Allah’s U.S. Terrorists Prepping For ‘Phase 5’ Of ‘The Plan’: The Final Jihadi Battle Is On! ‘Minnesotastan’s’ Template. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

WHENEVER any serious discussion at this site turns toward documenting what lies in wait re Allah’s Muslim Terrorists and Islamic jihad, inevitably, ‘The Plan’ surfaces to the fore. Suffice to state, without internalizing its centrality, it is akin to piloting a plane with blinders on. That deadly and dark. Pitch black.

THEREFORE, for readers who are unfamiliar with its basis, the following – conceived and designed by the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia – will catch everyone up to speed. As is known, there is NO time like the present.

At its core, “The Plan” is a detailed blueprint, one which the leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood adheres to – and augments as necessary – to infiltrate and penetrate the west, but most intrinsically they are targeting America, the “Great Satan”. It is the main linchpin to the west’s fall. “The Plan’s” basic goals are described thusly:

Phase 1: Establishment of an elite Muslim leadership, while raising taqwa, or Islamic consciousness, in the Muslim community.

Phase 2: Creation of Islamic institutions the leadership can control, along with the formation of autonomous Muslim enclaves.

Phase 3: Infiltration and Islamization of America’s political, social, economic and educational systems, forming a shadow state within the state. Escalation of religious conversions to Islam.

(One of the hot spots of conversion to Islam is America’s extensive system of prisons).

Phase 4: Openly hostile public confrontation over US policies, including rioting, and militant demands for special rights and accommodations for Muslims.

Phase 5: Final conflict and overthrow (jihad).

While each phase has many subsections and takes years to implement, the fact of the matter is that their goals have been ongoing for decades. They are rapidly, stealth-fully bearing fruit…..

Image result for pics of islamic caliphate

IN this regard, pay rapt heed. Although their overall mission for Allah is laid out in a detailed global-based ‘7 Phase Plan’, the ‘5 Phase Plan’ (cited above) is American-centric. But most significantly, the end goal is the same – the re-establishment of the Islamic Caliphate! 

WHICH brings us back to ‘Phase 5’, the final conflict and overthrow (jihad), and its intrinsic parallels with the real-time timeline that the jihadi leadership envisioned for 2016 – 2020, as laid out in the opening shot pictorial, ‘7 Phases for the Islamic Caliphate!’  

ASK yourselves: doesn’t it seem as if a peak has been reached (in the lead up to 2016 or thereabouts) in the stepped-up amount of brazen and ferocious jihadi terror from Mohammedans in America and Europe, back-to-back like? Even so, in general, soldiers for Allah have an ingrained ability to adapt, in so far as the long-range goal, the Caliphate…. خِلافة‎‎ Khilāfa….,is their marker. In other words, failure is NOT an option, and they will keep coming back until Allah is satiated. Deadly serious.

AND, for the record, spitting distance doesn’t exist between Allah’s Muslim Terrorists that are spread throughout Minnesotastan, comparative to every state in between – all fifty-wise! But, as is the ‘norm’, there are some who take the lead, and others who follow in close proximity. And this is where ‘Phase 5’ comes into sharp-eyed focus – its activation! 

TO wit, how much clearer and more dangerous can it get, now that Islam’s barbarians have – arsenal-wise – taken the jihad to the final level in America ala ‘Phase 5’, even if, this time, stopped in their tracks by sheer happenstance?

Image result for pics of Abdullah Alrifahe and Majid Alrifahe

A routine police check in Minnesota resulted in the arrest of two Muslim men on charges they were driving around with an arsenal of weapons including bomb-making devices.

Abdullah N. Alrifahe, 27, and Majid N. Alrifahe, 26, both of Minneapolis, were arrested May 11 after police had reason to search their car and found a hand grenade, handgun, several assault rifles and magazines and a large quantity of ammunition, according to the police report. They also found cellphones, drone parts, computers and electronics devices capable of igniting a bomb.

A newly released ISIS video encouraged terrorists in the U.S. to launch new attacks, and the video’s instructions, delivered by an American ISIS operative, included the use of drones and rovers.

“It showcases a range of proprietary weapons that ISIS militant workshops have developed,” Laith Alkhouri, a security analyst with Flashpoint, told NBC News, pointing out rocket-propelled grenade launchers, shoulder-launched surface-to-air missiles, video-equipped guided missiles, a remote-controlled “rover” that can drop explosive devices under military vehicles, and a drone that could potentially drop a bomb on a crowd.

Former Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann said the size of the cache should send off alarm bells for local police, as it signals that an active Islamic terrorist cell could be operating in the city. But the city seems paralyzed by political correctness, she said.

“Of course we have cells in Minnesota, but the Minneapolis police believe the religion of peace doesn’t commit terror acts,” Bachmann said. “The hijab-wearing Minneapolis mayor [Betsy Hodges] and the police department blind and disarm themselves because their Muslim advisers tell them that’s what they should do.”

According to police, both men gave their address as a nearby public housing building. Both have a criminal history. Abdullah has prior convictions for weapons violations. He has also been convicted of receiving stolen property. Both men are listed as having numerous arrests, not only in Minnesota but also in Texas.

“This is more evidence of failure from the discredited CVE program,” Bachmann said.

The CVE or “countering violent extremism” pilot program under President Obama was first tried in Minneapolis, Los Angeles and Boston before being expanded throughout the nation. It focuses on “violent extremism” inspired by a host of causes such as “white supremacism” and “right-wing” ideology while portraying Islam as just one of many possible causes of terrorism.

The CVE program also led to an attempt to rehabilitate Somali Muslim terrorists, which WND recently reported has failed miserably.

Here is how the two men’s cache was found: Police said a man walked by a parked car in north Minneapolis about 5 p.m. last Thursday and confronted the people inside after they threw food wrappers on the ground. They ignored him until he paused to get the car license number. But the men got out of their car and indicated they had guns, according to a May 15 criminal complaint.

“The man flagged down officers, the complaint says, but the men from inside the car continued to yell at him and resisted the officers’ attempts to control the situation,” the Star-Tribune reports. The men insisted they needed to be near the car because a drone was coming to “deliver a package,” according to the complaint. Because of the suspicious circumstances and fear for the man’s safety, the police placed the two men in a squad car while they searched their vehicle.

That’s when the weapons were found.

Bomb-squad personnel called to the scene noted that the large amount of ammunition and electronic devices could be used for bomb-making, the complaint said.

“We are in the middle of an insurgency and in order for it to be stopped, we need a counter-insurgency effort,” said Debra Anderson, head of the Minnesota chapter of ACT for America. “It’s alarming. They are preparing for war. And the first line of defense is going to be our neighborhoods. That’s why I’ve been primarily focused on educating my fellow Minnesotans about the nature of the threat.”

She said sheriffs, legislators and pastors hold the key to defeating the threat, which will be defeated at the local and state level. “Pastors are the hardest nut to crack.”

Alrifahe, 27, was charged with a gross misdemeanor for carrying a handgun in public without a permit and was convicted of the offense in December.

INCONTESTABLY, how many MORE caches are primed to explode, and at a time and place of their choosing? Mind you, they are ABSOLUTELY hidden within mosques, their barracks, and assorted safe houses throughout the country! Indeed, this intel (for just a glimmer, peer within) has been confirmed through multiple counter terror sources, each of whom dutifully apprised the FBI and DHS. Still yet….

AND, did you know, there are certain research labs housed within U.S. college campuses – or affiliates thereof – where radioactive materials have gone ‘missing?’ But despite its dire implications, the same open sesame access exists, beyond the fact that officialdom (within related universities) is aware of this and that, never mind relevant security agencies!! Yes, Mohammedans are still ‘working’ in plain sight within (some of) these ‘it’s yours for the taking’ labs. Imagine that.  

SO, the core question hangs and begs to be answered: since the nation’s domestic security arms were tied into pretzel-like knots under HUSSEIN’s two-term coddling of Allah’s Muslim Terrorists (gifting them eight years of unfettered freedom to prep for battle, among other such mega advantages), how is the domestic jihadi danger faring, now that President Trump is at the helm?

WELL, he too is deaf, dumb and blind (more accurately, HUSSEIN’s holdover staff is running circles around him), at least in terms of any substantive changes vis-à-vis Islamists in America! Read the proofs, and then decide for yourselves.

NOT only that, if more evidence of the same is required from other reliable sources, that’s okay.

Under the Obama administration, the Department of Homeland Security invited the Council on American-Islamic Relations to help develop its counter-terrorism policy, even though the Justice Department had implicated CAIR in a plot to finance the terrorist organization Hamas.

So why is the DHS of President Donald Trump, who vowed during his campaign to eschew political correctness and “name the enemy,” still engaging with CAIR?

Leaders of CAIR’s Florida branch participated in DHS town hall discussions in Miami and Tampa earlier this month, reported the Investigative Project for Terrorism.

A discussion with CAIR at Miami-Dade College featured holdovers from the Obama administration, Veronica Venture, the outgoing DHS acting officer for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties; and Kareem Shora, section chief of the DHS Community Engagement Section, IPT said.

Philip Haney, a former DHS Islam subject-matter expert whose investigations of the radical ties of CAIR and other Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated groups were quashed by his agency under Obama, reacted to the news.

“It’s really distressing to see this continue to happen, when it’s already been irrefutably proven in federal court, almost 10 years ago, that CAIR and its leaders are tied to Hamas,” Haney said, referring to the Holy Land Foundation case in which CAIR was named an unindicted co-conspirator…..

CONSEQUENTIALLY, since 1 + 1 still = 2, doesn’t it rationally compute: since HUSSEIN’s open pathway made it possible (and still does) for the likes of Minnesota’s jihadists, Abdullah N. Alrifahe and Majid N. Alrifahe, to store and prepare their arms for battle, by extrapolation via a similarly correct calculation, how many more are priming for the same under President Trump’s non-closure? 

According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”  When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%).

More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. Only 39% of those polled said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts.

These notions were powerfully rejected by the broader population according to the Center’s earlier national survey.  It found by a margin of 92%-2% that Muslims should be subject to the same courts as other citizens, rather than have their own courts and tribunals here in the U.S.

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

RESULTANT, there are approximately 3.3 million Muslims living in America – and growing! Ipso facto, do the (alarming, but simple) math.

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network} – click on “Archives” icon to read, listed under date of commentary

{re-blogged at Conservative Firing Line}

{re-blogged at RepublicanRise.SwillNews.com}

{re-blogged at USSANews.com}

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED

Obama Inc. Created ISIS F/B/O Brotherhood’s Caliphate: DELIBERATE Knock-On Effects Of Libyan & Syrian Theaters. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 

 

IT is always gratifying to find out that straight shooting and high level security professionals have arrived at the same general conclusions as this Muslim Brotherhood expert and investigative journalist.

INTRINSICALLY, the aforementioned is in reference to the part played by Obama Inc. in “setting the stage” for the rise of ISIS, and its eventual declaration as the Islamic Caliphate. Well, said assessment may have appeared a tad “conspiratorial” in certain quarters, when first expounded at this site. No matter. No longer.

EFFECTIVELY, let’s hark back to particular dots which were previously connected, going as far back as 2013.

LET’S be clear: HUSSEIN Obama’s State Department, in tandem with the CIA, created ISIS. For the stated record, soon after Benghazigate blew up, this investigative journalist analyzed the following knock-on effects throughout several commentaries but summed up its basis in a recent report:

AS the world stares transfixed by the speed in which ISIS captured Ramadi and Palmyra, it must be internalized where the hydra-like monsters spawned from. This knowledge base will explain how they catapulted into top-tier status. Forthwith, let’s begin connecting the dots. It is only by taking the time to do so that we can properly extrapolate what HUSSEIN Obama’s game plan really is.

DOT ONE:

ALAS, it was previously asserted (Oct. 2013), while assessing the illegal war into Libya – with Benghazigate as its outgrowth – that the main objective was a weapons-running operation F/B/O Syrian Sunni jihadists and the empowerment of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. Caliphate-driven. Concomitantly, the Brotherhood is the parent of al-Qaeda and ISIS is its offshoot.

DOT TWO:

MOREOVER, as the region started to melt down after Obama Inc’s. adventure into Libya, requisite players realized that Iraq’s forces were in no position to stand up to ISIS without multiplying its force power. Therefore, what else did they expect the knock-on effects of said quasi-intervention in Iraq would be, other than a complete mowing down by ISIS? Huh and duh…continue reading

SO as repeatedly proven, ISIS is an offshoot of al-Qaeda in Iraq, andal-Qaeda is a product of the Brotherhood Mafia. Simple as that….

RESULTANT, why wouldn’t the very same “benefactors” of ISIS (al-Qaeda/MB alike) train a so-called Islamist “police commander” – plus countless others – rather than deny them elite training on U.S. soil too? Rhetorical.

A fighter with the Islamic State group in a new online video was trained in counterterrorism tactics in the U.S., the State Department confirmed.continue reading….

BUT even as hard as it is to conceive that a malignant POTUS would (and could) subvert the entire national apparatus and interest – and with an impotent and somewhat colluding Congress barely taking him on – the proofs are more than manifest. Indicting. Alas, former head of the DIA – Lieutenant General Michael Flynn – confirmed this site’s thesis, as gleaned from a RECENTLY (emphasis placed) leaked Defense Intelligence Agency document.  

An internal Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document produced recently shows that the U.S. knew that the actions of “the West, Gulf countries and Turkey” in Syria might create a terrorist group like ISIS and an Islamic caliphate.

While the powers-that-be have tried to downplay the significance of the document, the former head of the DIA – Lieutenant General Michael Flynn – just confirmed its importance.

By any measure, Flynn was a top-level American military commander. Flynn served as:

  • The Director of the U.S. Intelligence Agency
  • The Director of intelligence for Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), the main military agency responsible for targeting Al-Qaeda and other Islamic terrorists
  • The Commander of the Joint Functional Component Command for Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance
  • The Chair of the Military Intelligence Board
  • Assistant director of national intelligence

Flynn confirmed the authenticity of the document in a new interview, and said:

[Interviewer] So the administration turned a blind eye to your analysis?

[Flynn] I don’t know that they turned a blind eye, I think it was a decision. I think it was a willful decision.

[Interviewer] A willful decision to support an insurgency that had Salafists, Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood?

[Flynn] It was a willful decision to do what they’re doing.

CFmpcUQUEAEm80u.png-large

alqaeda4

Hasan: In 2012 the U.S. was helping coordinate arms transfers to those same groups [Salafists, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda in Iraq], why did you not stop that if you’re worried about the rise of quote-unquote Islamic extremists?

Flynn: I hate to say it’s not my job…but that…my job was to…was to to ensure that the accuracy of our intelligence that was being presented was as good as it could be.

Forensic evidence, video evidence, as well as recent admissions of high-level officials involved (see former Ambassador to Syria Robert Ford’s admissions here and here), have since proven the State Department and CIA’s material support of ISIS terrorists on the Syrian battlefield going back to at least 2012 and 2013 (for a clear example of “forensic evidence”: see UK-based Conflict Armament Research’s report which traced the origins of Croatian anti-tank rockets recovered from ISIS fighters back to a Saudi/CIA joint program via identifiable serial numbers).

CFjzBroW8AA42Td.jpg-large-e1432512219123

The  DIA report makes the following summary points concerning “ISI” (in 2012 “Islamic State in Iraq,”) and the soon to emerge ISIS:

  • Al-Qaeda drives the opposition in Syria
  • The West identifies with the opposition
  • The establishment of a nascent Islamic State became a reality only with the rise of the Syrian insurgency (there is no mention of U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq as a catalyst for Islamic State’s rise, which is the contention of innumerable politicians and pundits; see section 4.D. below)
  • The establishment of a “Salafist Principality” in Eastern Syria is “exactly” what the external powers  supporting the opposition want (identified as “the West, Gulf Countries, and Turkey”) in order to weaken the Assad government
  • “Safe havens” are suggested in areas conquered by Islamic insurgents along the lines of the Libyan model (which translates to so-called no-fly zones as a first act of ‘humanitarian war’; see 7.B.)
  • Iraq is identified with “Shia expansion” (8.C)
  • A Sunni “Islamic State” could be devastating to “unifying Iraq” and could lead to “the renewing facilitation of terrorist elements from all over the Arab world entering into Iraqi Arena.” (see last non-redacted line in full PDF view.)

img_3546860969587-e1432512449736

MIND you, it is important to note that Turkey’s Erdogan, HUSSEIN Obama’s closest ally in the Mid East – highlighted within the DIA report – had been singled out as a Caliphate/Brotherhood/ISIS beneficiary at these pages as a key player, and more than once. At major interviews alike. Okay.

 

CONCLUSIVELY, it is not as if the U.S. is new to climbing into bed with Islamists. Not at all. In fact, through a grave geo-political miscalculation (let alone lack of understanding as to the ultimate goals of Islam’s warriors, as well as due to the prodding of National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, an inveterate lover of   Arabs/Muslims and the go to guy during this period) the CIA funded and trained the mujahideen, aka Al Qaeda and the Taliban, to rout the Russians from Afghanistan.

ADDITIONALLY, Brzezinski is also an influential  foreign policy adviser to HUSSEIN Obama! The “plot” thickens.

 

 

STRATEGICALLY speaking, the strategy to counter the Russians by training Islamic barbarians was beyond miscalculated. No, this is not a 20/20 hindsight observation, but that which is borne from a deep knowledge base, relative to warriors inspired by the Koran! Not only that, preceding Islamic inspired terror attacks – from the earliest part of the 20th century – displayed what Allah’s soldiers understood as their duty to protect the ummah, regardless of all else. 

HOWEVER, in the main, most – though not all – of America’s top tier were looking out for U.S. interests during the proxy war with Russia. Its blow back hardly requires edification.

NEVERTHELESS, instead of internalizing the lessons learned – as byproducts of aligning, by proxy or otherwise, with Islamic jihadists –HUSSEIN Obama and surrogates aim for an anti-American outcome. Incontrovertibly. 

AS is said, this is where the rubber meets the road. Inherently, the above (plus enumerable proofs scattered throughout this site and elsewhere) demonstrates how ISIS became the mega force it quickly morphed into, thereby, possessing the ability to declare a Caliphate in such short order.

CONSEQUENTIALLY, how much should be accrued to happenstance, bad luck or the like, when a treasure trove of high grade U.S. military hardware was left behind for ISIS (and aligned groups) to inherit? 

screenshot.2

Additional military prizes, courtesy of Obama, included numerous stacks of weapons crates that were full of the latest and greatest small arms and explosives that will undoubtedly be used against America and our allies in the future.

screenshot.1

HMM…”spoils of war” is one way to look at it. More accurately, purposefully gifted booty!! 

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

Shariah BLASPHEMY Laws Demanded By Western Politicians/Lawyers:Appeasement To Tame The Islamic Beasts!Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

WHILE many western elitists, including those who hold governmental positions of power – ugh…slimy politicians…damn them to hell –  are TOTALLY clueless as to the ins and outs of Shariah law, others understand the basic goal of Islamic leaders; submission of all to Allah via an overriding Islamic Caliphate. A tall order, but no less doable.

REGARDLESS, those who profess ignorance are no less culpable of the ensuing outcome, just like their better informed counterparts. In fact, as a matter of legal record, ignorance of the law – ignorantia juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat – is NOT a defense. Those of us who have a background in law, particularly in criminal law, understand what’s what.

THAT being the case, it is this site’s mission to catch millions of its readers up to speed, most compellingly, re the basics of Shariah law.  Inherently, Shariah law is anti-freedom and anti-liberty, defacto, inhumane.

NOT only that, but if addled westerners believe their stranglehold is something they can escape – if not beaten back – think again:

Bit by bit, Western nations are adopting Muslim legal standards on blasphemy and on the treatment of women.

The excuses are manifold. Racism, cultural differences, Islamophobia, relativism… but it all ends the same way, with Western writers, artists and thinkers being censored and Western women being subject to Taliban treatment.

This is how it began.

An Afghan refugee would drive from his home in Tullamarine to nightclubs in Frankston late at night searching for drunk, vulnerable young woman to prey on, a court was told today.

He would pick them up in his white 1988 Honda Civic and rape them.

The victim was sitting on the footpath behind the 21st Century Dance Club when Esmatullah Sharifi approached her and offered to give her a lift to the Bay Hotel.

She accepted but became anxious and confused when they had been driving for an hour and she saw a road sign saying Sorrento.

Sharifi then pulled over into a dark side street and raped her in the front passenger seat.

“She began to scream and cry out for help,” Ms Dalziel said.

“The accused put his left hand over her mouth and his right hand around her neck, restricting her breathing. He said to her, ‘I’ll take you home after it, I’ll give you back your phone as well’.

In the rapist’s defense, his lawyer argued that he wasn’t at all clear about this whole “Women are human beings” thing.

Mr Regan said Esmatullah Sharifi was uneducated, illiterate, inexperienced in forming relationships with women, and was confused about the nature of consent. He is in Australia on a permanent protected visa.

The judge didn’t buy it then, but the usual lefty approach is to just keep appealing until you find a bleeding heart judge who accepts the horrible notion being put forward. And that didn’t take very long.

Granting leave to appeal, Court of Appeal Justice Robert Redlich said: “The sentencing judge rejected any suggestion (Esmatullah Sharifi) didn’t have a clear concept of consent in sexual relations.”

In April last year, a psychologist told the County Court that Sharifi had “an unclear concept of what constitutes consent in sexual relationships” in Australia.

“It proves, in my view, an adequate basis for most grounds of appeal that (Sharifi) wishes to pursue,” the judge said.

We’re not just dealing with ignorance of the law. We have Western judges setting out the notion that if a Muslim settler in Europe, America or Australia does not understand the concept that women can refuse sexual contact, that this is a mitigating circumstance….

INCONTROVERTIBLY, their overt barbarism (via ALL of Shariah law’s other offenses) renders Islam, its laws, in violation of western laws and norms, even as western judges/politicians are cowed into accepting Shariah law as the “law of the land”! Dangerous as that.

Islam teaches that shari’a, as God’s revealed law, perfect and eternal, is binding on individuals, society and state in all its details. By logical extension, any criticism of shari’a is heresy. Muslims who deny the validity of shari’a in any way are labeled as non-Muslims (infidels) or apostates (those who convert to another religion) by traditionalists and Islamists. As such, they face the threat of being prosecuted for apostasy, a crime that carries the death penalty in shari’a.

The mandates of shari’a are extremely harsh compared to modern Western standards. They infringe on many modern principles of human rights, religious freedom, and equality of all before the law. For example:

Hudud punishments are the severe penalties prescribed by shari’a for offenses defined as being against God himself. The punishments for these crimes are seen as divinely ordained and cannot be changed by humans. These include 100 lashes or stoning to death as punishment for adultery; 80 lashes for false accusation of adultery; amputation of limbs for theft; 40 or 80 lashes for drinking alcohol; imprisonment, amputation or death (by crucifixion in serious cases) for highway robbery; and the death penalty for apostasy from Islam. Methods of execution for apostasy can include decapitation, crucifixion, burning, strangling, drowning, impaling, and flaying. Apostates are denied a decent burial after their deaths, and the Muslims who participate in killing them are promised an eternal reward in paradise.

Discrimination on the basis of religion is fundamental to shari’a. By religious edict, Islam must be dominant; only Muslims are considered to be full citizens. Jews and Christians are defined as dhimmis (literally “protected” i.e. permitted to live). However this protection is on condition that they do not bear arms, know their lowly place in society, treat Muslims with respect, and pay a special poll tax (jizya).

Shari‘a divides the world into two opposing domains: the House of Islam (Dar al-Islam) and the House of War (Dar al-Harb). Muslims are supposed to wage jihad to change the House of War (where non-Muslims are dominant) into the House of Islam, dominated by Muslims. While some modern Muslims reject this aggressive understanding of jihad, and see it merely as a strengthening of personal faith, most agree that jihad includes defending Muslim territory and Muslims from any form of aggression; this leaves the door open to interpreting any conflict involving Muslims as a case of defensive jihad. Islamic terror groups justify their atrocities by references to the shari’a rules on jihad.

Shari’a discriminates on the basis of gender. Men are regarded as superior. Women are treated as deficient in intelligence, morals and religion, and must therefore be protected from their own weaknesses. Shari’a rules enforce modesty in dress and behavior and the segregation of the sexes. These regulations place women under the legal guardianship of their male relatives. Women are inherently of less value than men in many legal rulings. A man is allowed up to four wives, but women can have only one husband. A man can divorce his wife easily; a woman faces great obstacles should she want a divorce from her husband. A daughter inherits half as much as a son, and the testimony of a female witness in court is worth only half that of a male witness. In cases of murder, the compensation for a woman is less than that given for a man.

Shari’a courts often display a clear gender bias. This is seen in the widespread practice of accusing rape victims of illicit sexual relations (zina), an offense which carries punishments ranging from imprisonment and flogging to death by stoning.

Female genital mutilation is widespread among some Muslim communities, especially in Egypt, East Africa, Yemen, and Indonesia. Many Muslim leaders see the practice as essential for preserving women’s chastity on which family honor largely depends.

In shari’a there are differences between the various schools of law as to the extent of what a woman may reveal in public. The Hanafi and Maliki schools of law permit face and hands to be revealed in public, thus there is no need for a veil over the face. Among Hanbalis there are two opinions, some permitting the revealing of face and hands, others forbidding it. The Shafi‘is demand that a woman’s face and hands be covered in public, thus demanding some kind of veil over her face.

Both Qur’an and hadith urge modesty in women’s dress and command them to cover themselves in public. The problem is a matter of interpretation of the original Arabic words used.

Most Sunni Muslims believe shari‘a to be completely unchangeable, althoughShi’as allow for the possibility of interpreting and adapting it to new circumstances. Since the nineteenth century, there have been efforts at reforming shari’a in a liberal direction in order to accommodate it to the modern world, but in the contemporary Muslim world, the traditionalists and especially the Islamists — upholders of the traditional view of shari’a — are now dominating public opinion.

Of particular concern for Americans are cases where Muslim litigants seek — sometimes successfully — to have their cases in U.S. courts decided by principles of Sharia law. As of May 2011, the Center for Security Policy (CSP) had identified 50 examples in 23 states “where Muslim-Americans had their cases decided by Sharia Law against their will.” In one case, a Trial Court judge had ruled based on Moroccan Sharia law, even though those involved were not Moroccans or even Muslims. In Tampa, Florida, a judge had ruled that a dispute between two Muslim parties would be solved in accordance with Sharia, overruling the objections of one party. And in a notorious New Jersey case, a judge had exonerated a Muslim man of raping his wife because Sharia allowed him to do so. (The ruling was later overturned.) The 50 instances cited by CSP represented just a fraction of the total number of such cases.

IN line with the above barbaric implementation of Shariah, the aforementioned any criticism of shari’a is heresyis especially noteworthy. It aligns with today’s thesis: the implementation of blasphemy laws across the west! An omerta.

At his White House press conference Friday, President Obama once again endorsed the placement of a triumphalist mosque in immediate proximity to Ground Zero, declaring it the “inalienable right” of the increasingly transparently immoderate imam determined to build it there. Troubling as this evidence is of Mr. Obama’s submission to shariah – the supremacist political-military-legal code of places like Saudi Arabia and Iran that Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf says he wants to bring to America, even more worrisome is something else he at least implied: He was prepared as “Commander-in-Chief” to prevent the burning of Qurans by a pastor in Florida.

Now, I am no fan of book-burning, of any kind. But, as I noted in this space recently, it is absolutely the “inalienable” right of any American citizen to do it – whether the book is the Bible (which we now know the U.S. military has burned in Afghanistan, lest it be used to proselytize there), the U.S. Constitution or, yes, the Quran.

The President evidently feels justified in contemplating the use of force to stop Quran burnings on the basis of the possibility raised by General David Petraeus, among others, that such a bonfire in Gainesville would translate into a conflagration elsewhere. All of us must be concerned at the prospect that the latter might consume U.S. servicemen and women or civilians, in Muslim lands or elsewhere.

Still, as such brilliant commentators as Andy McCarthy, Diana West, and Debra Burlingame have observed, there is something peculiar about the remarkably contrasting concern being expressed by Barack Obama and his friends over Muslims’ rights and sensitivities on the one hand, and his seeming indifference to those of Americans who are not Muslims. The only common denominator between his attitude toward a mega mosque that offends more than 70% of our countrymen and women and his attitude toward the prospect of an “insensitive” book-burning is that he wants to ensure nothing is done that would offend Muslims.

This practice amounts to enforcing shariah’s strict laws prohibiting “blasphemy” and “slander.” In Saudi Arabia and the other states governed by this repressive code, the penalty for such a crime can be death…..

WITHOUT reservation, this investigative journalist warned the readers: Obama Inc., via Eric Holder’s (in)Justice Dept. (in concert with his replacement), has already laid the groundwork for implementing blasphemy laws, even if called otherwise. A pig is still a pig, even if prettified with lipstick. Sheesh. Believe it, or not.

CONCOMITANTLY, as previously explained, Shariah law’s bias against women goes far beyond what western women consider discriminatory, particularly as they continuously opine over fair and equitable pay in the workplace etc, even if their creds are not up to snuff. Regardless, as part of Shariah law, one would think that ACTUAL enslavement of women would be a non-starter for them! Okey dokey. Not so fast.

INCREDIBLY, leftist women are as insane as their male counterparts, at least when it comes to silencing any criticism of “sacred cows”, Islam being one of them. Resultant, they believe they can pick and choose which Shariah laws they will “tolerate”, as if they will have a choice to do so. Dumb asses. Once Islamic law becomes the “law of the land” there will be no going back. Understood?

BUT that doesn’t mean that the rest of us will be dragged into their warped mindset, even if they babble that “peace” will be achieved, contingent upon westerners zipping their lips re Islam. Hell no. 

NOW Islamic countries are free (that’s an oxymoronic statement) to do what they wish within their boundaries and there isn’t a damn thing that westerners can do about it. But outraged folks can shout about Islam’s inhumane actions from the rooftops, and they can badger their reps to cease sending monies to anti-freedom offending countries. 

CONSEQUENTIALLY, if one wants to visualize what handing over control to Shariah law jihadists entails, as dictated by appeasement-oriented westerners, well….

Zuhair Hindi is a teacher at the UNRWA Jabalya Prep School for Boys.

He is also a terror supporter.

His profile picture on Facebook is of Qassam Brigades terrorist Hassan Mohammed al-Hindi, who might be a brother of his or perhaps another relative, who was killed when trying to attack Israel from the sea early in the summer war.

But even before the war he showed how much he loved terrorism – and Hamas’ Al Qassam Brigades:

In this cartoon on his page we get an impression of how well he adheres to supposed UNRWA standards of tolerance, peace and coexistence:

How about his opinion of the children that he teaches?

Here is a photo that reveals his view of children:

His caption is “The next generation of the elite.”

Is that enough to get him fired? Come on, who are we kidding?

For those who are not offended by any of this, you have my sympathies. But maybe you are the type of person for whom this photo, that he also posted, is considered worse than incitement to murder…..

AMERICANS may want to cogitate over this: MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA COMPLETES ‘PHASE 3′ FROM ‘THE PLAN’, INFILTRATES AMERICA’S FAMILY COURT SYSTEM. 2 MORE ‘PHASES’ TO GO!

SICK, twisted bastards….the jihadists and their enabling western appeasers! Lights out for the west, if not beaten back!