FOR the umpteenth time, without piercing the veil upon the most deceptive weapon of all time, “Islam Is A Religion Of Peace” (fully elucidated within this linked interview), its adherents will continue – without pause – to devastate the world upon its altar. Free rein.
NOW, before we go to the crux of the matter, it is important for you to view the following short clip. Why? It will pierce the veil even further! Promise.
ALAS, from the get go, the Jihad-in-Chief is hardly the sole White House resident who lies about this worldwide danger. So too did President Bush, and it was right after 9/11/01! However, there are many important distinctions between the two, least of which is that Bush is (basically) a patriot, regardless of his disgraceful Allah-wash re Islam. Let’s leave that for another discussion. But do recall, he is a deep aficionado of the New World Order, as is his father, a real anti-nationalist. One dovetails the other.
MOST trenchantly, it has been reported that Barack HUSSEIN Obama became enraged (what a shock…) at a recent Pentagon briefing, when he perceived Islam was faulted for this and that. Okay now.
Within seconds, Barack Obama returned again to the just concluded briefing, pointing at the still seated Pentagon staff and indicating how “inappropriate” it was to “try and paint all of Islam with the same brush.” The president repeated similar remarks, his mood going from agitation to outrage. His voice carried to several other West Wing offices.
The senior adviser, who did not originally return with the president into the briefing, suddenly re-appeared alongside him, as well as the president’s personal aide. She was smiling, and telling everyone “we’re done here” which she repeated several times and then led the president back out into the hallway…..
IT gets worse, if your heart can withstand it. Just stiffen your spine, and then deconstruct his Orwellian U.N. speech, another atrocity, none of which resembled reality :
At the same time, we have reaffirmed that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam. Islam teaches peace. Muslims the world over aspire to live with dignity and a sense of justice. And when it comes to America and Islam, there is no us and them – there is only us, because millions of Muslim Americans are part of the fabric of our country.
So we reject any suggestion of a clash of civilizations. Belief in permanent religious war is the misguided refuge of extremists who cannot build or create anything, and therefore peddle only fanaticism and hate. And it is no exaggeration to say that humanity’s future depends on us uniting against those who would divide us along fault lines of tribe or sect; race or religion….
AS to the remainder of his scripted lies, nothing more than lipstick on a rotting pig. Thus, when the leader of the heretofore free world views his role as an apologist for Islam, and insists that America IS a Muslim nation, well, what else needs to be said?
Pointedly, the Jihadi-in-Chief dispatched a White House rep to reassure – sending them a THANK YOU NOTE – the mosque’s adherents in Oklahoma City, you know, those who indoctrinated the recent beheader! He is letting them know that they are an integral fabric of the American landscape and to have no worries. He has their backs. You got that? Are you feeling woozy yet?
THEREFORE, is it any wonder why paying heed to the likes of Prof Paul Eidelberg, a true patriot (an American-Israeli), an absolute scholar, a renaissance man to boot, is necessary for the west’s survival? No exaggeration.
On Muslims and Islam
Prof. Paul Eidelberg
Part I. A Candid View of Muslims and Islam
Professor Bernard Lewis, the doyen of Islamic studies, recognized that overweening arrogance is characteristic of Muslim culture. From Lewis we learn that the worshippers of the Quran are so proud of their own perfection that Islam is “impervious to external stimuli.”
Thanks to Islam’s theological mentors, even illiterate Muslims despise non-Muslims as “dogs.” Of course, not every Muslim has been corrupted by Islam.
Islam did not distort the mind of the great Arab philosopher al-Farabi (d. 950), who was a Muslim in dress only. To avoid the punishment of death as an apostate, al-Farabi wrote a book on Plato and Aristotle in an esoteric form to conceal his contempt for Islam on the one hand, and his admiration of those Greek philosophers on the other.
In the present age, however, despite our vaunted freedom of speech and press, hardly any scholar questions the veracity of Islam. The typical academic translates Islam into “Islamism,” and to avoid harassment, he obscures the true nature of Islam by speaking of “radical” Islam as if the adjective and noun were separable.
Hence it’s surprising that Wikipedia had the candor and courage to report: “In an attempt to polish Islam’s image, Muslim activists usually quote verses from the Qur’an that were written … while Mohammed lived in Mecca. Those passages make Islam appear loving and harmless because they call for love, peace and patience. Such is a deception. The activists fail to tell gullible people that such verses, though still in the Qur’an, were nullified, abrogated, rendered void by later passages that incite killing, decapitations, maiming, terrorism and religious intolerance. The latter verses were penned while Mohammed’s headquarters was based in Medina.”
Islam has been sanitized by academia. Despite the murderous hatred purveyed in the Qur’an, which exalts the Muslim who “slays and is slain” for Allah (Sura 9:111), Islam is usually painted with linguistic camouflage to safeguard the reputations of professors, journalists, and politicians who fear being accused of racism, bigotry, or Islamophobia – perhaps of being beheaded.
To his great credit, the illustrious al-Farabi renounced Islam because of its contempt for reason and violent theology. This is why Islam was rejected by the outstanding and exceptional Arab historian and sociologist Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406), who dared write that Arabs are a savage people, and that “savagery” describes their inherent character.
Al-Farabi and Ibn Khladun merely affirmed the judgment of two of the greatest philosophers of the Middle Ages, Maimonides and Thomas Aquinas. Given the superlative credentials of these theologians and philosophers, what are we to say of Maimonides’ “Epistle to Yemen,” where he refers to Muhammad as a “Madman and an imbecile”?
And Aquinas, who says this of Islam’s prophet in the Summa Contra Gentiles: “He seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasures … His teachings also contained precepts that were in conformity with [such] promises … the truths that he taught [in the Quran] were mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity… he perverts almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them fabrications of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity.”
Were Maimonides and Aquinas afflicted by Islamophobia? Were al-Farabi and Ibn Khladun?
What is it but fear or a lack of intellectual integrity magnified by the contemptible academic doctrine of moral and cultural relativism that stifles the truth about Islam, which Winston Churchill the greatest scourge of mankind, a scourge not to be obscured or minimized by gracious acknowledgment that, thanks to God, not all Muslims are jihadists?
Part II. Obscuring the Truth about Islam
Ever since he became Israel’s Prime Minister in 1995, Benjamin Netanyahu has taken the easy path of “political correctness.” Like countless others, he has obscured the plain truth that peace between Israel and the Palestinian Authority (PA) is not possible. Not possible because the PA consists of Muslims, disciples of Muhammad, who taught his disciples, there can be no peace between Muslims and “infidels.”
But all of a sudden ISIS, the Islamic State of IRAQ and SYRIA, removed the veil of lies. At last our opinion makers have begun to reveal the truth – or as much as they can grasp of the truth. They are beginning to identify the enemy of civilization.
The identity of that enemy was obscured the day after 9/11, thanks very much to the President of the United States, George Bush, who called Islam as a “religion of peace.” This he said about Islam while Muslims throughout the world were gleefully celebrating the cruel deaths of the 3,000 victims of 9/11 in the name of Islam’s deity “Allah the compassionate,” to quote the words of what President Barack Obama calls the “Holy Qur’an.”
It took ISIS and its decapitation of James Foley, an American journalist, to arouse in the timid enough courage to identify America’s enemy, Islam – twelve years after the beheading of Daniel Pearl, theWall Street Journal reporter executed in Pakistan in 2002.
Yes, the enemy is Islam is ISLAM – ISLAM pure and simple, and not any of the abbreviated or “politically correct” versions of ISLAM used by academics, journalists, politicians, and political scientists to avoid being accused of “Islamophobia” or racism.
ISIS has revealed that the “religion of peace” is unadulterated barbarism that uses the veneer of monotheism to avoid being identified as paganism.
One scholar has come close to defining Islam as “monotheistic idolatry,” which makes Allah so absolute that there is no room for human freedom or human creativity, as we learn from Genesis 1:26-27 of man’s creation in the image of God – a concept that Muslim theologians deem blasphemous.
Given its mantra of death, Islam may be defined as the “religion of nihilism,” of nothingness or of absolute darkness. It is the light of reason that separates and distinguishes one thing from another. Death is the dissolution of all distinctions.
Islam’s mantra of death is the deadliest form of nihilism. Nihilism rejects the role of reason in human affairs because reason, as Whitehead has said, is the “organ of emphasis on novelty.” “Throw reason to the dogs,” said a placard of Taliban, thus denying that which distinguishes the human from the subhuman. The logic is inescapable: Islam’s rejection of reason renders Islam subhuman! If empirical evidence is wanted, enough to mention Hamas’ use of its own children as human shields, surpassing the evil of the Nazis.
When President Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union the “Evil Empire,” he deflated Communism. No longer was it deemed worthy of respect and admiration; it was an abomination. Islam should also be treated as an abomination. For evidence, enough to cite the February 21, 2007 issue of FrontPage Magazine, which reported that Muslims have slaughtered approximately 270 million people – Christians and Jews, Hindus and Zoroastrians and countless other “infidels” – since the ascendancy of Islam’s role model, Muhammad.
Urgently needed, especially in Israel, is the truth about Israel’s Islamic enemies. Israeli prime ministers prefer to obscure the truth lest it shatter their “politically correct” drivel about the “peace process” with an enemy that exalts war and the shedding of Jewish blood.
Prime Minister Golda Meir is famous for having been “the only man in her Cabinet.” Why? She shunned “political correctness.” Truth was her strong card, especially the truth about Israel’s sworn enemies: “I have never doubted for an instant that the true aim of the Arab states has always been, and still is, the total destruction of the State of Israel, or that even if we had gone back far beyond the 1967 lines to some miniature enclave, they would not still have tried to eradicate it and us…. It is our duty to realize this truth; it is our duty to make it clear to all men of good will who tend to ignore it. We need to [face] this truth in all its gravity, so that we may continue to mobilize from among ourselves and the Jewish people all the resources necessary to overcome our enemies” (My Life, 1975). That was Golda, the only man in her Cabinet. Now we have BB.◙
NOW that Prof Eidelberg’s pearls of wisdom have been absorbed (recall his association to this blog), it should be beyond obvious what has to be done: Islam, as a “religion”, must be deconstructed. As such, eradicating Shariah law from western soil – initially within the court of public opinion – is mandatory. Let them do whatever the hell they want in Muslim nations, who cares… What matters is that its basis is diametrically opposed to America’s Constitutional laws of the land, regardless of what the fifth column thinks. Beyond a doubt, Islamic leaders in America (those who are pulling the strings at the White House, no less) are VERY overt about their lack of loyalty. Are they NOT the definition of a fifth column?
ONCE Islam is revealed for what it is – a clear and present western danger – wiping out its terror havens will become a necessary response to save western civilization. What could be more important? Not much.
ASSUREDLY, it’s a Herculean task. However, saving the west is not for the weak-willed or weak-kneed. It requires millions of dedicated patriots to forge ahead, despite all obstacles.
SIGNIFICANTLY, once Islamists realize that the west will no longer be held hostage to the idée fixe, Islam is “peaceful” – let alone being anything but a war-like political weapon masked under the guise of religion – they will have little option but to cease and desist. It will take years, but it will happen.
BESIDES, what’s the alternative? And will history forgive this generation for handing America’s keys to freedom and liberty over to monstrous barbarians – the likes of which are unparalleled in history – only to destroy the west in the process?