Tag Archives: a regime gone wild

MALIK OBAMA’s TERROR TIES TRANSFIXES/EXPLODES WITHIN EGYPT!U.S. EMBASSY (in CAIRO)STONE SILENT.CONGRESS TOO.WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? WHAT WILL IT TAKE FOR AMERICAN ACTION? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
8

JUST imagine the biggest scandal erupting in America, so much so that countless Americans are clamoring for answers, yet the powers that be pretend that what is isn’t. Been there. Done that.

Such is the tone-deaf behavior of Obama Inc., a regime which operates akin to a criminal syndicate. Hence, expecting them to ‘fess up should be within the same realm of possibility as flying monkeys. Besides, how many times has the following been reiterated, and in how many ways:Obama Inc. Repeatedly Caught With Their Pants Down: A REGIME GONE WILD. Where Is This Leading?

Couple the above with all the evidence compiled against Malik Obama, at this site alone, and truckloads are needed to haul it away. Long-haulers.

Truckload One:

Now, shouldn’t DIRECT links to Hamas, the Brotherhood’s jihadi spawn, be enough to convict Malik Obama and his half bro’…or so you would believe:MALIK OBAMA’S OPEN TIES TO HAMAS:JOINS EXHORTATIONS TO WREST JERUSALEM FROM ISRAEL.HAMAS, THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD’S LINKS TO THE POTUS VIA HIS BROTHERHOOD TIES!

Truckload Two:

Although the noose is tightening inside Egypt, within America – not so much:NOOSE TIGHTENING AROUND MALIK OBAMA:TAX-EXEMPT FRAUD CHARGE (FURTHER) EXPOSED VIA PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR. DAUGHTER OF TOP EGYPTIAN NAVY ADMIRAL JOINS THE FRAY!

Truckload Three:

Nevertheless, as a first pit stop, charges were filed against the POTUS via Egypt:Breaking, EGYPT FILES CRIMINAL TERROR CHARGES AT The ICC- AGAINST OBAMA!

Yalla….يا ألله…

Malik Obama Scandal BLOWING UP in Egypt; U.S. Embassy behaving like Three Famous Monkeys

**SHOEBAT EXCLUSIVE**

Recently, Dr. Sadek Raouf Ebeid, whose articles we have published in the past, appeared on a prominent Egyptian television program for nearly 20 minutes to discuss the case of Malik Obama. While there has essentially been both a mainstream and conservative media blackout in America on this scandal, it has captured the attention of tens of millions of Egyptians.

Here is an edited, shorter version of the intervies – with subtitles – between Ebeid and Al Kahera we Nas:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzHX0V5o6qE

Prominent Arabic newspaper Al-Wafd also picked up on Ebeid’s interview (translated):

Sadek Raouf Ebeid, an Egyptian doctor in the U.S., implored the U.S. Congress to investigate the scandal involving Malik Obama, the brother of U.S. President Obama, saying that by providing Malik’s organization with American taxpayer dollars, the American people are also aiding Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir.

Ebeid, in a televised interview via telephone, said he had notified members of the U.S. Congress that according to the laws of the U.S., Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir is a war criminal, and is prohibited from entering the United States and that because Malik provides material support to al-Bashir, he too qualifies as an enemy combatant / terrorist.

The doctor pointed out that the U.S. authorities have overlooked the laws as they apply to the U.S. president’s brother.

During the interview, Ebeid challenged the U.S. Embassy in Egypt to dispute any of the four allegations he brought forth. In the live interview, hosted by a very well known newscaster in Egypt, Dr. Naeela Emara, Ebeid was asked to lay out the allegations. Emara adopted Ebeid’s public challenge, herself calling on a spokesman from the Embassy to make a statement in response to Ebeid’s claims.

Ebeid’s allegations were as follows:

  1. That President / General Omar Al-Bashir of Sudan is classified by the current White House and State Department as an enemy combatant and was denied an entry visa to the U.S. for posing a threat to America’s national interest and its homeland security.
  2. Malik Obama works for one of Al-Bashir’s largest organizations.
  3. Ebeid referred to the Military Commissions Act (MCA) of 2006, amended in 2009. This law deems anyone who provides an enemy combatant with material support, qualifies as an enemy combatant himself, even if he did not pick up arms against the U.S. himself. This would make Malik Obama an enemy combatant.
  4. Malik Obama’s Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) was granted 501(c)(3) status to collect money from unwitting U.S. taxpayers, under false pretenses (EIN# 262461343). This status was granted by former IRS official, Lois Lerner. Both Ebeid and Emara highlighted the fact that the BHOF received its status on a Sunday (June 26, 2011). In the interview, Emara sarcastically stated that Lerner obviously, “…opened the office on a Sunday morning to give Malik what he wants.”

Ebeid warned Dr. Emara that her broadcasting his allegations in this public manner will open the gates of hell her against.

Dr. Emara replied stating, “Egyptians have gone through hell before. They fear hell no more!”

It remains unclear whether the White House will issue a denial or continue to hide its head in the sand in fear of the American public knowing anything about Malik Obama.

Considering that State Department spokesman Marie Harf admitted to continuing dialogue with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the Obama administration is showing no signs of engaging in this scandal publicly.

In Egypt, it’s exploding.

Truth dare be told – and this blogger couldn’t care less what Obama’s goons think – it will be a cold day in hell before anyone can convince this site that the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia is not a worldwide danger, an expertise within!

Not only that, but the dangers from Sudan’s President General Omar Al-Bashir are housed within these pages. 

In this regard, a policy paper was requested, by Dr. Martin Sherman, from this American-Israeli. It reads in part:

INDEED, Malik Obama is affixed at Al-Bashir’s terror tied hip (Egypt’s leadership can’t be fooled…nor many of its public…or this site), as well as enjoined with his half bro’, Barack HUSSEIN Obama too.

How much clearer must the nexus be, before Congress places the American people before its terror-laden leadership and removes the Muslim Brotherhood’s boot, its sword, from the neck of the free world?

MANY are becoming increasingly enraged…and not only in Egypt!!

Obama Inc/CIA Designs “False Flag” Production Set: The Toppling Of Syria’s Assad. To What End? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
1

The most renegade, radical, revolutionary regime in U.S. history is Obama Inc. and the civilized – and not so civilized – world is viewing a window into their treachery.

Many contend that they are a bumbling crew and are out of their depth in both domestic and foreign policy issues. Absolutely not. For the historical record, their actions are purposeful and decidedly anti-American.

For a glimpse into said charges, let us start with some building blocks:

Well before his reelection, this blog warned about the ensuing nightmare from a second term Obama presidency, and its thesis has indeed come to pass. Not long after, a regime gone wild more than proved said prognostication. But aside from Obama Inc.’s specific red/green allied plans, a clear cut case was made which demonstrated the outcome when radical revolutionaries gained the helm. NO charges at this site have ever been made in a vacuum. But do take special note of the co-option of the Pentagon and CIA by the same radical forces, even before Hagel and Brennan officially took over. 

So, aside from countless other indictments within these pages, one stands above the others, at least in the realm of their deliberate foreign policy fires – Benghazigate, which in turn leads us straight into Syria and the HEART of the matter. 

Obama Admin Produced Fake News Of Syrian Dictator Being Toppled

OCTOBER 1, 2013 BY Kris Zane – Video embedded
The failed novelist, once Obama speech writer, now National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes wrote a series of phony newscasts showing Syrian president Bashar al-Assad being overthrown.

Huge movie sets of the al-Assad presidential palace were built in Saudi Arabia, overseen by our own CIA, in which doubles of al-Assad and his generals are depicted fleeing the Free Syrian Army.

The Hollywood-like operation had an army of special effects crew, stuntmen, and makeup artists that rivaled most studios.

The phony footage was to be fed through Arab League-controlled satellites, preempting regular Syrian newscasts, making the Syrian people think their government had just been toppled.

The CIA-controlled CNN would then re-broadcast the phony footage, causing the world to think al-Assad had been overthrown.  While Syria was mired in anarchy, a real coup would take place; and Obama would ride in on his white horse, installing another Islamic regime.

The plan, scheduled to occur on June 15, 2012, never happened because Syrian officials got wind of it and put a stop to it. The White House and CNN then buried the story down the memory hole and created a new fiction: al-Assad’s August 21, 2013 chemical weapons attack, also nowproved to be fake, perpetrated by Obama’s own al-Qaeda rebels in order to warrant a U.S. bombing campaign.

This according to Tony Cartalucci’s book, War on Syria: Gateway to World War III and his subsequent blockbuster articles.

NO sane non-jihadi would argue that Assad is anything but a stone cold killer and that getting rid of him – particularly due to his allegiance to Iran’s Hitlerite regime – is not a western interest. However, this is not Obama Inc.’s impetus, and this fact has been proven beyond a doubt. 

In the main, the Islamist-in-Chief and his captured/captivated surrogates have chosen sides in the centuries old jihadist struggle, having thrown America’s weight in with the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, of which Al Qaeda/Al Nusra is in the forefront. You got that? Instead of removing the boot of Iran’s regime from the region – thereby completely weakening Assad in the process – back in 2009, as Iranian freedom fighters bled in the streets, Barack HUSSEIN Obama gave them the finger. 

YET, even the leader of the mighty super power can’t control all events, and geo-politics inherently involves fast moving parts with many knock-on components. Blow back. 

In effect, as Syria’s rulers got wind of Obama Inc.’s celluloid-designed coup – to help usher in an authentic one – Benghazigate, with its own tailwind, exploded on the scene and Obama Inc. revised its plans.

YES, and while all of the above was exploding, Obama Inc. didn’t count on Morsi’s Brotherhood Mafia being swept from power, another regional and unanticipated blow back. As such, as most Islamists at heart are wont to do, they have little aversion to switching sides midstream, understanding that the “strong horse” is the best way forward to march on the west.   

To the civilized world’s horror, the leader of the once free world is completely on board with both Syria and Iran. And this was predicted too through all the above.

The Intersection of Banksters; Obama Inc.; Previous Administrations; Euro Elites & The Destruction of GLOBAL Wealth…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
5
Firstly, before absorbing the following expose’, remember this bit of advice: if you don’t (learn to) laugh, surely you will cry…have learned this (bitter) lesson well. Though the info contained herein is nothing short of off the charts, the fact of the matter is that its contents are so bizarre, insane and otherwise mind-numbing, one has no choice but to laugh, at least at the way some of the facts are presented. You shall see, but you don’t have to rely on this blogger’s word. Keep reading.
Alas, as Obama and surrogates (from both parties) feign caring about the average citizen, NOTHING could be farther from the truth. From their incitement to race wars; to collusion with Islamic jihadists; to their attempts to gut the Second Amendment, all of it has led to a regime gone wild.
But it gets worse. And even though Obama Inc. did not start the global train wreck, he is definitely on board and assisting via the deconstruction of America’s economy. 
ENTER: Larry Summers….but even though he eventually withdrew his name for confirmation as Federal Reserve Chair – due to a highly anticipated, acrimonious (dis)approval process – he was Obama’s top pick, and the facts below still stand as is: the purposeful deconstruction of the American system, in expectation of a global monetary order.
video embedded

By Greg Palast for Vice Magazine

When a little birdie dropped the End Game memo through my window, its content was so explosive, so sick and plain evil, I just couldn’t believe it.

The Memo confirmed every conspiracy freak’s fantasy:  that in the late 1990s, the top US Treasury officials secretly conspired with a small cabal of banker big-shots to rip apart financial regulation across the planet.  When you see 26.3%unemployment in Spain, desperation and hunger in Greece, riots in Indonesia and Detroit in bankruptcy, go back to this End Game memo, the genesis of the blood and tears.

The Treasury official playing the bankers’ secret End Game was Larry Summers.  Today, Summers is Barack Obama’s leading choice for Chairman of the US Federal Reserve, the world’s central bank.  If the confidential memo is authentic, then Summers shouldn’t be serving on the Fed, he should be serving hard time in some dungeon reserved for the criminally insane of the finance world.

The memo is authentic.

To get that confirmation, I would have to fly to Geneva  and wangle a meeting with the Secretary General of the World Trade Organization, Pascal Lamy.  I did.  Lamy, the Generalissimo of Globalization, told me,

“The WTO was not created as some dark cabal of multinationals secretly cooking plots against the people…. We don’t have cigar-smoking, rich, crazy bankers negotiating.”

Then I showed him the memo.

It begins with Summers’ flunky, Timothy Geithner, reminding his boss to call the then most powerful CEOs on the planet and get them to order their lobbyist armies to march:

“As we enter the end-game of the WTO financial services negotiations, I believe it would be a good idea for you to touch base with the CEOs….”

To avoid Summers having to call his office to get the phone numbers (which, under US law, would have to appear on public logs), Geithner listed their private lines.  And here they are:

Goldman Sachs:  John Corzine (212)902-8281
Merrill Lynch:  David Kamanski (212)449-6868
Bank of America, David Coulter (415)622-2255
Citibank:  John Reed (212)559-2732
Chase Manhattan:  Walter Shipley (212)270-1380

Lamy was right: They don’t smoke cigars.  Go ahead and dial them.  I did, and sure enough, got a cheery personal hello from Reed–cheery until I revealed I wasn’t Larry Summers.  (Note:  The other numbers were swiftly disconnected. And Corzine can’t be reached while he faces criminal charges.)

It’s not the little cabal of confabs held by Summers and the banksters that’s so troubling. The horror is in the purpose of the “end game” itself.

Let me explain:
The year was 1997.  US Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin was pushing hard to de-regulate banks.  That required, first, repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act to dismantle the barrier between commercial banks and investment banks.  It was like replacing bank vaults with roulette wheels.

Second, the banks wanted the right to play a new high-risk game:  “derivatives trading.”  JP Morgan alone would soon carry $88 trillion of these pseudo-securities on its books as “assets.”

Deputy Treasury Secretary Summers (soon to replace Rubin as Secretary) body-blocked any attempt to control derivatives.

But what was the use of turning US banks into derivatives casinos if money would flee to nations with safer banking laws?

The answer conceived by the Big Bank Five:  eliminate controls on banks in every nation on the planet – in one single move.    It was as brilliant as it was insanely dangerous.

How could they pull off this mad caper?  The bankers’ and Summers’ game was to use the Financial Services Agreement, an abstruse and benign addendum to the international trade agreements policed by the World Trade Organization.

Until the bankers began their play, the WTO agreements dealt simply with trade in goods–that is, my cars for your bananas.  The new rules ginned-up by Summers and the banks would force all nations to accept trade in “bads” – toxic assets like financial derivatives.

Until the bankers’ re-draft of the FSA, each nation controlled and chartered the banks within their own borders.  The new rules of the game would force every nation to open their markets to Citibank, JP Morgan and their derivatives “products.”

And all 156 nations in the WTO would have to smash down their own Glass-Steagall divisions between commercial savings banks and the investment banks that gamble with derivatives.

The job of turning the FSA into the bankers’ battering ram was given to Geithner, who was named Ambassador to the World Trade Organization.

Bankers Go Bananas

Why in the world would any nation agree to let its banking system be boarded and seized by financial pirates like JP Morgan?

The answer, in the case of Ecuador, was bananas.   Ecuador was truly a banana republic.  The yellow fruit was that nation’s life-and-death source of hard currency.  If it refused to sign the new FSA, Ecuador could feed its bananas to the monkeys and go back into bankruptcy.  Ecuador signed.

And so on–with every single nation bullied into signing.  

Every nation but one, I should say.  Brazil’s new President, Inacio Lula da Silva, refused.  In retaliation, Brazil was threatened with a virtual embargo of its products by the European Union’s Trade Commissioner, one Peter Mandelson, according to another confidential memo I got my hands on.  But Lula’s refusenik stance paid off for Brazil which, alone among Western nations, survived and thrived during the 2007-9 bank crisis.

China signed–but got its pound of flesh in return.  It opened its banking sector a crack in return for access and control of the US auto parts and other markets.  (Swiftly, two million US jobs shifted to China.)

The new FSA pulled the lid off the Pandora’s box of worldwide derivatives trade.  Among the notorious transactions legalized: Goldman Sachs (where Treasury Secretary Rubin had been Co-Chairman) worked a secret euro-derivatives swap with Greece which, ultimately, destroyed that nation.  Ecuador, its own banking sector de-regulated and demolished, exploded into riots.  Argentina had to sell off its oil companies (to the Spanish) and water systems (to Enron) while its teachers hunted for food in garbage cans.  Then, Bankers Gone Wild in the Eurozone dove head-first into derivatives pools without knowing how to swim–and the continent is now being sold off in tiny, cheap pieces to Germany.

Of course, it was not just threats that sold the FSA, but temptation as well.  After all, every evil starts with one bite of an apple offered by a snake.  The apple:  The gleaming piles of lucre hidden in the FSA for local elites.  The snake was named Larry.

Does all this evil and pain flow from a single memo?  Of course not:  the evil was The Game itself, as played by the banker clique.  The memo only revealed their game-plan for checkmate.

And the memo reveals a lot about Summers and Obama.

While billions of sorry souls are still hurting from worldwide banker-made disaster, Rubin and Summers didn’t do too badly.  Rubin’s deregulation of banks had permitted the creation of a financial monstrosity called “Citigroup.”  Within weeks of leaving office, Rubin was named director, then Chairman of Citigroup—which went bankrupt while managing to pay Rubin a total of $126 million.

Then Rubin took on another post:  as key campaign benefactor to a young State Senator, Barack Obama.  Only days after his election as President, Obama, at Rubin’s insistence, gave Summers the odd post of US “Economics Tsar” and made Geithner his Tsarina (that is, Secretary of Treasury).  In 2010, Summers gave up his royalist robes to return to “consulting” for Citibank and other creatures of bank deregulation whose payments have raised Summers’ net worth by $31 million since the “end-game” memo.

That Obama would, at Robert Rubin’s demand, now choose Summers to run the Federal Reserve Board means that, unfortunately, we are far from the end of the game.

* * * * * * * *

Special thanks to expert Mary Bottari of Bankster USA BanksterUSA.org without whom our investigation could not have begun.

The film of my meeting with WTO chief Lamy was originally created for Ring of Fire, hosted by Mike Papantonio and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Further discussion of the documents I laid before Lamy can be found in “The Generalissimo of Globalization,” Chapter 12 of Vultures’ Picnic by Greg Palast.

GAME (still) on, despite the fact that Summers is slithering into the shadows! 

Notably, previous discussions at this site cited Obama Inc’s plan to kill the dollar, and its underbelly is revealed in full.  But aside from being the bearer of bad news and connecting the dots, this blog looks to challenge others – readers included – to come forth with remedies/action plans. Put on your thinking caps before the American/western way of life, as you know it, disintegrates.

 

The INCREASED Rallying Cry For Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s IMPEACHMENT Grows Louder: Which Groups Are Jumping On Board? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
23

To be a patriot – at least in the western sense – has zero to do with ones skin color, sex or ethnicity. What it has to do with is a person’s adherence/appreciation for G-d given personal liberty and freedom.

This site has amassed a trove of evidence, detailing why Obama is ripe for impeachment. Consider: what about a regime gone wild shouldn’t lead to actionable judgment? Let us continue to count his crimes against the American people via trampling on the Constitution: IRSgate, Benghazigate and NSAgate are opening shots.

Yet, it warms the heart when Black Republicans break ranks, not only with fellow Congressional RINO’s, but with many in the Black community. Leftists in general ( Jewish brethren atop the list ), and Blacks in particular, believe that the law does not apply to Obama Inc and that is that. Fist bumps all around.

BLACK REPUBLICANS CALL FOR OBAMA IMPEACHMENT

President ‘has prevented, obstructed and impeded the administration of justice’

BOB UNRUH – videos embedded

  
Impeach

A Florida-based organization of black Republicans is calling for Barack Obama’s impeachment, releasing “Articles” that charge him with “egregious acts of despotism that constitute high crimes and misdemeanors.”

According to the Florida WatchdogWire, there are 10 articles including obstruction of the investigation into the Benghazi, Libya, murder of four Americans; the scandal of the administration’s running guns to drug ring lords in Mexico and the Internal Revenue Service’s campaign to obstruct the operations of conservative and Christian organizations.

The National Black Republican Association is an organization that is dedicated to returning “black Americans to their Republican Party roots by enlightening them about how Republicans fought for their freedom and civil rights, and are now fighting for their educational and economic advancement.”

The organization said the articles were delivered to Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, House Speaker John Boehner, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives.

“On July 4, 1776, the founders of our nation declared their independence from governmental tyranny and reaffirmed their faith in independence with the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791. Asserting their right to break free from the tyranny of a nation that denied them the civil liberties that are our birthright, the founders declared: ‘When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such government…”

Brand new! “Impeachable Offenses” reveals the evidence of the crimes Barack Obama has committed against the United States.

The Constitution also requires that a president or vice president “Shall be removed from office” for treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The challenge to Obama lists Benghazi, his disclosure of secret grand jury material about Benghazi, the Fast and Furious gun-running scandal, his authorization of the provision of confidential income tax returns to outside interests, the IRS audits of conservatives, the electronic surveillance by the National Security Agency of innocent Americans, the Department of Justice’s wiretaps on journalists, the thwarting of the will of the people over the Defense of Marriage Act, his unconstitutional appointments of three members of the National Labor Relations Board and his intimidation of whistleblowers.

“Barack H. Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office,” the articles finish.

Just a few days earlier, a member of Congress said there likely would be votes enough in the House to impeach.

But Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas, said it would be ineffectual because the Democrats in control in the Senate never would take any action.

Buzzfeed reported Farenthold responded to a question from a constituent at an open house.

The Constitution also requires a president to be a natural-born citizen, which the Founders apparently defined as the offspring of two citizens of the nation. Obama’s father never was a U.S. citizen.

The issue got so much attention during Obama’s first term that he presented a document he claimed was his birth certificate from the state of Hawaii.

Since then, Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse investigative team have concluded the document is a fraud.

WND has reported that members of Congress are expressing interest in the dispute.

Farenthold said at the open house Saturday that it’s probably too late to address the matter.

“I think unfortunately the horse is already out of the barn on this, on the whole birth certificate issue,” said the congressman. “The original Congress, when his eligibility came up, should have looked into it, and they didn’t. I’m not sure how we fix it.”

Farenthold told the audience in Luling, Texas: “You tie into a question I get a lot: ‘If everyone’s so unhappy with what the president’s done, why don’t you impeach him?’ I’ll give you a real frank answer about that: If we were to impeach the president tomorrow, you could probably get the votes in the House of Representatives to do it. But it would go to the Senate and he wouldn’t be convicted.”

He cited the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, who was not convicted by the Senate.

That episode, he said, “redefined sex” for a lot of young people.

“What message do we sent to America if we impeach Obama and he gets away with what he’s impeached for and he is found innocent? What then do we say is OK?” Farenthold asked.

There already is a grass roots movement called Overpasses For Obama’s Impeachment, and members are staging protests on freeway overpasses, calling for impeachment.

WND also has reported Watergate investigator Bob Woodward of the Washington Post compares Obama to Richard Nixon. And there’s a national petition that calls on Congress to immediately investigate the “unconstitutional and impeachable offenses” of Obama.

The latest American group to seek formal congressional action against Obama says on its website that its goal is simple: “The removal of the corrupt and criminal president of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama.”

“His actions go unimpeded, our pleas through petitions unanswered. Our calls and letters to Congress are left ignored and unopened,” the group’s online post explains. “Our only peaceful recourse is to take to the streets and overpasses of America and DEMAND that our nation be returned to We the People, and that Barack Hussein Obama be impeached, removed from office, and held accountable for his actions while serving as president.”

The overpass protest group says America “is in its greatest time of peril in since the Founding Fathers bravely fought in the Revolutionary War.”

“Lady Liberty is calling YOU to stand up, to speak out, to take to the streets and DEMAND that the corrupt tyrant be removed from the White House, and all of those who colluded with him in his crimes against the United States be held accountable to the full extent of the law, with the maximum sentences handed down upon them.”

WND has reported previously on many calls for Obama’s impeachment, which would put him in the company of Nixon and Bill Clinton.

Sign the petition right away!

The petition states: “Therefore, we the undersigned urge Congress to immediately undertake a full and impartial investigation into the many blatantly unconstitutional actions of Barack Obama. For members of Congress, each of whom has also sworn a solemn oath to uphold the Constitution, to allow a president to routinely flout the Supreme Law of the land without being held accountable is equally repugnant to a free country and a free press.”

Tens of thousands already are on board with the effort, which is just the latest in a long string of calls for impeachment or an investigation.

Impeachment has been brought up by several WND columnists, too.

Nat Hentoff wrote that Obama, “since taking office, has continually limited the First Amendment, the most singular and powerful right that distinctly identifies Americans from residents in all other countries on Earth.”

Columnist Bert Prelutsky took it further.

“I want Obama to go through the process because he has it coming. In totalitarian states, after all, the people have no other recourse except to take to the streets and spill blood. But we have available the process of impeachment, and Obama should be forced to defend his contemptible lies and actions,” he wrote. “If for no other reason than his unbearable arrogance, the schmuck should have to pay a penalty. For instance, when a White House reporter asked him to justify spying on the Associated Press, Obama said, ‘I’ve still got 60,000-plus troops in Afghanistan and I still have a bunch of intelligence officers around the world.’ No, sir, the United States has 60,000-plus troops in Afghanistan and a bunch of intelligence officers around the world.”

A panel of top constitutional experts convened by WND blasted Obama’s actions in office. Bruce Fein, the legal scholar who is best known for having drafted articles of impeachment against former President Clinton for perjury after he lied under oath, said Obama’s orders to drone-kill a terror suspect were “tantamount to murder.”

“You can’t have democracy and the rule of law if you never get to know what the facts are and you just have to accept what the government says they are. If you don’t have a trial, that’s the definition of tyranny.”

Louis Fisher, a scholar in residence at the Constitution Project, said of Obama’s appointment of “czars”: “That is a big deal. A lot of people say, ‘Well, that’s been going on a long time.’ In our form of government, citizens vote for representatives and representatives pass laws. You have people heading departments, and they’re confirmed. There’s an understanding that we will call you up whenever we need to. … Congress passed legislation saying there’d be no funds for three czars, and they were named in the bill. Obama signed it into the law, but in the signing statement, he said that’s unconstitutional because he has the ‘prerogative’ to get the advice he needs to implement statutes. Well, c’mon Obama. You don’t have a prerogative to bring into the White House anybody you want at any salary. It’s all done by law. It goes back to 1978 where Congress passed legislation saying you have this number of people and these are their salaries and Congress can increase or decrease that at any time.”

And Herbert Titus, counsel to the law firm William J. Olson who previously taught constitutional law, common law and other subjects for 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools, said Obama’s military actions in Libya are a strong argument for impeachment.

“That’s the one that stands out. It’s unprecedented. It doesn’t even fit within any of the precedents that have been set since Korea.”

Obama should have seen such a move coming. A recent poll earlier this year said half of Americans say he should be impeached.

“It may be early in the process for members of Congress to start planning for impeachment of Barack Obama, but the American public is building a serious appetite for it,” said Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies, which did the telephone poll.

Half or nearly half of those surveyed said they believed Obama should be impeached for the multitude of scandals now consuming Washington.

On the issue of the Benghazi scandal, in which four Americans were killed after terror threats were ignored, 50.1 percent of Americans said Obama should be impeached. That included 27.6 percent of the responding Democrats.

On the IRS harassment of conservative and Christian organizations? Forty-nine percent said they agree that impeachment is appropriate, including 24.4 percent of the Democrats.

And on the fishing trip the Obama administration took into AP reporters’ telephone records in search of a security breach that may have been done by his own administration, 48.6 percent said impeachment is appropriate. That included 26.1 percent of the Democrats.

Sign the petition urging Congress to impeach Obama.

Former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan wrote that the country is in the midst of the worst Washington scandal since Watergate.

“The reputation of the Obama White House has, among conservatives, gone from sketchy to sinister, and, among liberals, from unsatisfying to dangerous<” she said. “No one likes what they’re seeing. The Justice Department assault on the Associated Press and the ugly politicization of the Internal Revenue Service have left the administration’s credibility deeply, probably irretrievably damaged. They don’t look jerky now, they look dirty. The patina of high-mindedness the president enjoyed is gone.

Noonan said Obama, “as usual, acts as if all of this is totally unconnected to him.”

“He’s shocked, it’s unacceptable, he’ll get to the bottom of it. He read about it in the papers, just like you. But he is not unconnected, he is not a bystander. This is his administration. Those are his executive agencies. He runs the IRS and the Justice Department,” she continued. “A president sets a mood, a tone. He establishes an atmosphere. If he is arrogant, arrogance spreads. If he is too partisan, too disrespecting of political adversaries, that spreads too. Presidents always undo themselves and then blame it on the third guy in the last row in the sleepy agency across town.”

It’s even being compared to Watergate, the break-in that ultimately led to the resignation of President Nixon.

That was the assessment of no less than Woodward, whose reporting on Watergate eventually snared the sitting president.

Woodward said recently: “If you read through all these emails, you see that everyone in the government is saying, ‘Oh, let’s not tell the public that terrorists were involved, people connected to al Qaeda. Let’s not tell the public that there were warnings.’ And I have to go back 40 years to Watergate when Nixon put out his edited transcripts to the conversations, and he personally went through them and said, ‘Oh, let’s not tell this, let’s not show this.’ I would not dismiss Benghazi. It’s a very serious issue.”

A Republican congressman also recently brought up the subject.

“I would say yes. I’m not willing to take it [impeachment] off to take it off the table, but that’s certainly not what we’re striving for,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told CNN.

“We want truth, we want to bring the people who perpetrated the terrorism in Benghazi to be brought to justice, and we want to have the president do what he has said he would always do. And that is be open and transparent. Thus far, the White House has not done that.”

Earlier, Chaffetz, in an interview with the Salt Lake Tribune, was asked if impeachment was within the realm of possibility.

“It’s certainly a possibility,” he told the paper. “That’s not the goal but given the continued lies perpetrated by this administration, I don’t know where it’s going to go. … I’m not taking it off the table. I’m not out there touting that but I think this gets to the highest levels of our government and integrity and honesty are paramount.”

Chaffetz has been championing the call to probe the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the Benghazi compound that left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.

Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., said impeachment was possible over the “most egregious cover-up in American history.

“People may be starting to use the I-word before too long,” Inhofe told radio host Rusty Humphries, according to The Hill.

“The I-word meaning impeachment?” Humphries asked.

“Yeah,” Inhofe responded.

Additionally, radio host Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor and one-time presidential candidate, predicted Obama won’t serve out his second term because of his complicity in a cover-up over Benghazi.

Other members of Congress who have suggested impeachment for a variety of reasons in recent years include Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C.; Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.; Rep. Steve Stockman, R-Texas; Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas; Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fla.; and Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa.

Others who have raised the subject include rock legend and gun-rights defender Ted Nugent, who said there’s “no question” Obama should be impeached.

He blasted “the criminality of this government, the unprecedented abuse of power, corruption, fraud and deceit by the Chicago gangster-scammer-ACORN-in-chief.”

“It’s so diabolical,” he said.

Even Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin called for the impeachment of Obama over his policy of permitting drone strikes on American citizens overseas who are members of terrorist organizations.

On WABC Radio’s “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” Benjamin affirmed she believes the drone warfare is an impeachable offense.

You asked for it! Sign the petition urging Congress to impeach President Barack Obama.

See Texas congressman lobby for impeachment over gun control:

See Andrew Napolitano talk about impeachment over the budget:

WND also compiled a special report on the various offenses Obama is blamed for committing and reported what experts on the Constitution believe should be happening.

See detailed results of the recent survey questions:

The administration of Democrat Barack Obama has still not satisfied congressional and media questions about just what it knew and when it knew it about the terrorist attack on U.S. diplomats in Benghazi, Libya, last September 11. That attack killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya. The Obama administration has changed its explanation of that attack several times since and has so far refused to identify those officials who made key decisions not to send help to stop the attacks, and who decided not to initially call the killings a terrorist attack. Knowing that and anything else you may be aware of about this issue, do you agree or disagree that President Obama should be impeached over his handling of this situation?

It has been learned that the Internal Revenue Service, under the administration of Democrat Barack Obama, has purposely targeted conservative and Christian groups for harassment over their tax exempt status while giving liberal nonprofit groups little or no scrutiny. Further, the IRS apparently leaked private tax information from these conservative groups to opposing liberal groups who were able to use that confidential information for political advantage. Knowing this and anything else you may be aware of about this issue, do you agree or disagree that President Obama should be impeached over his handling of this situation?

It has been learned that the U.S. Department of Justice under the administration of Democrat Barack Obama secretly obtained confidential telephone records of many reporters of the Associated Press in Washington, D.C. Attorney General Eric Holder has said his department obtained the phone records without the permission or knowledge of the Associated Press in order to find who in the federal government was leaking information about terrorist plots against America. AP officials have strongly protested this invasion of their privacy but the administration stands by its actions. Knowing this and anything else you may be aware of about this issue, do you agree or disagree that President Obama should be impeached over his handling of this situation?

Sign the petition right away!….http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/senator-obama-perilously-close-to-impeachment/

IF one is seeking the Constitutional backing/muster to indict the Commander-in-Chief for High Crimes and Misdemeanors, look no further than the imprimatur of Professor Paul Eidelberg. He delivers the goods. 

Most ominously, under the out of control reign of the Radical/Islamist-in-Chief, law enforcement has become the regime’s personal bludgeon…shades of Nazi Germany. As a matter of fact, under his purview local policing has become increasingly militarized, in direct violation of Posse Comitatus! Need some visual aids to said charges? Fine. ‘Big brother’ cops crush push to impeach Obama.

So, will patriots wait until Obama Inc.’s goons start roughing them up, if they dare to legally ! demonstrate against ‘dear leader’? And, isn’t America starting to resemble the totalitarian grip of Germany, while under the crushing boot of the SS?

America, NO Longer A ‘Tyranny-in-the-Making’…THAT Ship Has Sailed…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
15

At first blush it appears hysterical, over the top and full of hyperbole to suggest that America is akin to a tyranny. After all, there are authentic tyrannies world over and history is replete with their devastation. Be that as it may, Rome wasn’t built in a day and neither are tyrannies. Some creep forward more subtly than others, and it is this incremental-laden application – stealth by stealth – which is (mostly) hidden from prying eyes.Yet, tragically, many wake up when it is too late to stop the national damage, too horrified to even scream at the wreckage before their eyes. 

And it is this ‘soft-like’ tyranny which is often described at this site. Consider what it really, really means to basically have your Constitutional right to free speech relegated to a ‘free speech zone’. Huh? And who gets to move the goal posts, those who instituted the ‘zones’ in the first place? Welcome to Orwell’s universe. So, is it then a rant to posit, the evisceration of free speech is in the here and now? Nope.

It is not for nothing that this blog cites the leadership in Washington as Obama Inc., purposely invoking images of Mafia Inc., not unlike the Brotherhood Mafia! ALL are criminal run enterprises, even though there are differences in play. And the most demonstrative way to describe Obama Inc. is within its parallel to the Iron Curtain, where totalitarian rule intersects with government criminal behavior. Truly, absolutely, a regime gone wild.

America under tyrannical rule: what we must now do

Northeast Intelligence Network

hagmann071413

Image courtesy of Canada Free Press

 

By Douglas J. Hagmann

14 July 2013: With every new Executive Order, the options that we, the people, have to seek redress for the crimes committed by the United States government are becoming more limited. Have you sent a fax or e-mail to your elected representative lately about an issue of constitutional importance? How did that work out? Have you organized or attended a “rally” lately? Tell me, what has changed by your sincere efforts? Oh, and was the rally limited to a “First Amendment zone,” (or “Free Speech zone”) or a specified location where you were “allowed” to exercise your First Amendment rights granted by the U.S. Constitution? Did you even know such zones existed and if so, are they alright with you?

America has been conquered in a faceless coup, where the meteoric rise of a virtually unknown man of Arab, not African descent (if we are to believe his own tale of his origins) was selected to complete the job of destroying our national sovereignty and eradicating what remains of our civil rights. Meanwhile, the U.S. Congress has been made irrelevant by this unclothed emperor wearing only the headdress of a pharaoh, while the judiciary has been infiltrated and corrupted to the point of being useless as a method of resolution of our grievances.

America under martial law

The United States is effectively operating under martial law. No, not “the troops are in the streets all of the time” type of martial law, but a more subtle form. A type of martial law that exists under the veil of a false sense of normalcy, which can still be plausibly denied to the most gullible among us by both our leaders and the media. Like the proverbial frogs in the pot of water being brought to a boil, most people are being conditioned to accept actions forced upon us that our founders would have not only found objectionable, but absolutely intolerable. In fact, the Revolutionary War was started and fought for much less.

We currently exist under a modern system of tyranny, where the criminality of our leaders is overt and oppressive, yet excused and embraced by those on both sides of the false political paradigm and propagated by the corporate media and the bobble heads of the airwaves. We’ve asked for answers about issues ranging from Benghazi to the Obama eligibility issue and dozens more, yet have received nothing but contempt for merely asking such questions. We are treated as unworthy subjects to royalty. If you don’t believe that, or need examples of this tyranny, then please get out of the way and let us adults do the heavy lifting to do what we must to get our country back on point.

So, exactly what must we do to achieve effective, legal and nonviolent redress, to stop the naked criminality within our government, and to bring a dose of justice to those deserving of it? We could ask for a special prosecutor like the Nixon and Clinton eras, but who would appoint one and wouldn’t such a prosecutor themselves be politically compromised? Also, we’re running out of time. We could ask for congressional hearing, but we’ve seen how well this is working out for the TEA parties. While the TEA party members and other groups are turning blue waiting for congressional hearings to be conducted in an already corrupted venue, others are calling for a second American Revolution. Neither is the answer, at least not now.

Having spent literally hours with an insider who knows how the system in DC works, or more appropriately, how the game is played, I believe there is only one current answer that could be both expedient and effective. It is our last option to stop the corrupt actions of corrupt individuals who are out of control.

What we MUST do

There is only one viable method remaining to bypass the people and groups inside of our government who refuse to  enforce the United States Constitution. We must first recognize and acknowledge that certain people, departments and groups within the United States government are involved in, or leading others to be involved in criminal activity and behavior as part of a corrupt organization. Once we have compiled a complete and detailed list of such criminal conduct, we must then file a civil complaint against the government under the federal statutes of the RICO Act, or the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, enacted by section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970.

We allege that the United States government at the Executive Branch is operating as a criminal enterprise. The Executive branch has shown not only contempt of congress, but contempt for every American citizen and is operating, by executive order, as the Chicago Mob. Previously, it was the Texas and Little Rock mobs, but organized criminal enterprises nonetheless.

To bypass the corrupt Department of Justice, our efforts must be made from the civil side. The RICO Act allows for us to sue one or more “racketeers” for damage to our person (civil rights, etc.) and property. Civil actions under the RICO Act can be filed in state or federal courts. The structure available for proactive measures already exists under our current RICO law, so we must take advantage of this while we still can.

A trial by the jury of our peers is our last hope for holding these criminals accountable for their actions. The civil aspects of the RICO Act gives us a very big stick to let a jury of Americans decide whether we will continue to be subjects of royalty, or citizens of a Constitutional Republic.

At present, we have no other legal recourse to ask questions with the expectation of receiving answers. There are no more checks and balances within our government. Our efforts thus far have been nothing more than the bleating of sheep to the unclothed emperor and the congressional eunuchs who won’t raise substantive issues for fear of losing their committee memberships or positions of authority. That can be changed, and must be changed, before the next stroke of the executive pen turns martial law light into actual martial law in every corner of the United States.

At its base, it will be a herculean effort to rid the decades-in-the-making albatross from America’s neck, culminating at this point in time. The onus is so much heavier due to the beyond compromised AG’s office, as well as similarly gripped relevant power centers. And while the utterance of ‘revolution’ is surely whispered behind many closed doors, Americans fought the first one for a whole lot less. 

EVERY generation has its burden, its cross, to bear. This one is mammoth.  It can’t be ignored, wished away or sidestepped. The time is now.

‘Mama Janet’ Resigns,Yet DHS & Their Fixation On Vets Will Continue: A Regime’s Penchant For Spying – “Putin-esque”…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
17

NO one needs to convince this blog that white supremacist groups are a danger. And knowing full well that eliminating Jews is as important to them as killing Blacks, well, this registers very high on the self preservation meter.

That being said, let’s place the cards on the table: The tangible priority that DHS assigns to the above domestic threat is barely negligible. And even though ‘mama Janet’ is no longer a factor it will hardly make a dent, at least under Obama Inc’s radical oversight.  Not only that, but US prisons are the largest conduits for Aryan front groups, as well as Islamist ones. Nevertheless, many of them re-enter society more dangerous than prior to their incarceration. Imagine that. Rehabilitation at its finest. But never mind…the fact of the matter is that zippo and zilch is done to suppress said recruitment. And while the above has been the case for years, why isn’t DHS reining them in? Exactly.

But Obama Inc. does have these militias in their sights, yet not for targeting. In fact, they are the useful straw men to achieve other means, and certainly not in America’s interests. So while we are witnessing the anti-American activities of Obama and surrogates, a regime gone wild, they would have Americans believe that they don’t have targets on patriots’ backs, even after they placed bulls eyes on them via IRSgate. Ho hum….

‘Operation Vigilant Eagle’ Spies on Veterans Who Speak Too Freely’

In 2009, the FBI and Department of Homeland Security began a program to monitor white supremacists and “militia/sovereign-citizen extremist groups” for terrorist activities.

Included among the suspected terrorists were Iraq and Afghanistan veterans.

At the time it was revealed, the program called “Operation Vigilant Eagle” caused some controversy but was quickly forgotten and buried by the media.

For the DHS, Vigilant Eagle was the expression of the misdirected paranoia that exists at the agency’s highest levels, which since President Obama stepped into office have issued multiple reports about a supposed wave of terrorism by American conservatives of various stripes, from Tea Party members to off-duty cops.

At the time, Janet Napolitano, Homeland Security secretary and chief conspiracy theorist, told NBC that, “This is an assessment of things just to be wary of, not to infringe on constitutional rights, certainly not to malign our veterans.”

Tell it to Brandon Raub.

Last year, Raub was arrested by a small mob of FBI and Secret Service agents and held for a week at a psychiatric facility, all because the Marine vet likes to gripe in blogs and on Facebook about the federal government. (Who doesn’t?)

According to WorldNet  Daily, one sample of his posts reads, “The United States was meant to lead the charge against injustice, but through our example not our force. People do not respond to having liberty and freedom forced on them”

Ah, yes. You can feel the imminent danger.

He has filed a lawsuit against the federal government. Wonder if another visit to the psych ward is in order?

He was only released last time after a judge stepped in and admonished the agencies holding him that the case was “devoid of any factual allegations.”

Raub’s attorneys claim that the arrest and forcible commitment were an attempt by FBI and other officials with Operation Vigilant Eagle to silence Raub for his criticism of the government.

Documents about Operation Vigilant Eagle show the project idea was hatched in December 2008 as a joint operation of the FBI and Defense Department, as the Bush Administration was packing up and the Obama Administration was moving in, according to the Wall Street Journal.

By February 2009, just weeks after President Obama’s DHS opened shop, a project memo stated that the purpose of Vigilant Eagle was to “share information regarding Iraqi and Afghanistan war veterans whose involvement in white supremacy and/or militia sovereign citizen extremist groups poses a domestic terrorism threat.”

Supposedly, this assessment of a suddenly “growing threat” was based on confidential information, undercover sources and “publicly available” information — I’m betting the Huffington Post or Mother Jones, but the memo doesn’t specify.

Raub’s attorneys say they’ve been contacted by numerous other military veterans recounting similar stories.

After his arrest on August 16, Raub was ordered by a “Special Justice” to be held for 30 days for evaluation and “treatment.” The arresting officials specifically stated his Facebook postings were the reason for his arrest.

Fortunately, Circuit Court Judge Allan Sharrett heard about the case and intervened, throwing out the allegations by the feds.

If this is how we treat our veterans, our country has crossed the line and joined other countries like China and the Soviet Union that use tactical psychological “treatment” and detention to silence the opposition.

Thanks to the Obama Administration, the freedoms our brave veterans fought to protect are slipping away daily. http://godfatherpolitics.com/11001/operation-vigilant-eagle-spies-on-veterans-who-speak-too-freely/#ixzz2Ug5jxqMG

Yet from the get go this blog sent out a clarion call: Calling all vets, Obama Inc. is gunning for you! Talk about pay back for serving ones country.

So vets stand at attention and pay this forward.  

But the hunt is not exactly all inclusive, as Muslim vets are given a pass. Simply put, the Pentagon has been taken over by anti-American leadership. Here’s another nail in its co-option, even as the Pentagon’s chief officers admit there is a clash between civilizations.

And even patriots who haven’t served, conveniently dumped into the “militia” category (this is not to suggest that dangerous militias don’t need scrutiny…they do, but they are being used as a bugaboo against Tea Partiers and the like) definitely need to pay heed, as ALL patriots are in their cross hairs. Can anyone rationally explain DHS’s shopping spree for billions in ammo/hardware? Nope.

Now the above doesn’t obviate the fact that a small percentage of returning vets come home with problems and are in need of “follow up”. Of course they not only require medical assistance, but are owed the best of care. Yet NOT by DHS’s goons, but by health professionals for PTSD or physical infirmities, and a democratic nation entitles them to as much. And more.

Most revealingly, the core issue is that DHS realizes that those who return intact are not only combat trained, but less likely – after all their sacrifices – to lie down and take commands to give up “this and that”. Herein lies the crux of the spying. The hunt against them too. Evil on its face. By design.

Is it still any wonder why this site compares DHS to Germany’s Gestapo? And if the symbiosis between Obama Inc to Germany’s Gestapo is still seen as a bridge too far, perhaps their coming mandate, to spy on ones fellow workers, will stir the pot. It can be gleaned via Obama’s plan to “predict” future leakers! 

The Snowden Affair & NSA’s Outing: What Is Obama Inc. REALLY Afraid Of? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
10

Contrary to all common sense, patriotic outrage, legal precedent and American interests, Obama Inc. consistently insists that trying foreign terrorists in the U.S. criminal court system is the “American” way. In fact, their mantra has been, it will show the world what a transparent and open democracy America is, chiefly via the laws it upholds as sacrosanct foundations to truth and justice. Blah, blah, blah…as if there is ANY legal basis to do just that.

Never mind the national secrets which will surely be revealed, once “due process” kicks in, with all the attendant discovery and disclosure requirements in a U.S. court of law. Having taken more than a fair share of law courses – civil, criminal, Constitutional, business etc – this blog knows the score. Rule 16. Discovery & Inspection is very clear, as are all the laws evinced thereof. None of it is rocket science, otherwise, truthfully, would not have aced its coursework. In addition, the surviving Boston bomber is being given all due “rights” in the criminal court system, to the extent of refusing to even label the Chechen terrorist as an “enemy combatant”. Astonishing. Outrageous. Laws twisted pretzel-like, to gift the Boston jihadist legal “rights”. 

But what does the above have to do with the NSA & Snowden’s flight to “parts unknown”? Everything. 

In the main, this site has no investment in Snowden per se. And if it is PROVEN he is revealing secrets, that enemy states can use against America, then this blog will be in the forefront of clamoring for ultimate punishment. That being said, the core of Obama Inc.’s angst revolves around what Snowden revealed in the most public way: The unfettered spying on ALL Americans. Trusted sources have repeatedly been in agreement: There has been NO indication that anything related to high value national security has been breached. Apparently, Northeast Intelligence Network backs up said assessments.

But it is the case that the regime has much too much to hide, too much at stake, to deal with the pesky requirements of “due process”. Need some reminders? Try these on for sizing: America is a police state in the making; The POTUS’s “enemies lists”; DHS Insider confirms the true intent of NSA’s spying; The Purging: An Omerta Re Islam + Terror; Obama’s goons are eyeing/spying on America’s kiddies. All of the above links fall under one main category – a regime gone wild! Folks, in all honesty, would you entrust your cat or dog with this malignant crew, let alone with ferreting out national truths?

‘The truth about the Snowden affair and why you should care’

Northeast Intelligence Network, July 3, 2013

3 July 2013: Some call Edward Snowden a traitor, while others call him a hero. One thing that is certain is that he cannot be both to the citizens of the United States. Interested by this stark difference of perception, I decided to investigate exactly what it was that he allegedly did that caused this drama that has captivated so many.  In the process, I found that there is a lot of misinformation and outright disinformation that exists about his actions. Most troubling is that much of it seems to be coming directly from officials within the U.S. government and members of the corporate media. In this investigative process, I also learned why every American, and every “free” person reading this regardless of what country in which you live, should be very concerned about the case of Edward Snowden.

A second but closely related theme that should be well beyond debate is that any federal law that violates the United States Constitution is not a valid law. There is a rich history for the principle that an unconstitutional law is void, and no legislative act that is contrary to the constitution can be considered valid. Again, the Edward Snowden affair must be properly viewed in this context.One overriding theme that was reinforced during my investigation is that our elected officials have a rabid contempt for any constitutional limitations placed upon them. While this is not exactly a news flash, the case of Edward Snowden must be viewed against this backdrop of contempt, which is not specific to any one political office or party and knows no restraint.

Edward Snowden in brief

Although there are many side issues and offshoots of the case “against” Edward Snowden, the core issue of the matter is fairly straightforward. At the heart of all the drama and legal machinations being discussed is one very simple issue: his security clearance and the executive order under which it was created and Edward Snowden was working.

Proper understanding of the issue required me to contact a very highly placed, known and trusted source familiar with how the various processes of security clearances work. While this statement might seem oversimplified to those in the intelligence business, it makes little difference to us as American citizens or freedom loving people of our own countries. It does not change the facts of the Snowden affair.

At the time Edward Snowden received his security clearance, he signed away certain constitutional rights in exchange for his loyalty to the government, and to operate at the mercy and direction of the office of the President or his designate. Nonetheless, he is still an American citizen.

Based on the information obtained during the course of my investigation, it appears that Mr. Snowden, while working in the capacity described, learned that he was involved in activities that he reasonably believed to be in direct opposition to the laws of the United States Constitution. He found that contrary to what was being said by the government to the American people and the world, he was not only aware of, but involved in spying activities that were inconsistent with the protections, rights and freedoms afforded to us by the U.S. Constitution.

At some point, as an American, he had to make a decision. It would be an unenviable position that would forever change his life. Does he violate the executive order under which he was operating to expose a system of spying on the American people, a system that was so vast and out of control that he felt so compelled to let us know what is actually taking place and face the consequences, or does he keep his mouth shut and continue to operate under an order he believed to be unconstitutional?

Included within that decision was something else. Would his revelations harm, in any way, the security of the United States and his fellow citizens? Again, based on my investigation of the information released, nothing was revealed by Snowden that any potential enemy of the U.S. did not already know. Additionally, he did not appear to release any “fruit” of the data mining and spying operations, but merely disclosed the scope and extent of its existence.

What then, is Edward Snowden allegedly guilty of? He can only be guilty of one of two things, but he cannot be guilty of both. Either he criminally disclosed our national secrets to our external enemies, consequently putting all Americans at risk in violation of his oath, or he decided that as a citizen, he had an  obligation of overriding importance to his fellow citizens that trumped the oaths he signed and was working under, to expose government programs that are operating outside of the laws of the U.S. Constitution.  It’s really that simple.

A solution exists

Amid all of the drama that exists pertaining to where Edward Snowden will likely end up, there is a simple, viable solution that would benefit all involved that no one seems to be talking about – perhaps for good reason. As it stands today, should Snowden return to the United States, he would not be permitted the same rights as any other citizen under the U.S. Constitution to have an open and fair trial or answer the charges against him based on the “contract” he signed for his clearance. In reality, he could and likely would be tossed in prison indefinitely, denied access to legal counsel, and denied all of the normal and customary rights granted to American citizens accused of a crime. He would have less rights than murders and most terrorists, and the proceedings against him could, and likely wood take place well outside of the purview of American citizens.

All of this could be avoided while still forcing him to answer the charges against him. With the stroke of a pen, the President could simply sign an order that would allow Mr. Snowden to return to the United States and be subjected to be tried in the American criminal justice system, , in open court, in a manner consistent with the Constitution of the United States that would afford him the normal judicial and constitutional protections as an American citizen.

Knowing this, perhaps the appropriate question that one that no one is asking, is what is this administration afraid of by allowing this case to proceed in this manner? Are the risks of multiple international incidents more palatable or easily manageable than a system of transparent judicial process? If so, something is terribly wrong.

Who will be valiant for justice sake?

Edward Snowden made a conscious decision to expose a massive, draconian system of spying on American citizens that he believed is violating the rights of every American. He could not reconcile his responsibilities under the executive order in which he was working with his knowledge as an American citizen himself. He made a conscience decision to fall on the side of the fence for the American citizen.  Is anyone coming to his aid?  Who will be valiant for justice sake?

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/8791

In plain English, Obama and henchmen/women are picking and choosing who “deserves” the “right” to due process! Guess what? Obama Inc. denies due process to American warriors but NOT to jihadists. Color this blogger none too swift, but isn’t it more than pressing to challenge the gangsters running Washington to put up or shut up, demanding: President Obama, as Commander-in-Chief, utilizes Executive powers hither and yon. With the stroke of a pen, he can entice Snowden to return to face America’s justice system. How so? The POTUS must detail in writing, thus assuring Snowden’s right, as an American citizen (who didn’t blow up an American city, create terror and actually murder anyone, unlike the Chechen bomber), to a completely open, transparent trial, with all due process applicable. Now, wouldn’t this demonstrate, to one and all, how truly just the American system is? 

Read Snowden’s first public statement, and judge for yourselves what’s what – http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/07/statement-from-edward-snowden-in-moscow-2699014.html?utm_source=direct-b4in.info&utm_medium=verticalresponse&utm_content=beforeit39snews-verticalresponse&utm_campaign=&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fb4in.info%2FrALb

UPDATE: Now we’re cooking….U.S. Explodes With 100 Anti-NSA Protests. Let freedom ring!