The Relationship Between Muhammad, Islam, And Barack Obama: Tri-Linkage To The G-d Of Israel. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 “You will surely find the most intense of the people in animosity toward the believers to be the Jews…” — Qur’an 5:82

WHENEVER intellectual heft is required at this site, a handful are considered “worthy” to do the heavy-lifting. This is no small feat, nor an exaggerated statement. Even more so, out of this select circle, the “few and far between” are considered experts in their niche field, but fewer are qualified, as such, in multiple spheres of scholarship.

AS always, the “gift that keeps giving” is Professor Paul Eidelberg. He is not only an esteemed political scientist, but a quintessential Renaissance Man. Not for nothing.

  Muhammad, Islam, and Barak Obama

 Prof. Paul Eidelberg

 

Mohammad is the role-model of Muslims, hence of Barak Obama, who proudly calls himself a Muslim. How curious, since Muhammad was a warlord, whereas Obama coos like a dove. Let’s probe a little deeper.

As everyone knows, Muhammad is introduced in the Qur’an as the prophet of Allah.  Since Allah is the God of all Muslims, Obama is not an “infidel,” like Benjamin Netanyahu. As a Muslim, Obama despises infidels as “dogs” and “pigs,” as does the Qur’an. Whatever one may say of Obama, his belief that Allah is God means he is not an atheist.

In, The Science of God, physicist Gerald Schroeder writes:  The god an atheist does not believe in is usually not the God of the Bible.” This may also be said of the god of a believer like Barack Obama, whose god, most emphatically, is not the God of the Bible. Indeed, it is the profoundest error to identify Allah with the God of the Bible, i.e., the Tetragrammaton, YHVHThe Zohar puts it, “the Name YHVH belongs only to Israel.

Perhaps this fact underlies Obama’s animosity toward Israel, whose name is derived from the God of the Bible. One may therefore say Obama is an enemy of the God of Israel. Indeed, this is precisely the deeper but seldom said meaning of “anti-Semitism,” of which scholars have written ad nauseam. While they classify Jews as “Semites,” the Bible calls Jews the “Chosen People” who cannot be included under any general category without obscuring their uniqueness. Let me explain in a somewhat novel way.

It’s common knowledge that the people of the Bible are forebears of the Jews of the Talmud. It’s also well known that the Talmud is unique, sui generis. The Talmud is pretty much the subject matter of Maimonides’ monumental Mishneh Torah, a 14-volume codification of Jewish law. The scope of knowledge embodied in the Talmud extends from hygiene to cosmology. It’s of encyclopedic dimensions.

Therefore, to call Jews “Semites” trivializes them. It also obscures what anti-Semitism really signifies, but is almost never even whispered, namely, a denial of ethical and intellectual monotheism. This is the big picture obscured by countess scholars that dabble in the Lilliputian concept of “anti-Semitism.”

It may somewhat clarify the subject by saying a word about Islam’s malediction “Death to Israel.”  This curse means the “death to the Jews.” But “death to the Jews” means death to the most persistent and more profound exponents of monotheism. But this touches only the surface of Islam’s malediction.

That malediction heralds the global ascendancy of Islam and a new and endless Dark Age. Islam would extinguish the light that would illuminate and liberate mankind by an unprecedented revolution approach as if on cat’s paws: the discovery of a convergence of the laws of nature, becoming more and more a matter of common knowledge to mankind, and what is hardly known at all to mankind, the laws of morality long known in the Torah of the Jews! It is no accident that Jews, as even gentiles admit, are the preceptors of the laws of morality, as well as the paragons of scientific knowledge.

This binary knowledge of the laws of nature and the laws of morality is an obvious derivative of Hebraic monotheism. We thus stand at the brink of a new and glorious age. As I show in my latest book Rescuing America from Nihilism: A Judeo-Scientific Approach, Jewish and even some gentile astrophysicists are studying knowledge  – not mysticism – codified in the alphanumeric language of the Torah,  which will eventually reveal the aforementioned convergence of the laws of nature and the laws of morality, which will actually enlarge human creativity and concept of man’s creation in the Image of God as mankind first learned upon reading the Creation Narrative in the Book of Genesis.

This “binary” knowledge will be accelerated by the further elucidations of the Big Bang theory, as manifested in the related observations of the space satellites launched by NASA and the European Space Agency, which are yielding more and more knowledge of the origin, history, and structure of the universe. But here a caveat is in order.

Given its correlation with the Bible of Israel, the emerging cosmological knowledge poses the greatest threat not only to the moral relativists and moral relativism that dominate higher education in the democratic world, but also to the moral absolutists and moral absolutism of Islam, hell-bent on Israel’s destruction via the unknown Muslim Barack Obama, an otherwise paltry individual.

Obama would need more than a teleprompter to respond to this remark of the renowned historian and philologist Ernest Renan (1823-1892):  “To liberate the Muslim from his religion is the best service that one can render him.”

By definition, however, the “Empty Suit” in the White House, elected by the disemboweled, the moral relativists of academia and the media, is beyond redemption. Perhaps this is why the perceptive Lee Harris warns us of The Next American Civil War, a book whose subtitle is The Populist Revolt Against the Liberal Elite.

——————————————————————————————————————–

POSTSCRIPT:

The perennial hatred of Jews is easy to understand: They are envied for their superior intellects. As the Jesuit-educated Dr. Thomas Cahill graciously and astutely admits in his 1998 book, The Gifts of the Jews:

We Gentiles can hardly get up in the morning or cross the street without being Jewish. We dream Jewish dreams and hope Jewish hopes. Most of our best words, in fact – new, adventure, surprise, unique individual, person, vocation; time, history, future; freedom, progress, spirit; faith, hope, justice – are the gifts of the Jews.*

__________

*Thomas Cahill, The Gift, of the Jews (New York: Anchor Books, 1998), 241. In anticipation of writing The Gifts of the Jews, Dr. Cahill studied scripture at Union Theological Seminary in New York, and spent two years as a Visiting Scholar at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, where he studied Hebrew and the Hebrew Bible. He also reads French and Italian.

In 1999, he was awarded an honorary doctorate from Alfred University in New York. Cahill has taught at Queens College, Fordham University, and Seton Hall University, served as the North American education correspondent for the Times of London, and was for many years a regular contributor to the Los Angeles Times Book Review. Prior to retiring to write full time, he was the Director of Religious Publishing at Doubleday for six years.

School’s out.

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

Islamic Rape & Enslavement Upheld By Shariah Law:”Moderate” (Female) Cleric Expounds! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

IN an ever increasing Orwellian sphere akin to Alice-in-Wonderland’s magical universe, leftists hurl bugaboos towards conservatives as if they were “truths” derived from Mount Sinai. Whom do they think they are fooling?

BUT in the real world the facts are quite the opposite, therefore, they should shut their traps and reconsider the garbage they continuously spew in said direction. In reality, as they accuse conservatives of everything under the sun, racism (as if Islam is even a race!) is atop their laundry list of inflammatory rhetoric. Not only that, the real culprits, those who are up to their eyeballs and necks with slavery AND rape – from time immemorial and with no end in sight – are their Islamic pets who have yet to give up both predilections! Imagine that.

NOW, some may believe that this site is obsessed with the sexual relationship between Islam and jihad, but that too would be a monstrous lie. More specifically, it is Islam’s barbarians who are deeply embedded with sex and slave jihad due to its “koshering” by fatwas and the like! Ain’t that the damnable truth. It is what it is, despite the left’s refusal to recognize with whom they are “in bed.”

DO readers recall a recent truth-telling fest, one whose (icky and depraved) basis revolved around leftist/socialist imbued German “welcome wagons” given to the so-called “refugees”, despite their rampant raping of non-Muslim women and children, female and male alike? If not, time to catch up to speed.

AS is said,”boys will be boys” takes on the most ominous tone imaginable, at least when exposing Germany’s official “welcome wagons.” How so? Their Orwellian reactions to rape-jihad, which happened to occur right under their noses, is a prudent place to start! And if readers are still capable of being shocked, due to all the madness displayed by western leaders, suffice to state the following is prime evidence of said moral and national breakdown

Oh, the irony. An association called “Refugees Welcome Bonn e.V.” organized a refugee welcome party. But then these do-gooders met the Islamic culture: the Muslim migrants sexually molested the women at the party.

And still the running dogs for Islam on the left continue to lay down for them (literally).  You can’t make this stuff up.

Here is what “Welcome Refugee” org posted on their site after the party (thanks to Mark):

*English version*

Refugees Welcome Bonn e.V. wants to comment on the incidents that happened on party on the Township on Nov. 7th and was co-organized by our group. At the party we observed that some men molested, touched and harassed women. As co-organizer we want to apologize. During the party we tried to identify the offenders and make the leave the venue; also we made announcements where we asked to stop this behavior immediately. However, these measures were not successful. We apologize for that! Those men cast a negative light on our organization as well as on all men and male refugees, who were at our party.

[…] instead of just adversely pointing fingers at those who misbehave, we believe it’s as important for everyone in our civil society to tackle these differences in the daily integration.

For that reason we will increase our efforts to give no space to such behaviour during our upcoming parties and other events. We believe it’s essential to treat each other with respect and share the idea of a general equality between all human beings. That necessarily includes, akzepting [sic] a “No“, when making advances to somebody, instead of forcing your will on another person. We as a group campaign for this. Still it has to be said clearly, that this kind of behavior is not acceptable and not tolerated in our group.
WHEN all the above info is placed into civilized and rational context, one can then “understand” how Merkel’s Germany became a raging pit of Islamic jihadi hell fire. Alas, rape is now “explained” away as “misbehavior” that has to be “understood”, as indicated by the leftist/socialist co-organizers of the “welcome wagons”: “We believe it’s as important for everyone in our civil society to tackle these differences in the daily integration.” W T F??

 

IF said proofs are not prima facie evidence of twin devils separated at birth – Islam’s monsters and their leftist/socialist collaborators – well, little else qualifies. But that doesn’t mean they have the right to drag the rest of us down to their filthy depths of what is considered “acceptable” within a civilized society. Not on this site’s watch.

EVEN so, hang onto your last meal….

Suad Saleh is a Muslim professor at Al-Azhar University who, according to the Middle East Media Research Institute, explains what is acceptable in the Islamic culture for committing female rape.

Saleh says, ‘Those whom you own’ (slaves) existed before Islam. It existed among all nations and countries, not just among pre-Islam Arabs. Anyone could trade in freeborn men and women. This is called the selling of freeborn people. It’s like the selling of human organs and trafficking in freeborn humans today. But when Islam emerged, it put slavery into order, by limiting it to legitimate wars between Muslims and their enemies. If we fought Israel, which is plundering land, and is an aggressor against people and their faith…”

She continued, “Obviously, it is impossible that we will fight Israel, even though Surat Al-Isra in the Quran foretells this, and nothing is beyond the power of Allah… The female prisoners of wars are ‘those whom you own.’ In order to humiliate them, they become the property of the army commander, or of a Muslim, and he can have sex with them just like he has sex with his wives…”

Now, keep in mind this is coming from a “moderate” Muslim, so this is not an extreme view…

STILL yet, if more proof of the same is required, so be it.

Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)

It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)

The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:

Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.

When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.

Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.

A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”

The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”

“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.

“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”

The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction. These Muslims in Cologne no doubt don’t think they have done anything wrong — these women, after all, are just Infidels.

ALAS, when even supposed “moderate” (female, no less) clerics from Al-Azhar – Sunni Islam’s most revered university – expound upon the Islamic legality of rape and slavery, isn’t it time to admit that Islam has NO place within the borders of ANY civilized western country, regardless of its “religious” veneer??

LESSON LEARNED:

MOST significantly, if Islam was an atheistic and geographically-defined regime like Nazi Germany or Communist Russia, many more westerners would be able to grasp its evil intent by now. But our enemy poses as a worldwide monotheistic religion, and here is where Islam departs from other cultures that exalt war. Islam, is a religion whose prophet forms an integral part of the faith. It is not sufficient to believe in the Scriptures of such prophets or messengers but in the messengers themselves. This is another reason why Muslims have wielded the sword to spread the faith and to send “infidels” to eternal rest. 

AND even though many of us are not religious, we tend to believe that, withstanding the wars in which Christian monotheists engaged in the past, the participants in these wars were actually violating their sacred creeds or scriptures. In other words, we want to believe that religion—at least monotheism—is basically benevolent and peace loving; and that even though history manifests bloody examples to the contrary, we incline to the idea that these wars may be attributed—stated simply—to either (1) intellectual causes, (2) moral causes, or (3) systemic causes, meaning, the international system of sovereign states. The first may involve the miscalculations of statesmen regarding the interests of their respective countries. The second may involve the lust for power and dominion. The third may involve, as indicated, the nation-state system itself, which tends to intensify and magnify international conflict.

ABOVE all else, that which clarifies the intractable nature of Islam and why this enemy constitutes a mortal threat to Western civilization, hence, to the Judeo-Christian heritage, the heart of this civilization, is the most pressing task of our times.

EVERYTHING pales in comparison.

Female Islamic Cleric - Slavery and Child Rape 1

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}