OBAMA INC’S HIT LIST:PATRIOTS/VETS TARGETED VIA PROPAGANDA MACHINE…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
19

MinistryofPropaganda

This site follows very closely the intelligence gathering coming out of Northeast Intelligence Network and it is not for nothing. Not one, but several counter terror contacts (each operating independently of the other) have “advised” to do as much. While bringing forward their own unique intel to these pages, oftentimes there is an overlap of info. And since our (implied) agreement has been – for the most part – to steer clear of any mention of their names, it is understood if the same basic info comes out of Northeast it should be uploaded. After all, Doug Hagmann has already “come out of the shadows”, despite a concerted online campaign to paint him as a “right-wing” nut job.  Pish posh.

So those of us who know what’s what understand why silencing and intimidating him is a high priority for Obama Inc. It is intrinsic to say as much, even though this blogger is not always in agreement with certain religious overtones taken at his site…let’s just leave it at that. Mind you, as to this American-Israeli’s ultimate goal, however the truth comes out, regardless of attempts to censor this and that, an attempt will be made to do so. Guaranteed.

Assuredly, a regime which is absolutely, incontrovertibly allergic to linking Islam + terror within its official lexicon is incapable of protecting cats and dogs, let alone its citizens. Said protection is NOT on their agenda, but the opposite is the case, even if many refuse to internalize the highly dangerous facts on the ground. 

  • “Page 13 inaccurately states that AQ [al Qaeda] is responsible for the bombing of the Khobar Towers and that AQ is ‘clearly linked’ to the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.”
  • “The Qur’an is not the teachings of the Prophet, but the revealed word of God.”
  • “Remove sweeping generality of ‘Those who fit the terrorist profile best (for the present at least) are young male immigrants of Middle Eastern appearance’”
  •  “author seems to conflate ‘Islamic militancy’ with ‘terrorism’ and needs to define the difference and use it in their analysis”

In its May 22, 2013, article on some of the Judicial Watch revelations, The Washington Examiner reported, “While the Muslim Brotherhood is not on the U.S. State Department’s official list of international terrorist organizations, some of its offshoots, including the Palestinian group Hamas, are.” Ironically, FBI Director Mueller, who ordered the purge of “offensive” material – including the exoneration of the Muslim Brotherhood – has described the organization as a group that supports terrorism in the US and overseas.

“The FBI is rewriting history in order to help al Qaeda. This shows that the law enforcement agency is in need of serious top-to-bottom reform. As we recently learned from the Boston Marathon terrorist attack, the country is less safe when we allow radical Muslim organizations to tell the FBI how to train its agents and do its job,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The FBI’s purge of so called ‘offensive’ material is political correctness run amok, and it puts the nation at risk. The Obama administration needs to stop putting the tender sensibilities of radical Islamists above the safety of the American people.”

It is within this Orwellian context that outspoken patriots, be they vets, active duty personnel or those who are thinking to join any nation-saving movement, understand the methods utilized by socialist, Marxist, communist and Islamic propaganda machines. Totalitarian regimes in toto. In fact, it was hardly coincidental that alerts were raised within this site, time and again, to said effect. Specifically,

Alert One:

Who in their right (no pun intended) mind can still argue that Obama Inc. does not operate akin to a Goebbel’s-like propaganda machine? Of course it does.

Alert Two:

And knowing what you do, is it outlandish to posit: are Americans being led like sheep to the slaughter, or some such jarring comparison? This site clearly sees the parallels. What say you?

Alert Three:

For what other reason, other than to control the populace, would a so-called democracy (essentially) gut the First Amendment? Exactly.

Alert Four:

But still, in order to go from there to here, what else is required in practical terms? Well, if one finds highly disturbing parallels between DHS and Germany’s World War 2 Gestapo, would that be sufficient to warrant a distinct clarion call? Hope so.

Yes, national/nazi socialism are where it’s at for Obama Inc. and Islamists are following the lead. After all, who isn’t familiar with Islamic nazi salutes?? Totalitarianism is where it’s at, the red/green hatred of Judaism and Christianity.

Onto Obama Inc.’s propaganda ministry…just as in any “good” totalitarian regime, and to take DIRECT aim at patriots of all stripes, a trigger point is needed for a “firing squad”! A bull’s-eye must be painted on their backs, for the purging to begin.

PROPAGANDA Conspiracy Designed To Create A Circular Firing Squad

By Catherine Crabill, contributing columnist

Tuesday, 27 May 2014: When I decided to run for delegate in the 99th District of Virginia, my mission was to change the debate from the mundane and inconsequential of local politics to focus on the alarming erosion of our Constitution and the Rule of Law, while working toward resurrecting the 10th Amendment. I knew whoever controls the dialog controls the debate, and few, if any, were addressing these issues at that time. Little did I know that my entire platform of Constitutional liberty and re-infusing religious expression in the public square in 2009 would make me Public Enemy #1.

The FULL COURT PRESS that followed was astounding. No one could have prepared me for the entire Republican Slate conspiring to publicly denounce me. Denounce me for what? Promoting liberty? The Rule of Law? Quoting the Founding Fathers? Yep.

Had I not personally experienced such bizarre attacks from the party I spent my life supporting I would find the demonization of our military, in particular, “returning Vets”, impossible to conceive of. The list of patently offensive remarks and publications denouncing our veterans are well documented, but most egregiously are those published by the Department of Homeland Security, aka, Obama’s SS.

In concert with the attacks on the character of our military is the propaganda warfare within the military against us.

Incredibly, an Army Training Manuel publication in 2013 identified “Evangelical Christians, Catholics, Mormons, and Jews as ‘domestic terrorists’. They were listed with Al Qaeda, Hamas, The Muslim Brotherhood, (which has been invited/allowed to completely infiltrate the White House and Pentagon…), and the KKK!

So while we are being propagandized to distrust our military, they are being propagandized to distrust us. The natural partnership and respect between us is being eroded. I contend that such a bond must be weakened, if not broken, for the militarization of our domestic police to rule the day when the final hammer comes down.

Is it any wonder that those who have demonstrated the most consistent patriotic fervor, willing to seal their commitment in their own life’s blood, are under attack by this administration? The Veteran’s Administration “Wait Lists” to delay/prevent veteran care is not an oversight, not an omission, it is deliberate in its wicked intent to kill off those who pose the greatest threat to prevent the over throw of America from within.

The 2012 NDAA, (National Defense Authorization Act), unconstitutionally authorized the arrest, detention, ‘rendition’ (torture), of American citizens ANYWHERE, ANY PLACE, ANY TIME WITHOUT DUE PROCESS, IF said American is SUSPECTED of associating with ‘terrorists’.

In the NDAA 2013, The Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987 that banned domestic propaganda was unconstitutionally ‘legalized’. Will the militarized domestic agencies, which are now legion, be implemented to round up demonized patriots while our military ‘stands down’ because they have been propagandized to view us as the enemy?

The CONSPIRACY of “DISINFORMATION”, (deliberately lying, misleading, deception….), AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE IS A DECLARATION OF WAR.

Yesterday, Memorial Day, I cornered the Key Note Speaker of our Memorial event, an extremely distinguished Active Military Officer. I asked him if he was concerned about the demonization of the military. Without hesitation, his wife nodding vigorously over his shoulder, he affirmed he was deeply concerned and offended. He declared that one could only imagine where all of this was leading.

As a “Conspiracy Theorist”, (Those who question known liars…), I am convinced this is designed to cause the majority of freedom loving, God-fearing Americans, those of us who should be natural allies, to be suspicious of one another.

This propaganda conspiracy is meant to create a circular firing squad.

NO one should be naive enough to believe that an actual firing squad is not in the offing. Consider the facts at hand and you decide:

Fact One:

Why in heaven’s name are so many experienced patriots raising their own alarms…is it that they realize who DHS is laser focused on, perhaps those who “stubbornly cling” to the Constitution?

Fact Two:

In light of fact one, does untold purchases of (domestic) heavy ammo make better sense, yet to be explained, as well as being unprecedented in its scope?

Fact Three:

What about the militarization of police forces throughout the U.S., actually steps to prep for Martial Law? Such planning is required, for once the shit hits the fan – whatever its “precipitating” factor – “law and order” must be restored.

A + B. 1 + 1.

 

OBAMA’S COLLABORATION WITH TALIBAN/AL-QAEDA:RELEASE OF TALIBAN LEADERS FOR AWOL ARMY PRIVATE, CONVERT TO ISLAM.MORE THAN MEETS THE EYE…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
17

U.S. Army Private Bowe Bergdahl, AWOL & Muslim Convert too! 

There are certain levels of treachery which rise into the stratosphere, none more so than treason by a national leader. A citizen too. Pardon this blogger for being so blunt, but a hanging by the balls – if male – is viable retribution on this end. A painful way to go, but not in comparison to a nation betrayed. As to female betrayers, well, we can discuss suitable measures another time. First things first.

Now that the above prescriptive remedy is out in the open, what has gotten this American-Israeli – again – so riled up? It goes without saying, this site pointed out the absolute, incontrovertible evidence that Barack HUSSEIN Obama is in league, embedded with Al-Qaeda, regardless of his public statements to hunt them down! Liar, liar…his pants are totally on fire.

If markers are required to fully indict the Betrayer-in-Chief, rest assured, there are too many to point to. But in relation to his fealty to Al-Qaeda, the bastard child of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, they are visible for all to see, unless one is willfully blind.

Founded in 1928 by the Egyptian schoolteacher/activist Hasan al-Banna (a devout admirer of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis), the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) — a Sunni entity — is one of the oldest, largest and most influential Islamist organizations in the world. While Egypt historically has been the center of the Brotherhood’s operations, the group today is active in more than 70 countries(some estimates range as high as 100+). Islam expert Robert Spencer has called MB “the parent organization of Hamas and al Qaeda.” In 2003, Richard Clarke – the chief counterterrorism advisor on the U.S. National Security Council during both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations – told a Senate committee that Hamas, al Qaeda, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad were all “descendants of the membership and ideology of the Muslim Brothers.

Be that as it may, wherein belies today’s treacherous “news”? Well, if one factors in two levels of treachery, then the Islamist-in-Chief’s recent release of heavy-duty Taliban terrorist leaders makes “sense”. Their blood soaked hands are stained with American (western) blood, of this there is no doubt. Now, in exchange for an AWOL solider, a convert to Islam whose loyalties are indeed worthy of questioning to begin with, why is this deal in the interests of the nation, nor under the rubric, “no soldier left behind”? It’s not.

Level One Treachery:

We must first internalize: the raging mid east fires have been set by the Islamist-in-Chief and they are meant to benefit Islamist forces, chiefly Brotherhood related. No one with a modicum of geo-political knowledge, let alone intellectual integrity (regardless of party/ideological affiliation), can argue otherwise. As a matter of record, Benghazigate’s main beneficiaries were Al-Qaeda linked terror forces, and this was NO accident!

ONTO the tie-in to the release of “AWOL convert to Islam, Abdullah Bergdahl, a traitor or a deserter. Company Commander at Fort Bragg, Stephen Kirouac, called Bergdahl a “dirtbag” and “sympathizer.” And it’s not just that, the soldier, who has converted to Islam, is alleged to have been teaching its fighters bomb-making skills. Bergdahl’s father praised Allah when the announcement of the trade was made. His father wants to see all the GITMO terrorists released….” and the claim that Barack HUSSEIN Obama (and surrogates) have the backs of jihadi soldiers, wherever they may be.

Level Two Treachery:

Recall – who can forget – several cases of Muslim-American soldiers (whether converts or not, makes no diff) killing fellow soldiers, and the appalling disrespect towards those who were targeted, juxtaposed against the kid glove treatment to the “soldiers for Allah”!  

Screen Shot 2014-06-01 at 12.43.04 PM

CONSIDER the AWOL soldier’s own words and decide whether or not Obama Inc. knew about this email BEFORE unleashing monsters for his release:

Just days before he was reported missing, he sent an email to his father, Bob, indicating he felt he was fighting for the wrong side.

“I am sorry for everything here,” he wrote. “These people need help, yet what they get is the most conceited country in the world telling them that they are nothing and that they are stupid.”

His commander was a “conceited old fool,” Bergdahl continued, noting his disgust at being associated with the U.S. military – and even the nation in general.

“I am ashamed to be an American,” he wrote. “And the title of US soldier is just the lie of fools. I am sorry for everything. The horror that is America is disgusting.”

Reports indicate he subsequently deserted his fellow soldiers, leading to the deaths of multiple individuals involved in a rescue and recovery mission. Once in Taliban custody, the terrorist organization used him in propaganda videos in which he criticized the American government.

Capping off the saga surrounding his release, reports this week indicate Bergdahl – a man who made it clear he wants nothing to do with the U.S. Army – is now on the fast track to a military promotion.

ADDITIONAL “proofs in the pudding” can be found within, and it is not as if Obama Inc. hasn’t a clue. To the contrary, they knew exactly who they “rescued” and who they released in exchange…more than a deal with the Islamic devil…

AWOL Muslim covert’s “hit list” of faves for his viewing pleasure: Shaykh Anwar al-Awlaki, condemning America as a terrorist state:

Bergdahl's Youtube account's favorites list has an anti-American Anwar al-Awlaki video

Bergdahl’s Youtube account’s favorites list has an anti-American Anwar al-Awlaki video. Notice Bergdahl’s name above the list, showing that it is indeed his account

Perhaps the following videos will bring Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s treason full circle – 

Watch Obama smile as soon as Bergdahl gives the most famous Muslim expression, the “Bismillah” or the “Basmallah”:

The “basmallah” is the Islamic expression for victory and only indicates that Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s father is a Muslim, as is the Traitor-in-Chief! 

Bad Deal, Obama Grinning as Bergdahl Dad Speaks Arabic in Rose Garden

YES, a POTUS collaborator frees a wannabe jihadist in exchange for 5 terrorist monsters!

AWOL Jihad Traitor for Taliban Terrorists: Mullah Omar Rejoices, Prisoner Swap “Big Victory” for Global Jihad, Obama promises more concessions

Here’s more on the treasonous terror deal I wrote about here: “AWOL Traitor Traded for Taliban Terrorists: “In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful,’’ AWOL soldier’s dad said in Arabic.”

Anyone in the Obama administration that cops out to “we don’t leave anyone behind” as the reason why they traded an AWOL traitor for five GITMO Taliban leaders is lying. The Obama administration abandoned our people in Benghazi — heroes and patriots — when they needed us most. Obama’s contempt for our troops is nothing new. Taliban insider attacks spiked to unseen levels under Obama as he continued to sanction and reward the Taliban. Obama’s rules of engagement in Afghanistan was an invitation to murder — it was open season on US soldiers.  The Washington Times recently reported that “the number of U.S. battlefield fatalities exceeded the rate at which troop strength surged in 2009 and 2010, prompting national security analysts to assert that coinciding stricter rules of engagement led to more deaths.”

Obama’s reception at West Point was icy for good reason.

Obama has been a Taliban supporter for some time now — despite the slaughter, the insider attacks, the destruction of schools, the attacks on girls, etc. He strong-armed President Karzai into partnering with them. He supports the Taliban. He insisted that Karzai share power with the Taliban. He insisted that NATO recognize the Taliban.

Karzai has said that the Obama Administration actually told him that the Taliban, which provided al Qaeda its base of support for September 11, was not an enemy of the U.S.

in 2012,  Barack Hussein Obama used the NATO summit to press Afghan leader Hamid Karzai to engage with greater urgency with the Taliban about a political settlement in Afghanistan. Obama stalked and chased these jihadist murderers. Obama demanded that Afghanistan be designated a “major non-NATO ally.” The non-NATO ally declaration allowed for streamlined defense cooperation, more money, expedited purchasing ability of American equipment, and easier export control regulations.

Mullah Omar, long known to be in Afghanistan is one of the word’s most wanted terrorists. He is the leader of the Taliban and is wanted by the U.S. State Department since October 2001. There’s a ten million dollar reward on his head. He sheltered Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda killers in the years prior to the September 11 attacks. He had a hand in the 911 attacks, and directed  the Taliban’s ongoing war against the U.S.-led NATO forces and the government of Afghanistan.

Obama negotiated this “trade” as a cover to release these jihad killers. Many called the AWOL convert to Islam, Abdullah Bergdahl, a traitor or a deserter. Company Commander at Fort Bragg, Stephen Kirouac, called Bergdahl a “dirtbag” and “sympathizer.” And it’s not just that, the soldier, who has converted to Islam, is alleged to have been teaching its fighters bomb-making skills. Bergdahl’s father praised Allah when the announcement of the trade was made. His father wants to see all the GITMO terrorists released.

Two Republican lawmakers said President Barack Obama violated U.S. laws when he approved the exchange of an American soldier believed held by Islamist insurgents for five years for five Afghan detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Congressman Howard “Buck” McKeon of California and Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma said Saturday in a statement that Obama is required by law to notify Congress 30 days before any transfer of terrorists from the U.S. detention facility.

So what are they going to do about it? Continue to sit by while Obama wages war against us?

mullah-omar-taliban-010101jpg-ca2c0b38a5a4c814

Mullah Omar has been wanted by the U.S. State Department since October 2001. There’s a ten-million-dollar reward on his head. He sheltered Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda killers in the years prior to the September 11 attacks. He had a hand in the 911 attacks, and is directing the Taliban’s ongoing war against the U.S.-led NATO forces and the government of Afghanistan.

Screen Shot 2014-06-01 at 12.42.56 PMWhat’s the Obama administration’s response to this?

More surrender:

Screen Shot 2014-06-01 at 12.52.12 PM

“‘New opening’ for US-Taliban talks possible: Hagel” The International Times

WASHINGTON: US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel expressed hope Sunday the release of US Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl would lead to direct US talks with the Taliban.

“It could, it might and we hope it will present an opening,” Hagel said in an interview from Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan with NBC´s “Meet the Press.

“Hagel noted that the United States had engaged in talks with the Taliban before, until they were broken off in 2012, and that it strongly supported an Afghan-led effort to reach a peace agreement with the Taliban.

 

There is little more reprehensible than a scumbag leader who abuses the military’s “Warrior Credo”, in what amounts to treasonous objectives, pulling on America’s heartstrings and its bastardization in the process: “In the U.S. Armed Forces, we don’t leave anyone behind. It’s one of the basic pillars of what the Army calls the Warrior Ethos: “I will never leave a fallen comrade.”

SANS any hesitation, this much is for sure: when a citizen is guilty of treason the amount of damage accrued by their betrayal can be anywhere between low, medium and high. Despicable on its face. And those tasked with meting out punishment should factor in the tangible, as well as the intangibles in their calculus.

HOWEVER, when it comes to a treasonous leader – a President no less, regardless of party affiliation – NO punishment should be considered too extreme. Show no mercy. NONE!

 Have they died in vain?

The following are photos of six U.S. soldiers reportedly killed while searching for Bergdahl:

What say you, Traitor-in-Chief and henchmen??

Something fishy: Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel (C) made press statements aboard a military aircraft but failed to notify Congress that five Guantanamo Bay detainees would be walking free. Now soldiers have come forward demanding to know why they were attempted to be hushed

BENGHAZIGATE PANEL:POTUS’S “MISSING TIME” RISES TO TOP TIER! AWOL COMMANDER-in-CHIEF MUST ‘FESS UP…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
6

IntelligenceInsider

This site’s most trusted contacts kept pointing in two directions when Benghazigate first exploded and they duly “advised”: it would be prudent to rely on, to pass on, their insider information (Northeast Intelligence has Insider “W”, others have…), that which these sources developed over time. Significantly, it was this information which played out when Benghazigate broke.Concomitantly, they realized that the captured media would not report on key developments (under any circumstances) and only a few alternative media sites would even enter the fray.

In this regard, they counted on this site to do the right thing. Well, not only were said contacts spot on re the underbelly of Benghazigate, but a paltry few conservative sites touched the second tier of this explosive story, heretofore referenced below. However, for the most part, various media came on board with the first tier when its efficacy could no longer be denied.

Specifically, the first tier involved definitive markers which led towards the largest weapons running operation in Mid East history, illegal on its face. Not only was Congress left in the dark, vitiating the War Powers Resolution, but the toppling of Qadafi – no longer a strategic threat to the U.S. – became “necessary” to give open sesame to Muslim Brotherhood strongmen to attain hegemony. 

The Constitution of the United States divides the war powers of the federal government between the Executive and Legislative branches: the President is the Commander in Chief of the armed forces (Article II, section 2), while Congress has the power to make declarations of war, and to raise and support the armed forces (Article I, section 8). Over time, questions arose as to the extent of the President’s authority to deploy U.S. armed forces into hostile situations abroad without a declaration of war or some other form of Congressional approval. Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in the aftermath of the Vietnam War to address these concerns and provide a set of procedures for both the President and Congress to follow in situations where the introduction of U.S. forces abroad could lead to their involvement in armed conflict…..

Now, it is a fact that al-Qaeda has been the beneficiary of Barack HUSSEIN’s wildfires in the Mid East, so much so that they are embedded in places heretofore less “hospitable” to their terror forces. The knock-on effects of the Islamist-in-Chief. The “gift” that keeps giving.   

al-Qaeda terror thug celebrates after Benghazi compound explodes

On top of tier one, let us segue over to the all important tier two, the one which is so germane, so explosive, that very few sites dare to touch it. Radioactive. Cowards.

Nevertheless, several commentaries (at this site…some even questioned if this American-Israeli lives in a bunker…oh yeah…) spelled things out and they couldn’t have been clearer.

Starting with the general query: what/who was occupying Barack HUSSEIN Obama when Benghazigate went down? to: POTUS AWOL during Benghazigate slaughter, sexually compromised, drugged up and inebriated too, could it get any starker? Not much, unless one requires video evidence! But never mind, it is hard for committed ideologues to think outside the box, for if they did, the most intrinsic piece of the puzzle, its missing piece, would tell the very tawdry tale.

Regardless, if bonehead Boehner’s special panel to investigate Benghazi does not include his “missing time”, well, a key piece to the AWOL POTUS will stay buried and that would be a travesty of mega injustice and historical falsehood. Unfathomable. Unconscionable. Indeed, if most understood what REALLY went down with Barack HUSSEIN Obama while Americans were slaughtered, it is very likely that even the captured media could not stop them from “storming the gates”. 

Obama with Reggie Love

The “down low” POTUS & his “body double”: Reggie Love, his hunk of lovin’!

The Single Most Dangerous Question To Obama Re Benghazi – Northeast Intelligence Network

22 May 2014:  Although numerous unanswered questions continue to plague the Obama White House about the criminal and murderous events of the Benghazi attacks on September 11, 2012, there is one single question that needs to be asked with absolute precision and answered with authenticated specificity.

It is the question that Obama and a very small contingent of his innermost circle fear the most, for it is my professional investigative assessment, based on insider information, that the answer to this question alone will cause the immediate demands for the impeachment and removal from office of Barack Hussein Obama. It is this precise question:

Where exactly within the White House was Barack Hussein Obama, from the time he left the Oval Office at approximately 7:30 p.m. ET, until the following day when he boarded Air Force One destined for Las Vegas, who was he with, and what were the exact nature of his activities during this period?

Unfortunately, I have significant doubts that specific answers to this multi-part question, subject to verification by Secret Service logs, will be forthcoming or cross-referenced with other internal White House logs and other records that are known to be kept and maintained. I also have serious doubts that the Select Committee will press the issue beyond any vague, superficial and peripheral testimony offered by those called before the investigative body.

It is this one particular question—and a complete, truthful and verifiable answer—that has the ability to completely change the perception of events that have been carefully crafted like a cheap paint-by-numbers picture set suitable for children 8-12 years of age.

Just where was the Commander-in-Chief while Americans were fighting for their lives and awaiting assistance that would never arrive? We now know where he wasn’t, which was in the White House situation room. What activities could possibly take precedence over even a brief “pop-in” to the Situation Room for a strategic, election year photo-op? Think about that and all that it implies for a moment.

Based on information supplied to me by two insider sources, the truthful answers to this multi-part question will never be disclosed—ever. Based on one DC insider who is legally muzzled by multiple national security secrecy oaths, “negotiations” are in progress (or perhaps complete) to make certain the committee will stay away from this question beyond a very narrow line of inquiry. This explains the ostensible partisan cooperation under the direction of Nancy Pelosi, according to my source. There is immense pressure being forced upon the committee chair and others to stay away from this line of questioning beyond the requisite superficiality designed for our entertainment.

Moreover, I have been informed that the Secret Service logs, White House visitor logs, and cross-referencing records “including and especially of those individuals present in the private presidential quarters that would identify the names, ages and alleged purpose for their presence” will never be remitted, at least not in their original form, if at all. Furthermore, any answers relating to this question by witness testimony will not be properly reconciled with any documentation at the depth required.

Robert “Tosh” Plumlee, CIA whistle blower, posed 11 questions about Benghazi to elected officials from both political parties and received no responses in return. I pose one, publicly, for it is the truthful answer to this question that is, and forever will be, the “third rail” of the deepest recesses of insider knowledge.

Wait. Watch. And mark my words.

It gets worse, if you dare imagine. The foxes in the Repub hen house have already compromised the investigation, by dint of the fact that the LEAD Executive Director of the select committee is tied into both far left AND Islamist groups! Need proofs?

The American people are supposed to trust Republicans appointed to investigate Benghazi but as it turns out, the Executive Director appointed to the House Select Committee on Benghazi – Philip Kiko – is a lobbyist for the Smith-Free Group, in which his clients include the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the radical environmentalist group the Sierra Club, Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), National Council of La Raza “the Race” (NCLR), and the National Organization for Women (NOW), NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (NLDEF) and others.

And it even gets worse, it also turns out that he lobbied for a group with strong connections to Muslim Brotherhood front groups in the U.S.

Philip Kiko

This constitutes a major problem

Select Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy and House Speaker John Boehner.

Let’s address the elephant in the room. When it comes to Benghazi, the attackers all resided under the Muslim Brotherhood umbrella.

Muslim Advocates
Kiko, appointed by Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, has been a lobbyist for Smith-Free Group since 2013. One of Smith-Lee’s clients is the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, a consortium of racial and liberal organizations that includes the highly suspect Muslim Advocates (MA). There also appears to be a connection to Wisconsin politicians. The head of MA used to work for U.S. Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Kiko for Rep. James Sensenbrenner as Deputy Chief of Staff from 2001 – 2007. Sensenbrenner is credited with authoring the Patriot Act.

MA’s President and Executive Director Farhana Khera worked directly for Feingold for six years and was Counsel to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee. Ironically, a primary focus of Khera has been to water down the Patriot Act to protect Muslims. The degree to which she was successful can be seen in both how politically correct the law is as well as Feingold being the only U.S. Senator to vote against the law.

Farhana Khera with Nancy Pelosi.

Khera represented the Muslim Students Association (MSA) in the U.S. and Canada in a suit filed against the City of New York over the surveillance of the Muslim community. MSA is a known Muslim Brotherhood front group and Khera is clearly a pro-Muslim activist who has argued that sting operations lead to “anti-Muslim sentiment”.

In 2010, Khera spoke at the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) convention. In her speech, Khera tipped off Muslim leaders about law enforcement surveillance techniques. ISNA is also a Muslim Brotherhood front.

Perhaps one of Khera’s most prized accomplishments was a letter she received from then-Deputy National Security Adviser John Brennan, who is currently the Director of the CIA. Brennan’s letter was in response to a letter sent by Khera and 57 Muslim organizations requesting that training materials offensive to Muslims be purged from counter-terrorism manuals. Brennan expressed agreement with Khera in his response.

When it comes to other Muslim Advocates members advocating for terrorist organizations, at a 2007 Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) convention, Muslim Advocates counsel Akil Vohra vouched for the Holy Land Foundation, insisting that it was not connected to terrorism. One year later, the HLF was found guilty on all charges related to terrorism.

When former Deputy Chief of Staff to Hillary Clinton Huma Abedin found herself at the center of controversy after Rep. Michele Bachmann raised questions about Abedin’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, at least one Muslim Advocates member expressed support for Abedin. Board member Amber Khan sent out the following tweet about Abedin’s attendance at the White House iftar dinner in 2012:

Amber_Khan_Praise_Huma

Curiously, Kiko’s former boss – Sensenbrenner – was one of a handful of Republicans who publicly defended Abedin, thereby siding against Bachmann.

Rep. Keith Ellison, one of two Muslim U.S. Congressmen, was one of Abedin’s staunchest of defenders against Bachmann. Ellison responded to Bachmann’s questions with an incoherent two-page letter that was rebuked with a 16-page letter from Bachmann; it would be her last public words on the matter.

Ellison also has a connection to Muslim Advocates. The organization’s Director of Program to Strengthen Muslim Charities, Mohamed Sabur, was once an employee of Ellison.

Mohamed Sabur

Mohamed Sabur (r) selling Islamic materials circa 2002.

Sabur is also credited with founding The Qunoot Foundation. This organization is a partner with CAIR. Muslim Advocates is identified as a kind of offshoot from the Muslim Brotherhood front. In fact, their advocates work with CAIR. In fact, on CAIR’s official website, an application was accepted for a CAIR / Qunoot Fellowship.

Another co-founder of Qunoot Foundation – Zahier Janmohamed – supports Hamas, which is itself a Muslim Brotherhood group whose beliefs are in line with the Benghazi attackers.

Other figures on the Muslim Advocates website that warrant further scrutiny are Deputy Director Naheed Qureshi and Board Asifa Quraishi-Landes. As we have learned, the Qureshi name (can be spelled differently) is quite prominent within the Muslim Brotherhood. Suheir Qureshi was identified by Shoebat.com as one of the 63 Muslim Sisterhood leaders. Naheed joined other Muslim Brotherhood figures at the 2010 White House Iftar Dinner, to include Huma Abedin’s mother Saleha Abedin.

Here is a promo video on the Muslim Advocates website, the organization Kiko has lobbied for. The video features Sabur, Khera, and Ellison:

Foley and Lardner
Another potentially noteworthy aspect to Kiko’s background is his time with Foley and Lardner as Of Counsel.One of the partners of this firm is Cleta Mitchell, who inexplicably defended Grover Norquist and Suhail Khan in the face of overwhelming evidence of their complicity in the Muslim Brotherhood agenda.

Mitchell: Insists Grover Norquist and Suhail Khan are clean.

The evidence against both Norquist and Khan is incontrovertible. Yet, Mitchell chose to vehemently defend them while smearing those who pointed out their Muslim Brotherhood connections, as Shoebat.com reported. The extent of Kiko’s relationship with Mitchell is unclear but it is noteworthy that both Mitchell and he have either advocated for or defended individuals or groups with connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. As a partner with Foley, Mitchell would have been senior to Kiko, who was listed as ‘Of Counsel’.

Kiko Should Recuse Himself
Shortly after Speaker John Boehner appointed Trey Gowdy to head the House Select Committee on Benghazi, Gowdy appointed Kiko. To what extent Boehner may have had a hand in Gowdy’s naming of the longtime DC lobbyist is not known but Boehner sure seemed pleased with the appointment immediately after it was announced, saying:

“Phil Kiko is a man of unquestioned integrity with a record of distinguished service to the House and the American people. His appointment today is further proof of Chairman Gowdy’s commitment to an investigation that is serious, fact-based, and professional. The American people deserve the full truth about what happened in Benghazi on September 11, 2012, and there is no better person to help lead this effort than Phil.”

Select_Committee

Like Sensenbrenner, Boehner was one of the handful of Republicans who defended Abedin against Bachmann, as Shoebat.com reported.

Let’s face it, Congress has a poor track record with the American people. It’s a place where corruption thrives like weeds in a garden that needs constant tending. Despite this, there is an industry in Washington, DC that is viewed with even more contempt, perhaps the most unprincipled profession in the nation’s capital – lobbying. Often, the extent to which any one lobbyist’s principles – or lack thereof – can be known are by looking at his clients.

When doing this with Kiko, it becomes apparent that he should recuse himself from the Benghazi investigation. Boehner, Gowdy and every member of the House Select Committee should demand it.

 

ASIDE from all the mutating, co-joining and bedding patterns between Demsters and RINO’s with Islamic mouthpieces, let us never forget the part played by “dear Hill”. Now, there are several hot commentaries demonstrating why she too belongs in jail due to her immeasurable complicity re Benghazigate, but we don’t even have to rely on her recent crimes.

In a nutshell, if the buck is truly going to stop with Obama Inc, don’t let the Clinton machine off the hook either. Via their body counts over the years, especially when Hill runs for POTUS, Benghazigate is just her latest criminal activity. 

So for your (dis)pleasure, sit back, bring out the popcorn or whatever suits your personal taste buds, and view the following movie, one which Clinton’s gang is desperate to hide!

SHARIAH LAW MUST BE ELIMINATED TO SAVE AMERICA & THE WEST.ITS CANCEROUS SCOURGE. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
245

Let’s be clear from the get go: agreed, Islam has been around for centuries and it is nauseatingly deemed one of the three “great” religions, regardless of its barbarity. Get over it. In any event, it is time to cease pandering to its “hallowed” status and to commence telling the truth, otherwise the west will be destroyed. Simple as that.

In reality, it has never stopped its war-like thrust. On the other hand, its catapult has never been more obvious. Ensured. Additionally, don’t become (mentally) entrapped into believing that to “wage war” against Islam is akin to any form of bias against individual Muslims. It is not.

Assuredly, the west’s struggle is against a totalitarian political ideology. Hence, it must be re-focused against a politically fascist and religious cloaked doctrine which has, from time immemorial, targeted western infidels, many of whom are also apostates from Islam. Essentially, “pure” Islam dictates who lives and who dies. Period.

In fact, Winston Churchill presciently noted the following observations and his predictive words are as true today as they were when he uttered them.They are absolutely historically accurate. Beyond dispute.

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! 
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia
in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many
countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods
of commerce and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the 
Prophet rule or live.  A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and 
refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity.  The fact that in Mohammedan 
law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as
a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the
faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.  


Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion 
paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.  No stronger retrograde
force exists in the world.  Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant 
and proselytizing faith.  It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising 
fearless warriors at every step, and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the 
strong arms of science, the science against which it (Islam) has vainly struggled, 
the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”  

And if its immutable relationship with blood is not enough of a precipitate, predictive and proximate danger, what else qualifies? 

With the above firmly implanted in mind, how can westerners disregard the inherent dangers from Islam, even as their leaders babble otherwise?

Only One Way To Prevent Shariah From Destroying America and other non Islamic Countries 

By: Dave Gaubatz

27 May 2014

I am not going to spend hours and hours to answer this question.  America, Israel, Canada, and other non-Islamic countries can be spared their destruction from the evils of the Islamic ideology by only one method. 

I am not a war monger, do not desire any form of violence, or want to see innocent children harmed by a war in their country.  I am providing my professional analysis of a very serious problem.  The problem is the Islamic ideology.  It is an ideology that lives, breeds, and grows faster than any know terminal form of cancer.

If we do not want America to be destroyed it is going to take Americans saying no to Islam.  Not just with bumper stickers.  Americans are going to have to demand the Islamic ideology and Shariah law to be labeled as an Islamic terrorist group.

Al Qaeda, Hamas, Boko Haram, and the dozens of other Islamic terrorist groups are just splinters from the Islamic ideology itself.  There is no good with such violent groups as the KKK, Al Sharpton’s organization, or the Islamic ideology.

Think back the last decade, how many days have gone by in which Islam and their murderers have not been in the world news.  In the name of Islam, their fighters have murdered thousands upon thousands of innocent men, women, and children.

Americans must stand up and fight the ‘Holy War’ Islamic leaders have always expressed their desire for.  The days of shaking hands and allowing Islam to spread in America are gone.  There are approximately 2300 mosques in America. Their numbers are growing and existing mosques are expanding in size.

How do Americans fight?  Again this is my analysis, not my desire.  During the civil war Americans (due to politics) had to fight other Americans.  Politicians left Americans with no choice.  In 2014 after six long years of Socialist Obama, politics are again pitting Americans against people living in America.  The people within Islam are not Americans, regardless of what a court or politician dictates.  One can only be an American if he/she vows to put the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land.  An American vows to give his/her life for America against enemies from the inside and out.

The Islamic ideology and it’s followers living in America do not support the U.S. Constitution over Shariah law.  If a Muslim tells you he/she does, they are lying to you.  The only solution to save America is for America to be a land for Americans only or those who would give their life to support the U.S. Constitution.  If a person does not meet this requirement then he/she should be considered an enemy of America.

Boko Haram, the group that kidnapped 300 innocent Christian children in Nigeria are practicing Islam as Mohammed and Shariah law dictate.  They are not radical. They are ‘Pure Muslims’ who desire to live in a land as Mohammed wanted.  They are just carrying out his commands.

“A Radical Muslim’ is a ‘Practicing Muslim’, a ‘Moderate Muslim’ is a ‘non Practicing Muslim’ or otherwise known as an Apostate of Islam…The penalty for Apostasy under Sharia law is Death”   

 “Destroy the Islamic ideology worldwide and we will have peace worldwide” .

“Islam is an economic, military, and political ideology, that uses religions as a method to obtain their ultimate goal: Islamic Ummah (Nation)Worldwide and under Sharia law” 

 “CAIR has a larger and more dependable ‘Confidential Informant’ Network’ than our entire FBI Department.  CAIR has devoted non Muslim people within local, state, and federal government.  They have police officers in high positions, medical personnel, military personnel, and most importantly they have Pastors, Ministers, and Rabbi’s.

“We are not at war with Al Qaeda, Hamas, The Taliban, or other Islamic terrorist groups.  We are at war with Islam itself and the groups that emerge from the violent ideology of Islam are our secondary enemies”. 

 Defying Statistics - 6

Paradoxically, and in a very Orwellian sense, Churchill’s Britain is Allah-bent on becoming a Shariah compliant financial hub, as are other Euro capitals. London is leading the charge. Rolling out the green carpet, so to speak!

London is vying to be the capital of Islamic finance outside of the Muslim world, says the city’s Deputy Mayor Sir Edward Lister.

A task force on building the UK’s Islamic finance industry has been at work since early 2013 and London will host the World Islamic Economic Forum in October.

“The task force has just started and its aim is to make it easier for banks in London to have Islamic products, which is still quite a new concept to any of them,” Lister told a press conference, reported Reuters.

“Only now people are beginning to understand what the products actually mean and how they comply … What you will see is a lot of companies introducing those products.”

Globally, the Islamic finance industry is forecast to be worth $2.6tn (€1.9bn, £1.6bn) by 2017. It has grown by around 30% each year since the millennium and consultancy firm Oliver Wyman predicts that there will need to be at least 150 Islamic finance institutions by 2020 to meet the ever-growing demand.

There are more than 20 UK banks offering Sharia-compliant products, such as HSBC and RBS. There are also three Sharia-only institutions, including the Islamic Bank of Britain (IBB).

By increasing the number of Sharia-compliant financial services in London it will be easier to facilitate investment in the UK from Islamic investors.

Not only that, but America is doing everything to usher in Shariah law and all its destructive permutations. Yet, with absolute certainty, Islam without Shariah law is like a bird without its wings. It would simply die. Crash and burn.
Ominously, consider what has transpired under Obama Inc. and you decide where America is headed:
On the legal front there are plans afoot to silence all criticism of Islam, so much so that the First Amendment is in its cross hairs. Moreover, Shariah financing has gained a sandal-hold into America, and Bloomberg Finance is leading the charge.
Now it is not as if (most) westerners begrudge capitalist entities from chasing after future business, but it is decidedly the case that Shariah law financing, in absolute terms, adds to Islamic jihad coffers all over the world.

Reports by Islamic banking scholars, the IMF, or the Congressional Research Service do not mention that Islamic banking was first concocted by Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna in the 1920s. The stated goal was to penetrate the Western finance system, corrupting it from within in hopes of creating a parallel system to re-establish a global Islamic empire governed by Islamic law (shariah). Islamic rules of commerce (fiqh al-muamalat) forbid interest (riba) and investing in a prohibited (hara’am) enterprise. They also mandate tithes on wealth (zakat). However, the Koran fails to precisely define these concepts. Imams and ayatollahs differ, for example, on whether riba prohibits all interest or only usurious interest.

The first successful Islamic banking experiment was the Mit Ghamr Savings Bank in Egypt in 1963. But five years later, the Egyptian government, which subsidized the bank, shut it down after Muslim-Brotherhood-led demonstrations swamped the country.

In 1963, Malaysia also introduced a limited form of Islamic banking, with establishment of Tabung Haji (Pilgrim’s Fund) that served only as a savings institution, to help Muslims save towards their pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj).

Ten yerrs later, growing oil fortunes in the Middle East, lead the Organization of the Islamic Conference’s (OIC) to establish the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) “in accordance with the principles of the shariah,” as prescribed by the MB-and to launch the fast-growing petrodollar-based Islamic financing market. The IDB, more a development than a commercial bank, was established largely “to promote Islamic banking worldwide.”  Consequently, the IDB founded the Bahrain-registered and -based Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). Other regulatory organizations followed.

Finally, the most crucial element that helped persuade reluctant Muslims to use Islamic banks, the invention of “Islamic banking windows,” is never noted in reports documenting the development of  Islamic banking. This happened in 1993, when Anwar Ibrahim, then Malaysia’s finance minister, helped to introduce the newly invented “Islamic Banking windows” into conventional banks. This measure, which familiarized clientele with and built confidence in the unknown Islamic banking system, proved central to the development of the global Islamic finance industry.

So the questions become: since Islam is underpinned by Shariah law, and Shariah law finance funds global terror, what precisely must be done to save the west? Cut off its oxygen…the head of the snake!

CENSORSHIP AT SOCIAL MEDIA GIANT ACCELERATES:CRITICS OF ISLAM/SHARIAH LAW TARGETED-AGAIN!Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
13

http://islamexposed.org/2014/05/30/censorship-at-social-media-giant-accelerates-critics-of-islamshariah-law-targeted-againcommentary-by-adina-kutnicki/#more-7585


Islamophobia - 4

This site has never hidden its association, its nexus, with counter terror expert Dave Gaubatz. And this is only because permission has been granted to bring it to the forefront, otherwise, rest assured, it would not have seen the light of day.

So it becomes that much more egregious when his patriotic findings (via his counter terror work) are given the finger. How dare FB & Co. spit in the eye of a patriot extraordinaire. Such mistreatment is taken very personally within these pages. Not only that, FB’s intent, their muzzling, is akin to squashing freedom of speech and in line with Shariah Blasphemy Laws, all done under the “watchful” gaze of those who have the temerity to claim: Facebook to Joe Newby of Examiner: We review every piece of content that is reported to us or flagged in the system and each one is held to the exact same standard. Really? Come again? 

What’s really going on? Yet before we even get to their latest act of censorship, revealing the actual string pullers, one must hark back to where FB’s achilles heel lies; its affinity for all things Islamic! Consider (just some of) the evidence:

Is Facebook okay with death threats from Islamists? That’s the question administrators of “Islam Exposed” asked earlier this week. After administrators received a number of threatening messages, Facebook pulled the page, citing “harassment,” but restored the page on Tuesday, telling Examiner.com it “was removed in error…..”

Would Facebook take action against those issuing the threats? The social media site did not say, but the group did not wait and filed complaints with the FBI.

“A single bullet will strike ur (sic) head one day [admin] from a jihadist. Insha-Allah,” one threat read. Another Facebook user with a Muslim name threatened to cut off administrators’ heads if they continued to post articles in a rant too profane to quote here. Yet another person threatened to blackmail one of the administrators.

“I am giving u (sic) warning,” said another person. “Stop this page.”

According to the group, one administrator received several threatening phone calls, with some including a Muslim prayer in Arabic. He reported it to the police, they said, but nothing was done. Just this week, they added, he received two threatening calls.

Adina Kutnicki, an investigative journalist based in Israel, said she has been harassed on Facebook by an individual she identified as Iranian Mohamed Erdem.

“Back off you satanist scum of the earth! You want war, war with me!” he told Kutnicki on Facebook. The threats she received from Erdem was so alarming, she added, that “heavy duty counter terror contacts decided to ‘check things out…..'”

Fast forward to a week later…that was then…this is now:

On Wednesday, Dave Gaubatz, a former Air Force investigator and author of “Muslim Mafia,” told Examiner.com that he “infiltrated” a Muslim conference held in Detroit earlier this month. While at the conference, he reportedly spoke to a representative of a group known as Muslim Advocates, who said the organization is working “closely” with social media sites like Facebook and Twitter to close down accounts of users critical of Islam.

“They are asking these groups to close the accounts of anyone who is critical of Islam,” he said. “This is considered serious hate speech and should not be allowed on the Internet.”

According to Gaubatz, the representative also said that “anyone critical of Islam and sharia law are haters.” Ditto for those who oppose either the construction or expansion of a mosque in the United States.

“We are experts with deep experience in the courtroom and powerful connections in Congress and the White House,” Gaubatz recalled being told by the Muslim Advocates representative…..

He reportedly met and spoke with executives from the Islamic Society of North America and the North American Islamic Trust.

“I was informed that NAIT owned several hundred million dollars of property in America, and has the funding from 400 plus Islamic Centers in America,” he added…..

We contacted both Facebook and Muslim Advocates to verify Gaubatz’ claim and received no reply as of this writing.

Update: A few hours after this article was published, Facebook falsely flagged the link as “unsafe” in what appears to be a bid to keep it from being circulated. We have reached out to Facebook, but have not received a response.

WITHOUT missing a beat, no sooner did Examiner’s latest examination, its revelations, get posted up to some of FB’s personal and group pages, a message was sent – a warning of sorts….best to toe the line…or else – to the very same administrators who are continually beating back the censors re Islam Exposed Online. Round and round they chase us, but they won’t wear us down. This is a promise. Readers should know this by now, perhaps they can feel a measure of comfort in this site’s (and its companion, Islam Exposed Online) steadfastness. Fortitude. Hope they do.

  • Adina Kutnicki Try this – http://www.examiner.com/article/muslim-mafia-author-muslims-working-with-facebook-to-silence-critics-of-islam
    Unable to post comment.

Bear in mind, after our link to Examiner’s latest expose’ was repeatedly banned, similar messages were received by other “friends”, they too were “unable to post comment”! In other words, FB’s censorship is way bigger than what this American-Israeli journalist is reporting. Experiencing. Other journalists, anti-Shariah Law activists and counter terror experts (a preponderance are associated with this site, but some are not) are cataloging the same anti-freedom agenda treatment. Know this: FB’s silencing, its omerta, extends to ALL Americans/westerners, except to those who hue to Islamic and radical leftist ideologies.

NOT to be lost in the discussion, let’s peer into the composition of the aforementioned Muslim Advocates. Are they akin to the boy scouts, girl scouts or some such pro-American organization? Oh dear….its President and Executive Director, Farhana Khera, having “made her bones” as a fox in the Congressional hen house, also rubs shoulders with some terror-tied clerics, some of whom have links to Al-Qaeda operatives! Six…three…degrees of separation found within the above pdf link….but never mind, “she be” (her group, plus others) in charge of running interference between FB and Islamic “concerns”.

Groundbreaking Report Exposes Anti-Muslim Hate Online

Posted on May 6, 2014 by Junaid Sulahry

Contact:
Fatima Khan
media@muslimadvocates.org
617-216-7089

Muslim Advocates “Click Here to End Hate” Report Empowers Social Media Users

(Oakland, CA — May 6, 2014) In a groundbreaking report, “Click Here to End Hate: Anti-Muslim Bigotry Online & How to Take Action,” Muslim Advocates exposes the breadth of anti-Muslim bigotry online, explains the law and corporate policies that regulate content on the Internet, and empowers individuals with the tools necessary to effectively respond to hate online.

“Online bigotry towards American Muslims continues to be a serious issue, particularly in the last few years where we’ve seen hate groups, anti-Muslim proponents, and public officials use various social media platforms to spread hate,” said Madihha Ahussain, Muslim Advocates staff attorney and lead author of the report.  “Their voices are amplified on the Internet and help create a space for the American public to echo these sentiments of hate and engage in acts of violence against an entire group or community.  People often think that there is nothing they can do to respond, but the reality is that their voices can be a powerful antidote to hate speech.”

Many use the Internet to organize online and rapidly gather supporters for their agendas.  For example, Pamela Gellar, a well-known anti-Muslim proponent and blogger had about 19 thousand followers on Facebook in June 2013.  Today, less than a year later, she has over 78 thousand.  Click Here to End Hate not only gives examples of offensive online content, but also sheds light on the legal considerations surrounding hate speech and what social media companies are doing about it.   The report also serves as a guide for individuals who want to push back with reporting mechanisms built into social media platforms and by engaging in counter speech.

Muslim Advocates has a dedicated program to counter anti-Muslim hate, and works with a broad coalition of faith, civic, and civil rights organizations to challenge bigotry against religious minorities.  Through this work, Muslim Advocates monitors hate crimes targeting American Muslims, bigotry by public officials, anti-Sharia legislation bills that have been proposed or passed in various states, and opposition to mosque construction projects affecting communities throughout the country.

The report is available online at http://www.muslimadvocates.org/click-here-to-end-hate-pdf.

Muslim Advocates is a national legal advocacy and educational organization working on the front lines of civil rights to guarantee freedom and justice for Americans of all faiths. Through high-impact lawsuits, policy advocacy, and community education, Muslim Advocates serves as a resource to empower communities and ensures that the American Muslim community is heard by the courts and leaders at the highest level of government.  Visit Muslim Advocates at http://www.muslimadvocates.org and follow @muslimadvocates.

DESPITE all their blah, blah nonsense about “advocacy” and “civil rights”, their associations, their alliances” (contained within the above linked pdf) attest otherwise. So in light of the above – and so much more – the following questions beg to be asked and answered: wherefore art thou FB, are your corp offices housed in the sands of Arabia, instead of  Menlo Park, CA? and to whom are you beholden? These are more than fair queries, at least from a western perspective.

In this regard, is it any wonder that FB finds it “offensive” to adhere to America’s Constitutional basis, that is, because they are hardly in sync with its underpinnings. Concomitantly, though long suspected, we now know for sure – ALL credit afforded to the valiant efforts of Dave Gaubatz –  – that those FB (Obama Inc. in toto) is taking its cues from are part and parcel of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. For added listening (dis)pleasure, this too tells the tale –

http://www.mixcloud.com/UncleSamsMisguidedChildren/tank-radio-show-2014-05-29/

Tank Radio Show 2014-05-29

www.mixcloud.com

Rick Ferran aka Tank and patriots with a special guest free lance writer Joe Newby speaking about Facebook’s new attacks and censorship bias towards any news regarding Islam or Muslims. Resent article by Joe Newby and Islam Exposed Facebook Page

 

YES, a clear nexus exists between FB and Islamic front groups! As Gaubatz noted, “anyone critical of Islam and sharia law are haters.” Ditto for those who oppose either the construction or expansion of a mosque in the United States.

“We are experts with deep experience in the courtroom and powerful connections in Congress and the White House,” Gaubatz recalled being told by the Muslim Advocates representative.”

Alas, in your mind’s eye, can you see this blogger’s disgust and outrage, positing, once again: double really? double come again? whom do they think they are kidding, thereby, taking for fools? Not this site’s readership, that’s for damn sure.

So if FB mistakenly believes that this issue, a cornerstone of liberty, is going to magically disappear – now you see it, now you don’t – well, their censors are hallucinating. Associates of this blogger at Islam Exposed online (am its Israel Administrator) are determined to bring a positive result to our readers:

The Case of Virtual Sharia on Social Media Platforms and the Missing Links: Now You See Them, and Now You Don’t!

“As a U.S. State Department-trained Arabic linguist and a retired Special Federal Agent with the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), Gaubatz has received the highest forms of U.S. intelligence clearances and top-secret briefings — including for weapons of mass destruction and espionage — for what is known as black projects. Since he retired, he has continued his work independently and has gone undercover for such projects as Mapping Sharia and has infiltrated and investigated hundreds of U.S. mosques and Islamic centers for terrorist cells, as well the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) — a named “joint venturer” in the largest U.S. Federal terrorist-financing trial to date, U.S.A. v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, et. al (HLF). Gaubatz gave Joe Newby of Examiner an earful the other day in what may be construed as a clear-cut case of Facebook Sharia, pulling off its vanishing act of the year in “Now you see it, and now you don’t” — only this time, you cannot see it at all on Facebook, at least not any of Joe Newby’s latest Examiner.com articles about it!”

Facebook falsely flags articles mentioning Islam as ‘unsafe’


More Photos

View all6 photos

“One article dealing with allegations made by a counter-terrorism expert was falsely blocked by Facebook on Wednesday. The other article ironically dealt with a petition on the White House “We the People” site calling for an end to censorship of speech dealing with Islam. Screen captures of both blocks can be seen in the slideshow above.

On Friday, Adina Kutnicki, an investigative journalist based in Israel, said that at least six links mentioning Islam appeared, then mysteriously disappeared but “have now miraculously reappeared.” Attempts to share the links on Facebook, however, failed as of this writing.”

OBAMACARE, VIA SURROGATE AGENCIES, SEIZING CONTROL OVER THE KIDDIES:BREAKDOWN OF THE FAMILY KEY….Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
8

hitler youth

“Conspiracy theories” cease being conspiratorial in nature – the figment of ones wild imagination – when evidence supplants the so called “conspiracy theory”. But never mind, leftist “true believers” expect the rest of us to go along (like sheep to the slaughter) with their “explanations” for this and that, even when THEIR lies are exposed in plain sight. Regardless, some of us insist on recognizing what is right before our (lying) eyes. What a conundrum – for them!

MOST inherently, when it comes to the kiddies, they are considered the ultimate “prize” of the socialist, Marxist and communist aligned. The jihadi set too. Why? Think of it this way:little foot soldiers are necessary to become big foot soldiers. Imparting their twisted ideology to a captured generation makes diabolical sense. Yes, it does. Thus, one generation after another passes the poison(s) – FORWARD MARCH…and so on and so forth. A twisted and devilish path.

That being said, where is this site’s purported evidence? Here and there:

Here and There One:

Indeed, Obamacare is front and center in capturing the kiddies, so recall this warning from Dec. 2013: Obama’s end goal rooted in national socialism; Obamacare’s hidden nexus!

Here and There Two:

Besides, does anyone really believe that Common Core has ANYTHING to do with the “3 R’s” and scholastic proficiency? Of course not. Alas, what are they up to? Well, complete surveillance of America’s kiddies…and that’s no conspiracy theory!

Here and There Three:

But who do you think is in the forefront of Common Core, as its chief (mis)educator? A domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers, the “guy who just happened to live in Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s neighborhood.” Oh yeah, THAT guy.

 

The Obama Youth Movement & The Seizing of American Children

There is presently a massive conspiracy designed to separate you from your children and give the government complete control over your children. To put it simply, Health and Human Services (HHS)  and their state level emissary, Child Protective Services (CPS) are engaged in a conspiracy which will culminate in (1) the Agenda 21 designed breakdown of the family; (2) the eradication of any semblance of parental authority over children; and, (3) unbridled and unfettered access to seizing children from the home in unlimited quantities for whatever nefarious purposes which might dictate the volume of child seizures.

The Plot Is International, Begins with the UN

This program emanates from a partnership between various United Nations organizations and ICF, acting on behalf of HHS, CPS and Obamacare (i.e. The Affordable Health CareAct). The evidence in this article, along with the included links, will demonstrate that when Obamacare is fully operational, our families, specifically our children will be living in a Hitler Youth Movement hellish nightmare in which the state owns and can seize your children.

After reviewing HHS, CPS and UN documents, what is being presently reported in thealternative media is merely the tip of the iceberg with regard to HHS’ intentions toward the ultimate outcome of the children in this country. After reviewing the documents, there is no doubt that Obama is representing international interests which will seek to remove as many children as possible from the homes of their parents in the spirit of the Hitler Youth Movement.

But first let me quickly review the recent revelations of the HHS/CPS/Obamacare intention to conduct what I have dubbed as “home invasion interventions.”

Obamacare Home Invasions and Interventions

According to a previously unreported Obamacare regulation, that has managed to escape “scrutiny” from the mainstream media, millions of American families will be targeted for home invasion by the forces of the Federal government in the name of preventing parental neglect resulting in disabilities in their children. And the Fourth Amendment be damned, as of January 1, 2014, Federal officials may enter your home without a warrant in order to “intervene” for the purpose of saving “high risk” children.

Obamacare’s Definition of High Risk

The exposure of the extreme and intrusive nature of Obamacare through home invasion visits is finally seeing the light of day in the alternative media. However, this exposure is grossly understated. As a starting point, I will briefly review what is making the rounds in the alternative media. According to HHS, your family is eligible for this Hitler style for “intervention” in the following situations:

1. Families where mom is not yet 21.

2. Families where someone is a tobacco user.

3. Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities.

4. Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States. 

5. Although this is not being widely reported, homeschoolers and their families will be targeted for “interventions” as will be families who object to having their children take vaccines.  

There is no question that all of the above categories, will warrant a home invasion followed by “remediation.”  The visits will not be conducted by HHS officials as has been reported in several publications. The home invasion visits will be conducted by CPS on behalf of HHS.

HHS has designed a detailed 110 page policy manual which focuses on the criteria constituting child neglect. This policy manual which is the guide created by HHS for CPS’ home intervention visits makes the above criteria, presently being reported in thealternative media, look tame by comparison.

HHS, CPS and the Criminalization of Parenthood 

In the 110 page HHS/CPS manual, the variables which comprise child neglect, worthy of government intervention is frightening beyond any words I can find to express their undisguised intentions. This entire document which will serve as the field manual by CPS in support of Obamacare undermines parental authority to a level that is beyond belief.

How many of you were ever grounded by your parents and not permitted to play outside with your friends? This is now illegal under the HHS/CPS policy manual. They label the treatment as neglect by isolation. There are not time frames set forth which constitutes isolation and it is left to the field representative. This obviously erodes parental discipline.

If your child is judged to be underachieving in school, this is referred to as educational neglect and is worthy of governmental intervention. Further, if your child is absent for five days in any one month from school, the same allegation would be made against the parent.

If your child has ADD or ADHD, you could be accused of neglect because the document details how this can be somehow caused by poor nutrition, although the variables associated with the cause are not specified.

The document goes out of its way to specify that poverty and neglect are not inextricably linked. Then the document goes out of its way to link poverty with child neglect. Read between the lines America. As we already are aware, many poor children who go missing from scandals such as Jerry Sandusky’s Second Mile Foundation, the infamous FranklinScandal and last year’s CPS scandal with the 78 missing wards of the state in Oklahoma, frequently end up being put into child sex trafficking rings operated and funded by such notables as DynCorps and HSBC bank.

Of course, no Obama inspired program would be complete without an attack upon theSecond Amendment. Obamacare is no exception as one of the criteria for child neglect  are parents who are also gun owners.

The presence of alcohol in the home is a trigger for an allegation of neglect and subsequent “intervention.” Of course, alcoholic parents can present a clear and present danger to a child’s well-being. However, in the policy manual the conditions for concern over alcohol do not detail the amount and percentage of the family resources involved necessary to obtain alcohol. In other words, one can of beer in the home can be considered to constitute child neglect by the Obamacare CPS fieldworker.

If your child has engages in any type of illicit or criminal behavior, your family is at risk. Raise your hands if you ever smoked pot before the age of 18, or drank as a teen, or engaged in any kind of sexual activity before the age of 18, ever stayed out past curfew, or ever shoplifted? IF your children ever engages in these and a multitude of other transgressions, you are in danger of losing your children. This also means that if your child is ever involved in a fight in school or is assigned detention, the school will be required to report the behavior to the HHS/CPS and you can expect to have a “home invasion intervention” session with your friendly Obamacare CPS fieldworker.

If you are ever late picking up your child from daycare or from school aftercare, you will now be reported to CPS.

If you have ever been depressed or have been treated for any mental disorder (e.g. PTSD,anxiety, etc.), you are at risk for losing your children.

Even illegal immigrant families are not immune from this insanity. Children are judged by the field worker to not be fully acculturated, do not properly speak the language, exhibits signs of being homesick and is judged to have not formed an unspecified number of friends and formed a cohesive social network, allegations of neglect can be made.

I would invite the reader to spend some time reviewing the document which will be serving as the policy manual for the forced home inspections. Please note that when the reader gets beyond the flowery language and professed concern for children, that the language is written so broadly that virtually any human condition, any family circumstance or child’s behavior can be interpreted as child neglect. There is literally no end to the tyranny that awaits the art of parenting in the present day.

The important thing to note is the use of language by this manual. Parents who are deemed by an Obamacare CPS field worker, operating under the HHS flag, to be neglectful towards their children are considered to have created “disabilities” within their children. As the reader will soon discover, the use of the term “disabilities” is key to understanding how far this administration is willing to go to seize children for some nefarious purpose.

Sadly, this is still only the beginning. There is far more to be concerned about beginning with who is ultimately responsible for these outrages.

Meet the Creators of the State Sponsored Child Kidnapping Rings

The primary author for this insane manual for HHS/CPS and their designed home invasion interventions is Diane DePanfilis, Ph.D., M.S.W.  She is the Associate Dean for. Research and an Associate Professor of Social Work at the University of Maryland.  More importantly she is a co-editor of the Handbook on Child Protection Practice. In other words, DePanfills has been a major player in the unconstitutional practices we see in CPS in all 50 states. As if this is not concerning enough, all of the other contributing authors have their professional origins and affiliations with the same organization.

Lindsay Ritter Taylor, from Caliber, an  ICF  International Company

Matthew Shuman, M.S.W,  A consultant with Caliber, an ICF International Company

Jean  Strohl,  A consultant with Caliber, an ICF International Company,

Jeannie Newman, M.S.W,  M.I.B.S.,  A consultant with Caliber, an ICF International Company

It was at this point, I smelled a rat. We have the primary author being a CPS author designed to teach their field operatives on the methods of how to abuse parents and undermine parental authority. And all of the contributing authors come from the exact same corporation, ICF. At this point, it is prudent to ask the question, who is ICF?

ICF Is the Biggest Player That You Have Never Heard Of

ICF International partners with government and commercial clients to deliver consulting services and technology solutions in climate change, energy, environment, transportation, social programs, defense, andhomeland security markets. In my mind, this established ICF as a major player in the introduction and implementation of the globalist agenda by designing matching Federal programs. And as it turned out they are a major player in Obamacare through their subsidiary acquisition, Caliber Associates.

Caliber is an “established leader in providing research, consulting, and innovation in human services and human resource issues.” ICF acquired Caliber in 2005 in order “to serve HHS, the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Department of Defense, and the U.S. Department of Education.”  Caliber Associates and their four contributing authors to the HHS/CPS field manual, which will be used to enforce child welfare regulations, was the undeniable link to Obamacare through this field manual. But as I discovered, the rabbit hole went even deeper.

After I found the co-authors of the HHS/CPS policy manual which will guide these forced home inspections, I smelled the distinct odor of the United Nations and Agenda 21 and sure enough, this was exactly what I found.

The United Nations and Obamacare

At times, I feel that I have the globalist playbook and I am able to often anticipate their next move. Please allow me to briefly illustrate how the globalists have operated in another area, education, and then draw the parallel to how the UN is deeply involved in Obamacare.

The Common Core Curriculum, which is sweeping the nation’s education system, was the product of “Education for All.” Education for All comes from the United Nations education arm, the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).Common Core went from UNESCO to the National Governors Association who in turn farmed out the development of the details to various NGO’s which in turn sent the standards to each state for implementation. This is the standard model that the globalists follow when implementing a controversial program and Obamacare follows a similar pattern as did Common Core.

There is no doubt that the provisions of allegedly protecting children in Obamacare, originated with the United Nations

Why do they want our kids?

In the United Nations document entitled, Human Rights, Persons with Disabilities, ICF and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Training toolkit), implementation for programs designed to help people, children in particular, with disabilities, came from the World Health Organization (WHO) [Page  36], UNESCO [Page 37], the International Labour Organization (ILO) [Page 36] and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)[Page 38]. As one can see from the title, ICF and the UN have partnered to protect people/children with disabilities.

Conclusion

Please remember that earlier in the article, I made the point that the HHS/CPS field manual referred to neglected children as children who have disabilities. It is quite apparent that any of the conditions listed in the HHS/CPS manual will produce children who have disabilities. Under this guise, I can draw no other conclusion than Obamacare is state sponsored child slavery.

Under Obamacare, virtually every aspect of parenting is criminalized. Any child can be considered to have a disability for which the state is the only legitimate treatment source. When Obama was first running for President in 2008, he promised to build a civilian security force that “was just as strong, just as well-funded as our military.” And when one combines this conspiracy with Obama’s Executive Order 13603 which calls for a mandatory civilian conscription to complement a coming military draft, it is clear that this lunatic is planning to enslave a large segment of the population and he will obtain many of his conscripts from Obamacare. And many of you who are familiar with Agenda 21 and their expressed views toward parental rights and the rights of children, do not need me to make connect the dots, you already have done so.

My advice to all parents, don’t answer the door when you see the lady ringing your doorbell.

I cannot see any way out of this dilemma other than to resist through the use of force. The Obamacare goons will NOT gain entry into my home while I am still breathing. I predict that HHS/CPS will soon be armed because they will, and should, meet massive resistance from the citizens.

America, we must resist this heinous tyranny with every means at our disposal. 

Will you protect your children?

———————————————————————————————————-

BOTTOM LINE: if one truly believes that children are the property of the government, then just dismiss all the above as nothing to see here…moving right along. Mind you, their “collectivist” notion is not some anomaly within radical left circles. In fact, it is a “mainstream” outlook.

On the other hand, if it’s your biggest nightmare to hand over your children’s welfare to Fed entities – international ones too – then there is NO time to lose. Like it or not, plans are in motion – and have been in place for decades, only to be ratcheted up under the Radical-in-Chief – and they will succeed, if massive push back isn’t exerted.

At the same time, no rational person is suggesting that some parents/homes aren’t indeed unfit and dangerous to their children’s welfare. We get that. But that generally involves CLEAR cut cases of child abuse, as well an urgency to remove children from homes where a parent(s) is an addict, be they an alcoholic, drug abuser or a combination of both. Nevertheless, this is not what Obama’s goons (domestic and international) are after. They want TOTAL control and that is that.

SIGNIFICANTLY, most of their radical mischief is happening under the radar, aggregated within various “agencies” and “committees”. However, some of us have been tracking their footprints and they are HUGE. GARGANTUAN. The time to act is NOW!

GUN CONTROL VIA OBAMA’S BACK DOORS:BANKS CLOSE ACCOUNTS OF LEGAL GUN SHOPS.POLITICAL OPPONENTS TOO…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
3


Barack Obama 5 SC

Obama’s “brain”, his architect, Valerie Jarrett, infamously intoned: “there’s a lot of ways to skin a cat” and “she be” right. 

But while the aforementioned exhortation related to Obama Inc’s end run around illegal immigration, the same principle applies to all their illegal, anti-American activities. Let there be no doubt: their actions are illegal, at least within the confines of America’s Constitutional legal framework.

That being said, their “legal koshering” of illegal aliens is a subset of plans for total control – via gun control! In a very tangible sense, once legal guns are confiscated the citizens become vulnerable to whatever the leaders dictate – legal or otherwise. It is this stripping which is at the core of gun control fanatics, at least in relation to those who are imbued with power. Fascists. What utter, monstrous gall. A total putsch against “We the People”, even those of us who are ex pats.

It is the duty of every American, those who wish to live free – or die – to defy any attempts to exert gun control. Gun control is manifested through various back doors, essentially by hook or by crook.

Back Door One:

Significantly, there are several stealthy entry points, but two stand out among the rest. Therefore, let us designate them: “domestic entry” and “international entry”. To wit, let’s first deal with the internal ones.

Enter: Obamacare. How many understand the hidden march towards gun control through Obama’s nightmarish “overhaul” of America’s health system? It had been, up until now, a well functioning health system, at least compared to the rest. Very few have a clue.

Back Door Two:

Adding to the domestic nightmare, whenever criminals or insane persons use guns to kill, rest assured gun control becomes the main target. It is presumably the case – or so the twisted logic goes – when gun control becomes the “law of the land”, criminals will magically give up their black market guns and crazy folks won’t gain access to weapons either. Outrageously mendacious. In reality, the ones left defenseless will remain the formerly legal gun owners! The really dangerous – not so much.

Regardless, rabid leftists are never rational, instead exhorting to murder those who adhere to the 2nd Amendment, unless they give up their legal guns! Insanity.

Back Door Three:

As if the unglued left is not enough of a danger, those who are gunning for ultimate control over the kiddies would leave them totally defenseless and without armed guards at their schools, if they had their way. Thus, gun store owners have been in their sights for a while, but the ultimate form of totalitarian control is now wending through their bank accounts! Simply put, Obama Inc. is TOTALLY out of control. They have gone over the marked line and must be pulled back, otherwise everyone who refuses to toe the line is in for a rude awakening – banking-wise.

STUNNING: This Obama Scheme Is Shutting Down Legal Gun Stores!

WASHINGTON — Congressman Steve Stockman (R-TX 36) demanded the Obama administration suspend the Justice Department’s “Operation Choke Point,” in which government agents are pressuring banks to close the accounts of legal and law-abiding businesses engaged in commerce contrary to the political views of Barack Obama.

“(T)he Justice Department has launched Operation Choke Point, a credit card fraud probe focusing on banks and payment processors. The threat of enforcement has prompted some banks to cut ties with online gun retailers, even if those companies have valid licenses and good credit histories,” The Washington Times reported Monday morning.

“Under Obama’s ‘Operation Choke Point,’ banks are complaining that government agents are threatening them because they service legal businesses engaged in legal commerce. Often, the customer is a gun retailer or other businesses that poses no risk, but differs with Obama’s political agenda,” said Stockman.

Thousands of gun retailers have had their bank accounts forcibly closed, despite engaging in no illegal activity whatsoever.

“This is just the latest example of the Obama administration exploiting executive power to target political opponents. It would appear the only purpose of Operation Choke Point is to choke the life out of businesspeople with political views that may differ from the President,” said Stockman.

“Unable to pass gun control in Congress, Obama is seeking to stamp out gun ownership through the kind of threats and harassment you’d expect from Third World dictators or Mafia bosses,” said Stockman.

“Targeting the bank account of gun retailers engaged in peaceful and legal commerce is a blatant violation of civil liberties. Under Obama, the United States are becoming a banana republic. The Obama administration must suspend Operation Choke Point and instead focus its resources on criminal enterprises,” said Stockman.

 

Segueing over to the “international entry” point for disarming Americans, what can be more dangerous than a group of kleptocrats, which passes themselves off as world body reps, as they aim to shred the 2nd Amendment, the last vestige before the lights go out for the west? To be fair, let’s not blame these thugocats entirely, in so far as U.S. globalists are deeply in sync with their world rule!

When it comes to radical revolutionaries, and the implementation of their designs, the ends ALWAYS justifies the means. In fact, it’s a hallmark of their radical thinking, their trademark. And which entity qualifies more than the reprobate world body, the U.N? None.

Bulls eye. Machiavellian.

 

POTUS’s SYRIAN LIAISON:JIHADIST LEADER & DRUG TRAFFICKER!INTRODUCING, AHMED JARBA. Medea Daghestani Too…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
3


Photo

Radical leftists (and their Islamic counterparts) are forever beating the “fairness” drum, even though the reds and greens (Islamists) have their own definition of what constitutes being “fair”. This site gets it.

So as a Zionist and Conservative blogger it would only be fair – turnabout IS fair play – if some related water bills are reimbursed by either side. How they split the bill is neither here nor there. Meaning, it is due to their incestuous relations that a yucky feeling often overcomes this American-Israeli, requiring more showers than usual. Simple cause and effect.

Now that we got that settled, what have they done – again – to bring up the high cost of this blogger’s water bills in Israel? Well, it appears as if Muslim-Americans are freely bandying about their vision for America, ala Shariah Law, and they have many red and green proponents within Obama Inc. As a matter of record – and hardly an anomaly – an Imam from one of the largest mosques on the east coast recently exhorted the following, sans batting an eye. What balls.

“We, as Americans, have to put limits and borders [on] freedom of speech,” Qatanani, leader of the Islamic Center of Passaic County (ICPC), told TheBlaze. He explained that while Americans may ”have the freedom“ to speak their mind, ultimately, they “have no right to [talk about Muslim] holy issues” as it will incite “hatred or war among people.”

Qatanani said he thinks agitators who slander Islam, or, more specifically, the Prophet Muhammad, incite violence and hence, pose a national security risk that threatens the safety of Americans at home and abroad. Thus, America should disregard its First Amendment as it is typically applied and instead act in accordance with sharia law for the ultimate “good” of society.

The overwhelming presence of  the mobbed up Brotherhood Mafia within Obama Inc., their influence, accounts for their brazen pronouncements. It is as if they have a green light to dictate: the evisceration of the cornerstone of America’s Constitution, free speech, is a done deal !

And lest anyone disbelieves their closeness, think again:

OBAMA, CAIR, THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, AND THE UNINDICTED 
CO-CONSPIRATORS

BHO & the Muslim Brotherhood - 7

As is said, a picture is worth a thousand words.

AGAIN, it is mandatory to step into their cesspool even further…oh no, extra showers are on tap! And yes, although this American-Israeli is hardly a prude, playing footsie with Obama Inc. involves many hinky dealings, sexually speaking. Clearly, picking a major jihadist leader/drug trafficker to consort with as the “new face” of Syria, plus combining the admins sordid relationship with a female “spokeswoman” who is sexually promiscuous, well, it raises some concerns. Eyebrows too. Lo and behold, Hill admires this female jihadist’s (aka “pro-democracy activist”) bodacious “loveliness”! Wonder why.

Obama Embraces and Works With Major Muslim Jihadist Leader & International Drug Trafficker

That woman was also seen with Hilary Clinton (see photo below) – identified by Reuters at the time as a “young Syrian pro-democracy activist” – has since been hired by the man with whom the Obama administration has chosen to work with as the President of the Syrian Opposition Coalition, Ahmed Jarba.

Medea Daghestani meets with Hillary Clinton in Istanbul on April 1, 2012.

How she met Hillary Clinton most likely was arranged since Daghestani was prominent in staging riots and gives fiery speeches against the Syrian regime:

And the type of Jihadi operatives that the U.S. Administration is supporting involves some major terrorist leaders cooperating sexually with Daghestani. Some months after meeting with Clinton, Medea Daghestani was caught engaging in Skype sex with one of the top commanders within the Syrian opposition, Abdulrazaq Tlass. According to reports, Tlass and Daghestani performed for each other without knowing that hackers for the Assad regime were able to hijack Tlass’s computer and record the episode.

In this screenshot, Daghestani can be seen with Tlass in the lower right-hand corner:

Daghestani with Tlass during Skype sex (name spelled "Medya Daghistaney")

So one would think that her career would be over? Think again. Daghestani is flung into the arms of the very man whom the Obama works with to take over Syria. Earlier this year, Dagestani was hired as a Public Relations specialist by Syrian Opposition Coalition President Ahmad Jarba.

Daghestani: Hired by Jarba earlier this year.

Despite Jabra’s checkered reputation, Obama still meets with Jarba and was recently given additional credibility when Obama met with him at the White House during a scheduled meeting Jarba had with National Security Adviser Susan Rice:

Jarba (L) with Obama (R). Susan Rice is seen seated next to Obama.

As if all this is bad enough, Shoebat.com just obtained from Middle Eastern sources Jabra’s history in major drug trafficking operations.

And just who is this Jabra really working for? According to reports, Jarba is close to Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan, who was a key figure in Jarba’s new position. Bandar instructed his agents and mercenaries in Syria to appoint Jarba (as a Saudi puppet) despite multiple convictions for drug trafficking between Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and the Gulf States, especially in Saudi Arabia.

Jabra is useful to both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia since he is well connected. Jarba reportedly utilized contacts he developed in the Syrian Embassy to secure his release every time he was arrested.

And it gets even worse, a couple of weeks ago, the DEA while entering the U.S. in Washington Airport searched his body cavities since they knew of his drug dealings and he was let go after someone important made a phone call.

Jarba’s Allegiances
Ahmad Jarba’s predecessor as the face of the Syrian opposition was at one time Ahmed Muaz Al-Khatib Alhassani (Al-Khatib), a Sufi Muslim with loyalties to the Muslim Brotherhood, as Shoebat.com reported. Jarba being of Saudi origin belonging to the Shamra Saudi clan makes him an ideal operative to ensure the Wahhabist plans for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia which has its foothold and extensions into Syria to ensure its Islamist future.

Al-Khatib’s removal remains a mystery. Analysts do not agree whether it was Qatar, Saudi Arabia or the C.I.A which foresaw his removal. But in an Arabic news report, Al-Khatib said that Jarba was:

“…bribed by the highest bidder as is commonly known. Qatar and Saudi Arabia purchases through bribes whom they want.”

On his facebook page, Al-Khatib said that 40 members even walked out on Jarba after noticing the corruption.

Ahmad Jarba embraces Saudi flag to show his allegiance; Al-Khatib on right.

On his twitter page, Jarba draws a line of distinction between the faction that he represents and the other side, tweeting that he encourages Al-Nusra Front terrorist group (translation below image):

Translation: I am not a member of Al-Nusra Front, but I encourage Al-Nusra Front. What makes the Nusra Front different is that it conquers, it burns and its destructive.

How Obama supports a man who is for Al-Nusra Front that “conquers” “burns” and is “destructive” remains a mystery. Al-Nusra is an Al-Qaeda front and a designated terrorist organization by the U.S.

But there appears to be a shift in strategy when it comes to Obama administration policy in Syria. While the “Friends of Syria” coalition is still in place, the elevation of Jarba means Saudi Arabian interests are being given more consideration after relations between Obama and the Saudis had been greatly strained.

Obama’s Friendship with “Friends of Syria” is Obama’s Farewell to Israel
Obama’s plans seem to coinside with the plans of the Syrian revolution, especially when it comes to Israel by appeasing both the Saudi Wahhabists and Muslim Brotherhood factions in Syria. Weapons shipments by a coalition of western nations Barack Obama boasted about forming and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly promoted and helped launch. Based on research done by Shoebat.com, not only should the true intentions of the recipients of these weapons have been known by Obama and Clinton but they obviously were.

Benghazi attacks made arming Syrian rebels more difficult for Barack and Hillary.

Threats made by one of Syria’s opposition leaders who has been receiving U.S.-made anti-tank missiles to fight the Assad regime indicate the jihadists he leads would like to make good on Barack Obama’s call for Israel to return to its pre-1967 borders, which would include returning the Golan Heights to Syria. The group that provided these weapons is known as “Friends of Syria” or “Friends of the Syrian People”.

Clearly, sending anti-tank missles – as Friends of Syria has been doing – to jihadists who threaten Israel does not serve Israel’s interests. It would seem, however, to serve the interests of Barack Obama, who called for a return to the 1967 borders just months prior to the formation of Friends of Syria:

One day later, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rebuked Obama publicly, from inside the White House:

Based on the claims in an interview with a rebel Division leader named Ahmad Al-Sa’oud, the high powered weaponry should be considered a threat to Israel’s sovereignty. Al-Sa’oud told the interviewer, “We are for the return of all Syrian land occupied by Israel”. Just two days prior to that interview being published, the U.S. State Department issued a press release reiterating U.S. support for Friends of Syria.

During a presidential debate prior to Obama’s reelection (after the Benghazi attacks), the President had the following to say about Friends of Syria:

We are playing the leadership role. We organized the Friends of Syria. We are mobilizinghumanitarian support, and support for the opposition. And we are making sure that those we help are those who will be friends of ours in the long term and friends of our allies in the region over the long term.

Who are these friends and allies of the Obama administration?

Ahmad Al-Sa'oud: Syrian rebel leader with U.S. anti-Tank missiles wants Golan Heights back.

Several months earlier, while in Tunisia, it was then Secretary of State Clinton who held a news conference at the group’s first meeting (the second meeting is when Clinton met with Daghestani), where she expressed the Obama administration’s commitment to the Friends of Syria. It was made clear that the administration would be assisting the group in its efforts to remove Bashar al-Assad from power. Said Clinton:

I think today the Friends of the Syrian People sent a strong and unified message that the Assad regime’s escalating violence is an affront to the international community, a threat to regional security, and a grave violation of universal human rights… we resolve today to ratchet up the pressure on the regime and increase its isolation. Now you know that until now, the Assad regime has ignored every warning, squandered every opportunity, and broken every agreement.

Turkey was represented at the Tunisia meeting by Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, who said:

“We should concentrate our efforts on empowering the Syrian opposition, which will be the backbone of a new democratic regime.”

One month prior to the Benghazi attacks, Clinton traveled to Turkey, where she met with Davutoglu and Syrian refugees. According to National Public Radio, the purpose of the meeting was two-fold. 1.) To prepare for a chemical weapons attack by Bashar al-Assad’s regime and 2.) To plan for Syria’s collapse.

Hillary and Davutoglu in Turkey one month prior to Benghazi attacks.

According to the details of a report relayed by Shoebat.com, the U.S. operation in Benghazi was about covertly shipping weapons out of the CIA Annex to Syrian rebels via Turkey. These claims were bolstered by an admission from Speaker of the U.S. House John Boehner and reports filed by Catherine Herridge of Fox News, who reported that a Libyan ship docked in Turkey days before the Benghazi attacks was allegedlytransporting weapons. A consequence of the attack was the cessation of that covert operation, which had allegedly been run by CIA Director David Petraeus.

00:00
00:00

Petraeus meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davotoglu in 2011.

A couple of months after the Benghazi attacks, Mouaz Moustafa, the executive director for the Syrian Emergency Task Force (SETF) attended a Friends of Syria meeting in Paris according to his group’s website. The website underwent quite an overhaul when its political director Elizabeth O’Bagy found controversy after the chemical attack that occurred in Syria last year, as reported by Shoebat.com. After leaving SETF, Senator John McCain curiously hired O’Bagy as a Legislative Assistant.

Mouaz Moustafa and U.S. Senator John McCain in Syria.

Less than one year after the Benghazi attacks, the U.S. Congress approved a deal that would ship arms to Syrian rebels. At the time, O’Bagy said of the deal:

“…I wonder how much of this is simply an announcement of what they’ve already been doing on the ground,” referring to pre-existing administration efforts to encourage Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey to ship weapons into the country with assistance from the U.S.”

That comports with the explosive findings of veteran journalist Seymour Hersh that describe what the Benghazi Annex was being used for prior to the attacks, according to a ‘highly classified annex’ to a Senate Committee Report that explained the details of a deal between Obama and Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan. It was about the weapons trafficking operation:

By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar… The operation was run by David Petraeus.

Congress agreed to officially ship arms to Syrian rebels after being lobbied hard by the SETF and the Syrian Support Group (SSG).

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Mike Rogers expressed concern over where the weapons would eventually end up but signed off on the deal anyway.

A man named Mazen Asbahi sits on the Board of SSG. He was ironically jettisoned from the Obama campaign in 2008 as Muslim outreach adviser because of his time serving on a Board with radical Islamic cleric Jamal Said, who has close connections to Hamas. At the time, CAIR-Chicago’s Executive Director Ahmed Rehabdefended both Asbahi and Said (CAIR is a Muslim Brotherhood front group):

Despite these connections, Asbahi has been an effective lobbyist for Syrian jihadists who seek to take back the Golan Heights from Israel.

As this lobbying was going on, Friends of Syria held a meeting in Turkey. Those present included Al-Khatib, the Obama administration’s handpicked choice at the time to be the face of a post-Assad government in Syria, as reported by Shoebat.com. It was after this meeting that Al-Khatib announced his resignation for the second time. Reports indicate that he did so out of frustration over the inability of the Friends of Syria to ship weapons to the rebels.

The decision by the Obama administration to negotiate with Al-Khatib as a Syrian leader is disturbingly revealing. The administration attempted to give the extremely anti-Semitic Al-Khatib a political facelift when, in reality, he’s a member of the Muslim Brotherhood who has referred to all Jews as “the enemies of Allah”. This view obviously comports with that of rebel division leader Ahmad Al-Sa’oud, who represents Syrian jihadists who recently began receiving shipments of advanced U.S. weaponry.

Just because al-Khatib resigned from that post doesn’t mean he’s out of the picture. Just this month, he was part of a delegation that visited Egypt recently to negotiate political solutions in Syria.

During a trip to Cairo that took place before the lobbying efforts of SETF and SSG had paid off, Al-Khatib was photographed with SETF’s Mouaz Moustafa and former chairman of the Dar al-Hijrah mosque Bassam Estwani, who serves on the Board of the SETF, and is connected to terrorism as Shoebat.com reported [here,here, here, and here]:

This site wagers a challenge: if anyone can DISPROVE the inextricable relationships between Obama Inc. and the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, which have been consistently, repeatedly described at these pages, well, this individual is welcome to watch this blogger eat a plate of crow and dirt in their presence. And if they can’t afford the airfare to the Jewish homeland, well, we can do this over skype, or some such web-based forum. Will even issue a requisite mea culpa.

The bet is on…

SETF Executive Director Mouaz Moustafa (far left), al-Khatib (second from left) and Estwani (far right) in Cairo.

CHINA OWNS AMERICA:LOCK,STOCK & BARREL!TROOPS IN PLACE. HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
7

china buying us banks

ASIDE from all the geo-political reverberations – seismic-worthy – spanning from the bloody Islamic slaughters of Christians throughout the Mid East and Africa to Russia’s increasing “footprints” from the Ukraine to Iran, the fact of the matter is that China has been equally busy. Not only that, but the leadership of the free world is lending the Communist People’s Republic of China more than a helping hand. More like a lock, stock and barrel approach to scoop up America! This has been going on for years, but exponentially more so under the “(mis)management” of the Radical-in-Chief. Hmm.

Indeed, while only the comatose are unaware of China’s stranglehold on American debt, few are aware of its extent. Its global ramifications. Its blow back, straight onto the very lives of ordinary Americans. What’s going on?

Well, back in Jan. 2013, a dog’s age in geo-political manipulations,this site reported on the machinations afoot to sell off America to China:The Radical-in-Chief’s Sell Off – Literally – To Communist China…Bargain Basement Prices! Oh boy…

Now, follow the trail to a follow up commentary, one written in July 2013: PHASE TWO To ‘Deconstructing The U.S. Economy’: Gold Plunges 66%, Two Days Later JP Morgan’s MAIN Gold Warehouse Catches Fire. Coincidence? What’s Going On? Happenstance? The aforementioned report was then, and here we are now, 10 months later…and J P Morgan looms again!

The Chinese Are In the Process of Occupying Amerika

Dave Hodges

May 2014

The Common Sense Show

In order to keep its head about water for just one more day, the Federal Reserve has now permitted Chinese-controlled banks to take stakes in US banks. This is a nefarious invasion of the U.S. economy. Subsequently, we have witnessed a major shift in the percentage of the U.S.debt owned by Chinese vs. the Federal Reserve. This is the beginning of the end for the dollar, the U.S. economy, your standard of living, your assets, your freedoms and for many of you, your very lives.

China Owns the Federal Reserve and Here’s How It Happened

At the end of January 2009, the month President Barack Obama was first inaugurated, Communist China owned $744.2 billion in U.S. government debt and the Fed owned $475.129 billion. In May of 2012, the Federal Reserve has approved applications by three big Chinese government-controlled banks to set up branches and take stakes in US banks after deciding they were adequately regulated in their home market.

The Chinese ownership of U.S. debt, compared to the Federal Reserve, appears to be unchanged in 2014. However, the Chinese are slowly but surely acquiring the Federal Reserve and thus, are acquiring a greater amount of U.S. government debt. Therefore, much of the debtowned by the Federal Reserve, is now owned by the Chinese and their new partners consisting of two large Spanish banks, a German bank and the Chinese. The complete Chinese takeover of our economy is silent but undeniably insidious. It would be appropriate to think of this development as the United States government doing a debt consolidation of all its treasury bonds because it can no longer pay or service the debt and the Chinese and their partners are acquiring the assets of America for pennies on the dollar. It will soon be announced that China is in the process of purchasing major Western banks (e.g. Bank of America, Wells Fargo) and physical assets. These banks make up the majority owners of the Federal Reserve. By purchasing these banks as distressed properties, the Chinese, will in effect, have purchased the Federal Reserve because these banks own the Federal Reserve. surabachiFor the naysayers that will write to me and say there is no way that this will ever take place, I will respond by telling you that you are a day late and a “distressed dollar” short with your anxiety over the future of the American economy.

Late last year, China purchased the JP Morgan building in Manhattan for $725 million. This was a symbolic move like planting the U.S. flag on top of Iwo Jima’s Mount Surabachi during the famous WW II battle. This signified that the Chinese have laid claim to all assets in the United States. One might  reason that the Chinese have in fact purchased all of JP Morgan. When this happens in earnest, it will come in the midst of a dollar devaluation and we are only months away from this happening.

The Death of Our Asset Holdings

The Chinese yuan, also known as the renmimbi, is China’s national currency. The yuan has an important role in keeping China’s economy competitive. China keeps the yuan pegged to a basket of currencies, most notably the U.S. dollar. The yuan is worth a little more than fifteen cents.

This is all about to change. China has the ability to sell its Treasury holdings, putting the value of the U.S. dollar into free fall. However, it’s not in China’s best interests to do so. By threatening to sell U.S. Treasuries, China would quickly devalue its own holdings. Even so, it’s been unwise for the U.S. to allow itself to become so indebted to any other country. However, the Chinese now have partners who are willing to purchase U.S. treasuries and shoulder the burden of owning most of the U.S. debt which will result in the total collapse of the US economy. These large investors are busy purchasing the Federal Reserve through the back door. For example, the Spanish Bank, Banco, is purchasing Citigroup in Spain according to the Wall Street Journal. The buyoff of the major investors in the Federal Reserve is well underway. China, and their BRICS country allies, and a consortium of international interests (e.g. the previously identified Spanish and German banks), will through the I.M.F., manage the U.S. debt through exchange rate increases and trade tariffs.

Dr. Jim Garrow announced on my show that a devaluation is near as the dollar will soon be valued on a 6 to 1 ratio in favor of the Chinese renmimbi. Let’s talk about the ramifications of this event. If you own a mortgage on your home for $150,000, you now owe the Chinese interests controlling your bank, who holds your mortgage note, $900,000 dollars. If you owe the bank $20,000 for your automobile, following the 2014 dollar devaluation, you now owe $120,000.  Your grocery bill for your family just went up by a factor of six. What about your retirement and social security? What retirement and social security? Long before most of you will be able to collect, your retirement will collateralized against the debt. The same is true for your 401K and your saving account holdings. It would be wise to spend your money now on elements of survival that you will need.

There is also an important aspect that nobody is talking about. When the Chinese come to claim your home, your car and your retirement, what legal recourse will you have? The answer is you will have no due process rights because your economic situation will be adjudicated in accordance with Chinese law. Under Chinese law, you will truly have the right to remain silent. When one considers the net effect of this Chinese takeover of the Federal Reserve, it is not far-fetched to postulate that Americans will actually be starving to death.

It is completely understandable that Americans will be fleeing the country. However, the Chinese will no doubt put controls in place that may allow you to leave, but your assets will stay inside the country.

The Bigger Picture

Elements, not the entire government, have sold our country out. Reid, Feinstein, Clinton, Pelosi and of course, Obama, have committed treason against the United States by participating in this planned demise. Yes, the planned demise is in full view.

The Bundy Affair is the most significant event in present day America. It exposes the fact that the Chinese will soon control our new solar based energy delivery systems through the Solar Energy Zones. These Solar Energy Zones lie on top of an estimated $228 trillion dollars of underground mineral assets. They also lie adjacent to major military installations and international corridor of interstate highways which will all soon be controlled by the Chinese.

Please note that all the rising economies of the world are tying their currencies to gold as Dr. Garrow astutely pointed out on my show. The United States is not one of these countries. He is correct as the China and India have been trading in gold, as opposed to the dollar, for several years. The present set of events represents the fulfillment of our demise which has been planned by the global elite for quite some time. If there is a silver lining, America will soon shed much of its sheep’s wool and America will fight. Hence, the real reason behind Obama’s push for gun confiscation and the fact that John Kerry signed the UN gun ban treaty last year. Now that you know that the Chinese own the very clothes on your back, it is time to take a look at how the Chinese will soon be exerting complete dictatorial control over the United States.

To date, we have largely been conquered by stealth. Soon, the specter of Chinese and Russian troops along with their DHS allies will be opposing Americans in the streets. This will be the topic of Part Three.

MOST intrinsically, the question becomes: why would U.S. leadership be on board with sinking America into such unsustainable debt – a sinkhole – knowing full well that a Chinese wolf – with others in tow – will come knocking down its financial door(s)? The answers are complex, but also quite simplistic in intent. This is not a contradiction in terms. Machiavellian too: ECONOMIC FIRESTORM:THE PLANNED DESTRUCTION OF THE U.S. ECONOMY; ITS KNOCK-ON FALLOUT!

WITH the above in mind, does it now make better sense as to why Chinese and Russian troops (others too) are firmly implanted on U.S. ground?    

Pre-designed collapse, or not? You decide.                                                                                                 

OBAMA’s GAY LOBBY & THEIR VISE-GRIP OVER FAMILIES; EXPANDING THEIR REACH TO FEMALE RUSSIAN MINISTER WHO PROTECTS TRADITIONAL FAMILIES! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
10

 

 

Packet given to kids at conference from “Boston GLASS” homosexual activist group includes oral sex instructions . . . and much more.

NONE of this site’s regular readership would ever imagine that a Russian poohbah would require protection herein. Well, color yourselves shocked. Floored too. Don’t keel over.

In fact, this blog is centered around exposing the red/green alliance, so much so that countless are beyond fuming at said truth telling. Regardless, there are always extenuating circumstances and this is one of those times.

Now, before we get to the heart of the matter, one has to internalize that America is in the vise-grip of revolutionary forces. They are equally as dangerous as those attributed to Putin’s Russia, as well as similarly imbued red regimes. Not only that, but a recent commentary revealed the symbiotic relationship between the two:OBAMA & PUTIN:RED TWINS SEPARATED AT BIRTH.POTUS PURPOSEFULLY TAXES A DIVE!

Nevertheless, while they are politically and ideologically aligned, there exists particular fissures, those which touch upon the definition of what constitutes a traditional family and all that it entails.

Most are also aware where the Degenerate-in-Chief aligns, and his alliances are clear as a bell:

Alliance One:

In the history of the United States of America, a nation built upon Judeo-Christian moorings, which POTUS is responsible for altering the underpinnings of the traditional family, one which has sustained the nation for its entirety:The Gay-in-Chief “Exposed” Himself Once Again: Excited About Knocking Down DOMA,. Made Time To Call Gay Couple. Why?

 

Not your father’s US Justice Department.Attorney General Eric Holder presents special award to transgender activist Diana Flynn, a man wearing women’s clothes, during the DOJ’s LGBT Pride Month program. At right is Chai Feldblum, radical lesbian activist and Commissioner of the EEOC.

Yes, we know that others will babble about “progress” and all that blah, blah hogwash . However, we also understand that radical revolutionaries must eviscerate traditional moorings to bring down America and rebuild from its ashes. We get that. And, Barack HUSSEIN Obama has been brought to power to usher in America’s demise. 

Alliance Two:

In this regard, what worse nightmare is there for traditional Americans than a “down low” POTUS, one whose proclivities are too yucky even to say aloud:The Continued Adventures of The “Down Low” POTUS & His (Previous) “Body Double”, Reggie Love!

Alliance Three:

And who doesn’t recall Rev Wright and his infamous “Church”:The “Down Low” POTUS And Rev Wright’s Guiding Hand: Trinity Church’s Many Secrets Stripped Naked!

Alliance Four:

Moreover, the spillage from the Degenerate-in-Chief’s activities hardly stays within the confines of his private life. That is hard enough to swallow. However, it is the kiddies who suffer, and this site is not referring to “his girls”:DEFILING The Kiddies Via “Koshering” Pedophilia: The Left’s Next Phase For Bringing Down America Midst Sexual Gratification/Perversion!

DUE to all of the above (and more), how many want any input, whatsoever, from the militant, radicalized Gay Lobby, regardless of their insertion into Russian affairs?

U.S. SANCTIONS TARGET PRO-LIFE WOMAN WITH NO CRIMEA LINKS

‘This is payback for Russian restrictions on abortion, pro-family initiatives’

Video included

A Russian lawmaker known for her outspoken support for traditional marriage and the unborn is among the officials listed in new U.S. sanctions against individuals for their alleged contribution to Russia’s unlawful grab of Ukrainian territory.

Weeks ago, President Obama announced sanctions aimed at several individuals for their alleged roles in facilitating Russia’s actions. But Yelena Mizulina’s seems out of place on the list. Mizulina is chairwoman of the Russian Duma’s Committee on Family, Women and Children’s Affairs.

She was also the lead sponsor of legislation banning Americans from adopting Russian orphans, fearing the children could suffer harm if adopted by homosexual partners.

In the documents outlining the sanctions, the allegations against Mizulina simply cite “her status as a state duma deputy.”

“Yelena Mizulina, as far as I know, has nothing to do with the controversy over the Crimea. She did sponsor a bill to make it easier for residents of the Crimea to have Russian citizenship. That was
before the Crimea was incorporated into Russia. Other than that, (she had) absolutely nothing to do with the Crimea,” said Don Feder, communications director for the World Congress of Families, which promotes traditional values around the globe.

“This is payback. This is payback for Russian restrictions on abortion. It’s payback for the child protection law. It’s payback for all the pro-family initiatives that the Russian people have undertaken in the last few years,” he said.

Feder said this story is another alarming example of who is calling the shots for the Obama administration.

“This administration is clearly controlled by the gay lobby. Whatever organized homosexuals want, the administration gives them. It was about a year or year-and-a-half ago that Obama announced that promoting gay rights abroad would be a major U.S. foreign policy initiative. You have to shake your head in wonder,” he said. “In fact, U.S. ambassadors have been ordered to march in gay pride parades all over the world, wherever they’re held.”

Listen to the WND/Radio America interview with Don Feder:

It’s a major shift in emphasis for Obama, who only embraced gay marriage publicly two years ago. Feder said it was a pragmatic move by the administration and not the result of any deep soul-searching.

“I think a lot of it has to do with funding. Remember that when Obama ran for president in 2008, he said while he was sympathetic to gay rights, he believed that marriage was between a man and a woman. Then at the beginning of 2012, at the beginning of his re-election campaign, suddenly he decided that he was in favor of gay marriage. What changed?” asked Feder.

“Obviously nothing, it was expediency. He was told by certain gay donors if he didn’t begin supporting gay marriage, they would withhold their donations. On that basis, Obama decided to have this very convenient change of heart. I think that supporting homosexual marriage … has always been Obama’s position. I think he adopted the one man-one woman (position) in 2008 as a matter of expediency. So part of it is Obama’s natural philosophical inclination on social issues and part of it is expediency,” he said.

According to Feder, the impact of the sanctions will be minimal. He said they will restrict Mizulina’s travel but will not impact her legislative work at all. In addition, he said any intended message sent through these sanctions will fall on deaf ears with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“I think Putin feels the sanctions are a joke. It gives [Obama] an opportunity to say to the people who are pressuring him to do more, ‘Look, I have this list of people that I’ve applied sanctions to,’” Feder said.

“It’s sort of like his famous red line. He’ll say, ‘I’ve drawn a red line and if Syria crosses the red line there are going to be serious consequences.’ So Syria crosses the red line and the serious
consequences are Obama drawing another red line. I don’t think Putin takes any of it seriously. In fact, I don’t think he takes our president seriously,” he said.

But what about Mizulina’s impact on Americans’ efforts to adopt Russian orphans? Many Americans on all sides of the gay marriage and gay adoption debates were frustrated by Russia putting a halt to them, even for traditionally married couples. Feder wholeheartedly endorses Mizulina’s actions.

“I think her position is absolutely right. The Russians are very traditional people. They have a strong religious orientation. They haven’t gotten caught up in the whole politically correct thing that has captured so many people in this country, that homosexuality is essentially the same as heterosexuality, that it’s genetically determined and what’s called discrimination against gays is the same as discrimination against a racial minority,” Feder said.

“The Russian people don’t feel that way. They don’t want to see Russian children placed with homosexuals,” he said. “Frankly, I don’t blame them.”

EVERYONE who can see the forest from the trees understands why America’s traditional underpinnings are purposefully falling down, one root at a time. And it is beyond Orwellian that the so-called leadership of the free world is busy targeting those in Putin’s Russia, who seek to protect that which used to be America’s priority – family and children. Can you believe it?

Not only that, but a creeping totalitarian, fascist network of underlings are marching full force, ever since the Gay-in-Chief took office. Their militancy started decades ago, but their stridency has reached fevered pitch: meet the new fascists – and their victims!

Thus, if readers look around, wondering, who exactly is controlling Obama’s America, rest assured the answer is: the most radical, anti-American forces bar none, even compared to Putin’s Russia!! 

Perverts of the highest degree are running rampant in Obama’s America! Indeed, they are indubitably cut from the very same sick ilk; cultural Marxists within the (very real) movement to normalize pedophilia!

CIA’s BRENNAN & HIS DEADLY FINGERPRINTS:BENGHAZIGATE’S VIDEO “DEFENSE”;OBAMA’s PASSPORT; “MYSTERIOUS” DEATHS & MORE…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
16
hagmann051814

 The infamous “spontaneous” cause of combustion – the video made them do it!

This site has repeatedly written about several key intersecting themes – all of which are now coming full circle – with tie-ins re Benghazigate and other geo-political matters. And if it was up to the Renegade-in-Chief, rest assured, all the skeletons would stay buried; from those who willingly participated in certain crimes, to others who (literally) got caught in the crossfire.

However, in order to go from there to here, it is imperative to back-track, far enough to elicit relevant and pertinent factoids. Let’s call it our patriotic “background check investigation”.

Background Check One:

Aside from one’s visceral, creepy-feeling reaction – due to the CIA Chief’s perpetual satan-like stare – John O. Brennan requires special scrutiny, but not because he resembles the devil! Pinkie swears. 

So, to lend some underlying context, let’s segue to the patch quilt connection between Obama’s mysterious, non-transparent past and his CIA pick. 

More than likely, the “fixer” landed the top spot at the CIA via a quid pro quo. Rest assured, Brennan’s CEO post at the very same defense contractor which “caught” one of its employees breaching the  POTUS’s bonafides was no accident.

A supposed Republican, the only diff between Brennan and the POTUS is his affinity for drone strikes. Most significantly, they are in sync with the same Islamic patrons. Regardless, Brennan understands the value of “insurance policies”, so having the upper hand always helps in this and that, particularly when the POTUS is squeamish about certain “elimination” tactics and panders to a rabid left base. Hence, the need to breach. In reality, they only differ re tactics, but agree on who needs to come out on top – the Brotherhood Mafia. This is where Benghazigate intersects with the “video defense”.

Background Check Two:

As is usually the case, at least in criminal organizations – and Obama Inc. qualifies as such – what you think you know is little more than smoke and mirrors. In other words, while the crime boss operates in the shadows, many get whacked in the process. So too it is with the skulking hulk, Washington’s hit man, John O. Brennan, himself a Muslim convert! And while we will never know the exact scope of his/their criminal dealings, the fact of the matter is that they operate completely outside the “advice and consent” of Congress!

If that isn’t shocking enough, Brennan, as an almost de facto President of the United States, was secretly meeting with heads of state!According to top secret cables recently released by Wikileaks, Brennan in 2009 met with none other than the King of Saudi Arabia and then-President of Yemen Ali Abdullah Saleh! And these are just the heads of state that we know of!

Why was Brennan, then a low-level advisor to Barack Hussein Obama, secretly meeting with heads of state? Under what authority was (and probably still is) John Brennan waging secret wars in North Africa and the Middle East? Was this the real reason for the attack on the Benghazi consulate, as Benghazi: The Definitive Report makes clear? Does the intel that came out yesterday that Ambassador Christopher Stevens was murdered via lethal injection after a failed kidnapping attempt make sense in light of Brennan’s illegal involvement in Libya and attack of Ansar al-Sharia?

According to an “exclusive” by the Washington Times yesterday:

According to a March 14 posting on an al Qaeda-linked website, Dhu–al-Bajadinstated that Stevens was given a lethal injection that was overlooked during the autopsy. The “plan was based on abduction and exchange of high-level prisoners,” the terrorist wrote on the prominent jihadist Web forum Ansar al-Mujahideen Network. “However, the operation took another turn, for a reason God only knows, when one of the members of the jihadist cell improvised and followed Plan B.”

 

Background Check Three:

Do readers recall the “mysterious” death of Lieutenant Charles Harris Jr.? Oh dear. The poor shnook got caught up in more than he bargained for, and now he lies six feet under. Fingerprints galore.

Most intrinsically, Obama Inc’s bloody fingerprints – with the CIA as the main “fixers”… State, FBI, DHS were surely their back up teams – in Benghazigate could not have happened without shadowy insiders operating behind the scenes. It is this critical element which led to the “video made them do it” “defense” and the entire criminal cover up!  

Investigative Findings: Benghazi Video Linked To CIA?

18 May 2014: Based on my extensive 18-month investigation, it is my professional conclusion that the Internet video known as Innocence of Muslims, the video allegedly responsible for Middle East violence and more importantly, the September 11, 2012 attack in Benghazi that resulted in the death of four Americans can be directly tied to a covert intelligence operation and operational assets of the U.S. Department of Justice. Additionally, the individuals and entities responsible for the Internet promotion of the video of that name can be traced not just to an intelligence operation contemporaneous to the attacks, but to previous events of historical significance and current relevance.

Investigation found that the video cited as the cause for the attack in Benghazi and riots in the Middle East underwent at least four name changes, including Desert Warrior, The innocence of bn Laden, The Real Life of Muhammad, and finally, Innocence of Muslims. Investigation also found evidence that the primary individual behind the film worked as an operational asst for the FBI in exchange for leniency due to his criminal past. Indications of a possible association by one or more of the individuals responsible for the film to U.S. intelligence agencies, including the CIA, are also suggested.

This investigator also found evidence that suggests that the Internet promotion of the video is linked to at least one entity with ties to government subcontractors. That is, an analysis of electronic footprints of the video trailer under the title Innocence of Muslims, which existed in virtual obscurity for a significant period from its production until September 11, 2012, has been traced to a now defunct Internet YouTube news channel that appears connected to the company formerly known as Stanley, Inc., a subcontractor to various agencies of the U.S. Federal Government that provided products and services to the U.S. military, the U.S. State Department and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, among others. Stanley, Inc. was acquired by the CGI Group in 2010.

It is relevant to note that Stanley, Inc., based in Arlington, Virginia, was awarded a $164 million contract to print new U.S. passports in 2006. It is even more important to point out that two employees of Stanley, Inc., along with a third individual employed by another defense contractor identified as The Analysis Corporation, were identified as the perpetrators who breached the records of the U.S. passport office on three occasions in 2008 and “improperly accessed” the passport records of Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain. The breaches occurred on January 9, February 21 and March 14, 2008.

Investigation verified that the CEO of the Analysis Corporation at the time of the passport office break-in was John O. Brennan, who served as a close advisor to Obama in 2008 on matters of intelligence and foreign policy. Brennan also contributed to Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign and had a 25-year career in the CIA. John O. Brennan is now the head of the CIA under Obama.

It is here that we must recall that at the time of the passport office break-in, Barack Hussein Obama was on the campaign trail as the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee. The news of the breach was made public within a week of the last intrusion, and a week later, on March 21, 2008, Obama was asked for his reaction by ABC News Jake Tapper while campaigning. Obviously, Obama now officially knows that the public has been informed about the level of the breach, and that Obama’s personal and confidential biographical information, in addition to his international travels was apparently “accessed.”

It is important to note that that the files accessed included Obama’s personal passport and not limited to his diplomatic passport.

On April 8, 2008, Obama continued to comment on the fact that the confidentiality of his passport records were apparently compromised. It was on this occasion when Obama admitted, for the first time in any public venue as a presidential candidate, that he traveled to Pakistan in 1981. It is reasonable to wonder whether Obama would have disclosed his Pakistan trip at this time had it not been for the uncertainty that the information was already “in play.”

Even ABC News appeared surprised at this sudden and unexpected revelation, considering all of the talk about Pakistan and U.S. foreign policy during the previous several months. Research shows that Obama did not disclose this trip at any time during any policy discussions or debates prior to the passport office breach.

It is also important to point out that during the investigation of the breach of the passport office records, the Washington Times reported that “officials do not know whether information was improperly copied, altered or removed from the database during the intrusions” [Emphasis added]. As time progressed, however, so did the leaks. It was reported that at least one employee within the U.S. State Department shared passport information with a man identified as Lieutenant Charles Harris Jr.

My investigation suggests that Harris was the intended recipient of stolen credit card information from the State Department employee, but received more than what he bargained for. When he realized the scope of the crime and the explosive nature of the information he possessed, he turned to investigators for protection. He also began to talk with investigators and ultimately, made a deal with federal prosecutors.

Before he could make good on his deal, Lieutenant Quarles Harris Jr. was found shot to death in his car on April 17, 2008, just over a month after the last breach. He was found in front of the Judah House Praise Baptist Church in the northeast section of Washington. He had been shot in the head.

The murder of Harris remains unsolved, and the official narrative of that murder is that Harris was either a victim of random violence, or his murder was a result of a “street deal gone bad.”

Clearly, investigation into the video and those individuals and entities behind the video known as Innocence of Muslims has found tentacles that reach far beyond the Benghazi attacks. There seems to be a connection, born out of electronic footprints, to our own intelligence agencies in the creation and promotion of this video as outlined above.

Introduction

Following the announcement to establish a Congressional Select Committee on Benghazi and in response to recently released documents to Judicial Watch, numerous government officials and media pundits have “doubled down” on the narrative that an anti-Muslim movie ultimately titled Innocence of Muslims was the proximate cause for the attacks in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012 that killed four Americans, including a U.S. Ambassador. To stipulate that the video played a primary role in the attack and murder in Benghazi, therefore, is to require it to be properly characterized as critical evidence in a criminal act of international terror. Accordingly, the video, and anyone involved in its funding, production and dissemination must be subjected to extensive investigation as it must be classified as evidence in a multiple homicide stemming from an attack on U.S. property located on foreign soil. To date, no meaningful investigation has been conducted.

Since the Benghazi attacks, officials at the highest levels of our government, supported and even in some instances, facilitated by many in the media and political pundits, have identified the film as the primary and sole motive behind the attack and the murders. As referenced above, evidence of such facilitation was further confirmed in a series of 41 documents secured by Judicial Watch pertaining to Benghazi on April 18, 2014.

Among those documents include a recently declassified e-mail originating from then-White House Deputy Strategic Communications Adviser Ben Rhodes and other Obama administration public relations officials “attempting to orchestrate a campaign to ‘reinforce’ President Obama and to portray the Benghazi consulate terrorist attack as being ‘rooted in an Internet video, and not a failure of policy.”[1][emphasis by this author]

It is relevant to point out that Ben Rhodes, now Obama’s deputy national security advisor, is the brother of CBS News president David Rhodes. As the e-mail ‘thread’ details, Ben Rhodes was instrumental in changing the talking points used by administration spokesmen immediately following the attack in Benghazi. It would appear that a prima facie case now exists that places the origins of emphasis and blame on an Internet video originated at the White House level, pursuant to the instructions or with the imprimatur of Obama or one of his stand-ins. The message was merely conveyed by Rhodes, who would likely lack operational authority to make such a decision, according to multiple sources interviewed for this investigation.

In criminal cases and in modern popular culture that includes television, movies and detective novels, motive is one of three aspects of a broader summation of a crime that is used to establish, in part, the determination of guilt of a suspect or suspects. We often hear of “motive, means and opportunity” as a “three-legged stool” on which the guilt or innocence of suspects might rest. With respect to Benghazi, the motive for the attacks has been persistently identified as the creation and distribution of the film Innocence of Muslims.

For the specific benefit of anyone who maintains the belief that the film was the motive behind the attack and murders, the following represents the findings from my research and investigation. For the benefit of anyone who believes otherwise, the following should serve as confirmation that the film was a convenient, albeit planned cover story that had its origins deep within the mechanics of covert intelligence operations.

Summary of Findings

Overview

Based on extensive investigation and research in my capacity as an investigator and investigative journalist, it is my professional opinion that blaming the Internet video for the attack at Benghazi is plagued by at least three major irreconcilable inconsistencies that appear to lack any credible explanations in the context of motive:

1. The suppositious relationship between the alleged creator of the video, including others reportedly involved in its funding, creation, distribution and promotion, to U.S. federal intelligence agencies and related government subcontractors. The intelligence agencies include the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI);

2. The extemporaneous timing and method of the film’s distribution;

3. The post-event use of the film by government officials and their spokespersons as a ready-made, readily accessible asset of otherwise limited prominence to divert attention away from the actual nature of the attack in its immediate aftermath.

Several investigations have already been performed by various oversight committees, including the often cited Accountability Review Board (ARB), yet none of the issues listed above have been addressed or investigated in any meaningful depth or fashion.

Supplemental note regarding video-spurred violence: Deceptive characterization of attack site

It is important to note that while the primary issue of focus has been that of inadequate security at diplomatic facilities (i.e. embassies and consulates) particularly in the Middle East, the attack occurred at an unmarked, nondescript location that effectively served as a CIA operations center and logistics facility for the covert transfer of arms and personnel throughout North Africa.

There were no American flags flying outside of the compound, and nothing iconic was overtly displayed that would readily identify this location as official U.S. property conducting normal embassy or consulate business. Therefore, to suggest that this site would be a logical target for a demonstration by Muslims upset over an insulting video is disingenuous at best, and represents an intentional deception that could only be purveyed by individuals who fully understood the precise reason for the existence of this compound.

The initial descriptions of the attack occurring at an embassy, then a consulate, and finally a “mission” were deliberately misleading. The compound was none of those, and this fact was known from the beginning. The false descriptions were used to (1) hide the true nature and use of the CIA compound in Benghazi, and (2) to reinforce the government’s position that the video caused sufficient and spontaneous violence beyond what could be reasonably anticipated or controlled.

While the issue of security failures and lapses might indeed have merit in the broader context of U.S. diplomatic facilities in the Middle East, to apply those talking points to this compound is an intentional redirection and sleight of hand deception designed to focus attention away from the real issues.

The Filmmaker…..

The Facilitator…..

The video chronology….

Online/Digital forensic investigation….

False fallout….continue connecting the dots here

Besides, the CIA’s underbelly has been demonstrably gutted, not by someone from the outside, but by a DEEP cover insider. Folks, when “the agency” veers off the American path, it is lethal to each and every U.S. citizen, regardless of their service to the country. This is a fact.

In the main, readers are free to believe that the orchestrated treacheries, from the hellish bowels of Obama Inc., are merely coinquidinks. That the interlocking trails leading straight back to the White House…to the FBI…CIA…the “contractor”…aka the “shredder” (CGI to Accenture)…are simply happenstance. Whatever floats your boat.

ISLAMIC “REFORMATION” IMPOSSIBLE:IMMUTABLE WAR-LIKE IDEOLOGY.GRAVEST THREAT TO THE WEST!Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
9


 ‘The Black Flag of Jihad’

WHILE a resurgent Russian bear, in tandem with an imposing China, threatens the west (particularly America), the fact of the matter is that the right leader – no pun intended – can counter them. Reagan was one such example, as well as others. However, that was then and this is now. Americans are literally being squeezed, sandwiched, between the reds and the greens! Nevertheless, do not think, even for a nanosecond, that Barack HUSSEIN Obama is upset with their ultimate goals; the knock down of America as a super power. He is in bed with them.

Consequentially, in light of the fast changing geo-political landscape, it is of utmost urgency to come to grips with the greater menace – Islam. Despite all the realities at hand, too many westerners lull themselves into a false sense of “reality”, hoping to buy off adherents to Islam with extended hands of friendship, as if this peace-seeking wish is worth a damn.

Realistically, those who are devoted to Islam are unable to accept said outstretched hand, simply because they are mandated not to. Embracing Islam IS to submit to the will of Allah! عرض…

The Quran Says that Non-Muslims Should Not be Taken as Friends

Given that Allah hates non-Muslims to the extent that he would prevent them from knowing the truth, cause them to err and then condemn them to eternal torture for their unbelief and misdeeds, it would make little sense if he intended Muslims to treat unbelievers by the same standards that they treat each other here on earth.

The Quran says that no true Muslim would ever love anyone who resists Islam, even if it is a family member:

Thou wilt not find any people who believe in Allah and the Last Day, loving those who resist Allah and His Messenger, even though they were their fathers or their sons, or their brothers, or their kindred. (58:22)

There are at least nine places in the Quran where believers are warned not to befriend non-Muslims:

O ye who believe! Take not for friends unbelievers rather than believers: Do ye wish to offer Allah an open proof against yourselves? (4:144) 

In fact, anyone who does take a non-Muslim as a friend could be accused of being an unbeliever as well:

O ye who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for friends. They are friends one to another. He among you who taketh them for friends is (one) of them. Lo! Allah guideth not wrongdoing folk. (5:51)

Note that Christians, according to the Quran, are included in the ranks of “unbelievers”:

They indeed have disbelieved who say: Lo! Allah is the Messiah, son of Mary (5:17)

Muhammad said that unbelievers have it out for Muslims.  They may appear harmless or friendly, but, in reality, they harbor corruption and evil intentions:

O ye who believe! Take not into your intimacy those outside your ranks: They will not fail to corrupt you. They only desire your ruin: Rank hatred has already appeared from their mouths: What their hearts conceal is far worse (3:118)

For the Unbelievers are unto you open enemies (4:101)

As for them, they are but plotting a scheme (86:15)

Those outside of Islam are really helpers of evil against Allah:

The Misbeliever is a helper (of Evil), against his own Lord! (25:55)

The Quran says that “hostility and hate” will exist between Muslims and infidels “for ever” until the latter “believe in Allah alone.” (60:4)

Instead of befriending non-Muslims, the Quran encourages hostility.  Muslims are ordered to fight unbelievers:

O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty.(9:123)

The Quran tells Muslims that they will spend eternity laughing at unbelievers (83:34) and mocking their suffering as they are tortured in Hell:

And the dwellers of the garden will call out to the inmates of the fire: Surely we have found what our Lord promised us to be true; have you too found what your Lord promised to be true? They will say: Yes. Then a crier will cry out among them that the curse of Allah is on the unjust. (7:44) – Muhammad got an early start on this by personally mocking his dead enemies following the Battle of Badr (Ibn Ishaq 454)

One does not befriend those over whose suffering they will later rejoice, nor does it make any sense that Muslims would befriend those whom the Quran labels “enemies of Allah” by virtue of their unbelief. 

Let this incontrovertible fact sink in: those who follow Islam, Shariah Law, internalize the above mandate (and the rest of the Koran/hadiths) as an immutable dictate. Thus, does anyone truly think that steeped believers will disabuse Allah’s will? Asked and answered.

Nevertheless, before we delve any further, no one should dare opine: such talk is hateful against Muslims….blah…blah…yada yada too. As a matter of fact, the aforementioned truth-telling is not only mandatory for the west, but for all Muslims who are slaughtered under the boot of Islam, for whatever “infraction” they are deemed “guilty” of. So, don’t even go there…

Islamophobia - 4

 

And, if more is needed to prove the futility of said conciliatory hallucinations, well, perhaps this will disabuse said thinking – or not – 

“A single bullet will strike ur (sic) head one day [admin] from a jihadist. Insha-Allah,” one threat read. Another Facebook user with a Muslim name threatened to cut off administrators’ heads if they continued to post articles in a rant too profane to quote here. Yet another person threatened to blackmail one of the administrators.

“I am giving u (sic) warning,” said another person. “Stop this page.”

According to the group, one administrator received several threatening phone calls, with some including a Muslim prayer in Arabic. He reported it to the police, they said, but nothing was done. Just this week, they added, he received two threatening calls.

Adina Kutnicki, an investigative journalist based in Israel, said she has been harassed on Facebook by an individual she identified as Iranian Mohamed Erdem.

“Back off you satanist scum of the earth! You want war, war with me!” he told Kutnicki on Facebook. The threats she received from Erdem was so alarming, she added, that “heavy duty counter terror contacts decided to ‘check things out.'”

The face of another administrator was photo-shopped into a Nazi uniform and added to a Facebook post intended to incite harassment. Another picture depicted Kutnicki superimposed on a nuclear mushroom cloud with a warning that Israel would be destroyed and wiped off the map.

Folks, this is serious sh-t…listen up….      

“A Radical Muslim’ is a ‘Practicing Muslim’, a ‘Moderate Muslim’ is a ‘non Practicing Muslim’ or otherwise known as an Apostate of Islam…The penalty for Apostasy under Sharia law is Death”   
Dave Gaubatz

“Destroy the Islamic ideology worldwide and we will have peace worldwide” Dave Gaubatz

“Islam is an economic, military, and political ideology, that uses religions as a method to obtain their ultimate goal: Islamic Ummah (Nation)Worldwide and under Sharia law” 

“CAIR has a larger and more dependable ‘Confidential Informant’ Network’ than our entire FBI Department.  CAIR has devoted non Muslim people within local, state, and federal government.  They have police officers in high positions, medical personnel, military personnel, and most importantly they have Pastors, Ministers, and Rabbi’s. 

“We are not at war with Al Qaeda, Hamas, The Taliban, or other Islamic terrorist groups.  We are at war with Islam itself and the groups that emerge from the violent ideology of Islam are our secondary enemies”.

Islam Can’t Be Reformed

By: Dave Gaubatz

19 May 2014

Today I received about 25 emails asking me if Islam can be reformed.  Specifically they wanted to know if a Muslim could follow Islam and not Shariah law.  They said a well known counter-terrorism expert who was recently on the radio said a Muslim could set aside Shariah law and still be a good Muslim.  I laughed and laughed when I heard this.  The people who say this are the ‘Medical Quacks’ of the 1800’s.  They will give their audience anything for a few pennies.

This was my basic answer to the separation of Shariah from Islam:

“There is no Islam without Shariah law. One can’t separate the two. There is no Christianity without the Ten Commandments, and the same goes for Islam. The alleged counter-terrorism experts who say a person can be a follower of Islam, yet does not practice Shariah, should be tuned out. They are hurting the educational awareness of understanding ‘Pure Islam’. Islam was founded on the sayings and actions of Prophet (Pseudo) Mohammed. He is the example for all Muslims to follow. If a Muslim denies the sayings and actions of Mohammed, he/she has committed both ‘Blasphemy and Apostasy’. Dave Gaubatz, Author ‘Muslim Mafia’www.wearenotafraid.blogspot.com” 

Islamic leaders put out material distributed from Pakistan, India, and Saudi Arabia detailing the specifics of how a ‘Pure Muslim’ should lead their lives in accordance with Shariah law. A Muslim can’t pick and choose which aspects of Shariah they want to adhere to and which ones they prefer not. A Muslim is either Shariah compliant or they are not. In other words, they either practice Shariah law or they are non practicing Muslims. If a Muslim does not adhere at least in his or her heart to all aspects of Shariah law, they are considered Apostates by their leaders. This is a death sentence for them regardless of what country they reside in. Islam and Shariah law have no boundaries. Boundaries are man-made specifically by Jews and Christians, and in the hearts of Muslims they are meaningless. 

The following three requirements are directly from Islamic leaders/Imams from whom my research team and I have received advice over the last three years. The intelligence I collect is always first-hand intelligence.

 

1.  Islam is not a religion. Islam is a political, economic, and military ideology. Religion within Islam is used as a tactic to achieve the ultimate goal of Islam which is an Islamic Ummah (nation) worldwide and under Sharia law.

 

2.  Shariah law is an all or nothing. A Muslim can’t pick and choose which parts of Sharia they desire to adhere to. 90% of Shariah law may be peaceful, but it is the 10% that innocent people must ‘fear’. This part pertains to the intolerance of other religions, the hatred of Jews, Christians, and even Muslims who do not adhere to Shariah law, and physical Jihad. All Muslims are not required to physically fight their enemies, but ‘All’ Muslims must assist in equipping and financing their brothers and sisters who are engaged in physical Jihad. For a Muslim to choose not to do so equate to him/her being an Apostate of Islam; again this is a death sentence for the accused.

 

3.  The innocent people of all races, religions, and cultures are at war with Islam. This is the hardest and most difficult concept for people to understand. The Muslims who committed murder on 11 Sept. 2001 were doing so in the name of Islam. The 4000 plus men and women who have been murdered in Iraq and Afghanistan were killed in the name of Islam. Maj. Hassan from Ft. Hood who killed several people did so in the name of Islam. The same materials being studied by Hamas, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and the Taliban are the exact materials being distributed across America and provided to innocent young Muslim children to study in order to be ‘Pure Muslim’.

During the last year I have met with thousands of Patriots around the world.  I have had one main goal.  I want people to realize there is no peace in Islam.  Islam and Shariah law are very dangerous and one need only look around the world each day to confirm this.  When an alleged counter-terrorism expert tells you there is a peaceful side to Islam and Shariah law can be discarded by a Muslim they are doing this for one of four possible reasons:

 
1.  They are incompetent 
2.  They are playing the Political Correctness Game
3.  They are playing the Middle of The Road Game so as not to distance themselves from the actors and actresses of the media, politicians, and from Conservative ‘Reformers’
4.  They do not want to upset the many millions of people who will donate to them if they do not go to far off the liberal course in explaining Islam
 
In closing:  We will be defeated by the Islamic ideology and it’s followers if we do not define Islam for what it is.  Islam has been dangerous for over 1400 years and it can’t be changed.
 
I explain Islam using first hand evidence.  Since I started my crusade to expose Islam I have always done so in a purely journalistic manner.  I report facts: It is no concern to me if I offend the actors and actresses of the media, I do not care if I offend law enforcement who side with Islamic terrorists more than they do innocent Americans, I do not care if I offend politicians from the left or right, I do not care if I offend non profit 501 organizations from the left or right, I especially don’t care if I offend America’s number one Muslim Brotherhood Supporter Barack Hussein Obama. 
 
I lose many donations because of my straight forward reporting.  I only conduct first-hand research because I want Americans and others to know ‘Pure Islam’. When I can I use my own meager funds.  There are a few that donate for me to conduct research in their areas.  For those who would rather donate to alleged counter-terrorism experts who are hurting our country more than helping, this does not offend me.  Anyone who spouts off lies about the alleged peaceful side of Islam is hurting not only America, but the innocent people worldwide.  They are hurting the future of our children.  There is no excuse for this.
 
My message:  Condemn the Islamic ideology and it’s leaders/supporters as haters of the free world. 
 ——————————————————————————————————

ASIDE from all the truths laid out by Dave Gaubatz, as long as Islam can maintain its religious-based cloak of armor, well, nothing short of the full eradication of the west – and by then it will be too late! – will convince multi-culti ideologues.

The Muslim Brotherhood’s plan for America was found in an internal Brotherhood document and presented into evidence during the Holy Land Foundation terror financing trials in 2007 and 2008.

“The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and by the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Let’s face reality – however uncomfortable and harsh it is – instead of burying ourselves in the process: does anyone really believe, if Islamic adherents had their druthers, they wouldn’t implant their boot of Shariah Law all over the west’s throat? If the answer is still negative, there is nothing else to talk about. Alas, good luck with said fantasies, but don’t forget to turn the (western) lights off on your way out!

 

 

 

Facebook Yanks, Restores Anti-Islam Page After Admins Receive Death Threats…Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
26

MANY of the readers are aware of this site’s association with Islam Exposed Online. I am its Israel Administrator.

In this regard, the following article is more than germane. It speaks for itself.

Facebook yanks, restores anti-Islam page after admins receive death threats

Joe Newby – Examiner.com
May 21, 2014

Is Facebook okay with death threats from Islamists? That’s the question administrators of “Islam Exposed” asked earlier this week. After administrators received a number of threatening messages, Facebook pulled the page, citing “harassment,” but restored the page on Tuesday, telling Examiner.com it “was removed in error.”

Administrators were extremely grateful to see the page restored, but questions regarding the threats remained. Would Facebook take action against those issuing the threats? The social media site did not say, but the group did not wait and filed complaints with the FBI.

“A single bullet will strike ur (sic) head one day [admin] from a jihadist. Insha-Allah,” one threat read. Another Facebook user with a Muslim name threatened to cut off administrators’ heads if they continued to post articles in a rant too profane to quote here. Yet another person threatened to blackmail one of the administrators.

“I am giving u (sic) warning,” said another person. “Stop this page.”

According to the group, one administrator received several threatening phone calls, with some including a Muslim prayer in Arabic. He reported it to the police, they said, but nothing was done. Just this week, they added, he received two threatening calls.

Adina Kutnicki, an investigative journalist based in Israel, said she has been harassed on Facebook by an individual she identified as Iranian Mohamed Erdem.

“Back off you satanist scum of the earth! You want war, war with me!” he told Kutnicki on Facebook. The threats she received from Erdem was so alarming, she added, that “heavy duty counter terror contacts decided to ‘check things out.'”

The face of another administrator was photo-shopped into a Nazi uniform and added to a Facebook post intended to incite harassment. Another picture depicted Kutnicki superimposed on a nuclear mushroom cloud with a warning that Israel would be destroyed and wiped off the map.

All of these incidents have been reported to Facebook, they said, but the social media giant has so far done nothing. Instead of punishing those actually making the threats, Facebook responded by retaliating against the victims. Unfortunately, this is not all that uncommon.

Last August, for example, we reported that a conservative female said she was targeted with explicit threats of death and rape from users with Muslim-sounding names, but Facebook dismissed them. According to that user, Facebook responded with a private email saying they could not confirm the threats violated their community standards. One threat reported to Facebook was quite specific: “We will kill you.”

At the time, Facebook told The Blaze it not only supports freedom of speech but enforces its standards uniformly across the board.

“We review every piece of content that is reported to us or flagged in the system and each one is held to the same exact standard – as is every person who uses our service and we will enforce our Statement of Rights and Responsibilities equally,” a Facebook spokesperson said.

But the administrators we spoke to — along with many hundreds of others who have reached out to Examiner over the last two years — dispute that. For Kutnicki and others, the issue is Facebook’s willingness to turn a blind eye to those who attack Jews and Israel while hammering anyone who even mentions Islam in a post.

 

 

 

VETERANS DEATHS:OUTGROWTH OF OBAMA’S CONTEMPT FOR U.S. MILITARY.PATRIOTS ALIKE…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
10

US soldiers, along with Afghan Local Police (ALP), climb a hillock to access the Surech check post during a patrol in Kush Kunar District in the province of Nangarhar©AFP

It is not for nothing that countless scandals are erupting under the reign of Barack HUSSEIN Obama. Despite the growing list of treachery, many millions of American citizens become especially enraged, when its fighting forces are defamed and mistreated – by those sworn to have their backs! Such is the unending tragedy, under the boot of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, regardless of his blatherings, that, he too “appreciates” the sacrifices of American soldiers. Bullshit.

Obama Inc’s list, re their backstabbing of patriots, is endless. Yet, there is a common theme, a dark undertone: disdain for America’s soldiers, the symbol of U.S. hyper-power.

Along this trajectory, it is a fact that the army’s “down-sizing”, really its castration, is taking place under the regime’s hatchet. Not only that, as radical leftists are wont to opine, “downsizing” (in actuality, deconstruction) has everything to do with empty coffers. P L E A S E. For if this is even remotely true, how could it be that money ALWAYS magically appears, to fund green schemes and every other radical left pet project? Moreover, where is the money coming from to fund this and that overseas Islamic “outreach” and the “gifting” of heavy weaponry? 

Back to the dying vets…and Obama Inc.’s absolute hand in their demise….

Talk-radio host Rush Limbaugh on Monday blasted the Veterans Administration as a “death panel being done on purpose” as the investigation into secret waiting lists and backlogs causing unnecessary deaths expanded to 19 states.

“These people are special. These are soldiers. They’re special. They got wounded in action … defending this country on missions assigned by their commander-in-chief and other commanding officers,” Limbaugh said.

“Now we learn of these deaths by attrition, secret waiting lists, and this is the real bad thing of it. People on these lists assume that they’re being moved ahead of the line. That’s the purpose of the secret list, that they’re going to really be taken care of. Because the backlog is so jammed, the line for treatment at the VA is so long that they’ve come up with this secret list business, and the people on that list think that they’re essentially being moved to the top of the class, or the head of the line, in front of the line. And they’re just being ignored,” he said.

He said it appears the death toll, combining various reports, has passed 100 victims.

“It’s simply unconscionable. So you have to ask, the natural assumption is that nobody wants these people to die, even if you add the death panel component, nobody wants these people to die, yet they are. At the very least what we’re dealing with here is a total inability to deal with this. And at worst it’s the death panel being done on purpose.”

He said he knows some people won’t recognize the death panel aspect, “even though the evidence is pretty clear.”

But if the above isn’t clear enough, well, this site pointed out their dangerous proclivities, predisposed towards active duty soldiers, as well as vets. The following was a foreshadowing:

Foreshadowing One:

What kind of monstrous regime places a bulls eye on the backs of vets and patriots?

Foreshadowing Two:

Moreover, when U.S. warrior of warriors, its SEALS, are stomped upon like yesterday’s garbage, what else does one expect their treatment of “regular” vets will be?

Foreshadowing Three:

Adding insult to grave injury, officers alike are placed in mortal danger! On the other hand, Muslim soldiers/officers are handled with kid gloves. Can you believe it? You better.

Foreshadowing Four:

As detailed, whatever the case, Obama Inc. plans to take down vets and patriots, even usurping the IRS to do its dirty work!

In this regard, why not get rid of as many vets as possible, scandal be damned?

Veterans scandal risks engulfing Obama

By Geoff Dyer in Washington

Amid contrived outrage over Benghazi and the improving fortunes of its healthcare reform, the Obama administration could be facing a genuine scandal about its treatment of military veterans that has the potential to attract broad political condemnation of its competence.

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is facing mounting evidence that some of the hospitals it runs have been keeping two sets of books to make it look as if they were reducing waiting times to see a doctor.

 More damning, the department is investigating the claims of a whistleblower doctor in Arizona that dozens of patients at one hospital died while they were languishing on a hidden waiting list without ever being given an appointment.

Richard Griffin, the department’s acting inspector general, admitted on Thursday that its review could lead to criminal charges. In the first political casualty of the scandal, Robert Petzel, the department’s undersecretary for heath, resigned on Friday.

If the evidence of mismanagement continues to accumulate, the Obama administration will find itself not in another partisan knife-fight, but under fire from both parties in a Congress where the uniformed military is venerated.

The veterans’ healthcare scandal is, in part, one of the unintended consequences of the wars in Afghanistan in Iraq, which have created “our 9/11 generation who have served with honour in more than a decade of war,” as President Barack Obama described them on Thursday.

More than 970,000 veterans from those wars have filed disability claims, taking the total enrolled in the VA system to 8.57m by the end of 2012.

At the same time, the healthcare system is dealing with the fact that many of the 6m veterans from the Vietnam era are now reaching the age when they start to require a lot of medical services. In 2010, the administration expanded coverage to exposure from Agent Orange, the chemical used during the war in Vietnam, prompting another surge of claimants.

The result has been a constant struggle to meet new demands, despite big spending increases. The budget for the VA has risen from $73.1bn in 2006 to $153.8bn this year. However, the number of outpatient visits at its facilities has increased from 46.5m in 2002 to 83.6m in 2012. “I am amazed this is still happening, given the big increase in resources that the department has received,” said Phillip Carter, a former army officer who researches veterans’ issues at the Center for a New American Security in Washington.

I am amazed this is still happening, given the big increase in resources that the department has received– Phillip Carter, Center for a New American Security

The VA, which runs 152 hospitals and 817 outpatient clinics, has long suffered from delays and a dysfunctional bureaucracy. In 2010, it introduced a new appointments system which promised a 14-day wait for an appointment with a primary care doctor or a specialist.

While there have been reports for several years that the new waiting line system was being abused, the subject really began to gather steam three weeks ago when CNN interviewed Sam Foote, who had recently retired as a doctor after working for 24 years for VA hospitals in Phoenix, Arizona.

He said that as many as 40 patients had died after being placed on a hidden waiting list that could last for up to a year, while officials at the hospital shredded documents and faked evidence to make it seem as if waiting times were under control.

Three officials in Phoenix have been put on leave, although Mr Griffin said there was no evidence yet that patients had died because of delayed appointments.

Since then, whistleblowers have alleged similar practices at least seven other VA hospitals around the country and claimed that officials at the hospitals were sometimes paid bonuses for reducing declared waiting times.

The political impact of the scandal has been somewhat muted so far, in part because of the respect still enjoyed by the veterans affairs secretary, retired four-star general Eric Shinseki who was himself wounded twice in Vietnam. Appearing before a Senate hearing on Thursday, Mr Shinseki received pointed questioning, but in a tone more respectful than almost any other cabinet member would have encountered. “I am mad as hell,” he told the committee.

However, if Congress concludes that efforts to manipulate waiting lists have become systemic – or if the allegations that patients died while waiting for phantom appointments are proved – Mr Shinseki will face huge pressure from both parties to resign.

Richard Blumenthal, a Democratic senator for Connecticut, said there was “solid evidence of wrongdoing within the VA system”, while his colleague from Washington Patty Murray told Mr Shinseki: “The standard practice at the VA seems to be to hide the truth.”

In a sign of how serious the White House believes the political fallout could become, the president’s deputy chief of staff Rob Nabors has been dispatched to the VA to help manage the fallout.

And when the fish stinks from the head up, is it at all shocking that VA heads, instead of placing their increased resources towards patient care, shell out multi-millions for fancy digs? Again, a display of utter contempt for the men and women who served the nation, not unlike the disdain exemplified by the so-called Commander-in-Chief and his out of control Pentagon!

Concomitantly, while the silencing of Christian and Jewish beliefs has become the “norm” at the Pentagon (sanctioned by Obama Inc.), lookee here, as we witness Muslim-American soldiers, butts in the air, praying at the same Pentagon!! If you dare, click pic on to see enlargement.

 
Facebook Picture
It gets worse. How many patriots know the back-end story to the deaths of Seal Team Six, not only its “mysterious” underpinnings, but the accompanying outrage? Well, guess who was picked to “eulogize” these lost souls, while Christian and Jewish prayer was disallowed at the military memorial:Unreal:Pentagon invited Muslim cleric to funeral for fallen Navy SEALS who invoked Islamic prayer damning infidels to hell!
The top brass spat on their graves and that’s that. Bastards….reprobates…and every other anti-American descriptor imaginable fits them to a tee!

OBAMA’S AMERICA:FREEDOM OF SPEECH DOA.PARENT ARRESTED, FORMER PROSECUTING ATTORNEY, AT SCHOOL BOARD MEETING!WHAT’S GOING ON? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
12

BEFORE we delve into the heart of the matter, please recall who the Governor of New Hampshire is. In fact, the Mrs. in charge of the citizens of New Hampshire is married to the principal of Phillips Exeter Academy, a prep school featured within these pages. A real power couple. How nice for them.

Full Disclosure: a few close acquaintances/business associates graduated from the halls of Philips Exeter Academy (the subject below) back in the early 1980′s, and just a few years before its Islamic infestation. These individuals are at the top of their chosen professions, therefore, the influence many of its graduates yield is considerable, even if not in the Presidential arena.

‘Academy That Produced Three Presidents Now Terrorist Breeding Ground’

To quote an excellent article by Chris Anu of the New Hampshire Herald:

…On Thomas Hassan’s watch, numerous Islamic scholars and activists with ties to radical Islamic groups have been invited to address student assemblies and other student forums. Among them, Hadia Mubarak, former president of the Muslim Student Association, spoke at a PEA assembly on Oct, 1, 2007. Founded by the Muslim Brotherhood, the MSA was labeled “a virtual terror factory” by terrorism expert Patrick Poole. Its former members include such notable jihadists as Anwar al-Awlaki, Ramy Zamzam, Omar Hammami, Abdurahman Alamoudi, Aafia Siddiqui and Ramzi Yousef.

With the above in mind, it is hardly surprising that strong-arm tactics are being used against anyone who refuses to toe the radical left’s dictates or the increasingly emboldened thrusts by Islamists. Readers must internalize that one does not negate the other, in fact, they feed off of each other! Dracula-like. Hence, the constant reference to the red/green alliance.

Into this arena, along came a concerned father from the small state of New Hampshire (he happens to be a lawyer, having worked in the NYC Prosecutor’s office, not exactly a milieu which renders one squeamish, nor aghast at heavy-handed actions) who became duly alarmed by a particular book assigned to his 14 year old daughter. Not unlike any responsible parent, he placed a call into the principal’s office. No one responded to his concerns. After several failed attempts, he attended a school board meeting to address the issue. Well and good – or so you would think. 

Now, the fact that the book was written by a bestselling author is neither here nor there. But what does matter is the absolute graphic and sexual nature of this work of fiction, which in the “infinite wisdom” of leftist driven school officials is supposed to teach requisite lessons. It is “a fictional account of a school shooting in New Hampshire that lasted for 19 minutes (hence the title) that contains explicit and graphic sexual material, along with arguably controversial messages about homicide and yes, gun violence”.

What’s the point? Well, even though authors are free to sell their stories – PG rated or XXX – responsible parents are allowed (actually obligated) to object to material they consider gratuitously sexual and violent in nature. The questions become: what are the educators in America, the poohbahs, thinking? and what is their driving force?

In the main, there is a concerted push to “desensitize” students to graphic sexual content and lifestyles. At the same time, they are bent on indoctrinating them into a gun control mindset, and their methods are targeted in approach.

Adding to the incendiary mix is the vise-grip surrounding all those who refuse to cow to their radical, revolutionary, anti-freedom agenda. Consider: how much easier is it to deconstruct America, especially when every sexual lifestyle is seen as “equal”(hence the push for graphic materials etc) and citizens are terrified to express opposing views, fearing they too will be arrested for resisting said putsch?

When protecting your children becomes a crime against the state in New Hampshire – The critical back-story now told

Northeast Intelligence Network

 

baer21By Douglas J.  Hagmann

Thursday, May 7, 2014: “I was arrested.”

It took a minute for me to wrap my mind around those words, uttered by a one of the most decent men I know. He is an attorney by profession, having worked in the prosecutor’s office within the Five Boroughs of New York City. He’s dealt with some of the most unsavory people and unspeakable crimes of our nation in that capacity. More importantly, however, he is a proud and protective family man. He’s a loving husband and a proud father of two children, including Marina Baer, a ninth grader in the Gilford, New Hampshire School District.

My mind raced as I fired questions at him with mind numbing rapidity. “Where, What for? What happened?” I prodded. He answered each question calmly and methodically, combining his replies with an extremely important “back-story” that will probably not be reported anywhere by the mainstream media.

Mr. Baer explained that he was arrested at a meeting of the Gilford School Board meeting on Monday, 5, 2014 and charged with a misdemeanor charge of disorderly conduct. As audio and video evidence of the events clearly illustrates, however, there was nothing remotely disorderly about Mr. Baer’s conduct at the meeting. It was the first time he was arrested in his life.

No, there was something far deeper at work here, something that you will not see, hear or read about in the “drive-by” reports done by the mainstream media. It is this lead-up to the school board meeting that puts the events of May 5th in a much clearer, and much more unsettling perspective. It should serve as a warning to all parents that there is an agenda much greater than what we are seeing. In the words of Mr. Baer, “something is very wrong.” Indeed it is, and the report that follows should send a chill down the spine of every parent, of every American, for this is coming to your city, town, or municipality if it does not already exist.

The critical back-story

Last Thursday, Mr. Baer sent me an e-mail about a book his daughter was assigned to read by her teacher with the full and complete approval of the Gilford School Board. He wrote that he was stunned, despite his experience working in one of the toughest cities in the country, by what was assigned to his 14 year-old daughter for her ninth grade Honor’s English class, and attached a scanned copy of one page from the book for my perusal. Having over a quarter century of investigative experience myself, I’m no prude in reading graphic text. Regardless, I would never have knowingly permitted my child to read what he sent, even if it was part of a school assignment sanctioned by the school board.

Upon closer scrutiny of the book, Nineteen Minutes by author Jodi Picoult, Mr. Baer saw that it was a fictional account of a school shooting in New Hampshire that lasted for 19 minutes (hence the title) that contains explicit and graphic sexual material, along with arguably controversial messages about homicide and yes, gun violence. Despite its inclusion on the New York Times best seller list, any ordinary parent of reasonable sensibilities would certainly question why such a book was selected as required reading for a ninth-grade Honor’s English class.

After doing his own homework, Mr. Baer followed a logical approach to learn why the book was assigned without his consent, and to be proactive, for he was not about to allow his daughter to be subjected to this subject matter, at least not in this fashion. He first contacted the high school principal, who declined to formally meet with him in order to find a suitable remedy to this issue. After being effectively deferred and deflected at every turn, Mr. Baer was left with attempting to remedy the situation by attending the school board meeting to publicly address this issue.

It was as if it was made impossible for Mr. Baer to be given any remedy to clear this matter up, except by attending the school board meeting that would convene the following Monday. It is here—at this exact point— that people must pay attention to how events were being managed behind the scenes.

According to information obtained by this author, the Gilford, New Hampshire school board was alerted in advance to Mr. Baer’s intention to raise this issue at their normal Monday meeting. In anticipation of Mr. Baer’s attendance, they did a number of things they have not done in the past.

First, they stationed a Gilford Municipal police officer inside the meeting venue “to keep order.” Then, they limited all public comments to two minutes only, and refused to answer any questions of the attendees. Ostensibly, this was done because of the multitudes of those present to speak out against the book, yet not more than a few dozen people were actually present. Also, the number who actually wished to speak remained in the single digits, including Mr. Baer. Accordingly, any sensible person would question the rationale behind such an arbitrary policy instituted for this particular meeting.

No dissent permitted

The critical back-story, then, indicates that the school board not just anticipated Mr. Baer’s attendance, but took very precise steps to make certain that his objections would be muted and otherwise dealt with in a manner that has been inconsistent with previous public meetings. It would appear that dissent about the book as an assignment in an ninth grade honors class was not merely expected, but the response to such dissent was decided in advance.

The meeting

When attendees were called to speak, Sue Allen, the board chairwoman, could be heard asking at least twice if anyone cared to speak before Mr. Baer was recognized. When he was permitted (or confined) to his two minutes, he first noted that there was an unusual “default setting” to the parental authorization that would permit the children to be exposed to this material. Normally, a parent must “opt-in” to allow the book to be read by their child, must like parental authorization is given for a field trip. In this case, however, it was only if the parent had an objection to the book that they would need to “opt-out.”

Secondly, Mr. Baer asked the principal present to read page 313 of the book to give those in attendance the reasons for which he was voicing his objections. After all, not everyone there was aware of the contents of the book. The principal refused as did every other board member, calling it “inappropriate.” Mr. Baer attempted to compel the board members to answer legitimate questions about the class assignment and methods, but they refused, asserting they would only allow the attendees two minutes worth of comments to be put on record. As the video shows, it was an exasperating exercise in futility for Mr. Baer to seek redress in this venue to which he was directed.

Mr. Baer ultimately exceeded his two minutes by 18 seconds, an obviously egregious offense to the royalty of the Gilford School District. After sternly warning Mr. Baer that his time was up and they would have no part in addressing his concerns, he dutifully sat down.

At this point, a man positioned behind Mr. Baer spoke up and glowingly described how the book actually prompted a frank family discussion about the subject matter of the book, taking a tone that seemed to paint Mr. Baer as an advocate of censorship and book banning, which is far from the truth or Mr. Baer’s intent. In response to this false accusation and mischaracterization, Mr. Baer verbally dissented. He calmly defended himself against these public accusations, attempting to set the public record straight.

It was as a result of this egregious offense, one that caused Mr. Baer to add another 30 seconds or so onto his unauthorized 18 seconds beyond the allotted 2 minutes that caused the school board to react – and react with prejudice.

The arrest

Remember that out-of-place municipal police officer standing guard for the first time in recent memory at the Gilford School Board meeting? Based on what appeared to be the hand signal of a member of the school board, the officer responded by walking to a stunned Mr. Baer, who was now seated, reaching to escort him from the meeting. Mr. Baer asked if he was being asked to leave, if he was being arrested, and was further stunned by the rapidity of the response for such a minor infraction of exceeding his allotted time by less than a minute in total, including his unscheduled verbal defense against his character.

According to Mr. Baer and as seen in the video, the arresting officer appeared a bit nervous while escorting this dissenting parent from the room and placing him in handcuffs behind his back. Mr. Baer has a bad neck injury, which he made known to the officer, that restricted the movement of his left arm. This, as is seen, was apparently construed as resisting arrest by the otherwise docile Mr. Baer.

Apparently the officer had his orders, for it is here that the officer could have used his discretion and let Mr. Baer go, as long as he did not re-enter the meeting or otherwise cause problems for the school board.

Unless or until enough Americans rise up to the tyrannical methods used to quell dissent against child abuse at the hands of school authorities, Mr. Baer will be arraigned on June 17th, 2014 for charges of disorderly conduct. I spoke with Mr. Baer, who stated that he feels strongly about not just the book, but how he stood up to the school board to protect his daughter.

As an investigative journalist who thoroughly researched this set-up and a friend of Mr. Baer, I urge everyone to see through the fog of disinformation and to make your own voices of dissent heard on his behalf by demanding that the charges against him be dropped without prejudice.

I am absolutely certain that Billy Baer, attorney, father and American patriot, would do the same for all of us.

Make your voices heard: Gilford NH High School

Principal: Mr. Peter Sawyer (email – psawyer@sau73.org)
Assistant Principal: Mr. Anthony Sperazzo (email – asperazzo@sau73.org)

Video (Part one-Mr. Baer’s statement and subsequent arrest): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HC2LPu8wHQ&feature=youtu.be

Video (Part two – daughter speaking on behalf of her father following his arrest): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ryVWfATBT9M&feature=youtu.be

Gilford School Board: http://www.sau73.org/school-board

Listen to Billy Baer discuss the events on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report on Tuesday, May 6, 2014 –CLICK HERE

———————————————————————————————————-

In a VERY real sense, a police state is forming all over America, from the smallest of states to the largest. Not to switch topics midstream, but isn’t it curious that a military apparatus appeared – seemingly out of nowhere – to cow Bundy and his supporters, not unlike in a fascist police state?

In other words, isn’t there an underlining strategy at work, a common denominator, meant to intimidate/threaten parents whose only “crime” is protecting their children, as well as those who assert their property rights and more?