Israel’s Decision-Makers Reaching A Highly Rational Conclusion….Irrespective of An EMP Strike On Iran….And, This Method Is ENTIRELY Lawful…Grounded In International Law…Adina Kutnicki

Generally, Israel’s leaders try every act of appeasement before the jig is up.

But make NO mistake. Israel’s leadership is always best when it has its back up against the wall. Discussing the pros and cons of such behavior/thinking is best left for another discussion.

Know this. Once the decision is made, and a bull’s eye gets painted on their backs, there will be NO place – on this bleeding planet – for them to hide. Take it to the bank.

And, with Iran’s top leadership marked, Hizbullah’s chieftain won’t be far behind.

Any doubts? Just ask those ( try, I dare you…unless you know something that yours truly doesn’t..contacting the dead and all ) who have been dispatched/eliminated…..over and over…..

http://debka.com/article/22293/Iranian-leaders-in-Israel%E2%80%99s-sights-after-calling-for-its-destruction

“President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu have bandied thousands of words in their dispute over an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear sites. For a time, their argument muffled the abiding ambition of the Islamic Republic to destroy Israel – come what may.
However, the message roared by Iranian leaders over last weekend – before and after Al Quds Day – was quite simply this: Israel must be destroyed, irrespective of whether or not it attacks the Islamic Republic

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was cheered by half a million demonstrators in Tehran shouting: Death to Israel! Death to America! when he declared Israel is a “cancerous tumor” that will soon be finished off in the new Middle East. He called “the Zionist regime’s existence an insult to all humanity.”

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said:  “The fake Zionist (regime) will disappear from the landscape of geography,”

And although both were severely rebuked by world leaders for their violent invective, it continued to pour out of Tehran in a comment by Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Aerospace Force Chief, Brig. Gen. Amir Hajizadeh who said an Israeli attack would be welcome “as a pretext to get rid of Israel for good.”

Israel’s new Home Defense Minister Avi Dichter laid it out in plain language: While Syria, Lebanon and Gaza confront Israel with a strategic threat, Iran imperils our very existence.”

Certain Western intelligence sources were reminded of a speech by Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu in 2006 when he quoted a Holocaust survivor as saying:  “My main lesson from the Holocaust is that if someone tells you he is going to exterminate you, believe him. And I add to that. Believe him and stop him!”
Six years later, those sources now suggest, after America’s top soldier Gen. Martin Dempsey offered the opinion that Israel can no longer destroy Iran’s nuclear weapon capacity – only delay it , that Netanyahu may be willing to go further: Not only to stop them, but kill them.
They are quietly using the term “decapitation.”

They point to the Israeli Mossad’s long record of targeted covert operations for dealing with past and would-be annihilators: In the fifties, the Mossad captured the Nazi criminal Adolf Eichmann in Operational Finale.

In the seventies, Golda Meir ordered Operation Wrath of God to hunt down and pick off one by one the Palestinian Black September murderers of 11 Israeli sportsmen at the 1972 Munich Olympics.
In February 2008, Iran’s senior terrorist operations commander, Hizballah’s Imad Mughniyeh, was liquidated in Damascus, so ending a bloody career of assassinations, terrorism and abductions against US and other Western targets as well as Israel.
Hizballah’s chief Hassan Nasrallah knows the score: He has spent six years hunkered down in a fortified bunker, taking care never to  broadcast his inflammatory speeches calling for Israel’s destruction live, only by video.
It cannot be ruled out that this point, Israel may decide to disable Iran’s nuclear program by going for its leaders.”

Whoever executes the deeds – a blessing on their heads!

And, if the opportunity arises…say, this one is from Adina Kutnicki!

The Fruits Of Washington’s Dictator-in-Chief…Via Short Video Clip…Adina Kutnicki

Oh well…at least millions of illegal aliens are pleased as punch.

American citizens – not so much.

http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-empowers-countless-illegals/

Hail to the Dictator-in-Chief!

Will A Confluence Of Known Terrorists Jumping To Huma Abedin’s Defense (Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff) Hit Critical Mass? Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Let us contemplate the following scenario : a laundry list of ‘who’s who’ in Mafia circles, recommends ‘so and so’ for the position of Chief Operations Officer/Chief Financial Officer for a mega national/international conglomerate, or for any legitimate going concern. Would they get hired?

From this blogger’s considerable time spent in corporate tax (recall, this is how ‘following the jihadi money’ described herein started –  https://adinakutnicki.com/about/ ) interfacing with this ‘COO or that CFO’, such a scenario would never happen, unless the job description entailed ‘chief gangster’.

Head hunters – and am not referring to the head chopping kind – eschew any whiff of tainted backgrounds, even if tangentially revealed. After all, there is such a concept as ‘due diligence’, and most business types take it very seriously, even if scoundrels still manage to enter their workplaces.

The basic standard of ‘due diligence’ is most definitely not being adhered to in the ‘People’s House’. ( what kind of slipshod organization are they running in Washington? are they hiring counter clerks in any old convenience store? even ‘mom and pop’ stores want to make sure their employees aren’t going to rob them blind ). The semblance of any such vetting – through required investigations – should be a minimum standard to adhere to, particularly with the stakes as high as they are.

Obviously (as the following will demonstrate), background checks are tossed aside –  two sheets to the wind – akin to the unfazed attitude of alcoholics, as they survey their wreckage with nary a care in the world, sidestepping over their destruction in the process.

Is this any way to run a government, especially one which is hailed as the leadership of the free world?

Standards, what’s that? Due diligence, which schmuck adheres to such an outmoded concept?

And, so it unfolds that Secretary of State Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Huma Abedin , is ( currently ) less than three ( no longer six)  degrees separated from well known terrorists!

You got that?

Even Houdini couldn’t have wiggled himself out of such highly connected (terror) contortions. Nevertheless, poobahs in Washington are still defaming the bearers of truthful tidings, instead of securing the national interest! Mea culpas? Never gonna happen. Mind you, the forthcoming ‘news’ should have been uncovered through proper vetting.

No matter. Stalwart patriots are performing the heavy lifting, hoping to bury her chances of staying put, but only through extreme pressure points.

Many of the building blocks, sealing shut the case against her, are featured at this blog. ‘Uncovering The Tip Of Huma Abedin’s Islamic Spear….The House of Al-Saud’ is the final block of cement –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/16/uncovering-the-tip-of-huma-abedins-islamic-spear-the-house-of-al-saud-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

However, the foundation of the indictment against her – the initial building blocks – are found here – ‘The Muslim Student Association (MSA)…Islamic Student Arm Of Muslim Brotherhood/Muslim Mafia…Huma Abedin Board Member Too…What Does This Mean?’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/15/the-muslim-student-association-msa-islamic-student-arm-of-muslim-brotherhoodmuslim-mafia-huma-abedin-board-member-too-what-does-this-meancommentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

And, here US government fools are exposed as knaves – ‘Huma Abedin’s Supporters Will Have Nowhere To Hide…Creeping Closer & Closer To (Figuratively) Crucifying Their Position…As They Stand By Their (Islamic) Woman’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/05/huma-abedins-supporters-will-have-nowhere-to-hide-creeping-closer-closer-to-figuratively-crucifying-their-position-as-they-stand-by-their-islamic-woman/,

Enter ‘Madame Secretary’ …..in all her brazen chutzpah… defending her ‘close’ associate – ‘Hillary Clinton’s Tap Dance Around Huma Abedin’s Brotherhood/Sisterhood Connections…And Media Matters Request-Show Us Her Security Clearance!’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/03/hillary-clintons-tap-dance-around-huma-abedins-brotherhoodsisterhood-connections-media-matters-request-show-us-her-security-clearance-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

Notice how terror ties run in families..sort of like dominant genes…‘UPDATE : Huma Abedin’s Familial Muslim Brotherhood/Sisterhood Tree Gains Another Root’ https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/28/update-huma-abedins-familial-muslim-brotherhoodsisterhood-tree-gains-another-root-addendum-to-huma-abedin-deputy-cos-to-hillary-clinton-inextricably-tied-to-muslim-brotherhoodsisterhood/.

And, Huma’s terror train continues unimpeded – ‘Huma Abedin, Deputy COS To Clinton INEXTRICABLY Tied To The Muslim Brotherhood/Sisterhood (embedded report)’https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/24/huma-abedin-deputy-cos-to-hillary-clinton-inextricably-tied-to-the-muslim-brotherhoodsisterhood-embedded-report-addendum-tosenator-mccain-digs-himself-into-a-hole-via-his-indefensiblein/, leaving no doubt where her allegiance lies.

Consequentially, Senator John McCain ( what the hell is wrong with him? ) wades into the fray via ‘Senator John McCain Digs Himself Into A Hole…Via His Indefensible/Inexplicable Inexplicable Support Of Huma Abedin…Hillary Clinton’s Deeply Connected Muslim Brotherhood ‘Sister’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/20/senator-john-mccain-digs-himself-into-a-hole-via-his-indefensibleinexplicable-support-of-huma-abedin-hillary-clintons-deeply-connected-muslim-brotherhood-sister-commentary-by-adina-kutnick-132-2/.

Now that Huma’s terror dots have been irrefutably established, what will her Washington defenders (and others) do with more ‘news’ on the horizon? In other words, with actual terrorists coming out in her defense, how will their indefensible defense of her become reconcilable?

Is this writer making herself clear? If not, Walid Shoebat ( a reformed Muslim Brotherhood operative/terrorist, who dedicates his life to exposing their ‘grand jihad’ plans ) should seal her fate within the US, and (hopefully) those who continue to defend her!

‘Another Huma Abedin Defender With An Interesting Background?’ 

“The list of individuals who have publicly defended Huma Abedin – willfully blind Republican politicians like John McCain, John Boehner, Scott Brown, Marco Rubio, Jim Sensenbrenner, and Mike Simspson notwithstanding – may be telling us something all by itself.”

“In the meantime, another defender of Huma’s honor is a woman named Amina Chaudary, who wrote a piece last week called, “We’re all Huma Abedins”. At the bottom of this post, we’ll explain Chaudary’s relevance (stick with us – it’s worth it)………”

“Where do we begin? As has been the case with all those who have come to Huma’s aid in response to the letters penned by Reps. Bachmann, et. al., a faulty premise is used to craft a ridiculous narrative. That premise is that Huma is being unjustly attacked because she’s Muslim. The truth is that the concerns raised have to do not with Abedin’s religion but with her associations, which are SUPPOSED to matter in issues related to granting someone a security clearance, especially at the level where Huma currently works (Hillary’s closest aid).”

“Moreover, Huma’s most ardent defenders also seem to leave clues behind that actually make them appear as less than good character references. For example, have a look at what Chaudary writes in attempt to prove her point:”

While this is the first time such accusations have been leveled against Abedin in a public forum, it is not the first time guilt-by-association tactics have scuttled the promising political careers of American Muslims. Some may recall in the early days of the Obama campaign Mazen Asbahi, an American Muslim lawyer, was appointed by the campaign to undertake outreach to the American Muslim community. Within days, Asbahi was forced to resign due to guilt-by-association relationships with certain individuals, none of whom was ever convicted or indicted for criminal activity in a court of law.The Obama administration feared a distraction, and Asbahi was forced to resign. He, and others like him, would never be able to garner the widespread support for Abedin. Perhaps this is why demonizing American Muslim politicians has become all too common. For the rest of us, gaining widespread support and defense of high-ranking officials in similar scenarios is unheard of.

“Mazen Asbahi? Chaudary went there?”

“Pssst. Amina, not a good idea.”

“For starters, Asbahi was jettisoned once it became learned that he had ties to aradical Imam from Chicago named Jamal Said, who has distinct ties to Hamas. The Wall Street Journal reported that Asbahi served on a Board with Said. Not only that, but when Walid was a Muslim Brotherhood activist in Chicago, Said was his trainer; Walid confirms Said’s nefarious agenda with his firsthand account.”

“By pointing to the Asbahi case, Chaudary introduces another name into the discussion – Ahmed Rehab, the Executive Director for the Chicago office of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). Like CAIR, Said was listed as anunindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation trial.”

“Incidentally, Fox News Channel’s Bill O’Reilly interviewed Rehab in August of 2008, shortly after Asbahi resigned. Note how Rehab actually defends Jamal Said in addition to Asbahi:”

“Obviously, Rehab knows about Asbahi’s relationship with Said. In fact, he actually defends it by praising Said as “a great American faith leader”.

“As for Chaudary, are we supposed to believe that she doesn’t know about Asbahi’s connection to Jamal Said? Doesn’t care? Thinks it’s a good thing? Does she hold the same opinion of Said that Rehab does? If so, that is a person Abedin may not want in her corner.”

“Again, Chaudary conflates two completely separate things and isn’t challenged for doing so; being denied a security clearance / job in a Presidential administration because of associations is not even remotely similar to being convicted of a crime for having certain associations. The former is completely legitimate; the latter is unjust. Yet, Chaudary wants you to believe Huma Abedin is a victim of guilt by association. Huma’s not been proven guilty but it’s looking more and more like she should be disqualified from holding the position of Deputy Chief of Staff for the Secretary of State. It’s an apples and oranges argument on the part of Chaudary and every Huma defender that media outlets – on both the left and the right – continue to let go.”

“As for why Amina Chaudary’s defense of Huma Abedin might be a point of interest…”

“As we learned a few days ago, Huma served on the Board of the Muslim Students Association (MSA) at George Washington University (GWU) as recently as August of 1997. As far back as January of 1999, a woman namedAmina Chaudary is listed as that chapter’s Vice-President (her name remained on the Board until at least June of 2000). Is the Amina Chaudary who served on the same Board at MSA GWU (that Huma did one year earlier) the same Amina Chaudary that is defending Huma today? Do the two women know each other? If so, did they meet through the MSA?”

“Here again, is the screen shot of the MSA GWU Board from August of 1997. Notice the last name of the President at the time – Aisha Chaudary. Do Aisha and Amina know each other? Are they related? After all, we ARE talking about the same MSA GWU Board that welcomed Anwar al-Awlaki onto its Board as a “Chaplain” in late 2001.”

“Such associations do matter when we’re talking about national security.”

http://www.shoebat.com/2012/08/19/another-huma-abedin-defender-with-an-interesting-background/

Still not convinced? Go to – ‘Successors at MSA Board Huma Served On At GWU Include Al-Qaeda Terrorist, IIRO  Leader’ – http://www.shoebat.com/2012/08/18/successors-at-msa-board-huma-served-on-at-gwu-include-al-qaeda-terrorist-iiro-leader/.

Could it get any worse? Nope.

BOTTOM LINE – if one serves as an Editor at any organization which has proven ! terrorists on their Board, the only conclusion ( at the very least ) drawn must be – said person has the same philosophical/ideological outlook as the terror-tied members/founders.

And, the company one keeps surely ( at a minimum ) is one measure of said person’s ‘interests’.

Therefore, within any realm of civilized society, Huma Abedin is ( if one is in a OVERLY generous mood ) a Muslim Brotherhood ‘sympathizer’, or more than likely one of their MAIN operatives.

Sach ha’kol – at the end of it all – what are American patriots going to do about it? Will they swamp their Congressional reps to take action against her?

I am doing my part. Will you do yours?

The Mother Of All Strikes….A Very Real Possibility…To Be Unleashed Against Iran…Adina Kutnicki

This writer never laid claim to military expertise – far from it – however, yours truly does claim to be closely connected to those who have such strategic resumes, as well as relevant ‘work’ experience.

Therefore, when approached ( on many occasions ) by folks with the question : what is your considered opinion, regarding how a pre-emptive strike will unfold, the first response has been – a devastating EMP attack, followed up by Jericho 111 missile strikes.

So sayeth said contacts. Who am I to argue?

Thus, it came as no surprise to read the following at a very on target site – ‘Is Israel Planning EMP Attack On Iran?’

“WASHINGTON – Analysts say because Israel now believes diplomacy has failed to halt Iran’s nuclear program and the Jewish state’s very survival is at stake, Israelis have not ruled out a Jericho III missile launch to detonate a single electromagnetic pulse warhead at high altitude over central Iran.”

“The assessment is underscored by recent comments from Israeli officials that the Islamic republic is reaching its “zone of immunity” from conventional military attack on its nuclear sites.”

“In addition, analysts point out the use of long-range aircraft with refueling capability would be highly complex and pose many logistical problems. Israel also probably would not be allowed overflight permission from Turkey, Iraq or Saudi Arabia to reach its Iranian targets. Further, such an approach would minimize any element of surprise.”

“Meanwhile, top religious and political officials in Iran have issued repeated warnings they plan to obliterate the Jewish state.”

“Israel has made an assessment that Iran is on the threshold of a breakthrough to make a nuclear weapon. However,  some national security experts, including some in the United States, believe Iran is several years away from making such a device. And they say actual weaponization – the ability to miniaturize a nuclear bomb to fit on its nuclear-capable missiles – still is further off.”

“Debate over just how close Iran may be to making a nuclear weapon has raised the issue of the quality of the intelligence to back Israeli claims. Sources point to the example of the intelligence used to assess Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction that prompted the U.S. to attack Iraq in March 2003.”

“With Iran continuing its enrichment program, however, Israel and some Western countries are concerned that the amount of low-level uranium it has enriched could be enriched further to some 90 percent purity – which is what is required to make nuclear weapons.”

“U.S. officials don’t assess that Iran has reached that point.”

“Given that Iranian sites may be hardened against a conventional military attack, several Israeli and foreign sources believe that Israel has a nuclear device to create an electromagnetic pulse, or EMP, that would produce little radiation on the ground but could knock out all of Iran’s electronics.”

“Israel also is assessed to be able to launch nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles from its German-supplied Dolphin electric submarines that could carry a one-kiloton or more device and explode over Iran, effectively neutralizing all of Iran’s electronics.”

“This would include Iran’s command and control capabilities and its ability to launch ballistic missiles in retaliation to a pre-emptive Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear sites, which Western intelligence has assessed is a cover to make nuclear weapons.”

“Sources say that an Israeli EMP attack also would effectively halt Iran’s ability to launch its forces to block the Strait of Hormuz, which the Islamic republic has threatened to do if it is attacked, along with targeting a number of U.S. military facilities in the region, as well as Israel.”

“An electromagnetic pulse occurs following a nuclear weapon exploded at a high altitude, creating a very strong electrical field that can overwhelm all electronics, knocking out or seriously damaging any electronic devices connected to power sources or antennas, including communications equipment, computers, electrical appliances, automobile and aircraft ignitions systems. Experts say it also can adversely affect a person’s implanted heart pacemaker device.”

“The effect from an EMP would be very similar to electronics in a near lightning strike or a solar storm which also can affect electronics but on a lesser scale than a pulse from a high-altitude nuclear explosion.”

“Another scenario discussed among some Israeli leaders is the detonation of an EMP over the entire Middle East, including Israel, whose military infrastructure has been hardened against such attacks. This would allow Israel to fly its jets directly to Iran without concerns about detection. Though it would also turn out the lights in Israel, sources there say the Jewish state could bring power back for civilians in a matter of days. A detonation at an altitude of up to 250 miles not only would affect all electronics in Iran but could damage electrical systems from the Middle East and much of Europe, these experts add. Such an EMP event also would dramatically affect all U.S. military facilities in the region.”

“An EMP attack on the United States, for example, from a 30-kiloton nuclear weapon exploded at an altitude of 62 miles, or 100 kilometers, effectively would knock out 70 percent of electrical systems up to a thousand miles in every direction. A similar explosion at a higher altitude of some 250 miles would virtually affect all electronics from Boston to Los Angeles and from Chicago to New Orleans, according to experts.”

“Consequently, a detonation limited to Iran would have to be at a much lower altitude to avoid such far-ranging effects on the electronics in the region and beyond.”

“According to U.S. intelligence sources, Israel not only possesses nuclear devices of one kiloton or more which would be sufficient to create an effective result from an electromagnetic pulse but has Jericho III missiles which it tested in 2009 capable of carrying nuclear payloads some 2,500 miles. The distance between Israel and Iran is approximately 1,000 miles.”

“U.S. sources knowledgeable about ways to “harden” buildings and other facilities against an EMP attack say business in this area has been booming throughout the Middle East for months.”

“In recent weeks, U.S. intelligence officials have told WND/G2Bulletin that they have detected Israel handling propellants for its Jericho missiles.”

“The prospect that Israel has this capability was first made known by an ex-CIA case officer, Chet Nagle, at a Capitol Hill EMPact America press conference held in Washington, D.C., in November 2011.”

A similar prospect was outlined in a Nov. 10, 2011, Front Page Magazine article, “Connecting the Nuclear Dots on Iran,” written by Kenneth Timmerman who is the president of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran and maintains close ties with the Iranian opposition.”

“Any Israeli attack on Iran is sure to make of Israel an international pariah, Nagle argues,” Timmerman said in quoting Nagle in a conversation. “Plus, the likelihood of success – that is, in destroying or disabling all of Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities (by conventional means) so they have nothing to launch on the morning after the attack – is low.”

“If you’re going to go to all that trouble and be a pariah,” Timmerman quoted Nagel as saying in their conversation, “why not take one of those Jericho missiles, and detonate it 300 miles above the surface and deliver an EMP strike on Iran? That would stop their clock – if it’s electric – as well as all those centrifuges and everything else. Then the Greens can take over the country and we can go back in and rebuild the grid.”

“The prospect for this doomsday approach has arisen due to a comment made by Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak last February that Iran was entering a “zone of immunity” from military attack. Other officials in recent days have suggested that such a “zone of immunity” will be reached before the end of the year.”

“The world, including the current U.S. administration, understands and accepts that Israel necessarily views the threat differently than they do, and that ultimately, Israel is responsible for taking the decisions related to its future, its security and its destiny,” Barak said.

“Given that this “zone of immunity” could be reached before the end of the year, there has been increasing speculation in recent days that Israel may launch an attack prior to the U.S. presidential elections in an effort to force the U.S. to act. Sources say that the Israelis have assessed that if President Obama is re-elected, he may want to continue down the path of negotiating with the Iranians.”

“The sources add that by attacking prior to the U.S. elections in November, the U.S. then will have no choice but to back Israel due to the U.S. commitment to ensure Israel’s security. They add that it also will help Obama’s re-election efforts.”

“Iran, however, insists that its nuclear development program is for peaceful purposes as a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and as a member of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Under the terms of the NPT, Iran has the “right” to enrich uranium as it is doing. Iran has enriched up to 20 percent, which is more than enough for refueling its nuclear reactors but is considered an acceptable level for medical research.”

“As early as 2005, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued a fatwa, or religious decree, that is a legal pronouncement in Islam, that the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that the Islamic republic “shall never acquire these weapons.” Last February, Khamenei reiterated his 2005 fatwa.”

“The Iranian nation has never pursued and will never pursue nuclear weapons,” he said. “There is no doubt that the decision makers in the countries opposing us know well that Iran is not after nuclear weapons because the Islamic republic, logically, religiously and theoretically, considers the possession of nuclear weapons a grave sin and believes the proliferation of such weapons is senseless, destructive and dangerous.”

“Sources say that the edict from Khamenei is considered more than a fatwa, given that he not only is an ayatollah but also the supreme leader of Iran. For that reason, what he said is considered a hukm, or decree of the Supreme Jurisprudent, or Vali-yi Faqih, that determines the legal framework of the Islamic republic in accordance with Islamic law.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/is-israel-planning-emp-attack-on-iran/ .

Never being a betting sort, this time I will wager the following prediction – said scenario will take place before the elections.

Lights out…Iranian Hitler.

And, to our ‘holy warriors’ – G-d speed!!

The Paradox & Pitfalls of Liberal Democracies, In A time Of (im)Moral Relativism: The Havoc Wrought By Leftist Academia…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Let this writer set the record straight from the onset – the utmost respect for higher education is definitely in play. For if this was not the case, would expending a veritable fortune to educate one’s progeny at two of the highest esteemed institutions in the world – MIT and Caltech – make sense ? Of course not.

Hardly a genius, but certainly not dense nor fool hardly.

And, herein lies the paradox.

On a micro/personal level, what tack does a parent take when they intuit that the western academy has become little more than a cesspool of (im)moral relativism, and, by extension, (mental) boot camps in the process? Intrinsically, parents must be prepared to honestly ask themselves: can their (dear) offspring withstand the process of leftist indoctrination? This is not an easy question, but it mandates an honest assessment.

Too much is at stake.

And while the sciences/engineering disciplines are (still) relatively safe from the left’s grasping clutches, the same dare not be said of the social sciences/humanities.

Why is this important?

On a macro/societal level, the damage wrought by leftist academics is incalculable, so much so, western civilization hangs in the balance.

NO kidding around.

As such, this site has attempted to bring the above issue to the fore — from several seemingly diverging, yet, ultimately converging directions. In fact, several op-eds have addressed its import and impact.

Specifically, ‘Post-Zionist Academics Further Israel’s Delegitimization’ was featured at The Jewish Press, as a maiden attempt to raise the clarion call within Israel – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/06/22/post-zionist-academics-further-israels-delegitimization/. Part of the effort includes working with leading political scientists Dr. Martin Sherman and Professor Paul Eidelberg — primarily, revolving around beating back the deleterious effects described above.

Similarly, ‘Leftist Dogma The Same World Over … Freedom Loving People, Beware’ attempts to connect the leftist dots, regardless of where it embeds itself – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/01/leftist-dogma-the-same-world-over-freedom-loving-people-beware-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-32-2/.

‘When Intellectual Honesty Smacks Up Against Leftist Delusions…A Nation-Saving Prescription To Beat Them Back’ demonstrates, in absolute terms, the havoc leftists heaped – and continue to – upon the Jewish nation – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/10/when-intellectual-honesty-smacks-up-against-leftist-delusions-a-nation-saving-prescription-to-beat-them-back-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-84/.

Once again, ‘When Leftists, Mega-Rich, ‘Peace’ Obsessed Instigators Get Involved…What Can Go Wrong?’ spells out a catastrophe of their (leftist) making – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/22/when-leftist-mega-rich-peace-obsessed-instigators-get-involved-what-can-go-wrong-everything-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-111.

To make matters clearer – at least on a psychological level – ‘Leftism…Lethal To Jews & Their Overall Health…Others Too’ demonstrates how their ‘religious’ devotion to leftist ideology kills – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/08/leftism-lethal-to-jews-their-overall-health-others-too-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

And, ‘What Happens When Resident Leftists/Peace Fantasists Hold The Reins Of Power…Regardless of Which Party Holds Sway’ allows the reader to clearly see the demonstrable repercussions of leftist hegemony – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/04/what-happens-when-resident-leftistspeace-fantasists-hold-the-reins-of-power-regardless-of-which-party-is-in-power-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ .

Last, but not least, is an academic exercise on Israeli politics, explaining why Israel is where it is via ‘The Paradox Of Israeli Politics:Vote Right, Get Left’ http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/the_paradox_of_israeli_politics_vote_right_get_left.html.

Enter … esteemed Professor Paul Eidelberg  (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Eidelberg ) and his sage wisdom:‘ The Crisis of Our Times:Connecting The Dots’

The Crisis of Our Times: Connecting The Dots

Prof. Paul Eidelberg, President

Israel–America Renaissance Institute

Part I. Introduction

Will Israel or the United States strike Iran before it deploys ballistic tipped nuclear weapons? Why this belated question? Why has America, the most powerful nation in the world, refrained from launching a preemptive strike against a regime whose president has the audacity to scream “Death to America”? Given the deadly attacks on American forces by Iranian proxies in the past, should the malediction by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad be deemed a casus belli and elicit some sort of U.S. military attack on Iran?

Did Nazi Germany attack America before December 11, 1941? It was not till that day that the United States Congress declared war on Germany. Did the U.S. Congress base its declaration of war on international law? Would this have made any difference? Franklin D. Roosevelt understood very well that a Nazi-dominated Europe would have been the gravest threat to the United States. The same may be said of a nuclear-armed Iran, except that the present occupant of the White House is a post-American President, more precisely, a moral relativist. Never mind his exalting Islam, which exudes moral absolutism.

As a moral relativist, Mr. Obama should be morally indifferent to the number of civilian casualties that would inevitably result from a U.S. attack on Iran. Relativism aside, can a people rightly be held responsible for the official acts of its government?

Albert Einstein, a kindly man and a pacifist, answers this question. In a message honoring the heroes of the Warsaw ghetto, Einstein declared: “The Germans as an entire people are responsible for the mass murders and must be punished as a people if there is justice in the world and if the consciousness of collective responsibility in the nations is not to perish from the earth entirely”

Neither Roosevelt nor Churchill, who were not moral relativists, seems to have had moral qualms about the napalm-bombing of Dresden, which incinerated an estimated 25,000 Germans. The firebombing of the much more densely populated Tokyo on the night of 9/10 March 1945 was more deadly; indeed, it has been said to be single deadliest air raid of World War II, greater than Hiroshima or Nagasaki as single events.

Whether moral distinctions should be made differentiating Germany from Japan in that war is an issue beyond the scope of this essay. But this issue may arise again should the United States or Israel launch a preemptive attack on Iran. Such an attack is bound to kill “non-combatants,” but would they be entirely innocent? Have they not heard the genocidal maledictions of their government?  Besides, Iran’s government has a long criminal record of fostering and financing international terrorism. Its leaders have not only issued genocidal threats against America and Israel, but Iranian proxies have killed hundreds Americans and Israelis during the past two decades.

However, even at this late date—and Israel and America may be approaching the moment of truth—we may hope it will not be necessary to launch a preemptive attack on Iran. But we dare not obscure or minimize what is at stake in this juncture of history. Iran, a Shi’ite Muslim country of almost 80 million people stands athwart the Persian Gulf. Through the Hormuz Strait there flows much of the oil on which the world’s economy depends. It’s not just oil. The lives and quality of life of hundreds of millions of people depend on that oil.

Nuclear-tipped ballistic missiles deployed by Iran’s ruling Revolution Guard would constitute not only an obvious existential threat to Israel. Such missiles would enable Iran to control the Middle East and beyond. Ahmadinejad’s visit to Venezuela’s American-hating dictator Hugo Chavez should remind us Fidel Castro’s Cuba. Remember Nikita Khrushchev and the Cuban missile crisis?

And then there’s Europe. Iran has tested a variety of missiles. Its long range missiles can reach not only Israel but also and Europe. Europe, cowed by its own growing Muslim population will roll over. With the loss of its European markets America will collapse. This is not hyperbole. But let’s probe a little deeper, into the realm of ideas and regimes.

Part II. Post-Modern Democracy

A liberal and egalitarian democracy like the United States is psychologically ill-equipped to deal with the catastrophic threat mentioned above. America is steeped in the vulgar and anti-heroic doctrine of moral relativism. This relativism undermines national pride and a person’s readiness to fight and if necessary die for his country.

Relativism is not the only emasculating doctrine of liberal democracy. Unknown to most academics and intellectuals, liberal democracies suffer from a political versus pedagogical contradiction. On the one hand, they exalt individual freedom; on the other hand, their behavioral sciences—sociology, psychology, and criminology—generally attribute antisocial or criminal behavior to economic and genetic causes. In other words, while democracies preach freedom, their universities, by and large, teach determinism. This confusion leads to another.

Democracies are based on the primacy of consent as opposed to coercion. This predisposes their governments to resolve conflicts even with non-democratic regimes by diplomacy and reciprocity, ignoring the fact that these adversarial regimes are based on the primacy of intimidation. But what is most striking and ludicrous, as well as shameless, is the sight of liberal democratic diplomats consorting with Muslims who despise democracy and for whom mendacity is very much a way of life—a statement that can be confirmed by Muslims who have somehow liberated themselves from the decadence that has befallen Islam.

The failure of democracies to take Islam seriously—for which we may thank the Iilluminati that dominate western universities—is the reason why the awful moment of truth is approaching. While Iranian Ahmadinejad screams “death to America,” Mr. Obama’s advisers, academically processed idiots, urge him to challenge a facsimile of Genghis Kahn to a game of “Conflict Resolution.” Here, let us pause.

It should be obvious that the character of a regime shapes its foreign policies. In a democracy, those policies are very much influenced by the dogmas of democratically subservient political scientists. These academics very often become the advisers of governments, of the political officials that formulate a nation’s foreign policy. Nietzsche has said that great learning and great stupidity go well together under the same hat. I have validated Nietzsche’s adage by subjecting to critical analysis books written by Professor Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser, and books written by the late Professor Yehoshafat Harkabi, a Middle East expert who was the mentor of Shimon Peres, Israel’s erstwhile Defense Minister and Prime Minister. These two high-placed academics were moral relativists. Unsurprisingly, both were leftists.

Dot One: Brzezinski advocated drastic reductions in military expenditures on the one hand, and “outreach” to the Soviet Union on the other. (Professor B has been linked to Barack Obama, himself a relativist, who is aping the Brzezinski-Carter appeasement policy.)

Dot Two: Shimon Peres opposed the bombing of the Iraq’s Osirak reactor; orchestrated the Israel-PLO Agreement; and, like his academic mentor, advocates the creation of a Palestinian state—a nation state for what Mr. Newt Gingrich calls an “invented people” (which should make us wonder about the mentality of Harkabi, which I discuss at length in my book Demophrenia, whose thesis is that moral relativism is a mental disorder that afflicts contemporary democratic societies.)

Connect the dots. It’s not a conspiracy. The university-bred doctrine of moral relativism is a phenomenon of post-modern democracy—democracy in its senility. This doctrine, which surfaced in America in the beginning the second decade of the twentieth century, has been propagated, first by a few, then by many, and now by almost all American colleges and universities. The subject is elaborated in my article “The Crisis of Our Rimes.” The article was published in the American Congressional Record, Senate, pp. E.7150-E.7157.”

Paul, take a well deserved bow. The world is richer for your penetrating insights.

Bravo!

Repeat, Until The Cows Come Home, There Is NO “Moderate” Islam. Addendum To: What The West Knows About Islam Can Fill A Thimble. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

This blog will continue to beat into submission the dangerous, absurd, noxious, made up out-of-whole-cloth, notion that a “moderate” Islam exists. It never did. It never will.

Western leaders, as well as their non-elected functionaries (chiefly their media surrogates; legal denizens; academic back benchers; and a rag tag assortment who will do anything to belong to the “in crowd”) possess a sundry list of reasons for continuing with their mendacity. Nevertheless, western citizens dare not comply with this charade, even for a moment longer. Not only that, doing so will kill many of the obliging souls in the process!

Besides, is “going along to get along” worth the ultimate price? Rational folks would affirm in the negative.

The commentary ‘What The West In General…And Its Leaders…Know About Islam Can Fill Less Than A Thimble’ https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/18/what-the-west-in-general-and-its-leaders-in-particular-know-about-islam-can-fill-less-than-a-thimble-morsis-muslim-mafia-crucifies-christians-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ – skewers “moderate” Islam into nothingness.

And its “sister” piece ‘Islamists (meaning, all adherents to Islam) Have Reason To Cheer…Westerners-Not So Much..Until The Final Submission’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/05/islamists-have-reason-to-cheer-westerners-not-so-much-but-it-is-not-over-until-the-final-submission-how-close-are-we-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/ – is a realistic assessment of where the west is at…this writer/blog eschews pie-in-the-sky meanderings.

Placing the final nail in the coffin of “moderate” Islam, an associate, Professor Paul Eidelberg, presents a pre-eminent paper on the subject entitled ‘Islam and Blood’ – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/13/islam-blood-a-groundbreaking-policy-paper-contained-herein-the-world-stands-on-a-precipice-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-109/.

But that doesn’t mean that there isn’t room to glean additional insights. To the contrary. They are most welcome!

Therefore, once again, let’s turn to Daniel Greenfield/Sultan Knish, as he guts the left’s rendition of “moderate” Islam. 

‘The Mirage of Moderate Islam’ 

“Travelers across the vast stretches of the Arabian desert have been known to get lost and in their thirst and exhaustion hallucinate oases with palm trees and flowing water. Western policymakers lost in the vast stretches of madness that define the Muslim world are even more wont to hallucinate the oasis of a moderate Islam to take refuge in. Whether you’re dying for a drink or a way to reaffirm your reality, a mirage is sometimes the only way you can find it.”

“Moderate Islam is a mirage, a projection by desperate Westerners of their own values and culture, on an entirely different religion and culture. It is a mirage that many Muslims are eager to uphold, in the same way that desert merchants might sell goblets and bowls of sand to passing travelers foolish enough to confuse water with dust. And like travelers who think they are drinking water, when they are actually swallowing sand, it is a deception that will eventually kill the deceived.”

“When the Western cultural elite look at Islam, they see what they have to see to avoid falling into crisis mode. Like the traveler who would rather choke on sand, than face up to the fact that he is lost in a desert, they would rather keep most things as they are, even at the cost of the extinction of the nations they preside over, than confront the full scope of the threat surrounding them. A threat that they had a hand in nurturing and feeding in the name of goals that seemed to make sense at the time.”

“It is easier to segregate a “Bad Islam” composed of a tiny minority of extremists from the generally “Good Islam” of the rulers of the Muslim world and the waves of Muslim immigrants washing up on their shores. That this segregation has no objective reality, and is nothing but a psychological defense mechanism against experiencing the full reality of a disaster. From the Titanic to World War II, there are numerous similar situations in which the people in charge chose to ignore a growing crisis at a horrific cost.”

“The two primary paradigms through which Western political elites see Islam, is that of tyranny on the right, and the evils of Western foreign policy on the left. Bush employed the former when he defined the problem as being one of tyranny, rather than Islam. Having defined the problem in terms of a majority of “Good Muslims” oppressed by “Bad Tyrants”, Bush tried to liberate the former from the latter, only to discover that there was a good deal of overlap between the two. Under Obama, we have seen the left implement its own construct of Islam, as popular resistance movements against colonial oppression, who are reacting to the evils of American foreign policy. This knee jerk Marxist formula goes one worse than the Bush Administration by defining terrorists as “Good Muslims” and moderates as “Yankee Puppets”.

“But the only item of true significance to emerge from the contrast of these worldviews, is the revelation that American political leaders from both sides of the spectrum still view Islam in terms of the old Cold War struggle between Communism and Capitalism. Like many generals who fight every war in terms of the last war, the political leaders of the West still see Islam in Cold War colors, which prevents from seeing it for what it is.”

“While Islam shares some common denominators with Communism, as well as Nazism, it is also a quite different entity than either one. For one thing it is not Western in any sense of the word. It does not rely on a centralized leadership. It has had over a thousand years to seep into the culture of the regions it has conquered. That has made Islam into an identity in a much more profound way, than Adolf or Vladimir could have ever managed with their own crackpottery.”

“Islam predates the political movements such as Communism and Nazism that arose to fill a vacuum of faith in a secularizing West with dreams of racial and economic utopias. It is the original sin of the East, a ruthless religion based on stolen beliefs and stolen property, its moment of religious transcendence was not that of the law or the spirit, but the sight of tribal rivalries uniting under a single green banner. The banner of Islam.”

“The powerful appeal of Islam has been rooted in that dream of unity, an idea that is hard for more civilized peoples to understand because they take unity for granted. Yet any European need only turn to the fierce struggle for an independent and united German nation in the 19th century, or for an independent and united Italy around the same time. An eventual outcome in which both nations ruled by nationalist regimes faced off together against England and France during WW2 could be traced back to that false sense of destiny which papered over national insecurities with blood.”

“But nationalism requires meaningful national identities, while the Muslim world only has artificial borders drawn by colonial administrations, differences in Arabic slang and bitter familial rivalries. Despite the best efforts of Arab Socialist autocrats like Gamal Abdel Nasser or Saddam Hussein, the vaunted unity of the Arab nation failed to materialize. While Nasser admired Hitler and Hussein admired Stalin, neither was able to turn their respective countries into anything even as barely functional as Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia. Instead Nasser got by on Soviet aid and Saddam Hussein on oil money.”

“Glance at a map, and you will see the Muslim world defined in terms of borders and politicians, but as Allied troops along the Afghan-Pak border are discovering, the actual Muslims on the ground define themselves in terms of tribe and family, not nation. The Muslim world is a hodgepodge of dispossessed ethnic groups crammed into artificial nation states created by the UK and the UN. Nation states that have a vote at the UN, an embassy off Turtle Bay and little tangible reality.”

“If that sounds farfetched, consider that there is an actual debate among foreign policy experts over who really runs Pakistan. Many European observers of Turkey have a similar debate going there as well. Most of the Muslim world is run by families, like the rulers of Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Some are run by dictators who took part in military coups and hold power using the military and the secret police. These are the only forms of stable government in the Muslim world that matter.”

“Without a dictator or a powerful ruling family, or clique of them, civil war follows. Yemen has been torn apart by such tribal civil wars for a long time now, the latest phase of the war is being conducted with the participation of Al Queda. Anwar Al-Awlaki, the infamous Imam, did not join Al Queda merely out of anger or ideology, he did it because his Awlaki family is allied with the local Yemeni Al Queda. Think about that for a moment, and you begin to see the byzantine maze of loyalties and alliances in the vast desert of the Muslim world.”

“Empires and kingdoms combined church and state in order to insure that there would be no contradiction between religion and the authorities, that the will of the king would also be the will of god. Mohammed tried to make the same leap in the multicultural environs of Mecca, eliminating all religions, but the one he had newly created in order to glue together the warring families and tribes. That act was and is the essential basis of Islam. Everything else is borrowed glamor from the other religions that he had subjugated and destroyed to make way for Islam.”

“For Muslims that initial bloody butchery is the only true act of religious significance that matters. Because for a brief shining moment, the internecine quarrels were brutally suppressed, and thousands of backstabbing desert tribesmen came to see themselves as something larger and greater. Of course that false unity collapsed back into warring families and tribes. Which has made it all the more of an unattainable dream. It is why Jihad is the ultimate religious act for a Muslim, and why the Caliphate is the great religious goal.”

“In the face of this understanding, any talk of a moderate Islam is nothing but a farce. To Muslims, Islam is what the Thousand Year Reich was to Nazis and a United World is to socialists. A perfect form of global unity that must be achieved at any cost.”

“A moderate Muslim might pursue such a goal “peacefully” through Dawa or missionary work, but successful Muslim mass conversions have taken place either directly or indirectly through the sword. Even Muslim missionary successes in the West take place in the context of Muslim terrorism. There is no Islam without the sword, because it has no meaning or identity without violence. A non-violent Islam is nothing but a collection of tribal mores and borrowed religious ideas. It quickly recedes to the secular and the cultural, driving the Islamists to revive its core ethos through acts of violence and terror.”

“This is what Western political and cultural leaders do not understand. The Right is correct that Islam like Communism can be weakened by capitalism, but it cannot be destroyed that way. Because Islam is not incompatible with business, it originated among merchants after all. The fruits of capitalism can help secularize Islam, but not without empowering the very same type of merchants who helped create it. That is why American capitalism has helped create the terrorist threat by enriching the new rulers of Mecca, the House of Saud, which has expanded its own power by funding a new Islamic invasion against its best customers in the West. And so history repeats itself again.”

“The Islamists have shown that they can quite effectively exploit Capitalism and Democracy to further their aims. Capitalism brought down the Soviet Union, but it could not give Russians a meaningful identity. Instead it financed the rise of a new Russian totalitarian regime of KGB bosses and oligarchs who had grown wealthy on the profits from Western business. Even Communist China has shown that it can incorporate Capitalism and only become more of a threat by doing so.”

“The fundamental error conservative American political leaders made was to assume that Capitalism and Democracy were absolute forms of good, in reality they’re simply tools and prisms which different cultures use to express their potential in different ways. The Bush Administration showed the limits of applying Cold War rhetoric to Islamic realities. Or treating 1.5 billion Muslims as the demographic equivalent of a 1500 nuclear bombs, without ever admitting the attitude behind the diplomacy.”

“The Left however is even more wrong, falling back on its old habit of treating all enemies as resistance movements against capitalism, globalism and all the isms that they associate with First World nation states. If the Right is still echoing Ronald Reagan, the Left is still stuck on the Philippine–American War of the 19th century. And while the Right has shown that it can learn, the Left has only shown that it can shout the same self-destructive thing even louder. The Obama Administration is an exercise in national self-hatred. A ritual purging for the sins of Western success similar to an anorexic vomiting after every meal.”

“If the Right has some ideas for dealing with Islam, the Left has decided that Islam is right. There is no logic behind this, but that of “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”, along with healthy doses of orientalism and the fetishization of the Noble Savage.”

“American foreign policy triggers Muslim rage, as do cartoons in Europe, Jewish housing in Israel, Buddhist statues in Afghanistan, British female tourists in Dubai, a teddy named Mohammed in Sudan, and countless other “irritations”. But none of these excuses are the real cause. The chief cause of Islamic outrage, is that these displays of anger allow Muslims to feel a sense of power. Anger empowers small men, whether they are beating their wives or blowing themselves up in cafes. The excuses, “She made do it”, “She shouldn’t have walked in front of the TV” or “She should have had dinner ready”, are just that. Excuses. The real cause is the sense of power that comes with the anger. The sense of suddenly being larger than life. That anger is its own cause and its own reward. And that is what Islam gives to the Muslim. The Jihad. The Caliphate. Anger in the name of Allah.”

“In America, Democratic and Republican leaders primarily differ on how tiny that “tiny minority of extremists” really is, and who’s to blame for their extremism. The ugly reality that their entire view of Islam is based on a mirage, is not something they are willing to accept. But to talk of the Taliban or Al Queda without speaking of Islam, is as absurd as discussing the Gulags without mentioning Communism. It means that not only can the problem never be solved, but it can never even be addressed. Because we have never stated the cause.”

“Instead we try to fight Islamic terrorism by cultivating alliances among the constantly churning factions of governments, militias, warlords and tribal elders, hoping to use them– only to be used as pawns in their own games instead. That is what happened in Afghanistan and Iraq. It has happened among the Palestinian Arabs and the Yemeni government, in Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, and anywhere else we try to apply Western policy making.”

“The Muslim world has technology, but no civilization. Western nations have given to the Islamic East, the appearance of nationhood and the fruits of industry, without ever acknowledging that they were tossing pearls before swine. A pig wearing a pearl necklace is still a member of the porcine family. Only now it is a well-dressed pig. We have dressed up the Muslim world, but underneath it is not so different from the warring tribes that Mohammed tried to glue together with Islam. And that is why Islam retains the power that it does. Islam does not have a separation of Mosque and State, because there is really no state, only the mosque. The great dream of over a millennium of a transcendent global Muslim unity. A Great Leap Forward across the chasm of tribal savagery and into a Caliphate, which will undo all the achievements of all other peoples, and demonstrate once and for all that the Muslim is supreme over all the rest of the world.” – http://sultanknish.blogspot.co.il/2012/08/the-mirage-of-moderate-islam.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed:+FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews+(from+NY+to+Israel+Sultan+Reveals+The+Stories+Behind+the+News)

In the main, it is patently clear that Greenfield supports the dominant thesis of ‘Islam & Blood’ presented by Professor Eidelberg – with the assistance of this writer – in the above embedded policy paper.
In plain parlance, either western leaders bury Islam (through a reformation, or other agreed processes) or it will bury us.
No doubt about it. There is no time to lose.

The Thug-in-Chief, Hell-Bent On Disarming Christian Patriots Ordered His Racialist AG To Turn Up The Heat…Addendum To: Barack Hussein Obama’s ‘Brave New World’…Second Amendment…Pro-Life Supporters Bear Watching/Labeling…Islamists-Not So Much…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The twin devils of the left centers around religion and guns.

This is no accident.

Obsessing like jilted lovers, they continually rail against Christianity and gun owners. (Jews – for once – don’t enter into the equation…they are too minute a percentage of the US population…and let’s face it…how many American Jews “cling to their guns”? Exactly. )

NEVER mind that the “religion of peace” is treated as a protected American interest/species, necessary to prove America’s tolerance. Besides, as is often repeated at this blog, the RED/GREEN alliance works in concert to destroy American values. The enemy of my enemy is my friend….until they go for each other’s throats.

Faster…faster.

However, the left’s witch hunt is primarily targeted at those who believe there is a higher power than the leadership at hand. Free will and personal responsibility must be destroyed – for the collective ‘good’.

And what flows from the above necessitates – as many hammer blows as it takes – prying loose those who stubbornly cling to the embrace of the traditional family, whereby a man and woman are its anchor.

Now suppose those who hold the reins of power – elected and non-elected functionaries – view the exact same things as obstacles to their overall reshaping of America (and beyond)?

What’s a devoted disciple of leftism to do? First and foremost, eviscerating the construct of the traditional family must be a chief rallying cry on their deconstruction list.

Shebang.

Is it an accident that the “gayness” of America has been an official poster child/barometer of “tolerance” for decades? Alas, the most intolerant of all are those who foist their purposeful and insidiously misnamed tolerance upon “non-believers”, demanding the rest of us fall into line…or else.

What can one further conclude, as conservative parents look on in horror, as the public school system is reshaped into indoctrination camps for gayness, offering up this new paradigm as a viable family option?

Really now? Are two mommies and two daddies supposed to procreate the next generation?

I think not.

Most significantly, those who capture the hearts and minds of the kiddies are the ones who control generations to come. Communists/Marxists/socialists control their societies by indoctrinating children from the get go – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/10/25/first-they-came-for-the-kiddies-well-heeledknown-prep-school-philips-exeter-academytrucks-with-terrorists-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/.

And, those who cling to Judeo-Christian moorings are more than likely to “cling to their guns”, holding fast to  the Constitution and the values it imparts. Therefore, the Second Amendment has been a bane of the left, and its chief bugaboo.

NEVER mind that mass shootings are rarely executed by those who hold to Christian traditional values, regardless of the media hype, and the stirring of the pot via DHS. In fact, Islamists running amok, killing American citizens, are deemed “workplace crimes”, hardly worthy of religious overtones.

Extrapolating further, separating family oriented Americans from their guns IS an imperative for the ruling left. For since their penultimate goal is total control of the citizens, then the guns have got to go – Constitution be damned.

As such, this blog has been ringing many blaring bells regarding the above, for it is very alarming. See –

Exhibit Number 1 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/09/barack-hussein-obamas-brave-new-world-second-amendment-pro-life-supporters-bear-watchinglabeling-islamists-not-so-much-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/,

Exhibit Number 2 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/09/washington-very-close-to-subsuming-the-constitutional-right-to-bear-arms-straight-into-thuggish-un-arms-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-15/,

Exhibit Number 3 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/07/barack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-green-wise-via-the-economy-disarming-the-citizens-via-gun-control-connecting-the-dots-addendum-to-the-second-term-plans-of-an-obama-presidency-c/,

Exhibit Number 4 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/06/the-progressiveregressive-mask-is-slipping-fascism-rears-to-the-fore-yeah-chick-fil-a-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/,

Exhibit Number 5 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/31/the-purposeful-deconstruction-of-the-us-the-co-opting-of-dhs-into-a-radical-force-for-societal-transformation-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/, plus more.

Northeast Intelligence Network’s Director, Douglas Hagmann, reports via Canada Free Press a highly chilling read, but hardly an unexpected one. I implore fellow Americans, and all those who cherish liberty over collective slavery, to imbibe his report in full. Passing it on will save many American lives too.

‘Christianity & Gun Owners in the Crosshairs : Chilling Tactics Exposed’ 

“If you are an outspoken Christian in America, you need to be concerned. If you are an outspoken Christian in America who happens to be a gun owner, you need to be very concerned.  And if you are a Christian gun owner who disagrees with the Progressive anti-Christian agenda in America and have a platform to inform others, you better believe that you are under intense scrutiny. Sound like paranoid propaganda? Read on.”

“It’s one thing to say that there is a war against Christianity and an active agenda to disarm Americans, but it’s another thing altogether to watch it unfold, up close and personal.  And yet another to actually document an insidious but effective tactic that is presently being used to silence and disarm Christians right here in America. In this report, I will expose a new tactic being used by the atheistic communist supporters of the Obama regime to silence Christian critics and to disarm them at the same time.”

“I might have never known about this had it not been for our nightly radio program, the Hagmann & Hagmann Report. In fact, our show played a minor role in the events that transpired. Jason Ergoff, a 28-year old web designer and graphics artist from Scranton, Pennsylvania, called in to our show last week to comment on current events, including how Christianity seems to be under attack in America and across the globe. From the statements made by the CEO of Chick Fil-A regarding traditional families as defined by the Bible to the resurgence of attacks on Christians across the Middle East as a result of the “Arab Spring,” we conversed about how Christians are in the crosshairs now more than any other time in recent history. We talked about Barack Hussein Obama’s role in what seems to be overt antagonism toward Christianity and Biblical principles. Mr. Ergoff’s input to our show was a rational and welcome discourse about the events we see unfolding.”

“Mr. Ergoff called our program before and has always been articulate and well informed. His call last week was equally articulate and without unnecessary emotion or hype, just like his previous calls. He made his points in a very well-reasoned, rational and non-threatening manner and said nothing with which we could disagree.”

“Through our dialogue that included off air correspondence, we were delighted to learn that Mr. Egroff himself is hosting his own weekly radio program called Revelation News Radio, a show that provides his analysis of current events through the prism of the Holy Bible. As he is just getting started, he did a few shows leading up his weekly slot, including a show on August 7, 2012, a day after he called our program as a guest. After his call to our program, we moved on, and our program concluded without incident. This is when events began to get very interesting, and go very wrong for Mr. Egroff.”

“As Mr. Egroff was seated at his computer preparing to listen to our program that began at 8:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 8, 2012, he received a telephone call from a man who identified himself as “Officer Steve” from the city of Scranton Police Department, who told Jason that he was calling just to check on him, to see if he was “alright.” Jason, who never heard of “Officer Steve,” or really understood the nature of the call, responded that he was fine and had no problems where he might need the police. He was taken off guard by the call and became uneasy, especially since the officer was elusive in providing a legitimate reason for the call.”

“While our broadcast was playing on Jason’s computer, he received another telephone call from a “restricted” number. It was “Officer Steve” again, although this time he was calling from the front porch of Mr. Ergoff’s house. The officer reintroduced himself, and asked Jason to turn on the porch light and step outside as he wanted to speak to him. Knowing that he had done nothing wrong, Jason complied with the officer’s request. As he stepped onto the porch, “Officer Steve” was there to meet him, accompanied by another law enforcement officer.”

“I should note that Jason Ergoff is not stupid or naive, and sensed that had he not complied with the officer’s request, things might have gotten ugly. “It was a matter of choosing my battles,” he told me, but he was still not quite ready for what happened next.”

“The officer told Jason that the Scranton Police Department received a telephone call from a “friend” living in New York City who claimed to be concerned about Jason’s mental health. This friend works as a physical therapy assistant at a large New York City hospital.  It is important to note his “friend’s” professional position is well outside of the mental health practice.”

“According to the officer, Jason’s friend contacted his department, and claimed that he was “worried” about him, citing his recent talk about the Bible in general, Biblical prophecy in particular, and the role of the Obama regime in the larger picture detailed by prophecy. This “friend” has been listening to Jason’s calls to The Hagmann & Hagmann Report as well as Jason’s own recently started BTR radio show.”

“Additionally, Jason’s friend knew that he owns a couple of guns, none that are of much monetary value or the type people intent on doing harm would possess. Despite this, his friend expressed concern that Jason could possibly use the weapons in some nefarious manner. Based on Jason’s own admission, he rarely uses the guns to target practice and has little attachment to them. During my interview with Jason, he said that he did not care if he had a gun or not, they are simply not that important to him.”

“You need to come with us”

“The officer told Jason that he had to go with them based on a mental health complaint that originated solely from his friend, the physical therapist assistant in New York, who claimed that he was worried for Jason’s safety. At this point, Jason was under the control of the officers, and was not permitted to be alone as he entered his house to shut things down for the trip he was about to take.”

“The officers took Jason to the local hospital psychiatric ward for “evaluation.” For the next 18 hours, he was subjected to some of the most humiliating searches, probes, and questions by hospital personnel. Questions included those specific to his religious faith and what he thought about the government and Obama. Questions that were structured in such a manner that regardless of the answer, they would result in portraying him as a dangerous, gun-owning Christian zealot. All as a result of Jason expressing his non-violent, well reasoned, and articulate views on our show as well as his own. All ostensibly from the concern of one “friend” from another state and well over 100 miles away.”

“Jason Ergoff was indeed evaluated by two medical health professionals. Despite the manner in which Mr. Ergoff was picked-up, detained, probed, prodded and interviewed (some might call it an interrogation), he remained calm and did his best to comply. He believed that the medical professionals would find him in good mental health and realize that this was all a mistake. He could then use his experience to help others.”

“Christianity: the medical diagnosis of psychosis”

“Jason was indeed released after about 20 hours of evaluation. He was given his belt and shoelaces back, and all of his personal belongings taken from him upon admission. He was released without fanfare, without apology, and without explanation. But with little additional interaction, Jason was now labeled with the medical diagnosis of “psychosis” and urged to take medication that he states he does not need and does not want. Additionally, Jason was released under the condition that he gets rid of any and all firearms he owns and report to a crisis counseling center upon discharge.”

“This gets a bit more interesting when Jason, who felt it best to accommodate the evaluating doctors, reported to the crisis counseling center as instructed. Mr. Ergoff furnished the handful of paperwork to the crisis center worker who spent a few minutes looking over the documents. After a lengthy pause, she looked at Jason and made the following chilling observation as if it was a matter of routine: “So, you’re here because of your religious beliefs.” As Jason tells it, this was not a question, but a statement of fact.”

“As a career investigator, I’ve been exposed to people with mental health issues, and interviewed many. I know that it’s easy to be fooled, and that a person might appear normal, say the correct things, but then turn out to be a complete lunatic. I’ll admit that in Jason’s case, I expected to find just that scenario. I conducted a lengthy interview with Jason, asked him some very personal questions, and demanded to see documentation related to this incident. I was not about to get fooled by Jason or anyone else. To his credit, Mr. Ergoff complied with my every request and provided me with the hospital documentation I requested.”

“Watching the watchers who are watching the ‘watchmen’

“After spending two days of constant research and investigation into his case alone, I must report here that there is something very wrong about this case, and it’s not Jason Ergoff. Despite the diagnosis of “psychosis,” he was permitted to keep his guns, at least for now. As for his “friend” who was so worried about his welfare, I’ve got his “number.” You see, one thing I did not tell Mr. Ergoff is that I was able to learn the identity of the man who turned him in as a threat to himself and society. I’ve tracked his IP addresses and his online activity. My investigation found that this is no ordinary case of someone being concerned about a friend’s welfare, but part of a larger agenda to silence the Christian conservatives and critics of this administration. I am holding that information and documentation closely, as I feel that Jason and perhaps others might need it when they come for his guns or even him once again.”

“By the way, the concerned friend showed just where his concern actually lies, and it certainly does not appear to be with Jason. That was clearly illustrated in a 3:00 a.m. phone call made to Jason by his friend, where he screamed at Jason for daring to mention the incident on our program, sans names, of course.”

“Lest you think this is an isolated case, I have since heard from five-(5) other individuals in different parts of the U.S. that this has happened to within the last thirty-(30) days. It appears the war against freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, openly professing one’s belief in God and the right to bear arms is now sufficient to earn you a medical diagnosis of “psychosis.”

“Christian gun owners of America, be forewarned.”

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/48845

First they came for the (legal) gun owners….

‘Bitter Clingers’…(another purposeful derogation) watch your backs!

BRINGING Down America never looked so viable – http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/bringing_down_america_a_review.html

Western Dhimmis Bow – Again! – To Islamic Supremacists….When & Where Will This End? The Jury Is Out On Said Results…Brief Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Once again, this time in Canada, authorities warn Israeli supporters to bury their support !

NO flag waving tolerated ! Otherwise it will be on said ‘offender’s’ head if violence erupts….sort of like blaming the rape victim for all their unjust suffering….the home owner too…for their burnt down house….courtesy of the pyromaniac !

Take a look at the latest ! Dhimmi submission from the so called authorities –

Toronto: Jewish Man Told Israeli Flag ‘Incites Riots’ –

“A Jewish high school teacher from Toronto was warned by local police that he is inciting a riot and could be causing mass violence by carrying an Israeli flag.”…The teacher was interviewed by a local blog, “BlazingCatFur”, and said that he had been shadowing the rally on his bicycle while waving his Israeli flag.

Here’s the video interview – http://blazingcatfur.blogspot.co.il/.

None of this is happenstance. Its pace is quickening, as the misnamed “leader of the free world” encourages Islamic submission –

https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/28/alert-radical-in-chief-obama-tasks-illegally-bent-ag-holder-to-criminalize-islamic-speech-via-thuggish-un-dictates-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/,

https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/12/dhimmitude-comes-to-the-us-stealthily-knocking-blowing-down-its-doors-a-nation-mostly-unawares-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/, and so much more!

Perverted.

Twisted.

Enraging.

 

Americans HOPE To CHANGE The Occupant Of The White House..An Anti-American POTUS Runs An Un-American Campaign…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Those who voted for Barack Hussein Obama – on the basis of his skin color – hoped  against hope to shore up their post-racial bonafides. Concomitantly, they expected to expunge any taint associated with America’s history of racial strife.

How did that guilt-ridden, “holier than thou” crap work out?

Little did many ( foolhardy ) Americans realize that the candidate for “Hope & Change” exploited their inner demons, only to usher in a national nightmare of gargantuan proportions.

This blog was hip to the Race-Baiter-in-Chief’s jive talk from the get go, and am hardly a genius.

Besides, it is not as if American voters in 2008 ever owned slaves, and the only slave owners left are in Muslim countries! How’s that for some truth-telling?

In fact, as evidenced by this blog’s many commentaries, the POTUS is more adept at being the Racialist-in-Chief, than a ‘healer and transformer’ for American ills. As a foretaste:

Indictment Number 1 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/27/barack-hussein-obama-the-radical-in-chief-his-subversive-underlings-lurching-from-one-anti-american-disaster-to-another-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/,

Indictment Number 2 –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/07/barack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-green-wise-via-the-economy-disarming-the-citizens-via-gun-control-connecting-the-dots-addendum-to-the-second-term-plans-of-an-obama-presidency-c/,

Indictment Number 3 – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/02/revealed-the-second-term-plans-of-an-obama-presidency-nothing-short-of-a-national-nightmare-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/,

Indictment Number 4 –  https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/31/the-purposeful-deconstruction-of-the-us-the-co-opting-of-dhs-into-a-radical-force-for-societal-transformation-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/….and on and on….

Enter my favorite political prognosticator – Daniel Greenfield aka Sultan Knish.

And one of these days he is going to have to ‘fess up to his audience, regarding the genesis of his blue head swathing…maybe this American-Israeli should adorn likewise…but let’s not digress.

‘The Most Divisive Campaign In American History’ – http://sultanknish.blogspot.co.il/2012/08/the-most-divisive-campaign-in-american.html

“In 1980, when President Reagan asked Americans, “Are you better off now than you were four years ago”, it was still possible to campaign on a theme as simple as the job performance of the other guy. But now, 32 years later, the campaign hinges on a much more fundamental split among the voting population.”

“Romney appeals to voters who are dissatisfied with the last four years. Obama appeals to voters who are dissatisfied with America.”

“This basic gap was obscured in the 2008 campaign by the window trappings of inspiration. Among all the plastic pillars and stolen quotes from poets who stole them from sermons, it was harder to see that the underlying theme of the campaign was dissatisfaction with America. But in 2012, Obama can no longer run as a reformer or an optimist.”

“The coalition that he committed to last year is a coalition of those who are unhappy with America, not in the last four years, but in the last two-hundred years. Its core is composed of groups that fear democracy and distrust the will of the people. There is no optimism here, but a deeply rooted pessimism about human nature and the country as a whole. It is the Democratic Party’s coalition against democracy.”

“After 2010, the numbers were crunched, and it was clear that Obama and the Democrats could not win a mainstream campaign. Instead, they targeted narrow groups, stirred up conflicts over issues aimed at that group, whether it was union pensions, racism or birth control. There was no more pretense of a national election, only a frenzied rush to polarize as many groups as possible and join them together into an acrimonious coalition, not so much for anything, as against Republicans.”

“There isn’t any inspiration here. Just paranoia over everything from gay marriage to abortion to racial profiling to illegal immigration. A dozen illegal benefits being handed out with the explicit threat that they will be lost if Romney wins. A dozen mini-civil wars being stirred up to divide Americans and set them at each other’s throats for the benefit of the Obama campaign.”

“From Occupy Wall Street to Wisconsin, from Trayvon Martin to Chick-fil-A, the goal of these manufactured conflicts has been to divide and conquer the electorate by emphasizing group rights over individual economic welfare.”

“Obama can’t win on the economy. He can’t win on foreign policy. He can’t win on any aspect of his administration. All he can do is stir up violence and then promise to heal the country in his second term while winking to all the representatives of the grievance groups. It’s not a new game, but the Democratic Party has never played it quite this baldly in a national election. And if it succeeds, then national politics will have finally been reduced to the level of a Chicago election.”

“We were expected to believe that the typical Obama voter in 2008 was hoping for a better country, but in 2012 there is no more hope, only hate and fear. The typical Obama voter is not acting as an American, but as a representative of an entitled group looking to secure and expand those entitlements at the expense and the detriment of the country at large.”

“To vote for Obama after years of grotesque economic mismanagement that has no precedent in history, that exceeds the worst actions of Andrew Jackson or Ulysses S. Grant, is not the instinct of an American, but a selfish greedy looter scrambling to grab a few dinner rolls off the tray while the ship is going down. There is no policy justification for voting for a man with the worst economic and foreign policy record in the country’s history. There is no American justification for voting for him. Only the UnAmerican motivation of carving up a dying country into group fiefdoms privileging identity politics over the common good.”

“This is an UnAmerican campaign. It is an Anti-American campaign. It is a campaign by those who hate and fear what America was and who resent having to care about anyone outside their own group. Its group jingoism, its dog whistles and special privileges are repulsive and cynical, treating the people of a great nation like a warren of rats eager to sell each other out for a prize from the Cracker Jack box of identity politics entitlements.”

T”here is not a single Obama voter anywhere in the land who believes that another four years of him will make this country better. Not a single one from coast to coast. No, what they believe is that he will make the country a worse place for those people that they hate. That he will have four more years to sink their ideas deeper in the earth, regardless of how many families go hungry and how many fathers kill themselves because they can no longer take care of their families. What they believe is that Obama will grant their group more special privileges and the rest of the country can go to hell.”

“In his DNC keynote address in 2004, Obama said, “There is no Black America or White America or Latino America or Asian America, there is just the United States of America.” And now he has completely disavowed it. He isn’t campaigning to lead the United States of America, instead he is running for the presidency of a dozen little Americas, Trayvon Martin America, Abortion America, Illegal Alien America, Sharia America, Gay Marriage America, Starbucks America and any others you can think of. And if he can collect enough of these little Americas together, then he may get the privilege of running the United States of America into the ground for another four years.”

“Obama has never been the President of the United States of America. He has been the president of Washington D.C., of Wall Street and of Solyndra. He has been the President of Green America and of Chicago. He has been the President of Warren Buffett, George Soros, Bill Gates, Penny Pritzker and James Crown. He is the President of George Clooney, Harvey Weinstein and Anne Hathaway. And now, facing disaster, he still isn’t running to be President of a country, but of a dozen little countries with money from freshly bailed out Green America and Wall Street, not to mention Hollywood.”

“The Obama campaign is not accidentally divisive. It did not stumble into divisiveness. It is not even divisive as a byproduct of its real aims. Divisiveness is its aim. Divisiveness is the only way that a divisive administration can hold on to power. The anger and the violence are not an accident, they are the whole point. Set one group against another, feed the hate, massage the grievances and very soon there is no longer a nation but a handful of quarreling groups being roped into a mutual alliance to reelect their lord protector whose appeal is that of the outsider becoming the insider.”

B”ain is a metaphor whose details don’t truly matter. The target audience for that swill doesn’t really care where Romney was when a steel plant was shut down. It doesn’t care that like so many private equity bigwigs, the man who actually was in charge is one of Obama’s bundlers. This isn’t about truth, it’s about menace. The Bain message is that Romney is a man who takes things away. That is the  image that the UnAmerican alliance is meant to take away. The ominous sense that Obama’s era of giving them things is about to come to a close and Romney’s era of taking away things will begin.”

“It doesn’t take much prompting for the UnAmericans to come to this conclusion. Thieves are always looking over their shoulders. They always expect to have their ill-gotten gains taken away from them. And that is Obama’s true achievement. Like Tammany Hall, he has corrupted a massive section of the population and made it complicit in his criminality. What the old political machines did to cities or small groups of vested interests, the Zero has done to tens of millions, if not a hundred million people, who want him in power not because they think he’s the best man for the job, but because he’s their crook. The middle man for a crime ring that begins with him and ends with them.”

“The true insidious evil of the man is that he is the face of a machine of power and privilege that turns Americans into UnAmericans, that corrupts and degrades every ideal and principle, suborns every office and picks every pocket, while wrapping that thievery in the flag and every bit of history that it can filch. The Hussein Way is the clearest expression of the rot at the heart of the Democratic Party, the marriage of leftist agitation and powermongering with the old urban political machines for a level of abuse usually seen only in banana republics.”

“The abomination in Washington is a welfare-state technocracy that mixes crony capitalism with radical social policy. It steals from everyone and gives back to some. It plays the game of divide and conquer with the panache of marketing executives knowing that the worse the economy is, the more likely everyone is to look in everyone else’s mouth. Its worst aspect is its insistence on cloaking its cynicism as righteousness, wrapping every ugly means in the glorious flag of the ends when the truth is that its means are its ends.”

“Divide and conquer isn’t just a means to the greater end of giving Zero Hussein another four years. And perhaps another four years after that. It’s also the end. Every tyrant from Joseph Stalin to Saddam Hussein knew that a divided people are easier to rule. The more you divide them, the less likely they are to give you any trouble when you’re raiding their last pennies to pay for the latest Green gimmick that your billionaire backers have thrown up all over Wall Street.”

“Obama is the ultimate Post-American figure passing himself off as the embodiment of all that is truly American. But the UnAmericans got the real message in 2008 and in 2012 there is no other message. There is no more hope and faith, and the ones who have been waiting for are the UnAmericans who think that they are about to come into their own, when they are little more than pawns being used to rob and destroy a great nation.”

“This is the Post-American, Anti-American and UnAmerican campaign to divide up, carve up and toss aside the laws and traditions of the United States and replace them with the power of arrogance. It is the last stand of a beleaguered nation facing barbarians inside its gate. Every previous election was a contest between two American candidates who wanted to preside over the United States.”

“This is an election contest between the United States and an emerging Post-American order. That entity will be an American EU run by unelected bureaucrats, governed by politically correct technocrats and upheld by corrupt financial pirates disguising the collective bankruptcy with numbers games so elaborate that they make every billion-dollar con game and pyramid scheme that has come before seem as simple as child’s play.”

“The entity is already here. Its czars are running things in D.C., and its judges are dismantling both constitutional government and democratic elections. It creates a crisis and then makes sure that it doesn’t go to waste. It has excellent design skills and terrible planning skills. It has all the money in the world and none at all. It is the Post-American America, and 2012 is its big referendum. The one that will decide whether this Post-American America, this horrid graft of E.U. governance and Mussolini economics, Soviet propaganda and FDR volunteerism, Tammany populist criminality and U.N. foreign policy will be permitted to devour the United States of America.”

“Obama cannot win an American election. But he isn’t running in an American election. He’s running in a Post-American election.”

Talk about voters getting smacked upside the head…suffering kicks in the butt too…for attempting to embrace a “post racial” POTUS!

Phooey and hooey.

Time for a refund!

Comrades-in-Arms ALWAYS Have Each Other’s Backs…Whether Black, White Or Islamic Supremacists…The RED/GREEN Alliance’s Common Denominator…Seriousness of Issue Necessitates Its Length…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Beating the drums of the RED/GREEN alliance at this blog is hardly an exercise in “idle hands are the devil’s tools” aka “idleness is the root of mischief” ( for the record, this axiom is traced back to Chaucer’s ‘Tale of Melibee’…oh, to – once again – have the luxury of reading for reading’s sake! ).

This blog’s efficacy lies within a historical knowledge of the evils wrought by communist takeovers, and similar inroads blasted through Islamic conquest. BOTH ideologies are adept killing machines and totalitarian in their constructs.

Therefore, while apartheid South Africa was hardly a model of nationhood, it was certainly not lost on this blogger what an African National Congress takeover would portend! In fact, Nelson Mandela, a revered idol of the left, was not an innocent. He understood full well the “ties that bind” the ANC to communist handlers.

In fact, having received the Nobel peace Prize in 1993, he joined a laundry list of none too deserving recipients. Westerners who fete him need to understand the utter contempt he has for them, aside from the accolades they heap upon him!

With this in mind, while duly repulsed, no one should be shocked to find out the latest, regarding the thugs who rule the ANC

“STOCKHOLM, Sweden – The eyes of the world were on South Africa two decades ago as the apartheid era came to an end and Western governments helped bring the communist-backed African National Congress to power.”

“Last month, however, when Genocide Watch chief Gregory Stanton declared that white South African farmers were facing a genocidal onslaught and that communist forces were taking over the nation, virtually nobody noticed.”

“Few outside of South Africa paid attention either when, earlier this year, the president of South Africa began publicly singing songs advocating the murder of whites.”

“The silence is so deafening that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton didn’t even publicly mention the problems when she was there last week. Instead, she was busy dancing, pledging billions of dollars and praising the ruling government.”

“I find that quite disturbing, as if Afrikaner lives do not count for the Obama administration,” Dan Roodt of the Pro-Afrikaans Action Group, PRAAG, told WND……”

“Genocide Watch, a highly respected U.S.-based nonprofit organization led by arguably the world’s foremost expert on genocide, has been sounding the alarm on the genocidal onslaught facing South Africa for a decade. The world media, however, has barely uttered a word about it.”

“Over those 10 years, thousands of white South African farmers, known as Boers, have been massacred in the most horrific ways imaginable.”

“Experts say the ongoing slaughter constitutes a clear effort to exterminate the whites or at least drive the remaining ones – now less than 10 percent of the population – out of the country. In other words, South Africa is facing a genocide based on the United Nations’ own definition.”

“More than 3,000 farm murders have been documented in that time period, representing a significant number considering the number of commercial white farmers is now estimated at less than 40,000.”

“Tens of thousands of whites have been murdered throughout South Africa, too, according to estimates.”

Disemboweled, drowned in boiling water

“Many more victims have been savagely tortured, raped, disemboweled, drowned in boiling water or worse. The horrifying evidence is available for the world to see on countless sites throughout the Internet: pictures of brutalized dead women and children – even babies.”

“We don’t know exactly who is planning them yet, but what we are calling for is an international investigation that will try and determine who is planning these murders,” Stanton said.

“The ANC government downplays the problem, claiming it is mostly just “regular” crime. Experts, however, know that is not true.”

“Things of this sort are what I have seen before in other genocides,” Stanton, who also worked against apartheid, said of the murdered white farmers after a fact-finding mission to the “Rainbow Nation” in June.

“This is what has happened in Burundi, it’s what happened in Rwanda,” he continued in a speech to the Transvaal Agricultural Union in Pretoria. “It has happened in many other places in the world………”

“The government often classifies the brutal farm murders as simple “robberies,” for example. Sometimes the crimes are not even reported……”

“In some cases, experts also say, authorities are actually involved in the brutal crimes. Police oftentimes participate in cover-ups, too.”

“The non-stop wave of grisly, racist murders in the Rainbow Nation – new incidents are reported almost daily now – has led Genocide Watch to conclude that South Africa is close to the final phases of the genocidal onslaught.”

“When ANC Youth League boss Julius Malema began singing “Kill the Boer,” Genocide Watch moved up South Africa to stage six out of eight on the road to genocide – the preparation and planning. The seventh phase is extermination of the target group. The final stage is denial.”

“It became clear to us that the [(ANC) Youth League was this kind of organization – it was planning this kind of genocidal massacre and also the forced displacement of whites from South Africa,” Stanton explained.

“When a court declared the racist song “hate speech” for inciting genocide against whites, the self-styled communist president of South Africa, Jacob Zuma, began singing it too.”

Dehumanization

“It is all part of a vicious campaign of dehumanization aimed at whites, according to experts. Demonizing the victims always precedes genocide.”

“Known as Boers or Afrikaners, the descendants of Northern Europeans, mostly Dutch, arrived in Southern Africa hundreds of years ago, in some cases as far back as the 1600s. Still, racists refer to them as “settlers,” implying they do not belong there.

“Whenever you have that kind of dehumanization,” Stanton explained, “you have the beginning of that downward spiral into genocide.”

“The National Socialists (Nazis) did it in Germany, and the Islamists did it in Turkey before exterminating Armenian Christians, he added.”

“The government, meanwhile, has already launched a campaign to disarm Afrikaner farmers. As Genocide Watch observed in a recent report on South Africa, disarmament of the target group is one of the surest warning signs of impending genocide…..”

“Necklacing, in which a tire filled with gasoline is placed around a victim’s neck and set on fire, for example, became a common form of punishment for dissenters and ANC opponents. Even Nelson Mandela’s wife endorsed the monstrous practice!”

“Beyond genocide against whites lurks another largely overlooked but related phenomenon: the efforts by communist forces to completely take over South Africa.”

“It is hardly a secret. The Communist Party of South Africa has always has been a firm ally of the ANC. Both of the last two presidents have been members of the Communist party.”

“As in Zimbabwe after Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe seized power, the issue of land distribution is being used to advance the same dangerous agenda in South Africa.”

“Whatever system of land tenure is adopted in South Africa, the communists – in the long run – have in mind to take away all private property. That should never be forgotten,” Stanton warned during his recent trip.”

“The idea, he said, is to crush all potential resistance.”

“Every place you go where communists have taken over, they take away private ownership because private ownership gives people the power – the economic power – to oppose their government,” Stanton continued. “Once you have taken that away, there is no basis on which you can have the economic power to oppose the government.”

“While the outside world largely refuses to understand or even acknowledge what is really going on, white South Africans are keenly aware of what awaits the nation if the communist schemes are not stopped.”

“The ANC regime has publicly stated that it wants to nationalize all land, in effect doing away with private property when it comes to agricultural land,” explained PRAAG’s Roodt.

“The Communist Party has always been the real intellectual home of the ANC, and even government ministers call each other ‘comrade’ in public,” he added.

Land redistribution

“Since the end of Apartheid, the ANC government has been working to redistribute land – much of which is still currently owned by the white minority – to blacks and others.”

“As in neighboring Zimbabwe, once one of the wealthiest nations in Africa, the schemes have mostly resulted in failure. Under Mugabe, who gave the stolen land to his cronies, estimates suggest millions of people have died from starvation. Others fled, ironically, perhaps, to South Africa.”

“Now, the ANC wants to speed up the land reform process. Some elements within the government are even advocating forced expropriation without any compensation.”

“The farm murders, analysts say, are the early phases of what may be coming.”

“More and more, the ANC regime’s supporters are turning to violence and revolution to achieve their aims of taking control over land and industry,” Roodt explained.

“Over the last few days there has been an increase in attacks on family owned farms with the intent of driving owners off their land,” he continued, echoing a widespread sentiment among South Africans that the situation is quickly spiraling out of control.”

“Hit squads target specifically women and elderly farmers as they are seen as soft targets,” he added. The government also disbanded farmer self-defense groups known as “commandos” that formerly protected rural areas.

“According to Roodt, South Africa, like every country during a communist takeover, is being deliberately destabilized. Ethnic and racial tensions are being purposefully stirred up as part of the scheme as well, he said.”

“The ANC regime has failed completely to create jobs for its mass of supporters,” Roodt told WND. “So it is using the white minority as a scapegoat, blaming them for its own economic failures due to corruption, mismanagement, nationalization, racial preferences and so on.”

“Roodt says the “revolution” could drag on, slowly, with a lot of talk but little action. On the other hand, there could be a sudden, radical shift such as what happened in Zimbabwe, where white farmers who refused to be driven off their land were tortured or murdered.”

“There could even be a Rwanda-type situation in which whites would be targeted for wholesale slaughter, Roodt warned.”

Sadists encouraging sadists

“Anything is possible,” he added, saying the ruling government was very similar to an organized criminal enterprise. “What is going on in South Africa today with the rape and killing of children, torture or farmers and racial violence, is tantamount to a sadistic society. We are ruled by sadists who encourage other sadists to go out to rape and kill.”

“No matter how bad it gets, however, Roodt and other South Africans fear that the world will shut its eyes and wash its hands.”

“To many people in the West, especially liberals and leftists, I think it is seen as normal for blacks to hate whites and oppress them,” he explained. “Because of their historical guilt associated with colonialism, whites are deemed to deserve punishment, even of the most extreme kind such as torture and mass murder.”

“Even in South Africa, the press is largely silent about what is going on. Consider that after Stanton announced his preliminary findings in late June – explosive by any measure – just one newspaper covered it.”

“Many white South Africans believe that time may be running out. Some want their own country in Southern Africa to preserve the unique Afrikaner culture, language and civilization. Others are currently working with Western governments in an effort to raise awareness and hopefully allow especially vulnerable populations to escape as refugees before the festering tensions explode into a full-blown catastrophe. More than a few, though, have vowed to stay and fight back if and when the time comes.”

“For now, activists, exiles and human rights leaders told WND they hope Americans will help spread the word about the looming potential calamities facing South Africa. If the ANC gets its way, they say, it will be an unmitigated disaster for whites, blacks – basically everyone except politically connected cronies.”

http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/genocide-looms-for-white-farmers/

And, if readers want to compare Nelson Mandela to another ‘Peace Prize’ recipient, one name comes to the forefront – ‘Chairman Arafat’.

Mandela hearts with barbaric Islamists –

“The much revered leader of the struggle against racism and apartheid in South Africa, and the first President of the non-racist Republic of South Africa, Nelson Mandela, had the following to say on the issue of the Palestinians, according to journalist John Pilger. “To Nelson Mandela,” he wrote, justice for the Palestinians is “the greatest moral issue of our time.”

“Here is an excerpt from a speech Mandela gave on International day of Solidarity with the Palestinians:

“The temptation in our situation is to speak in muffled tones about an issue such as the right of the people of Palestine to a state of their own. We can easily be enticed to read reconciliation and fairness as meaning parity between justice and injustice. Having achieved our own freedom, we can fall into the trap of washing our hands of difficulties that others faces. Yet we would be less than human if we did so.”

“It behooves all South Africans, themselves erstwhile beneficiaries of generous international support, to stand up and be counted among those contributing actively to the cause of freedom and justice”.

“Even during the days of negotiations, our own experience taught us that the pursuit of human fraternity and equality — irrespective of race or religion — should stand at the centre of our peaceful endeavours. The choice is not between freedom and justice, on the one hand, and their opposite, on the other. Peace and prosperity; tranquility and security are only possible if these are enjoyed by all without discrimination.”

“It is in this spirit that I have come to join you today to add our own voice to the universal call for Palestinian self-determination and statehood.”

Birds of a radical feather.

And the Radical-in-Chief is busy nationalizing big industry through “death by regulation/strangulation”, as well as other re-distributive schemes.

Sound familiar….. to an incremental socialist/communist/Marxist takeover?

More to the point, The Racialist-in-Chief’s buddies, the Black Panthers ( whose leadership has visited the White House on several occasions ) exhorted thusly: kill all white men, women, babies….

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/new-black-panthers-play-vile-radio-opening-kill-all-white-men-women-babies-blind-cripple-faots-lesbians-then-dig-em-up-kill-em-again/.

It bears repeating….birds of a radical/communist feather!

SHORING Up Barack Hussein Obama’s Second Term Plans…Addendum To:Barack Hussein Obama’s Deconstruction Plans…Green-Wise Via The Economy…Disarming The Citizens Via Gun Control…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

With ‘D Day’ fast approaching on the horizon, let us now refer to a second term (heaven forbid !) re-election of the Radical-in-Chief as Disaster Day. It goes straight to the heart of the matter.

NO sense trying to spin it otherwise.

It would necessitate a national day of mourning.

Many serious commentators have expounded on what it would mean for America’s fate if Barack Hussein Obama becomes unchained in a second term. This blogger pulls no punches about such a disaster-in-the-making, including, but not exclusive of the following:

These are his deconstruction plans – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/07/barack-hussein-obamas-deconstruction-plans-green-wise-via-the-economy-disarming-the-citizens-via-gun-control-connecting-the-dots-addendum-to-the-second-term-plans-of-an-obama-presidency-c/,

And its necessity lies in its destruction – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/31/the-purposeful-deconstruction-of-the-us-the-co-opting-of-dhs-into-a-radical-force-for-societal-transformation-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/,

As such, nothing but a national nightmare will ensue – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/02/revealed-the-second-term-plans-of-an-obama-presidency-nothing-short-of-a-national-nightmare-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/,

Enter Steve McCann, a political commentator, and a businessman, into the fray –http://www.americanthinker.com/steve_mccann/ –

“The 2012 election has often been described as the most pivotal since 1860.This statement is not hyperbole. If Barack Obama is re-elected the United States will never be the same, nor will it be able to re-capture its once lofty status as the most dominant nation in the history of mankind.”

 “The overwhelming majority of Americans do not understand that Obama’s first term was dedicated to putting in place executive power to enable him and the administration to fulfill the campaign promise of “transforming America ” in his second term regardless of which political party controls Congress. That is why his re-election team is virtually ignoring the plight of incumbent or prospective Democratic Party office holders.””The most significant accomplishment of Obama’s first term is to make Congress irrelevant. Under the myopic and blindly loyal leadership of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats have succeeded in creating an imperial and, in a second term, a potential dictatorial presidency.””During the first two years of the Obama administration when the Democrats overwhelming controlled both Houses of Congress and the media was in an Obama worshipping stupor, a myriad of laws were passed and actions taken which transferred virtually unlimited power to the executive branch.”“The birth of multi-thousand page laws was not an aberration. This tactic was adopted so the bureaucracy controlled by Obama appointees would have sole discretion in interpreting vaguely written laws and enforcing thousands of pages of regulations they and not Congress would subsequently write.””For example, in the 2,700 pages of ObamaCare there are more than 2,500 references to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. There are more than 700 instances when he or she is instructed that they “shall” do something and more than 200 times when they “may” take at their sole discretion some form of regulatory action. On 139 occasions, the law mentions that the “Secretary determines.” In essence one person, appointed by and reporting to the president, will be in charge of the health care of 310 million Americans once ObamaCare is fully operational in 2014.”

“The same is true in the 2,319 pages of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act which confers nearly unlimited power on various agencies to control by fiat the nation’s financial, banking and investment sectors. The bill also creates new agencies, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, not subject to any oversight by Congress. This overall process was repeated numerous times with other legislation all with the intent of granting unfettered power to the executive branch controlled by Barack Obama and his radical associates.”

“Additionally, the Obama administration has, through its unilaterally determined rule making and regulatory powers, created laws out of whole cloth. The Environmental Protection Agency on a near daily basis issues new regulations clearly out of their purview in order to modify and change environmental laws previously passed and to impose a radical green agenda never approved by Congress. The same is true of the Energy and Interior Departments among many others.”

“None of these extra-constitutional actions have been challenged by Congress. The left in America knows this usurpation of power is nearly impossible to reverse unless stopped in its early stages.”

“It is clearly the mindset of this administration and its appointees that Congress is merely a nuisance and can be ignored after they were able to take full advantage of the useful idiots in the Democrat controlled House and Senate in 2009-2010 and the Democrat Senate in the current Congress.”

“Additionally, Barack Obama knows after his re-election a Republican controlled House and Senate will not be able to enact any legislation to roll back the power previously granted to the Executive Branch or usurped by them. His veto will not be overridden as there will always be at least 145 Democratic members of the House or 34 in the Senate in agreement with or intimidated by an administration more than willing to use Chicago style political tactics.”

“The stalemate between the Executive and Legislative Branches will inure to the benefit of Barack Obama and his fellow leftists.”

“The most significant power Congress has is the control of the purse-strings as all spending must be approved by them. However, once re-elected, Barack Obama, as confirmed by his willingness to do or say anything and his unscrupulous re-election tactics, would not only threaten government shutdowns but would deliberately withhold payments to those dependent on government support as a means of intimidating and forcing a Republican controlled Congress to surrender to his demands, thus neutering their ability to control the administration through spending constraints.”

“Further, this administration has shown contempt for the courts by ignoring various court orders, e.g. the Gulf of Mexico oil drilling moratorium, as well as stonewalling subpoenas and requests issued by Congress. The Eric Holder Justice Department has become the epitome of corruption as part of the most dishonest and deceitful administration in American history. In a second term the arrogance of Barack Obama and his minions will become more blatant as he will not have to be concerned with re-election.”

“Who will be there to enforce the rule of law, a Supreme Court ruling or the Constitution? No one. Barack Obama and his fellow-travelers will be unchallenged as they run roughshod over the American people.”

“Many Republicans and conservatives dissatisfied with the prospect of Mitt Romney as the nominee for president are instead focused on re-taking the House and Senate. That goal, while worthy and necessary, is meaningless unless Barack Obama is defeated. The nation is not dealing with a person of character and integrity but someone of single-minded purpose and overwhelming narcissism. Judging by his actions, words and deeds during his first term, he does not intend to work with Congress either Republican or Democrat in his second term but rather to force his radical agenda on the American people through the power he has usurped or been granted.”

“The governmental structure of the United States was set up by the founders in the hope that over the years only those people of high moral character and integrity would assume the reins of power. However, knowing that was not always possible, they dispersed power over three distinct and independent branches as a check on each other.”

“What they could not imagine is the surrender and abdication of its constitutional duty by the preeminent governmental branch, the Congress, to a chief executive devoid of any character or integrity coupled with a judiciary essentially powerless to enforce the law when the chief executive ignores them ”

“Conservatives, Libertarians, Independents, the Republican Party, and Mitt Romney must come to grips with this moment in time and their historical role in denying Barack Obama and his minions their ultimate goal. All resources must be directed at that end-game and not merely controlling Congress and the various committee chairmanships.  And remember, with appointment opportunities coming up in his second term, the Supreme Court will be forever in the government’s pocket, lock, stock, and barrel.  And, if for no other reason, Obama must NOT be granted a second term!”

“We, the American people, MUST also come to grips with this moment in time, and play our role in denying Barack Obama his lifelong goal of “transforming” us into his slaves, working on his government plantation.”
McCann has it covered.
Can’t think of a damned thing to add.

What The West In General, And Its Leaders In Particular, Knows About Islam Can Fill Less Than A Thimble. Morsi’s Muslim Mafia Crucifies Christians. Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

EVEN after the most horrific terror attack hit America’s homeland on September 11, 2001, few have bothered to learn the requisite lessons. An average student (one hardly needs to be a genius to have an inquiring mind) should want to know : what animates/underlies a preponderance of Muslims, whose most fervent desire is to destroy western civilization?

Moreover, how can (most) westerners be so incurious? Why are millions upon millions of adherents to Islam exhorting the west’s destruction?  And what price will be paid by the west’s blindness?

In a nutshell, cognitive dissonance, much like Alice-in-Wonderland thinking, offers temporary respite. But it is very lethal, and fleeting at best.

At its base, our civilization depends upon westerners waking up – before it is too late!

‘Islam & Blood’ is therefore more than a blog commentary. Its contents exposes Islam for what it is, not what PC pundits and leaders wish it to be – https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/07/13/islam-blood-a-groundbreaking-policy-paper-contained-herein-the-world-stands-on-a-precipice-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki-109/ . The embedded policy paper is a must read. It is Lesson Number One !

And it is the height of (historical) irony that Walid Shoebat, a reformed Islamic terrorist, is currently becoming one of the west’s saviors, among several other vocal rescuers. However, disquieting as this turn of events is, it is also a blessing in disguise.

In other words, who understands the mindset of Islamic jihadists better than a former jihadist?

Bulls eye.

‘ A Video Is Worth A Thousand Words’ is more than that….it is the bold faced truth about the virus of Islam, and the death grip it has over its adherents, as well as those who are hardly considered devout. Moreover, it exposes the myth of Sufi Islam as a gentle alternative.

Sort of like, Nazism-lite.

“Andrew McCarthy has published another must-read about Huma Abedin’s affiliation with the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs. Earlier this week, we posted about Huma serving on George Washington University’s MSA Executive Board in 1997. As McCarthy rightly points out, none other than Anwar al-Awlaki served on that same board a fews years later, joining in late 2001 and serving as a “Chaplain” there until some time in 2002.”

“While Huma and Awlaki don’t appear to have served on the Board together, the fact that they served on the same MSA Board does raise even more suspicion about GWU’s MSA chapter.”

“McCarthy also explains the views of Turkey’s Prime Minister – Tayyip Recep Erdogan – on assimilation.”

“In light of his going there, I thought that perhaps a video is worth a thousand words. Check out these clips from 1994 in which was hosted by unassimilated Turkish Muslim youth who filled up a stadium in Germany to hear a Hitler style speech which was attended by Erbakan and Erdogan while the latter was a mayor in Turkey. Watch as all in attendance praised the charismatic Nazeem Qibrisi, a Naqshabandi Sufi Muslim leader, as he boasted about how the West will bow to Islam.”

“Incidentally, the West still thinks that Sufi Islam is the peaceful brand. Hitler would have enjoyed speech lessons from a Naqshabandi Muslim like Qibrisi. In fact, Hitler would have most certainly cheered Qibrisi as well.”

“So I will be silent. Now to the show:”

http://www.shoebat.com/2012/08/17/a-video-is-worth-a-thousand-words/ .

It is incumbent upon the readership to view both video clips. Please wait for the English subtitles to appear. Pay strict attention to the transfixed appearance of the audience.

Cult-like.

And, if a video doesn’t quite cut it, this report should get the juices flowing. ‘Muslim Brotherhood Crucifies Opponents, Attacks Secular Media’.

Heaven help us.

“Last week in Egypt, when Muslim Brotherhood supporters terrorized the secular media, several Arabic websites—includingArab NewsAl Khabar NewsDostor Watany, andEgypt Now—reported that people were being “crucified.” The relevant excerpt follows in translation:

A Sky News Arabic correspondent in Cairo confirmed that protestors belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood crucified those opposing Egyptian President Muhammad Morsi naked on trees in front of the presidential palace while abusing others. Likewise, Muslim Brotherhood supporters locked the doors of the media production facilities of 6-October [a major media region in Cairo], where they proceeded to attack several popular journalists.”

“That there were attacks and violence—both in front of Egypt’s presidential palace and at major media facilities, is well-documented. An August 9 report by El Balad, a widely read Egyptian website, gives the details:”

“Last Wednesday, August 8, “thousands of the Muslim Brotherhood’s supporters” attacked 6-October’s media facilities, beat Khaled Salah—chief editor of the privately-owned and secular Youm 7 newspaper—prevented Yusif al-Hassani, an On TV broadcaster, from entering the building, and generally “terrorized the employees.”

“El Balad adds that the supporters of Tawfik Okasha, another vocal critic of President Morsi—the one who widely disseminated the graphic video of a Muslim apostate being slaughtered to cries of “Allahu Akbar”—gathered around the presidential palace, only to be surrounded by Brotherhood supporters, who “attacked them with sticks, knives, and Molotov cocktails, crucifying some of them on trees, leading to the deaths of two and the wounding of dozens.”

“Far from condemning these terrorists, Al Azhar, Egypt’s most authoritative Islamic institution, has just issued a fatwa calling for more violence and oppression, saying that “fighting participants in anti-Muslim Brotherhood demonstrations planned for 24 August is a religious obligation.”

“Most of the aforementioned Arabic sites point out that these attacks are part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s campaign to intimidate and thus censor Egypt’s secular media from exposing the group’s Islamist agenda, which Youm 7, On TV, and Okasha do daily. [Note: the latter’s channel was recently shut down, despite Morsi’s previous reassurances that “no station or media will be shut down in my era.”]

“These threats are not new; back in April, an organization called the “Jihad Group to Cleanse the Country” threatened these media with “painful and severe punishments.” Apparently now that Morsi has become master of Egypt, threats are becoming reality, just as promises are being broken.”

“And the threats are taking their toll. Sky News, which was first to report about the crucifixions, has taken down its original article (though the URL still appears in the address box with the Arabic words “protesters-crucified-in front of-egypt’s-presidential-palace”).

“While one may argue that Sky News removed the article because it was found false, one can equally argue that it censored itself for fear that it would be next in the terror campaign against the media.”

“In reality, there is little reason to doubt this crucifixion story. Militant Muslims crucifying their opponents is a regular feature of the Islamic world—recent cases coming from the Ivory Coast, wheretwo Christian brothers were crucified, similarly by supporters of a Muslim president who ousted a Christian; Indonesia, where Islamic separatists crucified a fellow Muslim for being a military informant; and in Iraq, where Muslim militants crucified Christian children.”

“Moreover, those alleged to have been crucified in Egypt certainly fit the Koran’s description of who deserves to be crucified. According to Allah, “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this: that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off…” (Koran 5:33).

“Making mischief in the land” is precisely what the secular media is being accused of, by constantly exposing the Muslim Brotherhood and its Islamist agenda. Even the Jihad Group to Cleanse the Country, which threatens to “liquidate” many secular media, accuses them of “creating chaos to implement the American and Zionist agenda.”

“Finally, it is telling that only a few months ago, and for the first time in Egypt’s modern history, an Egyptian MP proposed to institutionalize Sharia’s most draconian punishments—including crucifixion.”

“In short, under the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, the bottle has been uncorked and the Islamic Genie set loose. Expect much worse to come.”

http://www.algemeiner.com/2012/08/16/muslim-brotherhood-crucifies-opponents-attacks-secular-media/

A breath of fresh air….though it might not seem like it at first blush.

Unmasking the scourge of Islam.

A Nation-Saving Documentary…NOT To Be Missed…In US Theaters NOW…’2016:Obama’s America’…Adina Kutnicki

NO commentary required – http://2016themovie.com/trailer/

Spread the word !!

 

Placing Israel’s Fate In US Hands Is (Always) A Non-Starter…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

The world is transfixed and questioning : will PM Netanyahu pre-empt the Iranian Hitlerite regime? or, will he allow the US to take the lead? Either way, sober (historical) judgment must prevail

Half of world Jewry stands on the precipice.

Alas, there are so many opinions floating overhead, bets should be taken at Vegas to tabulate the odds.

Be that as it may, even if a non-hostile POTUS sat at the helm, it would hardly matter. And, with an irredeemably hostile one squatting at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Israel’s leaders would have to be madder-than-hatters to rely on his ‘promises’.

Damn straight.

In this regard, here are some sobering thoughts, and more than enough ‘food for thought’ for those who bleat the drums for American ‘permission’ to strike.

As IF Israel needs it in the first place!

Besides, are we still slaves in Egypt?

The following is a most rational guideline to follow via the historical realm, but without any operational input. (Retired) Ambassador Ettinger is smart enough to know where his expertise lies.

“Israel’s Unilateral Action – a Test of Sovereignty”
Ambassador (ret.) Yoram Ettinger, “Second Thought”
“Israel Hayom”, August 17, 2012

“Maintaining Israel’s independence of action – in face of Iran’s nuclear threat – is consistent with Israeli/Jewish history, with common sense, regional stability and with the enhancement of vital US national security interests.  On the other hand, surrendering Israel’s inalienable right of self-defense would undermine Israel’s sovereignty, erode its posture of deterrence, jeopardize its existence, fuel regional chaos and undermine US interests in the Middle East.”

“On June 3, 1967, President Johnson pressured Prime Minister Eshkol against preempting the pro-Soviet Egypt-Syria-Jordan military axis, which threatened the survival of moderate Arab regimes (e.g., Saudi Arabia) and Israel’s existence. Johnson advised that Israel will not be alone unless it decides to go aloneWe cannot imagine that [Israel] will make this decision.”

“Johnson warned that a unilateral Israeli military preemption could trigger severe regional turmoil, transform Israel into a belligerent state, and preclude assistance by the USA.  Johnson refrained from implementing the 1957 unilateral and multilateral guarantees issued to Israel by Eisenhower.  He insisted that Israel should rely on the diplomatic-multilateral option.”

“Eshkol defied Johnson.  He preempted the anti-US Arab axis; devastated a clear and present danger to vital Western interests; rescued the House of Saud from the wrath of Nasser; expedited the end of the pro-Soviet Nasser regime and the rise of the pro-US Sadat regime in Egypt; dealt a major setback to Soviet interests; and demonstrated Israel’s capability to snatch the hottest chestnuts out of the fire, without a single US boot on the ground.  He transformed the image of Israel from a national security consumer (a client state) to a national security producer (a strategic ally).”

“Eshkol realized that a defiant national security policy – in defense of the Jewish State – yielded a short-term political and diplomatic spat with the US, but resulted in a long-term national security upgrade and dramatically enhanced strategic respect.”

“From time immemorial, the Jewish People has faced powerful adversities in asserting its sovereignty over the Land of Israel, and by undertaking unilateral national security actions. Conviction-driven defiance of adversity has earned the Jewish People deep respect.”

“Israel’s contemporary history demonstrates that dramatic national security enhancement requires unilateral actions, in defiance of regional and global powers.”

“For example, in 1948/9, Prime Minister Ben Gurion declared independence, annexed Western Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, initiated wide construction in Jerusalem and refused to end “occupation” of the Negev and absorb Arab refugees, in defiance of a US military embargo, the threat of US economic sanctionsand significant domestic Dovish opposition.  Ben Gurion’s steadfastness led General Omar Bradley, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs-of-Staff in 1952, to recommend reconsideration of Israel as a major ally in the Middle East.”

“In 1967, Prime Minister Eshkol reunited Jerusalem and launched construction projects in eastern Jerusalem, in the face of US, global and domestic opposition.

In 1977, Prime Minister Begin’s initiative to negotiate directly with Egypt, circumvented President Carter’s initiative to convene an international conference, which intended to focus on the Palestinian issue and Jerusalem.”

“In 1981, Prime Minister Begin concluded that the cost of a nuclear Iraq would dwarf the cost of preempting Iraq.  He realized that diplomacy would not stop Iraq’s nuclearization, and that most Arab/Muslim countries considered a nuclear Iraq to be a lethal threat.  Therefore, he preempted, destroying Iraq’s nuclear reactor, in spite of the US threat of a military embargo and a nasty diplomatic US reproach, worldwide condemnation and vocal domestic opposition, especially by national security circles.”

“Begin’s daring unilateral initiative in 1981averted regional chaos, sparing the US a nuclear confrontation in 1991, which would have devastated vital US human, economic and military concerns.”

“In 2012, Prime Minister Netanyahu is aware that sanctions against Iran are inherently ineffective due to non-compliance by Russia, China, India, Japan and some European countries.  He recognizes that sanctions provide Iran with extra-time to develop/acquire nuclear capabilities.  He knows that sanctions did not prevent Pakistan’s and North Korea’s nuclearization. He concluded that Iran’s time-to-develop/acquire is unpredictable and uncontrollable. He realizes that a nuclear Iran would doom the pro-US Gulf regimes; would traumatize the supply and price of oil; would accelerate nuclear proliferation; would provide a tailwind to Islamic terrorism and scores of sleeper cells in the US; and would entrench Iran’s military foothold in America’s backyard – Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and Mexico. He understands that a military preemption – with no boots on the ground – is a prerequisite for regime change in Iran. Just like Begin, Netanyahu is convinced that the cost of a nuclear Iran would dwarf the personal, diplomatic, political, economic and military cost of preempting Iran.”

“Just like the aforementioned Prime Ministers, Netanyahu is cognizant of the cardinal Jewish proverb: “If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If not now, when? (Ethics of the Fathers, 1:14).”

Yoram Ettinger, “Second Thought: US-Israel Initiative”     יורם אטינגר, “במחשבה שנייה”

www.TheEttingerReport.com
Facebook    Twitter
“Please disseminate as widely as possible.”

So, dear readers, isn’t it self evident, had PM Eshkol bent to President Johnson’s dictates, would ‘yours truly’ be sitting in the heart of Israel penning said blog?

The answer should tell us all we need to know.

And, those who leave their fate to others are consigning themselves to the dustbin of history!

Israeli Hospitals On War Alert…IDF Practices Chemical Drills In North…US Special Forces Ready To Enter Syria…Commentary By Adina Kutnicki

Region on the brink…ready to explode…and DEBKA exposes it all –

“The US and its allies are discussing a worst-case scenario that could require up to 60,000 ground troops to go into Syria to secure chemical and biological weapons sites following the fall of the Assad government, an unnamed American source said Thursday night, Aug.16.

This scenario postulates the disintegration of his security forces, he said, leaving chemical and biological weapons sites vulnerable to pillaging. It assumes the sites could not be destroyed by aerial bombings in view of health and environmental hazards.

“There is no imminent plan to deploy ground forces,” the source insisted. This is just a worst-case scenario.
DEBKAfile’s military sources find in this disclosure a bid to psychologically prepare the world for the prospect of chemical warfare, as the dialogue between Bashar Assad and his neighbors gains in violence.
The American special forces deployed on the Jordanian-Syrian border and in bases in Israel and Turkey clearly perceive a chemical-biological weapon threat. Military and medical preparations are being quietly put in place. Reconnaissance teams from potentially targeted countries have infiltrated Syria. They are on the lookout for any chemical missiles being moved into firing positions, although it is taken into account that Assad may be shifting decoys and that not all the real launchings can be stopped.

The Syrian ruler may also decide to transfer chemical explosives to Hizballah in Lebanon. Israel is on record as warning it would prevent this.

Medical preparations are also in place. The US and France are flying special military hospital facilities trained in the treatment of chemical weapon injuries to Turkey and Jordan.

Israeli hospitals are on war alert and have begun opening fortified emergency wards and making them ready for patients.

Tuesday, Aug. 14, IDF Home Front Command units embarked on a series of chemical attack drills in the towns of the northern district down to Afula, which is 52 kilometers east of Haifa and 110 kilometers north of Tel Aviv.

The soldiers taking part those drills wore new anti-contamination suits.
In Tel Aviv, city hall announced underground parking spaces would be available in an emergency as bomb shelters for up to 850,000 people.

Wednesday, August 15, Bashar Assad’s violence again broke new ground:
Syrian air force bombers struck Azaz not far from the Turkish border – for the first time with the aim of razing a complete Syrian town. More than 80 people were killed and 150 wounded. He was telling the Free Syrian Army rebels who had been using Azaz as their command post and logistical hub for the Aleppo battle that the gloves were off and the same punishment would be meted out to any urban areas hosting them.

The Syrian ruler also warned Ankara through back channels that if any more Turkish FIM-92 Stinger anti-aircraft missiles were supplied to the FSA, he would arm the 2,500 Turkish rebel PKK Kurdish fighters allowed to deploy on the Syrian-Turkish border with Russian SA-8 anti-air missiles for use against Turkey.

Ankara shot back: That will be war.
DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s military sources report that Assad is resolved more than ever to stand fast after the shot in the arm he received last week from Tehran.

Iran’s National Security Adviser Saeed Jalili visited Damascus Aug. 6-7 to ascertain that Syria would strike Israel and US military targets in the region with all its might if they attacked Iran.

Assad was ready to offer this pledge, but demanded in return that Tehran guarantee to exercise all its military capabilities to save him from any military or covert attempts to end his rule – whenever it was requested.
Jalili promised him that guarantee. He also held a similar conversation with HIzballah’s Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut.”

http://debka.com/article/22285/Syria%E2%80%99s-neighbors-braced-for-chemical-threat-Assad-warns-Turkey-on-Stingers.

Addendum to – Israeli Pre-emption…Or Events Overtaking Best Laid Plans…Syria In The Mix’ https://adinakutnicki.com/2012/08/15/israeli-pre-emption-or-events-overtaking-best-laid-plans-syria-in-the-mix-commentary-by-adina-kutnicki/

The upcoming conflagration will shake the foundations of the Middle East….the west…and hit American shores.

There is no way around it.

Appeasement begets many dead innocents, and emboldens barbaric Islamists.

When will western leaders learn their lessons? And, what cost will their citizens have to bear?