The Morphing Of Socialism & Nazism…One & The Same…Their Hatred of Judeo-Christian Ethics…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

  • The Nazi era is (rightfully) seen as the pinnacle of man’s inhumanity against man; a genocide of unimaginable proportions. And the fact that this blogger’s family suffered directly (not unlike too many others) makes it that much more personal. And if one wants a glimmer into the above reference take a peek hereinadinakutnicki.com/about/.

But as history marches on, so too the attendant lies and distortions. Yet there is one aspect which rarely gains attention, and its underpinnings couldn’t be any more relevant to our times.

Many have been taught a revisionist form of history, and most of the “credit” should be given to leftist profs – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/21/the-paradox-pitfalls-of-liberal-democracies-in-a-time-of-immoral-relativism-the-havoc-wrought-by-leftist-academia-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…the bane of western civilization.

The humanities courses taught in U.S. academia – the bar which most western academies aspire towards – is nothing short of a national nightmare – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/26/the-death-of-the-west-or-its-survival-runs-through-western-academia-addendum-to-the-paradox-pitfalls-of-liberal-democracies-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …and this blogger’s experience re the above runs six ways to Sunday.

Alas, the historical truth lies within –   www1.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/microsoft%20word%20-%205941.pdf.….and no amount of obfuscation will change the historical facts. For its relevance couldn’t be starker, as today’s leftist forces – their mirror image – feign distance from the Nazi’s murderous ideology, pretending that the worst atrocities, in collective memory, were perpetrated by those removed from socialist dogma, but “only” committed by far right fascists! How dare they.

And to make matters more enraging, they demur that totalitarian ethos is the sole purview of the far right, but the truth really lies within their twin pathologies; hatred of that which is intertwined with Judeo-Christian teachings. For it is no accident that the far left and Islam march hand in hand, as both are irredeemably hostile towards the “Saturday” and “Sunday” people – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/19/comrades-in-arms-always-have-each-others-backs-whether-black-white-or-islamic-supremacists-the-redgreen-alliances-common-denominator-seriousness-of-issue-necessitates-its-length-commenta/

So, as another Christmas season recently ended; as readers view the swath of destruction from the worldwide rise of Islam; leading to the footprints of the Radical-in-Chief, domestically and beyond, it is imperative to forge the connection between Nazi socialism and the left. Finally, understanding why Christmas is being expunged from the public square.

‘Video: Nazi Christmas’

by  on DECEMBER 25, 2012 

Well, how coincidental! What we have been witnessing in America for some time has been the removal of Christ from Christmas by… you guessed it, socialists. This is not unchartered territory.

Check this out from the New York Times:

1937 ‘Neo-Pagans’ Target Carols

BERLIN — De-Christianization of famous German Christmas hymns, such as “Silent Night, Holy Night,” is the outstanding contribution to the current holiday season of the rapidly spreading German faith movement or “religion” of National Socialism. In the new versions of the old songs reference to Nazi tenets of race, blood and soil replace familiar words concerning Christ, Child and the like. The accepted English translation of Mohr’s “Silent Night,” stanza three lines two and three is: “The Son of God loves pure light, radiant beams from thy Holy faith.” Equivalent lines in the Nazified version are “German blood, O how laugh the lips of thy children, blessed with joy.”

The socialist left of today not only seeks to diminish the meaning of Christmas while painting Obama as a messiah (note the decorations hung above a photo of Hitler in the video below) but it continues to paint Hitler as a right-wing fascist, despite the fact that Nazi means ‘National Socialist Party’.

A hidden treasure and the best book written on the middle east ever – The Forgotten Ally, click for details.

A shining example of left-wing projectionism.”

shoebat.com/2012/12/25/video-nazi-christmas/

NOT sure about anyone else, but this American-Israeli has a long historical memory. As such, it is incumbent to be alert to past similarities, especially those which mimic the dangers within. And if this upsets the sensibilities of others, then so be it. For in the realm of the Jewish people’s collective murder (and genocide in general), this blogger neither forgives nor forgets. Nor should others.

 

Hillary’s Fall & Its Surrounding Mystery…Why ALL The Secrecy & Disjointed Info?…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Now don’t go jumping to conclusions, tarring yours truly as an unfeeling clod. In fact, those who know her best can attest otherwise. She is quite the mushy sort, just ask her sons. However, such sentiments are reserved for those who deserve said sensitivities. Not so with the Sec of State. 

Be that as it may, the origins of her unfortunate accident are up for debate. Some way smarter than this blogger are equally scratching their noggins. Its twists and turns are worthy of an Agatha Christie Mystery. Much of the initially released info (from her surrogates) directly contradicts the present drips and drabs detailing the ongoing saga. The simple question is: what’s up with that?

Those who are plugged into intelligence info keep pointing back to Obama’s jaw-jaw with Iran’s Hitlerite regime. It is not as if this blog hasn’t dealt with this very issue, albeit through several intertwining commentaries. 

It is an established fact that the Islamist-in-Chief tasked his top dogs/mouthpieces to engage in Iranian jaw-jaw – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/01/the-potuss-iranian-strategy-negotiating-with-islamic-devils-but-it-always-ends-in-death-destruction-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …running out the nuclear clock, as they jibber jabber. Anti-Americans doing the handiwork of Islamic devils. Recognize it for what it is.

And Hillary’s tap dance/stonewall around her part in Benghazigate – before her fall!- ties into much of her boss’s Islamic inclinations.  adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/19/hillarys-benghazigate-stonewall-will-she-or-wont-she-testify-that-is-the-question-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/Her sentiments too.

In the midst of all the drama, don’t lose sight of her relationship with Huma Abedin, the Deputy COS. She is intimately tied into all of the above – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/07/spotlight-on-huma-abedin-islamist-infiltration-in-washington-arabmuslim-world-turning-up-the-heat-via-bengazigate-addendum-to-hillary-takes-the-fall-but-there-is-a-silver-lining-sp/ … and much of Hill’s weaving and bobbing, re testifying, surrounds their relationship.

Nevertheless, if Congress has any sense of American ethos left they will target Huma Abedin, alongside her boss – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/18/hillary-takes-the-fall-for-the-potus-in-bengazigate-but-there-is-a-silver-lining-shining-the-spotlight-on-huma-abedin-addendum-to-uncovering-the-tip-of-huma-abedins-spear-the-house-of-al-sa/ …assuming Hill is ‘fit’ enough to testify. Huma can’t be allowed to hide behind her boss’s medical angst. She’s a big girl. She is woman…hear her roar. 

NOT to be overlooked is the MAIN player, Valerie Jarrett – valerie-jarrett-her-mischief-making-capable-of-upending-western-civilization-the-unofficial-buck-startsstops-at-her-door-addendum-to-barack-hussein-obamas-hidden-hand-commentary-by-a/ …up to her communist/Iranian-rooted neck with Iran’s mullahs.

So along comes DEBKAfile Intelligence positing similar doubts, and theirs is hardly an exercise in “conspiracy theory”.

‘Hillary Clinton in hospital amid speculation of plane accident in Iran’

DEBKAfile Special Report December 31, 2012,

“US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s admittance to the New York-Presbyterian Hospital Monday, Dec, 31 – with a blood clot caused by concussion – gave wings to a cloud of rumor and conspiracy theories surrounding her state of health. The hospital, where Saudi King Abdullah was also treated two years ago, stated that the Secretary was receiving anti-coagulents and her condition would be assessed after 48 hours.

However, NBC television’s medical correspondent Robert Bazell was skeptical about the blood clot being caused by an earlier concussion because, he said, it if were, it would not be treated with anti-coagulents. “So either it’s not really related to the concussion and she’s got a blood clot in her leg or something, or there’s something else going on that we’re not being told.”

Speculation about her condition started flying about in early December, when she cancelled without notice, her participation in the Friends of Syrian forum in Marrakesh on Dec, 6. Not only was she one of the founders of this forum, but her presence was vitally needed at the time because NATO and Washington were picking up suspicious movements of the Syrian army’s chemical weapons, which marked a disastrous turn in the Syrian conflict.

She was first reported to have come down with flu and, three days later, on Dec, 9, with a stomach bug.
On Dec. 10, the day before she was due to testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee on the September 11 terrorist attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi – in which Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other US diplomats lost there lives –   the State Department which has been heavily under fire over the episode, announced that Clinton had sustained a concussion after fainting out from dehydration.
None of the details normally released in such cases, such as when exactly she fainted, the seriousness of the concussion she suffered or how she was being treated, was offered. A State Department source was only willing to say it was “not severe.”
According to another unofficial report, she was apparently working from home. No one in the office appeared to have been delegated her functions although the secretary herself has not been been absent for three weeks.
Then, Friday, Dec. 21, President Barack Obama announced the nomination of Massachusetts Senator John Kerry as next Secretary of State. Clinton had made it known for some time that she intended stepping down at the start of Obama’s second term of office. It was reported that she had talked to the president and Kerry, and commended the senator as having proven his mettle in a long and wide-ranging military, political and diplomatic career. Nothing was said on this occasion about her state of health.

But around Tehran and the Gulf Emirates, DEBKAfile was already picking up insistent rumors claiming that Clinton was seriously injured while on a secret mission in the region in the first week of December. Some claimed that in the same incident, Americans in her party – advisers and security personnel – were either injured or killed. Those rumors did not say what her secret mission was.  However, the episode described occurred shortly after Dec. 1, when, as DEBKAfile reported at the time, Obama administration officials and senior representatives of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei launched secret talks on Iran’s nuclear program.

Although our sources have not identified the negotiators on either side of the table, one of the theories floating around certain capitals claimed that Hillary Clinton three weeks ago was on her way to a secret meeting with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in regard to those negotiations. The plane carrying her from Bahrain logged its destination as Baghdad, but  is described as having changed direction in midair and headed for Ahvaz, capital of the south Iranian province of Khuzestan. There, it was said, the Iranian president was awaiting her arrival. But then the plane ran into technical trouble and made an emergency landing and that was when she was injured, according to this theory.

The unexplained death of Commander Job Price, 42, SEALs commander in Afghanistan is tied by some of the speculation to that incident. At the time, the Pentagon reported that his sudden death on Dec. 22, in Uruzgan, Afghanistan, was under investigation. It is now suggested that Commander Price was head of the security detail attached to Clinton for her Iran mission and he was one of the casualties of the accident.

In the nature of things, the impact these kinds of rumors have lingers even when they are officially denied – especially given Secretary Clinton’s unusually long absence from the public eye. The medical report promised Wednesday after she is monitored at the hospital for 48 hours to assess her condition, “including other issues associated with her concussion,” is tensely awaited.  After that, said the hospital announcement, “her doctors will determine if any further action is required.”

Clinton, known as the most traveled Secretary of State in US diplomatic history, has been in the international spotlight since 1992 when her husband Bill Clinton was elected president and she became first lady. She then served in the US Senate and later ran for the presidency against Barack Obama.”  – www.debka.com/article/22645/Hillary-Clinton-in-hospital-amid-speculation-of-plane-accident-in-Iran

Alas, the ever stalwart John Bolton nudges the truth along…wherever it lands.

‘John Bolton continues to publicly press Hillary Clinton over Benghazi’

by  on DECEMBER 29, 2012 

When it was reported that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would not be able to testify about Benghazi because she got a concussion after falling due to a stomach virus, former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton termed it a ‘Diplomatic Illness’. Now, in an op-ed, Bolton continues to publicly apply pressure to Clinton and outlines some questions she should be required to answer.

Via the New York Post:

* Before the attack, was Clinton aware of the security threats to our consulate and other international presences in Benghazi? Did she know about repeated Tripoli embassy requests for enhanced security? If not, why not?

Libya was a centerpiece of supposed success in Obama’s foreign policy, not some country of small significance and low threat levels. It is important to establish not only the actual paper trail in this case, but even more importantly why, on such a critical foreign-policy issue, it did not automatically come to Clinton’s seventh-floor office.

* On Sept. 11, what were Clinton and Obama doing? We need a minute-by-minute chronology. When was she first told of the attack, and what was said? When and how many times did she speak with the president? What help did she ask for? Was it denied, and by whom? When did she retire for the evening?

“Why do Islamic fundamentalists really want to kill us, what drives them and how to fight back. Click here for details”

* And in the tragedy’s aftermath, Clinton must explain how the administration came up with its story that the Benghazi attack grew out of a demonstration against the now-famous Mohammed video trailer. Clinton herself referred to the video at the Sept. 14 ceremony when the remains of the four murdered Americans returned home. On this point, the ARB was crystal clear that “no protest took place” before the attacks.

We’ve bolded that third bullet point because the detail found in theAccountability Review Board’s (ARB) report with respect to what happened on the ground in Benghazi is incredibly specific (except for the part about Tyrone Woods using a laser to identify the source of the mortar fire that ultimately killed him). This doesn’t appear to be lost on Bolton, who is calling for a similar account of what Clinton and Obama were doing.

The ARB report’s lack of detail in that regard – compared to what incredibledetail it revealed about what happened half a world away – is conspicuous in its absence.

In fact, the detail of what happened on the ground in Benghazi was as compelling as the detail provided by the 9/11 Commission Report about how the first 9/11 attacks happened.

However, like the ARB report, the 9/11 Commission Report blatantly avoided implicating those at the top who were responsible as well.

Incidentally, Bolton was one of the courageous few who sided with Michele Bachmann for asking questions about Hillary’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin.

Abedin’s family is very well connected to the Muslim Brotherhood.”

shoebat.com/2012/12/29/john-bolton-continues-to-publicly-press-hillary-clinton-over-benghazi/

If still inclined to get teary eyed over Hill’s recent medical mishap, go right ahead. No offense taken. But do bear in mind her history of radical revolutionary behavior, and imagine what her decades long mischief making has cost the Republic. That ought to mitigate too many tears.

Besides, getting to the bottom of Benghazigate will also rip open the Commander-in-Chief’s machinations in Iran. Inextricably linked.

 

Iranian Hit Squads Await Their Orders….Inside America! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

As depressing as it is to read the (often) nightmarish scenarios posted herein, imagine how difficult it is to sift through the muck and find out (from “this one and that one”) yes, “this and that” is on target. Sorry to be more right than wrong.

But the flip side is that ignorance isn’t bliss, especially when it comes to protecting oneself and ones family. And even though some events can’t be thwarted, it doesn’t translate into being ill prepared for whatever may lie ahead.

Besides, based on the fact that Islamic terror has already claimed thousands of American lives, how much of a leap of faith (and intelligent reasoning) does it take for folks to internalize that the worst is yet to come? Not much. Therefore, a sprint down (recent) memory lane is appropriate, to fully comprehend the warnings blared below, courtesy of Reza Khalili.

As discussed this past September, Hezbollah cells are burrowed within U.S. cities (large and small) – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/14/hezbollah-burrowed-within-u-s-cities-latin-america-forward-bases-readying-to-pounce-addendum-to-northeast-intelligence-director-digs-deeper-and-do-you-know-who-your-neighbors-are-comm/ …poised to strike at a moment’s notice. This is a verifiable fact.

Awaiting their orders from Iran to pounce – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/08/irans-long-arm-poised-to-pounce-at-a-time-of-their-choosing-in-any-city-usa-fbicia-hardly-up-to-the-task-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ … at a time of their choosing… not too far off in the near future.

‘NEXT 9/11: IRAN’S DEATH SQUAD IS HERE’

Team infiltrated, assigned to attack from within next year

12/11/2012

Reza Kahlili served in CIA Directorate of Operations, as a spy in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, counterterrorism expert; currently serves on the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, an advisory board authorized by Congress

“Iran has infiltrated a team of Quds Force terrorist leaders into the United States to attack from within in 2013, according to a source.

The source within the office of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of the Islamic regime, said the team is to create instability in America through terrorism should the U.S. fail to accept the regime’s illicit nuclear program, increase sanctions, confront Iran militarily or intervene in the Syrian civil war.

Members of the team, no more than 10 Quds Force officers, each lead cells totaling about 50 terrorists already in the U.S.

The source is risking his life not only to reveal the terror operation but to warn that Iran is pursuing its nuclear bomb program around the clock from several secret sites.

Details of the terror plot, meant to disrupt the West, have been passed on to U.S. officials, who are taking countermeasures.

The source said the team members, unlike the alleged Iranian operative Manssor Arbabsiar, who was arrested in a plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington, D.C. in 2011, are highly trained and sophisticated.

The team leaders are all senior Revolutionary Guard officers who were recruited for this specific mission nine years ago on the recommendation of the Quds Force commander, Qassem Soleimani, and with the approval of security advisers to Khamenei.

Some of these individuals held high-level posts before joining the mission. One served as the security officer in the supreme leader’s office, another was a member of the special forces for intelligence and security in charge of protecting regime officials, two were in charge of security of ground and air transportation, another was a commander of recruiting assets, and others had experience in security and intelligence.

Most of the team members have been in America for a year; a few were successfully placed here about five years ago.

The families of the team members are financially supported by the regime, but team members are financially supported through various means as they do not maintain any contact with Iran.

Two wealthy Iranian businessmen in Iran with ties in Europe are used to finance the team; one routinely travels to the U.S.

One well-established Iranian businessman in America who often travels to Iran was approached by the Quds Force for his collaboration in return for incentives in Iran. He acts as the sponsor of the team, transfers cash to team members, hosts meetings at his residence and passes on information from the regime to the team. He also takes care of any legal issues, leases, contracts and such.

Information and pictures of potential targets have been submitted for Khamenei’s approval, the source added. They include high-voltage towers to create blackouts, cell towers, water supplies, public transportation and various other buildings belonging to the Defense Department and military.

The source said the planned attacks could be greater than what happened on 9/11 and that in the last phase of the attack, al-Qaida operatives will also be involved.

After Osama bin Laden’s death, Khamenei has taken a greater role in leadership on the collaboration with al-Qaida, and according to the source, four top al-Qaida commanders visit Khamenei every two months.

The plan is that if by next six months America does not accept Iran’s nuclear program and either increases sanctions or a military confrontation occurs, the assets have been ordered to carry out their mission. The regime feels it must act by then because current sanctions, which have already had a serious effect on Iran’s economy, could spark civilian rioting.

As reported in the Washington Times on Oct. 5, a secret memo by the regime’s Intelligence Ministry warned that deteriorating economic conditions from international sanctions had greatly increased the possibility of an uprising and urged them to take appropriate action.

The United States has set a March deadline for Iran to comply with International Atomic Energy Agency demands on its nuclear program or face much harsher measures.

The regime believes, the source said, that if the U.S. fails to accept Iran’s nuclear program, Israel will be much more likely to attack its nuclear facilities and military installations.

Previously an exclusive report in WND revealed that terror cells of the Islamic regime were on high alert to attack targets in America. Gen. Massoud Jazayeri, deputy head of Iran’s armed forces, stated that, “In the face of any attack, we will have a crushing response. In that case, we will not only act in the boundaries of the Middle East and the Persian Gulf, no place in America will be safe from our attacks.”

Iranian officials also see the possible overthrow of Syrian President Bashar Assad as a red line, and with the looming confrontation over their nuclear program, they have taken several measures, one of which is to retaliate against Israel through several fronts and in coordination with their proxies, such as Hezbollah. As reported in WND, 170 ballistic missiles have been pre-targeted on Tel Aviv alone, some with biological warheads. And an attack on America from within would create economic havoc on the fragile U.S. economy.

The source warned that the IAEA has no idea that the Islamic regime is actively working on its nuclear bomb program at secret sites, that it has even enriched uranium to over 90 percent – weaponization grade – and that with the help of North Korea, it is working on a plutonium bomb.

The assumption that Iran is far from accomplishing its goals is a hoax, the source warned. The regime next year will make operational intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching the U.S. Armed with nuclear weapons, it would be too late for the world, he said.”
http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/next-911-irans-death-squad-is-here/#5HzbDUmEvQ0c47Jj.99

Islamic killers live to kill infidels, wherever they reside. Nevertheless, the “Big Satan” and “Little Satan” are their prime targets. And if one is forced to rate the “efficiency” of Islamic killing machines, make no mistake, Iran’s Rev Guards (and its proxy Hezbollah arm) are the most adept at their trade crafts. Send them to the head of the terror class. Give them a gold star.

It then stands to reason – depressing as it is – why active vigilance is necessary, staying alert to the dangers within. Better than the alternative.

 

Leftists Go Postal Over Gun Control…Threatening To KILL Legal Gun Owners…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

This blogger is all too familiar with the left and how they operate. Not just from a historical basis, but from having spent much time with “religiously” imbued leftists within the confines of the upper east and west sides of New York City. The so called creme de la creme.

Reference was made to the above forays in a previous commentary, as such, it doesn’t require repeating. If interested, seek within – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/18/benghazigates-femme-fatales-not-just-smokin-hot-chicks-addendum-to-covering-up-benghazigate-exquisite-political-timing-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

In any case, the highlighted report below, and its deadly meaning, is not for nothing. In fact, would be shocked if the Pulitzer Prize winning writer hadn’t spewed his venom. Countless times have been in the company of acclaimed writers/authors (great clients, but world’s apart in personal perspectives) who expressed equally appalling views, at least when it came to Conservative folks from Middle America. Their disdain was palpable and dripping. But for various reasons it was necessary to hold ones tongue (not an easy feat), and it is not as if one can’t learn a lot by being quiet too! A fly on the wall.

WND EXCLUSIVE

‘WE’LL ‘PRY GUNS FROM COLD, DEAD FINGERS’

Columnist proposes killing NRA members, dragging Republicans behind pickups

DES MOINES, Iowa – “For 50 years, the left-leaning columnist Donald Kaul has raged against guns, but after the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre, he says, it’s time for “anger,” killing gun owners and dragging legislators who disagree with gun control behind pickup trucks until they get the message.

The Pulitzer Prize-nominated columnist penned an alarming screed published in the Des Moines Register in which he further suggested the Second Amendment be repealed and the National Rifle Association be declared a terrorist organization.

“During my 50-year career,” Kaul wrote, “every time some demented soul would take a semiautomatic gun and clean out a post office, a school or a picnic, I’d get up on my soap box and let loose with a withering diatribe about guns, the National Rifle Association and weak-kneed politicians. Did it about 75 times, give or take.”

Yet each time, he lamented, the only result was a spike in gun sales.

Donald Kaul

“That’s obscene,” he opined. “Here, then, is my ‘madder-than-hell-and-I’m-not-going-to-take-it-anymore’ program for ending gun violence in America.”

His first step: “Repeal the Second Amendment, the part about guns anyway. It’s badly written, confusing and more trouble than it’s worth. … Surely the Founders couldn’t have envisioned weapons like those used in the Newtown shooting when they guaranteed gun rights. Owning a gun should be a privilege, not a right.”

Second: “Declare the NRA a terrorist organization and make membership illegal. … Make ownership of unlicensed assault rifles a felony. If some people refused to give up their guns, that ‘prying the guns from their cold, dead hands’ thing works for me.”

Third: “Then I would tie Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, our esteemed Republican leaders, to the back of a Chevy pickup truck and drag them around a parking lot until they saw the light on gun control.”

“And if that didn’t work,” Kaul concludes, “I’d adopt radical measures.”

Kaul explains his dramatic measures this way: “The thing missing from the debate so far is anger – anger that we live in a society where something like the Sandy Hook Elementary massacre can happen and our main concern is not offending the NRA’s sensibilities.”

It would appear Kaul has supplied his missing ingredient.” http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/pry-guns-from-cold-dead-fingers-works-for-me/#D0HPFJkfLctUAmZF.99

But most significantly, the left’s push for total control runs straight through legal gun owners. Too many leading gun control advocates are malevolent in intent, yet hardly stupid. And with the destruction of the economy – fiscal cliff “deal” beside the point – they are almost on schedule, at least they believe they are – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/27/dhs-americas-planned-deconstruction-via-valerie-jarrett-domestically-foreign-policy-wise-addendum-to-barack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Their chutzpah knows no bounds but there is push back too. ‘Gun Owners Mad As Hell And Will Not Take It!’ – www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52104

Alas, the above from WND, egged on by Canada Free Press, brings into sharp relief (even ties it into a bow) the following remedial advice, if patriots are truly worried about anti-Americans violating their Constitutional rights.

‘SHERIFFS CALLED OUT TO FIGHT THE LAW’

Local officers predicted to be key to preventing gun confiscation

“A high-profile former sheriff who once sued the U.S. government over its gun regulations – and won – says it’s the local sheriff who will have to defend Americans when and if the feds start banning and confiscating guns.

Richard Mack, a former sheriff in Graham County, Ariz., joined with then-Ravalli County Sheriff Jay Printz in a lawsuit against Washington when Bill Clinton demanded sheriffs enforce provisions of the Brady Bill gun-control law.

He won. And since then he’s been at the front of a movement that highlights the responsibility of local sheriffs.

Now, as Washington gears up to consider imperious plans to limit guns, require fingerprinting and registration, impose additional taxes and fees, ban particular features or functions outright, and even confiscate weapons of self-defense, Mack has told WND that there’s hope remaining in local law enforcement.

It’s not complicated, he said.

“Gun control is illegal, and it’s against the Constitution,” he said. “What people don’t realize is that the Second Amendment was designed to protect us from the power of the federal government.”

He said he would expect sheriffs across the country to defend the rights of ordinary Americans.

“I hope and pray America’s sheriffs won’t allow any more gun control,” Mack said. “The sheriffs need to be united in letting the federal government know that we’re not going to allow it.

“In the ’90s when I was the sheriff of Graham County, Ariz., we worked with other sheriffs and stopped two or three Brady Bills,” he recalled, a fight that he’s been detailing in seminars with sheriffs.

He said the office is critical, as it’s not only in law enforcement, but also is elected directly by the people.

“Out of 200 sheriffs with whom I’ve met, I’ve only had one give me a wishy-washy answer. That one said he would try to take the federal government to court,” Mack said. “Most of them have said they would lay down their lives first rather than allow any more federal control. They also said they would do everything they could to stop gun control and gun confiscation.”

Alan Stang at News With Views wrote about another battle Mack encountered while sheriff. A bridge had washed out and parents were driving children 26 miles to school, which physically was located only half a mile across a river.

The county decided the fix the bridge and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers warned that an environmental study alone would take 10 years. Mack promised to provide protection for the workers, and said he’d call out a posse if needed.

The bridge was built.

Stang wrote about other close encounter between sheriffs and the feds:

Find out who is working to aid Barack Obama in the destruction of the 2nd Amendment, in “America Disarmed.”

“In 1997, in Nye County, Nev., federal agents arrived to seize cattle that belonged to rancher Wayne Hage. The sheriff gave them a choice: skedaddle or be arrested. They skedaddled. … In Idaho, a 74-year-old rancher shot an endangered gray wolf which had killed one of his calves. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service sent three armed agents to serve a warrant. Lemhi County Sheriff Brett Barslou said that was ‘inappropriate, heavy-handed and dangerously close to excessive force.’ More than 500 people turned out for a rally in the small towns of Challis and Salmon to support the sheriff and the rancher and to tell the federal government to back off.”

Mack, who’s written “The Magic of Gun Control,” said if there is an actual specific plan to start taking Americans’ weapons, he expects a response.

“If the federal government wants to start a new Civil War, all they need to do is go ahead with gun confiscation,” Mack said.

Just a day earlier, WND reported that Firearms Coalition Executive Director Jeff Knox said Second Amendment supporters aren’t planning negotiations with Obama over gun control.

“We are not going to back down. We are not going to give in. And we are not going to concede one more inch,” Knox said.

He was responding to questions about America’s response to plans like those from Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., to demand gun registration, bans and fingerprinting in the wake of the Sandy Hook school shooting in Connecticut.

“Unfortunately, the president and other anti-rights politicians are not doing anything to keep what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary from happening again,” he said. “Instead they are going after law-abiding gun owners and targeting commonly owned firearms and ammunition feeding devices. Their proposed restrictions on these items would have had no impact on what happened at Sandy Hook, and, if passed, would not stop the next craven murderer from wreaking just as much havoc and destruction.”

Gun Owners of America Executive Director Larry Pratt shares Mack’s opinion.

“The county sheriffs need to act and make new deputies to stop federal authority in the counties,” Pratt told WND. “This is a defensible idea. He can deputize people to serve since they are the ones who voted for him to represent them. A lot of citizens would stand up for their Second Amendment rights if they were protected by the sheriff.”

He cited a move that already is surging among states to adopt laws and use the Tenth Amendment to curb federal activity. The Tenth Amendment simply reserves to the states and the people all responsibilities not specifically assigned to Washington in the Constitution.

Pratt noted the move that over the past few years has seen eight states adopt laws that exempt firearms made, sold and kept in the state from federal oversight. The federal government has taken the issue to court, where it remains at this point.

“A number of states are passing laws that use the Tenth Amendment to curb federal control. Their law says that if a gun is made in the state and sold in the state, that the federal government has no control over it,” Pratt said.

He provided additional examples of what already has resulted from sheriffs’ disputes with the feds.

“In Elkhart County, Ind., there was a farmer who produced raw milk. The Department of Justice was investigating the farmer and was trying to shut down the farm,” Pratt said. “Elkhart County Sheriff Brad Rogers defended the farmer by saying that without a warrant signed by a judge and without probable cause, they had no jurisdiction to investigate the farmer within his jurisdiction of Elkhart County.”

“Rogers said that if they didn’t leave, he would arrest them. The DoJ threatened to arrest him, but Rogers sent his deputies to defend the farmer,” Pratt said. “The feds have had to back off.”

He also said local officials in New Mexico burned trees from a small parcel of federal land to halt a raging forest fire.

“The sheriff is the chief officer in the county even on federal land if the land is in the county,” Pratt said.

But Washington is not idle. Barack Obama said he will put the weight of his office behind gun control, and Feinstein even has proposed a federal gun buyback program that has been endorsed by about 40 members of Congress.

Feinstein’s dedication to eliminating the Second Amendment is unquestioned.

The California Democrat was one of sponsors of the so-called “Brady Bill,” the 1995 “assault weapons” ban. Faced with the limitations placed in the version that was making its way through Congress, Feinstein said, “If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States, for an outright ban, picking up every gun in America, Mr. and Mrs. America, turn ‘em all in.”

Mack, who is also the founder of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, said Feinstein is a “polimagician,” a political leader who believes his or her policies will work magic for their constituents.

“They think they’re special and better than everyone else. Feinstein’s [own] concealed carry permit is the product of this elitist attitude,” Mack said. He said Congress and Obama simply are loading their political agenda onto the backs of the victims of Sandy Hook.

He said gun control through history produces one result: “Genocide.”

Pratt warned that Washington’s strategy will accomplish nothing but creating vast new ranks of felons in America.

“A lot of Americans spend an awful lot of money on these guns. I don’t think there will be very many who will willingly accept $200 for a gun that they paid $500 to $1,000 for,” Pratt said.

The last two major gun rights cases that went before the U.S. Supreme Court were decided in favor of gun rights, and as a followup the Second Amendment Foundation has been taking on local and state restrictions.

Recently, a federal judge struck down a North Carolina provision that authorizes a ban on firearms and ammunition outside homes during “a declared emergency,” determining that violates the Second Amendment.

WND reported earlier when residents of King, N.C., were startled by the banishment of firearms during a “declared snow emergency.”

Judge Malcolm J. Howard wrote, “[T]he court finds that the statutes at issue here are subject to strict scrutiny. … While the bans imposed pursuant to these statutes may be limited in duration, it cannot be overlooked that the statutes strip peaceable, law abiding citizens of the right to arm themselves in defense of hearth and home, striking at the very core of the Second Amendment.”

“When SAF attorney Alan Gura won the Heller case at the Supreme Court,” noted SAF Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb, “the gun ban crowd said that we were a ‘one-trick-pony’ and that we would never knock out another gun law.Well, SAF has now knocked out gun laws in Maryland, Illinois and North Carolina.”
http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/sheriffs-called-out-to-fight-the-law/#j4MaTowTjXPUrduW.99

Keep your Sheriff’s number on speed dial…map out the quickest route to his office too – just in case.

UPDATE: frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/anti-gun-newspaper-that-outed-gun-owners-forced-to-hire-armed-guards/…irony of ironies…magically delicious!

What Happens When Terrorists Hide Behind Democracy, “Martyrdom” & Revolution? Scores Of Innocents Die…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Placing lipstick on a pig doesn’t change its appearance. Not even for a nanosecond. But when it comes to the ever “aggrieved” pet jihadis of the international community – the Palestinians – there is no amount of barbarism which will dent their “victimhood” status. None at all. 

They can head chop, throat slit and awash themselves in Jewish and infidel blood, but no matter. They are still considered “innocent”. A world gone mad.

Some may even recall the following unimaginable act of blood lust, while others may not. But if one act of cannibal-like behavior embodies their orgasmic relationship with blood, this one is for the jihadi books  – www.think-israel.org/freerepublic.octoberramallahlynch.html. However, this blogger implores her readers to take a peek within on an empty stomach, she doesn’t want it on her conscience if something or other gets upchucked. You’ve been warned.

But it is not as if their above bonding with blood is an enigma, a one off. Far from it. Again, readers may be familiar with this commentary/policy paper but if not, acquaint yourselves. It is the biggest lesson, and gift, of all, Islam & Blood  –   adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/13/islam-blood-a-groundbreaking-policy-paper-contained-herein-the-world-stands-on-a-precipice-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-109/.

Couple it with the knowledge that Muslim sanctioned Sharia Law embodies their  boundless blood lust – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/13/muslim-blood-lust-boundless-no-excuses-needed-yet-western-third-world-devoteesappeasers-supply-them-addendum-to-islam-and-blood-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…and the heretofore inexplicable will become (horrifically) explicable.

Now don’t get yours truly started on the PA/Fatah/PLO mastermind, none other than the Nobel Peace Prize winning, godfather of modern terrorism, “Chairman” Arafat. The readership hardly needs any edification on his bloody history. His infamy precedes him. May he rot in hell.

Yet it is intrinsic to let the public know that its rival terror half, Hamas, the other side of the PA state coin, are the progeny of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia. Significantly, there is not one Muslim terror group which has not spawned from the Brotherhood’s terror-laden loins, Al Qaeda included. 

Here’s a brief overview of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s plans for America, but they aim for other westerners too- adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/25/the-muslim-mafia-aka-the-brotherhood-their-overarching-plan-what-it-means-for-americas-future-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/As such, the entire Palestinian terror hydra’s “activities” are as dangerous to those outside Israel, as much as they are within the Middle East, including the “darling” PA terrorists.

Cutting to the heart of the matter, let us now join the master of international law, via his latest op-ed, as he ties Palestinian terror to international law; PA statehood to its place among civilized nations; and the banners under which jihadi terrorists “martyr” themselves, hidden behind the guise of democracy and revolution. Oh what a tangled terror web they weave.

‘Op-Ed: Convenient Masquerade: “Martyrdom” in the Middle East’

Published: Saturday, December 29, 2012
Democracy, revolution and “martyrdom” are words that have hidden meanings in the Jihadic resurgence which we are witnessing.

Prof. Louis René Beres (cited herein too – adinakutnicki.com/about/)

Louis René Beres, Ph.D., Princeton

For just a fleeting moment, Palestinian terrorism may have been quieted by the Palestinian Authority’s recent UN-approved end-run around normal legal rules.

Newly upgraded in status by the General Assembly to “Non-member Observer State,” the PA, together with its reluctant Hamas partners in Gaza, will no longer have to fulfill ordinary requirements of the Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (the Montevideo Convention, 1934), or the binding Oslo Agreements with Israel. Paradoxically, and via the “good offices” of the United Nations, Palestinian statehood is now being brought about not by authoritative international law, but by flagrantly contrived diplomatic fiat.

Still, in time, Palestinian inclinations to Jihad and “martyrdom” will inevitably resurface, and so, too, will similar sentiments in certain neighboring Arab countries. Notwithstanding earlier and possibly latent movements toward democracy in the region, originally, the so-called “Arab Spring,” current expressions of revolutionary fervor are apt to deteriorate rapidly into new forms of Islamic dictatorship and Islamist rule. This is already most obvious in Mohammed Morsi’s Egypt, and it is plainly foreseeable in post-Assad Syria.

As for Israel, it must finally be apparent that the Jewish State, since its very beginnings in May 1948, has been a readily convenient scapegoat for several successive and retrograde Arab tyrannies. Always, to be sure, the truest enemy of the Arab peoples has been their own deeply-corrupted and incompetent leaderships. Indeed, if only the Arabs had immediately embraced rather than assaulted Israel – a perfectly rational embrace that would have been welcomed by all Israelis – the Arabs would have benefited enormously. Moreover, these considerable benefits would have been experienced on several levels; politically, intellectually, medically, scientifically, and materially.

In world politics, what is real, is not always rational. Because of endless manipulation by the Arab governments, demonization of Israel, not a gainfully symbiotic embrace, became de rigueur from the start. Now, following multiple and often inter-dependent revolutionary eruptions across the Arab world, Israel will likely remain in the self-destructive cross-hairs of still-irrational regional foes. More specifically, Islamist forces, some long suppressed, will continue to surface and seek power across the area. Willing “martyrs” in an ongoing Jihad, these more-or-less disciplined and capable forces will expand with a vigorously renewed dedication to cruelty. Prudently, this re-dedication will be pleasingly masked in sanctimony.

Significantly, the results of this energetic re-dedication will be felt not only in the Arab world and Israel, but also in Europe, and in the United States. Some evident consequences of the Jihadist resurgence may quickly become visible not only in Cairo, Tripoli, and Damascus, but also in Tel-Aviv, London, and New York.

In Gaza, al-Qaeda, not to be outdone by newly-emergent Muslim Brotherhood elements that are presently coalescing throughout the Hamas-controlled strip, will accelerate its own commitment to “sacred” violence. For all Jihadist terrorists, here and elsewhere, violence and the sacred will remain mutually-reinforcing and conspicuously inseparable. In fact, among the Palestinian leadership these days, the commitment to sacred violence and martyrdom has taken an altogether bizarre and non-Islamic turn.

Openly attaching himself to Jesus, and to corollary ideas of Christian martyrdom, senior PA leader Jibril Rajoub said in Al-Hayat Al-Jadida (November 30, 2012): “Jesus is a Palestinian; the self-sacrificing Yasser Arafat is a Palestinian; Mahmoud Abbas, themessenger of peace on earth is a Palestinian. How great is this nation of the Holy Trinity!”

So, for the PA leadership, Jesus was a “Palestinian.” We ought not be too surprised, therefore, that today’s headlines from the “revolutionary” or “democratizing” Middle East are often misleading and incomplete. At its core, Jihadist terrorism, now being grotesquely linked to Christian sacrifice, has very little to do with war, politics, or revolutionary resistance to oppression. The deeper meanings of these recurrent excursions into barbarism can be found less in rationally-calculated judgments of expedient tactics or strategy, than in personally passionate feelings of fear, dissatisfaction, cowardice, and ritualistic loathing.

Examined closely, these feelings include:

(1) a consuming, though unrecognized, horror of death (relieved for “martyrs” by a compelling promise of immortality);

(2) an unfulfilled wish for ecstasy, or an intense, time-limited pleasure;

(3) a satisfying and self-righteous joy, drawn from the presumptively mandatory targeting of all those who would “lack sacredness;” and, perhaps even more acutely after the fall of Mubarak and Kaddafi,

(4) an utterly abiding hatred of “apostates” and “infidels.”

In searching for authentic meanings of regional revolutionary fervor in the Middle East, the implications for Jihadist terrorism will never be fully discoverable in official declarations, charters, resolutions, or covenants. Nor will they be made more understandable in less formal Islamist diatribes. Obliquely, but profoundly, these genuine meanings will remain securely hidden in the incalculable sufferings that are inflicted by Jihadists upon both their past and future victims.

In Iraq, the indiscriminate car bomb is back in fashion. In Yemen, all sides to the endless internecine conflicts disregard the growing problems of hunger and utter starvation. In Syria, and elsewhere in this volatile region, especially “Palestine,” Jihadist terror will re-emerge with a “sacred” vengeance.

Seeking to express Shahada, or Death For Allah, the seemingly secular goals of revolutionary terror will create a convenient smokescreen for what are unalterably religious objectives. Incrementally, whenever feigned “democracy” appears to replace dictatorship, the tyranny of Islamism – even when it is linked perversely to Christian martyrdom – will become the eventual beneficiary.

At its heart, the civilizational problems of the Middle East are problems of human pain. Significantly, human language can never accurately describe agony. In this connection, the defiling horror of Jihadist terror-violence can never really be understood or felt by others. Expert commentaries notwithstanding, this particular horror can never be reduced to any tangible or measurable inventory of casualties.

All agony is incommunicable. In matters of Jihadist terror, therefore, quantification must always miss the point.

Even in the “new Middle East,” the anguish of new terror victims will not only defile language, it will also be language defiling. However, the sheer inexpressibility of pain, although never determinable by politics, revolution, or society, will still have expressible political, revolutionary, and societal outcomes. In the case of still-advancing Jihadist terrorism, it may even stand in the way of recognizing new Islamist violence as evil or unacceptable. Ironically, we may encounter, in this context, comfortingly romantic celebrations of Jihadist terrorism as a necessary expression of “democracy,” “revolution,” and “martyrdom.”

We must plainly understand that Jihadist terrorists are spurred on by the distinctly voluptuous and allegedly purifying satisfactions of planned sacred violence. Islamist suicide-bombers prepare carefully for their cathartic missions of pain and extinction largely because of the anticipated ecstasy. Drawn from a presumed religious obligation, this ecstasy, which rewards doubly because it is also “cleansing,” represents an almost exact reciprocal of the unendurable suffering to be borne by the intended victims.

For Jihadist suicide terrorists, both past and future, the death that is dutifully meted out to certain “profane” others is an abstraction. These victims, after all, lack sacredness. And in the unchanging Quranic concept of war, terrorizing the profane unbeliever who refuses to be dhimmi ( to accept Shari’a domination) is necessarily a desired end unto itself.

Physical pain within the human body can not only destroy ordinary language, it can also bring about a visceral reversion to pre-language human sounds, to those primal moans, cries and whispers that are anterior to learned speech. While the soon-to-be expanding number of victims of Jihadist terror will writhe agonizingly from the burns and the nails and the screws, neither the “civilized” world publics who bear silent witness, nor the “martyrs” themselves, will ever experience what is actually being suffered.

Physical pain, it must be realized, even in the “new Middle East,” can have no consequential “voice.” When, at last, it may discover some potentially decipherable sound, the listener will no longer want to listen. This audience, mortal and fragile, will wish most strenuously to deny its own existential vulnerabilities. Such denial, as Freud himself had recognized, lies at the very core of what it means to be human.

Violent upheavals spreading across the Middle East will always contain important hidden meanings. Their principal legacy will have little to do with any sustained popular revolution, democracy, or the overthrow of earthly despotisms. Instead, it will bear upon long-latent and much more primal human hopes of achieving the indisputably greatest power of all, power over death.

Drawing upon these important hidden meanings of current revolutionary fervor in the “new” Middle East and North Africa, the essence of any capable counter-terrorist policy must soon begin to lie in the following critical awareness: Jihadist violence is never actually rooted in any ostensible political or revolutionary ideology, but rather in remorselessly vengeful images of religious obligation. In the end, unmistakably, Jihadist terror is always an irresistibly sacred form of religious sacrifice.

Once this starkly elusive concept can be understood, we will finally be able to deal intelligently and purposefully with emerging expressions of “democracy,” “revolution,” and “martyrdom” in the region.”

www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/12660#.UOA_u2_FVn0

There ought be nothing else required to demonstrate/underline/underpin, why the PA/Fatah/Hamas terror junta (though warring, the PA and Hamas are ostensibly part of one people, even though there hasn’t been a separate state of Palestine, but never mind) should NEVER be welcome among civilized nations. However, as the leader of the free world props up Islamists – here, there and everywhere – apparently, pointing out the obvious is no longer a given. 

Evil has been redefined. 

Presenting, A Strategic-Based Policy Interview With Dr. Martin Sherman, Founder of the Israel Institute For Strategic Studies (IISS) By Adina Kutnicki

In celebration of this blog’s six month anniversary, as well as having surpassed a significant milestone – well over hundreds of thousands of readers – it is more than appropriate to mark the occasion.

This dedicated blogger can think of no better way to honor such a critical juncture than through staying true to the Mission Statement, thus, highlighting an embodiment of Zionist and Constitutional-based Conservative ethos. Thereby, verily pleased to present a featured strategic policy interview with the founder of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS – www.strategic-israel.org/), Dr. Martin Sherman.

IISS is dedicated to the preservation and the propagation of joint values shared by the USA, as embodied in the US Constitution, and the Zionist movement, as reflected in Israel’s Declaration of Independence.

According to its Mission Statement, IISS’s underlying rationale is aptly conveyed in the words of Justice Louis Brandeis:

“Let no American imagine that Zionism is inconsistent with Patriotism. Multiple loyalties are objectionable only if they are inconsistent. A man is a better citizen of the United States for being a loyal citizen of his state, and of his city; or for being loyal to his college…

Every American Jew who aids in advancing the Jewish settlement… , will likewise be a better man and a better American for doing so.

There is no inconsistency between loyalty to America and loyalty to Jewry”.

The IISS is endorsed by numerous public figures both in Israel and abroad, who include senior members of the Israeli government and the security establishment, the British House of Lords, European parliaments and renowned thinkers and intellectuals.

It can best be characterized as a “policy entrepreneur” whose efforts are all devoted to two mutually complementary goals:

         *To confront, contain and counteract the “intellectual surrender” to the dictates of post-Zionist political correctness often reflected in the conduct of official Israeli policy-makers and in the content of official Israeli policy-making.

          *To lay the foundations of a new assertive Zionist-complaint paradigm for the conduct of the affairs of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people.

AK: Dr. Sherman, welcome to Adina Kutnicki/A Zionist & Conservative Blog Interview.

Dr. Sherman: Pleased to be here.

AK: Dr. Sherman, firstly, thank you for your service to Israel, the one and only (thousands year old) homeland of the Jewish people. Your efforts are applauded within Israel, as well as outside its borders. They embody a western imperative. 

Dr. Sherman: Yes, Israel’s fate is a western imperative.

AK: What would you say are the principal problems and major challenges facing Israel today?

Dr. Sherman: The major problems/challenges facing Israel today should be characterized more as an interfacing and interacting complex construct, rather than an “itemized” list of discrete and disconnected topics.

As such, the intensity of one problem impacts the severity of the other. Thus, in very significant ways, one problem is a component of, or an input for, another.

Thereby, the inability to devise a rational approach towards the Palestinian issue fuels the problem of de-legitimization of Israel, which in turn weighs on the ability to rally international support with regard to halting the Iranian nuclear program.

Likewise, it is the dysfunctional, detrimental–and regrettably, at times—disloyal role played by major sections of Israel’s civil society elites that thwarts any sustainable Zionist-compliant approach to the Palestinian issue and therefore feeds into the exacerbation of the other above-mentioned problems, and undermines the ability to contend with them effectively.

Accordingly, it would be an error to attempt to address these issues separately without an awareness of the mutual interactions between them. Indeed, without an understanding of the interconnectedness to the challenges and threats facing it, endeavors to redress them will, at best, achieve temporary success. 

In other words, Israel’s strategic agenda should be formulated to address a comprehensive syndrome as a systemic whole, rather than a pursuit of specific remedies for individual ailments, however severe they may be.

AK: So what should be the major components to the complex interacting challenges and threats facing the country?

Dr. Sherman: Well, without wishing to suggest that this is an exhaustive catalog, I would include the following as the nation’s major policy imperatives, not necessarily in order of importance since most of them are in one way or another intertwined with each other:

  The need to formulate and promote a Zionist-compliant paradigm that would (a) discredit, disprove and hence delegitimize the Palestinian narrative; and thereby (b) remove the issue of Palestinian statehood from the international agenda.

  The need for Israel to undertake a radical restructuring and revamping of its diplomatic strategy, infrastructure and doctrine and to prepare a massive public diplomacy assault on world opinion, without which Israel will not be able to generate the freedom of action to pursue policies compatible with its vital national interests.

  The need to restructure the “social topography” by challenging the hegemony of the incumbent civil society elites – through the promotion, emplacement and empowerment of alternative elites, among other things, by the establishment of institutions capable of competing with the existing establishment for “mainstream” status.

  The need to formulate and propagate a refurbished rationale for Jewish national self-determination and continued maintenance of Israel as the nation-state of the Jewish people, that can override the rapidly widening fissures in the social fabric of the country, and rejuvenate a sense of social cohesion that is crucial for the country’s ability to contend with the emerging threats to its existence both from the Shiite Iran and the Sunni Arab Spring.

AK: Some might find your “diagnosis” overly abstract and theoretical. What would you say to that?  

Dr. Sherman: It was Kurt Lewin, recognized by many as  the “founder of social psychology” who remarked that “There is nothing so practical as a good theory.

Unless policies emanate from a sound conceptual foundation, they have scant ability of achieving their desired objectives. Indeed, it is the intellectual components comprising the “conceptual envelope” which encompasses the analytical perspectives that determine the bounds of the politically acceptable and the ideologically imperative. These  in turn will determine not only what the national objectives are, but the nature of the operational measures deemed appropriate to achieve them.

Thus, a divergent “conceptual envelope” will generate different parameters for determining both one’s objectives and the means to achieve them.

Accordingly, a clear grasp of the conceptual foundations underlying the choice of policy goal and policy instruments is essential for producing the necessary resolve and confidence to adhere to them in times of challenges and criticism –something at which Israel’s “right-wing” is abysmally remiss.

Indeed, without such understanding—and the strength of spirit engendered by it—the vacillation and erosion of principle that has been so characteristic of Israeli policy over the last two decades is unavoidable. After all, Israel is engaged in a war of ideas which in many respects threatens it more fundamentally than the dangers its faces from physical combat in the battlefield.

AK: So what would the policy objectives and instruments that would flow from your preferred “conceptual envelope” be for Israel’s national strategy?

Dr. Sherman: Let’s begin with the Palestinian issue.

In one respect the radical left is right (i.e. correct) – albeit not necessarily for the right (i.e. correct) reasons. For it is indeed true as they claim that, in Israel today, there is an ongoing process of “Palestinianization” of the entire edifice of social, economic and political activity in the country that overshadows and permeates all walks of life – distorting the decision-making criteria and judgment of policy makers charged with charting the course of the nation’s future.

The most crucial element any prospective leader of the country must grasp is that the Palestinian issue is in fact the most significant and severe obstacle to the proper administration of the nation’s affairs.

In fact, without adequately addressing this matter it will not be possible to arrive at a rational paradigm for the allocation and activation of the nation’s resources in order to meet the daunting array of existing threats and emerging challenges that it faces today. As long as the establishment of a Palestinian state (or any other autonomous Palestinian collective entity) within the territory between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea remains the cornerstone of the Israeli approach to the Palestinian question, we will continue to be drawn into futile attempts to resolve it, which are doomed to disastrous failure – such as the Oslo process and its subsequent failed derivatives, the abortive “disengagement” and the aborted “convergence”. Even the exorbitant “security barrier” and “Iron Dome”, all off-shoots of the Palestinian threat, will soon be shown to be partial stop-gap measures.

The primary – and the most pressing – strategic challenge is therefore the removal of the topic of Palestinian self-determination, as a practical option, from the national and the international agenda.

Note that the intention here is not to remove the topic of the Palestinians’ fate from the public debate.

Quite the opposite. The intention is to formulate, present and promote the implementation of a policy proposal that would allow Israel to contend with – or rather avoid – the dual perils that all proposals raised hitherto create for it.

AK: What would such a policy entail?

Dr. Sherman: It is crucial to understand that in order to ensure its long-term survival as the nation-state of the Jewish people, Israel has to address two imperatives: The Geographic Imperative and the Demographic Imperative. The first of these imperatives calls for the continued control by Israel of all the territory east of the coastal plain up to the Jordan River in order to prevent unacceptable risks to its physical security; the second imperative calls for reduction of the Arab presence in this territory in order to prevent unacceptable risks to its status as the nation-state of the Jewish people. 

Clearly, to address these two imperatives successfully we need to be mindful not only of the substance of the policy proposal but also its style of delivery. After all, in order to be taken seriously as a pertinent policy alternative in the current realities of international politics, the manner and tone in which such a proposal is formulated and presented cannot reflect a blatant disregard for the principles of liberal democratic political doctrine and conformity with the prevailing “ambiance” of “political correctness”.

This is something that should not be trivialized.  Indeed, without adhering to this caveat, it will not be possible to implement the proposed policy (or even to attempt to do so) without risk of exposing Israel to a huge wave of censure and sanctions that could endanger its very ability to maintain social and economic routine in the country, and paralyze systems vital to its day-to-day functioning and existence. 

This brings to the fore the importance of Israel’s public diplomacy as a strategic consideration and highlights the interconnectivity of the topics I previously mentioned.

AK: Let’s leave the discussion of public diplomacy for later. For the present, what is the substance of your proposal?

Dr. Sherman: I have set out the elements of my tripartite policy proposal, and the mechanisms – and implications– of its implementation, in considerable details in various installments of my Jerusalem Post column and elsewhere. In it, I advocate a comprehensive approach to the Palestinian issue focusing not only on the Palestinian in Judea & Samaria, but on the Palestinian diaspora and refugee question. However, I feel it would not be appropriate to try and elaborate it in full detail in a wide-ranging interview such as this.

That said, in principle, the proposal comprises a prescription for a fundamental change in the nature of the discourse on the Palestinian issue, and in the methodology of implementation—i.e.depoliticizing the context and “atomizing” the application.  It involves diverting the debate from the political to the humanitarian, and addressing the Palestinian Arabs at the individual, rather than at the collective level. Finally, rather than striving to resolve the problem, it endeavors to dissolve (or dissipate) it.

At the root of this approach is a resolute refusal to accept the Palestinians’ (spurious) political demands but a far-reaching willingness to acknowledge – and address – their very real humanitarian predicament, and indeed to help extricate themselves from it.

Its implementation entails providing generous relocation grants directly to individual family units to allow them to emigrate to other countries where they can build a new and better future for themselves, outside the geographical confines of the Land of Israel – something which, according to numerous polls, many Palestinians in fact desire.

In the final analysis, the crucial and undeniable factor that the leadership of Israel must comprehend is that survival of the Zionist enterprise makes it imperative to adopt an unflinching position on the establishment of a Palestinian state that reflects the converse of Herzl’s well-known dictum, i.e. “If you wish it not, it is indeed a fantasy”.

AK: How realistic is the expectation of the Palestinians agreeing to relocate in exchange for material compensation?

Dr. Sherman: Let me say two things on this score:

  First, there is considerable evidence—both statistical and anecdotal—indicating that there is wide-spread desire among the Palestinians to emigrate and seek a better and more secure life elsewhere.  In fact, I commissioned a poll which found that only 15% of the Palestinians in Judea and Samaria would reject any material incentive to emigrate. Over 70% mention some kind of material inducement that would convince them to leave permanently. Other surveys carried out by Palestinian bodies, such as Bir Zeit University also found considerable willingness, particularly among the youth, to emigrate–if given the opportunity.  All I am proposing is to give them the opportunity they desire.

Now of course this is not unequivocal proof that massive emigration is feasible, but it is significantly more persuasive than some intuitive contention, based on little more than Palestinian rhetoric, that they will never leave.

  Second, the feasibility of a political goal is a function of political will and ideological commitment—which is why the cogency of the “conceptual envelopes” mentioned earlier is so important.   Objectives, which seem hopelessly unattainable under an initial set of circumstances turn out to be  eminently feasible once circumstances change.

For example, in the grim days of the 1950’s when the country was hanging on by a thread, engulfed by waves of immigration, with its fledgling economy teetering on collapse and surrounded by a sea of Arab aggression, who would have believed that Zionism would outlast Communism; that the nascent nano-state Israel would outlive the mega-Soviet empire; that a struggling agrarian economy would within a few decades become one of the world’s leaders in industry and technology. Conversely, after the 1967 Six Day War, after Israel’s stunning victories, when promoting Palestinian statehood was not only supported by insignificant fringe elements, but contacts with the PLO were punishable—and punished—acts of treason,who would have imagined that this idea would not only become a mainstream position in the Israeli polity but the official policy of a Likud (then-Herut) led party?

So in a large measure feasibility in politics is largely a function of the acumen, commitment, and stamina—and to a large degree resistance to the lure of being “pragmatic” and realistic”.

AK: Many people, even on the Right suggest granting the Palestinian Arabs in Judea and Samaria some form of limited civilian self rule or “autonomy”.  What is your take on that?

Dr. Sherman: My objection is two-fold – both in terms of the general principles of political science, and in terms of the empirical facts on the ground in Judea and Samaria.

With regard to the former: In principle there in nothing essentially flawed in the idea of autonomy, but for it to be a stable political/administrative arrangement, the autonomous entity (which by definition has its authority limited by some sovereign entity) must recognize the legitimacy of the sovereign entity to limit its authority.

However, when the rationale for granting autonomy does not reflect acceptance but rather rejection of the legitimacy of the sovereign (as in the case of the Palestinians and Israel), the entire endeavor is devoid of internal logic and doomed to failure.

Moreover,  in the specific context of Judea and Samaria, when you state that one proposes giving the self-governing Palestinian entity “full autonomy,” what does that include? One would assume it would exclude external defense and foreign policy, but in every other area, potential for confusion, dissension and worse abounds.

Even putting aside difficulties that might arise with regard to law enforcement and what legal system would apply where, particularly given the difficulty in delineating frontiers, there are a plethora of thorny issues in other, more “banal,” civilian spheres that make Israeli intervention in routine daily issues inevitable – hence virtually emptying the notion of Palestinian self-government of any significant substance.

 AK: For example?

Dr. Sherman: For example, would Israel allow the Palestinian autonomous entity to determine the location dangerous polluting industrial activities, such as charcoal production, which emits carcinogenic smoke, induces respiratory diseases and (according to Haaretz) has in some areas reduced life expectancy to 40?

Would Israel intervene to deal with sewage pollution emanating from Palestinian population centers that threaten Israeli water sources? Would it monitor, and enforce limits on, water extraction from the shared Mountain Aquifer?

Would Israel enforce road-worthiness standards for motor vehicles that travel on the envisioned shared highway system to ensure safety? If not, what would the consequences be – both legally and physically? With regard to preventative health measures, would Israel enforce, for example, the inoculations of household pets against rabies?

Clearly, if Israel does not control and ensure the implementation of these (and many other) activities, the ramifications for it citizens might well be severe. If, on the other hand, it does control them there is precious little left for the intended “self-rule.”

AK: I (and my readers) look forward to Part 2 of this very enlightening and illuminating exchange. To be sure, Part 1 is a most auspicious way to mark this blog’s six month anniversary.

You are indeed a gentleman and a scholar!  

Dr. Sherman: It has been my pleasure.

 
Dr. Martin Sherman acted as a ministerial adviser in the 1991-2 Shamir government. He also served for seven years in various defense related capacities and taught political science at Tel Aviv University. His works have been published in academic journals such as Journal of Strategic StudiesJournal of Theoretical Politics,International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence and Nations and Nationalism. He is the author of two books on international conflicts (Macmillan UK).Dr. Sherman is also a member of the advisory board of the Nativ journal in which he has published frequently.

A Radical, Racialist, Islamist Apologist DOJ Imposes A Mega-Mosque On A U.S. Community…Addendum To: Radical-In-Chief Tasks Illegally Bent AG Holder To Criminalize Islamic Speech…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The latest enforcement/infringement on American citizens – through an out of control Department of (in)Justice (DOJ) – is outrageously mendacious on multiple levels. 

On the one hand, it is no secret that DOJ is run by AG Holder, a radical leftist and Islamist sympathizing Obama official. Not only that, but the amount of lawbreaking under his purview is akin to witnessing mega-heists in broad daylight – record breaking within the annals of U.S. (legal) history.

Let us count the indictments, also wondering: when will AG Holder’s lawbreaking entity come crashing down? – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/will-barack-hussein-obamas-lawless-justice-department-under-the-aegis-of-ag-holder-finally-fall-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Adding to the people’s collective heartburn and angst they find themselves – mouth’s agape – watching on in horror, as Obama & gang lurch from one anti-American disaster to another – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/27/barack-hussein-obama-the-radical-in-chief-his-subversive-underlings-lurching-from-one-anti-american-disaster-to-another-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ ….feeling hopeless and helpless to boot. How much more misery can a people endure?

Atop insult to racial injury, the Radical-in-Chief tasks his racialist AG to do what? – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/28/alert-radical-in-chief-obama-tasks-illegally-bent-ag-holder-to-criminalize-islamic-speech-via-thuggish-un-dictates-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ . Have they no shame? Nope.

Now, if the above machinations are not enough for this dastardly duo, the out of control DOJ is also in sync with a made up, PC mandated “phobia”, sympathetically coined “Islamophobia”. Give this blogger a barf bag. It is a lie of gargantuan proportions, but nevertheless embraced by DOJ and the Islamist-in-Chief’s entire regime. Surrogates too.

Having previously demonstrated the efficacy of the above fantastical “persecution” at various junctures, a recap is available for first time readers. Just as a foretaste: readers are savvy enough to know when they are being smoked, and when western propagandists not only enable but shield Islamists and their trajectory towards their ultimate target, Sharia Law, this is the result – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/06/islamophobia-their-propagandists-western-enablers-who-shield-islamic-supremacists-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Isn’t it infuriating to learn that movie makers, corporate heads, and – for heavens sake – police too are dancing to Islamic tunes? – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/05/u-s-movie-makers-corporate-heads-police-too-dancing-to-islamic-edicts-where-is-the-west-headed-addendum-to-western-dhimmis-bow-again-to-islamic-supremacists-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

So where is this all headed? If not beaten back, the chopping of the First Amendment (and other Constitutional rights) is on the block – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/22/first-amendment-rights-on-the-chopping-block-via-criminalizing-criticism-of-islam-addendum-to-shariah-law-its-silencing-of-all-dissent-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

Incredibly, the same band of anti-American thugs, described above, must now be thwarted, as they force a mega-mosque upon an outraged community! The only way to deter them is through an equally major push back, directly aimed at Islamists and radical leftists.

‘DOJ Forces Mega-Mosque on Norwalk, CT Community’

Sun, December 23, 2012

by:

Ryan Mauro

Residents of the area of the proposed mosque were not bigoted; they were worried about traffic and safety. (Screenshot: wtnh.com)The Al-Madany Islamic Center of Norwalk in Connecticut wasn’t ready to give up when its proposal for a 27,000 square foot facility was turned down by the zoning commission over matters completely unrelated to religion. The Islamic Center sued, asserting—as you might have guessed—it was religious discrimination. The cry of “Islamophobia” got the Justice Department on its side, and the zoning commission suddenly changed its mind after a closed session.

The current Islamic Center was established in 1999 and serves 100 families. Feeling that more space was needed, the Center purchased the property in 2008 and made the $3.5 million proposal in the spring of 2010. It calls for a facility with an 80 foot minaret to serve as a community center and mosque, including eight classrooms, two libraries, three offices, a kitchen, a gymnasium and other rooms. It has a capacity for 1,000 people.

The proposal was rejected in June. The officials and residents that opposed it never referenced Islam and repeatedly emphasized that religion had nothing to do with it.

Mayor Richard Moccia said, “It was not based on any religious bias.” Commissioner Adam Blank said community centers are not allowed in triple AAA residential zones. Additionally, he said, parking was only allocated for the prayer hall that is 3,000 square feet, leaving the rest without parking.

Isabelle Harqgrove of “the “Keep 127 Fillow Street Residential” was concerned about increased traffic and its potential to “fundamentally alter the character of this quiet, New England neighborhood.” Local resident Brian Dough complained at a public hearing about the already heavy traffic in the morning.

“I don’t want to live near a Wal-Mart or a 27,000 square foot building, and I don’t think anyone in the neighborhood does. There’s no room, and this is huge,” he said.

Israel Herskowitz of the Stonegate Condominium Association that opposes the projectsaid, “The reason why it was rejected is it’s too big a development for too small a property … That would be the same if it was a church, or it was a synagogue.”

The Center rebutted by presenting a traffic study that projected that only 100 people and 50 cars would arrive for Friday prayer services. It also offered to help reduce traffic on special holidays by holding two services and hiring a police officer to direct traffic. The zoning commissionA drawing of the proposed Islamic center (Screenshot: wtnh.com) chairmanwas skeptical of the traffic study because it didn’t include the rear building. The Center claims that it will not use both buildings at the same time.

When the zoning commission ruled against the Center, the Center responded with a lawsuit, accusing it of anti-Muslim bias. Even one supporter of the Center’s proposal, Rabbi Jon Fish of Congregation Beth El, felt it was a dirty tactic.

“We all have problems with parking and space. It’s clear that the people who are concerned for their neighborhood are also good Americans, who also care a great deal about the diversity of our community. No one should be cast as a bigot,” he said.

Nonetheless, the “Islamophobia” accusation got the Justice Department to start an investigation. On November 29, the zoning commission had a private meeting andapproved the proposal “subject to an agreement depending on the terms of a final settlement.”

Herskowitz decried the “backroom politics” that left him and other residents out of the process. “We don’t know what’s in this proposed settlement. It’s frustrating,” he said. His group has filed a Freedom of Information Act request to find out.

All the Center had to do was claim discrimination for the Justice Department to intimidate local officials on its behalf. If a church didn’t get what it wanted from a zoning commission and accused it of “Christophobia,” would the Justice Department have intervened?

Few words are as powerful as “Islamophobia.” It preys upon the emotions of Americans disgusted by genuine acts of anti-Muslim bigotry. It tempts the politicians concerned about their public image. For Islamists uncomfortable with legitimate questions, it moves the conversation to victimization. And, as we now know, it compels the Justice Department to help get your mosque approved.”

www.radicalislam.org/analysis/cry-islamophobia-and-win/#fm

Orwell’s universe…Alice-in-Wonderland’s looking glass too…are apt descriptions  where patriotic Americans find themselves; outside looking in, as their beloved nation implodes from internal and external forces. Not only from the Islamic enemy “hiding in plain sight” but from the helping hands of those tasked to protect them! 

And since democracy is not a suicide pact, it behooves Americans to internalize the left’s mechanism for enforcement of their totalitarian thrust, as they aid and abet their Islamist helpmates – one bugaboo at a time. 

“Islamophobia”, their latest weapon of choice.

U.S. Leftist Media In The Service Of A Radical Revolutionary Obama Administration…What Can Go Wrong?Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Under the guise of the ‘Freedom Of Information Act’ an increasingly non-free media is servicing the government’s agenda. Say what? In plain English (not the bastardized cocktail blend used by multicultural psychotics), the media are behaving like quarterbacks for a regime they are ideologically in bed with, as well as being nudged along – by the powers that be – to “go along to get along”. Pravda-like.

And it is not as if the above is news, but it is the case that their back benching has increased manifestly ever since “The One” (repeatedly compared to Lincoln) burst – out of nowhere – onto the national stage. The (media) fix was in. 

Yet, the perils of a compliant media are self evident in third world, brutish regimes, but they are less so in a quasi-free society, whereby the appearance of freedom of expression is less than one step away from being the truth.

Make no mistake. The following are just some of the results of a government controlled media, where veering from the prescribed script is less likely than finding a virgin in a whore house – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/what-happens-when-a-compliant-media-ceases-their-due-diligence-thus-parroting-officialdoms-narratives-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …as journalist’s parrot officialdom’s narratives. Dangerous. Toxic. Deadly too.

While no one should be surprised at the report below, patriots should be spitting bullets – figuratively, of course – at its contents. And those who had the misfortune to see said reportage on their tv screens were very likely enraged to the nth degrees. Channel that anger, constructively-speaking. High blood pressure is a (silent) killer. 

For if the media truly believes that accessing home addresses and private info falls under the ‘Freedom Of Information Act’ (twisting its legitimate mandate into contorted knots), then who is to say that patriots don’t have the same rights too. Hell, yes. Therefore, turn about is indeed fair play. And this blogger leaves it up to her tens of thousands (currently topping 100,000 since her launch five months ago, but never mind) of readership to devise ways to “out” the private info of said media birdies, under the purview of the public’s “need to know”.

Need some fire in your bellies….

‘OWN A GUN? WE KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE’ – WND Exclusive

NEWSPAPER PUBLISHES A MAP OF ALL PERMIT HOLDERS IN ITS AREA

“A New York newspaper has gone to the effort to map out and publish online – complete with names and addresses – all the people in its area who own handgun permits.

The Journal News of White Plains, N.Y., has created interactive, online maps of all handgun permit holders in Westchester and Rockland counties, while it’s also waiting on information from Putnam County.

The newspaper boasts it was able to obtain the names and addresses through a Freedom of Information request, for New York state law makes permit holders’ information public record.

The interactive maps not only give an overall picture of the distribution of handgun permits, but can also be zoomed in upon, revealing the name and address of those licensed to own a handgun, be it pistol or revolver.

Presumably, a person familiar with an area could also use the maps to obtain locations of homes where the owner doesn’t have a handgun permit.

Jeff Knox, director of The Firearms Coalition, called the newspaper’s action “an outrageous invasion of privacy and a highly irresponsible action.”

“People choose to own handguns for a variety of reasons, personal defense being the most common,” Knox told WND. “How many victims of domestic violence, armed to protect themselves from an abusive spouse or boyfriend, were jeopardized by releasing this information? How many vulnerable seniors were placed at-risk by revealing the fact that they own guns?

A gun in the home is a last line of defense against violent criminals,” Knox continued. “Publicizing the existence of the gun in a particular home can have a potentially deadly impact. Guns are highly desirable targets of thieves, and we can expect that some of the people on this list will have their homes burglarized within the next 12 months.”

Response to the online article, judging by its comments section, has likewise been overwhelmingly negative.

“This is crazy!” commented a poster identified as Curtis Maenza. “Why in the world would you post every licensed gun owner[‘s] information? What do you hope to accomplish by doing this? This is the type of thing you do for sex offenders, not law-abiding gun owners. … I am canceling my subscription with your paper today!”

A poster identifying himself as Robert Wachtel of Mahopac, N.Y., added, “This is the single most irresponsible and dangerous piece of ‘journalism’ I have ever seen. Criminals can now target a specific neighborhood, wait for pistol permit holders to leave for work and burglarize their homes looking for firearms.”

He continued, “There is no legitimate public policy purpose for having pistol-permit info available to the general public. Many states have shielded this information and made it available only to law enforcement. I encourage everyone to contact their state representatives to have this … information shielded.”

The state of New York has become a hotbed for debate on the issue of gun laws since the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre in Newtown, Conn.

At the forefront is the New York Daily News, which shed all pretense of unbiased journalism by publishing a frontpage headline following the shooting that read, “Blood on Your Hands,” and called for readers to sign a petition to “institute comprehensive gun control.” The paper’s editorial department further called Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association a “gun-crazed maniac” who “will forever now be known as America’s maddest gunman.” It has continued in news and editorial coverage to refer to LaPierre as “crazy.”

The highly charged atmosphere surrounding the issue gave Knox yet another reason to criticize the newspaper’s action.

“At a time when prominent public personalities and political operatives are blaming gun owners for the terrible atrocity in Newtown, Conn., and calling for the deaths of gun owners and NRA members,” Knox said, “the publication of this information appears to be an overt threat and intentional effort at intimidation.

“The publication of this information just goes to demonstrate why gun owners around the country are so vehemently opposed to laws requiring registration of firearms,” he concluded. “Something like this paints a large bull’s-eye on the backs of gun owners and on the front doors of their homes, placing them and their families at risk for no justifiable reason.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/own-a-gun-we-know-where-you-live/#hbZKq2AACDpsv9tv.99

And because radical leftists have not met the back hand of Constitutional Conservatives they continually up the ante. Therefore, this NY newspaper continues apace with their “revelations” – www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/12/gluttons_for_pain_ny_newspaper_to_publish_more_addresses_of_gun_owners.html…but it is doubtful they would have the cajones to do so in “red neck” territory.

Nevertheless, leftist revolutionaries should be careful what they wish for. For if they persist in their witch hunt, they run the risk of turning otherwise law abiding, patriotic, Constitutionally Conservative Americans into their enemies.

After all, when this one or that one places bulls eyes on their backs, what else should they expect? Indeed.

And if the left is as smart as they think they are, unlike the “bitter clingers” they disparage, they would be wise to “cease and desist”….but then again, this blogger is Constitutionally Conservative, so according to the leftist revolutionaries she is as dumb as a post.

 

The Violation of ‘Due Process’ In Western Democracies…A Precursor To Tyranny…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

A western based democracy can’t claim to adhere to the rule of law without upholding ‘due process’. One needn’t be a lawyer to know this for a (legal) fact, but having access to some of the most astute legal minds in U.S. and Israeli  (specializing in international law) circles does have its advantages, especially in matters which require deeper delving. The point being, no one with a straight face can deny that a lack of ‘due process’ isn’t a deal breaker; a death kneel to democracy as well as to the rule of law.

And since ‘due process’ is joined at the hip with the U.S. Constitution, then undoubtedly its violation is doubly deleterious – legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Substantive+Due+Process. But since the ascent of Barack HUSSEIN Obama to the Presidency there have been more violations to the rule of law than at any time in U.S. history – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/01/will-barack-hussein-obamas-lawless-justice-department-under-the-aegis-of-ag-holder-finally-fall-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. More than enough evidence to choke a horse. An anti-American trail blazer.

But it is not as if Israel is free of their own ‘legal’ lawbreakers, and this blogger has first hand evidence. Now, don’t go thinking that yours truly has a sketchy past, but her writings have taken her straight to the underbelly. Several reliable sources grant her access, as necessary.

IF proofs are needed, take a peek within ‘administrative detention’ (against Jewish nationalists) as it tells the gory tale  – www.freeman.org/serendipity/index.php?/archives/475-ADMINISTRATIVE-DETENTION-ORDERS-AGAINS-JEWISH-NATIONALISTS.html….but this is only a partial rendering which could be (safely) written about, and more than one insider confirmed its contents. The burdens patriots have to bear.

But closer to America’s shores, and of special interest to the readership, are egregious violations against ‘due process’, repeatedly towards those who question ‘The One’s’ bonafides. To catch readers up to snuff, Larry Klayman, Founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch – previously, an ex Prosecutor for the Justice Department – knows his way around said violations. Here is his latest update:

‘CERTIFIGATE: THE JUDICIAL GRINCH WHO STOLE DUE PROCESS’

Exclusive: Larry Klayman whacks judge who dismissed eligibility challenge

Just when I thought I’d seen almost everything among the judiciary, along comes Judge Kevin J. Carroll of the Circuit Court in and for Leon County, Fla., the venue in Tallahassee where my client, a Democrat, Michael Voeltz, again challenged Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to be president following the Nov. 6 elections. Voeltz’s previous challenges were effectively held to have been premature by two colleagues of Judge Carroll. While Voeltz and I strongly disagree with these decisions and have them on appeal, out of abundance of caution and to squarely contest Obama’s re-election, we decided to file yet a third challenge after the election. Under Florida law, Voeltz has a clear-cut, unbridled right to challenge both Obama’s fraudulent representations that he was born in the United States and is thus a natural born citizen eligible to be president, as well as the simple issue of whether he is eligible even in the absence of fraud.

Florida Statutes Section 102.168 Contest of Election provides in relevant part:

(1) … the certification of election or nomination of any person to office, or of the result of any question submitted by referendum, may be contested in the circuit court by an unsuccessful candidate for such office or nomination thereto or by any elector (i.e. Voeltz) qualified to vote in the election related to such candidacy, or by any taxpayer (i.e. Voeltz), respectively (for): …

(3) (a) Misconduct, fraud or corruption …

(4) (b) Ineligibility of the successful candidate for the nomination or office in dispute.

Thus, Voeltz as an elector and taxpayer under Florida law, has an absolute right to file an election contest over Obama’s eligibility to qualify for the office of the president. Florida’s law is the strongest in the nation on this issue.

When this latest case was assigned to Judge Carroll – a Republican appointed by a “Republican” governor, Rick Scott, coincidentally to fill the judicial vacancy in Leon County that occurred when one of the few truly great judges in the nation, Judge Sanders Sauls, retired (Sauls was the Florida judge who presided over and decided the famous Gore v. Bush case in 2000, a trial I participated in while head of Judicial Watch) – I held out some hope that the rule of law might now prevail. I was wrong.

Without even permitting Voeltz to have a hearing on his complaint, after Judge Carroll had ruled that we could request one – which we did timely – Carroll panicked when he saw that we meant business and were prepared to bring witnesses, such as Sheriff Joe Arpaio, private investigator Mike Zullo and renowned investigative reporter and award-winning author Jerome Corsi to the hearing to testify, under oath, with hard evidence, that Obama’s claimed birth certificate is fraudulent (as well as many of his other identifying documents), and he was thus not born in the United States or its territories and thus not eligible to be president. (See www.freedomwatchusa.org to view sworn declarations of these witnesses.)

We requested that this evidentiary hearing be set for the week between Christmas and News Year’s, since time is short before Congress will meet to tally the Electoral College votes on Jan. 6, 2013 – but Judge Carroll apparently decided that he did not want to be “inconvenienced” during the holiday season. Without giving us an opportunity to have this hearing, he instead rushed, within hours of our having requested the hearing, to issue a brief and hastily written two and a half page “Order Dismissing Complaint,” lest he suffer a judicial heart attack at having to seriously preside further over a case that could remove Obama from the body politic of the nation and the world.

Here is part of what he said in denying Voeltz, the people of Florida and the nation a chance – known in both the U.S. and Florida constitutions to be “due process of law” – to be fully heard in order that he could weigh the considerable evidence of fraud and ineligibility and render a reasoned and just decision:

“We are now presented with Voeltz III. This Court notes that President Obama lives in the White House. He flies on Air Force One. He has appeared before Congress, delivered State of the Union addresses, and meets with Congressional leaders on a regular basis. He has appointed countless ambassadors to represent the interests of the United States throughout the world. President Obama’s recent appointment of The Honorable Mark Walker, formerly a member of this Court, has been confirmed by the United States Senate. Judge Walker has been sworn in as a United States District Court Judge and currently works at the Federal Courthouse down the street. The Electoral College has recently done its work and elected Mr. Obama to be president once again. [This is wrong!] As this matter has come before the Court at this time of the year it seems only appropriate to paraphrase the ruling rendered by the fictional Judge Henry X. Harper from New York in open court in the classic holiday film ‘Miracle on 34th St.’ ‘Since the United States Government declares this man to be President, this Court will not dispute it. Case dismissed.’”

Whatever Judge Carroll’s motive in dismissing Voeltz’ case without providing due process of law – for example, perhaps like his buddy he wants to be nominated for a higher federal judgeship – this jurist has not only violated his oath of office to obey the U.S. and Florida constitutions, but subverted the rule of law generally.

Our greatest Founding Father and second American president, John Adams, in arguing successfully for the Declaration of Independence, stressed that the new nation, unlike the British crown, was to be a country of laws and not men. In the face of this, Judge Carroll apparently believes that he, as part of the establishment judicial club, can do as he pleases without legal consequences.

Notwithstanding our forthcoming appeal of this dismissal, Judge Carroll and our other so-called public servants, who have brought us to the brink of revolution with their disregard for the constitutional rights of We the People, are about to learn otherwise.

This will be “Judicial Grinch” Carroll’s lawful gift from us this Christmas”.

Larry Klayman is a former Justice Department prosecutor and the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. His latest book is “Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/the-judicial-grinch-who-stole-due-process/#vOBRul4sdQQkQilZ.99

Yours truly has her own ideas about the above findings but most importantly, one needn’t be a lawyer to intuit when a basic Constitutional right is being violated, for whatever political reason – left or right.

A radical administration which compromises the separation of powers, in effect, leads its judiciary off the (legal) cliff and creates an imperiled nation. When citizens with absolute ‘legal standing’ have their enshrined rights to ‘due process’ violated, regardless of their opinions on this One or that One, the entire legal process falls apart. 

Western based democracy simply can’t withstand the evisceration of ‘due process’; the epicenter of rule of law. Simple as that.

 

Where Has Netanyahu’s “Red Line” Gone…Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s ‘Promises’ Too? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

There are some in Israel (they shall remain nameless) who are quite uncomfortable with this blogger’s truth telling. Others in America are equally distressed. But if they are seeking spinmeisters there are too many other addresses for them to seek out. This blog isn’t one of them. 

In this regard, understanding that there is no greater existential peril to Israel and to America in the long-term (as well as to the west in general) than a nuclear- armed Iran, it behooves removing the scales from ones eyes. Forthwith.

And as time marches precipitously forward, regarding Israel’s leadership (mental, moral fortitude) and their ability to step up to the plate, a rendering of their latest fecklessness comes to the fore. But the following doesn’t obviate this or that sabotage, at great risk to those acting on Israel’s behalf. Many are (or should be) deeply in their debt. This blog salutes them. A blessing on their heads.

However, relevant political and military leaders understand that a military operation…perhaps a non conventional EMP frying of the grids…is the only way forward; viruses, booms in the night aside.

But to their everlasting shame, spineless leaders always revert true to form – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/23/spineless-leaders-always-revert-true-to-formthey-cave-and-israels-leaders-are-its-poster-boys-addendum-to-israels-ship-of-fools-led-by-delusional-leadership-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …imperiling those they are tasked to protect. Damn them.

As such, Netanyahu’s cease/death fire is soon to blow up in Israel’s face – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/16/pm-netanyahus-cease-fire-and-its-deadly-results-soon-to-blow-up-in-israels-face-addendum-to-spineless-leaders-revert-true-to-form-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …but not before he gives them breathing room to rebuild and regroup – www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4325036,00.html?fb_action_ids=10151221459084317&fb_action_types=og.recommends&fb_source=timeline_og&action_object_map=%7B%2210151221459084317%22%3A321614451287905%7D&action_type_map=%7B%2210151221459084317%22%3A%22og.recommends%22%7D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D.

In light of the above, Professor Louis Rene Beres’s prescient warnings take on ever greater urgency, as he outlines two ways Israel can deter a nuclear Iran – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/16/two-ways-israel-can-deter-a-nuclear-iran-by-professor-louis-beres-my-mentor-decision-time-is-imminent/.

Ever the patient Professor, he lays out his non-paralleled wisdom regarding nuclear warfare doctrine – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/06/professor-louis-beres-his-non-paralleled-wisdom-re-nuclear-warfare-doctrine-addendum-to-two-ways-israel-can-deter-a-nuclear-iran-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …a task barely a handful in the world are capable of executing.

In tandem, he builds the underlying basis for a lawful preemption under international law –  adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/15/irans-wmd-genocidal-project-oxford-university-press-highlights-professor-louis-rene-beres-my-mentor-the-legal-basis-for-pre-emption-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …despite the blathering and dithering of those who posit otherwise. Most significantly, they have NO legal legs to stand on. They are floating in their ignorance.

With the above firmly in mind it is becoming increasingly clear that PM Netanyahu hitched Israel’s security to Obama’s “guarantees”; via an administration which has little interest, nor inclination, to do what must be done. As such, Israel’s PM wasted precious time, four years to be exact, to execute Israel’s “do or die” pre-emptive action.

But this is not to say that Israel will (heaven forbid) cease to exist, the day after Iran’s Hitlerite regime joins the “nuclear club’. But it does mean, for all intents and purposes, that a bolt out of the blue can come at their time of choosing; aliyah will dry up; and those who can most afford to leave the country will do so, not immediately but in the long-term.

‘Where are Obama and Netanyahu’s nuclear clocks?’

DEBKAfile Special Report December 26, 2012, 10:00

Iran's nuclear clock is ticking. Is anyone listening?
Iran’s nuclear clock is ticking. Is anyone listening?

Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his deputy, Strategic Affairs Minister Moshe Yaalon, suddenly woke up Tuesday, Dec. 25, when at the launch of their Likud-Beitenu election campaign, they were asked what had happened to the dire Iranian nuclear threat. “It will soon be back in the headlines,” they said. “Not a day goes by without it receiving our attention,” said sources close to the prime minister. “The nuclear clock is still ticking” – and it is fact that National Security Adviser Yaacov Amidror has made several recent trips to Washington to discuss the issue with American colleagues. “Now we are waiting for Barack Obama to form his new government,” Yaalon remarked.
But Obama and his government will only be sworn in on January 21, and the next day Israel itself goes to the polls. On past performance, an incoming Israel prime minister takes weeks, if not months, to assemble a new government. Iran has therefore been given the gift of at least three months to play with before either administration is ready for strategic decision-making with regard to preemptive action against its nuclear program. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei can therefore rest easy until the late spring of 2013.

Dennis Ross, Obama’s former adviser on Iran, who is well versed in White House thinking and has good access to the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem, said in an interview Monday that, for the moment, the Iranians “are not convinced we are prepared to use force.” Speaking to the Jackson Diehl of the Washington Post, Ross said he believed 2013 would be the critical year.
DEBKAfile connects this remark to a comment President Obama made while campaigning for reelection: He spoke of Iran attaining “breakout capacity” next year – a development which must be prevented, because it means, “we would not be able to intervene in time to stop their nuclear program.”
For breakout capacity, Iran would have to acquire the materials – highly-enriched uranium and components for a weapon – and the knowhow to build nuclear weapons quickly if it is so decided. A decision could be too fast for US intelligence, or presumably Israel, to catch in time to take action. It was this eventuality which Obama said must be prevented.

The current situation poses two problems. Although the US president has often expressed his determination to prevent Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon, he has never explained how he would achieve this, or promised to use force if nothing else availed. The other problem is that, according to DEBKAfile’s intelligence and Iranian sources, Tehran has already reached “breakout capacity.”

This phrase has therefore become a convenient slogan for delayed action, another red line to be missed, like the ones set by Netanyahu in his cartoon presentation to the UN Assembly last September, such as 20-percent enriched uranium.
Khamenei has rejected the stipulations the United States laid down in the secret direct negotiations held earlier this month for settling the controversy over Iran’s nuclear program. And there are no signs he is worried about repercussions. The only true words about the current stalemate were heard from Dennis Ross, that the Iranians “are not convinced we are prepared to use force.” The rest is spin.

www.debka.com/article/22636/Where-are-Obama-and-Netanyahu-s-nuclear-clocks-

And this too, reported by DEBKA  – “Iran Loses Its Fear of Military Attack
Its nuclear weapon program will bear first fruit by the end of 2012″.

IF there ever was a time that one hopes (and prays) to be proven wrong, this is it, albeit at the bewitching hour. But preferring to live in reality has always been a preferred way of life, and changing course is hardly a rational foot forward.

And even though it appeared inconceivable, even a few months back, that any (so called) Zionist leader of Israel would hue to Washington’s dictates in a matter of such grave national consequence, this track of thinking is no longer a given. Quite the opposite.

As such, their spin stops here. 

DHS & America’s Planned Deconstruction Via Valerie Jarrett: Domestically & Foreign Policy-Wise…Addendum To: Barack Hussein Obama’s Deconstruction Plans…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Laboring over several inter-related commentaries, detailing the (purposeful) deconstruction of the U.S. economy, in tandem with gun control, has not been for nothing. These efforts center around information gifted to this blogger from highly proven investigative journalists; work which is directly tied into investigating said destruction.

And, when one sees more than enough interlocking trails leading from sources, to info related publicly by Northeast Intelligence Network, then little more proof is required, at least on this end. Those who deal ‘within the fray’ also know that events don’t have to play out exactly how first described, but if the end result is the same this is all that actually matters.

So, recall the droppings posted, when aforementioned deconstruction plans centered on a “green” economy and a disarmed citizenry – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/07/barack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-green-wise-via-the-economy-disarming-the-citizens-via-gun-control-connecting-the-dots-addendum-to-the-second-term-plans-of-an-obama-presidency-c/.  

Then, head onto the second term plans of an Obama presidency – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/19/shoring-up-barack-hussein-obamas-second-term-plans-addendum-tobarack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-green-wise-via-the-economy-disarming-the-citizens-via-gun-control-commentary-by-ad/ …found herein.  

And, hop onto the first outing of Valerie Jarrett and the revelations concerning her communist leanings – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/17/valerie-jarretts-communist-leanings-why-she-matters-serving-as-barack-hussein-obamas-alter-ego-cementing-the-redgreen-alliance-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …detailing why she matters.

Thus, tying her into her boss’s familial and ideological bindings – adinakutnicki.com/2012/09/28/valerie-jarrett-barack-hussein-obamas-communisthidden-hand-familial-ideological-ties-that-bind-addendum-to-valerie-jarretts-communist-leanings-why-she-matters-commentary-by-adina/.    

Alas, their danger is so great, they are capable of upending western civilization, as we all know it – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/02/valerie-jarrett-her-mischief-making-capable-of-upending-western-civilization-the-unofficial-buck-startsstops-at-her-door-addendum-to-barack-hussein-obamas-hidden-hand-commentary-by-a/ but, then read the following jaw dropper…given the “kosher” stamp of approval from inside this American-Israeli’s tent too.

Yet, those who prefer to shut their eyes, please stop reading here. Its length necessitates an open mind, including those who aren’t afraid to be tarred “conspiracy” theorists. Truth is often stranger than fiction.

‘The latest from “DHS Insider”

Doug Hagmann, December 25, 2012, Canada Free Press

“Introduction: After a lengthy, self-imposed informational black-out, my high-level DHS contact known as “Rosebud” emerged with new, non-public information about plans being discussed and prepared for implementation by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in the near future. It is important to note that this black-out was directly related to the aggressive federal initiative of identifying and prosecuting “leakers,” at least those leaks and leakers not sanctioned by the executive office—the latter of which there are many.

Due to those circumstances, my source exercised an abundance of caution to avoid compromising a valuable line of communication until he had information he felt wassignificant enough to risk externalcontact. The following information is the result of an in-person contact between this author and “Rosebud” within the last 48 hours. With his permission, the interview was digitally recorded and the relevant portions of the contact are provided in a conversational format for easierreading. The original recording was copied onto multiple discs and are maintained in secure locations for historical and insurance purposes.

Meeting: The following began after an exchange of pleasantries and other unrelated discussion:

DH: Do I have your permission to record this conversation?

RB: You do.

DH: I’ve received a lot of e-mail from people wondering where you went and why you’ve been so quiet.

RB: As I told you earlier, things are very dicey. Weird things began to happen before the election and have continued since. Odd things, a clampdown of sorts. I started looking and I found [REDACTED AT THE REQUEST OF THIS SOURCE], and that shook me up. I’m not the only one, though, that found a [REDACTED], so this means there’s surveillance of people within DHS by DHS. So, that explains this cloak and dagger stuff for this meeting.

DH: I understand. What about the others?

RB: They are handling it the same way.

DH: I’ve received many e-mails asking if you are the same person giving information to Ulsterman. Are you?

RB: No, but I think I know at least one of his insiders.

DH: Care to elaborate?

RB: Sorry, no.

DH: Do you trust him or her. I mean, the Ulsterman source?

RB: Yes.

DH: Okay, so last August, you said things were “going hot.” I printed what you said, and things did not seem to happen as you said.

RB: You’d better recheck your notes and compare [them] with some of the events leading up to the election. I think you’ll find that a full blown campaign of deception took place to make certain Obama got back into office. The polls, the media, and a few incidents that happened in the two months before the election. I guess if people are looking for some big event they can point to and say “aha” for verification, well then I overestimated people’s ability to tell when they are being lied to.

DH: What specific incidents are you referring to?

RB: Look at the threats to Obama. Start there. The accusations of racism. Then look at the polls, and especially the judicial decisions about voter ID laws. Bought and paid for, or where there was any potential for problems, the judges got the message, loud and clear. Then look at the voter fraud. And not a peep from the Republicans. Nothing. His second term was a done deal in September. This was planned. Frankly, the Obama team knew they had it sewn up long before Election Day. Benghazi could have derailed them, but the fix was in there, so I never saw anything on my end to suggest a ready-made solution had to be implemented.

DH: What’s going on now?

RB: People better pay close attention over the next few months. First, there won’t be any meaningful deal about the fiscal crisis. This is planned, I mean, the lack of deal is planned. In fact, it’s necessary to pave the way for what is in the short term agenda.

DH: Wait, you’re DHS—not some Wall Street insider.

RB: So you think they are separate agendas? That’s funny. The coming collapse of the U.S. dollar is a done deal. It’s been in the works for years—decades, and this is one of the most important cataclysmic events that DHS is preparing for. I almost think that DHS was created for that purpose alone, to fight Americans, not protect them, right here in America. But that’s not the only reason. There’s the gun issue too.

DH: So, what are you seeing at DHS?

RB: We don’t have a lot of time, tonight—our meeting—as well as a country. I mean I have heard—with my own ears—plans being made that originate from the White House that involve the hierarchy of DHS. You gotta know how DHS works at the highest of levels. It’s Jarrett and Napolitano, with Jarrett organizing all of the plans and approaches. She’s the one in charge, at least from my point of view, from what I am seeing. Obama knows that’s going on and has say, but it seems that Jarrett has the final say, not the other way around. It’s [screwed] up. This really went into high gear since the election.

But it’s a train wreck at mid management, but is more effective at the lower levels. A lot of police departments are being gifted with federal funds with strings attached. That money is flowing out to municipal police departments faster than it can be counted. They are using his money to buy tanks, well, not real tanks, but you know what I mean. DHS is turning the police into soldiers.

By the way, there has been a lot of communication recently between Napolitano and Pistole [TSA head]. They are planning to use TSA agents in tandem with local police for certain operations that are being planned right now. This is so [deleted] important that you cannot even begin to imagine. If you get nothing else out of this, please, please make sure you tell people to watch the TSA and their increasing involvement against the American public. They are the stooges who will be the ones to carry out certain plans when the dollar collapses and the gun confiscation begins.

DH: Whoa, wait a minute. You just said a mouthful. What’s the agenda here?

RB: Your intelligence insider—he knows that we are facing a planned economic collapse. You wrote about this in your articles about Benghazi, or at least that’s what I got out of the later articles. So why the surprise?

DH: There’s a lot here. Let’s take it step by step if you don’t mind.

RB: Okay, but I’m not going to give it to you in baby steps. Big boy steps. This is what I am hearing. Life for the average American is going to change significantly, and not the change people expect. First, DHS is preparing to work with police departments and the TSA to respond to civil uprisings that will happen when there is a financial panic. And there will be one, maybe as early as this spring, when the dollar won’t get you a gumball. I’m not sure what the catalyst will be, but I’ve heard rumblings about a derivatives crisis as well as an oil embargo. I don’t know, that’s not my department. But something is going to happen to collapse the dollar, which has been in the works since the 1990s. Now if it does not happen as soon as this, it’s because there are people, real patriots, who are working to prevent this, so it’s a fluid dynamic. But that doesn’t change the preparations.

And the preparations are these: DHS is prepositioning assets in strategic areas near urban centers all across the country. Storage depots. Armories. And even detainment facilities, known as FEMA camps. FEMA does not even know that the facilities are earmarked for detainment by executive orders, at least not in the traditional sense they were intended. By the way, people drive by some of these armories every day without even giving them a second look. Commercial and business real estate across the country are being bought up or leased for storage purposes. Very low profile.

Anyway, I am hearing that the plan from on high is to let the chaos play out for a while, making ordinary citizens beg for troops to be deployed to restore order. but it’s all organized to make them appear as good guys. That’s when the real head knocking will take place. We’re talking travel restrictions, which should not be a problem because gas will be rationed or unavailable. The TSA will be in charge of travel, or at least be a big part of it. They will be commissioned, upgraded from their current status.

They, I mean Jarrett and Obama as well as a few others in government, are working to create a perfect storm too. This is being timed to coincide with new gun laws.

DH: New federal gun laws?

RB: Yes. Count on the criminalization to possess just about every gun you can think of. Not only restrictions, but actual criminalization of possessing a banned firearm. I heard this directly from the highest of my sources. Plans were made in the 90s but were withheld. Now, it’s a new day, a new time, and they are riding the wave of emotion from Sandy Hook, which, by the way as tragic as it was, well, it stinks to high heaven. I mean there are many things wrong there, and first reports are fast disappearing. The narrative is being changed. Look, there is something wrong with Sandy Hook, but if you write it, you’ll be called a kook or worse.

DH: Sure

RB: But Sandy Hook, there’s something very wrong there. But I am hearing that won’t be the final straw. There will be another if they think it’s necessary.

DH: Another shooting?

RB: Yes.

DH: That would mean they are at least complicit.

RB: Well, that’s one way of looking at it.

DH: Are they? Were they?

RB: Do your own research. Nothing I say, short of bringing you photographs and documents will convince anyone, and even then, it’s like [DELETED] in the wind.

DH: So…

RB: So what I’m telling you is that DHS, the TSA and certain, but not all, law enforcement agencies are going to be elbow deep in riot control in response to an economic incident. At the same time or close to it, gun confiscation will start. It will start on a voluntary basis using federal registration forms, then an amnesty, then the kicking-in of doors start.

Before or at the same time, you know all the talk of lists, you know, the red and blue lists that everyone made fun of? Well they exist, although I don’t know about their colors. But there are lists of political dissidents maintained by DHS. Names are coordinated with the executive branch, but you know what? They did not start with Obama. They’ve been around in one form or another for years. The difference though is that today, they are much more organized. And I’ll tell you that the vocal opponents of the politics of the global elite, the bankers, and the opponents of anything standing in their way, well, they are on the top of the list of people to be handled.

DH: Handled?

RB: As the situations worsen, some might be given a chance to stop their vocal opposition. Some will, others won’t. I suppose they are on different lists. Others won’t have that chance. By that time, though, it will be chaos and people will be in full defensive mode. They will be hungry, real hunger like we’ve never experienced before. They will use our hunger as leverage. They will use medical care as leverage.

DH: Will this happen all at once?

RB: They hope to make it happen at the same time. Big cities first, with sections being set apart from the rest of the country. Then the rural areas. There are two different plans for geographical considerations. But it will all come together.

DH: Wait, this sounds way, way over the top. Are you telling me… [Interrupts]

RB: [Over talk/Unintelligible] …know who was selected or elected twice now. You know who his associates are. And you are saying this is way over the top? Don’t forget what Ayers said – you talked to Larry Grathwohl. This guy is a revolutionary. He does not want to transform our country in the traditional sense. He will destroy it. And he’s not working alone. He’s not working for himself, either. He has his handlers. So don’t think this is going to be a walk in the park, with some type of attempt to rescue the country. Cloward-Piven. Alinsky. Marx. All rolled into one. And he won’t need the rest of his four years to do it.

DH: I need you to be clear. Let’s go back again, I mean, to those who speak out about what’s happening.

RB: [Edit note: Obviously irritated] How much clearer do you want it? The Second Amendment will be gone, along with the first, at least practically or operationally. The Constitution will be gone, suspended, at least in an operational sense. Maybe they won’t actually say that they are suspending it, but will do it. Like saying the sky is purple when it’s actually blue. How many people will look at the sky and say yeah, it’s purple? They see what they want to see.

So the DHS, working with other law enforcement organizations, especially the TSA as it stands right now, will oversee the confiscation of assault weapons, which includes all semi-automatic weapons following a period of so-called amnesty. It also includes shotguns that hold multiple rounds, or have pistol grips. They will go after the high capacity magazines, anything over, say 5 rounds.

They will also go after the ammunition, especially at the manufacturer’s level. They will require a special license for certain weapons, and make it impossible to own anything. More draconian than England. This is a global thing too. Want to hunt? What gives you the right to hunt their animals? Sound strange? I hope so, but they believe they own the animals. Do you understand now, how sick and twisted this is? Their mentality?

The obvious intent is to disarm American citizens. They will say that we’ll still be able to defend ourselves and go hunting, but even that will be severely regulated. This is the part that they are still working out, though. While the plans were made years ago, there is some argument over the exact details. I know that Napalitano, even with her support of the agenda, would like to see this take place outside of an E.O. [Executive Order] in favor of legislative action and even with UN involvement.

DH: But UN involvement would still require legislative approval.

RB: Yes, but you’re still thinking normal – in normal terms. Stop thinking about a normal situation. The country is divided, which is exactly where Obama wants us to be. We are as ideologically divided as we were during the Civil War and that rift is growing every day. Add in a crisis – and economic crisis – where ATM and EBT cards will stop working. Where bank accounts will contain nothing but air. They are anticipating a revolution and a civil war rolled into one (emphasis added by this author).

Imagine when talk show hosts or Bloggers or some other malcontent gets on the air or starts writing about the injustice of it all, and about how Obama is the anti-Christ or something. They will outlaw such talk or writing as inciting the situation – they will make it illegal by saying that it is causing people to die. The Republicans will go along with everything as it’s – we have – a one party system. Two parties is an illusion. It’s all so surreal to talk about but you see where this is headed, right?

DH: Well, what about the lists?

RB: Back to that again, okay. Why do you think the NSA has surveillance of all communications? To identify and stop terrorism? Okay, to be fair, that is part of it, but not the main reason. The federal agencies have identified people who present a danger to them and their agendas. I don’t know if they are color coded like you mentioned, red, blue, purple or peach mango or whatever, but they exist. In fact, each agency has their own. You know, why is it so [deleted] hard for people to get their heads around the existence of lists with names of people who pose a threat to their plans? The media made a big deal about Nixon’s enemies list and everyone nodded and said yeah, that [deleted], but today? They’ve been around for years and years.

DH: I think it’s because of the nature of the lists today. What do they plan to do with their enemies?

RB: Go back to what Ayers said when, in the late 60s? 70s? I forget. Anyway, he was serious. But to some extent, the same thing that happened before. They – the people on some of these lists – are under surveillance, or at least some, and when necessary, some are approached and made an offer. Others, well, they can be made to undergo certain training. Let’s call it sensitivity training, except on a much different level. Others, most that are the most visible and mainstream are safe for the most part. And do you want to know why? It’s because they are in the pockets of the very people we are talking about, but they might or might not know it. Corporate sponsorship – follow the money. You know the drill. You saw it happen before, with the birth certificate.

It’s people that are just under the national radar but are effective. They have to worry. Those who have been publicly marginalized already but continue to talk or write or post, they are in trouble. It’s people who won’t sell out, who think that they can make a difference. Those are the people who have to worry.

Think about recent deaths that everybody believes were natural or suicides. Were they? People are too busy working their [butts] off to put food on the table to give a damn about some guy somewhere who vapor locks because of too many doughnuts and coffee and late nights. And it seems plausible enough to happen. This time, when everything collapses, do you think they will care if it is a bullet or a heart attack that takes out the opposition? [Deleted] no.

DH: That’s disturbing. Do you… [interrupts]

RB: Think about the Oklahoma City bombing in ‘95. Remember how Clinton blamed that on talk radio, or at least in part. Take what happened then and put it in context of today. Then multiply the damnation by 100, and you will begin to understand where this is going. People like Rush and Hannity have a narrow focus of the political theater. They’ll still be up and running during all of this to allow for the appearance of normal. Stay within the script, comrade.

But as far as the others, they have certain plans. And these plans are becoming more transparent. They are getting bolder. They are pushing lies, and the bigger the lie, the easier it is to sell to the people. They will even try to sell a sense of normalcy as things go absolutely crazy and break down. It will be surreal. And some will believe it, think that it’s only happening in certain places, and we can draw everything back once the dust settles. But when it does, this place will not be the same.

DH: Will there be resistance within the ranks of law enforcement? You know, will some say they won’t go along with the plan, like the Oath Keepers?

RB: Absolutely. But they will not only be outnumbered, but outgunned – literally. The whole objective is to bring in outside forces to deal with the civil unrest that will happen in America. And where does their allegiance lie? Certainly not to Sheriff Bob. Or you or me.

During all of this, and you’ve got to remember that the dollar collapse is a big part of this, our country is going to have to be redone. I’ve seen – personally – a map of North America without borders. Done this year. The number 2015 was written across the top, and I believe that was meant as a year. Along with this map – in the same area where this was – was another map showing the United States cut up into sectors. I’m not talking about what people have seen on the internet, but something entirely different. Zones. And a big star on the city of Denver.

Sound like conspiracy stuff on the Internet? Yup. But maybe they were right. It sure looks that way. It will read that way if you decide to write about this. Good luck with that. Anyway, the country seemed to be split into sectors, but not the kind shown on the internet. Different.

DH: What is the context of that?

RB: Across the bottom of this was written economic sectors. It looked like a work in progress, so I can’t tell you any more than that. From the context I think it has to do with the collapse of the dollar.

DH: Why would DHS have this? I mean, it seems almost contrived, doesn’t it?

RB: Not really, when you consider the bigger picture. But wait before we go off into that part. I need to tell you about Obamacare, you know, the new health care coming up. It plays a big part – a huge [deleted] part in the immediate reshaping of things.

DH: How so?

RB: It creates a mechanism of centralized control over people. That’s the intent of this monster of a bill, not affordable health care. And it will be used to identify gun owners. Think your health records are private? Have you been to the doctor lately? Asked about owning a gun? Why do you think they ask, do you think they care about your safety? Say yes to owning a gun and your information is shared with another agency, and ultimately, you will be identified as a security risk. The records will be matched with other agencies.

You think that they are simply relying on gun registration forms? This is part of data collection that people don’t get. Oh, and don’t even think about getting a script for some mood enhancement drug and being able to own a gun.

Ayers and Dohrn are having the times of their lives seeing things they’ve worked for all of their adult lives actually coming to pass. Oh, before I forget, look at the recent White House visitor logs.

DH: Why? Where did that come from?

RB: Unless they are redacted, you will see the influence of Ayers. Right now. The Weather Underground has been reborn. So has their agenda.

DH: Eugenics? Population control?

RB: Yup. And re-education camps. But trust me, you write about this, you’ll be called a kook. It’s up to you, it’s your reputation, not mine. And speaking about that, you do know that this crew is using the internet to ruin people, right? They are paying people to infiltrate discussion sites and forums to call people like you idiots. Show me the proof they say. Why doesn’t you source come forward? If he knows so much, why not go to Fox or the media? To them, if it’s not broadcast on CNN, it’s not real. Well, they’ve got it backwards. Very little on the news is real. The stock market, the economy, the last presidential polls, very little is real.

But this crew is really internet savvy. They’ve got a lot of people they pay to divert issues on forums, to mock people, to marginalize them. They know what they’re doing. People think they’ll take sites down – hack them. Why do that when they are more effective to infiltrate the discussion? Think about the birth certificate, I mean the eligibility problem of Obama. Perfect example.

DH: How soon do you see things taking place?

RB: They already are in motion. If you’re looking for a date I can’t tell you. Remember, the objectives are the same, but plans, well, they adapt. They exploit. Watch how this fiscal cliff thing plays out. This is the run-up to the next big economic event.

I can’t give you a date. I can tell you to watch things this spring. Start with the inauguration and go from there. Watch the metals, when they dip. It will be a good indication that things are about to happen. I got that little tidbit from my friend at [REDACTED].

NOTE: At this point, my contact asked me to reserve further disclosures until after the inauguration.”

www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52005

There are reasons why people often feel as if their hair is standing on end, especially when danger is around the corner. And, there needn’t be a neon sign guiding ones way either.

For it should be enough to trust your reliable instincts, especially in tandem with a willingness to step outside the comfort zone.Thus, realizing when ones “lying” eyes are telling the truth.

This is one of those times.

UPDATE: re the part played by Billy-boy Ayers, yes, the domestic terrorist, head of the Weathermen – http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/bringing_down_america_a_review.html take it to the bank.

The Leader of the Free World Helps Install Shariah Law: The Mid East & Beyond…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Few can argue that Assad is a butcher, as he takes his orders from his paymasters in Iran’s Hitlerite regime. But before a super power rearranges the Middle East decks, it behooves its leaders to have American interests at the forefront. 

But instead of tempering the already precarious balance of power between Syria’s splintered minorities – most especially its deeply imperiled Christian population – the Islamist-in-Chief has other designs in mind, thus, fanning its flames into a full fledged civil war, onto the brink of a World War.

The point being, without his unlawful war in Libya, the so called ‘rebels’ (its front runners being Al Qaeda offshoots) wouldn’t have a pot to piss in, in a manner of speaking. And it is through his illegal weapons/gun running operation that a general jockeying for power in Syria became a powder keg in the Mid East, chemical weapons and all – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/25/the-coming-encirclement-of-syria-six-of-one-half-a-dozen-of-another-addendum-to-islamists-are-bloodthirsty-whatever-their-stripes-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

So World War 3 is not off the table, as place markers are set for its opening shots – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/07/world-war-3s-place-markers-set-up-through-barack-hussein-obamas-mid-east-fires-addendum-to-northeast-intelligence-network-posits-a-direct-nexus-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

But it still begs the question, what’s the end goal? Look no further than Shariah Law and its implementation all over the Mid East & beyond, ‘coincidentally’ under Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s watchful eyes…and this ain’t rocket science.

‘More Rocket Science: Syrian Rebels announce plans to implement Sharia when Assad falls’

by  on DECEMBER 24, 2012 

Those who were adamant that Bashar al-Assad should be removed (John McCain and Lindsey Graham, for example) have some ‘splaining to do.

Via Digital Journal:

Jabhat Al Nusra has emerged as the most powerful fighting group amidst the Syrian rebel opposition. The Islamist group has outlined its plans to impose sharia law once President Assad is ousted.

Sheikh Abu Ahmed, military commander of Jabhat Al Nusra, spoke with a reporter from the National. The Salafist leader said: “Our first goal is to get rid of Assad. Then we want a state where the Quran is the only source of law. Sharia is the right path for all humanity – all other laws make people unhappy.”

His vision of Syria under sharia is sure to make the populace happy, with alcohol, tobacco, cinema and immoral television shows banned. Ahmed claimed the people “will get used to it eventually.”

“The threat of Islam is predicted all over the Bible, read and study Walid Shoebat’s incredible work that explains all. Click here for more information.”

Now for the lie of 2012…

Abu Ahmed also said the minority groups including Christians and Alawites will have nothing to fear under sharia law. However, Christians in Syria are alarmed, fearing their religious freedoms will be abolished, Persecution.Org reported.

Of course! Just ask Egypt’s Copts.

Western leadership is completely vacuous.”

shoebat.com/2012/12/24/more-rocket-science-syrian-rebels-announce-plans-to-implement-sharia-when-assad-falls/

It is beyond dispute, the Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. has become the Mid East’s Pyromaniac-in-Chief, right along this blogger’s borders too. And for that, plus so much more, he must be held to account – legally, of course!

And, when Obama & gang babble about democracy taking root in this Muslim country or that, recall that Shariah Law is the antithesis to democratic, free principles via its totalitarian underpinnings in Islam – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/13/islam-blood-a-groundbreaking-policy-paper-contained-herein-the-world-stands-on-a-precipice-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-109/…and inextricably linked to blood !

Domestic Terrorist, Bill Ayers (Educator Too!), Exhorts Control Over The Kiddies…Addendum To: First They Came For The Kiddies…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

It doesn’t often happen that ones primary thesis is supported via the “horse’s mouth”. And those who are familiar with this blog’s commentaries are up to speed on the left’s penchant for capturing the hearts and minds of the kiddies.

At the same time, a parallel emphasis is placed on their symbiotic relationship with Islamists (“Red/Green Alliance”), who are Allah-bent on indoctrinating the “infidel” youth. Interesting. Quite a “coinquidink”.

Now, even those who are first time readers (of this blog) are generally familiar with “Billy boy Ayers” and his connection to the Radical-in-Chief. Although the Liar-in-Chief coins the domestic terrorist just a “guy from the neighborhood” we all know better – https://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/21/billy-boy-ayers-aka-weathermen-terrorist-too-affirms-his-connection-to-obama-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/. Obama spins the bull crap like every inveterate liar…bobbing and weaving as he goes along. No matter.

For a recap, the Ayers family was intimately involved with young Obama, even before most Americans learned hide nor hare of him – www.wnd.com/2012/03/postman-ayers-family-put-foreigner-obama-through-school/….and others, from the Islamic side, continued his educational financing through law school – www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/12/percy_sutton_dies_his_obama_re.html…   sort of like a “made man”.

Regardless, why is this noteworthy? Let this American-Israeli count the ways. Harping on this and that is not for nothing, and the video found below will bring matters full circle. But first the primary thesis must be reiterated to understand its depth.

AGAIN, let there be NO doubt that Barack HUSSEIN Obama received his primary trajectory into politics, deeply intertwined with Ayers, so much so that unrepentant terrorist Billy held a fundraiser to launch his political career – freedomslighthouse.net/2011/11/29/new-video-shows-what-obama-has-long-denied-william-ayers-admitting-he-held-an-obama-fundraiser-in-his-home-at-launch-of-obamas-political-career-video/. Oh me, oh my….the company one keeps.

And now that that’s settled, it is imperative to note whom the Radical-in-Chief tasked to be his “safe schools” czar….twisted doesn’t even begin to describe it – www.thegatewaypundit.com/2009/12/breaking-obamas-safe-schools-czar-is-promoting-porn-in-the-classroom-kevin-jennings-and-the-glsen-reading-list/…as a diddler became his czar of choice.

But the ultimate relevance lies in a preponderance of evidence, proving that leftist radicals are circling for TOTAL control over the kiddies. And Billy boy and wifey Dohrn (also a domestic terrorist), having escaped the long-arm of American justice, then turned their attention to the youngsters, amply demonstrated in ‘Bill Ayers and His Subversion of Education’. They came to the conclusion that the subversion of education is more effective, than scores of their (previous) bombs to upend America – www.americanthinker.com/2008/04/bill_ayers_and_the_subversion.html. The evolution and revolution of leftist thinking is duly evidenced within this blog’s recent book review – http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/bringing_down_america_a_review.html.

And leftist dogma is the same world over, even as Israel’s leftists attempt to indoctrinate generations of students into aligning with their enemies – adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/01/leftist-dogma-the-same-world-over-freedom-loving-people-beware-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-32-2/.

As indicated from the onset, the left and Islamic indoctrinators are knee deep in charging after the children, and they operate separately but also in tandem, as necessary – adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/25/first-they-came-for-the-kiddies-well-heeledknown-prep-school-philips-exeter-academytrucks-with-terrorists-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

But their main thrust is: destroy any and all vestiges of American ethos by the time they graduate, whether from high school or university, and this is where their ideologies morph – adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/21/the-paradox-pitfalls-of-liberal-democracies-in-a-time-of-immoral-relativism-the-havoc-wrought-by-leftist-academia-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …no stone left unturned.

‘Bill Ayers: Left Must Utilize Its ‘Absolute Access’ To America’s Classrooms’-Video

DECEMBER 22, 2012 BY 
Audaciously, as the left is going ballistic over the horrific massacre in Newtown, they have the absolute temerity to exhort their over the top concern for America’s children. Alas, these are the same monsters who are in bed with Ayers and with pedophile Kevin Jennings, and others of similarly dangerous backgrounds.

Most intrinsically, none of the above is about caring for America’s children, but all of it is about controlling generations to come. And it is not as if they have a leg to stand on to deny said charges. Again, straight from the “horse’s mouth”!

Benghazigate’s Practiced Liars…Via A Long & Bloody History…Addendum To: The Nexus Between Cover Ups…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Not unlike garden variety criminals government thugs generally leave a trail, but hardly wake up one morning and aim for broke. They start incrementally by testing the waters, gradually upping the ante. Indeed, they expect their crimes to remain undetected, especially if they have the weight of the White House to execute them. All manner of devastation is within their reach. Ahh…the infinite possibilities. The art of the possible.

And when one is a practiced thug (this one prefers her dreary pants suits…she really ought to up her fashion sense…but in the scheme of things this is the least of her problems), serving either as a spouse to a Liar-in-Chief or as a main underling to one, imagine the prospects for mischief. A radical leftist’s, Islamist loving, Shariah admiring piggy bank. 

As such, even though Benghazigate’s crimes ultimately land at the Commander-in-Chief’s doorstep, Hill’s fingerprints are indelibly demarcated, in tandem with Huma Abedin’s Brotherhood/Sisterhood designs. Thus, leading from here, back to Fort Marcy Park (video below) and onward. 

As Huma Abedin, Hill’s gal pal, climbed her boss’s ladder (and no, this is not meant to be a double entendre…get your minds out of you know where) she landed her BFF into the Islamic muck, exploding even as this is written  – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/07/spotlight-on-huma-abedin-islamist-infiltration-in-washington-arabmuslim-world-turning-up-the-heat-via-bengazigate-addendum-to-hillary-takes-the-fall-but-there-is-a-silver-lining-sp/Friendship should only go so far, one would think.

But if one meets their match, in all ways which matter, then it is only fair to share the blame when things go asunder adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/18/hillary-takes-the-fall-for-the-potus-in-bengazigate-but-there-is-a-silver-lining-shining-the-spotlight-on-huma-abedin-addendum-to-uncovering-the-tip-of-huma-abedins-spear-the-house-of-al-sa/Partners in crime. Spread the booty and the punishment too.

Alas, Sec of State’s practiced/accomplished liarette stonewalled here and there, but even her so called concussion will only last so long…the marvels of modern medicine – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/19/hillarys-benghazigate-stonewall-will-she-or-wont-she-testify-that-is-the-question-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ …but getting to the truth depends on whether or not Congressional investigators let her parse the meaning of ‘is’. Time will tell.

And if they need any assistance in their quantum leaps in logic they can study the following, how best to deconstruct from one cover up to another – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/21/the-nexus-between-cover-ups-benghazigate-mirror-image-of-fast-furious-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/…will offer considerable services pro bono…free of charge. A patriot’s duty. No thanks required.

Readers, you have earned your walk from Fort Marcy Park to Benghazi, if your head isn’t still spinning.

‘From Fort Marcy Park to Benghazi: Following the bloody footprints’ – Northeast intelligence Network, Douglas Hagmann

21 December 2012: Cover-ups reveal much about the crimes they are meant to shield, as do the people behind them. Therefore, it is only natural that from an investigator’s view that the people involved in any criminal conspiracy to cover-up death and murder be looked at very carefully. Certain patterns of criminal conduct emerge upon closer scrutiny, and parallels between the death or murder of individuals may be identified by thorough investigation.

Within the last 20 years, two high ranking U.S. government officials and a number of others related to their deaths met their untimely demise, yet legitimate investigations into these deaths were intentionally thwarted, investigators were deliberately misdirected, and as a result, the dead and their loved ones have been denied justice.

I am citing the cases of Vince Foster, the highest ranking government official to die under extremely suspicious circumstances since the 1963 assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy, and the deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Glen Dougherty, Tyrone Woods and Sean Smith. Ambassador Stevens was the first ambassador to be murdered since 1979. Nearly two decades separates the deaths of Foster and Stevens, but one common factor – or person –  figures prominently into both cases: Hillary Rodham Clinton.

In my professional experience as an investigator of nearly 30 years in the private sector, I have investigated numerous “suspicious deaths” for insurance companies that were on the hook for millions of dollars in life insurance proceeds that depended upon the outcome of my investigations. Few things motivate getting at the truth more than such financial exposure, except the need of family members to learn the truth so they may allow their loved ones to rest in peace and find the closure necessary to allow them to move on.  From the beltway to Benghazi, justice for the dead continues to be denied.

At the epicenter of this denial of justice is Hillary Rodham Clinton. The more things change, the more they seem to stay the same. So does the playbook of obstruction, obfuscation, lies and damn lies.

Washington and its spawn have evolved into a cesspool of death and corruption right in front of the eyes of the American public. We no longer demand accountability from our elected and appointed leaders, and the dinosaur media serves as nothing less than a facilitator of the cover-ups to the point of criminal conspiracy.

Converging investigations

Veteran investigative journalist Marinka Peschman has dug deep into the troubled lives of Hillary Rodham Clinton and Bill Clinton by bringing a evidence locker of facts to the American public about the 1993 death of Vince Foster and the activities of the Clintons and others as they relate to the cover-up. Ms. Peschman has given the public a unique opportunity to see through the magicians fog of distraction and misdirection in her new book Following Orders, The Death of Vince Foster, White House Lawyer. In tandem with her previous book titled The Whistleblower: How the Clinton White House Stayed in Power to Reemerge in the Obama White House and on the World Stage, this tenacious investigative journalist has done the job the American media refused to do, and many official investigators were prevented from doing.

Ms. Peschman connects important dots that lead from the Clinton White House directly back into the Obama White House. Following this trail, however, requires the unpleasant ask of having to step over the bodies of the dead, something most American journalists apparently have no problem doing.

Even more compelling, perhaps, is the parallels between the cover-up surrounding the 1993 death of Vince Foster to the recent murders in Benghazi. Marinka Peschman has revealed the playbook of deceit that has been in use for the last 20 years, and has done so with exquisite effectives and fine attention to detail.

Yes, there is a connection between the death of Vince Foster and the Benghazi murders, and that connection is found in the cover-up and the people behind it. The perpetrators are still in power, and they are laughing at you and me.

Join The Hagmann & Hagmann Report tonight beginning at 8:00 p.m. ET when we welcome investigative journalist and popular author Marinka Peschman. Walk with us as we follow the bloody footprints that stain the carpets of the White House and expose the criminal conspiracies that exist because “they can.”

www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/7297#more-7297

Even though Hill was Barack’s political foe in 2008, make NO mistake – their penchant for crossing legal lines (akin to too many criminally afflicted lawyers) are just one of their dangerous ties that bind.

A political, criminal cartel which makes the Mafia look like kindergarten chumps. Boy scouts too.

What Happens When UN Thugs Bestow ‘Statehood’ Upon Terrorists?…Addendum To: PA Statehood & Its Violations Of International Law…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The left has an irredeemable obsession with third world thugs; the bloodier their handiwork the more beloved they are. And part of their admiration stems from similarly bent ideologies, fully on board with totalitarian control. If it takes bludgeoning millions to death, so be it.

Recall Anita Dunn’s awesome “respect” for mass killer Mao Tse-tung. This is a woman who served the Radical-in-Chief as a czar too (www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2FVEe7wCzs). What a shocker. And the left’s fealty is so reflexive in nature, she didn’t even temper her loving words, as she waxed poetic from the confines of the White House, as well as on the speaking circuit. Birds of a revolutionary feather.

Yet, there is more to the symbiotic relationship than total control. Both the revolutionary left and UN thugs are particularly anti-American and anti-Israel. They view America as the “Big Satan” and Israel as the “Little Satan”, even as these hateful terms are generally attributed to Arabs/Islamists, heaven forfend not to UN diplos. For crying out loud. We all know that leftists and Islamists have the same underlying leanings/designs as totalitarian killers, although they demur otherwise. And this is the main reason why the “Red/Green alliance” is a match made in hell.

Enter Professor Louis Rene Beres and his incontestable, unrivaled international legal credentials. He patiently, diligently and doggedly explains – to the general public – why the UN’s embrace of Abbas aka Abu Mazen; having been Arafat’s protege; as he learned his deadly craft at the bloodied hands of the godfather of modern terrorism, is in DIRECT violation of international legal dictates/norms by  allowing a PA State into the community of nations. However, when thugs rule the roost in the halls of disrepute, then this is the expected result.

And for the record, the following was penned recently, also highlighting Professor Louis Rene Beres’s sage rendering  – adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/01/pa-statehood-its-violations-of-international-law-u-s-leadership-must-addressadhere-to-legal-constructs-israels-peace-obsessed-too-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

‘Why UN Fiat Won’t Turn Terrorists Into Statesmen’

By: Louis Rene Beres (and it is not for nothing that he is my mentor- adinakutnicki.com/about/)
Published: December 19th, 2012

Louis Rene Beres

“The Palestinian Authority has now succeeded with its deliberate strategy for acquiring incremental statehood at the United Nations. Though this cynical end-run around authoritative international law managed to skirt all critically governing expectations of the Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (The Montevideo Convention, 1934), most states in the UN General Assembly were nonetheless willing to grant the PA nonmember observer state status.

What was not summarily changed, however, were the underlying and deeply embedded inclinations of the PA to commit indiscriminate violence against the innocent. The UN vote won’t automatically turn terrorists into statesmen.

Jurisprudentially, at least, all persisting PA and Hamas expressions of violence against Israeli noncombatants will remain terrorism. From the standpoint of international law, even a now upgraded “Palestine” will be unable to justify serial murder of Israelis as “self-determination.” No matter how hard they might try for more sanitized designations in the UN-altered diplomatic milieu, those Palestinians who continue to identify the willful maiming and execution of Israeli civilians in the name of “national liberation” will still be criminals.

Terrorism is always a crime under international law. To date, whenever Palestinian insurgents have claimed a right to use “any means necessary” because they are victims of an alleged “occupation,” their argument has been contrived. After all, there remain irremediably firm jurisprudential limits on (1) permissible targets of insurgent violence and (2) permissible levels of insurgent violence.

The limited rights of insurgency under international law do not include the intentional firing of rockets at schools and apartments, or the use of nail-filled bombs, lovingly dipped in rat poison. Under even their most generous definition in law, these rights can never supplant the settled rules ofhumanitarian international law, norms that are also known as the law of armed conflict. Nowhere is it written that there are certain political goals so overwhelmingly worthy of implementation that they can permit the willful incineration of infants in their cribs, or children at play.

One needn’t be a professor of international law to understand such an elementary proposition.

From the beginning, supporters of Palestinian terror violence against Israelis have argued passionately that the ends of their insurgency (Palestinian “independence”) justify the means(barbarous attacks upon Jewish civilians). Leaving aside everyday and ordinary ethical standards by which such an argument is already manifestly indecent, the ends can never justify the means under conventional or customary international law. Indeed, for more than two thousand years the binding principles of world law have clearly stipulated that planned violence against the innocent is alwaysrepugnant, and always prohibited.

In contrast, in cases where Israeli counter-terrorism kills or injures Palestinian civilians, these particular harms are unintended and are made necessary by calculated Palestinian placement of rocket launchers among noncombatant populations. Here, from the standpoint of international law, the Palestinian side commits the codified crime of “perfidy,” and is therefore legally responsible for those harms actually inflicted by Israel.

Though fashionable to repeat at cocktail parties, the facile expression “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom-fighter” is an empty witticism, a shallow phrase devoid of any serious legal meaning. While it is true that certain insurgencies can be judged per se lawful (after all, the idea of “just cause” can be found in the Declaration of Independence of the United States), these residually permissible resorts to force must still conform to the longstanding laws of war.

Whenever an insurgent group or “nonmember observer state” resorts to openly unjust means, its actions are unambiguously terroristic. It follows that even if the ritualistic Palestinian claims of a hostile Israeli “occupation” were reasonable rather than invented, their corresponding claim of entitlement to oppose Israel “by any means necessary” would still remain false.

International law has determinable form and content. Its principles and practices cannot be fashioned and re-fashioned by individual terror groups only to satisfy their own presumed geo-political interests. This fact is unchanged by any diplomatic upgrading of the terror group in question.

National liberation movements that fail to meet the test of just means can never be protected as lawful or legitimate. Even if we could somehow accept the intrinsically spurious argument that Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Fatah fulfill the codified criteria of “national liberation,” it is plain that they do not meet the recognizable standards of discrimination, proportionality, and military necessity. These authoritative standards are applicable to insurgent organizations by the common Article 3 of the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, and by the two 1977 Protocols to these Conventions.

They are also binding upon all combatants by virtue of broader customary and conventional international law, including Article 1 of the Preamble to the Fourth Hague Convention of 1907. This rule, called the “Martens Clause,” makes all persons responsible for the “laws of humanity” and for the “dictates of public conscience.”

Under international law, the ends can never justify the means. As in the case of war between states, every use of force by insurgents must be judged twice, once with regard to the justness of the objective (in this case, a Palestinian state ultimately to be built upon the charred ruins of a dismembered Israel), and once with regard to the justness of the particular means used toward achieving that objective.

Enthusiastic murderers of young children are never “freedom fighters.” If, in fact, they were ever entitled to such a designation, we would then have to concede that international law itself was nothing more than a mannerly-veneered authorization for inflicting consummate evil in world affairs.

UN supporters of a Palestinian state continue to presume that “Palestine” will somehow be part of a two-state solution. For these naive believers in “peace,” a new and 23rd Arab state will cheerfully exist side-by-side with the extant Jewish state. Significantly, this kindly presumption is dismissed everywhere in the Arab/Islamic world.

Consider cartography. The official map of Palestine at the PA website includes all of Israel. There is only one state on this map; it is not the state of Israel.

In law, terrorist crimes mandate universal cooperation in both apprehension and punishment. As punishers of “grave breaches” under international law, all states are required to search out and prosecute, or extradite, individual terrorist perpetrators. In absolutely no circumstances are states permitted to characterize terrorists as freedom fighters.

This is emphatically true for the United States, which incorporates all international law as the “supreme law of the land” at Article 6 of the Constitution, and which was formed by the founding fathers according to the timeless principles of Blackstone’s Commentaries and antecedent Natural Law.

As Americans, we have an obligation to avoid expressly specious manipulations of law. Authentic freedom fighters do not make war against office workers, nursery schools, buses, flower markets, or mothers in ice-cream parlors. Until we can accept this most elementary human understanding for the Islamic Middle East, we will run the growing risk of further transforming ghoulish Palestinian gangs into a UN-supported government.

Today, the Palestinian Authority is allowed to call itself a nonmember observer state. Soon, leaders of Hamas will join with their enemies in the PA to make common “national” cause against Israel. When, predictably, they resort yet again to waves of expanding violence against the innocent, they will still be acting as terrorists. Despite their newly dignifying formal status at the UN they will remain, situated and unpunished, at the very outermost margins of civilized international relations.”

 And this is the same terrorist who sent a “condolence” missive to his bud at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave after the horrific massacre in Newtown, as if he “understands” the loss of innocent children – adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/18/pa-prez-abbas-commiserates-with-islamist-in-chief-obama-over-slaughter-of-innocents-

The world has gone off its axis. Its rocker too.