Is The Republican Leadership Aiming For The Truth Re Benghazigate? Embedded Radio Interview! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

One of the most counter intuitive aspects of Benghazigate’s cesspool is continually relying on the alcoholically-challenged Speaker Boehner, expecting him to step up to the plate. Pie-in-the-sky. Dreamland too. Truth be told, he can hardly cease his teary-eyed responses, long enough to perform his due diligence. He is simply not equipped for such heavy lifting, even though he knows things which could put this travesty to rest. 

In this regard, a few proactive Republicans are attempting to glean the truth, however, they are continually hampered by a gaggle of RINO’s, desperate to buck up the emotionally inept Speaker. Recall the film “Weekend At Bernie’s” ( and you get the drift…pretending what is isn’t…that dead men can be passed off for the living. Do rational, normal folks behave this way?

In fact, much to our chagrin, we witnessed the RINO’s in action, their disgraceful ineptitude during the Republican Convention. A nightmare in its own right, no pun intended. So much so, that even one Islamic outrage atop another didn’t cease their pandering to the “Arab Spring”- Unfathomable. Unspeakable.

So as McCain digs himself deeper, re Huma Abedin, one hardly expects him to be the bulwark against team RINO – …despite promising to get to the bottom of “this and that”. P L E A S E!!

Meanwhile, foot-in-mouth Boehner let loose some “secrets” pertaining to the CIA Annex, but so far he ain’t spilling the beans. If he requires any umph to what he already knows, perhaps he may want to show this video exchange to the RINO’s “investigating” the Islamist-in-Chief, as supplementary material – He doesn’t have the spine.

‘Audio: House Speaker John Boehner knows something about CIA Annex’ (and he’s not telling)

by  on JANUARY 24, 2013

Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) appeared on Laura Ingraham’s radio show and discussed the testimony of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton relative to the Benghazi attacks on 9/11. At the end of this clip via the Daily Caller (h/t Diana West), Boehner addresses the question asked of Clinton by Rand Paul, which involved whether or not the CIA Annex was being used as a hub for gun trafficking.

Here is the relevant portion transcribed:

Ingraham: Mr. Speaker, Rand Paul asked a question about funneling perhaps arms from Turkey through that CIA Annex to be shipped ultimately to Syrian rebels. Hillary Clinton – there was about four or five beats before she answered the question. Do you know anything about this and have you been briefed on any possibilities…?

Boehner: I’m somewhat familiar with the chatter about this and the fact that these arms were moving toward Turkey but most of what I know about this came from a classified source and really can’t elaborate on it.

If Boehner knows, what are the odds Hillary doesn’t know four months after the attacks?

Also, if Boehner knows that Hillary either knows now or knew then, he knows that she lied in Congressional testimony.

Here is audio of the interview between Boehner and Ingraham. Pay attention beginning at the 3:33 mark:

Remember, if Hillary knows the truth about what was going on at the CIA Annex, she lied when she said she didn’t know.

Boehner has been bullied by the Obama administration for a long time. Perhaps it’s time for him to tap into his inner-Ralphie. The snowball in this movie metaphor should represent Hillary placing the blame for the lack of security in Libya, on Congress. And, of course, Scut Farkus represents Hillary herself.

Then again, Boehner knew he was talking to a conservative audience during his appearance on Ingraham’s show and has historically demonstrated extreme deference when confronting this administration.

One more question… If keeping classified information classified is actually a greater threat to national security than making it public, doesn’t Boehner have an obligation to spill the beans?

NOW, if long-time investigator Doug Hagmann got a hold of the major players under oath, surely they would have little wiggle room left to spin their tales and weave or dodge. But that requires a true patriot executing the questioning AND the digging.

‘Running down the clock on Benghazi’

– Doug Hagmann  Thursday, January 24, 2013

Yesterday, Hillary Rodham Clinton provided unsworn testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee to answer questions about the 9/11 attack in Benghazi and the murders of four Americans.

I suspect that the majority of congressmen and senators will be sending their aides out today for a fresh supply of Chap Stick, while Clinton’s aides will be busy applying soothing layers of a similar ointment to another part of her anatomy as a result of that shameless and widely inappropriate public display of affection. Every American with normal sensibilities should be outraged over the lack of accountability that was celebrated instead of prosecuted, and the exploitation of the dead for political capital rather than an honest quest for the truth.Conducted as fact-finding hearings, many Americans were hopeful that the officials they elected to represent them were finally going to get to the bottom of a deadly event that has been mired in deception since the minute it began to unfold. Instead, Americans were sorely shortchanged by a combination of inept questioning and lengthy monologues of professional praise, the latter which served as an effective tactic to run down the game clock while limiting any errant exposure to the truth.

It is telling that the elected officials spent more time fawning over Hillary Rodham Clinton’s alleged medical issues from which she’s recovered, rather than attempting to learn the truth behind the brutal, agonizing and possibly preventable deaths of four Americans. One result from yesterday’s hearings was immediately evident in the Progressive media’s reports, particularly by Lawrence O’Donnell, who crowed that Hillary Clinton had put to rest “conspiracy theories” associated with the attacks in Benghazi. Sadly, O’Donnell and his ilk are more concerned over the future political viability of their “sacred cow” instead of exposing the truth behind an event that not only took American lives, but has hastened U.S. involvement into a life-changing global conflict.

A rip in the curtain Again, truth has been pushed behind a political agenda that continues unabated in a situation that if exposed for what it was, would eclipse all other political scandals to date in terms of scope and significance. It appears to be the nature of Washington, the immorality of its denizens and power brokers, and the rampant lawlessness that has evolved from decades of unchecked power allowed by a slumbering populace and a complicit media.

Once people understand that a full accounting of the events related to Benghazi would provide a rare glimpse into the agenda and activities of a rogue government operation of unfathomable consequence, it is easy to see why this regime is so intent on covering-up the truth. To understand the role the “special mission” in Benghazi played in providing arms to anti-Assad forces for the purposes of destabilizing Syria on behalf of Saudi Arabia and the Muslim Brotherhood is to see the larger geo-political picture in this high-stakes game of real-world Risk.

The attack in Benghazi ripped the curtain of secrecy, allowing the world to connect the dots into the Obama-Saudi plan for restructuring the Middle East – a plan that is being allowed to continue, compliments of an accommodating legislative branch of government and a fawning and obedient media.

Much like the events in Benghazi provided those with eyes to see the larger agenda by this unexpected rip in the veil of lies, there was one moment in the hearings that presented a similar opportunity to see through the veil of the cover-up.

Out of hours of “testimony” and pages of written transcripts, the most telling moment came in response to Senator Ron Johnson’s rewording of a question relating to the motive and origin of the attack. His persistence caused Clinton to raise her voice and flirt with hysteria, shouting:

“With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided to go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make?”

Her incomprehensible response offered a glimpse behind the curtain of deception, yet that tear in the fabric of lies was left open but ignored as if following the line of questioning would reveal too much.

The “difference,” Madame Secretary, lies at the very core of why there are four dead Americans. The question regarding what caused the attack is the foundation on which your house of lies has been built. Behind your unbridled hubris and feigned outrage that such a question should be asked exists the reason why the number of dead in Syria will not stop at 60,000, but will eventually rise into the millions. It is the very reason that Americans will, at some point in the not-too-distant future, lament their involvement into yet another war sparked by an American foreign policy designed bythe Saudis and implemented by a dutiful Barack Hussein Obama and your State Department.

Shameless exploitation of dead Americans

As I watched the hearings and poured through the transcripts, my thoughts turned to the victims of the Benghazi attacks and their families. Having personally experienced the murder of a family member that went unsolved for over five years, I know the feeling of being denied the truth. I know the agony and heartache associated with unanswered questions. Although I cannot speak for the families of the victims beyond my own personal experience, I certainly suspect that your arrogance and overbearing pride as exhibited by your response has only exacerbated their pain.

You shed a tear as you recounted how you and your boss met the arrival of the bodiesof the dead upon their return home, and how you stood next to the family members of the victims. In one moment you expressed sorrow and promised justice, yet wasted no time erecting a firewall against any meaningful disclosure that would allow for proper closure for the victim’s families.

To deflect questions away from the motive is to divert people from learning the truth, deliberately convoluting the facts and hiding the truth or from the victim’s families to every thinking American.

It is difficult to fathom how you could stand with your boss, shoulder to shoulder with the family members of the victims, while knowing the secrets you continue to keep hidden. It is equally difficult to fathom how elected leaders have so easily acquiesced by failing to ask the proper questions, and turned fact-finding sessions into de-facto canonization ceremonies amid a moral, ethical and spiritual vacuum.

Yesterday’s shameless hearings have done little to reveal the truth. To those paying attention, however, it is becoming much clearer that the truth continues to be held hostage of the current foreign policy constructed by the Saudis and implemented by the Obama military muscle.” .

Most significantly, here is an explosive radio interview with “DHS INSIDER” on some shocking truths – 

‘More about the DHS insider interview’ – by Doug Hagmann, Northeast Intelligence Network

trunews8 February 2013: Doug Hagmann appeared as a guest on TruNews with Rick Wiles today for a hour-long interview that covered information from the DHS insider in more detail. Rick adds his analysis and commentary about the information provided, and discussion about the objectives of the Obama regime ensues”.

In tandem, Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld (, head of the American Center For Democracy, pins Hillary to the wall, but doubts Capitol Hill leaders feel any such urgency –  

Is it possible that the Repubs will execute justice? Yes. Is it probable? No. 

Once again, patriots are left holding the bag. What are you gonna do?

6 thoughts on “Is The Republican Leadership Aiming For The Truth Re Benghazigate? Embedded Radio Interview! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

  1. First, thank you for your commentaries. There is so much good information packed in them that it makes my head hurt! Uff da! This is not directly related to the topic above, but I am curious about your thoughts on Obama’s ‘admiration’ for Lincoln. Charles Krauthammer gave a superb analysis of Pres Obama’s proclaimed ‘admiration’ of Pres Reagan during his inauguration speech. In his analysis he revealed Obama’s nefarious plans behind his expressed desire to be remembered for changing the ideological trajectory for America, like Reagan. Except Pres Obama has no desire to return us to a Constitutional Republic but to restore the Progressive’s 60 year history to “fundamentally transform” American into a Communist/Islamist nirvana. So I am trying to understand the duplicitous meanings that lie behind Obama’s admiration of Pres Lincoln. Could it be his desire for a civil war that would further his aims? Just wondering.

    • First, thanks for the heads up.

      As to his obsession with Lincoln – he understands that Lincoln is admired for the moral bearing he exhibited, as such, “The One” believes he is morally in the right – no pun intended!
      Indeed, he intends to set the stage for a civil war (albeit, with six degrees of separation), and I refer to this real possibility at various commentaries. Class warfare (via economic deconstruction/”fairness”) is his method, at the same time that he grabs for America’s guns. The perfect storm.
      However, I believe the actual plan is subliminally mixed up with his dangerous narcissism, again, considering himself “The One/The Chosen”. Coincidentally, I have an interesting piece today on this very subject. You may want to read it carefully.

      All the best (kol tuv) from the Jewish homeland!

  2. Pingback: Benghazigate Directives: Keep Your Mouthes Shut; Survivors Identities Subject To Change; & An “SOS” Is Issued For Admiral Gauotte…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  3. Pingback: Homepage

  4. Pingback: Alicia Ryherd


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s