JUST as the sun rises and sets, the following truth is a constant: Barack HUSSEIN Obama is Allah-bent on acting as a shield for Islam.
Many moons ago – at least in the time frame of too many ADD-afflicted westerners – the Islamist-in-Chief was immersed, as usual, in perpetual campaign mode and golf jaunts, all the while Iranian freedom fighters were slaughtered in their streets. Barely 4 years have passed since the leader of the free world ignored their pleas, as Iranians begged for assistance to remove the boot of the mullahs via the so-called “twitter revolution“. Obama Inc’s national disgrace is amply described within the above Washington Times Editorial.
It goes without saying, the Islamist-in-Chief has no interest in freeing the Mid East from the sword of Islam. His embrace of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia is more than emblematic of said charge. In fact, the polar opposite is the case. Currently, the leader of the free world is agitating (also threatening Egypt’s military) for Morsi’s Mafia to be set free, even though Egypt’s military has evidence of treason against them. Think about what this means in terms of which side America is siding with and the geo-political blow back, its knock-on effects. Besides, each and every intervention (“leading from behind” or full frontal) ends in further disaster, both for the west and towards regional factions seeking freedom.
EMBLEMATIC of the charge that Obama Inc. uplifted Islamism at the expense of freedom, just recall the slap in the face – back-handed by the Islamist-in-Chief – given to Iran’s Green Revolution in 2009; its freedom fighters. Indeed, in both verbal messaging and through inaction, he was deaf to their pleas and their cries, even as their blood flowed in the streets. What a bastard. They literally screamed to the anti-freedom POTUS: help us overthrow the mullahs; the biggest sponsors of world terror!
IN furtherance of said charges….
‘So now, at this pivotal point in time, it is up to the countries of the free world to make up their mind,” Iranian opposition leaders told the Obama administration in an eight-page memo in 2009. “Will they continue on the track of wishful thinking and push every decision to the future until it is too late, or will they reward the brave people of Iran and simultaneously advance the Western interests and world peace.”
The memo, written by leaders of Iran’s Green Party after the summer 2009 anti-government demonstrations, was obtained by the Washington Examiner.
The document confirms GOP candidate Rick Santorum’s charge that the U.S. squandered an opportunity to undermine the government established by the Ayatollah Khomeini three decades ago.
In the Arizona GOP debate last week, Santorum noted that “we did absolutely nothing to help” the Green Revolution. But “when the radicals in Egypt and the radicals in Libya, the Muslim Brotherhood … rise against either a feckless leader or a friend of ours in Egypt, the president is more than happy to help them out.”
AS such, the underlying “twinning” thesis of the commentary – linking the shielding of Hamas and Iran’s mullahs as part of the Islamist-in-Chief’s main geo-political thrust – is further cemented through Valerie Jarrett’s Iranian sprints, as she shuttles back and forth to Iran’s top leadership, ensuring that they attain WMD status. Indeed, there can no longer be any doubt: Barack HUSSEIN Obama has a vested interest in the Shia side of the sword against Israel and the west.
IN furtherance of the aforementioned “twinning”, the following is more than germane:
The launching of two-thousand plus Iranian and Syrian-made rockets of various ranges raining throughout Israel at the same time that Iran’s leadership was sitting with the P5+1 in Vienna to negotiate a deal over its nuclear program has exposed Iran as the root cause of instability in the Middle East.
NOW, juxtaposed against his outright support of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, of which Hamas is a main spearhead, it is legitimate to query: what is Obama Inc. up to, even as Washington lists Hamas as a terror org?
Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) are foreign organizations that are designated by the Secretary of State in accordance with section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as amended. FTO designations play a critical role in our fight against terrorism and are an effective means of curtailing support for terrorist activities and pressuring groups to get out of the terrorism business.
Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations
INCONTROVERTIBLY, evidence abounds as to Obama Inc.’s fealty to Iran and his absolute allegiance to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. Iran (in concert with Turkey and Qatar) is the biggest financier of Hamas‘s genocidal goals, though one is Shia and the other Sunni.
While the world powers seek to end Iran’s illicit nuclear-weapons program, the Islamic Republic and its strategic partner Syria are supplying the Palestinian terrorist entity Hamas with conventional arms – which Hamas is using right now to target Israel.
With the above in mind, the geo-political picture comes into sharper focus. And this is where the rubber meets the road, so to speak. Therefore, leaving Hamas standing, by holding back the IDF’s FINAL victory, becomes a must.
Obama: Within a week of the end of Israel’s military activities, Qatar and Turkey will begin negotiations with Hamas on the basis of the 2012 understanding [following the end of Operation Pillar of Defense – ed.], including Israel’s commitment to removing the siege and restrictions on Gaza,
INTRINSICALLY, one must not get confused by his support for both Sunni Hamas and Shia Iran. Such mental meanderings will only serve the enemy’s interests, including Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s!
ONTO more of the same…
Lost amid the understandable focus on the fighting in Gaza was a major Middle East news story. On July 18, the U.S. and its Western allies agreed to extend the Iran nuclear talks for four months. But rather than the fighting between Hamas and Israel allowing the negotiations to continue under the radar, the events unfolding in Gaza ought to make it harder rather than easier for the Obama administration to evade its obligation to deal with this threat.
The leaders of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee groused in public yesterdayabout the way the Iran talks are proceeding with little public accountability. Both Democratic Chair Senator Robert Menendez and ranking Republican Bob Corker expressed dismay about the way the supposedly finite period for negotiations with Iran had effortlessly transitioned into injury time with every possibility that the four-month period could be extended again in November. There was no appetite on the committee for a rerun of the bruising and losing fight Menendez waged against the administration on behalf of tougher sanctions on Iran in order to strengthen the West’s hand in the talks. Yet the frustration about the P5+1 process is clear.
While their comments didn’t get much attention, Menendez and Corker are right to be worried. More to the point, the Gaza crisis ought to be causing more concern about the Iran talks rather than allowing Secretary of State John Kerry’s negotiating team a free pass to continue to work toward an agreement that will both legalize Tehran’s nuclear program and fail to curb its support for terrorism.
It is important to understand that without Iran much of what is happening in Gaza wouldn’t be possible. Iran supplied Hamas with advanced rockets and money for years enabling it to create the infrastructure of terror that has plunged the region into conflict. Iran and Hamas had a very public spat in recent years when the Islamist terrorists chose to oppose Tehran’s ally Bashar Assad in the Syrian civil war. But the breach between the two may be over. Yesterday, Iran’s Supreme Leader Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said he supported replenishing Iran’s arsenal. If, due to international pressure and the desire of the Obama administration to halt the current fighting, Hamas is left standing and in control of Gaza, the odds are good that Khamenei will make good on his pledge.
Economic sanctions on Iran made it harder for the regime to divert money to Hamas as well as to Islamic Jihad, which has stayed in Tehran’s good graces these past few years. But if Kerry gets the deal he is looking for, the sanctions that were weakened in the interim deal concluded last November would be eviscerated. At that point, Hamas may be able to count on refinancing and resupply from Iran as well as from their ally Qatar.
What has this to do with the nuclear talks?
The assumption on the part of most foreign-policy observers is that these are two separate issues. But that belief is a mistake. Iran’s status as the leading state sponsor of international terrorism through its support of Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, and perhaps Hamas again makes it imperative that the P5+1 process not limit itself to talks that ignore the threat that Tehran’s auxiliaries pose to the West.
Kerry signed a weak deal with Iran last fall because, as he publicly admitted, the secretary decided sticking to the West’s demands for Iran to dismantle its nuclear program was not possible. Instead, he appeased Iran and granted tacit recognition to their “right” to enrich uranium in exchange for concessions that do little to retard the Islamist regime’s nuclear ambitions. The willingness of the West to go into overtime with an Iranian negotiating partner that has clearly signaled their unwillingness to agree to measures that would make it impossible for them to build a weapon may herald another retreat by Kerry. If so, that will bring us closer to the day when Iran will not only be able to threaten the West with a nuke after a brief “breakout” period but also hasten the moment when it can extend a nuclear umbrella over its allies in Lebanon and Gaza.
While the prospect of such a dismal outcome to these negotiations raises the possibility that Israel will decide at some point to act on their own to stop the Iranians, it also raises the stakes in Gaza. The U.S. decision not to keep its word about limiting negotiations with Iran makes it even more imperative for Israel not to allow Hamas to escape the current fighting with its arsenal and control of the strip intact. Just as Iran’s nuclear dream poses an existential threat to Israel, the American willingness to kick the can down the road on the nuclear issue makes it more vital that Israel finishes off Hamas now before an end to the blockade and Western appeasement of Tehran changes the strategic equation in Gaza and the Middle East.
WHEREAS there are many things which can’t be predicted, there are some which can. In essence, the Islamist-in-Chief – and surrogates – understands that leaving Gaza armed to the teeth allows a Sunni terror enclave to attack Israel from the south. In concert, assuring the nuclear status of Iran brings Israel to heel, either through nuclear blackmail or by an actual strike, akin to a bolt out of the blue.
AND it should go without saying: once Iran goes nuclear they will not hesitate to smuggle WMD into Gaza, even as they similarly arm Hezbollah. Notably, since PM Netanyahu has demonstrated that he is mentally incapable of extricating from Obama Inc.’s dictates, imagine the hegemony gained by nuclear bombs in the hands of genocidal foes, including Hamas!
MIND you, not only is Barack HUSSEIN Obama counting on Israel’s compliance, but so too are Hamas and their attendant terror accomplices, Sunni and Shia. They internalize PM Netanyahu’s penchant for burying his head in the sand, even though fully aware of the tunnel threats for years! Nothing was done. Nothing. Don’t confuse strategic victory with smoke and mirrors via exploding buildings. Worlds apart.
REPEATEDLY, this site asserts: Barack HUSSEIN Obama is intent on ensuring the triumph of Islam, whether Sunni or Shia. He is, in both word and deed, Islam’s best friend.
OMINOUSLY, with the world’s attention riveted on Gaza, it serves Obama Inc’s agenda very well. Hamas stands in place to assist in Israel’s demise, at the same time that Iran’s genocidal mullahs push to the finish line. None of what is transpiring in both arenas is happenstance. It is by design – the POTUS’s.
MOST significantly, jaw-jaw has worked very well for the mullahs through Washington’s “side deals”.
Therefore, what’s a few more months of dragged out “talks” in the scheme of things?
A done nuclear-capable deal, that’s what!