BENGHAZIGATE’S Continual Liars…& When Does Perjury Become A (Legal & Moral) Factor? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

One needn’t be endowed with a super intellect to discern when “the fish stinks from the head up”. And there are several chief culprits whose sewage is smellier, than any normal non-Pinnochio-like nose can bear. A suffocating stench.

As to the liar at hand, she has been known to play, so to speak, in the shadows. But when her skeletons are rattling too loudly, ready to fall into full view, she resorts to amnesia-tic tactics. Now, if one is operating as a private person, ones personal secrets are nobody’s business. Couldn’t care less. But when said individual is in a top leadership position, “no can do”. Truthfulness is the only acceptable course, and if not, it must be pried from its lock box. By hook or by crook, for the greater good demands as much.

Just as a replay, the aforementioned player has been knee deep in the muck, and the following are just a sampling, but no less indicting:

Indictment Number One: Front and center lies directives to the survivors’ of the onslaught: keep your traps shut – . Leading rational folks to wonder: why the hush-hush?

Indictment Number Two: As Benghazigate unravels, others attempt to piece together the threads…stitch by stitch –

Indictment Number Three: Most intriguingly, CIA’s Panetta dropped some bomblets before his departure – just have to recognize them for what they are.

Indictment Number Four: Its continual carnage keeps cropping to the fore, despite all their best efforts –

Indictment Number Five: The lies are so outrageous, even a Four Star Admiral jumps in –….and the indictment goes on…seek and you shall be horrified!

The following is a rhetorical question:


New reports may contradict former secretary’s sworn testimony

Published: March 28, 2013


TEL AVIV – Did former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton commit perjury when she claimed in a Senate hearing that she did not know whether the U.S. mission in Libya was procuring or transferring weapons to Turkey and other Arab countries?

The goal of the alleged weapons shipments was to arm the rebels fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

Any training or arming of the Syrian rebels would be considered highly controversial. A major issue is the inclusion of jihadists, including al-Qaida, among the ranks of the Free Syrian Army and other Syrian opposition groups

During the recent hearings over the Obama administration’s handling of the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on U.S. facilities in Benghazi, Clinton was directly asked about alleged U.S. weapons shipments out of Libya.

Clinton claimed she did not know whether the U.S. was aiding Turkey and other Arab countries in procuring weapons.

The exchange took place with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.

Paul asked Clinton: “Is the U. S. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya?”

“To Turkey?” Clinton asked. “I will have to take that question for the record. Nobody has ever raised that with me.”

Continued Paul: “It’s been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that may have weapons, and what I’d like to know is the annex that was close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons, and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries, any countries, Turkey included?”

Clinton replied, “Well, Senator, you’ll have to direct that question to the agency that ran the annex. I will see what information is available.”

“You’re saying you don’t know?” asked Paul.

“I do not know,” Clinton said. “I don’t have any information on that.”

Clinton’s claims seem to now be unraveling.

Confirming WND’s exclusive reporting for over a year, the New York Times earlier this week reported that since early 2012, the CIA has been aiding Arab governments and Turkey in obtaining and shipping weapons to the Syrian rebels.

Middle Eastern security officials speaking to WND have said U.S.-aided weapons shipments go back more than a year, escalating before the Sept. 11, 2012, attack on the U.S. facilities in Benghazi.

In fact, the Middle Eastern security officials speaking to WND since last year describe the U.S. mission in Benghazi and nearby CIA annex attacked last September as an intelligence and planning center for U.S. aid to the rebels in the Middle East, particularly those fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.

The aid, the sources stated, included weapons shipments and was being coordinated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

The specifics of the New York Times reporting, meanwhile, open major holes in Clinton’s sworn claims to be in the dark about the alleged weapons shipments.

U.S. officials speaking on condition of anonymity told the Times that American intelligence officers have helped the Arab governments shop for weapons and then helped to vet rebel commanders and groups to determine who should receive the weapons as they arrive.

The plan mirrors one the Times reported last month in a separate article that was proposed by Clinton herself. The Times described Clinton as one of the driving forces advocating for arming the Syrian rebels.

Last month, the New York Times reported Clinton and then-CIA Director David Petraeus had concocted a plan calling for vetting rebels and arming Syrian fighters with the assistance of Arab countries.

The Times report from earlier this week of U.S. arms shipments and vetting seems to be the Clinton-Petraeus plan put in action.

It may be difficult for most to believe the secretary of state was not aware that her alleged plan was being implemented, especially when arming the Syrian rebels is a serious policy with obvious major repercussions internationally.

Clinton is not the only one in hot water.

As WND reported yesterday, the New York Times report threatens the longstanding White House narrative that claims the Obama administration has only supplied nonlethal aid to the rebels.

The White House has repeatedly denied directly arming the rebels.

Recruiting jihadists

Days after the Benghazi attack that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, WND broke the story that Stevens himself played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Assad’s regime in Syria, according to Egyptian and other Middle Eastern security officials.

Stevens served as a key contact with the Saudis to coordinate the recruitment by Saudi Arabia of Islamic fighters from North Africa and Libya. The jihadists were sent to Syria via Turkey to attack Assad’s forces, said the security officials.

The officials said Stevens also worked with the Saudis to send names of potential jihadi recruits to U.S. security organizations for review. Names found to be directly involved in previous attacks against the U.S., including in Iraq and Afghanistan, were ultimately not recruited by the Saudis to fight in Syria, said the officials.

The latest New York Times report has bolstered WND’s reporting, citing air traffic data, interviews with officials in several countries and the accounts of rebel commanders describing how the CIA has been working with Arab governments and Turkey to sharply increase arms shipments to Syrian rebels in recent months.

The Times reported that the weapons airlifts began on a small scale in early 2012 and continued intermittently through last fall, expanding into a steady and much heavier flow late last year, the data shows.

The Times further revealed that from offices at “secret locations,” American intelligence officers have helped the Arab governments shop for weapons, including a large procurement from Croatia. They have vetted rebel commanders and groups to determine who should receive the weapons as they arrive.

The CIA declined to comment to the Times on the shipments or its role in them.

The Times quoted a former American official as saying that David H. Petraeus, the CIA director until November, had been instrumental in helping set up an aviation network to fly in the weapons. The paper said Petraeus had prodded various countries to work together on the plan.

Petraeus did not return multiple emails from the Times asking for comment.

Both WND’s reporting, which first revealed the U.S.-coordinated arms shipments, and the Times reporting starkly contrast with statements from top U.S. officials who have denied aiding the supply of weapons to the rebels.

Rebel training

It’s not the first time WND’s original investigative reporting on U.S. support for the Syrian rebels was later confirmed by reporting in major media outlets. Other WND reporting indicates support for the Syrian rebels that goes beyond supplying arms, painting a larger picture of U.S. involvement in the Middle East revolutions.

A story by the German weekly Der Spiegel earlier this month reporting the U.S. is training Syrian rebels in Jordan was exclusively exposed by WND 13 months ago.

Quoting what it said were training participants and organizers, Der Spiegel reported it was not clear whether the Americans worked for private firms or were with the U.S. Army, but the magazine said some organizers wore uniforms.

The training in Jordan reportedly focused on use of anti-tank weaponry.

The German magazine reported some 200 men received the training over the previous three months amid U.S. plans to train a total of 1,200 members of the Free Syrian Army in two camps in the south and the east of Jordan.

Britain’s Guardian newspaper also reported U.S. trainers were aiding Syrian rebels in Jordan along with British and French instructors.

Reuters reported a spokesman for the U.S. Defense Department declined immediate comment on the Der Spiegel report. The French foreign ministry and Britain’s foreign and defense ministries also would not comment to Reuters.

While Der Spiegel quoted sources discussing training of the rebels in Jordan over the last three months, WND was first to report the training as far back as February 2012.

At the time, WND quoted knowledgeable Egyptian and Arab security officials claimed the U.S., Turkey and Jordan were running a training base for the Syrian rebels in the Jordanian town of Safawi in the country’s northern desert region.

Are the survivors hiding in “plain sight”? VERY likely –

In line with the above, not a word has been hinted about the real assassins, those same jihadis affiliated with Al Qaeda, who happen to be of Egyptian origin. Yes, THOSE Egyptians, the ones who have become the Islamist-in-Chief’s preferred Mid East pets. Yes, they are all offshoots of Egypt’s Brotherhood Mafia! Uncomfortable truths dare not be disturbed/rattled. Once again, the skeletons. 

‘Same Al Qaeda Gang led by “The Egyptian” Hit US Ambassador in Benghazi and Western Hostages in Algeria’ – DEBKAfile Intelligence
Abdelaziz Bouteflika

A personal president-to-president report from Algeria’sAbdelaziz Bouteflika to Barack Obama in early February contained evidence that an Al Qaeda unit commanded by “the Egyptian” (unnamed) murdered US AmbassadorChrist Stevens and three staffers in Benghazi last September, and that the same gang, under the same command, also carried out the Algerian In Amenas gas field siege in early January.
Three weeks after the Benghazi attack, DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s intelligence sources reported that the CIA and FBI were hunting for the perpetrators of theBenghazi assault in the wrong places, in Tunisia and Mali. The key was in Egypt.
The investigation into the terrorist hostage siege at the Algerian gas field is still ongoing to discover how 38 Western workers came to die and the fate of many other hostages who are still missing.
But meanwhile, the Algerian president’s exposure of the Egyptian angle and other common factors between the two outrages hit Washington like a bolt from the blue.
DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s intelligence and counterterrorism sources have obtained access to the Bouteflika report and disclose eleven of its eye-opening revelations….The Obama administration is keenly interested in playing down the discovery that the Benghazi and In Amenas outrages were the work of the same Egyptian-led al Qaeda band, DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s intelligence and counterterrorism sources report.”

Of course, the buck does stop with the Liar-in-Chief, but this does not obviate, nor mitigate, the culpability of his surrogates. Not at all.

Hillary, are you listening… feigned ignorance is NEVER a criminal defense, regardless of the suspect’s weaving, bobbing and dogging. Come on now, you’re a Yalie law grad, and an important leader of the free world. Know when to ‘fess up.

If not, it is up to each of us to nudge the process along. Faster…faster!

UPDATE: Obama Inc. is feeling the heat via special ops forces, as they are demanding Congress form a select committee to investigate Benghazigate –…most rational folks wouldn’t want to incur their wrath….

7 thoughts on “BENGHAZIGATE’S Continual Liars…& When Does Perjury Become A (Legal & Moral) Factor? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

  1. Pingback: “Solving” Benghazigate Via Its Underlying Calculus Will Illuminate Boston’s Jihad…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  2. Pingback: The Mid East Firestorm Primed To Explode…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

  3. Pingback: Benghazigate’s (ISIS) Skeletons Creep To The Fore:Obama Inc.’s Treasonous Liability…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s