Sharia Compliance Takes Over Tech Giants: Alphabet Inc. & Facebook Lead The Charge. What’s The Upshot? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

WITHOUT a basic understanding of Sharia (Islamic) Law, it is impossible to recognize when it is being (stealth-fully or otherwise) applied in America and the west at large. Resultant, its insidious dangers to western civilization are able to fly under the radar, and with few the wiser. And before non-Muslims realize what is taking place, constitutionally protected freedoms are no longer applicable. DOA.

AS a very simple A + B calculus, how many believe that criticism of Islam’s madman, the “prophet” Muhammad, couldn’t possibly lead to a so-called “hate crime” charge? If so (naively) inclined, think again. 

EFFECTIVELY, under the guise of “Islamophobia“, “hate speech” has become the weapon used by fascist-leftists and their Islamic counterparts to squash free speech in America. No doubt, one who dares to go up against their dictates – and evinces patriotic ethos – will find themselves within a myriad of cross-hairs. Extrapolating further, the west in general – and America in particular – is in the vise-grip of a Orwellian paradox – one which turns the basic definition of a phobia upside its head! Yes, its accepted meaning is:

persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a    compelling desire to avoid it. 

PATRIOTS, in furtherance of much needed disinfectant, take a peek at the anti-democratic police in the UK, a harbinger of things to come – as they brazenly threatened a Facebook user over “Islamophobia” ala “hate speech!” Be aware, this sampling is just Exhibit Number One – out of countless across the western world. Simply put, political leaders have gone off the rails, as they willfully apply Sharia Law’s Blasphemy dictates from atop this and that public agency.

If the blasphemer does not repent, the punishment is death. … Some modern Muslim scholars contest that Islam supports blasphemy law, stating that Muslim jurists made the offense part of Sharia. The Islamic law considers blasphemy against Muhammad a more severe offense than blasphemy against God.

NOW, with the accepted definition of “Islamophobia” at the ready, how can it even be considered a “phobia” to be afraid of Islam? Inextricably, Muhammedans, under its banner, are waging a murderous jihad – historically, derived from centuries of Islamic history! But no matter. According to Daniel Pipes, director of the Middle East Forum:

“The way the jihadists understand the term is in keeping with its usage through fourteen centuries of Islamic history…. The goal is boldly offensive, and its ultimate intent is nothing less than to achieve Muslim dominion over the entire world…. Jihad did have two variant meanings through the centuries, one more radical, one less so. The first holds that Muslims who interpret their faith differently are infidels and therefore legitimate targets of jihad…. The second meaning, associated with mystics, rejects the legal definition of jihad as armed conflict and tells Muslims to withdraw from the worldly concerns to achieve spiritual depth. Jihad in the sense of territorial expansion has always been a central aspect of Muslim life…. Today, jihad is the world’s foremost source of terrorism, inspiring a worldwide campaign of violence by self-proclaimed jihadist groups.”

MIND you, those who aren’t afraid of Islam’s dictates are more than irrational because the Koran – time and again – explicitly directs Allah’s Muslim Terrorists to execute the following, and countless of the same: 

Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.”

WHAT other interpretations are there, aside from those given by jive-talking apologists – ala officialdom, the (ene)media, or Alphabet Inc. and the like? Not only that, how many times have Americans (westerners at large) heard their rallying cry, “Allahu Akbar”, while exploding all over the world! But let’s just examine jihadist Omar Mateen’s shout-out, that which took place June 2016 at Orlando’s Pulse (gay) night club.

The phone conversations and high death toll – Mateen killed 49 people – have led some survivors to believe that he did not act alone. “There’s no way” he acted alone, survivor Leydiana Puyanera told CNN. She noted that she heard Mateen yell “Allahu akbar,” the Muslim slogan widely known as a battle cry among jihadis, and had heard that there were people holding the doors of the club closed. At least one survivor, Luis Burbano, has told media that he held the door closed fearing the gunman would run out to kill those who escaped.

NOT too incidentally, the above miscalculations are so central to national security, a preponderance of evidence in support thereof can be found within this author’s book (published Sept. 2016, with co-author Joe Newby) “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad.” More specifically, take note of Chapters Two and Twelve, respectively: Militant Jihad: Its Knock-On Effects To The West, and Jihad In Orlando: Facebook Takes Center Stage

ALL of which (and so much more) link back to the dangers at bay: Sharia Law sanctioned jihad; aided and abetted by tech giants, as they lend cover as well as lead the charge! 

IN this regard, considering the fact that Social Capital CEO Chamath Palihapitiya, a former Facebook executive, bluntly states (as reported, Sept. 14, 2017) that “Facebook and Google are like ‘surveillance states’ and are inviting a government crackdown”, is it any wonder that the thesis of “BANNED” (btw, which was conceived in 2015…hmm….more than two years ahead of those jumping aboard the bandwagon), as stated on its book jacket, expounds: 

POLITICIANS TALK ABOUT COMPANIES BEING TOO BIG TO FAIL, BUT IS FACEBOOK SO BIG THAT IT CAN FREELY OPERATE AS A GOVERNMENT UNTO ITSELF?

BUT for more proof of the same, let’s examine Youtube. Again, the west is subjected to the dangerous overreach of monopoly-like behemoths – those who are also in the “side business” of policing “hate speech.” Besides, who appointed them arbiters of this and that speech – approved, non-approved, or in between?? Egregiously, jihadists ply their murderous trade via Youtube 24/7 – akin to their exposure all over Alphabet Inc.! How dare they employ a double standard!

Youtube, a subsidiary of Google, has caved to pressure from designated Islamic terrorist group CAIR, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), the  far left ‘Jewish’ Anti Defamation League (ADL), and Pro-Publica, all of which are funded in part by George Soros .

They claim to be censoring  far-right extremism, incitement to violence and Islamic terrorism, but in fact, they are censoring the people who are providing crucial information about creeping sharia and exposing the threat of Islamic jihad, both violent and institutional, rather than ignoring it, as the Left does.

Now published on Vidme.com, this is the video that got my account banned. Click screen twice to play.

https://vid.me/e/jFM6K?stats=1

Content creators and video uploaders on YouTube who follow all of the site’s rules face censorship by the platform, under new plans announced by Google. Youtube has already deleted more than half the ‘truth about Islam’ videos posted at BNI.

Reported by Breitbart,  According to a post on YouTube’s official blog, videos will now be subject to the rule of the mob. If enough users flag a video as “hate speech” or “violent extremism,” YouTube may impose restrictions on the content even if it breaks none of the platform’s rules.

And it’s not only me. Apparently, YOUTUBE Suspends, Deletes Pamela Geller’s Account as well. Google is blacklisting and has admitted to working with alt-left smear groups to silence opposition and criticism of jihad and sharia.

AS to PayPal, one of the world’s largest internet payment companies, they too know no bounds. As some may be aware, the internet giant is banning conservative sites, thanks to heavy-lifting by fascist-leftist (and Islamist) groups that are aligned (and funded) with Soros. 

LO and behold, even though this site chooses not to solicit funds, nor does it post items for sale (for this and that reason), its conservative ethos surely inflame many passions. Be that as it may, it was quite a surprise that the following, an out of the blue supportive “advert”, popped up at Watchdogs of Our Freedom: WOOF! Counter-revolutionary commentary for our times.

PLEASE HELP US GET BANNED BY PAYPAL! BUY THIS BOOK!

Many of you know that PayPal has begun banning conservative websites. In a textbook display of leftist irony, sites advertising the book “BANNED” by Adina Kutnicki, courageous blogger, freedom lover, and Lioness of Zion, have been among those singled out for PayPal’s opprobrium. As most of you also know, we don’t affiliate with PayPal because we give away stuff when we have it, and we don’t ask for money. But we still feel left out , so we’re boldly endorsing Adina’s book (written with co-author, Joe Newby) in a desperate attempt to get banned by PayPal in solidarity with our fellow conservative bloggers–or at least notified that if we ever want to use PayPal, we are pre-banned–is that a thing? We’d settle for that–but the main idea is to get you to buy Adina’s book! DISCLAIMER: WOOF receives no portion of any proceeds resulting from this endorsement and attests that its advocacy of Adina Kutnicki’s work is unsolicited, unpaid, and based entirely on our personal belief that she is obviously a warrior goddess.

SWEET!

DESPITE it all, there appears to be a glimmer of hope on the horizon, that is, if instituted forthwith.

  • Reportedly (September 19, 2017), according to the UK’s Theresa May, “Google and Facebook will face punishing fines unless they remove terrorist propaganda within a two-hour limit.” Mind you, decades of Islamist and Euro incitement against Israel, coupled with Facebook’s enabling (since 2004) in the forefront, has led to the continuous slaughter of Jews (occasionally, with others caught in the cross-fire), but it never moved the Brits to become enraged – until their citizens became jihadi cannon fire! Oh well….
  • Similarly, despite Capitol Hill’s lip service response to jihad in Israel, America’s “see no Islamic, hear no Islamic evil” elites couldn’t care less about dead Jews – including, Congressional Jewish reps and many in positions of communal leadership. Two-faced opportunists. Regardless, akin to their Euro counterparts, some are running scared.

On Sept. 14, ProPublica reported that it had managed to purchase ads targeted at users who’d listed interests such as “Jew hater” and “How to burn Jews.”

Facebook quickly changed its ad system to prevent similar purchases, but the episode gives further ammunition to critics who worry that the company has grown too powerful with too little oversight. Abroad, Facebook faces challenges from aggressive European antitrust regulators and governments suspicious of both its power and its treatment of user data. The idea of a crackdown is catching on in the U.S., too, amid a larger backlash against Silicon Valley. Zuckerberg has become a big, enticing target for both liberal Democrats, who see him as a media-devouring monopolist, and for nationalist Republicans, who see an opportunity to rail against the company that embodies globalization more than any other.

  • And it beggars belief – in a good way – that an A.I. (artificial intelligence) founder had this to say:University of Montreal professor Yoshua Bengio is one of three members of what they have self-titled the “deep learning conspiracy.” This “Canadian Mafia” of artificial intelligence visionaries is largely responsible for the tech industry’s leap into machine learning.Bengio and his colleagues consult for the companies to which he is referring: Bengio for IBM, with Geoffrey Hinton and Yann LeCun for Google and Facebook, respectively. Apple’s AI research is led by Hinton’s protege Ruslan Salakhutdinov. These are the companies that can use AI to create even better AI, embarrass China at their oldest game, police Twitter, or give your next iPhone a brain.In responding to a question from an Axios reporter as to whether the tech giants should be broken up, Bengio openly scoffed. With their power and resources only looking to increase, he wants anti-trust laws to be enforced, saying that “governments have become so meek in front of companies.”…read the whole thing….and then refer back to “BANNED”, specifically, page 139….

ONLY time will tell if relevant governmental poohbahs will perform the serious work which mandates MUCH needed regulation. But if they need any assists, this patriot refers them to “BANNED”, in particular, pages 115-155. Surely their aides will find the recommendations worth their weight in gold – all for the discounted paperback price of $ 13.87 or Kindle cost of $ 7.99! Indeed, a drop in their line-item budgets. Still yet, if they find the prices too steep, no matter. This author – in service of patriotism – will ensure they receive copies gratis. No kidding. Give a shout out…

CONCLUSIVELY, the very fact that many millions of Muhammedans (followers of Islam, not to be confused with “Muslims by birth” who are non-practicing, in effect, apostates) are mandated to impose Islam on all of mankind, well, that about spells out its inherent danger to the entire non-Muslim world! Incontestably, “jihad by the sword” has been a centuries-long method, as prescribed by “prophet” Muhammad through Allah! Surah 9 is more than enough proof, as per this site’s charge sheet.

ALONG this treacherous minefield, isn’t it patently clear that the nexus between Sharia’s mandates for death, and Facebook’s (as well as Alphabet Inc. alike) collusive and corrosive helping hands, led to the purchasing of ads targeted at users who’d listed interests such as “Jew hater” and “How to burn Jews.” Moreover, only when shamed publicly by this vile outrage did Facebook pull the ads! How can this be, as Facebook’s mouthpieces continuously harp on their so-called (stringently applied) “community standards.” Nebulous. Mendacious.

FOR the record, as a Jew, a Zionist to boot, and an American patriot, here’s a heartfelt response to the censors at Facebook and (Alphabet Inc. alike): go to hell….and a F U salute too!! Never and never will anyone silence this voice, hard as they try.

MANIFESTLY, Sharia Law must be eliminated, extinguished, primarily, within America, that is, if western civilization is to survive. And regardless of PC dictates, it is obligatory for western patriots to stand up and be counted, thus, refusing to be “stuck on stupid” when so much evidence attests to the encircling dangers. 

TO wit, repeat this non-sanitized truth, and as many times as it takes: the “cult of Islam” – via Muhammedans who follow Sharia Law – is a direct danger to western civilization!!

AND that is that…a wrap too.Image result for pics of shariah compliance

{re-blogged at ConservativeFiringLine}

{re-blogged at TheHomelandSecurityNetwork} to read, click on “Archives”, dated Sept. 28, 2017

{re-blogged at TeaPartyUSA.org}

{re-blogged at USSANews.com} The Tea Party’s Front Page

{re-blogged at RepublicanRise.SwillNews.com}

{re-blogged at RightWingConservativeNewsblog.com}

{MEMO: FB’s censors are limiting the sharing of Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog! Indeed, the following message from FB’s censors is crystal clear:

MESSAGE FAILED

Americans, Are Your Homes/Backyards Free From Islam’s Clutches? Don’t Bet On It! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

UNDER the catch-all bugaboo of “racism” and “hate speech”, Allah’s Muslim Terrorists (in tandem with their cultural Marxist enablers) work overtime to stifle free speech, that which is a cornerstone of America and the rest of the west. In fact, their quest is so important to “reshaping” the west F/B/O of Islam and for self-proclaimed elitists (in reality, cultural Marxists) who seek to control western freedoms, little is out-of-bounds. 

IN this regard, everything which so-called progressives deign is ideologically “offensive”, well, it is all on the table for the veritable chopping block. Up for grabs. 

BUT before we veer to their latest (back-yard) invasion into the rights of Americans, the following must be noted:

WHENEVER Islamists and their cohorts attempt to stifle (what is left of) America’s freedoms, along comes their catch-all weapon of choice: “hate crime.” And even as their doctrinal underpinnings dictate an utter hatred of Jews (and Christians), they have the temerity to drag out the conflated comparison between anti-semitism – by using it as their shield to squelch any criticism of Islam, paradoxically, underlined by free speech – and juxtapose it against “hate-crimes” towards Muslims ala this and that method of silencing.

Depicting Jews – and sometimes also Zionists – as “the descendants of apes and pigs” is extremely widespread today in public discourse in the Arab and Islamic worlds.

For example, in a weekly sermon in April 2002, Al-Azhar Sheikh Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, the highest-ranking cleric in the Sunni Muslim world, called the Jews “the enemies of Allah, descendants of apes and pigs.”[1]

In one of his sermons, Saudi sheikh Abd Al-Rahman Al-Sudayyis, imam and preacher at the Al-Haraam mosque – the most important mosque in Mecca – beseeched Allah to annihilate the Jews. He also urged the Arabs to give up peace initiatives with them because they are “the scum of the human race, the rats of the world, the violators of pacts and agreements, the murderers of the prophets, and the offspring of apes and pigs.”[2]

“Read history,” called Al-Sudayyis in another sermon, “and you will understand that the Jews of yesterday are the evil fathers of the Jews of today, who are evil offspring, infidels, distorters of [others’] words, calf-worshippers, prophet-murderers, prophecy-deniers… the scum of the human race ‘whom Allah cursed and turned into apes and pigs…’ These are the Jews, an ongoing continuum of deceit, obstinacy, licentiousness, evil, and corruption…”[3]

In a sermon at the Said Al-Jandoul mosque in Al-Taif, Saudi sheikh Ba’d bin Abdallah Al-Ajameh Al-Ghamidi explained that “the qualities of the Jews” were present at all times and in all places: “The current behavior of the brothers of apes and pigs, their treachery, violation of agreements, and defiling of holy places… is connected with the deeds of their forefathers during the early period of Islam – which proves the great similarity between all the Jews living today and the Jews who lived at the dawn of Islam.”[4]

In an August 2001 sermon, Sheikh Ibrahim Madhi, Palestinian Authority official and imam of the Sheikh Ijlin mosque,Gaza City’s main mosque, called on the Palestinian people to forget their internal disagreements and turn all weapons against Jews: “lances must be directed at the Jews, the enemies of Allah, the nation accursed in Allah’s book. Allah described [them] as apes and pigs, calf-worshipers, idol-worshippers…”[5]

Seeing Jews as “descendants of apes and pigs” is common also in Shi’ite Islam. Such statements appear, for instance, in a 1998 speech by Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah on the occasion of the Shi’ite ‘Ashoura holiday. Nasrallah regretted that the holiday fell “on the 50th anniversary of the bitter and distressing historical catastrophe of the establishment of the state of the grandsons of apes and pigs – the Zionist Jews – on the land of Palestine and Jerusalem.” He closed his speech with these words: “… We reaffirm the slogan of the struggle against the Great Satan and call, like last year: ‘Death to America. To the murderers of the prophets, the grandsons of apes and pigs,’ we say: … ‘Death to Israel…'”[6]……

Chapter One: Islamic Religious Sources on the Jews – The ‘Descendants of Apes and Pigs’

According to Islam, the ancient Jews were turned into animals for transgressing the word of God.[11] This divine punishment is mentioned in the most important sources of Islamic religious law, in both the Koran’s recounting of the divine revelation, and in the extremely reliable Hadiths (traditions of the Prophet Muhammad) compiled by the leading ninth-century sages Muslim and Al-Bukhari,[12] which mention also mice, lizards, and other animals in the same context.

The divine punishment of Jews is mentioned in three Koranic verses: “… They are those whom Allah has cast aside and on whom His wrath has fallen and of whom He has made some as apes and swine…” (5:60); “…You have surely known the end of those from amongst you who transgressed in the matter of the Sabbath, in consequence of which we condemned them: Be ye like apes, despised” (2:65);[13] and “when, instead of amending, they became more persistent in the pursuit of that which they were forbidden, we condemned them: Be ye as apes, despised” (7:166).[14]

Arab literature (Adab) also discussed Jews’ transformation into animals. In his 9th century treatise The Book of Animals, the greatest of these authors, Al-Jahiz,[15] mentions that it is generally thought that the cheetah, eel, white ant, mouse, and lizard were originally Jews. He mentions the tradition telling how a sage saw a man eating a lizard and said to him: “Know that you have eaten one of the sheikhs of the sons of Israel.” He does not mention why they were changed into animals, but does say that proof of this is that “the lizard’s foot resembles the human hand.”[16]….read the whole Koranic supported hate-fest….

IN other words, knowing full well that hate crimes against Jews are based upon Islamic injunctions and centuries of Christian persecution which culminated into the biggest crime against humanity, the Holocaust, Islamists (and enablers) conflate the bugaboos against Muslims – even as the REAL fear of worldwide militant jihad accelerates at warp speed – with what ACTUALLY happens when Jews are scapegoats via skyrocketing anti-semitism!

SO it is along this lying, mendacious, and highly dangerous trajectory that a core jihadi imperative is deployed to cement Shariah Law in America. Targeted. Effectively, as their mouthpieces trot out “hate-crime” charges (whenever fear – rightfully and thankfully – of Islam’s followers raises its head, and this and that pro-active expressive actions are taken), they reflexively resort to stealth jihad. Indeed.

INTRINSICALLY, to impose their will on America – on the west at large – they must first silence all those who oppose Islamic doctrine which underpins (and incites) frontal jihad. Hence, ad infinitum, shrieks of “Islamophobia” are screamed. Bleeding ears.

THEREFORE, it is not an accident that any criticism of Islam must be stopped in its tracks, stealthily, via the laws of Blasphemy. Yes, it must slip into America under the radar. Thus, when Americans/westerners are warned that drawing cartoons of Muhammad is tantamount to “incitement” and a “hate-crime”, well, it must be internalized that Sharia Law is the goal, even if not acknowledged as such – at least for now! Alas, isn’t it interesting that in the same manner in which cartoons are deemed “over the line” and “inciting” to hatred, at the same time, ones “yard-art” is also beyond the “acceptable” pale?   A + B. Hmm.

An East Peoria, Illinois man’s yard is at the center of a racial (What ‘race’ is Islam?) controversy. The silhouette cutouts at Dennis Murdy’s home show a hunter pointing a shotgun at a person wearing an Islamic-looking rag on his head, while surrendering.

The silhouette cutouts at Dennis Murdy’s home show a hunter pointing a shotgun at a person wearing a turban, while surrendering.

Murdy claims he’s expressing his freedom of speech.

“The Muslims and Islam is one of the most violent cults there is,” he says. “It is not a religion. It’s a cult. Their Qur’an says nothing but violence. You can see what ISIS is doing. They are spreading across the country and this is biblical.”

The Islamic Foundation of Peoria is worried about the message the signs send.

“Free speech should not be mixed with hate speech. It’s extremely important and we have to draw that line. If Islamophobia is going to be acceptable, by the same token, anti-semitism and racism would be acceptable. That is wrong,” says Imam Kamil Mufti with the Islamic Foundation of Peoria.

http://up.anv.bz/latest/anvload.html?key=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

 

MIND you, the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood controlled Islamic Foundation of Peoria is “worried about the message the signs send”, well…

Islamic (Foundation) Center of Peoria

The centere’s website says it is a member of NAIT, affiliated with the North American Imams Federation and endorsed by the Hamas-linked Mosque Foundation.

MOST significantly, welcome to HUSSEIN Obama’s “Amerika” ala the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia and assorted high level cultural Marxists, all of whom seek the same goal – bringing down America!

MORE than Orwellian. A western nightmare!

{re-blogged at The Homeland Security Network}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

Islamic Foxes Within U.S. Police Depts: Miami Chief, What Say You, Re Your “F U” Non-Pledge of Allegiance? How Many More Are Embedded? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

(Anita M. Najiy…the “subject of interest”…Assistant Chief of Police, City of Miami Police congratulates Jorge R. Colina as Assistant Chief of Police during the promotions of seven executive staff members for the City of Miami Police on Friday, April 17, 2015)

 

logo

 

 

 

AS is said, a picture is worth a thousand words. Even more so, some are assigned a higher “market” value.

IN this regard, oftentimes, what is missing from a certain photo is the authentic and inner pictorial, the heart and thrust of the situation. In other words, when a law enforcement official, a top cop, fails to acknowledge the pledge of allegiance, what exactly does that signal as to “intent”? Could it be any clearer? 

(Assistant Chief (Muslim) Anita Najiy, just left of the flag, has raised the ire of police union head Javier Ortiz.)

The head of the city’s police union is accusing the assistant chief of police, Anita Najiy, of lacking respect for the United States, and he’s circulating a video he says should lead to disciplinary action against her. Her alleged crime against America? Not holding her hand over her heart during the Pledge of Allegiance. 

Fraternal Order of Police President Javier Ortiz was in the front row at a promotional event last week at Miami Police College to film Najiy, a 32-year-veteran of the agency, during the pledge. As other members placed their hands over their hearts, Najiy kept her arms by her sides.

In doing so, Ortiz says, she failed to exhibit courtesy and etiquette that “must be exercised when wearing a law enforcement uniform.”

“If you’re not pledging allegiance to the United States, my question is what country are you pledging allegiance to?” Ortiz says. “Anyone who isn’t offended by that is not American, because when you become a U.S. citizen, you pledge allegiance to the .US.”

Yesterday evening, Ortiz sent a letter to Chief Rodolfo Llanes outlining the event. He also suggested appropriate discipline, including Najiy’s removal from a commander position.

Though the police department’s code of conduct allows for reprimand if an officer doesn’t salute the flag, it makes no mention of protocol during the Pledge of Allegiance, according to the Miami Herald.

The Herald also reports that part of the code of conduct for U.S. military personnel supersedes the police’s code — and it states that “when in uniform, indoors, stand at attention, remain silent, and face the flag.”

And that’s exactly what Najiy did. Still, the matter is “currently under review,” according to a spokesman from the Miami Police Department.

That’s not Ortiz’s only complaint. He also says he’s heard “rumors” that Najiy is Muslim, adding that if true, he respects her religion but that some normal “protections” of the freedoms of religion and speech don’t apply to those in police uniform, because “you’re supposed to be neutral.”

“The flag is a symbol of our country,” he says. “What is the difference if I decide to light a U.S. flag on fire in a police uniform?”

Najiy declined to discuss the complaint with New Times.

MOREOVER, the fact that she is part of 3 ! protected classes – female, Muslim and Black – she can literally get away with breaching all protocol (and much more) and will remain untouchable. What a deal.

SO, let’s get real: feministas aka femi-nazis; Blacks; most resolutely, Muslims and their apologists, will have her back. Like night follows day. But no matter. This is a very serious national issue, and involves much more than her personal “F U”, leaving aside her smiling and smug mug. She recognizes the cards she holds, and that she has little to fear from the top brass! Media in toto.

INDUBITABLY, Najiy is a committed Muslim and this is the reason why she stood – at an OFFICIAL police ceremony – with her hands at her sides, failing to pledge her allegiance to America! She surely had the forethought to internalize that her non-pledge would be frowned upon. She didn’t care. This is because her real and authentic allegiance lies elsewhere. Americans (westerners) must understand this core aspect, otherwise none of what is transpiring, the visceral hostility within the Muslim community, will make sense. Resonate. 

RESOLUTELY, she mirrored – akin to a like-minded anti-American, HUSSEIN Obama  –  his “F U” non-salute pictorial! Concomitantly, the absence of his pledge!

YES, while Senator, in Oct. 2007, sans hand-over-heart, he was the lone “objector” (even Hill, as despicable as she is, didn’t dare to demonstrate said open disdain) during a ceremonial event when the pledge of allegiance was recited. Indeed, the pic was vetted six ways to Sunday and deemed authentic. That is that.

TO wit, what should we conclude from the fact that BOTH leaders (a preponderance of Muslims alike) refused to openly pledge their allegiance to the United States of America? Simply put, it must be viewed through the eyes, the prism, of a Muslim, and their commitments derived thereof. Forthwith, remove your (American) glasses to see the true picture. 

FIRST and foremost, it must be recognized that said stances are not akin to general protests against the flag, even by those who are ill-advised to do so, at least while operating in an official capacity. In uniform, no less.

ALAS, relative to Miami’s Deputy Police Chief, while her behavior was a breach of protocol, offensive and certainly grounds for demotion, her action – or lack thereof, like HUSSEIN Obama’s – stemmed from her one and only allegiance; to Allah and the Muslim ummah. NEVER forget this and that.

As an American Muslim,
I pledge allegiance to ALLAH and His Prophet,
I respect and love my family and my community,
and I dedicate my life to serving the cause

of truth and justice.
As an American citizen, with rights

and responsibilities,
I pledge allegiance to the flag

of the United States of America
And to the republic for which it stands,
one nation, Under God, indivisible,
with liberty and justice for all.

INDEED, the Islamic pledge is incumbent upon ALL Muslims, regardless of their western locale. Resultant, pledges of allegiance to ones (resident) nation is forbidden and sinful in Islam. Ḥarām… حَرَام … Understood?

THUS, in a bare-bones manner, what this means is that the very LAST pledge – evidenced in the above order of commitments – is to America, and only if what is expected of them, as Americans, is not in contradiction to Islamic Law, the Shariah. Immutable.

EXTRAPOLATING further, since Shariah Law is in DIRECT contravention to the Constitution, it is absolutely impossible to fulfill their very last pledge, though inserted for appearance’s sake. Their hierarchical order of allegiances are NOT random in nature. 

INCONTROVERTIBLY – just as one example out of enumerable – the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, freedom of speech and freedom of the press, is considered blasphemy under Sharia Law. It is this Islamic edict, blasphemy, which underpinned (even demanded) the recent massacre of the entire team of Charlie Hebdo. In fact, all of the non-stop Muslim rampages throughout the world – whenever an “insult” is perceived towards Islam – stem from Shariah Law. For the record, the weapon of “Islamophobia” was conceived to silence and mute all such “criticism”! This is one such merging/marriage of stealth and frontal jihad.

 

NOT only that, but the knock-on effect (one of many) to the aforementioned is the evisceration of freedom of religion, again, inviolate and rooted in the U.S. Constitution but unacceptable within Islam! We can go up and down the line and come to the same irrefutable findings: Islam is incompatible, in DIRECT conflict, with the west due to Shariah Law. Conclusively, sans Shariah Law there is NO Islam.  

DEAR readers, Muslims (exclusive of apostates from Islam, whether they officially convert to another religion or want nothing to do with Islam) simply can’t pledge their allegiance, hence, immerse, within western nations. This is the central and key element to what accounts for much of their ingratitude when living in the west. Fuggedaboutit!

MOST significantly, first and foremost, they commit themselves to Allah. It is this pledge which abrogates their ability to properly integrate, regardless of anything else.

KNOW this: none of their hostility stems from economic factors, in fact, the polar opposite is true. Incontrovertibly, a preponderance of the leading terrorists (increasingly, their followers alike) enjoy financial success and possess higher educational degrees, yet, their wealth and opportunities do not dissuade them from jihad.

AND for more proof-in-the-pudding:

Tareq Kamleh

 

 

 

 

 

A PERTH doctor has appeared in an Islamic State propaganda video urging medicos to join his jihad.

Dr Tareq Kamleh is filmed cradling a newborn baby in a hospital in the Islamic State stronghold of Raqqa in Syria, saying: “Please consider coming, please don’t delay.’’

The blue-eyed paediatrician says he is offering his medical services as part of his “jihad for Islam”.

The Sunday Times can reveal Dr Kamleh made multiple visits to an army surplus store in Perth late last year to buy gear for his trip.

The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency website shows he was registered as a medical practitioner in Subiaco in 2010.

A former friend said Dr Kamleh, now going by the name Abu Yusuf, left Perth for Adelaide to begin his medical degree about 10 years ago.

After graduating from Adelaide University, he began his pediatrics career at the Women’s and Children’s Hospital.

The friend, who knew Dr Kamleh when he was a paediatric registrar in 2011, said he showed no signs of radicalisation.

“I am just shocked and sort of saddened for him because it’s the end of his life in Australia, I imagine,” the friend said.

The video introduces the “ISHS” – or IS Health Service – and features a number of doctors talking about medical facilities.

Dr Kamleh is filmed telling converts that his only regret is not joining the terrorist state sooner.

A worker at the Perth surplus store said a man instantly recognisable as the doctor in the video made multiple visits last December.

The worker said the man spent $400 on a backpack, jacket, socks and several pairs of pants popular with security contractors in the Middle East.

“He didn’t speak about Islam or anything to do with religion during the entire conversation,” he said.

“Take away the beard and I just thought he was a young doctor going overseas to do his part.”…

SO, post haste, erase all that nonsense, as Harf barfed via her State Dept. story line fairy tale! 

IN fact, Jews (Christians et al) are not religiously obligated to choose sides, rather, they are encouraged to show gratitude for the countries that they live in. Oh yeah.

THUS, as an American-Israeli (living in Israel), this investigative journalist feels goosebumps when reciting the Pledge of Allegiance or singing the Star Spangled Banner, each and every time. Similarly, when singing Hatikvah, Israel’s national anthem.

AN equal stirring of the patriotic heart. No divided loyalties.

STIPULATED, herein underlies the key and core to a committed Muslim’s refusal to place hand-over-heart; Islam’s civilizational jihad!

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

Americans SILENCED: Shariah (Blasphemy) Law (Effectively) Enforced! Is It Too Late? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

IT is impossible to quantify the amount of grave damage accrued to freedom of speech within America (as well as throughout the west) due to self-censorship and the Brotherhood’s stealth-like enforcers.

INCONTESTABLY, few require an explanatory memorandum re “frontal” jihad, yes, flying body parts will suffice. And if one’s mind cannot (mentally) revert back to 9/11/01, well, that’s understandable. However, the failure to internalize the nuanced tactics endemic to stealth jihad amounts to a fatal flaw, relative to ones national obligations. The fact remains that the latter Islamic mandated directive is destroying America and other western nations. Regardless, certain subjects are requisite and dare not be considered as elective courses, especially, Blasphemy!

Wolff Bachner: After the Muslim Brotherhood took control of the government in Egypt, despite their constant promises that they had no interest in holding political office or influencing Egypt’s elections, we began to see and hear a new expression used to describe their activities; Stealth Jihad. What is Stealth Jihad and how is the Muslim Brotherhood using this powerful new weapon to achieve their goals?

Adina Kutnicki: Wolff, you are obviously up to speed on your Islamic verbiage. Definitely, Stealth Jihad is a mandatory concept to master. So, in order to follow the winding, often unfamiliar terrain attributed to Islam’s thrust into the west, its essence must be adequately explored.

It revolves around the ability of dedicated Islamists to fly below the (communal/national) radar, but only until the Islamic community is strong enough – both politically, economically and otherwise – to emerge from the shadows. Operating out of full view affords anonymity, yet allows jihadists to build up as many war chests as possible. Two key components are monetary bases and hidden terror cells. They must be ready and prepared to spring into frontal action, if necessary. As a matter of record, staying burrowed for years is often a requirement. As is said, “hiding in plain sight” is more than a saying to Islamists. It is an actual method of jihad!

But if one example stands out among countless others, look no further than to a recent commentary, which commemorates the 12th memorial of 9/11/01. The DESECRATION of 9/11/01: Stealth Jihad” Via Mosques; Adnan Oktar’s Turkish-Islamic Union, Taqiyya”, Penetrates Into Jewish/Israeli Media/Power Centers – Where Is The Nexus? demonstrates the despicable and dangerous lengths the Muslim Brotherhood pursues to effectuate their agenda. The submission (Islam literally means “to submit”) of the west to Shariah Law, as described in just one of many YouTube interviews with Islamic leaders, is anything, but circumspect, despite their usage of Stealth Jihad.

So while the Muslim Brotherhood utilizes a mix of Stealth Jihadin combination with “frontal/open jihad” – for this discussion, let us stick to what is less visible, than what is more readily apparent, that is, exploding body parts…..(read the rest here)

ON the one hand, frontal terror tactics are designed to instill a reflexive and immediate form of compliance. Therefore, when jihadi attacks explode within cities – NYC and Boston are just two examples – many become too terrified to speak out against the “religion of peace.” Speechless. See no Islamic evil, hear no Islamic evil…or “we will kill you”!

SIMILARLY, Charlie Hebdo-like assassinations – of those who dare to “defame” the “prophet” – are designed as particular warnings. In essence, a (heretofore) basic western underpinning, free speech, must cease and desist. Infidels, you got that?

REFLEXIVELY, western leaders, despite a pithy march of solidarity after the wholesale slaughter in Paris, reverted to self censorship. Even liberal-based Canada, in 2013, deemed that criticizing/parodying Islam’s wife beating “rules” was (still is) a non starter. Did you ever?

ON the other side of the spectrum, “soft/stealth jihad” is used in many insidious ways, chiefly, through interfaith “dialogue” and the Islamic process of da’wah. Moreover, a stepped up version is now in full force via the newly constituted Muslim-American political party, duly under the leadership of the Brotherhood Mafia!

REGARDLESS of their back door assaults, the fact of the matter is that the U.S. Constitution enshrines certain inalienable rights. Thus, one “accommodation” at a time, it is doubly egregious that the leadership of the free world has brought about this dire situation by silencing Americans.  

SUCH is the case because Obama Inc.’s Department of Justice has effectively criminalized any discussion of Islam, regardless of anything else. How many know this?

AND it is through this (illegal) slippery slope that a parent (in New Hampshire) was arrested at a school board meeting, all for daring to question the school’s choice of reading assignments! Imagine that.

With the above in mind, it is hardly surprising that strong-arm tactics are being used against anyone who refuses to toe the radical left’s dictates or the increasingly emboldened thrusts by Islamists. Readers must internalize that one does not negate the other, in fact, they feed off of each other! Dracula-like. Hence, the constant reference to the red/green alliance.

Into this arena, along came a concerned father from the small state of New Hampshire (also a lawyer…having worked in the NYC Prosecutor’s office…not exactly a milieu which renders one squeamish nor aghast at heavy-handed actions) who became duly alarmed by a particular book assigned to his 14 year old daughter. Not unlike any responsible parent, he placed a call into the principal’s office. No one responded to his concerns. After several failed attempts, he attended a school board meeting to address the issue. Well and good – or so you would think.

Now, the fact that the book was written by a bestselling author is neither here nor there. But what does matter is the absolute graphic and sexual nature of this work of fiction, which in the “infinite wisdom” of leftist driven school officials is supposed to teach requisite lessons. It is “a fictional account of a school shooting in New Hampshire that lasted for 19 minutes (hence the title) that contains explicit and graphic sexual material, along with arguably controversial messages about homicide and yes, gun violence”…..

When protecting your children becomes a crime against the state in New Hampshire – The critical back-story now told

STIPULATED, the subject matter was about inappropriate sexual and violent material and not about Islam. Nevertheless, the “thought police”, Gestapo-like (whether from the Islamist or leftist side), are never far behind, once citizens relinquish (without a fight) their Constitutional rights.

ATOP said anti-freedom infringement, is anyone shocked that a sports coach in Maine, at one of the oldest and toniest private schools in the nation, was “forced to resign” (essentially fired despite the so-called resignation) because he shared a negative Facebook post about Islam? Don’t be.

According to recent reports, a Conway, N.H., man was forced out of his position as a lacrosse coach at Fryeburg Academy after sharing an open letter to Barack Obama about the influence of Islam on the world. The letter has been circulating since 2009 and was reportedly written in response to a speech in which Obama declared Islam an integral part of America’s past.

Of course, Obama has made similar statement since then; and when Scott Lees received an email from a friend with the open letter attached, he felt it was relevant enough to share with his Facebook friends.

The letter as posted reads:

Dear Mr. Obama:

Have you ever seen a Muslim hospital?

Have you heard a Muslim orchestra?

Have you seen a Muslim band march in a parade?

Have you witnessed a Muslim charity?

Have you seen Muslims shak[ing] hands with Muslim Girl Scouts?

Have you seen a Muslim Candy Striper?

Have your seen a Muslim do anything that contributes positively to the American way of life????

The answer is no, you have not. Just ask yourself WHY???

Were those Muslims that were in America when the Pilgrims first landed? Funny, I thought they were Native American Indians.

Were those Muslims that celebrated the first Thanksgiving day? Sorry again, those were Pilgrims and Native American Indians.

Can you show me one Muslim signature on the United States Constitution? Declaration of Independence? Bill of Rights? Didn’t think so.

Did Muslims fight for this country’s freedom from England? No.

Did Muslims fight during the Civil War to free the slaves in America? No, they did not. In fact, Muslims to this day are still the largest traffickers in human slavery. Your own half-brother, a devout Muslim, still advocates slavery himself, even though Muslims of Arabic descent refer to black Muslims as “pug nosed slaves.” Says a lot of what the Muslim world really thinks of your family’s “rich Islamic heritage,” doesn’t it Mr. Obama?

Where were Muslims during the Civil Rights era of this country? Not present. There are no pictures or media accounts of Muslims walking side by side with Martin Luther King, Jr. or helping to advance the cause of Civil Rights.

Where were Muslims during this country’s Woman’s Suffrage era? Again, not present. In fact, devout Muslims demand that women are subservient to men in the Islamic culture. So much so, that often they are beaten for not wearing the ‘hajib’ or for talking to a man who is not a direct family member or their husband. Yep, the Muslims are all for women’s rights, aren’t they?

Where were Muslims during World War II? They were aligned with Adolf Hitler. The Muslim grand mufti himself met with Adolf Hitler, reviewed the troops and accepted support from the Nazis in killing Jews.

Finally, Mr. Obama, where were Muslims on Sept. 11th, 2001? If they weren’t flying planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon or a field in Pennsylvania killing nearly 3,000 people on our own soil, they were rejoicing in the Middle East.

No one can dispute the pictures shown from all parts of the Muslim world celebrating on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and other cable news networks that day. Strangely, the very “moderate” Muslims who’s asses you bent over backwards to kiss in Cairo, Egypt on June 4th were stone cold silent post 9-11. To many Americans, their silence has meant approval for the acts of that day.

And THAT, Mr. Obama, is the “rich heritage” Muslims have here in America…

Oh, I’m sorry, I forgot to mention the Barbary Pirates. They were Muslims.

And now we can add November 5, 2009 – the slaughter of American soldiers at Fort Hood by a Muslim major, a doctor and a psychiatrist, who was supposed to be counseling soldiers returning from battle in Iraq and Afghanistan.

That, Mr. Obama is the “Muslim heritage” in America!

P.S. Now, you can add the Boston Marathon bombings, too…

THE above posting was not only fact-based, but the coach had every Constitutional right to share it, regardless whose feathers became ruffled. But no matter, even historical truth is no longer tolerated, if Islamists demand an omerta. Do you agree, or not, to these strictures on your freedoms?

AS is said in Israel, sach ha’kol, at the end of it all, whether in America or within other western nations, a major fissure exists. One faction believes that keeping ones head down, essentially, self censorship, will tame the Islamic beasts and satiate them for the interim.

NEVER gonna happen. Besides, blackmailers keep upping the ante, once paid. Same outcome on steroids.

INTRINSICALLY, passive westerners will either bow down to Islam, submit, or they will be eliminated. This is where it is at; whether in the Mid East, Africa, Europe, America et al. Ones locale makes no diff. The coinage is inevitable and mandated through Islamic doctrine.  

Islamist insurgents have issued an ultimatum to northern Iraq’s dwindling Christian population to either convert to Islam, pay a religious levy or face death, according to a statement distributed in the militant-controlled city of Mosul.

The statement issued by the Islamic State, the al Qaeda offshoot which led last month’s lightning assault to capture swathes of north Iraq, and seen by Reuters, said the ruling would come into effect on Saturday.

It said Christians who wanted to remain in the “caliphate” that the Islamic State declared this month in parts of Iraq and Syria must agree to abide by terms of a “dhimma” contract – a historic practice under which non-Muslims were protected in Muslim lands in return for a special levy known as “jizya”.

“We offer them three choices: Islam; the dhimma contract – involving payment of jizya; if they refuse this they will have nothing but the sword,” the announcement said…

CRYSTAL clear.

HOWEVER, a divergent faction takes the polar opposite approach, refusing to cow and bow, instead, preferring to deal with their insatiable dictates head on. This is precisely why a growing backlash of non-compliant “dissenters” have taken up the struggle via the pen and otherwise. Educational sites, political commentary and satirical forums are examples of particular types of push back.

drawmuhammadfinal700

IN this regard, with an increasingly growing platform, this site will not comply, submit and agree to be silent.  Hey, Islamists and fellow enablers, you got that?

MOST significantly, the question remains: which approach – based upon overwhelming empirical (educational) evidence – has the best chance to stop Islam’s enforcers at our (western) gates?

READERS, either take a stand or submit. The choice is yours. There is no middle ground.

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

Shariah BLASPHEMY Laws Demanded By Western Politicians/Lawyers:Appeasement To Tame The Islamic Beasts!Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

WHILE many western elitists, including those who hold governmental positions of power – ugh…slimy politicians…damn them to hell –  are TOTALLY clueless as to the ins and outs of Shariah law, others understand the basic goal of Islamic leaders; submission of all to Allah via an overriding Islamic Caliphate. A tall order, but no less doable.

REGARDLESS, those who profess ignorance are no less culpable of the ensuing outcome, just like their better informed counterparts. In fact, as a matter of legal record, ignorance of the law – ignorantia juris non excusat or ignorantia legis neminem excusat – is NOT a defense. Those of us who have a background in law, particularly in criminal law, understand what’s what.

THAT being the case, it is this site’s mission to catch millions of its readers up to speed, most compellingly, re the basics of Shariah law.  Inherently, Shariah law is anti-freedom and anti-liberty, defacto, inhumane.

NOT only that, but if addled westerners believe their stranglehold is something they can escape – if not beaten back – think again:

Bit by bit, Western nations are adopting Muslim legal standards on blasphemy and on the treatment of women.

The excuses are manifold. Racism, cultural differences, Islamophobia, relativism… but it all ends the same way, with Western writers, artists and thinkers being censored and Western women being subject to Taliban treatment.

This is how it began.

An Afghan refugee would drive from his home in Tullamarine to nightclubs in Frankston late at night searching for drunk, vulnerable young woman to prey on, a court was told today.

He would pick them up in his white 1988 Honda Civic and rape them.

The victim was sitting on the footpath behind the 21st Century Dance Club when Esmatullah Sharifi approached her and offered to give her a lift to the Bay Hotel.

She accepted but became anxious and confused when they had been driving for an hour and she saw a road sign saying Sorrento.

Sharifi then pulled over into a dark side street and raped her in the front passenger seat.

“She began to scream and cry out for help,” Ms Dalziel said.

“The accused put his left hand over her mouth and his right hand around her neck, restricting her breathing. He said to her, ‘I’ll take you home after it, I’ll give you back your phone as well’.

In the rapist’s defense, his lawyer argued that he wasn’t at all clear about this whole “Women are human beings” thing.

Mr Regan said Esmatullah Sharifi was uneducated, illiterate, inexperienced in forming relationships with women, and was confused about the nature of consent. He is in Australia on a permanent protected visa.

The judge didn’t buy it then, but the usual lefty approach is to just keep appealing until you find a bleeding heart judge who accepts the horrible notion being put forward. And that didn’t take very long.

Granting leave to appeal, Court of Appeal Justice Robert Redlich said: “The sentencing judge rejected any suggestion (Esmatullah Sharifi) didn’t have a clear concept of consent in sexual relations.”

In April last year, a psychologist told the County Court that Sharifi had “an unclear concept of what constitutes consent in sexual relationships” in Australia.

“It proves, in my view, an adequate basis for most grounds of appeal that (Sharifi) wishes to pursue,” the judge said.

We’re not just dealing with ignorance of the law. We have Western judges setting out the notion that if a Muslim settler in Europe, America or Australia does not understand the concept that women can refuse sexual contact, that this is a mitigating circumstance….

INCONTROVERTIBLY, their overt barbarism (via ALL of Shariah law’s other offenses) renders Islam, its laws, in violation of western laws and norms, even as western judges/politicians are cowed into accepting Shariah law as the “law of the land”! Dangerous as that.

Islam teaches that shari’a, as God’s revealed law, perfect and eternal, is binding on individuals, society and state in all its details. By logical extension, any criticism of shari’a is heresy. Muslims who deny the validity of shari’a in any way are labeled as non-Muslims (infidels) or apostates (those who convert to another religion) by traditionalists and Islamists. As such, they face the threat of being prosecuted for apostasy, a crime that carries the death penalty in shari’a.

The mandates of shari’a are extremely harsh compared to modern Western standards. They infringe on many modern principles of human rights, religious freedom, and equality of all before the law. For example:

Hudud punishments are the severe penalties prescribed by shari’a for offenses defined as being against God himself. The punishments for these crimes are seen as divinely ordained and cannot be changed by humans. These include 100 lashes or stoning to death as punishment for adultery; 80 lashes for false accusation of adultery; amputation of limbs for theft; 40 or 80 lashes for drinking alcohol; imprisonment, amputation or death (by crucifixion in serious cases) for highway robbery; and the death penalty for apostasy from Islam. Methods of execution for apostasy can include decapitation, crucifixion, burning, strangling, drowning, impaling, and flaying. Apostates are denied a decent burial after their deaths, and the Muslims who participate in killing them are promised an eternal reward in paradise.

Discrimination on the basis of religion is fundamental to shari’a. By religious edict, Islam must be dominant; only Muslims are considered to be full citizens. Jews and Christians are defined as dhimmis (literally “protected” i.e. permitted to live). However this protection is on condition that they do not bear arms, know their lowly place in society, treat Muslims with respect, and pay a special poll tax (jizya).

Shari‘a divides the world into two opposing domains: the House of Islam (Dar al-Islam) and the House of War (Dar al-Harb). Muslims are supposed to wage jihad to change the House of War (where non-Muslims are dominant) into the House of Islam, dominated by Muslims. While some modern Muslims reject this aggressive understanding of jihad, and see it merely as a strengthening of personal faith, most agree that jihad includes defending Muslim territory and Muslims from any form of aggression; this leaves the door open to interpreting any conflict involving Muslims as a case of defensive jihad. Islamic terror groups justify their atrocities by references to the shari’a rules on jihad.

Shari’a discriminates on the basis of gender. Men are regarded as superior. Women are treated as deficient in intelligence, morals and religion, and must therefore be protected from their own weaknesses. Shari’a rules enforce modesty in dress and behavior and the segregation of the sexes. These regulations place women under the legal guardianship of their male relatives. Women are inherently of less value than men in many legal rulings. A man is allowed up to four wives, but women can have only one husband. A man can divorce his wife easily; a woman faces great obstacles should she want a divorce from her husband. A daughter inherits half as much as a son, and the testimony of a female witness in court is worth only half that of a male witness. In cases of murder, the compensation for a woman is less than that given for a man.

Shari’a courts often display a clear gender bias. This is seen in the widespread practice of accusing rape victims of illicit sexual relations (zina), an offense which carries punishments ranging from imprisonment and flogging to death by stoning.

Female genital mutilation is widespread among some Muslim communities, especially in Egypt, East Africa, Yemen, and Indonesia. Many Muslim leaders see the practice as essential for preserving women’s chastity on which family honor largely depends.

In shari’a there are differences between the various schools of law as to the extent of what a woman may reveal in public. The Hanafi and Maliki schools of law permit face and hands to be revealed in public, thus there is no need for a veil over the face. Among Hanbalis there are two opinions, some permitting the revealing of face and hands, others forbidding it. The Shafi‘is demand that a woman’s face and hands be covered in public, thus demanding some kind of veil over her face.

Both Qur’an and hadith urge modesty in women’s dress and command them to cover themselves in public. The problem is a matter of interpretation of the original Arabic words used.

Most Sunni Muslims believe shari‘a to be completely unchangeable, althoughShi’as allow for the possibility of interpreting and adapting it to new circumstances. Since the nineteenth century, there have been efforts at reforming shari’a in a liberal direction in order to accommodate it to the modern world, but in the contemporary Muslim world, the traditionalists and especially the Islamists — upholders of the traditional view of shari’a — are now dominating public opinion.

Of particular concern for Americans are cases where Muslim litigants seek — sometimes successfully — to have their cases in U.S. courts decided by principles of Sharia law. As of May 2011, the Center for Security Policy (CSP) had identified 50 examples in 23 states “where Muslim-Americans had their cases decided by Sharia Law against their will.” In one case, a Trial Court judge had ruled based on Moroccan Sharia law, even though those involved were not Moroccans or even Muslims. In Tampa, Florida, a judge had ruled that a dispute between two Muslim parties would be solved in accordance with Sharia, overruling the objections of one party. And in a notorious New Jersey case, a judge had exonerated a Muslim man of raping his wife because Sharia allowed him to do so. (The ruling was later overturned.) The 50 instances cited by CSP represented just a fraction of the total number of such cases.

IN line with the above barbaric implementation of Shariah, the aforementioned any criticism of shari’a is heresyis especially noteworthy. It aligns with today’s thesis: the implementation of blasphemy laws across the west! An omerta.

At his White House press conference Friday, President Obama once again endorsed the placement of a triumphalist mosque in immediate proximity to Ground Zero, declaring it the “inalienable right” of the increasingly transparently immoderate imam determined to build it there. Troubling as this evidence is of Mr. Obama’s submission to shariah – the supremacist political-military-legal code of places like Saudi Arabia and Iran that Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf says he wants to bring to America, even more worrisome is something else he at least implied: He was prepared as “Commander-in-Chief” to prevent the burning of Qurans by a pastor in Florida.

Now, I am no fan of book-burning, of any kind. But, as I noted in this space recently, it is absolutely the “inalienable” right of any American citizen to do it – whether the book is the Bible (which we now know the U.S. military has burned in Afghanistan, lest it be used to proselytize there), the U.S. Constitution or, yes, the Quran.

The President evidently feels justified in contemplating the use of force to stop Quran burnings on the basis of the possibility raised by General David Petraeus, among others, that such a bonfire in Gainesville would translate into a conflagration elsewhere. All of us must be concerned at the prospect that the latter might consume U.S. servicemen and women or civilians, in Muslim lands or elsewhere.

Still, as such brilliant commentators as Andy McCarthy, Diana West, and Debra Burlingame have observed, there is something peculiar about the remarkably contrasting concern being expressed by Barack Obama and his friends over Muslims’ rights and sensitivities on the one hand, and his seeming indifference to those of Americans who are not Muslims. The only common denominator between his attitude toward a mega mosque that offends more than 70% of our countrymen and women and his attitude toward the prospect of an “insensitive” book-burning is that he wants to ensure nothing is done that would offend Muslims.

This practice amounts to enforcing shariah’s strict laws prohibiting “blasphemy” and “slander.” In Saudi Arabia and the other states governed by this repressive code, the penalty for such a crime can be death…..

WITHOUT reservation, this investigative journalist warned the readers: Obama Inc., via Eric Holder’s (in)Justice Dept. (in concert with his replacement), has already laid the groundwork for implementing blasphemy laws, even if called otherwise. A pig is still a pig, even if prettified with lipstick. Sheesh. Believe it, or not.

CONCOMITANTLY, as previously explained, Shariah law’s bias against women goes far beyond what western women consider discriminatory, particularly as they continuously opine over fair and equitable pay in the workplace etc, even if their creds are not up to snuff. Regardless, as part of Shariah law, one would think that ACTUAL enslavement of women would be a non-starter for them! Okey dokey. Not so fast.

INCREDIBLY, leftist women are as insane as their male counterparts, at least when it comes to silencing any criticism of “sacred cows”, Islam being one of them. Resultant, they believe they can pick and choose which Shariah laws they will “tolerate”, as if they will have a choice to do so. Dumb asses. Once Islamic law becomes the “law of the land” there will be no going back. Understood?

BUT that doesn’t mean that the rest of us will be dragged into their warped mindset, even if they babble that “peace” will be achieved, contingent upon westerners zipping their lips re Islam. Hell no. 

NOW Islamic countries are free (that’s an oxymoronic statement) to do what they wish within their boundaries and there isn’t a damn thing that westerners can do about it. But outraged folks can shout about Islam’s inhumane actions from the rooftops, and they can badger their reps to cease sending monies to anti-freedom offending countries. 

CONSEQUENTIALLY, if one wants to visualize what handing over control to Shariah law jihadists entails, as dictated by appeasement-oriented westerners, well….

Zuhair Hindi is a teacher at the UNRWA Jabalya Prep School for Boys.

He is also a terror supporter.

His profile picture on Facebook is of Qassam Brigades terrorist Hassan Mohammed al-Hindi, who might be a brother of his or perhaps another relative, who was killed when trying to attack Israel from the sea early in the summer war.

But even before the war he showed how much he loved terrorism – and Hamas’ Al Qassam Brigades:

In this cartoon on his page we get an impression of how well he adheres to supposed UNRWA standards of tolerance, peace and coexistence:

How about his opinion of the children that he teaches?

Here is a photo that reveals his view of children:

His caption is “The next generation of the elite.”

Is that enough to get him fired? Come on, who are we kidding?

For those who are not offended by any of this, you have my sympathies. But maybe you are the type of person for whom this photo, that he also posted, is considered worse than incitement to murder…..

AMERICANS may want to cogitate over this: MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA COMPLETES ‘PHASE 3′ FROM ‘THE PLAN’, INFILTRATES AMERICA’S FAMILY COURT SYSTEM. 2 MORE ‘PHASES’ TO GO!

SICK, twisted bastards….the jihadists and their enabling western appeasers! Lights out for the west, if not beaten back!

 

OBAMA INC’s AGENTS FOR SHARIAH:CRIMINALIZING CRITICISM OF ISLAM VIA THE ISTANBUL PROCESS!ITS TENTACLED LINKAGE FROM BENGHAZIGATE’s VIDEO SUBTERFUGE,TO OBAMACARE & MORE…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

 Secretary Clinton addresses the Istanbul Process for Combating Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, Washington, DC.

Secretary Clinton addresses the “Istanbul Process” for Combating Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, Washington, DC

UNDER the guise of “tolerance”, the truly intolerant and dangerous, Islamists and leftists, are joining hands. They are actual force multipliers, but against liberty! It is under their Orwellian, taqiyya-laden umbrella (via CAIR, the Brotherhood’s American propaganda arm) that the made up out-of-whole-cloth term, Islamophobia, comes into sharp relief.

AND blow hards of whatever variation, who espouse otherwise, are damnable liars. Mind you, often leftists attach themselves to the fight against anti-semitism and work in the human rights arena, yet they become the most deceitful offenders (you know who you are, naming names is unnecessary, at least at this juncture). How so? They operate under what appears to be a righteous tent, but lend cover to Shariah law Islamists, those who are the worst of the worst.   

SPECIFICALLY, the fact that the charade of “combating intolerance and discrimination based on religion and belief” (by feigning, yes, Muslims are the truly injured/aggrieved party…put aside their inner-tribal warfare…whose fault is that!) took place in Istanbul, Turkey, well, what a shock. Not.

IN reality, it was the perfect address, an absolute foil, for the clueless west. Obama Inc. understood as much, as many still believe that Turkey is a “moderate” Muslim nation. Never mind that their Hamas/Brotherhood footprints are leading to the recent kidnapping of 3 Israeli Jewish teens! Oh dear…Hamas' Ismail Haniyeh and Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Hamas’ Ismail Haniyeh and Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Almost like lovers…note the cozy body language. UGH! PHEW!

YES, Erdogan’s Brotherhood is knee-deep in protecting Al Qaeda’s ISIS, a Brotherhood linked operation! Not only that, but the Turkish/Obama link was a focal point of a widely read interview (Oct. 2013), one which minced no words. It pointed to Turkey’s Erdogan as a major Muslim Brotherhood player, as well as backtracked to Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s nexus thereof. Why? Turkey’s Erodogan is often painted as a “moderate” Muslim leader, thereby, cooperating, aligning, together is in America’s best interests.Yep, to bridge/heal the divide between the Muslim world and America it’s prudent to “talk Turkey”. Such a tack is nothing but a fairy tale, and this blogger knows as much. Therefore, duty bound to apprise others. 

Wolff Bachner: Ever since Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan came to power in 2003, Turkey has slowly evolved from a secular state to a religious theocracy based on Sharia Law and Islam. Erdogan has taken every opportunity to undo decades of good relations with Israel while supporting Hamas and Jihad. What is going on in Turkey and what is Erdogan’s endgame?

Adina Kutnicki: In answer to the all important question of Turkey, its position as a so called “moderate” Muslim nation and its relationship to Israel, a brief backgrounder is in order. Turkey has enjoyed a “pet” relationship within the west, ever since its membership in NATO began in 1952. And, while the honeymoon lasted a little over 50 years, not too long after Prime Minister Recep Erdogan took over the helm, in March 2003, as Turkey’s 25th PM, the government’s Islamist agenda (from a secular leaning/tolerant nation) reared its head. Their volte face was not done in rapid moves, but akin to the precepts of Stealth Jihad – incrementally, phase by phase.

It is essential to acknowledge that PM Erdogan is a devoted and dedicated leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, as elucidated at Aina.org. He is also President Obama’s BFF, and this is no secret. Indeed, it is more than instructive to view their relationship in global terms, particularly since the rise of Islamism throughout Turkey merges with its entrenchment within Washington’s corridors.

In the words of Commentary Magazine:

“Hamas is a terrorist group in search of a home. Uprooted by the Syrian civil war, and shaken by the Egyptian coup, the Hamas leadership has taken temporary shelter in Qatar, but that tiny emirate is showing every sign that they want the Islamist radicals to move on. So where would a radical Islamist terrorist group dedicated to the eradication of the State of Israel and whose charter endorses the crudest anti-Semitism turn? Perhaps to Turkey, America’s NATO ally and a country whose leader President Obama identified as one of his top personal foreign friends.”

According to Hürriyet Daily News:

“The prime ministry in Ankara was the venue for a meeting between the head of Hamas’ political bureau, Khaled Mashaal, and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan today. The meeting, which started at 7 p.m. and lasted for three hours, was closed to the press. Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu, National Intelligence Agency (MİT) chief Hakan Fidan, Deputy Undersecretary for the Prime Minister’s Office İbrahim Kalın and advisor Sefer Turan were also present at the meeting, Anadolu Agency reported. The meeting between Mashaal and Erdoğan came around four months after their latest meeting. It came at a time when rumors suggest that Mashaal, currently in exile in Qatar, is searching for another place to live.”

As such, a perfect storm. A union for Allah.

REGARDLESS of the above truths and dangers, what do they have to do with this commentary’s thesis: yes, there is a direct linkage between Obama’s agents and Shariah law’s blasphemy implementation; “The Istanbul Process”; the “video made them do it” Benghazigate lie and Obamacare’s contractors? Read on.

EVER since the Islamist-in-Chief took office, his surrogates have been working assiduously to “legalize” the Shariah law of blasphemy. Eric Holder, as AG, is his “legal” point man. Others within his administration work in varied capacities to effectuate Islamic silencing, mostly via the U.N. And this is where, as is said, the rubber meets the road. Hill trotted over to Istanbul to begin the silencing “process” of American (western) masses! More precisely, this is where Benghazigate’s video “defense” entered the picture, however, its premature debut was unexpected. How so?

WELL, as reported at this site, the so called “video made them do it” was no more than a false flag operation, one which was commissioned by Obama Inc. to set the stage for these same blasphemy laws! What? Hang on, if you haven’t read it already….

The infamous “spontaneous” cause of combustion – the video, “Innocence of Muslims”, made them do it! hagmann051814

BUT as in all operations, expect the unexpected – the BLOWBACK. Benghazigate was not designed to kill Americans, but to empower the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia through weapons running and whatever else became necessary. The video’s initial intent was meant to spark worldwide Muslim rioting, but not as a “defensive” tool during the Libyan operation. Nevertheless, we all know, premature shit happens, and those who are adept in the art of propaganda, well, they are especially adaptable. Not a very rattled bunch. Nerves of steel. It is all very convoluted, bizarre and Orwellian, but no less true.

THAT being said, how do we jump from Istanbul all the way to Obamacare’s underwriters, so to speak? Easy peasy…and this ain’t a conspiracy theory!

READERS, do recall the specific reporting re John Brennan’s Islamic fingerprints and footprints, Obama’s CIA pick. More than relevant. In this regard, this is where his conversion comes into play, and the rest of his (Obama Inc.’s) anti-American activities flow from there.

SIGNIFICANTLY, he enters via attendant Mid East wildfires, specifically, through the “Innocence of Muslims” video whose producers are the SAME company, CGI Federal, which built Obamacare’s website! You got that? In fact, Brennan was the CEO of Stanley, Inc., the parent company of CGI. Hydra-like. Say what? Indeed, whatever it takes to bring down America.

In a SHOCKING discovery, CGI Federal – the Canadian Company that built the Obamacare website – appears to have a connection to the “Innocence of Muslims” video the Obama administration blamed for the Benghazi attacks.

And here’s how it was done:

The evidence is well established that in 2010, CGI acquired Stanley Associates, which “provides services to the U.S. federal civilian, defense and intelligence agencies”. [1]

When the crudely produced video “Innocence of Muslims” was posted to a YouTube it needed a boost, especially since it was posted by someone no one had ever heard of and who had only uploaded two videos – that were basically the same.

Well, a YouTube channel known as NewsPoliticsNow3 (NPN3) has been connected to Stanley Associates, the service provider for U.S. defense and “intelligence”…..

BUT there’s more. Another tidbit to remember was noted within these pages and related to CGI/Stanley Associates, aka the “shredder”:

Besides, the CIA’s underbelly has been demonstrably gutted, not by someone from the outside, but by a DEEP cover insider. Folks, when “the agency” veers off the American path, it is lethal to each and every U.S. citizen, regardless of their service to the country. This is a fact.

In the main, readers are free to believe that the orchestrated treacheries, from the hellish bowels of Obama Inc., are merely coinquidinks. That the interlocking trails leading straight back to the White House…to the FBI…CIA…the “contractor”…aka the “shredder” (CGI to Accenture)…are simply happenstance. Whatever floats your boat.

COMING full (Islamic) circle takes on ever more prescient meaning, since Obama Inc. heralded the “process” and sent Hillary (and others) as its emissary. These direct actions fully tie Obama Inc. to Turkey’s Erdogan and the entire Islamic push for Sharia law, and with the CIA’s (and others) deadly fingerprints working stealthily in the background.

WITH the above in mind, the following served as just one, of many, warning: the Islamic conquest of America is on target: its 20 year plan in perspective; a 10 year retrospective

THUS, as a matter of factual record, by reviewing the goals of the “process”, let there be no doubt: Obama and gang, in tandem with their Islamic counterparts, are advocating for the evisceration of the First Amendment in America; the freedom to criticize (even if “it be” Islam/Shariah Law), as enshrined under the Constitution. But this should not be news to the readership because the guideposts have been paved at this site, forewarning of the dangers.

INDEED, this site’s specialty is unraveling the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s global footprints, be it from Islamists deeply embedded inside America or within the Mid East and beyond.

SO yes, Barack HUSSEIN Obama is an agent for the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, as are his key people. This was as true for his first term, as for his second. However, the poisonous fruits of his treachery have come steadily to the fore during his second term.

ALAS, this is precisely why the Mid East is witnessing – for the first time since the collapse of the Ottoman Empire – the real possibility of the resurrection of the Caliphate, as exhorted, just this past week, by one of Obama’s key DHS Brothers, Mohamed Elibiary:

A member of President Obama’s Homeland Security Advisory Council known for controversial Twitter posts that seem to support the Muslim Brotherhood wrote Friday that it is “inevitable that ‘Caliphate’ returns.”

The Shariah States of America…that close…that dire!