Monthly Archives: October 2013

IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS On The Horizon: Barack HUSSEIN Obama In The House’s Cross Hairs, On Notice…Commentary By Adina Kunticki

Posted on by
11

BEFORE patriots (even those of us expats from as far away as Israel) bring out the party hats at the advent of some (hopefully) good news, it is imperative to view the following report as just one initial step, out of many others, which must ensue to “right” the ship of state. Anything less will be a fool’s errand.

NOT to be a blow hard, but this site championed said trajectory from the onset of Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s despoiling of the People’s House, back in Jan. 2009. On the domestic front, his “hope and change” “transformation” mantra became an immediate concern – a glaring red light – as his socialist/red policies jumped forward – march.

Foreign policy-wise, the POTUS’s “outreach” tour to the Muslim world in 2009, starting in Cairo, read more like a siren/love song to Islamists, than to those who championed freedom world over. None of this should be news to those who have been keeping apace with his crimes against the American people.

In fact, the biggest hint of all emerged when he bushwhacked Iran’s freedom fighters – as they valiantly fought to remove the boot of the mullahs from their necks in June 2009 – at the same time that Barack HUSSEIN Obama acted as an Islamic shield for its brutal Hitlerite regime ! Indictment sealed – against the POTUS and  Iran’s freedom seekers.

Due to the above, plus so much more, every opportunity was utilized to shine a spotlight on his crimes, thus, the imperative to commence impeachment proceedings. Wrapped up in a bow, regime gone wild set one end of the stage, as did a book review requested by the publicists for Bringing Down America. A deeply disturbing assignment.

To clarify the indictment as much as possible several commentaries were penned, starting back in 2012, with an actual charge of fraud. Heavy and heady.

Shortly thereafter, Benghazigate’s underpinnings surfaced to the fore, and more heft was added to move the indictment forward.

As an outgrowth, the POTUS’s impeachment loomed larger, yet not from the aforementioned direction. What else was he hiding? More tellingly, other groups started jumping aboard the impeachment bandwagon, and whose voices do you think were joining the fray? It’s all laid out within.

As a result, a growing chorus can be heard for his impeachment, and a 36 page compendium was compiled to effectuate said goal. Hmm….which leads us straight up to the House….

House Republicans Schedule Obama Impeachment Hearings

Oct 14, 2013
GOP Leaders Cite Inability to Halt Government Shutdown

bachmann-gohmert-king-presser-4a591e1a1c95b8773f7b75242e36e943dd302aef-s6-c30Republicans in the House of Representatives have scheduled impeachment proceedings against President Obama, claiming his inability to halt the federal government shutdown makes him unfit for office.

Congresswoman Michele Bachmann introduced a resolution to impeach Obama this morning and referred the matter to the House Judiciary Committee. Senior aides close to judiciary chairman Bob Goodlatte say hearings will begin Thursday.

“I think it’s high time President Obama be held accountable for his crimes,” explains Bachmann. “For two weeks now, vital government services have been disrupted, federal workers have gone without pay and national memorials have been closed, all because of the president’s refusal to negotiate over Obamacare.

“This isn’t just poor leadership. The Obama administration is corrupt to the core. The scandals surrounding the IRS, Benghazi, the Fast and the Furious (sic) and Solyndra have shown us this cabal will do anything to stay in power.

“But in shutting down the government President Obama has committed economic treason against the United States of America, and he must be removed before it’s too late. The Constitution provides us the mechanism of impeachment. It’s time to end this dictatorial regime and return the presidency back to the American people.”

Sour Tea

The U.S. federal government shut down on Oct. 1 after House Republicans refused to fund it unless President Obama agreed to repeal his signature health care reform, the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare.

Although most polls show that a majority of Americans blame Republicans for the shutdown, many in the Tea Party feel President Obama is at fault  for not immediately acquiescing to their demands.

“The tipping point for me was closing the World War II memorial,” says Texas Republican Louie Gohmert, who voted for the bill which effectively shut down the government. “I can’t believe Obama did that. I mean how dare he put politics ahead of our veterans.

“All this clown needs to do is repeal the most important law he ever passed, and then this will all be over. Why is that so hard? The Tea Party represents almost 22 percent of Americans. Only a dictator would refuse to give us everything we want. Obama should be more than impeached — he should be in jail.”

Hearings in the judiciary committee are expected to last for two weeks, after which the committee will create specific impeachment charges and refer them to the full House. If a majority of House members vote to impeach the President, the matter is referred to the Senate, where the Democratic majority makes ultimate success unlikely.

“We probably won’t be successful,” admits Ted Cruz, one of the few Republicans in the Senate supporting the impeachment process. “But we have to try. This guy is worse than Hitler. We have to do something.”

While the gov’t shutdown surely rates as more than dysfunctional, signifying the inability of the Commander-in-Chief to behave as a leader operating in good faith, the fact of the matter is that his “in your American face” contempt, his “FU finger”, opens up the discussion for impeachment, even if unlikely to pass the Demster vote-controlled outcome. And even if a deal is inked at the 11th hour to “save” the gov’t from free fall, it is apparent that whatever shakes out is less than a band aid for a sinking ship of state. In any case, turning up the heat to a boiling point is more than doable. It is mandatory. It is a patriot’s obligation. Alas, a major operation is needed to save the entire body politic from disintegration…as Texas’s Lt. Guv adds his two cents…and fearless Sarah rocks and rolls toward impeachment too.

So, armed with more than enough open source information, as well as bomblets which have never entered the public domain (for reasons which can not be discussed herein), this site pushed forward for impeachment proceedings, even as naysayers intoned: good luck with pie-in-the-sky expectations.  

Again, not to be a blow hard…and yes, keep the party hats in abeyance – for now.

The INCREASING THREAT Of MARTIAL LAW: Demster Rep. Shelia Jackson Lee’s Loose Lips, Her “Slip Of The Tongue”…Commentary By Adina Kunticki

Posted on by
10

WITH each and every passing day, the noose around American citizens is tightening, but many will still evince palpable shock when its effects strangle the life out of them. And while this blog is certainly not suggesting that Americans won’t be able to elicit actual breaths, nevertheless, the ability to choose life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness will be gravely diminished, as declared in the Declaration of Independence. Count on it.

This is no doomsday hypothesis, but a clear-eyed focus on what has been transpiring over the last 5 plus years, however, its stepping stones/seedlings sprouted decades ago. As a matter of actual record, those who planted said seedlings are now the gatekeepers to the Radical/Islamist-in-Chief ! Talk about less than six degrees of separation…and certainly not happenstance.

Getting back to the focal point – the noose – this blog keeps zeroing in on the issue of “martial law”, and it is not due to a lack of pressing concerns to report on. But in order to execute “this or that” plan, it is objectively necessary to rein in those who would otherwise object to TOTAL governmental control. Hence, in tandem, they are absolutely gunning for gun control. 

As to the swirling signs towards martial law, the following is merely a sampling and should just be considered its tip:

Indeed, how scary is it to find out that Russian/foreign troops are implanted in America and training for “this and that” outcome? Be afraid. Very afraid.

And when one carefully examines and dissects the footage and reporting from Boston’s jihad, well, martial law becomes a central component. A focal point.

More to the point, truckers roared into Washington, supported by some SEALS no less and on the heels of bikers too, does anyone believe that a civil/ideological war – of sorts – is not in the air? 

Yes, what’s up with the increased militarizing of police forces? Is this in line with “community policing”, or a well camouflaged response to the so called “war on terror”? You decide.

Onto foot-in-mouth Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee…

‘MARTIAL LAW’ DECLARED BY DEMOCRAT IN CONGRESS

Ratcheting up argument over federal shutdown     

A Democratic congresswoman from Texas has declared “martial law” is the solution to the current partial shutdown of the federal government.

The comments from Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, took some listeners by surprise, since a common understanding of “martial law” would be of an authority – a president or a military commander – using military force to impose its will on an uncooperative people.

Think machine guns, tanks and jail cells.

It came up during Lee’s speech on the House floor on Monday, when she was lamenting the plight of those left with uncertain futures because of the partial federal government shutdown brought on when Senate Democrats refused to consider compromises to a budget plan offered by House Republicans.

She said, “Our economy is bigger than the European Union. That means countries like Spain, Germany, France, England, all those members who as well are our allies, but look to America – how shameful it is for someone to be held, and if you will, tied up by their own individual personal interests.

“One would ask if the Founding Fathers, as imperfect as America was as she began, had come from the 13 colonies and various districts, and probably interests, and had held to those specialized interests, would we have created a nation that started out by saying we organize to create a more perfect union? Albeit that there were groups of populations that did not have dignity and justice and citizenship at that time, something that I could look back at in bitterness, but I do not, because this is the greatest nation in the world. But we are not showing ourselves that way.

“It is not the truth to suggest that there are not enough voters, members of Congress, that would vote right now today to open this government. It is something called a continuing resolution, but it’s a bill that you put on the floor that has been passed already by Republicans and Democrats in the United States Senate. ”

She said, “This is not an idea of anyone over another person. Republican and Democratic senators have already voted for this clean bill that we could vote on today. We have martial law. What that means – and my colleagues know what it means – is that you can put a bill on in just minutes.”

She accused Republicans of forcing people to decide “amongst your children which ones to feed.”

At Washingtonsblog was the comment: “The last time we heard Congress members use the phrase martial law was when Congressmen Brad Sherman and Paul Kanjorski, and Senator James Inhofe, all said that Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson warned of martial law if the TARP banks bailouts weren’t approved.”

A commenter suggested Jackson Lee was using it in the context of House rules that call for one day between announcing legislation and a vote:

“Instead, under ‘martial law,’ the leadership can file legislation with tens or hundreds of pages of fine print and move immediately to debate and [vote] on it, before members of Congress, the media, or the public have an opportunity to understand fully what provisions have been altered or inserted…”

Critics noted that Jackson Lee wasn’t exactly following the Constitution anyway, because she advocated for House approval of a spending bill from the Senate.

“Article I, Section 7, Clause I of the Constitution … states, ‘All bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives,” said one of the YouTube users who uploaded the video to share with Americans.

One other observer, who also loaded the footage onto YouTube, noted, “Can someone please explain why the representative from Texas used this language?”

And for a more robust reckoning of what awaits, an audio herein is HIGHLY recommended – Monday on Hagmann & Hagmann: Dave Hodges… U.S. fast approaching date with destiny. Listen up.

Regardless, no matter how you parse it, loose-lipped Rep. Jackson Lee is mirroring the regime’s actions, and having verbal diarrhea, talking off the cuff, happens all the time – all the backpedaling beside the point. Besides, this is a woman who is not exactly known for possessing much brain matter between her ears! 

Sheila Jackson-Lee might be the dumbest person in congress. She might even be the dumbest person outside congress. If there were ever a global championship for idiots, the country could send her there. And leave her there; because unlike Lassie, she wouldn’t be able find her way back on her own……

Dumb ass that she is, make no mistake, she is VERY dangerous. How so? Not only is she a radical leftist, but an Islamist devotee. Yup…take a peek at her name on a list of Reps who receive (and this is what is known…imagine what is given under the table) Islamic cash to buy influence for the Islamic agenda within America!

TOP 10 RECIPIENTS OF ARAB-MUSLIM CASH*

1. Rep. Nick Rahall (D-WV) … $16,970

2. Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA) … $15,000

3. Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) … $14,000

4. Rep. John Conyers (D-MI)… $12,500

5. Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) … $12,000

6. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-IL) … $8,500

7. Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) … $8,000

(tie) Rep. John Dingell (D-MI) … $8,000

8. Rep. Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick (D-MI) … $7,000

9. Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX) … $6,000

10. Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA) … $5,000

 Have mercy…

Islamic Jihadis Prep For 9/11/01 Replay: TSA (Under Orders From Obama Inc.) Keeps Public In The Dark…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
4

With the so called “war on terror” already won, as duly exhorted by the leader of the free world after the “capture” of Osama Bin Laden (its reportage full of more holes than swiss cheese, but no matter), one would believe that the dangers from another 9/11/01 airplane-driven jihadist was nothing more than history. No worries. Really?

As this site dutifully reports – a place where bull crap is never part of the calculus – what is, however uncomfortable, is. The spin stops here. So, on enumerable occasions alarm bells sounded on the ever present jihadi threat. Specifically, eight months ago, a commentary alerted the readers to the so called “case closed” jihadi plane redux, highlighting airplane “dry runs” as an ever present looming Islamic threat. Not only that, but the amount of non-reported “incidents” pale in comparison to those actually reported. Yet, what else can one expect from a regime which deems a “soldier for Allah” a non-jihadist, and attributes said terror to “workplace violence”? 

And so Islamic jihadi dry-runs remains unmentionable…a phantom in the skies…non-identifiable…bogyman-like. 

10 News Investigators find memo warning about terrorist “dry-runs” on airplanes

11:36 AM, Oct 10, 2013
 The 10 News Investigators have discovered an internal industry memo warning of terrorist dry-runs, including one in the past six weeks on a flight to Florida.
  •     

Video: INVESTIGATORS: Memo warns of terrorist ‘dry-runs’ on planes

 PDF Document: security memo 
Orlando, Florida — It was a flight bound for Florida, and some airline pilots believe it also may have been a dry-run for terrorists. 

The 10 News Investigators have obtained an internal memo that details a frightening incident that brings back memories of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Since then, federal efforts have gone in place to prevent a similar attack, leading many to believe another attack what happened on 9/11 could never happen again.

Wolf Koch, who flies Boeing 767s for Delta Airlines and is the Aviation Security Committee Chairman for the Air Line Pilots Association International, says that belief “is very foolish.”

Koch describes the events of 9/11 as “an incredible attack on us. It was very well orchestrated and they’re going to try it again… 100 percent, no question in my mind. They’re going to try it again.”

According to  Koch,  many other flight crews are concerned the planning may already be underway.

A memo obtained by the 10 News investigators from the union that represents pilots for US Airways says that “there have been several cases recently throughout the (airline) industry of what appear to be probes, or dry-runs, to test our procedures and reaction to an in flight threat.”

Koch says, “What most security experts will tell you that if a dry-run is occurring, the attack will shortly follow.”

The pilots say the most recent dry-run occurred on Flight 1880 on September 2. The flight left Reagan National Airport in Washington D.C. and headed to Orlando International.

Crew members say that shortly after takeoff, a group of four “Middle Eastern” men caused a commotion.

The witnesses claim one of the men ran from his seat in coach, toward the flight deck door. He made a hard left and entered the forward bathroom “for a considerable length of time.”

While he was in there, the other three men proceeded to move about the cabin, changing seats, opening overhead bins, and “generally making a scene.” They appeared to be trying to occupy and distract the flight attendants.

The 10 News Investigators contacted both US Airways and theTransportation Security Administration both confirmed the incident. US Airways says it won’t discuss the details of security measures, but that it works closely with authorities.

The TSA told us it takes all reports of suspicious activity aboard aircraft seriously, and the matter requires no further investigation  at this time.

However, a current Federal Air Marshal who works flights every week says of the TSA, “They’re liars. They’re flat out liars.”

The Air Marshal, whose identity we are not revealing because agency rules prohibit him from talking to the media, says  the TSA doesn’t want the flying public to be aware of the problems with terrorist probes. 

The Air Marshal and others we have spoken to say several flights they have worked were targets of dry-runs and that most of his colleagues believe no matter what the TSA says,  the incident aboard Flight 1880 is serious.

Until now, there has been absolutely no publicity about the US Airways flight from D.C. to  Orlando International Airport, but security experts say incidents  like this should not and cannot be ignored.

As the Federal Air Marshal and industry insiders  tell us, “We’re waiting for the next 9/11 to happen, because it’s not a question of if. It’s a question of when.”

Just like in relation to the jihadist attack in Boston, whereby Obama Inc. turned deaf, dumb and blind to all the warning signs re the Chechen jihadists, so too they will feign shock, shock when, not if, the next airplane(s) explodes on American soil, incinerating many thousands of innocents along for the ride!

See no (Islamic) evil. Hear no (Islamic) evil. The “war on terror” is DOA, so sayeth Barack HUSSEIN Obama!

PM Netanyahu’s SPINELESS Leadership Assists Iran’s WMD (More Than Likely) Victory…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
11

As is said, “it ain’t over until the fat lady sings” (is more than a crude colloquialism) but it is decidedly appropriate herein.

Well, Iran’s “fat lady” is singing all the way to sanctions relief and with its bomb making facilities intact. This is the very same course of “negotiation” which Obama Inc. “promised” – through years of jaw-jaw – would stop Iran from gaining the ultimate weapons of mass destruction, even as they vow to wipe Israel off the map, and from the halls of the UN too! Imagine if Israel ever made such a threat….the hell that would unleash upon the nation, and from all over the world no less. YET, Iran’s leaders were still feted and never skipped a beat, despite the so called sanctions. A double standard is hardly an apt charge. Instead, calls to boycott and divest from Israel barely raise an eyebrow, as if Israel is the “bad” actor. For the record “Here Is Israel”.

Now, no one familiar with this site can suggest that the above sanctions smoke screen, to thwart Iran’s annihilatory intentions, ever held any credence. In fact, it was DOA from the onset. And it was through a deep understanding of the Islamist-in-Chief’s goals, plus internalizing/analyzing the record of spinelessness from PM Netanyahu, that this blogger never veered off course. Indeed, always stopping short of victory, while acceding to Obama Inc.s dictates, hardly qualifies as winning strategies. The path of least resistance. Granted, booms in the night were noted herein, but hardly dent-worthy in the overall scheme of dangers.

With the above in mind, several commentaries are on target, as well as timely:

Dr. Martin Sherman’s analysis was highlighted in order to demonstrate the abject failures/dangers evinced, due to a total lack of strategic thinking/decision making from Israel’s top leadership, non-policies which led Israel from there to here. Piggybacked within is Dr. Martin Sherman’s major strategic interview at Inquisitr, one which expounds upon the above in grave detail.

Most trenchantly, and adding the GREATEST heft to the nuclear equation, along comes Professor Louis Rene Beres, under whose patient guidance this American-Israeli grew to understand what’s what. More than grateful for his years of tutelage. So, once again, pay strict heed, this blog’s “gift” to its readers: Israel’s pre-emptive window precipitously closed re Iran, and all its attendant links are mandatory reading. As is, After Years of Delay, What Can Israel Do About Iran?

Landing Israel straight here…

Netanyahu’s show of muscle comes too late to deter a nuclear Tehran

DEBKAfile Exclusive Analysis October 11, 2013
Israeli Air Force in long-range drill

Israeli Air Force in long-range drill

Israeli Air Force F-15 and F-16 fighter squadrons this week carried out exercises testing their capability to conduct missions at long ranges from base, the Israeli military said Thursday, Oct. 10. The drills included air-to-air refueling and dogfights against foreign combat planes. They were conducted together with Hellenic Air Force aircraft and naval units over the western Peloponnese and the Myrtoon Pelagos of Greece, shortly before the Six Power talks begin in Geneva on Iran’s nuclear program.
Israeli commentators noted that the drill broadcast a message to Tehran that Israel’s military option for bombing its nuclear program was alive and kicking. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu bombarded European TV media with interviews warning their leaders that the Iranians were conning the world while continuing to develop a nuclear weapon capability. “Don’t say I didn’t warn you,” he said.
Prime Minister Netanyahu was acting as though he believed he still holds three spanners for throwing into Iran’s nuclear program:

1. The Israeli military as embodied in its air force;

2. European leaders, who are dismayed by President Barack Obama’s precipitate rapprochement with Tehran. Addressing them, Netanyahu warned: “Better no deal than a bad deal.”
3. The US Congress, on which he counts to block future presidential applications to approve the lifting in stages of sanctions against Iran, simply by withholding approval of his agreements with Tehran.
However, the truth which every Middle East and Western leaders knows by now, is that the battle against a nuclear Iran is lost.

President Obama has wound up his secret negotiations with Iran and instructed US delegates to put on the table of the Geneva negotiations on Oct. 15 the understandings or deals he has reached with Iranian leaders.

Those understandings are about to be endorsed by the P5+1 (the five permanent Security Council members plus Germany) for implementation in stages. They will leave Iran with the capacity, reduced but intact, to continue to enrich uranium along with its ability to use clandestine sites to house the nuclear weapons they are able to produce.
Netanyahu may keep on calling this a bad deal. But after all, it took shape on his watch as prime minister. And after Barack Obama became president in 2009, Israel failed to stall Iran’s race for a nuclear bomb – not in Parchin, Arak and Fordo – but in the White House.

The prime minister staged the long-distance air force drill more for domestic consumption than for use as a deterrent to impress Tehran. The Iranians have succeeded far too well in their diplomatic maneuvers to take much notice. They are sure the Netanyahu government will tire of its campaign, end up aligning once again with the Obama administration and swallow its deals with President Vladimir Putin on Iran, just as it did for Syria’s chemical weapons.

Ego aside, would want nothing more than to be proven wrong, after all, living in the eye of the storm makes “right or wrong” less than a footnote, thus, allowing millions of Jews/Zionists to breath easier. YET, PM Netanyahu continues to opine: 

In the midst of what many see as warming diplomatic ties between Iran and the West, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu continues to warn the world on the dangers of a nuclear Iran and told the New York Times in an interview published on Friday that he would not let the Islamic Republic have nuclear weapons.

During the interview Netanyahu reportedly pointed to two photos above his desk in his Jerusalem office, one of the British WWII leader Sir Winston Churchill and the  founding father of Zionism, Theodor Herzl and said: “They were alone a lot more than I am…..”  

Nevertheless, it is neither hyperbole nor hysterics to state that PM Netanyahu’s FAILURE to act – so far – has been the worst misstep of leadership under any Israeli leader. NOW, that is not an easy statement to make, since the 1973 Yom Kippur War would not have occurred had PM Golda Meir been on the ball, instead of listening to her bombastic advisers, as well as Washington’s arm twisters to “stand down”, even as Egypt’s colossal army, with Syria in tow, amassed at its southern and northern borders. History repeats. Most recently, the accursed Oslo Peace/Death Accords, signed under PM Rabin’s stewardship, pale in comparison to Iran getting the bomb.

The charges laid out are not whether Israel’s leaders have the ability to stop Iran – they do. Dolphin subs…EMP strike…pick a door. Yet, despite ALL of PM Netanyahu’s verbal bluster, again, as is said, “the proof is in the pudding”, as their centrifuges never stopped spinning under his watch – PM Netanyahu’s rhetorical flourishes beside the point!! 

The hour before midnight is fast approaching, with hardly a few weeks left to spare. So, if this American-Israeli wakes up one morning to the sound of sirens wailing, signaling to take cover, that Israel is attacking Iran’s WMD sites, it will be a huge relief, even if the shit hits the fan for weeks to come. So be it. However, more than likely, the opposite will take place. Israelis will probably awake to the grim news, yes, Iran is a nuclear power and that is that. 

So far, “Vegas” odds are  – Iran: 1. Israel: 0. 

“FAST & FURIOUS” Revelations Squashed: First Amendment Rights Violated. What Are Obama & Goons Hiding? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
17

There are so many illegal actions swirling overhead on Capitol Hill it is nigh impossible to keep abreast, even if one is as tuned in as this blogger tends to be. Invariably, some poopings will fall through the cracks, yet it is not for lack of effort or relevant access.

Be that as it may, several remain a focal point, most intrinsically: Benghazigate, IRSgate, NSAgate, DOJgate as well as Fast & Furious. But before we catch up with one in particular it is instructive to take note of the following: if there is no “there there”, then surely opening up “this and that” to the public – and subjecting its aftermath to the light of day – should be warranted and certainly not hushed up. You think? Yet, if the opposite is the case, to hell with the First Amendment, and hiding under the guise of “security” and other made up out of whole cloth concerns suddenly becomes a mitigating factor. Give us all a break…so many tall tales…who can keep up!

Indeed, freedom of religion (NOT including the jihadist kind) and freedom of expression (but screaming fire in a crowded auditorium, for example, is hardly “protected” expression/speech) is sacrosanct, at least it is supposed to be in America. As such, some who retire from security-related posts are inclined to pen their memoirs, even though they are usually vetted by their former employers/superiors. No problem with that.

To be sure, no one at this site is suggesting that national security isn’t a critical concern, however, pointing out a program which ACTUALLY endangers U.S. interests – for whatever reason – must be fair game. If not, some who harbor less than an American agenda will continue as is and many citizens will be at risk. Well, in third world countries silencing whistle blowers is the norm, but is it the “new” normal in America? Hope not. Which leads us back to Fast & Furious and the censorship fight ahead.

ATF tries to block whistleblowing agent’s Fast and Furious book

1st Amendment battle over ‘gun-walking’ expose

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is blocking the main whistleblower in the Fast and Furious case from publishing a book for pay, claiming his retelling of the Mexico “gun-walking” scandal will hurt morale inside the embattled law enforcement agency, according to documents obtained by The Washington Times.

ATF’s dispute with Special Agent John Dodson is setting up a First Amendment showdown that is poised to bring together liberal groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and conservatives in Congress who have championed Mr. Dodson’s protection as a whistleblower.

The ACLU is slated to become involved in the case Monday, informing ATF it is representing Mr. Dodson and filing a formal protest to the decision to reject his request to publish the already written book, sources told The Times, speaking only on the condition of anonymity.

The battle also could have repercussions on Capitol Hill, where the two lead investigators who helped uncover the Fast and Furious scandal, Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell E. Issa, Calif. Republican, had written a foreword to the book, the sources said.

ATF officials declined Sunday night to discuss Mr. Dodson’s specific matter, citing personnel privacy. But the officials said it was possible for an agent to be rejected for publishing a book for pay but get permission to publish it for free. No manuscript for any Fast and Furious book has received approval for unpaid publication, however, the officials said.

Mr. Dodson was the first ATF special agent to go public in 2011 with allegations that his supervisors had authorized the flow of semi-automatic weapons into Mexico instead of interdicting them, touching off a scandal that toppled most of the top leadership of ATF in Washington and Phoenix. The controversy also led to angry recriminations in Mexico, which dealt with a wave of violent crime linked to the weapons, and high-profile congressional hearings that embarrassed the Obama administration.

Mr. Dodson began penning a book late last year about his role as the central whistleblower in the case and in June sought formal permission for outside employment that would allow him to engage a publisher and publish the book.

Documents show that one of Mr. Dodson’s supervisors in Arizona, Assistant Special Agent in Charge Carlos Canino, rejected his request July 19 and was backed in the decision by the agent in charge of the office, Thomas G. Atteberry, four days later.

Their rejection made no claims that the book would release sensitive or classified information or compromise ongoing law enforcement proceedings.

Rather, the supervisors offered a different reason for their decision. “This would have a negative impact on morale in the Phoenix [Field Division] and would have a detrimental effect on our relationships with DEA and FBI.”

The ATF general counsel’s office subsequently sanctioned the decision, all but killing the book project.

“An employee’s supervisory chain may disapprove any outside employment request for any reason, at any supervisory level,” ATF attorney Greg Serres wrote Mr. Dodson on Aug. 29, underlining the word “any” for emphasis. “The Office of Chief Counsel cannot approve outside employment requests in lieu of the supervisory chain’s disapproval.

“Therefore, your request to engage in outside employment is denied,” he said.

Separately, a top ATF official has been reviewing Mr. Dodson’s manuscript for any concerns about sensitive or classified information, potentially leaving open the possibility a process by which it could be published for free, a senior law enforcement official told The Times.

The gun-walking strategy — part of an undercover case called Fast and Furious — violated ATF’s long-standing policy to interdict weapons from straw buyers.

In all, ATF officials permitted more than 1,700 semi-automatic weapons to flow through the hands of straw buyers for the Mexican cartels, with many crossing the border.

Senior ATF officials hoped to trace the guns to crimes, then make a bigger case against the Mexican drug lords. The strategy, however, backfired when hundreds of the weapons began showing up at crime scenes on both sides of the border, including at the December 2010 murder of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry.

The Justice Department initially denied guns knowingly had been allowed to flow across the border, then months later reversed course and admitted the tactic had been used for more than a year. The change in story led to allegations of a cover-up.

The revelations exploded into public in spring 2011, catapulting Mr. Dodson and other ATF field agents who had objected into dual investigations by Congress and the Justice Department inspector general.

President Obama and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. both claimed they knew nothing about the strategy until the controversy erupted, but the president has invoked executive privilege to block Congress from seeing certain documents, thus thwarting the completion of that probe. A court recently ruled in favor of Congress in the ongoing legal dispute.

Both the congressional and inspector general investigations concluded that the gun-walking tactics were poorly conceived and put lives in jeopardy. The fallout forced the ouster of numerous top officials, including the U.S. attorney in Phoenix, Dennis Burke, and the acting director of the ATF, Kenneth Melson.

The ATF, under new director B. Todd Jones, says it has imposed sweeping procedures to ensure gun-walking doesn’t occur in future cases.

The book dispute with Mr. Dodson, however, is not the first First Amendment controversy to erupt in the aftermath of the scandal.

Last year, Mr. Jones raised alarm in Congress and inside his own agency when he released a videotaped message that warned agencies that there would be “consequences” if agents blew the whistle on wrongdoing outside their chain of command.

The message led to claims that whistleblowing would be chilled, and ATF subsequently clarified Mr. Jones‘ remarks to emphasize that the agency would not interfere with legitimate whistleblowing activities.

Patriots are receiving blows from both ends, sort of like a double-barreled shotgun. On the one hand, a hammer effect is chipping away at one freedom after another. This is no longer debatable, it is fact-based. On the flip side, those who are tasked to protect citizens’ rights are doing no such thing. Consider the detrimental, runaway results from AG Holder’s fiefdom, and then juxtapose them against the military-style gearing up of police forces.

Does it appear that there is any official entity a citizen-patriot can reliably count on? Not from this laser-focused patriot’s lens.

Israel’s Traitorous/Treacherous Left Dances On Jewish Ruins/Graves & Colludes/Celebrates With PA Arab Jihadists: The Enemy Within…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
2

ON so many levels the following report evinced deeply held guttural emotions, and intertwined within was the abiding connection that this American-Israeli’s “blood brother” had with the subject matter. He fought (literally) against Arab jihadists, as well as against Jewish traitors. A dagger to the (Zionist) heart.

But to understand the core of the issue, one must also internalize the never ending damage wrought by Israel’s hard core left, as well as the many betrayals from Israel’s leadership (whichever party has the helm…Israel’s Paradox:Vote Right, Get Left ) who actually operate on their behalf.

In particular, the so called “disengagement”, in August 2005, was really a hideous expulsion/destruction of over 9,000 Jewish patriots. “The Bitter Fruits Of “Disengagement” hardly does the horror justice, but its basic essence is more than resonant.

Yet, where does this blogger’s “blood brother” come in? Everywhere.

Specifically, as a Sayeret Matkal commando, Tsafrir Ronen, was involved in defending Israel from near and far, and most notably as part of the force during the raid on Entebbe. However, there were many dynamics to this incredible Zionist, a champion among champions. One of his many endeavors involved a frontal determination, through a concerted, action-oriented struggle, to return Jews to their communities which were destroyed at the hands of Israel’s leadership, both in Gush Katif and the northern Shomron during the blasted “disengagement”. As a result, he was a leading pioneer of “Homesh First”, a starting point to returning the land to their rightful Jewish owners. 

As the soul of Zionist activist Tsafrir Ronen enters shomayim, Israel is moved into action against antagonistic, Islamic jihadist Hamas – video embedded

Just days after Israeli nationalist leader, Tsafrir Ronen, entered shomayim (heaven), Israel finally took defensive actions against Hamas’ terrorism.  May his memory be an inspiration. Israel National News reports:”Tsafrir Ronen z”l, long associated with the establishment of new yishuvim (settlements) throughout Israel, passed away over Shabbat. Among Mr. Ronen’s many accomplishments was the establishment of the “Nahalal Forum,” which encompassed right wing, secular Zionist Jews. He also helped establish Kibbutz Gilgal in the Jordan Valley in 1973, and in more recent years was associated with efforts to help Jews settle in Judea and Samaria.Tributes poured in mourning Ronen’s loss. The “Homesh First” group said that “Tsafrir Ronen was a true partner in the efforts to return to Homesh.” Women in Green called him “a proud Jew who fought for the Land of Israel with his whole heart and soul.” MK Aryeh Eldad said that “Tsafrir was a tireless fighter for the Land of Israel and the right of Jews to settle in all its parts.” His funeral will take place on Sunday at 2PM in the moshav Moledet in northern Israel.”Tsafrir Ronen’s writings expose Jihadist Muslims’ self-confessed, manufacturing fabricating a “Palestinian national” identity as a political device to de-legitimize a Jewish sovereignty amidst a Muslim region. Mr. Ronen references this in his article,Hadrian’s Curse: The Invention of Palestine as a Psychological Weapon for Conquering Eretz Yisrael which was recently announced is being developed as a documentary for Israel Broadcasting. Mr. Ronen wrote:

At the Annapolis Conference, George Bush spoke about his vision regarding the virtues of two nations for two peoples.

One of those peoples has a clear identity – the Jewish People. Yet it would be interesting to know the identity of that second people: Already in 1977, one of the central spokesman of that “second people”, a member of P.L.O. leadership, Zahir Muhsein, the leader of the al-Sa’iqa Organization, revealed the truth in an interview to the Dutch newspaper, Trouw:

“The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism for tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa. While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.”

Mr. Ronen’s fighting spirit can be heard in this Yishai Fleischer, radio interview on Pres. Bush’s last political visit to the Middle East.

So, knowing that Israel’s rabid and rancid left are basically dancing on the destroyed Jewish communities and (no doubt) some grave sites too, while they agitate/collaborate with the enemy, well, that’s a treachery too far. IF Tsafrir were still alive, let’s just say that these Jewish traitors and their Arab counterparts would have had nowhere to run, nowhere to hide, for he would have absolutely challenged them at their anti-semitic rally, chased them like few others would dare. This is a fact. And, this is also why – among other reasons – he was one in a million. 

Shock in Samaria: Israeli Leftists at Anti-Semitic Rally

EU-funded Israeli group, PA official at anti-Semitic Arab celebration where revelers called to murder Jews.
By Maayana Miskin
First Publish: 10/10/2013
PA man waves anti-Semitic poster in Homesh

PA man waves anti-Semitic poster in Homesh
Israel news photo: screenshot

Israeli leaders in Samaria were horrified to learn this week that Israeli leftists with the Yesh Din organization took part in an Arab celebration on the ruins of the Jewish community of Homesh.

During the celebration Jewish symbols at the site were replaced with PLO flags, and a banner was waved that depicted a man in religious Jewish garb with a spear through his mouth.

Yesh Din was instrumental in causing the celebration as well. The group’s lawyers filed the lawsuit that lead the government’s legal adviser to declare that the government would transfer Homesh to Arab hands.

Acting head of the Samaria Council Yossi Dagan – who himself was expelled from Sa-Nur, near Homesh – was appalled to hear that Yesh Din had been at the rally. “The extreme left has hit an unbelievable low,” he said.

There were people at the celebration rally who called to murder Jews, he noted.

“We’re used to incitement and even libel from extreme-left organizations. But even for an extremist group like them, this crosses a red line, and brings them to depths I wouldn’t have dreamed they would reach,” he continued.

“I’m trying to picture how they have the audacity to seek donations from Israelis on the one hand, and to participate in anti-Semitic rallies where people call to murder Jews on the other,” Dagan said. In contrast to the group’s self-definition as a peace-seeking organization, “the security situation is likely to deteriorate due to its activities and provocations” in the region, he warned.

He called on the government to take a strong stance on the matter by stripping Yesh Din of its NGO status.

Yesh Din gets roughly 94% of its funding from foreign sources, among themthe European Union. In 2012 the group got over 1.1 million shekels from the EU, 1.2 million from the Norwegian foreign ministry, 120,000 from Holland’s embassy in Israel, and 120,000 from the British Foreign Ministry.

Also Present: PA Legal Official
The Palestinian Authority also played a troubling role at the rally. One of the men who held up the anti-Semitic poster depicting a dead Jew has reportedly been identified as Samir Dausha, a senior PA legal official in the Shechem region.

Yesh Din: It’s the Occupation
Yesh Din director Haim Erlich admitted that the group had representatives at the Arab rally in Homesh, but denied that the overall tone of the rally was anti-Semitic.

“During the event celebrating the restoration of lands, one anti-Semitic banner was indeed displayed by a Palestinian man who does not live in the area. After a short time, at the request of various people, the banner was taken down,” he said.

“Unfortunately, the reality of occupation creates mutual hatred between some Israelis and some Palestinians, and sometimes it spills over into hostile expressions and cruel actions,” he continued. “As a human rights organization, Yesh Din is trying to fight for a different reality, a better reality.”

When dealing with Israel’s left one must also realize where their funding comes from, and what their goals are: a Judenrein Israel, within the mythical “green line” and beyond. Now, a brief history lesson, regarding this or that “cease fire” line (mind you, after a war which Israel won hands down!), is in order before we get to the malevolent Israeli left and their EU and Washington helpmates. From this blogger’s interview at Inquisitr are the following two lessons:

The legal status of Judea and Samaria is currently “disputed” territories, even after Israel recaptured its (San Remo codified) heartland from an annihilatory waged war in 1967. Besides, whatever happened to “the victor goes the spoils” ? Regardless,”occupied” territories has become the accepted lexicon and tragically Israel’s left keeps trotting out the “occupation”, as if it is a truth derived from Sinai. Adding to the crux of the matter, it is absolutely, irrefutably the legal case that San Remo bestowed Palestine to the Jewish people. San Remo bases itself on Article 22 of the League of Nations, as such, ” a sacred trust of civilization” was declared and this Mandate created a Jewish national home in Palestine (incidentally, Palestine is the pejorative name given to Judea by the Roman Emperor Hadrian, over 2,000 years ago, as a reminder of the Philistines, an ancient enemy of the Jewish people). Even more so, the following clause was significantly added: “Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.” The legal case is closed, or so it would seem. But when it comes to Jewish title to their historical, legal, biblical birthright, nothing is as it should be. Up is down and wrong is right. Is it any wonder that evil is now reconstituted as good? For a complete education on the subject I refer the readers to Howard Grief’s (an eminent international legal expert) tour de force ” The Legal Foundation and Borders of Israel Under International Law.” What a fountain of (legal) truth….

Now, let’s move onto to the pernicious Israeli left and their deleterious damage to the one and only Jewish homeland – Israel. 

First and foremost, the Post-Zionist movement in Israel is replete within every sector where civil society elitists permeate. They burrow deeply inside the political and military hierarchies and their tentacles reach within academia, media, legal, cultural and public diplomacy arenas. Many are leftist ideologues, but some are simply well paid whores, handsomely provided for by various foreign-funded NGO’s, all in order to ply their wares. The New Israel Fund (among others) is a major umbrella front for those who seek to delegitimize Israel as the Jewish national homeland. On the other hand, it is estimated that a very small fraction (approximately 3%) of the Jewish majority public veers to the left. Nevertheless, the majority’s wishes are continually marginalized, and herein lies much of the rancor and push back from nationalist Jews, of which I am immeasurably aligned with.

Adding to the morass, the fact that Israel has yet to adopt a Constitution (Professor Paul Eidelberg, a renowned American-Israeli political scientist cited above – a PhD from the University of Chicago – has drafted/shaped many of Israel’s future Constitutional components, and they are held within the Knesset as place markers) muddies the waters. In word and deed, this is a fatal flaw which allows many offenses – which would otherwise be deemed treasonous – to fly under the radar, despite Israel’s Basic Laws.

As to the mental aberration, why Jews (hailing chiefly from the left) side with sworn enemies, well, this is a question which Dr. Kenneth Levin, a Harvard psychiatrist, as well as a PhD historian from Princeton, answered in his masterpiece; a monumental, epoch feat of scholarship “The Oslo Syndrome: Delusions of a People Under Siege.” To make a long story short (and to save myself from a throbbing headache…this subject irks to no end), a chronically besieged people – and the Jewish people qualify like none other – often end up internalizing the hatred and delude themselves about the malevolent intent of their enemies. The visceral, non-quenching hatred is too onerous to bear, therefore, fantasy becomes blurred with reality. Feeling totally out of control, they invent a fairy tale, not unlike chronically abused children. But this is just its tip, the rest must be gleaned through the book itself. It is an eye opener and jaw dropper….

As to the New Israel Fund, its dangers to Israel are such that a separate commentary was written about its noose around Israel’s neck. May they all rot in hell.

Full disclosure: this American-Israeli has a very large extended family in Israel, most of whom are right wing nationalists, while some consider themselves “centrists”, whatever that entails. Be that as it may, every family has its “black sheep”, but these misfits are usually just a familial embarrassment and that’s that. However, “left sheep” are often another breed and herein lies the difference, for they may very well become dangers to the nation. Now, not the sort to name names in this context, but there is one (and may very well be more, since it is hard to keep track of such a large family) Israeli cousin who is a hard core leftist, and she likely gives “aid and comfort” to our Arab enemies. Her FB page (in Hebrew…and this makes it worse, being that it is in the mother tongue) reads like a love/siren song to our Arab enemies and more than a bitch slap to fellow Zionists, let alone family members. Livid.

Alas, everyone (within and outside family confines) is entitled to their political persuasion, but no one is allowed to provide aid to the enemy. Period. In this regard, the above relation is just as dangerous as anyone else, regardless of family kinship. 

To be sure, this site makes NO apologies for terming the above Jewish left a cancer, one which must be expelled from the nation. Some belong in jail for treason, but that is not a likely scenario for Israel’s courts are held in the vise-grip of far left prosecutors and judges.

A recipe for national disaster!

DHS & (Not So) Stealth Jihad: Obama Inc. PROMOTES Muslim Brotherhood Mafia Infiltrator.What Are The Ramifications? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
24

There is no other group in the world which compares to Islamists in regard to their unparalleled, unabashed, impervious belief in Muslim supremacy. Their “righteous” indignation. Their absolute hegemony. It is this radical ideology which has imperiled the entire world, as they swathe across the globe with unquenchable blood lust. The worst is yet to come. In fact, the “marriage” of Islamists with WMD’s assures a deadly on target outcome.

Aside from countless Islamic attacks – in just a span of a few days – Al Qaeda jihadists (Americans in tandem) mutilated “infidels” in Kenya and it is hardly shocking because barbarism is core to Sharia Law. Without even pausing, fellow Islamists headed to Nigeria and gunned down 50 students, as additional ‘sacrifices’ to Allah – their bloody idol of worship – “Molima Idi Mato of the Yobe state College of Agriculture in rural north-east Nigeria told AP that the gunmen had killed as many as 50 students in their sleep after midnight Saturday. They also torched classrooms. Security forces are still recovering bodies. Some 1,000 students fled. Similar school attacks in the region have kept it on a military state of emergency.”

Islamic adherents, even those who do not actively spill blood, but assist – in a myriad of ways – by lending them cover are equally dangerous. They must be stopped.

WITH the above merely as a backdrop, the leader of the free world promoted a similarly imbued Islamic adherent, Mohamed Elibiary, to a chief position at DHS, even though this Muslim Brotherhood devotee demonstrates a palpable hatred for America and western ‘infidels’. Brazenly evidenced through tweets and social media he feels confident to forge ahead. More specifically, he will subvert America from within via “The Plan“, for at his disposal is the entire spectrum of ‘homeland security’ at his jihadi fingertips. Worse than a national nightmare. Global in scope.

Homeland Security advisor admits radical Islamic ties

October 7, 2013

Nothing good can ever come from having the proverbial fox guarding the henhouse.

But so it goes with Mohamed Elibiary, the self-described Muslim Brotherhood supporter recently promoted to a senior advisory position within the Department of Homeland Security.

The Washington-based, national security think tank, Center for Security Policy, published a disturbing 33-page report based on a series of interviews with Elibiary about his admitted ties to a man who raised funds for Hamas and “other radical Islamist causes,” all while serving and advising the Obama administration.

Mohamed Elibiary Twitter bio

Twitter Bio

Judicial Watch reported on the findings, noting that Elibiary “has regular access to classified information and is a prime mover behind two of the Obama administration’s most dangerous policies; normalizing relations with domestic and foreign Islamist groups (including the Muslim Brotherhood) and arduous enforcement restrictions of laws related to material support for terrorism.

The report gives the following sampling on Elibiary who:

Began as a teenager a tight friendship with a self-described Islamist named Shukri Abu Baker, who later was convicted of financing Hamas through his US Muslim Brotherhood entity, the Holy Land Foundation;

Donated to the Holy Land Foundation monthly since his first encounter with Baker until the Foundation was shut down by the US government;

Defends the innocence of this Hamas financier and depicts his prosecution as a case of political persecution;

Opposes the largest terrorism-financing prosecution in US history and the overall targeting of the US Muslim Brotherhood network;

Admits knowing the Muslim Brotherhood “social network” (as he calls it) in a “much more personal manner than the Average White Guy…”

Supports a partnership with Islamists, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood, in the US and abroad.

“I simply find it counterproductive to American national security interests to treat the Muslim Brotherhood like the mafia, Nazi party, fascists, communists or any other entity we politically ostracize,” Elbiary said, according to the report. “[Muslim Brotherhood members] naturally exist everywhere at this point, but that’s not a problem in and of itself because there have been MB members inside the US abiding by the law for a very long time.”

According to Judicial Watch, who noted the report’s information that Elibiary has ties to a U.S. Islamic group that promotes Sharia “as the only legitimate law according to Islam:”

As troubling as this may seem, Elibiary wields tremendous power in national security issues, promoting a narrative that the Muslim brotherhood and other Islamists are moderates. He has also worked to purge even the most basic information about the doctrinal drivers of terrorism from U.S. government training materials. The root cause of terrorism and Islamic extremism is not the Islamist ideology but legitimate gripes against Western policy, Elibiary insists in the interview.

When former Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced Elibiary’s DHS appointment in 2010 Judicial Watch reported that he was a backer of the Ayatollah Khomeini and a well-known Egyptian jihadist named Sayyid Qutb. In fact, Elibiary participated in a tribute to Khomeini, the ruthless Iranian revolutionary whose teachings continue to govern Middle Eastern terrorist organizations like Al Qaeda. Last year JW reported that Elibiary leaked classified documents to a media outlet that had declined to do a story supposedly exposing DHS’s promotion of “Islamophobia.”

Are we really to feel comfortable that the homeland is secure with Obama administration advisors like this in our midst?

Read the report from Center for Security Policy:

Don’t be distracted that his bio states he is Repub from Texas and a “proud” American…oh boy…so too is Grover Norquist, a self proclaimed fiscal Conservative Repub, YET he is a Muslim Brotherhood “activist”, the quintessential stealth jihadist! Married to a “Palestinian” woman, his proclivities are decidedly anti-American! The droppings some associates have imparted about the Muslim “beard” Grover….hardly tall tales.

IF you haven’t yet developed a migraine, peer within:DHS ADVISER: PERSECUTED CHRISTIANS INCITED MUSLIMS: Islamic leader appointed to post by Janet Napolitano

Another indictment pointing towards the same Islamic direction, via video and more – Muslim Brotherhood In The White House

And for those nitpickers who require “straight from the horse’s mouth” proofs, well, there is more than enough to choke said horse! Talk about whiplash…foxes in the hen house…

This blog has often compared the Muslim Brotherhood to a criminal/gang-like organization, so much so that both blame the victims for the atrocities perpetrated upon them.

Cards on the table: alongside other pending investigations, this site is gathering details as to the trajectory of Elibiary’s rise within Washington’s power centers. It is these stepping stones, most of which remain behind the scenes, which are as important to out – if not more so – than the proven fact that Obama Inc. trucks with terrorists. 

In plain language…an interest has been taken in Elibary’s ‘helping hands’, and by some very skilled investigators. Enough said.

UPDATE: American Truckers (Oct 11-13) To DESCEND Upon Washington, Pursuing Congress With Citizens’ Arrests & More…Patriots, Hear Them Roar! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
6

It is not often that two closely fused, but seemingly disparate dynamics merge/meld together like neatly woven threads. Herein lies one such (historical) moment in time.

Readers will recall a recent charge, fully laid out within the following thesis: tragically, under the (mis) reign of Obama Inc. U.S. law enforcement has become increasingly militarized, and it is not for nothing. Far from it. In fact, a fluid plan is in place to call upon regular police forces to clamp down, via martial law, patriotic unrest, which will result (sooner or later…as night follows day) from all the purposeful deconstruction and destruction within America by Obama Inc – one pillar at a time.  

So while their plans march on, so too are patriots planning their own revolts. Slowly, but surely, they are taking charge of their fates, and even smaller events will “progressively” reach their breaking/boiling point.

However, this go around, piggybacking upon the biker’s collective ride, along comes non-intimidated truckers, as they prepare to up the ante. Time will tell how many police agencies throw off the yoke of the dictatorial Feds and abide by their sworn obligation to protect the people, even if it means confronting their own dictatorial leaders!

TRUCKERS AIM FOR ‘ARRESTS’ IN CONGRESS

‘We are coming whether they like it or not’ – video embedded

Bikers came to Washington, D.C., by the thousands only a few weeks ago to express their patriotism for their country and their frustration at those running it, and only days later truckers in a loosely defined group holding a conversation on Facebook said they would do something similar.

The details now are becoming clear, and one component of the trucking fraternity has announced plans for arrests.

Of members of Congress.

With or without help from police.

According to a new report Monday in US News, a coordinator for the “Truckers Ride for the Constitution” rally said truckers not only will clog highways in Washington, express their frustrations and their opposition to political agendas, they will do so emphatically.

“We are not going to ask for impeachment,” Earl Conlon told US News. “We are coming whether they like it or not. We’re not asking for impeachment, we’re asking for the arrest of everyone in government who has violated their oath of office.”

The report said Conlon had cited a citizens’ grand jury as the means for indictments. That movement already has “indicted” Obama and other federal officials, but as they are jurors convening without a court sponsorship, their charges largely have not gone far.

Conlon told US News this might be different.

“We want these people arrested, and we’re coming in with the grand jury to do it,” he told the publication. “We are going to ask the law enforcement to uphold their constitutional oath and make these arrests. If they refuse to do it, by the power of the people of the United States and the people’s grand jury, they don’t want to do it, we will. … We the people will find a way.”

Conlon, from Georgia, said he is handling logistics for the Oct. 11 rally, and said the drivers will circle the city “three lanes deep.”

But he did not explain how an “arrest” would be made without approval of existing – and armed – law enforcement agencies.

Conlon said truckers think Obama committed “treason” by allegedly funneling weapons to al-Qaida-linked rebels in Syria, and members of Congress in support of the Syrian rebels are accessories.

Organizers say thousands of truckers already have confirmed plans to participate.

“If all I get is one or two congressmen walked out of there in handcuffs, that will be a shot across the bow that will ripple across all branches of government. … I hope they are all civil enough and brave enough to step out onto the congressional steps,” Conlon said.

Read the details of Obama’s actions and how they don’t align with the Constitution, in “Impeachable Offenses,” by Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott.

WND previously has reported that some participants say they do want impeachment.

In fact, WND recently reported that truckers calling for the restoration of a constitutional republic were joining with other Americans rallying on overpasses across the nation for Obama’s impeachment.

Sources reported the truckers were teaming up with Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment to line the routes into Washington with flags during the Oct. 11-13 event.

Truckers Ride for the Constitution leader and organizer Zeeda Andrews, a country singer and former truck driver, said Overpasses Founder James Neighbors reached out to her, suggesting the two groups form an alliance. Neighbors said the partnership is a “natural” merger for a common cause.

“Thousands of truckers have seen us across America,” he said. “We’ve gotten emails from them, thanking us for waking them up. The biker ride in D.C. happened. Then, the next thing you know, the trucker thing did, and we got even more emails from truckers across the country, thanking us.”

He added, “We are going to be out on the overpasses and at truck stops, encouraging the truckers to head to D.C., to join in with the others. They, in exchange, are encouraging their families who are at home to join us on the overpasses.”

Facebook tries to shut truckers down

It was shortly after they were starting to organize, on Sept. 22, that Facebook removed the truckers’ Facebook page, “Truckers to Shutdown America,” which had accumulated 86,000 “likes” within days of its launch.

“Political opponents attacked the Truckers to Shutdown America page within days, and they exploited a little known (to the public) feature on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter called ‘community standards’ flagging, which allows them to instantaneously shut down an account on these social media platforms,” the truckers group explained in a press release.

“[A]n administrator of the page offended someone by saying, ‘God bless you, and God bless America.”

Facebook headquarters in Menlo Park, Calif.

According to the group, radio talk-host Pete Santelli, of “The Pete Santelli Show,” has indicated that he “intends to take legal action against YouTube and Twitter on behalf of all truckers, their supporters, as well as other members of the public who are similarly harmed by these unconstitutional ‘community standards.’”

The truckers also then launched their website, RideForTheConstitution.org, and created a second Facebook page called, “Truckers Ride for the Constitution.”

‘Wake up the sleeping giant’

What do they intend to accomplish with a convoy into Washington and nationwide rallies on overpasses?

Neighbors explained, “The goal is to wake up the sleeping giant, the people of America.”

Truckers co-organizer Benn Pam said the rally will be quite a patriotic scene.

“I think it’s great,” he said. “There are going to be thousands of trucks on the highways, flying flags. There are all of those people who are in the Overpasses campaign flying flags. Between the two groups, we may be covering a good part of the national highway network.”

Officials expect more organizationsto join the rally.

Time to rally, contact lawmakers

Overpasses for Obama’s Impeachment national coordinator and co-founder Rick Halle said he’s hopeful that the event will get Congress to remember its commitment to the Constitution.

“The ultimate result would be for our representatives to start taking their oath to protect and defend the Constitution seriously,” he said. “At the very least, we will get the message out to others who believe, as we do, that government corruption is rampant and that they are not alone.”

However, Halle admitted that Congress will only feel pressure if enough people rally in the streets and make their voices heard by calling their lawmakers.

“We believe that we will also wake some people up so they start paying attention,” he said. “If enough people wake up and start contacting their representatives, then we believe that they will have no choice but to take notice.”

NOT unlike their biker counterparts, truckers are not exactly timid types, and they tend to be the sort to deal with conflict head on. And while the bikers elicited a whole lot of noise and muscle, they also set the pace for a picked up showdown.

In reality, what are the chances that the anger of these two subgroups is a good thing for the namby pamby leftists in Capitol Hill, and will turn out the way Obama Inc. wants it to? Simply put, who are they more likely to take seriously: general naysayers, or the above group of action-oriented patriots?

NOW, clearly the co-opted enforcement agencies will, for the most part, obey “dear leader”, however, revolutions start out when least expected. It is the convergence of 5 plus years of anti-American putsches placed upon the American people, with the culmination of Obamacare’s vise-grip, which has awakened the once sleeping patriotic giant.

So, if you are inclined to place bets, this American-Israeli suggests wagering on the above patriots, and they will be joined by other subgroups in the near future, evidenced by the SEALS joining in too. The (patriotic) genie will hardly go back into the bottle.

FORWARD – rightward – march!

UPDATE: TRUCKERS ROAR INTO D.C.Big rigs invade nation’s capitol to protest assault on Constitution

Islamic Jihadi Sacrifice; Its Explosive Religious Origins; What It Means For Western Civilization In General & Israel In Particular…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
2
Those who possess more than a cursory understanding of Arab/Muslim terror, also know that its genesis is rooted in Islamic fundamentalism; the underlying tenets of Sharia Law.

And while PA Arab terrorists spawn from a variety of splintered factions, a preponderance are Islamic adherents in toto. As a matter of factual record, ever since the accursed Oslo “Peace”/Death Accords – demonstrably delineated as Professor Louis Rene Beres deconstructs the tangled narrative of the “peace” process – the very same PLO/PA/Fatah “peace” partners, currently sitting across the table from Israel’s delusional leaders, were birthed from the PFLP’s Marxist roots. Their godfather, “Chairman” Arafat, received his KBG tutelage under their Marxist umbrella. You know, the very same terror leader who received the Nobel ‘Peace’ Prize, as he spoke from the halls of the UN with a schmatta on his head and a pistol holstered to his hip, proudly cursing the PA’s erstwhile partners for “peace”! Twisted insanity.

Never mind. More specifically, PA Arab terror is thoroughly documented…here, as the “peace” train chugs along…there, even though UN thugs bestow “statehood” upon Jew-killers…and everywhere, the always elusive quest for “peace” resulting in additional Jewish graves, with the “lucky” ones escaping maimed for life!

In addition to all the above, the core construct, the inherent thesis, to Islamic jihad revolves around “religious” sacrifice, duly codified within my mentor’s analysis below. Learn its lessons well. It will pierce much of the veil.

Part I: Terrorism, “Palestine” and Religious Sacrifice

Terrorism, “Palestine” and religious sacrifice meet at a dangerous crossroads for Israel and all of mankind. An article in three parts.

Prof. Louis René Beres

Once upon a time, the Palestinian terror movement against Israel was plainly “multipolar.” With substantially more constituent centers of regional power, a frankly common Palestinian ideology was unnecessary. In those “early days,” going all the way back to 1948, what really mattered was a conspicuously expressed antipathy to “The Jews.”

In some ways, at least for Israel’s self-declared Palestinian enemies, those early days were a sort of Dickensian “best of times.” Under a broadly welcoming canopy, Palestinian “diversity” was able to emerge and reign triumphant; even certain atheistic and Marxist elements were then generally permitted to make collaborative cause with “Islamic fundamentalists.” Emphasizing operational collaboration, no particular ideology was encouraged or allowed to become a singularly dominant or hegemonic orthodoxy.

In short, regarding policy matters of the Palestinian terror movement, convenience and mutuality of interest defined both the guiding standard, and the unifying watchword.

Here, history is clear. An apparent largesse was evident even inside Yasser Arafat’s Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), the umbrella terror group formed in 1964. Significantly, that was three years prior to the Six Day War, hence, three years before there were any so-called “Israel Occupied Territories.”

What was the PLO actually seeking to “liberate,” during those three particular years?

This is not a minor, or outdated query. It is a distinctly core question, one that should now be asked, especially of  Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, and U.S. President Barack Obama.

The answer, of course, was (and remains) all of Israel, all of the micro-state that is still identified on both Palestinian Authority (PA) and Hamas maps, as “Occupied Palestine.” But, today, despite an enduringly bitter “bipolar” schism between the two principal surviving Palestinian factions, there are compellingly new requirements for permission to join in the exterminatory battle against Israel. More precisely, all prospective Arab “liberators” must now first accept and meet a qualifying litmus test of Islamic purity.

Now, only Jihadists, only those who are properly in Ribat (religious conflict, fighting for “Islamic land”), can participate meaningfully in the divinely-mandated  “armed struggle.” The overall fight, it follows, has changed from being a preeminently secular and tactical conflict, to one that may wittingly ignore all of the more ordinary or usual strategic imperatives. This all-consuming “struggle,” expressed as terror, is founded upon certain overriding commitments to “sacred violence.”  In other words, it is, most essentially, a present-day expression of religious sacrifice
For the Palestinian terror movement against Israel, violence and the sacred remain inseparable.
Basically, the relevant “anthropology” is straightforward. For the Palestinian terror movement against Israel, violence and the sacred remain inseparable. Indeed, religious sacrifice is what Palestinian insurgency is now ultimately all about.

Looking even more deeply, Palestinian terrorism, in the fashion of all religious sacrifice, is intended to protect the Palestinian community from its own violence. By carefully choosing victims outside itself, the terror-sacrificers are thereby able to erect a suitably protective cordon sanitaire, prevent outside “contagion,” and expectedly restore harmony to their otherwise explosive community.

In the Islamic Middle East, religion instructs Palestinians as to what must be done to stave off any insufferable intra-communal harms. The main lesson is focused on the surrogate victim, here, the “Israeli,” the “Zionist,” or the “Jew.” Sacrificed by a thoroughly primal religious dogma that merely masquerades as politics, it is inevitably this proxy victim of terrorism, and this scapegoat alone, who can presumably rescue the terrorists from themselves.

Vital foundational links between religious sacrifice and violent insurgency have had a long and potentially instructive history. To acknowledge and gain useful insight from this pertinent chronology, we may look back to ancient Greece, specifically, to Plutarch.

The first century biographer’s Sayings of Spartan Mothers, names the proper female parent as one who had deliberately reared her sons for civic sacrifice. Such a venerated Greek mother was always relieved to learn that a son had died “in a manner worthy of his self, his country and his ancestors.” On the other hand, those “unworthy” Spartan sons who had failed to live up to this enviably bold standard of sacrifice, were carefully singled out for both unqualified reprimand, and community-wide humiliation.

One woman, we may learn, whose son had been the sole survivor of a disastrous military engagement,  killed him brutally, with a tile. Culturally, it seems, this was then the only fitting punishment for his incontestable cowardice. Later, the eighteenth-century Swiss (Genevan) philosopher, Jean Jacques Rousseau, citing to Plutarch, described another citizen-mother’s tale as follows: “A Spartan woman had five sons in the army and was awaiting news of the battle.  A Helot (slave) arrives trembling; she asks him for the news. `Your five sons were killed.’  `Base slave, did I ask you that?’ The slave responds: `We won the victory.’  The mother runs to the temple, and gives enthusiastic thanks to the gods.”

But why relate these seemingly irrelevant tales from ancient Greece? The answer is simple. There are serious lessons here for Israel, especially as U.S. President Barack Obama continues unhesitatingly to reinvigorate the “Road Map.”  Even now, it is impossible to deny that the deepest roots of Jihadist terror originate from cultures that display similar views of sacrifice.

In these largely adversarial and mostly Arab cultures, the key purpose of sacrifice always extends beyond any presumed expectations of civic necessity. This rationale goes directly to the very heart of individual human fear; that is, to the palpable and mesmerizing locus of existential dread.

Here, today, in the Arab Middle East, terrorism, as sacrificial practice, has become a sacred expression of religious obligation.

In these largely faith-based cultures, sacrifice derives, in part, from a desperately hoped-for conquest of personal death. Above all, by adopting such practice, the Jihadist terrorist expects, often desperately, to overcome or conquer his own terrifying mortality.

Even Palestinian-American terrorist, U.S. Army Major Nidal Hasan, actively sought the death sentence for his murder spree at Fort Hood on November 5, 2009. As he explained in open court, “If I die by lethal injection, I would still be a martyr.”

What could be more clear? What earthly promise could possibly be more gratifying than a pledged conferral of immortality? What promise could possibly be easier to understand?

Although still widely unrecognized, especially in the United States, there can never be any greater power in world politics, than the power to overcome death….Part II: Terrorism, “Palestine” and Religious Sacrifice explored herein.

Louis René Beres, educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971), publishes widely on world politics, terrorism, and international law. Born in Zurich, Switzerland, on August 31, 1945, he is the author of some of the earliest major books on nuclear war and nuclear terrorism, including The Management of World Power (1972); Transforming World Politics: The National Roots of World Peace (1974); Terrorism and Global Security: The Nuclear Threat (1979); Apocalypse: Nuclear Catastrophe in World Politics (1980); Security or Armageddon: Israel’s Nuclear Strategy (1986); and Israeli Security and Nuclear Weapons (Geneva, Switzerland, 1990). His recent articles have appeared in such publications as The Harvard National Security Journal (Harvard Law School); International Security (Harvard University); The International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence; The Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs; The Jerusalem Post; US News & World Report; and The Atlantic.

The Islamic conception of immortality is key to understanding their obsession with blood sacrifice, be it through taking part in the explosion of infidel body parts, or “martyring” themselves directly through self explosion/immolation, with the intent to murder as many unclean/impure as possible. A win-win proposition in their Allah-infused immortality-seeking death dance.

To wit, suicide bombing is the highest form of Islamic sacrifice. That’s a (death) wrap.

 

A GROWING Case Warranting The POTUS’s Impeachment & The Arming Of Muslim Brotherhood/Al Qaeda Aligned Terrorists Via Benghazigate: A Violation of American Law…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
17

Americans – and westerners in general – are conditioned to believe that their leaders, especially their top leadership, are allowed to execute this and that without qualification. Not exactly. Yes, there are Constitutional constraints, but there are always measures to circumvent Congress, particularly via Executive Orders. Indeed, Presidents have utilized them over the years, some more sparingly than others. But it is not the quantity which is at issue here, but the (legal) quality.

And herein lies the crux: whatever ones party affiliation, the fact of the matter is that it has always been a given – that is, up until now – that the leader of the free world has America’s best interests at heart, even if one disagrees with their methods of governing. Not anymore. It is this core differential which lies at the root of America’s deep divisions; with those who support Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s “transformation”, as opposed to those who vehemently want to block its implementation. The readers know where this blogger stands. EVERY patriot must take a stand. No more pussyfooting around.

In this regard, why should anyone be shocked by the above, for it is not a secret wherein the POTUS’s familial roots lie, even though a herculean effort is in play to block its full viewing. But the double whammy is that he is a hybrid, and this is not in relation to his bi-racial background. Not at all. It revolves around his red/green alliances and his allegiances thereof.

More specifically, the case was made for impeachment herein, and this was not done with malice aforethought, even if not a direct legal parallel. The fact of the matter is, if this was a criminal case, the provable elements would be overwhelmingly in favor of patriotic Americans.

Consider, and just as a foretaste: how much proof is needed to call for Obama’s impeachment? Adding to the weight of the indictment, back in Nov. 2012, as Benghazigate’s bubblings came to the fore, there was sufficient reason to probe further into Obama Inc.’s anti-American thrust. Most significantly, the POTUS’s impeachment looms ever larger, as his Brotherhood Mafia holds a sword of blackmail over his head! Thus, an increased rallying cry can be heard above the din, calling for his removal.

As the largest exhibit of all, a 36 page compendium has been developed, to aid in detailing the illegal actions of Barack HUSSEIN Obama. No guessing required.

Most recently, Western Center For Journalism has upped the ante.

The Case For Impeaching Barack Hussein Obama

Western Center For Journalism
OCTOBER 4, 2013 BY  

According to U.S. Code 18 USC Section 2339A, it is a treasonous act to arm a State Department-designated terrorist group. Barack Obama on September 16, 2013 signed an executive order essentially exempting himself from the law in order to allow him to send thousands of tons of weapons to what he calls “freedom fighters”—the Syrian rebels that openly identify with al-Qaeda. The executive order, however, is not retroactive.  This means that the 1000 tons of weapons that our own CIA distributed to the rebels on August 21, 2013— including thousands of shoulder-fired missiles capable of taking down a commercial airliner—is clearly a treasonous act. In fact, this was just one of dozens of weapon transfers prior to September 16, 2013 that the Obama administration has made to a terrorist group that murdered thousands of Americans on 9/11.

Part 1 of a video series exclusive to Western Center for Journalism, making the case for why Barack Hussein Obama should be impeached immediately.

Realistically speaking, the path for America was pre-ordained once he took over the helm. In essence, an anti-American POTUS was as likely to lead America in the right direction (no pun intended) as a pig can be expected to sprout wings. Ain’t gonna happen. It is “genetically” impossible.

So, is it more than ideological ranting to suggest: yes, there IS a case for impeaching Barack HUSSEIN Obama? In a pig’s eye.

UPDATE: The Case For Impeaching Barack Obama (Part 2)

The IRS As A Political Hammer: Don’t Dare Criticize Obama Inc. – Or Else …Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
10

One must internalize the depths Obama & goons will go to to silence those who dare to criticize their dictates, especially those with the “audacity” to do so in full national view! Just use your imagination, then place yourselves within any strong-arm dictatorship, and think of this moment in American history as the “softening up” process. The warning shot across the bow. Obey “dear leader”…or else.

Mind you, this is a not regime which tolerates any dissent, as “mysterious’ deaths have become “fall-back” options. But the IRS, in and of itself, is the most feared behemoth within American society, as it touches almost every citizen’s life, one way or another, therefore, its illegal co-option is more than threatening. 

IRSgate clearly demonstrates its gargantuan reach, and the resonance it has with (most)  Americans, regardless of other societal divisions.

So, along comes Dr. Ben Carson, an erudite, powerful speaker, let alone a renowned neurosurgeon, as he tears apart Obama Inc. and its push towards “affordable” healthcare, all the while attending a prayer breakfast as a featured speaker! Talk about a bushwhack between their eyes, and then some. Huh…and Obama’s goons decided to get even….instead of reflecting on this world class doctor’s recommendations and insights. What a bunch of no talent (other than for deconstruction and destruction) governmental ingrates.

IRS targeted Dr. Ben Carson after Prayer Breakfast speech 

The Washington Times

Thursday, October 3, 2013

  • Dr. Ben S. Carson (Courtesy of Dr. Carson) 
  • Just months after he gave a speech earlier this year that challenged America’s leadership in President Obama’s presence, Dr. Ben Carson was targeted by IRS agents who requested to review his real estate holdings and then conducted a full audit without finding any wrongdoing.

“I guess it could be a coincidence, but I never had been audited before and never really had any encounters with the IRS,” Dr. Carson said in an interview Thursday with The Washington Times. “But it certainly would make one suspicious because we know now the IRS has been used for political purposes and therefore actions like this come under suspicion.”

SEE ALSO: Marriage group to sue IRS over donor leak, says list went to political enemies

Dr. Carson is a world-renown neurosurgeon whose rise from poverty and a single family home, and his medical work with pediatric patients was celebrated in a movie called “Gifted Hands.”

He has electrified the conservative world with speeches and columns since his February National Prayer Breakfast speech in front of Mr. Obama, in which he decried the “moral decay and fiscal irresponsibility” of America in recent years. He writes a weekly column for The Times.

Dr. Carson first hinted at the problem earlier this week during a speech in Alabama when he made a vague reference to having his first “encounter with the IRS” earlier this year.

Dr. Carson told The Times that IRS agents contacted him in June — less than four months after the speech — and requested to review his real estate holdings. After finding nothing that concerned them, the agents then informed him they were conducting a full audit of his finances, and then asked to go back an additional year to review his records, he said.

They finally ended the review in August after finding no problems, Dr. Carson said.

“They told me everything was in good standing and left,” he said.

SEE ALSO: IRS collecting money but not sending tax refunds during shutdown

Asked whether he thought the audit was a retaliation for his speech, Dr. Carson quipped: “I guess I’m surprised it took them that long.”

He said the more serious issue is that the IRS has been politicized — “something that should never have happened” — and that leaves all of its activities open to suspicion.

Most succinctly, back in February 2013, Real Clear Politics tells the tale in ‘Somebody Has To Stand Up To The Bullies’. The righteous and valiant doc calls Obama Inc. what they truly are and smacks them broadside too. Oh yeah.

In this regard, a previous commentary relates why Obama Inc. is hell bent on imposing Obamacare, and its essence lies in ultimate control, not only of a significant portion of the economy, but as a path to gun control.

As such, what are the chances that the IRS and other entities, won’t be utilized to silence and more, as many of their enforcement agents will now be carrying shotguns? Less than slim to none. A piker’s dream.

The “Birther” Controversy FINALLY In Reach Of Congress (Backhandedly)Via The Supreme Court. Where Is It Heading? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
3

The more a controversy drags on, the likelier it is that the public will reach a point of exasperation, not with the “person of interest”, but with those who keep harping on the topic. As a matter of fact, such insistence on truth telling often works to the advantage of those who have MEGA secrets under wraps – or so it would seem. No matter. This one is such a biggie it is impossible to sweep it into the realm of psychotic babblings. 

From the onset, it has been patently clear that “dear leader”, aka ‘The One‘, is not who he purports to be. What an understatement. And though some of us knew this before 2008, the purveyors/denizens of “truth” – the media – begged to differ. They had/have his back and that is that. So, it has been left to others – mainly in alternative media – to pick up the slack. Our siren call. Be that as it may, more than enough proofs can be found at this site, as well as elsewhere. Seek and you shall find. You won’t be disappointed.

Almost 3 months ago, the subject was tackled, once again, at ‘Birthers’ Reaching Critical Mass: Congress Will (Soon) Receive An Earful & Eyeful. To wit, the following reigns supreme:

UPDATE: Eligibility resurrected: 

     “Most recently, Grace Vuoto of the World Tribune reported that among the experts challenging the birth certificate is certified document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an expert for Perkins Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in eligibility cases.

     “We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,” Zullo told the World Tribune.

    “Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator told the news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable expert. The very firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used Mr. Hayes in their cases.”

   The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and called almost immediately.

  “There is something wrong with this,” Hayes had said.

  Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my observations and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured document created by utilizing material from various sources.”

And for those who were paying attention, surely the above came as no surprise. Hardly a sneak attack.

Back in September 2012, a few weeks before the election, even Israel’s science and tech website waded into the kerfuffle…say what? Naturally, those with their thinking caps on straight understood what an illegitimate POTUS meant for the world, and not just for America. Hence, they entered the fray.

Moreover, at the same time, an explosive expose’ tackled the precise question: Donald Young’s Mysterious Death & His Connection to Barack HUSSEIN Obama. Clear as a bell. 

The mystery didn’t stop with the above. By a very wide margin, it was not a singular account. If only. So, wouldn’t you know, another digging was required to sift through his muck, asking: Who Is The POTUS And What Is He Hiding: Reggie Love And His ‘Down Low’ Lifestyle. Phew. Icky. Would rather change dirty diapers, but this blogger digresses.

 Most ominously, ‘Mysterious’ Deaths Are Never Far From Barack HUSSEIN Obama. What is going on? Tragically, the list goes on…yet the following news is a hopeful “secret”, at least for patriotic Americans!

Has The Eligibility of Obama in Their Sites
“ONCE IT STARTS, IT’S OVER”
By Cody Robert Judy | The Post & Email
©2013, Presidential Candidate, blogging at codyjudy

(Sep. 18, 2013) — It’s been a quietly kept secret in Congress, but this week word leaked out that the case on Barack Obama’s eligibility to be President is indeed in the cross-hairs of Congress, but here’s the surprise:  it has just as much to do with the Republicans as it does the Democrats, which would be required for it to have success.

The most promising case (that would be a reverse on Judicial Review whereby the Judicial Branch usually reviews a law passed by Congress as abiding by the Constitution or not), for Congress in the eligibility arena is indeed the low profile case of Democratic Party Candidate for President Cody Robert Judy that landed without a hearing in the United States Supreme Court Judy v. Obama 12-5276 because of its multiple reviewed index in 2012 and January 2013.

Barack Obama’s coattails just aren’t what they used to be, and in the face of mounting evidence his long-form birth certificate is a forgery, the devastation prospect of de-funding Obamacare with the House Revolution gaining steam, with champions R-Sen Mike Lee UT and R-Ted Cruz-TX Senate, Democrats are coming off the coattails of Obama in many ways with the 2014 elections looming and the American People still seething over Syria, Benghazi, NSA spying, IRS profiling and over a dozen more scandals pointing directly at the White House.

Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse was given the task of determining simply whether identity documents handed out by Obama from the White House Press Corps Room were authentic or if it represented an act of fraud or deception. The first step in that would be determining if the document Obama handed out was authentic or a fabrication.

Lead investigator of that Cold Case Posse Mike Zullo’s determination that the document was indeed a fraud was also indeed slipped into Cody Robert Judy’s Georgia State Court case against Barack Obama as an eligible candidate who, by his actions of fraud, was actually hindering Cody’s campaign for president in the Democratic Party Primaries in 2012.

Sheriff Joe’s Cold Case Posse findings were released March 1st, 2012 and were promptly inserted as legal evidence in collaboration of Cody’s insistence that Barack Obama was not a natural born citizen qualified for the Office of the President by the demands of the Constitution as far back as before the 2008 Election where Cody inserted a U.S. Supreme Court Case against Barack Obama in an Emergency Motion filed to the Federal District Court case he had against Sen. John McCain and the Republican National Committee. Judy v. McCain Case Number:2:2008cv01162
Filed: September 3, 2008 , that had to do with the same issue and McCain not being a natural born citizen with his foreign birth in Panama’s local hospital.

In the following interview with Detective Mike Zullo, supporting evidence from document expert and witness in the Alabama Supreme Court are discussed. Though the first two minutes is repeated in the video, one can skip ahead to see the entirety.

New Interview w Mike Zullo

[For video, see here]

The importance of this is also termed in legal jargon as having objected to qualification before Obama entered into office, not only in 2012 but in 2008, which maintains the grievance as unsatisfied by justice with prima facia evidence before trial which is sufficient to prove the case, which then led to the egregious manner in which Cody’s case was handled by the Clerks of the United States Supreme Court.

Cody’s case was sent to the Court some 7 months and over 7 times before he was actually given a case number. The only significant difference upon which Cody was granted a case number was the two other Georgia cases having to do with Obama’s eligibility that had also made their way up to the Untied States Supreme Court in theory giving the Clerks cover for a dismissal on “Standing.”

You might ask what “Standing” is and why it was used in this manner to dismiss so many of the Obama eligibility cases.

There are three standing requirements:

1) Injury: The plaintiff must have suffered or imminently will suffer injury—an invasion of a legally protected interest that is concrete and particularized. The injury must be actual or imminent, distinct and palpable, not abstract. This injury could be economic as well as non-economic.
2) Causation: There must be a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of, so that the injury is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant and not the result of the independent action of some third party who is not before the court.
3) Redressability: It must be likely, as opposed to merely speculative, that a favorable court decision will redress the injury.

Judy v. Obama 12-5276 case represented the ONLY case which satisfied all three directives of the “Standing” argument; however, if you want this to be covered up, what do you do?

You wait until there are two other cases from the same State Supreme Court to come up where the “Standing” argument can be used because there is no candidate for President in them, and you shove the one where the “Standing” argument is not applicable in between them and call it an innocent mistake.

That’s exactly what happened with Judy v. Obama 12-5276, and hearings in Congress can get to the bottom of it very quickly!

The biggest reason Congress has kept it a secret is that it is not something that is a mystery to its conclusion. Once it starts, it’s over for Obama because even Democrats in the United States Senate would be forced into submission in the overwhelming face of hard and convicting evidence.

[If you would like to help Cody Robert Judy in his bid for upholding the Constitution in “America’s Birther Campaign,” or ABC Campaign, which highlights the United States Constitution with information and education for voters to understand the tough questions politicians should be answering in 2014, and in the coming 2016 election for the Office of the President http://www.codyjudy.us/codyrobertjudyforpresident2012_011.htm

www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com

Editor’s Note:  The Post & Email asked Judy the source of the information about Congress’s alleged scrutiny of Obama’s eligibility, to which he responded, “It came from a source high up in the Government of the United States.”
Video – Sheriff Joe Obama ID Fraud Presentation – 5/31/2013

WATCH: Full HD Video: Sheriff Arpaio Obama ID Fraud Presentation Broadcast From Missouri – VIDEO HERE.

Besides, it is not as if alternative media didn’t put forth solid info in the past. Take a peek within – Occidental College Transcripts Reveals Obama Claimed Foreign Citizenship to Get Scholarship?

DESPITE the best efforts of all those involved, it will surely rest upon the shoulders of Congress to not only execute their due diligence, but their sworn duty; to uphold the Constitution (not the living breathing bastardized  interpretation) as the law of the land. Is there any more egregious (Congressional) violation than shielding a POTUS, who is no more eligible to serve than a person with fraudulent documents, including common criminals? Same thing.

What can American patriots do? Flood your reps with “marching orders”: open up a TRANSPARENT Congressional investigation into the POTUS’s bonafides, or the people will boot you all out – holding each and every one accountable – come re-election. They may not hold truthfulness close to their hearts, but they sure do care about clinging to their seats.

Simple as that!

Predicating Israel’s “Survival” On the Establishment Of A PA (Terror) State: Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Bludgeon…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
4

DESPITE all the wild fires consuming the Mid East, Barack HUSSEIN Obama hasn’t paused a beat in his laser-focused charge to “rearrange” the Mid East. And those who still insist that his missteps are happenstance are whistling past countless graveyards to stand by their assertions. They too will bear the onus as willing accomplices, even if only by their silent assent. As is said, “to be silent is to agree.”

IN the midst of the above ravages, along comes the heretofore leader of the free world warning the world body: 

“Friends of Israel, including the United States,” President Obama said in hisspeech to the UN on Tuesday, “must recognize that Israel’s security as a Jewish and democratic state depends upon the realization of a Palestinian state….”

Particularly because of its timing, the statement left most Israelis rubbing their eyes.

Imagine carving out about one-fourth of the U.S. and making it a separate country bordering Washington and a few miles from New York. This country is populated by people who systematically teach their children that the United States has no right to exist and must be destroyed, and name schools, public squares, and summer camps after terrorists who have inflicted mass-casualty attacks on the U.S.

No one in his right mind would call that a way to ensure America’s security……. 

Yet, this site is ahead of the curve in citing the Islamist-in-Chief as an ultimate weapon of destruction towards the Jewish State, so much so that too many commentaries prove said charge. For instance, a most recent analysis wraps the foreseen perils in a bow, thus, little more is necessary to state the case: Update: Nuclear  Iran A Foregone Outcome: A Merging Of The Islamist-in-Chief’s Intentions & Iran’s Hitlerite Regime.

ATOP said purposeful nuclear sword lies the implantation of a PA terror state into the Jewish State’s heartland, as Israel’s demented left helps wield the (deadly) forceps. Both sides are equally culpable. Nevertheless, Washington is indeed violating basic precepts in international law, as well as its own domestic anti-terrorism laws. Israel’s leadership is guilty of said violations as well, ignoring its own Basic Laws.To wit, Professor Louis Rene Beres, a preeminent scholar of international law and nuclear warfare doctrine, gifts this site with his wisdom and is featured prominently herein. Imbibe his lessons well.

But unlike others who claim superior insights, he is indeed head and shoulders above the legal pack. In this regard, read his ‘foreshadowing’ back in 1998 in one of his many policy papers, and then juxtapose it against what is taking place right before our horrified eyes. It is almost as if he is a soothsayer.

ISRAEL’S SURVIVAL IMPERATIVES: THE OSLO AGREEMENTS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND NATIONAL STRATEGY 

PROFESSOR LOUIS RENE BERES, POLICY PAPER NO.25, 1998

Ariel Center for Policy Research (ACPR) – full paper embedded below

The Oslo Accords exhibit a chilling irony. Not only are these non-treaty agreements inherently illegal, they also weaken Israel in the Jewish state’s protracted struggle for survival. From this starting point, the policy paper that follows identifies the overwhelming jurisprudential fallacies contained in Israel’s pro-Oslo stance (a stance that is not even acknowledged in the Islamic world) and the substantially injurious effects of Oslo on Israel’s security. This paper ends with the informed recommendation that Israel terminate its self-imposed and unreciprocated Oslo obligations immediately, a suggestion that may appear markedly naive and dangerous, but which is, in fact, considerably less risky than maintaining the present collision course. In reaching this conclusion, the paper examines such specific issues as Palestinian “demilitarization”, the requirements of Israeli nuclear deterrence, the question of Israel’s “bomb in the basement” and certain possible preemption expectations. Also included is an extensive/intensive examination of the effects of a nuclear war upon Israel and the region. This sobering examination, which draws upon the author’s more than quarter-century acquaintance with this subject (Professor Beres is the author of Apocalypse: Nuclear Catastrophe in World Politics, one of the first major books on nuclear strategy and nuclear war), advances three primary models: (1) exclusively counterforce attacks against Israeli hard targets; (2) exclusively countervalue attacks against Israeli civilian populations; and (3) mixed counterforce/countervalue attacks. Here the author’s hope is that such heuristic models will assist Israeli strategists in fashioning a pertinent “master plan”, a body of generalized and interrelated propositions from which precise policy options could be derived.

In the end, the so-called “Peace Process” – never anything more than an enemy Trojan Horse – must be stopped before it is too late. The obligation to rescue Israel from this process of attrition (terrorism) and annihilation (war) stems from both a legal and a strategic imperative. This policy paper clarifies the essential arguments that underlie these closely related imperatives.

For the complete text of this article, click here.

Yes, to fully internalize what drives Islamic jihad, under which a PA terror state will be “birthed”, one must also absorb their unquenchable blood lust, as well as their desire for ‘martyrdom’ which lies above all else. Regardless of time and place, look no further than the non-unique case of Fort Hood’s ‘soldier for Allah’, as he describes his only ‘regret’.

So, once the above is absorbed, the following is just more fuel to indict those who have thrown in their lot with Barack HUSSEIN Obama and his ‘prescriptions for Israel’s security’: Richard Falk’s Case Against Israel: Professor Louis Rene Beres Sets The Legal Record Straight, topped by Looking Back At Constant Error: Understanding The Tangled Narrative Of Middle East Peace, Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs are manifestly judicious. Injurious.

The legal case is CLOSED…SETTLED…against the PA/Fatah terror junta’s “statehood”, as well as those who push for its implementation!

 

Obama Inc/CIA Designs “False Flag” Production Set: The Toppling Of Syria’s Assad. To What End? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
2

The most renegade, radical, revolutionary regime in U.S. history is Obama Inc. and the civilized – and not so civilized – world is viewing a window into their treachery.

Many contend that they are a bumbling crew and are out of their depth in both domestic and foreign policy issues. Absolutely not. For the historical record, their actions are purposeful and decidedly anti-American.

For a glimpse into said charges, let us start with some building blocks:

Well before his reelection, this blog warned about the ensuing nightmare from a second term Obama presidency, and its thesis has indeed come to pass. Not long after, a regime gone wild more than proved said prognostication. But aside from Obama Inc.’s specific red/green allied plans, a clear cut case was made which demonstrated the outcome when radical revolutionaries gained the helm. NO charges at this site have ever been made in a vacuum. But do take special note of the co-option of the Pentagon and CIA by the same radical forces, even before Hagel and Brennan officially took over. 

So, aside from countless other indictments within these pages, one stands above the others, at least in the realm of their deliberate foreign policy fires – Benghazigate, which in turn leads us straight into Syria and the HEART of the matter. 

Obama Admin Produced Fake News Of Syrian Dictator Being Toppled

OCTOBER 1, 2013 BY Kris Zane – Video embedded
The failed novelist, once Obama speech writer, now National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes wrote a series of phony newscasts showing Syrian president Bashar al-Assad being overthrown.

Huge movie sets of the al-Assad presidential palace were built in Saudi Arabia, overseen by our own CIA, in which doubles of al-Assad and his generals are depicted fleeing the Free Syrian Army.

The Hollywood-like operation had an army of special effects crew, stuntmen, and makeup artists that rivaled most studios.

The phony footage was to be fed through Arab League-controlled satellites, preempting regular Syrian newscasts, making the Syrian people think their government had just been toppled.

The CIA-controlled CNN would then re-broadcast the phony footage, causing the world to think al-Assad had been overthrown.  While Syria was mired in anarchy, a real coup would take place; and Obama would ride in on his white horse, installing another Islamic regime.

The plan, scheduled to occur on June 15, 2012, never happened because Syrian officials got wind of it and put a stop to it. The White House and CNN then buried the story down the memory hole and created a new fiction: al-Assad’s August 21, 2013 chemical weapons attack, also nowproved to be fake, perpetrated by Obama’s own al-Qaeda rebels in order to warrant a U.S. bombing campaign.

This according to Tony Cartalucci’s book, War on Syria: Gateway to World War III and his subsequent blockbuster articles.

NO sane non-jihadi would argue that Assad is anything but a stone cold killer and that getting rid of him – particularly due to his allegiance to Iran’s Hitlerite regime – is not a western interest. However, this is not Obama Inc.’s impetus, and this fact has been proven beyond a doubt. 

In the main, the Islamist-in-Chief and his captured/captivated surrogates have chosen sides in the centuries old jihadist struggle, having thrown America’s weight in with the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, of which Al Qaeda/Al Nusra is in the forefront. You got that? Instead of removing the boot of Iran’s regime from the region – thereby completely weakening Assad in the process – back in 2009, as Iranian freedom fighters bled in the streets, Barack HUSSEIN Obama gave them the finger. 

YET, even the leader of the mighty super power can’t control all events, and geo-politics inherently involves fast moving parts with many knock-on components. Blow back. 

In effect, as Syria’s rulers got wind of Obama Inc.’s celluloid-designed coup – to help usher in an authentic one – Benghazigate, with its own tailwind, exploded on the scene and Obama Inc. revised its plans.

YES, and while all of the above was exploding, Obama Inc. didn’t count on Morsi’s Brotherhood Mafia being swept from power, another regional and unanticipated blow back. As such, as most Islamists at heart are wont to do, they have little aversion to switching sides midstream, understanding that the “strong horse” is the best way forward to march on the west.   

To the civilized world’s horror, the leader of the once free world is completely on board with both Syria and Iran. And this was predicted too through all the above.

SEXUAL JIHAD The New Rage, The Latest “Weapon” Waged To “Assist” Islamic Warriors. Where Is This Rooted? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
22
As this site’s readers are duly aware, Islam is inextricably tied to blood and to barbarism via Sharia Law mandated strictures. And even though Islamists demand that their women be covered from head to toe – heaven forfend any “offending” skin shows – they are more wedded to jihad than anything else.

Most intrinsically for this discussion, Islamic Jihad & Koranic Imperatives Have An Underlying Sexual Component and westerners must catch up to speed. It is a life and death matter to do so, and not just for the jihadi sex warriors!

Women stand in front of a window decoration of Islam's crescent moon and a five point star. Tunisian women have travelled to Syria to wage "sex jihad" by comforting Islamist fighters battling the regime there, Interior Minister Lotfi ben Jeddou has told MPs.

Women stand in front of a window decoration of Islam’s crescent moon and a five point star. Tunisian women have travelled to Syria to wage “sex jihad” by comforting Islamist fighters battling the regime there, Interior Minister Lotfi ben Jeddou has told MPs.

AFP – Tunisian women have travelled to Syria to wage “sex jihad” by comforting Islamist fighters battling the regime there, Interior Minister Lotfi ben Jeddou has told MPs.

“They have sexual relations with 20, 30, 100” militants, the minister told members of the National Constituent Assembly on Thursday.

“After the sexual liaisons they have there in the name of ‘jihad al-nikah’ — (sexual holy war, in Arabic) — they come home pregnant,” Ben Jeddou told the MPs.

He did not elaborate on how many Tunisian women had returned to the country pregnant with the children of jihadist fighters.

Jihad al-nikah, permitting extramarital sexual relations with multiple partners, is considered by some hardline Sunni Muslim Salafists as a legitimate form of holy war.

The minister also did not say how many Tunisian women were thought to have gone to Syria for such a purpose, although media reports have said hundreds have done so.

Hundreds of Tunisian men have also gone to join the ranks of the jihadists fighting to bring down the regime of President Bashar al-Assad.

However, Ben Jeddou also said that since he assumed office in March, “six thousand of our young people have been prevented from going there” to Syria.

He has said in the past that border controls have been boosted to intercept young Tunisians seeking to travel to Syria.

Media reports say thousands of Tunisians have, over the past 15 years, joined jihadists across the world in Afghanistan Iraq and Syria, mainly travelling via Turkey or Libya.

Abu Iyadh, who leads the country’s main Salafist movement Ansar al-Sharia, is the suspected organiser of a deadly attack last year on the US embassy in Tunis and an Afghanistan veteran.

He was joint leader of a group responsible for the September 9, 2001 assassination in Afghanistan of anti-Taliban Northern Alliance leader Ahmad Shah Massoud by suicide bombers.

That attack came just two days before the deadly Al-Qaeda attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York and Pentagon in Washington.

NOT unlike kinks which often crop up in some best “laid” plans, little did the new nymphets realize that there is a price to pay for indiscriminate sexual activity, even if done to satiate Allah, never mind the pleasure (look, these guys can’t afford to be picky ) given to sexually frustrated jihadists!

Alas, it has been reported that upwards of a hundred pleasure-givers have not only come home pregnant, but infected with AIDS !  Talk about a kick in the gut….the teeth…but even though westerners cannot wrap their brains around said Islamic jihadi mindset, the fact of the matter is that this is nothing new, except that it is now being publicized for general consumption.

The bill of goods that Islam is a “religion of peace” (the most recent Islamic-sanctioned eye gouging, murder and mayhem in Kenya should serve as a “test” case for what kind of political/religio ideology the west is facing), and their embrace of shared values for community and family are compatible with western norms, is being exposed for what it is.
The inherent question is: how many “infidels” will have to die upon its sacrificial PC altar before western leaders say – enough! Thereby, stating clearly: Muslims (anyone who adheres/clings to Islam) will not be allowed to immigrate into western countries, and this is due to irreconcilable differences between our civilizations. Think of it as a marriage gone awry to the nth degree.
And that is that, all the gobblygook of “freedom of religion” beside the point. Besides, where is it written that western democracy/norms is a suicide pact?