Islam’s Serial (Jihadi) Rapists Given Cover;Western Complicity! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

BNI does not use the politically correct "Asian" word when referring to Muslims

HOT on the heels of this investigative journalist’s disturbing report – re supportive proofs linking Islam and the gay agenda – more of the same hyper-sexual militancy keeps rearing its head. How could it not. Endemic.

'FACT'

MIND you, the same cult-like, war-driven “religion” which upholds homosexuality as part of its cultural “normative” behavior, on the other hand, murders those who are “caught in the act”! 

ADDING to the sexual component, Islam’s serial rapists absolutely believe it is their jihadi duty to defile (and terrorize) as many “infidel” women (whatever their ages) as they can get their hands on. Literally. The “spoils of war.”

CITATION-WISE, the Koran dictates the following about the infidels:

  • Slay the unbelievers wherever you find them (2:191)
  • Make war on the infidels living in your neighboorhood (9:123)
  • When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them (9:5)
  • Kill the Jews and the Christians if they do not convert to Islam or refuse to pay Jizya tax (9:29)
  • Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable (3:85)
  • The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them (9:30)
  • Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticise Islam. (5:33)
  • The infidels are unclean; do not let them into a mosque (9:28)
  • Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies
    (22:19)
  • Do not hanker for peace with the infidels; behead them when you catch them (47:4)
  • The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them (8:65)
  • Muslims must not take the infidels as friends (3:28)
  • Terrorise and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an (8:12)
  • Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorise the infidels (8:60)

CONSIDER the above dictates of unremitting hatred for non-Muslims, then place them atop said demonstrative evidence:

EVIDENCE ONE:

HOW many are aware that sexual jihad and slave jihad are Koranic derived? 

EVIDENCE TWO:

FATWA ONE: Unmarried girls demanded for battlefield sex!

REGARDLESS, the fact that a small segment of Muslim girls are dragged along the sexual jihad path, others absolutely volunteer to “service” their jihadi brothers. But the bottom line is that said actions satiate their pagan Allah and relieves their brothers of sexual frustration! A two-fer.

 

(Muslimas giving the one-finger ISIS salute!)

EVIDENCE THREE:

FATWA TWO: The sale of kiddies and wives has been deemed “kosher”!

Muslim-Young-Girls-Being-Lead-Off-in-Chains-To-Meet-Their-New-Husbands

 

 

 

 

 

 

EVIDENCE FOUR:

MOREOVER, all of the above doesn’t obviate an increasingly impotent response – due to an onslaught of Islamic gang bangs within non-Muslim nations – from western leaders. 

HOWEVER, what complicates the issue is two-fold: the driving force(s) to Islam’s sexual crimes are relatively unknown within the west’s non-Muslim population. Exacerbating the explosive situation, they are covered up by complicit leaders. In the main, while most are elected officials, other culprits are non-elected. They hail from various leftist circles; media, academia, legal and diplo arenas and they poison the well. Yet, what’s the upshot?

BASICALLY, in order to maintain the facade that Islam is a “religion of peace”, how would it appear if they out-and-out mentioned that the so-called (enumerable) “Asian” suspects are actually Muslims? 

BLOWING the lid…

The serious case report into the exploitation of six girls in the Oxfordshire area by a gang of sevenAsian Muslim men, who were later convicted at the Old Bailey in London, found that police and social services failed to act long after they were made aware that children were engaged in sexual relations with the men thanks to “a combination of not grasping the extent of exploitation, the focus on the girls and their families as the source of the problems, the corresponding lack of focus on perpetrators, and a host of administrative and management issues”.

Alan Bedford, the paper’s author, found that “the overall problem was not grasping the nature of the abuse – the grooming, the ‘pull’ from home, the erosion of consent, the inability to escape and the sheer horror of what the girls were going through – but of seeing it as something done more voluntarily. Something that the girls did as opposed to something done to them.”

rape-300x224_thumb

He notes that “scores of professionals from numerous disciplines, and tens of organisations or departments […] used language that appeared at least in part to blame victims and see them as adults.”

Education Secretary Nicky Morgan has told MPs that the report made it clear that police and social workers had failed on a number of levels. “[The report] is an indictment of the failure of frontline workers to protect extremely vulnerable young people over a number of years,” she said. “Reading the details of what happened to them has been truly sickening.

BwJ1F8uIcAATmTE.jpg-large-e1410651930356

“The serious case review makes clear that numerous opportunities to intervene to protect these girls were missed as police and social workers failed to look beyond what they saw as troubled teenagers to the frightened child within. “As a result they failed to act on clear evidence of sexual abuse, to protect girls or even to pass on concerns to a sufficiently senior level.” Morgan added that ministers rejected explanations that child sex abuse was not “widely recognized” at the time.

During the trial of the men at the Old Bailey, the Prosecution described the girls who became their victims as vulnerable children, aged just 11 or 12. “… these men, sometimes acting in groups and at other times separately, actively targeted vulnerable young girls from the age of about the ages of 11 or 12,” the prosecutor told the court.

“There is evidence that the men deliberately targeted children who were out of control. They also targeted children who had been sent to live in care homes for precisely that reason. … The girls who were chosen generally had troubled upbringings and unsettled home lives which made it less likely that anyone would be exercising any normal parental control over them or looking out for them.”

Extraordinarily, the police and social services, who are tasked with safeguarding vulnerable children, deemed the children themselves to be complicit in their own abuse. In one police report, a 13-year-old girl was recorded as having an “age appropriate sexual relationship” with an AsianMuslim man much older than her.

72316F6A06E000005DC250_634x379-vi

Bedford quotes a police report into the matter as finding that “there appears to have been a tolerance of underage sexual activity and no recognition of factors such as abuse of power and coercion and the fact that this was against the law.

“At interview most members of staff disputed they tolerated underage sex and they did try to talk to the girls about this but that often the most they felt they could do was to stress that it was inappropriate, to ask the girls why they thought older men would be interested in young girls and to talk about safe sex.”

Bedford concludes that “there was, beyond any lack of knowledge or clarity, an acceptance of a degree of underage sexual activity that reflects a wider societal reluctance to consider something ‘wrong’.”

The report includes testimonies from the girls, aged between 12 and 15 at the time of their abuse: “Dad was violent to me. I thought it was normal.” “Suddenly the guys were bringing me stuff. They said how lovely I was.” “They paid for drinks and gave us drugs” “They took us to a field where there were other men who had come to have sex with us. I tried not to do it. There were five of them.” “He urinated on me.” “It was always Muslim men.”

0_362727317155677_2108263175_n-vi

“I was expected to do things – if I didn’t they said they would come to my house and burn me alive. I had a baby brother.” “I turned up at the police station at 2/3am, blood all over me, soaked through my trousers to the crotch. They dismissed it as me being naughty, a nuisance. I was bruised and bloody.” “Social services washed their hands – ‘it’s your choice’ I was told.”

“Police… didn’t find me except once… I didn’t hide – I told people where I was.” “If a perpetrator can spot the vulnerable children, why can’t professionals?”

POINTEDLY, the political leadership’s (the police and social services alike) cycle of silence, coupled with bouts of obfuscation from the media – as to the religious persuasion of the rapists – allows Islam’s sexual predators to continue unimpeded. Not only that, non-Muslims throughout the west are perilously placed at risk due to their malfeasance. Sooner than later, non-Muslims must realize that they are on their own, as officialdom has zero interest to expose the evidence, the dangers, at hand!

{re-blogged at Joe For America}

{re-blogged at Islam Exposed}

{re-blogged at Israel’s Voice}

 

ISIS Leader(s) & Sexual Jihad Twist:Induction Via Sodomy!Blackmail Too…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

[Watch] ISIS Leader Is Homosexual, Marrying and Sodomizing All New Recruits

IN no uncertain terms, sans any poppycock, this site has warned about the dangerous, volatile and perverse connection between Islam and “sexual jihad”, as well as its twisted path to hyper-bloodletting via Koranic mandates and escalating barbarism.

IF the above appears too fantastical (to western, Jewish or Christian minds) that’s because it is. Regardless, it does not obviate its inherent truth. Believe it. But for those who are still skeptics, and for others who are left dumbfounded, the following should set (some of) the record straight:

Record One:

READERS, sodomy “for the sake of Islam” (Islam Über Alles) is a known mandate, though it is (or used to be) a well-kept “secret”. Don’t pay any mind to the “qualifiers” from this and that cleric, they are nothing but oozing manure.

Not only did the original “underwear bomber” Abdullah Hassan al-Asiri hide explosives in his rectum to assassinate Saudi Prince Muhammad bin Nayef—they met in 2009 after the 22-year-old Asiri “feigned repentance for his jihadi views“—but this “holy-warrior” apparently had fellow jihadists repeatedly sodomize him to “widen” his anus to fit the explosives—and all in accordance with the fatwas of Islamic clerics.

A 2010 Arabic news video that aired on Fadak TV gives the details. Apparently a cleric, one Abu al-Dema al-Qasab, informed al-Asiri and other jihadis of an “innovative and unprecedented way to execute martyrdom operations: place explosive capsules in your anus. However, to undertake this jihadi approach you must agree to be sodomized for a while to widen your anus so it can hold the explosives.”

Others inquired further by asking for formal fatwas. Citing his desire for “martyrdom and the virgins of paradise,” one jihadi (possibly al-Asiri himself) asked another sheikh, “Is it permissible for me to let one of the jihadi brothers sodomize me to widen my anus if the intention is good?”

After praising Allah, the sheikh’s fatwa began by declaring that sodomy is forbidden in Islam,

“However, jihad comes first, for it is the pinnacle of Islam, and if the pinnacle of Islam can only be achieved through sodomy, then there is no wrong in it. For the overarching rule of [Islamic] jurisprudence asserts that ‘necessity makes permissible the prohibited.’ And if obligatory matters can only be achieved by performing the prohibited, then it becomes obligatory to perform the prohibited, and there is no greater duty than jihad. After he sodomizes you, you must ask Allah for forgiveness and praise him all the more. And know that Allah will reward the jihadis on the Day of Resurrection, according to their intentions—and your intention, Allah willing, is for the victory of Islam, and we ask that Allah accept it of you.”

OKEY dokey…if Allah deems it acceptable…pleasing…so be it…how can an “infidel” (a woman, no less) argue with a ranting Islamist, whose head is still stuck in the 7th century!

Record Two:

SEGUING from male “sodomy jihad” to “regular sexual jihad” – as thuggish Muslims terrorize, rape and pillage all over Europe, and make their way into America too –  who would imagine, in the less than equal treatment of women in Islam, when it comes to jihad, well, the scales even out. How thoroughly modern-Millie of them! Say what?

Record Three:

IN this regard, yes, sexual jihad is all the rage! Fatwa-driven. Westerners, get with the (learning) program…

Record Four:

ACTUALLY, its mandates have reached feverish pitch…the sale of kiddies and wives raise the ante!

Record Five:

OMG…how much more depravity is necessary to demonstrably prove: Islam and the west are incompatible, and, yes, there IS a clash of civilizations!

isis2

SIGNIFICANTLY, this Islamic vixen awaits her jihadi bed mate, whether attached to ISIS/Al Qaeda et al. is irrelevant. Do they even care if their jihadi takes a shower first, more than likely hot and sweaty from the killing fields and pumped with adrenaline and rage? Just curious… Another question…”woman to woman”…is it enough of a gratifying experience to even shave one’s legs? Or, is it a “hit and run”? On the other hand, some girls are dragged kicking and screaming, but others volunteer. It’s their “contribution” to jihad. After all, what’s a good Muslima to do?

LO and behold, no one can claim that the jihadis are not thinking outside the box:

Austrian_teens

ISIS luring U.S. women with cash for babies promises…what will they think of next?

STILL, it is intrinsic to place all of this barbarism into Islamic context, if you will. So, as a matter of record, having participated in the review of a groundbreaking policy paper, Islam and Blood – https://adinakutnicki.files.wordpress.com/2012/07/islam_and_blood.pdf – it became apparent that the Islamic “love-affair” with blood permeated all core aspects of their lives, sex at the forefront.

NOW, if this sounds too surreal for most westerners brought up within Judeo-Christian culture, well, that’s the way it is. But to understand Islam properly is to also internalize the pent-up rage, and this includes the sexual component.

LET’s segue to the “news” re ISIS/ISIL and their “natural” partaking in sodomy ritual initiation, if your stomach can stand it. 

A video is circulating of what is identified to be an Iraqi official interrogating an ISIS terrorist who carried out seven beheadings. The interrogator asks the detainee about his forced recruiting into ISIS and the graphic acts that ensued.

The terrorist reveals yet another dark side to the Islamic State: sadistic acts of sodomy.

Shoebat.com translates that the recruit was one of eleven men who were ravaged by the ISIS “prince.”

He describes the leader as having a henna-dyed beard and slim figure, believed to be terrorist commander Abu Ala’.

Ala’ made a fatwa permitting himself to marry and rape his recruits, just as countless kidnapped women and girls are raped by their Islamist captives. The only exception is that none of the men may sodomize him in return.

The testimony aligns with a documentary broadcast by a Kurdish television station in August that claimed ISIS has been raping men in a ceremony it describes as “marriage,” recording the act as blackmail to force them to join.

The STERK station recorded the confessions of more than 20 ISIS insurgents:

The ISIL elements admitted that what they called ‘marriage’ was in fact rape. They said that every new member of the group was raped. The footage of the rape would be used as blackmail in the event of the new recruit refusing to participate in actions .

ISIS fighter Abdul Kareem Ibrahim Bazo explained that he was blindfolded before being raped:

“About a fortnight later they came and said I had to join. I did not want to. But they had the footage. They threatened to show it to my family .

“I fainted. When I came round they told me: ‘you are now with ISIL.’”

They ‘married’ me 15 times. Then they washed my head and put cologne on me. They told me no one could join ISIL without being married.”

This sickening abuse of power is just one of the many perverse tactics ISIS justifies with the Quran and hadiths.

H/T [Shoebat]

ALAS, in a mind-boggling twist – but par for the course within the perverse netherworld of Islamists – who can forget the insane rantings of Iran’s Mahdi-driven A’jad, when he opined: there are no gays in Iran! Well, truth dare be told, homosexuality is not only in full bloom in Iran, but throughout the Islamic Mid East and the diaspora too.

NOW, this is neither the time nor place to have a serious discourse on “alternative” lifestyles, but it does call into question the oft-repeated, bold-faced lies from Islamic leaders, as they continuously exhort the “purity” of living an Islamic lifestyle – covering their women from head to toe – as opposed to one of western decadence. Really now?

Muslim child brides

Islamic girls corralled – in chains – to meet their new husbands…happy wedding day…mazal tovs all around!

FOLKS –  if you aren’t worried about a head chopping ! – tell said dangerous bull sh-t to the Islamic sexual sadists who sodomize/rape BOTH boys and girls, all under the guise of jihad. Add to their perverted to do lists the goats and sheep they violate in acts of bestiality! Their animal-like behavior defies description…it is best to see it in plain view. Beyond any normal pale…

Islamic Sharia Law ruling. If a Muslim has sex with a goat or a sheep, and that goat or sheep has a baby, who owns the baby? The Muslim who had sex with the goat or sheep or the owner of the goat?

Under Islam, the man who owns the goat or sheep gets the baby from the ‘romance’ between the Moslem and the animal….lol

In Islam they believe that a man and an animal can create a baby if they have sexual relations…lol

No more goat-sex for Muslims in Sweden as government outlaw bestiality!

FRANKLY, you can’t make this craziness up…it is just too twisted. Resultant, is the west really supposed to be able to “tame” these beasts and live side by side with them?

WILD animals/beasts…חַיּוֹת בַּר…and I am not referring to the 4 legged ones!

 

“SEXUAL JIHAD” REACHES FEVERISH CLIMAX:ISIS (AL QAEDA) ISSUES FATWA:UNMARRIED GIRLS DEMANDED FOR BATTLEFIELD SEX-OR ELSE!Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

isis2

WITH all their harping on Islamic “purity”, covering their women from head to toe, one would think that “jihad by sex” would be out of the question. Out of bounds. If you believed as much, you would be wrong! So much so, now that the truth is seeping out, previous commentaries are coming into sharper relief, try as they might to hide it from westerner’s prying eyes.

BUT for added context, the western world must internalize how women are really viewed in Islam, aside from what is already known: indeed, women’s existence is against Islam, so sayeth the council of Islamic ideology! Really.

ADDING weight to their latest jihadi weapon, this too must be internalized, to understand the catastrophic dangers facing the west: yes, an Islamic fatwa “koshers” the sale of kiddies and wives!

NOT only that, aside from the sexually gratifying component (free of guilt from the prohibition of pre-marital sex), countless jihadi women are completely ready to bed AND roar, all for the sake of satiating their monstrous Allah! Monstrous Islam…

YET, despite the absolute Koranic dictates to kill all infidels, including Muslims deemed apostates, the fact of the matter is that there are sexual roots endemic in “jihad by sex”. Say what? Well, jihad is inextricably linked to repressed sexual rage within the Islamic male psyche, defining their relationship to women. And this is not psycho babble.

SO in light of the above, it makes entire “sense” for “sex by jihad” to become the new rage!

Muslim Terrorists In Iraq (ISIS) Issued A Decree Ordering All Families To Send Their Unmarried Women To Participate in “JIHAD BY SEX”

On June 12, only two day after capturing Mosul and other territories in Iraq, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria issued a decree ordering the people to send their unmarried women to “jihad by sex.” In the proclamation ISIS threatens to impose Sharia law on all who fail to comply with the decree.
Here’s a translation of the decree, followed by the original in Arabic.

In the Name of Allah the Merciful

Subject: Mandate LOGO The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria
The State of Nineveh

In the Name of Allah the Merciful

After liberation of the State of Nineveh, and the welcome shown by the people of the state to their brotherly mujahideen, and after the great conquest, and the defeat of the Safavid [Persian] troops in the State of Nineveh, and its liberation, and Allah willing, it will become the headquarters for the mujahideen. Therefore we request that the people of this state offer their unmarried women so that they can fulfill their duty of jihad by sex to their brotherly mujahideen. Failure to comply with this mandate will result in enforcing the laws of Sharia upon them.

Allah we have notified, Allah bear witness.

Sha’ban 13, 1435
June, 12, 2014
ISIS decree calling on women to report for “jihad by sex” duty.

Translated for by Dr. Samir Johna.

Here is the original proclamation in Arabic:

isis1

 

The word for marriage in Arabic is zawaj. The word Nikah literally means “legal copulation”. Jihad Nikah is simply sending the girls for “legal copulation” in order to have sex with Jihadists.

Jihad Nikah is one of the many Muslim decrees that came out within the last decade which included some bizarre fatwas as the Adult Breastfeeding fatwa (a Muslim male suckling milk from his wife’s breast), Sex with Infants (amongst Shia), Pedophilia, the popular Misyar marriage (traveler convenient marriage), Mut’a Marriage (Temporary marriage), Marriage with Intent to Divorce (Summer vacation marriage) and Jihad Nikah (marriage to advance warfare).

The idea of Jihad Nikah is simple. Women who want to participate in holy war (Jihad) can tend the battlefield by providing the gift of their bodies for Muslim veterans, especially in Iraq and Syria where the heat of Jihad is highest.

In every report of this sort, Muslims worldwide deny the phenomenon. However, Islamic Muruna which was issued by Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi, the most prominent Sunni theologian in the world explains not only the sanctioning of Misyar Marriage, but “the process of permitting evils”, altogether by “sanctioning prohibitions for the sake of an interest”. This “interest” regards Jihad, which is very well documented in his volume Fiqh Al-Muwazanat (The Jurisprudence of Balance) on his own website. This jurisprudence, as mad as it sounds, permits “reversing Sharia rulings” in order to “gain interests”. Imagine what “sanctioning prohibitions” means. If it says, “thou shall not kill” now it’s “thou can kill” for an “interest”.

Qaradawi explains that Sharia under war can permit almost anything:

“Sharia’s ability to be flexible and inclusive is that it cares for their needs while excusing the burdens Muslims have to endure. For the sake of their destiny, it was made lawful for them to have exceptions from the law that are appropriate for them since these exceptions match their general goals to make it easy for humanity by removing the chains of [Sharia] rules they were made to adhere to in previous Sharia rulings.”

By reversing Islamic law, Muruna concludes an amazing doctrine that sanctions all prohibitions:

“When evil and harm conflict as necessities demand, we must then choose the least of the two evils or harms. This is what the experts in jurisprudence decided … if interests and harms/evils conflict, or benefits conflict with evils, what is then to be decided is to review each benefit and each harm and its consequences, so the minor evils are forgiven for the sake of the greater long-term benefit. The evil is also accepted even if that evil is extreme and normally considered deplorable.

And this is how Jihad and prostitution becomes sanctioned.

Misyar marriage, for example, is nothing more than legalized call girls and has branches globally including in the U.S. It was first sanctioned in Egypt and Saudi Arabia to only spread to several other Muslim nations. There are many websites used to facilitate the transactions. The most popular is click here for ‘lonely’ Muslim men who are on the road and are allowed to have sex with local Muslim women (who advertise themselves) in the area where the lonely Muslim male is traveling in which he can order his bride in the comfort of his hotel room by the touch of his keyboard.

Mesiara Online screenshot.

Call girls are permitted in Islam and even with Muslim women donned with Hijabs. Misyar means sex for the travelers. While prostitution exists in every corner of the globe, its sanctification with fanciful words is what is particularly at issue here. The word prostitution is stealthily removed since there is a transaction established that says “marriage” instead.

Misyar is all over the Middle East and is sanctioned by many top Imams. The Muslim “conservative” world is much more disgusting than one can imagine. It’s actually far more like western liberalism than western conservatism. Misyar marriages are rarely if ever discussed in Western mainstream media, perhaps – at least in part – for that reason.

Misyar literally means the traveler marriage in which women must relinquish the care owed to them by a husband. Sheikh Ahmed al-Kubaissi, from the United Arab Emirates, thinks there is no formal problem withmisyar marriage. After all, it fulfills all the demands of Islamic law. Wealthy Muslim men sometimes enter into a Misyar marriage while on vacation, in order to have sexual relations with another woman without committing the sin of adultery. They usually divorce the women once their holiday is over.

However, if this is understood by both parties at the time of concluding the marriage contract (and this is usually the case), this would constitute a fixed time period.

The Sheikh of al-Azhar Mosque – Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi – and theologian Yusuf Al-Qaradawi note, in their writings and in their lectures, that a major proportion of the men who take a spouse in the framework of the misyar marriage are already married men.

Many of the men involved would not marry a second wife within the regime of normal Islamic polygamy because of the heavy financial burdens, moral obligations & responsibilities placed on the husband. Instead, they opt for the option of Misyar marriage when the theologians declare it licit. Amongst the Shia Muslims, according to a Fatwa for Ayatollah Sistani, Mut’ah is permitted but Misyar is considered to be prohibited by Sunnis. While both condemn the other sect accusing the other side of immoral acts, there is much similarity between Mut’ah and Misyar. Both require all the conditions applicable to Nikah (marriage) with the exception of fixed expiration date in Mut’ah. Every marriage by Sunnis requires two adult male witnesses, whereas in Shī‘as, the two witnesses required in either nikah-e-Mut’ah or in ordinary marriage may be just Allah and the Qur’an.

Websites in the English amount to a few thousand hits on Misyar with the usual Muslim discussion groups but the Arabic has over a million hits with a litany of services that facilitate the process with the blessings by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

To be fair, several Muslim theologians object. Muslim Saudi writer Dr. Zuhair Mohammed Jamil Kutby laments (I translated from Arabic) regarding the sexual revolution in the Muslim world, but argues that such deviant behavior stems from the Muslim history itself:

“The Arab Nation and through its scholars, jurists and intellectuals, think it is one of the best nations, and it is a nation like no other in the universe. But the fact is it went through periods of physical and moral degeneration that even history is embarrassed of. (Arab Vanity and Corruption)”

He added…

“When we come back to read some pages of our history—not the history written by Orientalists—this way we do not claim they are antagonistic. We find that our Arab history is full of conflict, crowded with a culture of lying and exposed by sexual and moral deviation … Is it not wrong and shameful the spread of corruption and sexual deviation in the corridors and palaces during Arab rule? Plentiful were these [deviations] written in our history books, novels and stories. For example, The Abbasid Caliph Harun al-Rashid spent his nights with Al-Majin and the immoral poet Abu Nawas…Here are the verses that indicate sexual decadence and corruption in which Abu Nawas says:

‘Adela blames my choice,
a boy smooth as an Oryx …
leave me alone, I said
do not blame me,
I am committed to what you hate
and until death do us part
Did not the book of Allah instruct?
To prefer boys over girls…’”

Pedophilia stems from the Qur’an and Muhammad. Muslim doublespeak artists cover up Muhammad’s marriage with Aisha, his six-year old wife and argue that he waited to consummate his marriage when she was nine. This waiting has nothing to do with Aisha’s maturity but with payment:

“…then Abu Bakr asked [the Prophet] ‘O Messenger of God, what prevents you from consummating the marriage with your wife?’ The Prophet said ‘The bridal gift (sadaq).’ Abu Bakr gave him the bridal gift, twelve and a half ounces [of gold], and the Prophet sent for us. He consummated our marriage in my house, the one where I live now and where he passed away.” [The History of Al-Tabari: Biographies of the Prophet’s Companions and Their Successors, translated by Ella Landau-Tasseron, SUNY Press, Albany, 1998, Volume XXXIX, pp. 171-173]

Muhammad’s companions and old geezers married underage girls. Ali gave his daughter to Umar:

“Umar asked ‘Ali for the hand of his daughter, Umm Kulthum in marriage. ‘Ali replied that she has not yet attained the age (of maturity)… Thus ‘Ali gave his daughter Umm Kulthum a dress and asked her to go to ‘Umar’ ‘Go and tell your father that you are very pretty …’. With that ‘Ali married Umm Kulthum to ‘Umar’.” [In Tarikh Khamees, Volume 2, p. 384 (‘Dhikr Umm Kalthum’) and Zakhair Al-Aqba, p. 168]

The Summary for The Message of Prayer, How To Teach Our Children Prayer by Sheikh Yousuf Al-Asfuri AlBahreini, First Edition, 1989.
This book is for the elementary schools in Bahrain (photo of page in Arabic here). In it, it gives the etiquettes of washing from ejaculation. Page 53 discusses the necessity to cleanse oneself and the conditions for washing

“1—intercourse with the vaginal part of a woman…intercourse after ejaculating in her anus…intercourse after ejaculating in a boy’s anus…after intercourse with an animal…”

al-emama

Moroccan journalist Hamid Tulist, in addressing the pedophilia problem in the Middle East, laments:

“Even the prince of the faithful Caliph Al-Amin, son of Caliph Harun al-Rashid, bought his eunuchs and dedicated them for his private use and refused women and slaves, and anguished over his love for a boy named Kauthar, and sang for him love songs and poetry. Caliph and Commander of the Faithful of Allah, al-Wathiq bin Khalifa Mu’tasim and Caliph Harun al-Rashid’s grandson, longed for a boy called Mahj. He dedicated sweet and delicate poems for him. Commander of the Faithful and Caliph al-Walid ibn Yazid ibn Abd al-Malik was even said that he enticed his brother to sodomize him.”

Tulist reverts not to the Quran, Hadith or Islamic jurisprudence to solve the problem of pedophilia in the Arab-Muslim world, but to the Jewish faith:

“The first mention of a type of sexual perversion (homosexuality) stated in the first religious book known in the Arab East was Genesis, a Jewish book and the first book of the five books of the Torah. In the story of Lot were God punished sexual perversion. In fact the Arabic word ‘Luat’ (sodomy) came from the Hebrew ‘Lot’ and not from the Arabic.”

What the Muslim world accuses the infidel of is exactly what the Muslim world is actually guilty of. But they have ways of passing their guilt. Of course, in the Middle East, the worst thing to be is a Jew and a woman. These are evil since hell is filled with them. Every evil is sanctioned in the Muslim world.

Adultery is cloaked in Muta and Misyar. Rape is cloaked in the right to own concubines. Murder is cloaked in Jihad against the collaborators and the Zionist enemy whom corrupted God’s Word, the Bible. Everything is twisted upside down.

AS in other religions, the faithful often attempt to live up to certain standards of conduct, try as they might. Now, it is no secret that Muslims believe that Abū al-Qāsim Muḥammad ibn ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-Muṭṭalib ibn Hāshim (Arabicابو القاسم محمد ابن عبد الله ابن عبد المطلب ابن هاشم‎; c. 570 – c. 8 June 632),[1] also transliterated asMuhammad (محمد), was a man from Mecca who unified Arabia into a single religious polity underIslam. Believed by Muslims and Bahá’ís to be a messenger and prophet of God, Muhammad is almost universally[n 1] considered by Muslims as the last prophet sent by God to mankind.[2][n 2]While non-Muslims regard Muhammad as the founder of Islam,[3] Muslims consider him to have restored the unaltered original monotheistic faith of AdamNoahAbrahamMosesJesus, andother prophets.[4][5][6][7]   

BE that as it may, this American-Israeli goes on record, stating: he was also a pedophile, rapist and polygamist! It is what it is. And though there are many citations to prove as much, the following is more than resonant, being that it pulls no punches: Mohammed was a paedophile, but hush, you can’t say that….

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sz90k9mug24#t=16

IN this regard, why is it at all shocking to hear that young girls – virgins to boot – are being (ab)used as nothing more than whores, even as their fatwa-laden pimp daddies regularly opine: girls/women must be covered from head to toe; virginity is a must; and Islam is a religion of peace, as inculcated by its psychopathic “prophet” !


Muslim child brides

BUT, “servicing” males for jihad, while they plunder, pillage and blow up everyone in their path, gives Islamic she-devils an exemption to said laws – not unlike their role model, many centuries ago.

YES, males AND females, emulating his bloody footsteps!