(Muslim cleric tried to turn the Fort Worth, Texas Rodeo into an Islamic Indoctrination event)
FROM this site’s inception (and it is consistently the case) certain themes are continually weaving through these pages. A primary emphasis revolves around the “locking of arms” between leftists and Islamists, aka reds and greens. It is not for nothing. Insidious. In fact, the “About” tab’s concluding paragraph reads as follows:
Hopefully, my small effort will enlighten Israelis and Americans (and the west in general) to the dangers posed by our common foes. These dangers are fueled exponentially by the morphing of the Red/Green alliance – radical leftists and Islamic jihadists.
NOW, more than a few have expressed vitriolic outrage due to particular revelations, and this is a mild descriptor. Most always, their ire reaches a crescendo when proof after proof exposes linkage between core Islamic teachings and its underlying basis, Shariah Law. But when the left is revealed for what they truly are – back benchers for the most retrograde barbarians, bar none – well, all hell breaks loose. Don’t even ask…
AFTER all, a core mission of the left is to tar opponents as “racists” and “Islamophobes.” Thereby, when one has the “audacity” to reveal this and that Islamic truth, it becomes incumbent to shut down any discourse. Hence, par for the course, the far left Southern Poverty Law Center (having strayed off course from its heretofore venerable roots) put together a “hit list.” Good luck with that tactic.
The Obama-tied leftist group that helped a gunman commit an act of terrorism against a conservative organization has assembled a starter kit for Islamists to attack American women who refuse to comply with Sharia law, the authoritarian doctrine that inspires Islamists and their jihadism.
It’s the summer special from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), an extremist nonprofit that lists conservative organizations that disagree with it on social issues on a catalogue of “hate groups.” A few years ago a gunman received a 25-year prison sentence for carrying out the politically-motivated shooting of the Family Research Council (FRC) headquarters after admitting that he learned about the FRC from the SPLC “hate map.” Prosecutors called it an act of terrorism and recommended a 45-year sentence.
Now the SPLC, which has conducted diversity training for the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ), is targeting female bloggers, activists and television personalities who refuse to comply with Sharia law which is rooted in the Quran. The European Court on Human rights has repeatedly ruled that Sharia is “incompatible with the fundamental principles of democracy” yet politically-connected radical Muslim groups—such as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR)—keep pushing to implement it in the United States and the movement has gained steam.
Among those resisting this effort publicly are the high-profile women being targeted by the SPLC. Some of them are colleagues or friends of Judicial Watch and now they must fear for their safety simply for practicing their rights under the U.S. Constitution. The new hate list is titled Women Against Islam/The Dirty Dozen and includes illustrations and detailed information on all the women, who are branded “the core of the anti-Muslim radical right.” The new SPLC hate brochure further targets them by claiming that they’re “a dozen of the most hardline anti-Muslim women activists in America.”
Political activist and commentator Pamela Geller is branded the “country’s most flamboyant and visible Muslim-basher” for, among other things “smearing and demonizing Muslims.” Blogger Ann Barnhardt is identified as one of the “most extreme Muslim-bashers in the United States” and radio talk-show host Laura Ingram made the list for saying that hundreds of millions of Muslims were delighted that 12 people were massacred by Islamic terrorists in the Paris headquarters of a satirical magazine. Former CIA agent Clare Lopez, who runs a Washington D.C. think-tank focusing on national security issues, made the list for saying that the Muslim Brotherhood has “infiltrated and suborned the U.S. government to actively assist…the mission of its grand jihad.”
Others appearing on the anti-Sharia docket include television personality and former judge and prosecutor Jeanine Pirro, former chairwoman of the Texas Republican Party Cathie Adams, talk-show host Sandy Rios of the American Family Association, syndicated columnist Diana West, attorney and columnist Debbie Schlussel, blogger Cathy Hinners, ACT! for America founder Brigitte Gabriel and conservative writer and TV personality Ann Coulter. Among her biggest offenses, according to the SPLC, is proclaiming that “not all Muslims may be terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims—at least all terrorists capable of assembling a murderous plot against America”….read the whole thing….
INDEED, in a Orwellian context they coined it an Intelligence Report! Did you ever? In other words, in perfect Alinskyite form, they turned the truth upside its head and perfectly executed “Rule 12” from Rules For Radicals.
* RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)
IN this regard, leftist Christian and Jewish leaders – with the clergy in the forefront but with others in tow, chiefly, academics – are more than in the fray. In fact, they are Islam’s chief shields! How so? Let’s count the ways:
FIRSTLY, one has to internalize where much of the nexus stems from, that is, a dogmatic fealty to multi-cultural dialogue, regardless of all the monumental risks and provable costs.
AND being that a very close association exists between this investigative journalist and one of the main experts on the phenomenon, it behooves keeping readers abreast of its dangers.
THUS, in July 2012 (2 weeks after this site’s debut), a marshaling of resources began. Enter, Professor Paul Eidelberg.
COINCIDENTALLY, it was at this time that a request from Prof Eidelberg to review (the most important policy paper written on Islam’s cultural and theological underpinnings) Islam & Blood was made. In short order it was ready for publication and distribution. Consider it your “bible” of sorts on the subject matter.
IN tandem, he issued a scathing report, one which links leftist profs (wherever they reside) to a “marriage” with Islam. Its basis lies within conflict resolution and multicultural dialogue. Hmm. The aforementioned are both housed here.
NOT only that, but the following commentary (Jan. 2015) is quite instructive:
IN the main, leftist clergy backbench for Islam’s supremacy, even if some opine otherwise. The fruits of their “multi-culti” efforts, the basis of “interfaith dialogue”, attest to its bitter outcome. Its poisons.
YET, PC infected congregants are too confused to recognize where their derelict clergy have led them. Tragically, they rely on them to pave the way, but congregants have been shamefully led astray. Indubitably.
AS a matter of record, would anyone have believed – years ago – that the most high-profile Cathedral in America would submit to Islamic “interfaith” outreach? Believe it.
IN essence, even the term itself, “interfaith dialogue”, is an Islamic smokescreen. An Allah wash. In reality, there are several Islamic mandates designed to present a benign face of Islam to Christians and Jews, but one stands out above the rest. It is termed “da’wah”. Don’t EVER forget its true meaning and intent.
Da‘wah (also transliterated daawa(h); Arabic: دعوة “invitation”) means the proselytizing or preaching of Islam. Da‘wah literally means “issuing a summons”…. A Muslim who practices da‘wah, either as a religious worker or in a volunteer community effort, is called a dā‘ī(داعي, plural du‘āh/du‘āt دعاة).
NOW, don’t confuse Islamic proselytizing with that of other religions. Worlds apart. Regardless, what brought da’wah full circle was witnessing its handiwork on MIT’s college campus, surely a replica throughout America’s campuses via the Muslim Student Association, the Brotherhood’s student arm!
For this discussion it is intrinsic to note the intersection between an “occupational” interest in the Muslim Student Association, and its morphing with a mother’s growing concern. This is an understatement.….
IN light of these findings, the urgent question becomes:
Is your Preacher or Rabbi a Muslim spy?….continue reading….
ALAS, with the above firmly in place, how shocking is it to find out that a Texas Pastor (out of enumerable clergy….oy vey…) is fighting “Islamophobia” and attempting to drag along his parishioners for the (deadly) ride?
A pastor in Keller, Texas continues to push back against so-called “Islamophobia” after making national news for standing up for Muslims when Rev. Franklin Graham said they should be stopped from immigrating to the U.S. after the massacre of 5 U.S. servicemen in Chattanooga by a Muslim.
After gunman Mohammad Youssef Abdulazeez killed five U.S. servicemen in attacks at two military installations in Chattanooga, Tenn., Graham wrote on Facebook that Muslim immigration to the U.S. should stop. Abdulazeez, 24, was born in Kuwait and raised in the U.S.
“During World War 2, we didn’t allow Japanese to immigrate to America, nor did we allow Germans,” Graham wrote. “Why are we allowing Muslims now?”
Last month, Roberts stood with American Muslim leaders on Capitol Hill to challenge Graham’s comments.
“I was so sad when I read the Facebook posting of Franklin Graham,” Roberts said in a report by the Religion News Service. “This is not ‘evangelical’ and even less evangelistic. I don’t want American Muslims to think we fear them or that they are our enemies.”
Roberts has long worked to support people of other faiths. He defended the inclusion of a Muslim imam at this year’s Fort Worth Stock Show after the issue sparked controversy on social media.
In 2011, his church had an event to promote Muslim-Christian cooperation. The Building Bridges with Fellow Texans event drew 2,500 people. Roberts said, the interfaith effort draws criticism in the U.S. from people who don’t understand the mission or don’t see how hate speech here can put Christians in danger in Pakistan by provoking extremists.
“Christians in America are very concerned about what is happening to Christians in Pakistan,” Roberts said. “What they don’t understand is how they treat Muslims here — what they say to the media here — affects Christians in Pakistan and Syria and all over the world.” (blogger’s note: hey shmucky Roberts, it is the Koran/Shariah Law which inspires the slaughter of Christians, Jews and other minorities, all the while your ilk gives them cover!)
Christian leaders and Muslims met in Nepal last year, and the initial talks led to meetings in Texas and Pakistan. Those gatherings resulted in a commitment by American Christians to look out for Muslims here and by Muslims to look out for Christians and other minorities in Pakistan.
Roberts’ work with the grand imam and Channan echoes biblical teachings of the golden rule, which asks people to treat others as they would like to be treated.
“I’m a Baptist so I am passionate about religious freedom,” Roberts said. “I have to be concerned about freedom of religion for the Muslim in America. If I want freedom of religion for the Christian in Muslim countries, I need to be very concerned about that here.”
OMINOUSLY, too many fail to internalize the depths of the dangers, due to the locking of arms between the left and Islam’s barbarians. Without exaggeration, their dance with the Islamic devil is six degrees separated from the deaths of many innocents!
TO wit, if Christian clergy fail to speak up for the wholesale slaughter of fellow Christians – no less, at the hands of those they shield, Allah’s soldiers – who else will??