HOWEVER one slices it, there is little doubt that the west is dealing with the deadliest scourge known to man, and this is not a reference to Ebola! Yes, infectious diseases must be eradicated but there are protocols to deal with them through modern medicine, IF containment is the goal.
“Run over, run over the 2-month-old baby girl – that’s how we get back at them,” went the lyrics according to a report on the song by Israel’s Channel 2 News.
The rallying cry was strikingly similar to an attack October 22 in which a Palestinian driver slammed his vehicle into a group of bystanders at a Jerusalem light rail station. A 3-month-old baby girl, Chaya Zissel Braun, a U.S. citizen, was one of two killed when the car rammed into her stroller, sending her flying into the air.
“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia
in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many
countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods
of commerce and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the
Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and
refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan
law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as
a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the
faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion
paralyzes the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde
force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant
and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising
fearless warriors at every step, and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the
strong arms of science, the science against which it (Islam) has vainly struggled,
the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.”
BASICALLY, only those living in a parallel universe haven’t heard about the savagery committed in the name of Islam, but some barbarism stands out, if you dare imagine.
About 200 or so in the small Christian community of Lahore, Pakistan, took to the streets in hopes to raise awareness towards the country’s poor treatment of Christians. Some signs held by the protesters read, “Christian carnage in the name of blasphemy should be stopped” and “the government has failed to give protection to minorities,” the BBC reported.
Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif recognized the need for more acceptable law enforcement practices, calling the mob-killing an “unacceptable crime.” He added, “a responsible state cannot tolerate mob rule and public lynching with impunity. The Pakistani state has to act proactively to protect its minorities from violence and injustice.”
Even Pakistan’s Muslim community isn’t free from danger when accused of having “insulted” the country’s dominant religion.
On Thursday, a police officer hacked to death an individual who allegedly “insulted the Prophet” during an interrogation. The victim, Syed Tufali Haider, got into an argument with officers before hurling an insult about Mohamed. What the Daily Maildescribe as a “senior Police Officer” then reportedly struck the detainee in the neck with an axe, which caused immediate death.
“Assistant Sub-Inspector Faraz Naveed, 36, became very angry on hearing the derogatory remarks against the companions of the Prophet and he killed the detainee with an axe in the lock up,” said an officer regarding the incident.
A recent Pew poll showed that 75 percent of Pakistanis believe: “Blasphemy laws are necessary to protect Islam in our country.” Pakistan’s blasphemy laws entail that insulting the prophet is punishable by death.
Over the weekend, the FBI announced that it would treat Islamist Alton Nolan’s alleged beheading of Colleen Hufford, 54, as a case of workplace violence. That despite the fact that Nolan’s Facebook page contains a picture of Nolan giving the ISIS salute, multiple pictures of Osama Bin Laden, a screenshot of the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center, and a quote reading, “I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smile ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them….”
REGARDLESS of all the jive talk – via the actual barbarians and their apologists – the fact of the matter is that jihad in America is on the rise and it will not cease. Yes, decapitation will tick towards the upswing, if interventions are not in the offing. In fact, the “art” of head chopping will skyrocket, if left unattended. Not only that, but people become immune to shocking acts, once all manner of barbarism enters their national sphere. It is just the way it is.
SO aside from flying heads and all the heretofore attacks in the name of Islaminside the U.S., readers should add cannibalism to the list!
HOW many ways, how many times, does it need to be stated: Islam is incompatible with western norms. Its basis, Shariah law, must be beaten back in America before it is too late, if it isn’t already!
WHAT a tool and a toadying fool….retired Marine General John Allen caves to Islam and Barack HUSSEIN Obama!
THERE is little doubt that Commanders – be they from the military or the high level political realm – must exert authority and ooze take charge personas. If not, who the hell is going to follow, respect AND fear them. Yes, a pussy cat leader won’t last long, that’s for sure. But that is a far cry from a dictator-like personality. We all know to whom this reference is alluding….
THAT off the table, Obama’s highest ranking Generals – the military’s TOP leadership – have been gutted of national patriots, bereft of men with chests, despite their pinned medals! Left in place are those who have agreed to toe to his Islamic diktats and that is that.
According to Allen, to defeat ISIS:
The solution is to “celebrate” Islam and show our “profound respect” for it.
“As we seek to expose ISIS’ true nature,” Allen told the gathering on Monday, “we must also tell a positive story, one that highlights our respect – our profound respect for Islam’s proud traditions, its rich history, and celebration of scholarship and family and community.” “We must work with clerics and scholars and teachers and parents to tell the story of how we celebrate Islam, even as we show that ISIS perverts it.”
Allen said that ISIS propaganda serves both to attract recruits and “perverts the innocent.”
“It is only when we contest ISIS presence online and deny the legitimacy of its message – the message that it sends to vulnerable young people – and as we expose ISIS for the un-Islamic, criminal cult of violence that it really is, it is only then that ISIS will be truly defeated.”
Similarly infected, the schmuck fromU.S. European Command Commander, NATO Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Philip M. Breedlove had this to say….
“The best way to beat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria’s success at recruiting Westerners is for moderate Muslims to step up and counter the message,” the commander of NATO forces in Europe said Monday.
U.S. Air Force Gen. Philip Breedlove said the extremist group’s ability to recruit foreign fighters to come to Syria and Iraq is a “real problem” for the alliance. And it is compounded by concerns about “lone wolf” terror attacks by fighters returning from the Middle East and others inspired by the group’s ideology.
“It’s hard to address recruiting until we address those hearts and minds,” Breedlove told reporters at the Pentagon. “We need to hear the voices of moderate Muslims in the mosques.”
NOW before we get to the wayward Commander-in-Chief’s hyper enmity towards the military and his purging of the patriotic High Command, think of the Betrayer-in-Chief (and others), as he bows down to Islam, yet envision some particular “delicate” parts placed in a vise-like instrument of sorts. Yet, for further edification, view this video from the “Doc of Common Sense”, if you haven’t done so already! Oh yeah…them’s fighting words….
AND with the above visual aid firmly implanted in your mind’s eye, segue over to how the military’s castration came from there to here. So for the absolute record,
Castration One:
IF one has to guess where Obama Inc.’s nut cracking is heading, well, stop scratching your head:
Regardless, pay them no mind, if you want to know what is happening on the ground. Herein the truth is revealed, wherever it lands. Moreover, those who have their shorts (or panties) in knots, over this and that, too bad. There is nothing they can do – threats and all – to stop said revelations. Just let them try.
Indeed, commentaries about Martial Law, the purging of General’s,, “mysteriously” deceased bankers, and journalists who “magically” disappear, isn’t easy reading. Sorry for that. But the alarms have to be raised, so here we go again….{keep reading…}
HIS treachery against the military is not for nothing and is highly selective. From the onset, when he first despoiled the People’s House in Jan. 2009, he knew that gutting the military (as well as the economy) would destroy America. Clearly, without a robust economy, it becomes “necessary” to slash military readiness. A two-fer.
IN light of his palpable rage against America, an obsessive hatred pulses through his veins. A recent commentary documented his anti-American fever.
AS is said, there is more than one way to skin a cat. And this saying is wholly apropos when describing the Anti-American-in-Chief. He is deadly serious in his animus by exacting revenge on America (and the west in general), come what may. Bringing down “Amerika” is in the forefront.
BESIDES, why is anyone surprised that it turned out this way? We all heard what he said, especially during his first term campaign. We also knew about the cast of rabidly hateful anti-Americans he surrounded (and still does) himself with. Birds of a feather. His plans centered upon “transforming” America from the world’s superpower, effectively, to be on par with third world countries. Indeed, these sentiments were front and center in the run-up to 2008….{read on….}
STILL yet, in practical terms, what does his castration and his unquenchable animus amount to, aside from military personnel – up and down the chain of command – being in an absolute uproar? Plenty.
WHEN the wayward Commander-in-Chief surrounds himself with TOP Generals who are willing (for whatever reasons) to betray the nation by Allah-washing Islam’s quest for global hegemony, the entire nation is in GRAVE peril.
AND by genuflections to Islam and refusing to tell Barack HUSSEIN Obama that “moderate” Islam doesn’t exist, they too are complicit in any American deaths.
BY failing to execute their sworn Constitutional duties to protect the U.S. homeland from enemies near and far, there is little standing between Islam taking over America. This is the case, unless millions of patriots understand the dangerous peril they are in; willing to defy the Commander-in-Chief and his hand-picked military henchmen, relative to any plans they have in store for the homeland.
FORGET about everything you think Obama’s monstrous regime is capable of, and up it exponentially by an explosive and deadly factor. And don’t wonder any longer why he thinks he can get away with whatever he has in store, even after he got bushwhacked at the mid-term elections. An “omnipotent” dictator.
MORE specifically, like a wounded animal, he is out for blood and the military is prime meat. And if you think this is smack talk, well, there is little one can do to convince on this end.
STILL, let us consider the fact that even qualified medical military personnel are not mandated to deal with infectious diseases. Their purview is treating wounded American soldiers during battle, and that is that. Not only that, but Ebola lands squarely within the specific mandate of WHOand all players recognize their primacy. In fact, any other health personnel who volunteer to deal with Ebola-infected regions are doing so under their own volition and this too is their choice! Undeniable.
UNFORTUNATELY, many who enter the military believe that orders are sacrosanct, even illegal ones. The fact of the matter is that it is entirely lawful to disobey illegal orders, and a renegade Commander-in-Chief tops the list. And no one should think that up and down the chain of command they are not starting to get “restless”. Consider:
Now, we are even beginning to see a number of military generals begin to take an active stand against Obama and his policies. Many of these leaders feel very strongly that Obama has created a situation which could lead to the US being run by a ruler, rather than elected official. The first clue we had of Obama’s real intentions should have been the firing of General Petraeus when he decided to tell the truth about Obama under oath. Imagine that, an Obama Regime official who actually tells the truth when he gives testimony!
The situation has continued to deteriorate since then. Just listen to this report from the Conservative Tribune:
“Retired US Army Major General Paul E Vallely has been vocal about his belief that American liberty will only be restored through peaceful marches and protests to force the resignations of key political leaders, including President Obama. General Vallely has been joined by Air Force Brigadier General Charles Jones to create a ‘citizens council’ directly challenging the administration’s policy decisions. Obama’s treatment of Islamic terrorists, including his trade of several Guantanamo Bay detainees for accused deserter Bowe Bergdahl has drawn fire from two other retired generals, Air Force Major General Bentley Rayburn and four-star Army General Jack Keane.”
Although you will notice most of these folks are retired, there has also been at least one current, active duty general to respond to this call. That would be Marine General John Kelly. He has been very outspoken on Obama’s refusal to take care of the border crisis, saying it even threatens the existence of the US as a whole. Listen to this, from WND:
“Particularly in regards to the drug trade, murder rates and terrorist activity brewing in Central America, Kelly says, the waves of Latin Americans sweeping through Mexico and illegally into Texas presents a threat to the US every bit as serious as Iran or North Korea.’In comparison to other global threats, the near collapse of societies in this hemisphere with the associated drug and illegal immigrant flow are frequently viewed to be of low importance,’ Kelly said in an interview with Defense One. ‘Many argue these threats are not existential and do not challenge our national security. I disagree.’”
We should also point out the fact that our lovely commander in chief has also undertaken one of the most dramatic (although highly under reported thanks to his buddies in the mainstream media) purges the military has ever seen. This has included the firings of literally hundreds of high ranking officials, including dozens of generals, colonels, lieutenant colonels, majors, and other ranks. He has also insisted that current officials actually take an oath to him personally.
What do YOU think about all this? Should we take notice how more and more military generals are beginning to openly question, criticize, and call for drastic changes in Obama Regime policies? What do you think of the quotes given by these generals…and the formation of their citizens council?
MORE than rumblings….indeed, a commandant…as mentioned, a Dictator-in-Chief!
UNDER this paradigm, and with the understanding that his vile hatred for the U.S. military is boundless, it makes entire sense to send military personnel into an infectious death zone. Thereupon, they will be shipped back into America and spread the disease to their families (communities too), ostensibly for “treatment” and via a duty to treat America’s heroes!
Many have been saying that you can not have a war with Ebola. You can’t shoot it. You can’t drive over it with a tank. You can’t throw a grenade at it. It has also been speculated that Obama’s Ebola war is simply a move to appease a religion and put our soldiers in direct exposure with the disease. Essentially, the true goal could be to kill them off and potentially expose millions when they returned home.
Despite the warnings, President Obama declared “war” on Ebola and sent 4000 combat troops into the contaminated area. He then signed an executive order activating the ready reserves to fight Ebola.
What happens when the worst fears are no longer tin foil, but fact?
WND obtained a screen shot from an interview with the Under Secretary of the Department of Defense. In it, it confirms the potential of exposure to Department of Defense civilian and military troops, who will in fact have direct contact with Ebola victims!
While it appears that troops will not be directly in the hospitals treating the Ebola patients, their four-hour training will consist of their responsibilities in a “support role.” So what is that support role, you might ask?
The Washington Post indicates that the areas that are infected the most are having trouble disposing of dead bodies. This seems to be due to the fact that Muslim burials require the body be washed for burial by same-sex individuals, and they are having trouble getting the families of the deceased to understand how to dispose of the bodies without infecting more people.
And a combination of inadequate infrastructure, logistical issues, conflicts with Western health care workers and burial traditions has contributed to widespread difficulties in containing the spread of the disease among mourners and those caring for the dead.
The World Health Organization provides specific guidelines for how to safely transport and bury Ebola victims. They include instructions to “be aware of the [victim’s] family’s cultural practices and religious beliefs,” and to “help the family understand why some practices cannot be done because they place the family or others at risk for exposure.” (The Washington Post)
So it seems that President Obama’s answer is to send US civilians and military troops into harms way to take care of a problem that should be dealt with by Africa and the Word Health Organization. We are training the people on the proper Muslim burial rituals, building a command center and burial sites, and providing training from the military personnel (who are not doctors or medical professionals and only receive 4 hours of training themselves) to individuals like the World Health Organization (who are supposed to be the trained medical professionals and doctors world-wide).We are also calling on US forces to bury the dead of another country and make sure we are “sensitive” to their “religious culture” for a group that daily chants death to America?
While shallow graves are part of the spread of the disease as the bodies are dug up by dogs and monkeys which are in turn eaten in their culture, it is not the US’s place to send combat troops into exposure to tell doctors how to handle political correctness if the culture does not like the fact that cremation is the only way to ensure the disease does not spread or to have troops wash dead bodies. While some Christians don’t believe in cremation, they are not likely to scream “Allah Akbar” and try to kill you if you let them know it is the only way.
Many veterans have seen this as a direct slap in the face to our armed forces with the potential to expose millions of American lives when they return home state side. One man I highly admire, U.S. Army Lt. Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin, who was commander of the US Special Forces, conducted an interview in which he shared similar concerns that this is potentially being used to slim down the troop ranks and kill Americans.
In exclusive interviews recently with WND, retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. William “Jerry” Boykin and retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely condemned Obama’s decision to deploy troops to West Africa, arguing they could bring the virus to the United States or to other units.
The generals said the mission of U.S. troops is to fight wars, not disease.
The concern is that these soldiers, who will be exposed to the environment where the virus is prevalent, could bring it to the U.S. and potentially spread Ebola as they return home and are assigned to other units. (WND)
The two generals are absolutely correct.
The United State is now number one after Africa in Ebola exposure cases, yet our Commander-in-Chief continues to fly people in for treatment daily and won’t stop flights into our country from West Africa. He also appoints an Ebola Czar that thinks the number one problem in the US is over population and gives him the title Czar so it doesn’t have to go through congress, where even the lame duck session would have not appointed him.
The United States is already at war with the Islamic State and terrorist organizations that are actual enemy combatants. You can not “war” with disease. We have an actual enemy to use the “Military Hammer,” as President Obama so equivalently told West Point earlier this year, and adhering to our enemies is still the number one thing listed in Article III, Section 3, of the US Constitution as TREASON!
Where is the Provost Marshal of the Pentagon when he needs to do his job and fulfill his oath of enlistment? — ALL enemies, foreign and domestic.
BEFORE we get to the reality of WMD’s already in the hands of Islamic jihadists, westerners must internalize the following: traditional moral boundaries, a “no can do” mindset, are off the table in relation to Islamic ambitions. Simply put, borders are not an obstacle to their goals, both within geographical and moral spheres. It’s a large swathe to cover but no less doable, at least for those with immutable, Allah-driven global and hegemonic rule as their driving and guiding force. Yes, their pagan Allah mandates this, that and the other and so it shall be!
FROM the onset, isn’t it obvious that those who are driven to satiate “religious” and political imperatives – to the point of burning alive Christians and others – are not going to be stopped by western appeasement or accepted norms? Dream on.
Sajjad Maseeh, 27, and his wife Shama Bibi, 24, were set upon by at least 1,200 people after rumors circulated that they had burned verses from the Quran, family spokesman Javed Maseeh told NBC News via telephone late Thursday. Their legs were also broken so they couldn’t run away.
“They picked them up by their arms and legs and held them over the brick furnace until their clothes caught fire,” he said. “And then they threw them inside the furnace.”
Bibi, a mother of four who was four months pregnant, was wearing an outfit that initially didn’t burn, according to Javed Maseeh. The mob removed her from over the kiln and wrapped her up in cotton to make sure the garments would be set alight….
SO with this clear understanding in tow, imagine what havoc they can wreck with nuclear WMD weapons in their hands! As to the chemical end, it is a done deal:
They warned that they had watched equipment there being looted on CCTV.
A CIA picture of the Muthanna State Establishment, which produced chemical weapons on an industrial scale
Remnants of Iraq’s chemical weapons program at the Muthanna State Establishment. It was destroyed by American bombs during the 1991 Gulf War
Cache: Isis controls a compound in Iraq containing 2,500 chemical weapons rockets, according to the Iraqi government. Pictured are Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal technicians preparing unexploded ordnance for demolition at a safe disposal area near Baghdad in 2003
In a letter to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Ambassador Mohamed Ali Alhakim said remnants of a former chemical weapons programme are kept in two bunkers there.
‘The project management spotted at dawn on Thursday, 12 June 2014, through the camera surveillance system, the looting of some of the project equipment and appliances, before the terrorists disabled the surveillance system,’ Alhakim wrote in the letter dated June 30.
‘The Government of Iraq requests the States Members of the United Nations to understand the current inability of Iraq, owing to the deterioration of the security situation, to fulfill its obligations to destroy chemical weapons,’ he said.
The Muthanna complex measures three by three miles and was thought to be capable of producing around 4,000 tonnes of nerve agent a year.
Alhakim singled out the capture of bunkers 13 and 41 in the sprawling complex 35 miles (56 kilometers) northwest of Baghdad in the notorious ‘Sunni Triangle.’
The last major report by U.N. inspectors on the status of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program was released about a year after the experts left in March 2003. It states that Bunker 13 contained 2,500 sarin-filled 122-mm chemical rockets produced and filled before 1991, and about 180 tons of sodium cyanide, ‘a very toxic chemical and a precursor for the warfare agent tabun.’
However, U.S. Defense Department spokesman Rear Admiral John Kirby said earlier that the United States’ best understanding was that ‘whatever material was kept there is pretty old and not likely to be able to be accessed or used against anyone right now’.
‘We aren’t viewing this particular site and their holding it as a major issue at this point,’ Kirby said. ‘Should they even be able to access the materials, frankly, it would likely be more of a threat to them than anyone else.’
It was revealed this week that about 5,000 chemical weapons were recovered or destroyed in Iraq following the 2003 invasion but the Pentagon chose to keep the findings top secret.
An investigation by The New York Times has revealed that U.S. forces happened across the hidden caches of warheads, shells and aviation bombs between 2004 and 2011.
OKAY…now, this investigative journalist has no vested interest in vindicating George W. Bush, for it means nothing on this end, other than to get at the truth. Besides, knowing full well that his domestic (and foreign) enemies have an anti-American agenda by sticking to their lying mantra ” Bush lied/People died”, speaks for itself. And the fact that he knew better but allowed them to continue tarring and feathering him is itself newsworthy. But no matter. Evidence abounds – and from more than one direction – that WMD’s indeed were found.
Troops did discover vast numbers of chemical WMDs, but the administration kept the discovery — and the injuries to our troops that handled them — secret.
The existence of the slur-busting weapons remained largely unknown to the public (but known to AT readers) until the New York Times published a front page story Wednesday, only a day after the New York Post revealed that ISIS fighters had taken over territory where these WMDs were stored. To be sure, these were old weapons, as my colleague Rick Moran is quick to point out, but they remain evidence of Saddam’s WMD programs and stockpiles.
So what genius decided to keep these WMD stockpiles secret? Eli Lake of The Daily Beast reports:
Starting in 2004, some members of the George W. Bush administration and Republican lawmakers began to find evidence of discarded chemical weapons in Iraq. But when the information was brought up with the White House, senior adviser Karl Rove told them to “let these sleeping dogs lie.”
IN this regard, some of us don’t require the NYT (or other publications) to confirm this or that. As a backgrounder in this investigative journalist’s tag team interview with Dave Gaubatz:
With over three decades of combined Air Force (AF) experience, his career has led him on missions spanning the Middle East — from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Kuwait to Iraq. As a Special Federal Agent, he has received the highest forms of U.S. security clearances for top-secret intelligence information — including for weapons of mass destruction and espionage — and has been briefed into many “black projects.”
Among his varied achievements, Gaubatz has investigated felony crimes against the U.S. Air Force and government, as well as has been assigned to counterterrorism and counterintelligence investigations. He was the very first Special Civilian Agent deployed to Nasiriyah, Iraq, in 2003 for Operation Liberation Iraq. Using his Arabic training to travel throughout, he gathered vital intelligence on espionage and weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Although he was able to uncover sites, the U.S. failed to excavate them, and the weapons were later taken by groups of insurgents.
During this stint in Iraq, Gaubatz was also assigned to rescue the family of Mohammed Odeh Al-Rehaief, the Iraqi lawyer who aided in rescuing Pfc. Jessica Lynch. He has earned numerous Federal awards for identifying WMD sites and Islamic terrorists planning attacks against the U.S. and its troops…..
CONCLUSIVELY, the very fact that Dave Gaubatz (and his team) “uncovered sites, the U.S. failed to excavate them, and the weapons were later taken by groups of insurgents”, should have been reason enough for Barack HUSSEIN Obama to keep U.S. troops in Iraq to stay on the hunt for the “groups of insurgents” . You think?
IN any case, with an open sesame given to Islamic barbarians, there is little doubt that the “weaponization” of Ebola via a human carrier, is hardly a science fiction scenario. Step by step they are achieving their goals, and the heretofore super power of the world – and other western nations – is giving them free rein to do so, regardless of their so-called limp efforts.
MOST significantly, while American poohbahs (and their western counterparts) opine that there is nothing to fear from Islam, its adherents are busy plotting dirty bombs and worse.
IF you don’t want to pay attention to the above warnings, you may want to reconsider. Just view the following as more than (yellowcake) food for thought:
The greater problem, however, of significant quantities of chemical weapons hidden at some date prior to the US invasion points to a current and growing threat. The leader of the neo-Saddamists allied now with ISIS is Izzat al-Douri, a former Iraqi army general and last member of the senior Baathist leadership not executed or imprisoned.
There is a distinct possibility that Saddam’s minions hid these munitions with the intention of disinterring them for deterrent use once again. And in fact, this is why Saddam’s military and secret police leaders never ceased to believe Iraq possessed WMD and could therefore project terror onto the Kurds and the rest of the region (Israel and Iran, specifically) until the end because Iraq did possess WMD, even after the dictator’s death by hanging. The Iraqi army and security services did not handle “special” weapons without the knowledge of the regime’s leaders. So to think that Saddam and his immediate circle, including al-Douri, did not know the locations of the WMD discussed in the Times article begs credulity.
Much of the area where the “antique,” yet still potentially potent chemical weapons discovered by US forces is now in the hands of ISIS, the forces of al-Douri, and their allied Sunni Arab tribes undergirding the “caliphate” occupying almost a third of Iraq. With hundreds of Western passport holders fighting in Syria and Iraq, the most immediate threat to the United States is the spread of jihadi terrorism to Europe now that ISIS has a border with Turkey, a gateway to the EU. Can one even imagine the impact of a weaponized sarin-gas attack in Paris?
REGARDLESS, those who profess ignorance are no less culpable of the ensuing outcome, just like their better informed counterparts. In fact, as a matter of legal record, ignorance of the law – ignorantia juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat – is NOT a defense. Those of us who have a background in law, particularly in criminal law, understand what’s what.
THAT being the case, it is this site’s mission to catch millions of its readers up to speed, most compellingly, re the basics of Shariah law. Inherently, Shariah law is anti-freedom and anti-liberty, defacto, inhumane.
NOT only that, but if addled westerners believe their stranglehold is something they can escape – if not beaten back – think again:
An Afghan refugee would drive from his home in Tullamarine to nightclubs in Frankston late at night searching for drunk, vulnerable young woman to prey on, a court was told today.
He would pick them up in his white 1988 Honda Civic and rape them.
The victim was sitting on the footpath behind the 21st Century Dance Club when Esmatullah Sharifi approached her and offered to give her a lift to the Bay Hotel.
She accepted but became anxious and confused when they had been driving for an hour and she saw a road sign saying Sorrento.
Sharifi then pulled over into a dark side street and raped her in the front passenger seat.
“She began to scream and cry out for help,” Ms Dalziel said.
“The accused put his left hand over her mouth and his right hand around her neck, restricting her breathing. He said to her, ‘I’ll take you home after it, I’ll give you back your phone as well’.
In the rapist’s defense, his lawyer argued that he wasn’t at all clear about this whole “Women are human beings” thing.
Mr Regan said Esmatullah Sharifi was uneducated, illiterate, inexperienced in forming relationships with women, and was confused about the nature of consent. He is in Australia on a permanent protected visa.
The judge didn’t buy it then, but the usual lefty approach is to just keep appealing until you find a bleeding heart judge who accepts the horrible notion being put forward. And that didn’t take very long.
Granting leave to appeal, Court of Appeal Justice Robert Redlich said: “The sentencing judge rejected any suggestion (Esmatullah Sharifi) didn’t have a clear concept of consent in sexual relations.”
In April last year, a psychologist told the County Court that Sharifi had “an unclear concept of what constitutes consent in sexual relationships” in Australia.
“It proves, in my view, an adequate basis for most grounds of appeal that (Sharifi) wishes to pursue,” the judge said.
We’re not just dealing with ignorance of the law. We have Western judges setting out the notion that if a Muslim settler in Europe, America or Australia does not understand the concept that women can refuse sexual contact, that this is a mitigating circumstance….
INCONTROVERTIBLY, their overt barbarism (via ALL of Shariah law’s other offenses) renders Islam, its laws, in violation of western laws and norms, even as western judges/politicians are cowed into accepting Shariah law as the “law of the land”! Dangerous as that.
The mandates of shari’a are extremely harsh compared to modern Western standards. They infringe on many modern principles of human rights, religious freedom, and equality of all before the law. For example:
Hudud punishments are the severe penalties prescribed by shari’a for offenses defined as being against God himself. The punishments for these crimes are seen as divinely ordained and cannot be changed by humans. These include 100 lashes or stoning to death as punishment for adultery; 80 lashes for false accusation of adultery; amputation of limbs for theft; 40 or 80 lashes for drinking alcohol; imprisonment, amputation or death (by crucifixion in serious cases) for highway robbery; and the death penalty for apostasy from Islam. Methods of execution for apostasy can include decapitation, crucifixion, burning, strangling, drowning, impaling, and flaying. Apostates are denied a decent burial after their deaths, and the Muslims who participate in killing them are promised an eternal reward in paradise.
Discrimination on the basis of religion is fundamental to shari’a. By religious edict, Islam must be dominant; only Muslims are considered to be full citizens. Jews and Christians are defined as dhimmis (literally “protected” i.e. permitted to live). However this protection is on condition that they do not bear arms, know their lowly place in society, treat Muslims with respect, and pay a special poll tax (jizya).
Shari‘a divides the world into two opposing domains: the House of Islam (Dar al-Islam) and the House of War (Dar al-Harb). Muslims are supposed to wage jihad to change the House of War (where non-Muslims are dominant) into the House of Islam, dominated by Muslims. While some modern Muslims reject this aggressive understanding of jihad, and see it merely as a strengthening of personal faith, most agree that jihad includes defending Muslim territory and Muslims from any form of aggression; this leaves the door open to interpreting any conflict involving Muslims as a case of defensive jihad. Islamic terror groups justify their atrocities by references to the shari’a rules on jihad.
Shari’a discriminates on the basis of gender. Men are regarded as superior. Women are treated as deficient in intelligence, morals and religion, and must therefore be protected from their own weaknesses. Shari’a rules enforce modesty in dress and behavior and the segregation of the sexes. These regulations place women under the legal guardianship of their male relatives. Women are inherently of less value than men in many legal rulings. A man is allowed up to four wives, but women can have only one husband. A man can divorce his wife easily; a woman faces great obstacles should she want a divorce from her husband. A daughter inherits half as much as a son, and the testimony of a female witness in court is worth only half that of a male witness. In cases of murder, the compensation for a woman is less than that given for a man.
Shari’a courts often display a clear gender bias. This is seen in the widespread practice of accusing rape victims of illicit sexual relations (zina), an offense which carries punishments ranging from imprisonment and flogging to death by stoning.
Female genital mutilation is widespread among some Muslim communities, especially in Egypt, East Africa, Yemen, and Indonesia. Many Muslim leaders see the practice as essential for preserving women’s chastity on which family honor largely depends.
In shari’a there are differences between the various schools of law as to the extent of what a woman may reveal in public. The Hanafi and Maliki schools of law permit face and hands to be revealed in public, thus there is no need for a veil over the face. Among Hanbalis there are two opinions, some permitting the revealing of face and hands, others forbidding it. The Shafi‘is demand that a woman’s face and hands be covered in public, thus demanding some kind of veil over her face.
Both Qur’an and hadith urge modesty in women’s dress and command them to cover themselves in public. The problem is a matter of interpretation of the original Arabic words used.
Most Sunni Muslims believe shari‘a to be completely unchangeable, althoughShi’as allow for the possibility of interpreting and adapting it to new circumstances. Since the nineteenth century, there have been efforts at reforming shari’a in a liberal direction in order to accommodate it to the modern world, but in the contemporary Muslim world, the traditionalists and especially the Islamists — upholders of the traditional view of shari’a — are now dominating public opinion.
Of particular concern for Americans are cases where Muslim litigants seek — sometimes successfully — to have their cases in U.S. courts decided by principles of Sharia law. As of May 2011, the Center for Security Policy (CSP) had identified 50 examples in 23 states “where Muslim-Americans had their cases decided by Sharia Law against their will.” In one case, a Trial Court judge had ruled based on Moroccan Sharia law, even though those involved were not Moroccans or even Muslims. In Tampa, Florida, a judge had ruled that a dispute between two Muslim parties would be solved in accordance with Sharia, overruling the objections of one party. And in a notorious New Jersey case, a judge had exonerated a Muslim man of raping his wife because Sharia allowed him to do so. (The ruling was later overturned.) The 50 instances cited by CSP represented just a fraction of the total number of such cases.
IN line with the above barbaric implementation of Shariah, the aforementioned “any criticism of shari’a is heresy“, is especially noteworthy. It aligns with today’s thesis: the implementation of blasphemy laws across the west! An omerta.
Now, I am no fan of book-burning, of any kind. But, as I noted in this space recently, it is absolutely the “inalienable” right of any American citizen to do it – whether the book is the Bible (which we now know the U.S. military has burned in Afghanistan, lest it be used to proselytize there), the U.S. Constitution or, yes, the Quran.
The President evidently feels justified in contemplating the use of force to stop Quran burnings on the basis of the possibility raised by General David Petraeus, among others, that such a bonfire in Gainesville would translate into a conflagration elsewhere. All of us must be concerned at the prospect that the latter might consume U.S. servicemen and women or civilians, in Muslim lands or elsewhere.
Still, as such brilliant commentators as Andy McCarthy, Diana West, and Debra Burlingame have observed, there is something peculiar about the remarkably contrasting concern being expressed by Barack Obama and his friends over Muslims’ rights and sensitivities on the one hand, and his seeming indifference to those of Americans who are not Muslims. The only common denominator between his attitude toward a mega mosque that offends more than 70% of our countrymen and women and his attitude toward the prospect of an “insensitive” book-burning is that he wants to ensure nothing is done that would offend Muslims.
This practice amounts to enforcing shariah’s strict laws prohibiting “blasphemy” and “slander.” In Saudi Arabia and the other states governed by this repressive code, the penalty for such a crime can be death…..
WITHOUT reservation, this investigative journalist warned the readers: Obama Inc., via Eric Holder’s (in)Justice Dept. (in concert with his replacement), has already laid the groundwork for implementing blasphemy laws, even if called otherwise. A pig is still a pig, even if prettified with lipstick. Sheesh. Believe it, or not.
CONCOMITANTLY, as previously explained, Shariah law’s bias against women goes far beyond what western women consider discriminatory, particularly as they continuously opine over fair and equitable pay in the workplace etc, even if their creds are not up to snuff. Regardless, as part of Shariah law, one would think that ACTUAL enslavement of women would be a non-starter for them! Okey dokey. Not so fast.
INCREDIBLY, leftist women are as insane as their male counterparts, at least when it comes to silencing any criticism of “sacred cows”, Islam being one of them. Resultant, they believe they can pick and choose which Shariah laws they will “tolerate”, as if they will have a choice to do so. Dumb asses. Once Islamic law becomes the “law of the land” there will be no going back. Understood?
NOW Islamic countries are free (that’s an oxymoronic statement) to do what they wish within their boundaries and there isn’t a damn thing that westerners can do about it. But outraged folks can shout about Islam’s inhumane actions from the rooftops, and they can badger their reps to cease sending monies to anti-freedom offending countries.
CONSEQUENTIALLY, if one wants to visualize what handing over control to Shariah law jihadists entails, as dictated by appeasement-oriented westerners, well….
But even before the war he showed how much he loved terrorism – and Hamas’ Al Qassam Brigades:
In this cartoon on his page we get an impression of how well he adheres to supposed UNRWA standards of tolerance, peace and coexistence:
How about his opinion of the children that he teaches?
Here is a photo that reveals his view of children:
His caption is “The next generation of the elite.” Is that enough to get him fired? Come on, who are we kidding?
For those who are not offended by any of this, you have my sympathies. But maybe you are the type of person for whom this photo, that he also posted, is considered worse than incitement to murder…..
PAR for the course (and not the golf one), as an investigative journalist, shout outs in this direction from certain quarters are elicited for this and that. In return, quid pro quos ping-pong back and forth. Yes, this is the way info is developed – some of which is highly explosive – and occasionally never sees the light of day for various reasons.
BE that as it may, it is due to the above (having nothing to do with this blogger’s charming personality) that particular geo-political global Editors, in tandem with other investigative journalists, seek out this address. In this regard, once news of the Islamic State’s first American beheading reached the desks of the aforementioned Editors, more than one asked for an analysis. They were accommodated. But of special note was a “tag team” interview, in tandem with Dave Gaubatz, conductedat Inquisitr; a powerhouse global website based in the U.S. Yet, the question becomes: why is this even being noted? For damn good reason….
IT has been a recurrent thesis at this site (and the aforementioned contacts were the first to be apprised of its underlying basis) that the Islamist/Jihadi-in-Chief – a moniker which is well-earned – is in sync with Islamic jihad in general, whether from the Sunni or Shiaside. This is indisputable and the evidence is overwhelming.
NOT for nothing, it has also been a consistent charge: the Islamic State was strengthening in the Mid East sphere, well before Barack HUSSEIN Obama precipitously removed U.S. troops from Iraq. Why would he leave this opening, especially after so much U.S. blood and treasure was spilled to keep Iraq from imploding? Indeed, if one understands what constitutes geo-political knock-on effects, assuredly, the outcome was pre-ordained. Consequently, a tailwind was purposefully given to its ascendancy (via the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia), when he entered an illegal war in Libya aka Benghazigate, one which was designed to give legs up to his Brotherhood Mafia in Syria, Egypt and Iraq.
WITH the above background in mind, the stage was set for a full prong interview at Inquisitr. Of special added emphasis re today’s thesis: absolutely, the Islamist-in-Chief knew about the Islamic State’s rise; his admin became clued in to the fact that journalists/hostages were taken; and also knew where they were and that their fate would be beheading! Okay?
President Obama would have us believe Islam is truly the Religion of Peace. He condemned ISIS as completely un-Islamic when he spoke about their beheading of American journalist James Foley, before returning to the golf course to complete his round.
“So ISIL speaks for no religion. Their victims are overwhelmingly Muslim, and no faith teaches people to massacre innocents. No just God would stand for what they did yesterday, and for what they do every single day. ISIL has no ideology of any value to human beings. Their ideology is bankrupt. They may claim out of expediency that they are at war with the United States or the West, but the fact is they terrorize their neighbors and offer them nothing but an endless slavery to their empty vision, and the collapse of any definition of civilized behavior.”
Yet Obama, who openly declares his love for the Qur’an after studying Islam since his childhood, certainly should know Islam’s Holy Book actually encourages the behavior of ISIS.
Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”
The viewpoint of ISIS echos throughout the Islamic world. Mawlana Abul Ala Mawdudi, founder of Pakistan’s Islamic Fundamentalist Movement, which boasts hundreds of thousands of members, spoke openly and honestly about the religion of Islam.
“Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to destroy any government made by man. Islam doesn’t look for a nation to be in better condition than another nation. Islam doesn’t care about the land or who own the land. The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of mankind to the faith of Islam. Any nation or power in this world that tries to get in the way of that goal, Islam will fight and destroy.”
While we can always agree to disagree on religious interpretation, Obama has a history of deliberately distorting or misrepresenting the Qur’an, and he lied to the world with his ‘Islam Is The Religion Of Peace” comments after the Boston Marathon bombings. David Wood produced an absolutely outstanding video on Obama’s post-bombing comments and made of a mockery of the President’s dishonest speech about “Peaceful Islam.” Every single American needs to watch this video and find out for themselves about the never ending program of Islamic deception that goes all the way to the Oval Office of Barack Hussein Obama.
To further illuminate the difficult subjects we are discussing, we asked Israeli journalist Adina Kutnicki and American investigator and security specialist David Gaubatz to weigh in on the threat from ISIS and the expanding Islamist army.
Adina is an expert on the Muslim Brotherhood and her previous interview about the expansionist ideology of the organization sent shockwaves across the internet. Adina is an editor of several websites that examine the growing violence in the name of Islam, and she is the creator of a popular Israeli blog. Her insights into the conflict between Israel and the Islamic terrorists of Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority will give our readers an opportunity to find out the truth about the Middle East without the Israel bashing propaganda of the mainstream media.
Hamas executes a man they claim was an Israeli collaborator. He received no trial and his body was dragged through the streets of Gaza after he was shot several times.
David Gaubatz is the author of a book about the Council on American–Islamic Relations and the Islamic infiltration of America, Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That’s Conspiring to Islamize America. Gaubatz is a U.S. State Department-trained Arabic linguist and a retired Federal Agent with the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI). With over three decades of combined experience, his career has led him on missions spanning the Middle East — from Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Kuwait to Iraq. As a Special Federal Agent, he has received the highest forms of U.S. security clearances for top-secret intelligence information — including for weapons of mass destruction and espionage — and has been briefed into many black projects.
Since leaving the government, Mr.Gaubatz has dedicated himself to exposing the Islamists who are infiltrating our nation at the highest levels. He is the Director of the Mapping Shariah Project, one of the few organizations willing to speak openly about Islam’s subversive activities in America. The project was funded by the Center for Security Policy to investigate what was being taught at Mosques across the United States. The information uncovered by Mr. Gaubatz and his investigators will frighten and outrage most freedom loving Americans, while the apologists for Islam will ignore every fact and scream Islamophobe until our ears bleed.
We can no longer afford to disregard the Islamic aspect of the violence we are witnessing in the Middle East, Asia and Africa. Nor can we ignore the constant agitation in the name of Allah we are witnessing from Muslim immigrants across the continent of Europe, complete with a 350 percent increase in attacks on Jews in 2014 and the growth of major Muslim no-go zones in many of Europe’s major cities.
Perhaps some of us prefer to ignore the chaos we are witnessing in our world today or write it off as an insignificant threat. If that is your opinion, consider the following facts. While it would still be a serious problem for the world at large, even if Islamists were just terrorists and numbered only in the thousands, most reports indicate that about 15 percent or about 200 million Muslims are radicalized and support organizations like ISIS, Hamas, al Qaeda, and Hezbollah. Even among so-called Moderate Muslims, support for Sharia Law, along with all of its draconian punishments that include stoning, amputation of limbs and the death penalty for leaving Islam, is alarmingly high, surpassing 80 percent in Egypt, Jordan and Pakistan.
Now, after six years of President Obama doing everything in his power to promote a positive image of Islam, while absolutely refusing to acknowledge the violent expansionist ideology and the obscene hostility to so-called Infidels openly voiced by many Muslims in the 57 Islamic nations, we are faced with an Islamic army of 20,000 well trained fighters armed with modern heavy weapons and assets of over one billion dollars. They control large portions of Iraq and have made considerable advances into Libya and Syria.
While criticism of Islam may not be a popular subject among the political elite, we can no longer afford to pretend Islamists are not a threat to the entire human race. How many more people must die at the hands of Jihadists, who read chapter and verse from the Qur’an as they behead and crucify, before our leaders stop lying to us and speak the truth about the expansionist goals of Islam? How many more Christians will join the millions already living in fear wherever Muslims are in the majority? How many more nations will be consumed by chaos by people waving a Qur’an before our duplicitous leaders finally acknowledge the elephant in the room?
While the outlook may be glum and uncertain, I have invited two acknowledged experts on Political Islam, Sharia Law and Jihad to join the discussion and provide information and answers. We will begin with David Gaubatz, followed by our friend from the Holy Land, Adina Kutnicki……
Wolff Bachner: Before we begin, I would like to thank you for your service to our country, your unwavering support for the Jewish state of Israel and your courageous work to bring the truth about Islam and Jihad to the public. While the elitists and apologists do their damnedest to hide and suppress any criticism of Islam, you refuse to be silenced and continue to expose the authentic Qur’anic roots of the modern Islamists with their many millions of supporters throughout the Muslim world and their endless religious violence.
Sadly, the shedding of innocent blood has increased to frightening levels recently, and we must begin our discussion by telling our readers about the terrible fate of James Foley and the inexcusable, pathetic response of President Obama.
As soon as the news broke that James Foley had been beheaded by ISIS, Obama interrupted his golf game to go on TV and claim that he ordered a secret special-ops rescue mission that failed several weeks before the murder of Foley.
Why would any Commander-in-Chief reveal a failed rescue mission at any time, no less when there are still live American hostages in the hands of ISIS?
Do you believe there actually was a rescue mission or is Obama trying to cover his butt for his abject failure to recognize and deal with the threat of ISIS?
As former military man and security expert with years of experience in Iraq and impeccable connections, do you have any concrete evidence that Obama is lying about the rescue mission?
David Gaubatz: If this question were posed to me when any other President was in charge I would take the word of the President. Obama is different. It has been shown over and over that Obama is a pathological liar. Obama is narcissistic. I have thought about this issue for a while and have went back and forth analyzing the pros and cons of releasing information about a failed rescue mission.
Based on my prior years working in the Department of Defense, a mission of this category would have been classified ‘Top Secret’. The utmost care is used by U.S. Security professionals (and I believe even more so by Israeli Counter-terrorism professionals) to safeguard the intelligence pertaining to rescue missions. I can’t imagine any reason to broadcast a failed rescue mission. Even more so that the hostage takers are Islamic based terrorists.
I am positive that based on my own experience in hostage rescue missions in the Middle East there were CIA and DOD counter-terrorism professionals who developed excellent rescue plans to secure the release of James Foley. They would have made very specific plans and would have put a timeline on each action that needed to be carried out. With most U.S. National Security matters Obama is slow in reviewing the plans, made significant changes to the original plan presented to him, and failed to carry out the mission by the timeframe the counter-terrorism planners had advised. Obama has routinely been behind the curve on reacting to security issues.
It is likely he did approve a rescue plan for Foley, but per the norm he second guessed the intelligence officials and had someone like Eric Holder (U.S. Attorney General) adjust the plan to make it more pleasing to liberals. Obama would have also wanted to inflict the least amount of damage to the Islamic captors and thus would have scaled down the amount of force, firepower, and personnel. After Obama and Holder changed the original plan, it would be stretching it to say Obama authorized any kind of true rescue mission. It was likely a failed mission from the start and few counter-terrorism professionals would have endorsed it, but Obama has put fear into the U.S. military’s top leaders and they would not openly voice their concerns because it would end their careers……{continuereading the whole gory truth….}
AS to the latest post interview (9/3/14) charges…..
IT is manifestly irrelevant who wielded the knife in each and every beheading, simply because assisting killing machines also entails affording them the freedom to continue unabated.
IF as a matter of U.S. law the Bastard-in-Chief is not technically a legal accomplice to murder, he (and his gangster regime) is indeed morally culpable and must be held accountable.
the fact of the matter is that too many RINOS are equally embedded. In other words, par for their “accommodating” course, they will hardly vote Conservative, especially on key issues. Forewarned.
THAT being the case, we must also recognize that the Islamist-in-Chief has admitted to the following (albeit through his mouthpieces), thus, he must be taken at his word:
MIND you, the Executive Branch must have Senate approval, as “equal partners”, to execute a “deal” with the genocidal mullahs. We know that. However, this is a Renegade-in-Chief who has bypassed Congress on key major policies, regardless of the accrued illegality. A Rogue-in-Chief.
Of course, over the last five years, the Obama administration has usurped unprecedented amounts of legislative power through the use of more than 150 unconstitutional executive decrees — far worse than the very real abuses perpetrated by his predecessors. On everything from gun control and “education” to “global warming” and energy — all areas that are constitutionally off-limits to Washington, D.C., even with legislation — the executive branch has stepped way outside the bounds of legitimate constitutional governance and into the realm of lawless tyranny. Last year alone, the Obama administration imposed more than 80,000 pages of new regulations on America. He also started a war without even informing Congress.
Instead of undoing the damage, however, Congress has allowed it all to happen. Despite some occasional rhetoric, lawmakers have even been providing taxpayer funding for the administration to implement its extreme and unlawful schemes. With a never-ending parade of major scandals, the public, of course, has had just about enough of the lawlessness, with more than two-thirds of Americans saying that the federal government is now “out of control” and threatening basic liberties. Surveys have even shown that a majority of voters support impeachment….
NO matter.
BUT to truly understand the unfolding nightmare(s), one must internalize two central and compelling factors: as stated, Barack HUSSEIN Obama views a “deal” with Iran as a central component to his second-term foreign policy, his legacy. Concomitantly, he will stop at NOTHING to get it done. Never forget this. You can hold this site accountable for its assessment.
IN tandem, losing face, via the most stinging rebuke to a second-term POTUS in decades, is a death-blow to his narcissistic personality. He is beyond inflamed. In essence, little is more dangerous, when compared to a narcissist’s rage, than a wounded ego, especially when feeling like a caged tiger. Yes, ego-driven to the max, narcissists will NEVER back down from their plans, and even more so when their power is threatened. Indeed, being foisted into the minority – no less, with a stinging rebuke from the “unwashed masses” – causes said dangerously afflicted personality to lash out in uncontrollable fury.
EVER more urgent, this site has accrued much evidence to point the readers where Barack HUSSEIN Obama is heading in regard to Iran, the west’s GLOBAL horror show. The following is just a small recap, amassed from many citations within this site:
Recap One:
YES, the Islamist-in-Chief has been shielding Iran, Islam, and this is no longer up for debate.
The leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee groused in public yesterday about the way the Iran talks are proceeding with little public accountability. Both Democratic Chair Senator Robert Menendez and ranking Republican Bob Corker expressed dismay about the way the supposedly finite period for negotiations with Iran had effortlessly transitioned into injury time with every possibility that the four-month period could be extended again in November. There was no appetite on the committee for a rerun of the bruising and losing fight Menendez waged against the administration on behalf of tougher sanctions on Iran in order to strengthen the West’s hand in the talks. Yet the frustration about the P5+1 process is clear…..
Recap Two:
MOST significantly, we must get to the heart of the Shia axis within his anti-American regime; Valerie Jarrett. A clear and present danger.
Valerie Jarrett is Barack Obama’s closest adviser.
According to Barack Obama himself, no presidential decision is made without her, creating what amounts to a co-presidency shared between Obama and Valerie Jarrett. According to insiders, she is often seen walking the halls of the White House late into the night, being dubbed “The Night Stalker” by Obama’s Secret Service detail.
But this “Night Stalker” moniker may mean more than sneaking into Obama’s chambers to secretly discuss what the “co-presidency” is planning. The “Night Stalker” may be planning the destruction of a country she abhors: the United States.
Watch this groundbreaking video to learn of the claim that Jarrett was behind the botched plan to kidnap ambassador Chris Stevens on September 11, 2012, as part of a plan to eventually destroy the United States!
IN reality, as night follows day, Valerie Jarrett is the main deal maker with Iran’s genocidal mullahs via her mobbed up familial connections to their top leadership! Say it ain’t so…
That being said, a starting point was documented, one which included Valerie Jarrett’s crimes against America and Israel in particular and the west in general.
IN light of all the above, plus so much more, does anyone in their sane mind want to give the mullahs the path, the freedom, to detonate a nuclear mushroom cloud over Israel, as well as the ability to do so inside America and beyond? And until they decide to actively EXPLODE their nukes they will – for a certainty – use their WMD status to blackmail the west into suicidal policies!
INDEED, a dangling nuclear sword. What could go wrong? Be worse?
AS a foretaste, just consider their decades of murderous jihad across the globe – mainly via Hezbollah, their proxy arm and Iran’s revolutionary Al Quds force – and this was without a WMD protective umbrella!
MORE specifically, one might query: hasn’t Barack HUSSEIN Obama thought of the above dangers? Rhetorical.
OMINOUSLY, it is precisely due to Iran’s aims to destroy the west (with or without their Sunni Brotherhood partners) that the Jihadi-in-Chief is strengthening them. The point being, Jarrett, as his point woman, his hatchet, is key!
SECOND-term…coming full circle…the west is on notice!
EVERYWHERE one turns the Jihadi-in-Chief is busy propping up Islamic jihad. The essence of this charge sheet surpasses even the highest burden of proof in U.S. criminal law via onus probandi…clear and convincing…beyond a reasonable doubt. Beyond the pale too. One can imagine, in the mind’s eye, Barack HUSSEIN Obama giving fist bumps all around, plus more of the same with high fives. No exaggeration.
AND for the actual record, if not for the Jihadi-in-Chief’s insistence (what’s the Bastard-in-Chief’s game plan??) in arming the Sunni “rebels”, Al Qaeda and its offshoots (Islamic State in toto) would not be recipients of America’s weaponry largess!
NOW whether the barbarism involves Al Qaeda, Islamic State, Boko Haram, Hamas, PA/PLO, PIJ, Hezbollah et al., it matters not a whit. They are one and the same – offshoots of the global Muslim Brotherhood Mafia – as are the Shia factions, even though often at odds while they fight for hegemonic rule. Regardless, pay no mind to their inner Muslim cockfighting! And the following was posited when Iraq’s implosion commenced, and it is in line with today’s thesis:
Mind you, while some Americans (other westerners too) understand the geo-political gravity of the situation, the fact of the matter is that this American-Israeli understands what is taking place, not just from an overall geo-political perspective, but from one whose own borders are, to a maximum degree, threatened. And so much more.
Such is the hyper-induced case with Hamas and ISIS, as ISIS is planning a key role ( ‘s), on the Brotherhood’s behalf, in Hamas’s war against Israel. In fact, they are already doing so, but more on the “down-low.”
Trenchantly, the facts on the ground are visible for all who wish to live in reality, juxtaposed against believing lullabies recited by deceitful leaders. Pay heed:
“The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has asked the Palestinians to be patient and stressed that the group will come to fight the “barbaric Jews”.
In a statement released on Twitter, through an account affiliated to the ISIS, it stated that it was aware of the “massacre” of Muslims in Gaza.
“As for the massacres taking place in Gaza against the Muslim men, women and children, then the Islamic State will do everything within its means to continue striking down every apostate who stands as an obstacle on its paths towards Palestine,” the group said.
The statement from ISIS seems to be a response to critics who have questioned why the group and its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi aren’t coming in support of the Palestinians.
Replying to that, the statement said: “It is not the manner of the Islamic State to throw empty, dry and hypocritical words of condemnation and condolences like the Arab tawaghit do in the UN and Arab League.” The ISIS militants instead promised that actions speak louder than words…..
“It is only matter of time and patience before it (Islamic State) reaches Palestine to fight the barbaric Jews and kill those of them hiding behind the gharqad trees – the trees of the Jews,” the statement concluded.
Earlier this month, the ISIS spokesperson had stated that while Palestine was an important agenda, but before taking on Israel it wants to consolidate its position in north.
According to Israel National news, ISIS spokesperson Nidal Nuseiri reaffirmed that group’s priority was conquering “Bayt el-Maqdis” [Jerusalem] and destroying the State of Israel. He noted that it was the central agenda of their “jihad”.
#IS #ISIS The Islamic State’s comment on Gaza in Dabiq Issue #2: pic.twitter.com/cDGt6o3D2Q
— أبو مصطفى الأنباري(@amustafaanbari1) July 29, 2014
While ISIS has claimed that it has no plans as of now for Israel, a recent video released on YouTube claimed an Islamic State fighter group has been formed in Palestine.
IPSO facto, the fact that the Jihadi-in-Chief is up to his neck with Brotherhood operatives in his administration, one must deduce that his assistance to one benefits them all.
An Egyptian magazine has claimed that six American Islamist activists who work with the Obama administration are Muslim Brotherhood operatives who enjoy strong influence over U.S. policy.
The December 22 story was published in Egypt’s Rose El-Youssef magazine and was translated into English for the Investigative Project on Terrorism (IPT). The story suggests the six turned the White House “from a position hostile to Islamic groups and organizations in the world to the largest and most important supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood.”
The story is largely unsourced, but its publication is considered significant in raising the issue to Egyptian readers, IPT said.
The six named people include: Arif Alikhan, assistant secretary of Homeland Security for policy development; Mohammed Elibiary, a member of the Homeland Security Advisory Council; Rashad Hussain, the U.S. special envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference; Salam al-Marayati, co-founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC); Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA); and Eboo Patel, a member of President Obama’s Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships.
Abdul Jalil al-Sharnubi, a former Brotherhood leader, made his statements during a satellite interview on the Arabic language program “New Evening” with journalist Jamal ‘Anayat.
His point was that the revelation that al-Baghdadi was in the Brotherhood should be no surprise. To make his point, he even added that “established lawyers and doctors [from the ranks of the Muslim Brotherhood] were among the first to volunteer to fight [for the Islamic State].”
More diplomatically but making the same point, Egyptian Minister of Religious Endowments (Awqaf), Dr. Muhammad Mukhtar Gom‘a earlier said that the fact that al-Baghdadi was with the Brotherhood proves “that the Brotherhood is the spiritual father to every extremist group.”
AS to the charge that the Islamist-in-Chief is demanding a “soft” hand against the Islamic State and to show “restraint”, what more needs to be said re his allegiances?
Reuters reports that Nigerian troops used “jets and helicopters to bombard targets in their biggest offensive since the Boko Haram group launched a revolt almost four years ago.”
The situation in northeast Nigeria has become so bad that President Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency there days ago.
Since that time, as Nigeria has used jets and helicopters to try to rein the Islamists in, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry says he has “credible evidence” that Nigeria has committed “human rights violations” in retaliating against the Islamists.
Kerry said he condemns “Boko Haram’s campaign of terror in the strongest terms,” but he wants Nigeria to show “restraint” in their response.
IN the main, one must understand that many forces are at play, in regard to Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s helping hands to Islam. Extrapolating therein, his fealty to jihad is both demonstrable and overwhelming.
FIRST and foremost, to aid his Caliphate-driven brothers and sisters, the Mid East (and beyond) must be set alight. As of now, his actions (and lack thereof) have been wildly successful. Atta jihadi…
MOREOVER, their inroads into America had to be strengthened, and this too has been a resounding achievement via their leading patron, at least for Shariah law advocates. But in the midst of all this chaos, one must internalize where Israel fits in.
BASICALLY, there has been no greater enemy to Israel than Obama. So when one carefully weaves together the threads one can view the emerging patterns very clearly. To wit, aside from the “Big Satan”, the “Little Satan” is the Brotherhood’s main target. Therefore, the question becomes: is there any way that their goals are out of sync? Not in a pig’s eye.
Appearing on “Justice with Judge Jeanine” on the Fox News Channel, Trump blasted the administration’s “concessions” to Iran and its relationship with the Jewish state.
“Probably, maybe from the beginning, there has never been a greater enemy to Israel than Barack Obama. It’s incredible the way he treats them, the way he’s speaking to them. I think he treats our known enemies much better.” said Trump.
Pirro noted that U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice had walked out ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu’s speech to the global body, and an unnamed administration official had referred to Netanyahu as “chickensh*t.”
“Why would they call him that?” asked Pirro.
Trump replied, “Look, they don’t like him and they don’t like Israel … [Obama’s] the worst thing that has ever happened to Israel. Now what’s going to happen is, the way it’s going, Iran will have a nuclear weapon. And it’s very close. As soon as that happens it’s a whole new ball game.”
MOST significantly, if the U.S. (west) dealt with Hitler in the same “restrained” manner, suffice to say that Americans (Europeans) would still be under Nazi rule, regardless of the passage of time. For when the mantle of leadership of the free world aligns with the most retrograde and barbaric forces known to man (Islam and Nazism), rest assured, the result is “pre-ordained”.
He who becomes compassionate to the cruel will ultimately become cruel to the compassionate. – Midrash Rabba, Ecclesiastes 7:16…קֹהֶלֶת.
Hillary at Dar al-Hekma University in 2010 with mobbed up Sisterhood leader Saleha Abedin (left). Huma Abedin, Hillary’s deputy COS (Saleha’s daughter) and Hillary (right).
NOW the overall dangers to America are the same, be it Kerry or Hill leading the cesspool. Yes, one is fonder of Iran’s Shia Islamists, while the other is kissy face with Sunni jihadists. Pick your anti-American poison. Moreover, both heads at State (under Obama Inc.) are one part Islamist-loving, another part radically leftist imbued. Equally precipitous dangers.
INTRINSICALLY, if State implemented pro-American policies it would be totally shocking. Additionally, most of us are well aware that the Brotherhood Mafia underwrites Hamas and attendant jihadi arms. Agreed.
IN this regard, irrespective of murderous jihad perpetrated by the PA/Hamas terror entity, State’s mouthpieces can’t bring themselves to identify them for what they truly are; Islamic killers! Instead, protecting them like patrons are wont to do, State’s reps become their willing accomplices. Yes, they are.
Based on her previous performances, it means the reports are correct. Had they not been, Psaki would have had no trouble setting the record straight. For a State Department spokesman not to know the details surrounding the death of a Palestinian-American boy in the West Bank that made international news is ridiculous.
As she appeared to be hopelessly hoping that everyone would buy her ignorance, Lee delivered a roundhouse kick with a follow-up, in which he asked Psaki to respond to reports that a Hamas headband was on Hammad’s head during his funeral. Psaki, who was visibly agitated at the prospect of it being blatantly obvious her claims of ignorance equated to a tacit admission that the reports were correct, proceeded to plead ignorance… again.
On top of all that, Psaki says the kid was not a terrorist:
Not only have the White House and the State Department refused to condemn Abbas for soliciting the murder of Jews. They have praised him and attacked Israel and its elected leader. In other words, they are not merely doing nothing, they are actively rewarding Abbas’s aggression, and so abetting it.
Since Abbas called for Palestinians to kill Jews, the White House and State Department have accused Israel of diminishing the prospect of peace by refusing to make massive concessions to Abbas. The concessions the Americans are demanding include accepting the ethnic cleansing of all Jews from land they foresee becoming part of a future Palestinian state; denying Jews the rights to their lawfully held properties in predominantly Arab neighborhoods; and abrogating urban planning procedures in Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem built within the areas of the city that Israel took control over from Jordan in 1967…..
WHICH brings us back to the diminishing of America through assorted Fed agencies, and with the indignity of Islamist-loving Kerry wagging his bony (Patrician) fingers in Israel’s direction….may they break in the process…
Kerry’s remarks, which appeared to lay the blame for the rise of the ISIS terrorist army in Iraq and Syria squarely on Israel, are but the latest in a series of controversial comments made by America’s top diplomat that seem to highlight the Obama administration’s growing hostility toward the Jewish state.
Speaking at a ceremonial State Department dinner commemorating the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha, Kerry implied that Israel’s refusal to concede to Palestinian demands were helping ISIS recruit new fighters.
“As I went around and met with people in the course of our discussions,” Kerry told his Muslim audience, “there wasn’t a leader I met with in the region who didn’t raise with me spontaneously the need to try to get peace between Israel and the Palestinians, because it was a cause of recruitment and of street anger and agitation that they felt” Kerry averred.
Israel’s reaction to Kerry’s remarks came quickly and harshly. Trade Minister Naftali Bennett said global terrorism would be fueled far more by Kerry’s foolish remarks than by a strong Israel.
“Even when a British Muslim beheads a British Christian”, said Bennett, “there will always be someone who blames the Jews,” “The assertion that the absence of peace between Israel and the Palestinians is helping the Islamic State group provides a tail wind to support global terrorism.”
Handlers for the famously thin-skinned Kerry were quickly dispatched to attack the motives of his critics while denying the Secretary of State even said what he was recorded as saying.
The State Department’s assistant spokesperson Marie Harf lashed out at Bennett, claiming Kerry’s “comments were taken out of context for political reasons,” by the Israeli minister she said, or they were “distorted” by him “for political reasons.”
The secretary general of the PLO quickly seized on Kerry’s comments by by announcing that the Palestinian Authority was “ready to work with the American administration to implement different levels of the strategic direction announced by Kerry,” Yasser Abed Rabbo told the AFP. “Linking the fight against terrorism and the end of the Israeli occupation is a strategic position that we support.”
Just this past April, Kerry created a major controversy with his risible claim that Israel risked “becoming an apartheid state” if the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did quickly concede to President Obama’s insistence, that in accordance with Palestinian demands, Israel withdraw its borders to the 1949 armistice lines.
Kerry’s usage of the tactic long deployed by Israel’s enemies to delegitimize the Jewish state by equating it with the former racist all white government of South Africa was so roundly condemned that Kerry, despite being outraged that the media quoted his “off the record remarks,” nonetheless apologized.
Kerry’s ISIS comments further expose the Obama administration’s growing desperation to do anything to detract attention away from the world’s descent into geopolitical chaos.
Guileless though he may be, even John Kerry is not naive enough to think he can bludgeon Hamas into making even the cosmetic concessions needed to stage an ersatz signing ceremony at the White House.
All that seems left of the rather empty Obama-Kerry world-view, is all there ever was to begin with. Doing what must be done to keep bad news out of the news by appeasing whoever needs to be appeased, and capitulating to whoever can’t be pressured. Since groups like Hamas are always making demands and can never be pressured, the Obama-Kerry default position has been to appease Israel’s enemies by threatening to punish Israel.
Alas, appeasing terrorist groups like Hamas not only validates their terrorist tactics; it accelerates them. Since firing rockets at innocents got Hamas much of what it demanded, then surely, firing more rockets at more innocents will get Hamas still more of what it demands– which is to rule all of Israel’s land without any of its Jews.
SIMILARLY, the Sunni connection ratcheted up at State via Hill’s significant other, Huma Abedin, her Deputy COS. What a mobbed up operative she is, as demonstrated in multiple locations. Yes, Hill and Bill are equally penetrated. Hmm.
Penetration Exemplars, Though Not In A Positive Light!
AS to their Brotherhood creds, where to begin?
INHERENTLY, Huma is so jacked up that it is safe to state that Benghazigate lands at her feet. At Hill’s too.And while the buck stops at the Islamist-in-Chief’s door, the fact of the matter is that TOP Brotherhood spawn operated (still do) out of State, and Huma (Hill too) were their hostesses. Yup.
Abdullah Omar Naseef, is deeply connected to the Abedin family…she worked on the editorial board of a Saudi-financed Islamic think tank alongside an extremist accused of financing al-Qaida fronts… “they be” less than 3 degrees separated!
BOTTOM LINE: only a Jihadi-in-Chief would appoint a Sunni loving Hillary and a Shia loving John to preside at State; an agency whose anti-American, anti-Israel enmity is indisputable. Incontrovertible. Beyond contempt…its halls, under Barack HUSSEIN Obama, are worse than ANY past admins…a high bar to climb.
IF there is any justice in this world Obama Inc. will crumble and fall into the dustbin of history. Whatever it takes. Bring them down!
FIRSTLY, in order to tap into the recesses of leftist western guilt (that’s another sickness, but let’s not digress), thus, causing them to cower, one has to recognize that the ubiquitous “race card” always enters into the public sphere. The silencing. In other words, par for the course, whenever truths re Islam + terror + barbarism are linked, voilà, poof-like, one is tarred a racist! Even uber liberal Bill Maher is getting wiseto their hammer and tongs. Welcome to this investigative journalist’s non-appeasing worldview.
WELL, some die-hard leftists do come to their senses, albeit kicking and screaming, but usually after witnessing non stop barbarism under the banner of Islam.
In the main, let’s get this fact straight: Muslims are not a race. Period. They are a collection of many groups who happen to follow Islam; a political construct/quasi religion propped up under the banner of Shariah law. Yes, some are Arabs, some are Blacks, others are Whites and the rest come from almost every other background. Intrinsically, if Muslims are considered a race, so too are Christians and Jews. We all know this is not the case. Nonsense. Agreed, one can be anti all three religions, but not tarred a “racist” for said pronouncements.
FOR added heft, dispelling the myth, “Islam is a religion of peace”, is the west’s most pressing/urgent battle. All else flows from said premise. Piercing the veil. Once accomplished, the west can move forward on proving that Islam is a retrograde and anti-humane force; forcing women into sexual jihad AND sexual slavery. Both are equal sides to the same abomination which are sanctioned and hailed under Islam!
Could you please clarify for me something that has been troubling me for a while. This concerns the right of a man to have sexual relations with slave girls. Is this so? If it is then is the man allowed to have relations with her as well his wife/wives. Also, is it true that a man can have sexual relations with any number of slave girls and with their own wife/wives also? I have read that Hazrat Ali had 17 slave girls and Hazrat Umar also had many. Surely if a man were allowed this freedom then this could lead to neglecting the wife’s needs. Could you also tell clarify whether the wife has got any say in this matter.
Praise be to Allaah.Islam allows a man to have intercourse with his slave woman, whether he has a wife or wives or he is not married.A slave woman with whom a man has intercourse is known as a sariyyah (concubine) from the word sirr, which means marriage.This is indicated by the Qur’aan and Sunnah, and this was done by the Prophets. Ibraaheem (peace be upon him) took Haajar as a concubine and she bore him Ismaa’eel (may peace be upon them all).Our Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) also did that, as did the Sahaabah, the righteous and the scholars. The scholars are unanimously agreed on that and it is not permissible for anyone to regard it as haraam or to forbid it. Whoever regards that as haraam is a sinner who is going against the consensus of the scholars.Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):“And if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphan girls then marry (other) women of your choice, two or three, or four; but if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one or (slaves) that your right hands possess. That is nearer to prevent you from doing injustice”….{Blogger’s note:read the whole thing…be prepared to vomit….}
FOR further Koranic confirmations and attributions….
Summary Answer:Islam neither ignores nor condemns slavery. In fact, a large part of the Sharia is dedicated to the practice.Muslims are encouraged to live in the way of Muhammad, who was a slave owner and trader. He captured slaves in battle. He had sex with his slaves. And he instructed his men to do the same. The Qur’an actually devotes more verses to making sure that Muslim men know they can keep women as sex slaves (4) than it does to telling them to pray five times a day (0).
The Qur’an:Qur’an (33:50) – “O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those (slaves) whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee” This is one of several personal-sounding verses “from Allah” narrated by Muhammad – in this case allowing himself a virtually unlimited supply of sex partners. Other Muslims are restrained to four wives, but, following the example of their prophet, may also have sex with any number of slaves, as the following verse make clear:Qur’an (23:5-6) – “..who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or (the captives) whom their right hands possess…” This verse permits the slave-owner to have sex with his slaves. See also Qur’an (70:29-30). The Quran is a small book, so if Allah used valuable space to repeat the same point four times, then sex slavery must be very important to him.Qur’an (4:24) – “And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.” Even sex with married slaves is permissible.Qur’an (8:69) – “But (now) enjoy what ye took in war, lawful and good” A reference to war booty, of which slaves were a part. The Muslim slave master may enjoy his “catch” because (according to verse 71) “Allah gave you mastery over them.“Qur’an (24:32) – “And marry those among you who are single and those who are fit among your male slaves and your female slaves…” Breeding slaves based on fitness.Qur’an (2:178) – “O ye who believe! Retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the murdered; the freeman for the freeman, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female.” The message of this verse, which prescribes the rules of retaliation for murder, is that all humans are not created equal. The human value of a slave is less than that of a free person (and a woman’s worth is also distinguished from that of a man’s).Qur’an (16:75) – “Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favours from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah.” Yet another confirmation that the slave is is not equal to the master. In this case it is plain that the slave owes his status to Allah’s will. (According to 16:71, the owner should be careful about insulting Allah by bestowing Allah’s gifts on slaves – those whom the god of Islam has not favored).
From the Hadith:Bukhari (80:753) – “The Prophet said, ‘The freed slave belongs to the people who have freed him.'” Bukhari (52:255) – The slave who accepts Islam and continues serving his Muslim master will receive a double reward in heaven.Bukhari (41.598) – Slaves are property. They cannot be freed if an owner has outstanding debt, but can be used to pay off the debt.Bukhari (62:137) – An account of women taken as slaves in battle by Muhammad’s men after their husbands and fathers were killed. The woman were raped with Muhammad’s approval.Bukhari (34:432) – Another account of females taken captive and raped with Muhammad’s approval. In this case it is evident that the Muslims intend on selling the women after raping them because they are concerned about devaluing their price by impregnating them. Muhammad is asked about coitus interruptus.Bukhari (47.765) – A woman is rebuked by Muhammad for freeing a slave girl. The prophet tells her that she would have gotten a greater heavenly reward by giving her to a relative (as a slave).Bukhari (34:351) – Muhammad sells a slave for money. He was thus a slave trader.Bukhari (72:734) – Some contemporary Muslims in the West, where slavery is believed to be a horrible crime, are reluctant to believe that Muhammad owned slaves. This is just one of many places in the Hadith where a reference is made to a human being owned by Muhammad. In this case, the slave is of African descent.Muslim 3901 – Muhammad trades away two black slaves for one Muslim slave.Muslim 4112 – A man freed six slaves on the event of his death, but Muhammad reversed the emancipation and kept four in slavery to himself. He cast lots to determine which two to free.
Bukhari (47:743) – Muhammad’s own pulpit – from which he preached Islam – was built with slave labor on his command.
Bukhari (59:637) – “The Prophet sent Ali to Khalid to bring the Khumus (of the booty) and I hated Ali, and Ali had taken a bath (after a sexual act with a slave-girl from the Khumus). I said to Khalid, ‘Don’t you see this (i.e. Ali)?’ When we reached the Prophet I mentioned that to him. He said, ‘O Buraida! Do you hate Ali?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘Do you hate him, for he deserves more than that from the Khumlus.'” Muhammad approved of his men having sex with slaves, as this episode involving his son-in-law, Ali, clearly proves. This hadith refutes the modern apologists who pretend that slaves were really “wives,” since Muhammad had forbidden Ali from marrying another woman as long as Fatima (his favorite daughter) was living.
Abu Dawud (2150) – “The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives. Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Qur’an 4:24) ‘And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess.'” This is the background for verse 4:24 of the Qur’an. Not only does Allah grant permission for women to be captured and raped, but allows it to even be done in front of their husbands. (See also Muslim 3432 & Ibn Kathir/Abdul Rahman Part 5 Page 14)
Abu Dawud 1814 – “…[Abu Bakr] He then began to beat [his slave] him while the Apostle of Allah (pbuh) was smiling and saying: Look at this man who is in the sacred state (putting on ihram), what is he doing?” The future first caliph of Islam is beating his slave for losing a camel while Muhammad looks on in apparent amusement.
Ibn Ishaq (734) – A slave girl is given a “violent beating” by Ali in the presence of Muhammad, who does nothing about it.
Abu Dawud 38:4458 – Narrated Ali ibn AbuTalib: “A slave-girl belonging to the house of the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) committed fornication. He (the Prophet) said: Rush up, Ali, and inflict the prescribed punishment on her. I then hurried up, and saw that blood was flowing from her, and did not stop. So I came to him and he said: Have you finished inflicting (punishment on her)? I said: I went to her while her blood was flowing. He said: Leave her alone till her bleeding stops; then inflict the prescribed punishment on her. And inflict the prescribed punishment on those whom your right hands possess (i.e. slaves)”. A slave girl is ordered by Muhammad to be beaten until she bleeds, and then beaten again after the bleeding stops. He indicates that this is prescribed treatment for slaves (“those whom your right hand possesses”).
Ibn Ishaq (693) – “Then the apostle sent Sa-d b. Zayd al-Ansari, brother of Abdu’l-Ashal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons.” Muhammad trades away women captured from the Banu Qurayza tribe to non-Muslim slave traders for property. (Their men had been executed after surrendering peacefully without a fight).
Umdat al-Salik (Reliance of the Traveller) (o9.13) – According to Sharia, when a child or woman is taken captive by Muslims, they become slaves by the mere fact of their capture. A captured woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled…..{read the whole dastardly Koranic “justifications”….}
AS to the absolute incompatibility of Islam’s inclusion into western norms/nations, one must also internalize where it presently stands, as opposed to the rest of the west: Muslim leaders/ethos are stuck in the 7th century, whereas the west is living in the 21st. And this is where the clash of civilizations ensues; its battle grounds.
BASICALLY, America left behind its own dark history of slavery through the realization that its blight cast a long shadow on its presumed ideals. Resultant, its people entered into a bitter Civil War to abolish what had become man’s inhumanity to man. And along with said enlightenment came a national understanding of the evils attributed to enslavement.
Islam, on the other hand, teaches no such ability for self or national reflection. As is said, this is where the rubber meets the road. BUT if a visual aid is required to shed the harshest light where Islam stands on a core human rights issue, pay heed to the following presentation. It is eye opening and jaw dropping, but no less true. It aligns the nexus between the mindset of Islam and Nazi socialism via their usage of propaganda machines and their anti-western hatred; the main “meeting of the minds” between the reds and greens!
REGARDLESS of all else, the Jihadi-in-Chief, the heretofore leader of the free world, has done little to thwart the Islamic State and attendant Islamic global aspirations. To wit, he has little issue with their barbaric enslavement, even as he blah, blahs over women’s rights issues. For the record, he facilitated their rise. The proofs are beyond reproach.
AND while many are doing their parts on the bloody battlefield to stop Islam in its tracks, others are busy beating them back via the sphere of public opinion and informing the public with the most updated info available.
ASSUREDLY, it is this site’s “sacred” mission to lead in this regard, hopefully, making a dent in the process.
Hassan Shibly, Nihad Awad, Zair Shakir, Kifah Mustafa and Siraj Wahhaj (clock-wise from left). All are radical Islamists who have been associated with CAIR.
MANY of us are familiar with the concept of “good cop/bad cop”, but some of us are better attuned to these matters than others. Be that as it may, in general, life-saving info is often gleaned from some very bad suspects by adopting varying stealth tactics, intel which would otherwise remain hidden. That’s just the way it is, whether the PC thought police believe this or that is too harsh, even when dealing with stone cold killers. Bleeding hearts….but never for the victims.
MORE specifically, the following is additional “bull’s eye” proof:
WHEN a jihadi group, CAIR, is the “go to” address for U.S. law enforcement, is it any wonder they feel free to issue hit lists? Patience, dear readers…
I receive internal emails from the ADAMS Center,ADAMS CENTER ISLAMIC ORGANIZATION SITEThe Executives of the ADAMS Center are very closely aligned with CAIR National. CAIR Executives often flip flop and join one another’s terrorist supporting organization. The ADAMS Center and CAIR National have previously been investigated and/or raided by the FBI. Why would the FBI recruit from Islamic terror organzations for sensitive positions, such as FBI Special Agents and FBI Analysts. The positions require a Top Secret clearance.
The answer is there is no good reason to recruit from terrorist organizations and supporters of terrorist. FBI Special Agent Amylynn Errera, Washington Field Office sent the email to Farooq Syed, ADAMS Center. Farooq then forwarded the email about FBI positions to members of their internal group of supporters. I was provided a copy by a source.
The FBI sends these job opening to Islamic terror supporters, yet I would make a multi-million dollar bet that no one from the Tea Party, ACT For America, and dozens of other conservative groups are provided an up front notice of sensitive job positions in the FBI. There are good people within the FBI, but the majority are not properly trained in regards to Islamic terrorism issues. Then there are some who knowingly have relationships with organizations that pose a threat to our national security.
The ADAMS Center has previously been raided for their support of terrorism (RAID ON ADAMS CENTER). I encourage readers to contact Special Agent Amylynn Errera and ask her why Islamic terror supporters (per the FBI’s own allegations) are being recruited for TOP SECRET positions within the FBI. Her contact information is at the bottom of the email she sent to the ADAMS Center.
U.S. government employees are paid their salaries by American taxpayers. They are not above the law and must answer to the American people.
AND additional direct evidence is from another close contact of this investigative journalist, Tom Trento, who just happened to make the hit list, as verified below. Yes, he agreed to a corroborative “outing” at this site from its inception, as has Dave Gaubatz. Bless their patriotic hearts…their assistance…
According to the website, “Islamophobia is closed-minded prejudice against or hatred of Islam and Muslims. An Islamophobe is an individual who holds a closed-minded view of Islam and promotes prejudice against or hatred of Muslims.”
The problem with such an assertion is nicely summed up by Ned May of the International Civil Liberties Alliance (ICLA) when he said that to use the term “Islamophobia” is “a violation of logic.”
He blasted the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) in 2013 saying that the word “fails solely to inclusion of the word ‘unfounded.’ Thus, well-founded fear, mistrust or hatred of Islam does not constitute Islamophobia.”
He also went on to point out, “Millions of non-Muslims have very real reasons to fear Islam and Muslim violence, and cannot reasonably be described as ‘Islamophobes,” he said. “Furthermore, any investigation into the fear of Islam, is denounced as ‘Islamophobia.’ Thus, the definition of Islamophobia is circular, a violation of logic.”
This doesn’t stop the irrational members of CAIR, who follow the murderous founder of Islam, Mohamed. The CAIR site also claims that it envisions “a time when being Muslim carries a positive connotation and Islam has an equal place among many faiths in America’s pluralistic society.”
Sorry, but Islam does not deserve an “equal” place among many faiths. In fact, the Bible teaches the only true faith. Jesus said He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life and that no man comes to the Father but by Him. He doesn’t make room for “other” faiths. There is no king, but King Jesus!
Let’s consider the closed-mindedness of Islam. Their own book shows that they are against Christians and all infidels (non-Muslim believers. Their own history demonstrates that they believe they are superior and that they have the right to destroy all those who will not name the name of Allah and recognize the demonically possessed, thieving murderer Mohamed as a true prophet. Here’s what CAIR is really all about. Trust me, you will want to watch this.
Funny, I don’t see Corkins’ name on the SPLC hate list, do you? He’s their poster boy one would think. After all, he didn’t do what he did out of love, did he? He did it out of… hate.
Here’s the list given by Hamas-CAIR at their website. Your’s truly apparently didn’t make the cut for some odd reason, but plenty of others did, and God has given them a place to speak out against the Mohammedan death cult.
Ali Sina A member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations, Sina believes, “there is NOTHING good in Islam and that it is all evil.”
Allen West A former Republican member of the U.S. House of Representatives. Allen believes, “Islam does not coexist.”…
Ashraf Rameleh A member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations. When speaking about the September 11th attacks he said “they are not terrorists, they are jihad. They are for the Quran.”
Babu Suseelani a member of the board of directors of Stop Islamization of Nations. In 2012 Suseelan told an audience “If we do not kill the bacteria, the bacteria will kill us. Muslims will breed like rats and they will be a majority.”…
Brigitte Gabriel The head of Act for America. Gabriel has said, “America and the West are doomed to failure in this war unless they stand up and identify the real enemy: Islam.”……
Clare Lopez Lopez is the vice president for issues and analysis at the Center for Security Policy. She also a board member at the Clarion Project. In 2013, Lopez told an audience, “When people in other bona fide religions follow their doctrines they become better people — Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, Jews. When Muslims follow their doctrine, they become jihadists.”……
David Horowitz The founder of the David Horowitz Freedom Center. The Southern Poverty Law Center, a group that tracks hate in the United States, names Horowitz “the godfather of the modern anti-Muslim movement.”
David Yerushalmi A co-founder of the American Freedom Law Center and employee of the Center for Security Policy. Yerushalmi beleives, “Our greatest enemy today is Islam.”….
Frank Gaffney The founder and president of the Center for Security Policy. Gaffney is also connected to the Washington Times, and Clarion Project. Gaffney has advocated renewing the House Un-American Activities Committee, a discredited McCarthy-era congressional committee that President Truman once described as “the most un-American thing in the country today.”
Glenn Beck Beck hosts the Glenn Beck show on the Blaze. In February, 2011, Beck hosted anti-Muslim speaker Joel Richardson on his Fox News program and the two “tied Islam to the Antichrist in the new testament.”….
John Guandolo The founder of Understanding the Threat. Guandolo is a former FBI agent who trains law enforcement officers to believe in conspiracy theories such as his beleif that CIA Director Brennan is a secret Muslim…..
Kamal Saleem A board member of Former Muslims United. In October 2012, Right Wing Watch posted a video of Saleem and noted that in that video, “Saleem alleged that Obama’s top speech writer and Sasha and Malia’s babysitter are both Islamic fundamentalists that are wielding secret power.”……
Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) A Minnesota Republican, Bachmann is a member of the U.S. House of Representatives. In June 2012, Bachmann led a group of House Republicans on a series of five letters to federal inspectors alleging that the Muslim Brotherhood was infiltrating the U.S. government. The allegations primarily centered on an aide to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and were soundly rejected by Republican leadership…….
Nonie Darwish A founder of Former Muslims United. Darwish asserts that “Islam should be fought and should be conquered and defeated and annihilated.”
Pamela Geller The caustic mouthpiece of the U.S. Islamophobia network, Geller believes, “Hitler was inspired by Islam.”She blogs at Atlas Shrugs and is a leader with the American Freedom Defense Initiative, Jihad Watch, and Stop the Islamization of Nations. Note: Geller also heads Stop Islamization of America, but this entity is identified as an AFDI project.
Rep. Peter King (R-.N.Y.) Peter King represents a district centered in New York’s, Long Island. He served as chairman of the U.S. House Homeland Security Committee from 2010-2012. King has maintained that “80%, 85% of the mosques in this country are controlled by Islamic fundamentalists,” and that average Muslims “are loyal,” but “don’t come forward, they don’t tell the police what they know”. Additionally in 2007, Representative King said, “Unfortunately, we have too many mosques in this country.”
Robert Spencer A prolific member of the U.S. Islamophobia network, Spencer runs the Jihad Watch web site and is also connected with the David Horowitz Freedom Center, the American Freedom Defense Initiative, and Stop Islamization of Nations. Spencer has referred to Islam’s Prophet Muhammad as a “con man. Someone who is knowing [sic] that what he is saying is false, but is fooling his followers.” In the same video he asserts, “From a historical standpoint, it is not even clear that Muhammad existed.”
Tom Trento Trento is the founder and director of The United West. He believes mosques exist to wage a “cultural jihad” against America….
Wafa Sultan Sultan is connected to both Former Muslims United and Stop Islamization of Nations. She says, “I don`t see any difference between radical Islam and regular Islam…You cannot be American and Muslim at the same time.”
Walid Shoebat The founder of the Forum for Middle East Understanding, Shoebat is the author of “The case for Islamophobia,” a book published in March 2013. Shoebat’s training and speaking events are promoted using his credentials and his “background” as a former PLO terrorist who converted to Christianity. In 2011, CNN researchers “found no evidence” to support Shoebat’s trademark claim of being a “former PLO terrorist.”
Former Lieutenant General William Boykin A board member of the Oak Initiative. Boykin asserts that “[Islam] should not be protected under the First Amendment,” that there should be “no mosques in America,” that Islam is a “totalitarian way of life,” and that there can be no interfaith dialogue or cooperation between Muslims and Christians.
While I cannot speak as to who all of these people are, one thing is for sure, this is nothing more than intimidation against them. Hamas-CAIR be warned that if any of these people are attacked physically in any way, you will be held accountable for it. I can tell you this though, since it is a hit list, I stand alongside such men as Marine veteran Nick Powers, who said if there is an attack on us, “there will be no mercy.” There, you’ve been warned!…..(see the “hit list” in its entirety…)
HEY, this investigative journalist has a personal shout out to CAIR: you deeply “wound” by leaving this blog off your list! In fact, you guys are losing your mojo, having also left off a top associate of this site – Dave Gaubatz! You know, the counter terror operative who OPENLY outed CAIR via his DEEP undercover investigations, resulting in many of the exhibits used in the Holy Land Foundation terror trial! As a matter of record, these same Islamic jihadists from CAIR issued a fatwa on his head, even going viral on FB with a head chopping!
IN any case, will let Dave know of his exclusion….will “commiserate” together…misery likes company. Besides, what does one have to do to warrant a “distinguished” place on your list….inquiring minds demand to know…LOL…
NO one with a smidgen of personal or professional integrity can deny the following: that Obama Inc’s administration is a jacked up Brotherhood operation! It is not even a “captured” one, for that would infer that Barack HUSSEIN Obama was co-opted against his will. Nope, the opposite is the case because he invited them in!
IT is with this inherent truth in mind that one must understand what the definition of collusion is, whether one agrees with a certain position or not. To wit, simply defined,COLLUSION is a secret agreement or cooperation especially for an illegal or deceitful purpose.
NOW that that is settled, either ex DHS head “Mama Janet” (as well as the current honcho, Jeh Johnson) was the most incompetent Homeland Security director imaginable, or, on the other hand, the most adept hatchet woman for the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia; so ordered by the Jihadi-in-Chief! This investigative journalist finds her in sync with the MB, as opposed to her rivers of denial to Rep. Louie Gohmert – when questioned under oath – that she didn’t know anything about anything! Perplexing, to say the least.
SIMPLY put, by allowing Elibiary, a top Brotherhood operative, to access high level security intelligence – and then lying about any knowledge of said breaches – well, she became a criminal accomplice to terror! She colluded with Islamic jihad. Perjured herself too. That definitive.
BUT one has to internalize the ins and outs of Elibiary’s jihadi linkage to fully appreciate, understand, the national dangers his access precipitated:
Born in Alexandria, Egypt, Mohamed Elibiary is a Texas-based Muslim who founded Lone Star Intelligence LLC (a security crisis consulting firm) and the Freedom & Justice Foundation (a Muslim Brotherhood nonprofit group established in November 2002 to “promote a centrist public-policy environment in Texas by coordinating the state-level government and interfaith community relations for the organized Texas Muslim community”). This Foundation played a key role in successfully lobbying for the passage of Texas’s Halal Food Law (the state’s first Muslim consumer-protection statute), and for the institution of Islamic prayers (recited by Imams) in both chambers of the State Legislature.
Identifying himself as a conservative Republican, Elibiary is a longtime official of the Texas Republican Party and served as a delegate for Senator John McCain in the 2008 presidential election. He believes that he can help the Party make inroads with Muslim voters by moving its foreign policy in a pro-Islamic direction.
According to the Clarion Project, “Elibiary is known for his almost daily advocacy for the Muslim Brotherhood on Twitter. He admits being intimately involved with the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood, which he describes as a ‘social network.’” Moreover, he has long maintained that the American government “needs to deepen our strategic engagement” with the Brotherhood.
At age 16 Elibiary befriended the CEO of the Holy Land Foundation (HLF), Shukri Abu Baker, who indoctrinated the youngster with propaganda about Israeli persecution of the Palestinians. Soon thereafter, Elibiary began making monthly donations to HLF, and he continued to do so until that Foundation was shuttered by the U.S. government in 2001 due to its terrorist ties.
In 2004 Elibiary wrote, “Just because I listen to Osama bin Laden’s tapes and agree that the West routinely insults Muslim dignity, that doesn’t make me al-Qaeda. By listening, I gain a better understanding of a philosophy I wish to counter.”
In December 2004 Elibiary was a guest speaker at a Dallas conference titled “A Tribute to the Great Islamic Visionary,” which was held in honor of the late Ayatollah Khomeini. When a reporter subsequently asked Elibiary to explain why he had chosen to appear at an event honoring the iconic jihadist, Elibiary claimed not to have known in advance about the conference’s agenda. When journalist Rod Dreher of the Dallas Morning News voiced skepticism about Elibiary’s explanation, the latter threatened Dreher, telling him: “Expect someone to put a banana in your exhaust pipe.”
In 2006 Elibiary co-founded the North Texas Islamic Council, to coordinate the activities of the many mosques, Islamic schools, and community groups serving the Dallas-Fort Worth area’s 150,000+ Muslim residents.
In a 2006 letter to the Dallas Morning News, Elibiary defended the early Muslim Brotherhood leader and theorist Sayyid Qutb, known for his extreme anti-Americanism. Said Elibiary: “I’d recommend everyone read Qutb, but read him with an eye to improving America not just to be jealous with malice in our hearts.”
“The Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, Jordan, Tunis, etc. is a social movement for religious revival that seeks to Islamicize the society through cultural changing Dawah and that includes the political system. Sound familiar? Yup, you’re right. They are the Muslim world’s version of the Evangelical Christian Coalition/Moral Majority movement.”
“We must always resist the temptation to force one group, such as Islamists, to reform by adopting ‘Liberalism’ for example. That would be denying them their self-determination to structure their societies according to their public will.”
“We should remember that them [Islamists] ruling their countries with Shariah law doesn’t mean them coming to our country and using our planes to destroy our buildings.”
Also in 2007, Elibiary condemned the American government’s prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation as a terrorism abetter, and he accused the U.S. of “using the law to force compliance with unjust foreign policies.” Further, Elibiary wrote that Shukri Abu Baker, CEO of the Foundation, was a victim of political persecution. Emphasizing that Baker had done “absolutely nothing ‘criminal,’” and that the case against him was “largely built on associations to convict First-Amendment-protected rights,” Elibiary added: “This global war on terror needs a new strategy because we’re destroying ourselves more than al-Qaeda ever could.”
Notwithstanding his professed admiration for the likes of Khomeini, Qutb, and Baker, Elibiary managed to cultivate a reputation as a moderate Muslim — “the country’s leading Muslim deradicalization expert,” according to one media report. Indeed, he went on to advise numerous federal, state and local law-enforcement organizations on homeland security-related matters.
In 2008-09 Elibiary was a Fellow at the University of Southern California‘s American Muslim Civic Leadership Institute, an organization whose list of guest speakers included Zaid Shakir, who believes that Muslims cannot accept the legitimacy of the existing American order; impugns the U.S. for its “pattern of demonization, destabilization, and the invasion of hapless Third World nations”; and claims that organizations such as al Qaeda and Hamas are pursuing manifestly legitimate objectives.
In December 2009 Elibiary helped establish the Texas Fusion Center Policy Council, to help state and local law-enforcement personnel improve their information-sharing, analytical capabilities, and community relations.
In October 2010, President Barack Obama‘s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary, Janet Napolitano, appointed Elibiary, who had recently begun working with the Texas Department of Public Safety’s advisory board, to DHS’s Homeland Security Advisory Council (HSAC). Over the ensuing four years, Elibiary would also serve on the DHS Countering Violent Extremism Working Group (CVEWG) and the DHS Faith-Based Security and Communications Advisory Committee.
In his work with CVEWG, which was responsible for reviewing counter-terrorism training guidelines, Elibiary played a key role in doing away with the practice of educating DHS and FBI personnel about the ideology and tactics of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood. Indeed, he and fellow activists condemned FBI curricula and training materials that drew any connections between Islamist supremacism, jihad, and terrorism. National security expert and political analyst Ryan Mauro explains how Elibiary helped purge these materials:
“On October 4, 2011, Elibiary joined other Islamist activists and leftists in writing [FBI] Director [Robert] Mueller demanding that the FBI’s training materials be purged of such offensive material. Fifteen days later, he [Elibiary] was among 59 individuals and groups who wrote [to] then-Homeland Security Advisor to the President, John Brennan, insisting that the purge be extended to the training and trainers involved with the military, the intelligence community and homeland security/law enforcement community, as well. On November 11th, Brennan agreed.”
YES, DHS is a front-arm for the Brotherhood Mafia and the proofs are manifest:
POINTEDLY and irrefutably, after a so-called homeland security agency is caught ferrying illegals into America’s cities, what exactly remains unclear about their motives?
INDUBITABLY, the very fact that Elibiary “retired” from DHS, “coincidentally” on the heels of Sotloff’s (the second American) beheading by ISIS, is more than instructive. In other words, the Islamist-in-Chief understood that Elibiary was “too hot” to handle and decided to “separate” him from DHS for the time being. Yup….the scuttlebutt is that he is skulking in the shadows of his “former” employment.
ON the other hand, according to Obama Inc.’s Islamist, Marxist loving DHS, this blogger/investigative journalist (and likely many of this site’s readers) is rendered a “threat”, even if not falling into every pigeonholed box. Take a peek, see if it includes you too! Can you feel their love? Oh dear.
NOW even those who aren’t suspicious sorts (yet in light of ALL the indisputable evidence re Elibiary’s Brotherhood Mafia ties) can agree that the following two conclusions are inordinately clear: DHS (via “Mama Janet” and its attendant arms in toto) covers his MB tracks and Barack HUSSEIN Obama is an operative/implant for these same jihadis!
BEFORE we get to the heart of the matter, readers must internalize the essence of the global struggle between Islam and the west; its epicenter. Islam’s fiery swathe and conquest – while burning/raging throughout the Mid East and beyond – is laser-focused on Israel’s eternal capital, Jerusalem, Zion (“IF I Forget Thee O Jerusalem”, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8thyFfK1PY , an IDF linked rendition…and a more traditional one just below).
INCONTROVERTIBLY, Islam’s top “religious jihadi” prize is the Temple Mount, Judaism’s holiest site…הַר הַבַּיִת…הַר הַמוריה. The Jewish people’s centrality. Their core. Their heart and soul.
IN this regard, its wresting is a theologically-driven jihad, one which is laced with political, national and territorial overtones. But above all else, it is mandated by Islamic doctrinal dictates; supported by Shariah law, and with an end goal to purge Judaism (and Christianity) to submit humanity to the will of Allah. Don’t dare forget this.
WITH the above seared into your deepest recesses, even ex PM Ehud Barak – a never say no to “peace” leftist – understood the inherent truths of Jerusalem and the Temple Mount to Israel’s survival, as the nation-state of the Jewish people. Nevertheless, that didn’t stop him, as PM in 2000, from turning around and effectively handing over (it was not “a form” of Muslim sovereignty, as reported below) Jewish sovereignty to Muslim control. This dastardly betrayal came atop the first capitulation, back in 1967, almost immediately after the reunification of Jerusalem and amid the costliest, bloodiest, of battles!
“Jerusalem and the Temple Mount are the cornerstones of Jewish identity.”
Prime Minister Ehud Barak, the United Nations, September 7, 2000
“Yes, at Camp David, Israel did agree to a form of Muslim sovereignty over the Temple Mount.”
Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami, Israel TV Channel 1, November 16, 2000
INDEED, who hasn’t heard the glorious words…spine-tingling…even after so many years – ” the Temple Mount is in our hands!” –
EGREGIOUSLY, betrayed, once again, by Israel’s leftist leaders, even after the IDF’s bloody sacrifices: “Defense Minister Dayan immediately ceded internal administrative control of the Temple Mount compound to the Jordanian Waqf (Islamic trust) while overall security control of the area was maintained by Israel. Dayan announced that Jews would be allowed to visit the Temple Mount, but not to hold religious services there”. Credo que absurdum??
MOREOVER, despite losing an annihilatory war waged against Israel, Israel’s leaders rewarded blood-sucking Arabs/Muslims for their aggression! Not only that, but the so-called “centrality” of Jerusalem, the Temple Mount, to Arabs/Muslims has been wishy-washy at best, merely dependent upon their political shifting winds of conquest. What kind of Jewish leaders behave this way? Asked and answered.
FOR an overview, a ratcheted up third intifada is taking place, whereby Jewish rights to the Temple Mount have been effectively abrogated. These humiliating conditions have been ongoing for decades, but they are now coming down from atop the PM’s office, never mind his incessant mantra: “47 years ago Jerusalem was reunified, that was the way it used to be and that is the way to will always be,” Netanyahu said. Regardless, the facts on the ground, the constant humiliation (with the resultant terror) suffered by Jews in their capital city, attest otherwise. Slowly, and surely, Jewish control over Jerusalem and the Temple Mount is becoming little more than empty rhetoric. Wither they go, so too does the rest of Israel.
ONTO this week’s assassination attempt on Yehuda Glick, who founded and heads the LIBA Initiative for Jewish Freedom on the Temple Mount…...
The shooter, police said, acted spontaneously – and reports Wednesday night said that he may have guided to shoot Glick by Islamist-run web sites that urged Arabs to protest or otherwise interfere with Wednesday night’s conference.
Glick’s photos were prominently displayed on the sites, with his image circled in red, and a notation pointing out that he was a “settlement leader.” The site said that it was Glick who was planning a “mass invasion” of the Temple Mount which would bring tens of thousands of Jews to the site, and that he was behind a plan to eliminate Muslims from the Mount altogether.
Speaking to reporters Thursday, Professor Shimon Glick, Yehuda’s father, said that his son had complained to police of threats against his life “many times,” but had been ignored. In response to his comments, police said that they had “no record” of any complaints by Yehuda Glick……
“Every Jew who ascends the Temple Mount is a target of violence. It starts with shouting, continues with spitting, throwing rocks and then with Yehuda being followed,” said Knesset MK Feiglin.
He stressed that “the writing was on the wall. The weakness of the government, the security forces and of the Minister of Public Security against the Arab conduct on the Temple Mount and the harassment of Jews, stimulates the continuation of violence and leads to attempted murder.”
NOW one must follow the DIRECT cause and effect to get to the “heart of the matter”, as stated in the opening paragraph; murderous Arab/Muslim Jew-hatred, coupled with cowardly, appeasement-driven Israeli leaders. No doubt.
FROM time immemorial, Arabs/Muslims have been slaughtering Jews, as well as others standing in their way of hegemony. This is not news. However, what many are not privy to is a “dirty secret”; one which is responsible for compromising the safety of Israel’s majority Zionist public, its Jewish citizens.
ON the heels of last week’s terror attack in Jerusalem, resulting in the slaughter of a 3 month old baby and a 22-year-old young woman, and with close to a dozen wounded, admissions of “stand down” orders (against Arabs/Muslims) are rippling forth from Israel’s security forces:
Speaking on Channel 2‘s “Shesh Im” TV program Thursday, a day after a Hamas terrorist wounded nine with his car including a three-month-old babywho was killed in the attack, the officer admitted the Border Patrol warriors are forced to “stand like dolls” against the Arab terror.
“We feel like our hands are tied,” the combat officer revealed, placing the blame squarely on the shoulders of Interior Security Minister Yitzhak Aharonovich for the collapse in security.
According to the officer, senior captains as well as Aharonovich are trying to calm things down and hush up the “silent intifada” rather than fight Arab terror to the end….
IN response to question 2, “and what part(s) has PM Netanyahu (the buck stops with him, he gives the security arms their marching orders) played in keeping the Jerusalem police force’s “hands in their pockets”…drip, drip…
Landau spoke to Arutz Sheva about the situation after a Hamas terrorist wounded nine people in Jerusalem with his car Wednesday, murdering a three-month-old baby and critically wounding an 18-year-old seminary girl.
“We are witnesses to the fact that this business has not stopped for three months already, and the more they succeed (in attacks) it will entice more and more terrorist attackers,” said Landau. “They see there isn’t a strong hand on our side, so they will continue.”
The statement comes a day after a Border Patrol officer serving in Jerusalem complained “our hands our tied,” revealing the police have been limited from above in their ability to quash the terrorism gripping the capital….{blogger’s note: where “from above”, perhaps a birdie is whispering in their ears from the sky?}
CONCLUSIVELY, Arabs/Muslims are VERY open about controlling the Temple Mount, and with Jerusalem as their (caliphate) capital!
KNOW this: whomever controls the Temple Mount rules Jerusalem and is defacto the sovereign entity over all of Israel. This is regardless of the blatant lies streaming forth from Israel’s leaders, as they continuously intone: “Jerusalem will never be divided”. Hogwash. If anything, suffice it to say that they are basically akin to supine “caretakers”, rather than acting as the current custodial/owners of the Jewish homeland in perpetuity. Assuredly, if this bold claim is not centered in reality, then all of the horrific facts (stated above) cannot be true either. But “they be”!
THE core thrust dovetails into the aforementioned (opening paragraph) epicenter: what are Jewish nationalists, the majority public, willing to do to “take back” control over Jerusalem (Israel), irrespective of all else? We already know what the Arabs/Muslims are willing to do…and they have admitted to their falsified “Palestinian” identity on multiple occasions, yet Israel’s leaders are deaf to their words AND (mis)deeds. Why? Rhetorical.
IT has never been the case that this site has “cried wolf”, relative to Islam or the Marxist left. If anything, readers should know that this investigative journalist has evinced remarkable “restraint”, considering the explosive info which comes this way, some of which is “too hot” to reveal. Believe it.
BUT one needn’t immerse themselves in the jihadi muck to know this: it is against the law to teach/indoctrinate religion within the public school system, and the Establishment Clause, housed within the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, is immutable. Yes, the oft-mentioned “separation of Church and State”. How dare the PC thought police – in the (mis)education department – allow this blatant violation, one which is counter to American law and ethos!
MORE specifically, the teaching of the “Shahada” should be viewed as the last straw…the “red line”, or more aptly termed, the “green line”…at least for ANY parent who is not looking for their kiddie to submit/succumb/prostrate to Allah! Ya think?
Some of the parents may scoff at such a notion but make no mistake; there are Muslims who certainly do not. In the same way that the Ground Zero mosque was intended to be about conquest, so too is forcing non-Muslim children to recite the Shahada. The local news reports do not pick up on this very significant element of the story.
As Shoebat.com reported recently, the Boston Police Department just announced the promotion of its first Muslim to Captain. While that may seem a separate issue, consider what new Captain Haseeb Hosein had to say about his plans:
As Boston police Captain Haseeb Hosein, a former science teacher and a firm believer in the power of reading, assumes leadership in Mattapan as the department’s first Muslim captain, he plans to have his officers walking not only the streets, but school hallways.
“I want my guys to go into the schools and spend 30 minutes and read” with a child, said Hosein, 52, who received his captain’s shield Wednesday in a ceremony at police headquarters. “I hate that police officers are always the bad guy. We should be an asset.”
As a Muslim, Hosein knows the Shahada and he knows that reciting it means conversion. We know that he wants his officers to “read” with children. Revere, which is less than 15 miles from Mattapan, is already teaching children Islam’s conversion prayer.
Can we not conclude that Hosein would have no problem with his officers helping children recite the Shahada?
Millions of students in public schools don’t understand fractions or pronouns at even a basic level but students in the oceanfront Boston suburb of Revere, Mass. are taking the time to learn all about Islam — in the most embarrassingly shallow and cheerleading way imaginable.
“I bear witness that there is no God but Allah,” it says.
The textbook portion also reverently celebrates Muhammad’s life.
“Muhammad never expected to change world,” the admiring, rah-rah textbook reads.
“Muhammad later tended sheep on the dry hills like many young Arabians,” the text explains. “Later he became a successful merchant and married a wealthy widow. However, he felt as though something was missing in his life, so he went on a retreat.”
The founder of Islam was “upset about the cruelty of his people,” the text also optimistically explains. They “killed baby girls.” They “treated their slaves unkindly.” And “Muhammad had a strong sense of right and wrong.”
One local parent, Anthony Giannino, is upset about the textbook’s treatment of the Muslim religion.
IT gets worse…and this is just a sampling of the indoctrination through a so-called “cultural” textbook:
THAT being said, children, the next generation, are the MAIN targets of Islamic leaders and their collaborators on the left. This is a fact. Not only that, but when jihad comes into full bloom on the streets of America – sooner than most realize – it is also a fact that they will head for America’s jugular: it’s kiddies!
When I was in Iraq I had the opportunity to interview several captured Al Qaeda members. I asked them what type of future attacks America would endure. The answer over and over was that the hearts of Americans would be attacked. They explained that this meant the American children would be attacked because they are the hearts of the American people. These terrorists said the attacks would not necessarily be physical attacks, but rather a slow indoctrination in U.S. public schools and universities. The indoctrinating would include the Islamic ideology is peaceful and even as non-Muslims they support Islam and the Muslim people…..
PATRIOTS, parents and concerned citizens, do you believe the above penetration came out of nowhere and just magically appeared? Hope not.
SO what else have Islamic “stealth” jihadistsaccomplished relative to America’s school children? Much more than you think.
Accomplishment One:
IF anyone believes that the likes of Obama Inc. is NOT totally involved in said infiltration and penetration – through their Brotherhood links within the administration and outside its confines too – well, go back to sleep. It is just easier for some to close their eyes and muffle their ears. Yet for the rest….
There’s a new controversy in Texas involving the online public school curriculum called CSCOPE, which already has been the subject of heated debate and state legislative hearings.
This is the dreadful situation facing America’s kiddies, even as one of the most well-known private schools, Exeter Academy, trucks with terrorists, Obama’s surrogates are hide nor hare in interfering. Why? As if.
MY word, even the IRS has jumped onto the bandwagon, in the rush to Islamize children, and this time in Europe! American taxpayers are funding overseas indoctrination! Did you know this?
According to an investigation by WND and the Gatestone Institute many of the United States taxpayers are paying for a program overseas to teach children about Islam and attempts to convert the impressionable into becoming Muslim.
According to their research, the program directly targets the Czech Republic and is paid for by a grant from the US Embassy in Prague. The program called “Muslims in the Eyes of Czech Schoolchildren,” admits fully to being funded by US Taxpayers through the US Embassy. The grant is a branch of the Anna Lindh Foundation, the European Commission Representation and the Prague library. The program is fully supported by the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports according to the coordinator and lecturer Klara Popovova.
IF the readers take away anything from this commentary’s thesis, suffice to say this: a double-prong plan is in place, one which is supported by Islamic leaders in America (aided and abetted by Brotherhood front-arms, throughout the Mid East & Africa) and their Marxist counterparts.
INTRINSICALLY, they are aiming, arming, for “soft” stealth jihad and frontal attacks. In effect, they are marching through America’s (and Europe’s, but let’s not digress) public (and some private ones too) schools, inch by inch leading the kiddies toward Islam’s “ways”. Basically, capturing their young and impressionable hearts and minds.
THERE are many aspects and facets to Islamic supremacy, but one stands out above all else: jihad – stealth and frontal – to effectuate submission to Shariah law. Bowing down to Allah. In effect, without jihad’s basis it would be impossible to resurrect the ultimate goal: the Caliphate. This is not pie-in-the-sky dreaming. Not by a long shot. In fact, more than enough evidence is housed at this site to prove said global thrust. Always bear these facts in mind, whenever attempting to make sense of this and that.
MOST recently, Turkey – via its assists from the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia and the Jihadi-in-Chief – has been front and center at these pages. For good reason. The fact of the matter is that President Erdogan (and his Brotherhood fronts) is actively lending helping hands to ISIS, as is the renegade POTUS. Their actions are part and parcel to the re-establishment of the Caliphate, never mind their lying words to the contrary. Watch what they do, as opposed to what they say.
READERS, in this regard, you would do well to absorb the following linked pdf –The Global Islamic Civilization: The Power Of A Nation Revived. However, do not ask why this investigative journalist is zeroing in on this particular document. Just know that there is a very good reason for doing so. Regardless, decide if Islamists are deadly serious – or not. It’s your call. Assuredly, knowing a thing or two about their operational methods/goals, a decision was made with related contacts – at the inception of this site – to warn about certain matters.
ADDITIONALLY, and along these same lines, Erdogan’s quest to resurrect the Ottoman Empire takes center stage at these pages. Prescient. So very soon into this minefield it became overwhelmingly clear: regardless of how much blood they have to spill to achieve their Brotherhood goals, Erodgan (and requisite Brotherhood leaders) will not be deterred. Guaranteed, Turkey’s thrust – with ISIS/Brotherhood as their partners – will reverberate FAR beyond its borders. All of the above is irrespective of Turkey’s inclusion into NATO in 1952. As always, Islamic supremacists behave as ingrates.
BASICALLY, it is equally intrinsic not to be distracted by the so-called tug of war between Turkey and ISIS. It is nothing short of a smokescreen. Good cop vs bad cop, one of the oldest ploys/plays around. Oh yeah….
“The ideology itself is violent and always has been. If one follows Islam it does not allow for an individual to be a good person. Shariah can’t be followed partially, it must be adhered to 100 percent or not at all. Essentially there are practicing Muslims and non practicing Muslims. A so-called moderate does not follow Shariah Law fully and is simply an apostate of Islam. If we don’t start branding the Islamic ideology itself as the problem, we will never defeat Islamic based terrorism. Islam was founded by a child rapist and my opinion is that anyone who hurts children is evil and the Islamic ideology can’t be given a free pass.” Evil on its face.
BACK to 9/11/01 and its sacred ground. Its continuous defilement.
AND while apologists for Islam will attempt to turn truth upside its head, don’t get sucked in.They continuously opine that it is “Islamophobic” to be upset by Islamic presence (Muslim “memorials”) at Ground Zero. Can you believe their utter gall? Please, smack them across their vile faces….for starters….
IT gets worse. Outrage piles atop outrage, and with no let up in sight. Way too many western appeasers are entering the fray. Even architects are jumping on board to assist Islamic designs – literally. When will their treachery end? Where is it leading?
YES, the symbols of Islamic triumphalism are at the epicenter of jihad. And this is why minarets must be understood for what they really represent in the west for Islam, as well as all over the world. They are NOT merely decorative.
IN line with said understanding, how about the out-sized gall of an architect who redesigned a Church DESTROYED on 9/11/01 to resemble Churches that became mosques! Beyond the pale.
Mr. Calatrava designed the church and will attend its groundbreaking on Saturday. If everything goes according to schedule, the building should be finished in 2016 or early 2017.
While the 9/11 Memorial, with its twin reflecting pools and alleys of trees, masterfully creates an opportunity for quiet reflection, there’s also something to be said for a sanctuary with four walls—and perhaps for lighting a memorial candle, no matter what religion you practice, or even if you practice no religion at all.
“All the circumstances around 9/11, the memorial embodies that very well,” Mr. Calatrava said as he sat in the stately Park Avenue townhouse that does double duty as his home and his office.
“This is what I want; this is what the church wants: a very ecumenical place; they would like to have 24 hours the church open.”
But Mr. Calatrava conceded the public has the last word.
That a Spanish architect should design a modern Byzantine church in Lower Manhattan for the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America, based on buildings in Turkey that were used for Islamic worship, goes to the heart of the message the archdiocese says it hopes to send with the $20 million project. The new St. Nicholas is to open by early 2016.
“If I may quote Jesus, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer for all people,’ ” said the Rev. Mark Arey, a spokesman for the archdiocese. “It will be open to everyone: the believer, the unbeliever, the Orthodox Christian, the atheist. Whoever you are, this is a space that you can come into and find some meditative solace.”
The architect claims it’s inspiration is two Byzantine churches…later conquered and converted into mosques.
Other than the barely discernible cross on top of the dome there is nothing on the exterior or interior for that matter that even suggests it is a church, never mind a rebuilt St. Nicholas.
ON the other hand – and despite a NYC condo board’s denials as to why they are pushing back against a “Ground Zero Victory mosque” – the fact of the matter is that they are, and this is cause for a thumbs up.
But by Sept. 18, before any prayer services were even conducted there, the condo — where apartments sell for $1 million and up and one features a bowling alley — posted a legal notice telling Park51 to get out by month’s end.
Park51 needs the space because its planned mosque near Ground Zero is under construction. Christophe Cornaire, the owner of the Warren Street retail space and a former Cantor Fitzgerald managing director (Cantor Fitzgerald where all of its employees were killed on 9/11 in the Twin Towers), has hired a lawyer to make sure the condo board does not evict the mosque.
“The unit owner is rattling sabers at us,” said Richard Menaker, a lawyer for the condo board. “He’s been accusing the board of misbehaving here . . . [of being] discriminatory.”
Menaker says bigotry has nothing to do with it (Yes, it does, nobody wants Muslims down there)— that the condo is simply holding Cornaire accountable for failing to fully disclose how the space would be used and how many people would use it.
“The key thing is, they’re talking about using the basement space which is not allowed to be used by people,” Menaker said. In the past, hundreds of Muslim worshipers crowded a makeshift prayer space on Park Place for Friday services, many spilling over into the basement of the building.
Cornaire’s lawyer, Adam Leitman Bailey, refused to comment. Cornaire, who lives in France, worked for Cantor Fitzgerald from 2000 to 2010. The firm lost 658 employees in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center.
Bailey represented Sharif El-Gamal, the developer behind the “Ground Zero mosque,” in lawsuits against the controversial project. El-Gamal’s grand plan called for a multistory building with a fitness center, swimming pool, auditorium, a restaurant and prayer space.
But the vision was put on hold for years. El-Gamal announced earlier this year he would scale back the scheme and construct a three-story museum with prayer space designed by noted French architect Jean Nouvel.
Next door to the museum, El-Gamal plans to erect a 39-story glass and steel condo tower. His company Soho Properties received $33 million in financing for the project last month…..
IT goes without saying, or at least it should: those who tolerate barbarism in their midst must share the onus (Islam’s useful idiots…this investigative journalist is referencing Christophe Cornaire, Mr. Calatrava and others of similar bent ilk), as they too are guilty, like the ones they seek to protect. Accomplices. Lending cover.
MORE specifically, said butt-covering is akin to allowing home invaders, rapists and murderers to “memorialize” those they killed, instead of being banished from civilized society! How dare they, even as they spit on the graves of those killed by Islam’s jihadi followers.
SIGNIFICANTLY, one of the 24 books of the Tanach – תַּנַ”ךְ – within the Old Testament, the Ketuvim/Writings – כְּתוּבִים – houses Ecclesiastes, aka Koheleth, קֹהֶלֶת. And it is within these Writings that the “meaning of life”, the best way of life, is found.
INDEED, while its essence revolves around seeking wisdom and enjoying “life’s simple pleasures”, its inherent value also lies within the Midrash Rabbah, aka Aggadah, אַגָּדָה, and its moral exhortations and practical advice.
IN this regard, the following has always been a core tenet within this blog, and is as applicable today as it was when written in the 3rd century BCE:
He who becomes compassionate to the cruel will ultimately become cruel to the compassionate. – Midrash Rabba, Ecclesiastes 7:16…קֹהֶלֶת.
audio
Adina Kutnicki 