Islamic Cannibalism/Barbarism Ratchets Up: ISIS, Boko Haram & Jihadi Umbrellas Partake! A Western Call To Arms. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

THE videotaping of Coptic Christians – and others similarly decapitated – must be understood as part of a goal-oriented program with two-tiers: propaganda recruitment, and striking (immediate/concomitant) terror in the west’s heart. Shock value.

WITHOUT a scintilla of a doubt, said acts are absolutely underpinned by the Koran, and can be found in several unambiguous verses: Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.” 

SO those who jive talk and scream that this barbarism is not Islamic, they are either ignorant of Islam’s dictates or they are attempting to Allah-wash Islamic-derived jihad. In either case, just ignore them or smack them upside the head. Whatever works.

ISIS Beheading 21 Coptic Christians in Libya 2 (resized)

FULL Disclosure: the latest gruesome act of jihad hit particularly hard. Why? Aside from the fact that much has been written at this site (out of countless commentaries) to prove the above thesis, a heightened degree of outrage was felt, regarding the Coptic Christian community. Yes, it comes atop enumerable acts of savagery- as Islamists swathe forward – in their absolute goal to wipe out the last vestiges of minorities in the Mid East and parts of Africa.

IN this regard, as a (one of two Israelis) Board Member of Israel’s Voice – a US based 501(c)(3) nonprofit – one of our valued coalition partners represents the Voice of the Copts.  

TO wit, this investigative journalist is duty bound to assert: what is the leadership of the heretofore free world doing to counter the non-stop onslaughts, other than offering pithy platitudes via his mouthpieces: “The Obama administration, in a statement released by press secretary Josh Earnest late Sunday, called the killing of the 21 Egyptian men a “despicable and cowardly murder” that should accelerate the need for a political resolution to the burgeoning conflict in Libya.” (blogger’s note: more than enraging…being that the Pyromaniac-in-Chief’s illegal war in Libya catapulted ISIS’s jihad – attendant offshoots – off the ground….even as he shrilly opines: “In his address last week, the president said “ISIL is not Islamic,” and “no religion condones the killing of innocents.”)

AND if it seems like an endless barrage of barbarism flows through these pages, that’s because there is no other alternative. Sorry for that.

NEVERTHELESS, ignoring the unthinkable certainly won’t solve the worldwide plague of Islam, but exposing some intrinsic linkages will alert countless westerners as to what’s what. 

Screen-Shot-2015-02-15-at-3.03.49-PM

Screen-Shot-2015-02-15-at-3.03.35-PM-550x424

Screen-Shot-2015-02-15-at-3.03.22-PM-550x420

THUS, a recap of their latest carnage is on display for all to view. Thankfully – unlike the Jihadi-in-Chief – Egypt’s Al-Sisi’s righteous revenge was swift, as it should be:

Islamic-State-beheads-Christians

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi has declared “Egypt reserves the right of retaliation and with the methods and timing it sees fit for retribution from those murderers and criminals who are without the slightest humanity.” 

EuroNews The kidnapped Egyptian workers were taken in December and January from the coastal town of Sirte in eastern Libya which is now under the control of Islamist groups. In the video (below link) it was made clear the victims had been targeted because of their faith.

islamic-state-isis-releases-video-of-beheadings-of-21-egyptian-coptic-christians-in-libya

UPDATE! THIS JUST IN: As promised, Egypt launches airstrikes on Islamic State (ISIS) in Libya.

UK Daily Mail  Egypt launched airstrikes on Islamic State targets in Libya this morning as it ‘seeks retribution’ for the barbaric filmed beheading of 21 Coptic Christians. There were at least seven strikes in Derna in the east of the country, which has become a hotbed of Islamic extremism since dictator Libyan Muammar Gaddafi was overthrown in 2011.

France Egypt Fighter Jets

It is the first time Egypt announced military action against Islamist targets in its western neighbour, having previously denied it targeted militants there, and the first time militants connected with the Islamic State terror group have been hit with airstrikes outside Syria and Iraq.

The strikes are in response to a gruesome video, released last night, showing a group of orange jumpsuit-clad Coptic Christians being marched to the shores of the Mediterranean Sea by masked, knife-wielding militants.

The 21 men, who were Egyptian migrant workers kidnapped last month, are then seen being forced onto their knees before they are beheaded simultaneously by the militants standing behind them.

Egypt strikes Libya

BUT lest anyone believes that ISIS is the “only” Islamic bloodletting force laying waste across the globe, think again. Whether acting in tandem or solo, the fact remains that they are ALL operating under the banner of Islamic jihad!

Muslims, all belonging to Boko Haram, entered the Christian village of Gwoza and butchered one thousand Christians. Why hasn’t this made the news? They were shot, burned alive, and slashed to death. They were slaughtered with bullets, cooked alive, and hacked to death. Nigerian relations expert Adeniyi Ojutiku received a report from a trusted colleague:

Shoebat  The terrorists seized a number of residents as hostages and killed nine hundred and ninety-seven an eye-witness whose mother among the women that are burying the … bodies confirmed… The insurgents took over the Emirs (mayor’s) Palace as well as a Government Lodge in Gwoza, and have appointed a replacement for the town’s fleeing Emir. They have hoisted their black flags with Arabic insignia all over Gwoza in a show of their total control of the territory.

boko_haram_moderate_enough_for_you_obama

Ojutiku received from Nigeria marked a phone call and was told that “an unprecedented emergency request for prayers for the inhabitants of the Christian village of Gwoza… The town has … been under siege of Boko Haram for the past nine days”.

Shoebat.com reported before that the Boko Haram Muslims in this same Christian village killed 100, but now a new report says 1000.

As one report described the slaughter:

Mbitsa, who supports Ojutiku’s grassroots Lift Up Now outreach to Nigeria, is a member of the Church of Christ in Nations on the lower coast of Gwoza, and was away in Maiduguri during the attack. Boko Haram killed Mbitsa’s pastor Musa Ishaya and at least nine members of the Church of the Brethren in the attack, Mbitsa said. He has not heard from many since, as communication towers were destroyed.

nigeria-muslims-slaughter-christians-2

“Only my elder brother, I heard from him among my family members,” Mbitsa reported. “Some brethren who escaped to mountains and bush for ten days now; only God knows how they are surviving without food, water, etc. Most of the brethren we communicate and get this information from them, their batteries are down.”

As Boko Haram blocked exit roads from Gwoza and went door to door killing people, Ojutiku said, Nigerian military officials abandoned their weapons and fled, leaving Boko Haram unchallenged.

nigeria-christians-1

“Now these weapons have fallen into the hands of the Boko Haram,” Ojutiku said. “A few people were able to escape to the mountainside, just exactly like is happening in northern Iraq. A few people are holding out on the mountains, but most of the people in the village are being slaughtered. There is no communication between Gwoza and other parts of the country.”

“I was told many Nigerian soldiers refused to go and confront Boko Haram, because their wives protested. They felt they were just sending their husbands to an untimely death.”

DSC_0127

New reports corroborated Ojutiku’s account. According to AFP, about 300 women and 500 children protested for two days at the gates of a military base in Maiduguri, demanding that their husbands and fathers not be sent to recapture Gwoza, as they did not have proper weapons.

“No weapons for our husbands, no trip to Gwoza or any volatile place,” AFP Aug. 12 quoted Thabita John, one of the protesting wives. “We are tired of burying our loved ones.”

Boko Haram, seeking to establish Sharia law, had killed 4,239 Christians, moderate Muslims, government officials and civilians in attacks targeting religious communities in Northern Nigeria, advocacy group Jubilee Campaign reported July 29. Hundreds of thousands have been driven from their homes.

NEWSFLASH: Boko Haram are HUSSEIN Obama’s kinfolk, yes, they are:

Last, but certainly not least, look who went to bat for terror-laden Boko Haram in 2013?

Therefore, why is anyone shocked to learn: that while the Mid East is burning, so too is Christianity across Africa and the Mid East, all “credit” given to…re-introducing…

OBAMA’S FAMILY SHARE BOKO HARAM’S AGENDA TO ERADICATE CHRISTIAN EDUCATION!

IN light of all the above info, is it any wonder that HUSSEIN Obama’s White House failed to mention the faith of Coptic Christians beheaded by ISIS? Hmm…

“The United States condemns the despicable and cowardly murder of twenty-one Egyptian citizens in Libya by ISIL-affiliated terrorists,” the White House statement said. The victims were also referred to as “innocents,” Spiering said, but no mention was made of their faith.

NOW, as stated from the onset, the fact of the matter is that recruitment of western jihadis (and others) is a prime target for ISIS, Boko Haram and related Islamic terror hydras. This danger is exponentially graver due to their sophisticated online/social media presence and their English language publication(s)!  

dabiq3

MORE specifically, this investigative journalist continually highlights the dangerous Islamic presence within America (the west, including Israel), one which is growing exponentially, including ISIS. This has been made very clear, and with no stone left un-turned. 

THUS, a particular commentary (Oct. 2014) must URGENTLY re-enter the fray, as it featured “star” Bostonians…a “father and son terror tag team”!

INTRODUCING, a bespectacled (jacked up terrorist) grandfatherly looking man, Abdulbadi Abousamra…the proud papa of Ahmad, you know, the social media guru, the propaganda coordinator, for ISIS straight out of the heart of Boston! Hmm…the terror apple doesn’t fall far from the Islamist family tree. Yes, THAT Boston jihadi connection, once again. A cesspool.

SO what’s the point of re-introducing this duo? Well, as stated within said commentary, Ahmad is the MAIN tech guru for ISIS!

The Man Behind the ISIS Media Curtain Ahmad Abousamra

Ahmad Abousamra was born in France in 1981 and grew up in the upper class neighborhood of Stoughton in the Boston area of Massachusetts. Abousamra is highly educated having attended Xavier Brothers Catholic School in Westwood and then Stoughton High school in his senior year. He is also a graduate of Northeastern University with a degree in computer technology. He was also employed at a telecommunications company. Abousamra is a dual citizen of the United States and Syria and is believed to be living in the city of Aleppo, Syria.

Ahmad Abousamra and another individual, Tarek Mehanna, had made multiple trips to places such as Pakistan and Yemen for the purpose of receiving military training to fight American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. The two are reportedly to have celebrated the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States according to at least one report associated with Special Agent Heidi Williams of the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force.

Ahmad Abousamra and Tarek Mehanna have both been charged with terrorism related activity. Tarek Mehanna was apprehended at his parents’ home on October 21, 2009 and later convicted in 2011 and sentenced to 17.5 years in prison. The two had previously made a trip to Yemen in 2004 trying to find a terrorist training camp to acquire training. However, they were unsuccessful in either finding one or being accepted in one. Mehanna is said to have worked with another individual in the media wing of Al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) founded by Abu Musab al Zarqawi, which became the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), then Islamic State of Syria and Iraq (ISIS) and finally the Islamic State (IS). Both individuals were originally questioned by the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force in 2006. Ahmad Abousamra was added to the Most Wanted Terrorists List in 2012. Given the associations Ahmad Abousamra had with Mehanna and background information on Tarek Mehanna is astonishing that the FBI would not have requested he be put on a no fly list with the probable cause they had.

FBI Most Wanted Terrorist Images of Ahmad Abousamra

(read the whole thing)

AT its base, this blog does NOT blow smoke. Promise.

IN any event, the most urgent query becomes: what, if anything, can be done about their online presence? A whole damn lot.

NO one should be foolish enough to assume that the powers that be in Washington (and other western nations) can’t block access to any group that is affiliated with an Islamic terror organ, regardless of shrill screams re “censorship” and what not.

NOT only that, but access to the internet does not apply to a GLOBAL terror movement which seeks to destroy the west, regardless of “free speech/access” hysteria. Say what? Since when do barbarians have any rights, let alone to recruit jihadis, to plot, via social media?

SO one must inquire: why haven’t American (western) intelligence agencies stopped their online recruitment via the internet’s “rabbit hole”, even if some of their digital tracks can be helpful? Moreover, if they didn’t have the internet as a recruiting platform, there would be less reason to angst over their expanded rise. Ya think? A + B…

RESULTANT, a tool box of “traditional” tracking methods would suffice, if Washington took the lead. Clearly, they have zero interest in stopping ISIS’s rise, at least under the reign of HUSSEIN Obama and his Islamic-leaning (CIA/State/Jarrett) surrogates.

AGREED?

{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

Obama Inc.’s FULL-ON Shield Towards Muslim Brotherhood: CAIR Not A Terror Org!Surrogates Go To Bat…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

BACK in the day, before Eric Holder (who never met an Islamist/leftist who was guilty of anything, let alone terrorism /subversion/treason/murder and mayhem) took the reins, the DOJ, to a large degree, was an address for American justice.

IN effect, an unindicted co-conspirator to the largest terrorism trial in U.S. history (Holy Land Foundation Trial) would hardly be in a position to ask any Fed agency, let alone the Executive Branch, for “assistance”. But that was then (in 2007/2008) and this is now. 

INTRINSICALLY, the criminal proofs against CAIR are crystal clear, even for those who are (ideologically rendered) blind as bats. However, pathological hatred for America – fueled by leftist/Islamist fixations – is impregnable. Fortress-like.

CAIR is indeed an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR operatives have repeatedly refused to denounceHamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements. Its California chapter distributed posters telling Muslims not to talk to the FBI.

Although it has received millions of dollars in donations from foreign Islamic entities, it has not registered as a foreign agent as required by the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), despite spreading Islamic supremacist propaganda within the United States.

And although it presents itself as a civil rights group, CAIR actually has numerous links to hateful and violent Islamic supremacist and jihad groups.

CAIR founders Omar Ahmad and Niwad Awad (who still serves as CAIR’s executive director) were present at a Hamas planning meeting in Philadelphia in 1993 where they and other Hamas operatives conspired to raise funds for Hamas and to promote jihad in the Middle East. CAIR has steadfastly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups.

Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror:

  • Ghassan Elashi , founder of CAIR’s Texas chapter, in 2009 received a 65-year prison sentence for funneling over $12 million from the Islamic charity known as the Holy Land Foundation to the jihad terrorist group Hamas, which is responsible for murdering hundreds of Israeli civilians
  • Mousa Abu Marzook, a former CAIR official, was in 1995 designated by the U.S. government in 1995 as a “terrorist and Hamas leader.” He now is a Hamas leader in Syria.
  • Randall Royer, CAIR’s former civil rights coordinator, in 2004 began serving a 20-year prison sentence for aiding al-Qaida and the Taliban against American troops in Afghanistan and recruiting for Lashkar e-Taiba, the jihadist group responsible for the 2008 Mumbai jihad massacres.
  • Bassem Khafagi, CAIR’s former community relations director, was arrested for involvement with the Islamic Assembly of North America, which was linked to al-Qaida. After pleading guilty to visa and bank fraud charges, Khafagi was deported.
  • Rabih Haddad, a former CAIR fundraiser, was deported for his work with the Global Relief Foundation (which he co-founded), a terror-financing organization.

In 1998 Omar Ahmad, CAIR’s co-founder and longtime Board Chairman, said: “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”

After he received unwelcome publicity as a result of this statement, Ahmad denied saying it, several years after the fact. However, the original reporter, Lisa Gardiner of the Fremont Argus, stands by her story.

CAIR’s spokesman Ibrahim Hooper once said: “I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.”

STILL, even with the above in mind, a few visual aids/proofs require additional edification:

Edification One:

THUS, before one views the two upcoming videos, please recognize that its host, Tom Trento, is not a so-called talking head. As such, blow him off at your own (western) peril. The evidence he brings to bear is second to none, and it will frighten you out of your mind. But that’s okay. Besides, it is better to have some mental discomfit now, before it is too late to (help) turn the tide. In any case, it doesn’t hurt that he has this site’s back, in a manner of speaking.

BUT before you click on, a brief synopsis is a must read:

In 2008 the Federal Bureau of Investigation warned America that the self-proclaimed “Muslim civil-rights” group, CAIR, was really part of the Palestinian terrorist organization the HAMAS. In fact, as we have proven, CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations actually functions as the “Special Operations Division” (SOD) of the political department of the HAMAS. Part of the CAIR “SOD” functions is to attack with media propaganda any person or organization who analyzes or criticizes CAIR. For several years now, CAIR has been able to maintain their non-terrorist Islamic “hue,” that is, until they have become a subject of our ground-breaking series, “Enemies of the State.” Stay tuned to this unique series as we send our research investigators deeply into the federal files on CAIR and present factual conclusions that will disrupt, disable and destroy the operations of CAIR/HAMAS USA.

 

TO wit, now that you are scared witless – so sorry for that – is it any wonder why CAIR, aka Muslim Brotherhood Mafia leaders, is inextricably linked to jihad terror-related crimes??

MORE specifically, this investigative journalist is completely up to speed on the intersecting terror hydras accrued under the Brotherhood’s umbrella. CAIR is front and center.

NOT only that, but being less than six degrees separated from a counter-terror expert who has been (and still is) within the belly of the MB beast – having provided much of the critical evidence to indict top Brotherhood terror leaders at the Holy Land Foundation trial – well, let’s just say they were none too pleased with the captured evidence revealed within Muslim Mafia. Poor dears, they still hold a grudge! Hmm…makes you want to shed a tear for their angst…just kidding…

Buy This Explosive Book Today!

The four Congressmen then wrote Attorney General Eric Holder on October 21, 2009, saying that in light of the book’s claims of CAIR attempting to influence national security policy within Congress, they were very concerned about CAIR’s relationships with terrorist groups, and requesting that the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) provide each Congressman a summary of DOJ’s evidence and findings that led DOJ to name CAIR an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism trial…

 

Left: Cartoon posted to Facebook depicting David Gaubatz being beheaded - Right: Gaubatz on duty in Iraq.

{Left: Cartoon posted to Facebook depicting David Gaubatz being beheaded – Right: David Gaubatz on duty in Iraq}

WITH the above info in tow, listen very carefully to the Mafia-like money laundering frauds utilized by the Muslim Brotherhood, with CAIR as “Exhibit Number One”. Yet, please bear in mind, it is not an accident (nor incidental) that the same two counter-terror hunters are housed within these pages.

READERS, grab a snack, put up your feet, get comfy and pay heed to what we (who operate separately, but also in tandem) term – “follow the (jihadist) money”

{a sampling of the monies laundered/exchanged – out of scores – between HLF and CAIR, some of which individually ranged from 100,000 on up, and collectively totaled into the many millions}

BACK to Obama’s “FULL ON” shield…but now that readers are more in the (terror) loop, just listen to his mouthpiece spin, dodge and weave. Good grief.

INCONTROVERTIBLY, the leader of the (heretofore) free world assiduously lends cover for the most dangerous Islamist Mafia, bar none – the Muslim Brotherhood.

AND since it has been demonstrably proven, six ways to Sundays, that CAIR is the Brotherhood’s American propaganda arm – akin to the machine run by Joseph Goebbels during the Nazi regime – it is only due to an Islamist-in-Chief at the helm that they remain under Washington’s protective shield and also “at large” throughout the U.S.

INDICTMENT SEALED….against Obama Inc. and the Brotherhood Mafia in toto!!

Explosive:Islam’s Mandated Barbarism Morphs With Genetic Inbreeding!Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

{one of many defects from Muslim inbreeding}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

PC addled westerners are akin to addicts in the throes of their addiction. Resultant, they will never admit to what’s what, even if warned that their lives (and those of their loved ones) depend on a volte face. In fact, appearing tolerant to the most intolerant on the face of the earth is their “religion” of choice. Such is the case, despite irreparable harm to enumerable innocents. It is the G-d’s honest truth. 

THUS, proof after proof can be brought to the fore, yet it won’t make a dent. But this doesn’t mean that facts will remain hidden, just because countless leftists, aka “liberals”, demand silence from the rest of us. Why should we die on their perverted altar? Not on this site’s watch…

AS to the charge of Islamic barbarism, where does one begin, other than at Islam’s linkage to blood. Read it in full. View the video below too.

http://www.liveleak.com/ll_embed?f=222a4fee078b

“Serious consequences of Muslim inbreeding

Among the results are lower average intelligence and impaired health
Muslim culture still practices inbreeding and has been doing so for the better part of 1400 years. Consanguineous marriages were originally sanctioned by Islam’s prophet Muhammed, who had a very liberal view on men’s sexual relationships. In addition his many sex slaves, he married several cousins, the divorced wife of his own adopted son and the six year old Aisha, with whom he had sex with when she was nine.
A rough estimate shows that close to half of the world’s Muslims are inbred as a result of consanguineous marriages. In Pakistan, 70 percent of all marriages are between first cousins – children of siblings – and in Turkey the share is 25-30 percent.
Statistical research on Arabic countries indicates that up to 34 percent of all marriages in Algeria are blood-related as are 46 percent in Bahrain, 33 percent in Egypt, 80 percent in Nubia (the southern part of Egypt), 60 percent in Iraq, 64 percent in Jordan, 64 percent in Kuwait, 42 percent in Lebanon, 48 percent in Libya, 47 percent in Mauritania, 54 percent in Qatar, 67 percent in Saudi Arabia, 63 percent in Sudan, 40 percent in Syria, 39 percent in Tunisia, 54 percent in the United Arabic Emirates and 45 percent in Yemen. According to Dr. Nadia Sakati of King Faisal Specialist Hospital in Riyadh, 45 percent of married Arab couples are blood-related. The fact that many of these couples are themselves children of blood-related parents increases the risk of negative consequences.
The number of blood-related marriages is lower among Muslim immigrants living in the West. Among Pakistanis living in Denmark the number is down to 40 percent and it is 15 percent among Turkish immigrants. This may be due to the fact that immigration rules make it difficult to import family-related brides. Another factor may be better information on the risks connected with blood-related marriages. Because of better human rights protection it is also more difficult for traditional Muslim families to force their children to marry within the family.
In spite of the lower percentage of consanguineous marriages among Muslims living in the West, at least 55 percent of Pakistanis living in the United Kingdom are married to a first cousin. This is thought to explain why British Pakistani families are at least 13 times more likely than the general population to have children with recessive genetic disorders – often resulting in serious genetic diseases.

Several studies show
 that, on average, children of consanguineous marriages have lower intelligence than children of non-related parents. The average intelligence quotient, IQ, in any age group is 100. Depending on the theoretical basis, the line between normal intelligence and low intelligence is 90 or 85. Below 70-79 is categorized as mild disability, 50-69 is moderate disability.  Significantly more low-IQ children drop out of school and remain unskilled workers throughout life.
There are many studies on the intelligence effects of inbreeding among cousins. One study from Bihar, India, on Muslim children living in suburban areas, shows that while outbred offspring have an average IQ of 95, inbred children have an average IQ of 79, which puts them in category of people with “low intelligence” having special needs in schools, difficulty handling simple job tasks and completing a basic education. The study also shows the social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand grasping are significantly delayed among the newborn inbred babies. A decrease in the ability to understand and react to social interaction is known to have a negative influence on children’s development, including social skills and empathy, later in life.
Other studies reach similar conclusions, also when adjusted for socioeconomic status. The cognitive consequences of Muslim inbreeding may explain why non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely than native Danes to fail the Danish army’s intelligence test.  It may also be part of the explanation why two-thirds of school children with Arabic backgrounds are illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The connection between low intelligence and a lack of ability to be self-supporting is well established. The extreme lack of scientific and social contributions from the Muslim world may be another result of inbreeding. While 184 Jews have received the Nobel Prize for their scientific, social and artistic contributions to the world, only 10 Muslims have had this honor.
Since 1901 Jews have received 34 percent of all Nobel Prizes. The world Jewish population in 2012 is approximately 14 million whereas the total number of Muslims is estimated to number 1.5 billion.
The risk of stillbirth doubles when parents are first cousins. A study comparing Pakistani children of consanguineous marriages with Norwegian children shows a 50 percent higher risk that babies die during birth. Infant mortality among the inbred Pakistani children was more than double that among the Norwegian children. Deaths due to disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy were 18 times more common among the Pakistani children and deaths due to multiple malformations, which may be part of unrecognized autosomal recessive syndromes, were 10 times more common.
Other research concludes that inbred people have a higher risk of developing mental disorders such as depression  and schizophrenia. The practice of consanguineous marriages in Muslim families may thus explain why more than 40 percent of the patients in Denmark’s Sct. Hans Hospital for the criminally insane and 70 percent of the inmates in Danish youth prisons have immigrant backgrounds.
**The consequences of consanguineous marriages may also bring us closer to an understanding Islamic terrorism. One study suggests that many suicide bombers are suffering from depression. Among some Muslims their actions are considered a socially acceptable way of committing suicide in order to end mental torment.
A study from Kabul, Afghanistan, based on autopsies of the remains of suicide bombers, shows that close to 90 percent were suffering from severe illnesses or deficiencies such as blindness, cancer, missing limbs or leprosy. Many Muslim societies, including that of Afghanistan, have a low social acceptance of handicaps and mental illness. Being physically handicapped or mentally retarded often leads to exclusion. Becoming a martyr may be the only chance of achieving social recognition and honor. Some cases of Down’s syndrome may be another unpleasant effect of inbreeding and al-Qaeda has been known to use people afflicted with it. People with low intelligence may also be more easily convinced that Islam, with its promise of 72 virgins to Muslims who die fighting for their religion, is true.

Inbreeding among Muslims has severe social implications both for the Western societies and the Muslim world. According to Danish Social worker Merete Lefelt, “When cousins have children together, they are twice as likely to have a disabled child. …  Disabled immigrant children cost Danish municipalities millions. In Copenhagen the number of disabled children … has doubled over 10 years.” She has contacted 330 families with disabled children in Copenhagen and estimates that one-third of her clients have a foreign cultural background. The cost of special education for slow learners consumes one-third of the Danish school budget. This means less money for normal and gifted learners. 51 percent of the children in Copenhagen’s three schools for children with physical and mental handicaps have immigrant backgrounds.
High levels of education may also make it harder for inbred students to finish their studies. Students with minority backgrounds have a significantly higher dropout rate at secondary schools than youths with a Danish background. In business schools, the dropout rate among immigrants is 60 percent, twice as high as among students with a Danish background. Interestingly the dropout among young people with Lebanese or Iranian background is far greater than among people of e.g. Vietnamese background. (Center for Knowledge on Integration in Randers, May 2005 “Youth, education and integration“).
The limited ability to understand, appreciate and produce knowledge as a result of low IQ is probably part of the reason why Muslim countries only produce one-tenth of the World average when it comes to scientific research. In 2003 the world average for production of scientific articles was 137 per million inhabitants, whereas the average among 47 Islamic countries was just 13.

 

MORE proof of the pudding, as to the blood thirsty nature of Islam, can always be gleaned through one of the most adept of this investigative journalist’s scholarly contacts. And though the following is directed at Israel’s leftist-driven leaders – those who truly make policy – it is a mirror-like prescription for American (western) leaders too. This site’s trusted prof always gets it right!

Ruthlessness is a Must against a Ruthless Foe

Prof. Paul Eidelberg

In a previous article, I quoted Bernard Lewis, the doyen of Islamic studies, who recognized that overweening arrogance is characteristic of Muslim culture. From Lewis we learn that worshippers of the Qur’an are so proud of their own perfection as to make Islam and its Muslim worshipers “impervious to external stimuli.” This requires Israel to treat these disciples of Mohammad ruthlessly, as brilliantly explained by the author of Civilization and Its Enemies, Lou Harris, the “philosopher of 9/11.

The inordinate pride or arrogance of Muslims will only be magnified by the sugary self-restraint of democratic politicians like Benjamin Netanyahu.  Muslims who regard Jews as “dogs” – their epithet for all non-Muslims – need to be treated as one might treat mad dogs: kill them at once.  Failure to do so will only encourage these beasts to murder more Jews. And mark this well: they will target our most eminent citizens, rabbis, to degrade Judaism and flaunt the “supremacy” of their own religion.

Only recall how the Viet Cong Communists targeted the mayors and teachers of South Vietnam villages – the most respected personalities – to demoralize their enemy in the South.

No sane person would seek to befriend a dog stricken with rabies – a poison analogous to the pathological hatred Muslims incubate and harbor for Jews, a hatred so vividly portrayed by Leon Uris in Exodus.

An Israeli Prime Minister that disregards the lethal theo-political significance of this hatred is not qualified for that office. An Israeli Prime Minister that does not feel morally outraged by the murder of rabbis – especially by Muslims – is a clod, to put it mildly.

The great Arab philosopher al-Farabi (d. 950), who was a Muslim in dress only, would agree. He wrote a book on Plato and Aristotle in an esoteric way to conceal his utter contempt for Islam on the one hand, and his admiration of those Greek philosophers on the other. Indeed, the great Arab historian and sociologist ibn Khaldun (d. 1406) regarded Arabs as “savages.” You don’t negotiate with savages, certainly not on the basis of “reciprocity” – which would be indicative of fatuity bordering on insanity!

Much the same may be said of Israeli officials who collaborate in a Government that consorts with the murderers of Jewish children. Against such ruthless enemies, ruthlessness is a must, lest they call us sheep as well as dogs!◙

TO place it all in perspective, it is imperative to not only see the truth, but to shout it from the rooftops. 

STIPULATED:

ISLAM is a retrograde, barbaric doctrine; one which is inherently a political bludgeon dressed up as one of the 3 Abrahamic religions. Really.

TAQIYYA SOftening hearts of non believer fingers crossed

 

 

YES, if slaughtering, pillaging, raping and bloody warfare is “religious” in nature, then Islam should be accorded religious respect. But just because a lie is repeated for centuries, it doesn’t change its basis. 

THE questions become: when will western leaders/elitists realize that Islam’s blood components are diametrically opposed to western civilization? and will they also admit that Islam’s backward, retarded growth has as much to do with continuous inbreeding – in the face of RAMPANT genetic mutations within their bloodlines – much of which adds to their violent behavior throughout the civilized world?  

IF not, why not? If not now, when?

ISIS Catapulted Via Libya’s Theater of War:Caliphate Implanted! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

(this site’s ISIS analysis quoted at Breitbart}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

SANS a scintilla of a doubt, this investigative journalist admits to harping on this and that, perhaps like a broken record. Yes, guilty as charged. Not only that, having a bull-like personality accounts for some of said doggedness. But make no mistake, it is absolutely the case that only subjects which impinge upon the safety of America and Israel (by extension, the west) are objects of such constant “obsession”.

NOW that the above is settled, what is absolutely shocking, more than amazing and incontestably dangerous is that anyone who works in a security related arena, let alone has a grasp of the geo-political realm, is at all surprised about Libya’s Caliphate status! Oh my…

SO it truly tries a patriot’s soul when a prior (or on duty) CIA/security operative claims that it is “oh, so shocking” that Libya is in ISIS’s cross hairs. Huh and duh? Can you believe it?

ISIS is taking over Libya and the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which supported the NATO mission to overthrow Gadhafi, is suddenly concerned. Europe is also suddenly very concerned about Libya being taken over by ISIS. As was the case with the UNSC, NATO signed off on the plan to take out Gadhafi. More specifically, many of the European nations that are NATO member states are very troubled by the ISIS takeover in Libya as well.

Shockingly, a former operative with the CIA, which was intricately involved in the operation to remove Gadhafi by helping the Libyan rebels, appeared on CNN with Wolf Blitzer and expressed outright disbelief at the situation in Libya.

Really?

Also, ISIS is not new. The flags that have been identified as ISIS flags were flown in Benghazi ever since the overthrow of Gadhafi. In fact, ISIS was created in late 2011 / early 2012 in Syria and Iraq. Benghazi was attacked on 9/11/12, long after ISIS had been created.

Was ISIS involved in the Benghazi attacks?

When it comes to learning what was really going on in Benghazi before four Americans were murdered there, House Speaker John Boehner admitted to knowing about weapons shipments from Benghazi to Turkey and then onto Syrian rebels.

U.S. policy in the Middle East is clearly being influenced by Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the U.S. government, which also leads back to Boehner.

In addition to defending Hillary Clinton advisor Huma Abedin while throwing Rep. Michele Bachmann under the bus in 2012, Boehner shockingly introduced an Imam – with highly suspicious connections – who delivered an Islamic prayer on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives.

All the while, Boehner kept his head bowed.

NOW before any further elaboration ensues, it is no secret that this site is hooked into certain experts, some of whom operate in the counter terror area, while others are strategic experts. Moreover, some are out in the open while others – not so much. Regardless, admittedly and resultant, the landscape clears on this end well before most understand what is taking place, aside from what the leadership wants the public to think. Understood. Nevertheless, there are no excuses for those who earn(ed) their living as so-called experts, yet are still dangerously misinformed. Woefully off the mark.

Mark One:

HOW many are familiar with the bull’s eye knock-on effects from Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s illegal war in Libya? Pointedly, its cataclysmic results were cited at this site, well before many other so-called journalists caught on. Mind you, some are still clueless! Bizarre.

STIPULATED, the boots on the ground in Libya were illegal, in so far as Congressional approval was not given for said intervention. Basically, an anti-Constitutional power grab. Simple as that.

He spent seven months bombing Libya without congressional authorization and without complying with the War Powers Resolution. His lawyers argued that thousands of airstrikes, which professor Jack Goldsmith of Harvard Law School notes “killed thousands of people and effected regime change,” did not constitute “hostilities.” Professor Ilya Somin of George Mason University School of Law says, “Claims that large-scale air attacks don’t count as warfare were specious when the administration trotted them out in defense of its intervention in Libya in 2011; and they have not improved with age.”

IN this regard, the entire Brotherhood Mafia, including ISIS, were the intended recipients of said U.S. thrust, and the proofs are manifest. As this investigative journalist noted:

LEST there be any misunderstandings, if not for the consequences generated from Benghazigate, Sunni Brotherhood jihadists – of which ISIS are part and parcel of, on whose behalf Barack HUSSEIN Obama ordered the largest weapons-running operation in Mid East history – would not be knocking on America’s door, nor Israel’s. Others as well. Nevertheless, as an American-Israeli, both nations are my top priorities. Hands down.

OMINOUSLY, a major outgrowth to Obama’s illegal war in Libya (the main goal of the weapons running was to destabilize Syria for the benefit of Syria’s Brotherhood Mafia) allowed countless man-pads to awash Syria and beyond. In this regard, isn’t it likely that this is how ISIS got their hands on said weapons and then some?

Islamic State militants stormed a Syrian airbase over the weekend, routing the remaining elements of the country’s army from northern Raqqah province and reportedly seizing a cache of shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles.

The seizure of Tabqa air base, while not the first installation of its type to fall to militants, highlights the Islamic State’s gains in the region and the group’s continued pilfering of advanced military equipment, particularly the surface-to-air missile systems known as MANPADS, short for Man Portable Air Defense Systems.

Matt Schroeder, a senior researcher at the Switzerland-based research group Small Arms Survey and author of a recent report on MANPADS in Syria, believes that the takeover of Tabqa airbase could mark a “significant proliferation” of the weapons across the region.

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, thou art an Islamic devil!

Mark Two: 

YES, in a very tangible sense, upending Libya (and Egypt, whereby during Morsi’s rule he flooded the lawless Sinai with tens of thousands of roaming, well-armed jihadis…indeed, the oft mentioned knock-on effects…) will yield the next 9/11/01, whether or not ISIS or another front group claims “credit”. The endless amount of explosive firepower, plus the open sesame created via deposing strong-arm dictators (akin to Mubarak and Qadaffi), gifted Islamist forces a bounty of booty, notwithstanding tens of thousands of man-pads, non conventional weaponry etc.

THE core questions become: how is the above working out so far, and to whose benefit? is the Mid East and Africa more stable, or in a cauldron of wildfire, as a result of the Jihadi-in-Chief’s machinations?

Mark Three:

STILL not convinced, as to how “necessary” it was for an Islamist-in-Chief to go from there to here? Okay.

ALAS, as more and more dirt is uncovered re Benghazigate, this site’s prior analyses – having already revealed the Brotherhood Mafia’s “circle of death” – are coming full circle, in a manner of speaking. Many other sites are finally catching on….

Almost immediately following the Benghazi attack, the Obama administration possessed information indicating some Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood participation in the assault, yet the Obama administration kept this critical piece of information from the public, reveals a new book, “The Real Benghazi Story,” by New York Times bestselling author Aaron Klein.

CONSEQUENTIALLY, there should no longer be any doubt: both parties, with Demsters led by the Islamist-in-Chief (and a gaggle of Congressional members) and Repubs led by RINOS Boehner, Rogers and McCain (others too), are duty complicit in the rise of the Caliphate. How so?

IN no uncertain terms, the aforementioned are bent on protecting Islam within America, whatever the costs.

On June 13, 2012, five members of Congress called for an investigation into Muslim Brotherhood influence operations in the Obama administration.  The five members– Michele Bachmann (R-MN), Trent Franks (R-AZ), Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Tom Rooney (R-FL), and Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA)– were widely criticized for doing so, even by their own Republican leadership, including John McCain (R-AZ), John Boehner (R-OH), and Mike Rogers (R-MI).

At the time, Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) said, “It’s not right to question the loyalty of fellow Americans without any evidence.”  Well, now we have the evidence.

BUT let’s get down to brass tacks, in a manner of speaking. Boehner is much more than an addled booze hound, which he is also guilty of being:

Lest you think this is sheer suicidal lunacy just from the Leftists, think again. The Leader of the House, John Boehner, allowed an Imam to say a prayer on the House floor Friday. I guess it was to compliment the service at the Cathedral. Another fool subjugates our leaders to Islam and America barely notices. What is wrong with these people?

cathedral3

Newly re-elected Speaker of the House John Boehner (who was elected by secret ballot, no less), presided and bowed his freaking head, while the Imam for the Islamic Center of Central Jersey praised Islam’s Allah from the House floor as the God who reigns supreme. What? Is the entire political leadership of the US now converted to Islam?

Imam Hamad Chebli didn’t just appear at the House floor; he also delivered Islamic prayers at theNational Cathedral which was prepared for Muslim prayers with rugs. One wonders if a statue of Baal were placed on the House floor, if Boehner would have prostrated himself before that demon as well.

Chebli is no harmless man of faith:

Early in his studies, a teacher named Hassan Khaled chose Chebli to serve at a neighboring mosque. Nearly four decades later, Chebli laughs as he recalls the puzzled expression of the mosques members when a lanky boy in glasses came to lead their prayers …[Hassan] Khaled, his mentor, was chosen Grand Mufti of Lebanon, the nations foremost Islamic legal scholar in the Sunni Muslim sect.”

MOVING right along, let’s hop over to Johnnie boy, you know, the elder “statesman” who continuously believes that having been a POW (decades ago, yup, the Stockholm Syndrome fried his brain) absolves him of this and that. Well, hell no. Just for the record, he and Huma Abedin, the highest, mobbed up Brotherhood/Sisterhood operative in America, are thick as thieves. Yes, this is precisely why he jumped to her defense when Rep Michele Bachmann pointed out her out-sized dangers. Whatever.

IT gets worse. The glued to his seat Senator from Arizona even assisted ISIS’s actual catapult! Bingo, he did.

BUT few deserve more Congressional opprobrium in this arena, other than Rep Mike Rogers, as he is the Intelligence Committee Chair! In other words, if this bastard doesn’t know what’s what and who’s who in the jihadi jungle (having been an FBI special agent too…my heavens…), then who does? 

ATOP said Congressional disasters, enter, Rep Mike Rogers, a piece of work like few others; a multiple-level deceiver. Demonstrably, Rogers is colluding with the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia:

Those of us who are anticipating a measure of (long overdue) justice for Americans who were slaughtered during Benghazigate will likely be waiting, as is said, until the cows come home. This tragic state of affairs revolves around many levels of treachery, but the latest emanates from a particular bastard, a Rep who is overseeing the House Intelligence committee. Wow. A snake in the grass.

At the very least, is it too much to expect that a man of honor sits at the head of said committee, a leader who is capable of discerning justice? Asked and answered.

Alas, this is not the case, even though (Repub) Rep. Rogers was a former FBI Special Agent and should be able to smell the jihad. This blogger has more than a nose for their scents, therefore he has zero excuse. Zip and zilch. Agreed?

Nevertheless, like many Congressional reps, in tandem with other powerful players in tow, Rogers turns deaf, dumb and blind and plays footsie, even to the point of accepting a keynote address at a mobbed up Brotherhood event! Readers, it doesn’t even matter why. What is intrinsic is he in their pockets, one way or another…

SURPRISE, surprise…the Islamist-in-Chief knew that Rogers would come through, understanding full well his collusive/suspect efforts as a supporter of KNOWN Islamic terrorists. Never in doubt…

THIS site understood, back in Aug 2014, that the “fix was in”, and Rogers assured its pre-ordained result!

 

 

 

 

 

Iranian Nukes & ‘Palestinian’ Statehood:Synergistic (Awaiting) Catastrophes For Israel & America/West …Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Jews Down Under}

Sentient and rational folks can no longer deny the obvious: the Iranian regime, when they exhort Death to Israel and Death to America, is indeed gunning for both nations. Their genocidal war inexorably twins the “Big Satan” and the “Little Satan”. Factual. Indisputable. Take them at their exact words. 

This past Monday marked the 34th anniversary of the takeover of the U.S. embassy in Iran, leading to 52 Americans being held hostage for several months. Contrary to what many analysts thought, and despite the recent “thaw” and optimism considering rapprochement between Iranian authorities and American leaders, tens of thousands of Iranian demonstrators packed the streets outside of the former U.S. embassy in Tehran this year. Hundreds of thousands also demonstrated against Israel and the U.S. in other cities across the country.

The protests were unprecedented in their scale and scope, reported as the biggest anti-U.S. and anti-Israel rally in years. According to Iran’s official media, millions of people participated in these protests and demonstrations around the country, the largest turnout in years.

Additionally, the leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran have designated Nov. 4 as a “National Day against Global Arrogance.” While this week, tens of thousands of Iranians shouted “death to America” and “death to Israel.” The burning of American and Israeli flags permeated throughout the cities. Furthermore, effigies of American President Barack Obama, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry were held up high by protesters….

SIMILARLY, when self-coined PA Arabs (in tandem with Hamas, their “bad cop” partners, and officially part of their terror entity) slaughter Jews, an imperative to destroy Israel, know that their hatred towards America is equally annihilatory. In fact, who recalls PA Arabs dancing and handing out sweets after 9/11/01 jihadists incinerated over 3,000 Americans under the banner of Islam? Their jihad has only gotten worse after years of perfecting their “art”. Think about it.

SO the urgent questions before Israelis and Americans – and the west at large – are: what exactly does Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s backroom deal with Iran’s mullahs portend? and, at the same time, how is PA (jihadi) “statehood” fitting into this same impending prism, both jointly and separately?

IN this regard, aside from Professor Louis Rene Beres, no one is more qualified to address these two synergistic global menaces. This too is a fact. And said qualifier is irrespective of his cornerstone at this site.

Ominously, especially for Israel, Iranian nuclearization and Palestinian statehood are progressing at roughly the same pace. Although this simultaneous emergence is proceeding without any conscious intent or coordinated design, the cumulative security impact upon Israel will still be substantial. Plausibly, and in contrast to more usual geometric orthodoxy, the “whole” of this impact will be considerably greater than the sum of its “parts.” Expressed more precisely, the appearance of Iranian nuclear weapons and “Palestine” will be synergistic.

For Israeli planners, of course, this unique and unprecedented threat should be treated with appropriate intellectual respect. In essence, and contrary to a long-prevailing conventional wisdom, Iran and Palestine do not represent separate or unrelated hazards to Israel. Rather, they delineate intersecting, mutually reinforcing, and potentially existential perils. It follows, unambiguously, that Jerusalem must do whatever possible to remove or diminish expected dangers on both fronts, and also at the same time.

Among other things, Israel will need to further enhance its multi-layered active defenses. As long as incoming rocket aggressions from Gaza, West Bank, and/or Lebanon (Hezbollah) were to remain conventional, the inevitable “leakage” could still be considered tolerable. But once these rockets are fitted with chemical and/or biological materials, any such porosity would quickly prove  “unacceptable.”

Facing Iranian nuclear missiles, Israel’s “Arrow” ballistic missile defense system would reasonably require a fully 100% reliability of interception. To achieve any such level of reliability, of course, would simply not be possible. Now, assuming that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has already abandoned any residual hopes for a cost-effective eleventh-hour preemption against pertinent Iranian nuclear assets – an altogether credible assumption, at this late time – this means that Israeli defense planners must look instead to deterrence.

Because of the expectedly corrosive interactive effects involving Iranian nuclear weapons and Palestinian statehood, Israel will soon need to update and further refine its existing strategies of deterrence. In this connection, Israel’s leaders will have to accept that certain more-or-less identifiable leaders of these prospectively overlapping enemies might not always satisfy the complex criteria of rational behavior in world politics. In such improbable but still conceivable circumstances, assorted Jihadist adversaries in Palestine, Iran, Lebanon or elsewhere might sometime refuse to back away from contemplated aggressions against Israel.

By definition, moreover, these irrational enemies could exhibit such refusals in thoroughly considered anticipations of a fully devastating Israeli reprisal.

Sooner rather than later, and facing a new and incalculable synergy from Iranian and Palestinian aggressions, Israel will need to take appropriate steps to assure that: (1) it does not become the object of any non-conventional attacks from these enemies; and (2) it can successfully deter all possible forms of non-conventional conflict. To meet this ambitious goal, Jerusalem, inter alia, must retain its recognizably far-reaching conventional superiority in pertinent weapons and capable manpower, including effective tactical control over the Jordan Valley.

In principle, such retentions could reduce the overall likelihood of ever actually having to enter into any chemical, biological, or nuclear exchange with regional adversaries. Correspondingly, Israel should plan to begin to move incrementally beyond its increasingly perilous posture of “deliberate nuclear ambiguity.” By preparing to shift toward prudently selective and partial kinds of “nuclear disclosure” – in other words, by getting ready to take its “bomb” out of the “basement,” and in carefully controlled phases – Israel could better ensure that its  relevant enemies will remain sufficiently subject to Israeli nuclear deterrence.

In matters of strategy, operational truth may sometimes emerge through apparent paradox. Israeli planners may soon have to understand that the efficacy or credibility of their country’s nuclear deterrence posture could sometime vary inversely with enemy views of Israeli nuclear destructiveness. However ironic or counter-intuitive, therefore, enemy perceptions of a too-large or too-destructive Israeli nuclear deterrent force, or of an Israeli force that is not sufficiently invulnerable to first-strike attacks, could sometime undermine this deterrence posture.

Also critical, of course, is that Israel’s current and prospective adversaries will see the Jewish State’s nuclear retaliatory forces as “penetration capable.” This means forces that seem assuredly capable of penetrating any Arab or Iranian aggressor’s active defenses. Naturally, a new state of Palestine would be non-nuclear itself, but it could still present a new “nuclear danger” to Israel by its impact upon the more generally regional “correlation of forces.” Thereby, Palestine could represent an indirect but nonetheless markedly serious nuclear threat to Israel.

There is more to be done. Israel should continue to strengthen its active defenses, but Jerusalem must also do everything possible to improve each critical and interpenetrating component of its nuanced deterrence posture. In this bewilderingly complex process of strategic dissuasion, the Israeli task may also require more incrementally explicit disclosures of nuclear targeting doctrine, and, accordingly, a steadily expanding role for cyber-defense and cyber-war. And even before undertaking such delicately important refinements, Israel will need to more systematically differentiate between adversaries that are presumably rational, irrational, or “mad.”

Overall, the success of Israel’s national deterrence strategies will be contingent upon an informed prior awareness of enemy preferences, and of specific enemy hierarchies of preferences. In this connection, altogether new and open-minded attention will need to be focused on the seeming emergence of “Cold War II” between Russia and the United States. This time around, for example, the relationship between Jerusalem and Moscow could prove helpful rather than adversarial.

For Jerusalem, it may even be reasonable to explore whether this once hostile relationship could turn out to be more strategically gainful for Israel, than its traditionally historic ties to the United States. Credo quia absurdum. At this transitional moment in geostrategic time, when Washington may need to align itself with Tehran and Damascus against Islamic State, virtually anything is possible.

It is essential that Israeli planners approach absolutely all prospective enemy threats as potentially interactive or synergistic. Even more specifically, if a soon-to-be-formalized state of Palestine does not readily find itself in the same ideological orbit as Iran – now a distinctly plausible conclusion, especially in view of steadily accelerating Shiite-Sunni fissions in the Middle East – the net threat to Israel could still become more perilous than the merely additive result of its area enemies. In approaching the near simultaneity of Iranian nuclear weapons and Palestinian statehood, Jerusalem must consciously bear in mind that the adversarial “whole” would be greater than the simple sum of its belligerent “parts.”
————–

Louis René Beres (Ph.D., Princeton, 1971) is Professor of Political Science and International Law at Purdue. He is the author of ten major books, and several hundred journal articles, in the field. Professor Beres’ shorter opinion articles appear in many leading US and Israeli newspapers and magazines, including The Atlantic, US News & World Report, The Jerusalem Post, The Washington Times, and Oxford University Press. In Israel, where his current writings are published by the BESA Center for Strategic Studies, the Institute for Policy and Strategy, and the Institute for National Security Studies, he was Chair of Project Daniel (2003). Dr. Beres’ most recent strategy-centered publications were published in The Harvard National Security Journal (Harvard Law School), The International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, Parameters: Journal of the US Army War College, The Brown Journal of World Affairs, and the Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs.

CLEAR as a bell!

DHS:AMERICA’s “STANDING” ARMY.OBAMA INC.’s FORWARD ARM.WHAT’s THEIR END GAME? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


LET’s be clear from the get go: this site is in constant contact with those whose “boots” are on the ground, be it in the realm of counter terror, or another related sphere. And those who expect this blogger to “give up” contacts, name names, (aside from one or two already cited at this blog, with their permission to do so) well, good luck with that. That’s not the way it works.

THAT being out-of-the-way, the related info at this site, re DHS and other matters, is not speculative, nor wholly from open source. Assuredly, none of it would see the light of day, unless supported by solid backing. Simply put, hardly that stupid.  

AGAIN, it bears repeating: yes, DHS, in its current incarnation, is a danger to America and not its protector! This is a seemingly strange and bold-faced statement, but no less true.

Danger One:

HOW many have noticed that DHS is appearing, again and again, as both an adjunct and trainer for civilian police forces? If not, time to catch up. And this is being done via Fed-laced financial incentives (even as the kitty runs dry), but under the guise of the “war on terror”.

Danger Two:

SO, by training community police forces on par with a regular standing army, well, whose needs does that serve (recall the motto, “to serve and protect”…hmm) other than those who are preparing for martial law? Exactly.

Danger Three:

EXTRAPOLATING further, since DHS appears to be preparing for martial law, then isn’t America becoming closer to a Police State, than not?

Danger Four:

And what more needs to be said, after a former NSA official spills the beans? Not much.

Whitehead: Has the Dept. of Homeland Security become America’s standing army?

“A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty.”—James Madison

“Here [in New Mexico], we are moving more toward a national police force. Homeland Security is involved with a lot of little things around town. Somebody in Washington needs to call a timeout.”—Dan Klein, retired Albuquerque Police Department sergeant

If the United States is a police state, then the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is its national police force, with all the brutality, ineptitude and corruption such a role implies. In fact, although the DHS’ governmental bureaucracy may at times appear to be inept and bungling, it is ruthlessly efficient when it comes to building what the Founders feared most—a standing army on American soil.

The third largest federal agency behind the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense, the DHS—with its 240,000 full-time workers, $61 billion budget and sub-agencies that include the Coast Guard, Customs and Border Protection, Secret Service, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)—has been aptly dubbed a “runaway train.”

In the 12 years since it was established to “prevent terrorist attacks within the United States,” the DHS has grown from a post-9/11 knee-jerk reaction to a leviathan with tentacles in every aspect of American life. With good reason, a bipartisan bill to provide greater oversight and accountability into the DHS’ purchasing process has been making its way through Congress.

A better plan would be to abolish the DHS altogether. In making the case for shutting down the de facto national police agency, analyst Charles Kenny offers the following six reasons: one, the agency lacks leadership; two, terrorism is far less of a threat than it is made out to be; three, the FBI has actually stopped more alleged terrorist attacks than DHS; four, the agency wastes exorbitant amounts of money with little to show for it; five, “An overweight DHS gets a free pass to infringe civil liberties without a shred of economic justification”; and six, the agency is just plain bloated.

To Kenny’s list, I will add the following: The menace of a national police force, a.k.a. a standing army, vested with so much power cannot be overstated, nor can its danger be ignored. Indeed, as the following list shows, just about every nefarious deed, tactic or thuggish policy advanced by the government today can be traced back to the DHS, its police state mindset, and the billions of dollars it distributes to police agencies in the form of grants.

Militarizing police and SWAT teams. The DHS routinely hands out six-figure grants to enable local municipalities to purchase military-style vehicles, as well as a veritable war chest of weaponry, ranging from tactical vests, bomb-disarming robots, assault weapons and combat uniforms. This rise in military equipment purchases funded by the DHS has, according to analysts Andrew Becker and G.W. Schulz, “paralleled an apparent increase in local SWAT teams.” The end result? An explosive growth in the use of SWAT teams for otherwise routine police matters, an increased tendency on the part of police to shoot first and ask questions later, and an overall mindset within police forces that they are at war—and the citizenry are the enemy combatants.

Spying on activists, dissidents and veterans. In 2009, DHS released three infamous reports on Rightwing and Leftwing “Extremism,” and another entitled Operation Vigilant Eagle, outlining a surveillance program targeting veterans. The reports collectively and broadly define extremists as individuals and groups “that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely.” In 2013, it was revealed that DHS, the FBI, state and local law enforcement agencies, and the private sector were working together to conduct nationwide surveillance on protesters’ First Amendment activities.

Stockpiling ammunition. DHS, along with other government agencies, has been stockpiling an alarming amount of ammunition in recent years, which only adds to the discomfort of those already leery of the government. As of 2013, DHS had 260 million rounds of ammo in stock, which averages out to between 1,300 to 1,600 rounds per officer. The US Army, in contrast, has roughly 350 rounds per soldier. DHS has since requisitioned more than 1.6 billion rounds of ammo, “enough,” concludes Forbes magazine, “to sustain a hot war for 20+ years.”

Distributing license plate readers. DHS has already distributed more than $50 million in grants to enable local police agencies to acquire license plate readers, which rely on mobile cameras to photograph and identify cars, match them against a national database, and track their movements. Relying on private contractors to maintain a license plate database allows the DHS and its affiliates to access millions of records without much in the way of oversight.

Contracting to build detention camps. In 2006, DHS awarded a $385 million contract to a Halliburton subsidiary to build detention centers on American soil. Although the government and Halliburton were not forthcoming about where or when these domestic detention centers would be built, they rationalized the need for them in case of “an emergency influx of immigrants, or to support the rapid development of new programs” in the event of other emergencies such as “natural disasters.” Viewed in conjunction with the NDAA provision allowing the military to arrest and indefinitely detain anyone, including American citizens, it would seem the building blocks are already in place for such an eventuality.

Tracking cell-phones with Stingray devices. Distributed to local police agencies as a result of grants from the DHS, these Stingray devices enable police to track individuals’ cell phones—and their owners—without a court warrant or court order. The amount of information conveyed by these devices about one’s activities, whereabouts and interactions is considerable. As one attorney explained: “Because we carry our cellphones with us virtually everywhere we go, stingrays can paint a precise picture of where we are and who we spend time with, including our location in a lover’s house, in a psychologist’s office or at a political protest.”

Carrying out military drills and lockdowns in American cities. Each year, DHS funds military-style training drills in cities across the country. These Urban Shield exercises, elaborately staged with their own set of professionally trained Crisis Actors playing the parts of shooters, bystanders and victims, fool law enforcement officials, students, teachers, bystanders and the media into thinking it’s a real crisis.

Using the TSA as an advance guard. The TSA now searches a variety of government and private databases, including things like car registrations and employment information, in order to track travelers’ before they ever get near an airport. Other information collected includes “tax identification number, past travel itineraries, property records, physical characteristics, and law enforcement or intelligence information.”

Conducting virtual strip searches with full-body scanners. Under the direction of the TSA, American travelers have been subjected to all manner of searches ranging from whole-body scanners and enhanced patdowns at airports to bag searches in train stations. In response to public outrage over what amounted to a virtual strip search, the TSA has begun replacing the scanners with equally costly yet less detailed models. The old scanners will be used by prisons for now.

Carrying out soft target checkpoints. VIPR task forces, comprised of federal air marshals, surface transportation security inspectors, transportation security officers, behavior detection officers and explosive detection canine teams have laid the groundwork for the government’s effort to secure so-called “soft” targets such as malls, stadiums, bridges, etc. Some security experts predict that checkpoints and screening stations will eventually be established at all soft targets, such as department stores, restaurants, and schools. DHS’ Operation Shield, a program which seeks to check up on security protocols around the country with unannounced visits, conducted a surprise security exercise at the Social Security Administration building in Leesburg, Fla., when they subjected people who went to pick up their checks to random ID checks by federal agents armed with semi-automatic weapons.

Directing government workers to spy on Americans. Terrorism Liaison Officers are firefighters, police officers, and even corporate employees who have received training to spy on and report back to government entities on the day-to-day activities of their fellow citizens. These individuals are authorized to report “suspicious activity” which can include such innocuous activities as taking pictures with no apparent aesthetic value, making measurements and drawings, taking notes, conversing in code, espousing radical beliefs, and buying items in bulk.

Conducting widespread spying networks using fusion centers. Data collecting agencies spread throughout the country, aided by the National Security Agency, fusions centers—of which there are at least 78 scattered around the U.S.— constantly monitor our communications, collecting and cataloguing everything from our internet activity and web searches to text messages, phone calls and emails. This data is then fed to government agencies, which are now interconnected: the CIA to the FBI, the FBI to local police. Despite a budget estimated to be somewhere between $289 million and $1.4 billion, these fusion centers have proven to be exercises in incompetence, often producing irrelevant, useless or inappropriate intelligence, while spending millions of dollars on “flat-screen televisions, sport utility vehicles, hidden cameras and other gadgets.”

Carrying out Constitution-free border control searches. On orders from the DHS, the government’s efforts along the border have become little more than an exercise in police state power, ranging from aggressive checkpoints to the widespread use of drone technology, often used against American citizens traveling within the country. Border patrol operations occur within 100 miles of an international crossing, putting some 200 million Americans within the bounds of aggressive border patrol searches and seizures, as well as increasingly expansive drone surveillance. With 71 checkpoints found along the southwest border of the United States alone, suspicionless search and seizures on the border are rampant. Border patrol agents also search the personal electronic devices of people crossing the border without a warrant.

Funding city-wide surveillance cameras. As Charlie Savage reports for the Boston Globe, the DHS has funneled “millions of dollars to local governments nationwide for purchasing high-tech video camera networks, accelerating the rise of a ‘surveillance society’ in which the sense of freedom that stems from being anonymous in public will be lost.” These camera systems, installed on city streets, in parks and transit systems, operating in conjunction with sophisticated computer systems that boast intelligent video analytics, digital biometric identification, military-pedigree software for analyzing and predicting crime and facial recognition software, create a vast surveillance network that can target millions of innocent individuals.

Utilizing drones and other spybots. The DHS has been at the forefront of funding and deploying surveillance robots and drones for land, sea and air, including robots that resemble fish and tunnel-bots that can travel underground. Despite repeated concerns over the danger surveillance drones used domestically pose to Americans’ privacy rights, the DHS has continued to expand its fleet of Predator drones, which come equipped with video cameras, infrared cameras, heat sensors, and radar. DHS also loans its drones out to local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies for a variety of tasks, although the agency refuses to divulge any details as to how, why and in what capacity these drones are being used by police. Incredibly, the DHS has also been handing out millions of dollars in grants to local police agencies to “accelerate the adoption” of drones in their localities.

It’s not difficult to see why the DHS has been described as a “wasteful, growing, fear-mongering beast.” If it is a beast, however, it is a beast that is accelerating our nation’s transformation into a police state through its establishment of a standing army, a.k.a. national police force.

This, too, is nothing new. Historically, as I show in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, the establishment of a national police force has served as a fundamental and final building block for every totalitarian regime that has ever wreaked havoc on humanity, from Hitler’s all-too-real Nazi Germany to George Orwell’s fictional Oceania. Whether fictional or historical, however, the calling cards of these national police agencies remain the same: brutality, inhumanity, corruption, intolerance, rigidity, and bureaucracy—in other words, evil.

DESPITE all of the above, the inherent questions become: what are they up to? what is their end game?

Basically, Americans are witnessing the “practical” application of planned “deconstruction”, on a scale heretofore seen in the free world. Meaning, when the (pre-planned) dollar collapse creates massive civil unrest, a militarized police state has to be up and running! You got that?  


martial-law-in-boston-april-19-2013

BUT not everything meant for America’s demise is executed on its soil. While the planning is (mostly) domestic, the current (purposeful) re-jiggering of the geo-political landscape in the Mid East, designed to usher in the “New World Order” – a plan supported by both Dems and RINOS alike – is taking place across the world.

FOR the historical record, Bush Sr. spoke glowingly of its “eventuality”, in tandem with other high level Americans.

IN essence, this national hit job (and this is what it amounts to) cannot be done without ushering in WW 3; with Russia and its Shia-led proxies fighting against CIA backed Sunni/Al Qaeda-linked/ISS forces. Each side understands that the dollar’s collapse is a “necessary” precursor, for the U.S. to collapse as the world’s superpower.

Down to the trip wire….

DIABOLICAL, but no less true. Undoubtedly, this collapse has been in the works for decades. Barack HUSSEIN Obama, a foreign implant, was brought in to oversee America’s – the dollar’s – demise

UN Hiring Peacekeepers To Disarm American Citizens…yes, they are!

AND….

Embedded image permalink

Obama Inc. ordered its forward arm, DHS, to implement a PLANNED illegal invasion!

BE afraid….very afraid…as…DHS SWAT excessive force raid on innocent couple (see video!)