ISRAEL’S “PEACE” OBSESSED LEADERSHIP COMMIT CRIMES AGAINST JEWISH NATIONAL SOVEREIGN RIGHTS, IN CONTRAVENTION OF ITS PENAL CODE !…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 26, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

A person who, with intent that any area be removed from the sovereignty of the state or placed under the sovereignty of a foreign state, commits an act calculated to bring this about, is liable to life imprisonment or the death penalty. – Section 97(b) of the current Penal Code in Israel – under “Treason.”

As to the illegality of releasing terrorists, the U.S. is in breach of the international legal aspect to the Palestinian demand for Israel to free terrorists, and to the US support for this demand. Binding UN Security Council resolution 1373 requires all states to “Deny safe haven to those who finance, plan, support, or commit terrorist acts, or provide safe havens.” In addition, Israel’s leadership are equally in violation of said international binding resolution by bowing to U.S. demands.

IN tandem with the above, there are a slew of laws within Israel’s Penal Code – primarily dealing with Jewish SOVEREIGN rights within Israel – which are violated with impunity by Israel’s leadership on a regular basis, yet propped up under political “necessity”, as if there is no other option but to chop apart the Jewish patrimony – or else. Really. This is the insidious cover under which the leadership hides behind, and opines that it just can’t be helped, as it is in the nation’s “interest” to do “this and that”. How ignorant of the laws of the land do they think its Jewish citizens are? As to the Arabs in Israel, they (mostly) support said lawlessness.

Regardless, there is no getting around this horrific fact. In effect, those who are entrusted to protect the rights/title inherent to the Jewish people’s eternal homeland, are its grossest violators. For even if the Jewish majority wanted to concede parts of Israel, they have NO mandate to do so. NONE at all.

In this regard, let us hark back to yesteryear and take a trip down historical (legal too) memory lane, one which is fully supported within the following legal treatise authored by the (late) preeminent legal scholar, Howard Grief:The Legal Foundation And Borders Of Israel Under International Law: A Treatise on Jewish Sovereignty over the Land of Israel.

“No Jew is at liberty to surrender the right of the Jewish Nation and the Land of Israel to exist.This right is reserved to the Jewish People throughout the generations. Our right to this land, in its entirety, is enduring and eternal and until the coming Redemption, we shall never yield this historic right.” -David Ben-Gurion, 20th Zionist Congress speech, Basel 1937

Believe it or not…

Israel’s Legal Right to Samaria is enshrined in International Law!

A cold, hard look at the law reveals an undeniable if inconvenient (for some) truth: Israel and the Jewish People have full sovereign rights to Judea and Samaria. A fair and objective analysis of the various post-WWI declarations, agreements, decisions and treaties regarding the Question of Palestine (not to be confused with today’s made-up “Palestine” that the “Palestinians” claim as theirs) can only lead to this conclusion.

The most significant of these decisions was the San Remo Resolution of 1920, which recognized the exclusive national Jewish rights to the Land of Israel under international law, on the strength of the historical connection of the Jewish people to the territory previously known as Palestine. The outcome of this declaration gave birth to the “Mandate for Palestine,” an historical League of Nations document that laid down the Jewish legal right to settle anywhere in western Palestine, between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. In fact, in San Remo, the nations of the world had formally obligated themselves not only to establish a Jewish state on the historic Jewish Homeland but also to facilitate its development as well (see Article 6 of the still-binding Mandate for Palestine). This plainly means that today’s Israeli settlements are in fact 100% legal and that the accusation of “occupation” is completely false. Back then, the concept of a “Palestinian People” was unheard of and “Palestine” referred only to a Levantine region and never to an Arab nation or state. Believe it or not.

From San Remo to Samaria: Following the WWI defeat of the Turkish Ottoman Empire, the League of Nations (precursor to the U.N.) decided to divide up the huge landmass of the vanquished Ottomans as follows: a mandate, or trusteeship, for France (Lebanon and Syria) and a mandate for Britain (Iraq and Palestine [comprised of what is today Israel, Gaza, Judea, Samaria and Jordan]). The legal position of the whole of Palestine was clearly defined in several international agreements*, the most important of which was the one adopted in April 1920 at the San Remo Conference, attended by the Principal Allied Powers (Council of Four). It decided to assign the Mandate for Palestine under the League of Nations to Britain. Two years later an agreed text was confirmed by the League and came into operation in September 1923. In Article 2 of that document, the League of Nations declared that
“The Mandatory shall be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and economic conditions as will secure the establishment of the Jewish national home, as laid down in the preamble.”

The preamble clearly stated that
“recognition has hereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.”

It was on this basis that the British Mandate was established. The San Remo Agreement was the last legally binding international decision regarding the rights to what is today known as the West Bank, and thus, according to international law which is still binding to this day, these parts, Judea and Samaria, belong to Israel and the Jewish People, period.

The significance for Israel and the Jewish People of San Remo cannot be overestimated. None other than Chaim Weizman, the Zionist leader of that time, declared:
“The San Remo decision…is the most momentous political event in the whole history of our (Zionist) movement, and, it is perhaps, no exaggeration to say in the whole history of our people since the Exiles”

Moreover, similar evidence was brought forth in the following interview: The Inquisitr Interviews Adina Kutnicki: The Reality Of Life For An Israeli Patriot (May 2013) –

Wolff Bachner: In your own writing, you have been quite outspoken about the Israeli government’s abusive treatment of the Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria (Gaza and the West Bank). They were encouraged by Israel’s leaders to move into the territories after 1967 and build entire communities, but since 2005 they have been uprooted time and time again by the order of the Israeli government.

What is the legal status of Judea and Samaria ? Wasn’t the land promised to Israel in 1924 under the San Remo doctrine, which is considered irrevocable international law under the UN’s founding charter? Isn’t Judea and Samaria actually Jewish land and don’t Israelis have the right to settle in these areas?

Why are Israeli leaders treating their own citizens which such brutality and contempt, as we have seen over and over in the gruesome videos of Israeli soldiers and police viciously assaulting Jewish settlers and destroying their homes with tanks and bulldozers?

Adina Kutnicki: Wolff, you keep hitting them out of the ballpark. Herein lies another lightning rod question which requires much needed edification (and disinfectant) for the general public.

The legal status of Judea and Samaria is currently “disputed” territories, even after Israel recaptured its (San Remo codified) heartland from an annihilatory waged war in 1967. Besides, whatever happened to “the victor goes the spoils” ? Regardless,”occupied” territories has become the accepted lexicon and tragically Israel’s left keeps trotting out the “occupation”, as if it is a truth derived from Sinai. Adding to the crux of the matter, it is absolutely, irrefutably the legal case that San Remo bestowed Palestine to the Jewish people. San Remo bases itself on Article 22 of the League of Nations, as such, ” a sacred trust of civilization” was declared and this Mandate created a Jewish national home in Palestine (incidentally, Palestine is the pejorative name given to Judea by the Roman Emperor Hadrian, over 2,000 years ago, as a reminder of the Philistines, an ancient enemy of the Jewish people). Even more so, the following clause was significantly added: “Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.” The legal case is closed, or so it would seem. But when it comes to Jewish title to their historical, legal, biblical birthright, nothing is as it should be. Up is down and wrong is right. Is it any wonder that evil is now reconstituted as good? For a complete education on the subject I refer the readers to Howard Grief’s (an eminent international legal expert) tour de force ” The Legal Foundation and Borders of Israel Under International Law.” What a fountain of (legal) truth.

As to Israel’s leaders…where to begin? A good place to commence is through a basic understanding of Israel’s political system – an (un)holy mess. In this vein, I penned an op-ed at American Thinker (reprinted at The Jewish Press) entitled ” The Paradox of Israeli Politics: Vote Right, Get Left.” To be precise, due to this glaring paradox, whereby the majority public elects a generally right wing leadership, citizens find themselves governed from the left. The reasons are manifestly beyond the scope of this forum, but a simple google search will direct interested readers to the aforementioned article.

In any case, this dysfunction explains how PM Sharon (and others have followed suit) was able to defy the will of the majority electorate who carried him to victory. Hence, he ordered the unilateral “disengagement” from Gush Katif (aka Gaza) and the northern Shomron, as he directed Israel’s citizen soldiers to bulldoze thriving Jewish communities, all the while over 8,600 lawful, taxpaying citizens were expelled – almost as if by fiat – even defying a referendum in the process. Orwellian. If any other western leadership behaved in such a brutish, non-democratic manner towards its Jewish citizens, well, all hell would have broken loose. Not to be lost in the discussion, had PM Sharon executed the same wholesale destruction towards its Arab citizens, then let’s just say that hell on earth would be more than an apt description. And in memory of the 6th year of said expulsion, another op-ed (“The Bitter Fruits of Disengagement“, August 19, 2011) was penned. It was featured at the Jewish Press and several other media outlets.

The above political pitfalls covers the “how” part of the question, and the “why” segment falls under the general purview of appeasement syndromes, not unlike Stockholm Syndrome. But as related above, its genesis lies in the Oslo “peace” process, thus, the “Oslo Syndrome” is highly applicable.

Wolff Bachner: The Netanyahu government seems dedicated to persecuting Israeli Jews who are Nationalists and believe in a strong Israel. Zionist patriots are prosecuted for hate speech if they say a word that is critical of Palestinians or Israeli officials and Rabbis are arrested for quoting Torah. Jewish homes in Israel proper are being destroyed by the Israeli authorities while Arabs squat and build with impunity on Jewish owned land. Israeli NGO’s accept millions of dollars of foreign money from nations and organizations that are openly hostile to Israel and use the money to defame Israel in the eyes of the world and endanger the lives of Israelis.

No other nation on the planet would tolerate hostile foreign governments undermining their national sovereignty and allow their citizens to accept money from those governments to attack the policies of their own country. Has the government of Israel lost its mind and its Jewish soul?

Is it now a crime in Israel to stand up for your country in the face of endless Muslim / Arab aggression and demand the government stop compromising with people who want to commit genocide against the Jewish people?

Adina Kutnicki: The Netanyahu government is emblematic of the disparate treatment meted out towards nationalist Jews, in contrast to kid glove treatment reserved for leftists and Arabists. It is entirely befuddling to those who are convinced that Israel has a nationalist leadership. While there are nationalists within, the overall policy is far from “right wing”. The left has a stranglehold on the justice/court system (Tzipi Livni, the current AG, is an avowed leftist), and its state prosecutors are beyond the pale. They haven’t met a Jewish nationalist who is not “guilty” and in need of “re-education”. Again, much of this lies within the scope of Israel’s broken parliamentary system of governance, whereby MK’s are not held accountable, hence, the lack of responsibility to a particular constituency.

As a matter of record, on behalf of my work with HONENU Legal Defense Organization – an Israeli non-profit designated to defend Israeli soldiers and citizens, free of charge, from legal traps which ensnare “settlers” and those who support their efforts – a series of investigations ensued. A centerpiece expose’ detailed a stunning indictment of Israel’s General Security Service (GSS), and as a reference point, its equivalent arm in the U.S. is the FBI. Instead of utilizing its frontal assault against a dangerous Arab fifth column, both inside the “green line” and in Judea and Samaria, it expends huge resources to entrap “settlers’, in the expectation that they will give up their defense of the heartland and just go “home” within Israel proper. Good luck with that. “Administrative Detention Orders Against Jewish Nationalists” (October 2011) delineates said internal struggle. Aside from its posting at HONENU, it can be found at the Freeman Center For Strategic Studies/The Freeman Blog. It is not easily digestible, so I apologize in advance for any ensuing heartburn.

I will leave it up to the readers to make their own determination, as to whether the leadership has lost its mind, its Jewish soul or both. It’s not a hard calculus to discern.

But never mind, the leadership’s treachery is executed and conducted under the banner of “political maneuverings”, disguised as diplomatic imperatives, and “what we see from there, you don’t see from here”. Reprobates.

Aside from their oft repeated diplo speak and mumbo jumbo, multiple Israeli governments have egregiously vitiated Israel’s own laws, (with the “peace” process at the forefront, they also violate concrete laws when releasing terrorists, not only in contravention of Israel’s “Basic Laws”, but in the international legal arena too), making nonsense of any semblance of “rule of law”.

As a result, they continually exhibit grave (im)moral bankruptcy, and worse! So, even if they wake up one morning and collectively decide, that ceding the majority of the Jewish heartland is “mandatory” for “peace”, they are STILL not allowed to do so! Manna dropping from the sky couldn’t cover their behinds. End of story. Or so one would believe…

THEREFORE, pay rapt attention to the following column by Dr. Martin Sherman, a close associate; the most incisive strategic policy analyst – bar none – within Israel! Into the fray: Infuriating, insidious, immoral.

Then hop on over herein: Confronting Israel’s Precarious Future: An Interview With Dr. Martin Sherman: Part One. Mind numbing.

In a nutshell, those who are bereft of any semblance of moral and ethical behavior think little of betraying their dead & living, therefore, JEWISH JUSTICE is always denied. Recoil, when thinking how easily legal (not to mention moral) dictates are thrown asunder!

Tragically, aside from the insidious, immoral treachery emanating from Obama Inc., rest assured, Israel’s leaders bear just as close watching, as it is THEIR sworn obligation to protect Israel from said predators!

And if more evidence is required, it important to recognize that the release of CONVICTED Jew-killers is never sanctioned under Israeli law – for political considerations or otherwise – nor under International Law, so much so that the following would hardly come to pass without the leadership’s violations thereof: Terrorist hard core swapped for Gilead Shalit believed orchestrating current Palestinian attacks. So, as a result, any ensuing Jewish blood lands at the leadership’s door. They have become – unwittingly or not – accomplices. Years of terror releases surely tells the bloody tale.

NO sense placing lipstick on whatever pig stinks up the truth. The results lead to the same foul and deadly ending.

DHS, AN OUTLAW, RENEGADE AGENCY: CAUGHT FERRYING ILLEGALS & USURPING LAW & ORDER. A MIRROR OF AG HOLDER’S LAWLESSNESS…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 25, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

Is anyone shocked to learn that the two largest and most powerful enforcement agencies in America, DHS and the AG office, operate as “legal” outlaws? In fact, so much so, that expecting them to obey the rule of law, one would still have to believe in the tooth fairy and whimsical fantasy tales. How many rational adults cling to said childhood dreams? Not too many.

In this regard, let us step back into one front of Obama Inc.’s lawlessness, and then segue into the latest revelation at hand.

And it is important to internalize that too many Americans have misplaced their faith into believing that the top law enforcement agency of the land, the AG’s fiefdom, has their backs. Nothing could be further from the truth. As a matter of record, AG Holder is running a renegade, lawless entity and his record is manifestly injudicious.

Where oh where to begin…perhaps at a most recent attempt to incite a race war, in tandem with the boss of bosses, his capo de tutti capi, Barack HUSSEIN Obama: indeed, on behalf of ‘Tray’ both continue to incite to race wars in America’s cities, courtesy of Obama Inc’s ‘shock troops’, as white teens are murdered in the crossfire. So will AG Holder investigate these crimes, given the part he plays? Don’t hold your breath.

Moving right along, we enter Holder’s DOJ and its renegade milieu, and as if on cue, bellies up to invoke Islamic “blasphemy” laws In the USA! Unfathomable, but no less true.

How impossible is it to realize that a radical, racialist, Islamist apologist DOJ imposes a mega mosque on a U.S. community, even though it was against the zoning laws to do so? Alerts are being issued, as the Radical-in-Chief tasks (il)legally-bent (AG) Holder to “criminalize” Islamic speech via thuggish UN dictates.

As a result, there is only so much patriots can tolerate, thus, a movement to IMPEACH AG Holder for crimes which surpass Articles of Impeachment is gaining steam. Yes, jail time is warranted.

In this regard, will Barack Hussein Obama’s lawless “justice” department finally ! fall?

Back to the 2nd lawless prong, the focal point of this commentary:

DHS’s (Black) employee, in charge of PROCURING weaponry, is reportedly inciting a race war! What’s going on that he is still on the job?

Concomitantly, DHS INSIDER and its heretofore scandals are ripe to blow wide open, and NSA’s Snowden’s revelations provide an opening shot.

But let’s not forget about “FAST & FURIOUS”, an illegal weapons running scheme, accruing many dead bodies, involving AG Holder & seguing into DHS!

The above raises increasing alarm bells re (previous DHS head)“Mama Janet’s” shopping sprees, accumulating billions in ammo & hardware alike! What’s their end goal?

Regardless, ‘Mama Janet’ resigned and landed a plum post as President of UC’s university system, yet DHS & their fixation on vets continues: a regime’s penchant for spying – “Putin-esque”.

So what are they up to now? And could it get any worse? Hang on tight…

Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.

By Stephen Dinan

The Washington Times

Thursday, December 19, 2013

A federal judge in Texas late last week accused the Obama administration of aiding drug cartels, saying that instead of enforcing immigration laws, agents knowingly helped smuggle an illegal immigrant girl into the U.S. to live with her mother, also an illegal immigrant, in Virginia.

In a 10-page order, Judge Andrew S. Hanen said the case was the fourth such case he’s seen over the last month, and in each instance Customs and Border Protection agents have helped to locate and deliver the children to their illegal immigrant parents.

The judge said in each case, the taxpayers footed the bill for flights — including flights to multiple locations in different parts of the U.S. that it took to find one of the children’s parents.

“The DHS is rewarding criminal conduct instead of enforcing the current laws. More troubling, the DHS is encouraging parents to seriously jeopardize the safety of their children,” the judge said, adding that some of the children have been made to swim the Rio Grande River or traverse remote areas as part of the smuggling.

In the case before the judge last week, a 10-year-old girl whose mother, Patricia Elizabeth Salmeron Santos, paid a smuggler to get the daughter from El Salvador across the border and to Virginia.

The agents apprehended the smuggler and the young girl, and prosecuted the smuggler, but delivered the daughter to Ms. Salmeron Santos in Virginia, even though agents were aware she was in the country illegally.

“The DHS, instead of enforcing our border security laws, actually assisted the criminal conspiracy in achieving its illegal goals,” the judge said. “It completed the mission of the conspiracy initiated by Salmeron Santos. In summary, instead of enforcing the laws of the United States, the government took direct steps to help the individuals who violated it. A private citizen would, and should, be prosecuted for this conduct.”

Judge Hanen said that Homeland Security officials regularly testify that the drug cartels control immigrant smuggling operations along the border, and he said the department’s actions in helping finish the smuggling actually end up benefitting the very cartels U.S. officials say they are trying to damage.

“The big economic losers in this scenario are the citizens of the United States who, by virtue of this DHS policy, are helping fund these evil ventures with their tax dollars,” the judge wrote.

Homeland Security officials told the court they won’t prosecute the illegal immigrant parents for their role in the smuggling, and Judge Hanen said it appeared to be a department-wide policy. Officials did say they are considering trying to deport Salmeron Santos, though it was unclear whether that had been done.

The cases highlight a growing problem along the border of what the government terms unaccompanied alien children, or UACs. Apprehensions of UACs jumped 81 percent from 2010 to 2012, suggesting more and more illegal immigrant parents are taking the risk of having their children leave home to join them in the U.S.

The young children present sympathetic cases, just as do those already in the country, known as Dreamers, after the Dream Act legislation.

President Obama last year announced a new policy to halt deportations of those young illegal immigrants, arguing they were brought to the U.S. by their parents with no say in the decision, and so should be allotted special treatment.

Immigrant-rights advocates now want the parents of the Dreamers to be spared deportation, arguing it is morally wrong to separate families.

But Judge Hanen said in the cases before him the illegal immigrants made that decision themselves, often years before. In the case of the 10-year-old, he said Ms. Salmeron Santos chose to come to the U.S. without her daughter years ago.

“She purposefully chose this course of action. Her decision to smuggle the child across the border, even if motivated by the best of motives, is not an excuse for the United States government to further a criminal conspiracy, and by doing so, encourage others to break the law and endanger additional children,” the judge wrote.

“To put this in another context, the DHS policy is as logical as taking illegal drugs or weapons that it has seized from smugglers and delivering them to the criminals who initially solicited their illegal importation/exportation. Legally, this situation is no different.”

**In tandem, DHS & AG Holder (Obama Inc.’s double swords) are actively colluding with illegal aliens, with their blatant violations impinging upon law abiding citizens: a** double crime; picking the public’s pocket and enriching/validating illegal aliens. Courtesy of the Thief-in-Chief

EVEN more so, the following tells another side of their lawbreaking tale: deportations under Obama plunged to just 1 percent last year ! More pointedly, America’s “law enforcers” gut the law, exhibiting the sham of immigration “reform“.

ADDING to the indictments against them, what are the chances that “Mama Janet’s” DHS “lost” 226 illegals, Deemed National Security Threats Too?

IN reality, without being able to shove major illegal immigration “reform” down America’s throat, the regime has found various circuitous, illegal routes to allow them to overrun America into a lawless nation. A regime gone wild.

Law and order…rule of law…dead and buried.

OBAMA’S SPYING VIA NSA TREACHEROUS: BETRAYALS REACH INTO ISRAEL’S FRONT YARD…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 24, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

While only those in la la land believe that allies don’t spy on one another, the fact of the matter is that certain revelations reach higher levels of treachery than others.

Consider the unending case of Jonathan Pollard, as he rots in a U.S. jail for 29 plus years, all for the crime of spying for America’s BFF, Israel. Mind you, not one spy – ever in U.S. history for similar charges and much worse – has received such an unjust and harsh sentence. This is a fact and it is well delineated within SEC KERRY’S DUAL LOYALTY: his close Iranian familial connection renders a conflict of interest. ILLEGAL.

Detailed within the above commentary, Washington’s (via the Executive branch, CIA, State Dept and Pentagon) hypocrisy and anti-Israel animus is on full display and encapsulated herein:

And this brings us to Jonathan Pollard, the American Jewish naval intelligence analyst who is now serving the 29th year of his life sentence for transferring classified materials to Israel.

Snowden’s revelations and the story of the CIA’s anti-Israel front group in Washington make clear that US indignation over Israel’s fielding of an agent in Washington was equal parts self-righteousness and hypocrisy.

There was nothing extraordinary in Israel’s efforts to gain information that its American ally didn’t wish to share with it. Allies spy on each other. And they use sympathetic locals to achieve their ends. South Korean Americans have been caught spying for South Korea. Taiwanese Americans have been caught spying for Taiwan, and so on.

US prosecutors prosecuted, and US judges convicted these agents of friendly countries for their criminal activities. The average prison term meted out to such agents of friendly governments runs from four to seven years. Their average time served in prison is two to four years.

Pollard was different not because of what he did, nor even, necessarily because he transferred classified information to Israel rather than to Britain.

Pollard was unique because he was an American Jew transferring classified information to Israel. And the discriminatory treatment he has received from the US government owes entirely to the same institutional anti-Jewish bias that caused the CIA to form the first anti-Israel lobby in Washington, just three years after Israel gained independence.……

Ever since NSAgate revealed many of its skeletons, foreign friends came to realize that they were very much in the dark. And what they thought they knew, re the rules of the spy “game”, was something much more insidious.

Snowden’s revelations paves the way towards what Obama Inc. is really afraid of.

As to the ultimate hypocrisy, well, exposing a heretofore secret (Israeli) military site of a trusted ally to the entire world, and then spying on it to boot, oh my, that tells the treacherous tale.

Not just the NSA: US spies rent a Jerusalem hotel suite to watch a secret Israeli site

DEBKAfile Exclusive Report December 23, 2013

Uncle Sam is listening

Many Israelis were scandalized when documents released by Edward Snowden revealed that their best friend, America, had in 2009 targeted a former prime minister and defense minister for secret surveillance. But their political leaders were not surprised. For years, the United States has been running a complex eavesdropping and surveillance web to spy on friends and foes alike, including Israel. Satellites gather and transmit data to command centers, “informers” operate in the field and the most fertile sources of all are not human but the instruments which bug cell phones, tablets and social networks.

The US National Security Agency, NSA, exposed by its former agent the whistleblower Edward Snowden, can monitor these devices whenever it wants, just by beaming its instruments at a defined country, location, group of people or topics.
If, for instance, NSA electronically obtains a list of Israeli servicemen, their cell phone numbers and credit cards, its monitors can keep each one under constant surveillance.

The same applies to the personnel of Israel’s Air Force, Aerospace industry and other high-tech military manufacturers, such as Elbit and Rafael. Those lists may safely be assumed to be already in the agency’s hands.
To collect videos and images, American spy agencies only have to pan through such data gold mines as YouTube, Instagram, Tumblr and Pinterest, the last of which was recently crowned Content Curation. This is because Pinterest does much of the intelligence watchers’ work for them by assorting the material according to subject and field of interest and so unknowingly providing them with neat data packages.

The network catching on like wildfire of late is WhatsApp.

It is also a favorite of Israel’s elementary schoolchildren for swapping their thoughts and news.
A child may explain he or she can’t join the gang that afternoon because his or her father, an Air Force colonel or captain of a naval vessel, is just home from Crete or Sardinia. This will tell the eavesdropper that Israeli crews have been changed at those bases.

An Israeli officer driving his car only has to consult Waze for a short cut to his secret destination to reveal it to a clandestine watcher.

So who controls these armies of spies and directs their focus?

Those are murky waters which are virtually uncharted, as President Barack Obama implied obliquely in the comments he made at his end-of-year news conference Friday, Dec. 20. To still the uproar against indiscriminate spying on Americans, he promised a review and possibly reforms of the NSA, adding tellingly: “Just because we can do something doesn’t mean we necessarily should.”

Snowden’s revelations about the spies sitting on the phones of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Brazilian President Dilma Roussef have got Washington into hot water. They also revealed the negligence of their own security services.

However, Israel, to our certain knowledge, has lived with this unwanted American attention from its earliest days. In the 1980s, when the late Menahem Begin was prime minister, an odd-looking vehicle sprouting a forest of antennae stood permanently and quite visibly beneath his office window in Jerusalem.
His staff identified it quite frankly as a mobile American listening station. The measures used later were a lot more sophisticated. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Defense Minister Ehud Barak and other Israeli officials, in their turn, had their e-mails intercepted regularly.

But after 2009, Washington introduced a high-powered, multilayered system of intelligence-gathering – especially against Israel, about which neither Snowden nor the Israelis have been forthcoming. This system had a single narrow focus: to pick up the slightest murmur or clue suggesting that Israel was about to launch an attack on Iran’s nuclear sites, which it had threatened to do without prior notice to Washington.

Listening in on the laconic conversations Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu held with Ehud Barak was not enough. What the spies were told to look for was out-of-the-way conduct, such as an order placed suddenly for a large quantity of aircraft fuel, or the import of an unusual amount of emergency medical equipment.

At the high noon of this period of mistrust, US officers of the highest ranks began dropping in on Israel with increasingly frequency. Every week to ten days, some many-starred general or fast-talking Pentagon official arrived for a visit. They were told to ferret out any signs of Israel getting ready for an attack on Iran in time for Washington to step in and stop it.

These emissaries had two directives:

1. To maintain a tight grip on the prime minister, defense minister and chief of staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz and other IDF generals and keep them in sight at all times;

2. To pick up on their every nuance of speech or behavior for signals of hidden activity too subtle for monitoring devices to register.
The tempo of these visits tapered off when Washington concluded that Israel had given up on a military strike on Iran at that stage.

However, the spying did not.

DEBKAfile’s intelligence sources report that in recent months Israeli complained to the Obama administration about hotel suites which undercover agents had rented in Jerusalem at sites overlooking a secret military installation frequented by high Israeli officials for their most private consultations. The Netanyahu government asked Washington to stop this underhand surveillance. But meanwhile certain other – less friendly – Western spy agencies had caught on and took suites at the same location.
The conclusion from these incidents is that US clandestine surveillance of Israel is unlikely to stop in the foreseeable future – and not just against key figures and military personnel, but also involving economic and industrial espionage.

To combat the expanding exposure of its secrets, Israel has been introducing “sterile spaces” impenetrable to illicit penetration as well as using tricks to misdirect attention. However, the Americans and other interested parties keep on looking for holes in these barriers – and so the contest goes on.

As to NSAgate and whatever one thinks about Snowden’s actions, rest assured he shines a spotlight on the level of duplicity emanating out of the bowels of Washington.

NOT only in regard to foreign spying, but most pointedly in relation to Obama Inc’s violations of the Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens, amply demonstrated through the purging: an omerta re Islam + terror within America’s power centers eviscerates NSA’s domestic spying.

So there you have it. As Muslim Americans remain out of bounds…off limits…hands off…everything else is a GO.

SHARIAH LAW MANDATES ISLAMIC WARFARE ON A MAIN TARGET:THE SILENCING OF THE WEST. HILLARY CLINTON, OBAMA INC. LEND SUPPORT! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 23, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

Commentary found at – http://islamexposedonline.com/

————————————————————————————————–

Western audiences must internalize and FULLY understand the tactics utilized through Islamic warfare – by Sunni and Shia alike – as they seek to grab global domination. Today’s commentary, as a “green alert”, is neither scare-mongering nor pie-in-the-sky dreaming by avowed Islamists. FAR from it.

Their efforts engage many pressure points, but those which must remain our TOP priority revolve around a two-tiered jihadi prong: stealth on the one hand and frontal on the other. The underpinnings cited herein are all part and parcel of Shariah Law. Non-negotiable. Immutable. Set in Allah-stone.

The most insidious of all are those which fly “below the radar”, hence, the “stealth” appellation. The Muslim Brotherhood developed a brilliant psychological tactic – one which is repeatedly referenced at this site.“Islamophobia” is a strategy used by Islamists and their propagandists, as western enablers act as shields for Islamic supremacists!

The reason for the term’s coinage is its visceral imagery, as if to IMMEDIATELY tar those who DARE to question Islam’s underpinnings as“phobics”, demonstrating that they are the problem, not Islam. As if they are “racists” of the highest magnitude and that is that. As if to scream there is no “there there”; that those who step out of line are doing so due to their own fevered imaginations, as such, they are the ones in need of “re-education” camps. Really. That’s their modus operandi.

POLITICS OF “ISLAMOPHOBIA”

The term “Islamophobia” was invented and promoted in the early 1990s by theInternational Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT’s ideology — now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them.

This plan was an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood’s “General Strategic Goal for North America,” by which the organization aimed to wage “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands … so that … God’s religion [Islam] is made victorious over all other religions.” To implement this plan, the Brotherhood enlisted the help of 29 likeminded “organizations of our friends” (one of which was IIIT), whose task would be to depict themselves as civil-rights groups speaking out on behalf of a Muslim American population that was allegedly besieged by outsiders who harbored an illogical, unfounded fear of them — i.e., by a society replete with “Islamophobia.”

Although the term was coined in the early 1990s, “Islamophobia” did not become the focus of an active Brotherhood campaign until after 9/11. Since that time, Islamist lobby organizations (including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR) and Muslim civil-rights activists have regularly accused the American people, American institutions, law-enforcement authorities, and the U.S. government of harboring a deep and potentially violent prejudice against Muslims. The accusers charge that as a result of this “Islamophobia,” Muslims are disproportionately targeted by perpetrators of hate crimes and acts of discrimination.

But FBI data on hate crimes show that the foregoing accusers are wholly incorrect. The incidence of anti-Muslim abuses nationwide has actually declined since September 2001.

And herein belies the crux of the danger, as Obama Inc., including front-line players like Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin work assiduously to impose restrictions on criticism of Islam, all the while stomping on America’s (the west’s) underpinning of free speech! YES, Hillary Clinton & her mobbed up Muslim Brotherhood terror associates: INEXORABLY tied. Politically AND business-wise. Treasonous.

**Their targeted assaults incredibly bore into every powerful recess of American influence (and beyond), not even eschewing spiritual cornerstones as “no go” zones:***“red/leftists” merge forces with “green/Islamists”, in a frontal attack against free speech and Rabbis (Priests too) used as bait.* How dare they? Is nothing off limits? Is nothing holy, other than their jihad for Allah? In any case, for the visually inclined, this should bring the danger home – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YsdbhIbZoc.

But if the above isn’t enraging enough, understand that a HUGE and concerted effort is continually waged through a powerful Islamic entity at the UN, and Hill is front and center egging them on! Other American leaders (some in the open, some behind the scenes) are working for the same result – the castration of free speech!

Powerful Islamist Org. Ramps Up War on Free Speech in West

The primary objective of the OIC is to pressure Western countries into passing laws that would ban ‘negative stereotyping of Islam.’

BY SOEREN KERN

December 12, 2013

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (left) participated in and supported the ‘Istanbul Process.”

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation, an influential bloc of 57 Muslim countries, has released the latest edition of its annual “Islamophobia” report.

The “Sixth OIC Observatory Report on Islamophobia: October 2012-September 2013” is a 94-page document purporting to “offer a comprehensive picture of Islamophobia, as it exists mainly in contemporary Western societies.”

The primary objective of the OIC—headquartered in Saudi Arabia and funded by dozens of Muslim countries that systematically persecute Christians and Jews—has long been to pressure Western countries into passing laws that would ban “negative stereotyping of Islam.”

In this context, the OIC’s annual Islamophobia report—an integral part of a sustained effort to prove the existence of a “culture of intolerance of Islam and Muslims” in the West—is in essence a lobbying tool to pressure Western governments to outlaw all forms of “Islamophobia,” a nebulous concept invented by the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1990s.

The OIC report comprises five main chapters and several annexes aimed at documenting “incidents of slandering and demeaning Muslims and their sacred symbols including attacks on mosques, verbal abuses and physical attacks against adherents of Islam, mainly due to their cultural traits.”

But the common thread that binds the entire document together is the OIC’s repeated insistence that the main culprit responsible for “the institutionalization of Islamophobia” in Western countries is freedom of speech, which the OIC claims has “contributed enormously to snowball Islamophobia and manipulate the mindset of ordinary Western people to develop a ‘phobia’ of Islam and Muslims.”

According to the OIC, freedom of expression is shielding “the perpetrators of Islamophobia, who seek to propagate irrational fear and intolerance of Islam, [who] have time and again aroused unwarranted tension, suspicion and unrest in societies by slandering the Islamic faith through gross distortions and misrepresentations and by encroaching on and denigrating the religious sentiments of Muslims.”

Chapter 1 of the report deals with “Islamophobia, Intolerance and Discrimination against Muslims,” and purports to reveal the “unabated rise of Islamophobia in Western countries, thereby exacerbating tensions at all levels and constituting additional obstacles to the diversity and multicultural fabrics of the societies.”

According to the OIC, freedom of speech is to blame for the “perpetuation of Islamophobia,” which:

“…has become increasingly widespread, which, in turn, has caused an increase in the actual number of hate crimes committed against Muslims. These crimes range from the usual verbal abuse and discrimination, particularly in the fields of education and employment, to other acts of violence and vandalism, including physical assaults, attacks on Islamic centers and the desecration of mosques and cemeteries.”

“In this context, acceptance of various forms of intolerance, including hate speech and the propagation of negative stereotypes against Islam and Muslims in some western countries contribute towards proliferation of intolerant societies. This process is further supported by… the exploitation of freedom of expression and perpetuation of an ideological context advocating an inescapable conflict of civilizations.”

Another factor favoring “the climate of intolerance” is:

“…the negative role played by major media outlets who not only propagate stereotypes and misperceptions about Islam, but also undermine and usually keep shadowed any meaningful instance of individuals or groups speaking out against intolerance, including advocacy of religious hatred and violence. This biased approach of the media has helped drawing an emphatically demonized, sometimes dehumanized, image of Muslims in the minds of a certain class of people which is predisposed to xenophobic feelings due to the increasingly dire economic situation, or the simply to the irrational fear of the other.”

Chapter 2 of the report deals with “Manifestations of Islamophobia in the West.” According to the OIC:

“The number of Islamophobic incidents continues to rise in the US, as a result of anti-Muslim propaganda. It is particularly alarming that anti-Muslim sentiments are taking deeper roots infiltrating further in the educational system. Notable among several other worrying trends/cases are: the initiatives taken by a leading and powerful US legislator [US Representative Peter King] to convene special Congressional Hearings on Radicalization of Islam in the US… In the same vein, the Republican Party in the recent 2013 [sic] US Presidential elections also used the anti-Islam card as a strategy.”

“With regard to Islamophobic trends in Europe, various reports and polls have revealed growing misperception vis-à-vis Islam and Muslims. Among the most common and recurring… are the ideas that Muslims are inclined to violence including revenge and retaliation; that Islam is an inherently expansionist religion, which strives for political influence, and whose followers are obsessed with proselytizing others, and more generally that Islam deprives women of their rights and encourages religious fanaticism and radicalism. According to the same polls, only a minor portion of the public tends to see Islam in a more positive light, as being a religion of peace that preaches love for neighbors, charity, openness and tolerance… Muslims who live in xenophobic environments are more exposed to daily stress and other forms of moral prejudice.”

The OIC concludes that “journalists and media organizations have a responsibility to avoid promoting rhetoric of hate by acting as a platform for its widespread dissemination.”

Chapter 3 of the OIC report highlights “Some Positive Developments” in terms of initiatives and other steps and positions taken to combat Islamophobia, including:

“…the condemnation of anti-Muslim hate speech by various quarters, including non-Muslim religious leaders; the barring from entry of certain Islamophobes to a number of countries where they intended to take part in anti-Muslim rallies or deliver inflammatory lectures; the recognition of Muslim holidays and other strict sanctions taken against acts of manifest religious intolerance. It was noted with satisfaction that a number of international organizations, including UNSECO, the OSCE and the Council of Europe, have recognized the danger posed by Islamophobia and have taken concrete steps to combat it, notably by laying down Guidelines for Educators on Countering Intolerance and Discrimination against Muslims.”

Chapter 4 of the report, “OIC Initiatives and Activities to Counter Islamophobia,” focused on the OIC’s ongoing efforts to promote the so-called Istanbul Process, an aggressive effort by Muslim countries to make it an international crime to criticize Islam. The explicit aim of the Istanbul Process is to enshrine in international law a global ban on all critical scrutiny of Islam and Islamic Sharia law.

In recent years, the OIC has been engaged in a determined diplomatic offensive to persuade Western democracies to implement United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) Resolution 16/18, which calls on all countries to combat “intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of… religion and belief.” (Analysis of the OIC’s war on free speech can be found here and here.)

Resolution 16/18, which was adopted at HRC headquarters in Geneva in March 2011 (with the support of the Obama Administration)—together with the OIC-sponsored Resolution 66/167, which was quietly approved by the 193-member UN General Assembly on December 19, 2011—is widely viewed as marking a significant step forward in OIC efforts to advance the international legal concept of defaming Islam.

Chapter 5 of the OIC report provides a set of conclusions and recommendations, which call on Western governments, international organizations and non-state actors to:

“Take all necessary measures within their power and legal/jurisdictional systems to ensure a safe environment free from Islamophobic harassment… by strictly enforcing applicable hate crime and discrimination laws;

“Create, whenever necessary, specialized bodies and initiatives in order to combat Islamophobia… based on internationally recognized human rights principles and standards;

“Combat Islamophobic hate crimes, which can be fuelled by Islamophobic hate speech in the media and on the Internet;

“Take all necessary measures to ensure that the media refrains from serving as a platform for the dissemination of hate speech… by associating extremism and terrorism to Islam and Muslims… and presents the true positive nature of Islam.

“Implement provisions of UNHRC Resolution 16/18 through the Istanbul Process mechanism as it offers a positive platform for debate, exchange of best practices and maintaining of a common and unified stance.”

The report states that “the OIC and the Member States should not be complacent in underscoring the fact that our present day world is gradually being driven towards the dangerous precipices of growing intolerance of religious and cultural diversity. This is the clear and present danger that the OIC has been consistent in warning the international community against. The sooner the phenomenon of Islamophobia is addressed, the better it is for ensuring peaceful coexistence of the present as well for the future generations to come.”

The report concludes with the transcript of a speech by OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, in which he thanks American and European political leaders for their help (here and here) in advancing his efforts to restrict free speech in the West.

“The Istanbul Process initiated with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Catherine Ashton … must be carried forward … the Istanbul Process must also be seen as a poster child of OIC-US-EU cooperation …” Ihsanoglu said.

Most significantly, the so called “liberal” left set are in the forefront of censuring free speech, all in the name of protecting a made up out of whole cloth phobia!

YES, even as the first Black (though a half breed) POTUS is the most powerful man in the west, they still would have us believe that conservative folks, aka“knuckledraggers”, and rational anti-Islamists are simply incapable of ferreting out this and that. Hence, strictures muzzling speech are for our own good. In fact, AG Holder already assembled said omerta: ALERT : Radical-in-Chief Obama tasks (il)legally-bent (AG) Holder to “criminalize” Islamic speech via thuggish UN dictates!

Never and never. They can all go to hell – and back.

Alas, as they hold aloft “civil rights” as the sine qua non for PC behavior, they behave like fascists and worse.

Now, few understand this subject like Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, as they attempted to silence her hither and yon trough a tactic called “lawfare”, but they lost!

In her book, “Funding Evil”, Dr. Ehrenfeld alleged that Saudi billionaire Khalid bin Mahfouz had financed al Qaeda through his bank and charitable organization. Mahfouz denied the allegations. Dr. Ehrenfeld, a U.S. citizen based in New York, had not written or marketed her book internationally and refused to acknowledge the jurisdiction of the British court over her case. Her refusal resulted in the British Court awarding a default judgment against her.

Represented by her attorney, Daniel Kornstein,^[5] Dr. Ehrenfeld pre-emptively countersued Mahfouz in New York to obtain a declaration that the judgment would not be enforced in the United States and that her book was not defamatory under United States defamation law. When the New York courts ruled that they lacked personal jurisdiction over Mahfouz, the New York State legislature took immediate action and unanimously passed the Libel Terrorism Protection Act^[6] (also known as “Rachel’s Law”). Rachel’s Law was signed into law on April-29-2008. The law “offers New Yorkers greater protection against libel judgments in countries whose laws are inconsistent with the freedom of speech granted by the United States Constitution.”^[7]

As of July 2010, six other states have passed analogs to Rachel’s Law: Illinois,^[8] Florida,^[9] California,^[10] Tennessee,^[11] Maryland,^[12] and Utah.^[13] A federal bill based on Rachel’s Law was passed unanimously out of the Judiciary Committee and has since then been approved by both Houses of Congress. President Obama signed the bill into law on 10 August 2010. The bill, S. 3518, the titled Securing and Protecting our Enduring and Established Constitutional Heritage Act (Speech Act),^[14] includes several measures aimed at closing loopholes in First Amendment protections for free speech. The act bars enforcement of foreign libel judgments that do not meet with American constitutional standards of due process and First Amendment protections. The burden of proof is also placed on the party suing for enforcement. The party suing to prevent enforcement may also sue the libel plaintiff for a declaration that the foreign libel judgment is “repugnant” to American constitutional law, and is entitled to attorney’s fees for resultant legal proceedings. The new federal law, and the existing seven state laws that predate it, do not, however, protect American persons who exercise First Amendment freedoms but who then travel abroad and then become subject to physical application of foreign libel laws and judgments. Many countries, for example, Thailand, maintain laws that cite jurisdiction over speech exercised outside their countries and which mandate punishment for libel inside the foreign plaintiff’s country even though the speech may have occurred outside. Extraterritorial jurisdiction over First Amendment rights has not been the focus of attention in international legal jurisprudence or focus in the diplomatic community.

Dr. Ehrenfeld’s efforts at libel law reform in the United States inspired the Libel Reform Campaign^[15] an NGO campaign with over 55,000 supporters. The British government has published a draft defamation bill, The Defamation Act [2013] which comes into action later this year. .^[16]

BEATING back Islamic warfare, through the silencing of all dissent, is a major linchpin to beating back Shariah Law ! One and the same.

NOT on our watch…kadima…קדימה…as we continue to expose the facts at Islam Exposed Online.

“LEGALIZING” TERROR ENTITIES TO ACCRUE POLITICAL OUTCOMES/GOALS: ‘PALESTINIAN’ STATEHOOD VIOLATES INTERNATIONAL & U.S. LAW; ISRAELI LAW/PENAL CODE TOO! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 22, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

Legal precepts, including their constraints and restraints, are often viewed as little more than non-discernible mumbo jumbo. Nevertheless, they are well documented within international and national systems of law and western leaders are NOT allowed to cherry pick when to abide by them, or to ignore their mandates with impunity to execute a more “valued” political outcome, come what may.

YES, one would think that legal dictates, whatever they may be, are binding upon all requisite players, unless legislated or adjudicated otherwise. Alas, this is the way a civilized system is predicated to operate. Then again, “democratic despotism” via a “soft tyranny” has become the (western) norm. Damn the law.

As to the referenced “mumbo jumbo”, there are few better equipped to extrapolate its underpinnings, other than Professor Louis Rene Beres. He is distinctly honored at this blog’s “About” tab.

My “go to” expert on all matters pertaining to international law, and a country’s right to anticipatory self defense – via preemptive strikes – is none other than Professor Louis Rene Beres of ‘Project Daniel.’ The working group’s original policy paper is found herein. He was Chair of the above strategic nuclear policy paper given to PM Ariel Sharon in 2003 – and subsequently briefed the report to President George W. Bush and to current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – in relation to Israel’s nuclear strategy in the face of Iran’s pursuit of WMD’s. He is a man of great integrity and humility.

Lou, a heartfelt thank you for being my mentor.

That being said, aside from his world class expertise in the nuclear warfare arena, he is equally an expert in the (i)legalities of Palestinian “statehood” for a sundry list of legal strictures, notwithstanding the PA’s irrefutable linkage with terror.

Tellingly, PA “statehood” & its violations of international law obligates U.S. leadership to adhere to legal constructs, as well as Israel’s “peace” obsessed too. Both reveal more of the same, indicting U.S. and Israeli counterparts (fueled by internal and external leftist players) for their parts in ignoring legal imperatives, thereby, precluding them from negotiating with those who engage in terror! Ringing any bells…as Abbas’s/Abu Mazen’s Palestinian Authority & its UNRELENTING anti-Jewish incitement more than legally binds leftist ‘peace’ fetishists, outside & inside Israel, from engaging in any “processes”, even as they thrust forward.

‘Little girls on PA TV:’

Jews are the “most evil among creations,
barbaric monkeys, wretched pigs,”
condemned to “humiliation and hardship”

by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik

Palestinian Authority TV continues to promote Islam-based hate speech and Antisemitism, voiced by little children. In this latest example, two sisters recited a poem that included the following demonization of Jews:

“You who murdered Allah’s pious prophets (i.e., Jews in Islamic tradition)

Oh, you who were brought up on spilling blood
You have been condemned to humiliation and hardship
Oh Sons of Zion, oh most evil among creations
Oh barbaric monkeys, wretched pigs.”

The poem also taught that Jerusalem is not for Jews, because Jerusalem “vomits” out the Jews who are said to be “filth” and “impure”:

“Jerusalem vomits from within it your impurity
Because Jerusalem, you impure ones, is pious, immaculate
And Jerusalem, you who are filth, is clean and pure.”

Click to view

NO serious leader can pretend that what is isn’t, even as they sit around the table pretending to be statesmen, “negotiating” this and that. The question remains: When UN thugs bestow “statehood” upon terrorists, how many violations are accrued via international law?

Once again, the floor, so to speak, is left to Professor Louis Rene Beres’s highly capable analysis.

BERES: Creeping toward Palestinian statehood

U.N. nonmember observer status was only the beginning – Washington Times

One year ago, on Nov. 29, 2012, the U.N. General Assembly voted to upgrade the Palestinian Authority (PA) to the status of a “nonmember observer state.” Although it is more or less widely thought that this organizational elevation was tantamount to a bestowal of formal legal personality, this is not the case. Jurisprudentially, at least, “Palestine” still remains outside the community of separately sovereign states.

This exclusion is evident “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Authoritative criteria of statehood making this point are already long-standing, explicit and readily available. More precisely, under pertinent international law, a state must always possess the following specific qualifications: a permanent population; a defined territory; a government; and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.

The formal existence of a state, moreover, is always independent of any recognition by other states. According to the 1934 Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (the Montevideo Convention): “Even before recognition, the state has the right to defend its integrity and independence, to provide for its conservation and prosperity, and consequently to organize itself as it sees fit .” It follows that even a Palestinian state that would fail to meet evident Montevideo expectations could simply declare otherwise, and then act persuasively “to defend its integrity and independence.” More than likely, any such “defense” would ultimately involve war or terrorism against “Occupied Palestine,” aka Israel.

Whenever the Palestinian Authority finally decides to declare statehood, thereby further enhancing its already upgraded status as a U.N. nonmember observer state, Montevideo standards and rights of statehood will be widely re-examined. Predictably, as Israel — challenging the adversarial declaration — will point correctly to relevant Oslo Agreement violations, the Palestinian Authority will counter-argue that its particular right to declare an independent state of Palestine is fundamental, or “peremptory.” It follows, the PA will subsequently add, that legal rights of statehood override any previously existing expectations of its peace accord with Israel.

In this connection, the Palestinian Authority will undoubtedly cite the plainly non treaty quality of the Oslo Agreements (per definitions of “treaty” at the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties), and certain allegedly basic and immutable human rights under international law that concern “self determination” and “national liberation.” For years, Israel has not troubled itself too intently with the juridical aspects of “Palestine.” Most Israelis, after all, were never entirely convinced that Palestinian statehood could ever become a genuinely critical issue. Now, of course, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seems to have conceded the eventual creation of Palestine, but only on the seemingly prudent condition of Palestinian “demilitarization.”

While this contingent condition may sound reassuring, it actually represents little more than a contrived and thoroughly impotent legal fiction.

No new state is ever under any obligation to remain “demilitarized,” whatever else it may have agreed to in its pre-state incarnation.

Over the years, a number of cases in U.S. federal courts have rejected the idea that the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), as “parent” of the Palestinian Authority, is in any way recognizable as the legitimate core of an independent Palestinian state. Earlier, perhaps, capable Israeli lawyers and policymakers might have been able to refer to such American case law in compelling support of an argument against Palestinian statehood, but not today. However grudgingly, after Oslo and so many years of incremental Israeli recognition of PLO-PA authority as legitimate, Israel will sometime have to accept Palestine as a co-equal “partner in peace.”

Legally, one must envy the Palestinians for the subtly nuanced dexterity with which they may have managed to outwit the Israelis. For years, legally at least, they have been very patient. Whatever other mistakes it has made in more narrowly tactical or strategic terms, the Palestinian leadership has nonetheless listened, learned, watched and persevered.

Now, even though they remain very far from satisfying the codified expectations of Montevideo, the overwhelming majority of U.N. member states are still all too willing to grant them full juridical parity with Israel.

Under the Montevideo Convention, all states are legally equal, enjoy the same rights, and have equal capacity in their exercise. The moment that the Palestinian Authority should proceed to declare a state of Palestine, the new country will become the effective juridical equal of Israel. When Israelis then begin to object strenuously to inevitable Palestinian claims for more territory — territory within “occupied Palestine” — the world will listen more than politely to the Palestinians. They will, after all, now be fully equal to Israelis under international law.

It is already too late to change all this. The concocted and perilous drift to legal symmetry between Israel and “Palestine” is the direct result of persistently concessionary policies mistakenly fashioned in Jerusalem, from Yitzak Rabin to Mr. Netanyahu. Israel can still learn some important and potentially remediating lessons from its myriad Oslo mistakes.

Above all, Jerusalem must argue vigorously against new European Union guidelines, insisting that Palestine’s borders never be based upon pre-1967 lines. In the words of an Israeli legal expert, Ambassador Alan Baker: “The legality of the presence of Israel’s communities in [Judea and Samaria] stems from the historic, indigenous and legal rights of the Jewish people to settle in the area, granted pursuant to valid and binding international legal instruments, recognized and accepted by the international community. These rights cannot be denied or placed in question.” Accordingly, Jerusalem should clearly affirm that Israeli settlement activity is recognizably consistent with international law.

For Israel to do otherwise on this contentious issue would represent a tangible and self-defeating violation of the law of nations.

At the end of the never ending “peace” process and death dance, few understand the synergistic threats involved, as does Prof Louis Rene Beres. In fact, the following analysis brings to bear the pressing and VERY GRAVE dangers of “Palestinian” statehood: Untangling synergies: Israel’s order of battle. A serious and predictable threat posed by Palestine would involve the new state’s virulent collaboration with Iran.

As the civilized world unravels due to Islamic terror one must demand that western leadership – most acutely America’s and Israel’s – seriously, urgently and diligently take the time to look back at constant error, thus, FINALLY internalizing the tangled narrative of Middle East “peace”. It is brilliantly expounded upon by Louis René Beres at Israel’s Journal of Foreign Affairs. You think?

After all, it is DEADLY clear what happens when UN thugs bestow “statehood” upon terrorists, as the addendum to PA “statehood” & its violations of international law succinctly documents.

Most significantly, how intrinsic are words “straight out of the horse’s mouth”? PLO Official: We Supported the Nazis in WWII

Former political bureau head of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) removes any doubt over Arab support for Nazi Germany. (video embedded)

Dead to rights!!

U.S. CONGRESSIONAL COMMUNISTS & The Ties That Bind: The RED Portion Of The RED/GREEN Alliance…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 21, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

It is impossible to overemphasize the multiplicity of reasons why this blog’s mission revolves around the pernicious and deadly effects of the “red/green alliance”, so much so that it is cited at the About tab within.

Sans a full understanding of the above nexus, it is akin to spitting in the wind and expecting to become well-informed in the process. It ain’t gonna happen. So, let’s backtrack to previous commentaries which connect the “red” dots, but leave the “green” part – at least for the moment – in abeyance.

It is hardly happenstance that the Radical-in-Chief is OPENLY supported by communists and their assorted supporters domestically and abroad. Pray tell, why? Bingo.

Yet, for those who prefer visual aids, the following is a prudent point of inception: Obama’s (visual-inspired) communist roots are indeed front and center. Explicitly, the POTUS’s Hawaiian ‘roots’ (the red side to his green Wahabbi roots) are certainly irrelevant due to the exotic locale. That’s for sure.

And equally deadly are the ties that bind him to his “green” side, but this is not a reference to the environment! His inner roots, Obama’s Kenyan narrative, are more than instructive. Deadly.

Thereby, placing one atop another accounts for more than an incendiary charge, and this lethal combination flows primarily from the Executive side. But even when one separates out the Executive branch from Congress – leaving Congress as a stand alone – well, the damage from the House of Reps is more than lethal to America’s well-being. Explosively so.

COMMUNISTS IN CONGRESS? JUST COUNT ‘EM

The book names names, details strategies to ‘transform’ U.S.

JEROME R. CORSI

NEW YORK – New Zealander Trevor Loudon has just published an encyclopedic new 689-page volume, “The Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the U.S. Congress,” to accompany his 668-page 2011 book, “Barack Obama and the Enemies Within.”

In both volumes, Loudon has proved himself to be among the foremost experts in the world investigating and reporting the penetration of communists, socialists and the current group of “progressives” affiliated with Democratic Party politics who portray themselves as liberals.

In his 2011 book, Loudon presented documented evidence that Barack Obama’s rise in politics was not an accident, but a conscious, decade-long effort by the radical left to promote a candidate with African roots. Obama, he said, was packaged as an engaging and seemingly harmless Trojan Horse radical, sent to Chicago to refine his skills running for office as a Democratic Party politician.

It is impossible to read “Barack Obama and the Enemies Within” without being convinced that Obama’s education in communist ideology stretches from the extracurricular education he received from Communist Party mentor Frank Marshall Davis in Honolulu to his recruitment as a New Party candidate in Chicago, with strong ties to the Democratic Socialists of America.

Loudon continues naming names in his current volume, “The Enemies Within,” which documents how extensively communists, socialists and progressives have penetrated the U.S. Congress, running on the Democratic Party ticket.

The goal of these radicals in Congress, Loudon demonstrates, is the same goal Obama announced when running for president in 2008, to transform the United States from the constitutional republic established by its Founding Fathers into a radical socialist state. The aim is to be achieved through passing extensive social welfare legislation designed to bankrupt a government adhering to concepts of private property and private enterprise.

In an insightful essay on the Democratic Socialists of America, Loudon emphasizes the impact on U.S. radicals of the late Italian Communist Party theoretician Antonio Gramsci, whose writings from prison declared that the “working class revolution” is a dead end, arguing instead that communism can best be achieved “by infiltrating civil society – political parties, churches, labor unions, universities, the media, community groups, etc., to turn them into revolutionary vehicles.”

Similarly, Loudon documents how the Communist Party of the USA itself has adopted a stealth plan to achieve revolutionary goals by decisions made in the 1970s to infiltrate and manipulate the Democratic Party. The plan is to form alliances with the radical elements in organized labor in conjunction with radicals in the African-American community and the feminist movement to establish a progressive coalition on the left that could dominate the national political agenda for decades to come.

His essay on the Institute for Policy Studies provides extensive evidence that the IPS, operating today with the distinction of being oldest – founded in 1963 – and most influential of the far left “think tanks” in Washington, D.C., “works closely with several U.S. Marxist groups, but is particularly close to the Democratic Socialists of America.”

The congressional profiles of current members of Congress provides extensive evidence of radical leftist ties in the backgrounds of top Democratic Party legislators, including Democratic Party Sens. Barbara Boxer, Dick Durbin, Tom Harkin, Barbara Mikulski, Elizabeth Warren, Ed Markey, Debbie Stabenow, Al Franken, Sherrod Brown, Ron Wyden, Jeff Merkley, Patty Murray and Tammy Baldwin.

In the House of Representatives, Loudon profiles the radical left background of Democratic Party Reps. Nancy Pelosi, Louis Gutierrez, John Conyers, Charles Rangel, Marcy Kaptur, Peter DeFazio, Sheila Jackson Lee, Jim McDermott and dozens more.

Loudon’s profiles of the radical lawmakers is extensively footnoted, complete with photos, news clips, website screen captures and quotations from published sources that leave no doubt as to the authenticity and accuracy of his allegations.

In documenting the success with which the radical left has captured the politically correct core of Democratic Party politics since the 1970s and the end of the Vietnam War, Loudon joins bestselling author Paul Kengor, who published in 2010 “Dupes: How America’s Adversaries Have Manipulated Conservatives for a Century,” followed in 2012 by “The Communist: Frank Marshall Davis, The Untold Story of Barack Obama’s Mentor.”

What authors Loudon and Kengor show is that communism in America did not die with the fall of the Berlin Wall. It is alive and well, with ties that run deep today with Barack Obama in the White House and the radical leftist Democrats serving in the halls of Congress.

Loudon will be in Washington, D.C., at the National Press Club Aug. 20 to participate in the all day conference “The Crisis in American Journalism and the Conservative Response,” hosted by the public policy group America’s Survival Inc.

Joining Loudon, who is listed on the program to speak about his book “The Enemies Within,” will be Kengor, presenting his new book, “All the Dupes Fit to Print: Journalists Who Have Served as Tools of Communist Propaganda.”

INDEED, if not for radical revolutionaries (assorted Marxists, socialists, communists) within Obama Inc., as well as those deeply embedded inside Demster politics, there is little doubt that Obamacare would have been shoved down America’s throat, ala the art of propaganda and worse. How so? Count all the Alinskyite disciples, domestic terrorists to boot, plus George Soros – the devil incarnate – and his handiwork, and American citizens would not be losing their nation-state.

Significantly, OBAMACARE MARKETERS: ‘PERCEPTIONS MORE IMPORTANT THAN FACTS’ reveals shocking statements by the architects of health-care law’s imaging, demonstrating their plans – with malice and forethought – to dupe Americans into believing, yes, health care reform is for the general good and welfare of America’s citizens! Imagine that.

AE describes itself as a consulting firm that uses social-values surveys, cognitive linguistics and political psychology to help foundations and nonprofits develop breakthrough social change initiatives.

AE writes that since 2005, its research findings and strategic initiatives on health care, the economy and the environment have been used by multiple members of Congress.

In April 2005, current AE managing partners Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger started AE’s American branch.

Shellenberger previously worked for the anti-corporate, anti-globalization Global Exchange in San Francisco before starting a spin-off public relations firm in 1996, Communication Works.

By 2001, Shellenberger’s firm had grown and he merged it with Fenton Communications.

Fenton is the main marketing strategist for groups funded by the Soros-financed Tides Center. Fenton also crafted the public relations strategy of MoveOn.org, as well as a who’s who of far-left causes, organizations and activists, from Soros himself to Health Care for America Now to a number of anti-war groups.

In 2004, Shellenberger registered with the Department of Justice as a foreign agent.

His prime client was Venezuelan dictator Chavez. Shellenberger’s private consulting firm, Lumina Strategies LLC, got a six-month, $60,000 subcontract to help build up Chavez’s image, including by providing polling data.

IF foxes in the hen-house has any meaning, it comes full circle when understanding just how compromised the American people are due to many in Congress. For whatever fanciful reason, citizens tend to believe (and their reps are more than pleased to cement the narrative forward) that their representatives have their backs. That they are, at their core, patriots.

Dangerous nonsense. Wishful thinking. Fantasy land. Time to burst the bubble and pierce many of their veils!

Forward march…back to a Constitutional Republic!

UPDATE:MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD LINKS TO HILL & BILL CLINTON STRENGTHEN: TIED INTO BENGHAZIGATE, BLIND SHEIKH & HUMA ABEDIN’S TERROR AXIS…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 20, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

A given investigation is only as good as its moving parts and how well they (eventually) fit together without nudging and prodding. Such is the case with one of the most pressing investigations of our times: the infiltration and global penetration of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia into America;its quest for dominance. Many are working towards ferreting out the facts at large, and a preponderance are coming to similar conclusions. Western shaking.

Specifically, charges against the Clinton’s and Hill’s “special” friend Huma are heating up, even though this site cited their nexus before most. The particulars are found within a most recent commentary: Hillary Clinton & her mobbed up Muslim Brotherhood terror associates are inexorably tied, politically and business-wise. Treasonous.

NOT only that, but Hill and Huma’s tie-ins to Benghazigate have been presented and explored at this site, and with requisite linkage to the Blind Sheikh’s contingent release from an American prison.

Mind you, Benghazigate’s stonewall involves Egypt’s Brotherhood & its multiplicity of fingerprints; proxy jihadis; weapons running and the Blind Sheik’s release.

As a matter of record, this American-Israeli first reported on the Egyptian terror mastermind in a 2005 op-ed, the opening of jihad on U.S. soil. Back then his centrality within the Muslim Brotherhood was more than appreciated in certain quarters, though many higher ups refused to listen. Just read the op-ed.

But fast forward to the present via Benghazigate’s trail of American death, and we land straight back at the Blind Sheikh’s cell. Full (jihadi) circle. How so? Alas, there are none so blind as those who refuse/fail to see!

Bill and Hillary Clinton Implicated further

by Shoebat Foundation on December 17, 2013

By Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack

The recent claims attributed to the wife of ousted Egyptian president Mohammed Mursi are shocking – very shocking. If they are true, they would be extremely damaging to the Obama administration generally but perhaps even more so, to Bill and Hillary Clinton. Naglaa Mahmoud is reported to have divulged some extremely specific details. While we wait to see the story develop, we thought we’d research secondary evidence in an attempt to discredit or bolster Mahmoud’s charges.Hillary and Mursi: Close friends since the 1980′s?While mostly circumstantial, these claims, when examined in the context of multiple other facts, appear to add more credibility to the claims allegedly made by Mahmoud. It is for this reason that we have introduced the report below as Addendum P of our “Ironclad” Report.

Employing the Brotherhood

The employment of a prominent Muslim Brotherhood figure in Egypt, by the Clinton Foundation may help add to the veracity of shocking claims recently attributed to Naglaa Mahmoud, wife of ousted Egyptian president, Mohammed Mursi. Among other things Mahmoud reportedly said in an interview was that the Clintons “recruited” her and her husband in the 1980′s while the Egyptian couple resided in the U.S. and that the two families became close friends.

Let’s take a look at some demonstrable facts in light of these supposed claims. First, consider the potential fruits of such a relationship between the Clintons and the Mursi family.Earlier this year, it was reported that Gehad el-Haddad had been arrested by Egyptian security forces; el-Haddad also worked for the foundation of the 42nd U.S. President.Gehad El-Haddad: Al-Shater’s Chief of Staff and Clintons’ employee.Gehad el-Haddad was also the Chief of Staff to Khairat al-Shater, a top Muslim Brotherhood leader in Egypt who was the front-running Brotherhood candidate for President until Mursi took that mantle and ultimately won the presidency in 2012. El-Haddad’s father – Essam el-Haddad – was an aide to Mursi as his top foreign policy adviser according to Politisite.

Benghazi

We have presented overwhelming evidence that Egypt – under the control of the Muslim Brotherhood at the time – was involved in the attack in Benghazi on 9/11/12 that resulted in the deaths of four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Mahmoud’s claims may bolster the case even more.Ambassador Stevens: Security at SMC was “grossly” inadequate.Let’s bring forth two indisputable facts:

Mohammed Mursi was passionate about wanting the release of Omar Abdel-Rahman (the Blind Sheikh). We presented this in EXHIBITS L and M of our “Ironclad” Report.
The Special Mission Compound (SMC) was woefully and inexplicably insecure, just begging to be attacked. Even the Accountability Review Board (ARB) commissioned by Clinton found State Department leadership failures to be “systemic” and that security was “grossly” inadequate. This SMC came under the ultimate authority and responsibility of Hillary Clinton.

These two facts taken together instantly become more relevant in light of claims attributed to Mursi’s wife. If the Clintons and the Mursis are truly close, with Abedin having served as a Brotherhood operative inside the State Department, claims made by retired four-star Admiral James Lyons, that the attack was likely about a kidnapping operation gone wrong (to exchange Stevens for the Blind Sheikh) may take on added significance as well (EXHIBITS O and AD).

Mursi’s Wife: Provided Sisterhood resources to Hillary?

Another claim attributed to Mahmoud is that Hillary “seeks the assistance – both official and unofficial – of several members of the Muslim Sisterhood” to “help with problems in the Middle East” and that Mahmoud has “many wives of Brotherhood leaders” at her disposal to do just that. If Mursi wanted the Blind Sheikh released, it can be concluded that Mahmoud does as well; ditto Saleha Abedin and her daughter. The same can most assuredly be said for the el-Haddads and Mahmoud’s co-Sisterhood leaders.

The “grossly” inadequate security at the SMC would be like low-hanging fruit for Muslim Brotherhood terrorists to capture Stevens and demand the Blind Sheikh’s release in exchange for Stevens’ release.

When asked in a Congressional hearing about the possibility of the attack being about a kidnapping operation gone wrong, the reason given by ARB Chairman Thomas Pickering for why he dismissed the idea, didn’t comport with the facts. Pickering said he didn’t believe the attackers knew where Stevens was inside the SMC but multiple sources confirm that Stevens was specifically targeted by the attackers (see EXHIBIT AE).

Of course, when talking about the Benghazi attack, the attempt made by both Hillary and Mursi to point to the video as the cause, takes on added significance in light of Mahmoud’s purported claims. Hillary blamed the video as early as the night of the attacks (EXHIBIT F). Later, on 9/25/12, while speaking at the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), Mursi blamed the video for the attacks as well (EXHIBIT H).

Mursi: Blamed video for Benghazi while speaking at Clinton Global Initiative.

This would mean that Hillary and Mursi were on the exact same page when it came to their expressed views for the attack on the SMC in Benghazi. Additional irony is provided by where Mursi was when he did so – CGI.

Again, the claims attributed to Mahmoud are bolstered by these facts.

Relationship with Clintons
How about the claim by Mahmoud that the Clintons ‘recruited’ her and her husband in the 1980′s? Here’s what is known. Mursi was in the U.S. from 1978 – 1985. He attended USC from ’78 – ’82 and then taught for three years at Cal State-Northridge in Los Angeles before returning to Egypt. The degree he earned from USC was in Materials Science, which appears to be a discipline of interest to Bill Clinton. In a 2008 interview Clinton gave to the AP, he said the following:

I also think colleges need to have more funding in basic funding and research and less politics, from stem cell research and human genome research to global warming research and research in materials science.

None other than Bill Clinton’s Foundation announced in November of 2007 that it would be partnering with Universities to deal with global warming from the perspective of Mursi’s area of expertise. Cal State-Northridge picked up the story at the time as well.

Via Elia Powers at Inside Higher Ed:

Its list of signatories continues to grow, and the American College and University Presidents Climate Commitment received a major boost Wednesday with the announcement of a partnership with the William J. Clinton Foundation to address global warming through building retrofits……To decrease energy consumption and work toward carbon neutrality, the commitment asks colleges to take several steps, which can include adopting green building standards and embracing energy-efficient appliances. That’s where the Clinton partnership comes in. The foundation is connecting colleges with companies that are offering to help them fund and complete building retrofits intended to decrease energy consumption and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

If Mahmoud’s claims of a relationship with the Clintons is correct, would it not have made sense for Bill to reach out to and consult with Mursi about this particular “Green Initiative”? To be sure, materials science would not be the sole aspect with regard to building retrofits but it would certainly be an aspect.

Mursi and Bill at CGI on 9/25/12: How well do these men know each other?

The Ph.D. Mursi earned from USC was in precisely this or a related discipline, according to the Daily Trojan. At Times Higher Education, just prior to Mursi taking office last year, David Matthews wrote:

When he submitted his PhD thesis on the “high-temperature electrical conductivity and defect structure of donor-doped [alpha]-Al2O3″ at the University of Southern California in 1982, it is doubtful that Mohamed Morsi thought he would one day become president of Egypt.

Aside from any expertise Mursi may have been able to provide to the Clinton Foundation with regard to his expertise in materials science, did a longtime relationship with the Clintons benefit Mursi’s campaign in any way? If the families were indeed close, there likely could have been some interest in seeing him win.

Consider this excerpt from an NBC News report shortly after he was elected:

Morsi has been described as the accidental candidate; in April, he replaced Khairat El-Shater, the Muslim Brotherhood’s more charismatic and effusive choice who was deemed ineligible to run.

Khairat Al-Shater was disqualified because he had been in prison too recently, convicted of crimes that included money laundering. Mursi was arrested and jailed in January of 2011, during the Arab Spring but was freed during a prison break.

After Al-Shater left the race, many believed that Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh would become the frontrunner but Mursi saw opportunity, claiming that the Muslim Brotherhood would not back Fotouh, who formally left the Brotherhood (wink, wink) in order to run for President, ostensibly because the Brotherhood announced that it would not put forth a presidential candidate. As chairman of the Freedom and Justice Party – the Brotherhood’s political arm – Mursi essentially torpedoed Fotouh’s chances by announcing that the Brotherhood would not endorse anyone for president who left the organization.

Uh, but the Brotherhood pledged not to put forth a candidate. No matter, Mursi ran anyway – and won on June 24, 2012.

Activities of Huma Abedin
It is noteworthy to keep in mind that questions about what Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin was doing during these months later became a source of controversy.In December of 2011, Abedin went on maternity leave. She returned in June of that year while simultaneously taking a job a Special Government Employee (SGE). In addition to her role their being quite ambiguous, questions about the legality of the arrangement caught the eye of Senator Charles Grassley, who sent Secretary of State John Kerry a letter demanding answers.

The letter sent in response by State Department legal counsel also included correspondence from Abedin herself. These letters raised more questions than they answered. Another interesting timeline aspect involved a letter sent by Rep. Michele Bachmann to the Inspector General at the State Department in June of 2012. In it, Bachmann expressed concerns over Abedin’s familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. It was during this same month that Abedin took her job as an SGE.

Let’s go back to transcript of the news report about Naglaa Mahmoud that appeared on Mehwar TV. While Mursi’s wife allegedly spilled a lot of beans, she went out of her way to say she would “not speak about Huma Abedin”. Remember, Mahmoud and Abedin’s mother – whom Abedin remains close to – have been very close colleagues as leaders in the Muslim Sisterhood.

In summation, the evidence already in existence, whether primary, secondary, or circumstantial only raises more questions when viewed in the context of the claims attributed to Naglaa Mahmoud.

Disgracefully, rumors abound regarding various Presidential libraries and their laundry list of nefarious contributors. But it goes without saying, the fact that terror-tied Brotherhood players are financially in bed with Clinton’s library, well, it all just comes into Brotherhood focus – the embedded infiltration and penetration of the Muslim Mafia.

Hill, Bill, Huma, Barack HUSSEIN Obama and assorted surrogates….jail should be the first remedy, but not the only one.

Where there is smoke there is always an underlying fire source. The American house is burning and many of its leaders are serving as primary incendiary agents!

U.S. ACADEMIA PLACES NAIL IN WESTERN CIVILIZATION: Deconstructing Gender To Finally Strip Judeo-Christian Teachings…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 19, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

NOBODY dare be fooled as to what is at stake, as the FINAL deconstruction of the American academy takes place. Its descent into civilization-toppling madness. Yup, this is no exaggeration.

From the get go, let’s be inordinately clear: radical, revolutionary fanatics ( wrapping themselves in “progressive” garb) are hell bent on destroying America, as such, it is the beginning and end of American exceptionalism, the epicenter of western freedoms.

Step by step, radical profs have infused America’s campuses with whatever components are necessary to bring about a revolutionary shift away from Judeo-Christian culture via divergent avenues. Consequentially, the “definition” of gender (as if it needs re-defining !) being either male and female no longer resonates. Twisted.

But no matter. This directional marker has been in their cross hairs for decades, but is now at the height of their deconstruction/transformation struggle. You got that? Their totalitarian mission cannot be completed without the destruction of the family unit, replacing it with whatever is required to meet their political end goals in its stead. As such, TRADITIONAL America gotta go.

IF this sounds familiar, it surely should, as its historical roots lie with Nazi Germany’s socialist regime; the morphing of socialism & Nazism, their hatred of Judeo-Christian ethics.

Thus, several decades ago socialists, Marxists and communists infiltrated every sphere of America’s public life, but the academy became “prime meat”.

Beginning in the 1950s, a more radical form of liberalism emerged in the academy that sowed the seeds for the sexual revolution and multiculturalism. Neo-progressivism mobilized the New Left of the 1960s, transformed American politics, and continues to dominate the cultural and political conversation today. It combines what neo-progressives call personal politics (the idea that American citizens have a right to all forms of self-expression) and cultural politics (the idea that cultural groups are entitled to special status) together as the twin pillars of a new identity politics. As a result, citizens today have more, not less, freedom from government in the realm of sexual expression, and the American electorate has been fractured into various groups.

In the past two decades, a new, more radical form of progressivism has taken over American social and political life, even finding its way into the White House. Fresh instances of this new progressivism appear every day.

And does anyone wonder why their decades long efforts are coming to fruition under the Radical-in-Chief? Does knocking down DOMA resonate, as the Gay-in-Chief “exposed” himself once again; excited about knocking it down, and even found time to call newly “married” gay couple. Why?

Genderqueer’ rising: Colleges welcome kids who identify as neither male nor female

OAKLAND, Calif. — The weekly meetings of Mouthing Off!, a group for students at Mills College in Oakland, Calif., who identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender, always start the same way. Members take turns going around the room saying their names and the personal pronouns they want others to use when referring to them — she, he or something else.

It’s an exercise that might seem superfluous given that Mills, a small and leafy liberal arts school historically referred to as the Vassar of the West, only admits women as undergraduates. Yet increasingly, the “shes” and “hers” that dominate the introductions are keeping third-person company with “they,” ”ze” and other neutral alternatives meant to convey a more generous notion of gender.

“Because I go to an all-women’s college, a lot of people are like, ‘If you don’t identify as a woman, how did you get in?’” said sophomore Skylar Crownover, 19, who is president of Mouthing Off! and prefers to be mentioned as a singular they, but also answers to he. “I just tell them the application asks you to mark your sex and I did. It didn’t ask me for my gender.”

On high school and college campuses and in certain political and social media circles, the growing visibility of a small, but semantically committed cadre of young people who, like Crownover, self-identify as “genderqueer” — neither male nor female but an androgynous hybrid or rejection of both — is challenging anew the limits of Western comprehension and the English language.

Though still in search of mainstream acceptance, students and staff members who describe themselves in terms such as agender, bigender, third gender or gender-fluid are requesting — and sometimes finding — linguistic recognition.

Inviting students to state their preferred gender pronouns, known as PGPs for short, and encouraging classmates to use unfamiliar ones such as “ze,”’sie,” ”e,” ”ou” and “ve” has become an accepted back-to-school practice for professors, dorm advisers, club sponsors, workshop leaders and health care providers at several schools.

The phenomenon gained notice in the San Francisco Bay area in early November after an 18-year-old student at a private high school in Berkeley suffered severe burns when a 16-year-old boy set fire to the student’s skirt while the two were riding a public bus. The parents of the injured student, Sascha Fleischman, said their son is biologically male but identifies as agender and favors they as a pronoun.

At the University of Vermont, students who elect to change their names and/or pronouns on class rosters now can choose from she, he and ze, as well as the option of being referred to by only their names. Hampshire College in Massachusetts advertises its inclusiveness by listing the gender pronouns of its tour guides on the school’s web site. And intake forms at the University of California, Berkeley’s student health center include spaces for male, female or other.

At Mills, the changes have included tweaking some long-standing traditions. New students are now called “first-years” instead of “freshwomen.” The student government also has edited the college’s historic chant — “Strong women! Proud women! All women! Mills women!” to “Strong, Proud, All, Mills!”

The nods to novel pronouns and nonconformity are an outgrowth of campaigns for gender-neutral bathrooms and housing that were aimed at making campuses more welcoming for transgender students moving from one side of the gender spectrum to the other. But as fewer young people choose to undergo sex reassignment surgery, such students are slowly being outnumbered by peers who refuse to be limited, said Genny Beemyn, director of the Stonewall Center at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

“Certainly we see students who are transitioning, particularly female to male, but the vast majority of students who identify under the trans umbrella identify in some way outside the binary, and that’s really causing a shift on college campuses,” said Beemyn, who studies gender identity in higher education and recently traded ze for they. “Having role models and examples allows people to say ‘Yes, what I am feeling is legitimate.’”

As neologisms like “ze” have moved beyond conversation and into students’ academic papers, some professors have expressed annoyance and uncertainty about how to respond, said Lucy Ferriss, writer-in-residence at Trinity College in Connecticut and a frequent contributor to the Chronicle of Higher Education’s language blog, Lingua Franca. .

“There is an initial discomfort. I think it’s probably hypocritical to pretend there isn’t, to say, ‘Ok, that’s what they want to do’ and leave it at that,” Ferriss said. “The people I know who teach will say ‘This is weird and it’s cumbersome and it’s not going to last because it’s not organic.’”

At the same time, Ferris thinks it’s a mistake for scholars and grammarians to dismiss the trend without considering whether English and society might be served by less-rigid ideas about gender.

“Mail carrier did not evolve organically and it’s a lot easier to say mailman. Decades ago there were poets who refused to be called poetesses,” she said. “Most language has evolved organically, but there have been times — and when it comes to issues of gender there probably have to be times — when there are people willing to push the envelope.”

Mel Goodwin, youth program director at the gay and lesbian community center in Las Vegas, said getting the hang of alternative pronouns can be tricky in conversation. Goodwin, 28, claimed they as a preferred pronoun four years ago and it took time “to unlearn what I had been taught about gender.”

Yet when people object to they as being grammatically incorrect, Goodwin counters that modern English is to blame and that scholars, writers and linguists have spent more than a century trying to come up with gender-neutral pronouns that stick. In public presentations, Goodwin also refers to a map that shows historic and contemporary cultures around the world that have recognized more than two genders.

“This is not about young people in the U.S. over the last 20 years kind of coming out of the woodwork and making up labels that aren’t real,” Goodwin said. “This is a real variation among humans, period.”

BOTTOM LINE: none of the above is about addressing the needs of some students who are indeed in much pain due to their sexual identity confusion. That being said, there are qualified medical professionals to deal with their angst, and this is definitely a painful road to travel. However, it is certainly NOT the purview of academia to behave as their mental health professionals, unless in crisis while on campus.

The fact of the matter is: to destroy America one must destroy its edifice, its Judeo-Christian foundation. Let no one opine otherwise.

To bring down the west one must first bring down America. Gender queer agenda fits to a tee. Simple, and evil, as that.

ISRAEL’S COWED LEADERS BETRAY THEIR DEAD & LIVING: JEWISH JUSTICE DENIED. CAPITULATING (AGAIN) TO OBAMA’S DICTATES! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 18, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

DURING a “hot” war casualties are a given, however tragic. Oftentimes civilians accidentally get caught in the crossfire, yet when dealing with Arab/Muslim forces they eschew all “norms/rules of war”. They purposefully place their own in harms way and abuse them as “human shields” for cannon fodder. Media and political sympathy is their “tactic” of choice, as the dead bodies of their civilians pile up for effect. In fact, they target Jewish civilians for sport, not unlike ducks at a shooting range. We all know this by now.

Yes, soldiers are supposed to be the front line defense, as such the risks they take are understood and appreciated, at least they should be. However, when it comes to Israel’s leaders they have little sense of right and wrong, whether involving their citizen soldiers or civilians. JEWISH JUSTICE, if you will.

In relation to Lebanon, Israel and its northern neighbor are in a “cold state of war”, though UN resolution 1701, laid down in 2006, isn’t worth the paper it is written on. Israel’s leaders opine otherwise, but we know better. In fact, had Israel’s derelict leaders taken Lebanon’s act of war (in 2006) to its rightful conclusion, Hezbollah would NOT be in control of Lebanon, and with an arsenal tenfold more lethal than before the “cessation” of hostilities allowed them to regroup and rearm!

As noted:

Resolution 1701 (2006) Adopted by the Security Council at its 5511th meeting, on 11 August 2006 The Security Council, Recalling all its previous resolutions on Lebanon, in particular resolutions 425 (1978), 426 (1978), 520 (1982), 1559 (2004), 1655 (2006) 1680 (2006) and 1697 (2006), as well as the statements of its President on the situation in Lebanon, in particular the statements of 18 June 2000 (S/PRST/2000/21), of 19 October 2004 (S/PRST/2004/36), of 4 May 2005 (S/PRST/2005/17), of 23 January 2006 (S/PRST/2006/3) and of 30 July 2006 (S/PRST/2006/35), Expressing its utmost concern at the continuing escalation of hostilities in Lebanon and in Israel since Hizbollah’s attack on Israel on 12 July 2006, which has already caused hundreds of deaths and injuries on both sides, extensive damage to civilian infrastructure and hundreds of thousands of internally displaced persons, Emphasizing the need for an end of violence, but at the same time emphasizing the need to address urgently the causes that have given rise to the current crisis, including by the unconditional release of the abducted Israeli soldiers….

To wit, when a member of the Lebanese army ( Hezbollah actually controls the gov’t, but no matter…) murders an IDF soldier through sniper fire – and ongoing attempts to attack Israel continues unabated – all the while Navy Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen, 31 was well within Israeli territory, then all “accommodations” should be off. Plain and simple, picking off Israeli soldiers is an act of war, or so one would believe.

HOWEVER, spineless leaders ALWAYS revert true to form, leading to the path of least resistance, even as they feign braggadocio and full blown bluster…huffing and puffing to blow the (enemy’s) house down. Bull crap.

Similarly, PM Netanyahu’s ‘cease fire’ with Hamas also blew up in Israel’s face, time and again.

Hence, it is no exaggeration to state: Israel’s leadership unfit to lead: capitulating to Hamas & “The One”, regardless of the spin…inexorably, a ship of fools!

The above is not to suggest that full scale operations should ensue, but targeted operations are a must. At the very least, the political echelon has a duty, a moral obligation (to order its military) to exact JUSTICE for the blood of its fallen soldier(s). Not just for the family of the slain, but for the entire Jewish nation. Does honor bound even resonate among Israel’s leadership? Not at all.

Israel accepts Lebanese explanation for killing of IDF soldier as “one-time” incident

DEBKAfile Special Report December 16, 2013

Israeli and Lebanese liaison officers met with UNIFIL Monday, Dec. 16, to clarify the circumstances in which a Lebanese soldier Sunday shot dead Navy Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen, 31, from Afula, while he was driving past the northern Israeli town of Rosh Hanikra.

At the end of the meeting, the Israel Defense Forces officers appeared ready to accept the Lebanese explanation that a member of its armed forces acted on his own initiative and “did not consult his station before carrying out the attack,” claiming it was a one-time incident. The soldier, they said, had been taken to the Defense Ministry offices in Beirut for interrogation.

DEBKAfile: The Lebanese account of the incident did not clear up the questions surrounding the attack, although Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon insisted earlier Monday that Israel would demand explanations of how it happened, whether it was a “rogue” attack and how the soldier was being disciplined. The minister wanted to hear what the Lebanese army was doing to prevent this sort of incident recurring.

Our military sources stress that Israel’s willingness to be fobbed off with lame Lebanese explanations is bound to have a negative effect on its posture of deterrence, broadcasting weakness in the face of its avowed enemies Iran, Hizballah, and Syria – especially since this was the second shooting attack from Lebanon in three days. Thursday, Dec. 12, cross-border gunfire at Israeli soldiers by another Lebanese soldier who apparently “forgot to consult” his superiors, was allowed to go without response, with the IDF spokesman speaking vaguely of “errant fire from Lebanese huntsmen” – although a fierce rainstorm was raging at the time.

Our sources report that the US, the UN and France, turned the heat on Jerusalem during the day to prevent the military encounter across the Israeli-Lebanese border from escalating into a major clash. Israel for its part was mum about the details of the event.

The IDF avoided disclosing why and who was responsible for the late Master Sgt Shlomi Cohen being ordered to turn around on his way home to Afula and take on an undisclosed mission along the Lebanese border, without being properly equipped. {Blogger’s Note: this is hardly the first time an IDF soldier died due to lack of proper equipment & backup!}

The first DEBKAfile report on the attack appeared Sunday.. The IDF confirmed Sunday night, Dec. 15 that an Israeli soldier, The soldier, Navy Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen, 31, from Afula, was killed in the Rosh Hanikra region opposite Ras Naqoura when a Lebanese soldier fired on his vehicle. The military spokesman earlier reported the Lebanese soldier had fired 6-10 rounds, after which Lebanese soldiers poured into the area. The spokesman said Israel takes a grave view of the incident and has summoned reinforcements to the border region. “We are ready for any step and reserve the right to retaliate at the right place and time,” he said.

The Lebanese army announced that “contact was lost with a Lebanese soldier,” believed to be the sniper,without explaining whether the soldier was thought to have been captured by Israel or fled. Also claimed was that an IDF patrol had crossed into Lebanon and was fired on by Lebanese troops, after which Israel air force planes flew over southern Lebanon.

In another incident in the Sidon area further north, two Lebanese military positions or checkpoints were attacked. A Lebanese soldier and four attackers were killed. In one attack, a suicide bomber blew himself up. Both took place in the al-Awwali district of northern Sidon, at the same time as the flare-up on the Israeli border further south. Heavy Lebanese military movements were sighted after the attacks. The Jund Al-Sham and other Al Qaeda-linked organizations in the Palestinian refugee camp of Ain Hilwa outside Sidon went on a high state of preparedness.

The IDF is investigating to find out if the Lebanese soldier who attacked the Israeli patrol was connected with the Sidon assailants. DEBKAfile’s military and counterterrorism sources say that if the two events turn out to be connected, it would constitute a coordinated attack by the same terrorist group on the IDF across the Israeli border and the Lebanese army in southern Lebanon. Before midnight Sunday, the UNIFIL spokesman reported a serious incident in the Ras al-Naqoura and Serra sectors and called for restraint by Israeli and Lebanese commanders. He gave no details of the incident.

All day Monday, Washington leaned heavily on Israel’s government and military leaders to hold back from a military strike to punish the Lebanese hands behind the shooting dead of Navy Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen Sunday, Dec. 15. The Obama administration was anxious to avert a major flare-up that might jeopardize its plans for dealing with the Syrian war in cooperation with Tehran.

BOTTOM LINE: Fealty to normless democracy, in juxtaposition to normative democracy, stops Israel’s top echelon from reaching for the jugular and finally ! declaring VICTORY over Israel’s sworn enemies. The military has the skill and the firepower to end the madness, that’s not the issue. Instead, the political leadership eschews VICTORY and brings the Jewish nation/people (bowing) on its knees to Washington’s dictates. Acceding to the demands of others has taken precedence over executing JUSTICE, without which there is no moral authority to govern.

החייל שנהרג – Below is Navy Master Sgt. Shlomi Cohen, 31, murdered in cold blood. May his blood be avenged. May Israel’s leaders grow balls. May JEWISH JUSTICE prevail, proving that Jewish blood isn’t cheap! May his family be comforted by all those near and far!

UPDATE: “BIRTHER” PROBE (SOON) COMING TO CLIMACTIC HEAD…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 17, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

This blog, all along, stuck to its guns, regarding The One’s bonafides, even when subject to mocking. Regardless, no wishy washy, finger-in-the-air prevarications herein, despite any recriminations. Tsk, tsk. Like water off a duck’s back. In any event, only facts and sound logic underlie this and that. No herd-like mentality on this end.

That being said, who in their rational mind (still) believes the Liar-in-Chief is anything but a fraud? Come on now, even if exposing said fairy tale lends to a cry of “racism”, so what? Where are we, in kindergarten…sticks and stones. But never mind, paradoxically, this egregious charge lands DIRECTLY at Obama’s door as he drags America towards a race war. Topsy turvy.

**In this regard, a myriad of proofs prop up “birther’s” claims and they are overwhelming.**

Undoubtedly, “birthers” are reaching critical mass and Congress will receive an earful. The question becomes: will they step up? Well, it may not matter, since certain events can even surpass their authority, thus, no longer allowing them to close their eyes and muffles their ears. Sounds like music to a patriot’s heart.

Regardless, there is no other way to describe what has taken place in America, other than the CRIME/HEIST OF THE CENTURY: Obama’s FORGED documents are uncovered.

**And here we find ourselves…despite the naysayers, brayers and cacophony of “O-cheerleaders”!**

UNIVERSE-SHATTERING’ TWIST IN OBAMA BIRTH PROBE

Arpaio investigator: ‘This is beyond the pale of anything you can imagine’

BOB UNRUH

The lead investigator in Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation of President Obama’s birth certificate says the case has taken a startling turn, and sheriff’s investigators now are assisting the Cold Case volunteers.

“When this information is finally exposed to the public, it will be universe-shattering,” Mike Zullo told WND. “This is beyond the pale of anything you can imagine.”

Zullo explained that because it’s an active investigation that could produce criminal charges, he’s unable to reveal details at the moment.

But the allegations, he said, which go far beyond a fraudulent birth certificate, could be public as early as March.

The issue arose once again because of the death Wednesday in Hawaii of state Health Department chief Loretta Fuddy in a plane crash. She was the official who waived state prohibitions and provided to the White House a copy of a document that Obama presented to the public as his birth certificate.

It’s the document that Arpaio’s investigators have concluded is fraudulent.

Amid conspiracy theories circulating the Internet, Zullo told WND Friday that Fuddy’s death – she was the only fatality among nine people aboard a small airplane that crashed off the coast of Molokai – appears to be a tragic accident, not foul play.

He said his investigation does not depend on any information from Fuddy.

In an interview today with author and talk-radio host Carl Gallups of PPSimmons News and Ministry Network and the author of “The Magic Man in the Sky,” and the new “The Rabbi who Found Messiah,” Zullo said his investigation of the Obama fraud case “does not hinge on Ms. Fuddy.”

“While her death certainly is a tragedy, it in no way hampers our investigation in this matter,” he said. “If people truly believe that her untimely demise was somehow related to an attempt to silence her for ‘what she may or may not know,’ then there are several more people in Hawaii who should be very, very concerned.

“Again, I want to emphasize,” Zullo said, “Sheriff Arpaio and I do not, at this time, believe her death was connected to any nefarious circumstances.”

The birth certificate dispute dates back to before the 2008 election. Critics, including Hillary Clinton, raised the issue about Obama’s status as a “natural-born citizen.” Not defined in the Constitution, it probably was thought at the time of the writing of the Constitution to be someone born of two citizen parents.

Obama fails that test because his father was a Kenyan student visiting the U.S.

Arpaio assigned his Cold Case Posse to look into the issue before the 2012 election, when constituents approached him and asked him to check whether Obama would be an ineligible candidate on the presidential election ballot.

In a recent radio interview with Gallups, Zullo affirmed the investigation had been expanded to the county sheriff’s office and was “moving in a direction that was not anticipated by us.”

“The whole [issue] is more nefarious than you can imagine,” Zullo said, crediting Arpaio for ordering the investigation and sticking with it.

“He knows in his gut that something is wrong,” Zullo said.

Dozens of lawsuits have been filed without success. One case is pending before the Alabama Supreme Court for which Zullo provided evidence.

See a report of Fuddy’s death:

Still a live issue

Zullo has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s birth certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the document had been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a genuine paper document.

“Mr. Obama has, in fact, not offered any verifiable authoritative document of any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event,” he explained. “One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together digitized data from several unknown sources.”

Zullo also has noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to produce an original birth document for Obama, and it should have been easy to find.

See some of Zullo’s evidence:

More recently, Grace Vuoto of the World Tribune reported that among the experts challenging the birth certificate is certified document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an expert for Perkins Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in eligibility cases.

“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,” Zullo told the World Tribune.

“Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator told the news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable expert. The very firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used Mr. Hayes in their cases.”

The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and called almost immediately.

“There is something wrong with this,” Hayes said.

Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my observations and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured document created by utilizing material from various sources.”

“In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated,” he says in the report.

Investigator Douglas J. Hagmann of the Northeast Intelligence Network reported this month that in October an affidavit was filed in a court case, under seal, that purportedly identifies the creator of the Obama birth certificate.

He said Douglas Vogt, an author and the owner and operator of a scanning business who also has an accounting background, invested over two years in an investigation of the authenticity of document.

Vogt, along with veteran typesetter Paul Ivey, conducted “exhaustive research of the document provided to the White House Press Corps on April 27, 2011 – not the online PDF, a critical distinction that must be understood,” Hagmann said.

“Using their combined experience of 80 years in this realm, they conducted extensive examinations of the ‘copy’ that was used as the basis for the PDF document. They acquired the same type of equipment that was used back in the late 1950s and early 1960s in an attempt to recreate the document presented as an ‘authenticated copy’ proving the legitimacy of Barack Obama. Instead, they found 20 points of forgery on that document and detail each point of forgery in the affidavit,” wrote Hagmann.

“Even more interesting, Mr. Vogt claims to have identified the ‘signature’ of the perpetrator, or the woman who created the forged document, hidden within the document itself. Her identity, in addition to the identity of other conspirators and their precise methods are contained in a sealed document supplementing the public affidavit.”

Grounds for impeachment

Last month, WND columnist Christopher Monckton wrote that the controversy he calls “Hawaiigate” should be “the central ground of impeachment.”

“First, the dishonesty is shameless and in your face. Mr Obama’s advisers, once they realized the ‘birth certificate’ was as bogus as a $3 bill, knew that if they simply went on pretending that $3 bills are legal tender the hard-left-dominated news media would carefully and continuously look the other way, pausing occasionally to sneer at anyone who pointed out that, in this constitutionally crucial respect, the ‘president’ has no clothes,” Monckton wrote.

“Secondly, not one of the numerous agencies of state, as well as federal government, whose duty was and is to investigate the Mickey-Mouse ‘birth certificate’ has bothered even to respond to the thousands of requests for investigation put forward by U.S. citizens.”

He said that in Hawaii last year, he watched “as a senior former state senator called the police and, when they came, handed over to them compelling evidence that the ‘birth certificate’ had been forged.”

“The police, correctly, passed the file to the state’s attorney general, a ‘Democrat,’ who did nothing about it,” he said.

“In Washington, D.C., I watched as a concerned citizen from Texas telephoned the FBI and reported the ‘birth certificate’ as being a forgery. They said they would send two agents to see him within the hour. No one came.”

‘You tell me about eligibility’

One of the highest profile skeptics has been billionaire Donald Trump.

Trump said he can’t be certain that Obama is eligible to be president, and he pointedly noted that a reporter who was poking fun at the issue admitted he can’t, either.

Trump repeatedly has insisted Obama has not documented his eligibility. At one point, he offered $5 million to the charity or charities of Obama’s choice if he would release his passport records and authorize the colleges he attended to release his applications and other records.

Trump argues that those documents would show whether or not Obama ever accepted scholarship or other aid as a foreign student, which could preclude him from being a “natural-born citizen.”

Trump’s conversation with ABC’s Jonathan Karl started with Karl noting that Trump took on the “not serious” issue of eligibility.

“Why does that make me not serious?” Trump demanded. “I think that resonated with a lot of people.”

Karl replied: “You don’t still question he was born in the United States, do you?”

“I have no idea,” Trump said. “I don’t know. Was there a birth certificate? You tell me. You know some people say that was not his birth certificate. I’m saying I don’t know. Nobody knows, and you don’t know either. Jonathan you’re a smart guy, and you don’t know.”

When Karl admitted he was “pretty sure,” Trump jumped on the statement.

“You just said you’re pretty sure … you have to be 100 percent sure,” he said. “Jonathan, you said you’re pretty convinced, so let’s just see what happens over time.”

Read all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the subject.

Among the many records the Obama camp has refused to release are the marriage license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.

Monckton, citing Zullo’s sworn affidavit in a court case, published a sworn mathematical analysis demonstrating the near-zero probability that the White House “birth certificate” is genuine.

Alongside the push towards exposing his illegitimacy, Forbes enters the fray, but from a divergent direction. Who the hell cares, as long as he is booted AND eventually prosecuted :Forbes Editorial Demands Obama’s Impeachment… and Goes Viral.

NOW, getting back to his fake “birth certificate”…. While it is a tad “coincidental” that the only person to die in the recent plane crash is a central player in “Hawaiigate”, and even though many questions loom in the death of Loretta Fuddy, see linked video – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xboa2FqizuQ – it doesn’t mitigate the explosions coming forward, it just makes them ever more urgent to reveal. But let’s wait and see what “officialdom” has to say about her unfortunate/untimely demise. Oh yeah.

EVEN so, the fact that too many folks linked – in one way or another – to knowledge thereof re Obama’s illegal behavior keep “dropping like flies”, well, suspicion is in order. Keep one eye peeled open. You think? And if it turns out that there is no there there, then that’s the way it is. Case closed.

NO matter. Arpaio’s crew has more than their hands full with their forthcoming explosive evidence and needn’t be distracted by this “inexplicable” tragedy. Therefore, if they are dismissing – as of now – the latest “fortuitous” Obama-related death, then this blogger understands that their eyes have to stay on particularly incendiary (juggling) balls.

Indubitably, the latest associated death is damn strange!

HILLARY CLINTON & HER MOBBED UP MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TERROR ASSOCIATES: INEXORABLY TIED. Politically AND Business-wise. Treasonous. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 16, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

At the inception of this blog site, to be precise, in June 2012, Six Degrees of Separation was written and the following was noted. An excerpt reads as follows:

In no uncertain terms it was made known: Hillary Clinton is deeply involved with her Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin. Draw your own conclusions, as to what is meant by “deeply”. The discussion (in 2007) centered around the possibility of another Clinton Presidency, at the time a very real possibility.

In any case, the individual was asking me if going public is in the best interests of the United States, in light of Abedin’s ties to the Muslim Brotherhood! You read this right. At first blush I thought there was a lack of communication between us, but then asked the individual to repeat themselves. Nothing changed.

Apparently, it was weighing heavily on said contact’s mind, that their Senator, quite possibly the next POTUS, was in a position to have deeply divided loyalties. When/where this contact found out such explosive information is neither here nor there. Besides, some matters must remain private. However, readers should know that Huma Abedin has been involved with the Clinton family since Bill Clinton’s first term, having been plucked for the plum assignment, as an intern, for the Clinton White House.

Lo and behold, not only was this trusted contact (once again!) correct, but in spades: Huma Abedin, Deputy COS to Hillary Clinton, is inextricably tied to the Muslim Brotherhood/Sisterhood. As a result of concerted digging, Huma’s familial Muslim Brotherhood/Sisterhood tree shook out OVERSIZED terror-laden fruits.

YET, in light of the above, how many are oh so shocked to find out: Hillary Clinton tap danced around Huma Abedin’s Brotherhood/Sisterhood connections…even though Media Matters demanded – show us her security clearance! To no avail.

Hill, like an arrogant potentate-in-waiting, continued (and still does) to play deaf, dumb and blind. Similarly, as if “rule of law” only belonged to the unwashed masses, during Benghazigate Hill conveniently fell on her head, and no one dared thwart her “diagnosis”! We all know, doctors wouldn’t lie for her…her surrogates neither…yada…yada. Hence, her testimony was delayed. Fortuitous timing.

Back to Humala.

NEVER mind the absolute fact that her joined-at- the-hip helpmate, Huma Abedin, was a leader at the MSA, a Muslim Brotherhood front group set up decades ago to advance the Islamic agenda – via dawah and stealth jihad – into America: the Muslim Student Association (MSA) is the Islamic student arm of the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia; HUMA ABEDIN Board member too. Need this blog connect more of this duo’s terror-tied dots?

Which leads us straight to heart of Arabia, as we further uncover the tip of Huma Abedin’s Islamic spear: the ‘House of Al-Saud’ !

As to Huma’s boss, also her “special” friend, Hill, her Islamic masters (business partners too…no kidding) stem from the Egyptian branch of the Brotherhood. Each Islamic nation operates independently, and in tandem, to institute their worldwide agenda – an Islamic Caliphate. Primarily, Egyptian & Saudi Brothers/Sisters call Hill’s shots. Think of her Islamic overlords as a tag team, as they pull whatever (American) strings are necessary.

But before we get to the meat of the matter, we must understand when the “ladies” first got introduced (in certain Jewish circles, some call it a “shidduch”).

Yes, it is no secret (at least to some of us) that Huma Abedin started working for the Clinton’s as an intern during Bubba’s reign in the White House. But no one ever asked: who exactly introduced this hottie diva to Hill & Bill? Well, this Bonnie and Clyde duo has a connection with top Brotherhood/Sisterhood operatives which spans close to 30 years, and this is where Huma ties in.

The following is some background info, but do pay particular attention to her Saudi bonafides, as Huma’s mama (as well as her papa and brother too) is a MAIN Sisterhood operative, and her position as assistant editor at Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs warrants much (terror aligned) scrutiny.

Requisite bio contained herein:

Abedin was born in Kalamazoo, Michigan. When she was two years old, her family moved to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Both her parents were educators. Her father, Syed Zainul Abedin, born in India in 1928, was an alumnus of Aligarh Muslim University, and later received his Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania. He died in 1993.^[5] Her Pakistani mother, Saleha Mahmood Abedin, also received her Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania, and is currently an associate professor of sociology at Dar Al-Hekma College in Jeddah.^[4]^[6]

Abedin returned to the United States at 18 to attend George Washington University, where she earned a B.A. degree.^[7]

While a student at George Washington University, Abedin began working as an intern in the White House in 1996, assigned to then-First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. In 1998, she was an assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs.^[8] She later worked as traveling chief of staff and “body woman” during Clinton’s 2008 Democratic Presidential nomination campaign,^[2]^[3] and subsequently served as Deputy Chief of Staff under Clinton in the State Department.^[9] She is currently a director of the transition team that is helping Clinton return to private life,^[4]^[10] and works for the William Jefferson Clinton Foundation.

IN light of the above GLARING facts, how many degrees is Hill (Bill too) separated from Islamic terrorism, chiefly via the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia? Like pigs to shit. That close.

Report: Hillary Clinton tied to Terrorism

by Shoebat Foundation on December 13, 2013

By Walid Shoebat and Ben BarrackAnother complaint has reportedly been filed with Egypt’s Attorney General, Hisham Barakat. According to multiple Arabic sources (Al Wafd and Vetogate among them), this one is said to allege that the wife of ousted President Mohammed Mursi not only admitted in an interview with Turkey’s Anatolia news agency that she sought to excite domestic insurrections to overthrow Abdel Fatah Al-Sisi but that she collaborated with Hillary Clinton.

Mursi’s Wife: Friends with the Clintons since the 1980′s?Mehwar TV Channel has posted a video of a news report, via Almesryoon, given by Nasr Qaffas, who relays the details of Mahmoud’s interview with Anatolia. Key excerpts of the report translated by Walid Shoebat, beneath the video below:TRANSCRIPT

Qaffas: According to Anatolia Press, Mahmoud said, “I have between my fingers, a treasure trove of secrets from the White House and Mrs. Clinton fears my wrath.”She said, “I will not speak about Huma Abedin”. When asked if she had a close relationship with Hillary Clinton, Mahmoud said, “When my husband returns from his kidnapping, the one who led the coup will pay a hefty price.” Of Mrs. Clinton, she said,“We have a long friendship of many years. We lived in the U.S. and my children learned there. This friendship increased further when my husband became the legitimate president of the country.”

Mahmoud went on to say that they were recruited by the Clintons from the U.S. and began their friendship in the 1980′s. This appears to be a conspiracy that is being hidden.

When asked if they still have friendships with each other, Mahmoud said communications never ceased and that the conversations are all recorded. The wife of Mursi divulged that Mrs. Clinton seeks the assistance – both official and unofficial – of several members of the Muslim Sisterhood organization to help with problems in the Middle East. “We also have routine business dealings with the Clintons.”

Mahmoud further stated that “Hillary depends on us tremendously to help her succeed in the coming presidential elections, just as we helped Barack Obama win twice.” She is quite the looney bin to believe she helped Obama win.

When asked about her relationship with Michelle Obama, Mahmoud said it is very good but it never developed to the point of close friendship, like with Hillary.

On the ability of women to take the lead in the revolution, Mahmoud said that could indeed happen with the Sisterhood. “I have many wives of Brotherhood leaders with me. Many of their husbands were kidnapped and jailed too. I tell them to be patient, for you will have a great reward in the future. I tell them that if their husbands are martyred, we will see to it that they are married off to other men as soon as their menstrual period is over,” she said.

According to Mahmoud, the police will not touch the women, which is why the women are so effective.

On her concerns that the Muslim Brotherhood could be identified as a terrorist organization, the wife of the former President said she was not and declared that she and her colleagues are in the process of organizing a “coup against the coup”.

“We are under the condition of war and Jihad,” she said, “and we have a good command of the necessities of war, the ancient and the modern. I will keep the tactics of war secret because in Islam, war is trickery.”

She said her conscience will not be eased until all of the traitors are hanged in the gallows.

Naglaa Mahmood and Mohammed Mursi.

As mentioned previously, this alleged interview with Anatolia has prompted a complaint to be filed with Egypt’s Attorney General, Hisham Barakat. This is the same AG with whom case 1761 was filed by Sadek Ebeid against Malik Obama.

Via Al-Wafd (translated):

Egypt’s Attorney General Hisham Barakat is inspecting the complaint submitted by attorney Assem Qandil against Naglaa Mahmoud, the wife of ousted President Mohammed Mursi. The complaint accuses Mahmoud of being behind the waves of violence that have befallen the nation. The complaint goes on to say that she is planning a coup to remove the current government.

The complaint requests that Mahmoud be arrested and interrogated.

Qandil told Almesryoon under the subject, ‘The wife of Mursi has between her fingers, a treasure trove of secrets of the White House’, which was stated on Mehwar TV. The complainant went on to say that the subject of the complaint stated to the news agency that she is the first person involved in terrorist conspiracies inside Egyptian universities, especially al-Azhar University.

Qandil also added in his complaint that Mursi’s wife is the main political operative and that with her are ladies from the Muslim Sisterhood who have been instructed to carry out these terrorist actions. The aim of these acts is to bleed the nation’s security by having women demonstrate in and around the universities. She stated that neither the military nor the police will bother the women. She confessed that her relationship with her husband, other Muslim Brotherhood leaders, and the U.S. administration was one of business. By doing so, Mahmoud is confessing that she is involved – her and her husband – with the CIA.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and others reportedly carried on these relationships.

The complainant demanded Mahmoud’s arrest and an investigation into both Mahmoud and other Muslim Brotherhood wives. Qandil demanded Isma Zaid, the editor of Almesryoon, and Nasr Qaffas be questioned as well, to present what they have by way of evidence.

A key revelation in these reports is Mahmoud’s claim that the Clintons befriended her family in the 1980′s while living in the U.S. As one of 63 leaders in the Muslim Sisterhood, Mahmoud is a colleague of Saleha Abedin, another one of those 63 leaders. Saleha is the mother of Huma Abedin, who is a close adviser to Hillary Clinton and wife of former Democratic Congressman, Anthony Weiner.

Huma first landed a job with Hillary in 1996 after attending George Washington University and havingserved on the Board of her University’s Muslim Students Association (MSA), a Muslim Brotherhood group. Were the seeds sown for the relationship between Hillary and Huma years prior via Mursi and Mahmoud?

Hillary at Dar al-Hekma University in 2010 with Sisterhood leader Saleha Abedin (left). Huma (Saleha’s daughter) and Hillary (right).

As for Mahmoud, leading protests in a post-Mursi Egypt is not new. Just days after Senators John McCain (RINO-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (RINO-SC) failed in their attempt to have Muslim Brotherhood leaders freed during their trip to Egypt this past August, Mahmoud led protests. If the complaint filed by Qandil is valid, it can be surmised that the purpose of said protests likely mirrored the ones being promoted today.

The claims that Mursi and Mahmoud worked with the Clintons, the Obama administration, and the CIA seem to further bolster a report that came out last month that was posted by Egyoffline. The report, translated by Eman Nabih, alleged that documents had been obtained that showed the Obama administration’s complicity in exciting domestic insurrections in Egypt in order to overthrow the current government in Egypt, a goal shared by Mahmoud.

As for Anatolia News Agency reports, these are not new either. At about the same time that Mahmoud was leading protests in Egypt this past August, multiple Arabic sources reported that Saad Al-Shater, the son of jailed Muslim Brotherhood deputy Khairat Al-Shater, told Anatolia that his father had the goods on Barack Obama and his administration’s collaboration with Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood.

Malik Obama: denies being connected to Muslim Brotherhood despite his boss Suar Al-Dahab being Muslim Brotherhood.

This past September, Malik Obama, half-brother of Barack Obama, granted an interview to Anatolia Press in order to attack our claims that he is involved with the government of Sudan as the Executive Secretary of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO), which is an arm of Sudan’s Omar Al-Bashir. As is usually the case, those who cannot refute our charges attack our character, which is what Malik did.

It should be noted that until we are able to locate the primary Anatolia News Agency source of Mahmoud’s claims, we cannot independently confirm the veracity of her claims. We are simply relaying the claims of reliable Arabic sources.

**UPDATE at 11:09am EST on December 13, 2013**
Arabic source El-Fagr is reporting that the complaint number filed with AG Barakat by Qandil is 18337.

ALTHOUGH Hill and her (eventual) boss fought tooth and nail for the Presidency in 2008, it didn’t obviate their most pressing intersections once the dust settled; their ideological devotion to the red/green alliance and its net ramifications. In other words, while national socialism is their red nexus, their fealty to the Brotherhood Mafia is rock solid. Their real “green/Islamist” accord.

And, as revealed within a recent interview at Inquisitr, the POTUS surely bonded (still does) with Hill over their deeply intertwined Brotherhood ties. Introducing, his half brother, Malik Obama. A chief operative as well!

As a foretaste, one must, at the very least, be willing to expend a concerted effort to uncover Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s roots. Then, as a result, his seemingly inexplicable foreign policy forays, as well as his administration’s domestic appointments, will fall sharply into focus. Most glaringly, my commentary link, regarding his Kenyan Wahhabi relatives, tells the tale -, yet the Shoebat Foundation fleshes out his family linkage further:

“After President Obama was inaugurated, the Muslim side of the Obama family in Kenya boomed; it went from rags to riches overnight. They became one of the most influential families in western Kenya and even extended their sphere of influence to Saudi Arabia. When Sarah, president Obama’s grandmother (step-grandmother), decided to go to the Hajj, an obligatory pilgrimage to Mecca with Musa, president Obama’s first cousin, they were welcomed with open arms and were provided a special escort with full security detail and first-class treatment at the Saudi royal court…”

Let us also meander further down the President’s familial tree, upon closer examination, Malik Obama certainly becomes a “person of interest”. While many of us have relatives we would rather avoid, or politely make a conscious effort to sidestep at family functions, none of us (that I know) have the power of the Presidency. Therefore, our less than stellar relatives are mostly family annoyances, even though a bane to us personally. The point being, Malik Obama is more than the President’s half-brother, he is a superstar all on his own. Delicacy aside, he is a “mobbed up” Brotherhood operative. Once again, the Shoebat Foundation reveals the dope:

“Citing Arabic-language Islam researcher Walid Shoebat, that Tahani Al-Gebali, the former chancellor and a continuing adviser to the Constitutional Court of Egypt, has claimed the reason the U.S. cannot fight the international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood is because Malik Obama is the architect of the Brotherhood’s financial investments.”

Since the publication of the initial article Aug. 20, sources have obtained independent confirmation that criminal charges have now been filed in Egypt against Malik based on Gebali’s accusation that he was managing investments for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

In response to a question about whether he had visited Egypt or intended to visit Egypt soon, Malik said: “I did not go to Egypt before. I am a Muslim, but I do not promote hatred or violence, and I have not belonged to any extremist group in my life.

Malik Obama is the executive secretary of the Islamic Dawa Organization, or IDO, a group created by the Sudanese government, which has been designated by the U.S. State Department as a terrorist state

To make matters more volatile – gravely endangering the American people – there are 8 billion reasons why the Islamist-in-Chief is desperate to keep his Brotherhood connections from spilling out. Alas, Hill has more than her share of skeletons rattling around her closet, and her Brotherhood ties are, believe it or not, “only” one part of her secret cache.

WITHOUT dispute, it is Hill’s maniacal quest to finally ! become POTUS which knows no bounds, and herein lies the crux. Nevertheless, even pushing aside all of the above, what about her non-Brotherhood skeletons?

Even as Hillary Clinton (2016′s Demster Front Runner!) covered up pedophilia at State, she has not been brought to heel, though the buck stopped with her. Is she THAT untouchable?

How many recall Billy Boy Clinton’s Presidency, as it was marred by much more than diddling an intern: a tale of Islamic jihad cover ups and so much more ! Indeed, Hill was part and parcel in all.

Dare this require repeating: again, how mobbed up is Hill and her ex boss with the most virulently (worldwide) anti-western Islamic organization, bar none? Rhetorical.

So how many more proofs are necessary to round up this anti-American treasonous crew?

To be sure, the charge of treason is highly supportable, starting with Hill and Barack, then up and down Obama Inc.’s line. Their long list of surrogates are inexorably culpable.

But first things first. Let’s aim for the top head(s) of the American snake(s) and work our way down!

SEC KERRY’S DUAL LOYALTY: HIS CLOSE IRANIAN FAMILIAL CONNECTION. Conflict of Interest & ILLEGAL, As MANDATORY Due Diligence Thrown Overboard! Where Is The Outrage? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 15, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

Apparently,“dual loyalty” is only dragged to the fore – within U.S. power centers and beyond – when American Jews voice concern and support for Israel. Not only that, but the case against Jonathan Pollard (as one egregious example, yet there are enumerable others) bespeaks of more than a double standard, and many of America’s top leaders have admitted as much. How so? Well, consider the following analysis from the esteemed Caroline Glick:

According to a new history of the CIA’s involvement in the Middle East, America’s Great Game, reviewed this week in The Wall Street Journal, in 1951 Kermit Roosevelt, the CIA’s operations chief in the Middle East set up a fake anti-Israel lobby in Washington called American Friends of the Middle East. Its job was to weaken popular support for the Jewish state. The CIA’s anti-Israel front group operated for 16 years, until the fact that it was a CIA front group was exposed in 1967 by the far-left Ramparts magazine.

And this brings us to Jonathan Pollard, the American Jewish naval intelligence analyst who is now serving the 29th year of his life sentence for transferring classified materials to Israel.

Pollard was different not because of what he did, nor even, necessarily because he transferred classified information to Israel rather than to Britain.

As former CIA director R. James Woolsey explained to National Public Radio in March, “I really take the view now that if someone says [Pollard] should not be released after 28 years, just pretend that he’s a Filipino American or a Greek American and pardon him. I see no reason why people should treat a Jewish American who spied for Israel on those grounds more harshly than they treat a Filipino American who spied for the Philippines or a South Korean American who spied for South Korea.”

Pollard’s prolonged imprisonment, and the fact that the criminal justice system has been used against him in such a profoundly discriminatory manner have brought about a situation where his only chance of early release is through a Presidential grant of clemency.

On Tuesday, former New Mexico governor Bill Richardson – a close supporter of President Barack Obama – became the latest in a long line of senior US officials from both parties who have called for Obama to commute Pollard’s sentence.

In his letter to the president, Richardson wrote, “In my view, there is no longer a need for a discussion today. Virtually everyone who was in a high position of government – and dealt with the ramifications of what Pollard did at the time – now support his release.”

Never mind that Israel is the ONLY staunch, reliable ally in the fiery cauldron of the Mid East and always in the cross hairs of those seeking to annihilate half of world Jewry – promising to wipe Israel off the map!

BACK TO KERRY.

Such obvious truth is completely two sheets to the wind, with nigh as much attention paid to it as an unwanted child, even as a Sec of State is as compromised as a two bit whore. Perhaps even more so, as prostitutes depend on their pimps for their livelihoods, hardly in positions to two-time them.

Back in March 2013, but buried beneath the radar, came forth a situation so explosive, that it’s underexposing smacks of more than a grave dereliction of duty. The media, as well as many power brokers inside the Beltway, surely knew. A pox on their heads. And now that Obama Inc.’s fingerprints are all over an “accommodation” with Iran’s genocidal regime, well, the truth (and its outing) couldn’t be more acute.

Similarly, Huma Abedin’s terror background has always been stamped with Hill’s “kosher” seal of approval and powerful poohbahs – with the media in tow – acceded to an omerta. Why is this germane? Well, a current Sec of State is compromised on the Shia side, just as Hill, the former Sec, was (still is) duly disloyal on the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood side, in conjunction with her mobbed up (former) Deputy Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin.

America (west) and Israel; between a Shia/Sunni rock and a hard place!

Secretary of State John Kerry demonstrates why Huma Abedin’s background mattered

by Shoebat Foundation

When folks like Andrew McCarthy articulated why our findings about then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s close adviser Huma Abedin were important, his camp was smeared as being discriminatory. His argument had nothing to do with discrimination or Islamophobia. It had everything to do with Abedin’s familial ties compromising her judgment and allegiances to the U.S. Constitution.Here we have an example that demonstrates this reality further and it comes via Kenneth Timmerman, who has picked up on the fact that the new Secretary of State – John Kerry – has a son-in-law with family still living in Iran. This reality could conceivably affect how Kerry deals with the Iranians.Via the Daily Caller:

In a greeting to the Iranian people on the occasion of the traditional New Year (Nowruz) holiday last week, Secretary of State John Kerry exposed a secret that journalists and academics have been agonizing over for the past six weeks: the fact that his daughter has married an Iranian-American who has extensive family ties to Iran. “I am proud of the Iranian-Americans in my own family, and grateful for how they have enriched my life,” Kerry said in the official statement. Kerry also said he was “strongly committed to resolving” the differences between the United States and the Islamic Republic of Iran, “to the mutual benefit of both of our people.” Politicians like to keep their families off-limits to the press, a decorum enforced vigorously when it comes to politicians who are in favor with the national media but ruthlessly discarded for others. But in Kerry’s case, there could be larger ramifications. Since its inception, the FBI has vetted U.S. government officials involved in national security issues, and it generally won’t grant clearances to individuals who are married to nationals of an enemy nation or have family members living in that country, for fear of divided loyalties or, more simply, blackmail.

There it is. Certainly, even leftists can comprehend this concept without inserting race into their thought processes (oh, wait). Imagine a scenario in which a representative of Iran’s mullahs approaches the State Department with a list of demands that, if not met, could have serious consequences for Kerry’s in-laws living in Iran. In the current political construct, such demands could conceivably involve the U.S. withholding money, weapons, or aid earmarked for a country like Egypt as tensions in the Middle East escalate. While that may not sound like a bad idea to those of us who understand the threat of the Muslim Brotherhood, shouldn’t our Secretary of State’s sole interest be in lockstep with the interests of the United States? Last year, Abedin’s familial ties to the Brotherhood prompted calls to see her Form 86, which she would have had to fill out in order to gain a security clearance. If she did not, we have a problem. Similarly, if Kerry did not, we also have a problem. Who would have thought that two consecutive Secretaries of State would have to deal with such controversy? Then again, enough people have to care in order for it to actually be a controversy. What time is ‘Dancing with the Stars’ on?

Critically intrinsic to the discussion at hand is the way in which Islamic-leaning, anti-Americans shift horses, at least in relation to the Sunni/Shia centuries long war for Islamic hegemony. As a matter of record, although the Islamist-in-Chief’s familial foot is categorically implanted in the Sunni side, special circumstances warranted a (temporary) shift in allegiance, as indicated herein: OBAMA’S SELL OUT TO IRAN: ITS KEY INTERSECTION WITH THE RED/GREEN ALLIANCE. BOXING IN ISRAEL CORE. But have no worries, the Brotherhood Mafia, his Sunni beneficiaries, are reaping many rewards within America’s power centers! Americans, not so much.

Thus, doesn’t the “news” from DEBKAfile Intelligence, as to the Islamist-in-Chief’s desertion of his Sunni brothers (again, temporarily, and only in relation to the Mid East’s reshuffling), as well as Israel, make infinite sense?

After a lecture captioned “Islamic Revolution against Global Arrogance,” which he delivered at the Imam Sadegh University in Tehran Wednesday, Dec. 11, a student asked the Revolutionary Guards commander whether any of the Western powers in Geneva had asked for Iran’s missiles to be reduced.

“We will never do this,” he replied.

Asked by another student to clarify his statement that Iranian missiles can reach Israel, Jafari replied: “We are still increasing the range of our missiles, but currently the Supreme Leader has commanded that we limit the range of our missiles to 2,000 km.”
The general therefore released to the public four facts already known to Israeli, Saudi and Turkish leaders,say DEBKAfile’s military sources:

1. The American and European negotiators in Geneva asked to discuss the ranges of Iranian ballistic missiles with Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, without citing the types capable of delivering nuclear warheads. Zarif refused to discuss this.
2. The Western delegations persevered, stressing that the US and Europe were concerned over the accelerated co-production by Iran and North Korea of the Shehab-6, which has a range of 3,000-5,600 km, and when operational can reach America and most parts of Europe.
3. The US and European delegates gave the Iranians to understand that they would like to extend the six-month nuclear freeze agreed in Geneva (for which no starting date has yet been set) to the apply to extra range being added to Iran’s ballistic missiles.

There was no objection, they said, to Iran retaining the Shehab missiles with a range of 1,500-2,000 km, which would be capable of striking Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia. They were only concerned about extending their range to cover America or Europe.
4. Jaafari’s remarks to students’ questions, which were most probably planted beforehand, lifted a corner of the veil concealing from the public the secret provisions of the deal with Iran on its missile arsenal. According to DEBKAfile’s Middle East sources, officials in authority in Ankara, Riyadh and Jerusalem knew all about it.

Alas, those who have little understanding of the inner Muslim strife between Sunni/Shia , yet do know about Obama’s clear nexus to Sunni Islam – via his Kenyan roots and the House of Saud – can’t wrap their thoughts around him jumping ship to the Shia side! Kinship, beside the point.

HOWEVER, if one internalizes that he chose a Sec of State with DEEP Iranian connections, one has to ask: doesn’t Obama’s rush to Iran’s nuclear aspirations become that much clearer?

MOST significantly, is the following assessment from Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld’s policy center, American Center for Democracy:

“IAEA Official: ‘We’re Not Prepared’ to Verify Agreement with Iran,” for the following reasons:

“* The IAEA was not fully consulted during the November negotiations between Iran and P5+1 nations.

* The IAEA may not have sufficient manpower to carry out required daily activities at Natanz and Fordow.

* The IAEA has very few inspectors with technical knowledge of heavy water reactors such as the one at Arak.

* The IAEA will not be able to render much substantive insight into data supplied by Iran because the agency will not be able to verify with confidence the source or reliability of the information.”

Despite these obstacles and Iran’s latest refusal to allow “inspection of its heavy water reactor in Arak,” the White House killed the amendment that could have allowed the reinforcing of the sanctions on Iran, for its guaranteed failure to stop its nuclear enrichment program. The White House dancing to the mullahs’ tune has dangerous implications.

In the end, while the Islamist-in-Chief’s MAIN consiglieri is Iranian-born Jarrett, and his Sec of State’s son-in-law is Iranian and well connected to its power brokers, what are the chances he even gave a backward glance to Saudi Arabia’s and Turkey’s concerns?

Indeed, there is certainly no love lost for the Saudis and Turks at this site, but they are related to his Sunni side! And even though Barack HUSSEIN Obama is religiously aiding the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood Mafia in various ways, inside and outside the U.S., what makes anyone think that Israel, a nation the POTUS despises to the core of his being, is faring any better?

This is precisely why this blog warned about Obama’s second term plans for Israel and its out-sized dangers – a catastrophe in the making!

OBAMA’S END GOAL: ROOTED IN NATIONAL/NAZI SOCIALISM. Obamacare’s “Hidden” Nexus Reveals All…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 14, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

As is said, “getting one’s ducks in a row” is necessary preparation for effective and efficient targeting. But whether one is focusing on a positive outcome or a dangerous result, the fact of the matter is that little surpasses the art of practice. Moreover, how many of us have said to our little ones: “practice makes perfect”? Undoubtedly.

IF a clearer nexus to an absolute anti-American ideology still needs to be drawn – between Obama Inc’s seemingly inexplicable public policy moves – look no further. Indeed, they have been adhering to “practice makes perfect” from the inception of his first term. And while some of the regime’s actions are steeped in communist/Marxist underpinnings (via intersecting common denominators to national socialism), the authentic parallel lies within national socialism. How so? Let’s count their footprints.

Recall: a visceral hatred of Judeo-Christian ethos envelops socialism & nazism. Hand in glove. Who can argue (at least with a straight face) that this isn’t the first American administration which rabidly detests the nation’s traditional bearings? Let’s exclude from the mix the following: “leg tinglers”, his homies and die-hard Demster ideologues.

For the record, internalize the Islamist/Radical-in-Chief’s own words: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmC3IevZiik…and do pay strict note to homage paid to the Muslim community. Now, even though he mentioned Jewish before Muslim, it matters not a whit. His words were meant to signal “parity” between everything under the sun, thus, eviscerating the basic foundations of America. Underneath the gooey-talk of “inclusion” lies a dangerous agenda; the removal of national ethos! This is the havoc wrought by normless democracy – in juxtaposition to normative – the altar in which Obama’s crew bows down to, which is a short leap to national socialism.

Furthering the thesis herein and its attendant indictment, how about the children, you know, the youngsters Obama and crew opine over? But never mind their penchant for defiling these same kiddies, ala “koshering” of pedophilia: the left’s next phase to bring down America!

What about the incomprehensible slamming of America’s door to HOMESCHOOLERS NABBED: Authorities Storm Class. The Remnants/Overreach Of Socialist/Totalitarian Roots. America’s Left Watches, Learns & Waits ….A Miscarriage of Justice, Obama administration seeking to deport Christian homeschooling family….even as “refugees” from terror-laden countries are brought in by the droves… bomb makers too. Say it ain’t so.

YET, where does Obamacare fit into the scheme of things, particularly in relation to national socialist designs? Obama’s march towards gun control runs through Obamacare, straight through its definition of “mentally ill. Know this: disarming the citizens is non-negotiable, chiefly in order to gain the upper hand. How low does Obama Inc. stoop? Rhetorical question. Hang on tight – to the kiddies. “Uber alles”!

Obamacare Provision: “Forced” Home Inspections

Citing the Heath and Human Services website, a report posted Wednesday at the Freedom Outpost says that under Obamacare, government agents can engage in “home health visits” for those in certain “high-risk” categories.

Those categories include:

• Families where mom is not yet 21;
• Families where someone is a tobacco user;
• Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities, and
• Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.

According to HHS, the visits fall under what is called the “Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program” allegedly designed to “help parents and children,” and could impact millions of Americans.

Constitutional attorney and author Kent Masterson Brown said that despite what HHS says, the program is not “voluntary.”

“The eligible entity receiving the grant for performing the home visits is to identify the individuals to be visited and intervene so as to meet the improvement benchmarks,” he said. “A homeschooling family, for instance, may be subject to ‘intervention’ in ‘school readiness’ and ‘social-emotional developmental indicators.’ A farm family may be subject to ‘intervention’ in order to ‘prevent child injuries.’ The sky is the limit.”

Joshua Cook said that while the administration would claim the program only applies to those on Medicaid, the new law, by its own definition, has no such limitation.

“Intervention,” he added, quoting Brown, “may be with any family for any reason. It may also result in the child or children being required to go to certain schools or taking certain medications and vaccines and even having more limited – or no – interaction with parents. The federal government will now set the standards for raising children and will enforce them by home visits.”

According to Cook, the program will require collection of a massive amount of private information including all sources of income and the amount gathered from each source.

One of the areas of emphasis mentioned by HHS is the “development of comprehensive early childhood systems that span the prenatal-through-age-eight continuum.”

Last session, Cook added, South Carolina State Rep. Bill Chumley introduced a measure that would make the forced home visitations illegal in his state. The measure passed in the House but died in the Senate.

In 2011, he noted, HHS said $224 million would be allocated to support these home visiting programs.

As stated previously, Obamacare was designed to (eventually) lead to TOTAL control; totalitarian rule, one “hidden” dictate atop another. Not only that, but (mis) educators are already in place, exhorting kiddies to ignore their parents and to consider themselves part of a collective of their own choosing. Seriously.

As a result of Obamacare’s implementation – as wobbly as it is – where do Americans find themselves? Well, county office BANS criticism ! of Obamacare! Warns employee ‘controversial’ statements not allowed…Employee’s anti-ObamaCare comments land her in hot water with boss…oh my, imagine what they would do to this particular blogger, if one of their employees. Crazy.

What’s their next phase? Now Obama gets ‘EXECUTIVE POWER’ CZAR – Specializes in bypassing Congress to enact ‘progressive change’.H E L L O…perhaps a return of Anita Dunn…Van Jones clones.

This blogger asks the ultimate question: is OBAMA introducing nationalist socialism to the United States? You decide.

YET, while there will still be those who shrilly opine: to compare Obama to a national/Nazi socialist is not only insane, but a denigration of the horrors inflicted by Hitler during the Holocaust, this American-Israeli begs to differ. And those of us who suffered losses due to their monstrous reign are less likely to look past the (current) obvious signs and signals, excerpted within this blog’s “About” tab:

This blog is dedicated in memory of their father; my beloved husband. A man who believed in justice, loved Israel, was a proud American and especially grateful for the freedoms it gave his parents, after they survived the horrors of Auschwitz.

As always, under the guise of “caring for the kiddies”, the most monstrous deeds take place.

Never forget. Never forgive…those who seek to impose total control!

ADDITIONAL TERRORIST THREATS/INCITEMENT FROM SFSU “PALESTINIAN” STUDENT UNION LEADER (Muhammad G. Hammad): EXHORTING TO DECAPITATE ISRAEL SUPPORTERS ON SOCIAL MEDIA; SCHOOL, AG AWOL…What Will It Take? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 13, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

Since America’s takeover by the Islamist/Radical-in-Chief, aside from missing family and friends, there aren’t many times when I chomp at the bit to be back home. Stomach churning.

HOWEVER, since the case involving San Francisco State University’s “Palestinian” student union leader, Muhammad G. Hammad, erupted – threatening this American-Israeli’s brethren – suffice it to say, I would not mind being closer by to “monitor” matters, instead of leaving it to relevant contacts in California.

Now, those who assume that Islamic threats to “head chop” are nothing more than crazy macho huffing and puffing, rethink your calculus: London’s Islamic-inspired/sanctioned head chopping & Cameron’s hideous whitewash response – part and parcel of Boston’s jihad – are a cause & effect. Does anyone – with their brains intact – still believe that Islamic barbarism is compatible with western norms? As such, why are these barbarians allowed into America and other western confines? Is national suicide the game plan? Apparently.

How many times does it need to be repeated: Islamic cannibalism is ROOTED In “Islam’s relationship to blood”, hence, the slaughter of Christians & Jews.

As cited when this story first broke, “PALESTINIAN” STUDENT AT CALIFORNIA U THREATENS TO KILL JEWS ON SOCIAL MEDIA: WIELDS BLADE IN PLAIN VIEW! Will SFSU Expel Him? Will Law Enforcement Act Accordingly, Charging MOHAMMAD HAMMAD With Terrorist/Hate Crime Threat?, who really believed SFSU would rein in the threat, in tandem with requisite law enforcement action taken? If you thought they would “take care of business”….

You would be wrong!!

‘OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!’ IS NOT JUST A QUOTE FROM THE QUEEN OF HEARTS

California Student Leader Wants to Decapitate ‘All Who Support the IDF’

Will SFSU’s president or national security take any serious action in response to a student leader calling for the decapitation of all IDF soldiers and their supporters?

By: Lori Lowenthal Marcus Published: December 11th, 2013

The Jewish Press brought you the story of the California student leader, Muhammad G. Hammad, who posted on a social media platform a picture of himself holding a sharp blade, and describing how he wanted to stab Israeli soldiers with it.

Well, he’s baaaaaa-aack.

A new posting on Tumblr from Mohammad G. Hammad, president of San Francisco State University’s General Union of Palestine Students (GUPS), has been discovered by the AMCHA Initiative. It’s even more graphic than the earlier one.

In this post, Hammad discusses the death of an Arab 17 year old in Hebron last year. The 17 year old was shot by a female Israel Defence Forces soldier after the youth attacked her and pulled a realistic-looking toy gun on her. The post includes an entirely fabricated version of the actual events, one which portrays the Arab as a deaf teenager innocently out to get some birthday cake when he was shot to death by the IDF soldier, following an “altercation.”

In his “CUPCAKESANDKITTENS4EVER” Tumblr account, Hammad writes: I’m sitting here looking through pictures of that f[EXPLETIVE DELETED] s[EXPLETIVE DELETED] [NAME REMOVED TO PROTECT THE SOLDIER] ….Anyone who thinks there can be peace with animals like this is absolutely delusional, and the only “peace” I’m interested in is the head of this f[EXPLETIVE DELETED s[EXPLETIVE DELETED on a plate, as well as the heads of all others like her, and all others who support the IDF The Liberation of Palestine can only come through the destruction and decimation of this Israeli plague and it can’t possibly come soon enough.

The Jewish Press contacted Dr. Leslie Wong, the president of San Francisco State University. We wanted to know whether the school plans to take any action against Hammad, given that he has now named a specific individual whom he wants to kill, and has stated his desire to decapitate anyone who serves in the IDF and any IDF supporters. Surely that includes at least some people at SFSU.

Ellen Griffin, SFSU’s associate vice president for communications, shared with The Jewish Press a statement issued yesterday by Dr. Wong. That statement addressed Hammad’s earlier Tumblr threat. According to Griffin, the administration had not been aware of the second violence-glorifying post by the president of the Palestine Students Union. It is now.

In yesterday’s statement Dr. Wong promised his university population that they should trust that I will step in when speech or actions cross the line into violations of law or University policy. I am absolutely committed to maintaining a safe environment. In both recent cases, for example, we have conducted thorough threat assessments with law enforcement, increased campus safety measures, facilitated dialogue with student groups, offered counseling resources and initiated the student conduct review process. I am confident these actions protect both the safety and the rights of our campus community.

Can the SFSU environment be considered a safe one with a student leader – let’s say that again, a student leader! – who has already posed making threats while caressing a knife, and is now calling for the beheading of IDF soldiers and anyone who supports them? Surely any “dialogue with student groups and counseling resources” is a tack already taken, one revealed to be insufficient. Will SFSU make clear that threats against its population will not be tolerated? The SFSU administration is already on notice. Any action taken after someone is already harmed will not be defensible. We await a response from Dr. Wong.

Coincidentally, yesterday’s commentary, SHARIAH LAW ENGULFS THE WEST: A mandatory implantation before a full take over, is more than prescient. How so? Well, Shariah Law upholds decapitation via beheading according to Quran 8:12 + 47:4, and it is illustrated by a graphic video. Just in case you think the above is a “one off” horrific moment, another Islamist terrorist shows a decapitated head to a baying crowd!

HOW much clearer can it be: if NOT for Islam’s steady inroads within America (and the west), would SFSU’s terrorist-in-waiting feel safe/smug that he is currently untouchable? How many other wanna-be’s are taking note of the “hands off” policy?

Let’s be inordinately clear: had this type of terror threat been directed at ANY other “protected” group, excluding Jews, the FURY would have been off the hook – from leftist academia, the AG’s fiefdom and even the Inciter-in-Chief would have held a press conference. Yes, the roof would have blown off at SFSU, with the offender hauled away in handcuffs – just for starters. Undoubtedly, if Muhammad G. Hammad’s threat does not comport with the “hate crime” statute, what the hell does?

Consequently, isn’t it more than obvious that threats against Jews have become not only acceptable, but de rigueur? And isn’t it more than truthful to charge: anti–semitism on U.S./western college campuses: the last “acceptable” prejudice/bias; its dangerous effects, a clear warning/message to parents.

Concomitantly, SHOUT IT FROM THE ROOFTOPS!!

SHARIAH LAW ENGULFS THE WEST: A Mandatory Implantation Before A Full Take Over…Commentary Adina Kutnicki

Posted on December 12, 2013 by Adina Kutnicki

Those of us who understand the insidious and encroaching perils from Shariah Law are not surprised by the “news” (“Shopping in the Mother Country”) below, but it doesn’t make the skin crawl any less.

Incontestably, Europe is near bowed. Many paying close attention already know this fact. As a matter of record, two of Europe’s early“voices in the wilderness” described said dangers years ago, but were vilified for their efforts. Demonized. They deserve countless mea culpas, but will never receive them from the poohbahs in our midst. Nevertheless, their clarion calls have been more than vindicated, but such admission becomes cold comfort, especially in light of present day events.

Specifically, in her seminal work, Bat Ye’or, recognized what few had the courage to state, as most were (still are) unwilling to admit to what was happening in their own backyards, described herein:

The Status of Non-Muslim Minorities Under Islamic Rule

Dhimmitude: the Islamic system of governing populations conquered by jihad wars, encompassing all of the demographic, ethnic, and religious aspects of the political system. The word “dhimmitude” as a historical concept, was coined by Bat Ye’or in 1983 to describe the legal and social conditions of Jews and Christians subjected to Islamic rule. The word “dhimmitude” comes from dhimmi, an Arabic word meaning “protected”. Dhimmi was the name applied by the Arab-Muslim conquerors to indigenous non-Muslim populations who surrendered by a treaty (dhimma) to Muslim domination. Islamic conquests expanded over vast territories in Africa, Europe and Asia, for over a millennium (638-1683). The Muslim empire incorporated numerous varied peoples which had their own religion, culture, language and civilization. For centuries, these indigenous, pre-Islamic peoples constituted the great majority of the population of the Islamic lands. Although these populations differed, they were ruled by the same type of laws, based on the shari’a.

This similarity, which includes also regional variations, has created a uniform civilization developed throughout the centuries by all non-Muslim indigenous people, who were vanquished by a jihad-war and governed by shari’a law. It is this civilization which is called dhimmitude. It is characterized by the different strategies developed by each dhimmi group to survive as non-Muslim entity in their Islamized countries. Dhimmitude is not exclusively concerned with Muslim history and civilization. Rather it investigates the history of those non-Muslim peoples conquered and colonized by jihad.

Dhimmitude encompasses the relationship of Muslims and non-Muslims at the theological, social, political and economical levels. It also incorporates the relationship between the numerous ethno-religious dhimmi groups and the type of mentality that they have developed out of their particular historical condition which lasted for centuries, even in some Muslim countries, till today.

Dhimmitude is an entire integrated system, based on Islamic theology. It cannot be judged from the circumstantial position of any one community, at a given time and in a given place. Dhimmitude must be appraised according to its laws and customs, irrespectively of circumstances and political contingencies.For books by Bat Ye’or, see www.dhimmi.org

Similarly, the late Oriana Fallaci understood the swirling dangers, yet not from a sense of personal safety (a veteran war correspondent, she was hardly a wilting flower), but from the depth of her soul: The Rage and the Pride, an incomparable tour de force, was written shortly after the devastating attacks on 9/11/01. Her reaction in spades.

Alas, the multi-faceted reasons for silence from many quarters – regarding the steady march of Shariah Law, Islam’s underpinning – hardly matters, as the results are playing out in horrific view; like blazing fires, as the western house burns down!

Shopping in the Mother Country Goes Shariah Compliant

by JANET LEVY December 9, 2013

Major Retail Mall in England to be Shariah Compliant

1) The production and sale of pork and pork products will be prohibited.
2) The production and sale of alcohol products will be prohibited.
3) No gambling activities are allowed on the premises.
4) The investment will respect the “purification” requirements of shariah by including donations to Islamic “charities.” (We all know how that goes! Revisit the Texas Holy Land Foundation-Hamas funding trial, the largest terrorist funding trial in U.S. history for more on “donations to Islamic charities.”)

British actor James Caan (NOT to be confused with the Jewish American actor) heads the investment firm, Dubai-based Arzan Wealth. He is extremely pleased with this deal, seeks similar investments and views the adherence to Islamic principles as a significant achievement.
Janet Levy, Los Angeles

TV dragon James Caan swoops to buy £41m retail park

A major retail park has been sold to a group headed by a former star of TV’s Dragons’ Den in a £41.5 million deal – and will be subject to Islamic law restrictions.

Crossley Retail Park in Kidderminster has been acquired from Chester Properties by a company known as 90 North Real Estate Partners LLP (90 North), which has James Caan as chairman.

A Middle Eastern investor, represented by Dubai-based Arzan Wealth, was advised on the purchase of the retail park by 90 North, an independent advisory firm specialising in Sharia-compliant real estate investment.

Certain trades and activities are prohibited under Sharia law and these include gambling, the production or sale of alcohol and the production or sale of pork.

However, where any real estate includes a shopping centre with, for instance, an off-licence, the investment can be structured so that part of the income is ‘purified’ by being donated to an Islamic charity.

The property is the first retail park acquired with help from 90 North, and there is said to be growing interest among other Middle East investors. Nicholas Judd, founder partner of the company, said: “The investment platform we manage in partnership with Arzan Wealth has now acquired approximately £110 million of property and we are seeking further substantial acquisitions”

Mr Caan said: “Once again, we have demonstrated our ability to originate and transact across the UK property spectrum, with recent transactions including central London redevelopments, warehousing and student housing properties, all structured in accordance with Islamic principles.”

He said that these were ‘key aspects’ at the core of 90 North’s business. Councillor Fran Oborski, chairman of Wyre Forest District Council, said: “As long as the new owner continues to invest in the site and ensure we have no empty properties there, I think we will all be happy.

“I think this shows that the retail interest in Kidderminster is looking up, the sale figure is a healthy price. If we can get the investment there, it would be nice to see someone come in and fill the empty shops in the town centre.”

Just in case any of the readers are growing misty eyed over the siren calls AGAINST Shariah Law within this blog, feeling squeamish at best, well, you may want to first internalize some truth telling lessons:

**Consider: how dangerous is it to enter the MANY “no go” zones in Britain (and all over Europe) with** ‘Muslim Patrol’ vigilantes attempting to impose Sharia Law in London? The video (linked within) tells the tale…oops, it appears as if in a matter of a few hrs, since the blog post went online, the aforementioned link went poof out of cyberspace…perhaps Shariah Law censors realize that this commentary is swirling around like a (western) house on fire! Regardless, better to pre-empt now, before it becomes an unstoppable wildfire.

But for further clarification, citing the diametrically opposed value systems between the west and Shariah Law, peer within: Sharia Law: Susie Steiner explains the Islamic legal system which has sentenced a Nigerian woman to be stoned to death. Americans (westerners), just ponder: are you willing to lose your fundamental rights? First Amendment Rights On The Chopping Block: Via Criminalizing Criticism Of Islam!

If the above isn’t fiery enough, Obama nominee sees no “reason why Sharia Law would not be applied to govern a case in the United States”!

Most significantly, the creeping of Shariah Law into many key spheres – under the Muslim Brotherhood’s “guiding hands” – is dutifully burrowed within Obama Inc. Some additional proofs to ruminate over:

Wolff Bachner: In a modern, highly political world, one must have enablers and allies to enact any global initiative, especially one that is subversive and secretive. Who are some of the enablers and allies of the Muslim Brotherhood and how high up the political food chain do they go?

Adina Kutnicki: Beyond a shadow of a doubt, their enablers and allies reach up into the highest recesses of the political food chain, so much so that the leadership of the free world is deeply implicated. One only has to witness their rise and prominence within President Obama’s administration to internalize how close they are to fulfilling their mission of Islamizing the United States of America into the “Shariah States of America”. This is not hysteria-talk nor hyperbole. It is their ultimate plan. However long it takes (and they view patience as a virtue, centuries ago seems like yesterday in their mind’s eye, unlike the mostly ADD-afflicted west) they will keep making inroads, that is, unless millions amass to thwart their efforts within America. But even though they burrowed within prior administrations, their trajectory rose exponentially under President Obama’s “guiding hands”.
Most significantly, according to BizPac Review, Mohamed Elibiary, a Muslim Brotherhood-tied adviser to DHS has just been promoted to a high senior level position! The details can be found herein, but the following excerpt is more than an eyeful:

“The Washington-based, national security think tank, Center for Security Policy, published a disturbing 33-page report based on a series of interviews with Elibiary about his admitted ties to a man who raised funds for Hamas and “other radical Islamist causes,” all while serving and advising the Obama administration. Judicial Watch reported on the findings, noting that Elibiary “has regular access to classified information and is a prime mover behind two of the Obama administration’s most dangerous policies; normalizing relations with domestic and foreign Islamist groups (including the Muslim Brotherhood) and arduous enforcement restrictions of laws related to material support for terrorism….”

As such, the Muslim Brotherhood is already in Obama’s White House, and this fact must be internalized and seared into ones brain:

“On December 11, 2004, Muslim Brotherhood apologist Mohamed Elibiary was a featured speaker at a conference honoring the memory of Ayatollah Khomeini, the man synonymous with Islamic terrorism. On September 13, 2013, this same man, Mohamed Elibiary was named the head of the Obama administration’s Homeland Security Advisory Council. Watch Western Center for Journalism’s exclusive video to find out why, exactly, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood is pulling the levers of power in the White House.”

Mind you, Elibiary’s appointment is hardly an anomaly. Skulking Islamic “advisers” are regular fixtures within President Obama’s inner circle, though most are not as well known as Elibiary. It would take an entire expose’ to flesh out all the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated appointments, most of whom are comfortably implanted inside President Obama’s administration. Nevertheless, it is impossible to understand the gravity of the situation without knowing how embedded they really are. Like termites.

In this regard, it is more than reasonable to posit: why would the Obama administration allow said infiltration and penetration? Simply put, the evidence is overwhelming that President Obama – and his surrogates – is in “deep sympathy” with the goals of the Muslim Brotherhood. Their symbiotic relationship amounts to a whole lot more than “placing lipstick on a pig”, a colorful phrase aptly coined by Sarah Palin.

So, herein revealed: MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MAFIA completes ‘PHASE 3′ from ‘THE PLAN’, infiltrates America’s Family Court. 2 more ‘phases’ to go.

Is it any wonder that the above DHS honcho crowed:

The United States of America is “an Islamic country with an Islamically compliant constitution,” a member of the Department of Homeland Security Council tweeted Thursday. His claim sparked controversy on the social media platform, prompting the official to defend his remark in detail.

Mohamed Elibiary made the eyebrow-raising claim while debating whether Islamic countries treat non-Muslims fairly.

“Please show me just ONE example of an Islamic country where non Muslims are treated with equality?” a Twitter user said.

Elibiary responded: “America and yes I do consider the United States of America an Islamic country with an Islamically compliant constitution. Move On!”

He also argued that “sociologically speaking” the Christian right is “similar” to the Muslim Brotherhood, the Washington Free Beacon first noted.

ALMOST a Shariah compliant (done) deal.

Share this:

Moving right along, we enter Holder’s DOJ and its renegade milieu, and as if on cue, bellies up to invoke Islamic “blasphemy” laws In the USA! Unfathomable, but no less true.

As a result, there is only so much patriots can tolerate, thus, a movement to IMPEACH AG Holder for crimes which surpass Articles of Impeachment is gaining steam. Yes, jail time is warranted.

In this regard, will Barack Hussein Obama’s lawless “justice” department finally ! fall?

Back to the 2nd lawless prong, the focal point of this commentary:

Concomitantly, DHS INSIDER and its heretofore scandals are ripe to blow wide open, and NSA’s Snowden’s revelations provide an opening shot.

But let’s not forget about “FAST & FURIOUS”, an illegal weapons running scheme, accruing many dead bodies, involving AG Holder & seguing into DHS!

The above raises increasing alarm bells re (previous DHS head)“Mama Janet’s” shopping sprees, accumulating billions in ammo & hardware alike! What’s their end goal?

Regardless, ‘Mama Janet’ resigned and landed a plum post as President of UC’s university system, yet DHS & their fixation on vets continues: a regime’s penchant for spying – “Putin-esque”.

So what are they up to now? And could it get any worse? Hang on tight…

In tandem, DHS & AG Holder (Obama Inc.’s double swords) are actively colluding with illegal aliens, with their blatant violations impinging upon law abiding citizens: a double crime; picking the public’s pocket and enriching/validating illegal aliens. Courtesy of the Thief-in-Chief

EVEN more so, the following tells another side of their lawbreaking tale: deportations under Obama plunged to just 1 percent last year ! More pointedly, America’s “law enforcers” gut the law, exhibiting the sham of immigration “reform“.

ADDING to the indictments against them, what are the chances that “Mama Janet’s” DHS “lost” 226 illegals, Deemed National Security Threats Too?

Share this:

Share this:

Commentary found at – http://islamexposedonline.com/

————————————————————————————————–

Their efforts engage many pressure points, but those which must remain our TOP priority revolve around a two-tiered jihadi prong: stealth on the one hand and frontal on the other. The underpinnings cited herein are all part and parcel of Shariah Law. Non-negotiable. Immutable. Set in Allah-stone.

Share this:

As to the referenced “mumbo jumbo”, there are few better equipped to extrapolate its underpinnings, other than Professor Louis Rene Beres. He is distinctly honored at this blog’s “About” tab.

That being said, aside from his world class expertise in the nuclear warfare arena, he is equally an expert in the (i)legalities of Palestinian “statehood” for a sundry list of legal strictures, notwithstanding the PA’s irrefutable linkage with terror.

NO serious leader can pretend that what is isn’t, even as they sit around the table pretending to be statesmen, “negotiating” this and that. The question remains: When UN thugs bestow “statehood” upon terrorists, how many violations are accrued via international law?

Once again, the floor, so to speak, is left to Professor Louis Rene Beres’s highly capable analysis.

U.N. nonmember observer status was only the beginning – Washington Times

After all, it is DEADLY clear what happens when UN thugs bestow “statehood” upon terrorists, as the addendum to PA “statehood” & its violations of international law succinctly documents.

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

NOBODY dare be fooled as to what is at stake, as the FINAL deconstruction of the American academy takes place. Its descent into civilization-toppling madness. Yup, this is no exaggeration.

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Even as Hillary Clinton (2016′s Demster Front Runner!) covered up pedophilia at State, she has not been brought to heel, though the buck stopped with her. Is she THAT untouchable?

How many recall Billy Boy Clinton’s Presidency, as it was marred by much more than diddling an intern: a tale of Islamic jihad cover ups and so much more ! Indeed, Hill was part and parcel in all.

Share this:

Share this:

What’s their next phase? Now Obama gets ‘EXECUTIVE POWER’ CZAR – Specializes in bypassing Congress to enact ‘progressive change’.H E L L O…perhaps a return of Anita Dunn…Van Jones clones.

Share this:

How many times does it need to be repeated: Islamic cannibalism is ROOTED In “Islam’s relationship to blood”, hence, the slaughter of Christians & Jews.

Share this:

Those of us who understand the insidious and encroaching perils from Shariah Law are not surprised by the “news” (“Shopping in the Mother Country”) below, but it doesn’t make the skin crawl any less.

Specifically, in her seminal work, Bat Ye’or, recognized what few had the courage to state, as most were (still are) unwilling to admit to what was happening in their own backyards, described herein:

The Status of Non-Muslim Minorities Under Islamic Rule

Alas, the multi-faceted reasons for silence from many quarters – regarding the steady march of Shariah Law, Islam’s underpinning – hardly matters, as the results are playing out in horrific view; like blazing fires, as the western house burns down!

If the above isn’t fiery enough, Obama nominee sees no “reason why Sharia Law would not be applied to govern a case in the United States”!

Share this:

**In tandem, DHS & AG Holder (Obama Inc.’s double swords) are actively colluding with illegal aliens, with their blatant violations impinging upon law abiding citizens: a** double crime; picking the public’s pocket and enriching/validating illegal aliens. Courtesy of the Thief-in-Chief