“OBAMACORE” TIED INTO DOMESTIC TERRORIST BILL AYERS: BRINGING DOWN AMERICA VIA THE KIDDIES…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

EVEN if the Radical-in-Chief is a lame duck for the rest of his term it matters not a whit. Between his thrust into every citizen’s core private recesses through Obamacare, the POTUS has designated the gov’t as the ultimate controlling entity. In effect, Obama Inc. seeks nothing less than control over life and death ! What could be more intrusive and totalitarian? Rhetorical question.

Similarly, the kiddies – for generations to come – are a key part of their radical designs. Revolutionary predecessors prepped the groundwork for their co-option, but the Radical-in-Chief has ratcheted up said implementation at warp speed. A good portion of evidence can be found within a book review featured at American Thinker: Bringing Down America.

As such, keep in mind the CORE contribution of Billy Boy Ayers, yes, the domestic terrorist cum “educator”, who has been orchestrating the (mis)education of the kiddies for decades.

INDEED, he has also been a frequent visitor at the People’s House, courtesy of Barack HUSSEIN Obama, even as the Liar-in-Chief opined: “Ayers was just a guy in the neighborhood.” Oh reallyTerrorist Bill Ayers: From Bombs to Obama.

No matter. Let’s not be bothered with pesky details, and never mind the fact that Ayers escaped the long-arm of the law (why isn’t he rotting in Federal prison?) as head of the Weathermen, a group which committed murder and domestic acts of terrorism for years!

Alas, onto the kiddies and Obama Inc.’s iron-grip core!

Obamacore: The travesty called the Common Core Standards (Part I)

by GAMALIEL ISAAC, PHD December  2013

This article is about the travesty called the Common Core Standards.  Its design began before Obama was elected but I and others refer to it as Obamacore because Obama played a major role in imposing it on the country, and like Obamacare it was passed without being read, and it involves centralized data collection of private information.  States across the U.S. signed on to Obamacore because they were bribed with stimulus funds.  As parents became aware of the changes that were made to their children’s education many joined organizations to oppose it.  Many insightful and alarming critiques have been written regarding the danger of Common Core.  There are fears that Common Core is paving the way for indoctrination of American students by centralizing control of education, collecting massive amount of data on students, and telling teachers what they must and must not teach.  There are reports that scores have dropped when the Common Core was adopted and that a curriculum designed to meet the Common Core standards would only prepare students for entry level courses in nonselective community colleges.

James Milgram, the only mathematician in the Common Core validation committee , refused to sign off on the math standards.  He said that Common Core math standards would put students two years behind those of high-achieving countries.  He told the Texas state legislature that Common Core standards are, “in large measure a political document that . . . is written at a very low level and does not adequately reflect our current understanding of why the math programs in the high-achieving countries give dramatically better results.”

He said:

“I had considerable influence on the mathematics standards in the document. However, as is often the case, there was input from many other sources — including State Departments of Education — that had to be incorporated into the standards…  A number of these sources were mainly focused on things like making the standards as non-challenging as possible. Others were focused on making sure their favorite topics were present, and handled in the way they liked.”

Dr. Milgram added that it led to a number of “extremely serious failings” in the Common Core that made it premature for any state hoping to improve math scores to implement them and that the Core Math standards were designed to reflect very low expectations.

The Common Core standards are low compared to those of high achieving countries but a study by the Thomas Fordham Institute found that the Common Core English standards are higher than those of 37 states and the math standards are higher than those of 39 states.  The reason for this is that states dumbed down their minimum standards so they could show they were meeting their standards and get No Child Left Behind money.  Previously it was easy for a school to exceed the minimum state standards.  Common Core imposes a low level curriculum on schools which dictate what to teach and what not to teach.

Why are the standards of Common Core low when the ostensible purpose of Common Core is to raise the performance of American students?  One can find the answer in a document by the American Federation of Teachers which states that one of the goals of Common Core is to “close the intolerable achievement gap between minority and non-minority students.”  It’s much easier to close the gap by lowering standards than to raise the performance of poorly performing students and no teacher or school administrator wants to be in the position where their jobs depend on getting students to perform.

There are ideological reasons to lower standards as well.  Common Core instructions tell teachers to “avoid giving any background context” to texts on the grounds that Common Core’s close reading strategy “forces students to rely exclusively on the text instead of privileging background knowledge, and levels the playing field for all.”

The ideology reason given above is to level the playing field although the argument that leaving out background information will somehow do that is ridiculous.  Those making that argument should be going to school instead of designing a curriculum for schools.

Common Core tests do not emphasize getting the right answer.  Instead they focus on essay questions, which makes possible grading in such a way that underperforming minority groups score as well as high performing groups.

The other goal of Common Core stated by the American Federation of Teachers is to help American students compete in the global economy.  That raises the question “Is the reason for America’s poor economic performance low standards?”

Is Curriculum the Cause of America’s Poor Worldwide Education Rank?

You can have the best curriculum in the world but if there is no discipline you can’t teach it.  A school staffer at Overbrook High School in Philadelphia told CBS that:

 “It’s mayhem. Students are in the halls, they’re smoking in the bathroom; cigarettes, marijuana,” said a worker at the school, who asked not to be identified. “We can’t contain them and it’s really hazardous for us working and these kids are not being educated at all.”

“It’s a zoo in here. Parents really need to come up here and see what’s going on in this school because it’s ridiculous,”

Asian students who want to study are assaulted by blacks.  In 2010, a federal judge found that black students at South Philadelphia High School had assaulted and harassed Asian students daily — for years but the principal said she did not call police because she did not want to “criminalize” the black students.

Laws prevent public schools from taking effective action to stop the violence.  John Hood in an article for the Foundation of Economic Education wrote:

“A host of administrative decisions, court rulings, and legislative actions have created such a maze of regulations that school principals and teachers are often unable to exercise meaningful control over their schools. Furthermore, the prevailing “ethos” in the education establishment-made up of researchers, administrators, and bureaucrats-is suspicious of many forms of punishment, and exhibits a fixation with “sensitivity training” and building self-esteem among students.”

One would think that if the Obama administration was serious about improving education they would remove the regulations that interfere with classroom discipline.  Instead in response to higher number of blacks being suspended than whites, President Obama issued an “executive order” which effectively placed “quotas” on school discipline based on race.  If there are more disruptive blacks than Chinese in a school and you suspend the blacks you could face possible civil rights violation charges.

Obamacore: The travesty called the Common Core Standards (Part II)

Obamacore: The travesty called the Common Core Standards (Part III)

David Coleman, one of the architects of Common Core said he believes there is “a massive social injustice in this country” and that education is “the engine of social justice.”

Common Core Literature and Writing books by Zaner-Bloser teach social activism to 6 year old children in first grade.  Children are taught how to manipulate others by getting them angry with emotional words.  Reading about this I can’t help but think how the Obama administration manipulates Americans with emotional words to get them angry at Republicans.  An example that comes to mind is Obama’s accusation against Republicans that they were holding the government hostage when they blocked funding for Obamacare.  A similar example of public manipulation was when the Obama administration blocked access to veteran memorials in order to make the public angry at the Republicans.

The Common Core approved book Barack Obama by Jane Sutcliffe indoctrinates children that whites mistreat black people and are racist and therefore didn’t want to vote for ‘Barack’, and only Barack can make the country better.  The Common Core approved book, Barack Obama, Son of Promise, Child of Hope, shows Barack glowing with a heavenly aura.

A Common Core lesson plan blames Islamic terrorism on low self esteem.  The Common Core approved text book World History devotes an entire chapter to promoting  the virtues of Islam and has anti-Israel propagandaspread throughout the book.  State Rep. Ritch Workman told Fox News that “kids are going to take this book as gospel and believe that Christians and Jews were murderous barbarians and thank God the Muslims came along and the world is great.”

The Common Core Science Curriculum teaches children that humans are dangerous to the planet, that man made global warming is an accepted incontrovertible fact even though it is not and that government action is required to fix global warming even though the taxes the Obama administration would like to impose on carbon dioxide producers would have a negligible effect on global warming but would have a devastating effect on a crumbling economy.

A February 2013 USDOE report that discusses measuring student attitudes, beliefs, and behavior lists desired competencies or improvement of attitudes such as “appreciation of diversity” and “recognizing bias in sources.”  From the perspective of the left wing originators of Common Core conservative view points are biased and of course this is what children will be taught.

The Obama administration has already used the IRS to harass conservative groups, which raises the concern that parents of children who lack sufficient appreciation of diversity might be harassed as well.  One can imagine a scenario where a child, who has some reservations about Islam, is labeled racist and his parents are determined to be the source of his racism.  Perhaps separation of the child from the negative influence of his parents might be seen as a solution to the problem.

One of the reasons given for collecting data on student attitudes is to help improve their motivation.  Studies have shown that students from fatherless parent families are less likely to be motivated to stay in school than those from two parent families.  If the government wants to motivate students they are more likely to accomplish their goal if instead of collecting personal data on students, they reconsider welfare policies that have been shown to lead to the proliferation of single parent families and antisocial behavior.

Is a Single Curriculum better than Multiple Curricula?

The final question I will consider here is whether one single common curriculum is a good idea.  Students have different abilities.  Some thrive in challenging environments while others perform better in more laid back environments.

Problems of a single curriculum become problems for everyone and there is reason to believe that the experimental approaches of Common Core are problematic.  Another problem of a single common curriculum is that it enables indoctrination by the Federal government on a massive scale as discussed previously.  The focus of a good curriculum should be to teach critical thinking which is the opposite of indoctrination.

How to Really Improve Education

The first and most important step for improving education in the U.S. is reversing legislation that prevents discipline in the classroom.  Attempts to level the playing field by bringing down performance of high achievers must be stopped.  Legislators should not impose a common curriculum that makes all schools the same.  Legislators should not interfere with school choice so that parents can use school vouchers to send children to the best schools for their children.  Legislators should reconsider welfare policies that lead to badly behaved youth.  Our government should step back and allow the free market of education to work without imposing restrictions on what teachers can teach and without passing laws that make it impossible for teachers and principals to bring peace to the classroom.

ADDITIONAL proofs – woven within several interconnecting commentaries – demonstrate their desperate quest to control future generations. However, one stands out on its own: ALERT: American Domestic Terrorists (Foreign Born Too) ARE Teaching Your Kiddies. Mentoring Their Teachers Through Workshops

Parents, what say you?

DHS: A Malevolent Anti-American Behemoth Targeting “Whistleblowers” & Patriots…Valerie Jarrett’s Fiefdom…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Tens of thousands of readers have viewed this blog’s commentaries regarding “mama Janet” and DHS. Its contents have flown across cyberspace at warp speed. Rational folks understand what is at stake. In other words, once the largest umbrella agency tasked to protect American citizens becomes a force for malevolence, surely ALL Americans are in danger. 

A nation-saving recap is mandatory, and this blog is issuing a CODE RED alert about DHS, and not in a good way! Start the hunt here:

As demonstrated, DHS is allowing Russian/Eastern European troops to train in Middle America via heavy armor – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/03/the-intersection-of-dhs-heavy-armor-russianeastern-european-troopstraining-in-middle-america-global-governance-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Why?

And Rep Louis Gohmert, an absolute patriot, is busy connecting the dots (not unlike Rep Michele Bachmann) between DHS’s plans and gun control –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/02/explosive-dhs-insider-reveals-congressman-louie-gohmert-too-disarming-americans-gun-control-empowers-the-redgreen-alliancesharia-law-its-beneficiary-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …at the same time that Sharia Law adherents become empowered. Again, why?

IF the above is not enough ammunition, regarding a regime gone wild, a historical parallel between DHS and Germany’s Nazi Gestapo is reason enough to become chilled – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/02/16/the-disturbingdangerous-parallels-between-dhs-nazi-germanys-gestapo-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

As such, it is crystal clear: Americans are endangered when a Homeland Security Agency becomes co-opted into a political force, especially one which is antithetical to America’s interests – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/08/the-politicizing-of-dhs-rendering-it-ineffective-a-danger-to-national-security-addendum-to-black-hawks-swirling-over-u-s-cities-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Therefore, this blog offers another ! warning to all patriotic citizens: the enemy is you! –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/21/warning-all-patriotic-americans-the-enemy-is-you-at-least-according-to-dhs-addendum-to-black-hawks-swirling-over-u-s-cities-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Their plan, in a nutshell, is to empower a rapid-ready, radical force for societal “transformation”; nothing resembling a regular law enforcement’s purview or readiness to hold Islamic terror at bay. Besides, where do they think they are, Putin’s Russia or inside the Iranian Hitlerite regime? –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/31/the-purposeful-deconstruction-of-the-us-the-co-opting-of-dhs-into-a-radical-force-for-societal-transformation-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . But as duly, repeatedly promised by Barack HUSSEIN Obama, from the moment he stormed the national stage via “hope and change”, a “transformation” will come, no matter how many “bitter clingers” or whistle blowers have to be stepped over.

Is it any longer necessary to ask: why is “mama Janet” spending billions in ammo/hardware, even when there is more than enough firepower to overpower the entire citizenry for decades to come? – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/03/12/the-increasing-alarm-bells-re-mama-janets-shopping-sprees-for-billions-in-ammo-hardware-alike-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

DESPITE the above, there are few things which still have the capacity to shock at this blog address, but the following video is beyond frightening. It is straight out of Orwell’s universe, and its contents/implications – detailing a regime which has the capacity to generate the most brutish tactics against those who blow the whistle, or are otherwise deemed “anti-government” patriots who dare to assert their Constitutional rights – should chill every American to the bone. Listen to the whole clip and hang on tight….

‘DHS Whistleblower Censored From 60 Minutes, Uncensored Version Here! (Video)’ (try both video links, one works!)

Friday, May 3, 2013

When the government acts beyond the law, like in the recent Fast and Furious, don’t “we the people” have a right to ask questions of our government?

Is asking questions of your government a crime?

Why is the government now labeling people anti government just because they ask legitimate question, on specific issues to hold the government responsible?

Now in Florida they are asking citizens to turn people into Law Enforcement if a person appears to be anti-government, why?

What is the definition anti- government?

To answer some of those questions, you will want to watch this. Once this gal starts talking you won’t stop listening.

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/05/dhs-whistleblower-censored-from-60-minutes-uncensored-version-here-video-2636730.html

NOT to be lost in the discussion, although “mama Janet” is DHS’s titular head, Valerie Jarrett, in tandem with Barack HUSSEIN Obama, is really in charge. Thus, whomever they deem a domestic terrorist will be targeted, never mind the fact that authentic domestic terrorists are deep within Obama Inc’s bowels. If anyone has a doubt as to the above’s validity, that’s okay. No offense taken. But do take the time to internalize the facts within ‘Bringing Down America’ – http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/bringing_down_america_a_review.htmlIt is the G-d’s honest truth.

Billy Boy Ayers, aka Weathermen Terrorist Too, Affirms His Connection To Obama…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Surely this blog’s readership came across the lie of all lies exhorted by the Liar-in-Chief, way back when he catapulted – seemingly out of nowhere – onto the world stage. He intoned, oh so smugly: Ayers was just “a guy who lives in my neighborhood.” Oh yeah, and this blogger is a leftist in rightist garb…never and never…(www.wnd.com/2013/04/bill-ayers-confirms-what-obama-has-denied/) We can readily assume his nose was in the air, his chin tilted too, as he spun another bold-faced tale. His lies are like tics, they just go on and on.

Back in the day (a mere 6 years ago), on May 2, 2007, when Barack HUSSEIN Obama announced his candidacy (a day which will live in infamy) many “knuckle-dragger” types were less than smitten, to say the least. And it was not as if his charisma was lost on us, but there was certainly something “off” about the guy. As such, what tack can inquiring minds take, other than to investigate, especially when one’s gut feeling is so strong, almost to the point of knocking the questioner to the ground? 

Which brings us to the present, as well as this blogger/op-ed writer’s non-stop truth telling, relative to the intersection of the POTUS & Ayers. Though Billy Boy is still “unofficially” top dog in the Weathermen, he (and fellow domestic terrorists) operates within the highest echelons of power, all thanks to Obama Inc. – http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/bringing_down_america_a_review.html . 

YET this is where it all began…the cover up about “THAT guy in the neighborhood”. His real connection to “The One” is still making headlines, but this should put the kibosh on Pinocchio’s ability to keep the lie going.

‘BILL AYERS CONFIRMS WHAT OBAMA HAS DENIED’

Weatherman domestic terrorist finally spills the beans

Weatherman domestic terrorist Bill Ayers is now confirming what the White House has previously denied – that he held a fundraiser in his living room for Barack Obama.

That 1995 meeting was said to have launched Obama’s political career.

In an October 2008 interview on MSNBC host Chris Matthews’ show, Robert Gibbs, a spokesman for Obama’s presidential campaign, categorically denied the fundraiser was ever held.

Matthews asked Gibbs: “Did [Ayers] have a fundraiser for [Obama], or not?”

Gibbs, who would become the White House spokesman, replied: “No, he did not have a fundraiser for our candidate as he said ten seconds ago.”

However, in an interview last week with the Daily Beast, Ayers recalled that fundraiser.

Stated Ayers of his relationship with Obama: “We were friendly, that was true; we served on a couple of boards together, that was true; he held a fundraiser in our living room, that was true; Michelle [Obama] and Bernardine were at the law firm together, that was true. Hyde Park in Chicago is a tiny neighborhood, so when he said I was ‘a guy around the neighborhood,’ that was true.”

Does this explain infamous Ayers living-room meeting?

Is the socialist-oriented New Party the missing link at the center of that now infamous 1995 Obama fundraiser in Ayers living room in Chicago?

It was at that meeting that New Party member Alice Palmer announced she wanted Obama as her successor as state senator since she was stepping down to run for Congress.

WND has found that in the July 1996 edition of the New Party’s newsletter, the New Party news, the controversial party announced “the Illinois New Party capped off a month-long house party drive in Chicago.”

Further review of New Party literature from 1995 and 1996 finds that so-called house parties were regularly utilized by the New Party to introduce candidates to leading party activists as well as to raise money and recruit new members.

It is known that single-payer activist Quentin Young, who advised Obama on healthcare when the politician was a state senator, was present at the parlor meeting at the Ayers’ residence.

WND reported that Young was listed by the New Party as an early party founder and builder.

“I can remember being one of a small group of people who came to Bill Ayers’ house to learn that Alice Palmer was stepping down from the senate and running for Congress,” Young was quoted as saying. “[Palmer] identified [Obama] as her successor.”

Chicago-based blogger Maria Warren was also present. She wrote that she remembered watching Obama give a “standard, innocuous little talk” in the Ayers’ home.

“They were launching him,” Warren wrote, “introducing him to the Hyde Park community as the best thing since sliced bread.”

It would make sense that the New Party sponsored the get-together in Ayers’ living room for Palmer’s announcement.

Palmer was the New Party’s signed candidate for office. The New Party, which had partnered closely with ACORN, was mobilizing support for Palmer among its constituents and the larger Chicago progressive community.

New Party founder and Marxist activist Carl Davidson recalled screening Palmer and signing her up to the party.

Wrote Davidson:

In the next two elections in the city … the New Party has taken a slightly different approach. It organized a citywide candidates forum and invited a number of progressive candidates. Of those responding, two were of special interest, Alice Palmer and Willie Delgado … Both Palmer and Delgado attended the [New Party] forum and were thoroughly questioned by 70 or so New Party members. At the close, both publicly signed a “contract” with the New Party … Two weeks later, the New Party formally endorsed them and is now mobilizing support.

How was the New Party mobilizing the stated support for Palmer at the time, an effort that Palmer wanted transferred to Obama?

WND reported the New Party had such a close relationship with ACORN that at one point the two shared an office address, fax lines and email addresses.

ACORN led the New Party’s mobilization and voter drive efforts. In progressive circles at the time, the New Party was considered the de facto political wing of ACORN, a group with which Obama long maintained a close relationship.

Ayers and Dohrn, meanwhile, traveled in the same political circles as New Party leaders, making it even more likely the duo could have hosted a New Party house meeting. The duo were key supporters of Palmer.

In 1994 Dohrn and Bill Ayers were listed on a “Membership, Subscription and Mailing List” for the Chicago Committees of Correspondence, which was co-chaired by New Party founder Davidson.

WND found that Chicago activists Joe Iosbaker and Stephanie Weiner were also listed as New Party leaders.

Iosbaker is a University of Illinois-Chicago office worker and a union steward for his SEIU local. His home was raided by the FBI in September 2010 reportedly as part of a terror probe investigating material support for jihadist groups.

Together with other activists raided in the same probe, Iosbaker and Weiner are founders of the so-called Committee to Stop FBI Repression, which protested the FBI raids.

Another founder of the committee whose home was part of the same raid is Hatem Abudayyeh, the executive director of the Arab American Action Network, or AAAN.

WND was first to report that Obama, while serving as a paid director of the far-left nonprofit Chicago Woods Fund, provided two grants to the AAAN. Obama served at the Woods Fund alongside Ayers.

AAAN was founded by a longtime Obama associate, Columbia University Professor Rashid Khalidi. Khalidi’s wife, Mona, is president of the Arab American Action Network.

The New Party, meanwhile, is coming under increased scrutiny after new information emerged further indicating Obama was a member of the party in the 1990s.

The New Party was a 1990s party that sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

In 2008, Obama’s campaign denied the president was ever a member amid reports, including from WND, citing the New Party’s own literature listing Obama as a member.

Information uncovered in recent weeks, including Obama’s signed contract with the New Party, further establishes the president’s membership with the controversial organization.

Socialist goals

The New Party, established in 1992, took advantage of what was known as electoral “fusion,” which enabled candidates to run on two tickets simultaneously, attracting voters from both parties. But the New Party disbanded in 1998, one year after fusion was halted by the Supreme Court.

The socialist-oriented goals of the New Party were enumerated on its old website.

Among the New Party’s stated objectives were “full employment, a shorter work week and a guaranteed minimum income for all adults; a universal ‘social wage’ to include such basic benefits as health care, child care, vacation time and lifelong access to education and training; a systematic phase-in of comparable worth; and like programs to ensure gender equity.”

The New Party stated it also sought “the democratization of our banking and financial system – including popular election of those charged with public stewardship of our banking system, worker-owner control over their pension assets [and] community-controlled alternative financial institutions.”

Many of the New Party’s founding members were Democratic Socialists of America leaders and members of Committees of Correspondence, a breakaway of the Communist Party USA.

Last month, WND reported on a 1996 print advertisement in a local Chicago newspaper that shows Obama was the speaker at an event sponsored and presented by the Democratic Socialists of America, the DSA.

WND first reported on the event in 2010.

Obama listed as New Party member

In 2009, WND reported on newspaper evidence from the New Party’s own literature listing several new members of the New Party, including Obama.

Earlier this month, Kurtz, writing at National Review Online, reported Obama signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.

In 2008, Obama’s Fight the Smears campaign website quoted Carol Harwell, who managed Obama’s 1996 campaign for the Illinois Senate, as stating: “Barack did not solicit or seek the New Party endorsement for state senator in 1995.”

Fight the Smears conceded the New Party did support Obama in 1996 but denied that Obama had ever joined.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/bill-ayers-confirms-what-obama-has-denied/#cGMtxUtF7PcuZh7t.99

All due attention is given (yet only from the alternative media) to the Radical-in-Chief and his assortment of revolutionary tentacles, but the Weathermen is too over the top. Moreover, the kiddies are in the mix, and this is not acceptable – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/25/domestic-terrorist-bill-ayers-educator-too-exhorts-control-over-the-kiddies-addendum-to-first-they-came-for-the-kiddies-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. It should be a blow to any parent’s or patriot’s heart, and their DIRECT connection must not be left in fantasy land.

We can debate why Ayers  lips are no longer (fully) zipped on this incendiary subject, even though he has (gingerly) alluded to it in the past. But there is something more evocative, and provocative, this time around. It is almost as if he dares anyone to do a damn thing about who’s really in charge – Obama & his radical, revolutionary Weathermen henchmen, as opposed to American patriots.

In other words, now that the Revolutionary-in-Chief is firmly cemented in power, it is more than a possibility that skulking in the shadows no longer suits any of their agendas. Thus, going for broke is becoming more than doable. Recall the Radical-in-Chief’s constant “in your face” tactics, as if he is already the Dictator-in-Chief. It is not for nothing. Then, consider all the attendant implications and ramifications. Feel free to exhale.