FROM every rational geo-political perspective, the PURPOSEFUL (mis)reign of Barack HUSSEIN Obama has precipitated untold disaster, not only for the entire Mid East but for the western world. And it is entirely understandable that most are left in a state of perpetual confusion, wondering, not only, how could this happen, but why would the POTUS aid and abet both Sunni and Shia sides? Yet, it is really not such a head banger, but it is exponentially diabolical. Machiavellian.

Al-Qaeda’s ISIS: Behind the Group That Took Mosul

But before we delve into Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Islamic goals, the reader must internalize where things stand right now, with the “news” that Washington will “cooperate” with Iran to beat back the ISIS’s destructive swathe in Iraq, as reported in various forums

Kerry: US open to working with Iran on Iraq 

DEBKAfile June 16, 2014

Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday in an interview: “I think we are open to any constructive process here that could minimize the violence, hold Iraq together, the integrity of the country and eliminate the presence of outside terrorist forces that are ripping it apart.” He said that President Obama was vetting “every option that is available,” including drone strikes.

Shortly before Kerry made the comments, Islamic fighters captured the northwestern Iraqi town of Tal Afar, the largely Turkmen town that is key their plan for an Islamic caliphate spanning Iraq and Syria.

In fact, it is more than noteworthy to cite: yes, historically, nations “cooperate” with those whose general worldviews are diametrically opposed, not unlike the allies working with Stalin during WW 2. Nevertheless, that was then and this is now, with the caveat being: the POTUS is working AGAINST an American victory! Herein lies the crux.

In any case, it is through this “cooperation” that Barack HUSSEIN Obama gets to assist both Sunni and Shia, and this is where it is at. On the one hand, if not for his wildfires in the Mid East – chiefly to empower the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia – Al Qaeda’s offshoot, ISIS terrorists, wouldn’t be in a position to destroy Iraq.

Nevertheless, after all the American/western blood and treasure spilled on behalf of Iraq, one would expect  that the ascension of an Al Qaeda Islamic State in Iraq and Levant – ISIS – endangers not only all of the Mid East and beyond, but the entire free world. Surely any POTUS would fight against this outcome – or so one would believe.

So the question remains: what is wrong with collaborating with the mullahs, as they too view the ISIS as a mortal danger? Everything. For in addition to Obama Inc.’s back channels to the mullahs, via Valerie Jarrett, to jaw-jaw them to the WMD finish line, it becomes ever more apparent that “dear leader” will proceed to paint the genocidal Iranian regime as a “reliable” partner, even as he continues to prop up the Sunni Brotherhood Mafia! A win-win for the Islamist-in-Chief.
In light of the above, how comfortable should Americans, Israelis and westerners feel about the “talks” with Iran? Btw, ignore the jibber jabber from Repubs, as they seek to place lipstick on this dangerous pig. Instead, they could have recommended utilizing lethal firepower to root out the ISIS  – after the anti-American POTUS cut and run from Iraq in 2011 – rather than subcontracting/collaborating with the world’s largest terror regime, Iran’s mullahs!

US Seeks To Expedite Talks With Iran Over ISIS

Effort under way to set up channel separate from nuclear talks, as one top Republican lawmaker warns of threat to Jordan.

WASHINGTON – Reflecting rapidly changing events on the ground in the Middle East, the United States is readying a new, direct channel with Iran that will allow the two powers to coordinate strategy against the menace of ISIS, a terrorist militia conquering territory throughout eastern Syria and northern Iraq.

The Obama administration is already preparing a channel separate from its efforts to forge a comprehensive agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, and hopes to begin talks this coming week, The Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday.

Independently, The Jerusalem Post could only confirm that deliberations are under way among administration officials over what the nature of such a line of communication between Washington and Tehran should look like.

“Whatever dialogue may or may not be taking place [with Iran] would take place on the sideline or outside the mainstream of the nuclear talks” in Vienna, US Secretary of State John Kerry told members of the press on Friday in London, standing with European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton. “We don’t want that linked and mixed.”

Kerry phoned his counterparts in Doha, Riyadh and Amman on Sunday over the crisis, which unfolded with dramatic speed last week as ISIS, a Sunni militia seeking a caliphate throughout Iraq and the Levant region, took control of Mosul and threatened an attack against Baghdad.

The group already claims domain in Syria, where the insurgent group formerly concentrated in Iraq managed to recalibrate its tactics and its funding. ISIS began a military campaign in October 2013 with the explicit aim of conquering territory for its own.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said on Saturday that he and US President Barack Obama have exchanged letters, and that Iran stands “ready to help” in coordination with US military operations.

A similar exchange took place under the George W. Bush administration, the Journal noted, over a shared interest in toppling the Taliban in Afghanistan in 2001.

But Rouhani’s overture marked a dramatic shift in relations nevertheless, after decades of near-silence between the two governments. A public rapprochement began last September— the first of its kind since the Iranian Revolution of 1979— when Obama called Rouhani congratulating him on his election, and expressing hope for better relations between the two nations.

Talks resume this week in Vienna over Iran’s nuclear program, and US officials might choose to speak on the sidelines of that negotiation with their Iranian counterparts over the ISIS threat.

Qasem Suleimani, commander of the elite Qods Force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards, was already in Iraq this weekend for consultations over how Iran might assist in Baghdad’s efforts to fight the small Sha’ria army.

Top Republican lawmaker Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on Sunday suggested that a deal with Iran might be necessary in the short term to stop ISIS from marching on Baghdad— not dissimilar to America’s alliance with Stalin’s Soviet Union at the height of the Second World War.

“We’re going to have to have some dialogue with the Iranians,” Graham said.

Graham, long a harsh critic of the Obama administration, joined a chorus of his peers from across the American political aisle in warning of the dramatic consequences of what might come next without a campaign to counter the terrorist group.

“We had al Qaeda in Iraq, the predecessor of ISIS, on their backs,” Graham said, calling on Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to resign. “We had this place in a good spot. They were playing politics, rather than killing each other.”

ISIS “will eventually march on Jordan and Lebanon,” Graham warned. “They’re going to take the king of Jordan down.”

US President Barack Obama remained in Palm Springs, California, over the Father’s Day weekend while his national security team weighed military options to offer the president. In preparation for any possible campaign, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel moved the USS George HW Bush aircraft carrier to the Arabian Gulf, equipped with Patriot missiles with reach throughout the country.

The US intelligence community estimates that ISIS has roughly $1.2 billion in cash flow from the black market trade of oil, pumped by the organization in eastern Syrian fields, and from the takeover of Iraq’s central bank of Mosul, where the group seized nearly $500 million.

That makes ISIS the richest terrorist organization in the world: for perspective, Al-Qaida was said to be rich before September 11, with estimated wealth at that time at $30 million.

MORE specifically, think of the POTUS as both the arsonist and the firefighter. Since he is the one who (through his Mid East adventures) set the stage for Al-Qaeda’s takeover, his intentions, his objectives, are steeped in Islamic rewards.

So from a series of precipitous Mid East fires (think: Mubarak, GO NOW…head over to the illegal war in Libya….) Obama Inc.’s strategy has been to set the region alight. This is no longer up for debate. And, as a bonus, “negotiating” with the mullahs gains a tailwind! The point being, in the Islamist-in-Chief’s worldview, it is a win-win situation. How so?

Well, the ultimate goal is to resurrect the Caliphate, come what may. Now, while he would prefer to see Sunnis astride the Caliph’s seat, the fact of the matter is that he knows that Sunnis and Shias will fight to the death for hegemony. Ain’t much he can do about that one. Nevertheless, we must see the forest from the trees and not become bogged down with their centuries old tribal warfare.

Inherently, geo-politics is never static, but its “players” surely understand certain constants: various pressure points become necessary – manufactured or otherwise – in order for the desired outcomes to prevail. Dominoes falling.

In the end, according to Barack HUSSEIN Obama, Islam wins and that is that.

The American public has trouble understanding why Obama is supporting and arming Islamic extremists in Libya and Syria. He has yet to explain what Chris Stevens was really doing in Benghazi and why on G*d’s good earth our Benghazi consulate was guarded by an al-Qaeda-affiliated militia instead of the U.S. Marines or a diplomatic security team. What is Obama’s justification for granting entry into the United States to Muslims who provided “limited material support” to terror groups, while turning away the multitudes of displaced Christian refugees from Syria, Libya, and Egypt who live in absolute fear for their lives from the mindless hatred of Islamist jihadists?

Obama might even explain why he apologized to the entire Muslim world for a YouTubevideo, but he had nothing to say when Khaled Al-Zaafrani, founder of the Egyptian Justice and Progress Party, went on a major Arabic television network and said,

“It’s well known that during the Passover, they [the Jews] make matzos called the ‘Blood of Zion.’ They take a Christian child, slit his throat and slaughter him. Then they take his blood and make their [matzos]. This is a very important rite for the Jews, which they never forgo…They slice it and fight over who gets to eat Christian blood.”

Khaled continued his revolting presentation by saying,

“It is the Jews who have instigated wars in the world. They instigated World War I, as well as World War II, and they will keep on instigating wars. The Jews cannot live without wars, conspiracies, deceit, and deception. We can rest assured that the Jews will not seek or uphold peace.”

Al-Zaafrani then put a bright ribbon on his package of slander by throwing in a bit of Holocaust denial for good measure, finishing with: “When this subject is raised, the Jews consider it to be a problem, just like the problem of Hitler and the Holocaust.”

Of course, unlike the angry hordes of Muslims across the Islamic world who went on a rampage of burning, beating, and killing over the Mohammad video, the world’s Jews didn’t commit a single act of violence in reaction to the blood libel on Arabic television. Obama, ever so eager to defend “the Prophet of Islam” from the insults of a badly made YouTube video, was strangely silent when Al-Zaafrani’s words were broadcast across the Middle East to millions of Muslims, who were already chomping at the bit to wipe Israel off the map and exterminate every Jew on the planet Earth. While this sort of infantile fantasy may be laughable on one level, we must also remember that many thousands of Jews have been slaughtered over the centuries as a result of insidious blood libels.

Watching Obama ignore the constant demonization of Jews and Israel is distasteful enough, but we must not overlook the crippling instability Obama has fostered in the region. We have seen one relatively secure Islamic state after the other descend into chaos at the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood and their Islamist allies — armed to the teeth with the latest American weapons, financed by American dollars, and bearing the blessings of the Obama administration.

IF this is not quintessential Machiavellian, what else qualifies?


There are certain levels of treachery which rise into the stratosphere, none more so than treason by a national leader. A citizen too. Pardon this blogger for being so blunt, but a hanging by the balls – if male – is viable retribution on this end. A painful way to go, but not in comparison to a nation betrayed. As to female betrayers, well, we can discuss suitable measures another time. First things first.

Now that the above prescriptive remedy is out in the open, what has gotten this American-Israeli – again – so riled up? It goes without saying, this site pointed out the absolute, incontrovertible evidence that Barack HUSSEIN Obama is in league, embedded with Al-Qaeda, regardless of his public statements to hunt them down! Liar, liar…his pants are totally on fire.

If markers are required to fully indict the Betrayer-in-Chief, rest assured, there are too many to point to. But in relation to his fealty to Al-Qaeda, the bastard child of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, they are visible for all to see, unless one is willfully blind.

Founded in 1928 by the Egyptian schoolteacher/activist Hasan al-Banna (a devout admirer of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis), the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) — a Sunni entity — is one of the oldest, largest and most influential Islamist organizations in the world. While Egypt historically has been the center of the Brotherhood’s operations, the group today is active in more than 70 countries(some estimates range as high as 100+). Islam expert Robert Spencer has called MB “the parent organization of Hamas and al Qaeda.” In 2003, Richard Clarke – the chief counterterrorism advisor on the U.S. National Security Council during both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations – told a Senate committee that Hamas, al Qaeda, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad were all “descendants of the membership and ideology of the Muslim Brothers.

Be that as it may, wherein belies today’s treacherous “news”? Well, if one factors in two levels of treachery, then the Islamist-in-Chief’s recent release of heavy-duty Taliban terrorist leaders makes “sense”. Their blood soaked hands are stained with American (western) blood, of this there is no doubt. Now, in exchange for an AWOL solider, a convert to Islam whose loyalties are indeed worthy of questioning to begin with, why is this deal in the interests of the nation, nor under the rubric, “no soldier left behind”? It’s not.

Level One Treachery:

We must first internalize: the raging mid east fires have been set by the Islamist-in-Chief and they are meant to benefit Islamist forces, chiefly Brotherhood related. No one with a modicum of geo-political knowledge, let alone intellectual integrity (regardless of party/ideological affiliation), can argue otherwise. As a matter of record, Benghazigate’s main beneficiaries were Al-Qaeda linked terror forces, and this was NO accident!

ONTO the tie-in to the release of “AWOL convert to Islam, Abdullah Bergdahl, a traitor or a deserter. Company Commander at Fort Bragg, Stephen Kirouac, called Bergdahl a “dirtbag” and “sympathizer.” And it’s not just that, the soldier, who has converted to Islam, is alleged to have been teaching its fighters bomb-making skills. Bergdahl’s father praised Allah when the announcement of the trade was made. His father wants to see all the GITMO terrorists released….” and the claim that Barack HUSSEIN Obama (and surrogates) have the backs of jihadi soldiers, wherever they may be.

Level Two Treachery:

Recall – who can forget – several cases of Muslim-American soldiers (whether converts or not, makes no diff) killing fellow soldiers, and the appalling disrespect towards those who were targeted, juxtaposed against the kid glove treatment to the “soldiers for Allah”!  

Screen Shot 2014-06-01 at 12.43.04 PM

CONSIDER the AWOL soldier’s own words and decide whether or not Obama Inc. knew about this email BEFORE unleashing monsters for his release:

Just days before he was reported missing, he sent an email to his father, Bob, indicating he felt he was fighting for the wrong side.

“I am sorry for everything here,” he wrote. “These people need help, yet what they get is the most conceited country in the world telling them that they are nothing and that they are stupid.”

His commander was a “conceited old fool,” Bergdahl continued, noting his disgust at being associated with the U.S. military – and even the nation in general.

“I am ashamed to be an American,” he wrote. “And the title of US soldier is just the lie of fools. I am sorry for everything. The horror that is America is disgusting.”

Reports indicate he subsequently deserted his fellow soldiers, leading to the deaths of multiple individuals involved in a rescue and recovery mission. Once in Taliban custody, the terrorist organization used him in propaganda videos in which he criticized the American government.

Capping off the saga surrounding his release, reports this week indicate Bergdahl – a man who made it clear he wants nothing to do with the U.S. Army – is now on the fast track to a military promotion.

ADDITIONAL “proofs in the pudding” can be found within, and it is not as if Obama Inc. hasn’t a clue. To the contrary, they knew exactly who they “rescued” and who they released in exchange…more than a deal with the Islamic devil…

AWOL Muslim covert’s “hit list” of faves for his viewing pleasure: Shaykh Anwar al-Awlaki, condemning America as a terrorist state:

Bergdahl's Youtube account's favorites list has an anti-American Anwar al-Awlaki video

Bergdahl’s Youtube account’s favorites list has an anti-American Anwar al-Awlaki video. Notice Bergdahl’s name above the list, showing that it is indeed his account

Perhaps the following videos will bring Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s treason full circle – 

Watch Obama smile as soon as Bergdahl gives the most famous Muslim expression, the “Bismillah” or the “Basmallah”:

The “basmallah” is the Islamic expression for victory and only indicates that Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s father is a Muslim, as is the Traitor-in-Chief! 

Bad Deal, Obama Grinning as Bergdahl Dad Speaks Arabic in Rose Garden

YES, a POTUS collaborator frees a wannabe jihadist in exchange for 5 terrorist monsters!

AWOL Jihad Traitor for Taliban Terrorists: Mullah Omar Rejoices, Prisoner Swap “Big Victory” for Global Jihad, Obama promises more concessions

Here’s more on the treasonous terror deal I wrote about here: “AWOL Traitor Traded for Taliban Terrorists: “In the name of Allah, the most gracious, the most merciful,’’ AWOL soldier’s dad said in Arabic.”

Anyone in the Obama administration that cops out to “we don’t leave anyone behind” as the reason why they traded an AWOL traitor for five GITMO Taliban leaders is lying. The Obama administration abandoned our people in Benghazi — heroes and patriots — when they needed us most. Obama’s contempt for our troops is nothing new. Taliban insider attacks spiked to unseen levels under Obama as he continued to sanction and reward the Taliban. Obama’s rules of engagement in Afghanistan was an invitation to murder — it was open season on US soldiers.  The Washington Times recently reported that “the number of U.S. battlefield fatalities exceeded the rate at which troop strength surged in 2009 and 2010, prompting national security analysts to assert that coinciding stricter rules of engagement led to more deaths.”

Obama’s reception at West Point was icy for good reason.

Obama has been a Taliban supporter for some time now — despite the slaughter, the insider attacks, the destruction of schools, the attacks on girls, etc. He strong-armed President Karzai into partnering with them. He supports the Taliban. He insisted that Karzai share power with the Taliban. He insisted that NATO recognize the Taliban.

Karzai has said that the Obama Administration actually told him that the Taliban, which provided al Qaeda its base of support for September 11, was not an enemy of the U.S.

in 2012,  Barack Hussein Obama used the NATO summit to press Afghan leader Hamid Karzai to engage with greater urgency with the Taliban about a political settlement in Afghanistan. Obama stalked and chased these jihadist murderers. Obama demanded that Afghanistan be designated a “major non-NATO ally.” The non-NATO ally declaration allowed for streamlined defense cooperation, more money, expedited purchasing ability of American equipment, and easier export control regulations.

Mullah Omar, long known to be in Afghanistan is one of the word’s most wanted terrorists. He is the leader of the Taliban and is wanted by the U.S. State Department since October 2001. There’s a ten million dollar reward on his head. He sheltered Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda killers in the years prior to the September 11 attacks. He had a hand in the 911 attacks, and directed  the Taliban’s ongoing war against the U.S.-led NATO forces and the government of Afghanistan.

Obama negotiated this “trade” as a cover to release these jihad killers. Many called the AWOL convert to Islam, Abdullah Bergdahl, a traitor or a deserter. Company Commander at Fort Bragg, Stephen Kirouac, called Bergdahl a “dirtbag” and “sympathizer.” And it’s not just that, the soldier, who has converted to Islam, is alleged to have been teaching its fighters bomb-making skills. Bergdahl’s father praised Allah when the announcement of the trade was made. His father wants to see all the GITMO terrorists released.

Two Republican lawmakers said President Barack Obama violated U.S. laws when he approved the exchange of an American soldier believed held by Islamist insurgents for five years for five Afghan detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Congressman Howard “Buck” McKeon of California and Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma said Saturday in a statement that Obama is required by law to notify Congress 30 days before any transfer of terrorists from the U.S. detention facility.

So what are they going to do about it? Continue to sit by while Obama wages war against us?


Mullah Omar has been wanted by the U.S. State Department since October 2001. There’s a ten-million-dollar reward on his head. He sheltered Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda killers in the years prior to the September 11 attacks. He had a hand in the 911 attacks, and is directing the Taliban’s ongoing war against the U.S.-led NATO forces and the government of Afghanistan.

Screen Shot 2014-06-01 at 12.42.56 PMWhat’s the Obama administration’s response to this?

More surrender:

Screen Shot 2014-06-01 at 12.52.12 PM

“‘New opening’ for US-Taliban talks possible: Hagel” The International Times

WASHINGTON: US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel expressed hope Sunday the release of US Army Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl would lead to direct US talks with the Taliban.

“It could, it might and we hope it will present an opening,” Hagel said in an interview from Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan with NBC´s “Meet the Press.

“Hagel noted that the United States had engaged in talks with the Taliban before, until they were broken off in 2012, and that it strongly supported an Afghan-led effort to reach a peace agreement with the Taliban.


There is little more reprehensible than a scumbag leader who abuses the military’s “Warrior Credo”, in what amounts to treasonous objectives, pulling on America’s heartstrings and its bastardization in the process: “In the U.S. Armed Forces, we don’t leave anyone behind. It’s one of the basic pillars of what the Army calls the Warrior Ethos: “I will never leave a fallen comrade.”

SANS any hesitation, this much is for sure: when a citizen is guilty of treason the amount of damage accrued by their betrayal can be anywhere between low, medium and high. Despicable on its face. And those tasked with meting out punishment should factor in the tangible, as well as the intangibles in their calculus.

HOWEVER, when it comes to a treasonous leader – a President no less, regardless of party affiliation – NO punishment should be considered too extreme. Show no mercy. NONE!

 Have they died in vain?

The following are photos of six U.S. soldiers reportedly killed while searching for Bergdahl:

What say you, Traitor-in-Chief and henchmen??

Something fishy: Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel (C) made press statements aboard a military aircraft but failed to notify Congress that five Guantanamo Bay detainees would be walking free. Now soldiers have come forward demanding to know why they were attempted to be hushed