Obama Inc’s “Gun Control” Fetish & Its Trap (Back) Doors…Commentary Adina Kutnicki

Leftist brayers love to target Constitutional Conservatives (particularly in relation to their “clinging” to the Second Amendment, yes, which gives citizens a right to bear arms!) as “knuckle-draggers”, “bitter clingers”, “mentally challenged” and a host of negative-infused attributes. In fact, if it was up to them we would all be carted off to mental institutions, or worse. Never mind the fact that our positions are, for the most part, backed up by the “law of the land”. However, in a leftist’s mind-trap laws are “progressive” and malleable, even as they dare call the Constitution “living and breathing”, whatever the hell that entails. Though currently living in Israel it is still deeply offensive to watch their wrecking balls.

Along this trajectory of thinking the following was written, duly noted, and its basis served as an initial wake up call. And as a matter of record, this blog pointed out the assault lines being set up, mostly to usher in gun control. Specifically, back in Aug. 2012 the markers were set, laying out the Radical-in-Chief’s second term plans, and chiefly designed to disarm Americans. Most significantly, a disarmed citizenry is a pliable one – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/19/shoring-up-barack-hussein-obamas-second-term-plans-addendum-tobarack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-green-wise-via-the-economy-disarming-the-citizens-via-gun-control-commentary-by-ad/. Easy as pie.

But not to be lost in the discussion are the beneficiaries of a gun-free populace; Sharia Law advocates in concert with their leftist  abettors – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/02/explosive-dhs-insider-reveals-congressman-louie-gohmert-too-disarming-americans-gun-control-empowers-the-redgreen-alliancesharia-law-its-beneficiary-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Ominously, CDC & FEMA have been co-opted, you know, the same addresses set up to aid victims of disasters, but this time they are the disasters-in-the-making –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/05/cdc-centers-for-disease-control-prevention-fema-what-are-they-up-to-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Along this anti-American push lies DHS – headed by “mama Janet”- and she has been busy with inexplicable shopping jaunts – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/12/the-increasing-alarm-bells-re-mama-janets-shopping-sprees-for-billions-in-ammo-hardware-alike-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

And on Obama Inc’s path one also finds all manner of bread crumbs, as they lead into the arms of the thuggish U.N. – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/28/obama-crew-march-in-lock-step-with-un-thugs-chiefly-to-disarm-americans-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Back to the opening thesis, regarding the “mental health” of American gun owners, one can find these initial goodies, deeply burrowed within Obamacare – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/18/obamas-march-towards-gun-control-runs-through-obamacare-via-its-definition-of-mentally-ill-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

As such, almost on cue, here is the left’s latest “mental health” confiscation/assessment:

‘A FORM OF GUN CONFISCATION HAS REPORTEDLY BEGUN IN NEW YORK STATE — HERE’S THE JUSTIFICATION BEING USED’ – embedded videos – The Blaze

Apr. 9, 2013  

Update: Hear an interview with the lawyer representing some of  the New Yorkers who were forced to surrender their guns and permits (at the end of this story).

Despite promises from the president and a host of other politicians who are pushing for more gun control that nobody is coming for your guns, the confiscation of guns and gun permits has apparently started in some form in New York State. One attorney representing several people who have been forced to surrender their guns spoke with TheBlaze and alerted us to some disturbing facts:

  • Gun owners are losing their 2nd Amendment rights without due process.
  • HIPAA Laws are likely being compromised and the 4th and 5th Amendments are being violated in some of these cases

How did confiscation start happening so quickly? Apparently the gun grabbing was triggered by something inside the NY SAFE Act — New York’s new gun law — that has a provision apparently mandating confiscation of weapons and permits if someone has been prescribed psychotropic drugs.

This is curious because in his January 9th address, Cuomo specifically addressed the issue of confiscation:

The Case:

On April 1st, a legal gun owner in upstate New York reportedly received an official notice from the state ordering him to surrender any and all weapons to his local police department. The note said that the person’s permit to own a gun in New York was being suspended as well. The gun owner contacted attorney Jim Tresmond (a specialist in gun laws in New York) and the two visited the local police precinct.

Mr. Tresmond reportedly went into the precinct and informed the officers that his client, waiting in the parking lot, was coming in to voluntarily surrender his weapons as requested. The local police were aware of the letter because they had already been contacted by the State Police. Apparently, if people do not respond to the initial mailing, local law enforcement is authorized to visit the gun owner at their home and demand the surrender of the firearms. In this case, the gun owner followed the request as written. The guns and permits were handed over and a receipt given to the client.

After the guns were turned over, a request for a local hearing was filed and the gun owner is expecting to have his Second Amendment rights restored. But there is more to this story.

In our conversation with lawyer Jim Tresmond, we learned that this client, who has never had a problem with the law — no criminal record and or violent incidents on record — did have a temporary, short term health issue that required medication. But how were his client’s private medical information accessed by the government? This appears to be a violation of HIPAA and Health Information Privacy policies at HHS.gov. If it is declared a violation, this becomes a civil rights issue.

Some claim that a broad interpretation of this statement from HIPAA might allow the government to have instant access to the medical records and gun ownership records of anyone who is prescribed psychotropic drugs.

A major goal of the Privacy Rule is to assure that individuals’ health information is properly protected while allowing the flow of health information needed to provide and promote high quality health care and to protect the public’s health and well being.

That short phrase, “protect the public’s health and well being” is probably going to be cited as the reason governments can require notification of any gun owner who is prescribed a class of drugs used to treat Depression and Anxiety known as SSRI ( Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors).

The Mental Health Law provision of the SAFE Act claims

The NY SAFE Act is designed to remove firearms from those who seek to do harm to themselves or others. This means keeping the minority of individuals with serious mental illness who may be dangerous away from access to firearms. This law should not dissuade any individual from seeking mental health services they need.

The law is clear on what it expects:

MHL 9.46 requires mental health professionals to report to their local director of community services (“DCS”) or his/her designees when, in their reasonable professional judgment, one of their patients is “likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others.”

The man who was asked/directed to turn over his guns reportedly did not exhibit any signs of violent or dangerous behavior. According to his attorney, the man’s doctor did not report any danger to the authorities. So, who did report it?

Also known as MHL 9.46, the law talks about who is supposed to report on mental health risks and which patients qualify:

  • The reporting requirement extends to “mental health professionals,” defined in the law as four professions – physicians (including psychiatrists), psychologists, registered nurses, or licensed clinical social workers.

In addition to what Mr. Tresmond called “the laughable diminution of our rights,” the lawyer speculated about additional unintended consequences of releasing this confidential patient information to law enforcement.

  • What if an employer learns that a worker had their firearms confiscated? Could that person’s employment be put at risk?
  • What if your neighbors saw police come to your home and leave with your guns? Could that compromise your safety?
  • Could this kind of confiscation also make people think twice about getting treatment for a temporary mental illness?

In an effort to learn how many permits and guns have been rescinded due to this medical exception, TheBlaze has made several attempts to contact the Erie County office over pistol permits where this one incident originated. We have yet to be connected with a real person who can answer these questions.

We have also reached out to the Albany office of the New York State Police, but no official response has been received.

Mr. Tresmond has also agreed to keep us posted on his client’s efforts to have his Second Amendment rights restored and get back his guns.

TheBlaze will continue to monitor this story and we are also interested in hearing from other New Yorkers who may have experienced this type of confiscation. Please send all emails to mopelka@TheBlaze.com.

Tuesday, Buffalo radio talk show host Tom Bauerle spoke with Jim Tresmond on WBEN radio.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/04/09/a-form-of-gun-confiscation-has-reportedly-begun-in-new-york-state-heres-the-justification-being-used/

Most mendaciously, the left’s position on mental health issues has more than exacerbated shooting sprees by truly mentally ill folks, people who require hospitalization for their afflictions, in tandem with requisite professional follow up. But never mind…an individual’s glaring mental health issue is not even on their radar, nor is the safety of the general public.

For if the above was not the absolute truth, then how do they account for the following, which leads directly back to leftist (policy) machinations: their abject refusal to allow involuntary commitment for those who are (more than likely) in danger of lashing out with horrific mass (shootings are the “norm”, but other forms of carnage are used as well) violence- http://www.humanevents.com/2013/04/10/coulter-liberals-go-crazy-for-the-mentally-ill/http://www.claytoncramer.com/speeches/mental.htm. Yes, the above are the absolute results of leftist interference, in the mismanagement of dangerously mentally ill individuals who often end up stalking the streets, evidenced within this report – http://www.sacbee.com/2013/04/14/5340078/nevada-buses-hundreds-of-mentally.html. While some are homeless, others live within family units. 

NEVERTHELESS, despite all the resultant evidence from leftist malfeasance, they brazenly violate the rights of citizens who  hardly qualify as mentally ill, yet at some point in their lives used anti-anxiety (or a similar derivative) medication to cope better with life’s unexpected curve balls. Alas, they are the citizens who must be disarmed – for the health of the community! You got that.

Not only have they failed to allow for involuntary commitment of the truly deranged, but they have trampled upon the privacy rights of basically healthy citizens (sans any run-ins with the law, or exhibiting any threatening behavior) by violating their medical files.  Sick and twisted. Illegal too.

So if anyone can still state – with a straight face – that gun control is about anything less than Obama Inc’s gunning for total control, then they are truly the ones in need of mental health meds! Commitment too.

Lastly, if anyone expects the Repubs to come to their rescue, as protector’s of their Constitutional rights, think again…even though some are more vocal in their opposition – http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/fierce-opposition-to-gun-control-compromise/. The Radical-in-Chief, as always, will be able to twist their arms, even as they feign “compromise”. To be sure, there is no middle ground when it comes to ones liberties. Once they are given up they are gone. Poof…up in billowing smoke.

Gun Control Madness & Its After Shocks…Directly Related To Students & Gun Stores Too…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

A recurrent blog theme deals with leftist madness, particularly as it impinges on the kiddies. And this is no small matter, whether they are 6 years old or 16.

Specifically, does it make sense to trust leaders who task domestic terrorists (as well as a man-boy devotee, designated as the “safe school’s czar”) to oversee the nation’s education curriculum, with anything, least of all ones children?- adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/25/domestic-terrorist-bill-ayers-educator-too-exhorts-control-over-the-kiddies-addendum-to-first-they-came-for-the-kiddies-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. If the answer is a resounding negative, then surely the infected school system is rotten to its core.  

As as upshot, when it comes to gun control the left is out of control. Simple as that – adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/03/leftists-go-postal-over-gun-control-threatening-to-kill-legal-gun-owners-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…as they keep marching toward’s disarming legal gun owners – www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/05/missouri-dept-of-revenue-compiling-data-on-concealed-carry-holders-and-forwarding-it-to-company-with-ties-to-government-lawsuit-alleges/.

Even more so, since the same leftist (mis)educators are in league with radical Demsters, has anyone bothered to ask them: Why was ObamaCare rammed through in the first place, even though a majority of Americans were up in arms? – adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/18/obamas-march-towards-gun-control-runs-through-obamacare-via-its-definition-of-mentally-ill-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Which leads right back to the abysmal lack of judgment, emanating from those who educate America’s children!

‘HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT DISARMS GUNMAN…GETS SUSPENDED?’

Mar. 2, 2013

A Florida high school student wrestled a loaded gun away from another teen on the bus ride home this week and was slapped with a suspension in return.

The 16-year-old Cypress Lake High student in Fort Myers, Fla. told WFTX-TV there was “no doubt” he saved a life after grappling for the loaded .22 caliber revolver being aimed point-blank at another student on Tuesday.

“I think he was really going to shoot him right then and there,” said the suspended student, not identified by WFTX because of safety concerns. “Not taking no pity.”

The student said the suspect, a football player, threatened to shoot a teammate because he had been arguing with his friend.

Authorities confirmed to WFTX the weapon was indeed loaded, and the arrest report stated the suspect, identified by WVZN-TV as Quadryle Davis, was “pointing the gun directly” at the other student and “threatening to shoot him.”

That’s when, the teen told the station, he and two others tackled the suspect and wrestled the gun away. The next day, all three were suspended.

“How they going to suspend me for doing the right thing?” he asked.

The school’s referral slip said he was given an “emergency suspension” for being involved in an “incident” with a weapon. Lee County School District spokesman Alberto Rodriguez said in a statement that “If there is a potentially dangerous situation, Florida law allows the principal to suspend a student immediately pending a hearing.”

“Those kids had to fight for their lives,” the mother of the suspended teen said. “All the kids that was involved in this they should have a pat on their backs because they did the right thing to save someone from burying their child.”

The suspended teen is allowed to go back to school Monday.

Meanwhile, the student accused of pointing the weapon has been charged only with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon “without intent” to kill.

The sheriff’s office said the investigation is ongoing and that the charges are “based on our findings at this time.”

www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/02/high-school-student-disarms-gunman-gets-suspended/

Yet as worrisome as the above is, there is some good news, at least coming from those who refuse to be cowed and bowed. 

‘NEW WEAPON OF DEMOCRACY’ – World Net Daily

High-capacity gun magazines airlifted to ‘freedom-loving’ Americans

A gun-magazine company in Boulder, Colo., has announced a campaign based on the Berlin Airlift to help Coloradoans “trapped inside occupied territory” to purchase large-capacity magazines before the Legislature passes a series of gun-control bills next week.

Magpul Industries manufactures magazines and other gun accessories for private, law-enforcement and military use. WND recently reported on how the company may be forced to relocate if the Democrat-controlled Legislature moves forward with plans to ban high capacity magazines, which is one of the company’s key products.

Following the president’s lead on the firearms issue, Democrats in the House passed a series of gun-control bills that the Obama administration has said would help them pass similar measures in other states.

Vice President Joe Biden “said it would send a strong message to the rest of the country that a western state had passed gun-control bills,” Tony Exhum, a Democrat lawmaker from Colorado Springs, told the Denver Post.

The series of bills included:

  • H.B. 1224, which would bans all magazines that hold more than 15 rounds.
  • H.B. 1226 would prohibit those with concealed carry permits, including off-duty police officers and former military personnel, from bringing their weapons on college campuses.
  • H.B. 1228 would force residents to pay for exercising a constitutional right by making them pay for a background check to prove they are not criminals. There is no limit on the amount the Colorado Bureau of Investigation could charge for the background check.
  • H.B. 1229 bans the private sale and transfer of firearms and institutes universal background checks and/gun registration for all Colorado gun owners.

In addition to the four house bills, on Monday the Senate Judiciary Committee will also conduct hearings on two additional bills.

  • S.B. 195 prohibits citizens in Colorado from taking online concealed carry training courses.
  • S.B. 196, which bans “assault” weapons sales in the state.

With Democrats in charge of the governorship and both state houses, the measures are expected to pass.

In anticipation of the magazine ban, Magpul has announced a project it calls the “Boulder Airlift” in its latest newsletter. The company said the project imitates the Berlin Airlift, which flew in supplies to West Berlin after the Soviets prevented the city from getting needed provisions in the days following World War II.

“Similar to the Berlin Airlift, the Boulder Airlift will bring much-needed supplies to freedom-loving residents trapped inside occupied territory,” the letter said. “While we plan to initially use FedEx or UPS instead of aerial delivery, we figure that $5 flat rate shipping will make up for any loss of ‘style points.’”

It goes on to explain the company is permitting Colorado residents to create a special account to purchase magazines prior to the ban.

“If the pending state legislation limiting sales and transfers of standard capacity magazines does pass, we will not be the only ones affected; Colorado residents’ right to purchase and transfer standard capacity magazines will be infringed in the near future,” the newsletter said. “With that in mind, we are beginning a program to help as many residents of our home state as we can, while we still can. To meet this need, we have set up a process for CO residents to purchase limited quantities of magazines from our website.”

The company is selling Colorado residents high-capacity magazines at bargain basement prices. The price for a 30-round magazine for an AR-15 is $12.95 with other magazines for MAK-90 7.62 rounds selling for $19.95. At stores, many of the same magazines are currently being sold for upwards of $50.

The company has warned lawmakers that if the magazine ban passes, they will be forced to relocate to another state.

“If we’re able to stay in Colorado and manufacture a product, but law-abiding citizens of the state were unable to purchase the product, customers around the state and the nation would boycott us for remaining here,” said Doug Smith, chief operating officer for Magpul Industries. “Staying here would hurt our business.”

Democrat Rep. Daniel Kagan said Magpul just doesn’t understand what the law says.

“Manufacturers will be able to still sell and transfer these high-capacity magazines to individuals in other states, the U.S. military and law enforcement,” Kagan told the Post. “We want [Magpul] to stay here in Colorado. It would be sad to see them leave.”

Dudley Brown, president of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and executive director of the National Association of Gun Rights, said Democrats will be engaging in political suicide if they continue with their plans to ban products produced by Magpul and strip away the rights of law-abiding gun owners.

“Gun owners are coming out of the woodwork right now to fight the battle,” Brown said. “What they are doing to us now in the legislature, we get to do to them in the next election, and we’re not going to play nice, either. We know how to play hardball, and we’re really going to play hardball this year.”

Weld County Sheriff John Cooke said he applauds Magpul’s efforts to help the state’s residents.

“I think their project is great. They recognize the unfair limitations that legislatures are putting on Colorado residents when none of the other surrounding states have a magazine ban. Magpul being a Colorado company, at least for now, is performing a great service. This is a great thing for the people of Colorado.”

Cooke said the magazine ban makes no sense, and he noted that his department has never had a situation that involved criminals using high-capacity magazines.

The sheriff has been an outspoken advocate for the Second Amendment during his time in office. Recently he declared his office had no intention to enforce any of Obama’s executive orders on gun control.

“I’m not going to help him in any way,” Cooke said. “I’m not going to enforce it because it’s unenforceable and because I don’t have the resources. The federal government doesn’t have the resources.”

Critics have said Cooke does not have the right to choose which laws to enforce; however, the sheriff brushes aside the concerns, accusing critics of having a double standard.

“Obama has refused to defend the Defense of Marriage Act. He has also chosen not to enforce our immigration laws. I find it interesting that these critics have no problem with that. Why should I be held to a different standard than the president?”

Cooke noted that the company has always been known for fair prices.

“They’ve always been really reasonable in the prices they charge. This program will help the law-abiding citizens of Colorado purchase a legal product that can help them with self-defense in these last few days before the Democrats decide to prohibit their sale.”

www.wnd.com/2013/03/new-weapon-of-democracy/

Valiant Americans, whether business owners or regular folks, take deep umbrage at the infringement of power hungry leaders, as they tread on their capitalist domain and their Second Amendment rights. The sentiment is the same: don’t DARE stomp on America’s liberties! Thus, taking care of business is the only way forward – www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6DK3XRmhJI.

Rock on!

EXPLOSIVE – “DHS Insider” Reveals…Congressman Louie Gohmert Too…Disarming Americans (Gun Control) Empowers the Red/Green Alliance;Sharia Law Its Beneficiary…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Hardly a violent person, but no nonsense too. These traits are not mutually exclusive. One can be as gentle as a lamb with those one holds dear, but fight like a tiger against those seeking to do harm. In fact, both concepts complement each other. The yin and yang.

As such, it often takes a slap (or two…or three…) upside the head, to arose the dreamy-eyed among us. All for a good cause. They are living in self imposed (mental) slumbers. Besides,they have no moral right to bring the rest of us down into the depths of their delusions, however unintentionally.

This is decidedly the case when it comes to average Americans (westerners) who are not hard core leftist devotees, but seek to take the neutral way out of an inherently life changing struggle. The “on the fence” attitude ain’t gonna fly. Like it or not, the “red/green” alliance will drag all of us along with their program (albeit kicking and screaming, or worse), via the disarming of Americans, and the empowering of their mutual anti-American forces.

Let average folks face facts: gun control is not about protecting Americans, or  their nauseating mantra – the protection of the kiddies. For heaven’s sake, disarming Americans (one gun edict after another, until the Second Amendment is shredded) will aid criminals, those who always gain access to weapons; anti-Americans, including socialists, domestic terrorists and anarchists; and most tellingly, the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, fully embedded in America and its power centers. As to protecting the innocent, never gonna happen, at least if the gun control enthusiasts get their way.

The issue is multi-faceted, but very clear in its intent, as adequately gleaned within. Yet who would imagine, that an attempt to overhaul America’s free market health care would become a (hidden) vehicle for disarming Americans – adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/18/obamas-march-towards-gun-control-runs-through-obamacare-via-its-definition-of-mentally-ill-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.  Regardless, the main players, pushing for disarming Americans, are nothing short of shock troops. They are willing to do anything to grab your (legal) guns – adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/03/leftists-go-postal-over-gun-control-threatening-to-kill-legal-gun-owners-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Hardly trustworthy sorts, especially with the safety of loved ones. NOT in this lifetime.

Yet, where does Sharia Law enthusiasts come into play, especially in connection to the revolutionary left’s all out push for gun control? Where don’t they! – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/22/what-happens-when-washington-counter-terror-officials-past-present-align-with-muslim-brotherhood-mafia-fronts-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. To make matters even more insidious, the Islamist-in-Chief is full throttle in the mix. Literally – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/13/coming-full-circle-the-planned-empowerment-of-the-muslim-mafia-aka-brotherhood-via-egypt-most-populous-arab-country-under-the-guidance-of-barack-hussein-obama-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Familial roots and all – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/11/the-islamist-in-chief-his-kenyan-wahhabi-relatives-obamas-inner-roots-addendum-to-the-ties-that-bind-the-islamist-in-chief-to-sunni-islam-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ … and the nexus is very clear.

Therefore, one of the few in Congress, who stands shoulder to shoulder with Representative Michele Bachmann, re the looming threat from Sharia Law, courtesy of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, issues this stark, dark warning:

‘Audio: Rep. Louie Gohmert suggests Gun Rights needed to protect against Sharia Law’ – embedded audio

by  on FEBRUARY 22, 2013
There are some politicians who do things that make you wonder if they’re not actively working with America’s Islamic enemies; there are a few who definitely understand the threat and are actively standing against it. Rep. Louie Gohmert is one who truly understands that threat and while on a conservative radio program, seemed to imply that Americans need to fight for the second amendment to protect – at least in part – themselves from those who want to impose Sharia law. It’s truly a shame that more politicians aren’t standing with Gohmert because there are, indeed, far too many standing against him who are either actively pushing sharia law or are doing it through dhimmitude.” shoebat.com/2013/02/22/audio-rep-louie-gohmert-suggests-gun-rights-needed-to-protect-against-sharia-law/

Here’s another example of Congress “hard at work”, and their general ineptitude, pretending that they’re doing something to keep Americans safer – www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senators-near-a-deal-on-background-checks-for-most-private-gun-sales/2013/02/23/d55e5f4a-7d0c-11e2-82e8-61a46c2cde3d_story.html . You got that?

But don’t think that the Feds are going to have the last word, at least when it comes to those who truly value their freedom – cnsnews.com/blog/gregory-gwyn-williams-jr/firearms-companies-restricting-sales-government-agencies-areas. A struggle that must happen. There is no other choice.

IF patriots require firmer evidence, as to the ensuing clash, look no further than “DHS Insider”, a trusted source of Northeast Intelligence Network. Lee Kaplan’s address too, as its Communications Director – www.homelandsecurityus.com/about/staff. And if “full circle” means anything, this blog’s connection to the above investigative journalist is rock solid – adinakutnicki.com/about/…so much so it is mentioned out of the gate.

‘Obama’s “Cyber-warriors” caught in gun control action’

Northeast Intelligence Network

“DHS Insider” information proven accurate By Douglas J. Hagmann 25 February 2013: We initially disclosed the existence of Obama’s “cyber-warriors” in an article published on 6 February 2013 under the title DHS Insider: Obama’s cyber-warriors & preparing for collapse. Today, a Texas lawmaker has reportedly caught Obama’s cyber-warriors in action, using fraudulent Twitter accounts to sway the gun control argument. According to Rep. Steve Stockman, Obama is using fictitious Twitter accounts to make it appear that there is more public support for gun control than really exists. Rep. Stockman analyzed 16 Twitter messages he received favoring Obama’s gun control initiative, finding that 10 out of the 16 were from accounts or people that don’t exist. They are fake accounts, or computer generated spambots, according to Mr. Stockman. Recent contact with my DHS insider verified that all social media is being heavily infiltrated by full-time workers under Obama’s “Cyber-Warriors for Obama” project that began on January 23, 2013, just two days after his inauguration. According to this insider, over 3,500 people are working to infiltrate various news and political sites on the internet. Their intent is to disrupt, divert topics, marginalize political opponents of Obama, and control as much public sentiment in favor of Obama as possible. “It’s a propaganda  campaign that would make Joseph Goebbels jealous. ” This is merely the start. Expect more,” stated this insider. www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/7869 …can’t stress enough to the readers…click on the Feb 6 embedded link, ‘DHS Insider: Obama’s Cyber Warriors & Preparing For Collapse’…then pass it forward!

Adding to the danger, the following report is the proof of the pudding, or the confiscation underway, evidenced in ‘See Police Confiscate Guns From Americans’ ! – www.wnd.com/2013/02/see-police-confiscate-guns-from-americans/. The video links are beyond shocking…pass them on too!

And not known to shy away from straight shooting, along comes Sarah – the Conservative rock star – Palin, mostly known for her VP run, but also for her on target usage of the phrase, “putting lipstick on a pig”. Pushing aside a stroll down electoral lane, the readers will likely be interested in her take on the regime’s plans.

The former Alaska governor and Republican vice-presidential nominee believes the federal government is “stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.”

Palin says the feds are afraid of what might happen if the sequester goes into effect.

She writes on her Facebook page: “If we are going to wet our proverbial pants over 0.3% in annual spending cuts when we’re running up trillion dollar annual deficits, then we’re done. Put a fork in us. We’re finished. We’re going to default eventually and that’s why the feds are stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.”

The sequester will trigger $85 billion in immediate cuts to federal funding and $1.2 over 10 years unless lawmakers reach a deal by Friday.

The prospect of civil unrest puts a chilling spin on an off-teleprompter remark then-candidate Barack Obama made in a Colorado campaign speech in July, 2008.

“We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded,” said candidate Obama.

Palin’s warning echoes a WND report Feb. 17 citing radio host Mark Levin’s point that federal non-military agencies have purchased enough ammunition recently not only to shoot every American five times but also engage in a prolonged, domestic war…….”

http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/palin-washington-buying-bullets-for-us/#hpPxd1EJHiTZxxjd.99

Most significantly, let’s not lose sight of Representative Gohmert’s warnings (via all the info overload), and the above is not his maiden attempt to alert fellow Americans – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/09/congressional-rep-declares-others-on-the-hill-agree-too-barack-hussein-obama-is-facilitating-an-islamic-caliphate-addendum-to/.

Yet it behooves patriots, inside and outside Washington, to SCREAM from the roof tops, as many times as it takes, to hammer the messages home. “Going for broke” describes Washington’s radical thugs, as they plan to disarm lawful Americans, just as the nation LITERALLY goes broke!

Choice verbiage often serves as a visual aid, thereby, its raw meaning is visible. No hiding in plain sight. Thus, Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s administration has an absolute goal post – the evisceration of the Second Amendment. Consequently, Sharia Law proponents will also become empowered. Patriots – not so much. That’s the plan.

Once again, the Brotherhood Mafia is in league with the radical left. A devil’s bargain. A marriage made in anti-American hell. Western civilization dangling off a cliff. Yes, it is.