Barack HUSSEIN Obama, as Commander-in-Chief, not only sets the tone for his entire administration, but his orders must be obeyed by the Pentagon, whether or not its military higher ups agree with his outlook. Even more so, individual soldiers must fall in line.
Now, with a patriot at the helm there is little need to be concerned about said orders, even though mistakes ( in hindsight ) are invariably made. However, with an anti-American steering the ship of state, glaring W T F ( excuse the insinuated expletive, but sometimes polite terms just don’t cut it ) questions are constantly surfacing, thus necessitating urgent answers.
Besides, when all is said and done, no one is above the law (unless “The One” really is King…anointed in a secret ceremony…without the public’s knowledge ), and the Constitution is the law of the land – at least, the last time this blogger checked.
In this regard, there are more than enough clues to lead to the following conclusion – the Commander-in-Chief doesn’t give a damn about the soldiers, whether in uniform or civilian garb.
‘The Hunt Against Vets…’ is prima facie evidence that soldiers are dispensable, sort of like yesterday’s trash, as well as reviled (whatever their status), in the POTUS’s calculus – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/03/the-hunt-against-vets-excluding-muslim-servicemen-is-the-first-path-to-disarming-patriotic-americans-the-game-plan-to-label-right-wing-citizens-as-domestic-terrorists-dave-gaubatz-spills/.
‘Tangible…Lethal…Military Related Results’ exposes the direct ramifications of an anti-American POTUS at the helm – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/30/tangible-lethal-military-related-results-from-the-redgreen-alliance-via-the-corrosive-influence-of-an-islamist-in-chief-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.
‘ When Radical Politics Trumps National Security’ demonstrates the toxic clash between radicals and U.S. security interests – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/24/when-radical-politics-trumps-national-security-what-can-go-wrong-everything-addendum-toamericans-hope-to-change-the-occupant-of-the-white-house-an-anti-american-potus-runs-an-un-american-cam/.
‘America Could Lose The Fourth World War ‘ is self explanatory…worthy of national hang wringing….considering the brilliant, yet pragmatic, source – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/15/america-could-lose-the-fourth-world-war-byprofessor-paul-eidelberg-no-commentary-warranted-adina-kutnicki/.
‘The Anti-American Commander-in-Chief Tasks His Military Brass To Do What’ lays bare whose side side Barack Hussein Obama is on – http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/09/the-anti-american-commander-in-chief-tasks-his-military-brass-to-do-what-pouring-fuel-onto-a-combustible-flame-law-of-intended-consequences-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ and,
‘Barack Hussein Obama’s Reflexive Disdain For US Military Power’ is another link in his anti-military chain –https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/09/barack-hussein-obamas-reflexive-disdain-for-us-military-power-his-planned-disenfranchisement-of-the-troops-ditto-his-surrogates-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.
Bearing the above in mind, why should anyone – with a modicum of common sense – be shocked by the startling revelations in ‘Dying Over The Truth:Why The Afghan Army Is Killing Our Soldiers’ –
By Diana West
“Andrew Bostom gleans the buried truth deep in an unclassified May 2011 internal Pentagon “Red Team” report on murder “inside the wire.” It turns out that these Pentagon analysts actually lifted the official blinders a crack to note clash of civilizations as a driver behind the constant violent assaults by Afghan security forces on U.S. and other Western forces, and even suggested US troops be instructed in an “objective and comprehensive assessment of the totalitarian nature of the extreme theology practiced among the Afghans.” Of course, that was only suggestion #40 out of 58, so … so much for the Red Team’s powers of priority analysis.”
“Clearly, the team’s suggestion wasn’t taken as a February 2012 pocket reference guide (pictured above), “Inside the Wire Threats — Afghanistan Green on Blue,” demonstrates. The complete handbook on which this so-called smartcard is based inexplicably remains classified, but the gist is clear. 1) US troops are to walk on eggs and refrain from saying or doing anything that might set off their armed, “hair-trigger moderate,“ Afghan counterparts: “Avoid public rebukes,” troops are told. “Counsel in private jointly with ANSF chain of command” (directions, surely, any self-respecting drill sergeant would roar at). 2) Worse, U.S. troops are ordered to assume the age-old role of the dhimmis, those wretched, self-censoring non-Muslims repressed and stunted by Islamic law: “Respect Islam, Koran or a mosque; Afghan women, elders and children. Avoid arrogance; i.e., belief that ISAF culture is superior to Afghan culture.”
“This, pure and simple, is code for submission to Islam’s culture and tenets, which, if the truth were taught in accordance with the Red Team’s sensible recommendation #40, directly conflict with and contradict “ISAF culture” — i.e., Judeo-Christian-humanist principles. The unspeakable fact is, “respecting Islam” and “avoiding arrogance” are impossible to do without surrendering these same Western principles. As much as Islam’s command to Muslims to slay the infidel, this fact, as the Red Team report perhaps inadvertently reveals, is probably at the heart of at least some of the “green-on-blue” attacks that are reported to have followed an “argument.”
“To wit, this Red Team summation of interviews with US personnel:
Many US soldiers were appalled by the rampant torture of dogs and puppies they witnessed while being based with ANSF units. Many ANSF members are prone to inflicting abuse onto stray dogs they bring to the base for “entertainment” purposes. Other ANSF members, while not condoning the torture, fail to see any importance in such behaviors given the standing of dogs in Islam. Dogs are seen [in Islam] as vermin and many ANSF members find it inexplicable that anyone could be concerned about such “trivial matters,” and deeply resent any interference…This animal abuse is a substantial psychological stressor for many US soldiers and has been the cause of many serious social altercations with ANSF members…
US soldiers reported that they had observed many cases of child abuse and neglect that infuriated them and alienated them from the civilian populace. They made it very clear that they wanted nothing to do with people who treat children so cruelly.
Although not reported by the US soldiers who participated in this study, there have been numerous accounts of Canadian troops in Kandahar complaining about the rampant sexual abuse of children they have witnessed ANSF personnel commit, including the cultural practice of bacha bazi [link – ed], as well as the raping and sodomizing of little boys…
Similarly, US soldiers…mentioned the poor treatment and virtual slavery of Women in Afghan society, and how they found such practices repugnant.
They found it unpalatable to befriend other men who had such primitive beliefs; the cultural gulf was too wide.
They were repulsed by the abuse and neglect they observed in how children are treated in Afghan society.
US soldiers largely reported that they did not care for Afghan civilians due to these factors as well as their suspected sympathies for the insurgents.
“And so they shouldn’t. And woe to us if they, or we all of us, ever do.”
Thus – in a no holds barred manner – it becomes painfully obvious what U.S. troops are up against.
They are being killed by those they are forced to train and operate with; they (and their commanders) now view themselves in a clash of civilizations; YET are commanded to appease the barbarians, regardless of the life-threatening dangers.
Dhimmitude….being dictated by the Pentagon….so ordered by the Islamist Commander-in-Chief!