
3.Obama knew that the Republican Congress would not table the sequestration, and it would go forward.
4. Obama planned on hyping up the sequestration cuts, blaming the Republicans with his allies in the mainstream media, with the goal of retaking the House of Representatives in 2014.
With Obama controlling both the House and Senate in 2014, this would allow the gutting of the military to go through. This would allow Obama to push any agenda through Congress, no matter how radical—including gutting the Second Amendment—thus allowing him to complete his “fundamental transformation” of America—that is, a Marxist utopia.
But America won’t go willingly. Obama would have to orchestrate the mother of all of his orchestrated crises.
Enter George Soros, who just happens to fund the leftist unholy trinity Think Progress, Media Matters, and Center for American Progress.
Soros also just happens to be a felon, convicted of insider trading. Soros, dubbed “The Man Who Broke the Bank of England,” funneled hundreds of millions of dollars out of the British economy with the collapse of the British pound and is now trying make money with the collapse the Euro.
And of course, Soros is a fixture at the White House.
But Obama and George Soros are after bigger fish than collapsing currencies.
The stock market in recent days has been at record levels. Many have predicted a stock market crash—losing up to 90% of its value—although those on the hard Left, especially our friend George Soros, won’t say it openly.
Soros has dumped most of his stock in the banking industry and is stockpiling a massive amount of gold. Soros has a secret that he is keeping wraps on: If the stock market crashes, the economy itself will collapse.
With unemployment at high levels, with an unsustainable welfare state pushed to its limits, and with our national debt approaching seventeen trillion, a stock market crash would make the crash of 1929 look like child’s play.
It would collapse our economy in a matter of days, if not hours.
What would occur if the economy collapses?
Food and water shortages. Civil disorder. Riots.
And of course, a call for martial law.
And the Obama administration knows this—“coincidentally” signing an executive order last year that gives Obama dictatorial power in the event of a “national emergency.”
Is this why the Obama administration has stockpiled two billion rounds of ammunition?
Is this why the Obama administration has been frantically trying to ban assault weapons while quietly stockpiling the same weapons?
Is this why the Obama administration has been stockpiling light armored tanks?
Is this why the Obama administration has ordered a fleet of “public safety” drones, able to pick up cell phone traffic, able to identify whether the target—that is, an American citizen—is armed or not—with the ability to be easily outfitted with missiles?
Is this why the Obama administration has drafted a secret memo that gives Obama the authority to execute a drone strike on any U.S. citizen, at any time, anywhere, without proof, without due process, accountable to no one?
And of course, Eric Holder this week finally admitted that yes, Obama can murder an American citizen on American soil with a drone—in “extraordinary circumstances.”
“Extraordinary circumstances” would be American citizens who are against Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America.
Here’s the possible worst case scenario: Obama successfully spins the sequestration “draconian” cuts as being the fault of the Republicans and takes back the House of Representatives in 2014. This allows him to push anything through, including gutting the military, expanding the welfare state, placing America under an increased surveillance nanny state with drones keeping track of everyone’s movements, and ticking up the national debt to an unsustainable level—nearing $20 trillion.
Then Obama, Soros, and the gaggle of leftist globalist pull some type of monetary switch to crash the U.S. stock market. Our economy then implodes in a matter of days, if not hours; and Obama, with his martial law executive order in hand steps up to his teleprompter and beams to every home in America his call for “temporary” martial law.
During this period of martial law, Obama would specifically target those “clinging to their guns and religion”—that is, conservatives—confiscating guns and using drones to spy on and kill the “domestic terrorists.”
When the “national emergency” was over, Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America would be complete, with a Marxist utopia safely in place.
Is this all a conspiracy theory? Perhaps. Perhaps not.
Read this as well, and then decide if worrying about Martial Law is off the wall – www.wnd.com/2013/03/picture-of-martial-law-alarms-forensic-profiler/.
Aside from the very fact that America is near and dear to this blogger’s heart – why else would there be a continual reference to “American-Israeli” – in practical terms, whither America goes economically, so too will the rest of us, whose economic fortunes are tied to the US. Therefore, the last thing to be wished for is an economic implosion, just to prove ones thesis! However, wishing doesn’t make it so, and head in the sand tactics is far worse.
As such, the more warnings given, the less the Pyromaniac-in-Chief and crew will be able to sneak attack. Of course, much of the damage will still occur, regardless of our best efforts. But to give them a free hand, to upend the greatest experiment in human liberty, is just – un-American.
America’s Founding Fathers (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_Fathers_of_the_United_States) foresaw this impasse. Learn their lessons well.