ISIS Leader(s) & Sexual Jihad Twist:Induction Via Sodomy!Blackmail Too…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

[Watch] ISIS Leader Is Homosexual, Marrying and Sodomizing All New Recruits

IN no uncertain terms, sans any poppycock, this site has warned about the dangerous, volatile and perverse connection between Islam and “sexual jihad”, as well as its twisted path to hyper-bloodletting via Koranic mandates and escalating barbarism.

IF the above appears too fantastical (to western, Jewish or Christian minds) that’s because it is. Regardless, it does not obviate its inherent truth. Believe it. But for those who are still skeptics, and for others who are left dumbfounded, the following should set (some of) the record straight:

Record One:

READERS, sodomy “for the sake of Islam” (Islam Über Alles) is a known mandate, though it is (or used to be) a well-kept “secret”. Don’t pay any mind to the “qualifiers” from this and that cleric, they are nothing but oozing manure.

Not only did the original “underwear bomber” Abdullah Hassan al-Asiri hide explosives in his rectum to assassinate Saudi Prince Muhammad bin Nayef—they met in 2009 after the 22-year-old Asiri “feigned repentance for his jihadi views“—but this “holy-warrior” apparently had fellow jihadists repeatedly sodomize him to “widen” his anus to fit the explosives—and all in accordance with the fatwas of Islamic clerics.

A 2010 Arabic news video that aired on Fadak TV gives the details. Apparently a cleric, one Abu al-Dema al-Qasab, informed al-Asiri and other jihadis of an “innovative and unprecedented way to execute martyrdom operations: place explosive capsules in your anus. However, to undertake this jihadi approach you must agree to be sodomized for a while to widen your anus so it can hold the explosives.”

Others inquired further by asking for formal fatwas. Citing his desire for “martyrdom and the virgins of paradise,” one jihadi (possibly al-Asiri himself) asked another sheikh, “Is it permissible for me to let one of the jihadi brothers sodomize me to widen my anus if the intention is good?”

After praising Allah, the sheikh’s fatwa began by declaring that sodomy is forbidden in Islam,

“However, jihad comes first, for it is the pinnacle of Islam, and if the pinnacle of Islam can only be achieved through sodomy, then there is no wrong in it. For the overarching rule of [Islamic] jurisprudence asserts that ‘necessity makes permissible the prohibited.’ And if obligatory matters can only be achieved by performing the prohibited, then it becomes obligatory to perform the prohibited, and there is no greater duty than jihad. After he sodomizes you, you must ask Allah for forgiveness and praise him all the more. And know that Allah will reward the jihadis on the Day of Resurrection, according to their intentions—and your intention, Allah willing, is for the victory of Islam, and we ask that Allah accept it of you.”

OKEY dokey…if Allah deems it acceptable…pleasing…so be it…how can an “infidel” (a woman, no less) argue with a ranting Islamist, whose head is still stuck in the 7th century!

Record Two:

SEGUING from male “sodomy jihad” to “regular sexual jihad” – as thuggish Muslims terrorize, rape and pillage all over Europe, and make their way into America too –  who would imagine, in the less than equal treatment of women in Islam, when it comes to jihad, well, the scales even out. How thoroughly modern-Millie of them! Say what?

Record Three:

IN this regard, yes, sexual jihad is all the rage! Fatwa-driven. Westerners, get with the (learning) program…

Record Four:

ACTUALLY, its mandates have reached feverish pitch…the sale of kiddies and wives raise the ante!

Record Five:

OMG…how much more depravity is necessary to demonstrably prove: Islam and the west are incompatible, and, yes, there IS a clash of civilizations!


SIGNIFICANTLY, this Islamic vixen awaits her jihadi bed mate, whether attached to ISIS/Al Qaeda et al. is irrelevant. Do they even care if their jihadi takes a shower first, more than likely hot and sweaty from the killing fields and pumped with adrenaline and rage? Just curious… Another question…”woman to woman”…is it enough of a gratifying experience to even shave one’s legs? Or, is it a “hit and run”? On the other hand, some girls are dragged kicking and screaming, but others volunteer. It’s their “contribution” to jihad. After all, what’s a good Muslima to do?

LO and behold, no one can claim that the jihadis are not thinking outside the box:


ISIS luring U.S. women with cash for babies promises…what will they think of next?

STILL, it is intrinsic to place all of this barbarism into Islamic context, if you will. So, as a matter of record, having participated in the review of a groundbreaking policy paper, Islam and Blood – – it became apparent that the Islamic “love-affair” with blood permeated all core aspects of their lives, sex at the forefront.

NOW, if this sounds too surreal for most westerners brought up within Judeo-Christian culture, well, that’s the way it is. But to understand Islam properly is to also internalize the pent-up rage, and this includes the sexual component.

LET’s segue to the “news” re ISIS/ISIL and their “natural” partaking in sodomy ritual initiation, if your stomach can stand it. 

A video is circulating of what is identified to be an Iraqi official interrogating an ISIS terrorist who carried out seven beheadings. The interrogator asks the detainee about his forced recruiting into ISIS and the graphic acts that ensued.

The terrorist reveals yet another dark side to the Islamic State: sadistic acts of sodomy. translates that the recruit was one of eleven men who were ravaged by the ISIS “prince.”

He describes the leader as having a henna-dyed beard and slim figure, believed to be terrorist commander Abu Ala’.

Ala’ made a fatwa permitting himself to marry and rape his recruits, just as countless kidnapped women and girls are raped by their Islamist captives. The only exception is that none of the men may sodomize him in return.

The testimony aligns with a documentary broadcast by a Kurdish television station in August that claimed ISIS has been raping men in a ceremony it describes as “marriage,” recording the act as blackmail to force them to join.

The STERK station recorded the confessions of more than 20 ISIS insurgents:

The ISIL elements admitted that what they called ‘marriage’ was in fact rape. They said that every new member of the group was raped. The footage of the rape would be used as blackmail in the event of the new recruit refusing to participate in actions .

ISIS fighter Abdul Kareem Ibrahim Bazo explained that he was blindfolded before being raped:

“About a fortnight later they came and said I had to join. I did not want to. But they had the footage. They threatened to show it to my family .

“I fainted. When I came round they told me: ‘you are now with ISIL.’”

They ‘married’ me 15 times. Then they washed my head and put cologne on me. They told me no one could join ISIL without being married.”

This sickening abuse of power is just one of the many perverse tactics ISIS justifies with the Quran and hadiths.

H/T [Shoebat]

ALAS, in a mind-boggling twist – but par for the course within the perverse netherworld of Islamists – who can forget the insane rantings of Iran’s Mahdi-driven A’jad, when he opined: there are no gays in Iran! Well, truth dare be told, homosexuality is not only in full bloom in Iran, but throughout the Islamic Mid East and the diaspora too.

NOW, this is neither the time nor place to have a serious discourse on “alternative” lifestyles, but it does call into question the oft-repeated, bold-faced lies from Islamic leaders, as they continuously exhort the “purity” of living an Islamic lifestyle – covering their women from head to toe – as opposed to one of western decadence. Really now?

Muslim child brides

Islamic girls corralled – in chains – to meet their new husbands…happy wedding day…mazal tovs all around!

FOLKS –  if you aren’t worried about a head chopping ! – tell said dangerous bull sh-t to the Islamic sexual sadists who sodomize/rape BOTH boys and girls, all under the guise of jihad. Add to their perverted to do lists the goats and sheep they violate in acts of bestiality! Their animal-like behavior defies description…it is best to see it in plain view. Beyond any normal pale…

Islamic Sharia Law ruling. If a Muslim has sex with a goat or a sheep, and that goat or sheep has a baby, who owns the baby? The Muslim who had sex with the goat or sheep or the owner of the goat?

Under Islam, the man who owns the goat or sheep gets the baby from the ‘romance’ between the Moslem and the animal….lol

In Islam they believe that a man and an animal can create a baby if they have sexual relations…lol

No more goat-sex for Muslims in Sweden as government outlaw bestiality!

FRANKLY, you can’t make this craziness up…it is just too twisted. Resultant, is the west really supposed to be able to “tame” these beasts and live side by side with them?

WILD animals/beasts…חַיּוֹת בַּר…and I am not referring to the 4 legged ones!


The Scourge Of Islam Facilitated By American (Western) Academia:Earth Shattering Blow Back…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

MUCH has been written at this site (and elsewhere) regarding a multiplicity of betrayals attributed to American (western) academia. In this regard, their poisonous influence is, after several decades of infection, bearing fruit from various explosive directions. Blow back.

INTRINSICALLY, if not for said fatal flaws, the west’s foundations would be sufficiently grounded to weather the upcoming (non “global warming”) storms. Sheer force of will may not be enough to beat back what is hurtling in America’s direction. Other western countries will be similarly affected. But this commentary is laser-focused on American academia (Israeli academia is a mirror image, but let’s not digress), as this subject matter is hardly news on this end. 

AT the same time, before we proceed, an educational grounding in the red/green alliance is mandatory scholarship. Stipulated, radical leftist profs, in collusion with their Islamist helpmates, are the main indoctrinating forces on U.S. campuses. Without their nexus this topic would hardly merit such attention.

The ubiquitous anti-American, MIT’s Prof Chomsky, in a sit-down with arch terrorist Hassan Nasrallah! He is emblematic of countless others who pollute/infect America’s most influential campuses.

WHILE most view academia as a means to an end – its end result being a diploma for gainful employment – its value, or lack thereof, is so much more. Yes, on an individual level a college education gives a leg up. But at what cost, aside from the financial debt accrued? Here are some essential truths:

Truth One:

FITTINGLY, the havoc wrought by western academia…its trials and tribulations…are its paradoxes and pitfalls.

Truth Two:

INDEED, one of its bitterest fruits are the life and death threats which have become the “norm” within America’s campuses, as if nothing too egregious is deemed unacceptable. In fact, a “BOLO” alert, regarding a  “Palestinian student” at SFSU Mohammad Hammad, was issued from these pages! That dangerous.

Truth Three:

SANS any hesitation, let it be resolved: U.S. academia is placing the nail in western civilization. A heady charge sheet, but no less true.

Truth Four:

CONCOMITANTLY, the death of the west, or its survival, runs through American (western) academia.

IN light of the harsh facts presented above, it is incumbent to tie up some loose threads. Alas, this is where Professor Paul Eidelberg, a rare exception to enumerable tainted profs, comes into the picture. He is a professor’s professor. All professors are hardly equal in stature.

The Scourge of Islam

Paul Eidelberg – Islam and Blood

One does not have to be familiar with the well-informed views of Lebanese-born Brigitte Gabriel, or of Syrian-born Wafa Sultan, or of Egyptian-born Nonie Darwish, or of Sudanese-born Ayaan Hirsi Ali – women of moral courage and integrity – to know that Islamic Scriptures, above all the Qur’an, have spawned worldwide terrorism, a scourge from which no man or woman, young or old, is safe.

Century after century, serious scholars and statesmen who represent a variety of nations, have written about the theologically-driven savagery that animates scores of millions of Muslims who collectively constitute the greatest threat to civilization in general, and to Western civilization in particular.

Yet hardly anything about this scourge is spoken in American and European universities, which otherwise boast of freedom of speech. It is simply “politically incorrect,” if not dangerous, to utter so much as a word that may be construed as disparaging of Islam or of hurting the feelings of Muslims, even though they represent by far the world’s leading terrorists.

Of course, in an age of liberal democracy that boasts of freedom of religion and tolerance, and whose institutions of higher education purvey the doctrine of multicultural moral relativism, it would be au contraire to say anything judgmental of any religion, even if its devotees danced gleefully and praised Allah upon learning of the destruction of the New York World Trade Center and the cruel death of almost 3,000 men, women, and children on that infamous day known as “9/11.”

“How dreadful is such violence” seems to be the most one hears from the clergy. Fearful of the canard of bigotry, or of arousing violent passions, the clergy have engaged in a conspiracy of silence about the religion that calls Israel the “Small Satan” and America the “Great Satan,” and then vows to eliminate the “Saturday People” first and the “Sunday People” second.  Islam has been given a free ride. It exploits the civil liberties of democratic societies to facilitate its imperialistic and totalitarian ambitions.

If moral relativism has made Europe post-Christian, what shall we say of America, where the 9/11 atrocity perpetrated by Islamic jihadists did not diminish the moral relativism prevalent on American campuses – indeed, where left-wing atheist professors have become allies of Islam.

How remarkable: the Age of Atrocity has become the Age of Stupidity, despite the unequaled number of PhDs that grace this democratic and scientific era.

I may be mistaken, but the odds are that no professor in this democratic era of triumphant secularism is going to encourage a graduate student to write a doctoral dissertation on the factitious development of Islam. Such a dissertation might suffer comparison with the doyen of Islamic scholarship, Bernard Lewis, who seems to have found nothing in that religion that contradicts reason or that scorns the Genesis conception of man’s creation in the image of God as blasphemous.

It follows from the preceding analysis that if Iran, the spearhead of Islam, develops nuclear-tipped intercontinental ballistic missiles, the game of life, from a Darwinian point of view, will be over, and the scourge of Islam, with its love of death, will reign over mankind.◙

The Professors - The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America (book cover).jpg
FULL disclosure: this topic took on a life of its own, even before this site’s inception in June 2012. How so? Countless friends and colleagues have inquired: how can we (as parents) ensure that our children have a shot at the “brass ring”, an admit ticket to America’s elite universities? They wanted to know this blogger’s “secret” to her parental success.

WELL, aside from telling them what is certainly not a secret – at the very least, top high school credentials are a given –  the counter question always becomes: what is your son or daughter interested in studying? While not really anyone’s business, the fact of the matter is that to answer the aforementioned question it becomes wholly germane.

INTRINSICALLY, if ones offspring will not be majoring in the sciences, engineering or a related tech arena, one would be foolish in the extreme to pay top dollar (or become indebted up to one’s eyeballs, whatever the financial case) for any of the so-called elite universities, including the “hallowed” trio, namely, Harvard, Yale and Princeton. Basically, any (mis)education in the social sciences/humanities is a harrowing gamble, a rolling of the dice that one’s child will not come out a full-fledged (im)moral cultural relativist! So, why expend a fortune for such a “privilege”? Indeed.

SIMPLY put, the more “esteemed” the school, the greater the damage. In essence, “no name” schools can hardly attract the biggest menaces to western civilization, the “superstar” whose life’s work is to bring down “Amerika”. Absolutely. Nevertheless, the lesser known schools have a similar problem, but just on a smaller scale. Parent beware.

SIGNIFICANTLY, without the toxic brews percolating within U.S. (western) academia – at least since the 1960’s – does anyone believe that a so-called play glorifying Jew-murder would be debuting (this Fall) at one of the world’s most famous opera houses, The Met? Yes, there is a direct correlation between The Death (Execution) of Leon Klinghoffer and those (mis)schooled in the social sciences aka humanities, as many of them end up in the arts, media, journalism and attendant cultural arenas. Mind you, many of their profs (spanning decades) did not teach them anything even remotely humane within the humanities discipline! They are still at it, deconstructing western civilization.

NOT only that, what took place in 2004, under MIT’s Associate Provost of the Arts banner, is nothing less than a mirror image of the upcoming travesty to debut at The Met.

The Tech - Online Edition

When History Becomes Hijacked

This past week, I attended the Dramashop’s performance of “The Company of Angels,” written by MIT Associate Provost for the Arts Alan Brody. As I thumbed through the Playbill, I came upon the end of the “Author’s Note,” a short message from Alan Brody in which he informs the audience that the modern state of Israel was the focal point of hope for the Holocaust survivors, but warns us that we shouldn’t misconstrue his play as “an apologia for political decisions being made by that country today.” He then continues to say that he hopes “the play is a reminder of what it means for any people to be homeless and stateless.” If his political agenda were not clear enough already, he concludes that he hopes his play “might help the people who see it to understand how important a home is to the Palestinians who have been driven to their experience of despair by historical circumstance.”

The moral implications of that statement are disturbing enough, of placing the onus on the Israeli people for the suffering of the Palestinians with the same moral weight as the unbearable burden of shame which lay upon the shoulders of the world community of silent bystanders after the Holocaust.

I also realize that it probably would not prove fruitful to begin a discourse on the utter fallacy of equating Israel’s policies of self-defense to the murderous genocide committed by the Nazis, an implication of Professor Brody’s statements clear to anyone who has studied the politics of the Middle East in the last decade.

Most significantly though for the readers of The Tech, I believe that it is an academic tragedy for a faculty member of Professor Brody’s stature to inject his own political tendencies into his work at the Institute. He was hired to contribute to the student body his great skill and talent in the world of theater, not for his personal ideologies which may constitute his world view. It is truly an inexcusable affront to those who survived the Holocaust and to the memories of the six million who perished, and a black mark on the proverbial eye of the Faculty of the Arts at MIT. – Chaim Kutnicki ’07

RESULTANT, the scourge of Islam is immeasurably facilitated by western academia. America’s cesspool is in the forefront.

ACADEMIC case closed!


Jihadists on the hunt…

WHILE the feint of heart, the PC deluded and general naysayers will scoff at such a thing as cannibalism in today’s “civilized” day and age, well, this blogger has news for them: “it be” true!

NOT only that, but Islamists have received a “halal”  ( حلال‎ ) seal of approval. You may ask: what the hell is that? Well, it is their “kosherized” form of the “Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval.” Yummy.  

But, in order to get to the real down and dirty, one must be willing to take the time to dig beneath the ROOT(s) of jihadi sacrificial slaughter:Islamic Cannibalism ROOTED In Islam’s Relationship To Blood -The Slaughter of Christians & Jews!

Moreover, the relationship between Islam and blood is inextricable, and it must be internalized for what it is.

To be sure, Jews are hardly spared from Islamic barbarism (they are prime/valued meat), as attested to too many times to recount. However, one particular act was more than demonstrative, as one Islamic jihadist dipped his hands in Jewish blood and shrieked with delight alongside his fellow barbarians:

And, if cannibalism doesn’t suit some of their taste buds, another “delight” is similarly Shariah Law sanctioned. Enter…beheading:Egypt’s & Syria’s Civil Wars – Brotherhood/Salafists/Al Qaeda In The Forefront – Christians Beheaded: The Cancer Of Islam!

Straight from America’s campuses, specifically, San Francisco State University (SFSU), a “Palestinian” jihadi student strutted his stuff. But never mind, aside from an outraged Jewish community, main players were non-pulsed:ADDITIONAL TERRORIST THREATS/INCITEMENT FROM SFSU “PALESTINIAN” STUDENT UNION LEADER (Muhammad G. Hammad): EXHORTING TO DECAPITATE ISRAEL SUPPORTERS ON SOCIAL MEDIA; SCHOOL, AG AWOL. The question becomes: what will it take to awaken the (mostly) slumbering west from its deer-in-the-headlights inaction?

Yet, if many Eurabians are feeling safe and smug – not so fast:London’s Islamic-Inspired/Sanctioned Head Chopping; Cameron’s Hideous Response; And Boston’s Jihad, Cause & Effect.

ONTO…the merging of Islamic cannibalism to the techno era!


Editor’s Note: EXTREME CAUTION ADVISED: The videos linked and embedded at the end of the story are extremely graphic, showing brutal executions.

Newly released videos show Muslims conducting “ritual human sacrifices” by slitting the throats of their victims or putting a bullet in their heads, according to researcher Walid Shoebat, a former member of the Palestine Liberation Organization who converted to Christianity.

Shoebat’s report includes several videos of ritual sacrifices. He noted the speaker in one video uses the term Qurban just before gunfire erupts and men lined up in a row fall to the floor one by one. Shoebat explained that the Arabic term “can only signify a sacrifice, which indicates that the filmed slaughter is nothing but a ritual human sacrifice.” Another video shows the throat of the “sacrifice” being slit with a knife. “Christians are being killed in these very rituals every day, and the bloodshed will not stop. We must work together to rescue them,” Shoebat said.

He has been working with a Syrian Orthodox nun, Sister Hatune Dogan, to assist persecuted Christians in Syria, Iraq, Jordan and Turkey. “For over a year now we have been writing and warning the world on both the realities and the revival of Islamic human sacrifice,” he said. “Though Islam is a Christian heresy, its pagan roots and elements cannot be ignored, which is why I prefer to call Muslims pagan heretics, or heretical pagans.”

Shoebat describes himself as a former “radicalized Muslim willing to die for the cause of jihad.” According to his biography, he arrived in the United States in 1978 to study in Chicago where he was recruited at a “terror conference” by Jamal Said, the founder of the Islamic Association of Palestine, a front group for Hamas that later launched the Washington, D.C.-based Council on American-Islamic Relations.

Shoebat said he converted to Christianity in 1994. He now is raising funds to assist Middle East Christians through a foundation he created called WND recently reported that Sister Dogan claimed members of the jihadist factions in Syria trying to oust President Bashar al-Assad are draining the blood of Christians they behead and selling vials to Islamic radicals for $100,000 apiece. The Christians, she said, are beheaded in ceremonies in which they are forced to kneel, with their hands and feet bound as the Muslim radicals read a death sentence imposed because the victim refuses to renounce Christianity and embrace Islam.

WND also has reported that the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, or ISIS, considered to be the most ruthless of the Sunni Islamic militant groups fighting in Syria, has ordered a Christian community in Raqqa, Syria, to pay nearly 38 pounds of gold as a “guarantee of their safety.”

The alternative offered was death. The videos discovered by Shoebat are graphic. Editor’s Note: EXTREME CAUTION ADVISED.The following videos show brutal executions.  Shoebat said the Islamic prayer in the video “is reminiscent to the prayer said in the sacrifice scene in the film ‘Apocalypto,’ which is historically accurate in regards to its depictions of the bloody Aztec rituals.” “What Islam is is an Aztec-like religion of the pagan world, riddled with human sacrifice, cannibalism, and a pool of human gore,” he said.

A video posted on YouTube shows Hatune presenting the results of an investigation in which she found women held captive by Muslims for ransom had been raped and mutilated. She also presents evidence for her claim Muslims are beheading Christians and selling their blood. Previously, Shoebat published a video of Sunni Muslims playing soccer with the heads of the people they murdered. WND Middle East correspondent Michael Maloof, a former senior security policy analyst in the office of the secretary of defense, said the “vociferous wrath” from jihadists that Hatune is receiving because of her vigorous effort to protect Christians has made her a prime target of al-Qaida and its affiliate, the Jabhat al-Nusra.

INTRINSICALLY, one must also recognize, Muslims who refuse to toe the Islamic line – or cross swords with another warring tribe – are very much in grave danger. Lest there be any doubt, think again: 

Some 11,000,000 Muslims have been violently killed since 1948, of which 35,000, or 0.3 percent, died during the sixty years of fighting Israel, or just 1 out of every 315 Muslim fatalities. In contrast, over 90 percent of the 11 million who perished were killed by fellow Muslims.

So, what’s the upshot? Either one of two things will have to happen:


Calling For An Islamic Reformation Via Strong American Leadership & Cold War Messaging. 

Or that:

The Confrontation: Winning the War Against Future Jihad! 

While this site has its own recipes for confrontation, the above is more than worthwhile to consider, at least as a starting point.

Nevertheless, sitting still is NOT an option. Most significantly, electing western leaders who are incapable of separating themselves from their linkage – to the very same sources/ideology of terror – is no longer viable. Untenable. 



WARNING: Disturbing image below…”courtesy” of Shariah Law…

 IMAGEThis blogger unreservedly apologizes in advance for its graphic contents, but it is what it is.The following video was uploaded on the YouTube channel of  Jihadis. Mind you, Obama Inc. sees NO conflict between Shariah Law and its “integration” within America’s Constitutional system

In this regard, Shariah Law mandates that ANY criticism of Islam is verboten. In fact, a fatwa is placed upon the “offender’s” head, if caught, death is the outcome. Amputation of limbs is “reserved” for “lesser” crimes.

Most recently, the spread of Shariah Law to the first Southeast Asian nation, Brunei, at the national level entails: under the new law, an adulterer could be stoned to death, a thief could face a severed limb, drinking alcohol could lead to flogging and so on….

Granted, as is said, there is more than one way to skin a cat, and this is precisely apropos herein. Say what?!

Even Barack HUSSEIN Obama – and his band of Shariah Law proponents – understands that America is not Brunei, nor is it Saudi Arabia – yet. Though he behaves like a Potentate-in-Chief, as he willy nilly disregards the rule of law, there are still certain matters which must be implemented stealthily. Indeed.

Thus, this renegade regime gleefully realizes, yes, they have a free hand to enact dictates designed to effectuate the bringing down of “Amerika”, but they must first implant varying underpinnings. They also understand that many Americans are barely paying attention to anything which distracts them from the latest Kardashian escapade, or some such blah, blah escapism. Nevertheless, the other half of the population is, for the most part, paying heed. Therefore, a multiplicity of tactics are employed to set the stage for one form of anti-American edict after another, whether socialist or Islamist derived. Whatever gets the job done.

To wit, their most effective weapon is one which will distance any taint of jihadi terror from Muslim-Americans and from Muslims in toto. Really, it’s like separating pigs from their shit. Can you imagine?   

Now, this is not to say that all (even though a disproportionately large percentage are “silent” accomplices) Muslims engage in terror, but it is absolutely the case – like it or not – that their religious/political doctrine underpins jihad and mandates its war-like implementation. Anyone who babbles otherwise is either an ignorant dolt or downright lying. Pick your poison.


The contents found within “Islam and Blood” offers irrefutable and underlying evidence, elucidating the otherwise unfathomable barbarism originating within Islam:

So, in light of all the above, how dangerous, treacherous and otherwise dastardly is it for America’s AG to dictate the following omerta, and over a period of several years?

First-Class Islam: Eric Holder Puts Muslims Above Terror Suspicion

No more instruction about jihad, and Islam is to be considered a race.
From 2008 to 2011, I was a guest lecturer at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (the primary DHS training facility, located in coastal Georgia) and at Joint Special Operations University (which brings foreign officers to learn of U.S. irregular warfare, located in Tampa). At both venues I was asked to lecture on the history of terrorism.

I did so in an even-handed and comprehensive manner, exploring the issue across place (Europe to East Asia), time (ancient Assyria to al-Qaeda), and ideology (religious: pagan, Jewish, Christian, Hindu, and Muslim; and political: right-wing, left-wing, anarchist, environmentalist, etc.). Only 14 of the 44 PowerPoint screens in my presentation dealt with Islamic terrorism, although several of those actually mitigated against the concept.

JSOU continued to utilize me until late 2011, when I was told by the course instructor that Muslim student officers had complained that “I talked too much about Islamic terrorism.”

I was actually surprised that I had not been yanked the year before,when references to Islam and jihad were stricken from Obama’s kinder, gentler National Security Strategy document. That same year, noted Islamic studies expert Eric Holder told the House Judiciary Committee that foiled Islamic suicide bombers in the U.S. were motivated by “Islam that is not consistent with” that religion’s “true teachings.”

Now, the Obama administration — led by Holder — has decided that Islam is a “race,” and therefore to examine or even to adduce a Muslim’s Islamic beliefs about jihadbeheadingviolence against kuffar (“infidels”), or re-establishing a caliphate is tantamount to racism. This administration behavior is rationalized because “federal authorities have in particular singled out Muslims in counter terrorism investigations and Latinos for immigration investigations.”

It is difficult to express just how willfully ignorant of reality these statements and accompanying policies are.

Per the immigration example: as over 80% of “undocumented aliens” are from Mexico or another Latin American country, it would be foolish, indeed delusionary, to ignore that fact. The same logic applies to directing extra scrutiny towards individuals who hold a set of beliefs that may predispose them to violence against others not of that belief system.

And that is the primary point: Islam is a belief system. Not a race.

Muslims can be of any skin, Bosnian or Turkish, Nigerian, Saudi, Chinese. If American, Muslims can perhaps be of several nationalities. This is equally if not more true of Christians, who can be white Finns, black Ethiopians, brown Lebanese, or Koreans, to name but a few examples. It is not possible to look at someone (sans distinctive clothing) and ascertain whether he or she is Muslim or Christian — or secularist, for that matter.

Advocacy groups and willing dupes in the media and Democrat Party — like Senator Dick Durbin — have foolishly yet successfully conflated race and ideology in the case of only one religion, Islam. They have made examining the latter tantamount to discrimination against the former.  No one ever argues that singling out Christians for repression because they hold politically incorrect views about gay marriage or abortion amounts to “racism.”

Beyond the obvious fact that beliefs do not constitute a race, Holder et al. are massively wrong to deny the clear link between certain Islamic beliefs and terrorism.

NOT unlike waving a white flag of surrender to America’s Constitutional Republic, Obama’s regime is putting forth a red carpet to Islamic adherents, an open sesame of sorts. So much so that even those who engage in material support for terrorism are sailing through the immigration process: OBAMA INC. VIOLATES U.S. COUNTER-TERROR LAW(S):CONGRESS & JUDICIAL BRANCHES STONE SILENT. MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TRIUMPHANT. HOW DID THIS HAPPEN?

Along this line of anti-American behavior it is imperative for Holder’s DOJ to invoke Islamic “blasphemy” laws in the USA, almost as a twin bookend to placing Muslim-Americans (and Muslims in general) above any terror suspicion!

Never mind that the amount of arrests (what about the ones who haven’t been caught?) related to terror plots within America disproportionately involve Muslims, Obama Inc. offers them carte blanche to continue their jihadi handiwork!

“On 9.11.01 our country was forever changed by the horrific events in New York. The entire country was victimized by the acts done on that day. Muslim and non Muslim alike were traumatized but we as Muslims continue 12 years later to be victimized by being made the villains. To this day every media outlet and anti Islamic organization has committed slanderous and libel statements against us as Muslims and our religion of Islam.”

ACT for America founder Brigitte Gabriel blasted the organization.

“It is amazing how fast they changed the original language on their website claiming victimhood, bigotry, and unfair treatment since Sept. 11th 2001,” Gabriel said. “Once they were confronted and debated by people like me who pointed out to them that in the last four years alone we have arrested on American soil 226 home grown terrorists. One-hundred eighty six of them were Muslims. Not Jews. Not Hindus, not Buddhist. But Muslims”

Gabriel says the facts are that Muslim immigrants to the U. S. are responsible for a disproportionally large number of domestic terrorism cases.

“Of all immigrants who have ever immigrated to America since its birth, America never encountered such hatred and terrorism coming out of one faith based group in our country that accounts for less than 2 percent of the American population and is now responsible for over 80 percent of attacks against America,” she said.

“In 11 years since 9/11, the Islamic American community has not organized a one million man march to condemn Islamic terrorism against America and call Hamas, al-Qaida, Hezbollah, al-Shabaab, and other groups by their names – terrorists,” Gabriel said.

AGAIN, why are Muslims “off limits” – by the gang ruling Washington – in relation to explaining the genesis of jihad and its Islamic origins??

Rhetorical question. Abhorrent. Treacherous. Treasonous.

DHS (Black) Employee, In Charge Of PROCURING Weaponry, Caught Inciting Race War! What’s Going On? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Most are familiar with the expression, ‘caught with one’s pants down’. Generally, it is used to paint the picture of a wayward spouse/boyfriend when found in a compromising affair, whether ongoing or a one night stand. To evoke even starker images – although highly nauseating – think of Anthony Weiner, as he (AND his hyper politically-charged, Muslim Brotherhood/Sisterhood connected diva wife, Huma Abedin) attempts to wipe away his stained behavior. NOT at this site.

Nevertheless, there are other usages for the above imaging, and its essence revolves around (seemingly) inexplicable behavior, but suddenly making sense via the ‘ahh’ (mental) light bulb. Such is the case when the following is absorbed:

Indictment Number One: Obama Inc. is hell bent on inciting a race war within America. Little more evidence is needed to secure said charge.

Indictment Number Two: Domestic upheaval, via a race war and targeting patriots/vetsis necessary for their end goals. 

Indictment Number Three: Plus, what is needed most to get the job done? Billions of rounds of ammo, and then some.

Indictment Number Four: NSAgate and its unfettered DOMESTIC spying excludes the Muslim America community – they are off bounds – so ordered by Eric Holder, the head of the Dept of (in)Justice. Is a political dissident’s list (read: patriotic Americans) their target? Yup.

Next stop: the meat.

DHS employee behind website promoting race war on paid leave

FILE: U.S. Department of Homeland Security emblem is pictured at the National Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Center in Arlington, Va.

The Department of Homeland Security said Friday that an employee who runs a racist website predicting and advocating a race war has been put on paid administrative leave.
Ayo Kimathi, an acquisitions officer for Immigration and Customs Enforcement who is in charge of buying weapons and ammunition for the government, operates the website named “War on the Horizon.” It includes descriptions of an “unavoidable, inevitable clash with the white race.” Kimathi is black.

Kimathi, who calls himself the “Irritated Genie,” told his supervisors that the website was set up to sell concert and lecture videos.

Kimathi has been with the department since 2009. His website criticizes whites, gays, those of mixed race, and blacks who integrate with whites. The Southern Poverty Law Center, which monitors hate groups, earlier this week reported on Kimathi’s role in running the site.

The report showed the site’s content strayed far beyond concert promotion, warning about a coming race war. The website declares, “in order for Black people to survive the 21st century, we are going to have to kill a lot of whites – more than our Christian hearts can possibly count,” the Alabama-based SPLC said in its report.

One of Kimathi’s former supervisors at DHS told SPLC’s Hatewatch that, “Everybody is the office is afraid of him,” and that his co-workers are “afraid he will come in with a gun and someday go postal.”

The supervisor, who was not named, continued, “I am astounded he’s employed by the federal government, let alone Homeland Security.”

Kimathi reportedly got the go-ahead from the government to create and maintain his website. That’s because as a law enforcement agency employee, he is required to get permission in writing if he engages in outside activities which includes everything from working a second job to volunteering.

The SPLC says Kimathi obtained official permission but did it by misrepresenting the true nature of his site.

“He told management that it was an entertainment website selling videos of concerts and lectures,” the report said. “He called it simply WOH, never saying that WOH stood for War on the Horizon.”

ICE spokeswoman Gillian Christensen said in a written statement this week that the agency “does not condone any type of hateful rhetoric or advocacy of violence of any kind against anyone.”

Kimathi hasn’t responded to email and phone calls requesting comment.

Fellow patriots, now that you have become privy to the above, how safe do you feel knowing that Obama Inc. – in actual word and deed – is inciting to a race war, and has tasked DHS to procure billions of ‘unexplained’ ammo? Yet, the question remains: to what end? In a nutshell, to bring down America, that’s what!

Think of it this way: if someone with this blogger’s online profile (don’t point fingers in this direction) worked for DHS, surely it would be their duty to do their due diligence and decide if certain duties should be executed by others. Extrapolating further, would said DHS supervisors task this hypothetical ‘so and so’, to head up a team designed for ‘dialogue’ between the Muslim American community on DHS’s behalf? Through facilitating a cursory online search (a middle schooler could help them, if incapable), wouldn’t a policy paper, akin to Islam and Blood, give them a clue as to where this (again, hypothetical) employee’s understanding lies? Namely, that Islam IS incompatible with western norms/values and there is NO point in feigning otherwise. You get the drift.

Now, since DHS is rumored to be tasked with ferreting out intelligence matters, shouldn’t they know who’s who, at least within their employ?

One would think.

So, they are either truly incompetent or highly malignant in their intent, as ‘protectors’ of the homeland. This blog veers towards malignant, even if they missed the boat on their employee’s ‘race war’ website! Paradoxically, it would make them BOTH incompetent and malignant, since ‘hiding in plain sight’ is impossible while on the web (this blogger knows it for a fact!). At the very least, they instinctively knew about his absolute hatred of ‘White America’; his racism, website savvy beside the point. 

Guess what? Hiring a Black Panther for the job would have made much more sense. After all, they worked side by side with the Weathermen, Billy boy Ayers and his domestic bombers in the 1960’s and 1970’s, and both groups are still plotting against America, but under different (leftist ‘koshered’) garb.The aforementioned domestic terrorists make no bones about their plans; goals which their good buddy, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, seems inclined to agree/support. After all, select Black Panthers (and Weathermen) have a revolving door relationship at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue !

The Beginning and End of American Exceptionalism: A Theo-Political Analysis…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

It is exceedingly rare for this site to endorse a particular book, except under compelling circumstances. Its essence must play a part in illuminating pressing western challenges through historical accuracy, offering ameliorating strategic imperatives in the process. Only several such book releases hit said home runs. And there are less than a handful of scholars – throughout the west – who are qualified to render a verdict via attendant prescriptive policies; to remedy/rectify the catastrophic challenges facing America and protect its place as the leader of the free world. Emphasis on free.

But before the reader becomes acquainted with the latest recommendation – duly described in Amazon’s sidebar – recall this scholar’s previous contributions:

While many scholars, let alone average Americans, still wonder whether America is even at war, Prof Paul Eidelberg is hardly in denial, and he even posits that a Fourth World War is in the offing. Yes, a fourth! 

Without any doublespeak, the “take no prisoners” prof calls it like it is, forewarning of the coming American collapse. As a former officer in the USAF, surely his strategic assessment is more than painful. It is what it is.

At the end of this American death dance freedom of speech’s evisceration has been a main casualtybut it couldn’t have come about sans its collision course with moral relativism and historicism. The above links are just appetizers to his political acumen.

The Beginning and End of American Exceptionalism

About the author:
Internationally known political scientist, author and lecturer, Paul Eidelberg is founder and president of the Israel-America Renaissance Institute (I-ARI) with offices in Jerusalem and Philadelphia.Prof. Eidelberg served in the United States Air Force where he held the rank of first lieutenant. He received his doctoral degree at the University of Chicago, where he studied under the world-renowned professor Leo Strauss. Before immigrating to Israel in 1976, Prof. Eidelberg wrote a trilogy on America’s founding fathers: “The Philosophy of the American Constitution,” “On the Silence of the Declaration of Independence,” and “A Discourse on Statesmanship.”

The Beginning and End of American Exceptionalism


A Theo-Political Analysis

Authored by Paul Eidelberg

The book marks the conclusion of some fifty years of research and writing on the foundational principles and structure of the American Republic by Professor Paul Eidelberg, a renowned political scientist.

Eidelberg addresses three interrelated objectives. One objective is to revive the foundational principles that made the United States of America the greatest nation on earth: the principles embodied in America’s Declaration of Independence and original Constitution. It is widely known that America is in a state of decline thanks largely to the multicultural relativism of its college-educated elite. This situation, however, is reversible. An uncorrupted and no longer silent majority of Americans has the will and spiritual values to restore American Exceptionalism.

The second objective is to revive the source of American Exceptionalism, namely, Hebraic Exceptionalism. Unknown to most Americans, both Protestant and Catholic Hebraists in Europe regarded the Hebraic Republic of antiquity as the most just and wisest polity in history, hence superior to those extolled by Greek and Roman philosophers. This evaluation was shared by the presidents of various eighteenth-century American universities. It is extremely important for Jews to know this because Israel, their one and only homeland, is the only nation on earth threatened with extermination. The Jewish people need to know that what a matured (but yet to be matured) Israel stands for, and what was manifested in the structure of the ancient Hebraic Republic, remains and will ever remain the fondest hope of mankind.

The third objective is to articulate the political and meta-political convictions that bond America and Israel, convictions concerning man’s God-given rights to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness-rights which necessitate limitations on the powers or functions of government. Public acknowledgement of these political and meta-political convictions will fortify the will of these two exceptional nations, not only to stand firm against their common foe-Islam’s renewed global ambitions and its “we love death” mantra-but also prompt the West to roll back Islam’s deadly threat to civilization.

Lest anyone believes that all academics are equal, and that cerebral smarts is a guarantee against stupidity – say what? – think again. NOTHING could be further from the truth…another gem from the good prof, as he takes a physicist – no less – to the (mental) wood shed. 

A Book Based on “Nothing”

Paul Eidelberg

Lawrence M. Krauss is a theoretical physicist. His book, A Universe from Nothing, makes nonsense of religion and theology, of which he knows “nothing”—excuse the pun.

In the Preface of his book, Krauss acknowledges his indebtedness to others. He mentions one person who “tragically passed away.” Toward another he expresses his “humbleness”, and of whom he will “remain in awe.”  Krauss seems to be oblivious that the words he uses to express his gratitude and feelings derive from the religious tradition which he scorns or deems irrelevant. His religion is scientism, the creed of crippled pedestrians or of what Ortega called “mass men.” Krauss therefore ignores Einstein’s famous remark, “science without religion is lame.”

The Afterword of Krauss’ book was written by Richard Dawkins, another (half-educated) atheist, who regards religion as pernicious, but seems unaware that 56 million human beings were murdered in just a few years by the leading atheists of the 20th century, Mao Zedong and Hitler.

In further proof that great learning and great stupidity go well together under the same hat, Dawkins, an English academic, seems oblivious that were it not for Christian America, he would be living under the Third Reich. Perhaps this may also be said of Lawrence Krauss, who obscures the difference between Zeus and the God of Israel and thus reveals himself as a neo-pagan. I say “neo-pagan” because those who believed in Zeus believed in a superior being, whereas Krauss, judging from his book, believes in “nothing.” This link is merely for reference purposes, this blog does NOT endorse its idiotic conclusions. Really. For if a theoretical physicist can twist his scientific mind into knots, in order to conform to his pre-conceived revulsion against religion, then how reliable are his scientific formulations/proofs to begin with, as he postulates NOTHING? Climate changers have been known to pervert said scientific principles as well, in the ignoble pursuit of leftism. Exactly. Ideology uber alles. Academic whores, pursuing “science” via taxpayer public funding. Phew.

Most significantly, this blog’s close association with Prof Paul Eidelberg is accurately noted within the following commentary and its embedded groundbreaking policy paper, Islam and Blood’It is mandatory readingSelf explanatory.