WHEN global leaders purposefully ignite certain fires – domestic or foreign – they do so with the full expectation that some of the blow back will be unanticipated. On the other hand, their main goals are usually met – even if not to an exactitude – due to the massive resources at their disposal. Geo-political chess games are more of an “art”, as opposed to a science. Understood.

SO as westerners stare agape at the bloody catapult of ISIS (and their aligned surrogates), don’t bother scratching your noggins to wonder: how the hell did this happen? Instead, ask the polar opposite side of the geo-political equation: how could it not?

Islamic State has set its sights on taking over Libya as a bridgehead to eventually waging war all across southern Europe, the British Telegraph is reporting on Wednesday.

The newspaper cited letters written by ISIS supporters.

According to the report, ISIS jihadists plan to “flood Libya with militiamen from Syria and Iraq, who will then sail across the Mediterranean posing as migrants on people-trafficking vessels.”

ISIS “would then run amok in southern European cities and also try to attack maritime shipping,” the Telegraph reported.

Earlier this week, Egypt conducted air strikes on ISIS targets in Libya as retaliation for the beheading of 21 Egyptian Copts taken captive.

Libya is a mere 300 miles from the tip of southern Italy. The instability in the North African country has European officials concerned that the tumult could spill over into the Continent.

Italian security chiefs on Tuesday approved a plan to put 4,800 soldiers on the streets throughout the country to help guard against potential militant attacks, the Interior Ministry said.

A statement after a meeting of military and security officials said they would guard sensitive sites and targets until at least June.

Italian media said about 500 would be deployed in Rome, where army troops already help guard diplomatic missions and residences, the capital’s synagogue and Jewish schools. 

 

IN a very tangible realm, ISIS’s plan to invade southern Europe (which will lead to an entire wave of ISIS and other aligned militia throughout Europe, flooding its borders under the cover of “fleeing migrants”) is precisely one of HUSSEIN Obama’s tactical thrusts (via “amnesty” and illegal immigrants) to undermine America and lend entry to Islamic jihadists! 

AS a matter of record, several alarms were heard to this same effect, at these pages:

ALARM ONE:

BACK in July 2013, under the DHS (mis)reign of “Mama Janet”, it was reported: DHS “lost” over 226 illegals who were deemed national security threats! Wow…a blind person could have a done a better job of guarding the homeland, but why quibble.

ALARM TWO:

IT gets worse. Additionally, five months later, guess what other method of mischief HUSSEIN Obama’s DHS got caught perpetrating? Well, they ferried illegals across the borders and they made no excuses for their illegal actions! Imagine. 

ALARM THREE:

SO, if you thought this was the end of their reign of terror – their open sesame for Islamists – think again: the Islamist-in-Chief’s henchwoman, Valerie Jarrett, coordinated the dumping!

ALARM FOUR:

REGARDING all of the above alarm bells, what’s their end goal? Simply put, Obama Inc’s Brotherhood Mafia are utilizing stealth jihad via a demographic implosion, plus other related tactics! 

(A chief MB honcho within Obama Inc.’s DHS, although now “shifted” to another posting)

IN this regard, ISIS is now on track to hold the maritime gateway to Europe hostage, similar to the Islamic Barbary pirates…aka Ottoman corsairs…from the 16th to 19th centuries. Yes, an effective Islamist weapon of yesteryear is now on tap through ISIS (and related) pirates, a lesson the Jihadi-in-Chief is on board with to maximum effect!! 

NEVER mind the (historical) fact that the U.S. Marine Corps. and the Navy were birthed due to the Barbary Wars. History be damned.

After the United States won its independence in the treaty of 1783, it had to protect its own commerce against dangers such as the Barbary pirates. As early as 1784 Congress followed the tradition of the European shipping powers and appropriated $80,000 as tribute to the Barbary states, directing its ministers in Europe, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, to begin negotiations with them. Trouble began the next year, in July 1785, when Algerians captured two American ships and the dey of Algiers held their crews of twenty-one people for a ransom of nearly $60,000.

Thomas Jefferson, United States minister to France, opposed the payment of tribute, as he later testified in words that have a particular resonance today. In his autobiography Jefferson wrote that in 1785 and 1786 he unsuccessfully “endeavored to form an association of the powers subject to habitual depredation from them. I accordingly prepared, and proposed to their ministers at Paris, for consultation with their governments, articles of a special confederation.” Jefferson argued that “The object of the convention shall be to compel the piratical States to perpetual peace.” Jefferson prepared a detailed plan for the interested states. “Portugal, Naples, the two Sicilies, Venice, Malta, Denmark and Sweden were favorably disposed to such an association,” Jefferson remembered, but there were “apprehensions” that England and France would follow their own paths, “and so it fell through.”

Paying the ransom would only lead to further demands, Jefferson argued in letters to future presidents John Adams, then America’s minister to Great Britain, and James Monroe, then a member of Congress. As Jefferson wrote to Adams in a July 11, 1786, letter, “I acknolege [sic] I very early thought it would be best to effect a peace thro’ the medium of war.” Paying tribute will merely invite more demands, and even if a coalition proves workable, the only solution is a strong navy that can reach the pirates, Jefferson argued in an August 18, 1786, letter to James Monroe: “The states must see the rod; perhaps it must be felt by some one of them. . . . Every national citizen must wish to see an effective instrument of coercion, and should fear to see it on any other element than the water. A naval force can never endanger our liberties, nor occasion bloodshed; a land force would do both.” “From what I learn from the temper of my countrymen and their tenaciousness of their money,” Jefferson added in a December 26, 1786, letter to the president of Yale College, Ezra Stiles, “it will be more easy to raise ships and men to fight these pirates into reason, than money to bribe them.”
SUFFICE to state: Obama Inc. and ISIS (a progenitor of the Muslim Brotherhood) are joined-at-the-hip! EVERY step HUSSEIN Obama takes is designed to weaken America, both domestically and foreign-wise. 

TO wit, the most incendiary region to precipitate worldwide fires is the hotter than hot Middle East.

ALAS, if you follow the Arsonist-in-Chief’s Islamist-empowering timeline, one can then gauge how ISIS is poised to gain a major foothold into Europe (other western nations too), as well as inside America.

TIMELINE ONE:

IN June 2009, only 5 months into his first term – via his speech at Cairo University – he set his sights on affirming the Muslim Brotherhood’s prominence. Front and center.

TIMELINE TWO:

CLOCK work!

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}