ISIS To U.S. Jihadists:SLAUGHTER Military Families!DHS’s Jeh Johnson “Unconcerned” Re Threats…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki


The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has released a slickly produced 52-second video threatening to kill Americans …

THOSE who “pooh pooh” ISIS’s directives for lone wolf attacks – never mind those deemed “spectacular” in nature –  on Americans are missing the point of entry, so to speak. As a matter of record, there has yet to be (in any of our lifetimes) a more “successful” terror hydra, than that of Islamic jihadists. This includes Shia and Sunni jihadists, as both adhere to Shariah law and its barbaric mandates.

INTRINSICALLY, post haste and whatever it takes, the following must be internalized: without the underpinning(s) of Islam, Shariah law, the Koran would be little more than an empty vessel, such that it is. Thus, Sunni and Shia who adhere to Shariah doctrines are MORTAL enemies to western civilization. Extrapolating further, as such, they are incapable of accepting western values, no less integrating within its borders. Ain’t that the truth. Pointedly, to muffle ones ears and blind ones eyes to what is threatening western civilization will only exacerbate the threat levels. Deal with it. Buck up.

THAT being said, reports are swirling that Iran’s Hitlerite regime is floating a deal, one which is akin to making a pact with one devil to fight another. In any case, for “flexibility” on their nuclear program, they will “assist” the west in fighting ISIS, as they too are in conflict with fellow Islamists. Yes, the centuries old war between Sunni and Shia jihadists continues apace. Let them slaughter each other. THAT’S a plan we can all get behind!

Revolutionary Guards

YES, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, jihadis who murder westerners (Jews are prime targets, yet Americans are atop their kill list) world over are offering their “services”….a win-win…they tag-team with westerners to kill their rival Sunni Islamists, then win “concessions” on their nuclear (genocidal) program! Let’s give them points for having brass balls, something western leaders have lost!

NOW, regardless of what the Jihadi-in-Chief blah, blahs, as to a quid pro quo being out of the question, think of it like even less trustworthy than verbal diarrhea. In fact, the opposite is the case.

IN reality, while he favors one side over the other (everyone is allowed their preferences…sheesh) the crux is that Islamic hegemony is where it’s at. This is clear, as he is Islam’s best friend.

BHO & the Muslim Brotherhood - 7

NOT only that, but Barack HUSSEIN Obama praised an Islamic cleric – while he gave a speech at the U.N. – who exhorted the killing Of American military! Is this even slightly ambiguous?

ALONG said Islamic trajectory, with Valerie Jarrett as his Iranian (and communist) spear, the Shia nuclear equation is already satiated, regardless of the political theater.

Obama’s Iranian-Benghazigate hatchet woman…

NEVERTHELESS, readers may rightfully inquire: what does this have to do with ISIS and its mounting threats, exhorting American jihadis to SLAUGHTER U.S. families and with military ones at the forefront? Everything. 

YOU see, it has already been established:

1 – Islamic jihadists execute their threats.

2 – Shariah law is barbaric.

3 – Barack HUSSEIN Obama is Islam’s best friend, ISIS’s too.

4 – And Iran’s mullahs are waiting in the wings to “collaborate” with the (western) “coalition of the willing”. Therefore, does any American believe that he will order his tainted DHS to thwart this and that attack? 

ATOP said reality-based thinking, evidence abounds that his pick for DHS, Jeh Johnson, is ill concerned about ISIS having crossed into America and their having forward bases at southern borders. No big deal. No reason to SEAL the borders, and tighter than Fort Knox!   

PRAY tell, in general, does this knowledge base bode well for the safety of Americans? Specifically, knowing what you do about the Islamist-in-Chief’s palpable hatred for the military (active duty and vets), why should anyone believe that a war-cry to slaughter patriotic families will move DHS into action? Not this DHS; which itself placed a target, a bull’s eye, on the backs of vets! It would be akin to asking serial rapists to protect the neighborhood children from active dangers. Get real….

IN light of these truths, how safe should Americans feel in their beds, aside from military families? You decide.

A law enforcement bulletin obtained by warned that Islamic State fighters have increased calls for “lone wolves” to attack U.S. soldiers in America in recent months, citing one tweet that called for jihadists to find service members’ addresses online and then “show up and slaughter them.”

There will be “a continued call – by Western fighters in Syria and terrorist organizations – for lone offender attacks against U.S. military facilities and personnel,” warned a July law enforcement intelligence bulletin from the Central Florida Intelligence Exchange, a state-run agency that gathers, assesses and shares threat information and works with the Department of Homeland Security. “These threats will most likely increase should the U.S. or its allies attack the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIS) in Syria or Iraq.”

In one example cited in the bulletin, a British jihadist encouraged radicals still living in the West to use Facebook and LinkedIn to find and target soldiers.

“You could literally search for soldiers, find their town, photos of them, look for address in Yellowbook or something,” the tweet read. “Then show up and slaughter them.”

DARE it be repeated: is DHS up to the task?

BESIDES, before the Islamist-slanted reign of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, who recalls the “lone wolf” attacks in 2002 of the so-called “Beltway Snipers”, whereby the PC “police” never touched upon their jihadi underpinnings? Why was there an omerta, especially so soon after 9/11/01? Asked and answered.

When the Washington-area snipers were caught in October 2002, I criticized the media in “The Snipers: Crazy or Jihadis?” for tip-toeing around the possible Islamist motives of the two suspected perps, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Malvo, and instead insisting on alternate explanations for their actions (making a quick buck, family problems, “stark realization” of loss and regret, a desire to “exert control” over others, Muhammad’s relationship with Malvo, and so on). The operational sentence in my article was:

when Muslims engage in terrorism against Americans, the guiding presumption must be that they see themselves as warriors in a jihad against the “Great Satan.”

Today comes news from the Washington Post confirming my hypothesis:

Prince William County prosecutors allege that sniper suspect John Allen Muhammad said “America got what it deserved” in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and that he has expressed other anti-American and racist views.

As I keep saying until I’m sometimes blue in the face: The United States can win this war only if Americans forthrightly recognize who their enemy is. (August 19, 2003)

Sept. 3, 2003 update: The Washington Post reports today that Malvo told a Maryland police officer, Cpl. Wayne Davis, that “one reason for the shootings was that white people had tried to harm Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam.”

Oct. 14, 2003 update: Evidence has emerged linking Washington sniper John Allen Muhammad,reports London’s Evening Standard today, with Al-Fuqra, the violent Islamist organization with a history of violence on U.S. soil and also linked to shoe bomber Richard Reid and the murderers of Daniel Pearl. Investigators are said to suspect that Muhammad is “an Islamic terrorist and believe his insanity plea is a cover story to disguise his support for fundamentalists.” The report even connects Muhammad’s actions to 9/11, noting that “He bought his Chevrolet Caprice car used in the attacks on the first anniversary of the September 11 attacks.”

Oct. 23, 2003 update: This report in today’s Seattle Post-Intelligencer adds a worrisome new dimension to John Allen Muhammad’s possible motives:

FBI agents with the Joint Terrorism Task Force made a chilling discovery in a South King County storage locker last week: a small arsenal of weapons including the same model rifle used last year in random killings around the nation’s capital.

The cache of weapons belongs to James Wilburn of Seattle, who according to court records, has a long history of federal firearms convictions. Agents and the U.S. Probation Office have uncovered some alarming parallels between Wilburn — who is behind bars after being arrested last month on a probation violation — and alleged D.C. sniper John Allen Muhammad.

Like Muhammad, Wilburn, 51, is a convert to Islam. In addition to having the same model rifle allegedly used in the Washington, D.C.-area shootings, Wilburn, like Muhammad, has had a long-documented fascination with firearms. And Wilburn recently traveled to Virginia Beach, Va., where Muhammad is on trial, federal criminal justice sources said.

Among the items found in the storage locker: a sniper outfit, a range-finder scope, silencers, gas masks, road spikes, knives, guns and “a black leather bag full of ammo,” according to an affidavit filed by Special Agent Fernando Gutierrez of the FBI’s domestic terrorism squad.”

We have assumed that Muhammad acted alone; could it be that he was part of an organized effort?

Oct. 31, 2003 update: The James Wilburn angle gets ever-more worrisome, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports today. FBI Special Agent Fernando Gutierrez paraphrases Wilburn in an affidavit saying that Wilburn “agrees with the actions of the September 11, 2001, terrorists, and that he wishes a full terrorist attack would occur in Seattle.” To make matters worse, Wilburn is a suspect in the mysterious death on Sept. 23, 2003 of his girlfriend, Joleen Abbott, in Virginia Beach, Va., the same town where John Allen Muhammad, the D.C. sniper, is on trial for murder. “Wilburn fits the profile of a lone-wolf type of terrorist similar to the D.C. sniper,” Gutierrez noted in his affidavit. One wonders how many more such individuals are on the loose out there.

Lee Malvo’s jailhouse picture of Osama bin Laden

Dec. 5, 2003 update: Lee Malvo’s defense (yes, defense) team introduced more than 80 drawings, an essay, and other writings that their client produced during his time in jail during his first year of captivity. (I reproduce one of them, of Osama bin Laden, “Servant of Allah,” here.) The pictures, a good number of which deal with Islamic topics, can be seen at the court’s website. As described by the Associated Press, here are some details:

  • The World Trade Center with a jet flying into it and the caption, “You were warned.”
  • A detailed depiction of the White House in crosshairs. “You will weep and moan & MORN. You will bleed to death. little by little. Your life belongs to Allah. HE will deliver you to us,” reads an inscription above the White House drawing. To one side of the crosshairs, it says, “Sept. 11 we will ensure will look like a picnic to you. “
  • Drawings and notes calling for jihad.
  • Drawings of Louis Farrakhan, Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Qaddafi.

May 24, 2006 update: The snipers are back in the news, now that John Allen Muhammad is on trial in Montgomery County, Maryland, and Lee Boyd Malvo is for the first time testifying against him. Malvo had much to say during his five hours of testimony, including these points, quoted from aWashington Post report:

John Allen Muhammad on trial.

Nov. 19, 2007 update: The Site Intelligence newsletter (not accessible online) inSite provides many details of jihadis discussing J.A. Muhammad as a lone wolf Islamist terrorist.


ISIS calls for 'lone wolf' US supporters to show up at the homes of soldiers and 'slaughter them'

    'Lone wolves in America' encouraged to attack servicemen and women as well as other key landmarks such as Times Square and Las Vegas strip
    Instructions for 'how to make a bomb in your kitchen, to create scenes of horror in tourist spots and other targets' pops up on message board 

 Americans radicalized by online propaganda from Islamic State and other militant groups pose the main terrorist threat to the United States, which is especially vulnerable to foreign fighters returning from Syria, senior U.S. security officials said on Wednesday.

While there is no evidence that the radical Islamist group plans an attack on U.S. soil, its vigorous propaganda machine and sophisticated online recruitment efforts created a clear potential threat, they said.

A law enforcement bulletin obtained by warned that Islamic State fighters have increased calls for 'lone wolves' to attack U.S. soldiers in America in recent months, citing one tweet that called for jihadists to find service members' addresses online and then 'show up and slaughter them.'  

The heads of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Homeland Security and the National Counterterrorism Center issued the warning in a hearing before the House Homeland Security Committee.

The group's threat lies in its online attempts to radicalize Americans and its efforts to recruit from 2,000 Westerners who have traveled to Syria to fight President Bashar al-Assad's government, the officials said.

The foreign fighters, who included 100 Americans, 'may eventually return to their home countries battle-hardened, radicalized and determined to attack us,' said Matt Olsen, the leading U.S. counterterrorism official.

There will be 'a continued call - by Western fighters in Syria and terrorist organizations - for lone offender attacks against U.S. military facilities and personnel,' warned a July law enforcement intelligence bulletin from the Central Florida Intelligence Exchange, a state-run agency that gathers, assesses and shares threat information and works with the Department of Homeland Security.

 'These threats will most likely increase should the U.S. or its allies attack the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIS) in Syria or Iraq.' 






CATCHING up to recent “lone wolf”  Islamic killing sprees, what about the “workplace violence” attributed to Muslim-American soldiers on U.S. bases? Moreover, how about this month’s domestic act of Islamic terror by Ali Muhammad Brown, upon a college student, Brendan Tevlin, admittedly in the name of jihad? And so on and so forth. Indeed.

SIGNIFICANTLY, whereas the (bastard) Feds stick their (fascist) noses into EVERY sphere of American life, even to the point of telling citizens what kind of light bulbs they can buy, where are they when it really counts, even as Facebook and Amazon run adverts for terror clothing on behalf of ISIS? Huh? Is this even kosher/legal?



NOW, the deadly silence is coming from an admin, whereby a Race-baiter-in-Chief saw fit to convene a press conference when his Harvard pal, Henry Louis Gates, had a run-in with the Cambridge police dept, admonishing them: the police acted stupidly! Ditto re Trayvon Martin…”could of been his son” nauseating mantra. Oh yeah. So, no one can state – at least with a straight face – that Obama Inc. doesn’t use his megaphone to stop this and that bull crap. Alas, why NOT the sale of ISIS terror gear?? 

CONCLUSIVELY, demonstrably, the “lone wolves”, at least up to now, will appear as kindergarten, when compared to future “lone wolves” operating under the barbaric banner of ISIS/ISIL Brotherhood’s umbrella.

MARK these words…


UPDATE: then read below for today’s commentary…

Satirical Turkish site on trial for insulting religion

Feb 7, 2014 


This is yet another sign of the erosion of Turkish secularism and its galloping re-Islamization, but what is noteworthy here is that the complaint was brought by Adnan Oktar (pictured above). Under the name Harun Yahya, Oktar has published a huge amount of Islamic apologetics material, including some “moderate” Muslim explanations of why jihad violence and suicide attacks aren’t justified in Islamic teaching, and so non-Muslims need not be concerned about them. But he seems to have no problem with the Sharia denial of the freedom of speech and enforcement of the prohibition on any criticism of Islam.

“Satirical Turkish site on trial for insulting religion,” from Al-Monitor, February 5 (thanks to Jerk Chicken):

One of Turkey’s most popular websites, the satirical Sour Dictionary (Eksi Sozluk), is on trial for insulting religion. Forty contributing writers have been charged following a complaint by popular Islamic figure Adnan Oktar. The trial kıcked off Jan. 14 with 27 of the defendants in attendance.

Oktar, in his complaint to the prosecutor, claimed that some entries in the dictionary included comments that amounted to insults of religion and prophets. The entries he cited and for which the prosecutor eventually pressed charges include jokes that the Prophet Muhammad and Allah had “sent money” to Turkey’s Housing Development Administration and that Jesus Christ and religious people were of low intelligence. Other examples include an entry on suggestions for a 100th name for Allah in addition to the 99 names Muslims have for their god and another titled “Allah’s official sponsors.”

The prosecutor is seeking jail terms of six to 12 months for the Eksi Sozluk writers. The defendants disputed the charges against them at their first hearing, arguing that they had no intention of insulting religion and that their comments fell within the scope of freedom of expression. A second hearing was scheduled for Feb. 17.

A string of similar legal cases in recent years indicate that accusations of insulting religion, especially Islam, is being used with increasing ease and frequency to press criminal charges. Emma Sinclair-Webb, a Turkey researcher for Human Rights Watch, says that the trials point to a new trend. What was once an epidemic of cases of “insulting Turkishness” are now being replaced by those of “insulting religion.”

Al-Monitor readers will recall that world-famous Turkish pianist Fazil Say was sentenced to 10 months in jail for insulting Islam and its prophet on Twitter. His sentence was eventually suspended but remains, dangling over Say’s head.

Another prominent figure convicted of the same charges is the Turkish-Armenian intellectual Sevan Nisanyan, for making the following remarks in a television program: “I don’t believe that Muhammad was a prophet. I don’t believe in the existence of a prophethood institution. I find it absurd that anyone could claim receiving special revelations from god. To me, that’s impertinence. Muhammad must have either lied or had hallucinations.”

Nisanyan was given 13 months in jail. Although he is yet to begin serving his sentence, Nisanyan was sent to prison in January to serve a two-year term over a small structure he built in violation of construction laws on his own land in the village of Sirince, in Izmir province. As explained in Al-Monitor, many in Turkey are convinced that construction regulations were used as a pretext to punish Nisanyan for his outspoken views on the Armenian genocide and critical opinion of religion.

Other cases demonstrate that even people who refer to religious figures in a critical context can end up in court on charges of insulting religion. Take, for instance, Canan Arin, a lawyer from Antalya who was charged after she said that the Prophet Muhammad had married an underage girl. Her trial was suspended conditionally, but she will find herself back in court if similar charges are brought against her over a period of three years.

Cartoonist Bahadir Baruter was also charged and faced a year in jail over a cartoon he drew of a mosque wall with the inscription “There is no Allah, religion is a lie.”

The zealous pursuit of “insults to religion” extends beyond the courts, with media outlets facing administrative sanctions. The Turkish CNBC-e channel, for instance, was fined by the Higher Board of Radio and Television over an episode of “The Simpsons” deemed offensive to religion.

Even though no one ended up behind bars in the above cases, the mere fact that people stand trial and risk jail sentences no doubt seriously intimidates the defendants as well as anyone with critical views on religion. The ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) has come under fire for promoting “religious chauvinism.” It appears that prosecutors who endorse the AKP’s views or vie to win the government’s favor are working hard to come up with such cases.

The prosecutors use the seemingly general wording of “insulting religion,” but all the cases pursued thus far have concerned comments deemed to be offensive to Muslims. Insults and hate speech against Jews or Christians clearly do not merit similar vigilance.

In this charged context, the case against Eksi Sozluk is likely to produce a serious bullying effect on social media. It is an alarming trial that calls for close monitoring.

Linked at Islam Exposed –  

EVERY investigation worth its merit must be premised upon solid building blocks, but they must fit into the puzzle – on their own – without being squeezed into place. Not only would a hinky investigation be non kosher, but it would be decidedly uncool. This address is anything but.

That being said and out of the way – before we get to the latest “connect the (Islamist) dots” – it is imperative to understand certain geo-political dynamics, even as traditional Sunni/Shia divides are seemingly (and momentarily) trashed aside.

As a historical backgrounder, Turkey and Iran are Occasional Allies, Enduring Rivals: Turkey’s Relations With Iran:

Building Block One:

“In reality, the motivation behind Turkey’s willingness to confront its Western allies over Iran’s nuclear program was never as simple as a desire to exchange membership of one alliance with membership of another. It was rather the product of a number of different factors, the most important of which was the desire to establish Turkey as the preeminent arbiter of power in its region: not a country which attached itself to others but a center to which others would gravitate…..

Economic relations between Turkey and Iran have developed rapidly over the last ten years. The two countries have signed numerous agreements and memoranda of understanding committing themselves to a closer economic relationship and bilateral trade has grown more than ten-fold. However, the main element underpinning the boom – the pipeline carrying Iranian natural gas to Turkey – dates to well before the AKP first came to power in November 2002; and the expansion in trade with Iran has taken place within the context of an attempt by the AKP to increase Turkey’s economic ties with all of its Muslim neighbors….

Indeed, one of the most striking features of the economic relationship between Turkey and Iran is that the gap between rhetoric and reality appears considerably greater than in Turkey’s economic relations with any other country. There is no questioning the appetite of Turkish and Iranian private companies for closer ties, particularly in the provinces on either side of their shared border. But, in practice, the two governments have displayed considerably more fervor for political posturing than for implementing the policies needed to strengthen economic cooperation…..

In speeches and public statements, in an indirect reference to Islam, politicians from both countries have repeatedly cited their “shared values” as forming the foundation for closer economic ties; often with the implication that religion makes Turkey and Iran natural partners for each other in a way that non-Muslim countries could never be. Over the last ten years, Turkish and Iranian officials have enthusiastically announced plans for a string of grandiose joint projects.
None has been realized….

There is no doubt that Iran has benefited much more than Turkey from the growth in economic ties. Iranian sales of hydrocarbons have ensured that the balance of trade is heavily in Tehran’s favor. By 2011, Iran had become Turkey’s largest supplier of crude oil and its second largest supplier of Occasional Allies, Enduring Rivals: Turkey’s Relations with Iran 51 natural gas. Yet, in early 2012, Turkish companies exporting to Iran continued to be faced with steep Customs duties, a huge fuel levy on transportation by Turkish trucks and an opaque and frequently xenophobic bureaucracy and legal system. While Iranians who have established companies in Turkey enjoy considerably more rights and a much more stable operating environment than their Turkish counterparts who have done likewise in Iran….”

MOST intrinsically, when it comes to Israel and regional dynamics, Erdogan’s Turkey and Iran’s Hitlerite regime are “kissing cousins”, sort of like a blended family that is often feuding but makes up when it suits everyone’s interests. As such, Turkey, whose Muslims are Sunnis form about 72%; Alevis of the Shia form about 25% of the Muslim population; and a Twelver Shia community form about 3% of the Muslim population, all should be considered Islamic twins separated at birth. Concomitantly, both want Israel gone (America buried too), whatever it takes. Methodology is “negotiable”.

So, with the above firmly placed in geo-political and Islamic context – in tandem with many facts on the ground – let’s hop over to today’s thesis and view it for what it is: IRAN’S ISLAMIC INTERSECTION ALIGNS WITH ADNAN OKTAR’S TURKISH/BROTHERHOOD CULT: VONGO HOSTS CEYLAN ÖZBUDAK & (IRANIAN-AMERICAN/IRANIAN-SYRIAN)DR. MAJID RAFIZADEH.

For a brief overview – as well as a primer – for the newly initiated, Ceylan Özbudak is not a newcomer to this site. Nor is she a newbie to other related venues. Pay special heed to the following via its truth telling:

Building Block Two:

“Ceylan Ozbudak works with the controversial Islamic leader Adnan Oktar, also known as Harun Yahya. One of Oktar’s announcements has been his desire to build a temple for all religions on Jerusalem’s Temple Mount.

Ozbudak suggested that Turkey can mediate between Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Egypt, and other surrounding countries for peace. She added that Turkey could protect the Jewish people’s right to live in Israel as well as manage the region. But will this grandiose plan work and does Israel want to give up much of its sovereignty to be protected by the former Ottoman Empire?

Ozbudak hosts a television show called, ‘Building Bridges’, with a variety of other young Turkish women. They have stated on the program that in order to ensure peace, “we believe that this can only be done through a Turkish Islamic Union, where all the countries will be independent in their states, but they will be under one roof and Turkey will be the spiritual leader of this Turkish Islamic Union”

The show airs on A9TV, which states on its website that it “has been set up to build up love, justice and solidarity among people and our main aim is being pioneer for peace all over the world by using the unifying policy of Turkish Islamic Union. In every show youwatch you will feel this policy clearly.”

It is now time to segue over to a recent explosive interview, whereby the aforementioned “hottie” and her “Oktarette’s”(a pet moniker for those who pimp for Adnan Oktar’s “Building Bridges”) are all duly exposed:

Building Block Three:

But let’s start with Aylin Kocaman, one of the buxom “Oktarettes”, and her CLEAR threat to Lisa Michelle; a Zionist activist, who happens to be an administrator at several well-trafficked Facebook sites. The aforementioned Aylin does more than just purr. The threatening message-rant was lobbed in a supposedly pro-Israel Facebook group. Sickening.

Word for word, Lisa Michelle was sent the following threat (now offline) from Aylin Kocaman, in a post dated 5/25/2013. But no matter, we screen captured it.

Aylin Kocaman voices her threats:

“Lisa, you are so naive my dear. You probably thought that our silence towards your insults will not be responded at all. You are wrong. We made a pretty good research about you and something about your personal life amazed us. I am sure it will amaze many people around you. Don’t worry I will share it in public soon just like you did the biggest lies about us. The difference is I will be announcing the facts about you while you are spreading lies about us. I want you to taste this. You might have underestimated us. Apparently if you did your research sufficient enough you would find out that we have great possibility and power to reach every information in the world. I think, you thought insulting Muslims would be easy. Maybe for you it is easy to insult Muslims in Afghanistan, since you think they are powerless, but we are powerful my dear. You made a grave mistake.”

Lisa Michelle responds:

“Are you threatening me, Aylin? I have nothing to hide, and I am not insulting Muslims. I’m raising awareness about the truth. Larry [an adminstrator at the Facebook site], do you see that I was just threatened?”

Building Block Four:

To drive the Islamist nail even further, please internalize Adnan Oktar’s (the “Oktarette’s” cult leader) true Brotherhood allegiance, in as much as it has already been established – from a multiplicity of directions – that PM Erdogan is a Muslim Brotherhood leader. Interesting.

And for a little more Turkish suberterfuge, Oktar (aka Harun Yahya) exhorted this recent pronouncement:

Adnan Oktar’dan yolsuzluk yorumu

Adnan Oktar, canlı yayında Erdoğan’a destek vererek, ‘şamata’ yapıldığını söyleyip sitem etti. Bırakın çalışsın Tayyip Hocam diyen Adnan Oktar, devamında “Ya çaldıklarını farzeledim, geri verirler. Bir o kadar da üstüne biz para verelim. Ne uzatıyorsunuz?” dedi.

Loosely translated: “reviewed by Adnan Oktar, giving support to Erdogan, ‘uproar’ has made ​​my calling…. Tayyip Adnan Oktar, the continuation of “What I farzele they stole, they give back…so we lend the money. Would you hold out?”

More pointedly, he continues, “If they (Erdogan’s AK Party) stole money, I will personally make this amount of payment to the Turkish State.” Hmm.

To wit, and extrapolating further, Oktar’s response to the increasingly incendiary charges heaped at PM Erdogan – and in non-bastardized linguistic mumbo jumbo – must elicit a major question for all rational thinkers: why in the world would Adnan Oktar offer up tens of millions in funds, reportedly, close to a billion (which his cult is in possession of, but that’s best left for another discussion), to “bail” out PM Erdogan and his cronies? Indeed.

Building Block Five:

On January 25th at 12PM EST Ceylan Özbudak will be hosting a discussion regarding Turkey’s Role in the present day Middle East. She will be joined by guest speaker Majid Rafizadeh to talk about what role Turkey should have with neighboring countries Syria and Iran. Please join us for what should be a very informative event!

Building Block Six:

This “auspicious” event is sponsored by VONVO:

As luck would have it (for some, but not for others), the referenced “hostess” is also busy promoting Turkish delights, yet her FB shout out is highly revealing…forget about the regular tourist venues…she/her posse are highly familiar with “off the beaten”, male-titillating, tracks. How lovely. Oh, kudos to VONVO, for booking such a wonderful representative and “guest” for a discussion re the fiery Mid East!

Ceylan, the “hostess with the mostest”, wishes one and all: المتعة فى تركيا – have fun in Turkey  –

Building Block Seven:

Alas, the featured guest at VONVO is an integral part of the “Oktarettes”, and it is little wonder (on this end) that some of her “colleagues” have been found, by our investigative team, as headliners on Turkish porn sites and the like! But no matter,“Building Bridges”, the media platform they front for, is seen as an “integral” platform for Mid East discourse and a “go to” address. Pray tell, for what? Credo quia absurdum! 

Now, since you must have had your fill of the Turkish connection, let’s meander over to the Iranian front. Agreed, this side is presented much more circumspectly and in a very dignified package. Hats off.

Folks, at the upcoming VONVO confab, there will indeed be a distinguished guest. This site will provide some linkage, but only as foretastes. It will be up to each and every one – this site’s discerning readership – to draw their own conclusions.

The Iranian side of the equation – make no mistake, this guest bespeaks a kinship to Iran –  is adroit with American finesse and exposure, and at the highest levels of policy making in Washington. 

Building Block Eight:

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh is an Iranian-American scholar, author and U.S. foreign policy specialist. Rafizadeh is the president of the International American Council. He serves on the board of Harvard International Review at Harvard University and Harvard International Relations Council. He is a member of the Gulf 2000 Project at Columbia University, School of International and Public Affairs. Previously he served as ambassador to the National Iranian-American Council based in Washington DC.

Listen up: key herein is the Ambassadorial connection (see bio clip directly above) to the National Iranian American Council and who they front for. You guessed it…the mullahs. Already exposed, a heads up to Reza Aslan: National Iranian American Council confirmed as front group for Iran’s bloody Islamic regime.

It gets even dicier, as said Iranian scholar has been a frequent, and fawned over, guest of the “girls”. And if the above “on and off” love-fest between Turkey and Iran (as described at the onset) is understood for what it is, Dr. Majid Rafizadeh has every reason to feel comfy, and this doesn’t even account for their bodacious loveliness.

Exhibit Number One:


Building Bridges program with WTPN, with their guests Majid Rafizadeh, Iranian-Syrian Scholar (11th June, 2012) – VIDEO


Exhibit Number Two:


Building Bridges WTPN – Majid Rafizadeh (11th June, 2012) -VIDEO


Exhibit Number Three:


A9 TV: A Talk with Majid Rafizadeh

 – VIDEO… and so many others! This linkage can go on all day…but who has the time.

In the main, and assuredly so, VONVO  (, as an independent media platform, is free to host whatever guests they want and to connect them worldwide. No one is disputing this. However, what cannot be disputed are the underpinnings of this event: it is absolutely and incontrovertibly Muslim Brotherhood connected, as well as to the “liking” of the Iranian mullahs. More than food for (western) thought.

In this regard, whichever media platforms host the Building Bridges Islamic crew, they must “man/woman up” and admit to the fact that they are indeed giving them a platform.

As such, many hundreds of thousands of readers at this site (and elsewhere) are no longer fooled by those whose main defenses are akin to feigned punts: blah, blah…all sides “deserve” equal time. Perhaps, but all “sides” must be identified correctly, demonstrating where their allegiances/agendas lie. After all, lipstick on a pig doesn’t change the pig’s ugly face.

Mind you, this site doesn’t hide behind its ZIONIST and CONSERVATIVE agenda, it’s out there for all to see – like it or not. Therefore, why should others be allowed to shuck and jive! Agreed?

Moreover, rational folks understand that certain media platforms are designed to air diverging positions. Fine. We get that. NEVERTHELESS, again, all sides must be properly identified (to the audience at hand) and vetted. It is a matter of due diligence and integrity. The viewership has a right to know to whom they are listening, in particular, regarding such devastatingly important matters! 

Besides, more than enough proofs – re the related program at VONVO – to choke many horses….pigs too.

DUE to all of the above – those in the know – we will be watching very closely for the related event which will debut on January 25th at 12PM EST (eastern standard time…for those of us in the Mid East, 7PM Israel time), in order to determine how truthfully the background of the guests are presented. After which, let it rip…

This site – and its investigative team – urges its readership to tune in and judge for themselves. We shall see if the media platform addresses (and properly identifies) who’s who. We shall also judge if VONVO finds it worthwhile to attach itself to the shuck and jive (conference) show – or not.

ADDENDUM:updates to above related issues…interesting tidbits-  

Subsequent to another recent commentary (within a few days of its posting), regarding the Turkish cult (intersecting with other matters), a new “follower” to my twitter emerged – DR. MAJID RAFIZADEH. What are the odds, and with millions of twitter folks in cyberspace? Mind you, this blogger is not very active on twitter, but no matter.

Adina Kutnicki, You have a new follower on Twitter. 

Majid Rafizadeh @majidrafizadeh President of International American Council. Fr Ambassador.Senior fellow:Harvard.Political scientist:CNN,Nytimes..Columnist Alarabiya USA, Washington DC. Website: ·

Next up in the “coinquidink” realm, less than 12 hrs after the above VONVO commentary emerges online, lo and behold, again, out of millions on FB, guess who “friends” this blogger? You would be right, if you said – Max Ringelheim!

Max Ringelheim wants to be friends with you on Facebook. SUNY Buffalo 179 groups Confirm Request See All Requests

Looks like two of the aforementioned players want to keep in “close contact” – or not.

It gets even stranger – or not. Tundra Tabloids , a rocking anti-jihadi website – with this site unaware of their re-posting – linked the smokin’ hot VONVO expose’.

Well, talk about SWIFT blow back!

Upon posting the following comment at their site, as a prelude to this blog’s VONVO,

Posted on 18/01/2014 by KGS

Keeping your eye on the brass ring, blinds you to whatever is happening around you.

Max Ringleheim from VONVO (of whom I’ve always had doubts) has now seriously compromised himself in his entanglement with Adnan Oktar and his creepy cult of big boobed blond bombshells. Adina Kutnicki has the full scoop on this event and the connections between the various parties.

and within “two shakes of a lambs tail”, a ferocious DDOS hack attack ensued – guess where it originated from?


Posted on 19/01/2014 by KGS
Laughing man
Thanks to all my pals out there who highlighted the problem, very much appreciated!
Tundra DDOS'ed but no surrender
This entry was posted in Tundra TabloidsUncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.