Americans, Take Notes: Ban Islam, Save The Nation! ‘Lesson Plans’ Included. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

IN the main, one must fully internalize that Shariah Law is the underpinning of Islam, without which Islam would be dead in its tracks. מת…mort…

CONSEQUENTIALLY, its underbelly must be dissected by Americans and westerners at large – as distasteful as it is – due to its barbarism. Buck up.

AS always, to this end, this site houses a continuous reservoir of materials; lesson plans. Admittedly, most are gory in the extreme, yes, sorry for that. Nevertheless, consider “Shariah Law Must Be Eliminated To Save America And The West: Its Cancerous Scourge” as your primary source and gift.

America is doing everything to usher in Shariah law and all its destructive permutations. Yet, with absolute certainty, Islam without Shariah law is like a bird without its wings. It would simply die. Crash and burn.

Ominously, consider what has transpired under Obama Inc. and you decide where America is headed:

On the legal front there are plans afoot to silence all criticism of Islam, so much so that the First Amendment is in its cross hairs. Moreover, Shariah financing has gained a sandal-hold into America, and Bloomberg Finance is leading the charge.

Now it is not as if (most) westerners begrudge capitalist entities from chasing after future business, but it is decidedly the case that Shariah law financing, in absolute terms, adds to Islamic jihad coffers all over the world.

Islamic banking is erroneously viewed as an ancient practice. “Neither classical nor medieval Islamic civilization featured banks in the modern sense, let alone ‘Islamic’ banks,” notes Timur Kuran, professor of economics and law at the University of Southern California.

Reports by Islamic banking scholars, the IMF, or the Congressional Research Service do not mention that Islamic banking was first concocted by Muslim Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna in the 1920s. The stated goal was to penetrate the Western finance system, corrupting it from within in hopes of creating a parallel system to re-establish a global Islamic empire governed by Islamic law (shariah). Islamic rules of commerce (fiqh al-muamalat) forbid interest (riba) and investing in a prohibited (hara’am) enterprise. They also mandate tithes on wealth (zakat). However, the Koran fails to precisely define these concepts. Imams and ayatollahs differ, for example, on whether riba prohibits all interest or only usurious interest.

The first successful Islamic banking experiment was the Mit Ghamr Savings Bank in Egypt in 1963. But five years later, the Egyptian government, which subsidized the bank, shut it down after Muslim-Brotherhood-led demonstrations swamped the country.

In 1963, Malaysia also introduced a limited form of Islamic banking, with establishment of Tabung Haji (Pilgrim’s Fund) that served only as a savings institution, to help Muslims save towards their pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj).

Ten yerrs later, growing oil fortunes in the Middle East, lead the Organization of the Islamic Conference’s (OIC) to establish the Islamic Development Bank (IDB) “in accordance with the principles of the shariah,” as prescribed by the MB-and to launch the fast-growing petrodollar-based Islamic financing market. The IDB, more a development than a commercial bank, was established largely “to promote Islamic banking worldwide.” Consequently, the IDB founded the Bahrain-registered and -based Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). Other regulatory organizations followed.

Finally, the most crucial element that helped persuade reluctant Muslims to use Islamic banks, the invention of “Islamic banking windows,” is never noted in reports documenting the development of Islamic banking. This happened in 1993, when Anwar Ibrahim, then Malaysia’s finance minister, helped to introduce the newly invented “Islamic Banking windows” into conventional banks. This measure, which familiarized clientele with and built confidence in the unknown Islamic banking system, proved central to the development of the global Islamic finance industry.

So the questions become: since Islam is underpinned by Shariah law, and Shariah law finance funds global terror, what precisely must be done to save the west? Cut off its oxygen…the head of the snake…continue reading…

MIND you, at the same time that too few are revealing the true face of Islam via Shariah Law, countless apologists (Islamists and leftist enablers) are hawking Shariah Law through financial instruments. Inherently, they are smokescreens marketed under an umbrella of ‘pure’ investment vehicles. In actuality, its basis houses money jihad!

STILL yet, as depressing as things appear, readers should pay strict attention to two recent developments, those which are practical and forceful in nature: outright BANS against Islam!

A French mayor, Robert Chardon, is calling for governmental legislation that will ban Islam. He said in a recent statement:

We must ban the Muslim faith in France.

He also stated, “It’s the only solution for most of France’s problems,” and, “We also need a Marshall Plan to send Muslims to countries where the religion is practiced.” This man is the mayor of Venelles, a French town with a population of about 8,000 people, and he is more righteous than any of the politicians in Paris. It is amazing how small town people have a better understanding of how to deal with evil than do metropolitan people. Chardon also said (and this is what makes his statements even better):

The Republic should promote the practice of the Christian faith.

continue reading….whoopee!!

WE are not done yet, let’s hop over to Australia:

They want to ban burqas, freeze Muslim immigration and end Australia’s “failed experiment” with multiculturalism.

The proudly anti-Islam Australian Liberty Alliance — the nation’s newest political party — also claims that a growing number of Australians want exactly those same things.

“I do believe that people are waking up to the dangers and the problems that will come from increased (Muslim) immigration,” ALA co-founder and political candidate Debbie Robinson said.

“Islam is a problem and if we don’t take steps to put laws in place to protect our culture and our society, then we are going to lose our freedom.”

It is a message that many Australians who have watched the rise of radicalism at home and abroad with a growing sense of unease are likely to identify with.

But many more will also find those same views confronting and offensive — none more so than members of Australia’s Muslim community who have described the emergence of the ALA as “alarming”.

Not since the rise of Pauline Hanson’s One Nation 20 years ago has a political party sought to win the hearts and minds of voters by demonising a minority.

For Ms Hanson, it was “Asianisation” that was threatening to destroy Australia’s national identity.

It is the so-called threat of “Islamisation” that the ALA is hoping will help propel its candidates into Federal Parliament at next year’s election.

Party members stood shoulder-to-shoulder in Perth this week alongside controversial Dutch anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders as it unveiled its first crop of Senate hopefuls.

Mrs Robinson will stand in WA, while anti-halal campaigner Kirralie Smith will represent NSW and former Katter’s Australia Party candidate Bernard Gaynor will run in Queensland.

The party hopes to field candidates in every State and claims to already enjoy a strong following.

Mrs Robinson believes most Australians are ready to have a sensible conversation about the nation’s future cultural direction.

“It (Islam) is a taboo subject but we cannot continue to be paralysed by political correctness,” she said.

“People are afraid to talk about it because they are afraid to offend or afraid to call a spade a spade.

“They have a level of concern about what is happening around the world and in Australia but the politicians are not paying attention. They are not facing up to what is really going on.”

Mrs Robinson is a former nurse from well-heeled City Beach who claims to be neither racist nor religious.

She believes in the Judaeo-Christian values that Australia was founded on.

She is also a mother and the wife of well-known orthopaedic surgeon Anthony Robinson who helped co-found the party with her.

But Mrs Robinson was unwilling to discuss her family during a long interview with The Weekend West this week.

Like her party, she is clearly mistrustful of the media, believing that “left-leaning” journalists are hostile to her far-right policies.

She also had another reason for wanting to protect her privacy, claiming she risked becoming a target for violence just like Mr Wilders.

His party enjoys strong support in the Netherlands, but he lives under 24-hour armed guard after many death threats.

Candidate Kirralie Smith claims to have also felt that same fear, having recently been forced to move house in Sydney after receiving threats.

“Why is it that we have to spend a fortune on security,” Mrs Robinson said.

“Why is Mr Wilders surrounded by 24-hour security? It is because the Islamic community have placed fatwas on his head because you cannot speak out against Islam.

“We have a problem with the Islamic community that we do not have with any other group.”

WA Islamic Council president Rateb Jneid said Mrs Robinson’s comments were highly offensive to Australian Muslims who loved their country and wished only to live in peace.

“The Muslim community is very concerned that a virulently Islamophobic political party was launched in Western Australia — a single issue political party based on promoting fear and hate of Islam,” he said.

“This is very reminiscent of 1930s nazi Germany. The acts of Muslim extremists do not represent the great religion of Islam in any way or form.”

Geert Wilders (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

Multiculturalism advocate Suresh Rajan has been cautiously watching the ALA’s rise and believes the party will garner some support and may even get some candidates elected.

But he does not believe they will become a force to be reckoned with.

“All our research shows that there are about 10 per cent of Australians who harbour very racist views and there is the potential that they (the ALA) will tap into their concerns about Islam,” Mr Rajan said.

“But the majority of Australians support multiculturalism and want to live in harmony,” he said.

AS to the blah, blah from WA Islamic Council president Rateb Jneid, it mirrors all the Islamic propaganda from the Muslim Brotherhood’s front-arm in America via CAIR. Just close your ears….

CAIR-Ibrahim-Hooper-Fooling-establishment

STIPULATED, while it may appear to be a fantastical and Herculean task to purge Islam from America (the west), this is far from the truth. In reality, once the underpinnings of its poisonous ideology are exposed and its instruments of jihad are revealed as force-multipliers, citizens will have amassed targeted focal points. Not only that, Islam’s mask as a ‘religion’ – according to western norms – will slip, thus, allowing for the shuttering of mosques, Islam’s barracks.

INTRINSICALLY, once Shariah Law’s barbarism becomes widely known, indeed, Islam’s undercarriage will crumble. In practical terms, a targeted pyramid has to be identified post haste.

12033194_857062304401361_598334054912809923_n

LESSON PLAN:

TARGET ONE: Shariah Law

TARGET TWO: Dismantling Mosques

TARGET THREE: Enact laws on the local level to BAN Islam

LESSONS LEARNED – DO’S & DON’TS

DON’T waste precious time attempting to convince Congress (led by RINO’S) of Shariah Law’s encroachment, it will fall on (mostly) deaf ears.

DO head straight to state legislatures and local officials, they will likely be more receptive.

REGARDLESS of all else, citizens still have a ‘contractual’ obligation to save the nation, despite any obstacles placed by the leaders. Indisputably, the fact that the Constitution commences with “we the people”, well, that’s all the legal imprimatur required.

FORWARD MARCH (no pun intended). Get busy!