“Legalizing” Drone Strikes Within America (Targeting American Citizens)…More Than Meets The Eye…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Readers would be hard pressed to find an individual – within the US, Israel or elsewhere – who believes that this blogger is soft on Islamic terror, be it domestic or foreign. This is beyond dispute. In fact, the opposite is entirely the case. 

That being said, separating the forest from the trees is more than appropriate, at least when attempting to discern the newly explosive directives from Eric Holder, John Brennan and the rest of the Radical-in-Chief’s revolutionary surrogates. Of course, they are completely ideologically in sync, but they are ultimately fielding the marching orders of a POTUS gone wild. Oh dear.

Now, atop the directive’s disconnect from facts on the ground; a dangerous form of cognitive dissonance; a dichotomy of gargantuan proportions, is their provable and absolute allergy to anything smacking of “Islamic terror”. Not only are they derelict in their actual verbiage/messaging, but in the implementation of strategic policies! The evidence is overwhelming and irrefutable.

So, the first question becomes: where do the facts really lie? Extrapolating therein, its outgrowth becomes: if a leadership is incapable of identifying the enemy, even to the point of an omerta re “Islamic terror”, then who are the drones aimed at?

Start with the Islamist-in Chief’s childhood roots, a belief system he has expounded upon in a myriad of ways, even stating, “the Muslim call to prayer is one of the prettiest sounds on earth”  (www.youtube.com/watch?v=iuXxtg4M_z8)  … there is every reason to believe that his fealty to Islam is rock solid – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/11/the-islamist-in-chief-his-kenyan-wahhabi-relatives-obamas-inner-roots-addendum-to-the-ties-that-bind-the-islamist-in-chief-to-sunni-islam-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…and this extends well beyond a son’s familial loyalty.

In fact, Barack HUSSEIN Obama was more than instrumental in the empowerment of the Brotherhood Mafia, both through the “Arab Spring” and within Washington’s & America’s power centers – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/13/coming-full-circle-the-planned-empowerment-of-the-muslim-mafia-aka-brotherhood-via-egypt-most-populous-arab-country-under-the-guidance-of-barack-hussein-obama-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Moreover, Washington’s counter terror officials have been aligned with Brotherhood Mafia fronts, even before the POTUS took the reins – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/22/what-happens-when-washington-counter-terror-officials-past-present-align-with-muslim-brotherhood-mafia-fronts-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Nevertheless, under his guidance, a triumvirate of hard left/Islamist leaning leaders have taken over during his second term –  adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/11/john-brennan-obamas-cia-pick-is-a-muslim-convert-brotherhood-mafias-infiltration-near-complete-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…notably, Hagel, Brennan and Kerry. Mind you, Valerie Jarrett, head cheese, is still implanted – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/01/valerie-jarrett-reigns-supreme-even-regarding-the-kill-or-not-of-osama-bin-laden-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

And their infiltration doesn’t even include the damage wrought by Clinton’s Deputy COS, Huma Abedin, a deeply entrenched Brotherhood/Sisterhood operative, having had 4 years to undermine the ship of state – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/07/spotlight-on-huma-abedin-islamist-infiltration-in-washington-arabmuslim-world-turning-up-the-heat-via-bengazigate-addendum-to-hillary-takes-the-fall-but-there-is-a-silver-lining-sp/.

Tellingly, what can else one conclude, when a Commander-in-Chief tasks his chief law enforcement official to “criminalize” Islamic speech? adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/28/alert-radical-in-chief-obama-tasks-illegally-bent-ag-holder-to-criminalize-islamic-speech-via-thuggish-un-dictates-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Bingo.

Ever the brazen thug, AG Holder imposes (as if by fiat) a mega mosque on a community which is adamantly opposed to its intrusion, even though the legal facts are not in dispute, and the residents should have prevailed – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/31/a-radical-racialist-islamist-apologist-doj-imposes-a-mega-mosque-on-a-u-s-community-addendum-to-radical-in-chief-tasks-illegally-bent-ag-holder-to-criminalize-islamic-speech-commentary-by-adin/ . Is this someone who should be trusted to oversee the “legalizing” of drone strikes, let alone traffic violations?

Alas, the above is the direct result of revolutionaries at the helm – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/07/when-authentic-revolutionaries-hold-the-reins-of-american-power-centers-via-the-most-radical-regime-in-u-s-history-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/….each one tasked with another entry point for America’s “transformation and deconstruction”.

‘Eric Holder: Drone strikes against Americans on U.S. soil are legal’

March 5, 2013 

“It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the President to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States,” Holder replied in a letter yesterday to Paul’s question about whether Obama “has the power to authorize lethal force, such as a drone strike, against a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, and without trial.”

Paul condemned the idea. “The U.S. Attorney General’s refusal to rule out the possibility of drone strikes on American citizens and on American soil is more than frightening – it is an affront the Constitutional due process rights of all Americans,” he said in a statement.

Holder noted that Paul’s question was “entirely hypothetical [and] unlikely to occur,” but cited the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks as the type of incidents that might provoke such a response.

“Were such an emergency to arise, I would examine the particular facts and circumstances before advising the President on the scope of his authority,” he concluded.

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, an attorney and Judiciary Committee member, told The Washington Examiner last month that the drone policy so far outlined by the administration is too vague.

“That has the potential to swallow the rule,” Lee said after the drone program white paper was leaked. “If you’re going to regard somebody as presenting an imminent threat of an attack on the U.S. simply because you have concluded that they are an ‘operational leader’ or they are involved in planning an attack in one way or another, you find yourself giving way to much discretion to the government.”

Lee said that the White House should release the formal legal analysis underpinning the drone program. “We know that in some instances where the government has released its legal analysis, it gets it wrong,” he said.


There are so many frightening dictates emanating Obama’s regime, it is nearly impossible to rate them in their range of import. However, once one understands that an overall policy of “drone strikes” has now reached America’s shore, though forced to do a quick, two step shuffle, for the time being… (“The White House issued a two-sentence response on Thursday to a 13-hour filibuster led by Sen. Rand Paul over whether the president is authorized to use a weaponized drone to kill U.S. citizens not engaged on combat on. It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: ‘Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?’ The answer to that question is no,” Attorney General Eric Holder wrote” ), one needn’t take a quantum leap in logic to posit: who are their ultimate targets, and what is their end game?

Going from one construct to another, the following comes into full focus, just think of it as a frontal assault on Americans:

The targets of the drone policy are on the backs of military vets, “bitter clingers” and all outspoken patriots – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/10/another-bullseye-painted-on-the-backs-of-u-s-military-vets-addendum-to-the-hunt-against-vets-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . No doubt.

Undoubtedly, patriotic Rep Louie Gohmert hit the nail on the head, as he pointed to the beneficiaries of gun control, its essence wrapped up into the newly conceived drone strike policy –  adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/02/explosive-dhs-insider-reveals-congressman-louie-gohmert-too-disarming-americans-gun-control-empowers-the-redgreen-alliancesharia-law-its-beneficiary-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . A pyramid of evil.

To make matters even more chilling, CDC & FEMA are preparing the ground – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/05/cdc-centers-for-disease-control-prevention-fema-what-are-they-up-to-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/… more to the point – the burial ground!

This is NO conspiracy. Just piece together the jigsaw puzzle, and it all makes sense. It doesn’t matter exactly when their plans coalesce, but the underpinnings are in place. Believe it – or not.

6 thoughts on ““Legalizing” Drone Strikes Within America (Targeting American Citizens)…More Than Meets The Eye…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

  1. Sounds as though the POTUS fears insurrection in opposition to some draconian plan he may have in mind. Well, if push comes to shove he is in for a big surprise. The enlisted men don’t like him. Muslims and blacks who would side with him represent a tiny minority. This would not be a South against a North type Civil War. If he thinks he can pull a Hitler on America he is deluding himself as he has been deluding America about his personal background. The lads who “pilot” the drones would direct them to wherever he feels he is safe. The generals he has been shuffling around would tell the Commander in Chief to play with himself.

    • Andy, stay tuned for several upcoming commentaries, within the next week. They will set your teeth on end. The POTUS is serious as hell, about provoking a civil war, albeit with plausible deniability.
      Aside from a vast majority of vets, the ones who will give him serious grief are the “good ole’ boys”. I must add, if I didn’t know some personally – and they can be sweethearts, if on your team – I would have no idea how formidable they can be. They are.

  2. What if all the Hispanics that are coming across the borders so easily these days.What if they were given citizenship by the Potus, if they were willing to shoot Americans . Black Islamists,Muslims,Hispanics with guns could be a force to be recond with.Just a thought.would it be possible. Bob NZ

  3. Pingback: When The U.S. House Collapses, How Prepared Will Americans (& Others) Be? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  4. Pingback: The Targeted Assassination Of Michael Hastings – The Question Is No Longer: Was The Investigative Reporter Murdered, But Who Ordered The Hit?…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s