Islam’s Serial (Jihadi) Rapists Given Cover;Western Complicity! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

BNI does not use the politically correct "Asian" word when referring to Muslims

HOT on the heels of this investigative journalist’s disturbing report – re supportive proofs linking Islam and the gay agenda – more of the same hyper-sexual militancy keeps rearing its head. How could it not. Endemic.

'FACT'

MIND you, the same cult-like, war-driven “religion” which upholds homosexuality as part of its cultural “normative” behavior, on the other hand, murders those who are “caught in the act”! 

ADDING to the sexual component, Islam’s serial rapists absolutely believe it is their jihadi duty to defile (and terrorize) as many “infidel” women (whatever their ages) as they can get their hands on. Literally. The “spoils of war.”

CITATION-WISE, the Koran dictates the following about the infidels:

  • Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them (2:191)
  • Make war on the infidels living in your neighboorhood (9:123)
  • When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them (9:5)
  • Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam or refuse to pay Jizya tax (9:29)
  • Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable (3:85)
  • The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them (9:30)
  • Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticise Islam. (5:33)
  • The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque (9:28)
  • Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies
    (22:19)
  • Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them (47:4)
  • The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them (8:65)
  • Muslims must not take the infidels as friends (3:28)
  • Terrorise and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an (8:12)
  • Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorise the infidels (8:60)

CONSIDER the above dictates of unremitting hatred for non-Muslims, then place them atop said demonstrative evidence:

EVIDENCE ONE:

HOW many are aware that sexual jihad and slave jihad are Koranic derived? 

EVIDENCE TWO:

FATWA ONE: Unmarried girls demanded for battlefield sex!

REGARDLESS, the fact that a small segment of Muslim girls are dragged along the sexual jihad path, others absolutely volunteer to “service” their jihadi brothers. But the bottom line is that said actions satiate their pagan Allah and relieves their brothers of sexual frustration! A two-fer.

 

(Muslimas giving the one-finger ISIS salute!)

EVIDENCE THREE:

FATWA TWO: The sale of kiddies and wives has been deemed “kosher”!

Muslim-Young-Girls-Being-Lead-Off-in-Chains-To-Meet-Their-New-Husbands

 

 

 

 

 

 

EVIDENCE FOUR:

MOREOVER, all of the above doesn’t obviate an increasingly impotent response – due to an onslaught of Islamic gang bangs within non-Muslim nations – from western leaders. 

HOWEVER, what complicates the issue is two-fold: the driving force(s) to Islam’s sexual crimes are relatively unknown within the west’s non-Muslim population. Exacerbating the explosive situation, they are covered up by complicit leaders. In the main, while most are elected officials, other culprits are non-elected. They hail from various leftist circles; media, academia, legal and diplo arenas and they poison the well. Yet, what’s the upshot?

BASICALLY, in order to maintain the facade that Islam is a “religion of peace”, how would it appear if they out-and-out mentioned that the so-called (enumerable) “Asian” suspects are actually Muslims? 

BLOWING the lid…

The serious case report into the exploitation of six girls in the Oxfordshire area by a gang of sevenAsian Muslim men, who were later convicted at the Old Bailey in London, found that police and social services failed to act long after they were made aware that children were engaged in sexual relations with the men thanks to “a combination of not grasping the extent of exploitation, the focus on the girls and their families as the source of the problems, the corresponding lack of focus on perpetrators, and a host of administrative and management issues”.

Alan Bedford, the paper’s author, found that “the overall problem was not grasping the nature of the abuse – the grooming, the ‘pull’ from home, the erosion of consent, the inability to escape and the sheer horror of what the girls were going through – but of seeing it as something done more voluntarily. Something that the girls did as opposed to something done to them.”

rape-300x224_thumb

He notes that “scores of professionals from numerous disciplines, and tens of organisations or departments […] used language that appeared at least in part to blame victims and see them as adults.”

Education Secretary Nicky Morgan has told MPs that the report made it clear that police and social workers had failed on a number of levels. “[The report] is an indictment of the failure of frontline workers to protect extremely vulnerable young people over a number of years,” she said. “Reading the details of what happened to them has been truly sickening.

BwJ1F8uIcAATmTE.jpg-large-e1410651930356

“The serious case review makes clear that numerous opportunities to intervene to protect these girls were missed as police and social workers failed to look beyond what they saw as troubled teenagers to the frightened child within. “As a result they failed to act on clear evidence of sexual abuse, to protect girls or even to pass on concerns to a sufficiently senior level.” Morgan added that ministers rejected explanations that child sex abuse was not “widely recognized” at the time.

During the trial of the men at the Old Bailey, the Prosecution described the girls who became their victims as vulnerable children, aged just 11 or 12. “… these men, sometimes acting in groups and at other times separately, actively targeted vulnerable young girls from the age of about the ages of 11 or 12,” the prosecutor told the court.

“There is evidence that the men deliberately targeted children who were out of control. They also targeted children who had been sent to live in care homes for precisely that reason. … The girls who were chosen generally had troubled upbringings and unsettled home lives which made it less likely that anyone would be exercising any normal parental control over them or looking out for them.”

Extraordinarily, the police and social services, who are tasked with safeguarding vulnerable children, deemed the children themselves to be complicit in their own abuse. In one police report, a 13-year-old girl was recorded as having an “age appropriate sexual relationship” with an AsianMuslim man much older than her.

72316F6A06E000005DC250_634x379-vi

Bedford quotes a police report into the matter as finding that “there appears to have been a tolerance of underage sexual activity and no recognition of factors such as abuse of power and coercion and the fact that this was against the law.

“At interview most members of staff disputed they tolerated underage sex and they did try to talk to the girls about this but that often the most they felt they could do was to stress that it was inappropriate, to ask the girls why they thought older men would be interested in young girls and to talk about safe sex.”

Bedford concludes that “there was, beyond any lack of knowledge or clarity, an acceptance of a degree of underage sexual activity that reflects a wider societal reluctance to consider something ‘wrong’.”

The report includes testimonies from the girls, aged between 12 and 15 at the time of their abuse: “Dad was violent to me. I thought it was normal.” “Suddenly the guys were bringing me stuff. They said how lovely I was.” “They paid for drinks and gave us drugs” “They took us to a field where there were other men who had come to have sex with us. I tried not to do it. There were five of them.” “He urinated on me.” “It was always Muslim men.”

0_362727317155677_2108263175_n-vi

“I was expected to do things – if I didn’t they said they would come to my house and burn me alive. I had a baby brother.” “I turned up at the police station at 2/3am, blood all over me, soaked through my trousers to the crotch. They dismissed it as me being naughty, a nuisance. I was bruised and bloody.” “Social services washed their hands – ‘it’s your choice’ I was told.”

“Police… didn’t find me except once… I didn’t hide – I told people where I was.” “If a perpetrator can spot the vulnerable children, why can’t professionals?”

POINTEDLY, the political leadership’s (the police and social services alike) cycle of silence, coupled with bouts of obfuscation from the media – as to the religious persuasion of the rapists – allows Islam’s sexual predators to continue unimpeded. Not only that, non-Muslims throughout the west are perilously placed at risk due to their malfeasance. Sooner than later, non-Muslims must realize that they are on their own, as officialdom has zero interest to expose the evidence, the dangers, at hand!

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}

 

SEXUAL JIHAD & SLAVE JIHAD:Koranic Mandates Inspired By Muhammad! Commentary by Adina Kutnicki

ONE has to internalize all the lies surrounding Islam, if one expects to make a dent in beating back its horrific effects on humanity. A scourge.
IN fact, dispelling its bugaboos are no less intrinsic than fighting the barbarians for Allah (and Muhammad) on the battlefield.
FIRSTLY, in order to tap into the recesses of leftist western guilt (that’s another sickness, but let’s not digress), thus, causing them to cower, one has to recognize that the ubiquitous “race card” always enters into the public sphere. The silencing. In other words, par for the course, whenever truths re Islam + terror + barbarism are linked, voilà, poof-like, one is tarred a racist! Even uber liberal Bill Maher is getting wise to their hammer and tongs. Welcome to this investigative journalist’s non-appeasing worldview.
 

 

WELL, some die-hard leftists do come to their senses, albeit kicking and screaming, but usually after witnessing non stop barbarism under the banner of Islam.
In the main, let’s get this fact straight: Muslims are not a race. Period. They are a collection of many groups who happen to follow Islam; a political construct/quasi religion propped up under the banner of Shariah law. Yes, some are Arabs, some are Blacks, others are Whites and the rest come from almost every other background. Intrinsically, if Muslims are considered a race, so too are Christians and Jews. We all know this is not the case. Nonsense. Agreed, one can be anti all three religions, but not tarred a “racist” for said pronouncements. 
FOR added heft, dispelling the myth, “Islam is a religion of peace”, is the west’s most pressing/urgent battle. All else flows from said premise. Piercing the veil. Once accomplished, the west can move forward on proving that Islam is a retrograde and anti-humane force; forcing women into sexual jihad AND sexual slavery. Both are equal sides to the same abomination which are sanctioned and hailed under Islam!

10382: Ruling on having intercourse with a slave woman when one has a wife


Could you please clarify for me something that has been troubling me for a while. This concerns the right of a man to have sexual relations with slave girls. Is this so? If it is then is the man allowed to have relations with her as well his wife/wives. Also, is it true that a man can have sexual relations with any number of slave girls and with their own wife/wives also? I have read that Hazrat Ali had 17 slave girls and Hazrat Umar also had many. Surely if a man were allowed this freedom then this could lead to neglecting the wife’s needs. Could you also tell clarify whether the wife has got any say in this matter.

Praise be to Allaah.  Islam allows a man to have intercourse with his slave woman, whether he has a wife or wives or he is not married.A slave woman with whom a man has intercourse is known as a sariyyah (concubine) from the word sirr, which means marriage.This is indicated by the Qur’aan and Sunnah, and this was done by the Prophets. Ibraaheem (peace be upon him) took Haajar as a concubine and she bore him Ismaa’eel (may peace be upon them all).Our Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) also did that, as did the Sahaabah, the righteous and the scholars. The scholars are unanimously agreed on that and it is not permissible for anyone to regard it as haraam or to forbid it. Whoever regards that as haraam is a sinner who is going against the consensus of the scholars.Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):“And if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphan girls then marry (other) women of your choice, two or three, or four; but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one or (slaves) that your right hands possess. That is nearer to prevent you from doing injustice”….{Blogger’s note:read the whole thing…be prepared to vomit….}

isis2

  FOR further Koranic confirmations and attributions….                                          

Question:
Does Islam condone slavery?  Does Islamic teaching allow Muslim men to keep women as sex slaves?

Summary Answer:
Islam neither ignores nor condemns slavery.  In fact, a large part of the Sharia is dedicated to the practice.Muslims are encouraged to live in the way of Muhammad, who was a slave owner and trader.  He captured slaves in battle.  He had sex with his slaves.  And he instructed his men to do the same.  The Qur’an actually devotes more verses to making sure that Muslim men know they can keep women as sex slaves (4) than it does to telling them to pray five times a day (0).

The Qur’an:
Qur’an (33:50)“O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee”  This is one of several personal-sounding verses “from Allah” narrated by Muhammad – in this case allowing himself a virtually unlimited supply of sex partners.  Other Muslims are restrained to four wives, but, following the example of their prophet, may also have sex with any number of slaves, as the following verse make clear:Qur’an (23:5-6)“..who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess…”   This verse permits the slave-owner to have sex with his slaves.  See also Qur’an (70:29-30).  The Quran is a small book, so if Allah used valuable space to repeat the same point four times, then sex slavery must be very important to him.Qur’an (4:24)“And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.”  Even sex with married slaves is permissible.Qur’an (8:69)“But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good”  A reference to war booty, of which slaves were a part.  The Muslim slave master may enjoy his “catch” because (according to verse 71) “Allah gave you mastery over them.Qur’an (24:32)“And marry those among you who are single and those who are fit among your male slaves and your female slaves…”  Breeding slaves based on fitness.Qur’an (2:178)O ye who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the murdered; the freeman for the freeman, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female.”  The message of this verse, which prescribes the rules of retaliation for murder, is that all humans are not created equal.  The human value of a slave is less than that of a free person (and a woman’s worth is also distinguished from that of a man’s).Qur’an (16:75)“Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah.”  Yet another confirmation that the slave is is not equal to the master.  In this case it is plain that the slave owes his status to Allah’s will.  (According to 16:71, the owner should be careful about insulting Allah by bestowing Allah’s gifts on slaves – those whom the god of Islam has not favored).

From the Hadith:
Bukhari (80:753)“The Prophet said, ‘The freed slave belongs to the people who have freed him.'” Bukhari (52:255) – The slave who accepts Islam and continues serving his Muslim master will receive a double reward in heaven.Bukhari (41.598) – Slaves are property.  They cannot be freed if an owner has outstanding debt, but can be used to pay off the debt.Bukhari (62:137) – An account of women taken as slaves in battle by Muhammad’s men after their husbands and fathers were killed.  The woman were raped with Muhammad’s approval.Bukhari (34:432) – Another account of females taken captive and raped with Muhammad’s approval.  In this case it is evident that the Muslims intend on selling the women after raping them because they are concerned about devaluing their price by impregnating them.  Muhammad is asked about coitus interruptus.Bukhari (47.765) – A woman is rebuked by Muhammad for freeing a slave girl.  The prophet tells her that she would have gotten a greater heavenly reward by giving her to a relative (as a slave).Bukhari (34:351) – Muhammad sells a slave for money.  He was thus a slave trader.Bukhari (72:734) – Some contemporary Muslims in the West, where slavery is believed to be a horrible crime, are reluctant to believe that Muhammad owned slaves.  This is just one of many places in the Hadith where a reference is made to a human being owned by Muhammad.  In this case, the slave is of African descent.Muslim 3901 – Muhammad trades away two black slaves for one Muslim slave.Muslim 4112 – A man freed six slaves on the event of his death, but Muhammad reversed the emancipation and kept four in slavery to himself.  He cast lots to determine which two to free.

 

Bukhari (47:743) – Muhammad’s own pulpit – from which he preached Islam – was built with slave labor on his command.

 

Bukhari (59:637)“The Prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, ‘Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)?’ When we reached the Prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, ‘O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumlus.'”  Muhammad approved of his men having sex with slaves, as this episode involving his son-in-law, Ali, clearly proves.  This hadith refutes the modern apologists who pretend that slaves were really “wives,” since Muhammad had forbidden Ali from marrying another woman as long as Fatima (his favorite daughter) was living.

 

Abu Dawud (2150)“The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Qur’an 4:24) ‘And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.'”  This is the background for verse 4:24 of the Qur’an.  Not only does Allah grant permission for women to be captured and raped, but allows it to even be done in front of their husbands.  (See also Muslim 3432 & Ibn Kathir/Abdul Rahman Part 5 Page 14)

 

Abu Dawud 1814“…[Abu Bakr] He then began to beat [his slave] him while the Apostle of Allah (pbuh) was smiling and saying: Look at this man who is in the sacred state (putting on ihram), what is he doing?”  The future first caliph of Islam is beating his slave for losing a camel while Muhammad looks on in apparent amusement.

 

Ibn Ishaq (734) – A slave girl is given a “violent beating” by Ali in the presence of Muhammad, who does nothing about it.

 

Abu Dawud 38:4458Narrated Ali ibn AbuTalib: “A slave-girl belonging to the house of the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) committed fornication. He (the Prophet) said: Rush up, Ali, and inflict the prescribed punishment on her. I then hurried up, and saw that blood was flowing from her, and did not stop. So I came to him and he said: Have you finished inflicting (punishment on her)? I said: I went to her while her blood was flowing. He said: Leave her alone till her bleeding stops; then inflict the prescribed punishment on her. And inflict the prescribed punishment on those whom your right hands possess (i.e. slaves)”.  A slave girl is ordered by Muhammad to be beaten until she bleeds, and then beaten again after the bleeding stops.  He indicates that this is prescribed treatment for slaves (“those whom your right hand possesses”).

 

Ibn Ishaq (693)“Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu’l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons.”  Muhammad trades away women captured from the Banu Qurayza tribe to non-Muslim slave traders for property.  (Their men had been executed after surrendering peacefully without a fight).

 

Umdat al-Salik (Reliance of the Traveller) (o9.13) – According to Sharia, when a child or woman is taken captive by Muslims, they become slaves by the mere fact of their capture.  A captured woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled…..{read the whole dastardly Koranic “justifications”….}

AS to the absolute incompatibility of Islam’s inclusion into western norms/nations, one must also internalize where it presently stands, as opposed to the rest of the west: Muslim leaders/ethos are stuck in the 7th century, whereas the west is living in the 21st. And this is where the clash of civilizations ensues; its battle grounds.

BASICALLY, America left behind its own dark history of slavery through the realization that its blight cast a long shadow on its presumed ideals. Resultant, its people entered into a bitter Civil War to abolish what had become man’s inhumanity to man. And along with said enlightenment came a national understanding of the evils attributed to enslavement. 

Islam, on the other hand, teaches no such ability for self or national reflection. As is said, this is where the rubber meets the road. BUT if a visual aid is required to shed the harshest light where Islam stands on a core human rights issue, pay heed to the following presentation. It is eye opening and jaw dropping, but no less true. It aligns the nexus between the mindset of Islam and Nazi socialism via their usage of propaganda machines and their anti-western hatred; the main “meeting of the minds” between the reds and greens!

REGARDLESS of all else, the Jihadi-in-Chief, the heretofore leader of the free world, has done little to thwart the Islamic State and attendant Islamic global aspirations. To wit, he has little issue with their barbaric enslavement, even as he blah, blahs over women’s rights issues. For the record, he facilitated their rise. The proofs are beyond reproach.

Female Jihadis, European & American, Are GRAVE Dangers! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

21-year-old-british-woman-join-isis-photo-hold-severed-head-syria-500x500

The photo is posted on Mujahidah Bint Usama’s Twitter page and shows her wearing a white lab coat, veil and holding her arm outstretched, with what appears to be a decapitated head. The photo is captioned “Dream Job.. A Terrorist Doc” which she has added a smiley face song and two hearts to.

THE so-called “fairer” sex in the netherworld of Islam can be as monstrous – some even more – as their male counterparts. This is especially true when Muslimas pledge their full throttle allegiance to jihad. They are Allah-driven women, hear them roar! Heads literally roll….their “pious” head to toe clothing notwithstanding!

NOW, all individuals have ingrained natures, so too is the case when it comes to females and jihad. In other words, as recently reported (thankfully, the commentary swirled around the web with lightening speed and to vast acclaim…Muslim websites re-blogged it too…G-d only knows why…could be for purposes of a Fatwa…who the hell knows what marinates in their twisted minds), “sexual jihad” is mandated to both “relax” the male jihadis, as well as to “pump” them up for the next battle. Wish it was a joke…hyperbole. 

ALONG this vein, let’s first explore the more “celebrated” women of jihad, but do not think that they are anomalies, nor the following listing all inclusive. Far from it.

Women Of Jihad One:

DO readers recall a “Palestinian” female jihadi, a she-devil, namely Mariam Farhat:

This monstrous woman, who gloried in blood and murder, should have been shunned by every decent person around her. But apparently there were no such people. She was not only not shunned; she was elected to Parliament and celebrated as a heroine. When she died, 4,000 people attended her funeral, including the Hamas Prime Minister. Tiny Minority of Extremists Update: “Palestinian lawmaker, mother of militants, dies,” by Ibrahim Barzak for the Associated Press, March 17 (thanks to AJ):

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip — A Palestinian lawmaker known as the “mother of martyrs” who praised and supported three of her sons who were killed while carrying out deadly attacks against Israelis died Sunday, a Gaza official said.

Mariam Farhat, who said she wished she had 100 sons to die while attacking Israelis, died in a Gaza city hospital of health complications including lung ailments and kidney failure, health official Ashraf Al-Kidra said. She was 64.

The mother of 10 first came to attention in 2002 when she recorded a farewell video with her 19-year-old son, Mohammed, giving him her blessing the night before he undertook a shooting attack in a Jewish settlement in the Gaza Strip.

The video showed Mohammed holding hands with his mother, who prayed for him to become a “martyr,” the term Palestinians use for militants killed in attacks on Israelis. Armed with grenades and automatic rifles, he broke into a study hall, killing five seminary students before he was shot dead by a soldier.

In a video that mother and son made together just before the attack, Farhat said: “I wish I had 100 boys like Mohammad. I’d sacrifice them for the sake of God.”

When I see all the Jews in Palestine killed, that will be enough for me,” his mother said on camera. “I wish he will kill as many as he can, so they will be scared.”

TO use the term mother in the same breath as this monster for Allah is to sully it for time immemorial. But from one mother to another, now that she is six feet under, this devil incarnate should roast in hell-fire for all eternity. This should be the first (of many) punishment meted out for her crimes against humanity. G-d willing. May (his) her name be obliterated….ימח שמו !

Women Of Jihad Two:

EMULATING in her barbaric wake, this investigative journalist has lost count of all the women suicide/homicide bombers, plus those who tried to self-detonate but failed! Yet one stands out in memory, and this is only because a sibling responded to, investigated, the horrific scene:

 Hanadi Tayseer Abdul Malek Jaradat (Arabic: هنادي تيسير عبدالمالك جرادات‎)….At the time of her suicide, Jaradat was a law student due to qualify as a lawyer in a few weeks. 

The Maxim restaurant is a small storefront sitting on a bluff overlooking the Mediterranean Sea. Right away he’s taking notes — how far out are the roadblocks searching for accomplices, where is the police perimeter? He steps lightly, careful to avoid anything that might be evidence, anything that used to be part of someone. For a second, he takes in the pleasant Mediterranean breeze, as if to assure himself that life goes on, then into the carnage he steps. He fights an impulse, learned in his days with Manhattan South homicide, to light up a stogie to mask the stink of slaughter. Back in New York, the old-timers would reach behind the bar, pour a couple fingers of Johnnie Black, and crouch, reading the scene, studying the dead, trying to conjure up their final moments. But this is no sloppy homicide brought on by booze or jealousy, no social-service killing of one skel by another, no scumbag who, let’s face it, had it coming. The dead here are truly innocent. And that is all that is left here, the dead.

Morty knows that at these events, the who done it is rarely a question. He’s learned a lot about bad things since coming to Israel and knows that when people explode bomb belts, their legs often blow down and away, their torsos are vaporized, and their heads fly up, coming to rest close to where they last breathed. The local gendarmes give him a quick rundown. This time it was a woman; she came in with a taxi driver, had herself a meal, got up, and, believe it or not, paid the bill before turning to stand in the middle of the room and flick a toggle switch that sizzled a charge from a nine-volt battery down a wire to ten pounds of explosives that sent shrapnel flying around the crowded café at eight hundred meters per second, killing twenty-one people.

Morty quickly discounts the reports of gunfire. It was fragmentation from the bomb that put bulletlike holes in the windows, not any change in tactics. He tries to ignore the gore, to focus on the facts of the case, but body parts are everywhere. There is a fat woman, dead, sitting on a chair, her mass keeping her upright, whereas the other dead are scattered prone, including the man lying beside her, his brains seeping out of his head like yolk from a cracked egg. Witnesses say the bomber was a beautiful Palestinian woman — a lawyer by trade, it would turn out — and her head sits on the floor, looking like a rubbery Halloween fright mask, pretty no more. The world will know her now. Her family will talk of vengeance and God, about a brother killed by the Israeli army, will heap praise on her. Morty will pay attention to none of this. He’s a Detective, not a politician.

He’s busy taking notes, counting the dead, studying the blast patterns, watching his step while studying how the Israeli cops, all too practiced at this, work the set. Bad news ricochets in a well-wired country about the size of New Jersey, so cell phones ring round the place, anguished calls from family never to be answered. Morty has heard the same thing many times and ignores the eerie tones. How did she get in? he wonders. Every restaurant in Israel is required to have a doorman armed with a gun and a magnometer, and they are usually effective and brave; several have died wrestling bombers to the ground……..

Women Of Jihad Three:

OH dear….never ending….as we segue to a Pakistani monster, however, she was one of many foreign student jihadis let into American universities, another parasite. And this one should certainly merit particular American opprobrium, as she DIRECTLY assisted the 9/11/01 terrorists! Of special note, she was a leader at MIT’s MSA, a school very close to heart.

Dr Aafia Siddiqui

Moreover, there were rumblings about MSA’s MIT most infamous alumni – none other than Ms. Aafia Siddiqui – a 9/11/01 Al Qaeda plotter, now in jail for life !

For a grand overview, please see this  via ‘The Counter Jihad Report’ 

“The Muslim community expressed its outrage this week over a New York Police Department surveillance report from 2006 that theAssociated Press reported on Monday. The report disclosed that the NYPD monitored Muslim Students Association (MSA) chapters in the Northeast. The outrage, centered on the perceived violation of privacy, is based on an incorrect presumption that law enforcement had no cause for concern with the MSA.”

Women Of Jihad Four:

ARE we sensing a (female) pattern here yet? Hope so. But let’s not forget “jihad Jane” – a born and bred American – one who became infamous and wildly dangerous in her own right. Atta girl….

Colleen R. LaRose

Homegrown

[EDPA] Colleen R. LaRose, aka “Fatima LaRose,” aka “Jihad Jane,” an American citizen residing in Montgomery County, Pa., and five unindicted co-conspirators (located in South Asia, Eastern Europe, Western Europe and the United States) recruited men on the Internet to wage violent jihad in South Asia and Europe, and recruited women on the Internet who had passports and the ability to travel to and around Europe in support of violent jihad. Colleen LaRose pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists, conspiracy to kill in a foreign country, making false statements and attempted identity theft. LaRose’s co-defendant, Jamie Ramirez pleaded guilty the following month to one count of conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists. In January 2014, LaRose was sentenced to 10 years in prison for conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists, conspiracy to kill in a foreign country, making false statements and attempted identity theft. The same month, Ramirez was sentenced to eight years in prison for one count of conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists.

Women of Jihad Five:

Let’s dare not forget the British (similarly, other Euros following in their footsteps) female soldiers for Allah, ala the “white widow” from Britain. Yet, she is also the “black widow”, as she carries the black flag of Islam!

An international arrest warrant has been issued for Samantha Lewthwaite, top, the 'White Widow’ after the Nairobi outrage<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />

ALAS, all of the above – and so much more – leads a path straight to the main thesis: women jihadis ARE a clear and present danger, and they are lying-in-wait within the heart of America and Europe.

On the description of herself she has a quote from Anwar al-Awlaki – a high profile terrorist for al-Qaeda. It reads: “Running away from Jihād will not save you from death. You can die as a coward or you can die as a martyr.”

The jihadi is just one of a frighteningly increasing number of British women who have travelled to Syria and Iraq to fight for the IS. Many have been put in charge of stamping out “immoral” behavior at the center of the terror group, while at the same time running brothels full of non-Muslim women to service ISIS fighters.

They have joined the feared al-Khansaa brigade – an all female force intent on hunting down those who do not strictly follow sharia-law. They brigade operates in Raqqa – the Syrian city where the ISIS set up its headquarters and close to where American hostages James Foley and Steven Sotloff are believed to have been executed.

SACH ha’kol, at the end of it all, one must internalize: a preponderance of these barbarians for Allah (male and female) are more highly educated than most westerners. Yes, they are. Not only that, the dastardly mantra, Muslims turn to jihad due to poverty and deprivation is NOTHING more than a monstrous PC leftist/Islamist-driven lie! 

REGARDLESS, educated or dumb as oxen, the fact of the matter is that Islam, Shariah law mandated jihad, is the epicenter of the clash between civilizations. NEVER forget this!

image2-vi

 

REPEAT: there are NO “moderate” adherents to Islam. Whether one becomes an active jihadist or gives material support, it matters not a whit to those killed under the banner of jihad!

 

 

ISIS Leader(s) & Sexual Jihad Twist:Induction Via Sodomy!Blackmail Too…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

[Watch] ISIS Leader Is Homosexual, Marrying and Sodomizing All New Recruits

IN no uncertain terms, sans any poppycock, this site has warned about the dangerous, volatile and perverse connection between Islam and “sexual jihad”, as well as its twisted path to hyper-bloodletting via Koranic mandates and escalating barbarism.

IF the above appears too fantastical (to western, Jewish or Christian minds) that’s because it is. Regardless, it does not obviate its inherent truth. Believe it. But for those who are still skeptics, and for others who are left dumbfounded, the following should set (some of) the record straight:

Record One:

READERS, sodomy “for the sake of Islam” (Islam Über Alles) is a known mandate, though it is (or used to be) a well-kept “secret”. Don’t pay any mind to the “qualifiers” from this and that cleric, they are nothing but oozing manure.

Not only did the original “underwear bomber” Abdullah Hassan al-Asiri hide explosives in his rectum to assassinate Saudi Prince Muhammad bin Nayef—they met in 2009 after the 22-year-old Asiri “feigned repentance for his jihadi views“—but this “holy-warrior” apparently had fellow jihadists repeatedly sodomize him to “widen” his anus to fit the explosives—and all in accordance with the fatwas of Islamic clerics.

A 2010 Arabic news video that aired on Fadak TV gives the details. Apparently a cleric, one Abu al-Dema al-Qasab, informed al-Asiri and other jihadis of an “innovative and unprecedented way to execute martyrdom operations: place explosive capsules in your anus. However, to undertake this jihadi approach you must agree to be sodomized for a while to widen your anus so it can hold the explosives.”

Others inquired further by asking for formal fatwas. Citing his desire for “martyrdom and the virgins of paradise,” one jihadi (possibly al-Asiri himself) asked another sheikh, “Is it permissible for me to let one of the jihadi brothers sodomize me to widen my anus if the intention is good?”

After praising Allah, the sheikh’s fatwa began by declaring that sodomy is forbidden in Islam,

“However, jihad comes first, for it is the pinnacle of Islam, and if the pinnacle of Islam can only be achieved through sodomy, then there is no wrong in it. For the overarching rule of [Islamic] jurisprudence asserts that ‘necessity makes permissible the prohibited.’ And if obligatory matters can only be achieved by performing the prohibited, then it becomes obligatory to perform the prohibited, and there is no greater duty than jihad. After he sodomizes you, you must ask Allah for forgiveness and praise him all the more. And know that Allah will reward the jihadis on the Day of Resurrection, according to their intentions—and your intention, Allah willing, is for the victory of Islam, and we ask that Allah accept it of you.”

OKEY dokey…if Allah deems it acceptable…pleasing…so be it…how can an “infidel” (a woman, no less) argue with a ranting Islamist, whose head is still stuck in the 7th century!

Record Two:

SEGUING from male “sodomy jihad” to “regular sexual jihad” – as thuggish Muslims terrorize, rape and pillage all over Europe, and make their way into America too –  who would imagine, in the less than equal treatment of women in Islam, when it comes to jihad, well, the scales even out. How thoroughly modern-Millie of them! Say what?

Record Three:

IN this regard, yes, sexual jihad is all the rage! Fatwa-driven. Westerners, get with the (learning) program…

Record Four:

ACTUALLY, its mandates have reached feverish pitch…the sale of kiddies and wives raise the ante!

Record Five:

OMG…how much more depravity is necessary to demonstrably prove: Islam and the west are incompatible, and, yes, there IS a clash of civilizations!

isis2

SIGNIFICANTLY, this Islamic vixen awaits her jihadi bed mate, whether attached to ISIS/Al Qaeda et al. is irrelevant. Do they even care if their jihadi takes a shower first, more than likely hot and sweaty from the killing fields and pumped with adrenaline and rage? Just curious… Another question…”woman to woman”…is it enough of a gratifying experience to even shave one’s legs? Or, is it a “hit and run”? On the other hand, some girls are dragged kicking and screaming, but others volunteer. It’s their “contribution” to jihad. After all, what’s a good Muslima to do?

LO and behold, no one can claim that the jihadis are not thinking outside the box:

Austrian_teens

ISIS luring U.S. women with cash for babies promises…what will they think of next?

STILL, it is intrinsic to place all of this barbarism into Islamic context, if you will. So, as a matter of record, having participated in the review of a groundbreaking policy paper, Islam and Blood – https://adinakutnicki.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/islam_and_blood.pdf – it became apparent that the Islamic “love-affair” with blood permeated all core aspects of their lives, sex at the forefront.

NOW, if this sounds too surreal for most westerners brought up within Judeo-Christian culture, well, that’s the way it is. But to understand Islam properly is to also internalize the pent-up rage, and this includes the sexual component.

LET’s segue to the “news” re ISIS/ISIL and their “natural” partaking in sodomy ritual initiation, if your stomach can stand it. 

A video is circulating of what is identified to be an Iraqi official interrogating an ISIS terrorist who carried out seven beheadings. The interrogator asks the detainee about his forced recruiting into ISIS and the graphic acts that ensued.

The terrorist reveals yet another dark side to the Islamic State: sadistic acts of sodomy.

Shoebat.com translates that the recruit was one of eleven men who were ravaged by the ISIS “prince.”

He describes the leader as having a henna-dyed beard and slim figure, believed to be terrorist commander Abu Ala’.

Ala’ made a fatwa permitting himself to marry and rape his recruits, just as countless kidnapped women and girls are raped by their Islamist captives. The only exception is that none of the men may sodomize him in return.

The testimony aligns with a documentary broadcast by a Kurdish television station in August that claimed ISIS has been raping men in a ceremony it describes as “marriage,” recording the act as blackmail to force them to join.

The STERK station recorded the confessions of more than 20 ISIS insurgents:

The ISIL elements admitted that what they called ‘marriage’ was in fact rape. They said that every new member of the group was raped. The footage of the rape would be used as blackmail in the event of the new recruit refusing to participate in actions .

ISIS fighter Abdul Kareem Ibrahim Bazo explained that he was blindfolded before being raped:

“About a fortnight later they came and said I had to join. I did not want to. But they had the footage. They threatened to show it to my family .

“I fainted. When I came round they told me: ‘you are now with ISIL.’”

They ‘married’ me 15 times. Then they washed my head and put cologne on me. They told me no one could join ISIL without being married.”

This sickening abuse of power is just one of the many perverse tactics ISIS justifies with the Quran and hadiths.

H/T [Shoebat]

ALAS, in a mind-boggling twist – but par for the course within the perverse netherworld of Islamists – who can forget the insane rantings of Iran’s Mahdi-driven A’jad, when he opined: there are no gays in Iran! Well, truth dare be told, homosexuality is not only in full bloom in Iran, but throughout the Islamic Mid East and the diaspora too.

NOW, this is neither the time nor place to have a serious discourse on “alternative” lifestyles, but it does call into question the oft-repeated, bold-faced lies from Islamic leaders, as they continuously exhort the “purity” of living an Islamic lifestyle – covering their women from head to toe – as opposed to one of western decadence. Really now?

Muslim child brides

Islamic girls corralled – in chains – to meet their new husbands…happy wedding day…mazal tovs all around!

FOLKS –  if you aren’t worried about a head chopping ! – tell said dangerous bull sh-t to the Islamic sexual sadists who sodomize/rape BOTH boys and girls, all under the guise of jihad. Add to their perverted to do lists the goats and sheep they violate in acts of bestiality! Their animal-like behavior defies description…it is best to see it in plain view. Beyond any normal pale…

Islamic Sharia Law ruling. If a Muslim has sex with a goat or a sheep, and that goat or sheep has a baby, who owns the baby? The Muslim who had sex with the goat or sheep or the owner of the goat?

Under Islam, the man who owns the goat or sheep gets the baby from the ‘romance’ between the Moslem and the animal….lol

In Islam they believe that a man and an animal can create a baby if they have sexual relations…lol

No more goat-sex for Muslims in Sweden as government outlaw bestiality!

FRANKLY, you can’t make this craziness up…it is just too twisted. Resultant, is the west really supposed to be able to “tame” these beasts and live side by side with them?

WILD animals/beasts…חַיּוֹת בַּר…and I am not referring to the 4 legged ones!

 

SEXUAL JIHAD REACHES NEW PEAKS:”RELIGIOUS” FATWA “KOSHERS” THE SALE OF KIDDIES & WIVES! “RELIGION OF PEACE” STRIKES AGAIN. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

{Videos – click on boxes}

ONLY within a parallel universe would it appear “normal” to dictate to the female population – even those barely out of kindergarten – to cover themselves from head to toe, and then kosherize, via fatwa, the gifting of said body to one man after another. Say what? Has this American-Israeli lost her marbles, spouting such insanity and doublespeak? Far from it.

NOT only that, Islam, a political/religiously-cloaked doctrine, is responsible (via its Koranic-dictates) for a rage-fueled, sexually repressed male population. From their earliest interactions with their mothers, women are blamed for giving them “impure” desires to begin with! This devastating truth is duly explained within:Symposium: Murdering Women For “Honor”.

NEED more evidence of the Koranic devil? Well, the fact-based revelations gleaned within the following commentary (via its linked policy paper) can cause a sane person to howl at the moon: Islam & Blood. Imbibe it.

 But before you lose your bearings, please also read the predecessor to the latest “news” found below:SEXUAL JIHAD The New Rage, The Latest “Weapon” Waged To “Assist” Islamic Warriors. Where Is This Rooted?

DEAR heavens….

The Emerging Muslim Sexual Revolution

The word Nikah literally means “legal copulation”. The word for marriage is zawaj. Take a look at Jihad Nikah. This is an indoctrination of young girls to have sex with Jihadists. We recently reported3000 cases of impregnated young girls who were persuaded to participate. I have reviewed documented cases from sources in Arabic of husbands selling their wives to have sex with dozens of men in a day. Fathers who sell their virgin daughters in a sex industry that is plagued with violence in Syria and in Iraq. Such reports also show medical examinations of these women that show signs of damaged uteruses. They have been also repeatedly sodomized. Indeed, it is the signs of the times.

So many Muslim theologians came out within the last decade to issue the strange fatwas, to include Adult Breastfeeding fatwa, Misyar marriage (traveler convenient marriage), Temporary marriage, marriage with intent to divorce (Summer vacation marriage) and recently a fatwa called Jihad marriage, or Jihad Nikah. Nikah is literally the act of copulation under Sharia.

The idea of Jihad Nikah is simple. Women who want to participate in holy war (Jihad) can tend the battlefield by providing the gift of their bodies for Muslim veterans, especially in Syria where the heat of Jihad is highest.

Many denied it and accused the Syrian intelligence of fabricating the Fatwa and the stories. But such denial was shattered when the Tunisian Interior Minister shocked everyone by insisting on the presence of Tunisian young girls, who went to Syria and returned pregnant after they got married through a simple oral agreement with warriors. Each girl was traded among twenty, thirty and at times a hundred fighters.

Then we had the Tunisian Director of Public Security, Mustapha Ben Omar. He announced the dismantling of a Jihad cell practicing Jihad Nikah on Mount Al-Shaanby, managed by gunmen linked to al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. Even Osman Al-Bateekh when he was mufti, said that Tunisian girls were lured and sent to Syria for jihad marriage and many of them became pregnant fighters.

Every time such reports come out, the Muslim public will call it a lie and demand numbers and statistics while being fully committed to denying them when they are presented.

However, Islamic Muruna reveals much as the most prominent Sunni theologian Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi explains is “the process of permitting evils”, by “sanctioning prohibitions for the sake of an interest”. This “interest” regards Jihad, which is very well documented in his volume Fiqh Al-Muwazanat (The Jurisprudence of Balance) on his own website. This jurisprudence, as mad as it sounds, permits “reversing Sharia rulings” in order to “gain interests”. Imagine what “sanctioning prohibitions” means. If it says, “thou shall not kill” now it’s “thou can kill” for an “interest”.

Would not Muruna sanction the <strong>marriage of a Muslim woman to a Jewish man for the sake of an interest?

Qaradawi explains that Sharia under war can permit almost anything:

“Sharia’s ability to be flexible and inclusive is that it cares for their needs while excusing the burdens Muslims have to endure. For the sake of their destiny, it was made lawful for them to have exceptions from the law that are appropriate for them since these exceptions match their general goals to make it easy for humanity by removing the chains of [Sharia] rules they were made to adhere to in previous Sharia rulings.”

By reversing Islamic law, Muruna concludes an amazing doctrine that sanctions all prohibitions:

“When evil and harm conflict as necessities demand, we must then choose the least of the two evils or harms. This is what the experts in jurisprudence decided … if interests and harms/evils conflict, or benefits conflict with evils, what is then to be decided is to review each benefit and each harm and its consequences, so the minor evils are forgiven for the sake of the greater long-term benefit. The evil is also accepted even if that evil is extreme and normally considered deplorable.

And this is how Jihad and prostitution becomes sanctioned.

The Tunisian Bin Omar said that Ansar al-Sharia, which is a designated terrorist organization in Tunisia, focuses on underage veiled girls, and that a cell that was dismantled led a girl born in 1996. All conditions for a brothel network – to include pimping minors – were turned into a jihad.

And now we even have cases of Jihad incest (Nikah Al-Muharramat), which is said to have been sanctioned by the prominent Mufti Al-Arifi (a charge he denied) and then by Nasser Al-Umar, which he also denied.

It is now permissible in Jihadi circles for a woman to legally copulate with her brother, a son with a mother and a man with his daughter. That is if he did not find another woman to marry during war. The issue is not the validity of the fatwa since Islamic revolutions issue instruction guides on how to conduct life during the Syrian revolution entitled Fatwas of the Syrian Revolution.

Cover of Jihad Instruction Guide.

The al-Nusra terrorist group even agreed to develop a program to copulate on the battlefield in which the terrorist has two hours with the female volunteer before moving to the jihad in the arms of a second Jihadi. This “sanctioned copulation” (Nikah) Marriage program is now a matter of public record as Shoebat.com obtained a reference to one of the leaked documents for the Mujahideen. We found that the period of the Jihad in the arms of the mujahid is only two hours. After a break, which consists of little more than the traveling involved in going into the arms of another combatant brother in jihad for a different two hour stay.

So for Aisha, she starts at noon to continues until midnight. She is visited by Subhi, Abu Khalid and Abu Walid while we find the female combatant Marwa has been visited by the Abu Farouk between 2pm – 4pm and Mujahid Abu Abdullah Mustafa from 6pm – 8pm and Abu Mujahid Mohammed bin Samir from 10pm – midnight.

Likewise, the female mujahid Um Omar Mujahid is to only embark on Sex Jihad from morning until evening (from eight in the morning until ten at night), while the Abu Mujahid Muhammad Mujahid Shikhani is the most fortunate as he labors for four hours otherwise the rest of the Mujahideen who are struggling get only two hours.

Screenshot of Sex Jihad schedule.

Jihad Nikah schedule.

Jihad Nikah can also be seen with Jihadi style weddings.

“We congratulate our beloved bridegroom brother. Congratulations and blessings to both of you that you unite in goodness. I would also like to add that Jihad and fighting does not obstruct marriage …” (starting at 00:20)

 

From Bacha Bazi (Boy Love) in Afghanistan to Misyar Marriage (Convenient Marriage) amongst Sunni Muslims sanctioned by Saudi religious authority and Mut’a Marriage (Pleasure Marriage) amongst Shiites, the Muslim world sanctions many deviances:

Mut’a (Pleasure Marriage) is even part and parcel of Iranian education in schools. Here, young girls are indoctrinated into the practice:

Many of the social issues need to be addressed to the blinded west and translated.

Secular Arabic television stations address the issues of pleasure marriages, sex with infants, boys, especially amongst the Shia. Yet, Misyar marriage is nothing more than legalized call girls in Egypt and all over the Arab world by the top officials and Fatwa issuers. There are many websites used to facilitate the transactions. Go ahead and click here to see for yourself. This is for ‘lonely’ Muslim men who are on the road and are allowed to have sex with local Muslim women (who advertise themselves) in the area where the lonely Muslim male is traveling.

Mesiara Online screenshot.

Call girls are permitted in Islam and even with Muslim women donned with Hijabs. Misyar means sex for the travelers. While prostitution exists in every corner of the globe, its sanctification with fanciful words is what is particularly at issue here. The word prostitution is stealthily removed since there is a transaction established that says “marriage” instead.

Misyar is all over the Middle East and is sanctioned by many top Imams. The Muslim “conservative” world is much more disgusting than one can imagine. It’s actually far more like western liberalism than western conservatism. Misyar marriages are rarely if ever discussed in Western mainstream media, perhaps – at least in part – for that reason.

Misyar literally means the traveler marriage in which women must relinquish the care owed to them by a husband. Sheikh Ahmed al-Kubaissi, from the United Arab Emirates, thinks there is no formal problem with misyar marriage. After all, it fulfills all the demands of Islamic law. Wealthy Muslim men sometimes enter into a Misyar marriage while on vacation, in order to have sexual relations with another woman without committing the sin of adultery. They usually divorce the women once their holiday is over.

However, if this is understood by both parties at the time of concluding the marriage contract (and this is usually the case), this would constitute a fixed time period.

The Sheikh of al-Azhar Mosque – Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi – and theologian Yusuf Al-Qaradawi note, in their writings and in their lectures, that a major proportion of the men who take a spouse in the framework of the misyar marriage are already married men.

Many of the men involved would not marry a second wife within the regime of normal Islamic polygamy because of the heavy financial burdens, moral obligations & responsibilities placed on the husband. Instead, they opt for the option of misyar marriage when the theologians declare it licit. According to a Fatwa for Ayatollah Sistani, a Shī‘a Sayyed, Mut’ah is permitted but Misyar is considered to be prohibited by Shias. While both condemn the other sect for immoral acts, there is much similarity between Mut’ah and Misyar. Both require all the conditions applicable to Nikah(marriage) with the exception of fixed expiration date in Mut’ah. Every marriage by Sunnis requires two adult male witnesses, whereas in Shī‘as, the two witnesses required in either nikah-e-Mut’ah or in ordinary marriage may be just Allah and the Qur’an.

Websites in the English amount to a few thousand hits on Misyar with the usual Muslim discussion groups but the Arabic has over a million hits with a litany of services that facilitate the process with the blessings by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Even liturgy (Nasheed) on Nikah (legal copulation) that repeats, “I want to copulate. I want to get married …” are out (“Ureed Nikah” is a nasheed for Jihadists):

 

To be fair, many Muslims object. Muslim Saudi writer Dr. Zuhair Mohammed Jamil Kutby laments (I translated from Arabic) regarding the sexual revolution in the Muslim world, but argues that such deviant behavior stems from the Muslim history itself:

“The Arab Nation and through its scholars, jurists and intellectuals, think it is one of the best nations, and it is a nation like no other in the universe. But the fact is it went through periods of physical and moral degeneration that even history is embarrassed of. (Arab Vanity and Corruption)”

He added…

“When we come back to read some pages of our history—not the history written by Orientalists—this way we do not claim they are antagonistic. We find that our Arab history is full of conflict, crowded with a culture of lying and exposed by sexual and moral deviation … Is it not wrong and shameful the spread of corruption and sexual deviation in the corridors and palaces during Arab rule? Plentiful were these [deviations] written in our history books, novels and stories. For example, The Abbasid Caliph Harun al-Rashid spent his nights with Al-Majin and the immoral poet Abu Nawas…Here are the verses that indicate sexual decadence and corruption in which Abu Nawas says:

‘Adela blames my choice,
a boy smooth as an Oryx …
leave me alone, I said
do not blame me,
I am committed to what you hate
and until death do us part
Did not the book of Allah instruct?
To prefer boys over girls…’”

Pedophilia stems from the Qur’an and Muhammad. Muslim doublespeak artists cover up Muhammad’s marriage with Aisha, his six-year old wife and argue that he waited to consummate his marriage when she was nine. This waiting has nothing to do with Aisha’s maturity but with payment:

“…then Abu Bakr asked [the Prophet] ‘O Messenger of God, what prevents you from consummating the marriage with your wife?’ The Prophet said ‘The bridal gift (sadaq).’ Abu Bakr gave him the bridal gift, twelve and a half ounces [of gold], and the Prophet sent for us. He consummated our marriage in my house, the one where I live now and where he passed away.” [The History of Al-Tabari: Biographies of the Prophet’s Companions and Their Successors, translated by Ella Landau-Tasseron, SUNY Press, Albany, 1998, Volume XXXIX, pp. 171-173]

Muhammad’s companions and old geezers married underage girls. Ali gave his daughter to Umar:

“Umar asked ‘Ali for the hand of his daughter, Umm Kulthum in marriage. ‘Ali replied that she has not yet attained the age (of maturity)… Thus ‘Ali gave his daughter Umm Kulthum a dress and asked her to go to ‘Umar’ ‘Go and tell your father that you are very pretty …’. With that ‘Ali married Umm Kulthum to ‘Umar’.” [In Tarikh Khamees, Volume 2, p. 384 (‘Dhikr Umm Kalthum’) and Zakhair Al-Aqba, p. 168]

The Summary for The Message of Prayer, How To Teach Our Children Prayer by Sheikh Yousuf Al-Asfuri AlBahreini, First Edition, 1989.
This book is for the elementary schools in Bahrain (photo of page in Arabic here). In it, it gives the etiquettes of washing from ejaculation. Page 53 discusses the necessity to cleanse oneself and the conditions for washing

“1—intercourse with the vaginal part of a woman…intercourse after ejaculating in her anus…intercourse after ejaculating in a boy’s anus…after intercourse with an animal…”

al-emama

Moroccan journalist Hamid Tulist, in addressing the pedophilia problem in the Middle East, laments:

“Even the prince of the faithful Caliph Al-Amin, son of Caliph Harun al-Rashid, bought his eunuchs and dedicated them for his private use and refused women and slaves, and anguished over his love for a boy named Kauthar, and sang for him love songs and poetry. Caliph and Commander of the Faithful of Allah, al-Wathiq bin Khalifa Mu’tasim and Caliph Harun al-Rashid’s grandson, longed for a boy called Mahj. He dedicated sweet and delicate poems for him. Commander of the Faithful and Caliph al-Walid ibn Yazid ibn Abd al-Malik was even said that he enticed his brother to sodomize him.”

Tulist reverts not to the Quran, Hadith or Islamic jurisprudence to solve the problem of pedophilia in the Arab-Muslim world, but to the Jewish faith:

“The first mention of a type of sexual perversion (homosexuality) stated in the first religious book known in the Arab East was Genesis, a Jewish book and the first book of the five books of the Torah. In the story of Lot were God punished sexual perversion. In fact the Arabic word ‘Luat’ (sodomy) came from the Hebrew ‘Lot’ and not from the Arabic.”

What the Muslim world accuses the infidel of is exactly what the Muslim world is actually guilty of. But they have ways of passing their guilt. Of course, in the Middle East, the worst thing to be is a Jew and a woman. These are evil since hell is filled with them. Every evil is sanctioned in the Muslim world.

Adultery is cloaked in Muta and Misyar. Rape is cloaked in the right to own concubines. Murder is cloaked in Jihad against the collaborators and the Zionist enemy whom corrupted God’s Word, the Bible. Everything is twisted upside down.

NOT only that, but it was under the doctrine of MURUNA that Muslim Brotherhood diva Huma Abedin (Hill’s “bosom buddy”) was allowed to marry disgraced ex Rep Anthony Weiner…just in case any  of the readers were wondering how this came to pass.

Those who still insist that there is ANY accommodation the west can offer towards such a twisted political/religious-cloaked ideology are truly insane. It’s that simple. That deadly. 

YES, AMERICA IS ON THE PRECIPICE. EURABIA’S FATE ALREADY SEALED WITH BRITISH LAW SOCIETY’S ACCEPTANCE OF SHARIAH LAW.FATAL.LIGHTS OUT!

ISLAMIC BUTCHERY SWATHES ACROSS THE GLOBE:JIHAD UBER ALLES!”PURIFYING” THE WORLD FOR ALLAH.Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 

SANS a scintilla of a doubt, it is IMPOSSIBLE to separate Islamic doctrine from bloody jihad. Not only that, if one political commentary herein stands above all the rest, it is no doubt this one:

In brief, it is a recent policy paper by Professor Paul Eidelberg; a paper which this American-Israeli had the privilege to review and add to; duly honored and humbled to have been asked to participate in his myth shattering scholarship.

Make NO mistake, its contents are earth shaking, unbelievably thought provoking and cogently analyzed. In particular, its historical analysis and theological basis are spot on. Having read many policy papers, this praise is not offered lightly. Therefore, sit down… put your feet up… have a drink (not the inebriating kind)…. enjoy some sweets (you may need it to lighten the mood)… and start reading – https://adinakutnicki.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/islam_and_blood.pdf .

Sharing its contents may well be your most important contribution to our common struggle. Really.

One dare not separate the authentic/true doctrinal dictates of Islam from decapitations, cannibalism, rapes, shootings, bombings and whatever method gets “the job done”. It is not as if one is dealing with Christianity or Judaism, whereby one can – if they so desire – pick and choose how religious they want to be without fear of bloody retribution.

However, in respect to Islam, savagery is meted out to all those who refuse to submit to the boot of Islam, even from within the Muslim fold. Their preferred targets are “infidels”. Muslims who stay on the sidelines and refuse to take part in their savagery are very much in their cross hairs too. 

Bloody Jihad One:

What other so-called religion inspires head chopping and more? London’s Islamic-Inspired/Sanctioned Head Chopping; Cameron’s Hideous Response, and Boston’s Jihad. Cause & Effect!

Bloody Jihad Two:

And, if decapitations are not convincing, as to the scourge from Islam, how about this: Islamic Cannibalism ROOTED In Islam’s Relationship To Blood:The Slaughter of Christians & Jews!

Bloody Jihad Three:

As is said, whatever floats your boat…and for females who are too “demure” to partake in frontal jihad, well, sexual jihad is all the rage! SEXUAL JIHAD:The Latest “Weapon” Waged To “Assist” Islamic Warriors. Where Is This Rooted?

Bloody Jihad Four:

Just how intrinsic are Islam’s underpinnings to all of the above? Explosive Religious Origins:What It Means For Western Civilization In General & Israel In Particular.

Therefore, is it any shock that Islamic jihadists are swathing across the globe and killing students/children/others hither and yon, as they scream – all under the banner of Allah – Allahu Akbar….?

Islamic militants attack Nigerian school, killing dozens of students

DAMATURU, Nigeria — Islamic militants set fire to a locked dormitory at a school in northern Nigeria, then shot and slit the throats of students who tried to escape through windows during a pre-dawn attack Tuesday. At least 58 students were killed, including many who were burned alive.

They “slaughtered them like sheep” with machetes, and gunned down those who ran away, said one teacher, Adamu Garba.

Soldiers guarding a checkpoint near the coed government school were mysteriously withdrawn hours before it was targeted by the militants, said the spokesman for the governor of northeastern Yobe state.

Female students were spared in the attack, said the spokesman, Abdullahi Bego, though girls and women have been abducted in the past by militants of the Boko Haram movement, whose name means “Western education is forbidden.”

This time, the insurgents went to the female dormitories and told the young women to go home, get married and abandon the Western education they said is anathema to Islam, Bego said. All of the dead were teenage boys or young men.

The militants, whose struggle for an Islamic state has killed thousands and made them the biggest threat to security in Africa’s top oil producer, have increasingly preyed on civilians, both Muslim and Christian. Some 300 people have died in attacks this month alone.

Local officials buried the bodies of 29 victims and another 29 were taken to Damaturu Specialist Hospital, according to the hospital records and an Associated Press reporter who went to the mortuary. Most of the victims appeared to be between 15 and 20 years old, Bego said.

Eleven wounded survivors of the attack were being treated at the hospital.

Touring the smoldering ruins Tuesday at the Federal Government College of Buni Yadi, Gov. Ibrahim Gaidam decried the federal government’s failure to protect the population.

“It is unfortunate that our children in schools are dying from lack of adequate protection from the federal government,” Gaidam told reporters.

He called on President Goodluck Jonathan to deploy more troops to the region.

Jonathan, who rarely comments on individual attacks, said in a statement that he felt “immense sadness and anguish” by the loss of life at the school, and vowed that the military would “continue to prosecute the war against terror with full vigor, diligence and determination.”

Garba said the militants locked the door of a dormitory where male students were sleeping, then set it on fire. Some students were burned alive in the attack that began around 2 a.m., he said.

The governor said it took hours for troops to arrive, giving the assailants plenty of time to set the rest of the school campus ablaze— six dormitories, the administrative building, staff quarters, classrooms, a clinic and the kitchen.

Bego, the governor’s spokesman, said the governor will be looking into why the school was left unprotected. “The community complained to the governor that yesterday the military were withdrawn and then the attack happened,” he said.

Soldiers from Damaturu, the state capital located some 45 miles (70 kilometers) away, did not arrive until noon, hours after the attackers had taken off, according to community leaders.

Military spokesman Eli Lazarus confirmed the attack, but could not give an exact death toll because soldiers were still gathering corpses. He had no immediate comment on the charge that soldiers withdrew before the attack.

Nigeria’s military has reported arresting several soldiers accused of aiding and passing information to Boko Haram extremists; a senator has also been accused of similar charges.

On Monday, Jonathan dismissed suggestions the military was losing the war to halt the 4-year-old Islamic uprising in the northeast.

Tens of thousands of Nigerians have lost family members, houses, businesses, their belongings and livelihoods to the rebellion and the fallout from a military state of emergency by soldiers accused of gross human rights violations, including setting ablaze entire villages and summary executions of suspects.

Tuesday’s attack is only the latest in a string of deadly assaults by Islamic militants.

Entire towns and villages were under the sway of Boko Haram when Jonathan declared a state of emergency in May. The military quickly forced the insurgents out of urban areas, only to have them regroup in forests and mountain caves where it has proved difficult to flush them out.

The military said recent attacks are being perpetrated by militants escaping a sustained aerial bombardment and ground assaults on their forest hideouts along the border with Cameroon, an offensive begun after Jonathan fired and replaced his entire military command last month. On Saturday, the military announced it had closed hundreds of miles of the border with Cameroon to prevent militants using it as a launch pad for attacks.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Monday condemned the “unspeakable violence and acts of terror” and said the United States was helping Nigerian authorities “to combat the threat posed by Boko Haram, while protecting civilians and ensuring respect for human rights.”

But survivors and local officials charge they get no protection.

“Everybody is living in fear,” local government chairman Maina Ularamu told the AP after Izghe village was attacked twice in a week this month — with militants killing 109 people and burning hundreds of thatched huts in neighboring Adamawa state.

“There is no protection. We cannot predict where and when they are going to attack. People can’t sleep with their eyes closed,” Ularamu said.

Aside for some pooh-pooh declarations of “outrage” muttered by Obama Inc., it is hardly comforting that these same mouthpieces BACK UP Al-Qaeda and its offshoots, all over the Mid East and beyond. 

In effect, Obama Inc. is guilty by omission and commission, despite their feigned exclamations of shock…horror…and what not! Besides, this is an admin which employs a terrorist to be an Obamacare “navigator”. Think this is smack talk? Nope. 

The fact of the matter is that Islam cannot be separated from its bloody roots, simply because jihad by the sword is DIRECTLY ordered through the Koran and by major Islamic scholars.

CASE CLOSED!

Question:Are Muslims permitted to force others into accepting Islam?

Summary Answer
:
Muslims are commanded to fight unbelievers until they are either dead, converted to Islam, or in a permanent state of subjugation under Muslim domination.  Allowing people of other faiths to live and worship independently of Islamic rule is not an option.

The Qur’an:
Qur’an (8:39) – “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.”  Translation from the Noble QuranQur’an (9:29) – “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”  Suras 9 and 5 are the last “revelations” that Muhammad handed down – hence abrogating what came before, which includes the oft-quoted verse 2:256 -“Let there be no compulsion in religion…”.Qur’an (9:5) “But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them…”  Prayer and charity are among the Five Pillars of Islam, as salat and zakat.  See below.  Islam sanctions violence as a means of coercing religion.Qur’an (9:11) – (Continued from above) “But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then are they your brethren in religion”  This confirms that Muhammad is speaking of conversion to Islam.Quran (9:56-57) – “And they swear by Allah that they are most surely of you, and they are not of you, but they are a people who are afraid (of you).  If they could find a refuge or cave or a place to enter into, they would certainly have turned thereto, running away in all haste.”  This refers to people living among Muhammad’s own people who may not be true believers, but have to pretend to be in order to survive.  They have no safe refuge to which to escape the Muslims.  If Islam were a religion of peace, then why the fear?Qur’an (2:193) – “And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion be only for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers.”  The key phrase is to fight until “religion be only for Allah.”Qur’an (3:83) – “Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and the earth has sub mitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?”  So much for the earlier verse (2:256) stating that there is “no compulsion in religion”.

From the Hadith:
Sahih Muslim (1:33) The Messenger of Allah said: “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay zakat.”  The first part of this condition is the Shahada, or profession of faith in Islam.  Violence is sanctioned until the victims embrace Muhammad’s religion.Sahih Muslim (19:4294) – “When you meet your enemies who are polytheists (which includes Christians), invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them … If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them”  Osama bin Laden echoes this order from his prophet: “Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually?  Yes. There are only three choices in Islam  … . Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.” (source: The al-Qaeda Reader p. 19-20)Bukhari (8:387) – “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.'”Bukhari (53:392) – “While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said, “Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle.”Bukhari (2:24) – “Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform a that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”Bukhari (60:80) – “The Verse:–‘You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.’ means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.”Bukhari (60:40) – “…:And fight them till there is no more affliction (i.e. no more worshiping of others along with Allah).”  ‘Affliction’ of Muslims is explicitly defined here being a condition in which others worship a different god other than Allah.  Muslims are commanded to use violence to ‘rectify’ the situation.Bukhari (59:643) – “Testify that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah, or else I will chop off your neck!”  Words of a military leader that Muhammad sent on an expedition with the mission of destroying a local religion in Yemen.Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 959 – Then the apostle sent Khalid bin Walid… to the Banu al-Harith and ordered him to invite them to Islam three days before he attacked them.  If they accepted then he was to accept it from them, and if they declined he was to fight them.  So Khalid set out and came to them, and sent out riders in all directions inviting the people to Islam, saying, “If you accept Islam you will be safe.”  So the men accepted Islam as they were invited.  The text goes on to say that Khalid taught the al-Harith about Islam after their “conversion,” proving that it was based on fear of slaughter rather than a free and intelligent decision.Ibn Kathir (Commenting on Quran 2:256, which says “let there be no compulsion in religion”) –“Therefore all people of the world should be called to Islam.  If anyone of them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the jizya, they should be fought till they are killed.”

 


Additional Notes:
Following his flirtation with preaching relative peace and tolerance at Mecca – a 13-year disaster that netted less than 100 followers (mostly friends and family) – Muhammad changed tactics during his last ten years.  Once he obtained the power to do so, he began forcing others into accepting his claims about himself at the point of a sword.  In many places in the Hadith, he tells his followers that he has been commanded by Allah to fight unbelievers until they profess their faith in Islam (theShahada).During these later years, Muhammad did not seem at all bothered by conversions that were made under obvious duress.  These included that of his sworn enemy of Abu Sufyan and his wife Hind.  According to Muslim historians, when Abu Sufyan went to seek peace with Muhammad, he was ordered instead to embrace Islam.  The exact words spoken to him in Muhammad’s presence were,  “Submit and testify that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the apostle of Allah before you lose your head” – (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 814).  He did.The entire city of Mecca followed suit, even though the residents and leaders detested Muhammad and had resisted his preaching from the beginning.  Most of them “converted” to Islam the day that he marched through their city with an army so dominant that little resistance was offered.  Only the most credulous of believers would think that the city’s religious epiphany just happened to coincide with the sword at their necks.Meccans who would not change their religion were forcibly expelled from the city following that last Haj (Quran 9:5).  The Christians and Jews living in Arabia at the time suffered the same fate on Muhammad’s deathbed order.  They were given the choice of either accepting Islam or being forced off their land (Sahih Muslim 19:4366).The Jews at Khaybar were not at war with Muhammad when he ordered his warriors to attack them.  Even his faithful son-in-law, Ali, whom he chose to head the mission, was somewhat perplexed as to the pretext on which they were to assault this peaceful farming community so far away from Medina:

Muhammad said: ‘Proceed on and do not look about until Allah grants you victory’, and Ali went a bit and then halted and did not look about and then said in a loud voice: ‘Allah’s Messenger, on what issue should I fight with the people?’ Thereupon he (the Prophet) said: ‘Fight with them until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger’  (Sahih Muslim 31:5917)

The Jews were caught entirely be surprise, of course.  Their wealth was stolen and their women and children taken and distributed as slaves by the prophet of Islam to his men.  Muhammad even took a woman for himself – after ordering the death of her husband.

Before he died, Muhammad sent his warriors against pagan Arab tribes, such as the al-Harith, demanding that they either convert to Islam or be wiped out (naturally, they opted for the Religion of Peace).  He cursed Christians and Jews to the very end (Bukhari 8:427).

According to al-Shafi in “The Ordinances of the Quran“, Muhammad “defeated the people until they entered Islam by hook or by crook.”  Muslims are taught to follow in the way of their prophet.  A devotee under the reign of Umar put it this way “Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute)” (Bukhari 53:386).

Likewise, Abu Bakr, Muhammad’s closest companion and immediate successor, pressed Jihad aggressively in foreign territory against people who did not want war and were of no threat.  In a letter sent to the Persians, the caliph bluntly stated, “You should convert to Islam, and then you will be safe, for if you don’t, you should know that I have come to you with an army of men that love death, as you love life.”

Down through the centuries Muslims have forced Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Zoroastrians, pagans and others to accept Islam, either by bluntly offering them death as an alternative, or by making their lives so miserable (ie. taxes, denial of rights…) that the conquered convert to Islam under the strain.

Forced conversions persist among extremists.  Recently in Egypt, a Christian girl was kidnapped and told that she would be raped if she did not convert.  In 2010, an 11-year-old Christian boy in Pakistan was kept enslaved in chains (12) by his Muslim landlord, who proudly told the world that he would liberate the lad if he embraced Islam.

Neither of these examples of attempted forced conversion was condemned by Islamic organizations, even in the West.  From the Muslim perspective, the victim in each case still technically retains the choice to convert.  In fact, some even lauded the Pakistani slave-owner for being magnanimous in offering freedom and debt relief to his subject for embracing Islam.

Since Muslims believe so sincerely that their religion is truth, they often can’t help but feel, on some level, that forced conversion is more of a favor done to the subject – a case of the end justifying the means.  As Muhammad said, “Allah marvels at those who are brought to paradise in chains” (Bukhari 52:254).

It is also important to note the critical role that jizya plays in Islamic conversion.  Paying a “tax” to Muslims is the only avenue of escape for those who don’t want to leave their religion, according to the Qur’an.  This answers the question of why Muhammad, his companions, and subsequent Muslim armies didn’t force everyone to convert to Islam.

As Muhammad realized with the Jews of Khaybar, who were allowed to keep their farming community provided they directed the profits of their labor to him, it was often more lucrative to leave local economies in place rather than killing every male who wouldn’t convert.  This became the loose rule for the Muslim armies that swept across Christian, Jewish, Persian, Hindu and Buddhist lands in the decades that followed.  The money that was collected was then used to further Islamic expansion.

As Muhammad put it: “My sustenance is under the shade of my spear, and he who disobeys my orders will be humiliated by paying Jizya” (another translation: “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.”)  The hadith has been quoted by al-Qaeda and is found in the original version of Bukhari and Ahmad (5114 or 4869, depending on the translation).

In fairness, Muslims have generally tended to follow verse 2:256 of the Quran, which states, “Let there be no compulsion in religion.” and have not felt it right to force others into embracing Islam.  However, this does not change the fact that verse 2:256 was clearly abrogated by later verses, particularly in Sura 9 – otherwise the practice of killing apostates if they do not recant their chose faith would not have become an acceptable part of Islamic law.

Another point to keep in mind is that in Islam, practice is more important than belief.  Muslims are commanded to fight unbelievers until they say they believe in Allah (or pay the Jizya), but there seems to be a tacit understanding that belief itself can’t be forced (ie. “there is no compulsion in religion”).  Nevertheless, once a subjugated individual outwardly converts to Islam under the strain of taxes and discrimination, they are not allowed to recant upon penalty of death.  Their children must also be raised Muslim.  And, if they aren’t, then it is a sign of apostasy – subject to death.

This is how Islam managed to spread so successfully within conquered populations to ratios in the high 90th percentiles over native religion.

One last point of interest is that Muhammad’s later practice of ordering people to profess their belief in him proved disastrous both for his own family and the legacy of his religion.  By the time of his death, his empire included a great many people and tribes who had accepted his rule merely to avoid war and slavery.  Many of them wanted out after he died, and several wars were immediately fought, resulting in thousands of deaths and cementing Islam’s legacy of violent intolerance.

Incredibly, even Muhammad’s sworn enemy of Abu Sufyan may have gotten the last laugh.  So ambitious was the prophet of Islam that he accepted his former foe’s outward profession of allegiance (at the point of a sword) in order to expand his empire.  Yet, it was Abu Sufyan’s own children who ultimately benefited – at the expense of Muhammad’s.

Abu Sufyan’s son, Muawiyah, inherited the empire after defeating Muhammad’s adopted son, Ali.  He also poisoned Hasan, one of the prophet’s two favorite grandsons.  Abu Sufyan’s grandson, Yazid, became the next caliph and promptly had the head of Muhammad’s other favorite grandson, Hussein, brought to him on a platter.

Such are the perils of forcing others to say that you are a prophet when they prefer to believe otherwise.

See also: MYTH: Muhammad Rejected Conversions Made Under Duress