Fast & Furious: Its Links To Gun Control Via (Obama & Surrogates) False Flag Operations…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

U.S. leftists, via their hegemony over mainstream media outlets, rely on their mouthpieces to steer the “news”. As such, they are able – in one stroke of a pen – to fabricate actual facts on the ground, as they smear alternative media outlets who dispute said “facts”. Does Pravda resonate?

Most significantly, ever since Obama Inc. has descended upon America, things have gone from bad to worse. It is no accident. In reality, radical revolutionaries have been in place for decades. However, before the ascent of “The One” their power was burrowed within academia and assorted “think tanks”, mostly funded through entities administered by George-the devil incarnate-Soros’s slush funds. This is no longer the case.

As a matter of record, the following re-release of BRINGING DOWN America, by Larry Grathwohl and Frank Reagan, was necessary due to the ensconcing of leftist revolutionaries within Obama’s regime – www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/bringing_down_america_a_review.html. The aforementioned topic has been given all due deliberation at this blog, and from various vantage points. As indicated in July 2012, when authentic revolutionaries hold the reins of power, the explosive results are pre-ordained – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/07/when-authentic-revolutionaries-hold-the-reins-of-american-power-centers-via-the-most-radical-regime-in-u-s-history-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

But where does Fast & Furious fit in? More to the point, where doesn’t it?

Fast & Furious is emblematic (fits like a glove) of an administration rife in cover ups, most recently, Benghazigate is a prime exhibit – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/21/the-nexus-between-cover-ups-benghazigate-mirror-image-of-fast-furious-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

And since disarming Americans is their main aim, then it stands to reason that the Second Amendment serves as a patriot’s “red line”, its “holy grail” –  adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/02/americans-the-second-amendment-a-red-line-constitutional-issue-a-holy-grail-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Most astonishingly, the leader of the free world, in concert with his underlings (sort of like a Mafia Don with his Consigliere) is lurching from one anti-American disaster to another –  adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/27/barack-hussein-obama-the-radical-in-chief-his-subversive-underlings-lurching-from-one-anti-american-disaster-to-another-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …akin to a speeding bullet train.

YET, when does a pile up of dead bodies lead to criminal indictments, even when they land at the White Houses’s door – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/03/when-does-a-pile-up-of-dead-bodies-not-lead-to-criminal-indictments-hint-when-perpetrated-by-the-obama-regime-commentary-byadina-kutnicki/ …alongside those of his appointed guns?

More specifically, when will the Radical-in-Chief’s lawless “justice” dept fall, under the aegis of AG Eric Holder? –  adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/will-barack-hussein-obamas-lawless-justice-department-under-the-aegis-of-ag-holder-finally-fall-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

But if not for the above, any discussion of “false flag”, in relation to Fast & Furious, would be dead on arrival – at least at this blog.

‘FAST AND FURIOUS’ CALLED FALSE FLAG AGAINST GUN DEALERS’ – World Net Daily – embedded videos

Author says government’s actions are ‘comparable to U.S. funding al-Qaida’

WASHINGTON—The U.S. government running guns to Mexican cartels is “comparable to the United States funding al-Qaida to make someone in the United States look bad,” according to the author of a new best-seller.

Katie Pavlich is the author of “Fast and Furious: Barack Obama’s Bloodiest Scandal and the Shameless Cover-Up,” news editor of townhall.com and an expert on the Fast and Furious scandal.

In an interview with WND, she asserted that the Obama administration intentionally orchestrated a “false flag” against lawful gun dealers, the U.S. Border Patrol and Mexican citizens to give cause for more gun regulation.

“This is a situation where the government was creating a situation where they could blame law-abiding citizens, turn them into criminals and creat[e] this false problem that they could solve through gun regulation,” Pavlich said.

Pavlich compares drug cartels to terrorist groups like Hezbollah, and new reports say the groups actually are linked.

“This is a situation where [the Obama administration was] willing to put public safety in danger, get thousands of people killed south of the border. The only reason we know about this is because (Border Patrol agent) Brian Terry was killed,” she said.

Pavlich cites the history of how the government courted gun dealers in Arizona to work with the ATF to sell guns to illegal buyers – allegedly to prove that guns were being transferred from American dealers to drug cartels.

She notes how the ATF assured gun dealers that “everything was OK” and that the ATF was “going to make sure the guns aren’t transferred to violent hands” and “not going to Mexico.”

Despite these assurances by the government, after the killings started happening, the government declared that gun dealers in Arizona were responsible for the “murder and mayhem in Mexico.”

When asked by WND if the real agenda was to make American gun dealers look bad, Pavlich said, “absolutely.”

She said Obama, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder “were giving us this false 90 percent figure” that 90 percent of guns being illegally trafficked to Mexico were coming from Arizona and the Southwest border.

Pavlich asserts that the administration’s agenda is mirrored in a 1995 video of Holder that shows him advocating “brainwashing” children to think differently about guns

In reference to the recent filibuster by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on the use of drones to kill American citizens, Pavlich said, “Fast and Furious was a perfect example” of the government setting the precedent and breaking psychological barriers to kill American citizens.

Pavlich is not the only commentator to assert that Fast and Furious was an attempt to curb the Second Amendment. NRA executive vice-president Wayne LaPierre said in 2011 that “Fast and Furious” was a “plot to undermine” the right to bear arms.

Former Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, in a 2011 interview with radio talk show host Alex Jones, said the government is criminally liable for Fast and Furious and described the operation as a “false flag.”

Pavlich said that since Fast and Furious, “Democrats have done everything they can to drop ‘Fast and Furious’ from their vocabulary” yet their attempts to press for gun control are obviously not hindered by the scandal.

She cited Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., who was an “ardent defender of Eric Holder” who is still out in front pressing for more gun control in the wake of the scandal.

However, the administration has been only partly successful in its strategy to use Fast and Furious.

Fellow Democrats such as Sens. Jon Tester, D-Mont., and Max Baucus, D-Mont., stood up to Holder in 2009 immediately after the scandal broke, saying they “oppose reinstating the ban on the sale of assault weapons, and we call on the Department of Justice to enforce existing laws before it considers imposing any new restrictions on gun ownership.”

See the following videos:

“Fast And Furious is a false flag”:

“ATF frames gun dealers”:

“Can this lead to impeachment?”:

 “Can U.S. government kill American citizens?”:

http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/fast-and-furious-called-false-flag-against-gun-dealers/#qWhIT9xMAvjIizjP.99

Rest assured, thugs-in-suits are ruling Washington’s power centers, chiefly through the White House and AG’s office.  Valerie Jarrett – his communist leaning, Islamist sympathizing alter ego – is deeply in the mix. And these revolutionaries are dead set on disarming law abiding Americans.

Many scoff at the notion of “false flags”, proclaiming they are the purview of conspiracy theorists. Yes, at times they are just that – conspiracy theories! However, this is absolutely not the case with Fast & Furious. Its essence lies in a definitive basis: creating a climate, whereby gun dealers would be blamed for death and mayhem; a situation wholly originating deep in the bowels of Washington; implemented by higher ups, so ordered by AG Holder, himself a lawbreaker of the highest magnitude.

Moving right along…next stop – gun control!

Choosing Life in Israel: a Review, Featured at American Thinker…by Adina Kutnicki

Choosing Life in Israel, by P. David Hornik (a columnist at Frontpage Magazine, a contributor to PJ MediaAmerican Spectator, and elsewhere), is a collection of essays vividly describing the author’s life in Israel with all its attendant regional whiplashes. Its trajectory veers like a roller coaster ride from the wildly delicious to the deeply terrified. From personal ups and downs to heart-stopping high drama, its quick pace leaves one breathless. The author’s compelling voice projects a rich tapestry of experiences living on the front lines of the Middle East.

The book is broken down into two highly readable sections. Part 1 deals mainly with the ins and outs of daily life in Israel with its multifaceted challenges. Its nine stories are interwoven into concise and entertaining segments,  not without cold doses of reality smacking the reader across the face. One such episode is particularly emblematic of what it means to live not only in Israel, but in Jerusalem; the epicenter of international fixation, bordering on fanatical obsession.

From “Mistaken Random Terror in Jerusalem:” ”

…just down the street from me, George Khoury, a 22 year old student of economics and international relations at Hebrew University who was out jogging, was shot dead by terrorists from Al-Aksa Martyr’s Brigades, part of Yasser Arafat’s Fatah movement… The “impersonal” nature of most terrorism… is its most chilling aspect… and killing him because (supposedly) he’s a Jew — is that personal or impersonal? Indeed, the Martyr’s Brigades was quick to apologize once it found out its error. Its commander called George Khoury’s father, the well known East Jerusalem lawyer Elias Khoury… and that the group considers George a “Palestinian martyr.”

Adding considerable angst to a father’s normal bereavement, Elias Khoury’s father, Daoud Khoury, was also murdered for being in the wrong place at a most unfortunate time. Visceral flashbacks surely must have resonated through Elias Khoury’s being. But when it comes to Islamic-sustained terror everything is flipped on its head. Even though he lost his father due to a booby-trapped refrigerator placed by the same Fatah terrorist outfit in the heart of a Jewish neighborhood in Jerusalem, his reaction to his son’s and father’s death evinced “moral” equivalency: “The Al-Aksa Martyrs Brigades are individuals who are trying to impose their way on everyone… this act was carried out by a group that undermines the cause of Palestinian justice… I am against all violent attacks against innocent civilians, whether it be against Israeli or Palestinian civilians.” Well and good, except for the fact that Israeli security forces take great pains to spare the lives of Palestinian civilians, often at unfathomable costs to its own soldiers and citizens alike. Those who invariably become “collateral” damage are accidental victims of legitimate counter-terror operations. Most significantly, many Palestinian casualties are strategically placed (by their leadership) in close proximity to bomb factories etc., in anticipation of an international hue and cry when the dead and maimed are paraded before the world’s cameras. More to the point, the author elicits many such examples of bloody jihad waged all over the streets of Israel, seemingly with no end in sight. Consequentially, P. David Hornik demonstrates, even when bereaved, Israel’s minority population is unwilling to condemn terror for what it is: murderous jihad.

Segueing to Part 2, the reader lands even more squarely in the heart of the hottest conflict in the world, aptly titled “Israel’s Struggle to Survive.”

Part of the richness of Choosing Life in Israel lies within its many paradoxes. In one fell swoop one can be swept up with pride when reading about the efficiency of Israel’s Defense Forces as it engages the enemy, though mostly in “reaction” to sustained terror on its citizens, instead of pursuing an initial offensive doctrine. This is absolutely the result of political “strategies”, as opposed to military readiness. To be sure, for the most part, the IDF is a well-oiled machine, and its special forces are second to none. At the same time, the reader cringes with embarrassment, bordering on acute distress, witnessing many hard-fought battles evaporate into nothingness as Israel’s political leadership reflexively turn battlefield victories into one “concession/peace” gesture after another. An unsustainable viciouscycle is played out, year after year.

Specifically, “How Not to Defeat Hamas” illustrates heartburn-worthy renditions of appeasement, while exemplifying the above dichotomy. “From the beginning, Israel has always fueled the Palestinian Authority’s war against it — quite literally. It provides the Palestinian Authority with key supplies like electricity, water and, through Dor-Alon Energy Company, even with gas and cooking gas…. Last Wednesday, though, Dor-Alon announced it was suspending supplies due to unpaid debts. Yet, by Thursday, the company said it was resuming supplies after PA chairman Mahmoud Abbas promised to send payments within 10 days.” An unbiased observer has to ponder: what can possibly possess an Israeli leadership to provide any supplies to an enemy entity, even while it rains rockets down on Israel’s terrorized citizens? Not only that, but it is a known fact that over 8,600  taxpaying Jewish citizens were pulled from Gaza, while their legally purchased homes (homes which were built with the government’s approval), beautiful communities, flourishing businesses, model schools and holy synagogues were torn asunder. To add to the readership’s cognitive dissonance, the dead were pulled from their resting places, all in order to “disengage” from Gaza. Yet, the author recognizes — clearer than most — that none of the above gives the leadership pause, to at least reverse course.

At its core, Choosing Life in Israel (available at Amazon.com in kindle and paperback) evinces what it means to be emotionally, spiritually, and viscerally drawn, as a Jew, to the siren song emitted by Israel. Its core components demonstrate an often overlooked but heartwarming reality: whether one is a secular or religious Zionist, those who choose to make their lives in Israel are generally kindred spirits. Thanks to P. David Hornik’s accomplished writing, reporting, and highly astute analysis of Middle East politics, this book offers a delectable and inspiring ride.

Adina Kutnicki lives in Israel and is an op-ed contributor to various media outlets. She blogs at www.adinakutnicki.com

 

Obama Inc’s “Gun Control” Fetish & Its Trap (Back) Doors…Commentary Adina Kutnicki

Leftist brayers love to target Constitutional Conservatives (particularly in relation to their “clinging” to the Second Amendment, yes, which gives citizens a right to bear arms!) as “knuckle-draggers”, “bitter clingers”, “mentally challenged” and a host of negative-infused attributes. In fact, if it was up to them we would all be carted off to mental institutions, or worse. Never mind the fact that our positions are, for the most part, backed up by the “law of the land”. However, in a leftist’s mind-trap laws are “progressive” and malleable, even as they dare call the Constitution “living and breathing”, whatever the hell that entails. Though currently living in Israel it is still deeply offensive to watch their wrecking balls.

Along this trajectory of thinking the following was written, duly noted, and its basis served as an initial wake up call. And as a matter of record, this blog pointed out the assault lines being set up, mostly to usher in gun control. Specifically, back in Aug. 2012 the markers were set, laying out the Radical-in-Chief’s second term plans, and chiefly designed to disarm Americans. Most significantly, a disarmed citizenry is a pliable one – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/19/shoring-up-barack-hussein-obamas-second-term-plans-addendum-tobarack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-green-wise-via-the-economy-disarming-the-citizens-via-gun-control-commentary-by-ad/. Easy as pie.

But not to be lost in the discussion are the beneficiaries of a gun-free populace; Sharia Law advocates in concert with their leftist  abettors – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/02/explosive-dhs-insider-reveals-congressman-louie-gohmert-too-disarming-americans-gun-control-empowers-the-redgreen-alliancesharia-law-its-beneficiary-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Ominously, CDC & FEMA have been co-opted, you know, the same addresses set up to aid victims of disasters, but this time they are the disasters-in-the-making –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/05/cdc-centers-for-disease-control-prevention-fema-what-are-they-up-to-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Along this anti-American push lies DHS – headed by “mama Janet”- and she has been busy with inexplicable shopping jaunts – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/12/the-increasing-alarm-bells-re-mama-janets-shopping-sprees-for-billions-in-ammo-hardware-alike-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

And on Obama Inc’s path one also finds all manner of bread crumbs, as they lead into the arms of the thuggish U.N. – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/28/obama-crew-march-in-lock-step-with-un-thugs-chiefly-to-disarm-americans-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Back to the opening thesis, regarding the “mental health” of American gun owners, one can find these initial goodies, deeply burrowed within Obamacare – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/18/obamas-march-towards-gun-control-runs-through-obamacare-via-its-definition-of-mentally-ill-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

As such, almost on cue, here is the left’s latest “mental health” confiscation/assessment:

‘A FORM OF GUN CONFISCATION HAS REPORTEDLY BEGUN IN NEW YORK STATE — HERE’S THE JUSTIFICATION BEING USED’ – embedded videos – The Blaze

Apr. 9, 2013  

Update: Hear an interview with the lawyer representing some of  the New Yorkers who were forced to surrender their guns and permits (at the end of this story).

Despite promises from the president and a host of other politicians who are pushing for more gun control that nobody is coming for your guns, the confiscation of guns and gun permits has apparently started in some form in New York State. One attorney representing several people who have been forced to surrender their guns spoke with TheBlaze and alerted us to some disturbing facts:

  • Gun owners are losing their 2nd Amendment rights without due process.
  • HIPAA Laws are likely being compromised and the 4th and 5th Amendments are being violated in some of these cases

How did confiscation start happening so quickly? Apparently the gun grabbing was triggered by something inside the NY SAFE Act — New York’s new gun law — that has a provision apparently mandating confiscation of weapons and permits if someone has been prescribed psychotropic drugs.

This is curious because in his January 9th address, Cuomo specifically addressed the issue of confiscation:

The Case:

On April 1st, a legal gun owner in upstate New York reportedly received an official notice from the state ordering him to surrender any and all weapons to his local police department. The note said that the person’s permit to own a gun in New York was being suspended as well. The gun owner contacted attorney Jim Tresmond (a specialist in gun laws in New York) and the two visited the local police precinct.

Mr. Tresmond reportedly went into the precinct and informed the officers that his client, waiting in the parking lot, was coming in to voluntarily surrender his weapons as requested. The local police were aware of the letter because they had already been contacted by the State Police. Apparently, if people do not respond to the initial mailing, local law enforcement is authorized to visit the gun owner at their home and demand the surrender of the firearms. In this case, the gun owner followed the request as written. The guns and permits were handed over and a receipt given to the client.

After the guns were turned over, a request for a local hearing was filed and the gun owner is expecting to have his Second Amendment rights restored. But there is more to this story.

In our conversation with lawyer Jim Tresmond, we learned that this client, who has never had a problem with the law — no criminal record and or violent incidents on record — did have a temporary, short term health issue that required medication. But how were his client’s private medical information accessed by the government? This appears to be a violation of HIPAA and Health Information Privacy policies at HHS.gov. If it is declared a violation, this becomes a civil rights issue.

Some claim that a broad interpretation of this statement from HIPAA might allow the government to have instant access to the medical records and gun ownership records of anyone who is prescribed psychotropic drugs.

A major goal of the Privacy Rule is to assure that individuals’ health information is properly protected while allowing the flow of health information needed to provide and promote high quality health care and to protect the public’s health and well being.

That short phrase, “protect the public’s health and well being” is probably going to be cited as the reason governments can require notification of any gun owner who is prescribed a class of drugs used to treat Depression and Anxiety known as SSRI ( Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors).

The Mental Health Law provision of the SAFE Act claims

The NY SAFE Act is designed to remove firearms from those who seek to do harm to themselves or others. This means keeping the minority of individuals with serious mental illness who may be dangerous away from access to firearms. This law should not dissuade any individual from seeking mental health services they need.

The law is clear on what it expects:

MHL 9.46 requires mental health professionals to report to their local director of community services (“DCS”) or his/her designees when, in their reasonable professional judgment, one of their patients is “likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others.”

The man who was asked/directed to turn over his guns reportedly did not exhibit any signs of violent or dangerous behavior. According to his attorney, the man’s doctor did not report any danger to the authorities. So, who did report it?

Also known as MHL 9.46, the law talks about who is supposed to report on mental health risks and which patients qualify:

  • The reporting requirement extends to “mental health professionals,” defined in the law as four professions – physicians (including psychiatrists), psychologists, registered nurses, or licensed clinical social workers.

In addition to what Mr. Tresmond called “the laughable diminution of our rights,” the lawyer speculated about additional unintended consequences of releasing this confidential patient information to law enforcement.

  • What if an employer learns that a worker had their firearms confiscated? Could that person’s employment be put at risk?
  • What if your neighbors saw police come to your home and leave with your guns? Could that compromise your safety?
  • Could this kind of confiscation also make people think twice about getting treatment for a temporary mental illness?

In an effort to learn how many permits and guns have been rescinded due to this medical exception, TheBlaze has made several attempts to contact the Erie County office over pistol permits where this one incident originated. We have yet to be connected with a real person who can answer these questions.

We have also reached out to the Albany office of the New York State Police, but no official response has been received.

Mr. Tresmond has also agreed to keep us posted on his client’s efforts to have his Second Amendment rights restored and get back his guns.

TheBlaze will continue to monitor this story and we are also interested in hearing from other New Yorkers who may have experienced this type of confiscation. Please send all emails to mopelka@TheBlaze.com.

Tuesday, Buffalo radio talk show host Tom Bauerle spoke with Jim Tresmond on WBEN radio.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/09/a-form-of-gun-confiscation-has-reportedly-begun-in-new-york-state-heres-the-justification-being-used/

Most mendaciously, the left’s position on mental health issues has more than exacerbated shooting sprees by truly mentally ill folks, people who require hospitalization for their afflictions, in tandem with requisite professional follow up. But never mind…an individual’s glaring mental health issue is not even on their radar, nor is the safety of the general public.

For if the above was not the absolute truth, then how do they account for the following, which leads directly back to leftist (policy) machinations: their abject refusal to allow involuntary commitment for those who are (more than likely) in danger of lashing out with horrific mass (shootings are the “norm”, but other forms of carnage are used as well) violence- http://www.humanevents.com/2013/04/10/coulter-liberals-go-crazy-for-the-mentally-ill/http://www.claytoncramer.com/speeches/mental.htm. Yes, the above are the absolute results of leftist interference, in the mismanagement of dangerously mentally ill individuals who often end up stalking the streets, evidenced within this report – http://www.sacbee.com/2013/04/14/5340078/nevada-buses-hundreds-of-mentally.html. While some are homeless, others live within family units. 

NEVERTHELESS, despite all the resultant evidence from leftist malfeasance, they brazenly violate the rights of citizens who  hardly qualify as mentally ill, yet at some point in their lives used anti-anxiety (or a similar derivative) medication to cope better with life’s unexpected curve balls. Alas, they are the citizens who must be disarmed – for the health of the community! You got that.

Not only have they failed to allow for involuntary commitment of the truly deranged, but they have trampled upon the privacy rights of basically healthy citizens (sans any run-ins with the law, or exhibiting any threatening behavior) by violating their medical files.  Sick and twisted. Illegal too.

So if anyone can still state – with a straight face – that gun control is about anything less than Obama Inc’s gunning for total control, then they are truly the ones in need of mental health meds! Commitment too.

Lastly, if anyone expects the Repubs to come to their rescue, as protector’s of their Constitutional rights, think again…even though some are more vocal in their opposition – http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/fierce-opposition-to-gun-control-compromise/. The Radical-in-Chief, as always, will be able to twist their arms, even as they feign “compromise”. To be sure, there is no middle ground when it comes to ones liberties. Once they are given up they are gone. Poof…up in billowing smoke.

Schadenfreude & Israel’s Left…Magically Delicious…Courtesy Of Prof Steven Plaut…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Every now and again the readers deserve some uplifting material, and there are few who can weave true tales like Prof Steven Plaut. For those who are unfamiliar, please peek within – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/20/im-an-israeli-soldier-a-youtube-presentation-by-latma-tv-adina-kutnicki/

Once again, this blog turns to the Prof for some side splitters, and they are all true! 

There is a saying that there is no joy quite as joyous as Schadenfreude, which is the joy one feels at the misfortune of (suitably deserving) others.  In Hebrew it is called “Simcha L-eid” while the German word (also used in English) means joy at misfortune.   It is the joy we feel when a Palestinian terrorist throws a molotov cocktail at some Jews but aims poorly and it comes down and lands on himself.   (You can also see the resemblance to Darwin Awards.)  You can see a delightful collection of such vignettes here: Daniel Pipes: http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/2009/01/instant-retribution-in-the-middle-east#Fatah

     There are lots of new stories that will give you a delightful sense of Schadenfreude.   First, there is the huge multi-million shekel suit filed against Haaretz by Anat Kamm.  You may recall Kamm as the clueless young leftist who stole oodles of sensitive classified military documents and gave them to Haaetz far-leftist reporter Uri Blau.   Kamm did some jail time for this, although not as much as she should have done.  Haaretz and Blau got off with a slap to the wrist.  After all, since when does the Israeli judicial system really prosecute Far Leftists?

 

    Well, Kamm is suing Haaretz because it published some of the stolen documents she gave them.  I find that almost as absurd as the woman who sued MacDonald’s for serving her coffee that was too hot, but nevertheless I am delighted to see Haaretz up to its Kaffiya in an expensive and grisly lawsuit.

 

   Then there was the Labor Party assembly this past week.  There the “clique” of Shelly “Little Bo Peep” Yachimovich reasserted its control of the party and defeated the opposing clique, headed by Eitan Cabel and others.   The amusing part was where the members of Shelly’s team starting using racist anti-Mizrachi hate speech, guaranteed to lose the Labor Party what little it still gets from the Mizrachi vote.

 

     Israeli leftists are almost all snotty yuppie Ashkenazim (of Eastern European descent).  They also have a long track record of making disparaging remarks about Sephardim-Mizrachim (of Mediterranean or Arabic Jewish descent).   The problem for the Left is that Mizrachim by and large are NOT.  Not Leftist, that is.  Perhaps the most famous was the set of snarls by the late Dudu Topaz about how all the “Chochchochim” are in the Likud, the term used as a derogatory term for Mizrachim, roughly similar to the use of “greasers” in the US to refer to Latinos, Italians, or other groups.  Before that the bovine “comedienne” Tiki Dayan made similar snooty comments (see http://www.hagalil.com/israel/politik/tv/propaganda.htm ) and there have been others.

 

    Well, this past week, Shelly’s mensheviks got up and started screaming at their own party opposition that they are a bunch of “Arsim.”   The Hebrew slang word “Ars” (it actually comes from Arabic – see this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ars_(slang) ) can mean pimp or thug but can also be a derogatory term for Mizrachim, and the party opponents to Shelly are led by several Mizrachim.   Now Shelly and her sheep are tripping all over themselves trying to “apologize” and spin the scandal for the media.   The rest of us can just sit back and sip our Arak and watch Labor implode.

 

       Ah, but by far the BEST story of Schadenfreude is this:     

 

     You recall the Gaza Flotilla of Turkish terrorists from the Turkish Islamofascist organization “IHH”.   These were the terrorists who tried to murder the unarmed Israeli soldiers who stopped their boat when it illegally tried to run the Israeli blockade of the Hamas in Gaza.  And these are the terrorists to whom Israel’s spineless Prime Minister just apologized and offered “reparations” as a reward for their trying to murder Israeli soldiers.

 

     Well, there are some interesting aftershocks to the whole story.  Another group of pro-Hamas “internationals” attempted to enter Gaza from Egypt to show their support for the Hamas.  They even named themselves the Mavi Marmara, which was the name of the Turkish terrorist ship that Israel stopped and for which it has now “apologized.”  This new group consists of European Muslims, mainly the children of Pakistanis living in the UK.  They started off in France and Spain, crossed over to Morocco and then made their way overland from Morocco to Gaza.  The “internationals” claimed to be bringing in food and civilian supplies to the Hamas, and the gasoline they bought to get from Morocco cost several times the value of their “aid cargo.” 

 

   Their problem was that when they got to the border between Libya and Egypt, the Egyptians would not let them pass through.  Egypt is having its own spats these days with the Hamas, after the Hamas murdered 16 Egyptian soldiers.   Anyway, five of these European “aid to Hamas” terrorists then turned back and returned to Benghazi.  Yes, that Benghazi.   There the five, three of them women, were kidnapped by Libyan soldiers.  In captivity, the three women were either raped or just sexually abused, depending on which media source you believe.  The Libyan Deputy Prime Minister says they were raped.  He also says that two of the women were raped in front of their own fathers who came to Libya to try to help their daughters get out.  After Pakistan protested, Libya arrested a group of soldiers for the rape and some have evidently confessed.

 

     Now you know doubt recall that MA thesis from Hebrew University that was supervised a few years back by Prof. Eyal Ben Ari, a far leftist professor of sociology.   In that thesis, which was awarded a special prize by the Hebrew University, it was claimed that the fact that Israeli soldiers never rape Arab women just goes to show you how racist the Jews are.   Some time after it received the prize, Ben Ari was fired by the Hebrew University after it was proven that he had raped some of his own Hebrew University students.   Maybe to prove he was not a racist.

 

      So it occurs to me that Prof. Eyal Ben Ari is now looking for a new gig and he could not find better work than serving in the Libyan military.  Perhaps he can bring with him a few hundred other Israeli tenured leftists?  There they can help fight racism!

To shore up the Prof’s thesis, re the kid glove treatment given to Israel’s “left set”, the proofs are within the following expose’, one which was written at the behest of HONENU, Israel’s legal address for soldiers and civilians who are targeted for their nationalist views (honenu.org/) – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/06/22/administrative-detention-orders-against-jewish-nationalists- or 3/www.freeman.org/serendipity/index.php?/archives/475-ADMINISTRATIVE-DETENTION-ORDERS-AGAINS-JEWISH-NATIONALISTS.html#extended. And the volume of corroborative info was off the charts…deeply disturbing…and disrupting to one’s equilibrium. Adding to the angst, an op-ed was written at The Jewish Press (the largest Anglo-Jewish newspaper) – ‘Justice In The Holy Land: Is It Ideologically Driven?’ – www.jewishpressads.com/pageroute.do/49117/ …another subject this American-Israeli is deeply involved with.

IF anyone has trouble following the insanity which passes for both Israeli leadership, and the lack thereof, well, at least Israel’s resident leftists are good for something – much needed comic relief, courtesy of Prof Plaut!    

 

Chavez’s Eschatology & The Iranian Hitler’s…A Meeting Of The Anti-Western/Totalitarian Minds…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

It is hard enough to convince the “oh so smart” (left) set that they are full of crap, but it also takes considerable effort to demonstrate certain truths, even to those who are less indoctrinated. And when it comes to discussing the “red/green alliance”, well, it ain’t easy. Backbreaking labor.

Leftists pretend that patriots/nationalists have gone mental (think of all the eye rolls…oh, if only they became cross eyed in the process), for deigning to suggest that leftward thinking is in any way similar to Islamic mindsets. Never mind that they march, arm-in-arm, at many demos exhorting anti-Israel, anti-American/western vitriol. They just roll their eyes and behave like superior beings, if one dares to question their symbiosis. Not nice…not nice at all.

Most tellingly, this blog brings their alliance to the forefront and it is one of the main missions herein. Besides, there are so many proofs, often causing ones head to explode…so sorry for that.

Besides, “DHS Insider” reveals much about “mama Janet’s” fiefdom, as she continually sets the stage for a red/green takeover – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/02/explosive-dhs-insider-reveals-congressman-louie-gohmert-too-disarming-americans-gun-control-empowers-the-redgreen-alliancesharia-law-its-beneficiary-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…with assorted surrogates in tow.

Par for their supremacist course, Sharia Law enforcers continue unimpeded – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/09/shariah-law-enforcers-continue-unimpeded-westerners-terrified-to-counter-them-the-redgreen-alliance-assures-their-eventual-western-triumph-if-not-stopped-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…mostly due to the tailwind given from their red co-conspirators.

And even leftist U.S. Generals are dancing to their tunes, as they dhimmify American interests in the process – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/01/us-general-dempsey-strikes-again-dhimmifying-us-interests-re-iran-so-ordered-by-the-islamist-in-chief-addendum-to-tangible-lethal-military-related-results-from-redgreen-alliance-commentary/.

In this regard, what else can be expected, other than tangible, lethal results from their alliance –  adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/30/tangible-lethal-military-related-results-from-the-redgreen-alliance-via-the-corrosive-influence-of-an-islamist-in-chief-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Yes, comrades-in-arms always have each others backs, regardless of locale – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/19/comrades-in-arms-always-have-each-others-backs-whether-black-white-or-islamic-supremacists-the-redgreen-alliances-common-denominator-seriousness-of-issue-necessitates-its-length-commenta/…and U.S./Israel western interests are always in their cross hairs.

Most ominously, Valerie Jarrett sets much of the anti-American agenda, yet few have a clue. Hiding in plain sight – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/17/valerie-jarretts-communist-leanings-why-she-matters-serving-as-barack-hussein-obamas-alter-ego-cementing-the-redgreen-alliance-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Thus, the “red/green alliance” also ties Hillary Clinton & Huma Abedin into oh so many knots – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/14/the-redgreen-alliance-the-ties-that-bind-hillary-clinton-huma-abedin-compromise-us-national-security-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-36/…and even the NYC mayor’s race is becoming a place for the female duo to flex their muscle. Does anyone (in their non-comatose mind) believe that Humala would have a chance, of becoming New York City’s “First Lady”, if not for Hill & Bill’s political fix? Never mind the sexually challenged, “beard” of a husband, Anthony Weiner, and in more ways than one! Alas, Humala & Anthony are being re-shaped as NYC’s next royal couple…and heaven forbid he wins. Folks, NYC  will never, ever be the same – warts and all.

But where does a “burning in hell fire” Chavez fit into the above picture? Where doesn’t he… 

‘VIDEO: CHAVEZ URGED SHIITES’ 12TH IMAM TO ‘COME SOONER’

Venezuelan president called on Muslim Mahdi, Jesus to ‘rush’ their return

March 9, 2013

 by REZA KAHLILI 

Reza Kahlili, author of the award-winning book “A Time to Betray,” served in CIA Directorate of Operations, as a spy in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, counterterrorism expert; currently serves on the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, an advisory board to Congress and the advisory board of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran (FDI). He regularly appears in national and international media as an expert on Iran and counterterrorism in the Middle East.
 Late Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who died of cancer this week, urged the Shiite Muslims’ 12th Imam, Mahdi, to return to Earth sooner than prophesied, as revealed in a video released by Rajanews, a media outlet of Iran’s ruling Islamic regime.

Shiites believe Mahdi, the last Islamic messiah, will only come back to Earth after a great conflagration engulfs the Middle East, setting the stage for global Armageddon. When Mahdi returns, Shiites believe, Jesus Christ will be at his side. Chavez was a Catholic.

Rajanews praised Chavez as a serious world leader who supported the Palestinian cause despite the absence of some Arab leaders. Chavez said in the video that global enmity “is located in Gaza” and that the fight for Gaza and the Palestinian cause “is beneficial for Venezuela, too.”

Chavez, in a meeting with Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinian National Authority, talked of his belief in the Coming of Mahdi, according to the video, and said, “The ultimate war of them all is the war in Gaza.”

In the video, which is not dated, but appears to have been captured during a signing of agreements at the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Nov. 27, 2009, Chavez told his audience “Quds (Jerusalem) is a holy place for all of us Christians. I spoke with (Iranian President Mahmoud) Ahmadinejad about the day that Islam’s Quran says both (Mahdi and Christ) will return. Jesus, holding hands with the 12th Imam, Mahdi. … Then peace will come upon the world. I tell Christ and Mahdi to come sooner, rush now, come sooner … because we witness the threats posed to the world, my God!”

Chavez served as president of Venezuela from 1999 until his death on March 5. He was diagnosed with cancer, undergoing surgery and chemotherapy in Cuba in 2011 and another operation in 2012. Although he had hoped to have recovered from his illness, he announced in December that he needed further cancer surgery in Cuba.

Iranian media on Thursday blamed the United States for Chavez’s death as part of a plot to kill off several Latin American leaders, who also have been stricken with cancer.

Ahmadinejad, who attended Chavez’s memorial service in Caracas Friday, implied in a letter of condolence to the interim president of Venezuela, Nicolas Maduro, that Chavez would return alongside of Jesus.

“I have no doubt that he will return alongside all the righteous and Jesus,” Ahmadinejad wrote, “and the only remainder of the righteous generation, the complete human being, will come and help the nations with the establishment of peace, complete justice, kindness and evolvement.”

Sources in Iran report many Iranians celebrated Chavez’s death and were hopeful, with him gone and with Syrian President Bashar Assad on the verge of collapse, the clerical regime in Iran could be next.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/chavez-mahdi-come-sooner-rush-now-come-sooner/#Z4Z5ifcBTdWSim7y.99

Not unlike a “gift toss in the mouth”, along comes video recordings and writings which absolutely proves the nexus; between the late, non-lamented, thuggish Chavez (and assorted leftist despots) and the underpinnings of Shiite eschatology. BOTH dogmas yearn for a world awash in blood, betting that their followers will survive (Chavez, if you are reading this, you got conned) said (pined for) holocaust.

Wouldn’t it be kismet, if some sharpshooting IDF Sayeret Matkal  (http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2001/12/israeli-counterterrorism-200112warriors proved A’jad/Nasrallah (etc, etc) wrong, demonstrating – in real time – that they will never get the chance to usher in world chaos AND enjoy their virgins?

The Intersection of “Killing The Dollar” & The “New World Order”…Joe Biden Enters The Fray…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Joe, foot-in-mouth, Biden has (once again) let loose a bucket-load of (verbal) diarrhea. But this time around it is not just a fool’s gaffes, but an uttering of  global consequence. Imagine that, trusting a bird-brain like Biden (come on folks, we know he is high up in the political food chain, but he is a serious mental midget…couldn’t tolerate him for a dinner partner, let alone anything else…guess wifey Jill, although a doctor, is enthralled with his powerful connections…women have been known to compromise for access) to let loose with a bombshell, but perhaps his handlers believed it would soften the blow, coming from someone who regularly “misspeaks”. Using him as a global errand boy – with the Radical-in-Chief’s complete blessing – is sort of like “testing the waters’, or a “trial balloon”…as we are forced to watch him mock us too – http://washingtonexaminer.com/article/2526679

And when the following propositions were posted many readers took notice: 

Specifically, a case was made for Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s fealty to communist, Marxist, socialist and Islamist rule, in juxtaposition to America’s place as the global leader – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/04/obamas-openly-communist-supporterssurrogates-here-there-everywhere-addendum-to-world-leaders-endorsing-the-radical-in-chief-most-vile-dregs-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Building upon that theory, overwhelming evidence was presented, demonstrating Obama’s proclivities to global dictates, chiefly through kleptocrats at the U.N.  – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/28/obama-crew-march-in-lock-step-with-un-thugs-chiefly-to-disarm-americans-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. And what he can’t ram through Congress – for those few who still exert some American spine – he issues via executive fiat. A dictator-in-training, as evinced by the left’s march (under his tutelage) towards totalitarian rule – adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/08/the-lefts-march-towards-totalitarian-rule-one-party-at-a-time-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Alas, where does loose lips Biden fit in?

‘Biden Calls For New World Order’ – APRIL 8, 2013 By  – Western Center For Journalism – embedded video

As the global elites tighten their grip on the neck of America, Joe Biden does their bidding by speaking out for a new world order. This new world order will be a place of less freedom and more tyranny.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/biden-calls-for-new-world-order/

Covered here too – www.theblogmocracy.com/2013/04/07/biden-calls-for-a-new-world-order/.

In fact, this blog recently brought (more than tangentially related) info to the readership’s attention, albeit from a totally divergent mindset. As a matter of record, said contents swirled around the blogosphere at top speed, even when compared to other postings. This related arena hits each of us in the gut, at least those whose livelihoods are tied into the dollar.

Eight months ago, well into the Radical-in-Chief’s campaign for a second term (less than 6 weeks into this blog’s inception), it became incumbent to issue the following alarm bells. It was crystal clear,  “The One” was gunning for the deconstruction of the U.S. economy, therefore, the dollar had to fall via several pressure points. ObamaCare & “green” schemes were in the forefront, but many related bomblets lurked alongside them, including untold numbers of illegal aliens as “koshered” citizens, and criminals receiving even more financial “benefits” – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/07/barack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-green-wise-via-the-economy-disarming-the-citizens-via-gun-control-connecting-the-dots-addendum-to-the-second-term-plans-of-an-obama-presidency-c/ .

Equally alarmed, Northeast Intelligence Network dug deep into its intel assets, and in April 2013 shored up the above thesis – adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/01/major-alert-from-intelligence-insider-the-potuss-wrecking-ball-purposeful-deconstruction-of-the-dollar-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . It doesn’t get any scarier, closer to the core, than that.

In concert, along comes Western Center For Journalism, as they issue the exact same alert, explaining how “back door” channels are being used to effectuate said goals, in the same stealth manner as this blog indicated above via ” many related bomblets lurked alongside them”.

‘Insider: Obama Plans To ‘Kill’ U.S. Dollar’ – Western Center For Journalism’ – embedded video

APRIL 5, 2013 BY 

The so-called “Gang of Eight” yesterday announced they were very close to coming up with an immigration reform bill.

Leading conservative Republicans, however—not the gaggle of RINOS that make up half of the Gang of Eight—point out that the immigration “reform” bill has a flaw:  it will provide a back door for millions of illegal aliens to collect welfare.

The cost? Several trillion dollars.

That’s trillion with a “t.”

That would put our national debt above the “magic number” of twenty trillion, the point that many economists state is the tipping point of our economy. Tipping point meaning the U.S. economy would implode.

Add to this the fact that Obama is actually calling for a second Stimulus—as if a trillion dollars flushed down the toilet wasn’t enough.

Add to this the artificially high level of the stock market due to Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s endless printing of money in which many are stating a crash is imminent—losing up to 90% of its value.

If one were a conspiracy theorist, it would seem like Barack Obama was actually trying to collapse the economy, putting us in a place like Cyprus where the EU is “taxing”—that is, confiscating—privately held bank accounts to the tune of 40% of their value.

On April 2, Ben Bernanke was asked if the U.S. would do the same thing in a dire economic crisis.

Bernanke hemmed and hawed for several minutes and finally gave up this answer: “It’s unlikely.”

Gee, that sure instills confidence in our banking system.

I guess we’re just a bunch of knuckle-dragging conspiracy theorists who think Obama is actuallytrying to collapse the economy—by devaluing (killing) the U.S. dollar.

Except that is exactly what a high level source in the intelligence community has stated, as reported in the Canada Free Press on Monday, in the widely read article, “Intelligence Insider: Obama Administration Agenda to Kill U.S Dollar.”

But that is just the beginning. According to the source, after the collapse of the economy, after the collapse of the dollar—after the U.S. dollar is properly devalued and buried long after the collapse of the euro—there will be a banshee cry by the globalists and banksters for an international currency with global government in order to prevent another world-wide economic crisis.

Yes, the economic crisis that they caused.

Obama’s push to gut the Second Amendment, the DHS’s stockpiling of two billion rounds of hollow point ammunition and tens of thousands of assault weapons, and Obama pushing George W. Bush’s Patriot Act to Orwellian levels by spying on literally every single American—is all part of a plan to institute a totalitarian New World Order.

Welcome to Barack Hussein Obama’s fundamental transformation of America.

www.westernjournalism.com/insider-obama-plans-to-kill-u-s-dollar/

So, believe it or not, it still behooves most of us to take a deep hard look at where we stand, especially in relation to what we are ready to give up. Now if world leadership is not a problem, then keep the blinders in place. If not, then take a stand, whatever (emphasis added) it entails.

Oslo’s Authentic Truth: The “Peace Process” & What It Really Entails – Prof Paul Eidelberg Illuminates. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Nations are led by humans – notwithstanding, all their attendant flaws. Therefore, their inner strengths or failings can’t help but rise to the fore – their moral or immoral forces at play. This is where a steel spine, intestinal fortitude, and righteous ethical bearing enter into the calculus. Statesmanship. For without said “intangibles”, irreparable havoc will be wrecked. Inevitably.

And, when it comes to the world’s “pets”, the “Palestinian” Arabs, nothing is off the table, regardless of the incalculable blow back. This is the G-d’s honest truth. In this regard, even when Arab leaders spill the beans, the world plays deaf, dumb and blind. Most egregiously, Israel’s die-hard, deluded left join into the gang-bang – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/27/another-arab-leader-spills-the-beans-the-palestinians-as-a-separate-people-do-not-exist-adina-kutnicki/. Warped, twisted, and, most especially, tragic.

Short of carting off Israel’s “leading lights” to mental institutions, a paradigm shift MUST ensue. Once again, calling Dr. Martin Sherman, via his prescriptive policy center, Israel Institute For Strategic Studies (www.strategic-israel.org/ ) – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/07/presenting-part-three-a-strategic-based-interview-with-dr-martin-sherman-why-you-should-support-israels-intellectual-warriors-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

Thank heavens there is more than one sane Doc/Prof in the (Israeli) loony tune house. Thus, Professor Paul Eidelberg (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Eidelberg) is often called for assistance, to help save Zionists from their leaders! If one believes this is an exaggeration, then they haven’t read the following; the most trenchant policy paper, bar none, which rips the scales off of the leadership’s deluded eyes – ‘Islam & Blood’ – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/13/islam-blood-a-groundbreaking-policy-paper-contained-herein-the-world-stands-on-a-precipice-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-109/.

So, presenting…..

Did End of Norway Begin with the Oslo?’
Prof. Paul Eidelberg 
This is an untold story about the Oslo or Israel-PLO Agreement, an agreement that surreptitiously heralded the advocacy of a “Palestinian” state in the Land of Israel.
It needs to be understood and emphasized that anyone, regardless of his subjective ideas or feelings, who supports the creation of an Arab-Islamic state in Judea and Samaria is OBJECTIVELY advocating Israel’s destruction. This applies even to an Israeli Prime Minister!
In support of this provocative statement, I offer certain demonstrable facts which indicate there is not a stitch of evidence that contradicts the Palestinian Authority’s commitment to destroy Israel.
This commitment, which is rooted in Islamic theology, is proclaimed in the PLO-Palestinian Charter. Any honest or decent human can see in that Charter the Muslim’s murderous hatred of Jews and Israel. This hatred permeates Palestinian propaganda. It is manifested in the education and military training of Arab children. This ghoulish hatred promises a continuation of the 20 years of Oslo terror that has murdered and maimed 15,000 Jewish women, men, and children.
What are we to say, therefore, of any Israeli or American statesman, who despite this horrendous evidence and bloodshed has the audacity to advocate the establishment of an independent Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria? Must we not deem this stance a confession of intellectual and moral decadence, as well as an insult to the intelligence of any decent human being?
The negotiations leading to the Oslo or Israel-PLO Agreement dignified evil and thus made Israel’s government complicit in the evil consequences that followed—confirming the prophecy of Isaiah regarding those who call evil good, and good evil. Woe, therefore, to those who continue the immoral policy of Oslo—the capital of a country that is becoming Judenrein.”

NOT only is promoting a “Palestinian” state against international law, it is also against Israel’s Basic Law, as evidenced by world renowned international law expert, Professor Louis Rene Beres  (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Ren%C3%A9_Beres) – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/01/pa-statehood-its-violations-of-international-law-u-s-leadership-must-addressadhere-to-legal-constructs-israels-peace-obsessed-too-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Most intrinsically, some wreckage can’t be swept under the rug (not unlike drunken drivers, careening down highways and byways, mowing down innocents), especially that of thousands of dead Jews and countless maimed for life. So, if any more incriminating evidence is required, as to the immorality and abject depravity of those (whether American, Israeli, or the rest of the braying forces throughout the world) who advocate for a “Palestinian” state, the least they can do is “man/woman up” and state the truth: Israel’s existence is negotiable, even according to some leaders in Israel, regardless of their protestations to the contrary; that they too are Zionists, but will “negotiate” “land for peace & security”!

 As to the rest of the “Palestinian” obsessed fetishists  (/adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/22/when-leftist-mega-rich-peace-obsessed-instigators-get-involved-what-can-go-wrong-everything-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-111/), what else is there to say….other than to offer a re-reading of the PA/PLO Genocidal “Charter” – 
MidEast Web Historical Documents
THE PALESTINIAN NATIONAL CHARTER:
July 1-17, 1968

 Introduction

Before the Six day war, the Palestine Liberation Organization  (PLO), founded in 1964 and led by Ahmed Shukhairy, had been instrumental in helping to provoke conflict. Shukhairy himself gave a speech at the U.N. describing graphically what the PLO would do to Israel and its Jewish inhabitants if ‘it will be our privilege to strike the first blow.’

Shukhairy drafted a charter for the PLO that was ratified in 1964. In Arabic, the document is called “Al-Mithaq Al-Kawmee Al-Philisteeni.” Mithaq was at first translated as covenant, but later the word “charter” was adopted. Palestinians claim that “Al Kawmee” is untranslatable. It evidently implies that Palestinians are less than a nation in their own right, and are part of the Arab nation or Ouma. In later years, the Palestinians adopted the designation “Shaabi” for the Palestinian people.

Following the Six day war, the PLO was reorganized under the leadership of Yasser Arafat.  In 1968, delegates met to redraft the PLO charter. The decline of prestige of Arab states caused by the war caused a shift in Palestinian thinking and produced, for the first time, a clear and consistent demand for a Palestinian state, rather than conquest of Palestine by Arab countries. The PLO charter of 1964, not a moderate document, was amended by adding four paragraphs and changing others. The main additions concern the reiterated call for armed struggle to eliminate Israel (“liberate Palestine”) and the change in the attitude to Jewish rights. The original version stated somewhat equivocally:

Article 7: Jews of Palestinian origin are considered Palestinians if they are willing to live peacefully and loyally in Palestine.

It is unclear if the above refers to Jews descended from families that lived in Palestine before the advent of Zionism, or to any Jews born in Israel, or what the status of Jews who have only one Palestinian Jewish parent. 

The revised version was more explicit:

 Article 6:The Jews who had normally resided in Palestine until the beginning of the Zionist invasion will be considered Palestinians.

Most such Jews “of Palestinian origin” or who had “normally resided in Palestine until the beginning of the Zionist invasion” (probably about 1880 had already died by 1968. Many of their descendants married Zionists. In any case, they are a tiny minority. About 100,000 Jews had lived in the area before 1914. Evidently the majority of the Jews were to be expelled or murdered, but their fate is not specified.

The charter speaks for itself. It calls for destruction of a member state of the UN, in violation of the UN charter. Nonetheless, the PLO was subsequently given observer status in the UN. The major and noteworthy features of both the 1964 and 1968 versions of the charter are:

1. Declaration of intent to destroy Israel and “liberate” all of Palestine:

Article 2:Palestine, with the boundaries it had during the British Mandate, is an indivisible territorial unit.

Article 3: The Palestinian Arab people possess the legal right to their homeland and have the right to determine their destiny after achieving the liberation of their country in accordance with their wishes and entirely of their own accord and will.

2. Defiance of UN General Assembly Resolution 181, which called for partition of Palestine:

 Article 19: The partition of Palestine in 1947 and the establishment of the state of Israel are entirely illegal, regardless of the passage of time, because they were contrary to the will of the Palestinian people and to their natural right in their homeland, and inconsistent with the principles embodied in the Charter of the United Nations, particularly the right to self-determination.

The above is especially instructive given the Palestinian insistence on “international legitimacy.”

3. Denial of the historic connection of the Jews to the land:

Article 20: …Claims of historical or religious ties of Jews with Palestine are incompatible with the facts of history and the true conception of what constitutes statehood.

The above claim has been seconded by attempts of pro-Palestinian academics to erase or deny archeological and other evidence of Jewish habitation in Jerusalem and elsewhere in ancient times. For some reason, US President Clinton was surprised when PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat denied that Jews had lived in the land in ancient times. There was no occasion for surprise, as it is an article of the Palestinian charter and is central to the Palestinian national credo.

4. Denial of Jewish peoplehood and of the right to self-determination of the Jewish people:

Judaism, being a religion, is not an independent nationality. Nor do Jews constitute a single nation with an identity of its own; they are citizens of the states to which they belong.

This statement should be borne in mind when considering the outraged and self righteous protests by Palestinian Arabs when some Israelis deny that there is a Palestinian people or that there was a Palestinian people before 1948.

5. Implicit call for expulsion (“ethnic cleansing”) or extermination of most of the Jewish population of Israel, as embodied in the two versions of Article 6.

A national charter that is based primarily on negation of another people’s rights is remarkable in itself. But the revision of 1968 added another unique feature – express commitment to armed struggle. The Palestinians defined themselves and their national movement as a violent movement directed at destroying the nation state of another people:

Article 9: Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine. This it is the overall strategy, not merely a tactical phase. The Palestinian Arab people assert their absolute determination and firm resolution to continue their armed struggle and to work for an armed popular revolution for the liberation of their country and their return to it…

Article 10: Commando action constitutes the nucleus of the Palestinian popular liberation war. This requires its escalation, comprehensiveness, and the mobilization of all the Palestinian popular and educational efforts and their organization and involvement in the armed Palestinian revolution.

Below is the complete and unabridged text of the original 1968  Palestinian National Covenant, as published officially in English by the PLO.* The charter was soon followed by a program for a “secular democratic state.” The word “secular” is significant, because it refers to the Palestinian assertion that the Jews are only a religion. In a “secular democratic state” the Jews, as a religion, would therefore have no political standing whatever.

The PLO program called for exile from Palestine of all Jews who had arrived after 1917 and their descendants.  In PNA offices there is a plaque commemorating the original 18 signers of the Charter or Covenant, many of whom were eventually killed by the Israeli secret service after planning or participating in massacres such as that of the Munich Olympics in 1972, or at the hand of rival organizations.

Obviously these charters are incompatible with a peace agreement with Israel, and it was agreed between the parties to change them following  The Oslo Declaration of Principles in 1993.

Under the leadership of the PNA and the Fatah, and under extreme pressure from Israel and the U.S.,  the PLO in fact held several meetings in which evidently some of  the offending articles were repealed, with disputed legality.

In his letter of September 9, 1993 to Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak RabinFatah leader and PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat stated:

In view of the promise of a new era and the signing of the Declaration of Principles and based on Palestinian acceptance of Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338, the PLO affirms that those articles of the Palestinian Covenant which deny Israel’s right to exist, and the  provisions of the Covenant which are inconsistent with the commitments of this letter are now inoperative and no longer valid. Consequently, the PLO undertakes to submit to the Palestinian National Council for formal approval the necessary changes in regard to the Palestinian Covenant.

In April 1996, the Palestine National Council, the legislative body of the PLO, met in Gaza and voted 504 to 54 to annul sections of the Palestinian National Charter that denied Israel’s right to exist, The meaning of the Palestinian vote and the importance attached to it is at best dubious:

The Palestinian National Council (PNC) finally did convene on 24 April 1996 and passed a resolution in which it “amended by canceling the articles that are contrary to the letters exchanged between the PLO and the Government of Israel” and assigned to a legal committee the task of redrafting the charter within six months. [Amendment Palestinian Covenant-Arafat Letter & Text – 4 May 1996, Information Division, Israel Foreign Ministry.] As of yet no so such body has fulfilled this task, and there have been no reports of such a committee meeting or working.

As explained by the speaker of the PNC, Salim Zaanoun, to the PNC during the April 24 session, structuring the resolution as it did was an attempt to “fulfill the commitment demanded at the lowest possible price.” [Jon Immanuel, “Fatah Report: Covenant Frozen, not Amended,” Jerusalem Post (22 May 1996).] It put off making the hard decisions until the legal committee completed its work. Although Palestinian leaders have continually proclaimed to Israel and the Western press that they fulfilled their obligation and nullified the articles at issue, in their internal documents and statements in Arabic they have suggested otherwise. An apparently authoritative internal publication issued by the “Research and Thought” division of Fatah in Ramallah in April 1996 clarifies that: “The text of the Palestinian National Covenant remains as it was and no changes whatsoever were made to it. This has caused it to be frozen but not annulled.” [Fatah, Research and Thought Department, “The Palestinian National Covenant¾Between Renewal and Being Frozen,” Fatah Publication #8, April 1996. Document provided by Peace Watch.] (Seehttp://www.biu.ac.il/SOC/besa/books/oslo/osloap2.html)

The charter itself was not been formally changed or re-drafted. Some members of the PLO contended that the vote is invalid. On May 4, 1996, PNA Chairman Arafat sent a letter about the nullification of the charter provisions to Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres supposedly affirming the invalidation of the offending parts of the charter.

In January of 1998, Yasser Arafat wrote a letter to President Clinton, again claiming that the charter had been nullified. The letter was quite specific about what parts of the charter were nullified (see  Letter of Assurance from PNA Chairman Yasser Arafat). The letter stated in part:

…The Palestine National Council’s resolution, in accordance with Article 33 of the Covenant, is a comprehensive amendment of the Covenant. All of the provisions of the Covenant which are inconsistent with the P.L.O. commitment to recognize and live in peace side by side with Israel are no longer in effect.

As a result, Articles 6-10,15, 19-23, and 30 have been nullified, and the parts in Articles 1-5, 11-14, 16-l8, 25-27 and 29 that are inconsistent with the above mentioned commitments have also been nullified…

In December 1998,  the PLC met again in Gaza to meet the demand of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahuthat the offending parts of the charter be formally revoked. US President Clinton attended the meeting. By acclamation, it reaffirmed the cancellation of those parts of the Charter which denied Israel’s right to exist, but it did not formally change or re-draft the Covenant. Farouk Kaddoumi, Foreign Minister of the PLO, stated in April of 2004 that the Covenant was never amended. (see http://www.imra.org.il/story.php3?id=20533)

The revisions that were supposed to admit the legitimacy of Israel  are not shown in any  version of the Charter published by the Palestinian National Authority or the PLO. Palestinian Authority publications. PLO officials still insist that the Jews are not a people but a religion, and Palestinian educational programs teach, for example,  that Haifa is the largest port in Palestine. The Web site of the Palestinian mission to the UN features a statement concerning the changes in the charter but it also displays the 1964 version of the Palestinian National Charter on a separate page, without comment as of December 2009. If the charter has been nullified and replaced by the Palestinian constitution, as some claim, it is highly irregular that charter is still displayed at an official PLO Web site. The PNA Basic Law or Palestinian constitution does not mention the Palestinian National Charter or claim that it is intended to replace or supersede it. The Web site of the Palestinian National Authority is non-functional at this date.    

Ami Isseroff

Revised, December 29, 2009

Still yet, in answer to those who bray, yes, they “revised” their “Charter”, well, think again! – www.palestinefacts.org/pf_1991to_now_plo_charter_revise.php.
To be sure, (terror) leopards do not change their spots. And with another ! round of Israel/PA “negotiations” set to take place in a few weeks, it is way past time to cease the Oslo “peace/death” train. IF Israel’s leaders do not want to go down – for time immemorial – as the ones responsible for wielding our national forceps, they would do well to “bury the process”, placing a nail into its long overdue coffin! Forthwith.

BENGHAZIGATE’S Continual Liars…& When Does Perjury Become A (Legal & Moral) Factor? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

One needn’t be endowed with a super intellect to discern when “the fish stinks from the head up”. And there are several chief culprits whose sewage is smellier, than any normal non-Pinnochio-like nose can bear. A suffocating stench.

As to the liar at hand, she has been known to play, so to speak, in the shadows. But when her skeletons are rattling too loudly, ready to fall into full view, she resorts to amnesia-tic tactics. Now, if one is operating as a private person, ones personal secrets are nobody’s business. Couldn’t care less. But when said individual is in a top leadership position, “no can do”. Truthfulness is the only acceptable course, and if not, it must be pried from its lock box. By hook or by crook, for the greater good demands as much.

Just as a replay, the aforementioned player has been knee deep in the muck, and the following are just a sampling, but no less indicting:

Indictment Number One: Front and center lies directives to the survivors’ of the onslaught: keep your traps shut – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/18/benghazigate-directives-keep-your-mouthes-shut-survivors-identities-subject-to-change-an-sos-is-issued-for-admiral-gauotte-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . Leading rational folks to wonder: why the hush-hush?

Indictment Number Two: As Benghazigate unravels, others attempt to piece together the threads…stitch by stitch – adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/24/benghazigate-unraveling-stitch-by-stitch-master-weavers-execute-the-unraveling-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Indictment Number Three: Most intriguingly, CIA’s Panetta dropped some bomblets before his departure –  adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/22/cias-panetta-leaves-a-parting-gift-an-important-admission-re-benghazigate-commentary-by-adina-kutnicyou just have to recognize them for what they are.

Indictment Number Four: Its continual carnage keeps cropping to the fore, despite all their best efforts –  adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/19/benghazigate-update-its-continual-carnagefallout-all-credit-due-to-the-islamist-in-chief-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Indictment Number Five: The lies are so outrageous, even a Four Star Admiral jumps in –  adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/12/benghazigates-indictment-of-an-islamist-in-chief-supported-by-retired-four-star-admiral-other-heavyweights-too-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/….and the indictment goes on…seek and you shall be horrified!

The following is a rhetorical question:

‘DID HILLARY COMMIT PERJURY?’

New reports may contradict former secretary’s sworn testimony

Published: March 28, 2013


hillary-clinton

TEL AVIV – Did former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton commit perjury when she claimed in a Senate hearing that she did not know whether the U.S. mission in Libya was procuring or transferring weapons to Turkey and other Arab countries?

The goal of the alleged weapons shipments was to arm the rebels fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

Any training or arming of the Syrian rebels would be considered highly controversial. A major issue is the inclusion of jihadists, including al-Qaida, among the ranks of the Free Syrian Army and other Syrian opposition groups

During the recent hearings over the Obama administration’s handling of the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Clinton was directly asked about alleged U.S. weapons shipments out of Libya.

Clinton claimed she did not know whether the U.S. was aiding Turkey and other Arab countries in procuring weapons.

The exchange took place with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.

Paul asked Clinton: “Is the U. S. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya?”

“To Turkey?” Clinton asked. “I will have to take that question for the record. Nobody has ever raised that with me.”

Continued Paul: “It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that may have weapons, and what I’d like to know is the annex that was close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons, and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries, any countries, Turkey included?”

Clinton replied, “Well, Senator, you’ll have to direct that question to the agency that ran the annex. I will see what information is available.”

“You’re saying you don’t know?” asked Paul.

“I do not know,” Clinton said. “I don’t have any information on that.”

Clinton’s claims seem to now be unraveling.

Confirming WND’s exclusive reporting for over a year, the New York Times earlier this week reported that since early 2012, the CIA has been aiding Arab governments and Turkey in obtaining and shipping weapons to the Syrian rebels.

Middle Eastern security officials speaking to WND have said U.S.-aided weapons shipments go back more than a year, escalating before the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. facilities in Benghazi.

In fact, the Middle Eastern security officials speaking to WND since last year describe the U.S. mission in Benghazi and nearby CIA annex attacked last September as an intelligence and planning center for U.S. aid to the rebels in the Middle East, particularly those fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

The aid, the sources stated, included weapons shipments and was being coordinated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

The specifics of the New York Times reporting, meanwhile, open major holes in Clinton’s sworn claims to be in the dark about the alleged weapons shipments.

U.S. officials speaking on condition of anonymity told the Times that American intelligence officers have helped the Arab governments shop for weapons and then helped to vet rebel commanders and groups to determine who should receive the weapons as they arrive.

The plan mirrors one the Times reported last month in a separate article that was proposed by Clinton herself. The Times described Clinton as one of the driving forces advocating for arming the Syrian rebels.

Last month, the New York Times reported Clinton and then-CIA Director David Petraeus had concocted a plan calling for vetting rebels and arming Syrian fighters with the assistance of Arab countries.

The Times report from earlier this week of U.S. arms shipments and vetting seems to be the Clinton-Petraeus plan put in action.

It may be difficult for most to believe the secretary of state was not aware that her alleged plan was being implemented, especially when arming the Syrian rebels is a serious policy with obvious major repercussions internationally.

Clinton is not the only one in hot water.

As WND reported yesterday, the New York Times report threatens the longstanding White House narrative that claims the Obama administration has only supplied nonlethal aid to the rebels.

The White House has repeatedly denied directly arming the rebels.

Recruiting jihadists

Days after the Benghazi attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, WND broke the story that Stevens himself played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Assad’s regime in Syria, according to Egyptian and other Middle Eastern security officials.

Stevens served as a key contact with the Saudis to coordinate the recruitment by Saudi Arabia of Islamic fighters from North Africa and Libya. The jihadists were sent to Syria via Turkey to attack Assad’s forces, said the security officials.

The officials said Stevens also worked with the Saudis to send names of potential jihadi recruits to U.S. security organizations for review. Names found to be directly involved in previous attacks against the U.S., including in Iraq and Afghanistan, were ultimately not recruited by the Saudis to fight in Syria, said the officials.

The latest New York Times report has bolstered WND’s reporting, citing air traffic data, interviews with officials in several countries and the accounts of rebel commanders describing how the CIA has been working with Arab governments and Turkey to sharply increase arms shipments to Syrian rebels in recent months.

The Times reported that the weapons airlifts began on a small scale in early 2012 and continued intermittently through last fall, expanding into a steady and much heavier flow late last year, the data shows.

The Times further revealed that from offices at “secret locations,” American intelligence officers have helped the Arab governments shop for weapons, including a large procurement from Croatia. They have vetted rebel commanders and groups to determine who should receive the weapons as they arrive.

The CIA declined to comment to the Times on the shipments or its role in them.

The Times quoted a former American official as saying that David H. Petraeus, the CIA director until November, had been instrumental in helping set up an aviation network to fly in the weapons. The paper said Petraeus had prodded various countries to work together on the plan.

Petraeus did not return multiple emails from the Times asking for comment.

Both WND’s reporting, which first revealed the U.S.-coordinated arms shipments, and the Times reporting starkly contrast with statements from top U.S. officials who have denied aiding the supply of weapons to the rebels.

Rebel training

It’s not the first time WND’s original investigative reporting on U.S. support for the Syrian rebels was later confirmed by reporting in major media outlets. Other WND reporting indicates support for the Syrian rebels that goes beyond supplying arms, painting a larger picture of U.S. involvement in the Middle East revolutions.

A story by the German weekly Der Spiegel earlier this month reporting the U.S. is training Syrian rebels in Jordan was exclusively exposed by WND 13 months ago.

Quoting what it said were training participants and organizers, Der Spiegel reported it was not clear whether the Americans worked for private firms or were with the U.S. Army, but the magazine said some organizers wore uniforms.

The training in Jordan reportedly focused on use of anti-tank weaponry.

The German magazine reported some 200 men received the training over the previous three months amid U.S. plans to train a total of 1,200 members of the Free Syrian Army in two camps in the south and the east of Jordan.

Britain’s Guardian newspaper also reported U.S. trainers were aiding Syrian rebels in Jordan along with British and French instructors.

Reuters reported a spokesman for the U.S. Defense Department declined immediate comment on the Der Spiegel report. The French foreign ministry and Britain’s foreign and defense ministries also would not comment to Reuters.

While Der Spiegel quoted sources discussing training of the rebels in Jordan over the last three months, WND was first to report the training as far back as February 2012.

At the time, WND quoted knowledgeable Egyptian and Arab security officials claimed the U.S., Turkey and Jordan were running a training base for the Syrian rebels in the Jordanian town of Safawi in the country’s northern desert region.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/did-hillary-commit-perjury/#83RvW9REW8k2ZAYM.99

Are the survivors hiding in “plain sight”? VERY likely – www.forbes.com/sites/richardminiter/2013/03/25/are-benghazi-survivors-hiding-in-a-washington-d-c-hospital/

In line with the above, not a word has been hinted about the real assassins, those same jihadis affiliated with Al Qaeda, who happen to be of Egyptian origin. Yes, THOSE Egyptians, the ones who have become the Islamist-in-Chief’s preferred Mid East pets. Yes, they are all offshoots of Egypt’s Brotherhood Mafia! Uncomfortable truths dare not be disturbed/rattled. Once again, the skeletons. 

‘Same Al Qaeda Gang led by “The Egyptian” Hit US Ambassador in Benghazi and Western Hostages in Algeria’ – DEBKAfile Intelligence
Abdelaziz Bouteflika

A personal president-to-president report from Algeria’sAbdelaziz Bouteflika to Barack Obama in early February contained evidence that an Al Qaeda unit commanded by “the Egyptian” (unnamed) murdered US AmbassadorChrist Stevens and three staffers in Benghazi last September, and that the same gang, under the same command, also carried out the Algerian In Amenas gas field siege in early January.
Three weeks after the Benghazi attack, DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s intelligence sources reported that the CIA and FBI were hunting for the perpetrators of theBenghazi assault in the wrong places, in Tunisia and Mali. The key was in Egypt.
The investigation into the terrorist hostage siege at the Algerian gas field is still ongoing to discover how 38 Western workers came to die and the fate of many other hostages who are still missing.
But meanwhile, the Algerian president’s exposure of the Egyptian angle and other common factors between the two outrages hit Washington like a bolt from the blue.
DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s intelligence and counterterrorism sources have obtained access to the Bouteflika report and disclose eleven of its eye-opening revelations….The Obama administration is keenly interested in playing down the discovery that the Benghazi and In Amenas outrages were the work of the same Egyptian-led al Qaeda band, DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s intelligence and counterterrorism sources report.”

Of course, the buck does stop with the Liar-in-Chief, but this does not obviate, nor mitigate, the culpability of his surrogates. Not at all.

Hillary, are you listening… feigned ignorance is NEVER a criminal defense, regardless of the suspect’s weaving, bobbing and dogging. Come on now, you’re a Yalie law grad, and an important leader of the free world. Know when to ‘fess up.

If not, it is up to each of us to nudge the process along. Faster…faster!

UPDATE: Obama Inc. is feeling the heat via special ops forces, as they are demanding Congress form a select committee to investigate Benghazigate – www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/700-retired-military-special-ops-tell-congress-to-form-select-committee-on-benghazi-libya?f=must_read…most rational folks wouldn’t want to incur their wrath….

The POTUS’s “Miscalculations” Are Driving N Korean & Iranian Bellicosity…Almost To The Brink…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Back in July 2012, a full 9 months ago, this blog asserted: World War 3 Place markers are being set up, chiefly through Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Mid East fires, as well as attendant foreign policy blunders/blinders. Nine months time is barely a drop in the bucket, at least in historical terms, but in the forever fiery cauldron of the Mid East, not so much. 

In this regard, the world is transfixed as the North Korean man-child threatens to wipe nations off the face of the earth, and this is indeed a precursor to World War 3. In tandem, the Iranian Hitler has his back, as expected. The two are inextricably linked, whether or not the (ideologically) blind as a bat POTUS wants to admit as much. Nevertheless, the leader of the free world will no longer be able to ignore his own handiwork, and its grave consequences. As such, a re-read of the following (July 12, 2012) is more than necessary – 

“A natural inclination is to close ones eyes and muffle ones ears, when terrifying truths are being discussed. But ones self induced blindness will not change the damnable facts. They are what they are.

In this regard, it is prudent to internalize what is transpiring, rather than to play deaf, dumb and blind. As such, the greatest gift an unapologetic Zionist (and an American patriot) can give is the tools to realize what is shaking out, even if others prefer not to recognize the dangers.

And in light of the real possibility of Syria’s chemical weapons exploding before the world’s terrified eyes, it is incumbent to internalize how we came from there to here. And it is not as if Assad, the butcher, hasn’t had many opportunities to use his deadly arsenals; chemicals which surely made their way into his bloody hands when Iraq’s dictator was nearing his own end. You know, the so called WMD’s which were never found…never existed. As if.

Be that as it may, one must understand the part the Pyromaniac-in-Chief has orchestrated in destabilizing Syria – via his hand in Libya – currently coined Benghazigate. And the insurmountable proof can be gleaned herein – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/29/benghazigates-stink-bombs-steadily-creeping-to-the-fore-regardless-of-the-regimes-spinmeisters-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/– supported by all the links necessary to prove said case.

So why – after all the years Assad is at the helm – is the region currently at the precipice? To be sure, continuous/unrelenting de-stabilizing by Iran’s Hitlerite regime is not lost on this blogger. Yet still, the mullahs have the Islamist-in-Chief in their hip pockets, as he jaw- jaws the west to a nuclear armed Iran! What in the devil is going on NOW, to cause all of the above to (soon) come to a head?

Well, geo-politics is rarely as it seems. Quite the opposite. And as the world is transfixed on the (most recent) introduction of chemical weapons into the region’s unfolding nightmare, please recall this blogger’s warnings via the POTUS’s connection to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, as a precursor to WW 3: adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/24/northeast-intelligence-network-posits-a-direct-nexus-between-the-potus-saudi-arabia-the-muslim-brotherhood-mafia-suggesting-a-purposeful-precursor-to-www-3-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. 

Once the above is reviewed the coming conflagration is, more or less, understood for what it is; a carefully planned operation by the Islamist-in-Chief and surrogates, as they rearrange the Sunni decks for the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia.”

‘Chemical weapons reports in Syria, exactly as warned’

Doug Hagmann, Canada Free Press, Northeast Intelligence Network, 12/5/12

“And so it begins, or should I say, so it continues. CNN is now reporting that an unnamed U.S. intelligence official claims that Assad’s Syrian forces are “combining chemicals that would be used to make deadly sarin gas for use in weapons to attack rebel and civilian populations.”

One aspect of the weapons plan was to set up a false flag operation to make it appear that Assad used chemical weapons against his own people. Imagine the outcry from the civilized world to the news that Assad ‘gassed’ his own people. That would be aninvitation to NATO and the West to openly intervene. Don’t forget about the timing of all of this. Two months before the elections, and time was running out. The job of taking out Assad was not yet complete. Such an event would quickly advance this agenda. By this time, however, being caught and placed in a rather unenviable position between Russia and the U.S., the Turkish consul general was in a ‘CYA, clean-up’ mode, assuring that none of the chemical weapons that might have still been in Libya were headed for Turkey.”As I wrote here before in variousreports pertaining to Benghazi, this was the plan all along and you are seeing it play out, albeit a bit behindschedule as Obama, Clinton and theirnational security advisors had to coordinate the Benghazi cover-up that few admitted existed and even fewer would report. Information about the use of chemical weapons, specifically gas, was detailed in the second part of my interview with an intelligence insider:

Now, because no one has stepped in to expose the big lie behind Benghazi, it is nearly certain that the U.S. and NATO will become involved. By not exposing the big lie, American soldiers likely will be on ground in Syria, facing not just Assad’s army, but theIranians and the Russian armies. The Russians already have about 100,000 soldiers in Syria. There have already been 40,000 deaths in Syria. Are you ready for four million?

As I wrote before, the fuse for WW III has been lit. You are witnessing history playing out right before your very eyes. I mapped out their plan. Has anyone been paying attention?”

www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/51515

Make NO mistake. When all is said and done, the region will be no safer when Assad is gone and Iran is supposedly subdued. Not at all. For the Iranian Hitler has no disinclination to change horses, from their Alawite partners to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia.

After all, both (as does Barack HUSSEIN Obama) want the same outcome; the eventual downfall of the U.S. and the total destruction of Israel – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/01/the-potuss-iranian-strategy-negotiating-with-islamic-devils-but-it-always-ends-in-death-destruction-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. And the POTUS well understands the following: whichever Islamic devil prevails is still a death kneel for the west.

Besides, his chess pieces are duly in place…soon set to explode!”

adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/07/world-war-3s-place-markers-set-up-through-barack-hussein-obamas-mid-east-fires-addendum-to-northeast-intelligence-network-posits-a-direct-nexus-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

NOW that the readers took a sobering look-back into the summer of 2012, along comes DEBKAfile Intelligence with similar warnings, in relation to North Korea’s brinkmanship.

‘Iran lines up behind North Korea, warns the US of “great losses”

DEBKAfile Special Report April 5, 2013

Kim Jong-Un with his generals
Kim Jong-Un with his generals

Tehran’s intercession in the Korean crisis on the side of its ally in Pyongyang was predictable, even though the US preferrs to ignore the close interrelations between the two allies.

And so, on Friday, April 5, Deputy Chief of Staff of Iran’s Armed Forces Brig. Gen. Masoud Jazayeri stepped forward to point the finger at Washington:
[“The presence of the Americans in [South] Korea has been the root cause of tensions in this sensitive region in the past and present. The US and its allies will suffer great losses if a war breaks out in this region,” he said, adding for good measure: “Independent countries will not submit to the US mischief. The time for Washington’s bullying and extortion is long past.”

DEBKAfile’s Iranian sources: The second part of the statement was a perfect fit for Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s flat refusal to accept US demands on Iran’s nuclear program. The Korean crisis gave the Iranians the opportunity to kill two birds with one stone.
As Kim Jong-Un moved two intermediate missiles to the east coast of North Korea, Gen. Jazayeri’s rhetoric landed on the latest round of talks the six powers were holding with Iran in Amaty, Kazhakstan for a diplomatic resolution of Iran’s nuclear challenge.

Washington hoped to spread some cheer over a diplomatic process that had long past proven futile by planting advance reports that Khamenei had ordered a slowdown of Iran’s nuclear program up to the June presidential election to avoid crossing a red line that would trigger a military response.
But when the parties came to the table, Iran’s senior negotiator Saeed Jalili refused outright to respond to the proposals put before Tehran in the previous session.
He seemed to have taken his cue from Kim Jong-Un, who too has stuck to his father’s rejectionism in the face of every American proposal for dismantling North Korea’s nuclear program.
DEBKAfile: The inevitable convergence of the Korean and Iranian crises confronts America’s three top officials, President Barack Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, with their most challenging international test.

Kerry would be well advised to take a break from his Sisyphean efforts to crack the latest of umpteen Israel-Palestinian disputes, call off his weekend appointments with Israeli and Palestinians leaders and instead fly to Moscow and Beijing.
There, he could start bargaining with Russian and Chinese rulers for preliminary understandings with Washington on Iran and Syria that would make it worth their while to use their leverage for bringing the out-of-control North Korean firebrand to heel.

So long as the Obama administration sticks to its current separate policies on Syria and Iran, Iran and Korea, Moscow and Beijing won’t lift a finger to apply the brakes to Kim Jong-Un before he drives the world to catastrophe.
www.debka.com/article/22879/Iran-lines-up-behind-North-Korea-warns-the-US-of-%E2%80%9Cgreat-losses%E2%80%9D

In effect, while DEBKA is not as direct as this blog, in pointing the finger at Obama’s (purposeful) “miscalculations”, its analysis is indeed coming to the same overall conclusion: by refusing to see the actors for what they are – common threats to western civilization – nothing but catastrophe will ensue. More to the point, Russia and China – spoilers under the best of circumstances – see no reason to pull N. Korea & Iran back from the brink, as long as the Commander-in-Chief keeps adding fuel to explosive fires. 

Extrapolating further, those who are reflexively anti-western cannot see the forest from the trees. Instead, they view (western) mortal dangers as entities to “rationalize” with, hence, the incessant jaw-jaw and mischief galore. 

Adding to this blog’s thesis, view this trenchant video report from Northeast Intelligence Network – www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNG_H5tSZUA…to understand Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s “hidden hand”, via the Brotherhood Mafia and with Saudi Arabia deeply in the fray. Bear in mind the POTUS’s “green” roots – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/11/the-islamist-in-chief-his-kenyan-wahhabi-relatives-obamas-inner-roots-addendum-to-the-ties-that-bind-the-islamist-in-chief-to-sunni-islam-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…never mind the “reported” rift between the Islamist-in-Chief and King Abdullah. Smoke and mirrors.

To our collective horror the leader of the free world is the one who bears the most watching. Americans are no longer safe in the knowledge that their leader has America’s back!

UPDATE: isn’t this blog’s thesis (unfortunately) bearing fruit; as N Korea & Iran rear their WMD’s heads in sync, and under the Pyromaniac-in-Chief’s nose? – www.debka.com/article/22885/North-Korea-to-fire-ballistic-missile-to-Pacific-Iran-unveils-new-uranium-processing-facilities

American Suburbs Taking The Initiative, Seceding From Failing Cities…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

As is said, “different strokes for different folks”. Similarly, some are action-oriented, others take their punishment lying down, even when repeatedly pummeled. As one who prefers to take the initiative, and is hardly the sort to ask for permission (particularly, when important matters are in play), it is pretty clear where this blog stands.

In this regard, recall a previous commentary, one which demonstrates how Americans are reacting to totalitarian rule – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/13/upwards-of-23-states-are-positingis-it-time-to-secede-due-to-the-radicalcorrupt-rein-of-barack-hussein-obama-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…actually putting it out there with the message: folks, it may be time to secede. Indeed.

But while some actions take longer than others – even from practical perspectives – some initiatives can be effectuated more quickly and exact a huge impact, essentially, biting back at the “alligators at the door” – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/25/northeast-intelligence-networks-director-his-food-for-thought-to-fed-up-americans-addendum-to-states-are-positingis-it-time-to-secede-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Lo and behold, Georgia’s suburban residents from Atlanta are starting to fight back, and the trend couldn’t come soon enough. Don’t be surprised that southern folks are taking the initiative. Middle America will surely follow suit. As to the east/west left coast ‘burbs, well, if they follow suit, then pigs do fly!

‘SUBURBS SECEDE FROM ATLANTA’

‘Detroit of the South’ bludgeoned by troubles

March 10, 2013

 

By John T. Bennett

As Detroit – beset by violence, debt and social woes – prepares to undergo a historic takeover by the Michigan state government, the city of Atlanta could be sliding toward a similar fate.

 Some are quietly wondering whether Atlanta is in danger of becoming “the Detroit of the South.”

The city has experienced an ongoing succession of government scandals, ranging from a massive cheating racket to corruption, bribery, school-board incompetence and now the potential loss of accreditation for the local DeKalb County school system.

For several years, problems of this sort have fueled political reforms, including the creation of new cities in northern Atlanta suburbs. Due to the intensification of corruption scandals in DeKalb, some state-level reform proposals could become national news very soon.

‘Super-white majority’ cities

As a result of the unsavory politics in urban Atlanta, northern suburban communities acted to distance themselves. Beginning in 2005, many communities began the process of incorporating into cities.

Thus far, Milton, Sandy Springs, Brookhaven, Dunwoody, Chattahoochee Hills and Johns Creek have done so.

These cities, after breaking away politically from urban Atlanta, have become so successful that a libertarian think tank, the Reason Foundation, has featured Sandy Springs as a model of effective government. The Economist has also applauded the northern Atlanta cities for solving the problem of unfunded government pension liability and avoiding the bankruptcy that looms over some urban areas. The new cities may soon be able to create their own school districts, which would free them even further from the issues besetting Atlanta.

While incorporation has been popular with residents of the new cities, not all of Atlanta is as satisfied. The Georgia Legislative Black Caucus filed a lawsuit in 2011 to dissolve the new cities, claiming they were a “super-white majority” and diluting the voting power of minorities.

A key leader in the black community and a driving force in support of the lawsuit, who wishes to remain anonymous, bemoaned the “disturbing tendency of black electorates to not elect the smartest and brightest, or even the cleverest.”

Nonetheless, he believes that there is a social contract between the northern and southern parts of the county.

“So when you allow powerful groups of citizens to opt out of a social contract, and form their own, it may benefit the group opting out, but it hurts the larger collective,” he said.

The lawsuit would have canceled incorporation and tied the cities back into the very county that they purposefully left.

State Rep. Lynne Riley, a Republican who represents one of the new cities, called the lawsuit “frivilous” and “disrespectful to the citizens of these cities who are most satisfied with their government.”

The federal trial court rejected the lawsuit, and the court of appeals affirmed the dismissal. However, an attorney for the Black Caucus plans to file an amended lawsuit.

Meanwhile, the same concerns that spurred incorporation continue to mount.

Failing schools

DeKalb County contributed to what the New York Times called “the biggest standardized test cheating scandal in the country’s history” in 2011.

Now, the county is faced with losing its regional accreditation. Losing regional accreditation is, by any objective measure, a devastating indictment of a school board, with severe consequences for students and families within the district.

When nearby Clayton County, Ga., lost its regional accreditation in 2008, it was the first school system in the country to do so in 40 years.

The result in Clayton, according to the Pew Foundation, was that thousands of students left county schools, the district lost millions of dollars and hundreds of teachers were fired.

In response to the Clayton County crisis, after witnessing the fallout and the harm to the state’s reputation, the legislature acted to prevent a repeat. In 2011, the Georgia legislature essentially gave the governor authority to remove board of education members when a district was placed on probation by the accreditation agency.

Last December, DeKalb was placed on probation. Then, in January, the governor of Georgia used his new authority and removed six members of the nine-member DeKalb Board of Education.

This year, well after the accreditation issue broke open, DeKalb school board elections were held. Four of nine board members were up for reelection.  Voters in one of the four districts returned their incumbent board member for another term, despite knowing that accreditation was at risk.

This week, a federal judge sided with the governor and agreed that the six suspended board members can be replaced. The decision places the dispute into the Georgia Supreme Court’s purview.

As the issue looms, the mere mention of losing accreditation has impacted the housing market in DeKalb, with at least one potential buyer directing his realtor not to search for homes in the county.

School leadership

Recently, at the helm of the DeKalb school system stood Crawford Lewis. The former superintendent has been indicted on racketeering charges.

Along with several of his associates, Lewis is accused by the DeKalb DA of fraud, theft by a government employee, bribery and a web of racketeering. The charges arose out of Lewis’ practice of steering lucrative government contracts toward favored companies.

According to the indictment, Lewis also used government funds to pay for a hotel room, which he used as the venue for an affair. Lewis had this affair with a person who held the position of “Executive Director of the Office of School Improvement.”

One of the numerous complaints about the DeKalb school board was that it voted to pay for Lewis’ legal defense. There had been a $100,000 cap on the costs allowed for legal defense, but the school board waived it for Lewis’ benefit.

The CEO in charge

At the very top, the head of DeKalb’s government is the position of CEO. The current CEO, Burrell Ellis, is being investigated for a list of concerns, including alleged bid rigging. Police searched Ellis’s home and office recently, and local news outlets report that while no charges have been filed, search warrantsare reportedly aimed toward potential extortion, bribery, theft, conspiracy, and wire fraud in connection with private vendors who contract with the county.

Most recently, Ellis sought approval from the county ethics board to establish a legal defense fund to benefit himself. The board rebuffed the request.

A corrupt school board becomes a civil rights issue

Instead of being treated as a story about rampant, inexcusable corruption, the school board fiasco has morphed into a civil rights issue. Atlanta’s NBC affiliate reports that the Georgia NAACP “accused Republican Governor Nathan Deal of being part of an alleged conspiracy to get rid of black office holders and deprive black voters of their rights.”

State Rep. Tyrone Books pointed out that criticism of the governor needed to include a word about black politicians who supported the governor’s removal authority.

“How can we complain about him when we have black folks standing there embracing the removal of black officials?” asked Brooks, D-Atlanta.

The state legislature is trying to prevent public funds from being used in the legal defense of the ousted board members. Because the ousted board members see their positions as a civil rights entitlement, the attorney’s fees required for their defense will quickly rise, unless legislation puts an end to the entitlement.

One of the suspended board members, Eugene Walker, responded to the judge’s ruling with a familiar appeal: “Minorities should not feel secure if contrived allegations from anonymous sources with hidden agendas can go to private agencies and to have their civil rights stolen away.”

DeKalb has changed from majority white to majority black over the last several decades. As the Atlanta Journal Constitution gingerly put it: “The county’s transition from majority white to majority minority was politically rocky .”

http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/suburbs-secede-from-atlanta/#l6IgSdyplKBYyP0W.99

Don’t  let anyone dare confuse the above issue, simply by tarring said initiatives with “racist” bugaboos. In fact, if it means that predominantly white suburbs (some are mixed) have a chance to save themselves, why the hell not? Should they sink in the morass, a graveyard dug by multi-culti psychotics, just to prove they are willing to go down with the ship via “redistribution”? Where is it written, that all citizens do not have the same EQUAL rights to save themselves, even if they are white? Nowhere.

Besides, who died and made others kings and queens over the cities/states? No one. Bone up on States’ Rights, and suburbs are part of the equation  – (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States’_rights…some of us paid attention in Con Law classes). And if it means going over someone’s inept head, then so be it. While it is best to first find a solution within the confines already set up, nevertheless, when it becomes clear that the answers lie elsewhere, then “going for it” is the only way forward. 

Ignore the naysayers. Your lives depend on moving….”forward march”.

Israel’s “Intellectual Warriors”- Via Israel Institute For Strategic Studies – Must URGENTLY Go Forth To “Battle”…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Before the rebirth (in 1948) of the modern state of Israel a battle raged all over the world, as various flavors of anti-Zionists/anti-semites railed against the notion, the very existence, of a Jewish State. It is ongoing, even as this is being written. Leave aside said temerity to dictate to the Jewish people that they have no “right” to their thousands yr old homeland. The question still remains: how perverse is it for so called “intellectual elitists” to expect that the Jewish people bow to their demands? Who died, anointing them masters of the universe? 

In tandem, anti-Jewish Jews are generally featured – front and center – as the purveyors of said poison pill, and their flaunting is not for nothing. On one hand, they are used as the useful idiots that they are. On the other side of the spectrum, many offer themselves up as a sampling of “good Jews“, you know, those who do the bidding of their (leftist) Gentile and Islamic overlords.

But their deviant behavior becomes somewhat explicable, only when certain derivatives come to the fore. Specifically, leftism is lethal to Jews, yet they are (mentally) immutable to its consequences – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/08/leftism-lethal-to-jews-their-overall-health-others-too-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Consequentially, what else but disaster can one expect when mega-rich, or other highly connected individuals get bitten by the “peace” bug? –   adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/22/when-leftist-mega-rich-peace-obsessed-instigators-get-involved-what-can-go-wrong-everything-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-111/. Its results are always detrimental to the Jewish nation/people. But never mind…they soldier on.

Whereas the above links cover Jewish dementia, the remaining- who oppose Israel (Judea and Samaria) as the cradle of Judaism – comprise a hodgepodge of leftists hewing to their “religious” dogma, irrespective of their actual religion or locale – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/01/leftist-dogma-the-same-world-over-freedom-loving-people-beware-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-32-2/.

In this regard, The New York Times, via their toadying Jew-boys, and like-minded Israel-haters have ratcheted up their vitriol. This is no small matter. Israel’s foremost (strategic) “intellectual warrior”, Dr. Martin Sherman, addresses said venomous onslaught and he is more than up to the challenge – www.strategic-israel.org/who-endorses-iiss-enterprise/ . The following is one sampling, out of countless others.

‘Into the Fray: ‘The New York Times’ versus the Jews’

03/21/2013

Over the last fortnight, the so-called “paper of record” has ratcheted up its bias and bile a notch or two.

There is an unavoidable conflict between being a Jewish state and a democratic state.
– Joseph Levine, “On Questioning the Jewish State,”The New York Times, March 9, 2013

There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.
— George Orwell

Last week I cautioned that a crucial intellectual battle has been launched to strip the Jews of their political independence and national sovereignty. As promised, in this week’s column I will elaborate on the inanity and iniquity of this Judeophobic initiative.

Pernicious, perverse, paradoxical

The Times – together with several other major mainstream media entities – has chosen to throw its weight decisively behind this patently pernicious, perverse and paradoxical endeavor.

But over the last fortnight, the so-called “paper of record” has ratcheted up its bias and bile a notch or two. This prompted the following comment from Commentary’s Seth Mandel in his “A New Low for the Times” (March 18): “The bias against Israel in the press, and especially the New York Times, has become so steady and predictable that it can be difficult to muster outrage.

Since the paper flaunts, rather than attempts to disguise, its hostility to Israel, it can be easy to miss when the Times crosses yet another line. And the paper and its editors have done so again this weekend.”

I have not designated this drive to denigrate, delegitimize and demonize the conduct of the Jewish state — and of late, the very idea of a Jewish state – “pernicious,” “perverse” and “paradoxical” without reason.

Should this unholy crusade achieve its declared objectives, it will precipitate a reality that reflects a total negation of the very values invoked for its promotion, and the antithesis of those allegedly cherished by its propagators.

Escalating enmity

Until relatively recently, the bulk of the Times’s censure of Israel’s actions focused on its policy regarding the status of the territories beyond the pre-1967 Green Line, and the fate of the Palestinian Arabs resident there.

But with the emerging realization — indeed, perhaps resignation — that the previously preferred outcome of establishing a Palestinian state in these territories, is becoming increasingly unworkable, emphasis has shifted and enmity escalated. It now seems that the paper has begun to channel condemnation less against what the Jewish state does, and more against what it is — i.e. Jewish.

This is a line that it is apparently pursuing with increasing virulence, frequency and prominence on its pages, last week touting it on both the front page of its Sunday edition and the cover of its weekly magazine.

Barely a week previously, a lengthy opinion piece by University of Massachusetts professor of philosophy Joseph Levine appeared, advancing contrived and contorted claims disputing the conceptual validity of the Jewish people’s right to national self-determination and political sovereignty, now even within the Green Line.

To recap

Readers will recall that in my column last week, I pointed out the conceptual fallacies and faults in Levine’s approach to statehood, which seems to postulate that no state can be considered “democratic” if the conduct of its public life reflects the sociocultural dominance of the major ethnic group — even if it comprises a “vast majority.”

Accordingly, we are asked to believe that majority rule is an intolerable moral anathema for democratic governance. Indeed, unless the majority surrenders — or, at least, substantially dilutes – the expression of its identity, while the minority is allowed full expression of its identity — no matter how incompatible or adversarial it might be with that of the majority — the resulting sociopolitical reality is allegedly so disastrously impaired that its continued existence cannot be countenanced.

Thus, in Levine’s eyes, a “people” only merit the right to self-determination if they comprise a segment of humanity whose members are bound together by nothing more substantive than their equality before the law of the land and the accident of their physical location within the borders of that land. This is, as I showed, a position severely at odds with those of leading philosophers of liberal political theory over the past two centuries. It is one which fails to capture the most elemental essence that drives aspirations for national self-determination and that comprises the primal conditions for stable democratic governance: A sentiment of political allegiance born of a spiritual compatibility — which may arise because of ethnic homogeneity, or despite ethnic heterogeneity.

Silly or sinister?

In the absence of such communal cohesiveness, as John Stuart Mill tells us, “Free institutions are next to impossible.” Indeed, “in a country made up of a people without fellow-feeling the united public opinion, necessary to the working of representative government, cannot exist.”

Recent history bears eloquent, if tragic, testimony to the enduring validity of this perceptive insight. Wherever attempts have been made to weld inimical ethnicities together in a single political entity, if it is not bound by the iron grip of tyranny, the results have almost invariably been reminiscent of a Hobbesian nightmare of anarchy, chaos and bloodshed — as the examples of Lebanon and the Balkans starkly underscore.

Clearly, then, proposing policy prescriptions that not only disregard, but directly contravene, both the theoretical rationale and the empirical evidence regarding the attainment of the purported goal of sustainable democracy is either silly or sinister.

But whether dumb or deceptive, it is an approach that harbors huge hazards for Jews and Arabs – and for the hopes of liberal democracy — in the Holy Land.

“Israel was a mistake”

Yet despite its clearly calamitous consequences, it appears that this is the approach the Times has opted to adopt and advance both by publications of explicit endorsement (such as Levine’s opinion piece) and by implicit insinuations (such as last week’s 8,000-word magazine cover story by one Ben Ehrenreich, warmly embracing the Palestinian “resistance”).

Thus for example, flying in the face of facts, the latter misinforms Times readers by implying that the recent Operation Pillar of Defense was an unprovoked Israeli initiative that began when “in mid-November, Israeli rockets began falling on Gaza,” conspicuously omitting any mention of the fact that it was hundreds of Palestinian rockets falling on Israel that precipitated the fighting.

But, perhaps more significant — and revealing — than the blatantly biased and manifestly misleading content of the Times cover story, was the choice of its author. For as veteran pundit Jonathan Tobin tersely remarks: “Ehrenreich’s bias is so deeply embedded in the piece that it is pointless to criticize anything but the decision to employ him to write it.”

And that is precisely the point. For it is more than implausible to assume the Times was unaware of Ehrenreich’s strong anti- Zionist predilections. Indeed, these were unambiguously laid out in a Los Angeles Times op-ed titled, “Zionism is the problem” (March 15, 2009). In it Ehrenreich unfavorably compares the Jewish state to apartheid South Africa, stating: “If two decades ago comparisons to the South African apartheid system felt like hyperbole, they now feel charitable.”

He goes on to advocate what in effect is the abolition of the nation-state of the Jews, pontificating: “The Zionist ideal of a Jewish state is keeping Israelis and Palestinians from living in peace. Establishing a secular, pluralist, democratic government in Israel and Palestine would of course mean the abandonment of the Zionist dream. It might also mean the only salvation for the Jewish ideals of justice.”

This appears then to be the kind of journalist/ journalism that the New York Times is promoting.

As to the public sentiment it is liable to arouse, this might be gauged by the tenor of one of the talkbacks to Ehrenreich’s cover story — rerun in abbreviated form as an interview with him posted on the New York Times site today (March 21) — from Molly in Costa Rica: “Israel was a mistake, and they must leave.

Israel is a transplanted organ that the Middle East is rejecting. It will never fly.”

Perilous, preposterous prescription

The New York Times-propagated prescription, that in effect promotes the dismantling of the Jewish nation-state and replacing it with an un-Jewish secular state-of-all-its- citizens, is preposterous and perilous — in both principle and practice. Supporting it puts you firmly on the wrong side of history — and for self-respecting New York Times readers, what could be worse? For the concept of “multiculturalism,” once so fashionable, that underpins the rationale of the state-of-all-its-citizens idea, is rapidly being discredited. It has been tried — and has failed.

As I pointed out in an earlier column, “Nakba nonsense,” May 17, 2012, harsh and explicit declarations have come from the leaders of nearly all major European countries – including France, UK and Germany – acknowledging its disappointing failure. For example, Angela Merkel lamented: “The tendency had been to say, ‘Let’s adopt the multicultural concept and live happily side by side.’ But this concept has failed, and failed utterly.” Moreover in democracies as far-flung as Australia and Canada, the media have begun to publish expressions of exasperation and frustration at the deleterious effects of trying to absorb cultures incompatible with the host culture.

Even against a far less adversarial national- political background, incompatible social-cultural and religious disparities are causing increasingly unacceptable societal consequences for the host societies.

It is thus entirely unclear why anyone — unless motivated by malice — could possibly propose the application of such a failed formula in the far more daunting circumstances prevailing in Israel.

Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism

Despite the protestations of anti-Zionists, such as Levine and Ehrenreich, that opposing Zionism “does not manifest anti-Semitism,” it does.

No amount of academic acrobatics or intellectual sophistry can blur the truth in the words, widely attributed to Martin Luther King Jr.: “When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews, you are talking anti-Semitism. And what is anti-Zionist? It is the denial to the Jewish people of a fundamental right that we justly and freely accord all other nations of the globe. It is discrimination against Jews because they are Jews. In short, it is anti-Semitism.”

It is anti-Semitic (i.e. Judeophobic) to denigrate every coercive action undertaken by Israel — whether military or administrative, proactive or reactive, preemptive or punitive — intended to protect Jews from attacks merely because they are Jewish, as racially motivated, disproportionate crimes against humanity.

It is anti-Semitic to peddle dangerous delusions, designed to deprive the Jews of their national independence and political sovereignty, and the purveyors of such poisonous merchandise must be forced to bear the burden of shame that plying their ignominious trade so richly deserves.

Fatal flaw in post-Zionist logic

I realize I have not fulfilled all my promises made last week, and several issues I undertook to deal with have been left unaddressed, particularly the significance for the non-Jewish minorities living in a Zionist Jewish nation-state. Regrettably, I have let my indignation at the New York Times distract me and that – together with new editorial constraints – preclude further discussion.

However, as my credibility is everything, I P-R-O-M-I-S-E to take up these topics soon in a forthcoming article – which I can already inform you will be titled, “The fatal flaw in post-Zionist logic”.

Until then, “Happy Passover.”

www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Into-the-Fray-The-New-York-Times-versus-the-Jews-307351this gem too ! ‘Senseless & spineless: Speaking truth to power’ – www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Article.aspx?id=308055

Is it any wonder why this blog issues its own rallying cry, in effect, summoning others to support “Israel’s Intellectual Warriors”? – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/07/presenting-part-three-a-strategic-based-interview-with-dr-martin-sherman-why-you-should-support-israels-intellectual-warriors-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Time is of the essence. It is NOT on Israel’s side!

Israel’s Pre-emptive Window Re Iran Has (Precipitously) Closed: Professor Louis Rene Beres Expounds. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

For well over a decade there has been no other contact (in the entire world) whose assessment was more valued, regarding Iran’s WMD program, than Professor Louis Rene Beres. So much so, he is given all due credit and respect at the ‘About’ tab – adinakutnicki.com/about/.

As such, his strategic nuclear assessments have been front and center at this blog. They must be given all due deliberation. The following, at Oxford U’s Press, highlighted the legal basis for pre-emption. Take note of its date, November 15, 2012, almost 5 months ago. Meaning, while Jerusalem wasted precious nation-saving time, hitching Israel’s completely lawful, anticipatory self defense to Washington’s dictates, the option of pre-emption has evaporated. This VERY short window, a mere 5 months ago, is no longer open –  adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/15/irans-wmd-genocidal-project-oxford-university-press-highlights-professor-louis-rene-beres-my-mentor-the-legal-basis-for-pre-emption-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/and every week lost is Iran’s gain, as its genocidal regime brings them to the “finish line”.

Catch your breath and read on…back in September 2012 a similar warning was blared from these pages, courtesy of Professor Louis Rene Beres…how many dead horses does one blog have to beat, figuratively-speaking – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/06/professor-louis-beres-his-non-paralleled-wisdom-re-nuclear-warfare-doctrine-addendum-to-two-ways-israel-can-deter-a-nuclear-iran-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. 

In this regard, Ariel Sharon, Israel’s ex PM, received this report from Project Daniel, and Professor Louis Rene Beres was its Chair. It was dated January 16, 2003. (www.acpr.org.il/ENGLISH-NATIV/03-issue/daniel-3.htm) Its commentary is linked herein – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/16/two-ways-israel-can-deter-a-nuclear-iran-by-professor-louis-beres-my-mentor-decision-time-is-imminent/. So when reading the latest op-ed at Israel National News, bear in mind Prof Beres’s 2003 report to PM Sharon. But do take the time to read his updated nuclear strategic assessment re Project Daniel – http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/parameters/Articles/07spring/beres.pdf …heady material! Please place his name in their search engine and his articles will pop up, or use this link http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/publication-search-results.cfm?submit=Search&criteria=professor+louis+rene+beres.

‘Op-Ed: Israel’s Increasingly Complex Nuclear Imperatives, Pt I’ – Israel National News, April 2, 2013

Though the logic of deterrence has always rested upon an assumption of rationality, history reveals the persistent fragility of any such understanding.

Prof. Louis René Beres

Over these many years, beginning at Princeton in the late 1960s, I have examined core bases of Israeli nuclear deterrence. Recently, in consequence of the still-growing threat of Iranian nuclearization, increasing attention has been directed toward pertinent issues of enemy rationality. With such issues in mind, this essay will seek to explain (1) the likely impact of enemy “irrationality” on Israel’s deterrence posture; and (2) the vital differences between prospective Iranian irrationality, and genuine enemy “madness.”

For states in world politics, at least according to the generally unchallenged conventional wisdom, successful strategies of deterrence must correctly assume enemy rationality. In the absence of such rationality – that is, in those relatively rare or residual circumstances where an enemy country might rank order certain values or preferences more highly than “staying alive” as a nation – deterrence could simply not work. Moreover, in those potentially much more serious situations involving nuclear deterrence, the direct consequences of any such failure could be stark, catastrophic, and even unprecedented.

Significantly, at least in world politics, irrationality is never the same as “madness.” To wit, an irrational enemy leadership could still maintain a distinct and identifiable hierarchy of preferences, but one in which national survival would not necessarily rank at the top. In more technical terms, strategic analysts would say here that these irrational state actors still maintain an order of preferences that is both “consistent” and “transitive.”

A “mad” leadership, on the other hand, would have no discernible order of preferences. Its actions, for the most part, would be random and unpredictable. It goes without saying that facing a “mad” adversary in world politics is “worse” than facing a “merely” irrationaladversary. Expressed in somewhat different terms, although it might still be possible and purposeful to try to deter an irrational enemy, there would be little point to seeking deterrence against a plainly “mad” one.

“Do you know what it means to find yourselves face to face with a madman,” asks playwright Luigi Pirandello’s Henry IV. “Madmen, lucky folk, construct without logic, or rather with a logic that flies like a feather.”

Credo quia absurdum. “I believe because it is absurd.” What is true for individuals is sometimes also true for states.

In the often-unpredictable theatre of modern world politics, a drama that so often bristles with apparent meaninglessness, decisions that rest upon ordinary logic may quickly crumble before madness. Here, dangers can reach even the most utterly portentous level. This is the aptly-dreaded point of convergence, when madness and nuclear weapons capability would coincide, fuse, or otherwise come together.

Enter Israel and Iran. Soon, because not a single responsible member of the “international community” has ever demonstrated a determinable willingness to undertake appropriately preemptive action (“anticipatory self-defense,” in the formal language of law), the Jewish State may have to face an expressly genocidal Iranian nuclear adversary. Although improbable, a potentially “suicidal” enemy state in Iran, one animated by graphically precise visions of a Shiite apocalypse, cannot be wished away, or, capriciously, dismissed out of hand.

Iran’s current leadership, and possibly even a successor “reformist” government in Tehran, could, at some point, choose to value Israel’s physical destruction more highly than even its own physical survival. Should this happen, the “play” would almost certainly end badly for all “actors.” In recognizably theatrical terms, the “director’s” command would be both unambiguous and immobilizing.

Exeunt omnes!

Nonetheless, despite U.S. President Barack Obama’s disingenuous hope for “a world free of nuclear weapons,” Israel’s ultimate source of national security must inevitably lie in sustained nuclear deterrence. Although still implicit or ambiguous, and not yet open, or disclosed, this Israeli “bomb in the basement” could readily “crumble before madness.” In certain easily-imaginable instances, circumstances involving enemy “madness,” the results of failed Israeli retaliatory threats could ultimately be existential.

Though the logic of deterrence has always rested upon an assumption of rationality, history reveals the persistent fragility of any such understanding. We already know all too well that nations can sometimes behave in ways that are consciously, or even conspicuously, self-destructive.

Sometimes, mirroring the infrequent but decisively unpredictable behavior of individual human beings, national leaders can choose to assign the very highest value to certain preferences other than collective self-preservation. In operatic metaphor, this could reveal a Gotterdammerung (“Twilight of the Gods”) scenario.

For the moment, no single Arab or Iranian adversary of Israel would appear to be authentically irrational or mad. Harsh enemy rhetoric notwithstanding, no current Israeli adversary appears ready to launch a major first-strike against Israel using weapons of mass destruction, with the expectation that it would thereby elicit a devastating reprisal. Of course, miscalculations and errors in information could still lead a perfectly rational enemy state to strike first, but this decision, by definition, would not be the outcome of irrationality or madness.

In strategic thinking, judgments of rationality and irrationality are always based upon prior intent.

Certain enemy states, most likely Iran, could one day decide that excising the “Jewish cancer” or the “enemies of Allah,” from the Middle East would somehow be worth even the most palpably staggering costs. In principle, at least, this particular genocidal prospect could be avoided by Israel’s adoption of pertinent “hard target” preemptions. Increasingly, however, any such once-reasonable expressions of anticipatory self-defense are now difficult or impossible to imagine. Operationally, in essence, a successful preemption is now almost certainly infeasible.

Now, most or all critical Iranian nuclear assets have likely been deeply hardened, widely dispersed, and substantially multiplied. For Israel, expectedly, there would also be considerable political costs to any preemption. To be sure, a preemptive attack, even one that could become an operational failure, would elicit overwhelming public and diplomatic condemnation.

It is plausible that undertaking certain alternative forms of preemption, including assassination of nuclear scientists, and/or cyber defense/cyber-warfare, could (still) be purposeful, but it is unlikely that any such alternatives could permanently obviate traditionally more expedient resorts to military force. (to be continued).

LOUIS RENÉ BERES is Professor of Political Science and International Law at PurdueUniversity. Educated at Princeton (Ph.D., 1971), he is the author of ten books and several hundred published articles dealing with Israeli security matters, including APOCALYPSE: NUCLEAR CATASTROPHE IN WORLD POLITICS (University of Chicago Press, 1980), and SECURITY OR ARMAGEDDON: ISRAEL’S NUCLEAR STRATEGY(Heath/Lexington Books, 1986). Professor Beres served as Chair of Project Daniel, a private effort (2003) to counsel former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon on existential nuclear threats to Israel. In March 2013, Dr. Beres presented another major Working Paper to the annual Herzliya Conference on Israeli strategy. Professor Beres was born inZürichSwitzerland, on August 31, 1945.

www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/13075#.UVwV8Rz-Fn0

Part’s 2 & 3 herein –  www.israelnationalnews.com/Controls/SendFriend.ashx?print=1&type=1&item=13093

Learning from a master should allow one to think more clearly, at least one hopes so. This is why the following was written on December 28, 2012, re PM Netanyahu’s cartoonish “red line” – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/28/where-has-netanyahus-red-line-gone-barack-hussein-obamas-promises-too-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…with the full understanding that it was vanishing, to the point of no return.

Due to all of the above, by the start of the 2013 it was obvious that PM Netanyahu trampled on his own “red line.” No one is suggesting, least of all this investigative journalist, that this is what he intended. But in matters of grave (quite possibly existential) import, good intentions are as viable as changing minds. Worthless.

Therefore, it is with great sadness, trepidation and complete outrage that Israelis (and others) await the grim news – Jerusalem will “learn” to “contain” Iran! Indeed, Israel’s “bombs in the basement” will have to surface. And this is a direct result of western abdication, as well as Israel’s lack of statesmanship. Cause and effect.

MADNESS….שגעון !!
 

The Intersection of DHS; Heavy Armor; Russian/Eastern European TroopsTraining In Middle America & Global Governance!…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

This blog has referenced, on multiple occasions, Washington’s “wink and a nod” to global governance, even if most poohbahs  raise their eyebrows in amusement…perish the thought…acting as if said purveyor of non-truths is loony tunes and a conspiracy monger, all rolled into one. Beg to differ.

On the other hand, there are some open references to their goals- going back to President George H.W. Bush – but they are few and far between. Nevertheless, its implementation has become highly noticeable under the reign of Obama, although they still “protest too much”. Liars always feign otherwise.

Couple the above with DHS’s more than strange acquisitions/shopping sprees (adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/12/the-increasing-alarm-bells-re-mama-janets-shopping-sprees-for-billions-in-ammo-hardware-alike-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/… and pit them together with Black Hawks swirling overhead. Could they all be part of “this and that” – adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/30/black-hawk-redux-this-time-houston-miami-too-what-the-hell-is-going-on-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ – as they hoard enough ammunition for many years’ worth of heavy combat? At the same time, the military is reportedly downsizing, ostensibly due to “sequestration” and fiscal naughtiness. You got that?

Adding to the incendiary mix is the incessant push (via Executive fiat or UN putsch) to eviscerate the Constitutional right to bear arms. One must ponder: is it easier, or harder, to impose foreign forces on American citizens if they are armed, or disarmed? And where does FEMA fit in, when laying out the above mischief? Pray tell, here? – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/05/cdc-centers-for-disease-control-prevention-fema-what-are-they-up-to-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Thus, are the readers very shocked to come upon this?

‘Why Are We Training Russian Troops In The US?’

APRIL 1, 2013 BY  
Embedded videos
Are America’s treasured National Parks being co-opted by the New World Order under the guise of designating them World Heritage Sites, thus allowing foreign troops and United Nations agencies to take over our country in a soft coup d’etat? A blogger has photographed heavily equipped armored vehicles carrying the “Special Response Team” logo in and around the Great Smoky Mountains National Heritage site in Gatlinburg, TN. (1) ”It is a deadly serious piece of equipment never before used inside the US until now,” says the blogger “Sherrie” who then adds, “The vehicles don’t come more heavily armored.”

Sherrie has put up several pictures of these in-country tanks which she said she saw on and near Interstate 75 when she was traveling back roads near Winchester, Richmond, KY, and lists Rt. # 627 as an area of interest. “This spot is (around) the US Army Chemical Depot” which covers 14,000 acres in Kentucky backwoods,” the blogger says on the video which the Liberty web site is putting up for general viewing. She mentions chemical weapons involving 523 tons of nerve agents and shows aerial photography of train tracks going up to several buildings in this compound! “I’m not sure what they are,” she says, positing the notion of a possible FEMA camp in the Kentucky woods.

Now in addition to sighting of MRAP vehicles, “Sherrie” tells readers that “Russians were stopping and questioning people in the Gatlinburg, Smoky Mountain Parks region.” She quotes a high ranking individual in a local area state militia organization who she says she trusts as being truthful. The scenario developed when these apparently foreign troops wearing DHS uniforms with the Eagle insignia tried to enter Tennessee from Kentucky. “They were NOT Americans. . .appeared to be Russian or Eastern European!”

The Tennessee State Guard is being formulated as part of the 22 state Governors’ Militia Organization of volunteers which answers only to the Governors, not to the Federal government. (2) What has developed is the confiscation of equipment belong to National Guard Units nationwide. Trucks and other equipment sent to Iraq are not being replaced or returned to the states by the federal government because it is “too expensive” to transport the vehicles and equipment back into the country. This has prompted 22 governors to form State Militia Units paid for by the states and thus kept out of the reach of the federal government. (2)

Has the Division of Homeland Security partnered with the United Nations One World military apparatus with a sleight of hand operation known as World Heritage Site designation? The observant blogger lists these US treasures also as being so designated: Statue of Liberty, Everglades, Mammoth Cave, Yellowstone, Yosemite, all former National Parks. Folks, this designation and UN involvement coincides with the ten region DHS map of the United States! Has this under-the-radar give away of America already taken place, thus allowing the constitutionally prohibited onus of foreign troops being stationed on American soil? What is your Congress doing about this?

World Heritage Sites Link Here:

www.westernjournalism.com/are-world-heritage-sites-being-used-to-train-russian-troops-in-the-us/

You gotta understand, this American-Israeli has written about a certain friendship with “good ole boys”, you know, the guys who live within Kentucky, Tennessee and surrounding areas. Yes, “these boys” – referenced in an upcoming quote, found within the commentary linked below, and alluded to in the (latest) news of Russian/Eastern European troops training in mid America – “You know what? I would take a chance – if still living in the U.S. – placing my fate alongside the “bitter clingers”, aka the “lock and load” crowd, hands down. Not being able to go into too much detail here, but when the crap could have easily hit the fan, some “good ole boys” had my back, and they were not even armed at the time! However, it was during a dicey situation (while they were visiting Israel, hence, their firearms were left behind) that I saw/felt the strength of these guys, not only in the physical sense, but in their ability to walk tall and proud, even while in a foreign country!” – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/09/washington-very-close-to-subsuming-the-constitutional-right-to-bear-arms-straight-into-thuggish-un-arms-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-15/.

So due to all of the above, one must see the developments for what they are, even if they seem too outlandish to comprehend. And the fact that some of the most well armed (legally, for the most part) folks are part of the above “good ole boys” crowd, you have to know they will not tolerate being disarmed, or surrendering their country! Hate to be so blunt, but how many CDC coffins will they need, as linked in the above CDC/FEMA commentary?  

“FEMA clearly is fast becoming the Obama administration’s secret in-country military operations that is scaring citizens out of their wits.  A video narrated by Dale Bohannan has popped up online with photos of what first appear to be porta-potties.  But on closer inspection, the black plastic containers are what the narrator reveals to be as many as 125,000 outsized casket liners that are in no way there to service the needs of live American citizens!
Bohannan drove down a newly cut road through a soybean field in Madison, Georgia and spoke with the field’s owner, who told him the Center for Disease Control (CDC) owned these coffin liners and was leasing his land for their storage!   “These are cremation containers for multiple bodies–patent # 5,425,163–burnable, (and) generate very little pollution.  They are multi-use cremation containers,” says an unidentified commenter to this video.  Further information claims that the lids have been modified so they could be STACKED easily because “Americans can withstand the notion of many bodies being thrown into these coffins far better than they could the sight of bulldozers tossing bodies in big holes as was seen after the large tsunami overseas.”

As any Boy/Girl Scout is taught: Be Prepared!!

Adina Kutnicki’s Book Review, Featured At American Thinker: BRINGING DOWN AMERICA: An FBI Informer with the Weathermen, written by Larry Grathwohl and Frank Reagan (Updated 2013 Edition)

Originally published at – American Thinker –http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/bringing_down_america_a_review.html

Bringing Down America: A Review

By Adina Kutnicki

BRINGING DOWN AMERICA: An FBI Informant with the Weathermen, by Larry Grathwohl and Frank Reagan, originally published in 1976, is being reintroduced in 2013. Its introduction is written by Dr. Tina Trent sorosfiles.com/soros/author/tina_trent.

During a dangerously volatile period of domestic terrorism, young anarchists were plotting the upending of America. In the vanguard stood the Weather Underground and the Black Panthers. Implanted in 1969 in the heart of a revolutionary movement, Larry Grathwohl, a 22-year-old Vietnam vet, found himself acting as an FBI informant. Inserted into the Weather Underground organization under deep cover, he became privy to their terror plots as well as the leadership’s “reasoning”. It is this facet which still resonates today. BRINGING DOWN AMERICA is a gripping tale of plots and subplots, each one aimed at “the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie [and] the establishment of the dictatorship of the proletariat”, as Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, and Jeff Jones exhorted in their 1974 manifesto, “Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism.” The subtext of this gripping memoir is brought to the fore in Chapter 14: The Cover Is Blown:

“Once in the van we drove around the city… while we were driving Maynard & Green (my FBI handlers) began telling me about the mystery man waiting for me. He was an Arab guerrilla. My meeting was to be in strict confidence. They refused to tell me why he was in the country, how he got in, obviously he was working for the U.S….”

The implication was very clear. The FBI understood that the Weathermen were deepening their foreign ties. It was inevitable that Arab terror contacts would be made. Thus, Ali Baba, an Arab informant, was sending a warning to Larry: having him as a “go-between” would mitigate any hesitation to cooperate with the Weathermen, in effect, keeping the FBI one step ahead.

Not only that, Ali Baba issued other warnings to Larry: “the Arabs plan to strike at the next Olympic games in 1972 [reviewer’s note: and they made good on their threat] and there is talk of doing something at the World’s Fair in Spokane in 1974.”

For the record, El (Al) Fatah was the referenced Arab guerrilla group. Yes, the very same terror outfit spawned by the godfather of suicide terror, “Chairman” Yasir Arafat, a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize. In tandem, the Weathermen conspired with the KGB and attendant communist regimes. The war being waged against the U.S. by the radical left and Islamist jihadis is premised on the U.S. as the Western spear and Israel as its twin “imperialistic” cousin. It has been playing out for decades, in one form or another. Nothing has changed other than the fact that many escaped justice and are entering their senior years. Despite their advancing age, they are as dangerous as ever — perhaps more so. Bill Ayers, the foremost leader of the Weathermen “is in his third decade as a national leader in the movement to radicalize the educational training of schoolteachers”. His wife, Bernardine Dohrn, a top leader too “is a professor of law at Northwestern and a high-ranking officer in the American Bar Association.” Eleanor Raskin (ne Stein) “is a law professor at S.U.N.Y Albany and, astonishingly, a NYS administrative law judge”. Jeff Jones “currently heads the New York-based Apollo Alliance, a highly influential coalition of labor leaders and environmentalists, and was responsible for drafting President Obama’s 2009 Recovery Act.”

The list of “respectable” cover, of other “notables” in the Weathermen, is equally impressive. Through a stringently planned operational “stealth jihad”, yesteryear’s Weathermen have returned, fully primed to carry out their original goal — the “transformation” of Amerika. Most significantly, they subvert the national interest from a distinctly dangerous vantage point. They are currently ensconced in some of the most powerful positions in academia and political life. The only difference is, this time they are dressed in “capitalist” garb, not only in their clothing choices, but in the wealth they have accumulated, paradoxically, through joining the “establishment”. Who said one can’t enrich oneself, but at the same time deny the masses/proletariat said wealth potential? Highly dangerous in their bomb-making days, their capacity to cripple America, sans firing actual weaponry is that much greater at this critical juncture in time. Deeply involved in the “transformation” process, as promised by President Obama, many of them working inside the executive branch, while others operate through progressive think tanks, they want nothing more than to distance themselves from their bloody past. Therefore, an omerta has descended from the denizens of the leftist media and their powerful organs.

So the timing of this book release couldn’t be more prescient. Although the mainstream media will surely attempt to shield the aforementioned from the facts borne out by the record, they are nothing more than “koshered” domestic terrorists.

Many westerners believe that history is behind them and therefore has no relevance to their lives. Nothing could be further removed from reality, or more deadly. In this regard, stepping back in time to the late 1960s and into the 1970s couldn’t be more imperative or instructive.

BRINGING DOWN AMERICA can be ordered as an e-book from Amazon.com or from Bringingdownamerican.com

MAJOR ALERT From “Intelligence Insider”: The POTUS’s Wrecking Ball; Purposeful Deconstruction Of The Dollar…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

It is impossible not to realize (for those who possess average intelligence) that each step the POTUS takes, appears like one step forward, two steps backward. The two step (national) hustle. 

In other words, ever since the ascent of Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s first term, America’s overall health has been going from bad to worse. To hell in a hand basket. This deterioration is playing out on both the domestic and foreign fronts. It is as if every “policy” measure is designed to implode, purposefully edging the U.S. fiscal house towards an awaited cliff. In tandem, his foreign policy disasters roll on. One would be hard pressed to find another conglomeration of advisers – hailing from the confines of the oh so “smart set” – making so many improbable prescriptive blunders, as those ensconced in Obama’s administration. (Just for the record: On the fiscal side, IF as many mistakes were made by any tax accountant, formerly employed in this American-Israeli’s previous business, they would have been given their walking papers, in short order) Yet, his surrogates are getting things wrong – over and over again – and they retain their jobs! Lucky bastards. Why is this? 

As repeatedly emphasized at this blog, the deconstruction of America is the Radical-in-Chief’s main job description, and this has been proven many times. Nevertheless, America’s wrecking ball was put in place, well before the Radical-in-Chief took over. However, its trajectory has been ratcheted up exponentially under his watch.

Moreover, this blogger’s latest op-ed, due for release this week, will target some of the relevant players; Obama’s “Weathermen” henchmen. Patience, dear readers. Keep your eyes peeled, it will be uploaded to the blog.

Specifically, detailing the purposeful deconstruction of America was not for nothing – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/07/barack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-green-wise-via-the-economy-disarming-the-citizens-via-gun-control-connecting-the-dots-addendum-to-the-second-term-plans-of-an-obama-presidency-c/…and its contents necessitated the most gargantuan ammo purchases in U.S. history. Despite their babblings…nothing to worry about…move right along…we know better. It should signal what’s coming down the pike. It is NO ordinary shopping spree – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/12/the-increasing-alarm-bells-re-mama-janets-shopping-sprees-for-billions-in-ammo-hardware-alike-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. It is one piece of the larger puzzle.

Thus, the leadership realizes that a majority of patriotic American’s won’t take their country’s destruction lying down, hence, the following “contingency” plans – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/23/signs-of-civil-war-could-lead-to-martial-law-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Evil by design. On its face.

And don’t think this blogger is led around by the nose. That’s worth a chuckle. Never gonna happen. It takes more than a nagging feeling, or a whisper in the ear, to posit the above. So, the advice coming forth is: Pay RAPT attention, another time, to “Intelligence Insider”. This is NO conspiracy theory.

‘Intelligence insider: Obama administration agenda to “kill U.S Dollar”

Is there any defensible scenario for this administration to want to “kill the dollar?”

By Douglas J. Hagmann, Northeast Intelligence Network

30 March 2013:  This week, I had a series of very sobering discussions with my highly-placed source within the intelligence world. The information he provided hit me like a proverbial tons of bricks. It connects everything we are seeing play out across the world, from the economic problems in Europe to the U.S. DHS ammunition acquisition orders and even the “gun control” debate. If you’re like me, you’re looking for clarity, context and focus with regard to all of the events we’re constantly hearing about but seem to lack legitimate explanation. I believe this report will provide the context and clarity we are all seeking, but I must warn you that the picture is not pretty.

Some might be surprised to learn that the fate of America’s economy has already been determined, verified and announced by the Obama White House. Yet, it has received scant attention from the corporate media. In 2011, economist Kyle Bass interviewed a senior member of the Obama administration about its planned solutions for fixing the US economy and trade deficit[i].The economic agenda: In plain sight

Among the questions he asked was about U.S. exports and wages, but the question itself was not nearly as important as the response he received from this senior administration official. In fact, this single, seven word response clarifies everything, explains everything, and leaves little else to discuss: “We’re just going to kill the dollar.”

There it is, the entire agenda in one short sentence. It explains everything we’ve been seeing domestically and globally. That one statement makes every other question irrelevant, or otherwise answers all economic questions and explains everything. Nothing else matters. I urge you to ponder that statement and all that it implies. Doing so will provide you with the clarity to understand not only what is taking place today, but what is yet to come.

Murder & High Treason

It is important to note the specificity of the word “kill.” Stated in the active voice, it means an unambiguously intentional and deliberate act. The murder of our national currency, the United States Dollar (USD), is the ultimate agenda to be implemented under Obama. To “kill” our national currency will subvert the United States and destroy it from within. This begs a number of questions, including what type of Americans would actually have, as their objective, the destruction of our national currency? To whom do they hold their allegiance, if not to the American people whose life’s work as well as the toil of our ancestors is represented in the form of wealth held in U.S. dollars? Does this make any sense to us, as Americans? The answer of course is “no.”

By its very definition, to kill our national currency is an act of high treason by those engaged in this activity. It undermines the very sovereignty and survival of our nation, and will have a life-changing impact on every citizen in the U.S. It will also impact every nation and the people of every nation on the planet, as the USD is presently the world’s reserve currency. It is an act that should result in the filing of criminal charges against the conspirators, a trial of their peers and if convicted, a death sentence. It’s that serious.

According to my source, we are past the point of no return. We will not be able to stop what is coming, but must be wise enough to prepare and “get out of the way.” The murder plot involving the death of the dollar did not begin with Obama, but he and other conspirators have accelerated the plans, plots and schemes for its demise.

The ultimate objective

The ultimate objective is to implement an international currency in tandem with a system of global governance. The problem is that most people are not thinking large enough, nor do they understand the magnitude of the lie. They are not seeing the larger picture as their focus is diverted elsewhere. For example, they focus on various tentacles of the octopus such as the gun confiscation initiative, the DHS armament acquisitions and economic woes as independent and unrelated events. They are not.

Meanwhile, others continue to adhere to, or even perpetuate the dual party meme of governance, holding dearly to the notion that there is a practical difference between the Republican and Democrat parties. Have we not seen sufficient evidence that they are now of one party acting in concert with each other? They cannot see the collusion and backroom deals, and continue to hope that the next election will finally change the unchangeable continuity of agenda.

Most of the elected officials are onboard with the subjugation of the United States to a global system of governance. Some are actively facilitating this agenda, while others are making nominal objections on the stage of political theater while hoping to earn a seat at the global table. It’s entertainment for the globalists, distraction of the masses, and diversionary fodder for the talking heads in the media.

America has become a captured operation – captured from within. Think of the Vichy French, internal collaboration with the enemy, or softening the ground for a full takeover from within. The takeover of America has already happened, the collaborators have already been installed, and we are now on a path to complete subjugation of a larger global system of governance. If you continue to doubt this, how else would you explain the numerous examples of our dual-party governmental acquiescence of self destruction?

“Signs, signs, everywhere signs…”

Those who are pleased about the new record setting stock-market highs and various other manipulated statistics that indicate our economy is improving will be the most vocal critics of this report and who will attempt to discredit the validity of the information offered here. The more intellectually astute will look beyond the statistics offered for mass consumption not only to identify the deliberately manipulated data, but to understand what is actually driving these false hopes, figures and data. It is a magic show, and many are still captivated by the magicians’ many diversions, failing to realize that we are engaged in a global war while being simultaneously hobbled by enemy infiltrators from within.

One reason we are seeing new stock market highs is the rush to the dollar from other currencies, especially in the Eurozone. Another reason is the monetization of our debt by the Federal Reserve, despite the previous denials of Ben Bernanke and others.

Simply put, the plan by the globalists, or the central bankers and those behind them, is to create this rush to the USD like passengers from sinking ships to lifeboats. Once the lifeboats are filled to capacity, they will be sunk, and the United States Dollar will be completely worthless. As in such a scenario, many will not make it. Many will die from what is coming. The level of evil behind this plan is incomprehensible to the normal human mind.

Russia, China, Syria and Iran

As I detailed in my multiple reports about Benghazi, we are at war with Russia. After removing Qaddafi from power in Libya, the Obama-Clinton black-ops plan was immediately put into action. Benghazi was the logistics hub for arming the anti-Assad terrorists by our own State Department covert operatives who were shipping millions of tons of weapons to Syria via Turkey and other staging areas. Russia was aware of our actions, and through the attack at the CIA operations center in Benghazi by proxy forces, exposed this operation to the world while putting a stop to this operation. It seems that everyone except the Western media reported what had taken place.

The “dirty little secret” that explains why we have not been told the truth about Benghazi is quite simple. The efforts to overthrow Assad from power are continuing, except the arms and munitions shipments are now originating primarily from Croatia. Overthrowing Assad would pose a direct threat to Russia, both militarily and economically. Are we to expect Russia’s Putin to simply accept this without response? No. So what is Russia doing to subvert our efforts? He is waging war against America, striking at the weak underbelly of our economy which is the “oil backed” dollar as identified in Michael Reagan’s articleBuilding on a Kernel of Truth.

Sadly, the Obama regime is doing nothing to protect us from this asymmetrical war. It’s as if they are allowing it to take place.

Although it was reported in The New York Times, few have paid attention to last week’s meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow, but it was an extremely important event in terms of the planned murder of the U.S. dollar. An alliance is being forged between Russia and China to replace the USD as the reserve currency, already severely weakened by the policies of those in power, with a gold backed currency. Russia and China are hoarding gold to levels never before seen, while the U.S. issues worthless paper and digital currency backed by… nothing, save for the “oil-backed” scenario.

While reports do exist that cite the hoarding of gold by China and Russia, they are purposely under reporting their collective reserves. Meanwhile, Americans can’t even get honest answers to the amounts of our own gold reserves held in Fort Knox or the Federal Reserve. Don’t people find this reluctance for audit and inspection a bit curious if not outright suspicious?

The battle is being waged not only by military might but by a currency war. We are “being played” through our military involvement in the Middle East, including our covert operations against Syria at the behest of Saudi Arabia. Unlike Iraq, the war in Syria will explode, turn hot, and we will be engaged in an ominous battle that will quickly expand and turn deadly. Weakened militarily through the policies of the Obama regime, coupled with an already weakened economy, the U.S. will suffer consequences unlike anyone might imagine or is willing to address. It is a recipe for disaster planned and initiated by the global elite behind the central banking system, including those in our own government. We have been set up from within, lied to, and now, we are about to see exactly what this globalist system has in store for not only the United States, but every nation of the world.

It is critical to understand that the take-down of the U.S. will be the result of an asymmetrical war that includes the weakening of our military, our economy, and a direct assault on our ability to keep the dollar as the world reserve currency and protect the free flow of oil and energy to the United States.

Within the last week, China held a surprise naval exercise in the South China Sea. Meanwhile, Russia displayed their resurgent military night in the Black Sea. These exercises were conducted as U.S. military forces are spread thinly across many areas in the world. Is anyone paying attention here?

Just as certain a collapse of the dollar is coming, so will be chaos on the streets of America caused by this plan “to kill the dollar.” The central bankers and the leaders selected to govern each country have effectively used the Hegelian Dialectic[ii] to implement their agenda. Just as stated by George H.W. Bush on September 11, 1990, their predetermined solution of a “New World Order” is being formed before our very eyes. They’ve told us what they are doing, but we have chosen not to listen or failed to understand what was being said.

The U.S. has always been the firewall against the globalists. By their persistence, infiltration of global elitists into our government, and covert subversion from within, we are being led to slaughter. A view from space, looking at the larger picture of events for which many have questions, a clearer picture emerges. There will be some who dare to resist the pillaging of our bank accounts, the erosion of our rights, and the enslavement that comes with the dismantling of America.

The dust clouds visible on the far horizon that watchmen have been reporting for decades can now be seen as an attacking army of barbarians, whose fighters are now on the ladders and cannons are breaching our empire’s outer walls. Who knows how long the inner walls of our empire will survive the next wave of their coming attack.

Perhaps Ernest Hemmingway said it best in referencing John Donne from his novel of the same name… “And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; It tolls for thee.”

 www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/8046

The main caveat standing between the U.S. as a super power, and its reduced status as a basket case, is a fiscal implosion. This does not take a genius to figure out, but its basis entails brass tacks realism and a modicum of awareness of facts on the ground, plus a good understanding of history. Basically, without a successful capitalist engine, what else will be left to steer the ship of state? And this is precisely the jugular which a determined, radical, revolutionary socialist (and henchmen) must aim for.

Mission (almost) complete. But if readers still have their doubts, regarding all the banking/hacking “anomalies”, see this – www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/8041. And view Cyprus as a “test case”, as the leaders pulled off a national heist, one which would have landed regular folks behind bars, never to see the light of day. The infamous Mafioso appear like amateurs, juxtaposed against Cyprus’s leadership, egged on by Eurocrats, as they looted citizens’ wealth. 

Still believe your bank accounts (liberties/freedoms) are safe? If not, make sure that you have your “ducks in a row”, so to speak – adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/17/when-the-u-s-house-collapses-how-prepared-will-americans-others-be-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

From one patriot to another: Wrap your G-d given brains around the treachery. Be prepared!