The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has released a slickly produced 52-second video threatening to kill Americans …
THOSE who “pooh pooh” ISIS’s directives for lone wolf attacks – never mind those deemed “spectacular” in nature – on Americans are missing the point of entry, so to speak. As a matter of record, there has yet to be (in any of our lifetimes) a more “successful” terror hydra, than that of Islamic jihadists. This includes Shia and Sunni jihadists, as both adhere to Shariah law and its barbaric mandates.
INTRINSICALLY, post haste and whatever it takes, the following must be internalized: without the underpinning(s) of Islam, Shariah law, the Koran would be little more than an empty vessel, such that it is. Thus, Sunni and Shia who adhere to Shariah doctrines are MORTAL enemies to western civilization. Extrapolating further, as such, they are incapable of accepting western values, no less integrating within its borders. Ain’t that the truth. Pointedly, to muffle ones ears and blind ones eyes to what is threatening western civilization will only exacerbate the threat levels. Deal with it. Buck up.
THAT being said, reports are swirling that Iran’s Hitlerite regime is floating a deal, one which is akin to making a pact with one devil to fight another. In any case, for “flexibility” on their nuclear program, they will “assist” the west in fighting ISIS, as they too are in conflict with fellow Islamists. Yes, the centuries old war between Sunni and Shia jihadists continues apace. Let them slaughter each other. THAT’S a plan we can all get behind!
YES, Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, jihadis who murder westerners (Jews are prime targets, yet Americans are atop their kill list) world over are offering their “services”….a win-win…they tag-team with westerners to kill their rival Sunni Islamists, then win “concessions” on their nuclear (genocidal) program! Let’s give them points for having brass balls, something western leaders have lost!
NOW, regardless of what the Jihadi-in-Chief blah, blahs, as to a quid pro quo being out of the question, think of it like even less trustworthy than verbal diarrhea. In fact, the opposite is the case.
IN reality, while he favors one side over the other (everyone is allowed their preferences…sheesh) the crux is that Islamic hegemony is where it’s at. This is clear, as he is Islam’s best friend.
NOT only that, but Barack HUSSEIN Obama praised an Islamic cleric – while he gave a speech at the U.N. – who exhorted the killing Of American military! Is this even slightly ambiguous?
ALONG said Islamic trajectory, with Valerie Jarrett as his Iranian (and communist) spear, the Shia nuclear equation is already satiated, regardless of the political theater.
NEVERTHELESS, readers may rightfully inquire: what does this have to do with ISIS and its mounting threats, exhorting American jihadis to SLAUGHTER U.S. families and with military ones at the forefront? Everything.
YOU see, it has already been established:
1 – Islamic jihadists execute their threats.
2 – Shariah law is barbaric.
3 – Barack HUSSEIN Obama is Islam’s best friend, ISIS’s too.
4 – And Iran’s mullahs are waiting in the wings to “collaborate” with the (western) “coalition of the willing”. Therefore, does any American believe that he will order his tainted DHS to thwart this and that attack?
ATOP said reality-based thinking, evidence abounds that his pick for DHS, Jeh Johnson, is ill concerned about ISIS having crossed into America and their having forward bases at southern borders. No big deal. No reason to SEAL the borders, and tighter than Fort Knox!
PRAY tell, in general, does this knowledge base bode well for the safety of Americans? Specifically, knowing what you do about the Islamist-in-Chief’s palpable hatred for the military (active duty and vets), why should anyone believe that a war-cry to slaughter patriotic families will move DHS into action? Not this DHS; which itself placed a target, a bull’s eye, on the backs of vets! It would be akin to asking serial rapists to protect the neighborhood children from active dangers. Get real….
IN light of these truths, how safe should Americans feel in their beds, aside from military families? You decide.
A law enforcement bulletin obtained by FoxNews.com warned that Islamic State fighters have increased calls for “lone wolves” to attack U.S. soldiers in America in recent months, citing one tweet that called for jihadists to find service members’ addresses online and then “show up and slaughter them.”
There will be “a continued call – by Western fighters in Syria and terrorist organizations – for lone offender attacks against U.S. military facilities and personnel,” warned a July law enforcement intelligence bulletin from the Central Florida Intelligence Exchange, a state-run agency that gathers, assesses and shares threat information and works with the Department of Homeland Security. “These threats will most likely increase should the U.S. or its allies attack the Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIS) in Syria or Iraq.”
In one example cited in the bulletin, a British jihadist encouraged radicals still living in the West to use Facebook and LinkedIn to find and target soldiers.
“You could literally search for soldiers, find their town, photos of them, look for address in Yellowbook or something,” the tweet read. “Then show up and slaughter them.”
DARE it be repeated: is DHS up to the task?
BESIDES, before the Islamist-slanted reign of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, who recalls the “lone wolf” attacks in 2002 of the so-called “Beltway Snipers”, whereby the PC “police” never touched upon their jihadi underpinnings? Why was there an omerta, especially so soon after 9/11/01? Asked and answered.
When the Washington-area snipers were caught in October 2002, I criticized the media in “The Snipers: Crazy or Jihadis?” for tip-toeing around the possible Islamist motives of the two suspected perps, John Allen Muhammad and Lee Malvo, and instead insisting on alternate explanations for their actions (making a quick buck, family problems, “stark realization” of loss and regret, a desire to “exert control” over others, Muhammad’s relationship with Malvo, and so on). The operational sentence in my article was:
when Muslims engage in terrorism against Americans, the guiding presumption must be that they see themselves as warriors in a jihad against the “Great Satan.”
Today comes news from the Washington Post confirming my hypothesis:
Prince William County prosecutors allege that sniper suspect John Allen Muhammad said “America got what it deserved” in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and that he has expressed other anti-American and racist views.
As I keep saying until I’m sometimes blue in the face: The United States can win this war only if Americans forthrightly recognize who their enemy is. (August 19, 2003)
Sept. 3, 2003 update: The Washington Post reports today that Malvo told a Maryland police officer, Cpl. Wayne Davis, that “one reason for the shootings was that white people had tried to harm Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam.”
Oct. 14, 2003 update: Evidence has emerged linking Washington sniper John Allen Muhammad,reports London’s Evening Standard today, with Al-Fuqra, the violent Islamist organization with a history of violence on U.S. soil and also linked to shoe bomber Richard Reid and the murderers of Daniel Pearl. Investigators are said to suspect that Muhammad is “an Islamic terrorist and believe his insanity plea is a cover story to disguise his support for fundamentalists.” The report even connects Muhammad’s actions to 9/11, noting that “He bought his Chevrolet Caprice car used in the attacks on the first anniversary of the September 11 attacks.”
Oct. 23, 2003 update: This report in today’s Seattle Post-Intelligencer adds a worrisome new dimension to John Allen Muhammad’s possible motives:
FBI agents with the Joint Terrorism Task Force made a chilling discovery in a South King County storage locker last week: a small arsenal of weapons including the same model rifle used last year in random killings around the nation’s capital.
The cache of weapons belongs to James Wilburn of Seattle, who according to court records, has a long history of federal firearms convictions. Agents and the U.S. Probation Office have uncovered some alarming parallels between Wilburn — who is behind bars after being arrested last month on a probation violation — and alleged D.C. sniper John Allen Muhammad.
Like Muhammad, Wilburn, 51, is a convert to Islam. In addition to having the same model rifle allegedly used in the Washington, D.C.-area shootings, Wilburn, like Muhammad, has had a long-documented fascination with firearms. And Wilburn recently traveled to Virginia Beach, Va., where Muhammad is on trial, federal criminal justice sources said.
Among the items found in the storage locker: a sniper outfit, a range-finder scope, silencers, gas masks, road spikes, knives, guns and “a black leather bag full of ammo,” according to an affidavit filed by Special Agent Fernando Gutierrez of the FBI’s domestic terrorism squad.”
We have assumed that Muhammad acted alone; could it be that he was part of an organized effort?
Oct. 31, 2003 update: The James Wilburn angle gets ever-more worrisome, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer reports today. FBI Special Agent Fernando Gutierrez paraphrases Wilburn in an affidavit saying that Wilburn “agrees with the actions of the September 11, 2001, terrorists, and that he wishes a full terrorist attack would occur in Seattle.” To make matters worse, Wilburn is a suspect in the mysterious death on Sept. 23, 2003 of his girlfriend, Joleen Abbott, in Virginia Beach, Va., the same town where John Allen Muhammad, the D.C. sniper, is on trial for murder. “Wilburn fits the profile of a lone-wolf type of terrorist similar to the D.C. sniper,” Gutierrez noted in his affidavit. One wonders how many more such individuals are on the loose out there.
|Lee Malvo’s jailhouse picture of Osama bin Laden|
Dec. 5, 2003 update: Lee Malvo’s defense (yes, defense) team introduced more than 80 drawings, an essay, and other writings that their client produced during his time in jail during his first year of captivity. (I reproduce one of them, of Osama bin Laden, “Servant of Allah,” here.) The pictures, a good number of which deal with Islamic topics, can be seen at the court’s website. As described by the Associated Press, here are some details:
- The World Trade Center with a jet flying into it and the caption, “You were warned.”
- A detailed depiction of the White House in crosshairs. “You will weep and moan & MORN. You will bleed to death. little by little. Your life belongs to Allah. HE will deliver you to us,” reads an inscription above the White House drawing. To one side of the crosshairs, it says, “Sept. 11 we will ensure will look like a picnic to you. “
- Drawings and notes calling for jihad.
- Drawings of Louis Farrakhan, Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Qaddafi.
May 24, 2006 update: The snipers are back in the news, now that John Allen Muhammad is on trial in Montgomery County, Maryland, and Lee Boyd Malvo is for the first time testifying against him. Malvo had much to say during his five hours of testimony, including these points, quoted from aWashington Post report:
|John Allen Muhammad on trial.|
Nov. 19, 2007 update: The Site Intelligence newsletter (not accessible online) inSite provides many details of jihadis discussing J.A. Muhammad as a lone wolf Islamist terrorist.
CATCHING up to recent “lone wolf” Islamic killing sprees, what about the “workplace violence” attributed to Muslim-American soldiers on U.S. bases? Moreover, how about this month’s domestic act of Islamic terror by Ali Muhammad Brown, upon a college student, Brendan Tevlin, admittedly in the name of jihad? And so on and so forth. Indeed.
SIGNIFICANTLY, whereas the (bastard) Feds stick their (fascist) noses into EVERY sphere of American life, even to the point of telling citizens what kind of light bulbs they can buy, where are they when it really counts, even as Facebook and Amazon run adverts for terror clothing on behalf of ISIS? Huh? Is this even kosher/legal?
NOW, the deadly silence is coming from an admin, whereby a Race-baiter-in-Chief saw fit to convene a press conference when his Harvard pal, Henry Louis Gates, had a run-in with the Cambridge police dept, admonishing them: the police acted stupidly! Ditto re Trayvon Martin…”could of been his son” nauseating mantra. Oh yeah. So, no one can state – at least with a straight face – that Obama Inc. doesn’t use his megaphone to stop this and that bull crap. Alas, why NOT the sale of ISIS terror gear??
CONCLUSIVELY, demonstrably, the “lone wolves”, at least up to now, will appear as kindergarten, when compared to future “lone wolves” operating under the barbaric banner of ISIS/ISIL Brotherhood’s umbrella.
MARK these words…