WAR RAGING AGAINST “OBAMACORE”:THE PURPOSEFUL DUMBING DOWN OF “AMERIKA”.30 STATES, PARENTS, TEACHERS ON THE WARPATH…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
11

New York City families protest Common Core (Photo: WNYC)

AS repeatedly stated at this site, charging after the kiddies is a MAIN objective of the radical, revolutionary left. In fact, this is precisely why “capturing their hearts and minds” has been a preoccupation of the left, ever since they went wild in the 1960’s.

At the same time that Demsters were busy indoctrinating generation after generation via leftist front-arms of (mis)education – plus co-opting the teacher’s unions…most recently through Obama Inc’s training of various foot soldier’s – what have conservatives been doing? NOTHING. Yup…nada, zip, zilch. 

To wit, the chickens have come home to roost and America’s children are their prized foul. How so? Let this site count the ways:

Count One:

Charging after America’s children, one cannot escape the imprint of both the reds and the greens (Islamists). Tragically, as a result, the kiddies are boxed into their vise-grip:First They Came For The Kiddies: Well Heeled/Known Prep School (Philips Exeter Academy)Trucks With Terrorists!

Count Two:

Therefore, how many American parents (others too) understand how insidious the grab for the kiddies is? And, as mentioned, their reach has been ongoing for decades, yet, under the reign of the Radical-in-Chief, their thrust has been raised to the max:Domestic Terrorist, Bill Ayers (Educator Too!), Exhorts Control Over The Kiddies!

Count Three:

In light of the above, a little over a year ago, this issue required back to back alarms and the following was blared:ALERT: Americans, Domestic Terrorists (Foreign Born Too) Are Teaching Your Kiddies & Mentoring Their Teachers Through Workshops Etc!

This issue is so serious, it was also featured at an op-ed (by this blogger) at American Thinker:

Bill Ayers, the foremost leader of the Weathermen “isin his third decade as a national leader in the movement to radicalize the educational training of schoolteachers”. His wife, Bernardine Dohrn, a top leader too “is a professor of law at Northwestern and a high-ranking officer in the American Bar Association.” Eleanor Raskin (ne Stein) “is a law professor at S.U.N.Y Albany and, astonishingly, a NYS administrative law judge”. Jeff Jones “currently heads the New York-based Apollo Alliance, a highly influential coalition of labor leaders and environmentalists, and was responsible for drafting President Obama’s 2009 Recovery Act.”

The list of “respectable” cover, of other “notables” in the Weathermen, is equally impressive. Through a stringently planned operational “stealth jihad”, yesteryear’s Weathermen have returned, fully primed to carry out their original goal — the “transformation” of Amerika. Most significantly, they subvert the national interest from a distinctly dangerous vantage point. They are currently ensconced in some of the most powerful positions in academia and political life. The only difference is, this time they are dressed in “capitalist” garb, not only in their clothing choices, but in the wealth they have accumulated, paradoxically, through joining the “establishment”. Who said one can’t enrich oneself, but at the same time deny the masses/proletariat said wealth potential? Highly dangerous in their bomb-making days, their capacity to cripple America, sans firing actual weaponry is that much greater at this critical juncture in time. Deeply involved in the “transformation” process, as promised by President Obama, many of them working inside the executive branch, while others operate through progressive think tanks, they want nothing more than to distance themselves from their bloody past. Therefore, an omerta has descended from the denizens of the leftist media and their powerful organs….

Count Four:

Really, how many times must it be shouted: “OBAMACORE” IS TIED INTO DOMESTIC TERRORIST BILL AYERS: BRINGING DOWN AMERICA VIA THE KIDDIES!

Alas, 30 states are now on the warpath, and thank heavens for that…aiming for all 50!

30 STATES WAGE WAR ON ‘OBAMACORE’

‘They thought people would be sheep and roll over, but it hasn’t turned out that way’

By Karen VanTil Gushta

Editor’s Note: This is the third in a series of stories about Common Core, the controversial new educational agenda aimed at imposing federal government standards on every aspect of public and private education in America, which some are even calling “ObamaCore.” The first part spelled out the high stakes for parents, students and education. The second part followed the money trail behind Common Core.

The battle over the deceptively titled Common Core State Standards Initiative, or CCSSI, is raging, and the rhetoric is fierce. Supporters of the national standards have called their opponents “right-wing nuts” and “black helicopter” types.

“All of us get lumped together as ‘the fringe,’ ‘the far right,’ tea partiers,’ etc.,” said Jane Robbins, co-author of the report “Controlling Education from the Top: Why the Common Core is Bad for America.”

“When they don’t have the facts on their side they resort to ad-hominem,” she said.

Opponents of Common Core claim it is the product of progressive elitists who want to put all children under control of federal government bureaucrats. That view was reinforced when a panelist at the liberal think-tank Center for American Progress discounted the opposition as only a “tiny minority,” claiming such views should be ignored because “the children belong to all of us.”

The term “Common Core” has become “toxic,” according to former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee. He continues to support the standards in spite of a unanimous resolution by the Republican National Committee in April 2013 to oppose them. Huckabee told state education leaders at a meeting of the Council of Chief State School Officers: “Rebrand it, refocus it, but don’t retreat.”

So far, Arizona, Iowa, Florida and Pennsylvania have followed his advice, eliminating the name “Common Core” from their state standards.

‘White suburban moms’

Education Secretary Arne Duncan claims opposition to Common Core is coming from “white, suburban moms” who are suddenly discovering their children are not “as brilliant as they thought they were.” When Duncan’s comments went viral, “white, suburban moms” quickly found many defenders in the blogosphere and opinion columns.

In January, Duncan spoke to a gathering of curriculum professionals. As he lectured them on the distinction between standards and curricula, he asserted that “not a word, not a single semi-colon of curriculum [sic] will be created, encouraged, or prescribed by the federal government.”

But Duncan’s pep talk to curriculum specialists about their role in implementing the standards only increased the perception that it is indeed a federal, not a state, initiative. George Will noted in his Washington Post article “Doubts Over Common Core” that when the federal government initiates top-down “reforms” in education, any mistakes that result are “continental mistakes.”

Will stated the obvious: “National standards must breed ineluctable pressure to standardize educational content. Targets, metrics, guidelines and curriculum models all induce conformity in instructional materials.”

Indeed, textbook companies now advertise “Common Core Editions,” and educational testing companies provide “Common Core-aligned” standardized tests.

The link between the national SAT test and Common Core was forged when the College Board, which puts out the placement test for college-bound students, hired David Coleman as president. The Gates and Mott foundations gave Coleman’s nonprofit, Student Achievement Partners, money to write the standards, which were commissioned by the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association.

The new College Board assessments will start rolling out this year with the redesigned PSAT. The new SAT is scheduled for 2015. The once-venerable Iowa Test of Basic Skills is now Common Core-aligned, and even the GED is getting its first makeover since 2002 so it will line up with the standards.

Teachers withdraw support

Fearing this link between the national standards and high-stakes testing, the board of New York’s teachers union voted unanimously Jan. 25 to withdraw its support for the national standards “as they are being implemented.” The union board also declared no confidence in Education Commissioner John King Jr., a Common Core backer, and asked the Board of Regents to remove him. Union leaders urged the state education department to make “major course corrections to its failed implementation plan” and enact a three-year moratorium on the testing.

The Board of Regents responded to the concerns by giving public schools five more years to implement Common Core. Public school teachers will not be held accountable for student test scores for two years.

There is some movement in Congress to oppose the CCSSI. On Jan. 30, Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., introduced Senate Bill 1974. It is now in the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, on which Roberts sits.

The bill, titled the “Learning Opportunities Created at the Local Level Act,” would prohibit the federal government from coercing states to adopt education standards like Common Core. The act would forbid the federal government from intervening in a state’s education standards, curricula and assessments through the use of incentives, mandates, grants, waivers or any other form of manipulation.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry and the state legislature effectively banned Common Core from Texas schools

Roberts opposed the Obama administration’s Race to the Top grant program, and he and nine other senators have gone on record against spending any federal funds to develop education curriculum or standards, including the Common Core. Given the present make-up of the Senate, Roberts’ efforts may not gain much headway in Congress.

The real battle against Common Core is being waged in the states. As of Feb. 8, edu-blogger Mercedes Schneider had identified legislative action on the Common Core in 30 states.

“Legislators in most of these 30 states are advancing bills to halt the testing consequences of a CCSS that they admittedly do not understand – and for which they must now count the cost,” Schneider wrote.

Initially, the only states that didn’t compete for Race to the Top funds were Alaska, North Dakota, Texas and Vermont. For Texas legislators, that wasn’t enough. They wanted to ensure the State Board of Education would not follow Alaska’s example and adopt Common Core anyway. In June, Texas Gov. Rick Perry signed H.B. 462, effectively banning the Common Core State Standards from Texas schools. The bill had passed by a 140-2 vote in the Texas House.

Some states are now delaying implementation of the standards, such as New York. Illinois has bills in both legislative chambers to delay implementation. Colorado’s legislation would delay them until public hearings have been held. Rhode Island wants to study and evaluate the standards.

After its Board of Education voted in 2010 to adopt the CCSSI, Indiana became the first to align its teacher preparation standards to Common Core. However, even members of the state legislature’s education committees didn’t know much about what the adoption entailed until they started hearing from alarmed parents when the standards began to impact school curricula.

Opposition spreads

As opposition to the standards spread, former Indiana Superintendent of Instruction Tony Bennett visited tea-party meetings around the state to defend them. His Democrat opponent in the 2012 election, Glenda Ritz, told parents she wanted to “pause” adoption of the Common Core.

When election results came in, Bennett was out, in spite of the $90,000 reportedly given by the Gates Foundation to fund pro-Common Core advertising on Indiana TV and radio. Last May, newly elected Indiana Gov. Mike Pence signed a bill delaying adoption of the Common Core. In January, the Indiana Senate Education and Career Development Committee voted to send a measure to the Senate floor to repeal the Common Core Standards. If the state legislature passes the bill, it would charge the State Board of Education with developing by July 1 new “college- and-career-ready standards,” a favorite phrase with the pro-Common Core faction.

Erin Tuttle, founder of the grassroots Hoosiers Against Common Core, told the Indy Star that the State Board of Education should not make a few tweaks and slap the label “Indiana Standards” on any new guidelines. She said parents will notice if their children are assigned homework that looks like Common Core.

“Parents will be outraged. They will feel tricked,” he said.

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said to be “big gorilla” behind Common Core movement

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has been an active advocate of Common Core, not only in Florida but across the country. His nonprofit, Foundation for Educational Excellence, which received $500,000 from the Gates Foundation in 2010, has lobbied for the Core and sent letters to state legislators in embattled states.

Jane Robbins, senior fellow at the American Principles Project, said Jeb Bush “is the ‘big gorilla’ behind the Common Core movement.”

“Bill Gates is the financier, but Jeb Bush is the one who is twisting the arms of all of these Republican governors and legislators around the country not to do the right thing and regain local control,” Robbins said.

See the dozens of products in the WND Superstore that address education, what it is, what it should be, and what it is becoming in America.

In 2013, after he was voted out as Indiana school chief, Bush’s protégé, Tony Bennett, was appointed Florida’s Education Commissioner. His tenure didn’t last long. He resigned after eight months when it was discovered he had been involved in a plan to improve the school evaluation grade of an Indiana charter school run by Christel DeHaan, a major donor to the Republican Party and to Bennett.

Now the question is whether Bush’s influence in Florida is strong enough to stop efforts there to repeal Common Core. A bill to prohibit the State Board of Education from continuing to implement the Common Core Standards has been introduced in the Florida House, which convenes March 4. The bill (H.B. 25) would stop implementation until certain requirements are met for the adoption or revision of state curricular standards. It also would prohibit Florida from implementing Common Core-aligned assessments.

Common Core supporters are hoping H.B.25 won’t go anywhere. It’s being held in the House and Senate education committees until a companion bill is offered in the Senate. Karen Effrem, co-founder of the Florida Stop Common Core Coalition, said a Senate companion bill has been written and will be submitted.

Effrem said that since Florida is “the land of Jeb Bush,” if these bills pass “it would be a huge shot in the arm to the anti-Common Core movement not only in Florida, but in the rest of the country.”

“And that is why ‘the powers that be’ are fighting us so hard.”

Florida protest against Common Core (Photo: The Florida Stop Common Core Coalition)

Scathing report

The Heritage Foundation, Heartland Foundation, Pioneer Institute and the American Principles Project, which produced the scathing report on Common Core, “Controlling Education from the Top: Why Common Core Is Bad for America,” are all providing intellectual bullets and moral support to those on the battle lines. Co-authors of the APP report, Emmett McGroarty and Jane Robbins, have been traveling around the country to speak to groups that are fighting the standards.

Robbins said proponents of Common Core did not anticipate how much opposition they would face.

“They thought people would be sheep and roll over and accept what the experts told them to do; but it hasn’t turned out that way,” she said.

Arizona, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Tennessee now have bills in their state legislatures to halt or abolish the standards.

MOST stunningly, the dept of (mis)education always has the backing of one billionaire Demster or another. RINO’s can be found in tow too. Appallingly, the Bush dynasty is in the forefront, even as they audaciously drape themselves in Repub garb. Disturbingly, too many conservatives buy their hustle. For the umpteenth time, Bush and Co. play footsie with Demsters and their globalist agenda, of which indoctrinating the kiddies are part and parcel thereof! And, this is NO conspiracy theory. Full disclosure: mea culpa, this American-Israeli voted for Bush…does holding ones nose resonate? 

In other words, while Gates and cronies have amassed great wealth – and can afford to educate their kiddies for generations to come, however they deem fit – the mischief they design (think:George Soros, the devil incarnate) towards America’s children (and their parents) is nightmarish. So, one has to ask: what benefit do they accrue by “dumbing down” generations of American kiddies?

Intrinsically, the bigotry of low expectations, especially against minorities who are most at risk, is stunningly revealed. Obamacore has been exposed for what it is. It is hereby renamed: Indoctrinecore. Indeed, does total control ring any alarms?

Assuredly, even when the leftists of today are no longer among the living, their blood lines move forward for generations to come Think: the New World Order designs of the Rockefeller’s and their lust for total power and control!  

EGYPT OUTFLANKS OBAMA INC:OUTLAWS HAMAS & DEPORTS CODE PINK’S TERROR ABETTOR, KUDOS TO ‘STOP THE ISM’! OBAMA REGIME HAS YET TO STEP UP! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
9

Medea Benjamin in Cairo

Code Pink’s leader Medea Benjamin was stopped at the Cairo airport on Monday along with other U.S. women within her organization and placed in a detainment cell. The radical left-wing anti-war group, known for its support of Hamas, was on its way to Gaza for International Women’s Day 2014. 

Internalizing the bloody footprints of Islamic jihad didn’t just fall into this blogger’s domain. Assuredly, certain converging events led from there to here and they were (for the most part) described within said interview link. 

That being said, it is important to understand (or recall, whichever the case) the following connection herein to “Stop The ISM” and its founder, Lee Kaplan:

I am an investigative journalist and independent op-ed contributor to various Zionist andConservative media outlets. I contributed to an in-depth investigative series at FrontPage Magazine with Lee Kaplan from 2003-2007.We are still working together . Go to the 5:59 timeline at –http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lwBAv7f1Vg…here as well– http://www.presstv.ir/Program/320411.html – to listen to him address the current situation in Syria. He is a world class expert on the ISM (International Solidarity Movement), and he utilized my foundation in forensics and investigative journalism to “follow the jihadist money.” Unfathomably, the ISM was able to accomplish the above money laundering, courtesy of their IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status. Specifically, my name appears at the end of the expose’, ‘Does The Pro-Terror Left Violate U.S. Tax Laws’? 

In this regard, the reader must square the circle to the embedded nexus between the red and green alliance, in order to fully appreciate the dangers the west is facing. Why? Well, how many are familiar with the leftist (red) anti-American, anti-western activities of Medea Benjamin and her penchant for aligning with terror soaked (green) Islamists? This rabble-rouser is not just venting steam. Far from it.

In the main, this site has yet to find a radical leftist who is NOT in bed with equally totalitarian-bent Islamists! Hence, the coinage, the “red/green alliance”. Bringing down “Amerika” is key to these (not so) strange bedfellows.

So, along comes Lee Kaplan, an associate herein, and he believes in taking no prisoners. Yes, this is a prerequisite for any said association. As such, although Medea, publicity hound that she is, manages to turn lemons into lemonade, suffice to say Lee Kaplan smacked her butt VERY hard – Egyptian-style! Mind you, Obama Inc. hearts with her, even as Demsters feign to be upset with Medea’s various “naughtiness”, carrying on here and there at their rallying cries. Indeed, she is a like-minded anti-American foot soldier. Don’t forget this.

Onto Stop The ISM!

Op-Ed: Egypt Deports Code Pink Leader: ‘Stop the ISM’ Did It

Published: Wednesday, March 05, 2014
Sometimes pro-Hamas activists do get what they deserve.
Lee Kaplan, Head of Stop the ISM

The news wires were all abuzz today with the report that Medea Benjamin of Code Pink was deported from Egypt on trying to enter Gaza through the Rafah crossing. Stop the ISM, a division of DAFKA.org was responsible for this.

Upon learning that Benjamin was planning a trip to Gaza under the ruse of bringing lanterns to the Palestinian Arabs, our agency contacted the Egyptian embassy in Washington D.C.  and alerted them to her plans. The result was  Egyptian officials met her airplane when she arrived and immediately arrested her.

Benjamin, who exults in creating media scenes, attempted to resist the Egyptian police who, she claims, then dislocated her shoulder as they dragged her to a holding cell prior to her deportation to Turkey.

Benjamin is a lifelong communist and funds the BDS movement in the United States through one of her nonprofits, Global Exchange, in the San Francisco Bay Area. Until recently, Benjamin was employing Dalit Baum of Who Profits in Israel to tour the U.S. and promote BDS against Israel and Jewish institutions as well as corporations that do business with Israel.

Baum now works for another part of the ISM, the American Friends Service Committee, whicht helps her organize her tours, mainly of college campuses.

Benjamin has become famous by creating rackets and demos in the U.S., demonstrating against the United States and Israel, appearing topless on more than one occasion. She even interrupted President Obama during a speech in Washington to scream about drones being used against al Qaeda in Yemen. In that instance, she was not arrested, as usual, and got away with her antics.

Benjamin’s arrest and deportation show a serious shift in Egypt’s relationship with Hamas since the ouster of the Muslim Brotherhood and Morsi from that country. Only days ago, Egypt closed the Hamas office in the country and put out a clear signal that Egypt recognizes that the threat from Hamas extremists poses just as much of a threat to stability in Egypt as elsewhere in the MiddleEast.

Benjamin is part of the ISM network in the United States and was involved in several excursions to Gaza where her NGO’s would bring support to the Hamas terrorist leadership in Gaza.

Egypt is to be commended for finally putting a stop to this woman’s penchant for encouraging aid to a terrorist organization and disguising that aid as “humanitarian work.”  In any case, her arrest and removal by the Egyptian authorities is the first concrete step taken toward reining in Hamas in Gaza.

Hamas has been aligning itself more and more with Iran, also increasingly supported by Benjamin, so that she is seen as posing a security concern for Egypt.

{P.S. – The benefits accrued through Lee Kaplan’s investigative work resonates around the world, as Americans, Israelis and now Egyptians (others too) are alerted to those who attempt to do harm through tactical subterfuge. When deciding where to make charitable donations, the non-profit operated under his auspices is more than worthy – by paypal leekaplan@dafka.org or mail to DAFKA 118 Pelican Loop, Pittsburg, Ca 94565 USA…..501 (c) (3) deductible}

So, thanks to ‘Stop The ISM’s’ efforts, a big whoopee is in order. Yet, it is certainly a tragic day in American history when one acknowledges that Egypt is taking the lead in outlawing the jihadi progeny of the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas (see below). In fact, they already banned their parent, the Brotherhood Mafia! On the other hand, Obama Inc. is jacked-up with the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia and they are going from strength to strength in overtaking America’s Constitutional basis. Beyond contemptible. Traitors – Obama Inc.

You may ask: where’s the proof? Here and there:

Proof One:

For a change, back in July 2013, this site brought readers some optimistic news:Egypt’s Brotherhood Mafia Defanged-For Now-YET Muslim Brotherhood Calling The Shots In America! How Did This Happen? The Islamist-in-Chief’s Hysterical Reaction: Why? Ponder the proofs from 8 months ago.

Proof Two:

As a result of earthshaking events in the Mid East, Egypt’s military head took the lead, DESPITE Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s hysteria:Egypt’s Strongman, General El-Sisi, Gives Barack HUSSEIN Obama The Finger! Now, what does that tell you? Mind you, Egypt is a Sunni majority country and Hamas/Muslim Brotherhood is too. Yet…

Proof Three:

To be sure, Egypt’s leadership have boxed the Brotherhood into a corner, at least within their national borders:Egypt’s Al-Sisi Triumphing Over Brotherhood Mafia:Trampling Over Barack HUSSEIN Obama Too. Again, what the hell is going on here? 

Proof Four:

8 billion reasons and more helps to expose Washington’s/America’s Brotherhood Mafia:EXPOSED: A LIST OF MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA OPERATIVES INSIDE AMERICA. Next Up:Their Linkage To Obama Inc! 

Proof Five:

As a result of all the above: EGYPT FILES CRIMINAL TERROR CHARGES AT The ICC- AGAINST OBAMA!

Proof Six:

Kismet….and along comes another Egyptian – one with American citizenship too – and he pins the Islamist-in-Chief to the wall: MALIK OBAMA, OBAMA’s (CLOSELY CONNECTED) HALF BRO’ OUTED AS AL-QAEDA OPERATIVE.HOW DOES THIS “NEWS” LINK BACK TO OBAMA? 

NOT only that, but the scuttlebutt is such: when Lois Lerner is FINALLY compelled to testify, re her IRS bludgeon, many skeletons will be revealed.

“Time to spill the beans or ‘go down in flames’ Lois.For starters, the date stamped at the top of the Barack H. Obama Foundation’s 501(c)(3) approval letter which bears Lerner’s signature, is dated June 26, 2011. That day was on a Sunday. This new revelation comes after it’s been known that Malik Obama’s Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) received expeditious and potentially illegal tax exempt status from Lerner when the approval was backdated by 38 months. That this approval was granted on a Sunday raises more questions…..”

NOW, let us meander below and see how Egypt’s courts are dealing with terror-spawn Hamas, in juxtaposition to the kid-glove treatment given to them under Obama Inc.’s reign. Have mercy.

Egyptian Court Bans Hamas

Hamas furious, blames move as ‘serving the Occupation.’
By TovaDvorin
First Publish: 3/4/2014
Hamas

Hamas
Reuters

An Egyptian court outlawed the terror group Hamas on Tuesday, much like it banned the Muslim Brotherhood earlier this year, and ordered all of its assets seized.

The judge explained that the decision stems from the risks Hamas poses to Egyptian security. He accused the organization of terrorist activities in cooperation with the Islamist group called Al Qaeda in the Sinai Peninsula.

The court ruling is a blow to the economic power of Hamas rulership in Gaza, which had previously cooperated with Egypt in facilitating trade and smuggling activities; in addition, Hamas offices will be shuttered all over Egypt.

Hamas officials slammed the decision as a political tactic. “Any decision such as this is an attempt to besiege the Resistance, and serves the Israeli occupation,” Bassem Naim, a senior official in Hamas, told AFP Tuesday.

While the government of former Islamist president Mohammed Morsi was friendly with Hamas, the military-led government that ousted him has cracked down on the group, which it accuses of a December attack on Egyptian police headquarters, and of planning church bombings in Sinai last Christmas.

Hamas has denied the Egyptian government’s allegations, claiming they were an “attempt to demonize Hamas”.

Egypt has been clamping down on the smuggling tunnels which are used to smuggle goods, but also arms and terrorists, between Gaza and the Sinai.

Sources in Egypt recently hinted that now that the Egyptian military has taken care of Morsi’s Muslim Brotherhood, its offshoot Hamas was next to face the music.

“We cannot be liberated from the terrorism of the Brotherhood in Egypt without ending it in Gaza, which lies on our borders,” an Egyptian security official told Reuters in January.

Oh yeah…while it was decidedly delicious to uncover (as expected) one terror hydra after another, via this American-Israeli’s work with ‘Stop The ISM’, NEVERTHELESS, the IRS’s Criminal (anti-terror/fraud) Division (Newark, NJ) pussyfooted around the compiled evidence. They continue to shower the ISM with tax exempt status. Hmm…

While the ISM is on the IRS’s radar – due to heavy lifting by Lee Kaplan and this blogger – it is nowhere near enough, especially considering the truckloads of evidence against them, in more ways than one.

Therefore, before getting to the meat of the latest news, a recap is in order.

Firstly, a full forensic investigation was undertaken during different points between 2003-2007 by my corporate tax practice (as a co-owner had full latitude and discretion to do whatever was necessary), regarding the ISM and its tax exempt status (refer to https://adinakutnicki.com/about/). Many hours of pro bono work were accumulated, due to the seriousness of the issue. NO (financial) stone was left without examination.

A midway point in the investigation led to a centerpiece expose’ at Frontpagemagazine – ‘Does The Pro-Terror Left Violate U.S. Tax Law?’ – http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=7148. At the time, it was intrinsic to keep a lower public profile, therefore, make note of the credits (via a footnote) at the end of the investigation, coupled with William Levinson, who assisted in its review.

But make no mistake, the underbelly of their inter-related terror ties became obvious throughout the investigation. In addition, there were so many 501 (c)(3) IRS violations, they became glaring to anyone with a working background in forensics accounting (and the office was duly up to speed in said techniques – well before this project was undertaken- the practice offered it as a niche specialty ). More to the point, the results from the office always turned out in favor of the client, whenever engaged in a forensics examination.

MOREOVER, since the forensic examination of the ISM (International Solidarity Movement) commenced under Bush’s tenure – and Hamas aligned fingerprints were already found within – imagine how deaf, dumb and blind Obama Inc.’s (corrupt) IRS operates, when terror-tied orgs come up for review?? Now, how many don’t know about the Criminal-in-Chief’s hanky panky, illegal activities within the IRS, in relation to smacking down pro-American and pro-Zionist non-profits?

Bulls eye. 

BENGHAZIGATE’s CLEAR CONCLUSIONS:HILLARY’S BLOODIED HANDS VIA STAND-DOWN ORDERS. APPROVED BY BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
18

DeClassified-Dozens of Vessels Surrounded Benghazi When Clinton Ordered Stand-Down

WHATEVER lies the POTUS and Hillary Clinton (in tandem with others) attempt to weave, re culpability for the American blood spilled in Benghazi, well, plug your ears and feign dumb and blind. 

From the get go, there has been no doubt where the onus lies. And, if Benghazigate appears like “yesterday’s news”, there is a damn good reason for it. In fact, the captured media has ensured that little coverage, or any grains of truth, spills forth. No matter. This is where alternative media comes in and why this site is operating to begin with; to pull back the curtain and reveal what authentic Conservative and Zionist underpinnings demand. Free of charge.

That being said, let’s refresh some of the aforementioned spin and shed some much needed spotlights…to get us from there to here:

Spotlight One:

Benghazigates’s nuggets always required thinking outside the box, in effect, leading to the missing pieces of the indictment.

Spotlight Two:

In this regard, if the Pyromaniac-in-Chief and his ex Sec of State, Hillary Clinton, didn’t require cover ups, why would they be hiding witnesses, changing their identities and polygraphing CIA survivors on a repeated basis? Indeed.

Spotlight Three:

Moreover, if the following isn’t enough to land Hill in jail (with adjoining cells for most of this criminal regime) can’t imagine what will: yes, there are direct Muslim Brotherhood links to Hill & Bill, and they lead straight back to Benghazigate! Surprise, surprise…her gal pal, Huma Abedin, is DEEPLY in the mix!

To be sure, this site weaved the threads together, not soon after the bloody jihad took place. Granted, this site’s clues had some holes, but no longer. They fit like a jigsaw puzzle – bloody hands and all!

Hillary Clinton Implicated In Benghazi Murders

The Butcher of Benghazi, Hillary Rodham Clinton, has blood on her hands: the blood of Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Ty Woods, and Glen Doherty.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-md1vViEbY

This according to a scathing report entitled “Breach of Duty: Hillary Clinton and Catastrophic Failure in Benghazi,” put together by Special Ops OPSEC, the same group that produced the viral documentary Dishonorable Disclosures.

Western Center for Journalism has analyzed this groundbreaking report and found that Hillary Rodham Clinton has indeed been implicated in murder.

Watch our exclusive video for all the details about “The Butcher of Benghazi Hillary Rodham Clinton.”

PLACING a further stake through the lies from Obama Inc., along comes what some of us knew all along, yet could hardly prove it – until now!

DeClassified-Dozens of Vessels Surrounded Benghazi When Clinton Ordered Stand-Down

Thursday, February 13, 2014 – VIDEO

We have heard over and over from The Obama administration during Congressional hearings  that there wasn’t enough time to respond with our military to try and help save American lives that were involved in a firefight  during the Benghazi terrorist attack on Sept 11, 2011.  Well, it turns out that wasn’t true. Judicial watch has just released in in a new report that they have  obtained an unclassified navy map of all the naval ships positioned in the area around North Africa, and Guess what, this new map contradicts the Obama administrations claims of saying they didn’t have military assets in the area that would make it in time to help our ambassador Christopher Stevens and his staff fight off a terrorist attack.

JW Gets Map of Military Fleet Positions During Benghazi Attack

Dozens of vessels were stationed in the region on that day, including two aircraft carriers (Dwight D. Eisenhower and Enterprise), four amphibious ships, 13 destroyers, three cruisers and more than a dozen other smaller Navy boats as well as a command ship. Carriers are warships, the powerhouse of the naval fleet with a full-length flight deck for aircraft operations. During the Benghazi attack, two carriers were based to the east in the Arabian Sea, the Navy map shows.

Two amphibious assault ships (Iwo Jima and Gunston Hill) were situated to the east in the Gulf of Oman and one (New York) was in the Gulf of Aden, the map shows. A fourth (Fort McHenry) was located on the west side of the African continent in the Atlantic Ocean. Amphibious ships resemble small aircraft carriers and have air-craft strips for vertical and short take-offs and landings. The destroyers are scattered throughout the region, but the closest appear to be four (Cole, Forrest Sherman, Jason Dunham and Aboon) in the Mediterranean Sea north of Libya. The rest of the fleet includes cruisers, minesweepers, patrols and a command ship.

The map was provided to Judicial Watch by retired Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Randall R. Schmidt, who is investigating how the military responded to the Benghazi attack. Schmidt flew jet fighters during his active duty and says there’s no reason the military could not have efficiently responded in Benghazi. Schmidt got the map after filing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the Navy asking it to identify the location of all its assets in the region on September 11, 2012

ASIDE from the travesty of Benghazigate, the idea that this monstrous woman would ever become POTUS, well, shiver the free world timbers. Mind you, the above only matters if there is anything left of America’s carcass to put back together, especially after the reign of Obama Inc!  

Besides, how many times does one have to tie Hill to the Brotherhood Mafia to understand her inexorable nexus, both politically AND business-wise. Treasonous.

It gets worse. What kind of (ex) Sec of State turns the other cheek, when pedophilia and other risky business takes place under her domain? Rhetorical.

DUMP her as a contender…she belongs in jail, not in the People’s House!!

The Connection Between OHPI(“Online Hate Prevention Institute”)& the Islamic Council of Victoria:A Muslim Brotherhood Aligned Group…By Adina Kutnicki, Israel Administrator to Islam Exposed Online

Posted on by
1

Featured at – http://islamexposed.org/

The Connection Between OHPI & the Islamic Council of Victoria: A Muslim Brotherhood Aligned Group

BY ADINA KUTNICKI, ISRAEL ADMINISTRATOR

As a further rejoinder to the  inflammatory charges leveled at Islam Exposed as a “hate page” by Andre Oboler, the CEO of The Online Hate Prevention Institute(OHPI), several additional layers are involved.[1] Whether by ignorance or design, one stands head and shoulders above the rest, discrediting the credibility of his report, “Islamophobia on the Internet: The Growth of Online Hate Targeting Muslims.”[2]

In this regard, many have overlooked OHPI’s reliance – thus, its collaboration – on the Islamic Council of Victoria, which is acknowledged as its consultant in Oboler’s report: The OHPI report on online hate speech was “produced in consultation with the Islamic Council of Victoria.”[3] And while it appears “reasonable” to reach out to a leading Islamic center regarding Muslim issues – in the same manner in which OHPI reaches out to frontline Jewish communal organizations in its efforts to combat antisemitism – in no way are the two approaches comparable. In fact, they are worlds apart.

The first is supported by a vast resource of primary source records and evidence to inform Oboler’s reports. The same cannot be said for the second. Instead, he rests most of his case to suppress Muslim “hate” speech – and respectively his report – upon subjective opinions and theories and an inherently biased consulting organization as his primary go-to source to indict other groups. Meanwhile, an abundance of primary source material could have been easily accessed by him.

With the appropriate research, one cannot negate the harsh reality that much of today’s antisemitism stems from the Muslim world.[4] To understand antisemitismis also to understand this and to understand why.[5] [6] [7] This not only puts into question Oboler’s scholarship on each of the topics, but it also presents another serious problem. There is an endemic conflict of interest posed by his efforts against antisemitism and those against so-called anti-Muslim hate speech groups.

On the one hand, Oboler focuses on exposing and shutting down social networks that are deceptive in nature and that defy geographical and historical evidence about Israel and the Jews.[8] [9] On the other hand, he aims to silence any speech that exposes the truth about the deception and propaganda surrounding the former.

In fact, this has been an ongoing heated contention by many of OHPI’s leading donors, who were misled to believe that its mission, as well as its various fundraising campaigns, were aimed solely at targeting online antisemitic/anti-Israel hate speech and groups. They believe that there is an innate conflict of interest in supporting the two and stifling speech that exposes Islamic hate against Israel and the Jews. According to them, Oboler had grossly misrepresented his mission to them. This is evinced by screenshots that were captured in a group whose predominant goal is to remove antisemitic pages on Facebook. It is run and was founded by one of OHPI’s donors, Michael Mendelson, who is well-known within the pro-Israel camp for his avid efforts to combat antisemitism and for his coordination and finance of the following protest, “Remove Hate from Facebook“:

Michael Mendelson's October 14, 2013 Rally, "Remove Hate from Facebook"

Michael Mendelson’s October 14, 2013 Rally, “Remove Hate from Facebook”

As it so happens, Mendelson is also an administrator of Islam Exposed and has vocally expressed his objections to Oboler’s recent report that targets it. According to him, he never would have endorsed and supported OHPI if he had known just how contrary its mission is to his own. Nor would many other supporters who he had enlisted to help OHPI.

Needless to say, Mendelson has since removed Oboler from his group, but It is important to stress that he continued to emphasize antisemitism as his primary goal as late as September 21, 2013, only three months before releasing his December 2013 report on “Islamophobia” . . .

9-21-13 Oboler Post in RHP Re Antisemitism

September 21, 2013 Post by Andre Oboler, CEO of OHPI

As recently as October 27 and 31, 2013, one month before Oboler’s report, which specifically targets Islam Exposed as one of 50 Facebook pages that promotes hate speech against Muslims, he continued to mislead donors in Mendelson’s group. It is reasonable then to conclude that he had been in the throws of completing it, while continuing to solicit and secure funds for a contrary cause to that of some of his leading contributors. It also is likely he knew full well they were none the wiser about it . . .

10-27-13: Oboler Thanks Members of "RHP" for 10% of Donations

October 27, 2013: Oboler Thanks Members of “RHP” for 10% of Donations

10-31-2013 Oboler Drive Part 1

October 31, 2013: Oboler, Soliciting OHPI Support in "RHP"

October 31, 2013: Oboler, Soliciting OHPI Support in “RHP”

Mendelson was so convinced of Oboler’s intentions that he even sent out 112,000 emails for him as late as November 1, 2013 to raise more support for OHPI.  Less than three hours after, Oboler’s OHPI Facebook page grew by 600 new likes and by over 800 the following day . . .

11-1-13 Post by Michael Mendelson, Helping Andre Oboler to Raise Support

11-1-13 Post by Michael Mendelson, Helping Andre Oboler to Raise Support

It is no wonder Oboler remained “out of touch.”

Even more, Andre Oboler would be hard-pressed to find even one major Jewish communal organization which endorses, sympathizes, or otherwise condones terror, whether frontal or “in sympathy.” However, it is a fact that the Islamic Council of Victoria is in “deep sympathy” and allied with the Muslim Brotherhood. And yes, the Muslim Brotherhood indeed endorses terror, that which is sanctioned under Sharia Law.[10]

Not unlike the leading Muslim Brotherhood umbrella group within North America, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the Islamic Council of Victoria is a subsidiary of the main Islamic Society in Australia, Australian Federation of Islamic Council.[11] [12]Both leading groups operate under the Muslim Brotherhood’s global fiqh (Islamic, Sharia Law jurisprudence) council.[13]

As a matter of record, the following are just a few (out of many) exhibits attesting to the above nexus between the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic terror:

Exhibit One:

“Muslim Brotherhood (MB)” – Discover the Networks [14]

Exhibit Two: 

Understanding Jihad: The Islamic Holy War [15]

Views : 0
Ratings : 1

Exhibit Three:

Muslim Mafia - Full Size

Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that’s Conspiring to Islamize America

by P. Dave Gaubatz and Paul Sperry [16]

and so on….
To wit, how does Andre Oboler explain this statement: “The Islamic Council of Victoria recognizes the terrorist organization, the Muslim Brotherhood, whose mission statement includes:

The process of settlement is a ‘Civilization-Jihadist Process’ and their work is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house? [17]

Concomitantly, the Muslim Brotherhood (with which the Islamic Council of Victoria aligns) is completely embedded within Australia, as it is in most parts of the west and beyond: “The Muslim Brotherhood in Australia.” [18]

Thus, Andre Oboler, is everyone who opposes the swathe of Islamic jihad raging across the world “guilty” of “Islamophobia”? To be sure, as mentioned in Islam Exposed’s first response, “In the main, what the misdirected ‘Online Hate Prevention Institute’ is really hoping to accomplish is to silence all criticism of Islam (and by definition, since practicing Muslims are its adherents, how does one as a truly honest broker, distance Islam from its practitioners?) through a well-honed tactic, aptly coined, “Islamophobia.“[19] [20]

Fact: ”Islamophobia” is a (silencing) tool like few others, as it is the stealth end of frontal jihad: Muslim Brotherhood front group CAIR invents a whole new category of ‘Islamophobia’ to whine about: Anti-Muslim bullying in school.[21]

It bears repeating, by premising OHPI’s “hate speech” report on an Islamic-inspired weapon of intimidation and silence, via the “crime” of “Islamophobia,” it calls into question every other premise duly derived within this report.

And, are leading Australians – as well as many other westerners – making up spurious linkage(s) between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Islamic Council of Australia (assuredly, almost all major Islamic groups spanning the globe are similarly allied)? Again, the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamic supremacist group, condones and supports terror.

As an academic, surely Andre Oboler understands the intrinsic value of primary sources in juxtaposition to empirical data. Thereby, a plethora of direct Islamic documentation, much of it derived from leading Islamic scholars (in relation to mandates derived via Sharia doctrinal law), is available, that which proves the underlying basis, the inherent need, for a site such as Islam Exposed.

While it ordinarily might seem easy to dismiss all of the above as little more than “Islamophobic” rantings, the fact of the matter is that, unlike OHPI, Islam Exposedhas its own impartial experts – including this writer – relative to this highly-charged, yet very shadowy Islamic arena.

More than hypocritical – dangerously so. Thereby, Mr. Oboler, truth-telling should indeed be a matter of due diligence.

Other Works by This Author

Adina Kutnicki, an investigative journalist, has been acclaimed for her expertise on the Muslim Brotherhood in two widely circulated interviews with her by the Inquisitr: “The Inquisitr Interviews Adina Kutnicki: The Reality Of Life For An Israeli Patriot” and “The Muslim Brotherhood’s Quest For Global Dominance – An Interview With Adina Kutnicki,” which piggybacked on the first, A recent book review “On A Wing From The Holy Land [Review Of An Exciting New Novel About The Spiritual Journey Of An Israeli Woman]” was also spotlighted at Inquisitr. 

Kutnicki’s op-eds have been featured at American Thinker, Israel National News, Israel Insider, The Jewish Press, MidEast Outpost, The Freeman Center For Strategic Studies, HONENU – Providing Legal Aid To Israeli Soldiers & Civilians In Distress, JEWSNEWS.co.il (https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/10/why-is-drunk-driving-treated-more-leniently-than-assault-with-a-deadly-weapon-op-ed-by-adina-kutnicki-featured-at-jewsnews-co-il/) as well as at other sites. Her writings also appear in print media.

Endnotes

1 Online Hate Prevention Institute, The (OHPI), “The Problem with ‘Islam Exposed’,” OHPI, 10 Feb. 2014, http://ohpi.org.au/ohpis-exposure-of-islam-exposed/,
2 Andre Oboler, Islamophobia on the Internet: The Growth of Online Hate Targeting Muslims, OHPI, 2013, http://www.scribd.com/doc/ 190416797/%E2%80%98Islamophobia-on-the-Internet-The-growth-of-online-hate-targeting-Muslims.
3 Ibid, ii.
4 Religion of Peace, The, “Muslim Opinion Polls: A ‘Tiny Minority of Extremists’?” TheReligionsofPeace.com, 2002-2015, http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/opinion-polls.htm.
5 Andrew Bostom, “Understanding the Islam in Islamic Antisemitism” (delivered to New English Review Symposium May 30, 2009), New English Review, June 2009, http://www.newenglishreview.org/ custpage.cfm/frm/39207/sec_id/39207, in Islam Exposed (with Prelude by Lisa Michelle), http://islamexposed.org/multimedia-map/israel-and-the-arab-muslim-war-against-jews-multimedia/israel-and-the-arab-muslim-war-against-jews-printed-media/.
6 Mitchell Bard, “Treatment of Jews in the Arab World,” Myths and Facts: A Guide to the Arab-Israeli Conflict, Virtual Jewish Library, American Israeli Cooperative Enterprise (AICE) Inc., 2012, 11, http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths3/MFtreatment.html.
7 Nonie Darwish, Nonie, “Why Muslims Must Hate Jews,” American Thinker, 12 December 2013, http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/08/why_muslims_must_hate_jews.html.
8 Oboler, “Google Earth: A New Platform for Anti-Israel Propaganda and Replacement Geography,”  Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 8 (26 June 2008): 5. http://jcpa.org/article/google-earth-a-new-platform-for-anti-israel-propaganda-and-replacement-geography/.
9 Oboler, “Facebook, Holocaust Denial and Antisemitism 2.0,” Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 86 (27 August 2009), http://jcpa.org/article/facebook-holocaust-denial-and-anti-semitism-2-0/.
10 WkiIslam, Terrorism, 2013. http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Jihad.
11 Wikipedia, Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). Wikipedia Foundation, Inc., 2014. http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Islamic_Society_of_North_America.
12 WikiIslam, Australian Federation of Islamic Councils, 2014, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Australian_Federation_of_Islamic_Councils.
13 “Fiqh Council of North America Meets at IIIT,” The Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report. 22 September 2007, http://globalmbreport.org/?p=230.
14 DiscoverTheNetwork, Muslim Brotherhood (MB), DiscoverTheNetwork.Org, 5 March 2014, http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=6386.
15 Clarion Project, The, “Understanding Jihad: The Islamic Holy War,” The Third Jihad: Radical Islam’s Vision for America,Video (1:01:48). http://www.clarionproject.org/understanding-jihad/.
16 P. Dave Gaubatz, and Paul Sperry, Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld that’s Conspiring to Islamize America (Los Angeles, CA: WorldNetDaily [WND], 2009), http://www.amazon.com/Muslim-Mafia-Underworld-Conspiring-Islamize/dp/1935071106.
17 Q Society of Australia, Inc., “Q on: Understanding ‘Stealth’ or ‘Civilization’ Jihad” (Mass Immigration, Form Q110103R1 – Public Jihad Info Short1), Society of Australia, Inc., http://www.qsociety.org.au/qonjihad.pdf.
18 Ball, Jim. “The Muslim Brotherhood in Australia.” FAMSY. http://jimball.com.au/Features/The-Muslim-Brotherhood-in-Australia.htm.
19 Adina Kutnicki, “The Problem with ‘The Online Hate Prevention Institute’: Targeting Islam Exposed Instead of Examining Islam’s Roots,” Islam Exposed, 10 February 2014, http://islamexposed.org/2014/02/10/the-problem-with-the-online-hate-prevention-institute-targeting-islam-exposed-instead-of-examining-islams-roots/.
20 Robert Spencer, “‘Islamophobia’ in Academia,” Jihad Watch, 9 February 2014, http://www.jihadwatch.org/ 2014/02/ islamophobia-in-academia.
21 BareNakedIslam, “Muslim Brotherhood Front Group CAIR Invents a Whole New Category of ‘Islamophobia’ to Whine About: Anti-Muslim Bullying in School,” Bare Naked Islam, 20 December 2013, http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/12/20/muslim-brotherhood-front-group-cair-invents-a-whole-new-category-of-islamophobia-to-whine-about-bullying-of-muslims-in-school/.

SHARE THIS:

ISLAMIC BUTCHERY SWATHES ACROSS THE GLOBE:JIHAD UBER ALLES!”PURIFYING” THE WORLD FOR ALLAH.Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
8

 

SANS a scintilla of a doubt, it is IMPOSSIBLE to separate Islamic doctrine from bloody jihad. Not only that, if one political commentary herein stands above all the rest, it is no doubt this one:

In brief, it is a recent policy paper by Professor Paul Eidelberg; a paper which this American-Israeli had the privilege to review and add to; duly honored and humbled to have been asked to participate in his myth shattering scholarship.

Make NO mistake, its contents are earth shaking, unbelievably thought provoking and cogently analyzed. In particular, its historical analysis and theological basis are spot on. Having read many policy papers, this praise is not offered lightly. Therefore, sit down… put your feet up… have a drink (not the inebriating kind)…. enjoy some sweets (you may need it to lighten the mood)… and start reading – https://adinakutnicki.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/islam_and_blood.pdf .

Sharing its contents may well be your most important contribution to our common struggle. Really.

One dare not separate the authentic/true doctrinal dictates of Islam from decapitations, cannibalism, rapes, shootings, bombings and whatever method gets “the job done”. It is not as if one is dealing with Christianity or Judaism, whereby one can – if they so desire – pick and choose how religious they want to be without fear of bloody retribution.

However, in respect to Islam, savagery is meted out to all those who refuse to submit to the boot of Islam, even from within the Muslim fold. Their preferred targets are “infidels”. Muslims who stay on the sidelines and refuse to take part in their savagery are very much in their cross hairs too. 

Bloody Jihad One:

What other so-called religion inspires head chopping and more? London’s Islamic-Inspired/Sanctioned Head Chopping; Cameron’s Hideous Response, and Boston’s Jihad. Cause & Effect!

Bloody Jihad Two:

And, if decapitations are not convincing, as to the scourge from Islam, how about this: Islamic Cannibalism ROOTED In Islam’s Relationship To Blood:The Slaughter of Christians & Jews!

Bloody Jihad Three:

As is said, whatever floats your boat…and for females who are too “demure” to partake in frontal jihad, well, sexual jihad is all the rage! SEXUAL JIHAD:The Latest “Weapon” Waged To “Assist” Islamic Warriors. Where Is This Rooted?

Bloody Jihad Four:

Just how intrinsic are Islam’s underpinnings to all of the above? Explosive Religious Origins:What It Means For Western Civilization In General & Israel In Particular.

Therefore, is it any shock that Islamic jihadists are swathing across the globe and killing students/children/others hither and yon, as they scream – all under the banner of Allah – Allahu Akbar….?

Islamic militants attack Nigerian school, killing dozens of students

DAMATURU, Nigeria — Islamic militants set fire to a locked dormitory at a school in northern Nigeria, then shot and slit the throats of students who tried to escape through windows during a pre-dawn attack Tuesday. At least 58 students were killed, including many who were burned alive.

They “slaughtered them like sheep” with machetes, and gunned down those who ran away, said one teacher, Adamu Garba.

Soldiers guarding a checkpoint near the coed government school were mysteriously withdrawn hours before it was targeted by the militants, said the spokesman for the governor of northeastern Yobe state.

Female students were spared in the attack, said the spokesman, Abdullahi Bego, though girls and women have been abducted in the past by militants of the Boko Haram movement, whose name means “Western education is forbidden.”

This time, the insurgents went to the female dormitories and told the young women to go home, get married and abandon the Western education they said is anathema to Islam, Bego said. All of the dead were teenage boys or young men.

The militants, whose struggle for an Islamic state has killed thousands and made them the biggest threat to security in Africa’s top oil producer, have increasingly preyed on civilians, both Muslim and Christian. Some 300 people have died in attacks this month alone.

Local officials buried the bodies of 29 victims and another 29 were taken to Damaturu Specialist Hospital, according to the hospital records and an Associated Press reporter who went to the mortuary. Most of the victims appeared to be between 15 and 20 years old, Bego said.

Eleven wounded survivors of the attack were being treated at the hospital.

Touring the smoldering ruins Tuesday at the Federal Government College of Buni Yadi, Gov. Ibrahim Gaidam decried the federal government’s failure to protect the population.

“It is unfortunate that our children in schools are dying from lack of adequate protection from the federal government,” Gaidam told reporters.

He called on President Goodluck Jonathan to deploy more troops to the region.

Jonathan, who rarely comments on individual attacks, said in a statement that he felt “immense sadness and anguish” by the loss of life at the school, and vowed that the military would “continue to prosecute the war against terror with full vigor, diligence and determination.”

Garba said the militants locked the door of a dormitory where male students were sleeping, then set it on fire. Some students were burned alive in the attack that began around 2 a.m., he said.

The governor said it took hours for troops to arrive, giving the assailants plenty of time to set the rest of the school campus ablaze— six dormitories, the administrative building, staff quarters, classrooms, a clinic and the kitchen.

Bego, the governor’s spokesman, said the governor will be looking into why the school was left unprotected. “The community complained to the governor that yesterday the military were withdrawn and then the attack happened,” he said.

Soldiers from Damaturu, the state capital located some 45 miles (70 kilometers) away, did not arrive until noon, hours after the attackers had taken off, according to community leaders.

Military spokesman Eli Lazarus confirmed the attack, but could not give an exact death toll because soldiers were still gathering corpses. He had no immediate comment on the charge that soldiers withdrew before the attack.

Nigeria’s military has reported arresting several soldiers accused of aiding and passing information to Boko Haram extremists; a senator has also been accused of similar charges.

On Monday, Jonathan dismissed suggestions the military was losing the war to halt the 4-year-old Islamic uprising in the northeast.

Tens of thousands of Nigerians have lost family members, houses, businesses, their belongings and livelihoods to the rebellion and the fallout from a military state of emergency by soldiers accused of gross human rights violations, including setting ablaze entire villages and summary executions of suspects.

Tuesday’s attack is only the latest in a string of deadly assaults by Islamic militants.

Entire towns and villages were under the sway of Boko Haram when Jonathan declared a state of emergency in May. The military quickly forced the insurgents out of urban areas, only to have them regroup in forests and mountain caves where it has proved difficult to flush them out.

The military said recent attacks are being perpetrated by militants escaping a sustained aerial bombardment and ground assaults on their forest hideouts along the border with Cameroon, an offensive begun after Jonathan fired and replaced his entire military command last month. On Saturday, the military announced it had closed hundreds of miles of the border with Cameroon to prevent militants using it as a launch pad for attacks.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Monday condemned the “unspeakable violence and acts of terror” and said the United States was helping Nigerian authorities “to combat the threat posed by Boko Haram, while protecting civilians and ensuring respect for human rights.”

But survivors and local officials charge they get no protection.

“Everybody is living in fear,” local government chairman Maina Ularamu told the AP after Izghe village was attacked twice in a week this month — with militants killing 109 people and burning hundreds of thatched huts in neighboring Adamawa state.

“There is no protection. We cannot predict where and when they are going to attack. People can’t sleep with their eyes closed,” Ularamu said.

Aside for some pooh-pooh declarations of “outrage” muttered by Obama Inc., it is hardly comforting that these same mouthpieces BACK UP Al-Qaeda and its offshoots, all over the Mid East and beyond. 

In effect, Obama Inc. is guilty by omission and commission, despite their feigned exclamations of shock…horror…and what not! Besides, this is an admin which employs a terrorist to be an Obamacare “navigator”. Think this is smack talk? Nope. 

The fact of the matter is that Islam cannot be separated from its bloody roots, simply because jihad by the sword is DIRECTLY ordered through the Koran and by major Islamic scholars.

CASE CLOSED!

Question:Are Muslims permitted to force others into accepting Islam?

Summary Answer:Muslims are commanded to fight unbelievers until they are either dead, converted to Islam, or in a permanent state of subjugation under Muslim domination.  Allowing people of other faiths to live and worship independently of Islamic rule is not an option.

The Qur’an:Qur’an (8:39) – “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.”  Translation from the Noble QuranQur’an (9:29) – “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.”  Suras 9 and 5 are the last “revelations” that Muhammad handed down – hence abrogating what came before, which includes the oft-quoted verse 2:256 -“Let there be no compulsion in religion…”.Qur’an (9:5) “But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them…”  Prayer and charity are among the Five Pillars of Islam, as salat and zakat.  See below.  Islam sanctions violence as a means of coercing religion.Qur’an (9:11) – (Continued from above) “But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then are they your brethren in religion”  This confirms that Muhammad is speaking of conversion to Islam.Quran (9:56-57) – “And they swear by Allah that they are most surely of you, and they are not of you, but they are a people who are afraid (of you).  If they could find a refuge or cave or a place to enter into, they would certainly have turned thereto, running away in all haste.”  This refers to people living among Muhammad’s own people who may not be true believers, but have to pretend to be in order to survive.  They have no safe refuge to which to escape the Muslims.  If Islam were a religion of peace, then why the fear?Qur’an (2:193) – “And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion be only for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers.”  The key phrase is to fight until “religion be only for Allah.”Qur’an (3:83) – “Are they seeking a religion other than Allah’s, when every soul in the heavens and the earth has sub mitted to Him, willingly or by compulsion?”  So much for the earlier verse (2:256) stating that there is “no compulsion in religion”.

From the Hadith:Sahih Muslim (1:33) The Messenger of Allah said: “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay zakat.”  The first part of this condition is the Shahada, or profession of faith in Islam.  Violence is sanctioned until the victims embrace Muhammad’s religion.Sahih Muslim (19:4294) – “When you meet your enemies who are polytheists (which includes Christians), invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them … If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them”  Osama bin Laden echoes this order from his prophet: “Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually?  Yes. There are only three choices in Islam  … . Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.” (source: The al-Qaeda Reader p. 19-20)Bukhari (8:387) – “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.'”Bukhari (53:392) – “While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said, “Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace Islam, you will be safe. You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle.”Bukhari (2:24) – “Allah’s Apostle said: “I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform a that, then they save their lives and property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah.”Bukhari (60:80) – “The Verse:–‘You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.’ means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.”Bukhari (60:40) – “…:And fight them till there is no more affliction (i.e. no more worshiping of others along with Allah).”  ‘Affliction’ of Muslims is explicitly defined here being a condition in which others worship a different god other than Allah.  Muslims are commanded to use violence to ‘rectify’ the situation.Bukhari (59:643) – “Testify that none has the right to be worshipped except Allah, or else I will chop off your neck!”  Words of a military leader that Muhammad sent on an expedition with the mission of destroying a local religion in Yemen.Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 959 – Then the apostle sent Khalid bin Walid… to the Banu al-Harith and ordered him to invite them to Islam three days before he attacked them.  If they accepted then he was to accept it from them, and if they declined he was to fight them.  So Khalid set out and came to them, and sent out riders in all directions inviting the people to Islam, saying, “If you accept Islam you will be safe.”  So the men accepted Islam as they were invited.  The text goes on to say that Khalid taught the al-Harith about Islam after their “conversion,” proving that it was based on fear of slaughter rather than a free and intelligent decision.Ibn Kathir (Commenting on Quran 2:256, which says “let there be no compulsion in religion”) –“Therefore all people of the world should be called to Islam.  If anyone of them refuses to do so, or refuses to pay the jizya, they should be fought till they are killed.”

 

Additional Notes:
Following his flirtation with preaching relative peace and tolerance at Mecca – a 13-year disaster that netted less than 100 followers (mostly friends and family) – Muhammad changed tactics during his last ten years.  Once he obtained the power to do so, he began forcing others into accepting his claims about himself at the point of a sword.  In many places in the Hadith, he tells his followers that he has been commanded by Allah to fight unbelievers until they profess their faith in Islam (theShahada).During these later years, Muhammad did not seem at all bothered by conversions that were made under obvious duress.  These included that of his sworn enemy of Abu Sufyan and his wife Hind.  According to Muslim historians, when Abu Sufyan went to seek peace with Muhammad, he was ordered instead to embrace Islam.  The exact words spoken to him in Muhammad’s presence were,  “Submit and testify that there is no God but Allah and that Muhammad is the apostle of Allah before you lose your head” – (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 814).  He did.The entire city of Mecca followed suit, even though the residents and leaders detested Muhammad and had resisted his preaching from the beginning.  Most of them “converted” to Islam the day that he marched through their city with an army so dominant that little resistance was offered.  Only the most credulous of believers would think that the city’s religious epiphany just happened to coincide with the sword at their necks.Meccans who would not change their religion were forcibly expelled from the city following that last Haj (Quran 9:5).  The Christians and Jews living in Arabia at the time suffered the same fate on Muhammad’s deathbed order.  They were given the choice of either accepting Islam or being forced off their land (Sahih Muslim 19:4366).The Jews at Khaybar were not at war with Muhammad when he ordered his warriors to attack them.  Even his faithful son-in-law, Ali, whom he chose to head the mission, was somewhat perplexed as to the pretext on which they were to assault this peaceful farming community so far away from Medina:

Muhammad said: ‘Proceed on and do not look about until Allah grants you victory’, and Ali went a bit and then halted and did not look about and then said in a loud voice: ‘Allah’s Messenger, on what issue should I fight with the people?’ Thereupon he (the Prophet) said: ‘Fight with them until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger’  (Sahih Muslim 31:5917)

The Jews were caught entirely be surprise, of course.  Their wealth was stolen and their women and children taken and distributed as slaves by the prophet of Islam to his men.  Muhammad even took a woman for himself – after ordering the death of her husband.

Before he died, Muhammad sent his warriors against pagan Arab tribes, such as the al-Harith, demanding that they either convert to Islam or be wiped out (naturally, they opted for the Religion of Peace).  He cursed Christians and Jews to the very end (Bukhari 8:427).

According to al-Shafi in “The Ordinances of the Quran“, Muhammad “defeated the people until they entered Islam by hook or by crook.”  Muslims are taught to follow in the way of their prophet.  A devotee under the reign of Umar put it this way “Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute)” (Bukhari 53:386).

Likewise, Abu Bakr, Muhammad’s closest companion and immediate successor, pressed Jihad aggressively in foreign territory against people who did not want war and were of no threat.  In a letter sent to the Persians, the caliph bluntly stated, “You should convert to Islam, and then you will be safe, for if you don’t, you should know that I have come to you with an army of men that love death, as you love life.”

Down through the centuries Muslims have forced Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists, Zoroastrians, pagans and others to accept Islam, either by bluntly offering them death as an alternative, or by making their lives so miserable (ie. taxes, denial of rights…) that the conquered convert to Islam under the strain.

Forced conversions persist among extremists.  Recently in Egypt, a Christian girl was kidnapped and told that she would be raped if she did not convert.  In 2010, an 11-year-old Christian boy in Pakistan was kept enslaved in chains (1, 2) by his Muslim landlord, who proudly told the world that he would liberate the lad if he embraced Islam.

Neither of these examples of attempted forced conversion was condemned by Islamic organizations, even in the West.  From the Muslim perspective, the victim in each case still technically retains the choice to convert.  In fact, some even lauded the Pakistani slave-owner for being magnanimous in offering freedom and debt relief to his subject for embracing Islam.

Since Muslims believe so sincerely that their religion is truth, they often can’t help but feel, on some level, that forced conversion is more of a favor done to the subject – a case of the end justifying the means.  As Muhammad said, “Allah marvels at those who are brought to paradise in chains” (Bukhari 52:254).

It is also important to note the critical role that jizya plays in Islamic conversion.  Paying a “tax” to Muslims is the only avenue of escape for those who don’t want to leave their religion, according to the Qur’an.  This answers the question of why Muhammad, his companions, and subsequent Muslim armies didn’t force everyone to convert to Islam.

As Muhammad realized with the Jews of Khaybar, who were allowed to keep their farming community provided they directed the profits of their labor to him, it was often more lucrative to leave local economies in place rather than killing every male who wouldn’t convert.  This became the loose rule for the Muslim armies that swept across Christian, Jewish, Persian, Hindu and Buddhist lands in the decades that followed.  The money that was collected was then used to further Islamic expansion.

As Muhammad put it: “My sustenance is under the shade of my spear, and he who disobeys my orders will be humiliated by paying Jizya” (another translation: “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.”)  The hadith has been quoted by al-Qaeda and is found in the original version of Bukhari and Ahmad (5114 or 4869, depending on the translation).

In fairness, Muslims have generally tended to follow verse 2:256 of the Quran, which states, “Let there be no compulsion in religion.” and have not felt it right to force others into embracing Islam.  However, this does not change the fact that verse 2:256 was clearly abrogated by later verses, particularly in Sura 9 – otherwise the practice of killing apostates if they do not recant their chose faith would not have become an acceptable part of Islamic law.

Another point to keep in mind is that in Islam, practice is more important than belief.  Muslims are commanded to fight unbelievers until they say they believe in Allah (or pay the Jizya), but there seems to be a tacit understanding that belief itself can’t be forced (ie. “there is no compulsion in religion”).  Nevertheless, once a subjugated individual outwardly converts to Islam under the strain of taxes and discrimination, they are not allowed to recant upon penalty of death.  Their children must also be raised Muslim.  And, if they aren’t, then it is a sign of apostasy – subject to death.

This is how Islam managed to spread so successfully within conquered populations to ratios in the high 90th percentiles over native religion.

One last point of interest is that Muhammad’s later practice of ordering people to profess their belief in him proved disastrous both for his own family and the legacy of his religion.  By the time of his death, his empire included a great many people and tribes who had accepted his rule merely to avoid war and slavery.  Many of them wanted out after he died, and several wars were immediately fought, resulting in thousands of deaths and cementing Islam’s legacy of violent intolerance.

Incredibly, even Muhammad’s sworn enemy of Abu Sufyan may have gotten the last laugh.  So ambitious was the prophet of Islam that he accepted his former foe’s outward profession of allegiance (at the point of a sword) in order to expand his empire.  Yet, it was Abu Sufyan’s own children who ultimately benefited – at the expense of Muhammad’s.

Abu Sufyan’s son, Muawiyah, inherited the empire after defeating Muhammad’s adopted son, Ali.  He also poisoned Hasan, one of the prophet’s two favorite grandsons.  Abu Sufyan’s grandson, Yazid, became the next caliph and promptly had the head of Muhammad’s other favorite grandson, Hussein, brought to him on a platter.

Such are the perils of forcing others to say that you are a prophet when they prefer to believe otherwise.

See also: MYTH: Muhammad Rejected Conversions Made Under Duress

 

SECOND AMENDMENT & STATES’ RIGHTS BUTT UP AGAINST INCREASING TYRANNY:SHOW DOWN LOOMING! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
4

IN a much-needed show down between an out of control Federal putsch against Conservative, Constitutional abiding Americans, the Supreme Court, once again, abandons the American people to a fateful end.

To be sure, the very same Justice Roberts made a mockery of the law when he twisted Obamacare into the “law of the land”, as he upheld its non-Constitutional underpinning into “binding” law – pretzel-like – under the taxing authority’s umbrella. Unlawful. Outrageous.

As such, what hand is the Supreme Court playing against the enshrined right to “bear arms”, as an ever-increasing number of States are pushing back against the out of control overreach of the Federal government? Well, all of a sudden the powers that be are “hands off” when it comes to settling two of the hottest issues dividing the American people – States’ Rights and gun control. How accommodating. 

As has been repeatedly demonstrated at this site, the Feds, particularly under the abusive reign of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, envision garnering total control via cutting off the oxygen of States’ Rights. And, whereas the Second Amendment is an absolute individual right under the Constitution – thereby, states do not have to beg for rights to uphold its essence – the fact of the matter is that individual states are increasingly butting up against a Federal apparatus which nullifies both States’ Rights and individual rights at every turn. 

Well, turn about is more than fair play, and many states are turning the tables through nullification.

WND EXCLUSIVE

SUPREMES SHOOT DOWN STATE’S FIGHT FOR GUN RIGHTS 

‘It is fruitless to expect federal government to control the lust for tyrannical power’ – VIDEO!

 BOB UNRUH 

  • Contending it is “fruitless” to expect that the federal government would rein in its own “lust” for tyranny, the instigator of a years-long conflict with Washington over the Interstate Commerce Clause says the battle is over.
At least for now.

Gary Marbut, president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, said the lawsuit he and his organization brought to uphold the state’s rights on weapons will not be considered at the Supreme Court.

The court’s unwillingness to take the case leaves standing a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that upheld a lower court’s decision to throw out the Montana Firearms Freedom Act.

The law states that firearms made and kept in Montana are exempt from federal regulation under the Commerce Clause, which gives the federal government authority to regulate commerce only “among” the states.

In a posting to supporters, Marbut wrote that the case is now at the end of the road, but a movement has been spawned.

The Montana Firearms Freedom Act, he said, “caught a sympathetic wave as the first legislation of its type in the U.S.”

“It was cloned and enacted in eight other states, and cloned and introduced in the legislatures of about 23 other states yet.”

Marbut said it’s clear that “a majority of the states of the U.S. are operating under the same frustration with the run amok federal government as is Montana.”

“Further, the MFFA inspired a whole wave of other ‘freedom acts,’ such as the light bulb freedom act, the whiskey freedom act, the tobacco freedom act, the healthcare freedom act, and others. Inspired by the MFFA, the U.S. is now alive with ‘nullification’ efforts at the state level – state efforts telling the federal government to back off,” he said.

All of that activity, Marbut said, means there is a need for the Supreme Court to step into this general controversy “if it has any hope to maintain respect for its historic-but-abandoned turf as any sort of check on the other federal branches.”

“This epic trip to the U.S. Supreme Court, and the court’s rejection of MSSA v. Holder have finally persuaded me that it is fruitless to expect any part of the federal government to control the lust for centralized and tyrannical power that our federal government displays,” he said.

Marbut said further that, perhaps more importantly, his case “proves that it is improper to rely on the federal government, or any branch thereof, to be the judge of what powers the states have delegated to the federal government in the Constitution.”

“As the creator of the Constitution and the federal government, only the states may properly or practically do that.”

WND has reported on the case since it began, including months ago when attorneys general from a dozen states argued that the 10th Amendment essentially has been overturned by decades of incorrect court rulings, and the Supreme Court needed to repair the damage.

“By abandoning any meaningful standard for the substantiality of an intrastate activity’s effects on interstate commerce, this court has enabled the Congress to ‘draw the circle broadly enough to cover’ activity, that when viewed in isolation, would have no substantial effect on interstate commerce at all,” representatives for the 12 states told the high court.

The states were Utah, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Idaho, Kansas, Michigan, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota and Wyoming.

The Montana group had petitioned the high court to hear the case, arguing the federal bureaucracy has no authority to impose restrictions on a firearm made, sold and kept inside Montana.

It’s called “The Essential Second Amendment Guide” and the NRA’s Wayne LaPierre has assembled the facts you need to protect your constitutional rights.

The plaintiffs said the U.S. Supreme Court has gradually expanded Washington’s authority under the Commerce Clause so that anything can be regulated under it.

For example, various courts have ruled that under the Commerce Clause, a local law “tracking sex offenders” cannot be allowed because “any effect on interstate commerce from requiring sex offenders to registered is too attenuated to survive scrutiny under the Commerce Clause.”

Further, another court ruled that a disputed statute need not “be a purely economic or commercial statute” to fall under the economic jurisdiction of the Commerce Clause.

States need to ‘check’ Washington

The state of Montana also argued that the independent power of the states “serves as a check on the power of the federal government.”

“If the states are to serve as a real ‘check’ or ‘control’ on federal overreaching, then this court’s Commerce Clause jurisprudence – or more specifically, its Necessary and Proper clause jurisprudence – must provide enforceable limits that are more than just hortatory. This is especially true at the ‘outer limits’ where, as here, Congress tries to regulate purely intrastate activity in the ‘areas of criminal law and social police, where ‘states lay claim’ by right of history and expertise,’” the state said.

“It is long past time for the federal government and the lower courts to stop using [their own precedents] as a license to engage in pure conjecture as to ‘substantial effects’ on interstate commerce. More ‘careful scrutiny’ is required if the ‘constitutionally mandated balance of power’ between the states and the federal government is to continue ‘to ensure the protection of our fundamental liberties.’”

The Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence argued in its brief that the limitations on the federal government to its constitutional duties are foundational.

“Among the powers not delegated to the federal government was the power to regulate the health, safety, and morals of the people – the so-called police power,” it contends. “[Those] always belong to the states.”

And the Weapons Collectors Society of Montana explained that at the time Montana agreed to become a state – and Congress approved its constitution – there were no regulations, limits or restrictions on Montana’s gun industry.

“At the time Montana entered the union, no federal regulation of firearms and ammunition existed, so it would be impossible for the parties to intend that the wholly intrastate manufacture of firearm or ammunition would be subject to federal regulation. … This impossibility also extends to the parties being able to see 50 years into the future to intend that the unforeseen change in Commerce Clause jurisprudence would limit the ability of Montana citizens from these activities.”

WND reported earlier when the shooting sports association filed its request.

A ruling was needed, it said, that would overturn existing precedent and re-establish the powers to which the federal government is limited, restoring the power given to states.

No power

The case argued Congress has no power unless it is specifically granted by the U.S. Constitution.

Marbut, who has been barred by the federal government from building and selling a “Montana Buckeroo” rifle, released an open letter to members of the U.S. Supreme Court.

“The natives are beyond restless. They are at the stage of collecting torches and pitchforks and preparing to head for the castle gates en masse,” he said.

In his letter, Marbut charged that the problem is “overweening federal power,” describing the government’s attitude as “overconfident, conceited, cocksure, cocky, smug, haughty, supercilious, lofty, patronizing, arrogant, proud, vain, self-important, imperious and overbearing.”

He insisted there is plenty of evidence for his assertion.

The movement to enforce states’ rights, as provided by the 10th Amendment, goes beyond gun rights, he said.

“Other states have enacted or introduced other ‘Freedom Acts,’ such as the Whiskey Freedom Act, the Light Bulb Freedom Act, and the Healthcare Freedom Act. But those only tell part of the story,” wrote Marbut.

He noted that states are passing laws prohibiting enforcement of indefinite detention under the National Defense Authorization Act, the NDAA. Police agencies have publicly declared they will not enforce provisions of the Patriot Act, and some states have enacted various marijuana tolerance laws in defiance of federal law.

“These rejections of overweening federal power are happening not only at the state level, but at the county, city level, and with individual citizens,” he said.

“Frankly,” he wrote, “the working people of America are fed up with an overbearing federal government bent on regulating everyone and everything.”

Read Marbut’s letter

Peaceful revolution

In his letter, Marbut cited President John F. Kennedy’s warning: “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.”

His lawsuit, he said, “is our best, and could be the last or near last, attempt at the peaceful revolution we’d all emphatically prefer to the alternative Kennedy asserted.”

“It could well be that MSSA v. Holder marks an historical cusp similar to that served up to SCOTUS in Scott v. Sandford. (For any non-attorneys reading this, Scott v. Sandford is often known as the ‘Dred Scott decision,’ a Supreme Court decision thought by many historians to have been the spark that set off the Civil War, a decision that effectively upheld the institution of slavery.)”

Learn what you can do about your nation. Get “Taking America Back,” Joseph Farah’s manifesto for sovereignty, self-reliance and moral renewal

The lawsuit was filed by Marbut and several firearms organizations in Montana as well as the Second Amendment Foundation after the state legislature adopted the Montana Firearms Freedom Act.

Washington maintains that under the Commerce Clause, it has the right to control commerce inside states, even though the constitutional provision specifies it’s for commerce “among” the states.

Montana Buckaroo

The case never was only about a Montana Buckaroo.

“I wrote the Montana Firearms Freedom Act (MFFA) in 2004, specifically to use firearms as the vehicle to challenge federal power under the Constitution’s Interstate Commerce Clause (ICC),” Marbut explained.

The lawsuit was thrown out by a federal district judge on grounds of standing and merit. The far-left leaning Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, stating that the plaintiffs do have standing, but it affirmed the ruling on merit, opening the door to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Marbut argued in his letter that the problem traces back to President Franklin D. Roosevelt, who in a dispute over wheat price supports threatened to “pack” a Supreme Court with six extra justices so he could ram through his agenda of government control.

The Supreme Court folded, deciding the “Wickard” case in Roosevelt’s favor. The ruling formed the basis for the long string of later decisions that further tightened the federal grip on in-state activities.

New Definitions

Marbut explained the court created new definitions for the terms “regulate,” “commerce” and “among,” which became a de facto amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

He said “commerce” was changed to mean “any economic activity, no matter how minor,” “regulate” was given the meaning “prohibit” and “among” was made to mean “within.”

“The word ‘among’ is a bit slippery to define, although we all grasp what it means,” Marbut wrote. “However, we can easily define what it does NOT mean with a simple thought experiment: You say, ‘Among the three children they had enough money for two ice cream cones.’ I ask, ‘Is an X-ray machine required to find the money?’ You answer, ‘No, because the money is not within them, it is among them.’ Thus, we see clearly that the meaning of ‘among’ does NOT include ‘within.’ Yet to make the Wickard decision do what FDR wanted, SCOTUS had to redefine ‘among’ to mean ‘within.’”

Read Wayne LaPierre’s documentation of “America Disarmed: Inside the U.N. & Obama’s Scheme to Destroy the Second Amendment.”

Conflict

Marbut also argued in his letter to the Supreme Court that a standard principle of law is that provisions adopted later amend those adopted earlier. He notes that the Second Amendment, as well as the Ninth and 10th, were adopted after the commerce clause, and thus amended it.

“The laws that the U.S. asserts prohibit Montana from implementing the MFFA, and that prohibit me from making and selling the Montana Buckaroo sans federal regulation, are clearly a form of prior restraint,” he contended.

The U.S. Supreme Court, he said, “has been clear that prior restraint upon the exercise of constitutionally protected rights is not to be lightly tolerated.”

“Because federal laws being applied inhibit exercise of Second, Ninth and Tenth Amendment reserved rights in advance, those laws neatly fit the prior restraint definition. Generically, prior restraint of a reserved constitutional right may not be done when supported only by a rational basis. It will be difficult or impossible for the U.S. to muster persuasive arguments to satisfy a level of review more strict than a simple rational basis concerning an asserted federal trump of the MFFA.”

He also argued that Montana entered statehood in 1889 under a compact, or contract, and the state accepted the U.S. Constitution as it was understood at the time.

“If the people of Montana had understood in 1889 that this proposed Compact would preclude them from being able to make firearms, or even repair firearms, without a federal license, I seriously doubt that the Montana Legislature would have approved the Compact and Ordinance 1.”

Attorney Nick Dranias represented friend-of-the-court party the Goldwater Institute and others in the Ninth Circuit’s oral arguments, and Quentin Rhoades represented Marbut and Montana shooting interests.

The arguments presented to the Ninth Circuit were posted online:

In an Orwellian twist, even though many states are looking for relief from the tyrannical grip of the Feds through nullification, the fact of the matter is that the Feds have the power to strike down nullification through the Fed court system!

Therefore, anyone who is fully awake realizes that a looming crisis is in the offing, one which is being (purposefully) ignited under the Radical-in-Chief’s rule. Taunting.

Now, not being the cynical sort, it is becoming verily apparent that Obama Inc. would like nothing more than to have an excuse to enact Martial Law. As such, it is also obvious that millions of outraged Conservatives will never tolerate their individual rights to be further subsumed by the gang ruling Washington.  

Effectively, they are signalling and prepping for a show down, telling Obama Inc: bring it on! 
So be it. This site has heretofore chosen sides. Time for others to do the same.
 

OBAMA INC’s “WEAPONIZED” CYBER WARRIORS:GOEBBEL’S-LIKE DISINFORMATION DEPLOYED/AIMED AT AMERICAN CITIZENS. CONSERVATIVE SITES PRIME TARGETS! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
2

 “Send it by carrier pigeon.”

bushnsacartoon.jpg

WHATEVER one surmises about Edward Snowden’s true motives in revealing NSA’s all encompassing domestic spying (in tandem with their full throat-ed spying on friendly countries) apparatus, the fact of the matter is that he alerted American citizens to the totalitarian bent of Obama Inc.

To be sure, it was not as if citizens hadn’t been aware of increasing levels of spying, particularly in relation to internal domestic monitoring. Hell, this blog wrote about Obama Inc.’s Nazi-like tactics, well before Snowden burst onto the scene. However, the scope of the spying was unknown, as well as which group fared better than most. Orwellian.

For the record, Muslim Americans are off limits from unfettered spying, so ordered by the Islamist-in-Chief! NSA’S MONSTROUS LIE DECODED:INVASION OF PRIVACY (DECEITFULLY) PREDICATED ON “WAR ON TERROR” reveals Obama Inc.’s treachery!

But never mind, Obama’s Mafia is the most anti-American regime in the nation’s history, therefore, to expect patriotic ethos is to whistle past its graveyard. Absolutely.

Even so, what else is going on to warrant an updated shout out, other than the overall understanding that the regime in Washington is running wild? And, who in their right mind – no pun intended – will be shocked, shocked to find out that PAID propagandists and spies are infiltrating Conservative websites via orders of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, and remunerated for their efforts through the taxpayer trough?

Global Ministries of Disinformation confirmed

Northeast Intelligence Network

By Douglas J. Hagmann

28 February 2014: It was a year ago this month that I reported information revealed by my source within the Department of Homeland Security about the existence of “cyber warriors” working for the regime of Barack Hussein Obama. The initial report was published on 6 February 2013 titled DHS Insider: Obama’s cyber warriors & preparing for collapse and detailed, according to this source, government operatives working on behalf of Obama. According to this source, paid operatives began targeting websites, blogs, forums and social media accounts at exactly 7:00 a.m. on January 23, [2013] under an operation called “the Cyber-Warriors for Obama Project.” That report, which was met with a firestorm of skepticism despite the level of detail provided, noted the activation of government shills infiltrating and attacking “problem” web sites and forums, particularly Christian, conservative, “birther” and other similar sites. In one particularly disturbing characterization ostensibly included for motivational purposes, Obama was referred to as the “Pharaoh of the internet.”

Now, over a year later, documents leaked by Edward Snowden and reported by Glenn Greenwald provide hard evidence that “Western governments” are indeed engaged in such activity. In his report dated 24 February 2014, Mr. Greenwald discloses the role of GCHQ, or Government Communication Headquarters based in the UK, from top secret, classified government documents. These documents describe the methods employed by Western intelligence agencies to “manipulate and control online discourse with extreme tactics of deception and reputation-destruction.”  In his revealing report based on the Snowden disclosures, Mr. Greenwald explains that the targets of such marginalization are not at the nation-state level, but those who post material online that is contrary to the political interests and agendas of government.

While the revelations focus on the tactics of the UK based GCHQ, it is important to understand that intelligence between the UK and the U.S. is commonly shared to circumvent the laws that restrict U.S. intelligence agencies such as the CIA from operating domestically. The recently released authenticated documentation leaked by Snowden outlines very disturbing and controversial techniques to disseminate deception online, exactly as detailed in my report from a year ago.

These recent revelations should provide a level of verification that this activity is not merely restricted to GCHQ, but also involves a “virtual army” deployed domestically for the advancement of certain political agendas. The objectives are as numerous as they are nefarious. As the classified documents outline, government operatives are systematically attempting “to control, infiltrate, manipulate, and warp online discourse.” The larger agenda is to control free speech online and to ultimately destroy any political dissent by vilifying the messengers and nullifying their messages in an Orwellian fashion.

The recent verifications that paid government operatives are actively working to provide cover to the unlawful activities of the criminal elements within rogue governments as well as the globalists should concern everyone, if not cause righteous outrage. Not only are we are being lied to about the most serious issues, past and present, but those of us who are engaged in reporting the truth are the targets of a very sophisticated, highly organized, government backed campaign of nullification and vilification.

Is it any wonder, then, why the issue of the background and Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama has been such a magnet for marginalization? What about the numerous “conspiracy theories” that seem to attract the most aggressive and vocal opponents when various topics are presented for intellectual discussion?

We are engaged in an information war. The truth and those who seek it exist on one side. Those who want to bury the truth, or those who are otherwise known as paid operatives employed by the intelligence communities of various Western countries, exist on the other side. The globalists have already captured and control the corporate media. Today, the battle is being waged on the internet, just as I reported one year ago this month.

Perhaps now, a year after my report, people will begin to understand the monstrous scope of the battle in which we are engaged, and the enormity of the lies that are being thrust upon us. The battle transcends any adherence to partisan politics, as it involves the common theme of a global agenda to which each party is beholden.

Alas, since this site’s inception, a little over a year and a half ago, a constant stream of Obama’s zombies have been on a tear. Without fail, whenever a hot button issue surfaces – particularly when shining a spotlight on The One’s eligibility, gun control, DHS or their general penchant for totalitarian rule, a slew of “facts” appear at my wordpress via the comments section. 

Granted, there are many radical leftists pissed off at this blog’s unabashed Conservative AND Zionist (right wing) ethos, therefore, some may very well be venting on their own. Nevertheless, when a CLEAR pattern emerges – you can set your clock to it – and certain missives reek of the very same talking points, well, someone in charge is bent out of shape over the contents herein.

This site is being watched. NO doubt about it. Let them spit and spin. But all their propaganda tactics will only serve to strengthen the message within, demonstrating just how intrinsic it is to throw their yoke off America’s (and Israel’s) back!

Without a doubt, patriots can only be pushed so far. Obama’s goons would do well to look towards Egypt, to realize that the fate of the Brotherhood Mafia – as they attempted to strangle the people via totalitarian dictates – will be their own, if they do not cease and desist. In fact, they may have to turn in their designer suits for prison garb. Stranger things have happened.

AG HOLDER SUPPLANTS U.S. LAW:IMPOSES SHARIAH LAW BY SILENCING CRITICISM OF ISLAM & MORE!(GRAPHIC IMAGE) Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
29

WARNING: Disturbing image below…”courtesy” of Shariah Law…

 IMAGEThis blogger unreservedly apologizes in advance for its graphic contents, but it is what it is.The following video was uploaded on the YouTube channel of  Jihadis. Mind you, Obama Inc. sees NO conflict between Shariah Law and its “integration” within America’s Constitutional system: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHTsrraXYGc

In this regard, Shariah Law mandates that ANY criticism of Islam is verboten. In fact, a fatwa is placed upon the “offender’s” head, if caught, death is the outcome. Amputation of limbs is “reserved” for “lesser” crimes.

Most recently, the spread of Shariah Law to the first Southeast Asian nation, Brunei, at the national level entails: under the new law, an adulterer could be stoned to death, a thief could face a severed limb, drinking alcohol could lead to flogging and so on….

Granted, as is said, there is more than one way to skin a cat, and this is precisely apropos herein. Say what?!

Even Barack HUSSEIN Obama – and his band of Shariah Law proponents – understands that America is not Brunei, nor is it Saudi Arabia – yet. Though he behaves like a Potentate-in-Chief, as he willy nilly disregards the rule of law, there are still certain matters which must be implemented stealthily. Indeed.

Thus, this renegade regime gleefully realizes, yes, they have a free hand to enact dictates designed to effectuate the bringing down of “Amerika”, but they must first implant varying underpinnings. They also understand that many Americans are barely paying attention to anything which distracts them from the latest Kardashian escapade, or some such blah, blah escapism. Nevertheless, the other half of the population is, for the most part, paying heed. Therefore, a multiplicity of tactics are employed to set the stage for one form of anti-American edict after another, whether socialist or Islamist derived. Whatever gets the job done.

To wit, their most effective weapon is one which will distance any taint of jihadi terror from Muslim-Americans and from Muslims in toto. Really, it’s like separating pigs from their shit. Can you imagine?   

Now, this is not to say that all (even though a disproportionately large percentage are “silent” accomplices) Muslims engage in terror, but it is absolutely the case – like it or not – that their religious/political doctrine underpins jihad and mandates its war-like implementation. Anyone who babbles otherwise is either an ignorant dolt or downright lying. Pick your poison.

Consider:  

The contents found within “Islam and Blood” offers irrefutable and underlying evidence, elucidating the otherwise unfathomable barbarism originating within Islam: https://adinakutnicki.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/islam_and_blood.pdf

So, in light of all the above, how dangerous, treacherous and otherwise dastardly is it for America’s AG to dictate the following omerta, and over a period of several years?

First-Class Islam: Eric Holder Puts Muslims Above Terror Suspicion

No more instruction about jihad, and Islam is to be considered a race.
From 2008 to 2011, I was a guest lecturer at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (the primary DHS training facility, located in coastal Georgia) and at Joint Special Operations University (which brings foreign officers to learn of U.S. irregular warfare, located in Tampa). At both venues I was asked to lecture on the history of terrorism.

I did so in an even-handed and comprehensive manner, exploring the issue across place (Europe to East Asia), time (ancient Assyria to al-Qaeda), and ideology (religious: pagan, Jewish, Christian, Hindu, and Muslim; and political: right-wing, left-wing, anarchist, environmentalist, etc.). Only 14 of the 44 PowerPoint screens in my presentation dealt with Islamic terrorism, although several of those actually mitigated against the concept.

JSOU continued to utilize me until late 2011, when I was told by the course instructor that Muslim student officers had complained that “I talked too much about Islamic terrorism.”

I was actually surprised that I had not been yanked the year before,when references to Islam and jihad were stricken from Obama’s kinder, gentler National Security Strategy document. That same year, noted Islamic studies expert Eric Holder told the House Judiciary Committee that foiled Islamic suicide bombers in the U.S. were motivated by “Islam that is not consistent with” that religion’s “true teachings.”

Now, the Obama administration — led by Holder — has decided that Islam is a “race,” and therefore to examine or even to adduce a Muslim’s Islamic beliefs about jihad, beheading, violence against kuffar (“infidels”), or re-establishing a caliphate is tantamount to racism. This administration behavior is rationalized because “federal authorities have in particular singled out Muslims in counter terrorism investigations and Latinos for immigration investigations.”

It is difficult to express just how willfully ignorant of reality these statements and accompanying policies are.

Per the immigration example: as over 80% of “undocumented aliens” are from Mexico or another Latin American country, it would be foolish, indeed delusionary, to ignore that fact. The same logic applies to directing extra scrutiny towards individuals who hold a set of beliefs that may predispose them to violence against others not of that belief system.

And that is the primary point: Islam is a belief system. Not a race.

Muslims can be of any skin, Bosnian or Turkish, Nigerian, Saudi, Chinese. If American, Muslims can perhaps be of several nationalities. This is equally if not more true of Christians, who can be white Finns, black Ethiopians, brown Lebanese, or Koreans, to name but a few examples. It is not possible to look at someone (sans distinctive clothing) and ascertain whether he or she is Muslim or Christian — or secularist, for that matter.

Advocacy groups and willing dupes in the media and Democrat Party — like Senator Dick Durbin — have foolishly yet successfully conflated race and ideology in the case of only one religion, Islam. They have made examining the latter tantamount to discrimination against the former.  No one ever argues that singling out Christians for repression because they hold politically incorrect views about gay marriage or abortion amounts to “racism.”

Beyond the obvious fact that beliefs do not constitute a race, Holder et al. are massively wrong to deny the clear link between certain Islamic beliefs and terrorism.

NOT unlike waving a white flag of surrender to America’s Constitutional Republic, Obama’s regime is putting forth a red carpet to Islamic adherents, an open sesame of sorts. So much so that even those who engage in material support for terrorism are sailing through the immigration process: OBAMA INC. VIOLATES U.S. COUNTER-TERROR LAW(S):CONGRESS & JUDICIAL BRANCHES STONE SILENT. MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TRIUMPHANT. HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?

Along this line of anti-American behavior it is imperative for Holder’s DOJ to invoke Islamic “blasphemy” laws in the USA, almost as a twin bookend to placing Muslim-Americans (and Muslims in general) above any terror suspicion!

Never mind that the amount of arrests (what about the ones who haven’t been caught?) related to terror plots within America disproportionately involve Muslims, Obama Inc. offers them carte blanche to continue their jihadi handiwork!

“On 9.11.01 our country was forever changed by the horrific events in New York. The entire country was victimized by the acts done on that day. Muslim and non Muslim alike were traumatized but we as Muslims continue 12 years later to be victimized by being made the villains. To this day every media outlet and anti Islamic organization has committed slanderous and libel statements against us as Muslims and our religion of Islam.”
http://www.wnd.com/2013/08/marching-muslims-now-say-they-oppose-fear/#93ImcPpsY1b7qQUE.99

ACT for America founder Brigitte Gabriel blasted the organization.

“It is amazing how fast they changed the original language on their website claiming victimhood, bigotry, and unfair treatment since Sept. 11th 2001,” Gabriel said. “Once they were confronted and debated by people like me who pointed out to them that in the last four years alone we have arrested on American soil 226 home grown terrorists. One-hundred eighty six of them were Muslims. Not Jews. Not Hindus, not Buddhist. But Muslims”

Gabriel says the facts are that Muslim immigrants to the U. S. are responsible for a disproportionally large number of domestic terrorism cases.

“Of all immigrants who have ever immigrated to America since its birth, America never encountered such hatred and terrorism coming out of one faith based group in our country that accounts for less than 2 percent of the American population and is now responsible for over 80 percent of attacks against America,” she said.

“In 11 years since 9/11, the Islamic American community has not organized a one million man march to condemn Islamic terrorism against America and call Hamas, al-Qaida, Hezbollah, al-Shabaab, and other groups by their names – terrorists,” Gabriel said.

AGAIN, why are Muslims “off limits” – by the gang ruling Washington – in relation to explaining the genesis of jihad and its Islamic origins??

Rhetorical question. Abhorrent. Treacherous. Treasonous.

MAJOR U.S. GRAIN CO. (BLUMBERG) FINANCIALLY IN BED WITH BROTHERHOOD MAFIA: COZY CONGRESSIONAL REPS LEND COVER…Commentary by Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
Reply
Khairat al-Shater. Muslim Brotherhood's number two deputy in Egypt.

Khairat al-Shater. Muslim Brotherhood’s number two deputy in Egypt.

Too many American businesses – other western countries too – are financially in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. This is a fact. They can shuck and jive all they want and feign they are “just” conducting business where their services/products are needed, but any dealings with Muslim Brotherhood leaders bloodies their hands as well. NO doubt whatsoever.

To be sure, it is easy enough for greedy business types – sans ANY moral compass – to assert: well, the leadership of the free world plays footsie with these same players, so what’s the big deal. And – they would be right!

But as most parents admonish – at least they should – two wrongs don’t make a right. Besides, following any leader blindly will lead to ruin, sooner or later. 

In this regard, rational business leaders and politicians can’t claim that their dealings with Muslim Brotherhood operatives aren’t propping up this and that level of jihad. It defies credulity. In any case, the concept of due diligence is a well known and mandated business practice. It is also the sworn duty of national leaders to be equally diligent.

And if Blumberg Grain et al. requires requisite lessons, this site is more than willing to teach them right from wrong. Free of charge. No recompense warranted. See, that’s not so hard.

Lesson One:

This blog has duly revealed the terror facts at hand, therefore, any denial is a river of bull shi-t: MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA COMPLETES ‘PHASE 3′ FROM ‘THE PLAN’, INFILTRATES AMERICA’S FAMILY COURT SYSTEM. 2 MORE ‘PHASES’ TO GO!

Lesson Two:

But if anyone is silly enough to believe that Obama Inc.’s governmental organs are gonna step up and conduct their sworn due diligence…pigs fly too: DHS & (Not So) Stealth Jihad: Obama Inc. PROMOTES Muslim Brotherhood Mafia Infiltrator.What Are The Ramifications? 

Lesson Number Three:

Aside from DHS, take a peek at Hagel’s Islamic-oriented Pentagon: The Pentagon’s/POTUS’s Collusion With The Muslim Brotherhood Mafia: Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Islamic Thrust!

IF it looks like a terror duck…business-wise or Rep-wise…

Leaked Secret Emails Reveal Plan To Send $750 Million To Muslim Brotherhood

by  on February 24, 2014

Leaked secret emails published by Arabic sources reveal a $750 million deal between a major U.S. Company that provides crop preservation technology and the Muslim Brotherhood is raising a stink in Egypt when secret emails between Blumberg Grain and the top officials in the Muslim Brotherhood was released by Al-Watan Egyptian news.

The ordeal raises an eyebrow on how business is conducted between a private U.S. company and the notorious organization that was the mother of Al-Qaeda and Hamas.

In one email sent by David Blumberg, Blumberg Grain’s CEO for West Africa, to Ezz Nasser, an apparent intermediary for a top Muslim Brotherhood deputy, Blumberg makes reference to $750 Million in U.S. aid and a letter penned by two U.S. Congressmen – Reps. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) and Ted Deutch (D-FL) to use as leverage to persuade Khayrat Al-Shater, the senior Muslim Brotherhood leader that such letters would help in releasing the 750 million to the Muslim Brotherhood’s administration.

So unusual was the nature of this communication that there was no reference to a Department of Agriculture or any government ministry official as one sees the norm in such business dealings. TheMinister of Agriculture at the time was Sala Abdel-Mo’men and not Khayrat Al-Shater. Astonished, we suspected foul-play that the nature of such secret emails could be fraudulent we asked Blumberg for a comment and shockingly, they did not deny the authenticity or contents of the emails but simply denounced al-Watan’s conclusions. In the emails, Blumberg referenced Diaz-Balart as being on the committee that is “holding back” the $750 Million (email screenshots at bottom of this post) and that the letter secured by Blumberg from the Congressmen should sweeten the deal now that hundreds of millions could be released by the U.S. Government.

A Deal between Blumberg Grain and the Muslim Brotherhood regime in Egypt was not consummated, however based on the evidence it clearly raises questions on ethical standards in which a private company using the leverage or inference to “hold up aid” agreed to by the US Congress to push favor over one company over another based on “friendships” with congressmen.

In his exchanges with the Muslim Brotherhood (see emails with Nasser at bottom of this post), Blumberg attempts to highlight the significance of the Congressional letter because it came from both a Democrat and a Republican. Our request to see the letter written by Diaz-Balart and Deutch went unanswered.

The willingness to deal with al-Shater by a top U.S. Grain company is alarming for additional reasons. Didn’t Blumberg know that in 2012, al-Shater was disqualified for running for President because he had too recently been convicted of criminal activity. In 2008, al-Shater wassentenced to seven years in prison for money laundering.

At the time, Ahram Online reported that al-Shater had been in prison five different times (his current visit constitutes number six).

As for money laundering, al-Shater’s 2008 conviction wasn’t the first time he’d been charged:

In 1992, El-Shater was arrested and accused of money laundering in the case better known as “Salsabeel”, the name of a computer information systems company which he founded together with Brotherhood member Hassan Malek.

Though no investigations or allegations has been raised against Blumberg Grain, any decision to deal with the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Shater is one that should raise ethical and judgmental concerns.

Philip Blumberg

Philip Blumberg

The email sent El-Ajyal, by Philip Blumberg, chairman and CEO of Blumberg Captial Partners group to the Muslim Brotherhood’s Khairat Al-Shater on August 14, 2012 was just weeks after the Muslim Brotherhood had assumed power in Egypt has alarming quotes:

El-Ajyal

“Egypt is an important market for the company, but choosing the right local partner is very important. I understand that you [al-Shater] are interested in performing this role, and we are excited to see your interest in the matter.”

All this while al-Shater was not even listed as a member of the Egyptian government during the Muslim Brotherhood’s regime. In matters relating to hundreds of millions of dollars going to Egypt, why would a man who had been convicted of money laundering and who was not part of the government be involved at all?

As the Brotherhood’s Deputy Supreme Guide at the time, al-Shater was an extremely important power broker for the Muslim Brotherhood government of Egypt. While he may not have been an official member of the government, he clearly had political sway. The letter further indicates that al-Shater would have exclusive rights to use the technology produced by the company, to include participation in Blumberg’s projects in Turkey and Libya.

In March of 2013, the elder Blumberg granted an interview to Business Today. In it, he discussed his company’s plans to invest in Egypt, which was to include a “manufacturing plant and export hub” that “will employ 1,000 Egyptians” with a goal of increasing Egyptian exports by “$6 billion”.

Philip referred to “kick-starting Egypt’s economy with economic development projects” and working with “Egyptian leadership” without making reference to that leadership’s makeup – the Muslim Brotherhood. At this point in time, several of the group’s leaders are in prison and facing trial. It is expected that these email exchanges with Blumberg to be used in the trial of Mohammed Mursi and Khayrat Al-Shater.

In fact, al-Shater is one figure that the Obama administration seemed to take great interest in after the fall of the Muslim Brotherhood regime on July 3, 2013. Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns visited Egypt in August of that year and met with the jailed al-Shater for ninety minutes, despite an attempt by al-Shater’s Chief of Staff – Gehad el-Haddad – to diminish both the significance and duration of that meeting.

According to the Washington Free Beacon, el-Haddad was once employed by the Clinton Foundation for five years.

In another series of emails reported on by El-Ajyal as well as by El-Watan, David Blumberg is shown to be communicating with Nasser.

David Blumberg

David Blumberg

In the emails, Nasser is identified as the Country Manager for Velosi Egypt and Velosi Syria. ASaudi Arabian document that lists the ‘Worldwide Offices’ of Velosi Companies also identifies Nasser as the Egyptian representative:

Ezz Nasser: Point man for Velosi Egypt.

Ezz Nasser: Point man for Velosi Egypt.

In one email string, from May of last year, David Blumberg attempts to broker a meeting between his father, Philip Blumberg, other staff members, and al-Shater.

In this email, the younger Blumberg makes reference to “$750 Million” in foreign aid to Egypt as well as a Congressional letter penned by Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL) in his capacity as a member of the House Appropriations Committee, chaired by Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY) and Rep.

Ted Deutch (D-FL), in his capacity as a member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

[Point of clarification: The younger Blumberg erroneously identified Deutch as the ‘ranking Democrat’ on the ‘House Foreign Relations Committee’. First, ‘ranking’ member refers to the leader of the minority party on any committee. The ranking Democrat of the House Foreign Affairs Committee at the time was Rep. Eliot Engel (D-NY), not Deutch. Second, there is no such thing as a House Foreign Relations Committee.

There is, however, a Senate Foreign Relations Committee. We presume Blumberg meant the House Foreign Affairs Committee.]

Blumberg alludes to the letter being about “our project” and that it was sent to “the Egyptian Ambassador”. This could be a reference to Mohamed M. Tawfik, who had been appointed as Egypt’s Ambassador to the U.S. by Mohammed Mursi.

According to the El-Ajyal article, in another email, sent around the time of Philip’s email in August of 2012, David Blumberg refers to the two Congressmen as “my father’s friends” who are awaiting a response from Egypt’s ambassador regarding his country’s reaction and that Nasser’s “request has been fulfilled” with the letter from Diaz-Balart and Deutch.

The younger Blumberg, possibly eager to see the deal move forward, is quoted as saying:

“I admire how your administration runs things, but there are other countries interested in the project. It is important to have a clear understanding about the way it’s run.”

[Note: we are not in possession of any of the emails referred to by El-Ajyal or El-Watn from the August, 2012 time frame, only the ones referred to as being from May, 2013.]

Nasser then reportedly communicated with Philip Blumberg to assure him that he had begun working with the Ministry of Commerce to proceed with the project adding,

“I’ve also found a way, in the case of what we were able to combine the amount of
U.S. aid towards the project to create a short list of American companies only.”

Correspondence allegedly ended on September 20, 2012, with a letter from Nasser to Essam el-Haddad and an aid to Philip Blumberg regarding a need to re-schedule a meeting with al-Shater. This is the same el-Haddad mentioned above.

Email #1 from David Blumberg to Ezz Nasser.

Email #1 from David Blumberg to Ezz Nasser.

Transcript:

Dear Ezz,

You have received the Congressional letter from Congressman Ted Deutch, the ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Relations Committee, and Congressman Mario Diaz Balart, member of the House Foreign Appropriations Committee, to theEgyptian Ambassador on our project.

The House Foreign Appropriations Committee allocates all US foreign aid, and is the committee holding back the additional $750 million in American aid. The House Foreign Relations Committee also influences aid and other policy matters toward Egypt.

I hope you and Eng. al-Shater appreciate how extraordinary it is to receive a joint letter from both Democrat and Republican.

Here Blumberg was indicating that the decision to withhold or release aid to Egypt rested – at least partially – in the hands of two Congressmen – one Democrat and one Republican – who penned a letter to Egyptian government officials. Al-Shater forwards such emails to his Chief of Staff and former Clinton Foundation employee, Gehad el-Haddad:

Email from Nasser to David Blumberg.

Email from Nasser to David Blumberg.

MOST significantly, it matters not a whit that Blumberg’s actual deal was never “consummated”, after all, many financial deals go south. However, what DOES matter is that American businesses are scheming with Brotherhood operatives to get deals done, despite the fact that their financial relationships (inevitably) fund anti-western jihad!

Not only that, but the butchering of Coptic Christians (and other minorities) requires much needed financing. Do they even ask: where are these monies coming from? Does anyone care that Hamas’s parent, Egypt’s Brotherhood, supplies Israel’s terror-laden neighbors with jihadi weaponry to murder as many Jews as possible?

So, how dare Blumberg Grain – others too – and wayward Congressional Reps lend them U.S. cover!

The POTUS…damn him for eternity!

OBAMA INC. VIOLATES U.S. COUNTER-TERROR LAW(S):CONGRESS & JUDICIAL BRANCHES STONE SILENT. MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TRIUMPHANT. HOW DID THIS HAPPEN? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
6

People, especially juries, tend to look for “smoking guns” when trying to determine another’s guilt or innocence. Well and good. But it is often the case that circumstantial evidence – threads which weave together to demonstrate criminal intent and culpability- is more than enough to paint the full picture. Many vile criminals have been locked up due to said needling.

NOW, in relation to Obama Inc. – a criminal enterprise dressed up as the leadership of the free world – anyone who is waiting for a “smoking gun”, well, good luck with that. Yes, it would be great to have recordings of this and that, but rational folks understand it ain’t gonna happen.

In light of the above, it is instructive to piece together the intersecting linkages of guilt. As such, we will see how we came from there to here – to two interlocking crimes; one which IGNORES the letter of the law and the other which materially aids terrorists !

The latest crime committed by Obama Inc. – within every respect imaginable – violates ACTUAL legal precepts! Said enshrined law was predicated on preventing terrorists from ever coming into the U.S., regardless of circumstances. Hence, the all important (as readers will note below) mandate of “material support” became legal doctrine! Nevertheless, “legal” cover to terrorists is stamped under the imprimatur of the top law enforcement official of the land, AG Eric Holder. Mind blowing.

Indeed, many readers have read about this regime’s “koshering” of terrorists, whether under the guise of “refugee” status or otherwise. But few understand the underpinnings which set this stage, from the onset of the Islamist-in-Chief’s first term, to the latest violation of U.S. criminal (counter terror derived) law. But do bear in mind, families who truly seek asylum, those who are NOT compromised by terror, are told – GO TO HELL:Obama Bid to Deport Homeschool Refugees May Threaten U.S. Rights!

Smoking Gun One:

IF one expected that Obama’s Dept of (in)Justice would be in the forefront of exposing a recent act of Islamic barbarism, oh my, you would be wrong: WASHINGTON, MEDIA, DEPT OF (in)JUSTICE, RELIGIOUS, CIVIC LEADERS DEADLY SILENT. ISLAM, A METASTASIZING SCOURGE ON AMERICA (Video). 

Smoking Gun Two:

In tandem with Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s (lawbreaking) chief law enforcement officer, DHS, AN OUTLAW, RENEGADE AGENCY IS CAUGHT FERRYING ILLEGALS & USURPING LAW & ORDER. A MIRROR OF AG HOLDER’S LAWLESSNESS! 

Foxes all over the (American) hen house…

Smoking Gun Three:

But it is not as if the regime’s crimes have gone unnoticed, hell no:Movement To IMPEACH AG Holder:Crimes Surpass Articles of Impeachment.Jail Time Warranted.

Smoking Gun Number Four:

Is it any wonder that some rightfully conclude: America Is Heading Towards An Islamic Nation: DHS/Obama Inc. On Board. Imams In America Continuously Incite Against Christians & Jews, Yet They Aren’t Thwarted.

Smoking Gun Five:

In line with America’s so-called “border war”, The Lawbreaker-in-Chief Guts The Law. The Sham of Immigration “Reform”. So, what does that tell you about Obama Inc.’s ill intent towards America, as well as their penchant for lawbreaking?

Smoking Gun Six:

Not to place a too fine point on it, but is anyone shocked that Holder’s DOJ Is Working Towards Invoking Islamic “Blasphemy” Laws In The USA?

Smoking Gun Seven:

And, whereas Muslims fleeing internal wars can now enter America, DESPITE any material support given to terrorism, and in contravention to U.S. criminal law, on the flip side, American Warriors Are DENIED Legal Counsel/Due Process, But Muslim-American “Soldiers for Allah” Remain Protected!

To wit, a “natural” anti-American, pro Islamist progression leads from there to here….

U.S. Lifts Ban on Immigrants With Links to Terrorism

The Obama admin.is overriding the U.S. Criminal Code for individuals who have provided material support to terrorism.
BY CLARE LOPEZ

Sun, February 16, 2014

  • U.S. immigrants take on oath of allegiance to the U.S.upon being given citizenship. (Photo: © Reuters)

U.S. immigrants take on oath of allegiance to the U.S.upon being given citizenship.

Muslim Brotherhood affiliates scored a major victory in their efforts to degrade U.S. national security measures in early February 2014 when the Obama administration decided to override by fiat portions of the U.S. Criminal Code and immigration policy pertaining to individuals who provide “material support to terrorism.”

As published in the Federal Register on February 5, 2014, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State issued a joint notice that, henceforth, certain asylum seekers and refugees who only provided “limited material support” to terrorism would be allowed into the U.S.

The earlier law as written, The Real ID Law of 2005, states quite explicitly that the definition of engaging in terrorist activity includes:

To commit an act that the actor knows, or reasonably should know, affords material support, including a safe house, transportation, communications, funds, transfer of funds or other material financial benefit … to a terrorist organization [emphasis added]

Such activity, no matter how minor, constituted grounds for exclusion from entry to the U.S.

By unilaterally lifting restrictions — without so much as consulting Congress — for those intending immigrants who engaged in “(1) certain routine commercial transactions or certain routine social transactions (i.e., in the satisfaction of certain well-established or verifiable family, social, or cultural obligations), [or] (2) certain humanitarian assistance,” that benefited terrorist organizations, the Obama administration simply overrode existing law. So far, both the judicial and legislative branches of the U.S. government have let the administration get away with it.

According to the Daily Caller, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson and Secretary of State John Kerry signed the exemptions despite very real concerns about the legality of the executive branch deciding to ignore aspects of an existing law it doesn’t want to enforce and replacing them with its own guidelines.

Former State Department official and current director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies Jessica Vaughan worried as well that “those evaluating these cases will be ordered to ignore red flags in the applications, especially if the applicant is supported by one of the many advocacy groups that have the ear of senior DHS staff.”

The new policy decree marks a significant win for agents of influence belonging to advocacy groups acting on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood agenda to pursue “civilization jihad” “to destroy Western civilization from within…by [our] hands,” as asserted in the “Explanatory Memorandum,” a key Brotherhood document introduced as evidence in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation HAMAS terror funding trial.

As described at some length in “The Islamists’—and their Enablers’—Assault on the Right: The Case Against Grover Norquist and Suhail Khan,” an February 11, 2014 dossier of particulars published by the Center for Security Policy (CSP), it is precisely in executing political influence operations aimed at U.S. national security leadership (whether Republican or Democratic) that the Muslim Brotherhood so excels.

The CSP paper explains in exhaustive detail and with meticulously referenced citations how the Muslim Brotherhood targeted the Republican Party and the conservative movement over a period of years and succeeded in placing senior operatives such as Abdurahman Alamoudi, Sami al-Arian, Nihad Awad, and Khaled Saffuri deep inside senior leadership circles.

It was at those top levels of government—the Executive Branch, the Intelligence Community, and the National Security Council—where critical decision-making took place, especially in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, that set U.S. counter terrorism strategy on a hopeless loop that deliberately avoided, and indeed later would forbid, knowledge about Islamic doctrine, law and scripture as the animating inspiration for Islamic terrorism.

By divorcing the enemy’s core ideology from study of the enemy threat doctrine, Muslim Brotherhood agents of influence succeeded in ensuring that U.S. blood and treasure would be endlessly and fruitlessly expended in Counterinsurgency (COIN) warfare, nation-building exercises and democracy experiments in the most unsuitable places possible: Muslim lands under rule of Islamic law (sharia).

As noted in CSP’s 2010 Team B II Report, “Shariah: The Threat to America,” Americans do pretty well at defending against military-style frontal assaults. We do far less well, though, at either recognizing or countering the “menace posed by jihadist enemies who operate by deceit and stealth from inside the gates.”

And yet it is the latter threat that poses a far more serious threat to open, tolerant societies like ours than the openly terrorist attack like the one that struck on 9/11.

As cited by CSP’s Norquist and Khan report, the Washington Post described the stealthy operating style of the Muslim Brotherhood in a revealing September 11, 2004 front page article, “In Search of Friends Among the Foes.”

Juan Zarate, then-chief of the Treasury Department’s terror finance unit, admitted confusion about the Brotherhood and how it operated through familiar Western business enterprises but with Islamic “philosophy and ultimate objectives” that are antithetical to our own. Through a disciplined strategy and patient willingness to work under the radar for decades, they progress towards specific goals and, ultimately, “conquest through dawah,” as Yousef al-Qaradawi, senior jurist of the Muslim Brotherhood, has put it.

So it has been with the steady campaign to chip away at U.S. counter terrorism legislation and policy, much of it, like the Patriot Act, implemented in the months and years following 9/11.

In his 2007 book, “Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated America,” Paul Sperry noted, for instance, that, by securing key positions within the White House, such as the Office of Public Liaison, for Brotherhood operatives like Suhail Khan, access by various Islamic organizations could be controlled.

Likewise, the appointment of Mohamed Magid, president of theIslamic Society of North America (ISNA), the largest Muslim Brotherhood front organization in the country, to the Department of Homeland Security’s Countering Violent Extremism Working Group in 2010, served to place a top Brotherhood operative in a key position from which to influence U.S. counter terrorism policy.

In July 2012, Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, joined by four other courageous Representatives, sent letters to the Inspectors General of the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State plus the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, requesting each to investigate the extent of Muslim Brotherhood influence in these respective agencies.

Rep. Bachmann followed up with a sixteen-page letter to Rep. Keith Ellison (who had criticized the investigation request) in which she laid out documented instances of apparent Muslim Brotherhood influence over U.S. policy. These included Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s February 2011 testimony before Congress, in which he described the openly jihadist Muslim Brotherhood as “secular;” drastic, pro-Brotherhood policy initiatives by the State Department, during a period when Huma Abedin, who had been closely involved with the Muslim Brotherhood for years, served as Deputy Chief of Staff to Hillary Clinton; and U.S. cooperation with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) on a pro-sharia campaign to criminalize the criticism of Islam.

With the 2011-2012 government-wide Great Purge of training curriculum related to fact-based instruction about Islam followed by the wholesale backing for the al-Qa’eda and Muslim Brotherhood-led revolts in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia, U.S. policy is far gone along the pathway of acquiescence to a jihad and sharia agenda. When Hani Nour Eldin, member of Gama’at al-Islamiyya, a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, was granted a visa in June 2012 to visit the White House in order to petition the National Security Council for the release of Omar Abdel Rahman (the Blind Sheikh), the warning indicators were already well in evidence that the Obama administration was turning the Global War on Terror policy on its head.

Allowing political asylees and refugees known to have provided material support to terrorism to enter the country is yet one more milestone step bringing U.S. policy into closer compliance with sharia objectives—to our great detriment.

So, let us step into the real world and grab onto the FACTS that we have. They are more than explosive, and lead to one irrefutable conclusion:Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood Mafia feels triumphant, as well they should. Yes, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA COMPLETES “PHASE 3” FROM “THE PLAN”, INFILTRATES AMERICA’S FAMILY COURT SYSTEM. 2 MORE ‘PHASES’ TO GO! 

In actuality, while the Islamist-in-Chief floods America with terrorists – “materially” connected or what not – certain towns are overrun with the newest “refugees” and many haven’t a clue.

On the other hand, in an Orwellian twist of fate, along comes an Egyptian-American, a physician who was part of Egypt’s Air Force, and he wants to settle the score:Egyptian Doctor Files Terrorism Complaint With U.S. Congress Against Barack Obama!

NEVERTHELESS, can you hear the jihadists gloating – Allahu Akbar…الله أكبر ….America will be ours??


 

U.S. MARTIAL LAW, PURGED GENERALS & DEAD BANKSTERS:WHERE DO THEY INTERSECT?…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
21

VIDEO ALERT: Patriots, what do your “lying eyes” see? – 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8vLon9nIOY

Seeing is believing…don’t let your “lying” eyes fool you into believing otherwise, that what you actually see isn’t really happening! That’s a good motto to live by.

Along this vein, much has been written – at this site and at other alternative media – about the “captured” media and their allergic reactions to certain facts on the ground. Basically, whatever is radioactive to their leftist, radical narratives – and fails to prop up “The One” – well, deaf, dumb and blind becomes their “journalistic” credo. 

Regardless, pay them no mind, if you want to know what is happening on the ground. Herein the truth is revealed, wherever it lands. Moreover, those who have their shorts (or panties) in knots, over this and that, too bad. There is nothing they can do – threats and all – to stop said revelations. Just let them try. 

Indeed, commentaries about Martial Law, the purging of Generals, “mysteriously” deceased bankers, and journalists who “magically” disappear, isn’t easy reading. Sorry for that.

But the alarms have to be raised, so here we go again:

Alarm One:

The first order of business to impose a compliant citizenry is to confiscate their weapons. Hence, gun control is a main goal. Making sure to cover all bases, Obama Inc. has co-opted the National Guard for gun confiscation duty, in tandem with other agencies. Believe it, or not. OBAMA’S NATIONAL GUARD PLACED BULLS EYES ON PATRIOTS:A PATH TO GUN CONTROL & WORSE

Alarm Two:

But where do patriotic Generals come into play? Everywhere. This is why a purging has taken place, it was not for nothing:ALERT:TYRANNY COMES TO AMERICA. CHINESE TROOPS ON U.S. Soil. Dissent Against Obama Inc “Purged” Via Gestapo-Like DHS Tactics!

Alarm Three

Key to subduing patriots is a doctrine called Martial Law, one which is  only imposed in cases of EXTREME national danger. But those who are paying attention also understand that Obama & gang operate outside the rule of law. 

The question then becomes:evil, and non-American, as it sounds, in order to subdue patriots, what does Obama Inc. have to impose? MARTIAL LAW PLANS RATCHETED UP IN THE U.S.. What Does Obama Inc. Have In Store For “Non-Compliant” Citizens & Others?

Alarm Four:

Now, how many have heard about the “mysterious” deaths of KEY bankers and journalists, those who were, in one way or another, privy to preparations for a global financial re-jiggering? A RECENT TRAIL OF DEAD (FINANCIAL-RELATED) BODIES:THEIR INTERSECTION WITH BANKSTERS, CIA & NYPD TOP BRASS COVER UPS.GLOBAL ORDER-RELATED.

You Have Been Targeted for Internment & Resettlement–

Saturday, February 22, 2014

The Common Sense Show

fema home away from home

On January 23, 2014, the U.S. Army opened a one-hundred million dollar urban warfare training facility—a so-called “fake city”—on the outskirts of Bowling Green, Virginia. Despite U.S. Army press releases to the contrary, this is a replica of an American city, complete with American road signs. According to insiders, the subway even has a logo of that used in Washington, D.C.  The so-called “mosque” described in the press release is plainly an American church.

Why is the U.S. Army lying about the purpose of this training facility? Why not admit that they are preparing to roam the streets of America? Because what they are training for is illegal—treasonous. According to the Posse Comitatus Act, the military is forbidden from taking on the police powers of local and state police.

Well, it is legal—in a sense: Only if Obama declares martial law.

This could mean only one thing: Barack Hussein Obama is anticipating—or perhaps even planning—some cataclysmic event that will require the declaration of martial law and suspension of elections.

Will this be the third term Obama’s supporters are clamoring for?

This is not just another FEMA camp article which can be easily debunked. This article deals with the fact that a recent government manual, leaked to the public, details the plans for mass arresting dissident Americans and stripping them of their citizenship so as to be able to violate the Constitution and the Geneva Convention for the treatment of prisoners.

The previously mentioned document which has been leaked online, is entitled FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations (PDF). The document was originally to be kept secret, but everyone in the military command structure, as we know, is not on board with the encroaching tyranny sweeping across this country.

There are two terms which should concern you, namely, Internment and Resettlement (I/R). As if this needs any further elaboration, the two terms simply mean that you will be snatched from your home and sent to a detention camp for an undetermined period of time and treated in a manner which will not be defined by any law.

The Authorities Practice Targeting Second Amendment Supporters

There exists solid evidence that our illegitimate government, hijacked by the banksters, possesses a detailed plan to mass arrest Americans and it has moved from the pages of government documents and it is actually being practiced by authorities on American soil.

Jesse Hathaway wrote for MediaTrackers in which he said that a recent Ohio State National Guard exercise “reveal the details of a mock disaster where Second Amendment supporters with ‘anti-government’ opinions were portrayed as domestic terrorists.” Hathaway’s article went on to say that the “Ohio National Guard Communications Director James Sims II, MediaTrackers claims, told the website that it was “not relevant” as to why conservatives may feel targeted by being portrayed as anti-government extremists”. “Okay, I’m gonna stop ya there. I’m going to quit this conversation,” Sims told the site when reached for comment. “You have a good day.”

Then there is the ’fake” $96 million dollar Northern Virginia town which is being used to train the military to enforce martial Law. Of course, the government says that this is a foreign town being used to train our troops to occupy a foreign town. If this is true, then someone needs to explain why the town has a Christian church, handicap parking spots, Washington DC subway logos, loading zone signs and road signs in English. A picture is worth a thousand words as you will see in the following video.

In the Words of the Government

Straight from the Internment/Resettlement article (12 February 2010 FM 3-39.40 1-5) it states the following:

“…I/R operations may place Soldiers in continuous contact with or near insurgents, terrorists, or criminals who will exploit every opportunity to escape and kill or injure U.S. personnel or multinational partners“.

Whether you believe there are Russian troops training on our soil, along with other UN “Peacekeeping” troops is an irrelevant argument at this point. The above excerpt makes it clear regarding the INTENT to use “multinational partners” to round up and detain American citizens.

The following is a list of involved agencies involved in the soon-to-be roundups of American citizens who are not drinking from globalist Kool-Aid.

AGENCIES CONCERNED WITH INTERNMENT AND RESETTLEMENT 

1-40. External involvement in I/R missions is a fact of life for military police organizations. Some government and government-sponsored entities that may be involved in I/R missions include—

International agencies.

UN.

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).

International Organization of Migration.

.S. agencies.

Local U.S. embassy.

Department of Homeland Security.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Federal Emergency Management Agency.

There can be no doubt as to the meaning of the above quote from the manual. This government plans to enlist the aid of foreign troops in conjunction with the UN, DHS and FEMA for the purpose of rounding up and detaining American civilians.

Segregation of Civilian Detainees

I have previously been told my military sources that when families are transported to the I/R camps, husbands will be segregated from wives and children from parents.

“Detainees may also be segregated by ethnic and family groups and further segregated to protect vulnerable individuals. Additionally, detainees may be categorized by behavior (cooperative, neutral, or combative) to accurately resource guards and facilities”. Juveniles within the I/R population are typically segregated from the general population. (See DODD 3115.09.)

You Are An Enemy Combatant

Most of us who are detained in these I/R camps will be classified as enemy combatants. The following reads like the MIAC Report on steroids.

“Enemy Combatants

1-15. An enemy combatant is, in general, a person engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners during an armed conflict. (JP 3-63) Enemy combatant includes EPWs and members of armed groups.

1-16. Enemy combatants are divided as follows:

An enemy prisoner of war is a detained person who, while engaged in combat under orders of his or her government, was captured by the armed forces of the enemy.

Member of an armed group is a person who engages in or supports acts against the United States or its multinational partners in violation of the laws and customs of war during a named conflict that do not meet the criteria of a prisoner of war as defined within the Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War”

The last sentence is frightening. It says that anyone who supports acts against the United States or its foreign mercenaries, is not entitled to humane treatment under the Geneva Convention. An offense against the US government could include the failure to turn in your gun or to not pay your taxes. This also opens the door to torture and summary extermination as you will not likely have any rights. For those who think this is an exaggeration, ask yourself what does “do not meet the criteria defined within the Geneva Convention relative to the treatment of prisoners of war”, actually mean?

We already know that the present administration holds the US Constitution in complete disdain and utter contempt. Do you remember the domestic terrorist designations which are contained in the MIAC Report?  An authority not recognized by this criminal government would include Libertarians, Constitutionalists, a former Ron Paul supporter, a Bible believing Christian, a Second Amendment supporter and a veteran. If you belong to any of these groups, you are a domestic terrorist, an enemy combatant, a sovereign citizen and a stateless person.

The Legal Justification to Snatch You From Your Home

The following definition of an “evacuee” should concern all Americans. The definition of the term indicates the right of the military to remove a citizen from their home.

“Evacuee. An evacuee is a civilian removed from a place of residence by military direction for reasons of personal security or the requirements of the military situation.” (JP 3-57)

Do you remember when the globalists began to use the term “sovereign citizen”? This term was applied by DHS to Americans who claimed that they followed the Constitution, but not the “legitimate” governmental authority. The first time that I saw the term utilized by the government was in the Stacy Lynne case in which this anti-Agenda 21 activist had her son stolen by a NWO Judge, Julie Kunce Field, without so much as an allegation of parental wrong doing. This former World Bank and IMF consultant, turned judge, referred to Stacy as a “sovereign citizen” in her courtroom. As a result, Stacy was not allowed to call witnesses or object to the illegal practices she was subjected to while in Fields’ courtroom on the basis of the many  “constitutional violations” of law committed by Judge Field. This is because Field labeled Stacy as a non citizen, a stateless person. The following defines a sovereign citizen as a stateless person.

Stateless Person. A stateless person is a civilian who has been denationalized or whose country of origin cannot be determined or who cannot establish a right to the nationality claimed.

If one is a stateless person, they are, by default, an enemy combatant. I have been assisting the Larimer County resident, Stacy Lynne, for 26 months. Stacy has not been able to see her son in almost a year and a half. I always wondered what kind of chicken outfit could steal someone’s child without cause. When I read this I/R manual, my eyes were opened and chills went up and down my spine. What was done to Stacy was accomplished because she was an anti-Agenda 21 advocate who had her citizenship stripped by a globalist judge.. And through the complicity of this globalist judge.

When martial law comes to our land, we will be snatched from our homes because of our collective verbal and behavioral resistance to the tyranny that is sweeping our land. We will be met by the likes of  the self-appointed authority that globalist judges like Julie Kunce Field, who will subsequently  use their unconstitutional powers to declare a wide swath of Americans to be stateless, or sovereign citizens.

Conclusion

Do I have to spell it out for you? All of us are Stacy Lynne. The NDAA is for you and for me. By virtue of the fact that you have visited this website, or a website that linked into this website, your every keystroke has been cataloged by the NSA and you and your family have been declared to be non-citizens and targeted for forced Internment/Resettlement.

In the eyes of this criminal administration, we are all enemy combatants. We are all “sovereign citizens”. We are all stateless people not protected by either the Constitutional, in the pre-arrest period, or, by the Geneva Convention, in the post-arrest period.

.In the next part of this series, I will spell out what losing your Geneva Convention rights will mean to you and your family.

You will never stand before a judge and jury and have your freedom stripped from you. You will likely be taken from your home at 3AM, loaded into a transport vehicle with other designated sovereign citizens with only the clothes on your back, and shipped to your final designated I/R camp.

Also, the next part of this series will expose more details on the upcoming mass incarcerations and what the dead banksters and fired generals have to do with all of this.

So, what can the average patriot do to avoid the hurtling chaos? Plenty. 

And, yes, it is certainly not newsworthy to report on military training centers duplicating enemy landscapes. This is typical military doctrine. In fact, Israel has certain “replica” training bases which mirror jihadi enemy towns. Heck, even US armed forces come to train at said Israeli bases, all in order to hone their skills against Islamic jihadists!

However, first and foremost, the new “training” facility in Bowling Green, Virginia is NOT what it has been reported to be. Assuredly, several reliable sources – within the U.S. – confirm as much.

Do not despair. There IS strength in numbers. Yes, there are millions of determined patriots who will never allow Obama’s criminal regime to take over America. However, without a massive SHOWING of strength, all good intentions will fall by the wayside.

Now, since this site hates to re-work the wheel, one missive has been constant: circle a RED line around May 16. It may very well be the last chance patriots have to turn the ship of state around, freeing themselves from the (expected) tyranny in the offing.

AGAIN, trust your “lying eyes”. Circling. A confluence of evil.

SOCIALISM’S HYDRA SLAUGHTERS CHRISTIANS. JEWS TOO.OBAMA’S “AMERIKA” WILL DO THE SAME, IF ALLOWED TO “SUCCEED”.Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
9

POL POT’s HORROR SHOW!

Muffling ones ears…closing ones eyes…is hardly a recipe for success. In fact, it is an exact recipe for disaster. Always has been. Always will be.

Along this trajectory of thinking one has to study history without blinded eyes, sans PC revisionism. Ones failure to learn its lessons to the maximum degree possible will result in chaos, or much worse.  

Socialism, Marxism or communism are variant degrees of totalitarian “isms”, similar to Islamism. But let’s leave that aside – for the time being.

History alone tells the bloody tale:

Lesson Number One:

SOCIALISM’S DEATH COUNT is what it is. NO amount of jive talk will change the horrific body count.

Lesson Number Two:

In tandem, Marxism is the twin devil to socialism, and its killing fields are sky high:Death By Marxism.

Lesson Number Three:

Communism is steeped in mass murder, so much so that Pol Pot’s graves are legendary:Pol Pot: The Communist Monster Who Turned Cambodia into a Gulag and the movie was more than chilling- http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087553/

Now, who hasn’t heard about Mao’s China, re the Madman who starved 60 million to death: Devastating book reveals how Mao’s megalomania turned China into a madhouse. Recall, if you can, the Radical-in-Chief’s previous “Czarette”, Anita Dunn, and her school girl admiration for Mao!

But have no fear, this American-Israeli did not forget the other “ism” – Islamism! As a matter of record, Islamic barbarism is a sealed deal and leads straight to the slaughter of Christians and Jews!

So, the fact that socialist-Marxist terrorists are doing what they do best – killing off Christian (and Jewish) adherents by their roots – is nothing new under the (historical) sun. 

In this regard, let’s take a pause and draw the linkage between Obama Inc. with the above three red totalitarian roots. To wit, we will then recognize where the threads weave between Obama Inc. and Nazi socialism…but we all know how many millions died under the Nazi’s SS boots, including many of this American-Israeli’s close relatives!

Linkage One:

EVEN the U.S. Congress is rife with outright communists & their “sympathizers”: The ties that bind Congressional reds to their green counterparts.

Linkage Two:

And with U.S. home schoolers targeted by the Dept of (mis)Education, what are the chances that these same kiddies won’t be nabbed too? HOME SCHOOLERS NABBED: Authorities Storm Class. The Remnants/Overreach Of Socialist/Totalitarian Roots. America’s Left Watches, Learns & Waits.

Mind you, these same persecuted German home schoolers were denied refugee status by Obama Inc., when they fled to America:Supreme Court Orders Government to Respond in German Home schoolers Asylum Case.

However, Obama Inc. ordered the “loosening” of requirements for terror-tied Muslims and few find this treasonous:Yes, indeed, Obama Ending Restrictions On Islamic Asylum Seekers With “Loose” Terrorist Ties!

Linkage Three:

Whether a socialist, Marxist or communist label applies, Obama’s red roots are deeply embedded:The Radical-in-Chief & His Communist Hawaiian Roots: More Than Just An Exotic Locale!

So, if anyone believes that the report below is a “one off”, take off your blinders and scream from the rooftops:socialism/Marxism/communism/Islamism leads to killing fields. In fact, Billy boy Ayers – as have other “notable” radical revolutionaries” – was sorry his Weathermen terror group didn’t kill millions of Americans!

Pastor Receives This Message: “You must leave the region or you’ll die.”

by  on February 11, 2014
In Columbia, recently, a pastor received this letter from the socialist-marxist organization, FARC:

You must leave the region or you’ll die.

The socialists also included a photo of a coffin alongside the letter. The socialists, as they always have, want to massacre the Christians in Colombia. They are no different than the Muslims. Christian missionaries in Colombia, Manuel Pertuz, and his 11 year old son Daniel (fictitious names), were murdered by the socialists. This is what the socialists will do in America if given the power. Socialism must be defeated.

DESPITE a confluence of evidence that socialism, Marxism, communism and Islamism implant the seeds for killing fields, the fact of the matter is that democracies are fertile ground for their takeover, especially when its top leadership are ideologically on board. Take for example pre-Hitler Germany:When Hitler was appointed in January 1933, Germany was a democracy. 

And being a democracy in no way inoculates any nation from going over to the “dark side”, yes, history should be the guide…rational thought too: Obama Inc.’s end goal is rooted in national/Nazi socialism, as revealed through Obamacare’s underpinnings!

UPDATE:MALIK OBAMA, OBAMA’s (CLOSELY CONNECTED) HALF BRO’ OUTED AS AL-QAEDA OPERATIVE.HOW DOES THIS “NEWS” LINK BACK TO OBAMA? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
16

Dr. Sadek Raouf Ebeid

Dr. Sadek Raouf Ebeid

UPDATE: Here it blows…. Egyptian Doctor Files Terrorism Complaint With U.S. Congress Against Barack Obama

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tt9YSXSBhc4

NOT unlike a broken record, this site has hammered home TWO consistent and interlocking themes: Barack HUSSEIN Obama is DIRECTLY affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) Mafia, as is his half bro’ Malik Obama. Secondly, the MB is the “parent” umbrella for Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda, like many of the MB’s terror offshoots, is its main spearhead. 

Hammer Blow One:

How much clearer can it get, other than to reveal the following:EXPOSED: A LIST OF MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA OPERATIVES INSIDE AMERICA. Next Up:Their Linkage To Obama Inc. 

Hammer Blow Two:

IF further evidence is required, re the “helping hands” from Barack HUSSEIN Obama, well, here are some more goodies to ponder over: MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA COMPLETES ‘PHASE 3′ FROM ‘THE PLAN’, INFILTRATES AMERICA’S FAMILY COURT SYSTEM. 2 MORE ‘PHASES’ TO GO!

Hammer Blow Three:

Alternatively, ask yourselves: why would the POTUS’s Pentagon train Al-Qaeda linked terror groups?OBAMA’S PENTAGON TRAINS AL-QAEDA LINKED JIHADIS ON U.S. SOIL, JORDAN & ELSEWHERE!

Hammer Blow Four:

Malik, his Brotherhood/Al-Qaeda linked superstar bro’, is up to his neck in terror and is now FRONT PAGE headlines in Egypt and related countries. But never mind, Obama Inc’s captured media finds no interest in this mind blowing story. As such, leave it to alternative media to expose this and that:The Muslim Brotherhood’s Quest For Global Dominance – An Interview With Adina Kutnicki

For the pictorial record, here are 2 which highlight terror-soaked Malik, as he operates hand-in-glove with Hamas – another progeny of the MB – in lock-step with Al-Qaeda:

translated: Jerusalem is ours – WE ARE COMING!Here is the full photo:Malik: Expressing support for Hamas at an 'orphan' conference.

Muslim Brotherhood Fighters

Hammer Blow Five:

In this regard, how surprising is it to learn that Malik Obama has OPEN ties with Sunni Brotherhood terrorists? MALIK OBAMA’S OPEN TIES TO HAMAS: JOINS EXHORTATIONS TO WREST JERUSALEM FROM ISRAEL! HAMAS, THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD’S TERROR SPAWN LINKED TO THE POTUS VIA HIS BROTHERHOOD TIES!

So, let us now jump over to Egypt – a relatively short distance from this blogger’s perch – and see what’s transpiring at their trial of the century:

Obama’s Brother an ‘Al-Qaeda Enemy Combatant’ according to Egyptian who filed Complaint his Country is taking very seriously

An extremely explosive charge was levied against the brother of the President of the United States on the air today. The charge? Well, that there is evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that Barack Obama’s older brother is “an al-Qaeda Enemy Combatant”. Who made this charge?

His name is Dr. Sadek Raouf Ebeid. He served as an officer in the Egyptian Air Force and he is currently a physician in the U.S. In August of last year, he filed a complaint with the Attorney General’s office in Egypt against Malik Obama, the older brother of President Barack Obama, based largely on our research. Since that time, the Egyptian people know as much about the case as most Americans know about the Kardashians.

In fact, according to Ebeid, the Malik Obama scandal made Egypt’s 10:00 news last night. It’s a ubiquitous story in that country but in the U.S., short of some prominent blogs picking up the story and Dennis Miller having Walid on his show to essentially pooh pooh the story, no major media wants to touch it. Even Erik Rush, the man Sean Hannity credits for breaking the Jeremiah Wright story, is all over our findings. Yet, Hannity remains silent.

Later in the show, Barrack plays clips of Rep. Michele Bachmann’s interview with the Daily Caller’s Ginny Thomas.

Alas, there are far too many who require the actual taped conversations between the Islamist-in-Chief and his bro’, yet, such evidence may not even suffice their litmus tests. Ho hum.

As a matter of fact, even America’s courts of law require lesser burdens of proof, than his champions/leeches demand. If this is how they want to play it, so be it.  

But they shouldn’t be surprised if an international arrest warrant is issued for Barack HUSSEIN Obama – as an accomplice to Malik’s crimes – possibly ordered by the Egyptian government. It may not be far behind: 

FURTHER UPDATE TO: BREAKING/UNFOLDING: EGYPT FILES CRIMINAL TERROR CHARGES AT The ICC- AGAINST OBAMA! 

The POTUS may yet end up an international fugitive. A war criminal. Oh well. You lie down with terror dogs….

Yalla…يلا – يللا – ياللا…translated to: hurry up…let’s go…get a move on…Besides, Egypt’s leadership doesn’t give a damn about Obamabot zombies and their delicate sensitivities!

For that matter, neither does this site!

Obama-Zombies

PFLP ISLAMIC TERROR GROUP (POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF “PALESTINE”) & OTHER HYDRAS ATTACHED TO OXFAM, A SO-CALLED AID GROUP:LAWSUIT IN THE OFFING.Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
3

PSEUDO HUMANITARIAN AID GROUP OXFAM TIED TO TERROR, JUST LIKE THE NORWEGIAN GOVERNMENT…….

Humanitarians….

Laughing_Chimp

This American-Israeli has little interest in Hollyweird stars, they hold about as much appeal, within said confines, as jumping off a bridge. Never mind that many anti-semites/anti-Zionists would approve of said “self-sacrifice”. Don’t snicker. It ain’t gonna happen.

In this regard, it is wildly unusual for this site to mention any of their names, let alone place a specific personality front and center. However, Scarlett Johansson more than merits top billing. Due to her moral stance against vile Israel/Jew haters, inadvertently, she stepped into MEGA doo doo. Righteous actions usually lead to (and reveal) the truth. OXFAM, your rep is now mud! Roll in it. A sexy, highly popular star outed your vile “aid” organization. Sweet.

NEVERTHELESS, their connection to Islamic jihad has been known for quite some time, but they finally ! received a full public tarnishing. So, yes, Hollyweird stars can often reveal much more than they even intended, whether for the positive or the negative. Yippee.

Now, before we seep into the jihadi nest, it is imperative to unmask the penchant for far too many self-proclaimed “human rights/aids” groups to align themselves with terror groups. Not only that, it is inordinately clear, Jews are the only group – although the tiniest minority among minority populations – who are non-deserving of any “human rights”, at least according to so many of these scummy self righteous organizations. Israel/Jews are constantly targeted for having the gall to survive, despite all odds. What the hell.

Specifically, the following is a run down on just some of their jacked-up Islamic“aid partners”….you decide what their end game is.

Oxfam Partners


I. East London Mosque – an extremist institution whose speakers have included
Saad Al Beraik, a hate preacher who calls for the enslavement of Jewish
women.

II. Islamic Relief – a charity which the Israeli government has designated a
“terrorist front”. Ayaz Ali, the head of the charity’s Gaza operations, was
deported after being accused of funnelling money to Hamas. Neo-Nazi images
were found stored on his computer.

III. MADE in Europe – a charity whose staff are linked to the Muslim Brotherhood
and other radical Islamist groups, and whose offices are based at the extremist
London Muslim Centre.

IV. Human Appeal International – a charity identified by the US Government as
one of a number of groups used as conduits for funds to terrorist organisations,
including Hamas.

V. Zaytoun – a trade collective run by members of the anti-Israel, pro-terror
International Solidarity Movement. Zaytoun works to promote the boycott of
Israeli goods.

VI. Palestine Solidarity Campaign – an anti-Israel lobbying group which the BBC
has described as a ‘radical’ organisation that supports Hamas. The Board of
Deputies of British Jews has stated the PSC’s views include “racist conspiracy
theories, the propagation of antisemitic stereotypes and Holocaust denial”.

VII. Muslim Aid – According to its own accounts, Muslim Aid paid £325,000 to the
Islamic University of Gaza, where leading Hamas figures teach; and £13,998 to
the al-Ihsan Charitable Society, designated by the US government as a “sponsor
of terrorism” and a front for the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorist group.


VIII. Federation of Student Islamic Societies – a radical student movement which
has, in the past, promoted Al Qaeda recruiter Anwar Awlawki and has provided a platform to hate preachers such as Haitham Al-Haddad, who has said that Jews are “apes and pigs” and that the Gaza war made him happy because “it clearly encouraged Muslims to prepare themselves for jihad, all over the world”.



This report reveals that Oxfam has partnered with groups that
support terrorism, religious extremism, anti-Semitism and advocate
violence against Jews, women and homosexuals. But what exactly defines a partnership? Oxfam has sponsored events,
issued joint press releases, and run campaigns with all these groups.
Certainly, if these were far-Right groups, the criticism of Oxfam’s
associations would be much more loud and severe. And yet some of
these groups listed advocate ideas that are even more extreme than
the evil politics peddled by far-Right. Most importantly, Oxfam itself describes many of these relations as
“partnerships”. It partnered with Islamic Relief and Human Appeal and
Muslim Brotherhood-linked group MADE to produce a ‘campaigns
toolkit’.  Both Islamic Relief and Human Appeal have been accused by
a number of Governments of being “terrorist fronts”. Further, Islamic
Relief’s President, Essam al-Haddad, was the campaign manager for
Egyptian President Morsi, who recently described Jews as the
“descendents of apes and pigs”. In fact, on Oxfam’s website, the blog post acknowledging the
‘campaigns toolkit’ project was written by an Oxfam staff member
called Nina Gora, who was a leading anti-Israel activist while at
University. Working with the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, she
invited Aharon Cohen, the extremist leader of Neturei Karta, to
address students. A few years before, Cohen had said that Holocaust
victims “deserved it”. Gora also wrote this piece, titled ‘Horror of
Occuption’. Oxfam’s relationship with the London Muslim Centre, considered by
many to be one of the most extreme anti-Semitic institutions in
Europe, has also been described as a “partnership”. Oxfam proudly labels itself as the leading supporter of Zaytoun, an
organisation run by the pro-Hamas International Solidarity Movement.
Again, Oxfam calls the relationship a “partnership”. And yet Zaytoun
is one of the leading actors in the movement to boycott Israeli goods. Oxfam’s relations with these groups goes beyond sharing the
occasional platform; it includes running joint events and affirming
support for each other……

ONTO the “good” news, but let’s first offer a huge thumbs up to Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, Founder/Director of Israel Law Center, a woman who (legally) chews up and spits out terror garbage (and their enablers) on a regular basis! Nitsana, rock on.

Oxfam Accused of Ties to Terror Group

Palestinians dance at a rally marking the 46th anniversary of the founding of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine

Palestinians dance at a rally marking the 46th anniversary of the founding of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine / AP

BY: 
February 20, 2014 10:00 am

The aid group Oxfam International is said to be partnering with two Palestinian organizations tied to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), according to an Israeli advocacy group that defends victims of terrorism.

Several of Oxfam’s global affiliates are said to be providing financial aid and “additional forms of material support” to two Palestinian workers groups that are deeply tied to the PFLP, a U.S. designated terror organization, according to the Israel Law Center.

The Israel Law Center demanded in a letter sent Thursday that Oxfam end its relationships with these two groups—the Union of Health Workers Committees (UHWC) and the Union of Agricultural Workers Committees (UAWC)—or face possible legal action.

Oxfam, a group known for its harsh criticism of Israel, has been in the news in recent weeks for encouraging boycotts of Jewish state and criticizing actress Scarlett Johansson for her support of Israeli company SodaStream.

“Please be advised that providing services to the terrorist instrumentalities UHWC and/or the UAWC is illegal and may have already exposed Oxfam, its global affiliates and its officers to criminal prosecution and civil liability to Israeli, European, American, Australian citizens, and others victimized by terrorism sponsored by the PFLP, the parent organization of the UHWC and the UAWC,” the letter states, according to a copy obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

The Israel Law Center requests that Oxfam “immediately provide us written confirmation that Oxfam has discontinued the provision of aid and material support to the UHWC and the UAWC,” according to the letter. “Absent such confirmation, we will seek all available relief and remedies against Oxfam and its officers in all relevant jurisdictions.”

Oxfam, which says it has refuted the Center’s claims, has not been shy about publicizing its work with the UHWC and the UAWC. It provides the groups with financial backing and has described them as “partners” in various press statements, according the Israel Law Center.

However, both groups “were created by the PFLP, and they operate under the direct patronage and in close cooperation with the PFLP,” according to the Israel Law Center, which outlined extensive ties between the organizations.

“The UHWC and the UAWC are the PFLP’s health and agricultural organizations, respectively,” according to the Israel Law Center. “These organizations were created by the PFLP and they operate under the direct patronage and in close cooperation with the PFLP.”

The UHWC has been listed online as a subsidiary to the PFLP and has provided various medical services under the direction of the PFLP, which has also held events at official UHWC facilities, according to the Israel Law Center.

Top UHWC leaders have also held “senior positions” in the PFLP, which has claimed responsibility for the assassination of an Israeli minister and the murder of three Jewish children, according to the letter to Oxfam.

The UAWC also has been listed online as a PFLP affiliate, and the two outfits have been known to jointly hold events together, the Israel Law Center found.

Both groups have also dabbled in “anti-Israel political activities such as land day protests, publicly opposing Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations, supporting boycotts and divestments of Israeli academia and companies, and the like,” according to the letter to Oxfam.

Israel Law Center director Nitsana Darshan-Leitner said that Oxfam is providing support to the PFLP through its work with these two groups.

“While Oxfam accuses Israel of war crimes, they themselves have partnered with and financially supported a designated Palestinian terrorist organization,” Darshan-Leitner told the Washington Free Beacon. “The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine is responsible for some of the most heinous terrorist attacks against civilians over the past decades. Its criminal operations and murders continue against Jewish civilians today.”

“Oxfam claims to care about human rights in Gaza but then partners with the terrorist group which was responsible for massacring the Fogel children in the Itamar community,” she said. “There is no difference between providing aid and support to an instrumentality of the PFLP and giving funds to an instrumentality of al Qaeda. Any money given to a terrorist organization advances its ability to carry out murderous attacks.”

Financial support for the PFLP and its satellite groups could violate several European and U.S. laws, according to Darshan-Leitner.

Oxfam’s head of media Matt Grainger said his organization’s officials have not formally seen the Israel Law Center’s letter yet, but pointed to 2012 rebuttals of similar claims.

The Israel Law Center noted the UAWC’s connection to the PFLP in a 2012 suit and named Oxfam, among other organizations, in the claim, Grainger said. Oxfam and these other groups refuted the accusations at the time.

“Without seeing the new [Israel Law Center] letter, I don’t know if they’re the exact same allegations, against UAWC, or different,” Grainger said.

For the record, the PFLP terror group has been in this investigative journalist’s cross hairs for some time, and it had everything to do with their backing of the ISM terror front, a focal point herein:

I am an investigative journalist and independent op-ed contributor to various Zionist andConservative media outlets. I contributed to an in-depth investigative series at FrontPage Magazine with Lee Kaplan from 2003-2007.We are still working together . Go to the 5:59 timeline at –http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lwBAv7f1Vg…here as well– http://www.presstv.ir/Program/320411.html – to listen to him address the current situation in Syria. He is a world class expert on the ISM (International Solidarity Movement), and he utilized my foundation in forensics and investigative journalism to “follow the jihadist money.” Unfathomably, the ISM was able to accomplish the above money laundering, courtesy of their IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status. Specifically, my name appears at the end of the expose’, ‘Does The Pro-Terror Left Violate U.S. Tax Laws’? 

The nexus between the ISM and the PFLP (and their hydra organs) is solid as a rock:

Rogues Gallery FAYYAD SBAIHAT
 
Fayyad SbaihatDon’t let that toothy grin fool you. This is a bad dude. Israeli security has advised that Sbaihat’s entire family is active with the terrorist organization the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) that murdered Israel’s Tourism Minister and is responsible for the deaths of at least fourteen Americans in terrorist attacks. Sbiahat’s two brothers, Laith and Mohammed, are both PFLP terrorists. Sbaihat recently gave up his role as national spokesman for the ISM conference to Nadeem Muaddi of Temple University.Below is information on Sbaihat who is still active in the ISM and will no doubt be at Georgetown:

Based at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Fayyad Sbaihat is the national student organizer and leader of the Palestine Solidarity Movement (PSM), which is the campus arm of the International Solidarity Movement in the United States. True to the spirit of these two organizations, Sbaihat has organized – at colleges and universities across the U.S. and Canada – conferences advocating divestment from Israel and promoting the dismantling of the Jewish state.

Full circle. Bulls eye.

 

Jerusalem’s (Nachlaot’s) Underbelly:Pedophilia (Sexual Abuse Of Teens/Women Too)DEFILES The Innocent.”Former” Missionaries Involved & “Rabbis” Give Them Cover. Where Is The Nexus? Part One. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
16
'Megan with Father' photo (c) 2004, buildscharacter - license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

VERY little surprises, let alone shocks, this American-Israeli. Besides, one doesn’t immerse oneself in the muck in the work herein and except to come out smelling like a rose. Alas, the stinky cheese factor is a small price to pay. Let’s keep our eyes peeled on the objectives within and just ignore the foul odor. There you go…it’s not so hard.

NEVERTHELESS, certain orders (odors) of magnitude should send shock waves throughout a nation’s consciousness, yet, somehow they escape (for the most part) the long-arm of justice. And, most egregiously, after headlines die down, it becomes business as usual – for both the pedophiles/rapists and the nation at large. Not nice. Not nice at all.

INDEED, within Israel’s system of “justice” said crimes often become mired under an increasingly dirty carpet. Powerfully connected fake “Rabbis” – who do not even have the requisite Rabbinic ordination of S’micha סמיכה – engage in pedophilia, all the while they pose as Rabbis within the community! On the other hand, a dirty list of others possess “kosher” ordination, yet give disgraceful cover to these sexual acts of terror! They threaten/bribe those who are in positions to expose the most treacherous acts imaginable. Can you believe it? Well, certain “malleable” police  will be “advised” (via this and that pressure tactic) to take a step back.

AS a result, the most heinous crimes against children (boys and girls alike, equal opportunity pedophiles) and sexual assaults against women are, generally, not prosecuted. Mind you, many of those raping the kiddies are the same criminals assaulting women! Sick, twisted bastards. They deserve the death penalty. Oops, Israel doesn’t have capital punishment. 

THAT being said, the following is not a typical expose’, as certain names will not be provided – other than those linked below within the public domain – yet. This “omerta” of sorts is out of respect for evidence still being accumulated for possible trials, and related to other “delicate” matters. You got that? Never mind. At the end of it all, sach ha’kol, the basis herein is to reel in the perps and the pervs, hopefully, landing them behind bars for life. 

REGARDLESS, what the hell is going on in Nachlaot, Jerusalem? And, for the record, those who are unfamiliar with its seedy underbelly, they have every reason to be truly charmed by this otherworldly, quaint and beautiful neighborhood, as this investigative journalist has been on several occasions.

 

File:PikiWiki Israel 3988 stairs street jerusalem.jpg
  • STILL, before we dive into this unholy horror, suffice it to say, many who are in positions of power to mete out justice are playing deaf, dumb and blind. Unconscionably, they troll the internet and post DENIAL after DENIAL, feigning that this whole scenario has been blown way out of proportion. Oh really? Liars…enablers…accomplices…reprobates…the whole damn lot of them.

THOUGH many of the newly initiated into this cesspool will shake their heads in disbelief, the question still remains: where do the corrupt “Rabbis” and the “former” Missionaries come into play? In other words: what is their filth-ridden nexus?

IT is this question which is not only relevant but key to unlocking a pedophile ring plaguing Jerusalem and, by extension, all of Israel. Moreover, it is the most dangerous one to explore/expose – literally. 

ASIDE for a well known Missionary crisis within Israel , there are deeply hidden secrets within several “schools”, and they are plagued with sexual abuse. In fact, one “conversion” program – reportedly no longer open for “business” – enabled the pedophilia ring to thrive. Not only that, but those who ran the program are themselves “former” Missionaries, supposedly living as Jews in Israel. Interesting nexus.

YES, it was under this school’s “proverbial wings” that much of the following sexual crimes transpired. As a matter of record, men were not the only suspects involved. A smattering of women pedophiles throughout the community have been equally “busy.” 

AS such, the reader should bear in mind the following significant notations, before continuing any further:

Notation One:

SEVERAL sources – independent of each other – confirmed “this and that”, otherwise this commentary would not have seen the light of day. Moreover, it is intrinsic to understand: many of the victims are TERRIFIED to relate what they know, as they understand what their tormentors will do to them, if they dare speak out. The victims must be protected. Period.

IN effect, the fact that many of their violators are ROAMING free becomes a double crime. It makes it impossible for their victims to obtain justice, and to spare future victims from the same plight. Monstrous.

There was no hint of pedophilia in the community before October 2010. But the Haredi community in Nahlaot now believes that the highly organized ring has been operating secretly for years—possibly generations—and is governed by an elaborate hierarchy. According to community members with whom I’ve spoken over the past year, they believe that a small number of masterminds, including the 70-year-old Vorst, a convert to Judaism who directs Ohel Sarah Imenu, an organization that facilitates Haredi conversions, used formerly abused teenagers and mentally handicapped locals as scouts for the victims. Community members believe that these scouts watched the children and parents from outdoor locations that offered prime vantage points—under the guise of tending gardens, doing calisthenics, or panhandling—and memorized their schedules, recording when the children would be unsupervised. The pedophiles noted the schedules of various homeowners, residents of Nahlaot claim, and they allegedly snuck into dozens of apartments and sheds in the neighborhood in order to abuse the children, who have pointed out these locations to their parents. Many are convinced that there are Christian missionary motivations at play here and that false converts have infiltrated their community. A number of locals told me they believe that the videos and media produced by the pedophile ring are being sold for tens of thousands of dollars or more.

The Nahlaot situation is already widely referred to as the worst pedophile case in Israel’s history. This is a phenomenal understatement. If true, this would be, in terms of the number of perpetrators and the scope of conspiracy, unprecedented in known criminal history. Indeed, not only that: It would be the first proven instance of an association generally acknowledged to be the great white whale of sex crimes. “To be perfectly blunt,” said Dorothy Rabinowitz, a member of the Wall Street Journal’s editorial board who won a Pulitzer Prize for her extensive coverage of such cases, “there is no such thing as a pedophile ring.”

By the summer of 2011, there was, in the eyes of many in the community, no doubt that a pedophile ring was in their midst. It was around this time, too, that Leiby Kletzky, an 8- year-old Hasidic boy from Brooklyn, was abducted and gruesomely murdered by someone in his community. Parental fears were at a fever pitch. Aaron Leibowitz, a rabbi in Nahlaot, wrote an open letter to the community:

A great darkness has come over our community. I am sorry to have to share with any of you who may be hearing this for the first time that over 100 children, almost exclusively from the charedi camp, have been molested by a circle of despicable sexual predators living amongst us. While a few of these monsters have been put behind bars, there are others who continue to walk free due to a lack of hard evidence, and the problematic nature of child testimony. I was personally told by the social service official in charge of interviewing the children that there is no doubt that some of these men are guilty, only a lack of admissible evidence.

This lack of admissible evidence was indeed a problem from the start. The two-page report of Noa Klein’s original complaint, which is now court evidence and which I read in Politi’s office, shows the interviewing officer clearly growing more and more concerned about Satz. The complaint certainly contains potentially inappropriate behavior—including having children over to play games—but nothing illegal was mentioned. Satz was nevertheless held, but after six days he was released due to lack of evidence.

doll in Nachlaot; photo Michal Chelbin

Three days later, another complaint, this one filed by a local father named Dovid Manheim, mentioned Satz as well. Unlike Noa Klein’s complaint, this time Satz was directly accused. Mannheim approached the police to find out why Satz had been released after only six days. “My neighbors … told us that Binyamin Satz abused the children of one of the neighbors,” he said, according to the complaint. “We later found out that Binyamin Satz was arrested last Friday and was then released to house arrest, since there was no evidence against him because the kids didn’t tell the police or investigators. So, I came here yesterday to help, and I met the investigator Aliza, to find out how I can help in this case. She told me they need a testimony about an act that happened with a child. I came to the police today, because last night I asked my son [redacted], who’s 7, ‘Did you go into his house?’ That’s all I asked. And then he told me everything on his own.”

After hearing these stories, Lerner began to suspect that her own children’s developmental issues—which include extreme fear, antisocial tendencies, nervousness, and incontinence—might be due to Satz as well. She told me she gently interrogated her younger son, then 4-and-a-half years old. “I told him Binyamin Satz is in jail,” she recounted. “He said, ‘Why?’ I said, ‘because he did things to kids. Did he ever do anything to you?’ He told me, ‘No, he never did bad things, he just wanted to educate me.’ ‘How do you educate kids?’ He said he gave punishments for bad kids. He started describing, ‘He stuck a screwdriver in my backside,’ and all these sexual things that I can’t describe.”

By late 2010, dozens of children had told their parents they were abused, and the circle of accused kept growing. The acts reported by the children, nearly all between the ages of 3 and 9, are incredibly horrific and often very bizarre. Virtually none of the allegations involve only one molester and one victim; the children have consistently claimed multiple offenders and multiple victims. There are reports of orgies involving as many as 20 adults and more than a dozen children. There were, allegedly, frequent raping and forced sodomy of children as young as 2 years old. The children claim that various objects—including large branches, semi-automatic rifles, screwdrivers, and other carpenter’s tools—were forcibly stuck up their anuses and other orifices; that knives were held to their throats; that they were told that if they didn’t voluntarily return to be raped, they would be “chopped up into little pieces,” or that their entire families would be murdered. They claim that they were shown, by way of threat, the guns that would be used for this purpose and told that cameras had been installed in their homes to ascertain their silence. The children claim that they were, on various occasions, bound up and beaten, held on top of open flames, lashed with sticks, burned with chemicals, given soft drinks spiked with hallucinogens, and injected with drugs.

DUE to all of the above, several queries beg to be asked:

Query One:

WHY exactly did some of these “former” Missionaries (mostly women, but some men too) come to Israel in the first place, aside from their stated reasons to “convert” to Judaism? 

Query Two:

EXTRAPOLATING further – and in light of the bombshells within – isn’t it reasonable to posit: what better way to infiltrate/penetrate Jewish communities than to go straight for its jugular? In other words, by defiling scores of Jewish kiddies and raping many Jewish women, isn’t this a form of serially breaking the spirit of Jewish souls for generations to come? 

AND, isn’t the whole point of undermining Israel as a Jewish State – from a Missionary’s perspective – to weaken it, so much so that its limping carcass “reverts” back to those who believe it is theirs to begin with?

MIND you, an increasing proportion of hostile Israeli Arabs use lesser known tactics to destroy and destabilize Israel, as opposed to their more widely known frontal assaults. As a result, some choose to lure vulnerable Jewish girls into Arab/Muslim quarters and hold them captive. It is a dangerous and rising phenomenon.

PLEASE internalize that there exists complete “sympathy” for Missionaries within Israel, by said sectors who seek to undermine the Jewish nation. Aside from the perverse sexual gratification which drives these Missionary predators – this is true of all sexual predators – it is their ability to shatter as many Jewish souls as possible which is often irresistible. Simply put, the trauma inflicted on their victims serves to weaken the Jewish state. A double pay off.

YET, there is an upside – one always has to look for hopeful signs, if possible – the main Missionary ringleader is in jail and awaits trial. NOT one – as reported in Exhibit Four – but two men died under “mysterious” circumstances, in relation to this entire predatory ring. Hmm.

READERS, rest assured, this site is keeping a watchful eye on this travesty of injustice, in that too many of these criminals are still roaming free! Therefore, there will be follow-ups, on each lead sent this way.

CONSEQUENTIALLY, another investigation is ongoing with several associates – and we are also tracking the movements/links of particular “person(s) of interest”- who are linked in with pedophilia and Missionary activity. Our laser-beam is on this “person/pervert of interest” (and some of his associates), and he came onto our radar via his thrust into pro-Israel social media sites, particularly at Facebook. HUGE mistake.

IN effect, a red-line warning is issued herein:

DO NOT dare mess with the kiddies…you will be hunted down like the dogs that you are. Nowhere to run…nowhere to hide.

ADDENDUM:

Exhibit Number One:

Haredi kids eyes covered croppedHere is a court document for Zalman Cohen that discusses his alleged sex abuse of minor children in the Nachlaot neighborhood of Jerusalem, Israel.

Exhibit Number Two:

Nachalaot Pedophilia: Yisrael Hayom Report

Exhibit Number Three:

EXCLUSIVE: ‘Vigilante Justice’ in Jerusalem; Avrohom Mondrowitz, Fake Rabbi, Shrink Alleged to Have Molested up to 300 Children, Beaten by Unknown Assailant (VIDEO)

Exhibit Number Four:

3 more arrested in Nahlaot pedophile case

Exhibit Number Five:

Israeli court convicts first suspect in Jerusalem pedophile ring case

Two others still on trial in affair that shocked residents of the capital’s Nahlaot neighborhood.

FASTER, faster…so many more still need to be locked up!!