OBAMA INC. VIOLATES U.S. COUNTER-TERROR LAW(S):CONGRESS & JUDICIAL BRANCHES STONE SILENT. MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TRIUMPHANT. HOW DID THIS HAPPEN? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

People, especially juries, tend to look for “smoking guns” when trying to determine another’s guilt or innocence. Well and good. But it is often the case that circumstantial evidence – threads which weave together to demonstrate criminal intent and culpability- is more than enough to paint the full picture. Many vile criminals have been locked up due to said needling.

NOW, in relation to Obama Inc. – a criminal enterprise dressed up as the leadership of the free world – anyone who is waiting for a “smoking gun”, well, good luck with that. Yes, it would be great to have recordings of this and that, but rational folks understand it ain’t gonna happen.

In light of the above, it is instructive to piece together the intersecting linkages of guilt. As such, we will see how we came from there to here – to two interlocking crimes; one which IGNORES the letter of the law and the other which materially aids terrorists !

The latest crime committed by Obama Inc. – within every respect imaginable – violates ACTUAL legal precepts! Said enshrined law was predicated on preventing terrorists from ever coming into the U.S., regardless of circumstances. Hence, the all important (as readers will note below) mandate of “material support” became legal doctrine! Nevertheless, “legal” cover to terrorists is stamped under the imprimatur of the top law enforcement official of the land, AG Eric Holder. Mind blowing.

Indeed, many readers have read about this regime’s “koshering” of terrorists, whether under the guise of “refugee” status or otherwise. But few understand the underpinnings which set this stage, from the onset of the Islamist-in-Chief’s first term, to the latest violation of U.S. criminal (counter terror derived) law. But do bear in mind, families who truly seek asylum, those who are NOT compromised by terror, are told – GO TO HELL:Obama Bid to Deport Homeschool Refugees May Threaten U.S. Rights!

Smoking Gun One:

IF one expected that Obama’s Dept of (in)Justice would be in the forefront of exposing a recent act of Islamic barbarism, oh my, you would be wrong: WASHINGTON, MEDIA, DEPT OF (in)JUSTICE, RELIGIOUS, CIVIC LEADERS DEADLY SILENT. ISLAM, A METASTASIZING SCOURGE ON AMERICA (Video). 

Smoking Gun Two:

In tandem with Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s (lawbreaking) chief law enforcement officer, DHS, AN OUTLAW, RENEGADE AGENCY IS CAUGHT FERRYING ILLEGALS & USURPING LAW & ORDER. A MIRROR OF AG HOLDER’S LAWLESSNESS! 

Foxes all over the (American) hen house…

Smoking Gun Three:

But it is not as if the regime’s crimes have gone unnoticed, hell no:Movement To IMPEACH AG Holder:Crimes Surpass Articles of Impeachment.Jail Time Warranted.

Smoking Gun Number Four:

Is it any wonder that some rightfully conclude: America Is Heading Towards An Islamic Nation: DHS/Obama Inc. On Board. Imams In America Continuously Incite Against Christians & Jews, Yet They Aren’t Thwarted.

Smoking Gun Five:

In line with America’s so-called “border war”, The Lawbreaker-in-Chief Guts The Law. The Sham of Immigration “Reform”. So, what does that tell you about Obama Inc.’s ill intent towards America, as well as their penchant for lawbreaking?

Smoking Gun Six:

Not to place a too fine point on it, but is anyone shocked that Holder’s DOJ Is Working Towards Invoking Islamic “Blasphemy” Laws In The USA?

Smoking Gun Seven:

And, whereas Muslims fleeing internal wars can now enter America, DESPITE any material support given to terrorism, and in contravention to U.S. criminal law, on the flip side, American Warriors Are DENIED Legal Counsel/Due Process, But Muslim-American “Soldiers for Allah” Remain Protected!

To wit, a “natural” anti-American, pro Islamist progression leads from there to here….

U.S. Lifts Ban on Immigrants With Links to Terrorism

The Obama admin.is overriding the U.S. Criminal Code for individuals who have provided material support to terrorism.
BY CLARE LOPEZ

Sun, February 16, 2014

  • U.S. immigrants take on oath of allegiance to the U.S.upon being given citizenship. (Photo: © Reuters)

U.S. immigrants take on oath of allegiance to the U.S.upon being given citizenship.

Muslim Brotherhood affiliates scored a major victory in their efforts to degrade U.S. national security measures in early February 2014 when the Obama administration decided to override by fiat portions of the U.S. Criminal Code and immigration policy pertaining to individuals who provide “material support to terrorism.”

As published in the Federal Register on February 5, 2014, the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of State issued a joint notice that, henceforth, certain asylum seekers and refugees who only provided “limited material support” to terrorism would be allowed into the U.S.

The earlier law as written, The Real ID Law of 2005, states quite explicitly that the definition of engaging in terrorist activity includes:

To commit an act that the actor knows, or reasonably should know, affords material support, including a safe house, transportation, communications, funds, transfer of funds or other material financial benefit … to a terrorist organization [emphasis added]

Such activity, no matter how minor, constituted grounds for exclusion from entry to the U.S.

By unilaterally lifting restrictions — without so much as consulting Congress — for those intending immigrants who engaged in “(1) certain routine commercial transactions or certain routine social transactions (i.e., in the satisfaction of certain well-established or verifiable family, social, or cultural obligations), [or] (2) certain humanitarian assistance,” that benefited terrorist organizations, the Obama administration simply overrode existing law. So far, both the judicial and legislative branches of the U.S. government have let the administration get away with it.

According to the Daily Caller, Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson and Secretary of State John Kerry signed the exemptions despite very real concerns about the legality of the executive branch deciding to ignore aspects of an existing law it doesn’t want to enforce and replacing them with its own guidelines.

Former State Department official and current director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies Jessica Vaughan worried as well that “those evaluating these cases will be ordered to ignore red flags in the applications, especially if the applicant is supported by one of the many advocacy groups that have the ear of senior DHS staff.”

The new policy decree marks a significant win for agents of influence belonging to advocacy groups acting on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood agenda to pursue “civilization jihad” “to destroy Western civilization from within…by [our] hands,” as asserted in the “Explanatory Memorandum,” a key Brotherhood document introduced as evidence in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation HAMAS terror funding trial.

As described at some length in “The Islamists’—and their Enablers’—Assault on the Right: The Case Against Grover Norquist and Suhail Khan,” an February 11, 2014 dossier of particulars published by the Center for Security Policy (CSP), it is precisely in executing political influence operations aimed at U.S. national security leadership (whether Republican or Democratic) that the Muslim Brotherhood so excels.

The CSP paper explains in exhaustive detail and with meticulously referenced citations how the Muslim Brotherhood targeted the Republican Party and the conservative movement over a period of years and succeeded in placing senior operatives such as Abdurahman Alamoudi, Sami al-Arian, Nihad Awad, and Khaled Saffuri deep inside senior leadership circles.

It was at those top levels of government—the Executive Branch, the Intelligence Community, and the National Security Council—where critical decision-making took place, especially in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, that set U.S. counter terrorism strategy on a hopeless loop that deliberately avoided, and indeed later would forbid, knowledge about Islamic doctrine, law and scripture as the animating inspiration for Islamic terrorism.

By divorcing the enemy’s core ideology from study of the enemy threat doctrine, Muslim Brotherhood agents of influence succeeded in ensuring that U.S. blood and treasure would be endlessly and fruitlessly expended in Counterinsurgency (COIN) warfare, nation-building exercises and democracy experiments in the most unsuitable places possible: Muslim lands under rule of Islamic law (sharia).

As noted in CSP’s 2010 Team B II Report, “Shariah: The Threat to America,” Americans do pretty well at defending against military-style frontal assaults. We do far less well, though, at either recognizing or countering the “menace posed by jihadist enemies who operate by deceit and stealth from inside the gates.

And yet it is the latter threat that poses a far more serious threat to open, tolerant societies like ours than the openly terrorist attack like the one that struck on 9/11.

As cited by CSP’s Norquist and Khan report, the Washington Post described the stealthy operating style of the Muslim Brotherhood in a revealing September 11, 2004 front page article, “In Search of Friends Among the Foes.”

Juan Zarate, then-chief of the Treasury Department’s terror finance unit, admitted confusion about the Brotherhood and how it operated through familiar Western business enterprises but with Islamic “philosophy and ultimate objectives” that are antithetical to our own. Through a disciplined strategy and patient willingness to work under the radar for decades, they progress towards specific goals and, ultimately, “conquest through dawah,” as Yousef al-Qaradawi, senior jurist of the Muslim Brotherhood, has put it.

So it has been with the steady campaign to chip away at U.S. counter terrorism legislation and policy, much of it, like the Patriot Act, implemented in the months and years following 9/11.

In his 2007 book, “Infiltration: How Muslim Spies and Subversives Have Penetrated America,” Paul Sperry noted, for instance, that, by securing key positions within the White House, such as the Office of Public Liaison, for Brotherhood operatives like Suhail Khan, access by various Islamic organizations could be controlled.

Likewise, the appointment of Mohamed Magid, president of theIslamic Society of North America (ISNA), the largest Muslim Brotherhood front organization in the country, to the Department of Homeland Security’s Countering Violent Extremism Working Group in 2010, served to place a top Brotherhood operative in a key position from which to influence U.S. counter terrorism policy.

In July 2012, Minnesota Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, joined by four other courageous Representatives, sent letters to the Inspectors General of the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State plus the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, requesting each to investigate the extent of Muslim Brotherhood influence in these respective agencies.

Rep. Bachmann followed up with a sixteen-page letter to Rep. Keith Ellison (who had criticized the investigation request) in which she laid out documented instances of apparent Muslim Brotherhood influence over U.S. policy. These included Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s February 2011 testimony before Congress, in which he described the openly jihadist Muslim Brotherhood as “secular;” drastic, pro-Brotherhood policy initiatives by the State Department, during a period when Huma Abedin, who had been closely involved with the Muslim Brotherhood for years, served as Deputy Chief of Staff to Hillary Clinton; and U.S. cooperation with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) on a pro-sharia campaign to criminalize the criticism of Islam.

With the 2011-2012 government-wide Great Purge of training curriculum related to fact-based instruction about Islam followed by the wholesale backing for the al-Qa’eda and Muslim Brotherhood-led revolts in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia, U.S. policy is far gone along the pathway of acquiescence to a jihad and sharia agenda. When Hani Nour Eldin, member of Gama’at al-Islamiyya, a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, was granted a visa in June 2012 to visit the White House in order to petition the National Security Council for the release of Omar Abdel Rahman (the Blind Sheikh), the warning indicators were already well in evidence that the Obama administration was turning the Global War on Terror policy on its head.

Allowing political asylees and refugees known to have provided material support to terrorism to enter the country is yet one more milestone step bringing U.S. policy into closer compliance with sharia objectives—to our great detriment.

So, let us step into the real world and grab onto the FACTS that we have. They are more than explosive, and lead to one irrefutable conclusion:Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood Mafia feels triumphant, as well they should. Yes, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA COMPLETES “PHASE 3” FROM “THE PLAN”, INFILTRATES AMERICA’S FAMILY COURT SYSTEM. 2 MORE ‘PHASES’ TO GO! 

In actuality, while the Islamist-in-Chief floods America with terrorists – “materially” connected or what not – certain towns are overrun with the newest “refugees” and many haven’t a clue.

On the other hand, in an Orwellian twist of fate, along comes an Egyptian-American, a physician who was part of Egypt’s Air Force, and he wants to settle the score:Egyptian Doctor Files Terrorism Complaint With U.S. Congress Against Barack Obama!

NEVERTHELESS, can you hear the jihadists gloating – Allahu Akbar…الله أكبر ….America will be ours??


 

HOMESCHOOLERS NABBED: Authorities Storm Class. The Remnants/Overreach Of Socialist/Totalitarian Roots. America’s Left Watches, Learns & Waits…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Whenever one seeks to gauge where America’s left is heading, it is instructive to look towards Europe’s leftist bludgeon, as they most always lead the way. Not only that, a preponderance of Euro nations, whose authentic roots lie in socialism and fascism, retain remnants of ‘laws’ which help to prop up the (so called) ‘liberal’ left’s ‘democratic’ facade. Hiding in plain sight.

That being said, how many realize that grabbing the “hearts and minds” of the kiddies is an intrinsic method to achieving totalitarian rule? To be sure, they are “prize” possessions, not unlike pimps view their whores.

For if this is not the case, then why is PENETRATING the educational system the sine qua non of radical, revolutionary leadership? Little more evidence is necessary, other than the proofs within the following commentaries.

At the “head of the class” stands Billy Boy Ayers, a domestic terrorist, a LEADING American educator; the “teacher’s teacher”. Ayers works assiduously to control the kiddies. Lies in wait. Ready to pounce. In fact, part of the red/green alliance is an Islamist push into educational spheres to bring down America. 

Back to Europe’s roots…

POLICE STORM HOMESCHOOL CLASS, TAKE CHILDREN BY FORCE

‘Officers brought a battering ram and were about to break the door in’

The Wunderlich family, with Michael Farris of the HSLDA.

Four children, ages 7 to 14, have been forcibly taken from their Darmstadt, Germany, home by police armed with a battering ram, and their parents have been told they won’t see them again soon, all over the issue of homeschooling, according to a stunning new report from the Home School Legal Defense Association.

HSLDA, the world’s premiere advocate for homeschoolers, said the family of Dirk and Petra Wunderlich has battled for several years Germany’s World War II-era requirement that all children submit to the indoctrination programs in the nation’s public schools.

The shocking raid was made solely because the parents were providing their children’s education, HSLDA said. The organization noted the paperwork that authorized police officers and social workers to use force on the children contained no claims of mistreatment.

“The children were taken to unknown locations,” HSLDA said. “Officials ominously promised the parents that they would not be seeing their children anytime soon.”

The raid, which took place Thursday at 8 a.m. as the children were beginning their day’s classes, has been described by observers as “brutal and vicious.”

A team of 20 social workers, police and special agents stormed the family’s home. HSLDA reported a Judge Koenig, who is assigned to the Darmstadt family court, signed an order authorizing the immediate seizure of the children by force.

“Citing the parents’ failure to cooperate ‘with the authorities to send the children to school,’ the judge also authorized the use of force ‘against the children’ … reasoning that such force might be required because the children had ‘adopted the parents’ opinions’ regarding homeschooling and that ‘no cooperation could be expected’ from either the parents or the children,” HSLDA said.

Dirk Wunderlich told the homeschool group: “I looked through a side window and saw many people, police and special agents, all armed. They told me they wanted to come in to speak with me. I tried to ask questions, but within seconds, three police officers brought a battering ram and were about to break the door in, so I opened it.”

Join the battle over Germany’s homeschooling ban.

His narration continued: “The police shoved me into a chair and wouldn’t let me even make a phone call at first. It was chaotic as they told me they had an order to take the children. At my slightest movement the agents would grab me, as if I were a terrorist. You would never expect anything like this to happen in our calm, peaceful village. It was like a scene out of a science fiction movie. Our neighbors and children have been traumatized by this invasion.”

Human rights violations

Michael Farris, HSLDA founder, said in a report the actions violated a number of established European precedents, including provisions of the European Convention of Human Rights.

“The right to homeschool is a human right,” he said, “and so is the right to freely move and to leave a country. Germany has grossly violated these rights of this family.

“This latest act of seizing these four beautiful innocent children is an outrageous act of a rogue nation.”

Farris said the U.S. Constitution is “not alone in upholding the right of parents to decide how to educate their children.”

“Germany is a party to numerous human rights treaties that recognize the right of parents to provide an education distinct from the public schools so that children can be educated according to the parents’ religious convictions,” he said.

“Germany has simply not met its obligations under these treaties or as a liberal democracy. HSLDA and I will do whatever we can to help this family regain custody of their children and ensure that they are safe from this persecution. This case demonstrates conclusively why the Romeike asylum case is so important. Families in Germany need a safe place where they can educate their children in peace.”

As WND reported, the Romeike case has been submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court. In 2010, an immigration judge granted asylum in the U.S. to the family, which fled Germany because their children were forced to go to public schools.

The Obama administration, unhappy with the outcome, appealed and obtained an order from a higher court that the family must return to Germany. The Obama administration has argued in court parents essentially have no right to determine how and what their children are taught, leaving the authority with the government.

See a report on the Romeikes

Government custody

The German government already has confronted the Wunderlich family several times over homeschooling. Less than a year ago, a German court granted custody of the children to state youth officials.

However, government authorities at that time decided to leave the children in the family home because they were well-cared for.

WND reported the government told the family it had failed to meet the government’s demands for “integration.” The decision came from Judge Markus Malkmus, who ordered the children into the custody of the states’ “child protective agency,” called the Jugendamt.

The family earlier was subjected to an ordeal in France when police snatched the children from their home there, accusing them of “being alone.”

At the time, two French social workers and two police officers appeared without notice at the home of Dominique Chanal in St. Leonard, France, where Dirk and Angela Wunderlich and their children were living.

The family had fled Germany because of a series of fines imposed for homeschooling. The children were released a short time later. But Dirk Wunderlich was forced last year to return his family to Germany because he could not find work elsewhere.

Wunderlich told Mike Donnelly, HSLDA director for international affairs, that he and his wife were devastated.

“These are broken people. They said they felt like they were being ground into dust. They were shaken to their core and shocked by the event. But they also told me that they had followed their conscience and the dictates of their faith,” Donnelly said. “Although they don’t have much faith in the German state – they have a lot of faith in God. They are an inspiring and courageous family.

Donnelly said his question to the political leadership of Germany is: “How long will you permit these kinds of brutal acts to be perpetrated against German families?”

“Why is it so important to you to force people into your state schools? The echo of this act rings from a darker time in German history. When will leaders stand up and make changes so that brutality to children like the Wunderlichs no longer happens because of homeschooling? Isn’t there any German statesman willing to stand up for what is right anywhere in Germany?”

Dirk Wunderlich told HSLDA his 14-year-old daughter was forcibly taken out of the home.

“When I went outside, our neighbor was crying as she watched. I turned around to see my daughter being escorted as if she were a criminal by two big policemen. They weren’t being nice at all. When my wife tried to give my daughter a kiss and a hug goodbye, one of the special agents roughly elbowed her out of the way and said – ‘it’s too late for that.’”

After the children were taken, authorities “invited” the parents to a meeting with social workers. They were told they were not even being allowed an immediate court hearing on the status of the children.

Hitler youth

Germany has a long history of persecuting homeschooling families.

It was in 1937 when Adolf Hitler said: “The youth of today is ever the people of tomorrow. For this reason we have set before ourselves the task of inoculating our youth with the spirit of this community of the people at a very early age, at an age when human beings are still unperverted and therefore unspoiled. This Reich stands, and it is building itself up for the future, upon its youth. And this new Reich will give its youth to no one, but will itself take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing.”

Just a few years ago, a German government spokesman, Wolfgang Drautz, emphasized the importance of socializing children through public schools.

His statement followed a response from the German government to another family that objected to police picking up their child and delivering him to a public school.

“The minister of education does not share your attitudes toward so-called homeschooling,” said a government letter. “You complain about the forced school escort of primary school children by the responsible local police officers. … In order to avoid this in future, the education authority is in conversation with the affected family in order to look for possibilities to bring the religious convictions of the family into line with the unalterable school attendance requirement.”

HSLDA previously has documented in the Konrad and Plett cases how the German government considers homeschooling to be child abuse, even though it is recognized as a right by the Universal Declaration on Human Rights, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

HSLDA has warned that the behavior of German authorities is a foreshadowing of what American parents should expect if the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child ever is ratified in the U.S. Its concerns are detailed at the website Parental Rights.

In nearby Sweden, WND also reported a case in which authorities snatched a 7-year-old child from an airplane as the parents were moving to India so they could homeschool.

Swedish courts have ordered Dominic Johansson to be permanently separated from his parents, Christer and Annie Johansson.

For those who remain unconvinced, as to the linkage between Germany’s storm troopers (who nabbed the homeschoolers) and America’s kiddies – homeschooled or otherwise – rethink your calculus. Fast. 

Take a gander at this, courtesy of Obama and his own storm troopers, as lawbreaking Eric Holder gives the POTUS “legal” cover – Obama Bid to Deport Homeschool Refugees May Threaten U.S. Rights ! 

In this regard, the nexus between Obama’s America and Nazi-socialist tactics is crystal clear. Most significantly, DHS is mirroring Gestapo-like tactics, and it will be their agents who will assist local authorities in descending upon homeschoolers too. Not only that, but the Radical-in-Chief’s “core curriculum” is designed for socialist/Marxist outcomes

In any case, those who cannot afford appropriate private education are hostages to the renegade leftist (mis)educators, whether in the U.S. or elsewhere. As a result, homeschooling is looking better and better, despite the risks. Merge forces with like-minded families. Pool resources. There is power in numbers.

After all, what is more precious than the (mental and physical) welfare of the kiddies?