OBAMA INC.’S (ADDITIONAL BLUDGEON)TACTICAL WEAPON: THEIR TOTAL HIJACKING OF THE IRS! (VIDEO)…Commentary By Adina

Ask any American how they view the IRS and most will shudder at the mention of its name. Damn that tax sucking entity…

Now, those who understand the ins and outs of this bureaucratic behemoth are less intimidated due to a certain familiarity. This has its advantages. However, on the other hand, said individuals are more aware (than most) of its devastating reach and impact. Six of one, half a dozen of another.

Basically, a preponderance of taxpaying Americans don’t know the half of what the IRS is capable of doing, and their overreach extended BEFORE the Radical-in-Chief co-opted it as his political bludgeon!

In fact, the above knowledge base aided in following the “jihadi money trail” (on more than one occasion), as noted herein:

I am an independent op-ed contributor to various Zionist and Conservative media outlets. I contributed to an in-depth investigative series at FrontPage Magazine with Lee Kaplan from 2003-2007We are still working together . Go to the 5:59 timeline at –http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lwBAv7f1Vg…here as well– http://www.presstv.ir/Program/320411.html – to listen to him address the current situation in Syria. He is a world class expert on the ISM (International Solidarity Movement), and he utilized my foundation in forensics and investigative journalism to “follow the jihadist money.” Unfathomably, the ISM was able to accomplish the above money laundering, courtesy of their IRS 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status. Specifically, my name appears at the end of the expose’, ‘Does The Pro-Terror Left Violate U.S. Tax Laws’? 

With the above firmly implanted in mind, take the time to review the damage already accrued, ever since Obama Inc. started using the IRS as its (political) hammer. Rest assured, the deviants in charge are adding to their heavy duty arsenal. Just wait. But don’t let your head explode. You will need all your wits to absorb their treachery.

Bludgeon Number One: IRS Enforcement Agents are now armed with SHOTGUNS, even as law abiding citizens are disarmed, for this or that “non-specific” reason. Where are Obama’s goons heading?

Bludgeon Number Two: Obama’s IRS aims for the jugular: the ILLEGAL targeting of vets and patriots alike. “Tea Partiers” are prime meat. 

Bludgeon Number Three: The IRS, whose sole mandate is to collect revenue taxes, is being abused as a political hammer…don’t dare criticize Obama Inc.  – or else.

Bludgeon Number Four: IRSgate can be blown wide open, and its revolving door is key. 

Bludgeon Number Five: Via Its Chief Counsel, IRSgate lands squarely at the Lawbreaker-in-Chief’s door. Yippee! 

Bludgeon Number Six: Smokin’ hot e-mails will hopefully aid the people’s nightmare. 

Bludgeon Number Seven: The POTUS’s illegal actions are compiled in a 36 page compendium. As such, there is more than enough to indict him!

EVEN so, it gets much worse….

WND EXCLUSIVE

LOOK OUT! OBAMA WEAPONIZING IRS

Attorney warns taxman opening ‘2nd front’ in war on conservatives

Published: 5 hours ago

WASHINGTON, D.C. – “Non-profit groups must prepare to fight back [against] the IRS on yet a second front,” warns Cleta Mitchell, a partner in the Washington-based law firm Foley & Lardner LLP, well-known for providing expert legal advise to conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status.

In discussions throughout the Capitol, Mitchell has expressed her concern new rules proposed by the IRS demonstrate once again the Obama administration is determined to keep tea-party groups from having the type of impact on the mid-term elections this November that they had in 2010, when Republicans grabbed majority control of the House of Representatives.

“This is a real assault on the First Amendment rights of American citizens, and we need to do everything we can to stop the IRS from implementing these new rules,” Mitchell says.

Mitchell has produced in a YouTube video a briefing in which she explains the goal of the IRS is to limit the free speech of conservative groups:

(click article on for video!)

She is urging conservatives groups and individuals to file comments with the IRS right away, arguing it is “impractical, burdensome and unacceptable for the IRS to interject itself into the workings of every citizens group in the country.”

The legally constituted function of the IRS, Mitchell argues, is to collect tax revenues, “not to snoop and trample on First Amendment rights of the citizens.”

At stake this November is the possibility conservative tax-exempt groups campaigning for conservative Republican candidates for Congress might increase the Republican majority in the House and grab enough seats in the Senate to topple the current Democratic Party majority, she explains.

The Democrats in Congress appear this year to be particularly vulnerable given the debacle witnessed by the nation in the Obamacare implementation plus increasing economic data that shows job growth slowing, with historic numbers of Americans dropping out of the labor force.

How to file comments opposing IRS proposed rule

Conservative groups or individuals may submit comments electronically opposing the proposed rule changes at Regulations.gov, searching for the citation IRS REG-134417-13, an Internet search that yields a page entitled “Guidance for Tax-Exempt Social Welfare Organization on Candidate-Related Political Activities.”

The proposed rules can be found published in the Federal Register here, again under the title “Guidance for Tax-Exempt Social Welfare Organization on Candidate-Related Political Activities,” dated Nov. 29, 2013.

In a fact sheet Mitchell is distributing to conservatives, Mitchell is advising clients to file comments before the deadline on Feb. 27, 2014, to a series of new regulations the IRS proposes to implement with the goal of making sure conservative organizations with 501(c)4 status are prohibited before the upcoming mid-term elections in November 2014 from any activity associated with supporting a political candidate or influencing the outcome of an election.

“Conservative groups that do not submit comments to the IRS opposing these rule changes before the Feb. 27 deadline will not have standing to participate in the final rule-determination process required by law before the rules are implemented,” Mitchell explained.

Mitchell is encouraging conservative groups and individuals to insist in their filed comments that the IRS must hold public hearings in open forums around the nation before these proposed new regulations are implemented.

IRS war against conservatives

“With these new regulations,” Mitchell argued, “the goal is to restrict the free speech of conservatives in the United States. Progressives tend to focus on process issues, and these new IRS regulations are a direct attempt by the political left to rewrite the rules of political engagement unfairly in their favor.”

Last week, the IRS scandal deepened when the Washington Times reported the Justice Department selected Barbara Kay Bosserman, a DOJ trial lawyer, who had contributed to Obama’s presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2012 as well as to the Democratic Party, to lead the criminal probe into the IRS targeting conservative groups to deny their applications for tax-exempt status.[blogger’s note: foxes in the hen house…rigging the system for an intended result…manifestly illegal!]

Mitchell in her discussions with conservative groups has explained the activities the IRS seeks to define as “candidate-related political activities,” subject to taxation and reporting to the IRS, are basic 501(c)4 activities such as grassroots lobbying, candidate forums, candidate debates, voter registration drives, voter guides and issue advocacy.

“The IRS is fully aware this is a war in which conservative groups are being targeted,” Mitchell explains, noting the proposed IRS new rules do not apply to labor unions or trade associations. “The Obama administration is not looking for ways to restrain labor unions from using member dues to conduct similar activities.”

Historically, labor union political support has gone to Democratic Party political candidates since the end of World War II, while the upsurge in tax-exempt filings have come from conservatives and especially from the many tea-party groups formed since the economic downturn dating back to 2008.

MOST significantly, there are “legalized” weapons and those which are not. And this site’s readership are duly familiar with the Radical-in-Chief’s frontal tactics, whereby those who cross him often end up six feet under. No kidding. And this charge is more than demonstrated through Loretta Fuddy’s (HAWAII EX DOH DIRECTOR) “conveniently” timed death, just one week after Arpaio’s team announced criminally explosive findings re his “eligibility”. Not only that, too many of Obama’s liabilities drop like flies. Indeed, what are the chances?

As a result, another warning is being issued: the IRS is about to quietly adopt new rules that will “legally” muzzle tea party groups!

Enter the FBI, an entity which should – but no longer does – stand for truth-seeking justice, whatever the (political) costs: IRS Off the Hook: No Criminal Charges Over Tea Party Targeting. Down the (criminal) rabbit hole.

So when a leadership’s actions can no longer be differentiated from dictatorial regimes, decision time has arrived: either the people succumb or fight. There is no middle ground.

And since Obama Inc. is a regime gone wild, one must postulate the following questions: is America on the cusp of a tyranny or already a done deal? Precisely, where does the heretofore bastion for freedom stand? Is it teetering on a cliff, or has its pillars already taken a fatal fall?

UPDATE: IRAN ALIGNS WITH ADNAN OKTAR’S TURKISH/BROTHERHOOD CULT: VONVO HOSTS CEYLAN ÖZBUDAK & (IRANIAN-AMERICAN/IRANIAN-SYRIAN)DR. MAJID RAFIZADEH…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

UPDATE: then read below for today’s commentary…

Satirical Turkish site on trial for insulting religion

Feb 7, 2014 

EksiSozluk

This is yet another sign of the erosion of Turkish secularism and its galloping re-Islamization, but what is noteworthy here is that the complaint was brought by Adnan Oktar (pictured above). Under the name Harun Yahya, Oktar has published a huge amount of Islamic apologetics material, including some “moderate” Muslim explanations of why jihad violence and suicide attacks aren’t justified in Islamic teaching, and so non-Muslims need not be concerned about them. But he seems to have no problem with the Sharia denial of the freedom of speech and enforcement of the prohibition on any criticism of Islam.

“Satirical Turkish site on trial for insulting religion,” from Al-Monitor, February 5 (thanks to Jerk Chicken):

One of Turkey’s most popular websites, the satirical Sour Dictionary (Eksi Sozluk), is on trial for insulting religion. Forty contributing writers have been charged following a complaint by popular Islamic figure Adnan Oktar. The trial kıcked off Jan. 14 with 27 of the defendants in attendance.

Oktar, in his complaint to the prosecutor, claimed that some entries in the dictionary included comments that amounted to insults of religion and prophets. The entries he cited and for which the prosecutor eventually pressed charges include jokes that the Prophet Muhammad and Allah had “sent money” to Turkey’s Housing Development Administration and that Jesus Christ and religious people were of low intelligence. Other examples include an entry on suggestions for a 100th name for Allah in addition to the 99 names Muslims have for their god and another titled “Allah’s official sponsors.”

The prosecutor is seeking jail terms of six to 12 months for the Eksi Sozluk writers. The defendants disputed the charges against them at their first hearing, arguing that they had no intention of insulting religion and that their comments fell within the scope of freedom of expression. A second hearing was scheduled for Feb. 17.

A string of similar legal cases in recent years indicate that accusations of insulting religion, especially Islam, is being used with increasing ease and frequency to press criminal charges. Emma Sinclair-Webb, a Turkey researcher for Human Rights Watch, says that the trials point to a new trend. What was once an epidemic of cases of “insulting Turkishness” are now being replaced by those of “insulting religion.”

Al-Monitor readers will recall that world-famous Turkish pianist Fazil Say was sentenced to 10 months in jail for insulting Islam and its prophet on Twitter. His sentence was eventually suspended but remains, dangling over Say’s head.

Another prominent figure convicted of the same charges is the Turkish-Armenian intellectual Sevan Nisanyan, for making the following remarks in a television program: “I don’t believe that Muhammad was a prophet. I don’t believe in the existence of a prophethood institution. I find it absurd that anyone could claim receiving special revelations from god. To me, that’s impertinence. Muhammad must have either lied or had hallucinations.”

Nisanyan was given 13 months in jail. Although he is yet to begin serving his sentence, Nisanyan was sent to prison in January to serve a two-year term over a small structure he built in violation of construction laws on his own land in the village of Sirince, in Izmir province. As explained in Al-Monitor, many in Turkey are convinced that construction regulations were used as a pretext to punish Nisanyan for his outspoken views on the Armenian genocide and critical opinion of religion.

Other cases demonstrate that even people who refer to religious figures in a critical context can end up in court on charges of insulting religion. Take, for instance, Canan Arin, a lawyer from Antalya who was charged after she said that the Prophet Muhammad had married an underage girl. Her trial was suspended conditionally, but she will find herself back in court if similar charges are brought against her over a period of three years.

Cartoonist Bahadir Baruter was also charged and faced a year in jail over a cartoon he drew of a mosque wall with the inscription “There is no Allah, religion is a lie.”

The zealous pursuit of “insults to religion” extends beyond the courts, with media outlets facing administrative sanctions. The Turkish CNBC-e channel, for instance, was fined by the Higher Board of Radio and Television over an episode of “The Simpsons” deemed offensive to religion.

Even though no one ended up behind bars in the above cases, the mere fact that people stand trial and risk jail sentences no doubt seriously intimidates the defendants as well as anyone with critical views on religion. The ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) has come under fire for promoting “religious chauvinism.” It appears that prosecutors who endorse the AKP’s views or vie to win the government’s favor are working hard to come up with such cases.

The prosecutors use the seemingly general wording of “insulting religion,” but all the cases pursued thus far have concerned comments deemed to be offensive to Muslims. Insults and hate speech against Jews or Christians clearly do not merit similar vigilance.

In this charged context, the case against Eksi Sozluk is likely to produce a serious bullying effect on social media. It is an alarming trial that calls for close monitoring.

Linked at Islam Exposed –  http://islamexposed.org/  

EVERY investigation worth its merit must be premised upon solid building blocks, but they must fit into the puzzle – on their own – without being squeezed into place. Not only would a hinky investigation be non kosher, but it would be decidedly uncool. This address is anything but.

That being said and out of the way – before we get to the latest “connect the (Islamist) dots” – it is imperative to understand certain geo-political dynamics, even as traditional Sunni/Shia divides are seemingly (and momentarily) trashed aside.

As a historical backgrounder, Turkey and Iran are Occasional Allies, Enduring Rivals: Turkey’s Relations With Iran:

Building Block One:

“In reality, the motivation behind Turkey’s willingness to confront its Western allies over Iran’s nuclear program was never as simple as a desire to exchange membership of one alliance with membership of another. It was rather the product of a number of different factors, the most important of which was the desire to establish Turkey as the preeminent arbiter of power in its region: not a country which attached itself to others but a center to which others would gravitate…..

Economic relations between Turkey and Iran have developed rapidly over the last ten years. The two countries have signed numerous agreements and memoranda of understanding committing themselves to a closer economic relationship and bilateral trade has grown more than ten-fold. However, the main element underpinning the boom – the pipeline carrying Iranian natural gas to Turkey – dates to well before the AKP first came to power in November 2002; and the expansion in trade with Iran has taken place within the context of an attempt by the AKP to increase Turkey’s economic ties with all of its Muslim neighbors….

Indeed, one of the most striking features of the economic relationship between Turkey and Iran is that the gap between rhetoric and reality appears considerably greater than in Turkey’s economic relations with any other country. There is no questioning the appetite of Turkish and Iranian private companies for closer ties, particularly in the provinces on either side of their shared border. But, in practice, the two governments have displayed considerably more fervor for political posturing than for implementing the policies needed to strengthen economic cooperation…..

In speeches and public statements, in an indirect reference to Islam, politicians from both countries have repeatedly cited their “shared values” as forming the foundation for closer economic ties; often with the implication that religion makes Turkey and Iran natural partners for each other in a way that non-Muslim countries could never be. Over the last ten years, Turkish and Iranian officials have enthusiastically announced plans for a string of grandiose joint projects.
None has been realized….

There is no doubt that Iran has benefited much more than Turkey from the growth in economic ties. Iranian sales of hydrocarbons have ensured that the balance of trade is heavily in Tehran’s favor. By 2011, Iran had become Turkey’s largest supplier of crude oil and its second largest supplier of Occasional Allies, Enduring Rivals: Turkey’s Relations with Iran 51 natural gas. Yet, in early 2012, Turkish companies exporting to Iran continued to be faced with steep Customs duties, a huge fuel levy on transportation by Turkish trucks and an opaque and frequently xenophobic bureaucracy and legal system. While Iranians who have established companies in Turkey enjoy considerably more rights and a much more stable operating environment than their Turkish counterparts who have done likewise in Iran….”

MOST intrinsically, when it comes to Israel and regional dynamics, Erdogan’s Turkey and Iran’s Hitlerite regime are “kissing cousins”, sort of like a blended family that is often feuding but makes up when it suits everyone’s interests. As such, Turkey, whose Muslims are Sunnis form about 72%; Alevis of the Shia form about 25% of the Muslim population; and a Twelver Shia community form about 3% of the Muslim population, all should be considered Islamic twins separated at birth. Concomitantly, both want Israel gone (America buried too), whatever it takes. Methodology is “negotiable”.

So, with the above firmly placed in geo-political and Islamic context – in tandem with many facts on the ground – let’s hop over to today’s thesis and view it for what it is: IRAN’S ISLAMIC INTERSECTION ALIGNS WITH ADNAN OKTAR’S TURKISH/BROTHERHOOD CULT: VONGO HOSTS CEYLAN ÖZBUDAK & (IRANIAN-AMERICAN/IRANIAN-SYRIAN)DR. MAJID RAFIZADEH.

For a brief overview – as well as a primer – for the newly initiated, Ceylan Özbudak is not a newcomer to this site. Nor is she a newbie to other related venues. Pay special heed to the following via its truth telling:

Building Block Two:

“Ceylan Ozbudak works with the controversial Islamic leader Adnan Oktar, also known as Harun Yahya. One of Oktar’s announcements has been his desire to build a temple for all religions on Jerusalem’s Temple Mount.

Ozbudak suggested that Turkey can mediate between Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Egypt, and other surrounding countries for peace. She added that Turkey could protect the Jewish people’s right to live in Israel as well as manage the region. But will this grandiose plan work and does Israel want to give up much of its sovereignty to be protected by the former Ottoman Empire?

Ozbudak hosts a television show called, ‘Building Bridges’, with a variety of other young Turkish women. They have stated on the program that in order to ensure peace, “we believe that this can only be done through a Turkish Islamic Union, where all the countries will be independent in their states, but they will be under one roof and Turkey will be the spiritual leader of this Turkish Islamic Union”

The show airs on A9TV, which states on its website that it “has been set up to build up love, justice and solidarity among people and our main aim is being pioneer for peace all over the world by using the unifying policy of Turkish Islamic Union. In every show youwatch you will feel this policy clearly.”

It is now time to segue over to a recent explosive interview, whereby the aforementioned “hottie” and her “Oktarette’s”(a pet moniker for those who pimp for Adnan Oktar’s “Building Bridges”) are all duly exposed:

Building Block Three:

But let’s start with Aylin Kocaman, one of the buxom “Oktarettes”, and her CLEAR threat to Lisa Michelle; a Zionist activist, who happens to be an administrator at several well-trafficked Facebook sites. The aforementioned Aylin does more than just purr. The threatening message-rant was lobbed in a supposedly pro-Israel Facebook group. Sickening.

Word for word, Lisa Michelle was sent the following threat (now offline) from Aylin Kocaman, in a post dated 5/25/2013. But no matter, we screen captured it.

Aylin Kocaman voices her threats:

“Lisa, you are so naive my dear. You probably thought that our silence towards your insults will not be responded at all. You are wrong. We made a pretty good research about you and something about your personal life amazed us. I am sure it will amaze many people around you. Don’t worry I will share it in public soon just like you did the biggest lies about us. The difference is I will be announcing the facts about you while you are spreading lies about us. I want you to taste this. You might have underestimated us. Apparently if you did your research sufficient enough you would find out that we have great possibility and power to reach every information in the world. I think, you thought insulting Muslims would be easy. Maybe for you it is easy to insult Muslims in Afghanistan, since you think they are powerless, but we are powerful my dear. You made a grave mistake.”

Lisa Michelle responds:

“Are you threatening me, Aylin? I have nothing to hide, and I am not insulting Muslims. I’m raising awareness about the truth. Larry [an adminstrator at the Facebook site], do you see that I was just threatened?”

Building Block Four:

To drive the Islamist nail even further, please internalize Adnan Oktar’s (the “Oktarette’s” cult leader) true Brotherhood allegiance, in as much as it has already been established – from a multiplicity of directions – that PM Erdogan is a Muslim Brotherhood leader. Interesting.

And for a little more Turkish suberterfuge, Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) exhorted this recent pronouncement:

Adnan Oktar’dan yolsuzluk yorumu

Adnan Oktar, canlı yayında Erdoğan’a destek vererek, ‘şamata’ yapıldığını söyleyip sitem etti. Bırakın çalışsın Tayyip Hocam diyen Adnan Oktar, devamında “Ya çaldıklarını farzeledim, geri verirler. Bir o kadar da üstüne biz para verelim. Ne uzatıyorsunuz?” dedi.

Loosely translated: “reviewed by Adnan Oktar, giving support to Erdogan, ‘uproar’ has made ​​my calling…. Tayyip Adnan Oktar, the continuation of “What I farzele they stole, they give back…so we lend the money. Would you hold out?”

More pointedly, he continues, “If they (Erdogan’s AK Party) stole money, I will personally make this amount of payment to the Turkish State.” Hmm.

To wit, and extrapolating further, Oktar’s response to the increasingly incendiary charges heaped at PM Erdogan – and in non-bastardized linguistic mumbo jumbo – must elicit a major question for all rational thinkers: why in the world would Adnan Oktar offer up tens of millions in funds, reportedly, close to a billion (which his cult is in possession of, but that’s best left for another discussion), to “bail” out PM Erdogan and his cronies? Indeed.

Building Block Five:

On January 25th at 12PM EST Ceylan Özbudak will be hosting a discussion regarding Turkey’s Role in the present day Middle East. She will be joined by guest speaker Majid Rafizadeh to talk about what role Turkey should have with neighboring countries Syria and Iran. Please join us for what should be a very informative event!

Building Block Six:

This “auspicious” event is sponsored by VONVO: https://www.facebook.com/events/1456183967943790/?ref=notif&notif_t=plan_user_invited

As luck would have it (for some, but not for others), the referenced “hostess” is also busy promoting Turkish delights, yet her FB shout out is highly revealing…forget about the regular tourist venues…she/her posse are highly familiar with “off the beaten”, male-titillating, tracks. How lovely. Oh, kudos to VONVO, for booking such a wonderful representative and “guest” for a discussion re the fiery Mid East!

Ceylan, the “hostess with the mostest”, wishes one and all: المتعة فى تركيا – have fun in Turkey  – https://www.facebook.com/AlmttFyTrkya

Building Block Seven:

Alas, the featured guest at VONVO is an integral part of the “Oktarettes”, and it is little wonder (on this end) that some of her “colleagues” have been found, by our investigative team, as headliners on Turkish porn sites and the like! But no matter,“Building Bridges”, the media platform they front for, is seen as an “integral” platform for Mid East discourse and a “go to” address. Pray tell, for what? Credo quia absurdum! 

Now, since you must have had your fill of the Turkish connection, let’s meander over to the Iranian front. Agreed, this side is presented much more circumspectly and in a very dignified package. Hats off.

Folks, at the upcoming VONVO confab, there will indeed be a distinguished guest. This site will provide some linkage, but only as foretastes. It will be up to each and every one – this site’s discerning readership – to draw their own conclusions.

The Iranian side of the equation – make no mistake, this guest bespeaks a kinship to Iran –  is adroit with American finesse and exposure, and at the highest levels of policy making in Washington. 

Presenting,
 
Building Block Eight:

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is an Iranian-American scholar, author and U.S. foreign policy specialist. Rafizadeh is the president of the International American Council. He serves on the board of Harvard International Review at Harvard University and Harvard International Relations Council. He is a member of the Gulf 2000 Project at Columbia University, School of International and Public Affairs. Previously he served as ambassador to the National Iranian-American Council based in Washington DC.

Listen up: key herein is the Ambassadorial connection (see bio clip directly above) to the National Iranian American Council and who they front for. You guessed it…the mullahs. Already exposed, a heads up to Reza Aslan: National Iranian American Council confirmed as front group for Iran’s bloody Islamic regime.

It gets even dicier, as said Iranian scholar has been a frequent, and fawned over, guest of the “girls”. And if the above “on and off” love-fest between Turkey and Iran (as described at the onset) is understood for what it is, Dr. Majid Rafizadeh has every reason to feel comfy, and this doesn’t even account for their bodacious loveliness.

Exhibit Number One:

 

Building Bridges program with WTPN, with their guests Majid Rafizadeh, Iranian-Syrian Scholar (11th June, 2012) – VIDEO

 

Exhibit Number Two:

 

Building Bridges WTPN – Majid Rafizadeh (11th June, 2012) -VIDEO

 

Exhibit Number Three:

 

A9 TV: A Talk with Majid Rafizadeh

 – VIDEO… and so many others! This linkage can go on all day…but who has the time.

In the main, and assuredly so, VONVO  (https://www.facebook.com/max.lingelheim), as an independent media platform, is free to host whatever guests they want and to connect them worldwide. No one is disputing this. However, what cannot be disputed are the underpinnings of this event: it is absolutely and incontrovertibly Muslim Brotherhood connected, as well as to the “liking” of the Iranian mullahs. More than food for (western) thought.

In this regard, whichever media platforms host the Building Bridges Islamic crew, they must “man/woman up” and admit to the fact that they are indeed giving them a platform.

As such, many hundreds of thousands of readers at this site (and elsewhere) are no longer fooled by those whose main defenses are akin to feigned punts: blah, blah…all sides “deserve” equal time. Perhaps, but all “sides” must be identified correctly, demonstrating where their allegiances/agendas lie. After all, lipstick on a pig doesn’t change the pig’s ugly face.

Mind you, this site doesn’t hide behind its ZIONIST and CONSERVATIVE agenda, it’s out there for all to see – like it or not. Therefore, why should others be allowed to shuck and jive! Agreed?

Moreover, rational folks understand that certain media platforms are designed to air diverging positions. Fine. We get that. NEVERTHELESS, again, all sides must be properly identified (to the audience at hand) and vetted. It is a matter of due diligence and integrity. The viewership has a right to know to whom they are listening, in particular, regarding such devastatingly important matters! 

Besides, more than enough proofs – re the related program at VONVO – to choke many horses….pigs too.

DUE to all of the above – those in the know – we will be watching very closely for the related event which will debut on January 25th at 12PM EST (eastern standard time…for those of us in the Mid East, 7PM Israel time), in order to determine how truthfully the background of the guests are presented. After which, let it rip…

This site – and its investigative team – urges its readership to tune in and judge for themselves. We shall see if the media platform addresses (and properly identifies) who’s who. We shall also judge if VONVO finds it worthwhile to attach itself to the shuck and jive (conference) show – or not.

ADDENDUM:updates to above related issues…interesting tidbits-  

Subsequent to another recent commentary (within a few days of its posting), regarding the Turkish cult (intersecting with other matters), a new “follower” to my twitter emerged – DR. MAJID RAFIZADEH. What are the odds, and with millions of twitter folks in cyberspace? Mind you, this blogger is not very active on twitter, but no matter.

Adina Kutnicki, You have a new follower on Twitter. 

Majid Rafizadeh @majidrafizadeh President of International American Council. Fr Ambassador.Senior fellow:Harvard.Political scientist:CNN,Nytimes..Columnist Alarabiya Rafizadeh@fas.harvard.edu USA, Washington DC. Website: · http://www.tinyurl.com/majidrafizadeh

Next up in the “coinquidink” realm, less than 12 hrs after the above VONVO commentary emerges online, lo and behold, again, out of millions on FB, guess who “friends” this blogger? You would be right, if you said – Max Ringelheim!

Max Ringelheim wants to be friends with you on Facebook. SUNY Buffalo 179 groups Confirm Request See All Requests

Looks like two of the aforementioned players want to keep in “close contact” – or not.

It gets even stranger – or not. Tundra Tabloids , a rocking anti-jihadi website – with this site unaware of their re-posting – linked the smokin’ hot VONVO expose’.

Well, talk about SWIFT blow back!

Upon posting the following comment at their site, as a prelude to this blog’s VONVO,

HEY MAX RINGLEHEIM, IS THIS YOUR NEW VONVO BUSINESS MOVE, BEING IN THE POCKET OF IRAN AND THE AKP……?
Posted on 18/01/2014 by KGS

Keeping your eye on the brass ring, blinds you to whatever is happening around you.

Max Ringleheim from VONVO (of whom I’ve always had doubts) has now seriously compromised himself in his entanglement with Adnan Oktar and his creepy cult of big boobed blond bombshells. Adina Kutnicki has the full scoop on this event and the connections between the various parties.

and within “two shakes of a lambs tail”, a ferocious DDOS hack attack ensued – guess where it originated from?

TUNDRA TABLOIDS BACK ON LINE: DDOS ATTACK BY TURKS TURNED INTO A TURKEY SHOOT……!

Posted on 19/01/2014 by KGS
 
 
 
Laughing man
Thanks to all my pals out there who highlighted the problem, very much appreciated!
Tundra DDOS'ed but no surrender
This entry was posted in Tundra TabloidsUncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

U.S. VETS TARGETED BY OBAMA INC:DISHONORABLE PENTAGON PUNISHES HONORABLE SOLDIERS. What’s Going On? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

FEW haven’t heard about the purging of upwards of 200 top career officers under the orders of Obama’s Pentagon Chief. These orders are handed down the line by Chuck Hagel (like his counterparts, Brennan and Kerry, he is totally in sync with the Betrayer-in-Chief), a man who is as disloyal as the enemies U.S. troops are fighting and dying for. Such a person is in no position to judge fitness for duty. Or so one would think.

A retired Navy commander and a former Pentagon spokesman in the Office of the Secretary of Defense says the Obama administration is rushing to unload senior officers whom he believes have become “political pawns” dismissed for questionable reasons.

J.D. Gordon, in an op-ed piece in the Washington Times titled “Purging America’s Military,” said that the Pentagon justifies its dismissals due to “loss of confidence,” “insensitive remarks,” sexual misconduct and “counterfeit poker chips.”

Gordon pointed out that, on average, one senior military officer per week has been “summarily fired” since President Barack Obama took office in 2009.

“Statistically speaking, it’s actually closer to one every 8.8 days,” Gordon said. This amounts to close to 200 senior officers who have been dismissed since Obama became president.

Even though Gordon has worked for the Pentagon, he was critical of the reasons official military spokesmen have given for the dismissal of these senior officers.

Gordon questions whether today’s military is “really the most incompetent and corrupt” as some say, or is it just easier “to get hammered for real or perceived bad behavior and poor performance?”

He suggested that personal indiscretions notwithstanding, it is possible that “something even more sinister is going on today,” noting there seems to be a rush to unload these senior officers.

But don’t take anyone else’s word for it, just consider with whom we are dealing with and then be the judge, whether or not “something even more sinister is going on today”. Hmm.

As a first exhibit, more than enough fodder can be found within the Pentagon’s/POTUS’s collusion with the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia: Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Islamic thrust !

So was it any wonder that the POTUS picked Chuck Hagel as his Pentagon Chief, even as his underbelly was gutted…now you know why the Islamist-in-Chief went to the mat for him.

Yet, Chuck Hagel was confirmed (& his “fortuitous” Senate win, going back to 1996hardly made a dent) regardless of his anti-American associations.

At the same time, decorated soldiers are being trashed aside and making the military a “no go” zone for patriots alike. What’s to be done?

Decorated Marine Faces Loss of Career for Sounding Alarm about Taliban

by MICHAEL DALY December 17, 2013

Maj. Jason Brezler’s warnings about an Afghan police chief and his ‘tea boys’ went unaddressed, and three Marines were slain. One year later, the Marines are taking action-against him.

More than a year after three Marines were shot to death on their base in an insider attack by an Afghan police chief’s “tea boy,” there is still no official explanation for why a warning that could well have prevented the tragedy seems to have gone unheeded.

There is also no explanation for why the police chief was allegedly allowed to sexually assault children with apparent impunity on an American military facility.

But authorities have taken action against one person they should be praising, the 32-year-old Marine Reserve officer who issued the warning about the police chief and his crimes.

Marine Reserve Maj. Jason Brezler-now also a firefighter with the elite Rescue 2 of the FDNY-faces a forced exit from the Marine Corps as a result of an inconsequential security infraction he committed in his hurry to respond to an urgent email from Afghanistan that he received two years after he returned home.

The July 25, 2012, email that popped up on Brezler’s Yahoo account was sent to him from Helmand Province by a fellow Marine officer, and its subject line made its urgency unmistakable:

“IMPORTANT: SARWAR JAN IS BACK!!!”

Exclamation points by themselves in a message from Helmand meant it could very well be a matter of life and death. The name Sarwar Jan made it all the more so.

Jan had been district police chief when Brezler served in the same town, Naw Zad, in 2010. Brezler had come to the conclusion that Jan was involved in narcotics and arms trafficking as well as facilitating attacks by the Taliban, even selling Afghan police uniforms to the enemy. Jan also was alleged to be what Brezler’s lawyer would call “a systematic child rapist” who allegedly ran a child kidnapping ring and acquired “tea boys” with the help of U.S. taxpayer job development money.

Jan might have imagined himself untouchable as the protégé of an accused drug lord who has connections to Afghan President Hamid Karzai. Brezler kept pushing and was finally able to pressure the provincial governor into removing Jan from his post, a rare and notable bright spot in the bloodiest province in the bloodiest year of the war.

But now here was this email from a fellow Marine officer in Afghanistan saying Jan was back as police chief and had allegedly been raping as many as nine boys at Forward Operating Base Delhi. The email asked Brezler for any information he might be able to provide.

The Marines had not issued laptops during Brezler’s deployment, and he had used his own to send and receive reports while in the war zone. He was at a graduate school seminar using this same laptop when he received the email from Helmand, and it seemed like a stroke of great luck that the lone report he inadvertently still had on hand summarized the allegations against Jan.

Brezler attached the report to his reply and emailed it with the same urgency that he would demonstrate as a firefighter whenever an alarm came in. He made clear in the accompanying message that he considered Jan a serious threat who allegedly dealt with the enemy while essentially making the Americans party to sex crimes against children.

The fellow officer who had made the inquiry and received the response, identified by one source as Marine Maj. Brian Donlon, noted that in his haste Brezler had sent what was technically a classified document via an insecure mode of communication. Brezler acknowledged the error and duly reported himself, in keeping with a code of honor befitting a graduate of the Naval Academy.

Whatever Donlon did with Brezler’s warning, little, if anything, seems to have changed. Jan continued to come and go as he pleased at FOB Delhi, free to carry weapons and to consort with his “tea boys.”

“The Marines continued to provide Jan and his sex-abuse victims armed, unescorted access to their base,” Brezler’s attorney, Kevin Carroll, would later say.

On August 10, 2012, just over two weeks after the warning that should have resulted in the police chief being banned from the base, one of Jan’s teenage “tea boys” went into the FOB Delhi gym with what was apparently the police chief’s AK-47. The tea boy, Aynoddin,proceeded to kill three unarmed Marines, Staff Sgt. Scott Dickinson, Cpl. Richard Rivera, and Lance Cpl. Greg Buckley Jr. A fourth, Staff Sgt. Cody Rhode, survived despite being shot five times.

Buckley’s father, Greg Buckley Sr., would later report that his son had expressed misgivings about the police chief three months before.

“He said, ‘The chief of police is filthy,’” the father says. “I said, ‘How can he be in your base?’ And he said, ‘He is.’”

The father adds, “Everybody on the base knew [Jan] was a bad guy.”

The son had made the darkest of predictions.

“He said, ‘I’m not going to be coming home. They’re going to kill me here, murder me here,’” the father says.

The son recalled some advice the father had often repeated.

“He said, ‘You know what, Dad, you always said go with your gut feeling, and my feeling is something bad is going to happen to me on this base,” the father reports.

The son had been lifting weights in the gym with his buddies just two days from the end of his deployment when the tea boy shot him in the chest and neck.

“They keep telling us it’s under investigation,” the father says.

The Buckley family learned of Brezler’s warning—and the apparent failure of their son’s superiors to act—not from the Marine Corps but from the office of Rep. Peter King (R-NY), who had taken up the major’s cause. King is close to Brezler’s godfather, retired FDNY Capt. John Vigiano, who lost two sons on 9/11, one a firefighter, the other a police officer.

The law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan heard of Brezler’s plight and offered to represent him pro bono, with their man Carroll in the lead. Carroll met with the Buckley family, and they were doubly outraged to learn that Brezler was to be brought before a Board of Inquiry with the possibility he would be forced from the Marine Corps.

Back when Brezler self-reported the security violation resulting from the urgent email response, his immediate commanding officer had found no cause to pursue the matter. The investigating officer from his headquarters recommended the matter be closed with no disciplinary action. An assessment in Afghanistan determined that this intelligence “spillage” was of no military importance and recommended that the emailed report be declassified. The military analyst who wrote the report is of the same opinion.

But for reasons that are not clear, NCIS went ahead and initiated an inquiry. Brezler allowed agents to examine his computer and search his residence on October 17, 2012. They left without discovering any classified material.

Brezler then remembered an external hard drive he had brought home from Afghanistan. The agents had missed it in the search, but Brezler again proved to be an old school man of honor. He would have called the agents to come get the drive even if he had known that it still contained some 100 classified documents, largely of a tactical nature pertaining to particular combat operations that were long since completed. Their value to an enemy would be essentially nil.

“There is no allegation that Major Brezler was unauthorized to receive these documents in the first instance, or any evidence of additional spillage of these documents,” writes Carroll in a summary of the case. “NCIS closed their investigation without any criminal referral. Agents even remarked in the case file upon Major Brezler’s remarkable cooperation and transparency.”

Again for reasons that are not clear, Marine Col. Michael LeSavage took it upon himself to lodge a negative evaluation against Brezler for his supposed security infractions. Protocol called for the evaluation to have been issued by another commander, Lt. Col. Daniel Whisnant, who reportedly considered Brezler one of his best officers and had recommended him for promotion.

Even as Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and FDNY Commissioner Salvatore Cassano, among others, stepped forward on Brezler’s behalf, the Marine Corps moved ahead with plans to conduct a Board of Inquiry at the Reserve headquarters in New Orleans, perhaps in December.

Some observers believe the matter is being pushed by the present Reserve commander, Lt. Gen. Richard Mills. He was previously deputy commandant for combat development and integration. His predecessor in that post was Lt. Gen George Flynn, whose son-in-law happens to be Maj. Donlon, who sent the email inquiry to Brezler with the subject line “IMPORTANT: SARWAR JAN IS BACK!!!”

Donlon and Mills’s office both referred requests for comment to the public affairs officer for the Marine Reserve, Col. Francis Piccoli.

“Pursuant to a NCIS investigation that substantiated the mishandling of classified information, Maj. Brezler has been ordered to show cause for retention in the U.S. Marine Corps before a Board of Inquiry,” Piccoli said in an email. “The Marine Corps will not comment further on this case at this time because we do not want to influence the Board of Inquiry’s decision-making process and/or jeopardize the due process Maj. Brezler should be afforded during this administrative hearing.”

Jan has denied the widely reported sex crimes allegations in the past but is presently unavailable for comment. He was briefly jailed after the tea boy shooting and was placed under house arrest thereafter—officially, anyway. The tea boy is supposedly going on trial in Afghanistan in May, though the Buckleys want to see him tried in America.

As Brezler awaits the Board of Inquiry that will determine whether he can remain a Marine, he continues to serve with the FDNY. To watch Rescue 2’s rig rumble from its Brooklyn firehouse in response to an alarm is to see the spirit of the 343 members of the department who perished on 9/11 come alive anew.

And the six firefighters from the company who were among those 343 would no doubt be particularly pleased that the current members include a Marine Reserve major who served with such distinction in Iraq and Afghanistan, receiving a Bronze Star.

The Marines who were killed while serving with Brezler would surely be just as pleased that one of their own was riding with an elite outfit that had served so bravely on the morning when our longest wars began and that now continues to race into harm’s way for the sake of others.

The fallen fighters and fallen Marines would have cheered as one when Brezler and the rest of Rescue 2 joined other companies in fighting a fire on Ocean Avenue in Brooklyn on the night of November 9. Brezler was up on the fire floor, where flames were exploding out of the windows.

“A pretty intense job,” a fire officer remarked.

But imagine the disgust of the fallen, a disgust we all should share, at the prospect that this firefighter-Marine who so often has placed himself at risk should be betrayed.

Along with explaining its inaction following the warning and its failure to address the allegations of sex crimes against children in one of its facilities, the Marine Corps needs to explain why it is so insistent in going after one of its best.

What the Marines should do is send him another email, this one with the subject line “IMPORTANT: BREZLER’S BACK!!!”

In as much as an honorable Marine officer rightfully alerted his superiors to a treacherous infiltration, and on his own told his superiors that due to said urgency a non-secure platform was used to relate info, one would think that leeway would have been a given. 

The fact of the matter is this: until patriots retake the American helm it is decidedly dangerous – to ones career and worse – to join the military. Whereas West Point and other related academies are always seen as prime entry points for patriots, this is no longer the case.

On duty personnel (from combat soldiers to officers) and vets are treated like garbage and even as the enemy. Yes, what can be more indicative of their mistreatment than trampling on 9/11/01 heroes/victims alike, as Obama Inc orders to arrest, hound, harass, humiliate vets and patriots!

In the main, the Pentagon, under the Betrayer-in-Chief, Imprisons/betrays soldiers/vets & rewards terrorists. How Did This Happen? Not content with punishing those who return from combat, see what else they have in store, with an end goal towards gun control!

Returning with PTSD…go to hell!

BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S IRANIAN TREACHERY: ISRAEL, GO TO HELL! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

RIGHT here and for all intents and purposes, let it be noted: the time for pussyfooting has come and gone. Pretending what is isn’t will not be tolerated. Full stop.

AGAIN, the following is what it is: the Islamist-in-Chief (others as well, but let’s stick to the supposed leader of the free world) is Allah-bent on marching Iran to nuclear power status. Yes, he is. The whys and the wherefores are manifold. Boxing in Israel is core. As such, this became BREAKING NEWS: Additional treachery from Barack HUSSEIN Obama; his deal to elevate Iran to a world power. Western civilization at stake! 

The facts at hand (what we do know, imagine what is still hidden) are so Machiavellian that they obliterate any treachery previously plotted from behind the heavily fortified walls of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Simply put, sach ha’kol, Obama Inc. is in a criminally traitorous class by itself and will go down in history as such. Mind you, it was not as if the two-termed Clinton reign didn’t stain the People’s House, aside from the hanky panky with Monica in the Oval office! The Clinton machine was peerless – and not in a good way – until Obama’s reign began.

That being the case, Valerie Jarrett and Samantha Powers – in synchronized lock step with Barack HUSSEIN Obama – are key players, as exhibited within: VALERIE JARRETT: Iran’s “Deal Maker”, Her Main Mission As Obama’s Consigliere. Western Civilization’s Hit Woman.  

Included within the regime, one finds various advisers, surrogates and Cabinet members who are completely on board with Iran’s race to the bomb. Moreover, Kerry (whose son-in-law is Iranian and regime-connected) and Hagel (who was a lobbyist for Iran), though vetted before Congress, are in league with arming Iran. How can this happen?

Regardless, there are no ifs, ands or buts to their complicity, whatever their function. One is more malignant than the other. Seriously.

So, is it any wonder that the Islamist-in-Chief is jive-talking around his “promise” to have Israel’s back, yet we know better:

Back in October 2012, this site sifted through Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s (Israel) doublespeak – in dread of a second term – understanding the POTUS would go for broke!

As a result, giving Jerusalem the finger – again and again…

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report January 14, 2014
What brakes has he applied to a nuclear Iran?

What brakes has he applied to a nuclear Iran?
US Vice President Joe Biden when he met Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu Monday night, Jan. 13, refused to level with him on the detailed agreements which the Americans claimed were reached by the six powers and Iran in their talks earlier this week on the implementation of their first-stage Geneva accord. This is reported by DEBKAfile’s Washington and Jerusalem sources.  It was the first time US President Barack Obama personally vetoed a briefing to Israel on the content of the international nuclear negotiations he instigated – notwithstanding his private and public pledges to Netanyahu of “full transparency.”
This secretiveness has stirred concern and mistrust in Jerusalem on two grounds:
1.  It denotes a sharp decline in the strategic relations between the Obama administration and the Netanyahu government and leaves Israel in the dark on an issue of vital concern to its security.
2.  It is suspected that there is no implementation agreement at all and that the US President, Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov are repeating the performance they put on three months ago in Geneva. Then, they presented a very general framework of non-binding clauses reached between the six powers and Iran as a genuine, full-fledged, interim accord, when in reality it  omitted the details on how and when Iran would dismantle the military side of its nuclear program, and inter alia neglected to address the critical issue of Iran’s nuclear-capable ballistic missiles. Tehran itself has contradicted these assertions as “misleading,” referring specifically to the White House statement of Jan. 12 which said: “From Jan. 20, Iran will for the first time start eliminating its stockpile of higher level enriched uranium and dismantling some of the infrastructure that makes such enrichment possible.” Three days later, on Tuesday, Jan 15. Iran’s lead negotiator, Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi, went on national television with a less than polite denial: “…different interpretations come out of a single document and that is natural,” he said. “But we had better try to have common interpretations, and that is why during the talks we paused a couple of times and continued with the participation of the higher levels.” Homing in on the White House term “dismantling,” Aragchi countered: “We are aware of Mr. Obama’s problems in Congress, but ‘dismantling’ abuses the word after the recent deal.”
In the light of the conflicting versions coming out the White House and Tehran – and Joe Biden’s refusal to level with Netanyahu on the latest rounds of nuclear talks – Israel is left wondering what in fact US-led international nuclear diplomacy has achieved in the way of curbing Iran’s progress toward a bomb – if anything.
The coming DEBKA Weekly out next Friday, Jan. 17, will offer some pointed answers to those questions. We will also show how President Obama’s policies have opened the door for a major Iranian political offensive in the Middle East, which gives Tehran free rein to meddle profoundly in the affairs of Iraq and Lebanon in addition to Syria.

“OBAMACORE” TIED INTO DOMESTIC TERRORIST BILL AYERS: BRINGING DOWN AMERICA VIA THE KIDDIES…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

EVEN if the Radical-in-Chief is a lame duck for the rest of his term it matters not a whit. Between his thrust into every citizen’s core private recesses through Obamacare, the POTUS has designated the gov’t as the ultimate controlling entity. In effect, Obama Inc. seeks nothing less than control over life and death ! What could be more intrusive and totalitarian? Rhetorical question.

Similarly, the kiddies – for generations to come – are a key part of their radical designs. Revolutionary predecessors prepped the groundwork for their co-option, but the Radical-in-Chief has ratcheted up said implementation at warp speed. A good portion of evidence can be found within a book review featured at American Thinker: Bringing Down America.

As such, keep in mind the CORE contribution of Billy Boy Ayers, yes, the domestic terrorist cum “educator”, who has been orchestrating the (mis)education of the kiddies for decades.

INDEED, he has also been a frequent visitor at the People’s House, courtesy of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, even as the Liar-in-Chief opined: “Ayers was just a guy in the neighborhood.” Oh reallyTerrorist Bill Ayers: From Bombs to Obama.

No matter. Let’s not be bothered with pesky details, and never mind the fact that Ayers escaped the long-arm of the law (why isn’t he rotting in Federal prison?) as head of the Weathermen, a group which committed murder and domestic acts of terrorism for years!

Alas, onto the kiddies and Obama Inc.’s iron-grip core!

Obamacore: The travesty called the Common Core Standards (Part I)

by GAMALIEL ISAAC, PHD December  2013

This article is about the travesty called the Common Core Standards.  Its design began before Obama was elected but I and others refer to it as Obamacore because Obama played a major role in imposing it on the country, and like Obamacare it was passed without being read, and it involves centralized data collection of private information.  States across the U.S. signed on to Obamacore because they were bribed with stimulus funds.  As parents became aware of the changes that were made to their children’s education many joined organizations to oppose it.  Many insightful and alarming critiques have been written regarding the danger of Common Core.  There are fears that Common Core is paving the way for indoctrination of American students by centralizing control of education, collecting massive amount of data on students, and telling teachers what they must and must not teach.  There are reports that scores have dropped when the Common Core was adopted and that a curriculum designed to meet the Common Core standards would only prepare students for entry level courses in nonselective community colleges.

James Milgram, the only mathematician in the Common Core validation committee , refused to sign off on the math standards.  He said that Common Core math standards would put students two years behind those of high-achieving countries.  He told the Texas state legislature that Common Core standards are, “in large measure a political document that . . . is written at a very low level and does not adequately reflect our current understanding of why the math programs in the high-achieving countries give dramatically better results.”

He said:

“I had considerable influence on the mathematics standards in the document. However, as is often the case, there was input from many other sources — including State Departments of Education — that had to be incorporated into the standards…  A number of these sources were mainly focused on things like making the standards as non-challenging as possible. Others were focused on making sure their favorite topics were present, and handled in the way they liked.”

Dr. Milgram added that it led to a number of “extremely serious failings” in the Common Core that made it premature for any state hoping to improve math scores to implement them and that the Core Math standards were designed to reflect very low expectations.

The Common Core standards are low compared to those of high achieving countries but a study by the Thomas Fordham Institute found that the Common Core English standards are higher than those of 37 states and the math standards are higher than those of 39 states.  The reason for this is that states dumbed down their minimum standards so they could show they were meeting their standards and get No Child Left Behind money.  Previously it was easy for a school to exceed the minimum state standards.  Common Core imposes a low level curriculum on schools which dictate what to teach and what not to teach.

Why are the standards of Common Core low when the ostensible purpose of Common Core is to raise the performance of American students?  One can find the answer in a document by the American Federation of Teachers which states that one of the goals of Common Core is to “close the intolerable achievement gap between minority and non-minority students.”  It’s much easier to close the gap by lowering standards than to raise the performance of poorly performing students and no teacher or school administrator wants to be in the position where their jobs depend on getting students to perform.

There are ideological reasons to lower standards as well.  Common Core instructions tell teachers to “avoid giving any background context” to texts on the grounds that Common Core’s close reading strategy “forces students to rely exclusively on the text instead of privileging background knowledge, and levels the playing field for all.”

The ideology reason given above is to level the playing field although the argument that leaving out background information will somehow do that is ridiculous.  Those making that argument should be going to school instead of designing a curriculum for schools.

Common Core tests do not emphasize getting the right answer.  Instead they focus on essay questions, which makes possible grading in such a way that underperforming minority groups score as well as high performing groups.

The other goal of Common Core stated by the American Federation of Teachers is to help American students compete in the global economy.  That raises the question “Is the reason for America’s poor economic performance low standards?”

Is Curriculum the Cause of America’s Poor Worldwide Education Rank?

You can have the best curriculum in the world but if there is no discipline you can’t teach it.  A school staffer at Overbrook High School in Philadelphia told CBS that:

 “It’s mayhem. Students are in the halls, they’re smoking in the bathroom; cigarettes, marijuana,” said a worker at the school, who asked not to be identified. “We can’t contain them and it’s really hazardous for us working and these kids are not being educated at all.”

“It’s a zoo in here. Parents really need to come up here and see what’s going on in this school because it’s ridiculous,”

Asian students who want to study are assaulted by blacks.  In 2010, a federal judge found that black students at South Philadelphia High School had assaulted and harassed Asian students daily — for years but the principal said she did not call police because she did not want to “criminalize” the black students.

Laws prevent public schools from taking effective action to stop the violence.  John Hood in an article for the Foundation of Economic Education wrote:

“A host of administrative decisions, court rulings, and legislative actions have created such a maze of regulations that school principals and teachers are often unable to exercise meaningful control over their schools. Furthermore, the prevailing “ethos” in the education establishment-made up of researchers, administrators, and bureaucrats-is suspicious of many forms of punishment, and exhibits a fixation with “sensitivity training” and building self-esteem among students.”

One would think that if the Obama administration was serious about improving education they would remove the regulations that interfere with classroom discipline.  Instead in response to higher number of blacks being suspended than whites, President Obama issued an “executive order” which effectively placed “quotas” on school discipline based on race.  If there are more disruptive blacks than Chinese in a school and you suspend the blacks you could face possible civil rights violation charges.

Obamacore: The travesty called the Common Core Standards (Part II)

Obamacore: The travesty called the Common Core Standards (Part III)

David Coleman, one of the architects of Common Core said he believes there is “a massive social injustice in this country” and that education is “the engine of social justice.”

Common Core Literature and Writing books by Zaner-Bloser teach social activism to 6 year old children in first grade.  Children are taught how to manipulate others by getting them angry with emotional words.  Reading about this I can’t help but think how the Obama administration manipulates Americans with emotional words to get them angry at Republicans.  An example that comes to mind is Obama’s accusation against Republicans that they were holding the government hostage when they blocked funding for Obamacare.  A similar example of public manipulation was when the Obama administration blocked access to veteran memorials in order to make the public angry at the Republicans.

The Common Core approved book Barack Obama by Jane Sutcliffe indoctrinates children that whites mistreat black people and are racist and therefore didn’t want to vote for ‘Barack’, and only Barack can make the country better.  The Common Core approved book, Barack Obama, Son of Promise, Child of Hope, shows Barack glowing with a heavenly aura.

A Common Core lesson plan blames Islamic terrorism on low self esteem.  The Common Core approved text book World History devotes an entire chapter to promoting  the virtues of Islam and has anti-Israel propagandaspread throughout the book.  State Rep. Ritch Workman told Fox News that “kids are going to take this book as gospel and believe that Christians and Jews were murderous barbarians and thank God the Muslims came along and the world is great.”

The Common Core Science Curriculum teaches children that humans are dangerous to the planet, that man made global warming is an accepted incontrovertible fact even though it is not and that government action is required to fix global warming even though the taxes the Obama administration would like to impose on carbon dioxide producers would have a negligible effect on global warming but would have a devastating effect on a crumbling economy.

A February 2013 USDOE report that discusses measuring student attitudes, beliefs, and behavior lists desired competencies or improvement of attitudes such as “appreciation of diversity” and “recognizing bias in sources.”  From the perspective of the left wing originators of Common Core conservative view points are biased and of course this is what children will be taught.

The Obama administration has already used the IRS to harass conservative groups, which raises the concern that parents of children who lack sufficient appreciation of diversity might be harassed as well.  One can imagine a scenario where a child, who has some reservations about Islam, is labeled racist and his parents are determined to be the source of his racism.  Perhaps separation of the child from the negative influence of his parents might be seen as a solution to the problem.

One of the reasons given for collecting data on student attitudes is to help improve their motivation.  Studies have shown that students from fatherless parent families are less likely to be motivated to stay in school than those from two parent families.  If the government wants to motivate students they are more likely to accomplish their goal if instead of collecting personal data on students, they reconsider welfare policies that have been shown to lead to the proliferation of single parent families and antisocial behavior.

Is a Single Curriculum better than Multiple Curricula?

The final question I will consider here is whether one single common curriculum is a good idea.  Students have different abilities.  Some thrive in challenging environments while others perform better in more laid back environments.

Problems of a single curriculum become problems for everyone and there is reason to believe that the experimental approaches of Common Core are problematic.  Another problem of a single common curriculum is that it enables indoctrination by the Federal government on a massive scale as discussed previously.  The focus of a good curriculum should be to teach critical thinking which is the opposite of indoctrination.

How to Really Improve Education

The first and most important step for improving education in the U.S. is reversing legislation that prevents discipline in the classroom.  Attempts to level the playing field by bringing down performance of high achievers must be stopped.  Legislators should not impose a common curriculum that makes all schools the same.  Legislators should not interfere with school choice so that parents can use school vouchers to send children to the best schools for their children.  Legislators should reconsider welfare policies that lead to badly behaved youth.  Our government should step back and allow the free market of education to work without imposing restrictions on what teachers can teach and without passing laws that make it impossible for teachers and principals to bring peace to the classroom.

ADDITIONAL proofs – woven within several interconnecting commentaries – demonstrate their desperate quest to control future generations. However, one stands out on its own: ALERT: American Domestic Terrorists (Foreign Born Too) ARE Teaching Your Kiddies. Mentoring Their Teachers Through Workshops

Parents, what say you?

ISLAMIC BUTCHERY SWATHES ACROSS THE CHRISTIAN WORLD (JEWS NOT THEIR ONLY TARGETS!): CHURCHES DEAD SILENT.WHAT WILL IT TAKE TO AWAKEN THEM? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Linked herein – http://islamexposed.org/

ALL of us, at least those who use their brains to discern what’s what and eschew PC mantras, surely understand that the “religion of peace” is nothing of the kind. And those who are Islamists (devoted to Islam) also know what is demanded of them: jihad, here there and everywhere!

In fact, Turkey’s PM Erdogan (Obama’s BFF…one who is held aloft as a “moderate” Muslim…like being half pregnant…but why quibble…), a key Muslim Brotherhood leader/devotee, is completely in league with high level Islamists who exhort jihad to the masses. Don’t believe this site, if so inclined, but do listen to what their Islamic scholars proclaim as their truths:

Ali Gomaa, the grand mufti of Egypt, the highest Muslim religious authority in the world, supports murdering non-Muslims. In the daily Al Ahram (April 7, 2008), he said, “Muslims must kill non-believers wherever they are unless they convert to Islam.” He also compares non-Muslims to apes and pigs. Source

Muhammad Sayyid Al Tantawi, president of Al Azhar University (the most prominent and authoritative institute of Islamic jurisprudence in the world) also approves of killing and maiming Christians, Jews, and other infidels. He added, “This is not my personal view. This what the Shari’a Law says, the law of Allah, the only valid law on the earth.” Source

Syed Abul Ala Maududi, founder of the Pakistani political party Jamaat-e-Islami, said non-Muslims have “absolutely no right to seize the reins of power in any part of God’s earth nor to direct the collective affairs of human beings according to their own misconceived doctrines.” If they do, “the believers would be under an obligation to do their utmost to dislodge them from political power and to make them live in subservience to the Islamic way of life.” Source

The Chief Justice of Saudi Arabia, Sheikh abdullah bin Muhammad bin Humaid teaches that “at first fighting was forbidden, then it was permitted, and after that it was made obligatory.” He clearly identifies two groups Muslims are obligated to fight: “(1) they who start fighting against Muslims, and (2) they who worship gods other than Allah.” Source

The most prominent Muslim scholar of the 20th century, Sheikh Abu Ala Maududi, stated in his book, Islamic Law and Constitution, on p. 262, that the Islamic State “seeks to mould every aspect of life and activity. In such a state no one can regard any field of his affairs as personal and private. Considered from this aspect the Islamic State bears a kind of resemblance to the Fascist and Communist states.” Maududi added “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam.”Source

Hasan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood (the largest international Islamic organization in the world) wrote, “Islam is an all-embracing concept which regulates every aspect of life, adjudicating on every one of its concerns and prescribing for it a solid and rigorous order.” Hasan al-Banna acknowledged there are many levels of jihad, including mere “interior spiritual struggle,” which he deemed the lowest level. According to al-Banna, waging warfare against the infidels is the highest expression of fidelity.Source

Hasan al-Banna also wrote, “it is a duty incumbent on every Muslim to struggle towards the aim of making every people Muslim and the whole world Islamic, so that the banner of Islam can flutter over the earth and the call of the Muezzin can resound in all the corners of the world.” Now remember, this is the founder of the largest international Muslim organization in the world.Source: Robert Spencer’s book, Stealth Jihad.

Saudi Arabia’s Grand Mufti, Sheikh Abdulaziz Bin Abdullah Bin Mohammed al Sheikh said on Iqra’ TV channel, “Killing producers who show women unveiled is legal.” Source

The Saudi Sheikh Saleh Al-Lehadan, head of the Supreme Judiciary Council, told Al Watan Daily, (March 25, 2008) “After getting rid of the Jews in our Arab land, we must turn to the Christians. They have three options: either they convert to Islam, or leave, or pay Jizia (protection taxes).” Source

In this regard, this blog must express the following point of convergence between Jews and Christians: they have more in common than most realize. While Jews view the Old Testament as their sacred and main Book, many Christians view the Old & New Testaments as theirs. Others stick to the New Testament. But no matter, besides, to each his own beliefs, unless forcing others to believe otherwise.The point being, there are many times when both religions intersect, and this should be one of those times. 

NEVERTHELESS, despite ALL the death and destruction meted out by Islamists on behalf of Allah (recall the admonition at a recent interview, first the Saturday people, then the Sunday people), a preponderance of Churches (Synagogues fare little better) have been “turning the other cheek”. Instead of standing up for their co-religionists and banding together as one, what are they doing? NOTHING.

In fact, whatever the level of Islamic barbarism, extending even to cannibalism, it doesn’t move them to action, even when it is staring them in the face via credible sources and video uploads. What more do they require to make them scream: enough!

IF additional evidence is still ! necessary, well, let’s take a peek:

Exhibit Number One: Muslims enter Christian home, butcher husband, wife, and two children…gory enough?

Exhibit Number Two: Muslims kill Christians, bottle their blood, and sell It for $100,000 a piece to Saudis…yes, once again, Islam’s relationship to blood!

Exhibit Number Three: Islamic butchery manifests in America with Muslim immigrants…but why wouldn’t it?

Exhibit Number Four: Armenian Christian murdered for refusing to convert to Islam…as the Churches stand silent. Why?

Exhibit Number Five: “Had Allah allowed us to eat them we would have eaten them”…but he does! Haven’t they heard the “good” news…cannibalism is halal approved!

Exhibit Number Six: Bangladesh: Muslims murder young Christian who complained about anti-Christian jihad violence

Taking a break from the gory Christian carnage, let us turn our attention to their Jewish butchery, as such, when has it not been a factor? 

And if one thinks that the Muslim have evolved into a modern mindset, one must remember what took place in Ramallah in which two Israeli soldiers were beaten and tortured to death, their bodies thrown down a window to the sounds of “Allahu Akbar”, and their flesh then chewed by the crowd.

Arabs waving entrails of butchered Israelis in Ramallah

Muslims in Ramallah held body parts of Israeli while they cried out “I eat the flesh of my occupier!”

And those of us who studied in Jewish day schools/high schools – and some who attended certain Christian schools may have absorbed the Old Testament and its related texts – surely came across many of the Jewish prophets.

In fact, having spent a good amount of time studying the “Nevi’im” – נְבִיאִים – the Jewish prophets, much of it still resonates. And capable students (even after many years) recall many of its glorious stories, one of which includes Ichabod. But what does this have to do with today’s commentary? Everything.

The text itself reinforces the idea of this “focal point,” as it becomes successively smaller in scope – moving from the panorama of the battlefield, through the city gates, towards the very intimate moment of birth, and ultimately to a portrait of one woman whose final words are,

“…the ark of God is taken.” The ark is known to contain the Written Torah, which includes the Ten Commandments, and the Torah scroll dictated by God to Moses. The second essential part of the Torah – that is, the Oral Torah – is said to have been embodied by Eli and Pinchas, who were responsible for its transmission to future generations. The wife of Pinchas understands that her father-in-law and husband are living transmitters of Torah. As such, their deaths create a depletion of national glory, a loss of leadership and a longing for the physical and spiritual sustenance of Torah.

The wife of Pinchas remains steadfast in her clarity that Torah is the lifeline of the Jewish nation, and that its dispossession amounts to no less than catastrophe. She regards her family tragedy as a part of this national loss and, through the name Ichabod, she establishes her newborn son as living reminder to his people of their unique connection to the Divine. Through the prism of Torah, the wife of Pinchas discerns what is everlasting about her husband, her father-in-law and her child. While the loss of her family no doubt causes personal pain, she reserves her deepest anguish for what their loss means to the Jewish people. As living personifications of Torah, Pinchas and Eli exemplified the spark of eternity in every Jew. The name “Ichabod” elegizes them on this level.

Found in the book Samuel 1, the word Ichabod means literally “inglorious” or “there is no glory”…and what could be more ignoble than Churches ignoring the slaughtering of millions of their own?
 

“Their blood cries out:” The silence of Christian churches in the face of worldwide slaughter of believers is a signpost screaming “Ichabod”

Sunday, January 12, 2014; 8:00-11:00 p.m. ET

Special Program Announcement

The silence from the putrefying pulpits of America’s “mega” and minor churches in the face of the unfolding, full scale attempt to destroy bible believing Christians across the world is a testimony of seducing spirits and the doctrines of devils causing many to depart from the faith.

Pastor David Lankford, author of his new book Revelation 13 Revealed, and Steve Quayle, internationally acclaimed author, researcher and talk show host will be sharing the problem and the answer on Sunday, January 12, 2014. Together, they will be spelling out the doctrines and giving you the knowledge necessary to deal with these issues and prevail by the power of almighty God!

Listen Live

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN LIVE – SUNDAY

On the other hand, isn’t it interesting that a major operation undertaken by the IDF into Gaza, November 14, 2012 – to clean out the Hamas and assorted terror nests, yet the political leadership allowed them to live, to regroup and to fight another day- bespeaks of an insanity among Jewish leaders too.

In Israel, who among us didn’t understand its Hebrew operational name, coined amud anan…עמוד ענן…pillar of cloud…pillar of fire…pillar of defenseand where it came from? The Book of Exodus 14:19-20, that’s where.

The question cries out from the heavens: have our respective leaders – from the Christian and Jewish communities – learned nothing about what it means to be free and deserving of said freedoms?

So whether or not one believes in the Old, New or a combination of Testaments, it is excruciatingly clear: without putting out the fires, not only does one go against what is right and just, but one then becomes an accomplice to future acts of barbarism, Silence IS agreement. 

Wherefore art thou – those who hold themselves up as leaders – when it matters the most? Neither here, there or anywhere!

TOP U.S. GENERAL CONFIRMS THESIS (AT THIS SITE): OBAMA ADMIN MOBBED UP WITH MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD.WHAT DOES THIS PORTEND? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

WHILE it is heartening to have one’s backbreaking labor proven right (and from a multiplicity of directions), such confirmation is not always what it is cracked up to be. How so?

Alas, in certain matters of grave import there are things which should be bigger than one’s ego, so it would be better to be proven wrong and then issue whatever mea culpas are necessary. Humbling, but you just gotta suck it up. It happens to many well meaning folks. 

That being said, from the onset of this site, a warning was issued to the newly subscribed readership – and even to those who had yet to subscribe – with less than “six degrees of separation”:

In no uncertain terms it was made known: Hillary Clinton is deeply involved with her Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin. Draw your own conclusions, as to what is meant by “deeply”. The discussion centered around the possibility of another Clinton Presidency, at the time a very real possibility. In any case, the individual was asking me if going public was in the best interests of the United States, in light of Abedin’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood! You read this right. At first blush it seemed as if there was a lack of communication between us, but then decided to ask the individual to repeat said charge. Nothing changed.

Apparently, it was weighing heavily on said contact’s mind, that their Senator, quite possibly the next POTUS, was in a position to have deeply divided loyalties. When/where this contact found out such explosive information is neither here nor there. Besides, some matters must remain private. However, readers should know that Huma Abedin has been involved with the Clinton family since Bill Clinton’s first term, having been plucked for the plum assignment, as an intern, for the Clinton White House. 

But to catch everyone up to (current) speed, one must also be willing to revisit Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s first term via his stealth infestation of Brotherhood devotees, implanting Islamists within key positions. Though few reporters took notice, some of us did not aver our eyes. Thank G-d.

Therefore, a steady incontrovertible case was built, all in order to demonstrate how the Executive Branch (and other power centers, inside and outside the Beltway) had become a “captured” Islamic operation! And few commentaries gift wrap the inherent dangers like the following: the Muslim Mafia (aka The Brotherhood) & their overarching “Plan”: what does it mean for America’s future?

Similarly, this blogger revealed at Islam Exposed OnlineSharia Law mandates Islamic warfare on the west, and the expectation is its silencing. In no uncertain terms, Hillary Clinton, with Huma Abedin at her side, has been (and still is) instrumental to this quest.

ONTO the valiant General…

GENERAL: MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD INSIDE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION (VIDEO LINKS!)

‘There are a whole host of people in this government’

Retired U.S. Air Force Gen. Tom McInerney, who served as both assistant vice chief of staff and commander in chief of U.S. Air Forces Europe, has surprised interviewers on a radio program by confirming the presence of the Muslim Brotherhood inside the U.S. government.

The Islamic supremacist movement’s influence on Washington was reported in “Impeachable Offenses: The Case to Remove Barack Obama from Office” by New York Times bestselling authors Aaron Klein and Brenda J. Elliott.

The book confirms the Obama administration may have exposed national security information through Huma Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, who has deep personal and family associations with the Muslim Brotherhood.

Another key figure with Muslim Brotherhood ties is Mohamed Elibiary, a member of the Department of Homeland Security’s Advisory Council.

McInerney was being interviewed Thursday by WMAL in Washington about a tell-all book by former Defense Secretary Robert Gates that strongly criticizes President Obama and Vice President Biden for making politically motivated decisions regarding national security.

McInerney said Gates was doing the nation a service by exposing decision-making in the Oval Office but said he should have done it sooner. He also noted that the Muslim Brotherhood influences have been causing major problems throughout the Middle East.

Then he added, “We’ve got Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. government today.”

Asked by the talk-show hosts for their names, he said, “I haven’t got their names exactly but there’s a list of them, at least 10 or 15 of them in the U.S. government.”

He cited the organization’s influence in Homeland Security and the secretary of state’s office under Clinton, where Abedin has worked.

“Her parents are Muslim Brotherhood. And her intuitions are in that direction,” he said.

“There are a whole host of people in this government.”

He said Islam experts Frank Gaffney or Claire Lopez would have the details.

Gaffney, president of the Center for Security Policy, has created a publication called “The Muslim Brotherhood in the Obama Administration,” which addresses the issue that was brought to the attention of Congress in July 2012 by Republican Reps. Michele Bachmann, Trent Franks, Louie Gohmert, Tom Rooney and Lynn Westmoreland.

The lawmakers asked the inspector generals at the departments of Homeland Security, Justice and State to investigate, prompting Democrats and Republicans to rush to Abedin’s defense.

However, as WND reported, Abedin worked for an organization founded by her family that is effectively at the forefront of a grand Saudi plan to mobilize U.S. Muslim minorities to transform America into a strict Wahhabi-style Islamic state, according to an Arabic-language manifesto issued by the Saudi monarchy. Abedin also was a member of the executive board of the Muslim Student Association, which was identified as a Muslim Brotherhood front group in a 1991 document introduced into evidence during the terror-financing trial of the Texas-based Holy Land Foundation trial.

The internal memo said Muslim Brotherhood members “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and by the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Lopez, a CSP senior fellow, wrote at The Gatestone Institute: “The careful insinuation of Muslim Brothers into positions from which they can exercise influence on U.S. policy began long before the attacks of 9/11, although their success has accelerated dramatically under the administration of President Barack Obama.”

She said the “massive Muslim Brotherhood organization network in the U.S., so patiently built up over the decades since that first Oval Office meeting in 1953 [with President Dwight D. Eisenhower], eventually gave it a prominence and (false) reputation of credibility that was unmatched by any other Islamic groups, moderate or otherwise.”

She said the Brotherhood achieved “information dominance” during the George W. Bush administration that only intensified in the following years.

“Not only did figures associated and identified with the Muslim Brotherhood achieve broad penetration at senior levels of U.S. policy making, but voices that warned of their true agenda (such as Stephen Coughlin’s) were actively excluded,” she said.

That information dominance has contributed to startling consequences, most evident in the U.S. policy toward the al-Qaida and Muslim Brotherhood-dominated revolutions that many call the ‘Arab Spring,’ but which in fact are more accurately termed an ‘Islamic Awakening,’” she said.

Under the Muslim Brotherhood-influenced Obama administration, U.S. policy has undergone such a drastic shift in the direction of outright support for these jihadist movements – from al-Qaida militias in Libya, to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and both al-Qaida and Muslim Brotherhood-linked rebels in Syria — that it is scarcely recognizable as American anymore.”

In the WMAL interview, McInerney said Gates’ book should alert Americans about what should be done to protect national security.

“The Middle East is coming apart with this administration’s policies. Look at Libya. We should never have gone into Libya. … We’ve got Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. government.”

WND columnist Diana West wrote it likely wasn’t by chance that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, “reading from prepared notes, absurdly described the Muslim Brotherhood to the House Intelligence Committee last year as a ‘largely secular’ organization.”

“Is it an accident that in June the State Department issued a visa to Hani Nour Eldin of Egypt to meet with senior White House officials? Eldin is a member of Gama’a al-Islamiyya, a terrorist organization once led by Omar Abdel Rahman, ‘the blind sheikh’ convicted of the first attack on the World Trade Center. In the person of Rahman’s successor, Refai Ahmed Taha, the group is one of the five signatories of Osama bin Laden’s February 1998 ‘World Islamic Front Statement Urging Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders.’ Isn’t it imperative to review the policy mechanism that permitted a member of bin Laden’s jihad front into the White House?”

“Impeachable Offenses” also reported that then-CIA director John Brennan announced the Obama administration was calibrating policies in the fight against terrorism to ensure Americans are never “profiled.”

His speech was arranged by a Muslim Brotherhood-tied group that has deep relations not only with other Brotherhood fronts but to the White House and national security agencies.

Brennan’s NYU session was organized by the Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA. ISNA, whose members asked Brennan scores of questions during the event, stated the meeting was intended to initiate a “dialogue between government officials and Muslim American leaders to explore issues of national security.”

ISNA was founded in 1981 by the Saudi-funded Muslim Students Association, which itself was founded by the Muslim Brotherhood. The two groups are still partners.

ISNA is known for its promotion of strict Saudi-style Islam in mosques throughout the U.S.

Islam scholar Stephen Schwartz describes ISNA as “one of the chief conduits through which the radical Saudi form of Islam passes into the United States.”

According to terrorism expert Steven Emerson, ISNA “is a radical group hiding under a false veneer of moderation.”

But where do things currently stand? Well, this American-Israeli has revealed: the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia has completed “phase 3” from “The Plan”. They have even infiltrated America’s family courts…2 more “phases” to go. Not too shabby. Indeed, they are on a roll. “Al-hamdu lillahi rabbil ‘alaminالحمد لله ربّ العالمين‎”…“All the praises and thanks be to Allâh.” A real “divine” intervention!

Concomitantly, it is a necessary imperative for Shariah Law to engulf the west. It has!

Is there any longer a scintilla of a doubt as to the Muslim Brotherhood’s global ambitions, and with the leadership of the free world deeply in sync?

Indeed, more than one top General concurs with the thesis proferred herein: yes, it’s better to see things as they are, than how one wishes them to be.

As any patriotic General would declare: forewarned is forearmed!

MALIK OBAMA’S SUDANESE TENTACLES: ENSNARING OBAMA, HILL/BILL & HUMA ABEDIN TOO. THE NOOSE IS TIGHTENING. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Due to the incontrovertible linkage between Malik Obama (you know whose half bro’ he is…) and the Muslim Brotherhood, Omar al-Bashir, Sudan’s Islamist dictator, its butcher, is more than a “person of interest”. Consequently, it is a strategic imperative to link the following policy paper, as it serves as the first underpinning for today’s commentary thesis and a geo-strategic clarion call. The Sudan is hardly given the attention it deserves, either by the media or western leadership, and its negligence is a grave act of malfeasance.

Flesh out the facts from within, in so doing, acquaint yourselves with the Sudan’s importance, delineating the central role it plays in the Islamic thrust towards a global caliphate: the fungible definition of “who is a terrorist”. It invariably leads to the support of Islamists in Syria, Sudan & elsewhere: when politics/ideology trump all. 

Mind you, this paper was written at the behest of Dr. Martin Sherman’s strategic policy center (Israel’s foremost strategic policy expert) due to the geo-political importance the Sudan holds for Islamic hegemony within the entire region. It’s a holding station for the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood

As a result, the war raging in the Sudan between the Islamists in the north and the Black Christians in the south dare not be underestimated. It must be understood – its entire strategic scope – for what it is. Rest assured, Barack HUSSEIN Obama is in the thick of Omar al-Bashir’s end game, and Malik Obama is his/their major point man.     

As to the Islamist-in-Chief’s direct fingerprints, here too he is exposed via a list of MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA OPERATIVES INSIDE AMERICANot only that, his BFF in the Mid East, Turkey’s Islamist leader, Erdogan, is part of the Brotherhood’s international committee, just as Sudan’s dictator is! Never mind that Erdogan is on the ropes within his own country for many reasons (beyond the scope of this analysis), if necessary, he will find safe haven elsewhere to continue his Brotherhood’s global ambitions. The above are all fellow travelers and their ultimate plans will eventually come full circle.

Yes, Brotherhood links are found in so many places they can fill a book. Really. Yet, who has the time to tackle such an endeavor, even though requests have been made in this direction for such a project. Significantly, their tentacles lead straight back to the Islamist-in-Chief and his half bro’. What a treacherous duo.

Most ominously, internalize what his reaction, re Egypt’s General el-Sisi’s designation of the Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, reveals. It tells us all we need to know: Obama Rejects Muslim Brotherhood’s “Terrorist” Designation !

More spilling of the (Brotherhood) beans…

Brotherhood Insider bolsters case against Malik Obama

by  on January 7, 2014
By Walid Shoebat and Ben BarrackHis name is Tharwat El-Kherbawy and there was a time when he was on the inside of Muslim Brotherhood’s leadership in Egypt. After being expelled from the Brotherhood in 2002, he has been very open about what goes on inside the group. In a lengthy 2012 interview that, in hindsight has shown to be very prescient, El-Kherbawy explained how the ideology of the group had transformed since he joined in 1985.Tharwat El-Kherbawy: Brotherhood Insider.Tharwat El-Kherbawy: Brotherhood Insider.Via Egypt Daily News:

The syllabus in my time used to be rather moderate, which was at odds with the Salafi way of thinking. Then Salafi educational ideas were introduced to the Brotherhood. The Wahhabi way of thinking has become very prominent inside the group.

Nearly one year later, Al-Rakoba printed El-Kherbawy’s analysis of the relationship between the (wahhabist) Muslim Brotherhood and the government of Sudan (translated):

“Kherbawi said that the Muslim Brotherhood in Sudan, led by the ruling al-Bashir ofSudan has turned to the Brotherhood’s interest and not the interest of Sudanese.He also revealed that Omar al-Bashir is member of the International Organization of the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Before continuing with El-Kherbawy’s shocking insights, let’s take a look at the Obama family in Kenya. Malik Obama, half-brother to U.S. President Barack Obama, works as a prominent figure within the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO), headquartered in Sudan. There are photos of him at the same 2010 leadership conference led by al-Bashir, which can be found here. Barack Obama’s cousin Musa Ismail Obama and uncle Sayyid Obama are tied directly to the most virulent wahhabist schools in Saudi Arabia. During an interview with al-Jazeera, Musa admitted to sending Kenyan students to those schools. There are also several photos of Musa and Sayyid at one of those schools (Umm Al Qura University).

These linkages would seemingly confirm that at least three members of the Obama family are themselves wahhabists who share the ideals of the Muslim Brotherhood. We also know that Barack and Malik are quite close; Malik’s foundation was granted expeditious, retroactive, and illegal tax-exempt status from none other than Lois Lerner in 2011, which would make her an accessory to terror funding.

Now, back to Kherbawi… In July of last year, he stated on video that the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood intends to use its connections with Sudan to pass through and create a government in exile.

These disclosures could help to explain why the claims in complaint 1761, filed by Dr. Sadek Ebeidwith Egypt’s Attorney General, Hisham Barakat, were backed up by the former head of Egypt’s Constitutional Court Tahani al-Jebali. This complaint hasn’t only caught the attention of Barakat, it is being taken far more seriously than initially thought.

When viewed through the lens of Kherbawi’s claims, such concerns are more easily understood. There are also curious instances of anecdotal evidence that would seem to support Kherbawi’s charge that Sudan would be a safe haven for Brotherhood figures. Egypt’s former Prime Minister under Mursi was arrested attempting to flee there.

Via the BBC:

Egyptian police have arrested the former prime minister who served under ousted President Mohammed Morsi.

The interior ministry said Hisham Qandil was caught in a mountainous area with smugglers trying to flee to Sudan.

It’s worth noting that Kherbawi made his claims about Sudan being home to a Muslim Brotherhood government “in exile” several months before Qandil was caught trying to go there.

Just last month, in a report filed an Arabic newspaper, Kherbawi emphasized that while “Sudan is a holding station for the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt and Tunisia…”, the Brotherhood is not managing its forces in Egypt from Sudan.

Via Mobtrada, Kherbawi is quoted as saying (translated):

“This is a fact, International Organization of the Muslim Brotherhood is managing the situation in Egypt, and I do not think it manages Egypt from Sudan, because a state that has Brotherhood also has a desk for international regulations, and the Muslim Brotherhood when they fall in crises, they formed a committee to manage the crisis through Mahmoud Ezzat. The committee includes Rashid Ghannouchi and bin Hammam Saeed and others, and there are persons who have advisory roles, such as Turkey’s Prime Minister Erdogan. Therefore, Sudan is a (holding) station that supports the international organization from which the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt operated.”

The Prime Minister of Turkey is an adviser to the Muslim Brotherhood’s International Organization?

Oh, so?

This is corroborated, at least in part, by events in November of last year, when Turkey’s ambassador to Egypt – Huseyin Avni Botsali – was expelled from Cairo and sent back to Turkey. Al-Watan reported, via Hurriyet, that the reason for Botsali’s expulsion had to do with his using diplomatic immunity to funnel Brotherhood assets out of Egypt.

This too, could help explain why Egypt’s current government recently froze the assets of hundreds of Muslim Brotherhood figures, allegedly including those of former Clinton Foundation employee,Gehad El-Haddad. Concerns that Brotherhood money could leave Egypt for the sole purpose of strengthening the Brotherhood outside of Egypt seem to be well-founded.

As an aside, our readers are quite familiar with our assertion that the Brotherhood’s resurgence will one day manifest itself with the resurrection of the Ottoman Empire, which was based in Turkey. In fact, doing so was an inherent goal of the Brotherhood’s founders. Erdogan was dealt a significant blow when Mursi was overthrown, so much so that he shed tears over it on national television; he is not about to accept defeat; he can be expected to double his efforts.

While claims and accusations in the Middle East are very often exaggerated, the much less dramatic source of those exaggerations can be quite legitimate. For example, the Obama administration’s policy with respect to the Muslim Brotherhood generally – in Egypt specifically – has obviously been supportive of the group. That the Obama administration supports the Brotherhood is an idea that long ago embedded itself into Egypt’s public consciousness. Therefore, it’s easy to understand why the most clandestine arm of any U.S. Administration – the CIA – would be identified as the entity that helped to make it happen.

Evidence suggests these Egyptian protesters are right.

Evidence suggests these Egyptian protesters are right.

There has been significant speculative buzz on the streets in Egypt that Mursi is an agent of the CIA.Mursi’s English is not very good and comes across as not being very intelligent. Some point to this fact while raising questions about his ability to earn a Ph.D. in Engineering from U.S.C. In an article at the Canada Free Press, Egyptian journalist Ali Al Sharnoby wrote:

Morsi sent a message through his prison visitors to the CIA saying: How could America and its security institutes abandon me, while I served them sincerely and cooperated with them during the last period to prevent conflicts in the Middle East?

Robert Stacy McCain went in the other direction shortly after Mursi’s ouster, making the argument that the CIA played an active role in facilitating the collapse of the Mursi regime.

Let’s consider two Executive Branch entities that were at the center of the controversy over the Benghazi attacks – the CIA and the State Department. When the talking points – and the demonstrably false video narrative – began to harm the administration, it was the CIA – not State – that had to take the fall. Even CIA Director David Petraeus was forced to resign one day after Obama’s re-election when details of an extra-marital affair were made public. Evidence is overwhelming that the Justice Department had known about the affair for months in advance (Exhibit X of our “Ironclad” report).

Then CIA Director not comfortable with Benghazi talking points.

Then CIA Director not comfortable with Benghazi talking points.

The irony was that it was Petraeus who seemed the most uncomfortable with those talking points (Exhibit W of our “Ironclad” report), not his State Department counterpart, Hillary Clinton; she was protected aggressively by the administration. She even was able to appoint the leaders of a board tasked with investigating the very State Department she headed, with very predictable results.

One thing can be said with relative confidence; the CIA provided cover for and was blamed by the administration for providing faulty intelligence due to the ‘fog of war’ in order to protect the State Department after claims about the role of an anti-Muhammad video proved bogus.

However, if anything, recently uncovered evidence suggests that if Mursi was an agent for anyone,the Clintons themselves would be quite high on the list.

Last month, another complaint (No. 18337) was filed with the office of Egypt’s Attorney General, alleging that Mursi’s wife – Naglaa Mahmoud – claimed that her and her husband were recruited by the Clintons in the 1980′s, when they were in the U.S. Claims attributed to Mahmoud included charges that her and Hillary are extremely close. This claim is bolstered by the fact that Saleha Abedin – one of Mahmoud’s colleagues inside the Muslim Sisterhood – is the mother of Hillary’s longtime and very close adviser, Huma Abedin.

Arabic newspaper Al-Bawabh reports that while in the U.S., Mursi worked as a translator for the Islamic Center in California (ICC), which was co-founded by Maher Hathout, who also served asPresident of the ICC.

Mursi and Mahmoud around the time they were 'recruited' by the Clintons?

Mursi and Mahmoud around the time they were ‘recruited’ by the Clintons?

During Clinton’s presidency, the Clintons were very active in reaching out to Muslim Brotherhood groups in the U.S. In fact, Hathout also founded the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC). Hathout is identified as a supporter of Wahhabism, the same strain of Islam Kherbawi says the Muslim Brotherhood has adopted. In 1996, Hillary became the first wife of a sitting president to address U.S. Islamic groups outside of the White House. Where did she choose to break such ground?

At the Islamic Center of Southern California, a group for which Hathout was an official spokesman. He also spoke and praised Hillary at this meeting.

Via the L.A. Times (h/t Ryan Mauro):

The importance U.S. Muslims attached to Clinton’s appearance was apparent in the effusive introduction given her by Maher Hathout, spokesman for the Islamic Center of Southern California and one of the nation’s preeminent Islamic leaders.

“When our country becomes what we dream and when our society becomes warmer and more inclusive . . . it will be written in history in letters of light that the first first lady who took a major step to greet, include and to communicate with Muslims is First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton,” Hathout declared, drawing loud applause.

When did a younger Bill and Hillary befriend the younger Mursi and Mahmoud?

When did a younger Bill and Hillary befriend the younger Mursi and Mahmoud?

Let’s get back to Kherbawy’s interview from November of 2012…

El-Kherbawy explained that despite losing the spot as the Muslim Brotherhood’s presidential candidate (to Mohammed Mursi), Khairat el-Shater viewed himself as the real power broker.

Via Egypt Daily News, El-Kherbawy said:

El-Shater harped on about his economic potential and how with Al-Nahda project he can help revive the Egyptian economy as if saying “I will be the real president.” Before the election he said to the FJP paper that “from the first day Morsy wins, I will be the sole person responsible for the economic projects in Egypt.” He was promoting himself as the person behind Morsy’s success.

This squares with information we have published independently in the past. After the Muslim Brotherhood was ousted from power last summer, the Obama administration – State Department in particular – seemed to take specific interest in El-Shater’s release. Remember, it is former Clinton Foundation employee Gehad El-Haddad who was El-Shater’s Deputy Chief of Staff. He helpedbroker a meeting between Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns and the jailed El-Shater last August.

El-Haddad himself was arrested in September.

Regardless of the veracity of claims by Kherbawi – that Mursi is an agent of the CIA – there may be more evidence that he is an agent of Bill and Hillary Clinton, if not a close collaborator as Mahmoud seems to suggest.

According to a trusted Arabic source of ours, Kherbawi appeared on Egyptian television this past January 5th and gave his firsthand account about Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir (translated):

“In 1992, after al-Bashir became president of Sudan, he visited Egypt. I was asked to bring him in person to meet with Mr. Hamid Abou elNasr, the Muslim Brotherhood’s supreme leader in Egypt.

Hamed Abou elNasr told al-Bashir:

‘Ya Bashir elkhair’ The man who is the first to bring the good tidings, through you the Muslim Brother has become the rulers in Sudan.

El Bashir answered:

“God willing we will rule the world in your life time & mine.”

In summation, the brother of the U.S. Commander-in-chief works with and for a man in al-Bashir, who seeks to internationalize the Muslim Brotherhood. That Barack Obama does not know this is absurd. That he has not disclosed it publicly is indicting; that his IRS has aided and abetted Malik is damning.

So is the cover-up of Hillary Clinton’s culpability.

As to the part played by Hill (Bill too) and her co-conspirator (“gal pal”) Huma Abedin, and their absolute nexus to Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, well, the following prima facie evidence should (as a starter) serve to set the record straight:

Exhibit Number One: BENGHAZIGATE’s updates link them even further to Morsi’s Brotherhood Mafia, regardless that Morsi (and associates) is currently in the dock. Indeed, their trails to MALIK OBAMA render them up to their necks. Their eyeballs too. The trials in Egypt will drag them in even further. Can’t wait.

Exhibit Number Two: HILLARY CLINTON & her mobbed up Muslim Brotherhood terror associates are inexorably tied, politically and business-wise. Treasonous. 

Malik Obama, Barack HUSSEIN, Hill/Huma and all their assorted associates – deeply implicated!

 

IRAN’s CONTINUOUS DEFIANCE OF GENEVA “OBLIGATIONS”: OBAMA INC. & JERUSALEM STONE SILENT. WHERE IS THE DECEIT HEADED?…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

WHEN history is recorded Barack HUSSEIN Obama will forever be ascribed with infamous appellations, and this is no exaggeration. He will be known, from time immemorial, as a leader (with malice aforethought) who wrecked havoc, not only on Israel but on western civilization.

Such a sweeping charge is hardly made lightly or without weighing said accusations carefully. This judgment has been rendered with all due deliberation and with a requisite background in geo-politics and the Mid East in particular. It is not for nothing.

In this regard, when it comes to the leader of the free world’s assessment of Iran’s intentions, the following should be a rational and logical extrapolation for him (and surrogates) to postulate: the ultimate weapons of mass destruction MUST stay out of the hands of genocidal rulers. 

FULL STOP.

For at least since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, and demonstrated through their present day worldwide terror reach, (mainly through proxy forces) their future knock-on effects, in both regional and global terms, must be premised on the havoc wrecked WITHOUT the bomb. Therefore, a leader with good intent would multiply to the nth degree, as to what will transpire when Iran’s mullahs proclaim nuclear power status. Have mercy.  

In fact, in both words and deeds, Iran’s Mahdi-driven leadership make themselves manifestly and inordinately clear. There is no equivocation /jive-talk coming from Khamenei and neither from his mouthpieces, even as the charade of “negotiations” continues

– Nuclear talks exposed US hatred of Muslims, Iran’s supreme leader says

Such supreme arrogance comes from many underpinnings, least of which is their sacrosanct belief in the bloody upheaval (indeed, Islam & its relationship to blood is above all else) which must ensue, all in order to usher in the Mahdia vision shared by many Islamists.

Not only that, but Iran’s mullahs well understand that the leadership of the free world is “in the bag”, therefore, continuing apace – and in defiance – makes infinite sense. Under said (world changing) paradigm, yes, it does.

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report January 9, 2014
IR-2m centrifuges at Iran's enrichment plants

IR-2m centrifuges at Iran’s enrichment plants

Iran’s utilization of advanced IR-2m centrifuges for enriching uranium, in violation of the interim Geneva accord, was presented by the US and the five powers Wednesday, Jan. 8, as the main difficulty in its implementation. This claim allowed the follow-up meeting to take place in Geneva on Thursday, Jan. 9. DEBKAfile’s Iranian and intelligence sources report that this was a lame excuse to account for the real situation, which is that Iran has not even started implementing any part of the Geneva accord it signed last November 24. The follow-up talks this week are not expected to break out of this impasse, any more than the first round did on Dec. 19-20.

This is because the obstacles are far from technical; they arise from Iranian domestic politics.  Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has fenced in President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammed Jawad Zarif with hard-line objectors to the tactics employed till now by the Iranian team, led by Iranian deputy foreign minister Abbas Araqchi. In future, negotiators will be required to refer all the conclusions reached with the powers to the policy-making levels in Tehran for approval and abide by their guidelines.

Using a “senior Western diplomatic source” to paint the centrifuge issue as the main obstacle to progress allowed the three figures running the show – US Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy R. Sherman, EU Foreign Policy Coordinator Catherine Ashton, and her deputy Helga Schmidt – to keep the negotiations alive while disregarding the full scale and blatancy of Iran’s misconduct.
DEBKAfile’s sources reveal that the new state of the art centrifuges are not only already in place at the enrichment plants of Fordo and Natanz, but Tehran has brazenly informed the negotiating powers that even more advanced centrifuges have been developed and will soon be installed for test-runs.

The Iranians maintain that they are covered in this action by the Geneva clause acknowledging their right to pursue “nuclear research and development.”

Tehran is therefore treating this signal advance in uranium enrichment capacity as a done deal, even though it belies President Barack Obama’s words on November 25, which hailed Iran’s consent to halting the production and installation of advanced centrifuges as a major breakthrough won at the Geneva event.

So that there would be no misunderstandings about the use of the new centrifuges, Iranian Majlis member Mohammed Nabavian took the podium on Friday January 3 to explain:  “We had a few sessions on the nuclear issue at the Majlis with Foreign Minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, Deputy Foreign Minister, Abbas Araqchi, Deputy Foreign Minister Majid Takht Ravanchi and Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Marzieh Afkham, and one session in which President Hassan Rouhani personally participated…”

After listing the five sections of the Geneva nuclear pact, Nabavian assumed the voice of Washington to declare in the name of the United States: “ ‘Never before have we succeeded in ensuring Israel’s security as we did today by means of the agreement… If a certain country has 270 kg of enriched uranium at a level of 20% and 10 tons [of enriched uranium] at a level of 5%, and 20,000 centrifuges, it will be in a breakout position and could manufacture a nuclear bomb on the uranium track within two weeks.’ “
After this “US quote,” the Iranian lawmaker commented: “We don’t aspire to obtain a nuclear bomb, but it is necessary so that we can put Israel in its place…”

The main point of Nabavian’s narrative wasn’t just confirmation that Iran possesses the capacity to produce a nuclear bomb at extremely short notice, but its continued development of ever-faster centrifuges that will dramatically change these figures within a short time and produce a complete arsenal aimed at a single target: Israel

This is not what President Obama, Secretary of State Kerry or Prime Minister Netanyahu wants to hear or bring to general knowledge. The Iranians have no such inhibitions and are making no bones about flouting at least five separate clauses of the nuclear pact they signed in Geneva – plus one:

1.  There has been no suspension or slowdown of 20-percent uranium enrichment.

2.  Uranium enrichment to 3.5- and 5-percent purity continues apace in disregard of the ceiling agreed in Geneva.

3. Advanced IR-2m centrifuges continue to roll off the assembly lines. Making a slight bow to the pact, they are being installed at Fordo and Natanz in individual units, not cascades. The Geneva pact bans their installation in any shape or form.

4. Iran has not stopped preparations for moving up to 60-percent enrichment and is being urged by many voices at home to go up to 80 percent. Iran’s pretext is that this level is necessary to fuel the reactors of the nuclear vessels it is building.

5. There has been no pause in the high-speed construction of the heavy water-plutonium plant at Arak.

6. Neither is there any slowdown at the research and development centers for nuclear weapons. Since the military dimension of Iran’s nuclear program was left unmentioned in the Geneva accord, Tehran is at liberty to continue this pursuit free of international inspection while denying it is taking place.

BUT where does PM Netanyahu’s bluster fit in? Well, tragically, even if he musters the (mental) will to do what must be done, realize how much damage has accrued – making it that much harder to effectuate the best outcome – due to years’ worth of foot dragging and hitching Israel’s fate to Obama’s coattails.

Lest anyone starts to feel sorry for “poor Bibi”, having the fate of half of world Jewry on his shoulders, don’t even go there. NO one forced the mantle down his throat, in fact, he climbed over many to assume the “throne”. He is, first and foremost, a political animal.

Be that as it may, he has at his fingertips ALL the requisite legal – domestically and internationally – back up/cover for pre-emption. As we all know, he didn’t pre-empt, instead he punted….shucked and jived – Iran’s WMD genocidal project – Oxford University Press highlights Professor Louis Rene Beres (my mentor)& The Legal Basis For Pre-emption. YES, PM Netanyahu is in possession of all of Professor Beres’s nuclear-related findings, as described herein:

My “go to” expert on all matters pertaining to international law, and a country’s right to anticipatory self defense – via preemptive strikes – is none other thanProfessor Louis Rene Beres of ‘Project Daniel.’ The working group’s original policy paper is found herein. He was Chair of the above strategic nuclear policy paper given to PM Ariel Sharon in 2003 – and subsequently briefed the report to President George W. Bush and to current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – in relation to Israel’s nuclear strategy in the face of Iran’s pursuit of WMD’s. He is a man of great integrity and humility.

Lou, a heartfelt thank you for being my mentor.

Significantly, the questions become: where has Netanyahu’s “red line” gone:Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s electoral “promises” and gobblygook too? …..

And, isn’t Iran, for all intents and purposes, a nuclear state? It seems as if Israel’s former AMAN chief and a former head of the CIA concur, indicting both Israel’s and U.S. leadership!

History…G-d…will be the judge…damning them all!

UPDATE: and the following “news” confirms the above thesis: when an Islamist-in-Chief is bent on castrating American interests (in one of the most important and volatile regions in the world…true to his word in Cairo, in 2009, he promised to place America on “equal” footing with all nations); and when an appeasement-oriented leadership in Jerusalem refuses to unhitch its wagon to said anti-semitic leadership, Israel, by its own dereliction, is left in increasingly dire straits.

What emerges six months after the US-Russian accord for the elimination of Bashar Assad’s chemical stockpiles, and two months after the six-power interim nuclear accord with Iran, is the process of America pulling up its stakes in the Middle East and clearing the way for the Russians to move in and take its place.

Iran comes out of these steps well armored with Russian economic and strategic backing, while Israel is left on the minus side of the new regional equation unfolding fast in the New Year.

 

PA LEADERSHIP CONTINUALLY & OPENLY ADMIT TO A “STAGE PLAN” TO ANNIHILATE ISRAEL: WASHINGTON, ISRAEL DELIBERATELY PLAY DEAF,DUMB & BLIND (VIDEO LINK).WHAT’S GOING ON?…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

MANY resources are expended herein – in an often Orwellian quest – to explain to an increasingly wide readership the twists and turns of the insane “peace” maneuverings with the PA Arab terror junta. But a basic premise must first be understood: the thrust from Washington has its own internal dynamics, and it mostly revolves around appeasement of oil dictatorships (spanning many decades),even though America has vast energy potential of its own. Let’s leave that aside for now, for it is a stand alone, a travesty of untapped dimensions/explorations.

That being said, adding explosive fuel to the (regional) fires, it is absolutely the case that an added dimension to the “peace process” emanates from Obama Inc, as oil is less on their front burner, but anti-Zionist, anti-semitic intent and fervor is their primary impetus. This is KEY to remember. Recall just a few warnings showcased at this blog, but they are by no means meant to be exhaustive:

Warning Number One:  Obama’s second term plans for Israel, if re-elected, will go for broke. Its contents more than sets the stage. 

Warning Number Two:  More pointedly, a STUNNING video exposed the mendacity of the Islamist-in-Chief, in relation to Israel’s security!

Warning Number Three: YES, Obama sold out western/American interests to Iran & the key intersection traversed through the red/green alliance. Indeed, boxing in Israel is their main goal. 

Let’s now hop over to the Israeli side – but don’t expect rationality to rule, aside for leftist dementia and the Oslo Syndrome, qualifying as their “guiding” force  – where their resident lunatics are running the “peace obsessed” asylum.

Alas, Israel’s erstwhile “partners for peace” have made themselves manifestly clear, nevertheless, the oh so smart set in Israel refuses to take NO for an answer. So even while its enemies exhort the truth in Arabic, Israel’s leaders blatantly lie to its Jewish majority citizens. More than a betrayal.

YET more than anything else, how can one explain the grave dereliction of duty, for decades, from Israel’s own leadership? But it is not as if Dr. Martin Sherman, the author of this related analysis, is a newcomer to this site. NOT at all: Presenting, PART THREE: A strategic-based policy interview with Dr. Martin Sherman & why you should support Israel’s “Intellectual Warriors”.

And there is more than enough proof to damn anyone – and this includes both American, Euro & Israeli players – who continue down this treacherous path, despite all their blatherings! 

NOT only that, but in a featured interview, this American-Israeli exposed the thesis herein, terming it “straight from the horse’s mouth”.

Wolff Bachner:Who exactly are the Palestinians? Are they native inhabitants of the region, or as many historians have claimed, are they descendants of invading Muslim armies and the families of guest workers brought into the area as cheap labor in the early 20th century by the British to undermine the rebirth of Israel?

Adina Kutnicki: If one truly seeks the historical truth, one should keenly listen to what the Arab leadership enjoin when speaking before their own brothers and sisters, as opposed to the taqiyya (Sharia-derived dissimulation) spewed for western ears. Thus, the following is a sampling, but by no means exhaustive: Fathi Hammad, Hamas’s Minister of the Interior and National Security, had this to say, ” Brothers, half of the Palestinians are Egyptians and the other half are Saudis.” Likewise, Zuheir Muhsin, late member of the Palestinian Liberation Organization’s Executive Council, intoned: ” The existence of a separate Palestinian identity exists only for tactical reasons. The establishment of a Palestinian State is a new tool to continue the fight against Israel.” Similarly, Hussein bin Talal, late King of Jordan, opined,” The appearance of the Palestinian personality comes as an answer to Israel’s claim that Palestine is Jewish.” To be exact, the late, non-lamented Chairman Arafat – the Palestinian godfather of suicide terror, schooled by the KGB, but I digress – was Egyptian-born! Thereby, isn’t it appropriate to posit: Shouldn’t “straight out of the horse’s mouth” proofs be more than enough evidence, to finally put to bed the lies spun on behalf of the Palestinian narrative? Consequently, shouldn’t Israel’s leaders be the first to hammer these historical truths into the world’s consciousness?

ONTO the “stages plan”….well known by ALL the “peace players”!

Abbas Zaki, close associate of Mahmoud Abbas,
says a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders
is only first stage in the PA’s program
because “the inspiring idea cannot be achieved
all at once. [Rather] in stages”
by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ViFr3oIM4M

Senior Palestinian official Abbas Zaki posted on his Facebook page an interview he gave to Syrian TV in which he said the PA will only agree to a treaty with Israel if the Palestinian state is established on the 1967 lines. However, he stressed that ’67 lines would only be the beginning. After that, the Palestinians will continue with the stages plan:

“Even the most extreme among us, Hamas, or the fighting forces, want a state within the ’67 borders. Afterward, we [will] have something to say, because the inspiring idea cannot be achieved all at once. [Rather] in stages.”

Click to view

In an interview on Al-Jazeera TV in 2011, Zaki also mentioned this PA stages plan and referred to “the inspiring idea,” explaining that it means the end of Israel. He said that Mahmoud Abbas shares the goal of eliminating Israel in stages, but that the PA says it only wants a state along the 1967 borders because it is unacceptable politically to say you want to destroy Israel:

“You can’t say it to the world. You can say it to yourself.”

Zaki stressed that the goal is clear-cut because if Israel were to return to the 1967 lines, it certainly could not survive: “Israel will come to an end.”

This is Zaki’s full statement from 2011:

“The agreement is based on the borders of June 4 [1967]. While the agreement is on the borders of June 4, the President [Mahmoud Abbas] understands, we understand, and everyone knows that it is impossible to realize the inspiring idea, or the great goal in one stroke. If Israel withdraws from Jerusalem, if Israel uproots the settlements, 650,000 settlers, if Israel removes the (security) fence – what will be with Israel? Israel will come to an end. If I say that I want to remove it from existence, this will be great, great, [but] it is hard. This is not a [stated] policy. You can’t say it to the world. You can say it to yourself.”
[Official PA TV, Sept. 23, 2011]

Expressing his refusal to recognize Israel earlier this year during a public lecture, Abbas Zaki started to refer to Israel’s Ben Gurion Airport as “Israel’s Airport,” but then stopped himself and corrected himself:

“When Mr. Obama came to the region during his visit, as soon as he arrived at the airport of Isra… [corrects himself], I mean, the airport where the Israelis are. I don’t want… [corrects himself] this whole country is ours, and Allah willing, the airport will also return to us.”
[Official PA TV, April 8, 2013]

Click to view

Zaki sitting in place of honor one seat from M. Abbas at Fatah event in 2011.

These statements coming from Abbas Zaki are significant because he is a senior Palestinian official and a very close associate of Mahmoud Abbas. He was sent to Syria as Mahmoud Abbas’ personal representative a few months ago and has spoken at public events representing Fatah.

Another important statement reiterating that the PA is employing a stages plan to defeat Israel was expressed recently by PA Minister of Religious Affairs Mahmoud Al-Habbash in
a Friday sermon in the

presence of Mahmoud Abbas. Al-Habbash, speaking after the current round of peace talks was announced, said that the PA’s negotiations with Israel are modeled after the Hudaybiyyah agreement between Islam’s Prophet Muhammad and the tribes of Mecca. Recounting that Muhammad signed a 10-year truce, and yet two years later conquered Mecca, the minister stated: “This is the example and this is the model.”

Official PA children’s TV also teaches children to aspire to Israel’s destruction. Earlier this year the PA TV host told children:

PA TV host: “And of course we will never forget that we have land that was occupied in 1948, which will return to us one day. Remember well, children. Also [remember] to safeguard our folklore, our national games, the folklore in all its forms, our dress and our food and our games and anything that forms the Palestinian folklore – we have to safeguard it. If we don’t safeguard it, then the occupation might steal it as well, as it stole our land. Right? Do you agree with me? Bravo!”
[Official PA TV, Feb. 23, 2013]

Bringing up children to see all of Israel as “occupied” territory and as “stolen Palestinian land” that will “return” at some future time are significant components of Palestinian Authority ideology that are never expressed to Western leaders or Israelis, and are denied during peace discussions. Zaki’s description of the peace process as intended to lead to Israel’s destruction is consistent with these messages to PA children and many other internal messages the PA leadership sends to its population.

See more documentation here.
To read a detailed analysis of the PA’s continuing and ongoing deception and violations of its international commitments see PMW’s book, Deception which documents that the PA policy of saying it wants peace in English is contradicted by its internal political, social and cultural activities, its leaders’ statements and its education of youth in Arabic. Click to see reviews or to purchase Deception.

The following is an excerpt from Abbas Zaki’s recent interview:

Syrian TV host: “When they talk about [the US] imposing a solution, we know that it will be deficient.”
Member of Fatah Central Committee Abbas Zaki: “You can relax. We find ourselves united for the first time. Even the most extreme among us, Hamas, or the fighting forces, want a state within the ’67 borders. Afterward, we [will] have something to say, because the inspiring idea cannot be achieved all at once. [Rather] in stages.”
[Official Syrian Satellite TV Channel, Dec. 23, 2013]
The following is a longer excerpt of the sermon delivered by PA Minister of Religious Affairs Mahmoud Al-Habbash comparing negotiations with Israel to Muhammad’s Treaty of Hudaybiyyah:

“We hate war. We don’t want war. We don’t want bloodshed, not for ourselves, nor for others. We want peace. We say this because our culture is founded on this, and because our religion is based on this. Yes, we want peace, but not any peace. We want a peace based on justice, therefore the Palestinian leadership and the PLO have not missed any opportunity for peace…
The Palestinian leadership’s sense of responsibility towards its nation made it take political steps about 20 years ago (i.e., signing the Oslo Accords). Despite the controversy, despite much criticism and much opposition by some, it brought us to where we are today: We have a [Palestinian] Authority and the world recognizes the [Palestinian] state.
All this never would have happened through Hamas’ impulsive adventure, but only through the wisdom of the leadership, conscious action, consideration, and walking the right path, which leads to achievement, exactly like the Prophet [Muhammad] did in the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, even though some opposed it…
The hearts of the Prophet’s companions burned with anger and fury. The Prophet said: ‘I’m the Messenger of Allah and I will not disobey Him.’ This is not disobedience, it is politics. This is crisis management, situation management, conflict management…
Allah called this treaty a clear victory…
Omar ibn Al-Khattab said: ‘Messenger of Allah, is this a victory? Is this logical? Is this victory? We are giving up and going back, and not entering Mecca. Is that a victory?’ The Prophet said: ‘Yes, it is a victory.’
In less than two years, the Prophet returned and based on this treaty, he conquered Mecca. This is the example, this is the model.”
[Official Palestinian Authority TV, July 19, 2013]

Is it any wonder that Kerry, a man whose close familial Iranian-connections would ordinarily DISQUALIFY him for Sec of State or any sensitive foreign policy position (in tandem with his requisite Islamic-leaning surrogates),is considered more than a dishonest broker, as he fronts for Barack HUSSEIN Obama?

So, dear readers, due to all the evidence (particularly after viewing the above youtube video link…yet served up only as an appetizer, a foretaste), you decide whether or not Obama Inc. via Washington’s power centers – despite their vociferous protestations otherwise – has Israel’s back – or not.

UPDATE: FUDDY’S MUSLIM CONNECTIONS & MORE. LORETTA FUDDY’S (HAWAII EX DOH DIRECTOR) DEATH OCCURRED VERY SOON AFTER ARPAIO’S TEAM ANNOUNCED (CRIMINALLY) EXPLOSIVE FINDINGS RE “ELIGIBILITY”. COINCIDENCE, OR NOT? (VIDEO LINK) Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

{blogger’s note:important video link found at end}

ADDENDUM: Barack Hussein Soebarkah?

IF it looks like a hit job….

————————————————————————————————-

Okay now, let’s place the following premise – front and center – squarely on the table: there are more than enough disasters to investigate (and report on), as such, there is no need to chase (imagined) ghosts. 

But we must also recognize that heretofore alive and well bodies just happen to magically stop breathing at the most “convenient” time(s) for the Impostor-in-Chief. Lucky for him, but not for those who cross his path, willingly or otherwise, and then end up becoming liabilities. Their luck (just) runs out, so to speak.

Don’t shoot the messenger!

As to the aforementioned “mysterious” deaths, why are they always “fortuitous” strokes of luck for Barack Hussein Obama…but are they just happenstance or something more? You decide.

Yet, what rises to a “mysterious” demise(s) under the Obama regime, whether sexually related or otherwiseas the deceased, these lost souls, now lie six feet under?

Ah, another “convenient” death surrounding Obama Inc., as Michael Hastings, an award winning investigative reporter came too close for comfort. Yup, it is no longer a question of this or that spin cycle, but the need to follow the trail, wherever it leads. His death will turn out to be a targeted hit…as night follows day.

In this regard, upcoming news from Arpaio’s long awaited investigation will (sooner than later) blow the lid off the above tragedies, eventually explaining why so many had to die in the cover up’s wake. While it is too risky to murder the entire investigative team, it certainly helps to silence the main witnesses to his crime(s). Think about it. Regardless, one way or another, they met their Maker due to the Liar-in-Chief’s mega fraud(s). 

Before listening to the audio below from Western Center For Journalism, let us recap with the following update:

This blog, all along, stuck to its guns, regarding The One’s bonafides, even when subject to mocking. Regardless, no wishy washy, finger-in-the-air prevarications herein, despite any recriminations. Tsk, tsk. Like water off a duck’s back. In any event, only facts and sound logic underlie this and that. No herd-like mentality on this end.

That being said, who in their rational mind (still) believes the Liar-in-Chief is anything but a fraud? Come on now, even if exposing said fairy tale lends to a cry of “racism”, so what? Where are we, in kindergarten…sticks and stones. But never mind, paradoxically, this egregious charge lands DIRECTLY at Obama’s door as he drags America towards a race war. Topsy turvy. 

In this regard, a myriad of proofs prop up “birther’s” claims and they are overwhelming. 

Undoubtedly, “birthers” are reaching critical mass and Congress will receive an earful. The question becomes: will they step up? Well, it may not matter, since certain events can even surpass their authority, thus, no longer allowing them to close their eyes and muffles their ears. Sounds like music to a patriot’s heart.

Regardless, there is no other way to describe what has taken place in America, other than the CRIME/HEIST OF THE CENTURY: Obama’s FORGED documents are uncovered.

And here we find ourselves…despite the naysayers, brayers and cacophony of “O-cheerleaders”!

UNIVERSE-SHATTERING’ TWIST IN OBAMA BIRTH PROBE

Arpaio investigator: ‘This is beyond the pale of anything you can imagine’

 BOB UNRUH 

“When this information is finally exposed to the public, it will be universe-shattering,” Mike Zullo told WND. “This is beyond the pale of anything you can imagine.”

But the allegations, he said, which go far beyond a fraudulent birth certificate, could be public as early as March.

The issue arose once again because of the death Wednesday in Hawaii of state Health Department chief Loretta Fuddy in a plane crash. She was the official who waived state prohibitions and provided to the White House a copy of a document that Obama presented to the public as his birth certificate.

It’s the document that Arpaio’s investigators have concluded is fraudulent.

Amid conspiracy theories circulating the Internet, Zullo told WND Friday that Fuddy’s death – she was the only fatality among nine people aboard a small airplane that crashed off the coast of Molokai – appears to be a tragic accident, not foul play.

He said his investigation does not depend on any information from Fuddy.

In an interview today with author and talk-radio host Carl Gallups of PPSimmons News and Ministry Network and the author of “The Magic Man in the Sky,” and the new “The Rabbi who Found Messiah,” Zullo said his investigation of the Obama fraud case “does not hinge on Ms. Fuddy.”

“While her death certainly is a tragedy, it in no way hampers our investigation in this matter,” he said. “If people truly believe that her untimely demise was somehow related to an attempt to silence her for ‘what she may or may not know,’ then there are several more people in Hawaii who should be very, very concerned.

“Again, I want to emphasize,” Zullo said, “Sheriff Arpaio and I do not, at this time, believe her death was connected to any nefarious circumstances.”

The birth certificate dispute dates back to before the 2008 election. Critics, including Hillary Clinton, raised the issue about Obama’s status as a “natural-born citizen.” Not defined in the Constitution, it probably was thought at the time of the writing of the Constitution to be someone born of two citizen parents.

Obama fails that test because his father was a Kenyan student visiting the U.S.

Arpaio assigned his Cold Case Posse to look into the issue before the 2012 election, when constituents approached him and asked him to check whether Obama would be an ineligible candidate on the presidential election ballot.

In a recent radio interview with Gallups, Zullo affirmed the investigation had been expanded to the county sheriff’s office and was “moving in a direction that was not anticipated by us.”

“The whole [issue] is more nefarious than you can imagine,” Zullo said, crediting Arpaio for ordering the investigation and sticking with it.

“He knows in his gut that something is wrong,” Zullo said.

Dozens of lawsuits have been filed without success. One case is pending before the Alabama Supreme Court for which Zullo provided evidence.

See a report of Fuddy’s death:

Zullo has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s birth certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the document had been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a genuine paper document.

“Mr. Obama has, in fact, not offered any verifiable authoritative document of any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event,” he explained. “One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together digitized data from several unknown sources.”

Zullo also has noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to produce an original birth document for Obama, and it should have been easy to find.

See some of Zullo’s evidence:

“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,” Zullo told the World Tribune.

“Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator told the news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable expert. The very firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used Mr. Hayes in their cases.”

The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and called almost immediately.

“There is something wrong with this,” Hayes said.

Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my observations and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured document created by utilizing material from various sources.”

“In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated,” he says in the report.

Investigator Douglas J. Hagmann of the Northeast Intelligence Network reported this month that in October an affidavit was filed in a court case, under seal, that purportedly identifies the creator of the Obama birth certificate.

He said Douglas Vogt, an author and the owner and operator of a scanning business who also has an accounting background, invested over two years in an investigation of the authenticity of document.

Vogt, along with veteran typesetter Paul Ivey, conducted “exhaustive research of the document provided to the White House Press Corps on April 27, 2011 – not the online PDF, a critical distinction that must be understood,” Hagmann said.

“Using their combined experience of 80 years in this realm, they conducted extensive examinations of the ‘copy’ that was used as the basis for the PDF document. They acquired the same type of equipment that was used back in the late 1950s and early 1960s in an attempt to recreate the document presented as an ‘authenticated copy’ proving the legitimacy of Barack Obama. Instead, they found 20 points of forgery on that document and detail each point of forgery in the affidavit,” wrote Hagmann.

“Even more interesting, Mr. Vogt claims to have identified the ‘signature’ of the perpetrator, or the woman who created the forged document, hidden within the document itself. Her identity, in addition to the identity of other conspirators and their precise methods are contained in a sealed document supplementing the public affidavit.”

Grounds for impeachment

Last month, WND columnist Christopher Monckton wrote that the controversy he calls “Hawaiigate” should be “the central ground of impeachment.”

“First, the dishonesty is shameless and in your face. Mr Obama’s advisers, once they realized the ‘birth certificate’ was as bogus as a $3 bill, knew that if they simply went on pretending that $3 bills are legal tender the hard-left-dominated news media would carefully and continuously look the other way, pausing occasionally to sneer at anyone who pointed out that, in this constitutionally crucial respect, the ‘president’ has no clothes,” Monckton wrote.

“Secondly, not one of the numerous agencies of state, as well as federal government, whose duty was and is to investigate the Mickey-Mouse ‘birth certificate’ has bothered even to respond to the thousands of requests for investigation put forward by U.S. citizens.”

He said that in Hawaii last year, he watched “as a senior former state senator called the police and, when they came, handed over to them compelling evidence that the ‘birth certificate’ had been forged.”

“The police, correctly, passed the file to the state’s attorney general, a ‘Democrat,’ who did nothing about it,” he said.

“In Washington, D.C., I watched as a concerned citizen from Texas telephoned the FBI and reported the ‘birth certificate’ as being a forgery. They said they would send two agents to see him within the hour. No one came.”

‘You tell me about eligibility’

One of the highest profile skeptics has been billionaire Donald Trump.

Trump repeatedly has insisted Obama has not documented his eligibility. At one point, he offered $5 million to the charity or charities of Obama’s choice if he would release his passport records and authorize the colleges he attended to release his applications and other records.

Trump argues that those documents would show whether or not Obama ever accepted scholarship or other aid as a foreign student, which could preclude him from being a “natural-born citizen.”

Trump’s conversation with ABC’s Jonathan Karl started with Karl noting that Trump took on the “not serious” issue of eligibility.

“Why does that make me not serious?” Trump demanded. “I think that resonated with a lot of people.”

Karl replied: “You don’t still question he was born in the United States, do you?”

“I have no idea,” Trump said. “I don’t know. Was there a birth certificate? You tell me. You know some people say that was not his birth certificate. I’m saying I don’t know. Nobody knows, and you don’t know either. Jonathan you’re a smart guy, and you don’t know.”

When Karl admitted he was “pretty sure,” Trump jumped on the statement.

“You just said you’re pretty sure … you have to be 100 percent sure,” he said. “Jonathan, you said you’re pretty convinced, so let’s just see what happens over time.”

Read all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the subject.

Among the many records the Obama camp has refused to release are the marriage license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.

Monckton, citing Zullo’s sworn affidavit in a court case, published a sworn mathematical analysis demonstrating the near-zero probability that the White House “birth certificate” is genuine.

Alongside the push towards exposing his illegitimacy, Forbes enters the fray, but from a divergent direction. Who the hell cares, as long as he is booted AND eventually prosecuted :Forbes Editorial Demands Obama’s Impeachment… and Goes Viral.

NOW, getting back to his fake “birth certificate”…. While it is a tad “coincidental” that the only person to die in the recent plane crash is a central player in “Hawaiigate”, and even though many questions loom in the death of Loretta Fuddy, see linked video – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xboa2FqizuQ – it doesn’t mitigate the explosions coming forward, it just makes them ever more urgent to reveal. But let’s wait and see what “officialdom” has to say about her unfortunate/untimely demise. Oh yeah.

EVEN so, the fact that too many folks linked – in one way or another – to knowledge thereof re Obama’s illegal behavior keep “dropping like flies”, well, suspicion is in order. Keep one eye peeled open. You think? And if it turns out that there is no there there, then that’s the way it is. Case closed.

NO matter. Arpaio’s crew has more than their hands full with their forthcoming explosive evidence and needn’t be distracted by this“inexplicable” tragedy. Therefore, if they are dismissing – as of now – the latest “fortuitous” Obama-related death, then this blogger understands that their eyes have to stay on particularly incendiary (juggling) balls. 

Indubitably, the latest associated death is damn strange!

WITHOUT further ado, listen up….

WATCH: Doctor Calls Loretta Fuddy’s Death Very Strange – Western Center For Journalism – video exclusive!

MOSQUES IN AMERICA:JIHADI INDOCTRINATION “RELIGIOUSLY” GARBED. DAVE GAUBATZ INVESTIGATES…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

http://islamexposed.org/2014/01/07/mosques-in-america-jihadi-indoctrination-religiously-garbed-dave-gaubatz-investigates-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

ONLY those living within caves haven’t heard rumblings about jihadi indoctrination via mosques – and wherever Muslims are concentrated in numbers – not only in the Islamic part of the world but all over the west. And the fact that mosques in America are epicenters of their training, but Obama Inc. places mosques “off limits”, well, that’s the thrust of the matter.

Now, let us hark back to a recent terror attack in Boston and connect the jihadi dots via America’s mosques. Boy, are the footprints solid. US (western) Wahhabi-jihad mosques converged at Boston’s intersection, yet this act of jihad is hardly an anomaly to “Beantown”. Indeed, jihad is plotted here, there and everywhere, within any city/town U.S.A.!

So while one focus of indoctrination is rightly upon America’s Muslim children (read below), nevertheless, one dare not forget the spillover flowing into America’s classrooms and cultural centers, an (often) unrecognized danger. We will get to that. But where do these jihadi teachers think they are living, in the fiery Mid East? Take a peek at this: ‘No Jihadist Left Behind – Rachel Ehrenfeld, Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center’. Patriots, Muslim kiddies are given the SAME “education”, in one form or another. Yes they are!

But do give “credit” where it is due, and this American disaster lands squarely into Obama’s “green/red” domain via the donning of burqas at a U.S. school near you. It fully demonstrates the pernicious effects of the radical alliance between leftists and Islamists.

American Muslim Children Taught to Hate

The astonishing and disturbing findings of an undercover reporter inside America’s mosques.

In the last five years I have personally visited over 250 Islamic Centers, mosques, and Islamic Schools throughout America. The goal of my research has been to determine what Islamic leaders are teaching the young and innocent Muslim children. The findings are abhorrent, sad, unbelievable and frightening. Most disturbing is the fact our government is keeping this dangerous fact from the American people.

Muslim children attending mosques and Islamic schools are being taught to hate America, our government, our military personnel and its non Muslim population. In this article I will identify three significant mosques in America that are leading the way in teaching Muslim children to hate and influencing them to commit violent acts inside our country.

In America we have been programmed by the media and political leaders to believe violent teachings of Islam are only being taught to children in Palestine. We have watched the Muslim Palestinian children spew their taught hatred of the Israelis. What Americans are not being shown (due to political correctness) are that Muslim children throughout the world and specifically inside America are also being taught violence and hatred.

Children as young as seven years old are being taught that to assimilate with America is to disrespect and dishonor Islam. They are being taught that our military personnel are the enemies of Islam, and that it is justifiable to kill anyone who dishonors or oppresses the Islamic ideology.

During my research I have identified numerous mosques that are teaching young Muslim children to hate America and are leading them to commit future violent acts against our country and innocent people. I would like to focus on three such mosques.

Dar al Hijrah, Falls Church, Virginia

My researchers and I spent several weeks at the Dar Al Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia. Almost immediately we were informed to obtain our study material from the Halaco Bookstore which is located nearby the mosque. It was very apparent upon entering the store and reviewing the materials that the bookstore provides materials for the Sunni (Wahhabi) Muslim population across the U.S. and specifically for Dar Al Hijrah.

Anwar al-Awlaki was animam at the Dar al Hijrah Mosque from January
2001 until 2002. Three of the 9/11 hijackers, Khalid al-Mihdhar, Nawaf
al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour, attended some of Awlaki’s sermons at this
mosque. I was able to spend many hours talking with store personnel and was invited to the home of one employee to discuss Islamic issues.

There is a large section in the store dedicated to the education of the Muslim children. I discovered materials that are being sent to Islamic schools across America. Much of the material deals with Sharia(Islamic law) and jihad.

One of the DVD’s and books I obtained was by an Islamic scholar Ahmad Sakr. Sakr travels the U.S. visiting Islamic schools and educates them in Sharia law. I have watched one of his videos in which he tells the young children our government is evil and not to follow the laws of our country and Americas government leaders will all go to hell.

The material provided by Dar Al Hijrah and their selected Islamic bookstore also was filled with violent jihad. There were manuals informing the readers how to destroy America, and how to kill anyone who oppresses Islam. They are told how to obtain weapons, including weapons of mass destruction. Although all of the above is very disturbing and should (and actually is) against the law, the Muslim leaders of Falls Church are allowed by our government to indoctrinate the Muslim children into future violence against our country.

Al Farooq, Nashville, Tennessee

The Al Farooq mosque in Nashville, Tennessee is even more disturbing. My research team and I spent two weeks at the Al Farooq mosque. The mosque was Sunni and had the typical violent books and DVD’s/videos pertaining to the overthrow of any government system that oppresses Islam. They also had numerous teachings from current Islamic leaders operating in America who are teaching the Muslim population to hate our country and its people.

Although this should frighten all concerned citizens, there was even sadder and disturbing intelligence collected at this mosque. Lately, we have all read about the child brides and forced marriages in Afghanistan and in Saudi Arabia. What most Americans do not realize is that child marriages are occurring throughout our country and specifically in Nashville, Tennessee.

One young 7 year old Muslim girl at Al Farooq talked to our researcher about being beaten by her Islamic leaders and being married to a Muslim man. I reported the matter to the Nashville authorities, but almost from the beginning they were reluctant to intercede because this was a religious institution and more importantly to them it was Islamic.

Senior law enforcement authorities of the Nashville police department informed me they were afraid of being sued by Islamic organizations such as CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations) if they got involved, and it would be a political nightmare to get anything done at the mosque.

What bothered me most of all is the fact I contacted an Islamic organizations to help this innocent Muslim child and they also balked. This reinforced to me that Islamic law (Sharia) is alive and very active inside our country, to include child marriages.

Taqwa, Brooklyn, New York

The next mosque I investigated is led by an Islamic scholar who is not only a major fundraiser for CAIR but travels throughout the U.S. teaching his violent ideology of Islam. He is Imam Siraj Wahhaj. For those who have never visited the Islamic district of Brooklyn it would come to a surprise to many that the area around At Taqwa is similar to the Wahhabi land of Saudi Arabia. [ blogger’s note: Understand what all the above means, but do bear in mind that this blogger can state with absolute certainly the following: as a matter of fact, back in the early 1990′s, a particular investigative journalist contact is on record (and with detailed undercover photos to back up said claims), regarding aconclave of jihadists operating out of Brooklyn, NY, some of whom jumped (still do) between Brooklyn and Jersey City, NJ. Most infamously the (now incarcerated) “Blind Sheikh”, Abdel-Rahman, is a central jihadi player, despite FINALLY being behind U.S. bars I have previously described Wahhaj as the most dangerous man in America. I have reviewed hundreds of his Friday (Juma) mosque lectures.

In one speech he tells his followers that around the world Muslims will wake up and say,“I don’t want to follow the way of the colonial masters any more. I want the Sharia. I want Islam. We want to be ruled by Islam. And all we have to do is go back to that golden generation.”

He routinely called America an evil country and is a strong leader in developing Sharia law inside America. His violent lectures are available to the adult and child Muslims throughout America.

“Those who struggle for Allah, it doesn’t matter what kind of weapons, I’m telling you it doesn’t matter! You don’t need nuclear weapons or even guns! If you have faith in Allah and a knife!! If Allah wants you to win, you will win! Because Allah is the only one who fights. And when his hand is over your hand. whoever is at war against my friends, I declare war on them.” (From a video of a sermon from Sept. 28, 1991 by Sirah Wahhaj called “The Afghanistan Jihad,” given in Toronto, Canada.)

“If we go to war, brothers and sisters – and one day we will, believe me – that’s why you’re commanded [to fight in] jihad. When Allah demands us to fight, we’re not stopping and nobody’s stopping us.” (Sermon by Siraj Wahhaj entitled “Stand Up to Justice,” delivered on May 8, 1992 and distributed as a video.)Islamic teachings such as this are what led Major Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood Murderer, to commit his acts.

Although I have only focused on three mosques that lead the way in introducing Muslim children to violence and hatred, there are hundreds scattered across the U.S. Few states are immune from this growing threat. The violence spewed by these Islamic leaders will ultimately lead to more violence in the name of Islam. I have witnessed firsthand the violence being taught. There are numerous such Islamic centers in North Carolina, Florida, Virginia, New York and California.

Unless Muslim parents decry the violent teachings of Islam to their children, there will continue to be more and more Siraj Wahhaj-type Islamic leaders in America. The ultimate result will be the suffering of America as we now see in France, Britain and Canada.

REST assured, if Churches, Synagogues or other religious centers exhorted “death/subversion to America” inside their institutions, more than the wrath of G-d would descend.

In fact, a hammer blow from the Feds, chiefly propounded by AG Holder’s goons, would reverberate around the world and penetrate deep inside the heart of America. There would be punishments of mega proportions meted out. The IRS would continue to hound politically non “compliant” groups AND rescind the tax exempt status given to religious institutions. Those who would escape unscathed – you guessed it – would be mosques!

This is precisely why Holder’s DOJ, as if on cue, bellied up to invoke Islamic “blasphemy” laws in the USA ! Again, where do Obama’s hatchet people think they are, in a Mid East dictatorship? Looks like it. 

For weighty proof re Obama Inc’s Islamic alliance and tilt, look no further than their (unfathomable, but expected) reaction to Egypt’s designation of the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist group: Obama Rejects Muslim Brotherhood’s “Terrorist” Designation!

Indeed, this is the DIRECT result of electing radical revolutionaries to the People’s HouseCause and effect. Blow back. Knock-on results.

NSA’S MONSTROUS LIE DECODED:INVASION OF PRIVACY (DECEITFULLY) PREDICATED ON “WAR ON TERROR”…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

MOST Americans (the west in general) awoke to the nightmare of Islamic jihadi terror on 9/11/01 – recognizing its close tentacles – but only after the Twin Towers became nothing more than ashes and smoldering ruins. Many recall that some of the entrapped jumped to their deaths from the nearest windows.

NEVER forget these poor souls. NEVER forgive the Islamic jihadists. The same unforgiving sentiment should be reserved for U.S. leadership, for it was their absolute failure, over many years, which tolerated Brotherhood connected jihadi operations on U.S. soil. They still allow them more than free rein, especially as a cadre operate out of Obama’s White House!

Wolff Bachner: In a modern, highly political world, one must have enablers and allies to enact any global initiative, especially one that is subversive and secretive. Who are some of the enablers and allies of the Muslim Brotherhood and how high up the political food chain do they go?

Adina Kutnicki: Beyond a shadow of a doubt, their enablers and allies reach up into the highest recesses of the political food chain, so much so that the leadership of the free world is deeply implicated. One only has to witness their rise and prominence within President Obama’s administration to internalize how close they are to fulfilling their mission of Islamizing the United States of America into the “Shariah States of America”. This is not hysteria-talk nor hyperbole. It is their ultimate plan. However long it takes (and they view patience as a virtue, centuries ago seems like yesterday in their mind’s eye, unlike the mostly ADD-afflicted west) they will keep making inroads, that is, unless millions amass to thwart their efforts within America. But even though they burrowed within prior administrations, their trajectory rose exponentially under President Obama’s “guiding hands”.
Most significantly, according to BizPac Review, Mohamed Elibiary, a Muslim Brotherhood-tied adviser to DHS has just been promoted to a high senior level position! The details can be found herein, but the following excerpt is more than an eyeful:

“The Washington-based, national security think tank, Center for Security Policy, published a disturbing 33-page report based on a series of interviews with Elibiary about his admitted ties to a man who raised funds for Hamas and “other radical Islamist causes,” all while serving and advising the Obama administration. Judicial Watch reported on the findings, noting that Elibiary “has regular access to classified information and is a prime mover behind two of the Obama administration’s most dangerous policies; normalizing relations with domestic and foreign Islamist groups (including the Muslim Brotherhood) and arduous enforcement restrictions of laws related to material support for terrorism….”

As such, the Muslim Brotherhood is already in Obama’s White House, and this fact must be internalized and seared into ones brain:

“On December 11, 2004, Muslim Brotherhood apologist Mohamed Elibiary was a featured speaker at a conference honoring the memory of Ayatollah Khomeini, the man synonymous with Islamic terrorism. On September 13, 2013, this same man, Mohamed Elibiary was named the head of the Obama administration’s Homeland Security Advisory Council. Watch Western Center for Journalism’s exclusive video to find out why, exactly, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood is pulling the levers of power in the White House.”

Mind you, Elibiary’s appointment is hardly an anomaly. Skulking Islamic “advisers” are regular fixtures within President Obama’s inner circle, though most are not as well known as Elibiary. It would take an entire expose’ to flesh out all the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated appointments, most of whom are comfortably implanted inside President Obama’s administration. Nevertheless, it is impossible to understand the gravity of the situation without knowing how embedded they really are. Like termites.

Ask yourselves, in juxtaposition to the above, how is it possible to take at face value their claims: yes, NSA’s (domestic) spying is absolutely “necessary” to keep Americans safe! Huh? Indeed, the jihadis are safely ensconced in the White House, DHS and every major U.S. power center, making nonsense out of NSA’s rampant domestic surveillance. 

NOT only that, those who require overall watching, American-Muslims, are off limits.

IF one fully grasps that uncovering terror connections is NOT the epicenter of domestic spying, hence, its out-sized necessity, then other motives loom into focus. How do we know this? Well, more than enough evidence obliterates Obama Inc’s claims, yes, domestic spying is terror related and nothing more. Not exactly.

In fact, there has been a purging of Islam + terror within all of America’s anti-terror/enforcement protocols ! Worse, America’s mosques, the crux of terror activity, are off limits. Thus, balderdash aside, little else matters. Jibber jabber.

At the other side of the spectrum lies NSA’s real thrust, which revolves around its little known marching orders; a two pronged scooping/surveillance mission. 

Creating a dissident’s list, in tandem with collecting all relevant personal data, gives Obama Inc. more than enough ammunition to control millions upon millions of Americans. In particular, those likely deemed“troublemakers”, specifically patriots and vets, are a globalist’s nightmare.

In effect, with such dynamite in hand, the expectation of privacy, upon which liberty and freedom are lynch pins, becomes DOA.

But the more they prop up the “necessity” of NSA’s domestic spying, the same lying mantra to prop up what is, in effect, a surveillance statethe more they ensnare themselves in their own web of deceit. How so?   

As mentioned within this site and at various op-eds, Islamic terror was deeply embedded before the Towers fell, yet the powers that be were less than interested in stopping their activities on U.S. soil, let alone rounding them up. And little more proof is required, other than the following evidence trail:

The Islamists counted on the US authorities turning a blind eye to their intentions; and their assumptions proved demonstrably and deadly accurate.

Rabbi Kahane’s assassin was an Egyptian named El-Said Nosair. Soon after the murder, the investigating authorities found among Nosair’s belongings many boxes of Arabic writings, which for years were inexplicably not translated. Unbelievably, they included detailed plans for the upcoming 1993 World Trade Center bombings. In addition, Nosair was also a protege of Sheikh Abd Al-Rahman, the internationally infamous “blind sheikh” from a Jersey City mosque, convicted of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Furthermore, the gun used to kill Rabbi Kahane was given to him by Wadith El-Hage, a member of Al-Qaeda, who was convicted for the 1998 US embassy bombings. Significantly, in March 1997, an Egyptian Muslim opened fire at more than a dozen people who were congregated on the rooftop of the Empire State Building for a sightseeing visit. Three years later, in the fall of 2000, the USS Cole was attacked, albeit overseas. The nexus to this Islamic hydra was growing exponentially (the above are only some examples of their lethal attacks on US soil and US interests overseas), yet US investigative authorities kept undeniably missing the links. The catastrophic attacks of September 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center and the US Pentagon were a direct culmination of their blindness.

However, from day one after Rabbi Kahane’s murder, his supporters besieged US authorities to view it as an Islamic act of jihad. But to no avail. Coincidentally, Rabbi Kahane’s personal lawyer, Mr. Shannon Taylor, was also at his side when he was gunned down. In fact, he collapsed at Mr. Taylor’s feet. He never imagined that the camera he brought along to take pictures of the gathering at the Marriott Hotel would later be used to take photos of a dying Rabbi Kahane. These pictures were taken to compile evidence for eventual prosecutorial purposes. In fact, these same images were the ones which circulated all over the world right after the murder. 

Immediately, Mr. Taylor approached the local New York office of the FBI and the US Attorney General’s office with sources of information. Acclaimed terror investigator Steve Emerson produced a documentary, Jihad in America, that exposed that the FBI had buried moles and spies deep within some of the Islamic terror cells. However, no tangible results on Rabbi Kahane’s murder were forthcoming from the FBI. Coincidentally, Mr. Taylor had the occasion to speak with the newly retired CIA head, William Sessions. Mr. Taylor was flabbergasted to learn that Mr. Sessions never saw the crime scene pictures taken of Rabbi Kahane’s murder. This should have been the first order of business, to hand over the pictures to the head of the CIA. After all, that was a logical conclusion to make when Islamic terrorists were being pursued. What was later revealed, though, managed to fill in the blanks as to why no results were forthcoming in Rabbi Kahane’s assassination investigation. 

In a nutshell, the FBI was not only taken off Rabbi Kahane’s case, but all Islamic “infiltrating” was halted. President Clinton ordered the CIA, and the CIA then demanded that the FBI cease and desist. The Congress also put the brakes on the FBI. Why? The true motives are anyone’s guess. However, from 1990 until the 1993 first World Trade Center bombing, these groups were not monitored.

Understand what all the above means, but do bear in mind that this blogger can state with absolute certainly the following: as a matter of fact, back in the early 1990’s, a particular investigative journalist contact is on record (and with detailed undercover photos to back up said claims), regarding a conclave of jihadists operating out of Brooklyn, NY, some of whom jumped (still do) between Brooklyn and Jersey City, NJ. Most infamously the (now incarcerated) “Blind Sheikh”, Abdel-Rahman, is a central jihadi player, despite FINALLY being behind U.S. bars.

A deeper understanding of the above, its focal point, can be found within the following excerpt, as this subject matter is hardly taken lightly:

Adina Kutnicki: Wolff, thank you for inviting me back. It is a distinct privilege. From the onset, it is imperative to internalize the underlying dynamics of my “hunting and digging”, my occupational interest.

Its essence began as both a reaction and response to four converging events. So let us commence with the first pillar. It started shortly after the horrors of 9/11/01, at a time when my family home was less than an hour’s drive from Ground Zero. Not only that, having grown up in NYC, it also became my adult milieu – both socially and professionally – particularly the upper east and west sides of Manhattan, as well as the downtown Soho area. Accordingly, the immediate impact from 9/11/01 was beyond explosive.

That being said, secondly, I was acutely intertwined with the ensuing chaos, not just as a native New Yorker, but because my brother, then stationed as an NYPD Homicide Detective, First Grade, was deeply in the mix with all of the investigatory aftermath. In effect, there was no escaping the “bolt out of the blue” jihadi attack, as a horrified bystander and family-wise.

Know this: aside from the above as a mirror image of jihadi sleeper cell activity throughout many U.S. cities – going back many years – the actual strip alongside Atlantic Avenue in Brooklyn NY was where the plotting for the Towers (1993 & 2001) was most active. Rest assured, back in 1993, they struck their opening shot. As stated above, Clinton ordered the CIA and the CIA demanded the FBI to cease all monitoring from 1990-1993. Why?

Back to NSA’s domestic spying…as mentioned, under the Islamist-in-Chief’s “watchful eyes”, a basic “cease and desist” designates the American-Muslim community a no go zone. Again, why? 

But for those who require more fire to their (patriotic) bellies, the following “decoding” is a must view, but you need to click on where it says Click Here below, otherwise its essence is for naught.

Stunning: NSA Files Decoded

NSAa

By Douglas J. Hagmann – Northeast Intelligence Network

4 January 2014: On November 1, 2013, The Guardian published an interactive article (CLICK HERE) about what the NSA actions really mean to you. So, you think that what is being done in the name of security does not shred your rights under the U.S. Constitution? Think again.

If you’ve not seen this interactive display in it’s entirety, now is the time to do so. Our forefathers started a revolution against England for far less.  I would urge everyone to carefully review the interactive presentation, and share this among your friends. We cannot continue to remain silent about the abuses by an out-of-control government under the pretext of security.

If you saw this when it was first published, take another look for a refresher. If you are seeing this for the first time, prepare to become angry.What the revelations mean for you. 

The question still lingers: what can average Americans do about any of this? Well, since America’s forefathers set the ship of state right over a lot less, last week’s “call to action” takes on ever more resonance – A PATRIOTIC CALL TO ACTION: MAY 16, 2014. TAKE BACK AMERICA, YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!

This American-Israeli always keeps close to heart the following maxim and it is a constant driving force, regardless of circumstances: “If you will it it is no dream.” 

Discern from all of the above what you will.

AL QAEDA DECLARES FIRST INDEPENDENT STATE TOWARDS CALIPHATE: WHERE DOES OBAMA’S HANDIWORK REVEAL ITSELF ? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

When a leader places ones own political/ideological fortunes ahead of national interests the “natural” result is one of disaster – for their nation and those used as bargaining chips. And when the leader of the free world does as much, well more than hell on earth will eventually shake out.

So let us hark back to the Islamist-in-Chief’s declaration that Al Qaeda was essentially dead and buried, metaphorically sticking a fork in them – Obama Has Touted Al Qaeda’s Demise 32 Times Since Benghazi Attack. This “done deal” was facilitated after SEAL TEAM SIX (supposedly) dispatched Osama to greet Allah. Hmm.

Essentially, why would Barack HUSSEIN Obama (and surrogates) utter such blatant hogwash, placing a peremptory nail in Al Qaeda’s coffin, when even a well informed high schooler recognized that all was not as it seemed?

Well, a double-edged sword was wielded; one as “proof” that he was indeed up to snuff to handle the “war on terror” – while in the midst of a heated pre-election season – concomitantly, to appease his leftward flank via (one of) many campaign promises. As such, he precipitously withdrew all U.S. combat forces from Iraq in December 2011 and needed to make sure Americans believed that it was indeed a prudent move, especially now that Osama was dead! Hence, the conveniently-timed nail in his coffin.

Mind you, while all the above lies were deliberately designed to deflect from the real facts on the ground, R2P lurked (still very much alive and well) in the background. And its import lies within the arming of Al Qaeda Sunni jihadists, its blow back, knock-on effects, most widely felt via Benghazigate.

Now, as is said, what does all of this have to do with the price of tea in China, or more directly put, with the title and thesis of today’s commentary – AL Qaeda declares/establishes first independent caliphate: where does Obama’s purposeful strategy shine in? Everywhere.

It should be more than obvious – at least one would hope so – that deliberate fires were set in the Mid East via the Islamist-in-Chief’s handiwork, and with ill intent, in order to hand the Muslim Brotherhood (and its outgrowth, Al Qaeda) a leg up. To wit, they can now proclaim their FIRST arm of their intended Caliphate, a possibility which Barack HUSSEIN Obama crowed would never come to fruition, as he buried Osama and put an end to Al Qaeda. Yup. Looks like Al Qaeda rose from its grave.

Praise and thanks to Allah – Alhamdulillah (Arabic: الحمد لله‎) !

Al Qaeda battles Iraqi army for Falluja

Al Qaeda battles Iraqi army for Falluja
Al Qaeda proclaims first Islamic state from Iraqi Falluja

DEBKAfile January 4, 2014

After seizing the heart of the western Iraqi town of Falluja, Al Qaeda’s local branch (ISIS) Friday night decreed it the capital of a new independent caliphate. The jihadists continue to push Iraqi forces out of another western Sunni town, Ramadi. To cover up the army’s inability to stop Al Qaeda’s advance, the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki Saturday reported that the jihadists had sustained heavy losses and that ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdad had been killed in battle. DEBKAfile: Western sources counter this claim with a report that Al Baghdadi is still orchestrating the counter-offensive against the Iraqi army from Baqouba in the eastern province of Diyala. If this is confirmed, it would mean that al Qaeda continues to seize territory.

Al Qaeda’s most significant victory in the Syrian war was achieved this week in the Iraqi arena. Its Iraq and Syrian branch (ISIS), under the command of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, resoundingly defeated the Iraqi army which two weeks ago launched a major offensive to relieve the country of the jihadist grip. Baghdadi’s troops were able to throw back the Iraqi army’s crack 7th and 1st divisions and keep going to capture large sections of Ramadi and Falluja, the key Sunni cities of western and central Iraq.

This victory enabled ISIS to forge a territorial chain of control stretching from Ramadi in central in Iraq, 110 km west of Baghdad, all the way to the northern Syrian town of Al-Raqqah, 160 km from Aleppo.

It also brought the Iraqi military offensive to a standstill. Soldiers downed arms and fled and units still intact started falling back toward Baghdad, dumping their heavy weapons to hasten their retreat.

DEBKAfile’s military sources report that Al Qaeda owes much of its victory to the decision of the Sunni tribes of western Iraq to join and spearhead its counter-attack on Iraqi forces. After smashing whole Iraqi units in the two cities, these tribal militias opened the door for the ISIS jihadists to march in.

Ironically, the tribal militias backing al Qaeda are the same “Awakening” groups which the US army sustained and armed for the battle to root out Al Qaeda from western Iraq during the 2005-2007 landmark “surge” campaign devised by Gen. David Petraeus.
That surge wheel has clearly turned round in favor of al Qaeda. Iraq’s military downfall is the worst it has suffered since the US invasion of the country in 2003 and al Qaeda’s greatest Middle East battlefield triumph, following which its commander Al-Baghdadi has vowed to proclaim the first Middle East caliphate stretching between western Iraq and eastern Syria.
This development has many critical ramifications:

1.  There is no military force in the region capable of going into Iraq and stopping al Qaeda’s advance, which was allowed to happen in consequence of the US army’s precipitate exit from the country three years ago.

2.   Al Qaeda’s fortunes in Syria, Lebanon and Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula have received a major boost. The Sinai affiliates in particular are in close touch with Al Baghdadi.

3.  The hook-up between them exacerbates the terrorist threat hanging over Israel, Jordan and Saudi Arabia.

4.  The Nusra Front, Al Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate, has acquired strategic depth in Iraq. Its leader Abu Mohammad al-Julani (Golani) is expected to announce that his movement will join the new Islamist state.

5.  A merger of the Iraqi and Syrian al Qaeda branches could draw in a host of sympathetic Middle East Islamist groups.

6.  The ISIS victory in Iraq represents a humiliating setback for Tehran, which heavily backed the Iraqi army offensive led by its pro-Iranian prime minister Nouri al-Maliki for cleansing the country of the violent Al Qaeda presence.

7. The US, by its decision to send weapons to the Iraqi army for its engagement with al Qaeda, was shown to have backed the losing side.

8.  The Iraqi army used up all its reserves for this offensive. Its only remaining option now is to fall back to Baghdad and regroup for the defense of the capital.

9.  For Syrian President Bashar Assad and his Hizballah ally, Hassan Nasrallah, the Iraqi military debacle was the worst possible news. It struck them at the tipping moment of the Syrian war. Just as they gained the advantage over the rebel movement, they were confronted with a fresh war arena against al Qaeda now invigorated by its Iraq victory.

EVEN The Washington Post jumps into the fray as well – Al-Qaeda-linked force captures Fallujah amid rise in violence in Iraq…are pigs flying too?

Bear completely in mind that the centuries long struggle between Sunni Shia will continue, regardless of who sits in the White House. However, it has been proven that purposefully stirring their pot has become a prime “strategy” of the current occupant of the White House

Now, even as Shia jihadists are smarting from this Al Qaeda defeat, we all know that they coalesce, long enough to pause in their fighting, when it is necessary to fight the “Big and Little Satans” – America and Israel. 

In furtherance to the above question, a core component can be found within a groundbreaking policy paper written by Professor Paul Eidelberg. I had the honor and distinct privilege to participate in its review. Therefore, due to its efficacy, I am providing a link, and it will no doubt answer the heretofore inexplicable: Where is the relentless Jew hatred emanating from? .

Yet the saying, “First the Saturday People, then the Sunday People”, has never been more relevant nor acute, as global jihad swathes across every corner of the world. Essentially, the same religious “holy” war raging against Israel (and by extension to the Jewish people) is meting out against Christians. Their slaughter will continue apace, as long as Islamic overlords hold sway. To wit, it is no longer a question of whether or not there is a clash between civilizations. That ship has sailed. The west is drowning in “infidel” blood, as mandated by Islamic doctrinal Sharia Law.

So even as Barack HUSSEIN Obama has been more than lending a helping hand to Al Qaeda – the Muslim Brotherhood backed progeny – at the same time, he has empowered Iran to reach a nuclear status state.

Do any of the above actions even remotely resonate with a patriot’s strategic policy making, or are they inimical, in line with one who seeks an alternative outcome, perhaps to bring down America?

9/11/01 COVER UP PERSISTS: BUSH’S PART REVEALED. DECEPTION EXACERBATED UNDER OBAMA: THE SAUDI TIES THAT BIND…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Before we get to the crux of the matter, it is imperative to understand the direct linkage between the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda. As a matter of fact, Al Qaeda is an offshoot of the Brotherhood and is its most infamous progeny

That being established, keep in mind the recent commentary which outlines the absolute connection between Hill & Bill to the Egyptian arm of the Brotherhood, and the fact that Huma Abedin is part of its Saudi arm. To be sure, Obama’s Islamic connections are solid, though his “red” roots are equally treacherous and not as they appear. But let’s not become sidetracked.

Now, the fact that the Saudi connection to 9/11/01 has been covered up under Bush’s watch, well, the ties that bound (and still do) the Bush dynasty to the Saudi royals accounts for that. And even though Saddam (like countless Arab dictators, as well as Iran’s mullahs) shielded the attackers – pre and post attack – the fact of the matter was that going into Iraq, while the Saudi connection was much closer, well, it beggars closely held secrets uncovered within an explosive tour de force, The Secret History of the Iraq War by Yosef Bodansky – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yossef_Bodansky. Its essence has been devoured at this site. Its lessons learned well.

That being said, the reality that Obama refuses to declassify material which does not pose a threat to national security – finally opening up the facts as they are – bespeaks of a willingness to shield the House of Saud (forget about their recent rift due to the Islamist-in-Chief jumping atop the Iranian terror axis…it has zip to do with shielding the 9/11/01 cover up) at the expense of American citizens, including those who died at their hands on 9/11/01 and continue till this day. 

Inside the Saudi 9/11 Coverup

by PAUL SPERRY December 16, 2013

After the 9/11 attacks, the public was told al Qaeda acted alone, with no state sponsors.

But the White House never let it see an entire section of Congress’ investigative report on 9/11 dealing with “specific sources of foreign support” for the 19 hijackers, 15 of whom were Saudi nationals.

It was kept secret and remains so today.

President Bush inexplicably censored 28 full pages of the 800-page report. Text isn’t just blacked-out here and there in this critical-yet-missing middle section. The pages are completely blank, except for dotted lines where an estimated 7,200 words once stood (this story by comparison is about 1,000 words).

A pair of lawmakers who recently read the redacted portion say they are “absolutely shocked” at the level of foreign state involvement in the attacks.

Reps. Walter Jones (R-NC) and Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) can’t reveal the nation identified by it without violating federal law. So they’ve proposed Congress pass a resolution asking President Obama to declassify the entire 2002 report, “Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001.”

Some information already has leaked from the classified section, which is based on both CIA and FBI documents, and it points back to Saudi Arabia, a presumed ally.

The Saudis deny any role in 9/11, but the CIA in one memo reportedly found “incontrovertible evidence” that Saudi government officials – not just wealthy Saudi hardliners, but high-level diplomats and intelligence officers employed by the kingdom – helped the hijackers both financially and logistically. The intelligence files cited in the report directly implicate the Saudi embassy in Washington and consulate in Los Angeles in the attacks, making 9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but an act of war.

The findings, if confirmed, would back up open-source reporting showing the hijackers had, at a minimum, ties to several Saudi officials and agents while they were preparing for their attacks inside the United States. In fact, they got help from Saudi VIPs from coast to coast:

LOS ANGELES: Saudi consulate official Fahad al-Thumairy allegedly arranged for an advance team to receive two of the Saudi hijackers – Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi – as they arrived at LAX in 2000. One of the advance men, Omar al-Bayoumi, a suspected Saudi intelligence agent, left the LA consulate and met the hijackers at a local restaurant. (Bayoumi left the United States two months before the attacks, while Thumairy was deported back to Saudi Arabia after 9/11.)

SAN DIEGO: Bayoumi and another suspected Saudi agent, Osama Bassnan, set up essentially a forward operating base in San Diego for the hijackers after leaving LA. They were provided rooms, rent and phones, as well as private meetings with an American al Qaeda cleric who would later become notorious, Anwar al-Awlaki, at a Saudi-funded mosque he ran in a nearby suburb. They were also feted at a welcoming party. (Bassnan also fled the United States just before the attacks.)

WASHINGTON: Then-Saudi Ambassador Prince Bandar and his wife sent checks totaling some $130,000 to Bassnan while he was handling the hijackers. Though the Bandars claim the checks were “welfare” for Bassnan’s supposedly ill wife, the money nonetheless made its way into the hijackers’ hands.

Other al Qaeda funding was traced back to Bandar and his embassy – so much so that by 2004 Riggs Bank of Washington had dropped the Saudis as a client.

The next year, as a number of embassy employees popped up in terror probes, Riyadh recalled Bandar.

“Our investigations contributed to the ambassador’s departure,” an investigator who worked with the Joint Terrorism Task Force in Washington told me, though Bandar says he left for “personal reasons.”

FALLS CHURCH, VA.: In 2001, Awlaki and the San Diego hijackers turned up together again – this time at the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center, a Pentagon-area mosque built with funds from the Saudi Embassy. Awlaki was recruited 3,000 miles away to head the mosque. As its imam, Awlaki helped the hijackers, who showed up at his doorstep as if on cue. He tasked a handler to help them acquire apartments and IDs before they attacked the Pentagon.

Awlaki worked closely with the Saudi Embassy. He lectured at a Saudi Islamic think tank in Merrifield, Va., chaired by Bandar. Saudi travel itinerary documents I’ve obtained show he also served as the ­official imam on Saudi Embassy-sponsored trips to Mecca and tours of Saudi holy sites.

Most suspiciously, though, Awlaki fled the United States on a Saudi jet about a year after 9/11.

ANYONE who believes that the occupants (past and present) of the People’s House view the interests of the American people as the highest priority hasn’t been paying attention to the facts at hand.

The fact of the matter is that the deepest magnitude of treachery is accrued under the guise of officialdom. The following commentary was written at this site in November 2012, and it dovetails completely with Paul Sperry’s current revelations/ investigation:

Whores come in all types of packaging, but most recognize them as “ladies” of the night. Not so fast.

Oftentimes, this blog strips bare those who violate trusted positions in U.S. (and Israel too) leadership, whether still on duty or retired. Makes no difference. And it is not as if this is an easy task being that there are too many miscreants, deeply embedded in the pockets of those who wish America & Israel ill. Regardless, whatever their main impetus, let their psychiatrists, or significant others, delve into their dark recesses. This American-Israeli has too many pressing issues to hunt down. Alas, one does have to catch some nappy time…playtime too…delicious, precious babies await attention.

NEVERTHELESS, a laundry list of former Presidents, Congressional reps and government advisers are joined at the hip with their Saudi paymasters; in exchange for lucrative speaking gigs, as well as post retirement libraries too.

But especially since 9/11/01 (and even years before…see evidence at an op-ed posited here – www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/5798#.UKikrYfFXcw), it has become more than self evident; coinage from the Islamic world is nothing less than dealing with the anti-western devil. Literally.

Though infuriating, and surely violating more than one U.S. law (international laws too), the fact of the matter is, a former high official in national security, Richard Clarke, is one such duly ensnared.

Really? Indeed.

This is the same Richard Clarke…en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_A._Clarke…who understands the “ins and outs” of one of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s tentacled groups – Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) – like a pimp knows his whores. That intimate. As such, Clarke knows full well, Al Qaeda is part and parcel of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia.

So, if this blogger knows the Brotherhood score – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/09/shoring-up-a-decade-of-my-research-regarding-the-muslim-mafia-aka-the-muslim-brotherhood-embedded-video-links/- so should the targeted focus of this commentary. 

For further edification, and as an indictment, the following is embedded in his above linked wiki file:

‘EARLY WARNINGS ABOUT AL-QAEDA THREAT’

“CLARKE’S ROLE AS A COUNTER-TERRORISM ADVISOR IN THE MONTHS AND YEARS PRIOR TO 9/11 WOULD LEAD TO THE CENTRAL ROLE HE PLAYED IN DECONSTRUCTING WHAT WENT WRONG IN THE YEARS THAT FOLLOWED. CLARKE AND HIS COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION REGARDING BIN LADEN AND ASSOCIATED TERRORIST PLOTS TARGETING THE UNITED STATES WERE MENTIONED FREQUENTLY IN CONDOLEEZZA RICE’S PUBLIC INTERVIEW BY THE 9/11 INVESTIGATORY COMMISSION ON APRIL 8, 2004. OF PARTICULAR SIGNIFICANCE WAS A MEMO[8] FROM JANUARY 25, 2001, THAT CLARKE HAD AUTHORED AND SENT TO RICE. ALONG WITH MAKING AN URGENT REQUEST FOR A MEETING OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL’S PRINCIPALS COMMITTEE TO DISCUSS THE GROWING AL-QAEDA THREAT IN THE GREATER MIDDLE EAST, THE MEMO ALSO SUGGESTS STRATEGIES FOR COMBATING AL-QAEDA THAT MIGHT BE ADOPTED BY THE NEW BUSH ADMINISTRATION.[9]

In his memoir, “Against All Enemies”, Clarke wrote that when he first briefed Rice on Al-Qaeda, in a January 2001 meeting, “her facial expression gave me the impression she had never heard the term before.” He also stated that Rice made a decision that the position of National Coordinator for Counterterrorism should be downgraded. By demoting the office, the Administration sent a signal through the national security bureaucracy about the salience they assigned to terrorism. No longer would Clarke’s memos go to the President; instead they had to pass though a chain of command of National Security Advisor Rice and her deputy Stephen Hadley, who bounced every one of them back.

Within a week of the inauguration, I wrote to Rice and Hadley asking ‘urgently’ for a Principals, or Cabinet-level, meeting to review the imminent Al-Qaeda threat. Rice told me that the Principals Committee, which had been the first venue for terrorism policy discussions in the Clinton administration, would not address the issue until it had been ‘framed’ by the Deputies.[10]

At the first Deputies Committee meeting on Terrorism held in April 2001, Clarke strongly suggested that the U.S. put pressure on both the Taliban and Al-Qaeda by arming theNorthern Alliance and other groups in Afghanistan. Simultaneously, that they target bin Laden and his leadership by reinitiating flights of the MQ-1 Predators. To which Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz responded, “Well, I just don’t understand why we are beginning by talking about this one man bin Laden.” Clarke replied that he was talking about bin Laden and his network because it posed “an immediate and serious threat to the United States.” According to Clarke, Wolfowitz turned to him and said, “You give bin Laden too much credit. He could not do all these things like the 1993 attack on New York, not without a state sponsor. Just because FBI and CIA have failed to find the linkages does not mean they don’t exist.”[10]

Clarke wrote in Against All Enemies that in the summer of 2001, the intelligence community was convinced of an imminent attack by al Qaeda, but could not get the attention of the highest levels of the Bush administration, most famously writing that Director of the Central Intelligence Agency George Tenet was running around with his “hair on fire”.[10]

At a July 5, 2001, White House gathering of the FAA, the Coast Guard, the FBI, Secret Service and INS, Clarke stated that “something really spectacular is going to happen here, and it’s going to happen soon.” Donald Kerrick, a three-star general who was a deputy National Security Advisor in the late Clinton administration and stayed on into the Bush administration, wrote Hadley a classified two-page memo stating that the NSA needed to “pay attention to Al-Qaida and counterterrorism” and that the U.S. would be “struck again.”

9/11 Commission

On March 24, 2004, Clarke testified at the public 9/11 Commission hearings.[11] At the outset of his testimony Clarke offered an apology to the families of 9/11 victims and an acknowledgment that the government had failed: “I also welcome the hearings because it is finally a forum where I can apologize to the loved ones of the victims of 9/11…To the loved ones of the victims of 9/11, to them who are here in this room, to those who are watching on television, your government failed you. Those entrusted with protecting you failed you. And I failed you. We tried hard, but that doesn’t matter because we failed. And for that failure, I would ask, once all the facts are out, for your understanding and for your forgiveness.”[11]

Many of the events Clarke recounted during the hearings were also published in his memoir. Among his highly critical statements regarding the Bush administration, Clarke charged that before and during the 9/11 crisis, many in the Administration were distracted from efforts against Osama bin Laden‘s Al-Qaeda organization by a pre-occupation with Iraq andSaddam Hussein. Clarke had written that on September 12, 2001, President Bush pulled him and a couple of aides aside and “testily” asked him to try to find evidence that Saddam was connected to the terrorist attacks. In response he wrote a report stating there was no evidence of Iraqi involvement and got it signed by all relevant agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the CIA. The paper was quickly returned by a deputy with a note saying “Please update and resubmit.”[12] After initially denying that such a meeting between the President and Clarke took place, the White House later reversed its denial when others present backed Clarke’s version of the events.[13][14]

Prior to the 9/11 Commission, portions of Clarke’s August 6 Daily Briefing Memo, entitled “Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US” to President Bush were subsequently redacted by The White House for national security reasons. Despite the title of the memo, in response to aggressive questioning from Richard Ben-Veniste – a Democratic member of the 9/11 Commission – Rice stated that the document “did not warn of attacks inside the United States.”[15] Clarke then asked on several occasions for early principals meetings on these issues, and was frustrated that no early meeting was scheduled. No principals committee meetings on Al-Qaida were held until September 4, 2001.[16]

In a late November truthout interview, former Clinton advisor Sidney Blumenthal said, “Clarke urgently tried to draw the attention of the Bush administration to the threat of Al-Qaeda.. the Bush administration is trying to withhold documents from the 9/11 bipartisan commission. I believe one of the things that they do not want to be known is what happened on August 6, 2001. It was on that day that George W. Bush received his last, and one of the few, briefings on terrorism. I believe he told (Clarke) that he didn’t want to be briefed on this again, even though Clarke was panicked about the alarms he was hearing regarding potential attacks. Bush was blithe, indifferent, ultimately irresponsible… The public has a right to know what happened on August 6, what Bush did, what Condi Rice did, what all the rest of them did, and what Richard Clarke’s memos and statements were.”[17]

Former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, the only member of the 9/11 Commission to read the President’s Daily Brief, revealed in the hearings that the documents “would set your hair on fire” and that the intelligence warnings of al-Qaida attacks “plateaued at a spike level for months” before 9/11.[18]

And one shouldn’t give a rat’s behind about the mud slinging between Bush bashers and his defenders, as to whose doorstep 9/11/01 lands at. This blogger will leave said reckoning squarely in the highly capable hands of her readership. You all decide.

So the question before us is still: how is it possible a HIGH level counter- terror operative, upon his post-Washington assignment (by both parties!), finds himself “in bed” with MPAC; the same umbrella terror organization he rang alarm bells over? Once again, leave it to Walid Shoebat to get to the down and dirty.

‘REPORT : MPAC OPENLY PARTNERING WITH GROUP THAT HAS FORMER COUNTER-TERRORISM CZAR ON ADVISORY COUNCIL’

“REGULAR READERS MIGHT REMEMBER THE NAME HARIS TARIN. HE IS THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR THE MUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL (MPAC) IN WASHINGTON, D.C. HE IS ONE OF HUMA ABEDIN’S DEFENDERS. TARIN WAS FEATURED IN AN ARTICLE AT ONISLAM THAT FOCUSES ON MPAC’S WORK WITH A GROUP KNOWN AS THE NATIONAL SECURITY NETWORK (NSN).

Via OnIslam:

A Muslim activist is winning the admiration of Americans for his efforts to tackle issues that stoke tension between Muslims and non-Muslims and energize younger generations to balance between their faith and the western life.

“What I like about working with Haris and MPAC is that they understand both the needs of their community and the way Washington works,” Heather Hurlburt, director of the nonprofit National Security Network, told The Washington Post.

Hulburt’s group cooperated with Haris Tarin, director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) in Washington to hold a series of hearings on extremism in the US.

Aside from the infamous Samuel “Sandy” Berger and Gen. Wesley Clark listed as members of the NSN Advisory Council, the name another individual who was very involved in dealing with the threats of al-Qaeda in both the Clinton and Bush administrations, appears as a member of this Council.

His name is Richard Clarke, former National Coordinator for Security in the Clinton administration.

Shockingly, Clarke said the following in 2003:

The common link here is the extremist Muslim Brotherhood – all of these organizations are descendants of the membership and ideology of the Muslim Brothers.

In 2004 testimony, Richard Clarke apologized to the American people for allowing the 9/11 attacks to happen, saying that their government “failed them”.

Considering the fact that Clarke understands the Muslim Brotherhood hierarchy as well as the extremely close connections that MPAC has with that group, why would he be serving on an Advisory Council that seeks to partner with the likes of MPAC?”

http://shoebat.com/2012/11/14/report-mpac-openly-partnering-with-group-that-has-former-counter-terrorism-czar-on-advisory-council/

By the bye….the MPAC hasn’t changed its Islamist stripes…they still truck with jihadi terror!!

Does consorting with terrorists (without even the cover of six degrees of separation…as an “adviser” who will “partner” with MPAC…huh and duh?)…in the hip pocket…supping with the devil…take on broader/renewed/alarming context?

Rhetorical question.

Anti-American business, as usual, conducted straight from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Who needs enemies when they are operating right out of the People’s House!