Tag Archives: Adina Kutnicki: Fiddling With The Constitution

Forensic Profiling Unmasks The Leader Of The Free World…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
51

The advent of forensics (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_science), as a bonafide area of scientific study, has led to amazing results. While most are familiar with this discipline through an explosion of television shows, CSI & Forensic Files at the forefront, there is much more to this area of study than most are aware. In fact, knowing a thing or two about forensic accounting (adinakutnicki.com/about/) has led to many interesting developments and associations. Let’s leave it at that.

And while anything to do with delving into financial papers is enough to make ones eyes glaze over, the same cannot be said for forensic law enforcement. They utilize scientific tools to place all manner of criminals under the microscope, and hopefully behind bars. Said work is hardly devoid of high drama.

In this regard, its “sister” specialty, forensic profiling is less well known, yet more of an enigma. Well, this is because it is the purview of professionals who study the deep recesses of the mind,  a cerebral mystery, under the best of circumstances. While the FBI is the largest receptacle of said mental probing, there exists a smattering of private endeavors who bring, otherwise elusive, suspects to heel. One such address is The Forensic Panel (forensicpanel.com), headed by Dr. Michael Welner, featured herein – www.trutv.com/library/crime/criminal_mind/forensics/welner/index.html.

In this regard, cogitate over the above, as you read the following, from a most reputable, highly successful criminal profiler.

‘OBAMA’S ‘CONFESSION’ UNCOVERED BY FORENSIC PROFILER’

‘I am not a dictator. I’m the president’

Published: 5 days ago

 by BOB UNRUH 


obama-eyes

A forensic profiler whose previous cases have included the Natalie Holloway disappearance and the O.J. Simpson double murder says Barack Obama unconsciously made a stunning confession in his effort to blame the sequester idea he suggested on Republicans.

“Obama replied to (rare) press challenges about his contribution to the problem, ‘Give me an example of what I might do.’ Then he proceeded to unconsciously answer his own question with further denials, declaring, ‘I am not a dictator. I’m the president,’” Andrew G. Hodges, M.D., told WND in an assessment.

“Understand his powerful ‘dictator’ image spontaneously comes from his mind. Immediately following it with ‘president’ he unconsciously confesses, ‘I am the dictator president,’” Hodges said.

“For good measure he adds further unconscious proof in yet another vivid denial. I ‘can’t force Republicans to do the right thing’ – confessing again that in dictatorial fashion he was forcing the Republicans’ hands by not negotiating and failing to do the right thing.”

Hodges, who wrote “The Obama Confession: Secret Fear, Secret Fury,” previously deciphered the JonBenet Ramsey ransom note in the Boulder, Colo., murder case.

See all the details in Hodges’ book “The Obama Confession.”

He uses a unique psycholinguistic technique he calls “ThoughtPrint Decoding” to “read between the lines” of people’s statements – called “the cutting-edge of forensic science” by expert investigators.

He’s not new to the field, already having identified killers by studying ransom notes, emails, letters and police interviews to spot secret confessions. He decoded O.J.’s “suicide note” to confirm Simpson had committed a double murder. He deciphered the JonBenet ransom note from Boulder, Colo., to identify the child’s killer. He decrypted letters from BTK to predict that he was about to kill again – the only profiler to do so. He studied statements by Joran van der Sloot and Deepak Kalpoe to tie them to the slaying of Holloway. He showed how Casey Anthony secretly confessed to killing her daughter in 200 letters written to a jail mate. He even decoded Bill Clinton’s comments about Monica Lewinsky.

“Once more Obama has brilliantly and unknowingly profiled himself regarding his deceptive behavior – this time surrounding the sequester conflict with Republicans,” Hodges explained. “The profile is based on the discovery of an unconscious super intelligence – a major step beyond Malcolm Gladwell’s description of the ‘new adaptive unconscious’ in his best-seller ‘Blink.’ He demonstrated how our deeper mind quick-reads various situations in the blink of an eye.”

Hodges said that at Obama’s March 1 press conference, the president’s super intelligence quick-reads his deep motives about sequester and then announces those motives to the public.

“‘Let’s be clear: None of this is necessary,’ Obama said. ‘It’s happening because of a choice that Republicans in Congress have made. We shouldn’t be making a series of dumb, arbitrary cuts to things.’ We have another blatant albeit unconscious projection and confession. He knows his choice – a non-negotiable demand for more taxes after just receiving a $150 billion ‘tax raise’ in January – was foolish,” Hodges explained. “He further revealed his arbitrary behavior when he refused the choice offered to him to spread out the miniscule 2 percent budget cutacross the board to lessen the impact. Like a dictator he wanted power over the Republicans in his ploy to cast them as the evil ones.”

He also addressed Obama’s reference to two sci-fi movies.

“He suggested the idea, ‘I should somehow do a ‘Jedi mind-meld’ with these folks [Republicans] and convince them to do what’s right.’ He used a mixed image from two sci-fi shows,” Hodges explained. “First he alluded to a Jedi ‘mind trick’ used on weak-minded foes (‘Star Wars’ films) implying his continued mind games to trick subservient foolish Americans.

“His spontaneous ‘Star Wars’ image also references his war on the Republicans – efforts to discredit them so that he can affect the next election and control both houses of Congress in his dictatorial behavior. (He also suggests his war on the military – to weaken it.)

“Finally he implies in the ‘mind-meld’ technique he’s opening his unconscious mind up and we can read it if we know how – just as Commander Spock in ‘Star Trek’ would let others read his mind to provide them with special insightful messages,” he said.

He suggested Obama has been exaggerating the impact of sequester to “unconsciously paint a true picture of his overall destructive plan,” he said.

“His super intelligence looks into the future and sees the result of his plans long-term,” Hodges said.

“Middle-class families will ‘have their lives disrupted in significant ways.’ He predicts that Americans one day will know the economy didn’t have to suffer if bad decisions (his) had been averted. We ask which does greater damage: a 2 percent budget cut or his obvious long-term plan of crippling rising debt and increased taxes?”

Hodges also suggested Obama is revealing a coming “apocalypse” by saying, “There’s not going to be an apocalypse.”

“When he wonders (regarding Republicans) if he could do something else ‘to make these guys not paint horns on my head’ we indeed should be frightened beyond belief. He suggests America is in for a devil of a time to put it mildly – that deep down he harbors evil intentions,” Hodges said.

As WND reported, Hodges previously concluded Obama unconsciously confessed to stealing the 2012 election.

On Hodges’ website, Steven A. Egger, associate professor of criminology at the University of Houston, Clear Lake, has written that Hodges’ technique is “becoming the cutting edge of forensic science.”

“Dr. Hodges’ investigation of forensic documents in the Natalee Holloway case indicates that his ‘thoughtprint decoding method’ and ‘reading between the lines’ is, in fact, becoming a major contribution to law enforcement tools used by criminal investigators,” wrote Egger.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/forensic-analyst-uncovers-obamas-confession/#PVyj5xFAgKpqDHST.99

Much has been written, mostly by the alternative media, about Obama and his plans for America, as well as for the world. Never mind the ink spilled at these pages, including the time, energy and resources expended. But it was not an exercise in futility (at this blog), nor hyperbole, to essentially posit the question: Who is Obama, and what is he up to? Wish the question didn’t have to be asked.

And tied into his non-conventional lifestyle, a lifestyle which most Americans, at best, are uncomfortable with, lurks a man with an abiding hatred for America, and all that it represents –  adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/04/who-is-barack-hussein-obama-and-what-is-he-hiding-reggie-love-his-down-low-lifestyle-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Which leads us back to his red/green roots, and his basic “transforming” plans for the nation he is sworn to lead – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/28/valerie-jarrett-barack-hussein-obamas-communisthidden-hand-familial-ideological-ties-that-bind-addendum-to-valerie-jarretts-communist-leanings-why-she-matters-commentary-by-adina/. His “green” bonafides are duly exhibited within – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/11/the-islamist-in-chief-his-kenyan-wahhabi-relatives-obamas-inner-roots-addendum-to-the-ties-that-bind-the-islamist-in-chief-to-sunni-islam-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Most significantly, under his purview, the Demsters are fiddling with the Constitution – adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with-the-constitution-to-eviscerate-term-limitations-on-the-presidency-why-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. To wit, at the helm of the left’s march towards totalitarian, dictatorial rule sits Barack HUSSEIN Obama – adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/08/the-lefts-march-towards-totalitarian-rule-one-party-at-a-time-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. NO mystery at this end.

NOT to be lost in the discussion, any reasonable person, let alone one skilled in forensics, would find “The One’s” following statement, more than a little curious: ” In the prologue to the second of his autobiographies, “The Audacity of Hope,” Barack Obama said: “I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views.”
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/jack-kelly/obama-blank-slate-211169/#ixzz2OGzJ4dutwww.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/jack-kelly/obama-blank-slate-211169/. 

Due to the above preponderance of evidence, is it then far fetched to question: A leader of the free world, who views “serving as a bank screen” as a normative value system, really has more things to hide than his preference for “this or that”? Could it be, he came into power with designs so antithetical to American constructs (and against the majority public’s will, even though he managed to get elected) that only an exceptionally skilled forensic profiler can fully interpret the signs and signals?

Undoubtedly.

 

Signs of Civil War Could Lead To Martial Law…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
10

Hair raising barely begins to describe any discussion which starts with civil war. But when piggybacked by Martial Law (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_law), especially in reference to America, all bets are off. After all, we are talking about a nation which fought a bloody and protracted civil war, in the hope of truly becoming the land of the free, the home of the brave, not a replica of third world basket cases! 

Well, while the premise of freedom and liberty – for one and all  -used to be valid, recent facts on the ground suggest otherwise. If one merely implants one piece of evidence atop another, another reality emerges, one which supports a soon to be “transformed” America, if the revolutionaries steering America have their way.

And this is why the following alarming material has to be repeatedly aired. It is meant to set off bells, and not wedding ones!

Because fiddling with the Constitution is a big deal, at least if one hues to a life of liberty and freedom – adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with-the-constitution-to-eviscerate-term-limitations-on-the-presidency-why-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Yet to achieve revolutionary ends, a free thinking citizenry must be “conditioned” – adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/15/u-s-leaders-forward-march-towards-tyranny-conditioning-its-citizens-in-the-process-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…and the leaders in Washington are  forward marching towards this end. Yes, indeed.

But at the end of the radical process lies unspeakable measures, ones which must be put in place, even if it takes longer than anticipated to achieve their goals – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/05/cdc-centers-for-disease-control-prevention-fema-what-are-they-up-to-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

With the above firmly in tow, isn’t it more likely – than not – that  seeds are being sown for a civil war, a war which would enable the next contingency plan – Martial Law?

‘VIDEO: IS A CIVIL WAR COMING?’

MARCH 5, 2013 BY

VIDEO: IS A CIVIL WAR COMING? (see link)

MARCH 5, 2013 BY  
For anyone who has done even a cursory study of Barack Obama’s life, they know that his radical Marxist views are not a recent phenomenon.

During his New York years, he was a frequent participant in the annual Socialist Scholars Conference held in Manhattan.

He called for an outright ban on guns in 1996.

Through the 1990s and 2000s, he funneled millions of dollars to socialist front groups like ACORN, via the Woods Fund and the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. His buddy, domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, helped stuff the money in the pockets of these “public welfare” groups, often taking money from wealthy donors who believed the funds were being used to further education or stamp out poverty. This was Barack Obama’s first foray into “spreading the wealth around.”

The dirty little secret about Marxists is that the moral outrage they have about the poor, about gun violence, about war, and even about the environment (so-called “global warming,” now rebranded as “climate change”) is that these are all simply tools to set up a totalitarian government. A so-called utopia where “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs” is not determined by the individual, but according to an elite bureaucracy.

Except totalitarian governments don’t work very well unless you have a dependent and defenseless rabble. Obama has successfully created a welfare state, with food stamp and welfare rolls soaring.  And, with Obamacare, he will put virtually the entire citizenry on the public dole.

But creating a defenseless rabble is a little more difficult in America, with the majority of Americans holding the Second Amendment as sacred.

It was easy in Russia. In October 1918, the Communist government mandated that all of its citizens register their weapons. Then it conveniently confiscated all of these “registered” weapons. (It kind of sounds like Obama’s “common sense” call for universal background checks—really a Trojan horse for a national gun registry).

But this is all a conspiracy theory, right? America could never become like Communist Russia, could it?

In 2007 and 2008 when Obama researchers such as Stanley Kurtz and Trevor Loudon unearthed Obama’s extensive radical background and warned us from the highest mountaintops to beware, most of us handed these guys tinfoil hats, figuring that if a Marxist did get into office, we had a little document called the Constitution to keep him in check and/or impeach him.

Because of a dumbed down public and two weak RINO Republicans (first McCain, then Romney), Obama was able to garner enough votes to gain the presidency twice.

We’ve had a radical Marxist sitting in the Oval Office for over four years now.

But the Constitution was still there, including the Second Amendment and the separation of powers.

And the radical connections that were unearthed in 2007 and 2008 paled in comparison to what we learned in an almost month-by-month basis in the following years.

But the Constitution was still there, including the Second Amendment and the separation of powers.

Except what if the Obama administration could disarm a large portion of the population—the so-called “progressives” who believe that guns are evil, and the dumbed down population who didn’t know any better?

And what if the only ones left who refused to give up their guns, who demanded that the Constitution be followed, and who demanded that the separation of powers doctrine be upheld (against Obama’s “I can’t wait for Congress to act!” meme)—what if the only ones left were conservatives?

And what if the Obama administration declared conservatives domestic terrorists, as they have basically done with a so-called “study,” Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States?: Those who are “reverent of individual liberty.” Those who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority.” Those who believe there is a “grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.”

And what if the Obama administration could outgun their conservative enemies?

The Obama administration has amassed a staggering amount of bullets (over two billion rounds), most of it the hollow point, armor piercing variety, enough to kill every American, man, woman, and child five times.

And what if the Obama administration successfully banned “assault weapons” but was able to keep assault weapons for themselves (as they have already done) calling the use of AR-15s “personal defense weapons”?

And what if the Obama administration could nullify the Second Amendment from the portion of the public that were the most extensively trained, who were traditionally the most conservative—that is, veterans?

The Obama administration has sent out thousands of letters to veterans with the following:

 A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both…

And what if the Obama administration was purchasing thousands of light armored tanks to be used against its own citizens? This, we learned over the weekend.

And what if the Obama administration ordered a fleet of “public safety” drones, able to pick up cell phone traffic, able to identify whether the target—that is, an American citizen—is armed or not with the ability to be easily outfitted with missiles?

This is something we discovered is not out of a dystopian novel but hatched by our own government, with a fleet of 30,000 drones expected by the end of Obama’s “third term.”

And what if there was a secret memo that gave the Obama administration the authority to kill any U.S. citizen at any time, anywhere, without proof, without due process, accountable to no one? Investigative journalist Michael Isikoff uncovered this last month.

So what if, unlike the Communists in Russia, the Obama administration wasn’t able to disarm its enemy—conservatives—but were able to easily outgun them, with hundreds of thousands of “personal defense weapons,” billions of rounds, tanks, and “public safety” drones?

Is a civil war coming between a totalitarian Obama administration and conservatives?

Is this some wild-eyed conspiracy theory?

Perhaps. Perhaps not.

www.impeachobamacampaign.com/video-is-a-civil-war-coming/

Regardless, it stands to reason, a regime which understands the fissures it has (purposefully) created, is diligently preparing for the resultant outbursts. Thus, is Martial Law really pie-in-the-sky, conspiracy-mongering, tin-foil hat and loony tunes rabble?

‘Is Martial Law Coming?’

MARCH 7, 2013 BY 

When the Obama administration during its “War on Women” propaganda campaign was parading Sandra Fluke—the so-called “contraception girl”—on the red carpet leading to the White House, the Leftist blog Think Progress was leading the charge to take Obama’s Public Enemy Number One Rush Limbaugh off the air because of his Sandra Fluke “whore” comments.

Obama’s attack dog Media Matters then began literally feeding the mainstream media its talking points, all to ensure Obamacare would not be derailed by the “noise” of federal funding of contraception and abortifacients.

And of course, the third part of the unholy leftist trinity, the Center for American Progress, run by Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff John Podesta—considered the “brain” of the radical Left—was running the whole “War on Women” marionette show.

But behind the scenes of his marionette show, Podesta had bigger fish to fry.

Just off the heels of the debt ceiling crisis—part of the so-called sequestration debacle the Obama administration has been wringing their hands about lately—John Podesta was jumping for joy in the one hundred page position paper Rebalancing Our National Security. Written following the Obama-manufactured debt ceiling crisis, the paper touted the Budget Control Act of 2011’s gutting of the military to the tune of almost five hundred billion dollars over the next ten years, not the measly $86 billion sequestration cuts Obama has been wringing his hands about.

You can almost hear Podesta giggling in the background as he discusses how the military was being gutted:

The debate in Washington over security spending this year is being driven mostly by the Budget Control Act of 2011, the debt reduction deal that averted a government shutdown last summer. The law mandates about $1 trillion in cuts to federal government discretionary spending over 10 years beginning in fiscal year 2012, including $487 billion in Pentagon cuts…

…The “sequester” came in to play after Congress failed to reach an agreement on how to legislate the deficit reduction at the end of last year…The members of our Task Force agree with the near-universal consensus that sequestration is more about political maneuvering than sound budgeting practice. But we argue that the amount of cuts to the Pentagon budget mandated by both parts of the debt deal is readily achievable with no sacrifice to our security—if the cuts are done in a thoughtful manner over the next decade. We also agree that some of those savings in the U.S. defense budget should be redeployed to other parts of the federal government, specifically to those non-military programs that help our nation defend the homeland and prevent global crises from escalating into military confrontations…

Where should the gutted defense budget be “redeployed” to per Podesta? Not the $500 billion as proposed, but his call for one trillion dollars in cuts? Being a globalist, as expected, redistribution of wealth to the global community, with the United Nations no doubt holding the purse strings:

Our Task Force plan outlines an alternative trajectory for spending on offense and prevention that would achieve the benchmark of $1 trillion in military cuts over 10 years. This framework provides $123 billion for international affairs over 10 years. It would increase spending on diplomacy during this period by 28 percent more than the president’s request, and increase spending on development and humanitarian assistance by 40 percent.

It is clear then, looking at the one trillion dollars in cuts over the next ten years, that these so-called “draconian” $86 billion sequestration cuts are simply a sham.

There are four things that are apparent from the Obama administration’s antics and its partner in crime, Center for American Progress:

1. During the debt ceiling crisis, Obama knew the “super committee” would fail and the sequestration deal would go forward.

2. Obama knew the $86 billion sequestration cuts were just a drop in the bucket to the real cuts that were mandated by the Budget Control Act of 2011.

3.Obama knew that the Republican Congress would not table the sequestration, and it would go forward.

4. Obama planned on hyping up the sequestration cuts, blaming the Republicans with his allies in the mainstream media, with the goal of retaking the House of Representatives in 2014.

With Obama controlling both the House and Senate in 2014, this would allow the gutting of the military to go through. This would allow Obama to push any agenda through Congress, no matter how radical—including gutting the Second Amendment—thus allowing him to complete his “fundamental transformation” of America—that is, a Marxist utopia.

But America won’t go willingly. Obama would have to orchestrate the mother of all of his orchestrated crises.

Enter George Soros, who just happens to fund the leftist unholy trinity Think Progress, Media Matters, and Center for American Progress.

Soros also just happens to be a felon, convicted of insider trading. Soros, dubbed “The Man Who Broke the Bank of England,” funneled hundreds of millions of dollars out of the British economy with the collapse of the British pound and is now trying make money with the collapse the Euro.

And of course, Soros is a fixture at the White House.

But Obama and George Soros are after bigger fish than collapsing currencies.

The stock market in recent days has been at record levels. Many have predicted a stock market crash—losing up to 90% of its value—although those on the hard Left, especially our friend George Soros, won’t say it openly.

Soros has dumped most of his stock in the banking industry and is stockpiling a massive amount of gold. Soros has a secret that he is keeping wraps on: If the stock market crashes, the economy itself will collapse.

With unemployment at high levels, with an unsustainable welfare state pushed to its limits, and with our national debt approaching seventeen trillion, a stock market crash would make the crash of 1929 look like child’s play.

It would collapse our economy in a matter of days, if not hours.

What would occur if the economy collapses?

Food and water shortages. Civil disorder. Riots.

And of course, a call for martial law.

And the Obama administration knows this—“coincidentally” signing an executive order last year that gives Obama dictatorial power in the event of a “national emergency.”

Is this why the Obama administration has stockpiled two billion rounds of ammunition?

Is this why the Obama administration has been frantically trying to ban assault weapons while quietly stockpiling the same weapons?

Is this why the Obama administration has been stockpiling light armored tanks?

Is this why the Obama administration has ordered a fleet of “public safety” drones, able to pick up cell phone traffic, able to identify whether the target—that is, an American citizen—is armed or not—with the ability to be easily outfitted with missiles?

Is this why the Obama administration has drafted a secret memo that gives Obama the authority to execute a drone strike on any U.S. citizen, at any time, anywhere, without proof, without due process, accountable to no one?

And of course, Eric Holder this week finally admitted that yes, Obama can murder an American citizen on American soil with a drone—in “extraordinary circumstances.”

“Extraordinary circumstances” would be American citizens who are against Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America.

Here’s the possible worst case scenario: Obama successfully spins the sequestration “draconian” cuts as being the fault of the Republicans and takes back the House of Representatives in 2014. This allows him to push anything through, including gutting the military, expanding the welfare state, placing America under an increased surveillance nanny state with drones keeping track of everyone’s movements, and ticking up the national debt to an unsustainable level—nearing $20 trillion.

Then Obama, Soros, and the gaggle of leftist globalist pull some type of monetary switch to crash the U.S. stock market. Our economy then implodes in a matter of days, if not hours; and Obama, with his martial law executive order in hand steps up to his teleprompter and beams to every home in America his call for “temporary” martial law.

During this period of martial law, Obama would specifically target those “clinging to their guns and religion”—that is, conservatives—confiscating guns and using drones to spy on and kill the “domestic terrorists.”

When the “national emergency” was over, Obama’s “fundamental transformation” of America would be complete, with a Marxist utopia safely in place.

Is this all a conspiracy theory? Perhaps. Perhaps not.

www.westernjournalism.com/is-martial-law-coming/

Read this as well, and then decide if worrying about Martial Law is off the wall – www.wnd.com/2013/03/picture-of-martial-law-alarms-forensic-profiler/.

Aside from the very fact that America is near and dear to this blogger’s heart – why else would there be a continual reference to “American-Israeli” – in practical terms, whither America goes economically, so too will the rest of us, whose economic fortunes are tied to the US. Therefore, the last thing to be wished for is an economic implosion, just to prove ones thesis! However, wishing doesn’t make it so, and head in the sand tactics is far worse. 

As such, the more warnings given, the less the Pyromaniac-in-Chief and crew will be able to sneak attack. Of course, much of the damage will still occur, regardless of our best efforts. But to give them a free hand, to upend the greatest experiment in human liberty, is just – un-American.

America’s Founding Fathers (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_Fathers_of_the_United_States) foresaw this impasse. Learn their lessons well.

Obama’s “Cult Of Personality”…Enshrined During His Second Term…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
7

The “cult of personality” is endemic/embedded within socialist, Marxist, communist totalitarian regimes. How many know that Jim Jones was an avowed communist, as he ordered his followers to kill themselves while under his spell?  – pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2011/02/08/remembering-jonestown/. As a matter of record, African American Pastors are jumping on “Obama Is A Prophet/Savior” bandwagon – www.westernjournalism.com/pastor-disparages-gop-describes-obama-as-moses-in-pre-inauguration-message/. Sick. Twisted. (un)Holy crap.

Similarly, Arab/Muslim nations feature the faces of their leaders as deified, omnipresent fixtures in the public square, even as they harp on “Allah is great” countless times a day, going mental when pictures of their “prophet” are displayed. Nevertheless, Islamic nations must bind the masses to “dear leader”, all in order to control them, not unlike their red counterparts. They too drape their leader’s portraits hither and yon. Interesting nexus.

In any case, readers may recall seeing many visages of Obama’s halo atop advertisements, during both his campaigns. In fact, swooning at rallies became the “norm”; leg tingling, duly reported by Chris Matthews, was reported without a blink; comparisons to Abraham Lincoln appeared reasonable – Jarrett: “Obama Isn’t Going to Debate Government’s Role, ‘Progress Is Compelled by Action Right Now’-www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/jarrett-obama-isnt-going-debate-governments-role-progress-compelled-action-right-now_697423.html ; and suggestions to place his bust on Mount Rushmore doesn’t seem over the top, and so on.

The above is of piece with people mesmerized by cult-like figures. Moreover, Jarrett’s words/actions must be taken VERY seriously – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/27/dhs-americas-planned-deconstruction-via-valerie-jarrett-domestically-foreign-policy-wise-addendum-to-barack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

Nevertheless, glorifying “The One” is about the radical left’s attachment to totalitarian rule, which necessitates that a figurehead becomes the revered idol. Along the same vein, Anita Dunn, the Radical-in-Chief’s ex “czarette”, gushed like a besotted teen about Mao, a killing machine in his own right – www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fi1zg2NOCn8…reminiscent of Chris Rock’s “deification” too – www.impeachobamacampaign.com/video-obama-chris-rocks-cult-daddy/…and he is by far not alone in his idolatry.

In concert, Rules For Radicals must be employed, otherwise average folks won’t be swept up in the (mostly) subliminal indoctrination of “true believers”. The “Demons For Obama” have come out in full force, duly represented during his second inauguration. By the bye, “The One” is so unrestrained/unchained during his second term, his inaugural read like an ode to Soviet “red” rule, with a dash of “green” to boot – ‘Obama Unbound’, Charles Krauthammer – www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=301321

Saul Alinsky, Catholic Church, Catholic Campaign for Human Development, Community Organizing

‘Demons for Obama’ – Canada Free Press

Author
 – Judi McLeod

“The Obama button craze, apparent during ‘The Second Coming’ inauguration, took its inspiration from the Peace Movement.  ThePeace Movement covered all professions in buttons reading, ‘Grannies for Peace’, ‘Farmers and War Veterans for Peace’.  It also included “Panties for Peace”,  a movement, which someone started as a joke, but still collected members.

In secular, Marxist Obama land, it’s now ‘Sisters for Obama’, buttons with the Obama logo slapped below a Hollywood version of a young nun in a habit whose beauty outshines her virtue.

One of the first to report on ‘Sisters for Obama’ is savvy Catholic priest, Fr. John Zuhlsdorf, who has one of the most followed Catholic blogs on the entire Internet.  The blog is called ‘Fr. Z’s blog-What does The Prayer Really Say?’-”Frank commentary on Catholic issues & slavishly accurate liturgical translations by Fr. John. Zuhlsdorf.”In the Obama button culture every profession is represented on the Obama campaign.  According to David Graham, associate editor at The Atlantic, There’s ‘Dancers for Obama’, ‘Bartenders for Obama’, ‘Fisherman for Obama’ and now habit-wearing ‘Sisters for Obama’.
The one most conspicuously missing is ‘Demons for Obama’.

“Sisters for Obama?” Oh… that’s not… right… no….Here’s Fr. Z’s post on O’s alleged sisters:

Posted on 20 January 2013 by Fr. John Zuhlsdorf

My stomach turned as a I saw on the site of WaPo some photos of the preparation for the inauguration of the President – you know the one – tomorrow.

‘Sisters for Obama’ ( Brendan Smialowski / AFP / Getty Images / January 13, 2013 ) A pin with a nun on it is seen at the official Presidential Inaugural Committee’s gift shop in Washington, D.C.

No no no.  That’s just wrong.

I’d like to know who paid for these and how they are being distributed like this by the Presidential Inaugural Committee.

UPDATE:

I was reminded in a comment, below, about the great scene in Galaxy Quest.

A guiding light in probing Catholic issues of the day, Fr. Z’s thoughts of ‘Sisters for Obama’ serve as a reminder of how it was the deliberate restructuring of the infrastructure of the Catholic Church cemented with the Labor Movement, perfected by Saul Alinsky that was to one day bring Community Organizer Barack Hussein Obama into the White House.

The road to hell leading to a community organizer becoming America’s first undocumented president was paved 40 years ago by a cadre of Catholic priests—personally trained by atheist Saul Alinsky.

The road began in the Archdiocese of Chicago with Notre Dame University picking up the slack the only time it ever became necessary.
Now we know why the unabashed ‘Champion of Partial Birth Abortion’ had Notre Dame officials covering up the crucifix during Obama’s 2009 ‘commencement speech’.

It’s the true story of ‘Demons for Obama’ at work, and no one reports the story more compellingly than Fr. Z’s courageous colleague and friend, Michael Voris of the CIA. (Catholic Investigative Agency).

Voris gets behind the political front CCHD (Catholic Campaign for Human Development) which raised some $280 million from Sunday church collection under the guise of a Campaign Against Poverty, and points out that the poverty level was 12.6%  in 1970 and sits at 13.2% some 40 years later.

Instead of the end of poverty, we had the beginning of Marxism.

Voris defines ‘community organizing’ as “Taking power from you and giving it to us”.

It will take an hour to learn how Saul Alinsky used the Catholic Church to advance his radical agenda, and to follow the actual trajectory how Barack Hussein Obama got into the White House, but it’s an hour well worth it.

Meanwhile, we still don’t know where Obama was born, but we do know that he was brought into power by a path forged for him by the demons of self-proclaimed Lucifer lover Saul Alinsky. No better time to learn than on Inauguration Day.

God bless Catholic compatriots Fr. Z. and Michael Voris.”

www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52549

Ominously, a clue was recently dropped by the radical revolutionaries within Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s regime, as to how they intend to “organize” their shock troops. Doesn’t fiddling with the Constitution assist their aspirations? – adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with-the-constitution-to-eviscerate-term-limitations-on-the-presidency-why-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.  Yet another ! nightmare for every non-infected American.

Most significantly, if it looks like a communist, socialist looking glass, it is  – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/05/if-it-looks-like-a-socialistmarxistcommunist-plan-it-is-peekingpeeling-back-into-obamas-looking-glass-his-surrogates-too-their-bomblets-waiting-to-explode-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…and patriotic Americans have no choice but to resist.

Does anyone believe his cult will reverse course, even after all the evidence is in, demonstrably proving “The One” is not whom he purports to be – “Here, Carl Gallups has an interview with Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse head Mike Zullo. New evidence will apparently convince the greatest skeptic that Obama’s birth certificate was 100% forged” – www.westernjournalism.com/important-sheriff-joe-arpaio-obama-update/.

But never mind, “true believers” can’t be convinced, regardless of all the facts at hand. (Ideologically) blind as bats. Future shock troops too.

Leftist Mendacity…Gunning For The Second Amendment…The Gutting Of The Constitution…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on by
3

Protection for me but not for thee. Guns for me but not for thee. So sayeth the leftist brayers in America’s midst. Elsewhere too. And if one needs demonstrable proofs to support said thesis (of leftist mendacity), where oh where does a patriot begin? Here and there.

“Going postal” has taken on ever more sinister meaning, as the Radical-in-Chief leads (with his obnoxiously familiar head tilt, nose in the air, feigning he is above the fray, that he isn’t forward marching his leftist troops…and pigs do fly) his fellow revolutionaries into highly dangerous territory. Deadly.Thereby, creating a palpable environment for gun control advocates to threaten to kill legal gun owners – adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/03/leftists-go-postal-over-gun-control-threatening-to-kill-legal-gun-owners-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . Does it get any more twisted than that? Nope. An American leadership gone haywire.

If the above doesn’t send chills up and down your spine, imagine what drove a dedicated U.S. Marine to upbraid Sen. Feinstein (and fellow anti-Constitutional “lawmakers”) to the tune of an open letter – adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/11/of-mice-men-a-u-s-marine-rebukes-sen-feinsteins-washingtons-proposed-violations-to-the-second-amendment-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . A travesty. A tragedy in the making.

But what does one expect, when a rogue leadership fiddles with the Constitution, with the intent to install Barack HUSSEIN Obama as “President for Life” – adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/07/fiddling-with-the-constitution-to-eviscerate-term-limitations-on-the-presidency-why-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .This American-Israeli blogger is dead serious.

In this regard, welcome to “Obama’s America” –  adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/27/obamas-america-entering-the-parallel-universe-of-radical-politics-gone-haywire-a-short-path-to-dictatorship-addendum-to-gunning-for-tea-party-activists-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …. a land of tyranny. Diametrically opposed to its founding principles – the “land of the free, the home of the brave”.

Alas, leftist dogma is the same world over – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/01/leftist-dogma-the-same-world-over-freedom-loving-people-beware-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-32-2/ … a mortal danger – a dagger to its heart – to western civilization.

Therefore, the latest is a manifestation, a mandatory push back, against a tyrannical regime

‘GUN CRITICS CHALLENGED TO BE WITHOUT THEIR GUNS’

‘We think they should demonstrate their belief in their own programs’

A spokesman for a foundation that successfully has battled in court to uphold the Constitution’s Second Amendment is challenging not only politicians but celebrities who think the American public should be disarmed to go without their own firearms protections.

“That would include Joe Biden’s shotguns,” said Alan Gottlieb, executive vice president of the Second Amendment Foundation, “and the armed security now enjoyed by Sens. Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi.”

He said such leading opponents of gun ownership should begin the process and “lead by example” through repudiation of any of their own firearms as well as the “armed security” they now have.

“It seems clear from the direction the administration is going that it wants to severely restrict the rights of law-abiding gun owners to purchase the firearms of their choice,” Gottlieb said, “and we think they should demonstrate their belief in their own programs by giving up their firearms and security first.”

The issue is in the headlines right now because anti-gun politicians including President Obama are trying to capitalize on the horror following the school shooting in Newtown, Conn., that left 20 children and six adults victims.

The alleged gunman shot and killed himself, so there may be questions about the attack that never are answered.

An argument for armed self-defense, in “America Fights Back: Armed Self-Defense in a Violent Age.”

Nevertheless, Obama has appointed Vice President Joe Biden to head up a task force and make recommendations on more gun controls for the United States.

But Obama should be a leader in another area, Gottlieb said, that of relinquishing firearms and protection from firearms.

“It would especially apply to President Obama,” he said, “who just signed legislation giving himself Secret Service protection for life, at the expense of taxpayers he wants to disarm.”

He said the same standard is appropriate for “anti-gun celebrities who have bodyguards while supporting legislation that would deprive average citizens from owning firearms for personal protection.”

There is good that comes from Americans’ access to weaponry, he pointed out.

“For example,” he noted, “when I appeared with CNN’s Piers Morgan recently, he asserted that nobody needs an AR-15. The other day near Houston, a Texas teenager used an AR-15 to defend himself and his 12-year-old sister from a home invasion by shooting two burglars. Piers can choke on that.”

Gottlieb believes that public figures simply don’t have a right to advocate for gun bans for private citizens unless they first voluntarily give up their personal security.

“These anti-gun politicians were not elected to positions of royalty,” Gottlieb said. “They are citizens, with no more rights than any other citizen. They were elected to serve the public, not treat the public like serfs. If they want us to put our safety at risk, they should drop the pretense and give up their guns and guards before daring to suggest that anyone else do the same.”

The Second Amendment Foundation is the nation’s oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

It fought and won the landmark McDonald v. Chicago Supreme Court Case that applied Second Amendment rights to individuals in states all across the nation.

The organization earlier called out the hypocrisy of mayors across the nation who advocate for gun control.

It took a look at New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s plan called Mayors Against Illegal Guns that is to enhance gun restrictions on citizens city by city.

SAF officials said perhaps he should be focusing on the mayors themselves, not the residents of their cities.

“Michael Bloomberg created this group to further his personal agenda of public disarmament,” Gottlieb said at the time. “But within the ranks of his organization, our research has found several politicians who have been convicted of various serious crimes, thus making it impossible for them to finish their terms.

“We discovered,” he said, “one mayor convicted of perjury and embezzlement, another who was convicted of attempted child molestation, and yet another who was convicted of assault and racketeering. There was one who was convicted on bribery, fraud and money laundering, and another who was convicted of domestic violence.

“In short,” Gottlieb said, “many of these elitist politicians can no longer own firearms. The crimes they were convicted of suggest they are public enemies rather than public servants. No wonder they want to take guns from law-abiding citizens!

“Perhaps Bloomberg should worry about background checks on his colleagues, rather than law-abiding gun owners,” he suggested.

The group boasts that it has grown to more than 725 mayors in 40 states. But SAF is publicizing mayors who have run into their own troubles.

It is launching its campaign in newspapers, magazines and on the Internet, revealing the criminal and ethical wrongdoings of many of the mayors themselves.

See the ad.

Gottlieb reported the research conducted by the foundation found “a far higher rate of criminal activity within the ranks of the MAIG than among the ranks of more than eight million citizens who are licensed to carry concealed firearms in 49 states.”

Another recent battle for the SAF was in Alameda County, Calif., which changed the rules as three businessmen were trying to open a gun shop. The foundation successfully sued the county for allegedly violating the constitutional rights of three businessmen by wrongfully denying them permits to open a gun shop.

The foundation also recently argued a pair of California cities and the state’s Department of Justice improperly confiscated firearms during investigations and then refused to return them to their owners – even after the subjects of the inquiries were cleared.
Other cases the SAF has handled in recent months:

  • SAF sued the state of California over a “vague” gun ban over a case in which a man twice was jailed and then cleared. The focal point is the definition of an “assault weapon.” The statute’s definition of weapons is so “vague and ambiguous,” the group contends, that one man was arrested on two different occasions for violations but ultimately cleared of any wrongdoing. “It’s an insult to be arrested once for violating a law that is so vague and ambiguous that law enforcement officers cannot tell the difference between what is and what is not a legal firearm under this statute,” said Gottlieb, “but to be arrested and jailed twice for the same offense is an outrage.”
  • In New York, the organization has asked for a summary judgment that would strike New York City’s $340 triennial fee for just owning a handgun. The legal brief explains that under U.S. Supreme Court rulings “the right to keep a handgun in the home for self-defense is a part of the ‘core’ of the Second Amendment’s protections.” The case, brought by SAF, the New York State Rifle and Pistol Association and individuals including an electrical contractor, a paramedic, CPA and woodworker, argues, “The city’s $340 fee is inherently prohibitive and serves the impermissible purpose of discouraging the exercise of constitutional rights. While the city can charge a nominal fee to defray costs, the $340 fee is not nominal, and has never been calculated to defray costs.”
  • The organization has sued New Jersey and officials and judges over procedures that allowed them to refuse firearms permits for a kidnap victim, a man who carries large amounts of cash for his business and a civilian FBI employee who fears attacks from radical Islamists. The permissions were denied on the grounds people had not shown a “justifiable need.” “Law-abiding New Jersey citizens have been arbitrarily deprived of their ability to defend themselves and their families for years under the state’s horribly crafted laws,” said an SAF spokesman. “The law grants uncontrolled discretion to police chiefs and other public officials to deny license applications even in cases where the applicant has shown a clear and present danger exists.”
  • The SAF filed a case on behalf of an honorably discharged veteran from the Vietnam War and names as defendants Attorney General Eric Holder and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The case was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on behalf of Jefferson Wayne Schrader. The question is whether the state of Maryland can deprive an individual of the right to possess a weapon over a misdemeanor. Schrader had been convicted of misdemeanor assault relating to a fight involving a man who previously had assaulted him in Annapolis. But he was denied the opportunity to receive a shotgun as a gift or to purchase a handgun for personal protection.
  • SAF filed a claim against Maryland for a man who alleged the state was violating the Second Amendment by refusing to renew his handgun permit. Raymond Woollard originally was issued a carry permit after a man broke into his home during a family event in 2002. Woollard’s permit was renewed in 2005 after the defendant in the case was released from prison. But state officials later refused to renew the permit, even though the intruder now lives some three miles from Woollard.
  • SAF sued Westchester County, N.Y., because officials there were requiring that residents have a “good cause” to ask for a handgun permit. The federal lawsuit alleges the requirement conflicts with the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment establishes a personal right to “keep and bear arms.” Individual plaintiffs in the case are Alan Kachalsky and Christina Nikolov, both Westchester County residents whose permit applications were denied.”

http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/gun-critics-challenged-to-be-without-their-guns/#0fJepD0jElRBVJ5E.99

The left’s game plan is relentless, boundless and without remorse. But whether they honed their skills, aka “made their bones”, on Saul Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals” – www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals – is neither here nor there. What matters are the results of their misdeeds, deadly in their scope.

Due to the above – and so much more – patriots are as much at war with the die-hard left, as they are with the Islamists at their throats.

As is said, “forewarned is forearmed” – literally!