Whenever one sacrifices core values and ideals – “going along to get along”- an opening is widened for mischief makers who lie-in-wait.
There is a world of difference between sticking to principled values, and just being obdurate, regarding minute matters which hardly matter in the scheme of things. Intelligent and reasonable people know the difference. One hardly needs to be a rocket scientist to realize this distinction.
Thus, people who are sincerely steeped in Conservative ideals and politics will hardly be surprised at the report depicted below. However, people who pretend to be of similar persuasion, but only as long as it suits them, will be “oh so shocked”.
Moreover, the term RINO – Republicans In Name Only – is not for nothing. It depicts leaders ( but can also apply to regular folks ) who choose to stay within Republican Party politics, but are only conservative on paper.
It is under the stewardship of squishy Republican leaders that a host of Islamic foxes entered the governmental hen house. By no stretch is it honest to claim that Democrats are the only ones at fault for Islamic infiltration/penetration.
Not by a long shot, but they are absolutely the main ringleaders. (aside from Grover Norquist-the biggest Islamic fox in the Repub power-broker house) Their helpmates – RINOS’s.
Take a gander at the following Orwellian text from their party platform, courtesy of –
‘The Republican Platform and “the Arab Spring”
“There was another odd statement in the foreign policy section of the Republican platform:
We recognize the historic nature of the events of the last two years–the Arab Spring–that have unleashed democratic movements leading to the overthrow of dictators who have been menaces to global security for decades.
“What stands out here is how closely “the Arab Spring” is identified with the overthrow of “menaces to global security.” Ben Ali and Mubarak were oppressive and brutal authoritarian rulers, but “menaces” to global security are what they clearly were not. As far as the U.S. was concerned, they were quite the opposite. Gaddafi had been such a menace at one time, but he had ceased to be one many years ago. That didn’t stop the U.S. from helping to orchestrate his downfall, but that had nothing to do with eliminating a “menace” to global security. Indeed, overthrowing Gaddafi has led to the creation of other menaces to international security in Africa, but that certainly isn’t going to be mentioned. Syria is the one case where this description might apply, yet Assad is the only one of these four still in power.”
“So the statement isn’t very accurate, and it conveys a very confused understanding of what has been happening in the last twenty months. More important, it reflects the remarkable unwillingness among Republican democratists to acknowledge that popular uprisings can and do contribute to instability and insecurity. It suggests that the GOP’s leadership is still inclined to view events in the Near East and North Africa through a very distorted ideological lens.”
This blogger is not a leader of any party – unless one considers the matriarch of (a segment of) the Kutnicki clan akin to a party head! – but their confused interpretation of foreign affairs is stunning, and deadly inaccurate.
Deconstructing the above idiocy is “elementary, my dear Watson”.
Consider the following breadcrumbs as your clues, but leaders should hardly need a blogger’s assistance – and from one living half way across the world!
Clue number 1 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/21/repeat-until-the-cows-come-home-there-is-no-moderate-islam-period-addendum-to-what-the-west-in-general-and-its-leaders-in-particular-know-about-islam-can-fill-less-than-a-thimble-m/,
Clue Number 2 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/18/what-the-west-in-general-and-its-leaders-in-particular-know-about-islam-can-fill-less-than-a-thimble-morsis-muslim-mafia-crucifies-christians-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/,
Clue Number 4 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/14/fungible-definition-of-who-is-a-terrorist-invariably-leads-to-support-of-islamists-in-syria-sudan-elsewhere-when-politicsideology-trumps-morality-embedded-policy-paper-commentary-by/,
Clue Number 5 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/13/coming-full-circle-the-planned-empowerment-of-the-muslim-mafia-aka-brotherhood-via-egypt-most-populous-arab-country-under-the-guidance-of-barack-hussein-obama-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/,
Clue Number 10 – the biggie… containing the most intrinsic policy paper to date, as it delineates/expounds upon the underpinnings of Islam, thus defining its clash with the west – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/13/islam-blood-a-groundbreaking-policy-paper-contained-herein-the-world-stands-on-a-precipice-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-109/.
Bearing the above in mind, the latest revelations by Walid Shoebat ( a repentant, ex Muslim Brotherhood terrorist ) only adds to the already dangerous, feckless pronouncement cited above, via the Republican’s party platform.
‘Infiltrated: Republican Party and Fox News’
Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack
“As we demonstrated with The Abedin “Affairs” with Al Saud, there is a movement afoot in the West that seeks to transform Muslim minority lands into Muslim majority lands. And while the Right points fingers at the left on an array of issues, we need to seriously examine this movement’s spigot—Saudi Arabia and the Royal family.”
“Prince Alwaleed bin Talal is a member of that family. He acquired 5.46% of Fox News Channel’s parent Company – Newscorp. – in 2005. He is also its second largest shareholder. It was Fox News that provided a platform for perhaps the most stinging rebuke of Rep. Michele Bachmann’s questions about Muslim Brotherhood infiltration in general, and Huma Abedin’s background in particular. Edward Rollins – Bachmann’s former campaign chief – denounced Bachmann with a piece entitled, “Shame on you, Michele” while Fox provided no counter-balance to speak of.”
“The Fox News website also reported the rebukes of Bachmann by John McCain and Republican House Speaker John Boehner, yet Bachmann’s position was all but ignored.”
“So much for “Fair and Balanced”.
“Alwaleed has purchased significant influence at major U.S. Universities and has contributed to CAIR. How does this all work? Well, it was explained by Al-Walid himself. In an article that appeared on Accuracy in Media’s website,Diana West quoted from an interview the Saudi Prince granted to Arab News:
“Arab countries can influence U.S. decision-making ‘if they unite through economic interests, not political,’ (Alwaleed) stressed. ‘We have to be logical and understand that the U.S. administration is subject to U.S. public opinion. We (Arabs) are not so active in this sphere (public opinion). And to bring the decision-maker on your side, you not only have to be active inside the U.S. Congress or the administration but also inside U.S. society.’”
“Even the very liberal, Soros-backed Think Progress, reported on bin Talal’s influence over the Fox News Channel. In 2005, during riots in France (and two months after bin Talal acquired 5.46% of Newscorp.), the banner being run on Fox said, “Muslim riots.” Think Progress quoted bin Talal as saying the following:
“I picked up the phone and called Murdoch… (and told him) these are not Muslim riots, these are riots out of poverty. Within 30 minutes, the title was changed from Muslim riots to civil riots.”
“In 2001, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly interviewed Sami al-Arian and aggressively pursued al-Arian when the latter seemed to implicate himself as being involved in terror fundraising. Al-Arian was eventually convicted and O’Reilly’s efforts played a key role. It would be O’Reilly’s high water mark on such matters.”
“In an exchange with bin Talal in 2011, Fox News host Neil Cavuto made the pecking order quite obvious when he referred to the Saudi Prince as “Your Highness”.
“Then, in May of 2012, conservative host Sean Hannity welcomed none other than Ground Zero mosque imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf to his program to…promote his book. To his credit, Hannity was not as deferential as Cavuto was with bin Talal but he did provide Rauf with the platform to market his book.”
“The Democratic Party is lost and it has gladly welcomed Islamists so why are there Islamists with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood registering with the Republican Party? Part of the answer is that the Republican establishment is allowing them in. It is the Tea Party, which predominantly understands the Islamic threat that rejects Brotherhood elements.”
Let us look at some examples.
“CAIR’s Executive Director for South Florida is a man named Nezar Hamze. As such, Hamze is furthering the cause of CAIR’s leadership. The group’s national Executive Director and co-founder is Nihad Awad, a man who has expressed support for Hamas; he denounced the convictions of Islamic fundamentalists found guilty of the 1993 WTC bombing and did so while expressing a belief that the Mossad was behind that bombing. Prior to that Awad was the Public Relations Director for a Hamas front group. Incidentally, Hamas seeks the elimination of Israel.”
“Another CAIR co-founder – Omar Ahmad – was actually quoted by the San Ramon Valley Herald on July 4, 1998 as saying something that should be considered antithetical to both political Parties in the United States:
“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran…should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”
“If Hamze will not denounce the views of his group’s leadership, he has no place in the Republican Party. Yet, Republican Party leadership will not denounce him.”
MOIN “MOON” KHAN
“When Rep. Joe Walsh (R-IL) made comments critical of CAIR and would not apologize, Moon Khan – a Muslim Republican who is a precinct committeeman and York Township board of trustees’ member – invited Walsh to his home for some ‘dialogue’ with some other members of the Muslim community. Walsh ultimately visited Khan’s home and addressed more than 80 Muslims but did not apologize, though not for lack of trying on Khan’s part.”
“Walsh’s initial comments were critical of CAIR, a group sympathetic to both Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. As a Republican, why wouldn’t Khan stand with Walsh? Instead, he painted Walsh as defensive and unyielding, as someone unwilling to apologize for his comments. Khan once served as a chairman of Brotherhood front, ISNA’s 1997 National Convention’s Media Relations Committee.”
“The son of Mahboob Khan, Suhail Khan, was born to a man who co-founded two Muslim Brotherhood groups in the United States – the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Muslim Students Association (MSA). Despite this undeniable truth, while at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in 2011, Suhail said on camera that, “there is no Muslim Brotherhood in the United States.” With that one sentence, Khan denied his father’s work and obviously did so because he didn’t want the truth about it revealed.”
“Besides founding two Muslim Brotherhood groups, Mahboob Khan was an anti-Semite who agreed with the primary goal of the Muslim Brotherhood in America – overthrow the United States from within. The elder Khan never hid his true colors. In fact, as Paul Sperry wrote in Front Page Magazine, his son Suhail pledged to carry on his “dear father’s shining legacy”. Conversely, at CPAC, Suhail denied his father’s work. Yet, of all the people the Republican Party goes out of its way to distance itself from, Suhail Khan gets a pass.”
“Then we have Grover Norquist who is perhaps the most prominent Republican to avoid accountability for his Islamist ties. Norquist is founder of Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), a conservative group formed at the behest of Ronald Reagan in 1985. Then, something happened circa 1998. Norquist began to be influenced by two men who would later be convicted on charges related to terrorism – Abdurahman Alamoudi and Sami Al-Arian. According to Center for Security Policy’s Frank Gaffney, Alamoudi’s deputy – Khaled Saffuri – co-founded an organization called the Islamic Free Market Institute (IFMI), with Norquist. In 2005, Gaffney reported that he made it known to Norquist that the ATR founder was consorting with Muslim leaders who had unseemly ties. Gaffney wrote at the time:”
The idea that Norquist was unaware that he was aiding and abetting Islamists became untenable after I, among others, made known to him that his outreach effort was reaching out not to peaceable, tolerant, pro-American Muslims… but to those who are none of the above – i.e., adherents to an Islamofascist ideology and/or their sympathizers, financiers and apologists.
“Less than two months after the 9/11 attacks, in a an article published by theNew Republic, writer Franklin Foer wrote about how Saffuri, Norquist’s co-founder at the Islamic Free Market Institute, began ushering Islamic leaders into the White House shortly after George W. Bush’s inauguration nearly one year earlier with the help of none other than Suhail Khan, an administration advisor at the time whose job was to help with Muslim outreach.”
“Moreover, as recently as 2009, Khan was listed as a Board member of both Norquist’s IFMI as well as CPAC’s American Conservative Union (ACU).”
“In 2011, when much of the backgrounds of Khan and Norquist were available for public consumption, it was reported that Gaffney was the one who had been banned from CPAC while Khan and Norquist proudly attended.”
“The Republican Party’s silence over such an egregious, two-pronged affront was not just deafening; it was a damning indictment of itself.”
“Dutch Parliamentarian Geert Wilders launched his anti-Islam Party known as the Freedom Party (PVV) and has seen tremendous success. Formerly a member of the right wing, yet liberal VVD Party, Wilders broke away because VVD supported welcoming Turkey into the European Union (EU). With the passage of time, Wilders is vindicated on a near daily basis in that regard.”
“American politicians can learn much from Wilders’ path. VVD’s support for Turkey’s ascension to the EU is indicative of Islamic influence on the Party. When Wilders formed the PVV Party, he eliminated that possibility by identifying his Party as being “anti-Islam”. In 2010, The Week reported that Wilders would be launching his Party in both the USA and the UK.”
“As long as agents of the Muslim Brotherhood are able to successfully portray anyone who opposes them as racist, Islamophobic, or intolerant, Brotherhood apparatchiks will continue to make strides in much the same way that Nezar Hamze, Moon Khan, Suhail Khan, Grover Norquist, and Alwaleed bin Talal have made strides.”
“Conservatives will one day be faced with a decision. When that day comes, they will have to decide if the Republican Party can be sufficiently held accountable for identifying groups and individuals sympathetic to the Muslim Brotherhood. If it cannot, the birth of an anti-Islam, Tea Party will be in order.”
“Many of those who call us racist are anti-Semites, which makes them racist projectionists.”
Walid Shoebat is a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood and author of For God or For Tyranny –http://www.shoebat.com/2012/08/27/infiltrated-republican-party-and-fox-news/.
Another Republican betrayal via ‘Profiling Huma Abedin’s Defenders’ –
“Here is a list of prominent Republicans (click their names for details) who have sided with those above by either siding with Huma Abedin or denouncing Michele Bachmann for raising questions. Unless and until they renounce their current positions, they risk disgracing their very names and legacies:
Senator John McCain (AZ)
Senator Scott Brown (MA)
Senator Marco Rubio (FL)
Speaker John Boehner (OH)
Rep. James Sensenbrenner (WI)
Rep. Mike Simpson (ID)
Rep. Richard Hanna (NY)
Ed Rollins (Bachmann’s former campaign chief)
November’s election, by all accounts, is fateful. Therefore, it is essential that scores are settled after the election.
As treacherous as the above RINO’s are, it is imperative that the Islamist-in-Chief is defeated.
First things first.
Nevertheless, true Conservatives should make it their business to target the above culprits for ouster, when their seats are up for re-election.
Placing Conservative values as core party issues must be a rallying cry.
Tea Party…clean house…and rock on!