U.S. Islamists Plot Against The Homeland (& Israel) Under “Religious” Cover: Will They Be Stopped? If Not, Why Not? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Image result for pics of Sheikh Ramadan Elsabagh

NOT unlike criminals who abuse core components of the U.S. justice system  (often, skirting punishment via “legal” loopholes utilized by aggressive defense attorneys), similarly, Islamists get away with murder – or the incitement thereof.

HIDING behind the Constitutional protection of the First Amendment (freedom of religion), unencumbered, they strike at the heart of America. Perversely, it is this Orwellian paradox which will lead to the death of the nation – if left to stand undisturbed. Never mind the fact that Islam is a quasi religion; in line with an immutable set of political constructs which are aimed to submit all to Allah. Political Islam.

EFFECTIVELY, akin to their red counterparts (a hybrid of leftist-fascist groups, plotting to bring down America), Muhammedans have been waging Jihad throughout America – regardless of this or that “sore” point, and sans any real push-back, other than pitiful pus*y-footing around.

IN other words, despite the fact that a preponderance of Islam’s followers in America not only pray for the nation’s destruction and act in support thereof (be it through frontal, stealth/civilizational Jihad, material or adjunct measures), still, they are able to carry on unmolested. How can this be?? Regardless, Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem (btw, that which should have been acknowledged decades ago) as Israel’s capital is little more than a pig in a poke excuse for more of the same – Jihad, “business as usual!” Yes, they are “hiding” in plain sight.

BUT just because Muhammedans continuously conspire to destroy America, it  doesn’t mean that their incitement shouldn’t be highlighted, as if akin to nothing new under the sun…here they go again….moving right along. To the contrary. After all, they are not two-year-olds, innocently, caught up in an out of control tantrum-mode! 

Following President Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, a Texas-based Islamic cleric has posted a recorded prayer on his Facebook page calling for Israel’s destruction, along with “their allies, and those who assist them and those who allowed them into the abodes of the Muslims.”

While Sheikh Ramadan Elsabagh does not mention Trump’s Wednesday proclamation, the Investigative Project on Terrorism, which translated the message from Arabic, interprets it as a “clear reaction.”

“Our Lord. Help holy Palestine,” Elsabagh chanted. “… O Allah, be with your oppressed worshipers in Palestine, O Allah destroy the Zionists and their allies, and those who assist them and those who allowed them into the abodes of the Muslims. By your power, O mighty one, O mighty one, through your power and might, O Allah, deflect them with what you will, and however you will, for you are omnipotent, and with a response omnipotent.”

Elsabagh is listed as the head of the Islamic Services Foundation Quran Institute in Garland, Texas, and is featured as a Quran reader on many Internet sites. His YouTube pages have tens of thousands of views. His recitations are also featured in Google Play and iTunes.

“Oh Allah save [Al Aqsa] from the hands of the accursed violators, whom you have cursed in every book, and cursed them through every prophet,” he said in conclusion. “Oh Allah destroy them.”

The video drew several comments of “amen, amen,” according to a Facebook translation. One came from Said Abbasy, a New York-based Muslim Brotherhood supporter. Abbasy mourned the death of “Blind Sheikh” Omar Abdul Rahman – considered the spiritual guide for the 1993 World Trade Center bombers who was convicted for a plot to attack other New York landmarks and assassinate high-profile targets, according to IPT.

“Oh God,” Abbasy wrote on Facebook, “take vengeance on those who wronged him.”

Garland was the scene of a terrorist attack May 3, 2015, representing the first actually claimed by ISIS, Though the attack on a free-speech rally organized by activist Pamela Geller resulted in the deaths of only the two terrorists, who were killed by local police, it sent shockwaves through the U.S.

More than 100 people were gathered inside and the event was ending when two terrorists, radicalized Islamic extremists, Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi, drove up to a checkpoint manned by a Garland police officer and a school security guard. The two terorrists opened fire with automatic rifles. A security guard, Bruce Joiner, was shot in the leg. Officer Greg Stevens returned fire with his handgun. A SWAT team on the scene shot both of the attackers in the head.

This is standard Islamic belief,” Geller told WND about the imam’s public comments. “This imam may be reacting to President Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, but Muhammad says that Muslims will kill Jews and the Jews will hide behind trees, and the trees will cry out, ‘O Muslim, there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him.’ Trump’s decision is smoking out some of these Jew-haters, but American authorities are eventually going to have to face the fact that this is the Islamic mainstream, not ‘extremism.’ And it is Islamic Jew-hatred as commanded in Islamic texts and teachings that fuels this holy war against the Jewish state.”

Questions have remained about the role of the FBI in the case, which may have had advance knowledge of the attack.

The FBI has been under pressure from the U.S. Senate to explain the circumstances behind the terrorist attack. FBI Director James Comey told senators he would be willing to explain media reports that suggest the agency may have had advance knowledge of the attack. But he only said he would do that in a classified briefing, and no briefing has been set.

A report by “60 Minutes,” showed a remarkable level of involvement by the FBI on that day. An undercover agent was in the car immediately behind the two attackers, and was taking pictures of the scene just seconds before Simpson and Soofi opened fire. The undercover FBI agent had been in touch with Simpson for weeks prior to the shooting, and even texted him the message “Tear up Texas” weeks before the attack. And just after the pair began their attack, the undercover agent tried to flee the scene.

Hmm. But not to go off on a tangent, the FBI is neck-deep in Islam’s corner – a captured agency!

ANYWAY, presenting, Sheikh Ramadan Elsabagh’s increasingly ubiquitous “Allahu Akbar” (the battle cry of Islamic Jihadists, “God is Greater”…. لله أكبر …. the Takbir …. تَكْبِير) Quranic youtube recitations, as he incites Islamists online and at U.S. mosques – even with youths, knee-high to a grasshopper, reciting his teachings! 

IT must also be stated for the record: Prior to Sheikh Ramadan Elsabagh’s latest “battle cry to Jihad” against America and Israel (for the “crime” of acknowledging that Jerusalem is the ancient capital of Israel, the Jewish homeland), know that a very close associate, who happens to be fluent in Arabic, has “slipped in and out” of mosques and Islamic Institutes across the U.S. – HOTBEDS of incitement and terror plots. The point being, he has recorded the aforementioned Islamic Jihadist (and countless others), as he railed against the “Big Satan” and the “Little Satan” and implored worshipers to avenge (thus, “honor”) Allah!

AS it happens, this intelligence agent (and relevant associates) is very familiar with the Islamic Services Foundation Quran Institute in Garland, Texas, as well as a host of related cancers which are spread throughout the nation. 

TELLINGLY, it is not for nothing that these pages are rife with evidentiary trails – that which always lead straight back to venomous Jihadi exhortations from mosques. For the most part, they are handed over for this and that exposure – to be utilized however deemed fit. Discretionary.

IN this regard, but only as a foretaste, the following (open source) video and commentary links should suffice:

  • Back in May 2014, mosques were exposed as a dagger to America’s heart; a metastasizing cancer, where free speech is turned upside its head under “religious” cover!
  • Unsurprising, in the interests of national security, in Oct. 2014, it was more than intrinsic to reveal: The newly minted “most influential” American-Muslim, Hamza Yusuf, was a known commodity within. A full 4 months before he was anointed TOP Islamic dog, he came into this investigative journalist’s radar and was outed at these pages – by none other than two intelligence agents (feeding this and that) who alerted to the same! But was anyone listening?? For the record, his supporters were none too pleased with said spotlight(s) at this site. Too damn bad.
  • Moreover, in between 2014 and 2017, countless others were exposed. Therefore, once again, in July 2017, Islam’s barracks within America (the west) were deemed a cancerous scourge – in dire need of dismantlement!
  • Alas, how desperate can it get that a “Swiss template” was highlighted, in Oct. 2017, at this site? Rhetorical.

ALONG this Islamic trail of destruction, know that more than a few rallying cries have been recorded (in Arabic, some in English too) which revere the Jihadi conquests of Khalid Ibn Walid, aka the Sword of Allah; a noted commander of the forces of “Prophet” Muhammad and successive Rashidun Caliphs during the Islamic conquest of the 7th century. Pointedly, Islam has always been, and will always be, a “religion” of conquest. Mind you, Islam literally means “submission or surrender!” 

Image result for pics of the sword of allah

MOST significantly, this site has consistently asserted the following nexus: But for the fact that mosques, Islam’s barracks, are housed under the shield of “religious” cover, they would be exposed for what they are; communal “safe spaces” to incite to murderous Jihad – much of which is in Arabic, and with very few non-Muslims the wiser! You got that? 

RESULTANT, isn’t it beyond imperative for patriots to wage a “reverse Jihad”  (through their own rallying cries in the direction of their elected leaders), warning: The enactment of new legislation to push back against the internal threat is non-negotiable!

MORE specifically, on the one hand, a two-tier Congressional Bill must connect the dots between political Islam as a method of Jihad against America, and, on the other, demonstrate how mosques and related Islamic Centers are used to spread and incite the teachings of madman Muhammad.

TO wit, it is this linkage which is a mandatory requirement; one which will finally rip the “religious” mask off of Islam. As a knock-on effect, its spearheads/beachheads will no longer be protected under the Constitutional umbrella. Inestimably, Sharia Law, Islam’s underpinning, is in direct contravention of the laws of the land!

Image result for pics of mosques are barracks

NO time to lose!!

Image result for pics of Sheikh Ramadan Elsabagh

{re-blogged at ConservativeFiringLine}

{re-blogged at TheHomelandSecurityNetwork}, click “Archives” to read, dated Dec. 12, 2017

{re-blogged at TeaPartyUSA.org}

{re-blogged at RightWingConservativeNewsblog.com}

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED

Gay ‘Marriage’ Blow Back: DOJ Primed To ‘Kosher’ Pedophilia, Bestiality & More! Slippery Slope…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

NAMBLA Facebook

 

LIKE sheep to the slaughter, creep by creep, radical leftists aim to drag knuckledraggers to the ledge, albeit, kicking and screaming. It is a place whereby nothing is off the table, and moral boundaries are totally cast aside. Basically, a free fall society. Oh, joy. 

RESULTANT, whereas freedom to choose is their stated mantra, the fact remains that those who refuse to accept the intolerable in their midst, indeed, they are hardly free to voice their displeasure, let alone exhibit push back. For if they dare, yes, they will be swiftly shut down and punished. How so?

IN reality, a religious officiant who refuses to ‘marry’ a gay couple will face a fine AND jail, as if guilty of a crime!

Two Christian ministers who own an Idaho wedding chapel were told they had to either perform same-sex weddings or face jail time and up to a $1,000 fine, according to a lawsuit filed Friday in federal court.

Alliance Defending Freedom is representing Donald and Evelyn Knapp, ordained ministers who own the Hitching Post Wedding Chapel in Coeur d’Alene.

“Right now they are at risk of being prosecuted,” their ADF attorney, Jeremy Tedesco, told me. “The threat of enforcement is more than just credible.”

According to the lawsuit, the wedding chapel is registered with the state as a “religious corporation” limited to performing “one-man-one-woman marriages as defined by the Holy Bible.”

But the chapel is also registered as a for-profit business – not as a church or place of worship – and city officials said that means the owners must comply with a local nondiscrimination ordinance.

That ordinance, passed last year, prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation, and it applies to housing, employment and public accommodation.

City Attorney Warren Wilson told The Spokesman-Review in May that the Hitching Post Wedding Chapel likely would be required to follow the ordinance.

“I would think that the Hitching Post would probably be considered a place of public accommodation that would be subject to the ordinance,” he said.

He also told television station KXLY that any wedding chapel that turns away a gay couple would in theory be violating the law, “and you’re looking at a potential misdemeanor citation.”

Wilson confirmed to Knapp my worst fear — that even ordained ministers would be required to perform same-sex weddings.

“Wilson also responded that Mr. Knapp was not exempt from the ordinance because the Hitching Post was a business and not a church,” the lawsuit states.

And if he refused to perform the ceremonies, Wilson reportedly told the minister that he could be fined up to $1,000 and sentenced to up to 180 days in jail.

IN other words, even if ones religious convictions prohibit from sanctifying gay ‘marriage’, freedom of religion ceases with ownership of a PRIVATE business. Understood? Most significantly, the First Amendment is de facto completely null and void, at least for those whose financial living juts up against the newly enshrined ‘right’ of same-sex ‘marriage!’ Is THAT fair? And, is the current prescribed definition of freedom dependent upon being in line, agreeing, with the Gay Mafia? Apparently.

NOT only that, what about those who aren’t Clergy but their religious beliefs preclude them from even baking cakes (or otherwise partake) when requested by gay celebrants? Are their rights now trumped by a very tiny, shrill and powerful minority? Yup. Is this what it means to live in Obama’s America ala his surrogates at large? Again, it bears repeating, is this fair? Or, is it more in line with totalitarian regimes? You decide. 

Sweet Cakes By Melissa’s owners – Aaron and Melissa Klein – were forced to close their bakery and hit with a $135,000 fine from an Oregon state civil rights agency.

Homosexual rights bullies also succeeded in shutting down a GoFundMe campaign set up to help the Kleins with their legal bills.

The Rev. Franklin Graham even set up a fund via Samaritan’s Purse Ministries to help the Kleins after GoFundMe dropped them.

But, now there is a bombshell development in the case which points to collusion, corruption, and possible bribery on the part of those seeking to punish the Kleins.  The Daily Signal reports:

The Daily Signal has exclusively learned that the government agency responsible for enforcing Oregon’s anti-discrimination law appears to be working closely with a powerful gay rights advocacy group in its case against Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of Sweet Cakes by Melissa.

Communications between the agency, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries, and the LGBT organization,Basic Rights Oregon, raise questions about potential bias in the state’s decision to charge the Kleins with discrimination for refusing to make a cake for a same-sex wedding.

In April, a judge for the agency recommended the Kleins be fined $135,000.

Communications obtained through a public records request show employees of the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries—which pursued the case against the Kleins—participating in phone calls, texting, and attending meetings with Basic Rights Oregon, the largest LGBT advocacy group in the state.

“That’s a clear conflict of interest,” Hans von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal.

State agencies have a duty to represent the best interests of the general public, not the interests of one particular advocacy group. The relationship shown by these communications is inappropriate and raises basic questions about the objectivity, bias, and fairness of this agency and its proceedings.

Who knows how deep this corruption might go.  For a government agency to take its direction from a radical advocacy group is worse than bias, it is also illegal.

It is the same kind of corruption the Obama Administration engages in regularly with using the IRS, the Justice Dept., and the EPA to punish its political opponents.

ESSENTIALLY, know this: every coercive measure has attendant blow back and gay ‘marriage’ is no exception. Yet, certain back lash is worse than others, and this is hardly an understatement. 

ENTER: crimes of pedophilia against children  – via pressure to allow gay men to adopt little boys – has become an inalienable ‘right’! Moreover, if the following doesn’t scare the daylights out of you, NOTHING else will: Homosexuals admit to child molestation on camera!! Indeed, the heretofore dirty secret is now in plain view, and the Supreme Court clearly sees no cause and effect to their earth shattering sanctioning of gay ‘marriage.’ Clearly, pedophilia is the new ‘norm.’

A judge on Friday allowed two Glastonbury men, accused two years ago of sexually assaulting two of their nine adopted boys, to withdraw their no-contest pleas and take their cases to trial.

The unusual action came during what was to be a sentencing hearing for George Harasz and Douglas Wirth, who entered pleas in January to one felony count each of risk of injury to a minor. They agreed to suspended prison sentences. The only issue for Friday’s hearing was to be whether each would be required to register as sex offenders.

But a new allegation of sexual assault against Harasz by one of the victims, contained in a pre-sentence investigation of Harasz, helped scrap the plea agreement. The case was further clouded Friday by disclosure in court of new allegations of abuse by three other of the nine children. No new criminal charges have been filed. Continue reading via the Hartford Courant…

EGREGIOUSLY, it is under the guise of ‘fairness’ and ‘equality’ that said breakdown of civilized norms are eviscerated. Effectively, many haven’t a clue as to when their ‘thinking’ evolved to the point of no return, yet, it is mostly through subliminal, brainwashing messages. No matter. Some of us aren’t fooled nor cowed.

IN fact, the following commentary was more than prescient, and tragically on the mark:

A highly supportable argument can be made that they stand at the forefront of pushing western civilization off the cliff. Deadly serious. If inclined, start your journey inside America’s academic cesspools here. Warning label: just in case, find your barf bag.

NOT to be remiss in cataloging their helpers – those who lend them cover, thus, shielding their crimes – they primarily hail within the incestuous confines of media, legal (to a lesser degree medical) and cultural institutions. Their poisons are spreading wide and far, and it is increasingly impossible to protect western civilization from their insatiable grasp. The evidence is overwhelming and irrefutable. Phew.

NOT only that, from the time that the kiddies enter (public school) kindergarten they are firmly within the left’s vise-grip. For heaven’s sake, Common Core was designed to accommodate the penetration and indoctrination of America’s children for generations to come.

ABSOLUTELY, HUSSEIN Obama’s Gay Lobby knows no bounds, so much so that they extended their iron fist to Russia. Say what? Well, they even interfered with a Russian Minster who happened to be protecting the rights of traditional families. Evil.

THE twisted Gay Mafia perpetually campaigns for adult-child sex, as pedophiles can never satisfy their perverted obsessions. Pointedly, the Gay-in-Chief eviscerated DOMA by ensuring that the epicenter of western norms – the marriage between a man and a woman – was knocked down. Beyond contemptible. Devilish.

MIND you, anyone who dares to conflate the authentic civil rights movement with the so-called ‘right’ of gays to ‘marry’ is either an ignorant fool or lying through their teeth. Since when is forcing citizens to accept LIFESTYLE choices of others – via ‘legalized’ blackmail and other coercive measures – akin to non discrimination based upon ones color and gender? Besides, isn’t ones sexual relationship a private choice, having nothing to do with legal gymnastics? 

MOST judiciously, the Justices who dissented, arguing against the Supreme Court’s clear and convincing overreach, had this to say:

In all the Sturm und Drang following last Friday’s landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that discovered a right to same-sex marriage in the American Constitution, a fascinating and disturbing observation by Justice Antonin Scalia was largely overlooked: U.S. Protestants had no say whatsoever in the new social order enacted by the Court.

In his nine-page dissent, Scalia ripped into the majority opinion, calling it a “judicial Putsch” that poses a “threat to American democracy.” He added that a “system of government that makes the People subordinate to a committee of nine unelected lawyers does not deserve to be called a democracy.”

The Court’s “naked judicial claim to legislative—indeed, super-legislative—power” bulldozed the right of the People to self-government, said Scalia, who then turned to the peculiarly unrepresentative composition of the Supreme Court itself.

Scalia noted that “the Federal Judiciary is hardly a cross-section of America.”

“Take, for example, this Court,” he said, “which consists of only nine men and women, all of them successful lawyers who studied at Harvard or Yale Law School. Four of the nine are natives of New York City. Eight of them grew up in east-and west-coast States. Only one hails from the vast expanse in-between.”

Scalia then observed that not “a single evangelical Christian (a group that comprises about one quarter of Americans), or even a Protestant of any denomination” is to be found on the Court, which currently consists of six Catholics and three Jews.

How can such an elite, homogeneous committee presume to legislate over a constituency that finds itself as wholly unrepresented as do American Protestants? he suggested.

“The strikingly unrepresentative character of the body voting on today’s social upheaval would be irrelevant if they were functioning as judges,” Scalia continued. “But of course the Justices in today’s majority are not voting on that basis.”

To underscore the gravity of the Court’s action, Scalia compared it to England’s treatment of the American colonies before the war of independence. The justice said that in its hubris, Friday’s majority decision had perpetrated a more serious offense than the one that ignited the American Revolution.

Indeed, “to allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation,” he said.

“Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court,” Scalia said.

 

TO wit, is it any shock that the radically left, pro-Islamist DOJ has now illegally thrust itself into the criminal arena of pedophilia, henceforth, seeking to ‘kosherize’ it?

 

Packet given to kids at conference from “Boston GLASS” homosexual activist group includes oral sex instructions . . . and much more.

 

WAIT, there’s more. Bestiality and what not are also on their perverse menu! Intrinsically, as should have been expected, once the barn door is left open, well, all sorts of animals are let loose, and this is not in reference to the four legged kind.

RESULTANT, on the heels of the Supreme Court’s pretzel-like definition of marriage (if anything, overstepping its Constitutional boundary into the legislative arena via the Amendment process, instead, behaving as a social engineering arm of the Executive Branch), the above DOJ Secret Memo is the closest definition to a gargantuan slippery slope.

BESIDES, what’s next on their radical and illegal agenda, ‘permission’ to ‘marry’ pre-pubescents akin to Islam’s followers ala pedophile ‘prophet’ Muhammad’s example??

AMERICA….toppling…down….down…down…

 

CAIR, Brotherhood’s (U.S.) Propaganda Arm, Exhorts:Shut The Hell Up Re “Islamists”! Oh, Really?Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

795_large

LIKE the committed ISLAMIST that he is, CAIR’s Director, Ibrahim ‘Dougie’…Shmoogie…Hooper, has a set of brass balls, pardon the descriptor. Shmoogie, how dare you? Chutzpah galore.

AS the major (communications) mouthpiece for the Brotherhood’s terror Mafia, his main mission is (among other supportive acts of jihad) to squelch ALL criticism of Islam, come what may. 

CAIR-Ibrahim-Hooper-Fooling-establishment

AGREED, many have heard about CAIR and its association with Muslim “advocacy.” Hmm. But what CAIR couldn’t care less about is that their jihadi brand of “advocacy” involves the anti-democratic (antithesis) principle of closing down free and protected speech, including the absolute right to “insult” their pedophile “prophet” Muhammed. Yup. Ain’t that the truth. 

In a

BUT never mind the First Amendment and all that nonsense…Shmoogie is above the laws of the land, as is HUSSEIN Obama and his gang of anti-American ISLAMISTS. Indeed, both crews are less than six degrees separated…like pigs to shit….as the ISLAMIST-in-Chief refused to label the Muslim Brotherhood (CAIR’s parent) a terrorist organizationYet, the fact remains that Egypt’s gov’t has done so, and begged HUSSEIN Obama to do the same, still….you get the picture.

obamacair

AND while we are on the subject of truth and advocacy, here are some further proofs, relative to CAIR’s designs for America:

 DESIGNS GALORE:

ASK yourselves: if CAIR really cared about democracy and all that jazz, how come they continuously (and assiduously) advocate and agitate to submit America to Islam’s dictates? 

SERIOUSLY, between submitting Minnesotaits hammer-blows via the Brotherhood’s student arm, the Muslim Student Associationits war chestits inextricable ties to ISISits deep penetration/infiltration into U.S. law enforcementits targeted bullying and so on….around and around the ISLAMIST terror tree they go.

EVEN so, it’s not all bad news, and three of the main reasons include the following shout outs: mega heavy lifting done by 2 close counter terror contacts of this site, Dave Gaubatz, as well as Tom Trento via the United West

Brooke Goldstein’s efforts ala her (legal) megaphone rate too.

YET, bullies always revert to form, and ISLAMIST ones are especially dangerous. Therefore, exposing CAIR, whether via Shmoogie or another surrogate, is not gonna stop. Never and never.

CAIR  The Associated Press (AP) added the term “Islamist” to its influential Stylebook in 2012. That entry read: “Islamist — Supporter of government in accord with the laws of Islam. Those who view the Quran as a political model encompass a wide range of Muslims, from mainstream politicians to militants known as jihadi.”

That same year, CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) approached AP about modifying the reference, suggesting that AP change its Stylebook to incorporate language similar to that used in the reference to “fundamentalist,” which states that the label should not be used unless a group applies the term to itself.

CAIR urged media outlets to drop the term because it has become journalistic shorthand for “Muslims we don’t like” and because it is used in an almost exclusively pejorative context and is often coupled with the term “extremist,” giving it an even more negative slant. (But ONLY the AP complied)

Phony Islamophobes routinely use the term to disingenuously claim they only hate “political” Islam, not the faith itself. Yet they, and the media, fail to explain how a practicing Muslim can be active in the political or social arena without attracting the label “Islamist.” (Not true, lots of people and organizations use “Islamist” to refer to all kinds of abhorrent Muslims)

islamist

islamist-1

bangladesh_islamist_groups

brother-islamist

nazism_islamism

In a 2013 update emailed to online Stylebook subscribers, dhimmi AP modified the “Islamist” reference to:

DhimmiAdmitOne-vi“An advocate or supporter of a political movement that favors reordering government and society in accordance with laws prescribed by Islam. Do not use as a synonym for Islamic fighters, militants, extremists or radicals, who may or may not be Islamists. Where possible, be specific and use the name of militant affiliations: al-Qaeda-linked, Hezbollah, Taliban, etc. Those who view the Quran as a political model encompass a wide range of Muslims, from mainstream politicians to militants known as jihadi.”

dhimmitude-larger

While CAIR welcomed AP’s move as a step in the right direction, concerns about the use of the term remained. In a statement, CAIR said: “The key issue with the term ‘Islamist’ is not its continued use; the issue is its use almost exclusively as an ill-defined pejorative.”

There are few, if any, positive references to “Islamist” by the media and few attempts to actually define the term or outline what criteria are used when applying the label. (Nothing about it IS positive)

The unremitting linkage of the term “Islamist” to violence and denial of religious and human rights harms interfaith relations worldwide, unjustifiably links the entire faith of Islam to the violence of a tiny minority  minority of extremists and some Muslim governments (10% of Muslims are considered “extreme” which equals approx 150 million Muslims. Tiny?) and serves to alienate the vast majority of Muslims who know their faith does not endorse violence and resent being tarred with the same brush as terrorists. (If the label fits…)

Like these?

When the term “Islamist” is used to describe both those engaged in wanton acts of violence and those engaged in peaceful political participation, the line between the two is blurred and peaceful faith-based activism is stigmatized and made the subject of suspicion. And the media’s use of “Islamist” is not equivalent to its use in academic circles, in which depth of analysis offers a less subjective definition.

By not dropping use of the term, the media are making a political and religious value judgment each time it is used. The bottom line: Every journalist must determine whether there is such a thing as a “good” Islamist. If they answer is “no,” then the term is clearly a pejorative and should be dropped. (When pigs fly, Dougie)

wishywashyandrealmuslim

 

ON the upside, it was great to see that a victory for free speech was won against CAIR…see below. Indeed, a shock. Significantly, even their deep thrust into Philly couldn’t smack down the First Amendment, at least as far as one judge was concerned.
AS an aside, this investigative journalist is not in the good graces – to say the least – with CAIR’s Director in the “city of brotherly love.” But there is a (Jewish) twist to this tragic saga. It can be found, if curious, at “Is This Kosher?” 
“FREE SPEECH VICTORY”
PHILADELPHIA…jump to the 8:24 point and listen….

IN the main, Shmoogie (his like-minded terror crew alike) should watch his tongue, for he is NOT the arbiter of what can or can’t be said. Never mind the fact that HUSSEIN Obama has the Brotherhood’s back. 

BESIDES, it will be a cold day in hell before this “infidel” bends over for his dictates – or anyone else’s – for that matter. Rest assured, he would do well to shut his trap and understand some facts: even tolerant Americans have their limits. Yes, they do.

NOW, couple said limits with a well-armed (Second Amendment) citizenry, and it would seem to me that a goodly segment of Americans will never bow down and “shut the hell up”, as Shmoogie dictates. Besides, who died and made him/CAIR the “language Czar” ? Good grief.

ALAS, just because CAIR and the Brotherhood apparatus (HUSSEIN Obama & surrogates included…Holder, are you listening?) demand this and that, it doesn’t mean patriotic Americans will obey. Agreed?

First-Class Islam: Eric Holder Puts Muslims Above Terror Suspicion

No more instruction about jihad, and Islam is to be considered a race.
From 2008 to 2011, I was a guest lecturer at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (the primary DHS training facility, located in coastal Georgia) and at Joint Special Operations University (which brings foreign officers to learn of U.S. irregular warfare, located in Tampa). At both venues I was asked to lecture on the history of terrorism.

I did so in an even-handed and comprehensive manner, exploring the issue across place (Europe to East Asia), time (ancient Assyria to al-Qaeda), and ideology (religious: pagan, Jewish, Christian, Hindu, and Muslim; and political: right-wing, left-wing, anarchist, environmentalist, etc.). Only 14 of the 44 PowerPoint screens in my presentation dealt with Islamic terrorism, although several of those actually mitigated against the concept.

JSOU continued to utilize me until late 2011, when I was told by the course instructor that Muslim student officers had complained that “I talked too much about Islamic terrorism.”

I was actually surprised that I had not been yanked the year before,when references to Islam and jihad were stricken from Obama’s kinder, gentler National Security Strategy document. That same year, noted Islamic studies expert Eric Holder told the House Judiciary Committee that foiled Islamic suicide bombers in the U.S. were motivated by “Islam that is not consistent with” that religion’s “true teachings.”

Now, the Obama administration — led by Holder — has decided that Islam is a “race,” and therefore to examine or even to adduce a Muslim’s Islamic beliefs about jihadbeheadingviolence against kuffar (“infidels”), or re-establishing a caliphate is tantamount to racism. This administration behavior is rationalized because “federal authorities have in particular singled out Muslims in counter terrorism investigations and Latinos for immigration investigations.”

It is difficult to express just how willfully ignorant of reality these statements and accompanying policies are.

Per the immigration example: as over 80% of “undocumented aliens” are from Mexico or another Latin American country, it would be foolish, indeed delusionary, to ignore that fact. The same logic applies to directing extra scrutiny towards individuals who hold a set of beliefs that may predispose them to violence against others not of that belief system.

And that is the primary point: Islam is a belief system. Not a race.

Muslims can be of any skin, Bosnian or Turkish, Nigerian, Saudi, Chinese. If American, Muslims can perhaps be of several nationalities. This is equally if not more true of Christians, who can be white Finns, black Ethiopians, brown Lebanese, or Koreans, to name but a few examples. It is not possible to look at someone (sans distinctive clothing) and ascertain whether he or she is Muslim or Christian — or secularist, for that matter.

Advocacy groups and willing dupes in the media and Democrat Party — like Senator Dick Durbin — have foolishly yet successfully conflated race and ideology in the case of only one religion, Islam. They have made examining the latter tantamount to discrimination against the former.  No one ever argues that singling out Christians for repression because they hold politically incorrect views about gay marriage or abortion amounts to “racism.”

Beyond the obvious fact that beliefs do not constitute a race, Holder et al. are massively wrong to deny the clear link between certain Islamic beliefs and terrorism.

AMERICANS, you must understand that Shmoogie (and the Brotherhood Mafia) wouldn’t be demanding an omerta, if he didn’t know that Obama Inc. has CAIR’s back in toto. The ONLY open question is: do you, or not, agree to submit??

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

SHARIAH LAW MUST BE ELIMINATED TO SAVE AMERICA & THE WEST.ITS CANCEROUS SCOURGE. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Let’s be clear from the get go: agreed, Islam has been around for centuries and it is nauseatingly deemed one of the three “great” religions, regardless of its barbarity. Get over it. In any event, it is time to cease pandering to its “hallowed” status and to commence telling the truth, otherwise the west will be destroyed. Simple as that.

In reality, it has never stopped its war-like thrust. On the other hand, its catapult has never been more obvious. Ensured. Additionally, don’t become (mentally) entrapped into believing that to “wage war” against Islam is akin to any form of bias against individual Muslims. It is not.

Assuredly, the west’s struggle is against a totalitarian political ideology. Hence, it must be re-focused against a politically fascist and religious cloaked doctrine which has, from time immemorial, targeted western infidels, many of whom are also apostates from Islam. Essentially, “pure” Islam dictates who lives and who dies. Period.

In fact, Winston Churchill presciently noted the following observations and his predictive words are as true today as they were when he uttered them.They are absolutely historically accurate. Beyond dispute.

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! 
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia
in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many
countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods
of commerce and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the 
Prophet rule or live.  A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and 
refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity.  The fact that in Mohammedan 
law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as
a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the
faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.  


Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion 
paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.  No stronger retrograde
force exists in the world.  Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant 
and proselytizing faith.  It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising 
fearless warriors at every step, and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the 
strong arms of science, the science against which it (Islam) has vainly struggled, 
the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”  

And if its immutable relationship with blood is not enough of a precipitate, predictive and proximate danger, what else qualifies? 

With the above firmly implanted in mind, how can westerners disregard the inherent dangers from Islam, even as their leaders babble otherwise?

Only One Way To Prevent Shariah From Destroying America and other non Islamic Countries 

By: Dave Gaubatz

27 May 2014

I am not going to spend hours and hours to answer this question.  America, Israel, Canada, and other non-Islamic countries can be spared their destruction from the evils of the Islamic ideology by only one method. 

I am not a war monger, do not desire any form of violence, or want to see innocent children harmed by a war in their country.  I am providing my professional analysis of a very serious problem.  The problem is the Islamic ideology.  It is an ideology that lives, breeds, and grows faster than any know terminal form of cancer.

If we do not want America to be destroyed it is going to take Americans saying no to Islam.  Not just with bumper stickers.  Americans are going to have to demand the Islamic ideology and Shariah law to be labeled as an Islamic terrorist group.

Al Qaeda, Hamas, Boko Haram, and the dozens of other Islamic terrorist groups are just splinters from the Islamic ideology itself.  There is no good with such violent groups as the KKK, Al Sharpton’s organization, or the Islamic ideology.

Think back the last decade, how many days have gone by in which Islam and their murderers have not been in the world news.  In the name of Islam, their fighters have murdered thousands upon thousands of innocent men, women, and children.

Americans must stand up and fight the ‘Holy War’ Islamic leaders have always expressed their desire for.  The days of shaking hands and allowing Islam to spread in America are gone.  There are approximately 2300 mosques in America. Their numbers are growing and existing mosques are expanding in size.

How do Americans fight?  Again this is my analysis, not my desire.  During the civil war Americans (due to politics) had to fight other Americans.  Politicians left Americans with no choice.  In 2014 after six long years of Socialist Obama, politics are again pitting Americans against people living in America.  The people within Islam are not Americans, regardless of what a court or politician dictates.  One can only be an American if he/she vows to put the U.S. Constitution as the supreme law of the land.  An American vows to give his/her life for America against enemies from the inside and out.

The Islamic ideology and it’s followers living in America do not support the U.S. Constitution over Shariah law.  If a Muslim tells you he/she does, they are lying to you.  The only solution to save America is for America to be a land for Americans only or those who would give their life to support the U.S. Constitution.  If a person does not meet this requirement then he/she should be considered an enemy of America.

Boko Haram, the group that kidnapped 300 innocent Christian children in Nigeria are practicing Islam as Mohammed and Shariah law dictate.  They are not radical. They are ‘Pure Muslims’ who desire to live in a land as Mohammed wanted.  They are just carrying out his commands.

“A Radical Muslim’ is a ‘Practicing Muslim’, a ‘Moderate Muslim’ is a ‘non Practicing Muslim’ or otherwise known as an Apostate of Islam…The penalty for Apostasy under Sharia law is Death”   

 “Destroy the Islamic ideology worldwide and we will have peace worldwide” .

“Islam is an economic, military, and political ideology, that uses religions as a method to obtain their ultimate goal: Islamic Ummah (Nation)Worldwide and under Sharia law” 

 “CAIR has a larger and more dependable ‘Confidential Informant’ Network’ than our entire FBI Department.  CAIR has devoted non Muslim people within local, state, and federal government.  They have police officers in high positions, medical personnel, military personnel, and most importantly they have Pastors, Ministers, and Rabbi’s.

“We are not at war with Al Qaeda, Hamas, The Taliban, or other Islamic terrorist groups.  We are at war with Islam itself and the groups that emerge from the violent ideology of Islam are our secondary enemies”. 

 Defying Statistics - 6

Paradoxically, and in a very Orwellian sense, Churchill’s Britain is Allah-bent on becoming a Shariah compliant financial hub, as are other Euro capitals. London is leading the charge. Rolling out the green carpet, so to speak!

London is vying to be the capital of Islamic finance outside of the Muslim world, says the city’s Deputy Mayor Sir Edward Lister.

A task force on building the UK’s Islamic finance industry has been at work since early 2013 and London will host the World Islamic Economic Forum in October.

“The task force has just started and its aim is to make it easier for banks in London to have Islamic products, which is still quite a new concept to any of them,” Lister told a press conference, reported Reuters.

“Only now people are beginning to understand what the products actually mean and how they comply … What you will see is a lot of companies introducing those products.”

Globally, the Islamic finance industry is forecast to be worth $2.6tn (€1.9bn, £1.6bn) by 2017. It has grown by around 30% each year since the millennium and consultancy firm Oliver Wyman predicts that there will need to be at least 150 Islamic finance institutions by 2020 to meet the ever-growing demand.

There are more than 20 UK banks offering Sharia-compliant products, such as HSBC and RBS. There are also three Sharia-only institutions, including the Islamic Bank of Britain (IBB).

By increasing the number of Sharia-compliant financial services in London it will be easier to facilitate investment in the UK from Islamic investors.

Not only that, but America is doing everything to usher in Shariah law and all its destructive permutations. Yet, with absolute certainty, Islam without Shariah law is like a bird without its wings. It would simply die. Crash and burn.
Ominously, consider what has transpired under Obama Inc. and you decide where America is headed:
On the legal front there are plans afoot to silence all criticism of Islam, so much so that the First Amendment is in its cross hairs. Moreover, Shariah financing has gained a sandal-hold into America, and Bloomberg Finance is leading the charge.
Now it is not as if (most) westerners begrudge capitalist entities from chasing after future business, but it is decidedly the case that Shariah law financing, in absolute terms, adds to Islamic jihad coffers all over the world.

Reports by Islamic banking scholars, the IMF, or the Congressional Research Service do not mention that Islamic banking was first concocted by Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna in the 1920s. The stated goal was to penetrate the Western finance system, corrupting it from within in hopes of creating a parallel system to re-establish a global Islamic empire governed by Islamic law (shariah). Islamic rules of commerce (fiqh al-muamalat) forbid interest (riba) and investing in a prohibited (hara’am) enterprise. They also mandate tithes on wealth (zakat). However, the Koran fails to precisely define these concepts. Imams and ayatollahs differ, for example, on whether riba prohibits all interest or only usurious interest.

The first successful Islamic banking experiment was the Mit Ghamr Savings Bank in Egypt in 1963. But five years later, the Egyptian government, which subsidized the bank, shut it down after Muslim-Brotherhood-led demonstrations swamped the country.

In 1963, Malaysia also introduced a limited form of Islamic banking, with establishment of Tabung Haji (Pilgrim’s Fund) that served only as a savings institution, to help Muslims save towards their pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj).

Ten yerrs later, growing oil fortunes in the Middle East, lead the Organization of the Islamic Conference’s (OIC) to establish the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) “in accordance with the principles of the shariah,” as prescribed by the MB-and to launch the fast-growing petrodollar-based Islamic financing market. The IDB, more a development than a commercial bank, was established largely “to promote Islamic banking worldwide.”  Consequently, the IDB founded the Bahrain-registered and -based Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). Other regulatory organizations followed.

Finally, the most crucial element that helped persuade reluctant Muslims to use Islamic banks, the invention of “Islamic banking windows,” is never noted in reports documenting the development of  Islamic banking. This happened in 1993, when Anwar Ibrahim, then Malaysia’s finance minister, helped to introduce the newly invented “Islamic Banking windows” into conventional banks. This measure, which familiarized clientele with and built confidence in the unknown Islamic banking system, proved central to the development of the global Islamic finance industry.

So the questions become: since Islam is underpinned by Shariah law, and Shariah law finance funds global terror, what precisely must be done to save the west? Cut off its oxygen…the head of the snake!

OBAMA’S FCC:GUTTING THE FIRST AMENDMENT.THE PATH TO TOTALITARIAN RULE…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

IT is always instructive to pay attention to actions on the ground, as opposed to high flying rhetoric. Hogwash.

Now, if more Americans had used their G-d given brains (aside from those inclined towards “leg tingling”), the Orwellian rhetoric from the Fraudster-in-Chief would have resonated. After all, who in their right (no pun intended) mind would vote for a “blank screen”? And, it is not as if The One’s strange self-descriptive was an unknown in the run up to the 2008 election. Not only that, reg flags were raised more times than at the running of the bulls, as to his dangerous associations!

An empty canvas was offered by Barack Obama in the prologue of his book, The Audacity of Hope, with his admission: “I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views,” and “my treatment of the issues is often partial and incomplete.” 

To wit, we can go on ad infinitum, as to how dangerous Barack HUSSEIN Obama is to America and to western liberty at large, but let’s cut to the chase: his regime intends to bring down “Amerika”, this is their goal!

The path to said totalitarian rule runs in several directions, but none so clearly as through the gutting of the First Amendment and the gunning for the Second Amendment. Core points of convergence.

But before we unmask Obama Inc.’s next path towards total destruction, let us recall a few warning signs herein. Assuredly, these signs were not a result of soothsaying.

Warning Sign One:

Even a former top official at the NSA raised the alarm:AMERICA IS A “SOFT TYRANNY”:ON THE CUSP OF A POLICE STATE! TOP (FORMER) NSA OFFICIAL SPILLS BEANS.

Warning Sign Two:

Yet, leave it to a highly corrupt Demster to reveal even more:Rep Maxine Waters, Corrupt To Her Core, A Racist To Boot, Revealed Obama Inc’s Surveillance Game Plan.

Warning Sign Three:

Therefore, one can rightfully posit:America Is NO Longer A ‘Tyranny-in-the-Making’…THAT Ship Has Sailed.

Warning Sign Four:

But what is Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s end game? OBAMA’S END GOAL:ROOTED IN NATIONAL/NAZI SOCIALISM. Obamacare’s “Hidden” Nexus Reveals All!

Warning Sign Five:

And here we find ourselves, as 2014 becomes more than just another year on the calendar. Yes, AMERICA (TO BE) RULED BY FIAT, AS DECREED BY ITS DICTATOR-IN-CHIEF. 2014:THE YEAR OF ITS INAUGURAL.

ENTER: Obama’s FCC!

“The American people, for their part, disagree about what they want to watch,” wrote Pai, appointed to the FCC’s five-member commission in May 2012 by President Obama. “But everyone should agree on this: The government has no place pressuring media organizations into covering certain stories.”

The agency declined to comment. But watchdog groups immediately responded to Pai’s concerns.

“The FCC seems unable to keep its hands off the news media for any extended period of time,” Jeffrey Eisenach, a visiting scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, told FoxNews.com.

FCC Planning Government Monitoring Of American Newsrooms

FCC government monitoring
Freedom of the press may soon be a thing of the past in America. The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) is launching a pilot program which involves government monitoring of what goes on in newsrooms around the nation. If the apparent attempt to control and intimidate journalists is successful, 2014 will be forever known as the year the First Amendment died. The FCC controls the broadcasting licenses of all television and radio media outlets.
The FCC is also now attempting to expand its regulatory bounds to include newspapers, according to ACLJ. Print media does not broadcast and has never in the history of the United States been overseen in any way by the Federal Communications Commission – until now. Newspapers may also be included in the new government monitoring of news program.The stated purpose of the government news monitoring program is to unearth information from radio, newspaper, and television broadcasters about the “process by which stories are selected and how often stations cover critical information needs,” according to the FCC. The federal government agency will also be reviewing “perceived station bias” and “perceived responsiveness to underserved” populations.The FCC has also reportedly already selected eight specific categories of “critical information” that the governmental entity believes local news organizations should cover. Yes, you absolutely read that last startling and infuriating sentence correctly, the federal government via the Obama administration has taken upon itself to put its boot on the neck of the free press and dictate what news should be shared with the public.FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai acknowledged that the latest Obama administration initiative could be used to “pressure media organizations into covering certain stories.” Pai had this to say about the freedom of the press issue during an interview with the Wall Street Journal:

“Last May the FCC proposed an initiative to thrust the federal government into newsrooms across the country. With its Multi-Market Study of Critical Information Needs, or CIN, the agency plans to send researchers to grill reporters, editors and station owners about how they decide which stories to run. A field test in Columbia, S.C., is scheduled to begin this spring.”

The government monitoring program, if initiated as written, stomps on the constitutionally protected freedom of the press and free speech rights. As Thomas Jefferson once aptly stated, “Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.” America, the nation founded upon individual freedoms, currently ranks on 46th (out of 180) on the World Press Freedom Index.

MOST deceitfully and tragically, Barack HUSSEIN Obama indeed was truthful in his plans to transform America, minus the hope many envisioned. His transformation was never designed for a more prosperous and free America, but for one which will eventually implode its foundations. His building blocks are made of dynamite, just as his mentor(s) – Soros and company – envisions. As such, he is a prototypical Pyromaniac-in-Chief!

Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals demonstrates precisely why Obamacare had to be rammed through, in tandem with so many other unconstitutional putsches. They ALL, without exception, lead to total control.

Yet, only once America is left in tattered ruins, it will be possible to “rebuild” along their socialist, Marxist, communist designs, a hybrid of sorts. Mark these words down for posterity.

Alas, just as Rome wasn’t built in a day and eventually fell, it takes many wrecking balls to destroy a Republic like America. We are witnessing Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s mortal blows over a concerted period of time. They are reverberating to a deafening crescendo.

INDEED, those who voted for a POTUS based on “hope and change”,“transformation” and to claim “bragging” rights that they were not “racist”, was it worth it? How’s it working out, after 5 plus years of the Obamanation’s destruction? 

Ask yourselves: are you better off before the Pyromaniac/Radical/Islamist-in-Chief took over the helm, or before his reign of terror?

And, anyone who still can’t see the damage already wrought by the anti-American POTUS squatting in the People’s House, let alone the danger he (and his regime) poses to the entire west, well, go back to sleep. After all, you will need your strength, when his true TRANSFORMATION comes to fruition!

Have mercy…

Barack Obama On "Change" Wisdom Quote Collectible  Poster

“FAST & FURIOUS” Revelations Squashed: First Amendment Rights Violated. What Are Obama & Goons Hiding? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

There are so many illegal actions swirling overhead on Capitol Hill it is nigh impossible to keep abreast, even if one is as tuned in as this blogger tends to be. Invariably, some poopings will fall through the cracks, yet it is not for lack of effort or relevant access.

Be that as it may, several remain a focal point, most intrinsically: Benghazigate, IRSgate, NSAgate, DOJgate as well as Fast & Furious. But before we catch up with one in particular it is instructive to take note of the following: if there is no “there there”, then surely opening up “this and that” to the public – and subjecting its aftermath to the light of day – should be warranted and certainly not hushed up. You think? Yet, if the opposite is the case, to hell with the First Amendment, and hiding under the guise of “security” and other made up out of whole cloth concerns suddenly becomes a mitigating factor. Give us all a break…so many tall tales…who can keep up!

Indeed, freedom of religion (NOT including the jihadist kind) and freedom of expression (but screaming fire in a crowded auditorium, for example, is hardly “protected” expression/speech) is sacrosanct, at least it is supposed to be in America. As such, some who retire from security-related posts are inclined to pen their memoirs, even though they are usually vetted by their former employers/superiors. No problem with that.

To be sure, no one at this site is suggesting that national security isn’t a critical concern, however, pointing out a program which ACTUALLY endangers U.S. interests – for whatever reason – must be fair game. If not, some who harbor less than an American agenda will continue as is and many citizens will be at risk. Well, in third world countries silencing whistle blowers is the norm, but is it the “new” normal in America? Hope not. Which leads us back to Fast & Furious and the censorship fight ahead.

ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s Fast and Furious book

1st Amendment battle over ‘gun-walking’ expose

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is blocking the main whistleblower in the Fast and Furious case from publishing a book for pay, claiming his retelling of the Mexico “gun-walking” scandal will hurt morale inside the embattled law enforcement agency, according to documents obtained by The Washington Times.

ATF’s dispute with Special Agent John Dodson is setting up a First Amendment showdown that is poised to bring together liberal groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and conservatives in Congress who have championed Mr. Dodson’s protection as a whistleblower.

The ACLU is slated to become involved in the case Monday, informing ATF it is representing Mr. Dodson and filing a formal protest to the decision to reject his request to publish the already written book, sources told The Times, speaking only on the condition of anonymity.

The battle also could have repercussions on Capitol Hill, where the two lead investigators who helped uncover the Fast and Furious scandal, Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell E. Issa, Calif. Republican, had written a foreword to the book, the sources said.

ATF officials declined Sunday night to discuss Mr. Dodson’s specific matter, citing personnel privacy. But the officials said it was possible for an agent to be rejected for publishing a book for pay but get permission to publish it for free. No manuscript for any Fast and Furious book has received approval for unpaid publication, however, the officials said.

Mr. Dodson was the first ATF special agent to go public in 2011 with allegations that his supervisors had authorized the flow of semi-automatic weapons into Mexico instead of interdicting them, touching off a scandal that toppled most of the top leadership of ATF in Washington and Phoenix. The controversy also led to angry recriminations in Mexico, which dealt with a wave of violent crime linked to the weapons, and high-profile congressional hearings that embarrassed the Obama administration.

Mr. Dodson began penning a book late last year about his role as the central whistleblower in the case and in June sought formal permission for outside employment that would allow him to engage a publisher and publish the book.

Documents show that one of Mr. Dodson’s supervisors in Arizona, Assistant Special Agent in Charge Carlos Canino, rejected his request July 19 and was backed in the decision by the agent in charge of the office, Thomas G. Atteberry, four days later.

Their rejection made no claims that the book would release sensitive or classified information or compromise ongoing law enforcement proceedings.

Rather, the supervisors offered a different reason for their decision. “This would have a negative impact on morale in the Phoenix [Field Division] and would have a detrimental effect on our relationships with DEA and FBI.”

The ATF general counsel’s office subsequently sanctioned the decision, all but killing the book project.

“An employee’s supervisory chain may disapprove any outside employment request for any reason, at any supervisory level,” ATF attorney Greg Serres wrote Mr. Dodson on Aug. 29, underlining the word “any” for emphasis. “The Office of Chief Counsel cannot approve outside employment requests in lieu of the supervisory chain’s disapproval.

“Therefore, your request to engage in outside employment is denied,” he said.

Separately, a top ATF official has been reviewing Mr. Dodson’s manuscript for any concerns about sensitive or classified information, potentially leaving open the possibility a process by which it could be published for free, a senior law enforcement official told The Times.

The gun-walking strategy — part of an undercover case called Fast and Furious — violated ATF’s long-standing policy to interdict weapons from straw buyers.

In all, ATF officials permitted more than 1,700 semi-automatic weapons to flow through the hands of straw buyers for the Mexican cartels, with many crossing the border.

Senior ATF officials hoped to trace the guns to crimes, then make a bigger case against the Mexican drug lords. The strategy, however, backfired when hundreds of the weapons began showing up at crime scenes on both sides of the border, including at the December 2010 murder of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.

The Justice Department initially denied guns knowingly had been allowed to flow across the border, then months later reversed course and admitted the tactic had been used for more than a year. The change in story led to allegations of a cover-up.

The revelations exploded into public in spring 2011, catapulting Mr. Dodson and other ATF field agents who had objected into dual investigations by Congress and the Justice Department inspector general.

President Obama and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. both claimed they knew nothing about the strategy until the controversy erupted, but the president has invoked executive privilege to block Congress from seeing certain documents, thus thwarting the completion of that probe. A court recently ruled in favor of Congress in the ongoing legal dispute.

Both the congressional and inspector general investigations concluded that the gun-walking tactics were poorly conceived and put lives in jeopardy. The fallout forced the ouster of numerous top officials, including the U.S. attorney in Phoenix, Dennis Burke, and the acting director of the ATF, Kenneth Melson.

The ATF, under new director B. Todd Jones, says it has imposed sweeping procedures to ensure gun-walking doesn’t occur in future cases.

The book dispute with Mr. Dodson, however, is not the first First Amendment controversy to erupt in the aftermath of the scandal.

Last year, Mr. Jones raised alarm in Congress and inside his own agency when he released a videotaped message that warned agencies that there would be “consequences” if agents blew the whistle on wrongdoing outside their chain of command.

The message led to claims that whistleblowing would be chilled, and ATF subsequently clarified Mr. Jones‘ remarks to emphasize that the agency would not interfere with legitimate whistleblowing activities.

Patriots are receiving blows from both ends, sort of like a double-barreled shotgun. On the one hand, a hammer effect is chipping away at one freedom after another. This is no longer debatable, it is fact-based. On the flip side, those who are tasked to protect citizens’ rights are doing no such thing. Consider the detrimental, runaway results from AG Holder’s fiefdom, and then juxtapose them against the military-style gearing up of police forces.

Does it appear that there is any official entity a citizen-patriot can reliably count on? Not from this laser-focused patriot’s lens.

Independent Counsel Needed: Investigate ‘High Crimes & Misdemeanors’ In The White House…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Whereas this op-ed writer, blogger and investigative journalist holds no claim to being a Constitutional expert (whose expertise lies elsewhere, primarily in geo-politics and the Mid East/Islam), a close associate surely qualifies. Unarguably, he is considered world class.  

Most assuredly, trampling on the Constitution is no small matter, even if one attempts to hide behind the ‘living breathing’ nonsensical mantra, as Obama (a so called Constitutional lawyer…oh please…talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel) and surrogates regularly intone its ‘merits’. And there are so many examples of the administration’s malfeasance it is hard to know where to commence the indictment. Yet, even a few will suffice, starting with their obsessive quest to eviscerate the First Amendment, a hallmark of any free society. Specifically, what more proof is needed than to internalize that the highest law enforcement official in the land, AG Eric Holder, is initiating ‘legal’ actions against Americans who criticize Islam? Are you thinking this blogger has lost it? Think again. Contained within the above link are more than enough exhibits to place Holder, and his boss, in the dock for high crimes and misdemeanors! 

NOT content with violating freedom of religion and speech, the regime in Washington is gunning for the Second Amendment ! How audacious. The right to keep and bear arms, without a scintilla of a doubt, is a bedrock of America’s Constitutional Republic, but not according to Obama’s thugs. Yes, they will grab America’s guns – whatever it takes. And, the UN is their go to address, as they seek to strip Americans of their right to bear arms, yet patriots have other ideas, even as leftists go postal over gun control. It will be out of their cold, dead hands.

EVEN some in Congress are beginning to see that they have Constitutional options to indict this runaway regimeand it is not as if true scholars and patriots aren’t giving them Constitutional legal cover.

Along comes Professor Paul Eidelberg – a more than qualified Constitutional scholar and patriot – to America’s rescue, as he gives ‘We the People’ all the Constitutional muster needed to indict the criminals ruling Washington. Get busy. Start your petitions!

‘Needed: An Independent Counsel to Investigate the Obama Administration’

Paul Eidelberg (Ph.D., University of Chicago)

The failure of Barack Hussein Obama, the President of the United States, to protect American citizens abroad indicates that he may have violated Article Two, Section One, Clause Eight, of the U.S. Constitution which sets forth the presidential oath of office in these words:

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Accordingly:

Whereas the present writer, a native-born American citizen who served as a Lieutenant in the United States Air Force, and who conducted seminars during the Korean War to inform American soldiers about the totalitarian nature of America’s arch enemy, the Soviet Union;

And whereas this author has written books on the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, as well as a book entitled “Beyond Détente: Toward an American Foreign Policy,” a book based on Washington’s “Farewell Address”;

And whereas the principles elaborated in the latter book obliged the present writer to urge President Ronald Reagan to transcend the futile policy of détente with the Soviet Union—indeed, to promote the disintegration of that “Evil Empire”;

And whereas the same author sees that the Barack Administration is pursuing the discredited policy of détente vis-à-vis Islam, an imperialistic ideology which, like that of Communist Russia, does not recognize any international borders or the nation-state system;

And whereas this American, for the previous reasons, is more keenly aware of the perilous course of the United States, as well as more profoundly concerned about the well-being of Americans serving in American embassies and consulates abroad;

Indeed, whereas some of these Americans have perished because of the détente or ideologically neutral mentality of the Obama Administration and its possibly criminal negligence:

I therefore urge Americans to petition the Congress of the United States to reconstitute, in accordance with its Special Prosecutor Act of 1978, an Independent Counsel to investigate and prosecute designated high-ranking Executive Branch officials, including President Barack Obama, who are suspected of possible malfeasance in high office.

For those who are unfamiliar with Professor Paul Eidelberg’s background and groundbreaking scholarship, see within for his latest scholarly contribution.

IF the master Prof gives the heads up, citing the Constitutional underpinnings for said Independent Counsel, then take it to the bank. To heart. And this blog stands shoulder to shoulder with the recommendations herein. No additional ‘proofs’ required (nor footdragging or pussyfooting), other than a basic understanding of High Crimes & Misdemeanors

%d bloggers like this: